Loading...
06-543City of St. Paul COUNCIL FILE NO.� RESOLUTION RATIFYIN6 ASSESSt�NT By /�� I i File No. SEE BELOW t �U�i�w ix �� �` \j_ Assessment No. SEE BELOW ^ I U VJ -Uot �n<3 - - -- - _ _ - - -- - - - - --- - - _ _ . -- ------- -- — Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for � / 0602T1 (9050) removing diseased elm trees from private property during the winter season 2005/2006. J0506E1 (8202) Summary abatement for the excessive consumption of inspection services for property code violations during the months of October and November 2005. LAID OVER BY COUNCIL ON 5-17-06 TO 6-7-06 A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified. RESOLVED FURTAER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in One equal installments. Except file 0602T1 to be payable in Ten equal installments. Yeas Nays Absent Benanav 1,/ Bostrom � Harris � Helgen Lantry � Montgomery Thune � v v Adopted by Council Adopt' rtifi d / By:� Approved b�y�� l By: Date �� �' U`p �- 1 Secretary by Date ��UG I�-�c� - l�- 7- D(o � Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet � Oepartrnentlofficelcouncil: Date Initiafed: - � � � / � ` � � ` Pw -�li�wo�,� �-�Y.� Green Sheet NO: 3030827 <-,i_z-,, Contad PeBOn & Phone: Juan Oritr � , Must Be on Council Agenda by (Date): Number For Routing Order ContraetType: OT-0THER (DOESNT FR ANY CA7EGORY) To}al # of Signature Pages _(Clip All Lowtions for Signature) Departrnent SentToPerson "" IIDaM 0 bli W rks uan O" � o �/ 2 erk At Council's request on 5-17-06 these items were laid over to 6-7-06 removing diseased elm trees during winter 2005YL006 and surom abatement for excessive consumption during October and November 2005. File No. 0602T1 and J0506E1. ttlations: Appm�e (A) or Reject (R): me Planning Commission CIB Committee Citil Service Commission Personal Service Confracts MuslMswer fhe Following Questions: 1. Has this persoNfirm euer xrotked undet a cordract for this depar[ment? Yes No 2. Has this persorJfirm e�er been a crty empioyee? Yes No 3. Does this person/5rm possess a skill not normaily possessed by arry cuRent city empioyee? Yes No Expfain afl yes answers on separate sheet and altacfi M green sheet Initiating Problem, Issues, OppoRunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why): Property owners or renters create a health hazard at various times throughout the City of Saint Pau] when their property is not kept up. The Ciry is required by City code to clean up the property and charge the property owner for the cost of the clean up. Advantages IfApproved: Cost recovery progratns to recover expenses for snmmary abatements, grass cutting, towutg of abandoned vehicles, demolitions, garbage hauling and boazdings-up. Disadvanfages KApproved: None Disadvantages MNotAporoved: If Council does noT approve ihese charges, genezal fuad would be required tn pay the assessmeat. TotalAmountof $2 �� � Trensaction: Fundinq Source: CosNRevenue Budgeted: Aetivity Number: Financial Infortnation: (expiai�) 4 property owners will be notified of the public hearing and chazges. P s 4 " , May 22, 2006 8:56 PM Page 1 City of St. Paul Real Estate Division Dept. of Technology 6 Management Serv.COUNCIL FILE NO. REPORT OF COt�LETION OF ASSESSMENT File No. SEE BELOW Assessment No. SEE BELOW �� �� - -- --- Voting �` ----- Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for 0602T1 (9050) removing diseased elm trees from private property during the winter