Loading...
06-629> > � � r � �.�✓G' . City of St_ Paul RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT COUNCIL FILE N0. ' �a q By File No. SEE BELOW Assessment No. SEE BELOW Voting Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses £or 3� J0506E2 (8203) Summary abatement for excessive consumption of inspection services for property code violations during the months of October and November 2005. LAID OVER BY COUNCIL ON 5-17-06 TO 6-21-06 A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified. RESOLVED E'URTHER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in One equal installments. Yeas Nays Absent Benanav � Bostrom � Harris � Helgen � Lantry � Montgomery � Thune � � � Adopted by Council: Date Adoption Certified by Council Secretary BY� ` O Approved b� r: Date �! 'Lg (�(o By: City of St. Paul Real Estate Division Dept. o£ Technology & Management Serv.COUNCIL FILE NO. �p.'lp2 S REPORT OF CONIPLETION OE ASSESSMENT File No. SEE BELOW Assessment No. SEE BELOW Voting Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for J0506E2 (8203) Summary abatement £or excessive consumption of inspection services for property code violations during the months of October and November 2005. LAID OVER BY COUNCIL ON 5-17-06 TO 6-21-06 To the Council of the City of St. Paul The Valuation and Assessment Engineer hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz: Total costs Parks Admin Charge-Code Real Estate Fee Enforcement Service Charge $50.00 $ S $20.00 $70.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES Charge To Net Assessment $70.00 Said Valuation and Assessment Engineer further reports that he has assessed and levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $70.00 upon each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefitted by the said improvement, and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits conferred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, identified by the signature of the said Valuation and Assessment Engineer, and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by him, and which is herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as ma ,be considered proper. f Dated ✓ / Z Z60 ( /I � �� LP.,Vialuation and A essment Engineer ���, � �ubL i� t�eg�- l� a� Ol� � Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet � Departrnenfi/office/council: Date Initiated: �E �-�3-OC� Pw -�bL�Wa� �-�,Y� Green Sheet NO: 3030828 ��_�a� Contaet Person & Phone: Juan Oritr 26688(i4 Council Agenda ContradSype: OT-0TIiER (DOESNT FRANY CATEGORY) �� Assign Number For Routing Order ToWI # of Signalure Pages _(Clip All Lowtions for Signature) 1 ounc� a Erickson 2 rk At Councii's request on 5-17-06 tlils item was laid over to 6-21-06, summary abatement for the excessive consuwption of inspection services during the months of October and November 2005. File No. J0506E2. idations: Appro�e (A) or F Planning Commission CIB Committee CiNI Senice Commission 1. Has this persoNfirm eeer worked under a coMract for this departmerri? Yes No 2. Has this persoNfirtn e�er been a city employee? Yes No 3. Poes this personlfirtn possess a skill not nortnally possessed by arry current city employee? Yes No Explain all yes answers on separate sheetantl attach M green sheet Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why): Property owners or renters a heakh hazard at various times throughout the City of Saint Paul when their property is not kept up. The City is tequiced by City code to clean up the propercy and chazge the property ownei for the cost of the ctean up. Advanqges MApproved: Cost recovery programs to recover expenses for sutvmary abatements, grass cutting, towing of abandoned vehicles, demolitions, gatbage hauling and boardings-up. Disadvanfages NApproved: None Disadvantages IfNotApproved: If Council does not approve these charges, general fund would be required to pay the assessment. i oe� s�mounc or $70 Transaction: Funding Souroe: CosHRevenue Budgeted: Activ'rtv Number. Finaneial Infortnation: (Explain) 1 property owner will be notified of the public hearing and chazges. C��t MAY2�� May 22, 2006 9:25 PM Page 1 V ro � n P7 r � 0 m x m 3 ro H b � n � C � ro O m n H H H b C yyyy v�_[o�i J z� o 000o ro��tim�E Y y Y Y Y z m O o d�[= rrrr du+x y � � H CEt7 � v,mm�n z�K � o [�7 XX X G] HZX1f] � Sz1 znnn x �m� H!n U] UJ � W U] L�J C9 H � b LT i-�ii- i-�i p y y�� � b CCC �f [�]m� � b �rmc�m � •• a�o � K m � e� [<1 c] cl c} o $C, � 7y 222 N Z2 � m Cn m t�.