05-798Council File # O�+ _ � • "
n o r�
Green Sheet # O
RESOLUTION
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Presented By
Referred To
Committee: Date
!1
2 Whereas, Tom Karlan made application to the Heritage Preservation Commission
3 (hereinafter, the "HPC") in HPC file No. OS-205 for a pernut to construct a two and one half
4 story rear addition on property commonly known as 1009 Portland Avenue (Hill Historic
5 District); and
7 Whereas, on June 23, 2005, the HPC after having provided notice to affected property
8 owners, conducted a public hearing on the said application where all interested parties were
9 given an opportunity to be heard; and
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
Whereas, at the close of the hearing, the HPC, based upon all the testimony and records
before it, approved the application subject to certain conditions as set forth in the HPC's letter to
the applicant dated June 29, 2003, based upon the following findings set forth in HPC Resolution
No. OS-205:
1. The property is classified as contributing to character of the Hill Historic
District.
2. The addition will not destroy significant historical, architectural or cultural
material and complies with the guidelines for massing, scale, height and
character of the property, neighborhood and environment.
3. The detailing complies with the guidelines with a variation in the siding
treatment. There is a proposed trim band between the first and second floors that
is not present on the main house. Mitered corners are proposed on the first level
and comer trim boards are proposed on the upper level. Staff does not believe this
change will have a negative impact on the remaining house, site and district.
4. Proposed materials are consistent with the existing materials on the house.
5. This proposal will not negatively impact the architectural integrity and
historical chazacter of the site and district.
Whereas, on or about July 1, 2005, Christine Anning and Timothy O'Brien, pursuant to
I.eg. Code 73.06(h), duly filed an appeal from the decision of the HPC and requested a public
hearing for the purpose of considering the action taken by ihe HPC; and
Whereas, a public hearing was duly noticed and scheduled for August 3, 2005. However,
at the request of the appellanYs, the public hearing was further continued to August 17, 2005; and
Whereas, on August 17, 2005, a public hearing was duly conducted before the City
Council where all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard and, at the close of the
�" �
OS- �9$
said public hearing, the City Council, having heazd the statements made and having considered
the application, the testimony, the report of the staff and the record, minutes and resolution of
the HPC; does hereby
6 Resolve, that the decision of the HPC to approve the permit in this matter is upheld. The
7 Council finds that the appellants have not demonstrated errors in the facts, findings or procedures
8 of the HPC sufficient to overturn the decision of the HPC is this matter. Accordingly, the
9 Council adopts as its own the findings of the HPC in this matter as set forth in the staff report
10 and findings in HPC file No. OS-205. And, be it
11
12 Further Resolved, that the appeal of Christine Anning and Timothy O'Brien is hereby
13 denied; and, be it
14
15 Finally Resolved, That the City Clerk shall mail a copy of this resolution to the pernut
16 applicant Tom Karlan, the appellants' Christine Anning and Timothy OBrien, the Heritage
17 Preservation Commission, the department of licenses, inspections, and environmental protection
18 and the zoning administrator.
19
oS
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet
� DepartmenUoffice/council: Date initiated:
CA �itS Avamey
ConWct Person 8 Phone:
Peter Wamer/Amy Spong
266-8710
Must Be on
Z�A��-05 Green Sheet NO: 3027817
� Deoartrnent SentTo Person
0 A mev
Assign i " Attorne De artment Direc[o
Number 2 � A m
For
Routing 3 or's Office oN istant
OrdN 4 ounci
5 ' Cluk CS Cierk
Total # of Signature Pages _(Clip All Locations for Signature)
,
`•
Memorialize Ciry Council's August 17, 2005 Motion of Intent to deny the appeal of C7uistine Anning and Timothy OBrien from a
decision of the Heritage Preservation Commission granting a building pennit for property located at 1009 Portland Avenue in the HiR
Historic District.
idations: Approve (A) or R
Planning Commission
CIB Committee
Civil Service Commission
Personai Service
the
1. Has this personffirm ever worked under a contract for this department?
Yes No
2. Has this person/firtn ever been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this persoNFlrm possess a skili not normally passessed by any
current city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet
Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
AdvanWAes IfApproved:
The Council is requued pursuant to the City Chazter to have its actions reduced to a writing either in the form of a resolufion oi
ordinance depending upon the nature of the matter before. The decision of the Council in this matter requires a written resolution in
order to comply with the Charter. Approving the attached resolufion fulfills the Council's duty under the Charter.
Disadvantages If Approved:
None.
Disadvantages If Not Approved:
Failure to appzove the resolution violates the City's Charter requuements.
Total Amount of
Trensaction:
Funding Source:
FinanCial Information:
(Explain)
CosURevenue Budgeted:
Activity Number:
. � RPca�rn�g C
AUG 2 6 2pp5
OFFICEOFLICENSE, INSP6C770NSAND
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECZION
,7aneen E. Rosas, Director
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
Randy C. Kel1y, Mayor
JUIy 12, 2��5
Ms. Mary Erickson
City Council Research Office
Room 310 City Hall
Saint Paul, MN 55102
Deaz Ms. Erickson:
COdG1gRCEBUILDING
8 Fousth Street Easf
Suite 200
Sair+tPQUI, Minnesota SSI01-1024
as - �9$
Telephone: 651-266-900I
Facsimile: 651-266-9124
I would like to confirm that a public hearing before the City Council is scheduled for Wednesday,
August 3, 2005 for the following heritage preservation case:
Appellant(s):
File Number:
Purpose:
Location:
Staff
Recommendation:
Commissian
Christine Anning & Timothy O'Brien, 1005 Portland Avenue
I�PC# OS-205
Appeal of a Heritage Preservation Commission decision conditionally
approving a permit application to construct a rivo and one half story reaz
addition.
1009 Portland Avenue (Hill Historic District)
Conditional approval of the permit application.
Unanimous vote to conditionally approve the permit application.
I have confirmed this date with the office of Council Member Debbie Montgomery. My understanding is that
this public hearing request will appear on the agenda of the City Council at your earliest convenience and
that you will pubiish notice of fne heazing in the Saint Paul L,egal Ledger. Thanks!
Please call me at 266-9079 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
ATIl S Er^ri �
Y P� S
Historic Preservation Specialist
CC: Council Member Debbie Montgomery
Appellants, Christine Anning and Timothy O'Brien
Owner, Myra Karlen
Applicant, Thomas Karlen
Peter Warner, CAO
File
�''� NOTICE OF PDBLIC HEARINCr
'fl�e Saint Paul CSty Counal will conduct a
public hearutg on Wednesday, August 3,
20p5 at 5:30 p.m. in the City Councll
Chambecs, Third Floor City Hall, 15 West
Keltogg Houlevard, St. Paul to consider the
appeal of Ckuistine Anning and 17mothy
OBrien, 3005 Porfland Avenue, to a deci-
sion of the Heritage Pmservation Commis-
sion conditionally approving a permit ap-
plication to rnnstruct a Lwo and one-haif
story rear addition at 1009 Portland Ave-
nue (Hill Historic Disffict). (File No. � HPC
05-205).
