Loading...
06-158City of St. Paul RESOLIITION APPROVING FIXING TIME OF HEARING THEREON COUNCI ILE NO. �b'�I S t� �� AND By � � File No. ;... t �� ; �c� Assessment No. 5052 �'.. � `' � ,�� Voting Ward 2 & 3 Ia the Matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for the installation of an above standard, twin lantern lighting system on West 7 Street from Munster Avenue to Madison Avenue. Preliminary Order:_03-1026 approved 11/19/03 Final Order: 03-1119 approved 12/17/03 The assessments of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection with the above improvement having been submitted to the Council having considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefore, be it RESOLVED,That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects approved. RESOLVED FURTHER, That the 5th day of April, 2006 a� Council Chambers of the Court St. Paul;that the Valuation meetings, as required by the place of hearing, the nature against the lot or lots of directed. � public hearing be had on said assessment on : the hour of Five thirty o'clock P.M. in the House and City Hall Building, in the City of and Assessment Engineer give notice of said Charter, stating in said notice the time and of the improvement, and the amount assessed the particular owner to whom the notice is �a� t4�*"� � Adopte@ by the Council: Date: �� /S, a d�1� Certified Passed by the Council Secretary By � Mayor �,�?%� f���} �R � E °�� � Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet � �y� ���;-�Sg� Departrnentlofficelcouncil: Datelndiated: Pw -�b�.��� �E� Gree� Sheet NO: 3029632 ContactPerson 8 Phone: Bnice Ergelbrekt 2�54 Must Be on Councii Agend 72-FEB-0G �� Assign Number For Routing Order 0 �ublic Wmiia 1 Brure Eneelbreckt i 1 MB 'eleon Z le Conhact Type: - - OT-07HER(DOESNTFRANY � - ' CATEGORI� - . . Total # of Sgnatu P ege s _ (Clip AI� LowYw for Signature) � - � Action Requested:. . . . - ' Set date of public bearing to ratify She assessments for the installation of above ' standard'lights on W �th &om Mimster to Madison. File No_ 18999 . Assessment No. 5052 �Recommendafions: Approie (A) or Reject (R): � Rersonal Service Cont2cts MustMswerthe Foliowing Questions: , Plarmirg Commission . 1. Has this persoNfirm e�er wwked-under a contract for this departmerd? 'CIBCommittee , - Yes -No. � . . � CiNI Senice Commission � � 2. Has this persoNfirtn e`er been a city employee? . � - . �'Yes No. " . � � �.� � � `' � - 3. Does this peTSONfirtn possess a skll not rarmally possessed by arry . � . , � -currerd ci(y'emPioyee? � _ . , . . . - Yes._ No ' .�. ' . . . . , � ' � ExplainallyesanswersonseparetesheetandattachYogreensheet lnitiating Froblem, Opportunitq (Wha, WhaE, 4Yhen, Where,:Ylfi.Y)" . : : . � . � � . . � �. �. Project is completed. � Ratification is necessary in ordet to begin collecting assessmenYs 4o help pay for the project. :4dvantaStes If Approued: Same as aliove: DisadvantageslfApproved:� � � . Property owners will have assessments payable via property taxes. "Disadvantages{fryotAppmved:- � � To not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with City policy. TotatAmounYOf $363,883:88 _ - TransaMion: . . Funaina soy�ce: , Assessments & STAR Financiallnformation: � . - - . (ExpWin� ; � February 6, 2006 Y:02 PM Cost/RevenueBudgeted; Y P.cfrviry Nomber. , . Page 1 �,�; ��«��,'� ���!`�f ��� � � ����