05-957coun�;� Fue # OS 9s�
Green Sheet# 3027758
Presented By:
Referred To:
RESOLUTION
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, NIIIVNESOTA
��
1
2 WHEREAS, the City of Saint Paul, Police Deparhnent, pursuant to the attached grant application,
3 needs City Council review and endorsement of the attached Safe and Sober grant application; and
4
5 WHEREAS, this grant provides funding to increase compliance with traffic safety laws by enhanced
6 enforcement of traffic laws coupled with education and media relations; and
7
8 BE IT RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul City Council accepts this grant and authorizes Chief John
9 Harrington to administer the grant, if accepted.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Requested by Department of:
Bostrom
Harris
Thune
�
✓
Committee:Date:
by
Adopted by Council: Date: QGjp[�,r 1 a a
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary:
B
�'
�
�
✓
✓
✓
by Fi�ancial Services
Mayor for
Safe & Sober Grant acFiptance.cr.2005.xis
. OS- 9S�
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
DepartmenUofficelcouncil: Date Initiated:
pD — pot[cen��eac ,�-A��S Green Sheet NO: 3027758
Contact Person ffi Phone• Deoartment Sent To Person InitiaUDate
ChiOf John Hartington � 0 oG e a nt P 6ce De a eot
2665588 p�j 1 oticeDe ent D rbnent 'rector
MUSt Be on CoUncil Agenda by (Date): Number 2 man ' 1 'ces F'nancial rvices �
For 3 i Attome Ci Atto e
Routing
Ofde( 4 or's fCice Ma r
5 ounoil Council
6 i lerk i ler
� � 7 olice De artment Police De arfinent
ToWI # of Signature Pages i (Clip AII �ocations for Signature)
Action Requested:
Signatures on the attached council resolution authorizing the Ciry of Saint Paul, Police Department, to accept a Safe & Sober grant and
Chief John Harrington to administer the grant, if accepted.
Recommendations: Approve (A) orReject jR): Personal Service Contracts Must Mswer the Following Questions:
Plan�ing Commission �, Has this person�rm ever worked under a contract for this department?
CIB Committee Yes No
C'ivil Service Commission 2. Has this personlfirm ever been a city emptoyee?
Yes No
3_ Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any
currentcity employee?
Yes No
� Explain all yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet
Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
The City of Saint Paul, Police Department, has authorization to receive a Safe and Sober grant from the Minnesota Department of Public
Safety. A council resolution is needed to auffiorize participahon in the grant for the attached grant application.
t
AdvantaqeslfApproved:
The Safe and Sober grant provides funding to increase compliance with traffic safery laws by enhance enforcement of traffic laws
coupled with educ6on and media relations.
DisadvantapeslfApproved: ,
None.
����� Y ��
Disadvantages If Not Approved: JEP 2 20�5
Loss of funds available to increase compliance with traffic safety laws.
L✓H I T PY��i'i��
ToWlAmountof see contract CosURevenueBudgeted: �
Transaction:
Pundinq source: State of Minnesota Activity Number: 34147
Financial Information:
(Explain)
oS- 957
S��NtOFP(�B ^
s
a F
m
O K
P
l
9 �OFM�NNE 50
Of�ce of Traf�c Safety
444 Cedaz Street • Suite 150 • Saint Paul, Minnesota SS101-5I50
Phone: 651.296.6954 • Fag: 651297.4844 • TTY: 6�1.282.655�
www.dps.state.mn.us
August 15, 2005
Aicohol
and Gambling
Enforcement
ARMER/911
Program
Bureau of
Criminai
Apprehension
Driver
and Vehicle
Services
Homeland
Security and
Emergency
Management
Minnesota
Siate Patrol
Office of
Commumcations
OHice vf
Justice Programs
Office of
Traffic Safety
State Fire
Marshal and
Pipeiine Safety
Sgt. Dave Piucinak
St. Paul Police Department
367 Czrove Street
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Deaz Sgt. Plucinak:
I am delighted to inform you that St. Pau1's application for a 2006 Safe & Sober grant
has been accepted. We have set asi r your project. OTS's Maureen
7anke will be working with you and your project this year, and will be contacting you
to set up a meeting soon. Please keep in mind that we will need a resolution
authorizing participation of each agency in your grant from their council or boazd.