Dated: Juty 13, 2005
MAR,Y �ERiCKSON
Assistant city council Secretary
(JUIy 1S)
=m= 51:� PAUL IL+GAL IB•DGSR'_�=� c
22100171
. o�-���
Christine Anning ����� � ���
Timothy O'Brien
1005 Portland Ave .�(J� 9� � 2005
St. Paul, MN 55104
July 1, 2005
Office of LIEP
8 Fourth St. E, Ste 200
St. Paul, NIN 55101-1024
RE: APPEAL TO ST. PAUL CITY COUNCIL REGARDING PERMIT APPLICATION
FOR ADDITION - 1009 Portland Ave, Hill Historic District
We wish to appeal the recommendation of approval made by the Historic Preservation
Commission (F3PC) endorsing the construction of a two and one half story reaz addition at
Portland Ave. Our contention is that the scale and mass of the project violate the first two
standards of the Federal Standards for Preservation (see below) with regard to spaces and
spatial relationships specific to lot size, placement of buildings on lots, and their relation to each
other within the context of this historic block Despite the fact that several residents from the
effected and surrounding blocks attended the hearing and presented this argument to the
commissioners (see statement in Appendix A), a couple of commissioners stopped discussion
and refused to deal with this issue on two grounds: 1. They £elt this I�nd of development is
inevitable, and 2. They felt the city council would simply overturn any finding that was in
conflict with existing building codes regarding mass and scale of additions. In short, the
commissioners did not feei they could comment on this issue.
We respectfixily disagree with this interpretation and feei that recommendations on the massing
and scale of projects of historical impact are within the purview of the HPC as embedded in the
first two guiding standazds from the department of the interior.
As stated in the Federal Stca�cicrr•ds for Freservation:
(1) A property will be used as it was historically, or be given a new use
that maximizes the retention of distinctive materials, features, spaces
and spatial relationships.
(2) ...the replacement of intact or repairable historic materials or
alteration of features, spaces and special relationships that
characterize a property will be avoided. [The Secretary of the
Interior's Standards for the Treatment of ITistoric Properties, 1945}
If the HPC believes that it can only deal cvith appropriate detailing of structures and not with
potentially inappropriate alterations of mass and scale, we feel they are significantly hampered in
their task of protecting historical cultural resources for the City of Saint Paul.
0�°��'�
It is our hope that the City Council will:
1. Suspend decision on this application until the HPC ean meet to reconsider this issue
and make recommendations.
2. Send this application back to the HI'C specifically encouraging the commission to
review and make recommendations based on scale and massing of additions and new
construction within this and other historically significant azeas in Saint Paul.
Ifyou have any questions, please do not hesitate to call us at 651-293-1168
Sincer ly,
C
� `
� �
Christine Anning
Timothy O'Brien
c: Myra Karlen, 630 Deborah Dr. Maple Plain MN (Owner}
Tomas Karlen, 885 Linwood Ave, St. Paul MN (Applicant)
Deborah Montgomezy, Ward 1 Council, Room 310-A City Hall, Saint Paul, MN
Jay Benanau, Ward 4 Council, Room 310-D City Hall, Saint Paul, MN
APPENDIX A
Neighbor Statement June 23 hearing before the HPC
RE: 1009 Portland Ave Building Pernut
The single family houses on this block were all built for the lot size they fill and aze
positioned within a close zone of each other creating tight but harmonious yard and views
lending to a sense of shared community spaces (see photo 1). Kids play in each other's
yards, front and back Many of the low fences between yazds aze constructed with built in
access gates promoting movement across yards.
The exception on our block is the duplex, built as multifamily housing much later. It is
the only structure that pro}ects beyond the others.
The drawback to these older homes is the sma11 kitchens and lack of l floor bathrooms.
Many of the homes on both the north and south side of the block have built first floor
additions to allow for modern, expanded kitchens and a docvnstairs bathroom. The one
story additions built on the block have been in harmony with the existing structure and
exist within the panoramic landscape of the block.
The proposed 2'/z story addition increases the footprint ofthe house by more than 1/3
and carries that footprint a full three stories. This house, after the addition, will be closer
to the scale of the duplex, (see photo 2)
We recommend the Committee not apprave a 2'/2 story addition and ask the owners to
reconsider a one story design that compliments the existing spauaJ relationships between
homes and lots.
� � ;
� � � ��e�U3;�
1. \3�!
: � � -�`, ��� .,� �
.��
z �. �,� , �
�
'. ,4 .`� v � -;
� ;� � `�
�£: �'�1 7��
: ii.�'�`�:f.sfi-�'��,
� �W .�=�+...�+y
� L �iA :
. . . * > .,.. �.me
t -
���
- . Y �� ...
. . .. L t L '+A "�
� � .�
(� v�
,� *�
� �
' y � ���. z� ^�'
'".,� � � , . . •. ..
l ' � c �f t
i'
c
' : 4 �` , ' � �
, �,
i�, _ ?
�
`' ,i � : ` ' � e
�}
, �.:
�
� �
�� :
� ,
i �, ( ,�
r
R'
� \i.J� \' t.' . Z��+1+ � .-Z!
y�� 1 � -., i�`
^".� � ; k'Y,<� D ��f'9�. �� f ._
� � '`�'." d. ��! � ]y � , � J�.
+f °
�? t '� • 4 (' tS '4 � j`P�
h� r� � ,� y � , � �,� �'.� � � i 3 ;
s� � s V �}'Y�.�.; ^`�� ��J![<r• '�'.:.��
' �� �.�+� �' � ,s'z''� :. ,
$F '� Tw �` }# �' G� v.
�. . n
� � . ..al C't 't� ; �"aY � th'
r
� ��� �, < �"t-'`��'��A
.����Sr� �`.���`'�1 �'.. *'�.
, �.�r s, �
. ... . . _ � 9,.q :
Z� s, '� r � _;.
,3� ; t :
� k _ �.�.
� 2
ti � � '
F ��
+�. _
���� �_ ` �
� �„ , �
� Y � � Y
bY'��� ��T .. , . , ��.
1rt � _ �{-' ��., �
rE �
� `ep.��
(�3F " C
:. � Y» �,=��"�������J � �.�.�.
. �i` , s+�rva.uMCrmaY ��_'
- � C..r A '. .;;E
� ?-' � _
'�_ �t7=
�
OFFICE OF LICENSE, INSPECTiONS AND =-, r-
ENVIILONMENTALPROTECITON � � ` p �-' �
Janeen E. Rosas, Director
SA[NT
PAUL
�
AAAA
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
Rmrdy C. Kelly, Mayor
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Councilmembers
CC: Peter Warner, CAO
Janeen Rosas, LIEP
FROM: Amy Spong, HPC sta�j.
RE: HPC appeal for 1009 Portland Avenue, Hill Historic District
DATE: August 10, 2005
The following attachments highlight the events that have taken place and relate to the HPC review
of the permit application to construct a two- and one-half story addition to 1009 Portland in the
Hill Historic District:
ATTACFIlVI�NT 1(pages 1 to 14)
The applicant submitted a complete HPC design review application form with drawings.
ATTACHMENT 2(pages IS to 27)
The HPC voted unanimousdy to conditionally approve the application with the stafffindings. The
HPC also added one condition to change the location of the belt course. The HPC written order
to the applicant is.attached. The staff report highlighted the main findings and recommended
conditional approvaZ of the application.
ATTACHMENT 3(pages 28 to 29)
The minutes of the June 23, 2005 public hearing meeting that addresses the hearing for 1009
PortZand Avenue.
ATTACHMENT 4(p¢ges 30 to 34)
The request for an appeal by Christine Anning and Timothy O Brien is attachecZ
COMA�RCEBUILDING
8 E. Fourth Sbeet
Suite 200
Sa"vmt Paul, Minnesota SSIOI
Zelephoxe: 651-266-9090
Faa�imile:657-266-9124
ATTACHMENT S(pages 35 to 38)
Aerial views of the site and surrounding properties are attached.