season 2005/2006. J0506E1 (8202) Summary abatement for the excessive consumption of inspection services for property code violations during the months o£ October and November 2005. LAID OVER BY COUNCIL ON 5-17-06 TO 6-7-06 To the Council of the City of St. Paul The Valuation and Assessment Engineer hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz: Total costs Parks Admin Fee Charge-Code Enforcement Real Estate Service Charge TOTAL EXPENDITURES Charge To Net Assessment $2,421.70 $ $ 50.00 $ 80.00 $2,551.70 $2,551,70 Said Valuation and Assessment Engineer further reports that he has assessed and levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $2,551.70 upon each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefitted by the said improvement, and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits conferred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, identified by the signature of the said Valuation and Assessment Engineer, and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by him, and which is herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon s ma be onsidered proper. Dated �LZi G - �luation an sses ent Engineer 06-5 ,�3 n� ro n HHH � e arnrry'. �»:m [tl � o N 5a n 000 � ror•H � � ro mH� C� E w K7 O u HHH �[9�n .� � P]a wt7 � 2 .. Y 4 n yYY � Z�orou�0 � zwro c.� [_] �[_] �o .'[S C�] II C C` C � CI iP y T. � C7 Y z� x1 �l n nn �� ax �. .. m y u cnpy � z<rtix � z�-+rmE � o a r n cnox � c�� tzE , c�z x � a� � m y n a�a� ax mar � O n r��.Z �[�r�m �[�nO � y y X o O t' II L+1'<1L+7 � OSONS � O i 'O � __ n [+] 3 � 'a C�7 r+ ___ __�__ ____._ m u K7 c� O i .. z n� b �� d o< Z i k m __ _. —_..___. __.___ -_ u t9 G � �-` C � [l a t7 � t� _ '__'-___ . '_?C___ _' �[=T tr4Y o m H 7� o 3 u t' � C Y � w J—'�y---w-_._____ h1 u � R] � i o C H li � o w � o m m� n � �o � �o y � �tl n i P7 � 'v n � o i o cn � ,h1 II � m � a� (1 II � � m n C n � � m n n � rmx� rz��� n oyo� o �m�ro n y• ro� H�r�m � a� �� x� � H�o rn �+ �v+ � ti ro+-� � m n> m � ro ro N�� N ��z� ym�m a n Cv� � mOt7H � :� m a n ra m w tv C t' �7 � H t+ N n a u, n� i r m i ?�. ro��C '+ �noo� � x m� r �� n n• � �� �o a�e d II O O�l i N O� �'' H C� U7 H O 11 000 i �' tD� �, � ro C I r�] r� � 'JY i � 'j�' 1 H � i b� t7 N � H 1 F+ t� � H 3 H i �'/ 0 7 z H� r o� � o � r � y z� y� o x� x - � .3� �n x� m i pi �� q i � I I H 1 1 � b � � d � I � � � 7�7 3. [7 1 �'3 L7 1 n CH�S t CH[�] � H C � �z � �z �o � � n z� n x�x m m�nm � cn�m � y � t7',; � [a3 � z mm'o � �cao � % � � � � C � t��i � � t� x � ro � � z � � � o � � ti � � m � � n i y i i � � i o i m i � o i i N � 1 H i-j i N N � N N � �-7 I-� � O N I-� 1 O fIl Y i ' � � t O O O 1 � O O� 000 � o0o i y [n i o 0o i o0o i[�] m � � 3 'i H � � b �� a .�� y � �i m�0 b a � �t i .7 0 i rrJi NNm� v� ic o i oow i oo �a i Z' i 000 i OCJCJ i H 000 000iH � r 000� o0o m i i u i ii � � G�i n u i C] [9 i n n � H ?1 � II II � O 11 � il1 II 1/f � xY �'l n i r n r� ro �rrin in�_ n - i � W i,a n r�+na i�o n rrsmm � ��O II N N iP � 1-� II N N�] i O i N 11 O(Ji J � lp II O Ui �P i C i . �� . . . ; . tl . . - Z � w 11 0 o w iP II o o io i H ! O II O O O i O!I O O O i In 1 W I O 1 I W I �l � I N � N � �O I � i m i '�1 i i � � p N� N�ro � w i n> i[n ro i i i � � � i � � a � H L] N� r+ i K PJ i i i � O i O i H F' 1 O � O � O p i O I 1 � 1 J � �� ,� � N i N � Q�� �� D6s�3 H � O � O w � c7 �+ a � m h' N� m r cv a rz � V7 � N � t'l � !k � N � ry ; Q � 1 1 � 1 m 1 � (L � N i N ��__ _' _- `____�.. 