The URL can be used to link to this page

05-751Council File # — l � Resolution # Green Sheet # ��o.1�4a � RESOLUTION OF SAtNT PAUL, MINIVESOTA �1 Presented By Referred To 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 WHEREAS, Michaet Pazderski, Zoning File # 05-114196, has submitted for City Council approvat the attached lot split for subdivision of property, with a variance of the requirement that the lot to be divided is previously platted land. The subdivision lot split wili divide parcel (#252923220023) into 2 parceis: with the northern parcel tied to (#252923220020) and southern connected to (#252923220021) for the property located at the 510 Jessamine Ave. W., between Mackubin and Jessamine Court; and WHEREAS, the appropriate City departments have reviewed the lot split and found, subject to the recommended condition, that it meets the requirements of Chapter 67 of the Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, notice of pubiic hearing before the City Councit was duly published in the official newspaper of the City on July 21, 2005, and notices were duly mailed to each owner of affected property and property situated wholiy or partly within 350 feet of the subject property; and WHEREAS, the Gity Council heid a pubtic hearing on the proposed lot split with variance on August 3, 20�5, at which time all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard, the Council having considered all the facts and recommendations concerning the lot split; Committee: Date Lot Split Approval for 510 Jessamine Avenue West NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council accepts and approves the attached lot split for Michael Pazderski with variance of the requirement that the lot to be divided is previously platted land. The subdivision lot split will divide parcel (#252923220023) into 2 parceis: with the northern parcei tied to (#252923220020) and southern parcel connected to (#252923220021), subject to the condition that the applicant shall file a copy of the Council Resolution approving the lot split with the Ramsey County Recorder's Office. Requested by Department of: Plann' g—iz�Economic Dev lopm nt � sy: Approved by Financial Services sy: Form Approved by City Attorney sy: �l/. !✓ann^.-- 8''1 - o S By: / Date by Mayor for Submission to Council Approved By: Adopted by Covncil: Date � � r Adoption Certi�ed�by Council ecretary P�F�f1( f � 15151 6reer5wam Drive, A 712 FiELt7 SERVICE� �aRPORATION ��-�� Ceriifiqte af Sunrey for. Mike Pazderski i --- O — � � m r ----- i � � I �� _'__� W � I � � � ----- O) o � I N o r --- � - � � L___ w _ 0 a _ _ — � _ A 0 � ----- `� � � rn � DenotesMOnumenGs found O Denotes Monuments Set JESSAMINE STREET S 89°59'O5"W 215.03' 32.OQ, — — — pone — — -- -s 7 O � � N� �.� ---- � ---� � o �� y -� o T N . N � � D 32.04' 32.00' � D � n m r ao 8�.�0� � 1 — — — — — � — 0 A ao.00� � O � 0 - ---- � i ! � � � � i � ' S I ( I �� I C � � Z i � i I � � --t � m m � � a W o $ s --� a 0 O q� ° 1 0 � °� Z 8Q.00' ____._ O _ J 1 , -- -m -- 80.0� N 90 275.03' ""Note; See �eet (2o{Yj fim comple[e tegai desaip5on LOTS 3& 4 BLOCK 1Q COMO PR�SPECT ADDITION Ramsey County Minnesofa L Scale: 9��' = 30�� Eearings shown are aswmed �S �5� � Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet � /��._'1G ! DepartrnenUoffice/council: Date Initiated: V.J 1 JI PE — P��ning&EconomicDevelopment o�A��S Green Sheet NO: 3027629 Conqct Person & Phone: DeoartmeM Sent To Person Initial/Date Emily Ulmef � 0 � Isnnio & Econ mic Develo I � 591 Assign 1 lannina & Economic Develoo I Deoar[ment Director Must Be on Council Agenda by (Date): Number y �p. pttarnev � r eJ For Routing 3 voYs Office Mavor/Assistaot Order 4 ouncii I 5 i Clerk Ci Clerk Totai # of Signature Pages �(Clip All Locations for Signature) Action Requested: "' Adopt the resolution memorializing City Council acrion approving the subdivision lot split with a variance of the requirement that the lot to be divided is previously plated land. The public hearing was held on August 3, 2005. Rewmmendations: Approve (A) or Reject (R): Personal Service Contracts Must Answer the Following 4uestions: Planning Commission 1. Has this personffirm ever worked under a contrad for this department? CIB Committee Yes No Civil Service Commission 2. Has this personffirm ever been a city employee? Yes No 3. Does this personlfirtn possess a skifl not normally possessed by any current city employee? Yes No Explain all yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet IniGating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why): Michael Pazderski, submitted an application for a lot split into two pazcels for land formerly owned by Great Northem Railways. The properry is a norrow sirip of land behind Mackubin Street. Pazcel A would be ried to 1095 Mackubin, and Pazcel B would be connected to 1089 Mackubin. The City Council approved the subdivision lot split and variance on August 3, 2005, afrer a public hearing. Advanq5�es If Approved: I The lot split and vaziance will be adopted per City Council intent. ��CEI�1�� DisadvanWpeslfApproved: ��G �:; 200� None ��T� �� Disadvantaqes If Not Aporoved: Ciry Council action will not be completed. Total Amount of " � �- �-„ Transaction: Cwt/Revenue Budgeted: Fundinp Source: Activity Number: �� Q��„� �A Financial Information: (Explain) DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Susan Kimber[y, Director CITY OF SAINT PAUL Randy C. Kelly, Mayor July 19, 2005 Ms. Mary Erickson City Council Research Office Room 310 City Hall Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 Dear Ms. Erickson: � �-�5t Telephone:651-266-6700 Facsimile. 