Saint Pau1 Heritage Preservation Commission
C/o Office ofLicense, Inspections andErrvironmental Protection
8 Fourth Street E., Sulle 2DD
SairzT Paul, MN 55IO2
Phone: (651) 266-9078
� ~a m _ ., ..;
�
I�EERITAGE PRESERVATION COMIVIISSION
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Tius application must be completed in addirion to the appropriate city permit application if the aff'ected
property is an individually designated landmark or located within an historic dishict. For applications that
must be reviewed by the Heritage Preservation Commission refer to the HPC Meeting schedule for meeting
dates and deadlines.
Please check the category that best describes the proposed work
❑ Repair/Rehabilita6on ❑ Sign/Awning ❑ New Conshuction/Addition
❑ Moving ❑ FencelReYaining Wall ❑ Concept Review Only
❑Demolirion ❑Other
Street and number: j�D ` '7pE�,Lgjc�i �,� Zip Code: `�
Name of contact person:
Company:
Street and number, 4 U S �h �-'z—
City: � ��Uy State: /-�"
Phone nuxnber: ( �S/ ) 01�18- �1� e-mail: _
Name:
Street and nuxnber: (�� <Aeb�� ,(/rt�r�
City: � �"/� State: �
Phone number: (��) �3~aG �� e-mail: _
Zip Code: �J��S
Zip Code: s�s�l°�
\
Contact person: _
Company:
Street and number:
City:
Phone number: (
State:
e-mail:
Zip Code:
�;_ -_:
Completely describe ALL exterior changes being proposed for the property. Include
changes to architectural details such as windows, doors, siding, railings, steps, trim, roof,
foundafion or porches. Attach specifications for doors, windows, lighting and other
features, if applicable, including color and material samples.
�' \ D1J Gj�� �� � � r5'i
r l't_� �_
Attachaddatiottabsheetsifnecessary '
Refer to the Design Review Process & Checklisr for required information or attaclunents.
**INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WII.L BE RETURNEDx*
ARE THE NECESSARY ATTACIIMENTS AND INFORMATION INCLUDED?
❑ YES
Will any federal money be used in this project?
Are you applying for the Investment Tax Credits?
YES _ NO _
YES _ NO _
2 �
i.
� •
•
I, the undersigned, understand that the Design Review Application is limited to the aforemenrioned work to
the affected properry. I further understand that any additional exterior work to be done under my
ownership must be submitted by application to the St. Paul Heritage Preservation Commissioa Any
unauthorized work will���`- '� - --- -- � - a
Signature of applicant:
Signature of owner:
Dafe:
Date:
Da�e xeceived: (�7' �o `� kTI�E N0, V� "�
�e ; rr y
o€woxk;
Requires staff review
h Requires Commission review
�PFlieatio�. ['�S 1<IO
�e falla�ving condiflbn(a) m�st tze
�t iv rn�der �ar application to conforn�
preserva4icm program:
e
has heeu deYermin�d that fh�
ark ta �e performed pursua�t ta
e applicafion daes aoY adversely
ter:� the program far preservation
t�l arehitectural control pf the
:� preseruatiau dis#ric� nr �ita
EiPG staff approvaI
' �`��, � �is ofPlans
"���d SSeta£�'Iansreducedto8.'fz"
��:� by 11'r
,,
,��;�b P�atagrap�ts
� � �ity Permit t�pplicatitrn
��v Ccst�t�tlete HPC Dasign Revigu
�.�� apPlication
Seariug Aate s�t €ar: � `�`�-�"
�
3
OFFICE OF LICE� ISE, NSPECTIOAS AND ��� ����
ENVIRONVIENTqL pROTECTION
Jarteert E. Rosas, Director
CITY OF SANT PAUL
RaxdyC. Ke11y, iLfayor
CO�LLbtERCE BUILDGVG
Suite 200
8 Fourth Street E.
SaintP¢ul, Minnesola 55102
7elephone: 65l-266-9090
Facsimile: 651-266-912�1
June 29, 2005
Tom Karlan
885 Linwood Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55105
Re: 1009 Portland Avenue, Hill Historic District
File #HPCOS-205, building permit
Dear Mr. Karlan:
As you knoGV, the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) considered at its June 23, 2005 meeting
your application to construct a rivo-and one-half story addition at the property listed above. The
HPC voted unanimous[y to conditionally approve your application. This decision was based on
the discussion at the public hearing, public testimony and findings adopted by the HPC. •
The permit will be approved providzd the following condition(s) be met:
1. The belt course be raised to be flush with the fascia of the porch canopy.
2. An HPC stamped approved set of plans must be on site during the construction.
3. Any alterations or revisions to the approved plans must be submitted to staff or
HPC for review.
You or any aggrieved party has the right tb appeal the Commissioii s decision to the Saint Paui City
Council under Chapter 73 of the Saint Paul Legis(ative Code. Such an appeai must be filed within
14 days of the date of the HPC's order and decision. Chapter 73 states:
(h) Appeal to city council. The pennit applicarit or arry pnrty crggrieved by tlre decision of the
heritage preserti•atiort cwrmiissio77 shatl, ivityain fotrrteerr (1-!) days of the ctate of tlze heritage
preservntion conmzissio�t's order af�d decision, have a right to appeal szrch order nnd
decisio�r to the city cotrtrcil. The nppeal shall be deemed perfected zrpat receipt by the
division of planning [LIEP] of hro (Z) copies of a r:otice of appeal ancl staterraefit setting forth
the grouf7ds for the appenl. The dirision of planning [LIEP] shall trctnsrr:it orte copy of the
riotice ojappeal and statenient to the city coa�ncil and one copy to the heritnge preservation
contmissio�a. The cornmissior:, in crrry ivritten order de7ryirag n permit app[icatiorr, shnll advise
the applicant of tlre right to appen! to the city eoartiei7 arzd incle�de this perrngraplr ita all strch
orders.
AA-ADA-EEO Employer
(J
Pa�e 2
File #HPCOS-205
June 23,2005
;, d _� -� , 7 ' .
J .% .. .
Please note, an HPC approval or conditional approval does not obviate the need for meeting
app(icable building and zoning code requirements, nor is it a permit to allo�c for work to
commence. If revisions to the approved plans are made, be a�aare that additional HPC and/or staff
review will be required.
Please feel free to call me at 65 L266.9079 if you have any questions. An HPC decision wilt expire
after one year if no permit is issued. Please submit three fiill sets of drawings indicating the
changes noted above under the conditions for further processing.
Sincere[y,
����
Amy Spong
Historic Preservation Spzcialist
cc: Jon Heaner, Buifdin� Inspeetor
Myra Karlan, owner
File
A.4-:\D.a-EEO Emplo}er �
��
File #OS-205
� �� ��� ��
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COIVINIISSION STAFF REPORT
FII,E NAME: 1009 Portland Avenue
DATE OF APPLICATTON: June 6, 2005
APPLICANT: Thomas Kazian, Qwner
DATE OF HEARING: June 23, 2005
HPC SITE/DISTRICT: Hill Historic Dislrict
CATEGORY: contributing
CLASSIFICATION: building pemut
STAFF INVESTIGATION AND REPORT: Amy Spong
DATE: June 13, 2005
A. SITE DESCRTPTION:
The property at 1009 Portland Avenue was constructed in the Colonial Revival style in 1900.
