06-696City of St. Paul COUNCIL FILE No. DG -6 9�
RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSESSMENT AND By y,
FI%ING TIN� OF HEARING THEREON File No. SEE BELOW ��
Assessment No. SEE BELOW
Voting
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
0602LDSRP (4915) Replacement of Lead Water Service Lines as requested by
the property owner during April, May and June 2006.
The assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection with the
above improvement having been submitted to the Council, and the Council having
considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects
approved.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That a public hearing be had on said assessment on the 6th
day of September, 2006 at the hour of 5:30 P.M., in the Council Chamber of the Court
House and City Hall Building, in the City of St. Paul; that the Valuation and
Assessment Engineer give notice of said meetings, as required by the Charter, stating
in said notice the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement, and the
amount assessed against the lot or lots of the particular owner to whom the notice is
directed.
Yeas Nays Absent Adopted by the Council
Benanav � Date: �� �� ����
Bostrom
v
Harris ✓ Certified Passed by the Council Secretary
Helgen BY: ����� �<G/�6i2
Lantry
�
Montgomery � Mayor;
Thune �
,,,,,� �-��� �-e�i. - �- � 0� �
Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet
��' C��I C/ �� � ni�
DeparlmenUofficelcouncil: Datelnifiated:
Pw -�ti�wa� „-��� Green Sheet NO: 3031315 '���
ConfaM Person 8 Phone: Oeparlment SentTO Person ��IniliaVDate�
Juan Oritz � 0 6' orks doan ritz 1,(�J L�}.1 /�1�
2 ��� Assign I aunc"1 Ma Ericksoo , � �
Must Be on Councl p�enda by (Date): Number Z Ck�k
For
Routing
Order
Tofal # of Signature Pages _(Clip All Locations for Signature)
Acdon Requested:
Set date of public hearing and approve assmts for replacement of lead water service requested by the property owner during April,
May and 7une 2006. File No. 0602LDSRP
Recommendations: Appm�e (A) or Reject (R): Personal Service Contracts Must Mswer the Following questions:
Planning Commission 1. Has this persoNfirm e�erw�odced under a confraci for this departmenl? '
CIB Commiitee Yes No
CiHI Serrice Commission 2. Has this personlfirm e�er been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this persoNfirtn possess a skili not nortnaily possessed by any
current city empoyee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on separote sheet and aHach to green sheet
Initiating Probiem, issues, Opportunity (Who, WhaR �en, Where, Why):
Property owners replacing their lead watet service connections have requested that the cost of the work be paid by assessment. Work
has beea doue, and City has paid for the work
Advantages HApproved:
Ratification of the assessments will allow City to begin recovering the cost of the work done.
Disadvantages IFApproved:
None
Disadvantages tF Not Approved:
City wouid not recovez the money already paid out for the lead replacement work done.
TotalAmountof 2�180 CosflRevenueBudgeted:
Trensaction:
Funding Source: Activity Number:
Financial Information:
(Explain) 91 property owners will be nofified of the public hearing and charges. � �
! S r v
�
July 11, 2006 10:06 AM Page 1