651-228-3220 �`sV{t ��`9�f�'i.a F�,�..SUV E 11y I would like to confirm that a public hearing before the City Council is scheduled for Wednesday, August 3, 2005 for the following case: Zoning File: 05-114-196 Applicant: Michael Pazderski Location: 510 Jessamine Ave. W., Jessamine between MacKubin and Jessamine Court Purpose: Subdivision (lot spiit) with a variance of the requirement that the lot to be divided is previously platted land. The subdivision will divide parcel (#252923220023) into 2 parcels: with the northern parcel tied to (#252923220020) and southern parcel connected to (#252923220021). City staff has reviewed the proposed subdivision lot split with variance of the requirement that the lot to be divided is previously plated land. A staff report will be prepared and provided to the City Council the week prior to the public hearing. I have confirmed this day with Councilmember Helgen's office. My understanding is that this public hearing request will appear on the agenda for the August 3, 2005, City Council meeting and that you will publish notice of the hearing in the Saint Paul Legai Ledger. Please call me at 266-6591 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ��;� u��'� Emily Ulmer City Planner c: File # 05-114-196 Applicant: Michael Pazderski District 6 Planning Council Wendy Lane 25 West Four[h Street Saint Paul, M1V i5102 �, ,_ ' ; -NOTICE OF PDBLIC HR�RING 1he Saint Paul City Cou�uil wN caxluct a pubHc heaztng on Wednes�ay, August 3, 2005�at 5:30 p.m. in the City ct�,n�, �a ��r cicy xau, is w�c Kellogg Boulevard, St. Paul. MN, to�con- sider The application of Michael for a subdivtsioa pot split) with a variance of the reqiurement that the lot to be di- vided is previously platted land at 510 Jessamine Ave. W., Jessamine behveen MacKubin_and Jessamine Covrt (IiPC FYIe No. 05-072-122). . ., (July 21) sx rnor, r�cnr. �nc�ac zziooase AA-ADA-EEO Employer DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING —, 51 & ECONOMICDEYEIAPMENT ' Susan Kimbe>ly, Direc[or CITY OF. SAINT PAUL Randy C. Kelly, Mayor July 18, 2005 Ms. Mary Erickson City Council Reseazch Office Room 310 City Aall Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 Deaz Ms. Erickson: RE: Zoning File: OS-I 14-196: Michael Pazderski 2iW'es[FoucthStreet 7elephone:6Si-266-6700 Saint Paul, MN 55102 Facsimile: 651-228-3220 Subdivision (lot split) with a vaziance of the requirement that the lot to be divided is previously platted land. 510 Jessamine Ave. W., between MacKubin and Jessamine Court u • City Council Hearing: August 3, 2005, 530 p.m., CiTy Council Chambers PURPOSE: To consider a subdivision (lot split) with a variance of the requirement that the lot to be divided is previously platted land. The subdivision will divide pazcel (#252923220023) into 2 parcels: with the northem pazcel tied to (#252923220020) and southem pazcel connected to (#252923220021). Deaz Ms. Erickson, Michaei Pazderski has submitted an application for a subdivision by lot split with variance of the requirement that the lot to be divided is previously platted tand. Attached is a copy the staff report and supplemental information for your consideration. Subject to the conditions recommended in the staff report, this application meets all other subdivision requirements and staff recommends approval of the lot split and variance. This item is scheduled to be heazd by the Saint Paul City Council on Aua st 3, 2005. Please call me at 266-6591 if you have any questions. Sincerely, � l / � r iv; G;C--- Emily Ulmer City Planner Attachm�nts ca CiTy Council Members, Lazry Soderholm, Wendy Lane, Michael Pazderski 05- ��l SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT • FILE # 05-114196 1. qppLICANT: Michael Pazderski HEARING DATE: August 3, 2005 2. TYPE OF APPLICATION: Subdivision (lot split) with variance 3. LOCATION: 510 Jessamine Ave. W., between Mackubin and Jessamine Court C • 4. PIN AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PIN 25-29-23-22-0023; SECTION 25 TOWN 29 RANGE 23 SUBJ TO AVE PARTS OF EXTENDED N L OF JESSAMINE AVE OF FOL W 32 FT OF E145 FT OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SEC 25 TN 29 RN 23 5. PLANNING DISTRICT: 6 6. ZON{NG CODE REFERENCE: §69.304; §69.703 7. STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 2005 8. DATE RECEIVED: June 7. 