The two-and one-half story house has a one story porch that extends the full width of the house.
The porch is supported by fluted wood colwnns and the detailing and railing is believed to be
original or an eazly addition to the house. The wood frame wails have narrow clapboard siding
and the lupped roof with dormers has asphalt shingles. The property is considered contriburing
to the historic district and is located on a block of Portland with strong integrity and rythym.
B. PROPOSED CHANGES:
The applicant is seeking approval for a building permit to construct a two- and one-half story
addition to the rear of the house. A small entry porch and basement access wiil be removed as
well as portions of the rear wa11 and roof. The new addition will be recessed from the walls of
the main house on both sides to preserve the corner trim boazds. The new hipped roof extension
witk� a small dormer will step down from the main roof ridgeline. Proposed materials are an
asphalt shingle roof, concrete foundation, wood siding to match, wood trim and Marvin wood
double-hung windows.
C. Gi7TDELINE CITATIONS:
Historic Hill District Guidelines /I990)
1. Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a property which requires
minimal alteration of the building, structure, or site and its environment, or to use a property for its
originally intended purpose.
2. The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure, or site and its
environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of arzy historic material or
distinctive architectural features should be avoidecC when possible.
3. All buildings, structca^es, and sites shall be recognized tts products of their own time. Alterations
that have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shatl be discouraged.
4. Changes which may have taken ptace in the course of time are evidence of the hastory and
development of a building, structz�e, or site and its environment. Theses changes may have
acquired sign�cunce in thezr own right, and this sign fcance shall be recogniaed and respected.
S. Distinctive srylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize a building,
`�'
O � — � (� p File #OS-205
ra
siruuctza-e, or site shall be n-eated wzth sensitivity.
6. Deteriorated architectut features shall be repair^ed rather than replaced, whenever possible. In
the event repZacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in
composition, desigrt, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repair or repZacement of missing
cz�-chitectural features should be based on acczmate duplications of featur-es, substantiated by
histaric, physical, or pictarial evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of
different architectu�-al elements from other buildings or structures.
9. Contemporary design for aZterations and additions to existing properties sha11 not be discouraged
when such alterations and additions do not destroy signifzcant historicat, m or cutturat
material, and such design is compatible with the size, scale, color, material, and character of the
property, neighborhood, or errvironment.
10. Wherever possible, new addztions or alterations to structures shall be done in such a manner that if
such alterations were to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure
would be unimpaired,
New Construction
General Principles: The basic principle for new construction in the Historic Hill District is to maintain the
districYs scale and qualiry of design. The Historic Hill District is architecturally diverse within an overaZl
pattern of harmony and continuity. These guidelines for new construction focus on general rather than
specifzc design edements in order to encourage architectural innovation and quality design while
maintaining the harmony and continuity of the district. New construction should be compatible with the
size, scale, massing, height, rhythm, setback, color, material, building elements, site design, and character
of surrounding structures and the area.
Massing and Height: New consiruction should conform to the massing, volume, height and scale of
existing adjacent structzmes. Typicad residential struchmes in the Historic Hill Disirict are 25 to AO feet
high. The height of new construction should be no lower thcm the average height of all buildings on both
block faces, measurements should be made from street level to the highest podnt of the roofs. (This
guideline does not supersede the City's Zoning Code height Zimitations.)
Materials and Details: Yariety in the use of architectural materials and details adds to the intimacy and
visual delight of the district. But there is also ari overall thread of continuity provided by the range of
materials commonly used by turn-of-the-century builders and by the way these materials were used. This
thread of continuity is threatened by the introduction of new industrial materials and the aggressive
exposure of earlier materials such as concrete blocl� metal framing, and glass. The purpose of this section
is to encourage the proper use of appropriate materials and detaiZs.
The materials and detaiZs of new construction should reZate to the materials cmd details of existing nearby
buildings.
Preferred roof materials me cedar shingles, slate and tile, asphalt shingles which match the approximate
color and texture of the preferred materials are acceptable substitutes. Imitative materials such as asphaZt
siding, wood-textured metat or virryl siding, art�cial stone, and artificiat brick veneer should not be usecl.
Smooth four-inch Zap vinyl, metal, or hardboard siding, when welt instalZed and carefully detailed, may be
acceptable in some cases. Materials, including their coZors, will be reviewed to determine their appropriate
use in reZation to the overall design of the structure as well as to sur-r-ounding structures.
Color is a sigrtifacant design element, and paint colors should relate to surrounding strucnrres and the area
as well as to the style of the new structure. Buildingpermits are not requiredforpainting and, although the
2 �V
o L � � tS � File #OS-205
7
Heritage Preservation Commzssion may review and comment on paint color, paint color is not subject to
Heritage Preservation Commission approval.
Building Elements: Individual eZements of a building should be integrated into its composition for a
balanced and complete design. These elements for new construcrion should compZiment existing adjacent
structures as well.
1. Roofs. There is a great variety of roof treatment in the Historic Hill Dzstrict, but gable and hip roofs are
most common. The skyline or profzle of new construction should relate to the predorninant roof shape of
existing adjacenf buildings.
Most houses in the Historic Hill District have a roof pitch of between 9:12 and 12:12 (rise-to-run ratio).
HighZy visible secondary structure roofs should match the roofpitch of the main structure, andgenerally
should have a rise-to-run ratio of at least 9.'12. A roof pitch of at Zeast 8: I2 shouZd be used if it is somewhat
visible from the street, and a 6:12 patch may be acceptabte in some cases for structures which are not
visible,from the street.
Roof hardivare such as skylights, vents, and metal pipe chimneys should not be placed on the front roof
plane.
2. Windows and Doors. The proportion, size, rhythm and detailing of windows and doors in new
construction should be compatible with that of existing adjacent buildings. Most windows on the Hill have
a vertical orientation, with a proportion of between 2:1 and 3:1 (height to width) co»tmon. Individual
windows can sometimes be square or horizontal if the rest of the building conveys the appropriate
directional emphasis. Facade openings of the same general siae as those in adjacent buildings are
encouraged.
Wooden double-hzmg windows are traditional in the Historic Hill District and should be the fzrst choice
when selecting new windows. Paired casement windows, although not historically common, will often
prove acceptable because of their vertacal orientation. Sliding windows, awning windows, and horizontally
oriented muntins are not common in the district and are generally unacceptable. Vertical muntins and
muntin grids may be'acceptable when compatible with the period and style of the building. Sliding glass
doors should not be used where they would be visible from the street.
Although not usuadly improving the appearance of a building, the use of inetal windows or doors need not
necessarily ruin it. The important thing is thaf they should look dike parr of the building ttnd not like raw
metal appliances. Appropriately colored or bronze-toned aluminum is acceptable. Mi11 finish (sliver)
aluminum should be avoided.
3. Porches antl Decks: In general, houses in the Historzc Hill District have roofed fi�ont parches, whiZe in
mosf modern construction fhe front porch has disappeared. Front porches provide a transitional zone
between open and closed space which unites a building and its site, sen:iprivate spaces which heZp to defzne
the spatial hierarchy of the district. They are a consistent visual element in the district and often introduce
rhythmic variation, c1ar� scale or provide vertical facade elements. The porch treatment of new stJ-uctza�es
shoutd relate to the porch ireatment of existing adjacent structures. If a porch is not buiZt, the transition
from private to public space should be articulated wdth some other suitable design element.
