06-623Council File #��p��
Green Sheet # 3030888
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2$
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
$0
51
52
53
54
55
56
Presented by � .`,
12ESOLUTION
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
!�
WIIEREAS, in order to meet the exemption for approval by elecrors for the 2006 Street Improvement Bond issue, the City must assess at least
20% of the cos[ of the improvement, and
WHEREAS, ihe BakerBellows Residential Street Vitaliry Paving projec[ needs to use MSA dotlazs to finance those streets eligible to be
reconstructed with MSA funds (Dodd Road and Stryker Avenue) in the project in order to meet the 20% assessment match, and
WfiEREAS, a 4ansfer of MSA budget is necessary in order to accomplish this 20% assessment match, and
WHEREAS, there aze sufficient MSA funds in the 2005 and 2006 MSA Contingency projects to transfer to this project, so
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the Ciry of Saint Paul, upon recoccunendation of the Mayor and advice of the Long
Range Capital Improvement Budget Committee, that $657,086 is available for appropriation in the 2005 Capital Improvement Budget, as
heretofore adopted and amended by this Council, be hereby further amended in the Improvement Sudget, in [he following particulazs:
FINANCING PLAN
BakedBellows RSVP
COS-2T559-29273
MSA
Street Improv Snds
water uav�y
West Saint Paul
Sewer Service Fund
CIB
SPENDING PLAN
BakerBellows RSVP
COS-2T559-29273
Construction
FINANCING PLAN
MSA Contingency
COS-2T065
MSA
SPENDING PLAN
MSA Contingency
COS-2T065
Construction
FINANCING PLAN
MSA Contingency
C06-2T066
MSA
c�R�c
Budget
4,103,A71.90
z�s,000.00
98,0�0.�0
72,000.00
1.516,354.10
5,967,826.00
5 967 826.00
i,967,82b.00
398 10.29
398,310.29
398 310.29
398,310.29
32625336
326,25336
Change
657,086.00
(657,086.00)
o.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.00
0.00
o.00
(398,310.291
(398,310.29)
(398310.29�
(398,310.29)
(258,775.911
(258,775.71)
Amended
Budget
657,086.00
3,446,385.90
i�s,000.00
98,000.00
72,000.00
1,516,354.10
5,967,826.00
5.967.826.00
5,967,826.00
0.00
o.00
0.00
o.00
67.477.65
67,477.65
D6�6a..�
5�
5$
59
60
61
62
63
SPENDING PLAN
MSA Contingency-06
C06-2TQ66
construction
326 336
326,25336
(258.775.711 67.477.65
(258,775.71) 67,477.65
.,�. .�.._ :.: - .�,...•
- '� � � _ - - : ..
� , ..,�, :,.
/ . -,i , �
��� r �
Benanav
Bostrom
Harris
Helgen
Adopted by Council: Date
✓
Adoprion Certified by Council Secretary
� .i it
•.�� -.. ..� , '
!�' i / i
Requested b• riment of Public Waxks
PTK/jab �/25/06
By:
Form Approved by City Attorney
By: �/cS/.L � A��
Form App��Ma � r for Submiss
x ed b3
By: �
�
b �� � -; �0.�c;`�s 5� e�5
C�
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
0� -�a3
Pw - na,�i� wm�
Co�ct Person & Phone:
Paut Kur�
2G6-6203
Must Be on Councii Aaen�
ContracE Type:
AR-RESOLUTION W/$ 7RANSAC710N
�Y-� I Green Sheet NO: 3030888
� '
Assign
Number
For
Routing
Order
0
1 'cW De eotDirecfor _��
2 dal ' Servi
3 " A rne __��
4 or's O�ce od t
s c on� - r aro coun�
6 iLtitv Clerk �tv Qerk
�
Total # of Signature Pages _(Clip NI Locations for Signature)
Approval of attached resolution amending the spending and financing plaas of the BakerBellows RSVP project by transfemng MSA
from the 2005 & 2006 MSA Contingency projecfs.
Appro�e (A) or
Planning Commission
CIB Committce
Civil Senice Commission
1. Has this person/firm e�er waked under a coMract for this depadmerrt?
Yes No
2. Has this persadWnn evar been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this persoN6rm possess a skiil not nortnaliy possessed by any
cumeM cily employee?
Yes No -
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet
Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why): ..
In order to meet the exemption for approval by electors for the 2006 Street Improvement Bond issue, the City must assess at least 20%
of the cost of the unpiovement. The BakerBellows RSVP project needs.io use MSA dollars to finance those stceets eligible to be
reconstructed with MSA funds (Dodd Road and Stryker Avenue) in the project in order to meet the 20% assessment match. A transfer
of MSA budget is necessary from the 2005 & 2006 MSA Contingency projects to accomplish tiris 20% assessment match.
Advanqges IfApproved:
The 20% assessment match will be met for the 2006 Street Improvement bond issue.
JU� o a zUU6
Disadvanfages IfApproved:
MSA from the MSA Contingency projects will not be available for use on other MSA eligible capital d ts. �
Disadvanta9eslfNOtApproved:
171e 2006 Sheet Impiovement Bonds will not be eligible for use on [he BakerBellows project because the 20% assessment match
not be met. � �
TotalAmou�tof $65��86 CosNRevenueBudgeted: Y
Transaetion:
Fundiny source: Street Improv Bonds & Activity Number. Cp�2S55g, CpS27pg5 and C06-2T066
Financiallnformation:' MSA �DU(�C1� R@Sea1C� Gen�,g�
(F�cplain
�JUN 14 20U6
May 25, 200611:19 PM Page 1
June 7, 2006
TO: Matt
FR: Dede �J"`°
RE: GS 3030539 and GS 3030888
!7 °� /�1'
��������
,�!}5' ' '' ;!utSti
���-�-� �: �
'�
��� GS 3030539: A council resolution was passed in 1983 that established a requirement that
excess 5ewer Availability Chazges (SAC) shouid be used for sewer construction projects.
Sewer construction projects aze funded in the Capital Budget.
�IB
In 2005 SAC revenues exceeded SAC spending. Therefore, based on the resolution
passed in 1983 a transfer needs to be made to the Capital Budget. The excess amount is
$1,170,796. This resoluuon makes establishes the spending authority necessary to make
the transfer. Projects have been identified in 2006 that this can be financed with the
revenue. Contracts have been awarded to do the construction work in various areas of the
City.
GS3030888: The 2006 adopted CIB budget included Street Improvement Bonds to help
fund RSVP projects. There is a requirement that the City must assess 20% of the cost of
the improvement. In order to meet the 20% assessment match, MSA dollazs from 2005
and 2006 MSA contingency aze being proposed and included in this resolution.. The
identified projects (BakerBellows) meets the requirement for use of MSA.
Both of these resolutions aze on the agenda for the next CIB Committee mee6ng
scheduled for June 12�'.
I recommend approval and signature on these resolutions.
Once routed, the resolutions will be held in Council offices until after the CIB meeting on
the 12�' and after I have recorded the CIB Committees recommendation on the
resolutions, at which time they will then be placed on the next available Council Agenda.
RECElVED
��� 1 2 2006
�YQ��� �����ouncil Research Center
JUN 141006