The URL can be used to link to this page

06-781City of St. Paul RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT AMENDED 8/16/06 COUNCIL FILE N0. -` �I By t File No. SEE BELOW Assessment No. SEE BELOW Voting Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for J0606A1 (8222) Summary abatement (property clean-up) at 1368 Margaret St. During April 2006. LAID OVER BY COUNCIL ON 7-19-06 TO 8-16-06 39 A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, there£ore, be it RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects x�at-if-i-cc�.- deleted , . �- _i. - - - - .. - Yeas Nays Absent Benanav �/ Bostrom �/ Harris �/ Helgen �/ Lantry f/ Montgomery ✓ Thune � 1 Adopted by Council: Date_��C��Sf /�O,aUD�o Adoption Certified by Council Secretary By: Approved by yor: Date �� 0 2 /- �� By: /L�rt-G`�1 /. l�/'�_i,^� City of St. Paul Real Estate Division Dept_ o£ Technology 6 Management Serv.COUNCIL FILE N0. REPORT OF CONSLETION OF ASSESSN�NT File No• SEE BELOW Dl� -�� 1 Assessment No. SEE BELOW Voting Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for J0606A1 (8222) Summary abatement (property clean-up) at 1368 Margaret St. During April 2006. LAID OVER BY COUNCIL ON 7-19-06 TO 8-16-06 To the Council of the City of St. Paul The Valuation and Assessment Engineer hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz: Total costs Parks Admin Eee Charge-Code Enforcement Real Estate Service Charge $288.00 $ $ 50.00 $ 20.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES Charge To Net Assessment $358.00 $358.00 Said Valuation and Assessment Engineer further reports that he has assessed and levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $358.00 upon each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefitted by the said improvement, and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the bene£its conferred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, identified by the signature of the said Valuation and Assessment Engineer, and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by him, and which is herewith submitted to the Council for such proper. Dated �� leW� c.�t/p� �� ea�t �= /�- Dl� �� -2� t - � Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet � DepartrnenUoffiee%ouneil: Datelnitiated: Pw -�v�W� �,�,�� Green Sheet NO: 3 031505�7 �a� Confad Person & Phon 266-8864 ! �� Must Be on Couneil Af(en� �� }.- M � DeoaMient SentToPerson In� 0 ' W a Assign 1 Number Z For Routing Order Total # of Signature Pages _(Ciip All Lowtions for Signature) Action Requestetl: � At Council's request on 7-19-06 this item was laid over to 8-16-06 summary abatement (properiy clean-up) at 1368 Mazgaret Sl during Apri12006. File No. J0606A1. Appfo�e (A) or Planning Commission CIB Committee Citil Service Commission Following 1. Has this persorJfirtn e�er ewrked under a coM2ct for this departmerrt? Yes No 2. Has this person/firtn e�er been a city employee? Yes No 3. Oces this person/5rm possess a skill not nmmally possessed by arry curreM city employee? Yes No Explain all ye5 answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why): Property owners or renters create a health hazard at various times throughout the Ciry of Saint Paul when their properiy is not kept up. The City is required by City code to clean up the property and chazge the property owner for the cost of the clean up. AdvanpqeslfApproved: � Cost recovery pmgrams to recover expenses for summary abatements, grass cutting, towing of abandoned vehicles, demolitions, gazbage hauling and boazdings-up. Disadvantayes HApproved: None Disadvantapes If NotApproved: If Council does not approve these chazges, general fund would be required to pay the assessment. �Transaction: 3 � Funding Source: CastlRevenue Budgeted: L �52�c'2?'