Open porches are preferable, but screened or glassed-in porches may be acceptable if well detailed. Most,
but not all, porches on the HiZI are one story high. Along some streets where a strong continuity of porch
size or porch raof tine exists, it may be preferable to duplicate these formal elements in new construction.
I�
- — - - - — — - ---- � - Q � _ 7 �� - — — File #OS-205
f 7
The vertical elements supporting the porch roof are importcmt. They should carry the visual as, we11 as the
actual weight of the porch roof. The spacing of new balustrades shouZd refZect the soZid-to-void
relationships ofadjacent railings and porches. Generally, a solid-to-voidproportion between 1:2 and 1:3
is coinmon in the Historic Hil7.
Decks should be kept to the rear of buildings, should be visuaZZy refzned, and shouZd be integrated into �
overall buildzng deszgn. A raised deck protrz�ding from a single wall usually appecu�s disjointed from the
total design and is generally unacceptable.
D. FINDINGS:
1. The property is classified as conlributing to character of the Hill Historic District.
2. The additio.n will not destroy significant histor-ical, urchitectural or cultural material and
complies with the guidelines for massing, scale, height, and character of the properiy, neighborhood,
and environment.
3. The detailing complies with the guidelines with a variation in the siding treatment. There is a
proposed trim band between the first and second floars that is not present on the main house.
Mitered corners are proposed on the first level and corner trim boards are proposed on the upper
level. Staff does not believe this change will have a negative impact on the remaining house, site
and district.
4. Proposed materials are consistent with Uie existing materials on the house.
5. This proposal will not negatively impact the architectural_ integrity and historical character of the
site and district.
E. STAFF RECONIlVIENAATION:
Based on the fmdings above, staff recommends approval of the building pernut provided the
following conditions be met:
l. The stamped approved plans must be onsite during the construction.
2. Any changes or revisions to the approved plans must be reviewed and appxoved by tha
HPC or HPC staff.
4
�
�
� �
.�
� �
•� Q�
� .�
�
^♦ � �
� O �
c� U �
� �,
's� � �
4) , O � �
_ -� o
� N L
� � � �
(� � C� _
� tl� N V
� --
-
-{- j � � �
C� � � o-
�
1 � �
•
�
�
3
�
�
� ��
��
�
�
�
!
Z�
05-798
;
� �
� � �
O - �
O � �
O Q
LL
k
�
�
�-
05-798
�
v
�
� �
� � �
o_ �
o � >
�
� �C
z3
05 �
� �
� � �
0 � �
O � >
�
� �
Z� f
W
�
�
W
/
�
�
�
�
��
-�1�
L
�
�
•
�
�
�
1 ••
.
�
�
,�
.a
0
�
ZS
05-798
�
s
�
c
� �
� � �
Q _. �
O i �
0
L .i... �
Z.�o
�
�
�
�
�
Q
�
�
�
�
�
O
1..�
�
O
O
r �
0 5- 79 8
�
�
�
G
2�-
o�-��s
(PARTIAL and NOT APPROVED BY THE HPC)
1�'IINi7TES OF T`HE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
CI"I'Y OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
4�' Floor, Central Library, 90 West 4�` Street
June 23, 2005
Present: Susan Bartlett Foote, RD Brown, Carol Carey, Gar Hargens (Chair), Pat Igo, April
Janita, Paul Larson, 7ohn Manning, I,ee Meyer, Shari Taylor Wilsey
Absent: Richazd Faricy (excused), Dick Nicholson(unexcused), Daniel Scott(excused)
Staff Present: Amy Spong
CALL TO ORDER: 5:05 PM by Gar Hazgens (Chair).
1. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was approved.
Chair Hargens started by the meeting by introducing new HPC member RD Brown, April danita
and John Manning. Existing HPC members then introduced themseives.
2. CONFLTCTS OF INTEREST: There were no conflicts of interest.
3. PERNIIT REVIEW/PUBLTC FIEARING:
E.1009 Portland Avenue, Hill Historic District, by owner Thomas I�arlen, for a
building permit to construct a two- and one-half-story rear addition.
File #OS-295.
Spong presented the staff report recotnmending condirional approval of the permit application.
Larson questioned the location of the belt course and staff refened to the drawings. Emily and
Tom Karlan, owners and applicant, were present to answer questions and stated that the
foundation will be block concrete with a rock face. The public hearing was opened. Chris
Anuii�g, owner of 1005 Portland, spoke against tlie proposal stating houses here aze close
together. Aurting stated that with the exception of the duplex on the bIock, this addidon's
massing is too big and the house currently extends beyond their house at the rear. Aiuiing asked
the applicants to consider a one story addition instead. Tim O'Brien, owner of 1005 Portland,
spoke against the proposal stating that the footprint will be 1/3 larger. Kevin Ryan, 1�08
Ashland, was not in favor of the addition stating the same thing was aliowed two houses down
across the alley (editor's note: not in the historic district). Jan Carr, owner of 1000 Portland,
stated that she has lived there for 20 years and that she has met Tom Karlan and feeis that he is
doing a sensitive renovation, however, the problem is the scale. Carr stated this will impact the
neighbors on both sides. Joan Eggenberger, owner of 1008 Portland, stated that she has lived
across the street for 52 years and five years ago her neighbars got an addition approved which
was not a good idea. The public heazing was closed as no one else was present to speak. Igo
Page 1 of 2
� �
o�-<��
motioned to approve the staff recommendation and findings and WiLsey seconded the
motion. Larson stated that he is usually the only FIPC member who that speaks against
larger additions and new garages, however, in this case the floor plates of the original °
houses are small, Larson also stated that this process will happen in the districts and that
he would like to make a friendly amendment that the belt course be raised to be flush with ' -
the fascia of the porch canopy. The amendment was accepted. Hargens concurred with
Larson. The morion passed 10-0. Larson made au additional comment that he appreciates the
concems stated, but that the Commissions job is to use the Secretary of the Interior's Standards
for Rehabilitaflon and if this decision was appealed to City Council he feels the Council would
find the HPC did not error in its decision.
4. NEW BiJSINESS
A. Approve proposed preface for the architectural book of St. Paul (I,arson).
Lazson commented that the preface does not yet e�st and the co-author, Jeff Hess, is getting
involved. The time line is still okay and he should haue a pxeface by the next meeting for the
HPC to review.
5. ANNOiJNCEMENTS:
There were no further announcements.
6. ADJOURNIVIENT: 735 P.M.
Submitted by: Amy Spong
Page 2 of 2
Z�
0�5= 79 �
Christine Anning
Timothy O'Brien
1005 Portland Ave
St. Paul, MI�3 55104
July 1, Z005
Office of LIEP
8 Fourth St. E, Ste 200
St. Paul, NIN 55101-1024
RLC:�I`V�� �1 t Ll�l-�
JUL 4 G 2405
RE: APPEAL TO ST. PAUL CITY COUNCII. REGARDING PERI4IIT APPLICATION
FOB ADAITTON - 1009 Portland Ave, Hill Historic District
We wish to appeai the recommendation of approval made by the Historic Preservation
Comsnission (HPC) endorsing the construction of a two and one half story rear addition at
Portland Ave. Our contention is that the scale and mass of the pro}ect violate the first two
standards of the Federal Standards for Preservcrtion (see below) with regazd to spaces and
spatial relationships specific to lot size, placement of buildings on lots, and their relation to each
other within the contea�t of this kustoric block. Despite ihe fact that several residents from the
effected and sunounding blocks attended the hearing and presented this argument to the
comxnissioners (see statement in AppendiY A), a couple of commissioners stopped discussion
and refused to deal with this issue on two grounds: l. They felt this kind of development is
inevitable, and 2. They felt the city council would simply overtum any finding that was in
conflict with existin; buildin� codes regarding mass and scale of additions. In short, the
comxnissioners did not feel they cauld camment on this issue.
