06-622Council File #—�
Green Sheet #� a bS 3 q
RESOLUTION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
Presented by
�7
W�xEas , The Mayor pursuant to Section 10.07.1 of the Chazter of the City of Saint Paul, dces certify that there aze
available for appropriation $1,170,796.00 in funds in excess of those estimated in the 2006 budget; and
W�xEas , CouncIl File 277510, dated October 1,1981, did establish certain Special Fund Policies; and
W�xbns , Council File 281141, dated November 10,1983, did establish that Sewer AvaIlability Charge (SAC)
revenue in excess of expenses should be used for sewer construction projects; and
W�1tEns , SAC revenues in excess of SAC expenses in the amount of $1,170,796.00 were received in 2005; and
WHEREAS , Additional spending authority is required to transfer this amount to the Capital Projects Funds where
construction payments will be properly disbuxsed; and
WxEREas , This net 2005 SAC revenue over expense was closed to Sewer Utility retained eamings on December 31,
2005; and
WxEREns , The Department of Public Works has Sewer Availability Charge funds to finance sewer construction
projects in the Capital Improvement Program Budget; and
WxEltEas , Contracts have been awarded to do this mnstruction wark in various azeas of the City; and
W�xEns , This resolurion is intended to transfer the SAC funding to the 2006 Sewer Construction projects in the
CR' budget; and
WxExEas , The Mayor recommends that the following additions be made to the 2006 budget; and
Sewer Utility Enterprise Fund
Financing Plan
260 Sewer Utility Entecpxise Fund
9925 Use of Retained Earnings
All other Financing the Same
Total Financing Plan
Spending Plan
260 Sewer Urility Enterprise Fund
22217-0565 Transfer to Capital Projects Fund
All other Spending the Same
Total Spending Plan
Current Budget
$4,082,596
$45,129.212 \
$49,211,808
Current Budget
$1,849,000
$47,362,808
$49,211,808
Change Amended Budget
$1,170,796
�
$1,170,796
Change
$1,170,796
�
$1,170,796
$5,253,392
$45,129212
$50,382,604
Amended Budget
$3,019,796
$47,362.808
$50,382,604
Now, therefore, be it RESO[.vEn , That the City Council adopts the above additions to the 2006 budget.
Now, therefore, be it RESOr,vEn , by the City Council of the City of Saint Paul, upon recommendation oF the Mayor
and advice of the Long Range Capital Improvement Budget Comrnittee, that $1,170,796.00 is available for
appropriation in the 2006 Capital Improvement Budget, as heretofore adopted and amended by this Council, be
hexeby further amended in the Improvement Budgets, in the following particulars:
OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
(�'10 �a.
so
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
Ca itp al Improvement Budgets
Financin� Plan
Major Sewer Repair
C06-2T930
Sewer Service Fund
S�endin� Plan
Major Sewer Repair
C06-2T930
Conshuction
Current Budget
2,055,424.21
2,055,424.21
2,055,424.21
2,055,424.21
Change Amended Budget
1.170,796.00
1,170,796.00
3,226220.21
3,226,220.21
1,170,796.00
�,170,796.00
3226,220.21
3,226,220.21
Tne $t. Paul I,one! • Ranga CapItal fmproveaten4
BudSet Co rsceivecl this request on
<� �OJ f a �� .,o and xecommends
�� _ 4 �a��1�a �
m
Requested by Department of:
/�/Q4 �O�I�
By:
Form Approved by City Attome ,
$Y� i7�/c.Su� .� ���,�
Form
�
���•
Adoption CertiSed by Council Secretary
BY� � ` K Oaz
Approve ay . Date �/ Z 7r �j�(
- T�°° -
By:
�J
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
pW - Publicwodcs
Contact Person 8 Phone:
Joe Mueller
266 61A9
Must Be on Council Aaen�
ContractType:
AR-RESOLUiION W/$1(2P.NSACTION
� t
ToW I# of Signature Pages _(Clip All Locations for Signature)
Action Requested:
Approve Resolurion transferring excess Sewer Availability Chazges (SAC) revenues from unreserved retained eamings to Capital
Projects Funds (C06) for sewer construction. The excess (SAC) revenues will be used for Major Sewer Repair.
