06-138City of St. Paul COUNCIL FILE N0.
RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSESSMENT AND
FI%ING TIME OF HEARING THEREON
BY �,�� Ql�-t3�
File No. SEE BELOW
Assessment No. SEE BELOW 24
Voting
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
05LDSCRPL (4913) replacement of Lead Water service as requested by the
property owner during 2005.
The assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection with the
above improvement having been submitted to the Council, and the Council having
considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects
approved.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That a public hearing be had on said assessment on the 15th
day of March, 2006 at the hour of 5:30 P.M. in the Council Chamber of the Court
House and City Hall Building, in the City of St. Paul; that the Valuation and
Assessment Engineer give notice of said meetings, as required by the Charter, stating
in said notice the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement, and the
amount assessed against the lot or lots of the particular owner to whom the notice is
directed.
Yeas Nays Absent Adopted by the Council
Benanav Date:
✓ � /1 G//G� �. ai 0010
Bostrom �
Harris Certified Passed by the Council Secretary
✓
Helgen ✓ gy: �
/
Lantry
�
Montgomery ✓ Mayor;
Thune ✓
v.°� t4�
i �
.
�c,�l�� �e�e�� - ,-n�,�, �5 a��
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
Departrnentloficelcouncii: Date initiated: �� �/� I/ � f
PW - rutuowor� a�,lnta-os �Green Sheet NO: 3029551 �,-13�
Contact Person & Phone:
Bruce Ergelbrekt
266-8854
� '
/lssign
Number
Por
Routing
Orcler
Deoartrnent SentTOPewon Inih, 'aVDate
0 a lic Works ruc n rekt ��� �s �� ��y
/ ��'F /
1 unc� Ma E "ckson
2 rk
Must Be on Couneil /{qenda by (DaTe):
ContractType:
OT-0'fHER (DOESNT Fff ANY
CA'fEGORY)
Total # of Signature Pages _(Clip NI Loeations for Signature)
Action Requested:
Set date of public hearing and approve assmts for replacement of lead water service as requested by the property owner during 2005.
Fi/E NO• 05LD.Se���
iaatlons: Approw (A) or R
Planning Commission
CIB Committee
CiNI Ser.ice Commission
Personal Service Contrects MustMSwer the Following
t. Has this persoNfirtn eaer xrorked under a contract for this department?
Yes No
2. Has this persoNfirm e�er been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this person/firtn possess a skill not normally possessed by any
current city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on separete sheet and attaeh M green sheet
Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
Property owners replacing theit lead water service connecrions have requested that the cost of the work be paid by assessment. Work
has been done, and City has paid for the work.
Advanqges IfApprovetl: �
Ratification of the assessments will allow Ciry to begin recovering the cost of the work done.
DisadvanWSles NApprovetl:
None
Disadvantages N Not Approved:
City would not recover the money already paid out fot ihe lead replacement work done.
�omis�mouncor $562,297.85
Transacfion:
FundingSource: '
CosVRevenue Budgeted:
Activity Number.
Financial Information:
(Explain) 262 properiy owners will be nofified of the public hearing and chazges.
January 31, 2006 8:16 AM Page 1