2005 PRESENT ZONING: R4 BY: Emily Ulmer DEADLINE FOR ACTION: November 4, 2005 A. PURPOSE: Subdivision (lot spfit) with a variance of the requirement ihat the lot to be divided is previously platted land. The subdivision wiil divide parcel (#252923220023) into 2 parcels: with the northern parcel tied to (#252923220020) and southern parcel connected to (#252923220021). B. PARCEL SIZE: Parcel A: 98.42 x32 = 3149.44 and parcel B: 100x32 = 3200; the total lot area of parcels A+ B is 6,349.44 square feet. C. EXISTING LAND USE: Singie Family Residential D. SURROUNDING LAND USE: North: Marydale Park (R4) East: Single family residentiai (R4) South: Single family residential and Jefferson Smu�t an old factory site no longer in use (R4) West: Mixed density residential (R4) E. ZONING CODE CITATION: §69.304 provides standards for approval of lot spiits and adjustments of common boundaries; §69.703 sets standards for approving variances of the subdivision regulations. F. HISTORY/DISCUSSION: No history was found for this property. G. DISTRIC7 COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION: The District 6 Planning Council supports the lot split and variance. H. REQUIRED FINDINGS: 1. The appiicant has applied for a lot spiit into two parcels for land formeriy owned by Great Northern Railways. 7he property is a narrow strip of land behind Mackubin Street. Parcel A wouid be tied to 1095 Mackubin, and parcel B would be connected to 1089 Mackubin. 2. The City Councii adopted a resolution on April 27, 2005, which placed a moratorium on the Loeb Lake study area. The moratorium prohibited the issuance or approval of zoning and building permits for any parcel within the study area (Councii File 05-359). 3. On May 18, 2005, the Saint Paul City Council adopted a substitute ordinance which exempted some applications. Section 3.3 of the ordinance exempted "a subdivision application and if necessary an appiication for variances in order to split a lot located at 1095 Mackubin". The ordinance aiso stated that no other applications for zoning approvai or building permits were authorized under this exemption (Council File 05-397). p5 l51 Zoning File 05-114-196 City Council Staff Report Page 2 4. § 69.304 of the Zoning Code permits administrative approval of lot splits and adjustments of common boundaries without platting, provided the following conditions are met: (1) The lot or /ots have fronfage on an existing improved street and access to municipal services. This condition is could be met, the two parceis are located on a small strip of land behind the lots off of Mackubin Street. Parcel A has frontage on Jessamine and access to municipal services. Parce! 8 wouJd become landlocked with r�o access to municipai services. This condition would be met if parcels A and B were combined with the adjoining parcels, 1095 and 1089 Mackubin. (2) The lot orlots to be divided are previously platted land. This condition is not met. The applicanY has applied for a variance of the requiremenY that the lots to be divided are on previousiy platted land. r� L_J (3) The lot or lots meet the minimum standards for lot width and area for the zoning district in which they are located. This condition could be met. The minimum lot width for a lot in a R4 district is 40 sq. ft. and the minimum lot size is 5,000 sq. ft. Both parcels have a width of 32 feet; lot A has a total lot area of 3,149.44 sq. ft., lot B has on(y 3,200 square feet. However, the purpose of the lot split is to connect these nonconforming parcels with existing lots that meet the standards for the zoning district. (4) The division of the lots shal! not cause a remaining parf of a lot to become a separately described tract which does not meet the minimum standards of the zoning district in which it is Iocated or which does not have street frontage and access fo municipal services. This condition can be met by requiring the connection of an unused tract of land to two � adjoining parceis. The lots that have frontage on Mackubin Street meet the minimum standards for the zoning district and have street frontage and access to municipal services. (5) The division does not result in a split zoning c/ass�cation on a single lot. This condition is met. AII of the parcels would still be classified as R4. (6) The division does not result in the creation of a nonconforming structure or use. This condition is met. (7) No lot shall be created where the building pad area for the principal structure has an existing slope steeper than eighteen (18) percent or where a driveway steeper than twenty (20) percent is required to reach the burlding sife. However, the planning admrnistrafo� may approve the creation of a sfeeper Iot, as an exception to this regulation, where the steeper lof is spec�cally consistent with a city-approved neighborhood plan or redevelopment project. This condition is met. 7he site has a slope of less than 20 percent. 