1 _I_ I 1 1 �0 ' ' i_tp-__ 1 —_- I O � M - � '1---.- i � � � _ ._ ._. .__ VJ � O O O O 11 O� O O O O P O � - ___ _. ______ _ F� o 0 0 o n o � o 0 0 o ii o -�------- z i . . , . p . � . . . . n . � p i o 0 0 o p o i o 0 0 o II o i O� �f1L?lRN II h � If1L1U}N il l� CD �; il} LT il LT � L] L? 11 Ui a n � u fC � u u a � u � u x o � n n W N� II II i C) U � II II i ' I z W 1 II I 11 E UI � 0000 � 0000 i H�0000 �0000 H � O O O O I O O O O N i O O O O � O O O O O � � i N � ei O O.-I � rl O O�-1 � m � 1 Q 1 1 1 � EI ! 1 1 U I 1 1 � � I 1 1 �a 1 1 � 1 1 m W�0000 i0000 a [-� � o00o r o00o i �2�0000 �0000 � w � � ri � O N O o i O N O o i W N � �nt��nN i �nrinN � t0 H i �-1 ; rl � O i � 1 t O 1 h I I I i E i � U i i i w �aaa �aaa � a ���� ���� � a �zzz �zzz �000 �000 � a w�uuuw �uuuw � o � � w � w � w '�' � .^W+>"✓Ww i ?» i H i HHH[tj ` HHH[fj �n a � a�mmu almu�v H O � Ul Ul V] H 1 L/j Uj V} H I a H�www� �www> � � z w�wwwm �wwwm ' H i � �i I � I 1 � 1 � I �i] 1 1 1 x �p � �a � wN H �x � oH �� z z�F � � N� w o� o � r�a o� E r� � ti �r � m H O �o � W F i m i- ri U m� ? P. �(A ^ d� � L# U •• m i O H 1 � [[� I [t] �j1 [t] I a c � m o� � xww [-+� � £ �1� ',z� �VF� 22� 0000iio H k7 ��]f� H H H I 0000 11 O C] � 5 N W � x O W � •••• p• V � s� UI � � UE 4l �� o00o II o f+ J� � a�.' FC �n � m 1 KC rn i o ur+� a u a a H� �.7WO i Z.7H W o� N +n u r+ w a� Fwa., �•000 aM � � um a a � �io � x Hawti a m � ii O� F + o � • r-i z a: .a i n [Z � ViF* � OQ ZEa n LL W O �n � W Q H i-+ O �n i II i�a o i L7�y'm£a o i n i r n m � , n a � i n w i n U � � � �o n a o� o aaa n a,' i i � � � n W � 7 .-i � .i � � � n � r cv � in ro uJ m[n n F �n � W ,-+ N� p.' m N � O O O u � o [C � p .-i o � O *+ o i U U U W u W w�w �w ,a M wu x m�+iE Wo�• oW• i WWWWii W .-� r2 � N ,��+�C W� cG W.-i� W � ?>^✓ n � a i � in O�?J �ECO � �-+�-+t+W n a o o � �a u,a �oaN � mmv,canR i W CL W Vl �}i Ll N � ol VI Vl N n N � H�a wzx�C� qz�4 � wwwpno �.] x�>+ i C7 � � UUUC4 n E tn N [k W S+ P.' C7 � £ U' � �C X SC W 11 .] �n o�aaaahz��d�aaz � www�nnH w � Sw F?tn ri i � a� a�n�[ a� wa�'A � aaaa iiw a M w a a�,z � a aaz � a�a�c �� h a � wo+ mw � wa n,w FFHH uo a .-i �� pmHMa�xNHVa o�ooua ., o�waMV,.� �vav�•. � H HFUa � LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINLITES OF MAY 16, 2006 ----- - -- Ms. Moermond recommends approvai o�t�e assessmea�.----- ---_____.___ �.�-� �� o�-��� Page 2 Laid over summary abatements (scheduled for City Council on 5-17-06); J0506E Excessive consnmption of inspection services at 1173 Hancock Street J0506E Excessive consumption of inspection services at 1098 Seventh Street East J0506E Excessive consumption of inspecfion services at 399 Strvker Avenue 0602T Removal of diseased trees(s) from private property at 643 Winslow Avenue 1173 Hancock Street, $70 Ms. Moermond recommends approval because an appellant did not appear. 1098 Seventh Street East, $70 The following appeazed: Thao Yang, 2125 39 '/2 Avenue NE; and Keu Yang, 1098 Seventh Street East, appeared. John Betz reported that orders were mailed on 9-20-OS for a broken window in the reaz porch of the dwelling with a compliance date of 10-7-05. This is an excessive consumption for $50. The $75 and $150 excessive consumption assessments aze pending. Thoa Yang stated that he lives in Minneapolis. His father lives at 1098 Seventh. The first letter was not received because it may have been thrown away. Another month, they got a second Ietter that