The URL can be used to link to this page

06-633City oP St. Paul COUNCIL FILE NO. � b �� RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT By File o. SEE BELOW � � �� Assessment No. SEE BELOW (/ Voting Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for J0507E2 (8211) Summaxy abatement for the excessive consumption of inspection services for property code violations on 1758 Blair billed during the months of November and December, 2005. LAID OVER BY COUNCIL ON 6-7-06 TO 7-5-06 A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment havinq been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it RE50LVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified. RESOLVED FURTHER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in One equal installments. Yeas Nays Absent Benanav Bostrom � Harris f Helgen ` Lantry � Montgomery v Thune �/' S d a Adopted by Council: Date Adoption Certi£ied by Council Secretary � Appr � a��l�-�� .iuly 5, 2006 City Councii Action Minutes Page 8 33. Resolution Ratifying Assessment — 06-633 — In the matter of the assessment of benefits, costs and expenses for summary abatement for the excessive cansuxnption of inspection services for property code violations billed during November and December, 2005 at 1758 Blair Avenue. (Laid over from June 'n (File No. J0507E2). (Legislative Hearing Officer recommends the following: �} �1P?�.:. .,.:F.�,o .. :,,. �w t, r t i ��nti a 2� �' �"_ _.,.,_...,""_""' . ., ..'"�' Y ........ ,, b ..... b � ..� .....� . � �. � approving the assessment if the owner fails to paint the garage by July 1, 2006) (GS 3031026) Adopted as amended (per the recommendation of the Legislative Hearing Officer) Yeas — 5 Nays - 0 City of St. Paul Real Estate Division Dept. of Technology & Management Serv.CQUNCIL FILE NO. �'�P�� REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT File No. SEE BELOW Assessment No. SEE BELOW Voting Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for 30507E2 (8211) Summary abatement Por the excessive consumption of inspection services for property code violations on 1758 Blair billed during the months of November and December, 2005. r.nrD OVER BY COUNCIL ON 6-7-06 TO 7-5-06 To the Council of the City of St. Paul The Valuation and Assessment Engineer hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz: Total costs $75.00 Parks Admin Fee $ Charge-Code Enforcement $ Real Estate Service Chasge 520.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES Charge To Net Assessment $95.00 $95.00 Said Valuation and Assessment Enqineer further reports that he has assessed and levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $95.00 upon each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefitted by the said improvement, and in the case o£ each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits con£erred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, identified by the signature of the said Valuation and Assessment Engineer, and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by him, and hich is herewith submitted to the Council £or such action the�—ts m be nsidered proper. Dated !F / Z�t� � ,i� V�luatio a � s sment Engineer ♦ �� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheef DeparhnenUoffice/eouncil: Datelnitiated: � �� Pw -�L�Wor� ,�,�� Green Sheet NO: 3031026 Confact Person & Phone: Juan Oritr 266-6864 � ' Assign Number Fof Routing Order Deoarhnent SentToPerson 0 a li W duan ri 1 u 7 a E' on 2 rk on Council Agenda by (DaM): ContradType: OT-0l}{ER (DOESNT FIT AN`! CAiEGORI') Total # of Signature Pages �(Clip NI Locations for Signature) At CounciPs request on 6-7-06 this item was laid over to 7-5-06, Summary abatement for excessive consumption of inspection services for property code viola6ons on 1758 Blair billed during Nov and Dec, 2005. idations: Approw (A) or Reject (R): Planning Commission CIB Committee Cnil Service Commission Personal Service 1. Has this per5on/firtn e�er vrorked under a coMract for this department? Yes No 2. Has this persoNfirtn e�er been a city employeel Yes No 3. Does this personJfirtn possess a skili rrot nwmaily possessed by arry curtent city employee? Yes No