5. Sec. 69.703 authorizes the city council to grant variances to the subdivision regulations when compliance wouid create an unusual hardship to the development of the land, based on the following findings: (1) The intent of this chapter is met. This condition is met. The subdivion and variance wili not be detrimental to property or improvements in the neighbofiood and will not affect the health safety or generai welfare of residents in the area. (2) The granting of the variance will not be detrimentat to the public safety, health or welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in fhe neighborhood in which the property is /ocated. This condition is met by requiring that the parcels are combined with existing lots. • Connecting parcels A and B to the adjoining lots would not be detrimentai to the public welfare, or impact the.surrounding properties. 0`r�51 Zoning File 05-114-'196 • City Council Staff Report Page 3 (3) The conditions upon which the requesf for a variance is based are unique to the property for which fhe variance is sought and are generaily not appticabie to other property. This condition is met. The parceis are unplanted because they were o.wned by the railroad. This situation is not generally appiicabie to other property. (4) The literal interpretation of the provisions of this chapter would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by ofher properties in the same zoning district. This condition is met, provided parcel A is combined with 1095 Mackubin, and parcei is B are combined with 1089 Mackubin. (5) The specia/ conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. This condition is met. Parcels A and B were formerly owned by the railroad and were never platted. This condition did not result from action by the appiicant. (6) Because of the particular natural surroundings, shape or topographical conditions of the speci�c property involved, unusua! hardship to the owner would result, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of tirese regulations were carried out. This condition is met. The site is flat and there are no natural surroundings that would be impacted by the platting. However, the parcel to be split is substandard due to its location, shape, and size. These issues could be mitigated by combining them with the parcels on Mackubin. I. STAFF REGOMMENDATION: Based on required findings 1 through 7, staff recommends approval of the subdivision (lot split) with a variance of the requirement that the lot to be divided is � previously piatted land subject to the following conditions: 1. The northern parcel A shall be tied to 1095 Mackubin, and the southern 6 parcel shail be connected to Mackubin. 2. The appiicant shall file a copy of the Council Resolution approving the plat with the Ramsey County Recorder's Office. Attachments: Application Land Survey Letters Resolution Ordinance Photos Site Location Maps • , P i��f i � . ,e,e, �r�,�, o�.:,,z Fi�Lt� SEi�tfICE� G�3RPQRATIC3N � � �-�_ GeRificate of Survey for. Mike Pazderski _ --------------------------------- 7 JESSAMikVE S�tREET t { ^ — — — s es°ss�os�iv zis.o� � — --- -------e I O � � � � — — — — � O ; O � Cp ��-��-- � � N � r _ _ _ O O I Q �I N o r _ � � , y �--- w o W �o 0 a o 0 �zoo r � O � � ----- `� �� r -� � ��-- � Denotes Monumems Found O Deutu Monuments Set 32.60 �.�' O �� 1 N� eo.om ----- � ---{ 1 � o a� D � � T N � r D 32.0�' 32.00' � D � � m �- � P 8�.�� 1 1 '�� 0 �. A N � � 80.00' r �0$9 ° � � o . � , o � -� o � � � � � �_� �tD.— — — ao.oa I�t 94'W'OQ"E ""Note; See shee[ (2of � foreamptete kgal EesaiPSOn L4TS 3& 4 BtOCK 10 CO1�10 PRJS�ECI' ADE3ITION i2amsey Courrty Minnesota � Scale: 9� = 30� � �ings shown are assume6 � o W 0 0 ' r o p P � o � oI o V Z _ Q � � 245.03' � � D ^ ♦J � � m � � � � m -� ,�„ SHEET t 1 2 Ch��St � - r /\�� ` / � ;� v V �'' -�-� `�� rnc ��u�� `� ��g� { � ��ti P1'RAMID FIELD SERVICES CORPORATION Certifipte of Survey for: MIKE PAZDERSKI (SHEET 2 OF 2) LEGAL DESCRlPTION LOTS 3 8 4, BLOCK 10, COMO PROSPECT ADDITION, Ramsey County Minnesota together with the foilowing iwo parcel's hereinafter to be know� as Parcel "q" and Parcel "B' Parcet'A" to be described as foftows: Commencing at the Norfheast comer of said lot 3; thertce on an assumed bearing oF West along the iVorth Iine of said iot 3, block t0, a distance of 80.00fieet to the poirrt of beginning; thence North a distance of 4g_42 fegt; thertce South 89 degrees 59 minuFes O5 seconds Wesf a distance of 32.00 feet; thence South a distance o� 98.42 feet; thence East a distance of 32.00 feet; tfience North a distance of Sp.pp feet to the poinf of b�ining and there terminating. Parcel "B'• fo be described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of Said f Lot 3, Bfock 10,; thence ort an assumed bearing of West al6ng the North line of said f lot 3, a distance of SQ.Op fee� thence South along the West Iirte oF said Lats 3, & 4, a distance of bp_pp feet to the poirrt of beginning; thence South a distance of 100.00 fee� thence West a distance of 32.00 feex thence North a distance of 100.0p fee� thence East a distance of 32.00 feet to the Poirrt of Begir�ning and there tertninating. i �'�itlHtl�eh¢seve panorrepartuoswm� h � «�maa k�ws �� amad�lYL�eseELaMS�¢verytwlctln ��.