We respectfully disagree with this interpretation and feei that recommendations on the massin�
and scale of projects of historical impact are within the purview of the HPC as embedded in the
first two guidin� standards from the department of the interior.
As stated in the Federal Standards for Preservation:
(1) A property will be used as it was historically, or be given a new use
that maximizes the retention of distinctive materials, features, spaces
and spatial relationships.
(2) ... the replacement of intact or repairable historic materials or
alteration of features, spaces and special relationships that
characterize a property will be avoided. [The Secretary of the
Interior's Standazds for the Treatment of Historic Properties, 1995]
If the HPC believes that it can only deal with apgropriate detailing of structures and not with
potentialiy inappropriate alterations of mass and scale, we feel they are sigtuficantly hampered in
their task of protecting historical cultural resources for the City af Saint Paul.
30
,
o � ^ ��v z
It is our hope that the Ciry Council will:
l. Suspend decision on this application until the HPC can meet to reconsider tlus issue
and make recommendations.
2. Send this application back to the HPC specifically encouraging the commission to
review and make recommendations based on scale and massing of additions and new
construction within this and other historically significant azeas in Saint Paul.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call us at 651-293-1168.
Sincer�l� ,
E.i� � ��. >
Chri"§tine Anning
Timothy O'Brien
c Myra Karlen, 630 Deborah Dr. Maple Plain NiN (Owner)
Tomas Karlen, 885 Linwood Ave, St. Paul MN (Applicant)
Deborah Montgomery, Ward 1 Council, Room 310-A City Hall, Saint Paul, M1V
Jay Benanav, Wazd 4 Council, Room 310-D City Hall, Saint Paul, MN
3(
05-���
APPENDIX A
Neighbor Statement June 23 hearing before the HPC
RE: 1009 Portland Ave Building Pemut
The single family houses on this block were all built for the lot size they fill and are
positioned within a close zone of each other creating tight but harmonious yard and views
lending to a sense of sflared community spaces (see photo 1). Kids play in �ach other's
yards, front and back. Many of the low fences between yards aze constructed with built in
access gates promoting movement across yards.
The exception on our block is the duple� built as multifamily housing much later. It is
the only structure that projects beyond the others.
The drawback to these oider homes is the small kitchens and lack of 1�` floor hathrooms.
Many of the komes on both the north and south side of the block haue huilt first floor
additions to allow for modezn, expanded kitchens and a downstairs bathroom. The one
story additions built on the bloek have been in harmony with the existing structure and
er,ist within the panoramic landscape of the block.
The proposed 2'/2 story addition increases the footprint of the house by more than 1!3
and carries that footprint a full three stories. Tlus house, after the addition, will be closer
to the scale of the duplex, (see photo 2)
We recommend the Comrnittee not approve a 2'/2 story addition and ask the owners to
reconsider a one stosy desib that compinnents the e�sting spatial relationships between
homes and lots.
3Z.
�{ `~ � f ���4'P�t�Y"<�y`t R � � � ��S .�
� , ��a
; �.�` �� { � ��`�� , , >�
j K {�8
. C y � �' ' �� � t
�E�'� � .. � �'�4]jt �✓� • � . - 1
. . �♦ r=��• i +Y $ 7
x � �Pt> 4 �'xYf m � s�`
� i�'�`f.�, 't{ �
{ �.'
. � A -�' `�" -,'
h
�'.c` 2C 4 "' C 'Sa j �� t'$ '- L .� R�
" ;��i �a�' � . 1 f . .� ��
t � ;r3'! Y��� 3. Y� ��� J f �
. i ,� 4 . ��}���
- .� c,� f,-.�,'�,�:'t s._ �� i , ,•'��.c_ :.
-..r... > n i �3�II`. }
. _ '4..�`. � s` _-�..'. � �g �.� e��� ,;
� t �� � � � ��� � �_
�
. A2Y. v4_`� s•y .� f i. �
- � ;��`�- l� r irA y.t =Z
' � t �'-�K � `.
'�•11^'.��'� �.'�....y�r��`�� �'11"' �,i` �
�'e�.. � �� � Y-' '�,�-'
� �.. � ti ,�'�� ��`~� . a k� �� n �
r� :� � ; �' '�''�%'
! � 4.. . i " .:: g� � ��.y:
� , k'� ..aq ,�� � )��t `��'
�� � . .3w.�� l •
� � � � '. � $x. — �'� °<
<
� �-��' � S �
� r � _ �I . $ �f�'! �•---.-•. ��- 7 e
: � ; , S �: f � .. �
� �.�
� •. Y« �. y }. 3
. 1 . �� � ��Y''�rys.�C`
M1Y
5 y� �
� }� '
[ F � l E 11�9 yY:.
. X '� 3 ' � '±� i�. �
YI � �
1
: l � y' SS"�� C � ` 'Y �_r�.. y. `.:
h �
� X<
4 .' � 9 � �- � �;��
�� �� �
� . �, � ���z �� : :
�� � �
_ j �, ��,= :�
.� ___ : t , y,�.��-.� , ;.:
�.��` > „,���
�� ,
�' f'' _ _._„_.� t.�
. a._ "� .�..5�'.�.a� . .. . .__ __ .
��
� :_
� �� i.
.�
��������
..�:��
�; -�
_ .:��
�: - -�
„�,
`�---;j, , :f :, � ,� " y _ ;;� ;���
� ! , ` x t ;� �. t �`'�,��`.�i
" 7 s 4 ~ y'_T �'' �� `. — � . ;-'°�'`+,.
,.� Y � Sf 5 . � .
F � � '{ � r :� 5 i�' . � . •� �d x.
..� ti � t t - � g . � �
ti ;
--.. z a,� � °•. � � � �t�r` � � �_
. ; � --�, t .,� ^ti ' � ' ` rr� �
r �\ �� � €.`- :e -G' v�
� `� rt
`�� �' . i, Ij .. .
. ' ��.. , . . '„
� '�'r' . . .. ._ m:, r:
1 ` s 'R �� ,
. � . . _ � . . ' :��1 .
�- _.
�.
. . . . ' '... . � .
.. . ..� . ._ a5 -' - _ � ., '
� � . . : � . . _ . " . .
. . . � S � � � - _ . . . ,
� a' :... V�.. ' i .. '
� � : � -. .. ..S �: �
�5�� ...h.i !#`� . . ... ...
l - . �; � . � � , z
•. +
4 � �.5 `` � � � _'- F ? .. .
. . / ` L w . ,-4 { ..
'� . � � �+ \ � - .
:'A y� � `se � '
.�.� T�i �? � 1�, f,�4 !� ! r.
. : � t� � 3'�fh 3� '
.. � ,; «s • ! � ,S.