Explain all yes answers on separete sheet and attach W green sheet InRiating Problem, Issues, Opportunily �Who, What, When, Where, Why): Property owners or renters create a health hazacd atvarious times throughout the City of Saint Paul when theu property is not kept up. The Ciry is required by City code to clean up the property and chazge the properiy owner for the cost of the clean up. AdvanWges IFApproved: Cost recovery programs to recover ezpenses for summary abatements, grass cutting towing of abandoned vehicles, demolitions, gazbage hauling and boazdings-up. Disadvanta5�es HApproved: None Disadvantages IfNotApproved: If Council does not approve these charges, general fund would be required to pay the assessment. �om„vnuun[or $� Transaction: Fundinp Source: CosHRevenue Budgeted: Activily Number. Financial lnformation: (Explain) 1 pmperty owner will be notified of the public hearing and charges. June 14, 2006 8:56 AM Page 1 ♦ •� MINLJTES OF TF� LEGISLATIVE HEARING ORDERS TO REMOVE/REPAIR, CONDEMNATIONS, ABATEMENT ASSESSMENTS, ABATEMENT ORDERS, RENTAL REVOCATION CERTIFICATES Tuesday, May 30, 2006 Room 330 City Hall, 15 Kellogg Boulevard West Marcia Moermond, Legislative Hearing Officer The hearing was called to order at 10:00 a.m. STAFF PRESENT: Harold Robinson, Neighborhood Housing and Property Improvement (NHPI) 1. J0507E Excessive Consumption of Tnspection Services for Property Code Violations Billed During November and December 2005. 1758 Blair Avenue Mr. Robinson stated orders were issued to scrape and paint the garage and to repair the roof on June 1, 2005 with a compliance date of August 1, 2005. It was rechecked on October 14, 2005 and the owner called the inspector requesting an extension of time. The inspector granted the owner one month and on re-inspection on December 7, 2005, the property was still not in compliance. Another re-inspection was scheduled for June 1, 2006. Colleen Jamison, property owner, stated the roof had been repaired, however, she had not had time to scrape and paint the garage. She contended damage had been done to her fence and her aluminum greenhouse had been removed. She worked evenings, seven days per week, and believed this had been done when she was not home. She asserted that perhaps the inspector had done the damage and removed the greenhouse. Mr. Robinson stated the only orders were for the garage repairs and nothing was stated about the greenhouse. Ms. Moermond asked when the owner planned to paint the garage to bring the properiy into compliance. Ms. Jamison stated that she believed she could have the garage painted within a month. Legislative Hearing Officer recommended allowing the owner an extension to July i, 2006 in order for the owner to paint the garage. This matter will be laid over to the July 5, 2006 City Council Hearings in order for NI3PI to check on compliance of this order. If the property is in compliance, she would recommend deleting the assessment. � � Q a � � a w � � ri N m a E £ � � � 0 m O � 0 � � N N ,� �� A,o , H � O i �1 I N 1 E i .i i a w�M a�rv O p,' i m i W�N i � � M � i � 1 (A I O O O O ii O� H�0000no� 2 i . n , i � i O lf1 O O II N� O� L+ht/?N II O� i � ; � � 11 � II 1 i 11 a n O i n i H � n V II � 1 II I W � II � Vl � OOOO � H� O O O O 1 H i O O O O � Z� O O O O � J i . . . . i � O e-1 O ri � i a 1 1 Q I I H� U � � Qi i W i i i W�ooOO i F�0000 i r1 0 000 a: � � i o�noo F��n t� in c� i z H I � 1 ] I I ! �aaa � �� zzz � �000 W�UUUW � i W r W WW i z � H �N[x] i [K � fnma]U O I Uf � Uf H 1 EiWWW� i U�UUU0.' � i W i W W W C r i i i � i i i0 H m � o�z W � ., � o �o � E i i+ rn i a � E+ .. c H � H (x� � C(� 1 Q z Fi � W � z C H Q 1 �$ x� � � F�aaww� � W �F4oW� i a��wti o � o�w +� � W � O F O��n i � wcna o � � � � � � � � � I � o � � 1 M N N i � O � a � z � o ' W � O a� i ��."'+w�>w � a y � �s�aN�co � EC � 7 w'm � H � C4��FC� i i � � W i w�ama�z � z � a�n �w p � � �-�i u � t� i O O O O II O O o 0 o II O •�� O 1f1 O O 11 tf) i/Y h t? N II ol N �II� i II n N II II u n u n n II n n zzz II °v°wii W n »> ii �H�.w na U] U] U] U 11 r.� WWW�I10 VUV [K n E xxxwn WWW�] nE II V q��iih 0000ii F F F H n a � a w u � a a w X W 0 � a W V 4 a 'a �b-�3