The Safe & Sober conference is now part of the Toward Zero Deaths conference
which will be held in St. Cloud starting at 9:30 AM on November 16 and ending at
3:30 PM on the 17�'. On page 3 of the Basic Ageement of your grant application, you
identified who would be attending the conference from your (and if any, youz
partners) agency(ies). The OTS will cover the cost of registration and hotel room (if
necessazy) for one person from each agency in the grant. If you have identi£ied two or
more persons from a single agency in the basic agreement, please let me or your OTS
coordinator laiow by September 1 the name of the person for whom you want OTS to
pay. If there aze other changes in the names or departments attending the conference,
please also let us know that also. Agencies receiving a grant for the first tnne, and
those with new project duectors are expected to attend the "2006 Safe & Sober"
workshop in St. Cloud. Rather than being a separate evening meeting, it will be a
regulaz sessi�n of the conference this year. This meeting will brieFy cover gart
requirements and using the forms, and will give you a chance to suggest changes for
the future, ask questions, and meet other project directors. You'll receive more
information on attending the conference by e-mail at a later date.
Congratulations on receiving the grant. All of us in OTS look forward to worlang
with you.
5� cerely, ,...�
��.,����
Susie Palmer
State Program Admiuistrator
oS- 95�
DEPARTMENT OF POLICE
lohn M. Harnnglon, Ch�efofPo(ice
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
Randy C. Ke(!y, Mayor
36�G�oveStreet Telephone:651-291-I1(1
SCPaul,Minnuom 55101 Facsvnde 651-26fi-571I
This letter accampanies the 2006 Safe & Sober grant request by the City of Saint Paul. Saint
Paul has participated in Safe & Sober for 15 yeazs. For the last four yeazs the project duector
has been Sergeant David Plucinak. During the time Sergeant Plucinak has managed this
project Saint Paul has increased iYs contacts per hour each yeaz and maintained the highest
number of seatbelt citations in the state during the May Mobilization.
The child passenger safety practitioner for the St Paul Police Department is Officer Lila
Sturgeon. Lila conducts two clinics each month at a fire station and also responds to special
requests from public housing which lazgely serves Asian communities where education is
needed the most. Officer Sturgeon received a national awazd in Washington D.C. for her work
with Safe Kids last year.
The City of Saint Pau1 is the capitol of Minnesota and serves as host to many festivals such as
Taste of Minnesota, Ribfest, Grand Excursion, and winter Camival, conventions at the River
Center, and Professional hockey at the Excel Center that draw huge crowds from outside the
city.
The Saint Paul Police Department meets regularly with block clubs and district councils to
address their traffic related concems. We demonstrate the effects of impaued driving in
schools using fatal vision goggles and take interested citizens on ride-a-longs with traffic
squads. We routinely issue press releases to the media concerning our Safe and Sober efforts.
In addition we conduct on air radio interviews with local radio stations and give statements to
local major newspapers. We participate in media events as requested by the OTS Department
of Communications.
Scheduling for the seatbelt wave is conducted during daylight hours and after darlrness during
the impaired driving wave. Shift lengths are rypically about 6 hours but vary depended on the
individual Officer's past producrion. I have found our production has gone up when I am
flexibie with scheduling within reason.
The City of Saint Paul has put great ef£ort into making the City safer in the last two yeazs by
placing speed boazds in high accident azeas and redesigning streets using nationally recognized
traffic caiming techniques. The Saint Paul Police Department maintains a traffic enforcement
unit consisting of 10 motorcycle Officers and 8 unmazked squads. Their only duties aze to
enforcement traffic laws to educate motorists and make traveling in Saint Paul safer for
everyone. We look forwazd to our continued partnership with Safe & Sober in the coming
yeaz.