the window was broken. His father gave it to him. They were supposed to be at the hearing on May 2. The inspector referred him to the City Council. Tkey fixed the window on May 1 and have the receipt. Ms. Moermond stated the City is charging him for coming out because the work was not done yet. There aze 2 more assessments after this one. He should have gotten letters about them. When asked about the history on the properiy, Mr. Betz responded there was a vehicle issue four yeazs ago. Ms. Moermond asked does Keu Yang have someone help him with mail. It is important that lettars get translated. Thao Yang responded he brings iY to his house. Ms. Moermd recommends approval of this assessment. The expensive ones are the next 2. She will also recommend that the $75 be decreased to $50 and deleting the $150 one. When the post cazd arrives, the owner should write a note and call Racquel Naylor (City Council Offices). (The owners were given a business cazd.) 399 Stryker Avenue, $70 Irma Muetler, owner, appeared and stated the property was inspected. pb 5�3 LEGISLATIVE HEARING NIITTIITES OF MAY 16, 2006 Page 3 ------- IohnBetz_reported that orders were mailed on 7-1 i-OS for a gazage in need ofrepair with a compliance date of 10=3T=tT5. — -- - -- --- - Ms. Moermond asked was the garage fixed. Ms. Mueller responded iY would be done by now if it was nat raining. Ms. Moermond stated the owner got the notice last summer. Ms. Mneller responded that was the first letter. She was so busy and has so many things on her mind. The garage is in good shape. Eventually, ske will have to teaz it down. She would like an extension. Ms. Moermond asked has she talked to the inspector about an extension, to which Ms. Mueiler responded no. Ms. Moermond asked about the history being long on the property. Mr. Betz responded no. Two letters went out. The second was a final notice. There was a new deadiine for excessive consumption chazges. Ms. Moermond stated the owner got a few deadlines and asked can the work be done by May 24. Ms. Mueller responded it was raining. It will be done for sure by May 24. She has the paint. Ms. Moermond recommends laying this over to June 7. She will give the owner until May 31 to get this done. If it is done, she will recommend deletion. Otherwise, she wili make it approval. 643 Winslow Avenue, $1,919.40 Ed Oisen reported that the trees were removed 1-14-06. Elden W. Johnson, 1452 Ashland Avenue, owner, appeared and stated that he got the notice. It is too high. He was going to have a friend cut it down. He had another guy iook at the tree and assess it for $1050; therefare, he will settle for $1,050 for it. That is what the estimate was. Ms. Moermond asked who he talked to. Nir. Johnson responded he doesn't know. A tIier was on his windshieid. He thought it was taken caze of whan he went to Texas. He has emphysema and couldn't get up there [to do the tree himselfj. The cost to the City was $1900, says Ms. Moermond. She is wondering why the taYpayers should pick up the difference. He had 3 months to do the work. It sounds like a private matter. Mr. 7ohnson responded he can't help it that there was such a high bid. {He gave Ms. Moermond proof of his ta�ces.) Ms. Moermond asked is this rental property. Mr. Johnson responded yes. Mr. Johnson stated he will leave the check with her. Ms. Moermond responded she does not accept checks. Ms. Moermond recommended approval of the assessment.