06-720City of St. Paul
RESOLIITION APPROVING ASSESSMENT AND
FIXING TIME OE EiEARING THEREON
COUNCIL FILE NO. � � �vO
B d Z2
File No. 19022
Assessment No. 506
Voting
Green Sheet No. ��J�� ��'�l'
In the Matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for improving
Minnehaha Avenue from Dale Street to Arundel Street_
� � ��
Preliminary Order: 06-95 a pproved 01/25/06 ��°�� '�
Final Order: 06-214 approved 03/01/06
The assessments of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection
with the above improvement having been submitted to the Council having
considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in al1
respects approved.
RESOLVED-FURTHER, That
the 4th day of October, 2006
Council Chambers of the Court
St. Paul; that the Valuation
meetings, as required by the
place of hearing, the nature
against the lot or lots of
directed.
a public hearing be had o
at the hour of Five thirty
House and City Hall Buil
and Assessment Engineer
Charter, stating in said
of the improvement, and
the particular owner to
i said assessment on
o'clock P.M. in the
iing, in the City of
give notice of said
notice the time and
the amount assessed
whom the notice is
3 � `+y
AU6 21 'O6
Adopted by the Council: Date:�i�G�liirs«,�O�G
7
Certified Passed by the Council Secretary
By
Mayor
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
�%y�� Q�1 Z(�
DepartmenVoffice/council: I Date Inifiated:
i� P�/ — PublicWorks ; 2,.,��.� � G Sheet NO: 3031474
Conlad Person
Juan Ortiz
26G-8864
Must Be on Couifcil Agenda by (Date):
� 23AUG06
■�►
A55ign
Number
For
Routing
Order
�eaarmient sentTO Person
0 �QpbGc Works i .Tuan Ortiz �
1 Gouncii i Marv Erickson '
2 iri Clerk Shari Moore �
Total # of SignaWre Pages _(Clip All Locations for Signature)
Set date of public hearing to rarify the assessmenu for improving Minnehaha Avenue €rom Dale Street to Arundel Street.
File No. 19022 Assessment No. 5060
idations: Appro�e (A) or F
Planning Commission
CIB Committee
Citil Service Commission
rersonai semce contracts must answertne ronowmg ciuesfions:
1. Has this persoNfirm e�er wwked under a contract for this departmenl?
Yes No
2. Has this person/firtn e�er been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this persoNfirm possess a skill not rrofmally possessed by any
curtenl city employee?
Yw No
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet
Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
Ratification is necessary in order [o begin colllecting assessments to hetp pay for the project.
AdvantageslFApproved:
Same as above.
Disadvantages MApproved:
Property owners will have assessments payabie via property taces.
Disadvanpyes If NotApproved:
To not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with City policy.
� oca� wnouni or 798798 �
Trensaction:
Fundins� source: Assessments & Misc
Financial information: Aid
(Explain)
Activity Number.
i
Council Research Center
JUL 25 2006
CostlRevenue Budgeted: �'
July 21, 2006 2:24 PM Page 1