� tn H CCC � r cn i 333 � �at+ �ororo o wa � i m o i r i I W I N I I 1 � O N F� C�l x� i cn �oo Hb � ro * oxN�x i V rt yh] �7 d] O � N z H (n t' i ro � rro C7 InH � [9 v+n tn m i�[ yOx CY � H �t n N u+u tn � m T� C H Y.�1 i�G o n o00o i- m r m(]x � II • L�] N i t7 o II OOOO i H O�1�zC7 � C+1 O II 0000 i� 0�2'��-IOG� ' fI � 3k H C k7 �-+ i,'0 I [�] Q iP � (n 1 H � a••y m��ro �� tiy i H � � °J ooz� � ° z � a a�mrd � � r � � xrmd ox � � my m � � � mmmm�m mxxx�� � a�nna � n Cmm�n � «3 I H (n � U] 1 O nmcnm � z [J H H H 1 ; C C C � � � � � � I [1] I � �nnn�m ° z ° z ° z� � ���� � ���� � rororo� � � � � � � � � �� n� tn a in � H ooino i i . . . . � � 0000 0000�H i o00o i t] I I n] 1 fY 1 �] iy �o � � r� 1-� OOY i i . . . . � C O O O O i Z O O O O � H O O O O 1 H 0000 I tq I 1 �� ' � � n � n il i y i II O n � .K1 i II � II i � L+ II tn u+ i i �1 II NinU+Ut i O O II O O O o i[ t II 7 o n o 0 0 0� H o n o 0 0 0� m � � N ; � I I I 1 N i �d � � 7� i i i O N � ro N LTI i i i � wrH n� � K � � O � H O I [� W 1 i N � � � 0 � � i Y � m Y m y � y a W N O � � c� 6] 71 ,� N � m V� �o' �e� MIN UTES OF TT-� LEGISLATIVE HEt1RING ORDERS TO REMOVE/REPAIR, CONDEMNATIONS, ABATEMENT ASSESSMENTS, ABATEMENT ORDERS, RENTAL REVOCATIOI3 CERTIFICATES Tuesday, June 6, 2006 Room 330 City Hall, 15 Kellogg Boulevard West Marcia Moermond, Legislative Hearing Officer The hearing was called to order at 10:10 a.m. STAFF PRESENT: John Betz, Neighborhood Housing and Property Improvement (NIIPI) and Steve Magner, NHPI i. Laid over sununary abatements: J0507E Excessive consumption of inspection services at 800 Como Avenue; No one appeared; Legislative Hearing Officer recommended approving the assessment. J06T1Q Providing garbage hauling services at 763 Minnehaha Avenue East; Mr. Betz stated orders were sent on December 30, 2005 for this property owner to hire a licensed refuse hauler with a compliance date of January 6, 2006. The property was rechecked on January ll and the owner was still not in compliance. A work order was sent to Parks to provide refuse hauling service. On March 6, 2006 the wark order was cancelled as the owner was then providing service. Kou Yang, property owner, was represented by an interpreter, Ka Xiong. Mr. Yang contended that he did have trash hauling service at the time the orders were issued. He was disputing the assessment as the Ciry was not providing this service to him. Ms. Moermond asked whether Mr. Betz could confirm this information. Mr. Betz stated the file was still open and there was no worksheet in the file. The information he had was that the garbage service provided by the City was cancelled on March 6, 2006. Ms. Moermond asked Mr. Betz to confirm whether the owner had his own trash hauling service. If he did, she recommended deleting the assessment. � J0506E Excessive consumption of inspection services at 1885 Seventh Street East; No one appeared; Legislative Hearing Officer recommended approving the assessment; 30602B Boarding-up of vacant building at 572 Smith Avenue South; Mr. Magner stated orders were issued to secure a garage at this properiy. There were also orders to clean up the property on the same abatement which the City performed. Gerardo Rosas, properry owner, 3651 Greensboro Drive, Eagan, stated this was rental property which he owned. He did not receive the notice until three weeks after the orders were issued and he would have secured the garage himself. He could not afford the $82 assessment. Ms. Moermond recommended reducing the assessment by half for a total of $41.00.