� -� � �7� � ♦ . i
•.iRSa 'h .. ��;',ie
V�
http://pw8450.ci.stpaul.mn.us/servleUcom.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=StPaulxns&... 8/10/2005
Map Output t � Page 1 of 1
o�—Z7�
�
http://pw8450.ci.stpaul.xnn.as/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=StPaulms&... 8/10/2005
Map Output Page 1 of i
05-7�8
Map Output
05-798
Page,l of 1
3�
http://pw8450.ci.stpaul.mn.us/servleUcom.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=StPaulBase... 8/10/2005
Map Output Page 1 of 1
05-7��
� �
http://pw8450.ci stpaul.mn.us/servledcom.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=StPaulms&... 8/10/2005
�
m
�I
o
i
�
� O �
I- j G Z
Gi. o v .r
a
y m N
I � °
i
I
I
I
�
OPEN
AORCN
P ��
N�GHBOR-
StNGCE FAMLY HQUSE
0
0
PROPQ2TY LINE
IXISTING 5'
wnuswav
23'-0"
IXISTING STOOP
$ �_ 0 .
I50'-0'
I IXISi1NG STOOP
AND BASEA1ENi
CELIAR ACCESS
i0 BE REh10VED
HOUSE \
�. 1009 PORTIANb AYENUE
N
31'-2•
1 ''
IXISTING 6'
WOOU SGREENING
fENGE
0
�
(�
N
9� 80
PROPOSED
1 STORY
COVERED STQOP
I
i
3 U I
i
�
1 4
�`�`�' ' 2 SiORY i�':���f, IXISTING oa�uer,�av �
� �. ADDITION!'� { �
.`: �,� � , .r,,'",r . M � GARAGE
� .la�_u^ ` � " 31 �_6. 22 �- 0 . 6 �_ 6 . t �
� IXISTlNG &' WOOD
— — — — — — — � — — — — — — _ SCREINING FENCE _ — — — — — — — — _ �
���� `�./ � °
,�, � IXISIIM6 SHRU&S
�
OPEF1 NEIGHBOft -
PORCFi SlNGtf FkM!!Y NDl1SE
1009 PORTLAND SfTE PLAN
SCACE:1"=20'
,.
�/
�
�
MAIN FLOOR DEMO PLAN
SCALE:1/4"=1'-0"
R€MOVE IX'G MRIN kt00R
AND BASEAtENT S�k#R
camc sraie xwaixs)
REMOYE IX'G STOOP
THIS AREA
REMOUE CEIIAR ACCESS
FHfS ARFA
�/
IX'G STONE
FOUNDATION
WALL
T01/2°GYP.64AR� 51/2 S EP
SHO4YN �
I
t
EX'GfOUNDAl10N �
WALLTO BERFAdOVED
AND REPL/tCEO WITH\ '
STUDBERRINGWACL �.
t
OOWEI NEW WALL TO �
IX'GFOUN�ATION I
—��
M
N
s-7 va. a
�i�r �i�
-��
//�/ r'�.t�ff%r�/r/� i
I
r -'- - -------------� t
i E ,i
i ADDITION BASEMENT I i
� flEW 2X6 STUU BRG. NEW 4° COIdG. StA6 � I
1 WAIiONIX'GFtG. ONPOLYVAPORBARRIER I � (
� (OR NEW 16°X1Y CONC. AND SttND BFD� � �
FIG. !F REQ'D)
' / � t
�� NEW BpSEMEN( Fl.00R � I
IS 6' BFLOW IX'G BASEMEMt SIAB
I I �
� � NEW CENflG HEIGHi: � �
7'-912' T.O. CONC.
�• _. TO B.O. JOIST � I
I 1 �
I 117/8° -101SFS � I o
1/ � I6• O.C. I I �
� � � ,��
N Z
� � � �
I �
i � 1
NEW2-2X1U 12`CMUp2CQURSES) � d � �
1 ON ZO"X12' CONC. I I
' HEADER t7G. W( 2#S BARS CONT. � �
I I
� � ,' r �
ALlGN STUD
� WALLW/IX'G � ,�, �
� f0UN0AilON � .f� i
� (&fRAMINGABOYE) 1'-0'
L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J � �
' .f�.r 'r / ` .'�.f `, � �'' ,'`�.f / r �
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -�
ADDITION FQUNDAT{ON PLAN
SCAtE: l!4"=1'-0"
�/
�
m �
� a
N �J
12° CANCRETE
PQSi WOTINGS
��w
ia >
\�
�
�
�� ��
ta�-o•
,. � ��__ ___ _
���
�_; � 2 Il ll4' 4 U2' 3 ll4°
I ` � i
i � � � � �
� � � t �
I ? (" � " � �
THISWALI.Al1GN5 �# I� 1 I;
4NITH IX`G MAIN Fl.00R � �� �
WAU. I � � I '
I � I � ;
--- -- �
NEW 1X4 BFARfNG WALLS I�;�. I � r� UP 14R � 1 ;
ON16'X12•GONC.FOOTIN� � � '�----� F p21•FA
i y i------� � i
i ` i------r {. t
� s� ----- ''- I I :
� � �NEW2-2XI� _ � � ':
� HFA6ER
I ° I I �
`
� �
° y L_ J IX'G TIMBER BEAM ��
Cy � �
� � DIMENSIONS DOWN 1� -
NOTE
COORDINATE ANY EGRESS OR
6ENFRALBASEMENfW�NUOW
FOR ADDITION W(fN OWNER
IXIS7ING BASEMEN7
CEIEfNG NEIGHT:l'-6°
T.O. CONC. TO B.OJOISi
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOT€S:
- FOR ARCHITECNRAL QllESTtONS CALL BRYAN MEYER AT 612-599-8Q71.
- STRUCiUR4L EN6INEERING TO BE C006DtNATED BY OWNER AND fANiRACTOR.
- A!l DRRWlNGS AND NOTES PERTAIN'f0 THE H�USE ADD�110N AND RENOVATED SPACE SHOWN WlilitiN.
REFEft TO HOMEOWNER FOR REA�ODELLING AND MAINTENANCE 11EMS NOT iN DRAWINGS. —
- YERIFY ALL FlNISHES WITH OWNER.
- ALL NEVN IXTERIOR WALL fRRMING TO BE 2X6 SiUDS � I6" Q.C. A!L SiRtlGTURE TU BE ENGIN€EfiED AS PER Pl.APa NOTES.
- REW RADUWT HEAT MECHAN(CAL SYSiEM TO BE EVALUATED WITH HOME4WNER. ANY NEW RADIATORS TO BE BASERAY
BRAND RADIANT BASEBOARD OR EQUNALENT. MASTER BATHROOM TO NAVE ELEGTR{C MAT HEATEp fL00R.
NOTE: INTFRtOR �IMENSIONSARE
TO fACE OF GYPSUM BOARD, IXTERIOR
DIMENSIONS ARETO FACE OF ST@D
N
i =21
�
fLUSH HFADER TO
BE ENGINEERED
1a�-0•
BROQM �� R0°0
z'-111YG` " ---- -_--
_ CLOSET CCOSEi
4, J ' � r-4x �-y_;
� 5`-09(
w � 6'_g• 6 �_ 6 ,
a
� �
o, w 2'-87(
6 ��� PAUDROOM
�� � STONETILE
m� � UP36R�
� 7.75°FA. WBBfESTORAGE
3'-1 U2' I I
3'3 314° '
� 6 � $ . \ � � �
II �
3 �_ 0 . 2 ,_�. 3 �_ a . � � � 3,.Q.