�,�� a�G j � . . � , � �� DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVII,OPMENT Susan KimberTy, Director ��. '�J� CITY OF SAII�IT PAUL RmuTy G Kelly, Mayor Apri129, 2005 Michael Pazderski 1D95 Mackubin St St. Paul, MN 55117 Re: Denial of Lot Split OS-074-059 Dear Mr. Pazderski: 25WestFo�vthStreet Telephone:6i1-266-656� SainiPaul, MN 55102 Facsimile: 65I-2283367 On Apri127, 2005 the City Council approved a development moratorium for an area known as the Loeb Lake Small Area Plan and Zoning Study Area. The moratorium prohibits "on any parcel of land or part fliereof within the areas of the Study Area...flie issuance or approval of zoning and building permits, plat approvals or lot splits, until the expiration of • twelve months as provided in Minn. Stat. 462355, Subd. (4), or under such eazlier time as the Council has taken action on the recommendations contained in the study." (See the attached map showing the boundazies of the moratorium azea.) The area covered by the moratorium includes your properiy at 1095 Mackubin St. The City was in the process of reviewing a lot split with vaziance you submitted when the moratorium was adopted. Under the terms of the moratorium, t6e City cannot approve the lot split and therefore the lot split is hereby denied. If you have any questions, you can reach me at 651-266-6659 or yana.zhangna cistpaul.mn.us. S� cerely, Yang Zhang City Planner � K:\Woxd�Loeb Lake SAPV.otsplit-pazdexsld.wpd AA-ADA-EEO Emnlovec �:_-� =o-� � � m LEE HELGEN Councilmem6er Deaz Wendy and Larry: CITY OF SAINT PAUL OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCTL L � As you aze both awaze, a moratorium has been imposed on development in the Loeb Lake Study area. We have had a few requests for exemptions come in as these projects were underway before the moratorium was imposed. White I have agreed to allow these exemptions, I, along with pED, and in the case of the property on Norton, LIEP staff, have made it very clear to the applicants that by granting these exemptions, we are expecting them to address our concems with the design of the structures that may be placed on them. The exemption language states that the plans must be signed off by both the zoning and planning administrators. We request that when these plans come in, the plans be reviewed in collaboration with my office and PED. Please contact Donna Sanders of my office to schedule the review. We will be looking at the following documentation when considering approval: . � 3. � Compliance with District 6 and SPARC design guidelines — see attached. Use of high quality "g�een building" design and materials. Please ask them to submit pians for the building articulation, variation in window design, porches, interior open living azeas, and the option for a detached or attached garage. Also, ask for a copy of their standard specifications Iist for construction materials and products (i.e. types of windows, siding, roofing, porch material, interior finishes, appliances, etc.) That drainage issues are properly addressed — particularly for the properties on Norton, as this has been an issue for neighboring prop8rtces. Garages are to be iocated behind primary structure unless extenuating circumstances prohibit it The properties which have been granted an exemption aze: • 1126 Norton — lot s lit re u t O � p q es . wner plamm�g to selt lots to Wisdom Builders. • 489 Lawson — Iot split to build 2 single fami(y homes. Waily Nelson, Renovation Inc. • 501 Lawson — Shiloh Baptist Churoh. More concemed with potentiat contamination issues than desigR on this site. --- � 1095 MacKubin — receiving a lot split and variance exemption only. No bailding permits for accessory structure shall be issued during moratoriutn period. Please let me know if you have any questions regazding this request. Attached is a copy of the actual exemption language being incorporated into the moratorium ordinance. Thank you for your assistance in seeing this redevelopment occur successfully! Witfi est Regazds, cc: Yang Zhang, PED Tom Sanchez, PED Tom Beach, LIEP Sheri Pemberton-Hoibe, PED Paut Dubriel, PED Tom Riddering, LIEP . OS-�5� May 25, 2005 Emi1y Ulmer, PED CITY HALL SUITE 320A SAINT PALIL, hiINNESOTA SSt�2-f6t5 � � � Empluy'tr �J 651 R66-86: �? • �., n�t. � �'� ��a��a�oS RFS OLUT'ION CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Presented By Refeaed To p`�'�51 Committee: Date 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 