Recommendations: Approee (A) or Reject (R):
Plannirg Commission
CVB Committee
_. Citil Service Commission
Personal Service Contrects
1. Has this persoNfirm e�erworked urMer a wntract for this department?
Yzs No
2. Has this person/firtn eaer been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this persoNfirm possess a skill not rrormally possessed by any
curcent city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet
Initiating Pr6blem, Issues, Opportuniry (Who, What, When, Where, Why): �
Since the 2006 Budget was adopted, additional spending needs have azisen. This proposed amendment is in acwrdance with CouncIl
File 281141, adopted November IQ 1983, which states that SAC revenues in excess of SAC expenses should be used for sewc
construction projects. SAC revenues exceeded SAC related spending by $1,170,796.00 during 2005.
Advantaqes IfApproved:
Excess Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) receipts will be used for sewer construct'ton in accordance with City Council duection.
transfer of remaining SAC cash can be aceomplished within the 2006 City Council adopted budget.
Disadvantages IfApproved:
None.
JUI� 0 g 2006
Disadvantages H Not Approved:
The completion oF identified projects will be delayed.
Trensaction:
Funding Source:
Financial Information:
(Exptain}
$1,170,796
Z�a� �ed: � Green Sheet NO:
�����
3030539
' I Department SentToPerson InitiaUDate
- � 0 � blic Works �
Assign 1 61icWorks De ar[mentDirector �
Number y n ���� � ��
For � �/1
Routing 3 ANorne _j_�
Ofder 4 vor s OfSce Mavor7Assistant I
5 iCouncil i
6 �C'tv Clerk Cro Clerk
1 �'nanrial5ervi I
CosNRevenue Budgeted: �'
`� :� 1� I I� I I� 1,� ,' j:I:11 :
�
�•
Councii Research Center JUN 1 2 2006
�JUN 14 2006 ���'�u�a'S �FF10E
April 26, 2006 6:01 PM
Activity Number. CQfj27ggQ
Page 1
June 7, 2006
FR: Dede 6J'"°
TO: Matt
RE: GS 3030539 and GS 3030888
�� i
i
,�
;,
'��
/7 � /�' c�-�aa.
��������
JtS� ; � 'LuUb
����` •�`'-`..-��;�����'�'
��� GS 3030539: A council resolution was passed in 1483 that estabfished a requirement that
excess Sewer Availability Charges (SAC) should be used for sewer construction projects.
Sewer construction projects aze funded in the Capital Budget.
�IB
In 2005 SAC revenues exceeded SAC spending. Therefore, based on the resolution
passed in 1983 a uansfer needs to be made to the Capital Budget. The excess aznount is
$1,170,796. This resolution makes establishes the spending authority necessary to make
the transfer. Projects have been identified in 2006 that this can be financed with the
revenue. Contracts have been awazded to do the construction work in various azeas of the
City.
GS3030888: The 2006 adopted CIB budget included Street Improvement Bonds to help
fund RSVP projects. There is a requirement that the City must assess 20% of the cost of
the improvement. In order to meet the 20% assessment match, MSA doilars from 2005
and 2006 MSA contingency are being proposed and inciuded in this resolution.. The
identified projects (BakerBellows) meets the requirement for use of MSA.
Both of these resolutions aze on the agenda for the next CIB Committee meeting
scheduled for 3une 12�'.
I recommend approval and signature on these resolutions.
Once routed, the resolutions wiil be held in Council ofFices until after the CTB meeting on
the 12�' and after I have recorded the CIB Committees recommendation on the
resolufions, at which time they will then be placed on the next available Council Agenda.
RECEIVED
JUN 1 2 2006
�Y���� �����ouncil Research Center
:JUN 14 2006