AA-ADA-EEO Employtt
OS- 9S7
Application for the Following Agency(ies):
LEAD: Saint Paui Police Department
PARTNERS: NA
e-mail address: dave.olucinak(a�cistoaul_mn.us
� Saint Paul �Police D�aztment t. David Plucinak
367 Grove Street /? I J �/�//��� ,�
St Paul, MN 55101 `�� � �� �/(.P/
1�/ �J� .., � /
Pr �ec[ D3rec[or's Si nature
651 266-5727
P.O. Box
Street Address needed in addirion to P.O. Box)
55101 651 266-5852
St Paul
Ci
Lead or single agency applicants must fill in one of the following � p � � Kq54 �„
numbers. Ask your auditor or treasurer or city clerk.
Fis 1 ic Z (T ed name &'ob liUe)
Federal Employer ID Number:
416005521
Or
Minnesota Ta�c ID Number: scal Officer Si hue
Resolution Status: ❑ Attached In ptogress 3 (Date: 1
Please note: On the sheet the application evaluators complete (Attachment 4), your past participahon in mobilizahons and
your use of on-line crash reporting aze rated.
Please make every effort to complete the e-mail address box and to have your partners (if any) do so [oo. A home e-mail
address of the project duector is fine if one isn't available aC work Providing an e-mail addcess will help OTS commumcate
w�th you quickly and will be appreciated.
Complete addiuonal pages if more than one agency is involved. Copy the second page if needed for more agencies.
1 The person responsible for over-all management of the entire project (i.e., scheduling, media, summarizing reports and
mvoices for OTS).
2 The person responsible for verifying financial records for fhe project (cannot be the same as We project duector).
Q5-951
Basic Agreement
- �
Na
Saint Paul Police Department
Lead A enc Name
Pop.: 280 000 Officers: Full-Time: 556 Par[-Time: 0
Total Po ulation Served by A ency(ies) Total Number of Swom Officers in Agency(ies)
PTOb12I[1 ICICIlt1fiC8t10Il: To complete this double-bordered block please refer to the Grids — Attachment 1.
Name of ci or coun used from rids : Ramse
Alcohol-related Crashes lYon-use of Seat Belts in Crashes
By VMT (column BS): By VMT (column CS):
❑ highedworse than state rank or Q lower/safer than sta[e rank ❑ higher/woise tkian state rank or Q lower/safer than state rank
By Popularion (column B3): By Population (column C3):
❑ h� her/worse than state rank or ❑ lowedsafer than state rank hi herlworse than state rank or Q lowedsafer than state rank
Applicant in one of 20 counties with the highest number of deaths and serious injuries? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Individual projec! objectives will be completed in discussion with your OTS coordinator
While not a part of the evaluation process for the appIicahon, your ob�ectives and
ro ress towards meetin them wil( be considered cn uture ro ect ndin deccstons.
Ptease complele as much of the following table as possible with informatton on the
number of citations written by your agency(ies). In ihe space provided, tell us which
a encies are included in each o the numbers.
Year DWIs Seat Belt Citations ChIld Seat Citations S eed Citations
2000
2001 35 368 53 837
2002 69 578 28 976
2003 109 2717 79 1271
2004 0 590 so far 15 so faz 419
Which agencies aze included in which numbers?
St Paul only.
If not all, please explain:
2006 Safe & Sober Basic P,greement, page 1 of 3
05-957
Basic Agreement
22
4
2
[�
You are requued to distrlbute news releases to all media outleu (including to the edi[ors or staff counse3ors of high school and
college papers, if any) and to conduct other public information and media relations activities.
Fill in two numbers at the end of the line on the first four lmes. — jor uample,
3(10) if three officers need and ten ojfecers have had the course. For first year grants, Advanced
SFST is not required and neither first nor second year grants are required ta have a CPS practitioner:
put NA in the space zf that training is not required. Attendance is required by one person from each
lead agency a[ the November "Toward Zero Deatks" meeting. O�cers from partner agencies are
welcome but not required to attend. In order jor OTS ta pay for room costs, the lut after line 6 must
be accurate. See RFP page 9 jor Trauung Requirements and page 10 Getting Traming and for
The number of officers who
The number of officers who
The number of officers who will
The number of aeencv staff who
of a¢encv staff who
This section is a brieJsurvey of the number of inedin outlets available to
you. Fill in the number of each type in Ihe boxu lhat apply; leave blank
onl i there are none in our area.