--' I t
�
i y �I i
; KITCHEN � o w � � �
L__ CS° d' I
��� � HARDW000 Z.`°.r 1�— w �� � I
/i !il fL00R �� mza�� �
�oo m� � �
� �� �
t i� i�i �
r i
i o II i
2'-0' E4UAL M EQUAL � � �
i
� �
� _�
r"___� ..
� ' ' g
�_"""__� O O ��_ r. -�,..
� n � ��z
� o n i _
NEWWIN60W
MARVIN
WUGH2520
� ADDITION MAIN FLOOR PLAN
3 SCALE:ll4"=1'-0"
117t8' I-l61STS
� I6° O.C.
SIITING/6REA
Harsowoa
FLOOR
� SINGLE 2X6 SPACE A9ULL,
SEAT
1P2'
7'-0°
COATHOONS
MARVlN I 2'2X19 �
WUDH2832 , 5:
--�
� 8'-91Y1°
�/
MARYIN —
MNOH2O20 2-2)(10
�s io
�z•
�
m
4 ,�
`'v' � � '- i
3'-10'
�
' 11'
I
0
�
COYERED ENfRY
��N�
I I
51/2°
� r
M
MARYIN
WUDH2S32
;
N
V
0
N
M 1
�
9
v
�
��
05-���
EXISTING BATH
EXISTIN6 HALL
DN 16R � �
7.75° EA. �� STAIR
UP
MARVIN
WU�tf2422
2-2X8
MASiER
BATH
CERAMIC
lltf
14 �_p.
31/2' g_g•
a
Y Y-4°X
a g�_g• I
2'-6%(
s ,_ $ .
91t4° I-101STS
� 16' O.C.
NiASTER �
CLOSET ;
HARDNlOOD ��
F(AOR �
�
�
i
i
�
i
i'
I
i
2'-8"X
� s`s•
N�
I ' ' C
I / � `° " ''
V ; ��
' y�
� �5
5
EXISTING BEDROOM LAUNDRY � `
' � o�
�
LINOLEUM � o �
w
5'-fi' � 41M° m z
i w
, m
� ,
� �
NEW 2'-0' DOOR - '
MOVE CLOSET � � '
OPENING fROM NEW � ��'�
tAUNDRY RQOM ��` ' y EQUAL EQURt
TO IX'G BE6R006A ¢ ' �
�
i s: c,
� -
a
z-2xio
x€wwiNOOw
MARVIN
WU�H2620
�� ADDITION UPPER FLOOR PLAN
4 SCALE:1/4"=1'-0"
MASTER BEDROOM
NARDWOOD SINGLEIX6 �
ft00R SpqGEMUL4�P•
MAftYiN ' 2-2X8
WUDH2&26,
�/
MABYIN I2-ZX8
WUON2626,
a'-ia° � r-io°
C
<
�
•<
t�J
MARVIN
WUDH2828
� �
� M
�
AUGN WINDC
WITH GROUP
ar en �
_
y
1009 Portland Aaenue St. Paul, MN 55104 /� �
�} �
������
��
y
7('G
)RCH
ar en W
_
1009 Partland Avenue St. Paul, MN 55104 � 1
� �;
DORMERIAPSIDiNG
fQ 8E MITERED (TO
MpTCH IX'G)
IX6 PAIMEO CORNER BOARD
PAIMED BEVELED SIDING
IX46SURE'SO tfiATCH HIIUSE
PAIMf� WOOD DRIP RND
fi' TRIM BOAR�
MITER CORNERS THIS AREA
DRIP TO MATCH IX'G
(WATfR TABIE BOAR� DIFfERS
6UE TO CURRENT CONSTRUCTWN
USMG RIM BOARUSTRUCTUR�
�� NORTH ELEVATION
] SCALE:ll4"=1'_�"
�
E
❑
M! DH 828 I I I( W OH2828
AIARVIN MARYIN MARVIN
IUDH283 Wt1�H2882 WUON2832
NEW ADDITION
❑
ALIGN BOTTOM OF PORCH BEAM
Y�7TH 80TfOM OF 7RIM BOARDM'INDOW
HEAD
A
� � � � °� �
�v
�_WEST ELEVATIQN
8 SCALE:1/4"=1'-0"
�_-
i
��
T.O. IX'G ATTIC SUBft00R
TYPICAI NtW FLOOR CONSTRUCTION:
HARUWOOD FLOOR
3/4" T&G PLYW000
I-JOISTS �16° O.C. (SEE PtAM FOR SIZE)
St8" GYPSUM BOARIS �
T.O. IX'G tiPPER FlN. FI.00R
i.0. fX'G MAIN FtNISHED ft00R
�
4° CONCRETE SLAB �
ON POLY YAPOR BARRIER
ANO SANO BED �
� WALL SECTION
9 SCALE:1/4"=1'-0"
NEW ROOF P(fCH AND
PROFlLETO MATCH IX'G
�j
NEW ROOF CONSTRllCTION:
ASPHALTSHINGlES
30B 6UILDING PPPER
112' PLYtN00D SHEkTH1NG
2X8 RpitERS � 2A° Q.C.
ICYNFNE SPRAY INSUTAi10N
PQLYVAPOR BARRIER
5/8' GYPSUM BOARD (FlRUREJ
2XfiNNEEWAtL
NEW OYERHpNG �IMfNSIINV
AND'(RIM TO MAiCN IXtSFING
NEW fJ(TERIOR WALL CONSTRUCTION:
PAINTED CEDAR BEYELED SIDMG (IXpOSURETO A9ATCH HOUSE�
157f BUILDING PAPER OR TYVEK
IfY PlYW000 SHfATHMG
2X6 W00� STUDS � 16° O.C.
BATf INSULATION
POLYVAPOR BARRIER
1(2° GYPSUM BOARD
s REPER TO IXTERIQR ELEVATIONS FOR SIaiNG
,/'�— ANDWINDOWNOTES
TREATED 2X6 SILLW/ 1/2° ANCHOR
BOLTS � 48° O.C.
d'.1T79
2' R�GtD INSUtATION AN� WATERPROOflNG
(ALTERNATiVE INSUIRTIONTO BE IMERIOR 2X4 STUO
WN1W15H BATf �NSUL. AND POLYV.B.)
12 CMU FOUNDATION ON/IlON
iQ REINF. CONCRETE f00TiNG
PER4METER 4ftA4N (M3 S{LT SflC1q AND
FREE URAINING FlLL - CONNECFWttH NEW
1NTERIOR PfR�1ETEft SUMPSYSTEPd TO
BE INSTALLED BY OWNFR
��-7��
ar en �
H
1049 Podland Avenue St. Paui, MN 55104 n �`Z
J
F
� � MUDROOM ,� /
/�
il `
I �
I1 �
�
— — a , oQa\
— — � oea
D61 \ — � /
°x� -�,/" 4c___ I I
� ! �, � t �
\ ii
rn ��
;'� R � B I I �
�� KITCHEN � � �
W � . '
\ /1 � � e
�oo R R � � i
/\I � I I '
�! �
41 �
� ' �
u� ` I 7 I �
ii� V — ° '�1J I I �
v �
u t _______ � �
i ` _ i
�_____=- ' osr � nc_c_=�
GLm o o n 6Flrtn �
ADDITION MAIN ELECTRICAL PLAN
SCAtE: l!4"=1'-0"
� `` '
�
\
SITfiN(�B�REAKFAST
�---�. ^
�/
\
1
/ T
Ttl GARAGE LtGMT
�
�� ¢ — ,_° '� �
� 13