06-721City of St. Pau1
RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSESSMENT AND
FIXING TIME OF HEARING TEiEREON
COUNC L FILE NO. �"� Z�
By 23
File No. 19019
Assessment No. 5059
Voting Ward 7
Green Sheet No . ��. ��T� �
In the Matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for improving
Burlington Road from Totem Road to Totem Road.
Preliminary Order: 06-41 a pproved 01/04/06
Fina1 Order:
06-168 approved 02/15/06
The assessments of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection
with the above improvement having been submitted to the Council having
considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all
respects approved.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That
the 4th day of October, 2006
Council Chambers of the Court
St. Pau1; that the Valuation
meetings, as required by the
place of hearing, the nature
against the lot or lots of
directed.
House and City Hall Building, i
and Assessment Engineer give n
Charter, stating in said notice
of the improvement, and the an
the particular owner to whom t
assessment on
> P.M. in the
n the City of
�tice of said
the time and
�unt assessed
he notice is
. :. - i
.
l�.1G 21 '06
Adopted by the Council: Date: c��sf�i�oo�
Certified Passed by the Council Secretary
g .
�
Mayor
a public hearing be had on said
at the hour of Five thirty o'cloc
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
/r�/ay�o6
Department/office/counciL Date initiated; ,
PW - Pubiic Works � 21-JUL-06 �
Contad Person 8 Pfione: �
Juan Ortiz ��,
2668864 �` i
, Must Be on Council Agenda by �Date):
23-AUG-06 j
�
Assign
Number
For
Roufing
Order
Tofal # of Signature Pages _(Clip All Lowdons for Signature)
bla-�Z�
Green Sheet NO: 3031467
0 Public Works ! .ivan Ortiz
i C'oundt Marv Erickson
2 Citv Qerk Shari Moore i
; Set date of public heazing to rarify the assessments for improving Burlington Road from Totem Road to Totem Road.
File No. 19019 Assessment No. 5059
manons: nppm�e �n� or Ke�ec[ �p:
Planning Commission
CIB Committee
CiHI Senice Commission
rersonai service contracts
1. Has this persoNfirtn e�er wnrked under a contract Tor lhis department?
Yes No
2 Has this persoNfirtn e�er been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this persoNfirtn possess a skili not rwrtnally possessed by any
current city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attaCh to green sheet
IniBating Problem, issues, Opportunily (WF�o, Wha; Wheo, Where, Why):
Ratification is necessary in order to begin coliec6ng assessments [o help pay for the projec[.
� AdvanfapesHApproved:
� Same as above.
Disadvantaqes HApproved:
Property owners will have assessments payable via property taxes.
Disadvanta9es IfNotApproved:
To not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with City policy.
7oqlAmountof g�5727.81
Tansaction:
Fundina source: Assessments & Misc
Financiallnformation: Ald
(Explain)
CostlRevenue Budgeted: Y
Activity Number:
July 21, 2006 12:18 PM Page 1