0 6
become (or aze) certified Child
Testing: _ ( 240
and Enforcement: _ � 240
( 240 l.
6) The number of officers who you will send (or have had) to SFST Update trazning: _( 240 )(T'his will be required in
8) The people who will attend the Toward Zero Deaths conference on November 16"' and 17'"Osee page 10 RFP)
Phone Nutnber
David Plucinak I$t Paul I 651 266-5727
have had) Standazdized Field
iave had) Advanced SFST:
to become (or uel certified Child
2006 Safe & Sober Basic Agreement, page 2 of 3
D5-q 5 7
Basic Agreement
You must fill in # 4. (See Section page 7 af the RFP for irsformal survey infarmation.)
1) By Friday, Novemberll`", 2005 each grant lead agency will be required to fiunish to their OTS coordinator: A) a list of
o�cers eligible to work the Saje & Sober project with Yhe dates of officers' SFST, OPUE and (where applicable) Advanced
SFST Drugs That Impair and/or CPS Precrilioner training; B) a list of inedia contacts, organizatrons and addresses, aC) a list
of the sites wtieie the informal seat belt surveys will be conducted, and D) youT list of ob}ectives foz the project that you will
work out with our OTS coordinator.
2) A plan on a foim provided by the OTS will be submitted at least one month before the first day of overtime to be compieted
before May 1, 2006. Orher plans will be submitted by Monday, May 1 for the Memorial Day wave and mid-summer work
occumng before July 1; by Wednesday, June 1 for the Labor Day wave and aud-summer work occumng on or after July 1.
Basic informaQOn on enforcement schedules and ublic and media relations efforts aze included in the lans.
3) A full wave progress report on a foim provided by the OTS will be submitted by Friday, May 12`" on the results of any
overtime worked before May 1; by �riday, July 14`" on ffie results of overume worked between May 1 and 3une 30`�
(including Memorial Day); and by Friday, October 20`" on the results of overtime worked from July 1�` through September
30`�. Full wave progress reports include infotmation on citations and wamings for specific offenses written (during project
paid hours only) as well as public infoimation and media relahons activities conducted. The lead agency in a grant submits
one full wave report covenng all agencies in that grant.
4) A short report on the number of seat belt cita6ons written between November 21 and November 27 is due by noon on
Thursday, December l and on the number of DWis wriuen between December 16 through the 31�` by noon on TLursday,
January 5`". A short report on the number of seat 6elt citafions wcitten and of informal belt sucveys results for the May
mobilization will be submitted by noon on Thursday, June 8 A shoR report on the number of unpaired dnvers arrested
dunng the L,abor Day mobilization will be subnutted by noon on Thursday, September 7`". Each agency in a grant
submits the short mobilization report separately and it is to includes the appropriate citation or arrest number
re ardless ut whether ar not the were made on ro'ect aid hours..
5) A final report on progress towards objectives set and problems and successes will be submitted no later than Friday, October
27�', 2006.
6) A set of infonnat seat belt use sucveys wiR be conducted dueing the weeks of Apri124 throueh Aod130 and June 5 throueh
June 11. A set is defined as counts of shoulder belt use and non-use of drivers and front seat passenger
conducted at 5 sites. Site locations sha11 remain constant throughout the yeaz. Results will be submitted to OTS in
te rts.
7) Invoices will be submitted no less frequently than the following schedule: by Friday, June 9 for any hours worked before
May 1 on Friday, July 21" for overtime from May 1 through June 30; and by Friday, October 27`" for oveztime worked
from 7uly l fluough June 30�". The OTS is required to reimburse grant costs accordmg to state fiscal yeazs, therefore, you
must sepazate out all cosu mcurred before July 1�` from all costs incurzed after that date. Full wave reports on work must be
received before �nvoices can be aid; the re orts cover the same time enods.
2006 Safe & Sober Basic Agreement, page 3 of 3
bS-551
Budget
Z005 SAFE & SOBER PROJECT PROPOSED BUDGET
Lead Applieant Agency: Saint Paul Police Department
Note: Please round off all numbers; for exawQle $21,400.00 instead of $21, 361.54 and $45.00 instead of $44.50.