32 13 14 '�1$ 16 17 18 I9 20 2I 22 23 24 25 2b 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 7 38 39 40 WFiEREAS, the City, pissuant to pianning commission resolutions no.'s OS-13 and OS- 14, each dated February i I, 2005, has assembied a task force and initiated a"40 acre study" for the Loeb I,ake azea in the Ciiy's North End as set forth on the map entitled "Loeb I,ake Small Area Plaa and Zoning Study" (hereina£ter, "the Study Area"} and attached hereto and incorporated hereia by reference as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the City's planning process for the Study Area will address various redevelopment opportunities and recouunend appropriate zoning classifications and deveIopment guidelines for the redeveIopment and transformation of the Study Area and to incorporate fhose olassifications anc3 gui@e�iaes into the Gity's comprehensive plaas and official conuols; and �JHEREAS, some existing or former cominercial and industrial uses and some present zc nina classifica�ons within the Study Area may allow development in the aeaz ierm which wouid be incompatible or inconsistent with any long tzrm goats recommended and adopted by the City based upon the planning process initiated under the said pianniug commission resolutions noted above; and WHEREAS, #he potential for incompatible or inconsistent development within the Study Area raises substantiat questions telating to the ability of the City's present officiai controls to provide compliance with the longer term redevelopment and transformatian goals for the Study Area as well as the oomprehensive plan; and WHEi2EAS, because the planning process for the Study Area is incomplete and for the puxpose of preserving the status quo regarding Iand use in the study azea, and for the purpose of preserving ttie public's heatth, welfaze and safety pending the conclusion of the said study, the Council of the City of Saint Paui desires to immediately temporarily prohibit development on any parcel of land or part thereof cvitl�ari the Study Area depicted on Exhibii A, until suoh fime as tha aforemenfioned sYudy has been completed and presented to the plannuig commission and the Council has taken action on any recommendatians contained thereia: NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED, that under separate ordinance, the CouncIl of the City of Saint Pau1 will prolu�bit, on any pazcel of land or part thereof within the azeas of the Study Area depicted on E��bit A, the issuance or approval of wning and building permits, plat apgrovals or lot splits, ffiti� the expirafion of iwelve moaths as provided in Minn. Stat. § 462.355, Subd(4), or until such earlier time as the Council has taken action on the recommendations coatained in the study; AND, Council File � i�J — J S9 Green Sfieet � c3 �� lO � 9�j 05-�5 � as- 3s9 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 i5 lb 17 I8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 3� 31 32 BE IT FiIKTZ�R RESOLVED, that peuding #he adoption of the is�teri�rt ord'u3aace prohibiting any deveiogmern inconsistent with ihe pending study and any amendments to the City's zoning code within the Study Area boundaries descn�ed in Exhibit A, no zon;� or buitding pe�s, piat approvais or iot sg2i#s may be issued or approved, uuiess exempted as provided undeF the terais set forth in tUat same separate ordinance noted above, from this date aad untiI the eapiration oftwslve months as aIIowe@ by Nfinn. S`ta#. § 462355, Subd.(4), or until such earfiertime as the Council ofthe Ci#y of Saint Paul has taken aciion on the recommendations contained in the study; AIdD BE IT Ft7RTI�R RESOLVEB, tbat tbe foIIowing are exempted from the provisions of tUis resolution. 1. Building, plumbing, mechanicai and electricat permits for repairs oz minoz aIferations to confarming or nan-confom2ing struchues, or for wark necessary to m�;nfa;n the health and safety of oceupants of such structures. 2• $uildiag, plumbing, mechaaical arid electricat permits €or work on daagerous or vacant buildings administered tmder Legislative Code Chapter 43. Demolition permits for nuisance bui3dings purs�nt ta Legista$ve Code Chap#er 45. 4. Permits for "redevelopment projects," as tt�at term is defined under Minn. S#at. § 469A02, Subd. 14, necessary to complete a"redevelopment plan," as that term is defined un8er Minn. Stat. § 469.QQ2, Subd. 2b. AND, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, until such.time as the said studyhas been comp2eted and the Council has reviewed recommeadations far possible adopiioa, city departments receiving written applications for the approvats noted above shall accept the applicaiions and immediate3y process them in accordance with tfie provisions of Mina. Stat_ § 15.99, Subd. 2 and consistent witli the intent of tius resolutian and ihe interittt ozdinance. C� � Requested by Departaent of: 8�'e Porm AoPraved bS' City Attaxaey ?dopted by Couacil: Date �i ( � Adoption Certifi,ed by Couneil Secretazy 13dS Bya �L✓�crw`--- �{.24 4� � A � pp / s � oved by Mayor £or S�bmissi� to Couacii ar� l' �/�S'o' � .