05-815.. ;;.. .
Council File # �' � �s
Green Sheet # � � .3
RESOLUTION
OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Presented
3i
Referred To Co�ittee Date
WI�REAS, The Mayor recommended, and the Saint Paul City Council approved Council Resolution 04-323
which approved the Residential Street Paving projects to be constructed in 2004 and tentatively approved projects
for the years 2005 through 2008; and
4 WHEREAS, The tentatively approved proj ects for subsequent years must be reviewed by the CIB Committee
5 and the Mayor, and be approved by the City Council and the Mayor prior to each conshuction year; and
WfIEREAS, The Deparhnent ofPublic Works has been directed, on a yearly basis, to bring forward a revised
list of Residential Street Paving projects, moving up another year of proj ects to final approval; and adding another
year oftentative projects;and
9 WfIEREAS, The adopted 2005 Capital Improvement Budget funds the Residential Street Vitality Program at
10 7.525 million of CIB funds in 2005; and tentatively recommends $7.000 million of CIB funds in 2006; $7.000
11 million of CIB funds in 2007; and $7.000 million of CIB funds in 2008; and
12 WHEREAS, The estimated costs of Residenrial Street Vitality Program projects have been revised to reflect
13 the increased cost of construction; and
14 WHEREAS, Public Works recommends that two projects listed in Resolution 04-323 be constructed over two
15 years, both projects, BakerBellows and Arlington/Pascal, shall be constructed in 2005 and 2006. These schedule
16 modifications keep the Residential Street Vitality Frogram within the adopted and proposed Capital Improvement
17 Budgets as approved by the Mayor and Council; now therefore be it
18 RESOLVED, The City Council accepts the following list ofprojects, giving final approval for those listed for
19 2005 and tentative approval for the projects listed for years 2006 through 2009.
20 YEAR
21 2005
22 2005
23 2005
24
25
26
2006
2006
2006
PROJECT NO.
51
16
42
87
16
51
27 2007 61
28 2007 49
29 2007 80
30 2007 34
PROJECT NAME
ARLINGTON/PASCAL (Two-Year Project)
BAKER/BELLOWS (Two-Year Project)
EDMCJND/GALTIER
CHATSWORTH/GOODRICH
BAKER/BELLOWS
ARLII3GTOi3/PASCAL
IICJBBARD/GRIGGS
SEVENTHBAY
GRIGGS/JEFFERSON
ORANGElPARK
� °
1 YEAR
2 2008
3 2008
4 2008
5 2008
6 2009
7 2009
8 2009
9 2009
PROJECT NO. PROJECT NAME
4 WHITE BEAR/BURNS
10 IVY/KENNARD
20 EARL/MCCLEAN
70 ASHI,AND/PASCAL
67 KNAPP/RAYMOND
28 MAGNOLIA/EARL
71 CRETIN/GOODRICH
47 5EVENTH/DOUGLAS
OS- 81S'
Adopted by Council: Date �o� � � � (7 ,
Adoption Certified by Counc�Secretary
�
�
Datie l� "'
r � - �� ��-� , � , /
�
i T� �/��
Approval ec es led by Budg D'uector:
By:
os- 8�5"
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
pW - Pubticwo�ks
Confact Person & Phone:
Daniel A. Haak
266 6084
Must Be on Council Agen
Contract Type:
RE-RESOUff10N
Green Sheet NO: 3027737
Department SentToPerson
Gc W r
GeW rks De tDirector
Ctv Atfnrne
� fa or's t'fice or/Assistant
co�a
C'tv Clerk (Slv Clerk
ToW I# of Signa Pages _(Clip A ll Lo cat i ons for Signat
Action Requested:
Approve Councit Resolution giving fund approval of the 2005 Residentiai Street Vitality project areas and tentative approval of 200G
2009 projectazeas.
idations: Appro�e (A) or R
Planning Commission
CIB Commiltee
CiHI Senice Commission
'17-AUC DS
� '
Assign
Number
For
Rou6ng
Order
0
1
2
3
4
5
Personal Service Contrects MuslMswerthe Following Questions:
1. Has this persoNfimi e�er vrorked under a contract for this department?
Yes No
2. Has this persoNfirm e�er been a ciiy employee?
Yes No
3. Does this persoNfirm possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any
curtent city employee? �
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet
Initiating Problem, Issaes, Opportunity (Who, What, When, V9here, Why):
This Resolution is a follow up on Resolution 04323 which approved the 2004 RSVP pro}ects.
The 2006 [hrough 2009 project schedule is based on $7.0 Million of CIB per year because of past experience of adopted RSVP budget.
AdvanWpeslfApproved: �
Public Works, other City Depar[ments, Utility Companies, and outside agencies can star[ the planning and coordination for the 2006-
2009 projects.
DisadvantageslfApproved:
None
AUG 2 6 20�5
'S OFFICE
DisadvanWAeslfNotApproved:
Difficul[ [o plan for fu[ure projects. Expectations of residents will no[ be me[.
�i�
ioq�wmountof $0
Transaction:
Funding Soarce: WA
CosURevenue Budgeted: �'
Financial Information:
(Explain)
August 1$ 2 05 1:01 AM
AcErvityNumber. rJ/q
Page 1
AUG 2 5 2005
�
�;4�t�t�,`i� Rae??�rrh G?nfiBP
AUG 2 6 20p5