�? �r�:�%,�' Acfrvity Number. Financial Information: (Explain) I properiy owner wili be notified of the public hearing and chazges. JUL 312D�n July 25, 2006 1:09 PM Page 1 ��-��/ MINLJTES OF'I'HE LEGISLATIVE HEARING ORDERS TO REMOVE/REPt1IR, CONDEMNATIONS, ABATEMENT ASSESSMENTS, ABATEMENT ORDERS, RENTAL REVOCATION CERTIFICATES Tuesday, August 1, 2006 Room 330 City Hall, 15 Kellogg Blvd. West Marcia Moermond, Legislative Hearing Officer The hearing was called to order at 10:00 a.m. STAFF PRESENT: Steve Magner, Neighborhood Housing and Properry Improvement (NHPI); Haroid Robinson, NHPI; and Michael Urmann, Fire Prevention 1. Laid over Summary Abatements: �- 1368 Mar¢aret Street (J0606A) (Note: scheduled for August 16 City Council.) Quintin Tillman, owner, appeared and stated he had closed on the property Mazch 29, 2006. Ms. Moermond asked who the notification was mailed to. Mr. Magner responded the mortgage company and the previous homesteader. Mr. Magner stated one assessment was for brush and debris and the other was for boarding the building. Ms. Moermond recommended deleting the assessment since the owner did not receive proper legal notification. 1221 Rice Street (J0607A) The owner e-mailed a letter in lieu of appearing at the Legislative Hearing. After reviewing the records, Ms. Moermond recommended approving the assessment. 448 Page Street East - (J0606B) Nicholas Lopez, 808 Berry Street #490, appeared and stated there were two properties: 448 and 460 Page Street. Mr. Magner stated both properties were listed under Mr. Lopez's name, however, since the 460 address was not on the agenda, he had not brought that file. He was not sure if 460 had already been ratified by the City Council. Ms. Moermond stated that since 460 was not on the agenda, she did not have the ability to make a decision on this property. Mr. Magner stated the building was a Category II vacant building and the file had been opened in May, 2005. Orders were issued to board the building on April 18, 2006 with a compliance date of Apri124, 2006. The properiy was re-inspected on Apri127, 2006 and since the work had not been done, the boarding contractor secured the building. Since the vacant building file had been opened, thexe had been eight summary abatements issued. A majority resulted in work orders, so basically the City had been maintaining this properly far the owner. � � a a a 4 a W � � N N N 0 � £ � Q 0 i 0 N r 0 m 0 � ti .� , �� , q�o H � O 1 .71 � N 1 N ��v � a� � W�N � Ar � N O� a�m � a�N � ,� ,a � � M � � c11 O OO II O [+ ; O O O 11 O; � i OJOO 11 N t O � �N(V 11 In r � � (V tRLt 11 M r a �+n un, i � n � oi ii � H r 11 � U i 11 � w � ii tR � o0o i F�000 �+ � o00 � Z�000 � b � 1 W.1ei 1 � 1 m O � �v Ni � Ui 4 W i � � �000 � �000 i rC � o0o i tk . . . � � .+oo H � N N i H 1 1 � I 1 1 1 1 ' I I � 1 f 1 1 1 a � •ww � � wv,t7 � �N p� W � FC � �S � � ��U � � z �wxw � a�auu � o � �w�-+ � � � ,� x w � r�r�av � � � i � i � W i 2�F i O� H�O H � H �o � W � •• o � H� •a w�� a� C1 p H o � U� q FC O,-� i m � r(a z� � W � ur � a i tAH�� S� � O�nxFCm � F�x awo� P.' � [9 W NAo � W� O 4L m i a � w ., �- , a��HE�� a � wHo �o � �aoa o� � � � � � � � � i o� � � N i 1 d� ri i N � � �� W � E�t � }+ � cn o .. � a i nFG. � a HNwo� �aa�am� E � F[�7£R'� � o�z�a�z� � ti � H � w�zwaoz� z�H� Mw� ��aMF.+a� o � a .+ �n . . � O O 6 11 O 0 0 o u o •u co 0 o u co w tn N il u� �v cn+n u m � 11 N p u � n u u u n n x n •W W �I W U1U' 11 �. a u � O U n ?� x w ii a f#UU1I� Wr� n H x�uo �wWii mam iic H i ��Ch 00o ii a NFF 11 P� m a u 4 a N a w o-7 0 m a U � a 'i ��-�� I