�=.��.�3�7j Approved by aa� . . Date " $y� <i�/2�/Ji�A + '� �f . • � �� ; � � ��«� v � A•POftl � w��2��°�t Presented By S.s.�s 5(tg�QS �RDINANCE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA . �� c�, — �5� Council File � ��5 � 3�l or�inan�e r ��S��t� oa�a� 33 Referred To Committee Aate : 2 An interim ordinance pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 462.355, Subd. 4, 3 preserving the status quo in that area of the City's North End 4 presently subject to the "Loeb Lake Smali Area Plan and Zoning 5 Stud}�' pending the completion and report of this study and 6 possible action on the study by the City Council, including 7 amending the City's comprehensive plans and zoning ordinances. 8 i0 � 2 13 14 15 16 I7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 25 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 � 36 37 TF� COUNCIT, OF'1'fiE CITY OF SAIN'T PAi3L DOES ORDAIN: Section 1 Statement o£ LeQislative Intent: The Council of the City of Saint Paui finds that it is necessary to preserve the status quo regazding buiFding and development in that area of the C3ty presently subject to the Loeb Iake Small Area Plan and Zoning Study as delineated on Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incoiporated herein by reference. ?'he said study, authorized under City planning commissioa resolufions nos. OS-13 and OS-14, each dated February 11, 2005, is intended to assess redevelopment opportunities and recommend appropriate zoning classificaYions and development guidelines for the redevelopment and transfarmation of the LAeb Iake area and make recommendations for incorporating those classifications and guidelines into the City's comprehensive plans and o�cial controls. During ttle pendency of the I.oeb Lake study, there exists the possibiiity that existing or former commercial and industrial uses, as well as some of the present zoning classifications for land within the study azea would, in the near term, pernut deveIopment which could be incompatible or inconsistent witlz any recomtnen3ed Iong term goals and classifications arising from the said planning study of the Loeb Lake area and adopted into tFie City's comprehensive plans and official controls. The potential #or incompatible or inconsistent development in the Loeb Lake study area raises substantiai questions relating to the ability of the City's present offrcial controls to provide compliance with any long term comprehensive redevelopment and transformation goals for the T.oeb Lake area� : • � ! � �`J �5� ��-�az z 4 5 7 9 IO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 i9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 44 4I 42 43 4-0- 45 4fi 47 48 49 50 SI 52 Accordingly, it is the desire of the Council of the City of Saint Pau1 to establish, under Uus interim ordinance, a moratorium to protect the general health, weifare and safety of the public and to preserve the status quo with respect to the present land use within the said azea, pending the conclusion and report of a zonin� study of the lands described in Exhibit A by immediately prohibitina, subject to those excepriors provided herein, any development on any lot or paz2 thereof within the boundaries of Exhibit A, vnril such rime as the a�oremenrioned siudy has been completed, reported to the City Council, aud the effecrive date of any City Council action on any recommendatians atising therefrom Section 2 Moratorium Imposed: on any pazceI of land, iot, or part thereof within the boundaries of Exhibit A, pending the completion of the Loeb Lake Smalf Area Plan and Zoning Study and action by the Ciry Council on the said study, the issuance or approvaI of zoning pemuu, site plan and Iot split or ptat approvaLs, and building germits or occupancy certificaies, are prohibited antil the expiration of twelve months oz untii such eazlier time as the City Council has taken action on the recommendations contained in the said study, unless otherwise provided under Secuon 3 of thisinterim ordinance. Section 3 tl� For the puiposes oi this interim ordinance only, the foilowing pemiits aze exempted from the provisions of this interim ordinance: BuiIding, phurtbing, mechanical and eIectrical pemiits for repairs or minor alterations to conforming or non�onfomung structures, or for wor3c necessary to maintain the health and safety of occupants of such structures. ►a � 1; Building, plumbing, mechanical and elechicaI permits for work on dangerous or vacant buildings administered under I.e�slative Code Chapter 43. Demolition permits for nuisance buildings piusuant ta Legislative Code Chapter 45. � � • 4. Permiu for "redeveiopment projects," as that term is defined under NEinn. Stat. § 469.002, Subd_ 14, necessary to