See RFP pagcs 4, 5, and 6 for discussion and an example.
Proposed Federal Budget (only federal grant monies in this block)
1. Overtime Enforcement Hours Budget $ 55,000 1005
2. Discretionary Budget $ 0 0%
Federal Budget Total $ 55,000 100%
Note: Federally paid overtime enforcement hours must equal at least 90% of the total federal budget.
Part 1:
Police Officer
Sergeant
Total overtime
$45.00 ave 10.84%
$54.00 Ave 10.84%
1000 $49,878 $49,878
85 $5,122 $5,122
$55,000 $55,000
$0
$0
* Rank or seniority -- groupings of officers with similaz salaries.
** All dollaz amounts to be rounded and estimated. Attach fiuther explanation if not overtime hours.
***See RFP for information on an acceptable fringe rates.
[7;� � 1�
Admimstration
Equipment
Operating
Travel
TOTAL
Not allowable
$0
Not allowable
Not allowable
�0
$3,000
$0
$3,500
$0
$ $6,500
$3,000
�0
$3,500
$0
$ $6,500
* Detaiis required on second page/reverse side.
See RFP for a discussion of budgeting.
�0
2006 Minnesota Saje & Sober
Budget
rate ver mile* I 8641 I 0.405 I$3
* Although the grant this year does not aliow reimbursement of squad operating costs, agencies aze required to track
the miles driven and report them as local costs. The rate of $0.405 per mile can be used if an agency doesn't compute
their own rate.
See RFP for a discussion of budgeting.
2006 Mmnesota Saje & Sober
Breakdown of Discretionary Budget
* Note: Agency share for each piece of equipment must be greater than or equal to Federal shaze
Compazative Report
Au agencies which have seceived fu�+ding for ¢ Safe & Sober overGme palro[ grnnt sinte 1998 must compfete this repaK
REPORT ON ENFORCEMENT RESULTS DURING PREVIOUS SAFE &�OBER YEARS
When evaluating applications for Safe & Sober 2006, the OTS will consider your performance in comparison to other grantees
for the rate of vehicle stops per hour, the rate of stops that resulted in a citation or written waming for violation of the seat belt or
child seat laws, and the rate of stops resulting in a citation rather than a wacning. This report is meant to help you to make your
case that your agency is either relatively successful and/or has a plan in place for improvement Each yeaz OTS is able to
approve about haif of the requests for funding we receive — it is our responsibdity to do everythmg we can to ensure our grants
go to those commumties who need them mos[ and can make the best use of them. Please note: in regards to the seat belt and
child seat rate: "Everyone is buckled up" only tells us your agency doesn't need a Safe & Sober grant.
For each past federal year since 1998 (which began Occober 1, 1997 and ended September 30, 1998) for which you zeceived an
overtime Safe & Sober grany fill in the tluee blank columns vnth information about your agency &om Attachment 2. The results
by lead agency for 1998, 1999, 2000, Z001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 are in Atfachment 2. In evafuating how well your agency has
done, we will consider significant improvement and the answers to the questions as well as absolute percentages.
Year Average Your Average % of Your % of Average % of Your % of
Contacu Contacts Belts & Seats per Belts & Seats Cites per stop Cites per stop
sto er sto
1498 2.22 2.405 18.4°!0 8.2°l0 50.1% 43.2%
1999 2.29 --- 20.7% --- 57.1% ---
2000 238 2229 20.9% 223°/a 60.7% 112%
2001 2.41 2.226 21.5% 24.7% 63.9% 123%
2002 2.44 2.485 21.2% 29.9% 62.3% 104%
2003 239 2.999 21.8°/a 30.5% 65.4% 113%
2004 2.52 3.29 19.8% 37.9% 61.9% 94.9%
For the discussion below, use no more than the rest of this na�e and one addihonal naee.
Discuss yous average or above average results (which of the three aze they, if they improved over time, and what strategies
cantributed to your success) .
Discuss your below average results: (which of the ttuee are they, have they decreased ovei time, what went wrong and what
strategies wiIl you use to improve)
Compazative Enforcement Report for 2006 Safe & Sober Page I of 1
Send four copies w�th your appiication