complete a"redevelopment pian," as that term is defined aader Minn. Siat. § 469.002, Subd 16. i 2 • 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 lI 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 �26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 42 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 •49 50 51 52 � �-3�'� ��5� 3_ A subdiv"isfon a�ticatioii and=ifnecassaiv � aagIication for v�iances`in orde"r to �Iit a lot iocafed at 2fl9� iVIaeI�nbin =Ziowever. nb other av�iications for zoning s�rovals�or buildin¢ �nuts for this address a� authorized uuder this ezemption_ 4. A variance avulication and building oermits far the uutvose of redeveloninQ an szisrina industrial site at 501 West Lawson-with a new church Section 4 Moratorium. W ritten Reauests for Zoning Anprovals. Complianee with Minn. Stat � 15_99: Until such time as the said study has been compieted and acted upon by the City Council, City departments receiving written requests for approvals regulated under this inierim ordinance shall accept complete requests and immediately process such requests in accordance with the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 15.99, Subd_ 2, consistent with the legislative intent expressed tcnder this interim ordinance. Section 5 Moratorium. Effecfive Date: The effective date of the moratorium enacted under this interim ordinance is deemed to be as of the effective date of the Resolution in Council File No. OS-359. i 2 3 4 5 6 7 & 9 10 il 12 13 14 IS 16 : ..r . �-�S l ph-3q`1 Effective Date of Interim Ordinance to Sanercede and Discharpe Connct� �'1e No. OS-359; Interim Ordinance Eaemutions Anu&cable to Certain A�plications Processed Before �ffective Date of Iaterim Ordinaace :'This interim ordinance for the Laeb F ake azea shail tzice effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage, approvai and publication. Pending the effective date of this ordinance, apglications regarding land use intended for regulation by this interim ordinance sha12 be processed in conformance with the terms and condittons set forth in Councii File No. OS-354. Exemptions to be estabfished under this interim ordinance may be agplied to applications sub�sitted and processed under Council File No. OS-359. As of the effective date of this inxerim ordinance, the terms of the Resolution under Council �le No_ OS- 359 ue discharged. • � B]'= _e $'�Pi'o�Ted by�M�r: Date �_� � Requested by Depa2tment of: �Y= Poxm ApprWed by City AttOrney � l,/�..�...,,,, 3 ' - [Y - os BY: Approved by Mayor Por Suhmissior. to Cotmcil Bd= � r— Ei ::sQ _�.� �.F � "S✓.:. � • �� rr Adopted by Council: Date � ,s Adoption CertiEied by Coure±l cre5� .�. e � ��_ .. �. ,,� � � -<„ ,, �� .� . Y �', , � .. � 4 . � �� ' . � . . ,� S ��' ��""st".`�,� ., �• - ;,�,• . .. '� s ` �' - �a�� .43� = �.v '� ; . .. i 2 " �: ' � � • , � � . 3 i �"'�i.8�c` s?�3'°,$` . a � � 4 . �.��t ' � � ; ��`�� '..4+�� . . .: � � . ' . . oE � a � �1 : #",: r ,�; �q •�' � + .,. . � • wr �, . . � � q < � . �. �' ' �a < � y P r . . . a . � �� a �. � a�� . e` . ,. .. . � . 1Ra . . u:3 •� � �.�. � � , . � ti . - r . .� r.. . , . , . `. . . . � .� .. .s , . . � � .. _ . - � a . � p . � . , �-� . . . . . 'c;. » �'� ,: -.� _,� � �, ;. ' . � " >� = � .....�..,n-k e.r. _ M. .__ . , � *�'r°� t r�a& it 9s e � � �� . ,� 8tB :,� "� � ._ ° � � ° � > � � �,�;��' � � _ �. � : —� '��, � �. ;` � – . ,� � � � � #' � � ° . <"'"� h Y x - � � - . +. , . ... . �� . �. . � a n, ..�...:�.: y . . ... . ...:a+ �... ..... - � ID .� r �. : � e <r ^: .: 5I.9+�I...a� ..e. ., , ".'a?�i e' ''�s .. _.. . . . C �'� '- � d � g � 3 }� �# � �aya. � �w. . � ` -' �.y.R � � P : ! � jY ; �'+',3� . �S'b N �. ' �rc ° . . g 3 µ ? Y �' .��.F '� �Y � �3P+� ��t� ?$il� t ' N' � � � ��a Y a �� .°..: +�� `��-.`�'� �' � �� '�� 1 ��'�z'��,�� q§� � , `� � ��„ � .� � �F�� "� � .,u '��-`�, ,� � �, j �' a , - *,� �.� 'f � M1 g�b ��. y 4�}..,� � .-..aW '�: ��. >' «�'. �'.''��"^ ��,a �'�� ,: � �r'�°..�4�- �'"n �^ „- +�. ., ,'. :� a w � a � ,��` � s . �. � `" � � �..� . x��; �� '� -,� ' � � a �,` : �� a6 m � �'� t � � � ,c � � u � . k�; 3 + s �B� x -_ : �P � � '�,, s�i,.*„- . > � � "� ��5, z * ,.-y a ,e�"c .:� `�3 ' .,�, �.,, � �" ��`�� ' y > ,� � � � �� 4� �� W� �xx > u '�, - �,� 7° ��' a � � _ 's� � .,�� E ~� * s µ� S�f�`� �- Y . # .��"�� b . � � � �� `}i ° ,� � E � ��t y � p� y � � =¢� N' \ � K �'. g \ ' Y�- +5�, u6` �' �, a°�n F� � iYVa, i � P a.n 9 '. ," �.+�-�:'" '. ^' ' a 3� . � 5. �,,,.. . a�,a�:' h �' �. -'�"�,� 'Pix'�ffis� =� � � r n � _� �� .. � 4 �� pw ' � , f •S:y � �' � . � T ro�.4 , b " ' '� 3 v s ` -.wti � � 't�£ � o . .; . , ". °' J � " 'r-"a`. � P' �� y' �� ' - ., r . � � � �� . + -. � . t � �, �� a . -� , _ � ± ' �� ... , '�� ...: ,. � - �``.._ �..� �'� � Y � - �z':: Y �''.. � s � "`- ' � .. . '�� .�.v�m.a �� .v '�a»�" � ' S � �.�. � x ° a �'._°` �� •, , ,.. � . � .. ` � —v - � ,- g ,� `` .� ��,� '—:: Y '�`'"�" . - , x� ,.,� �, e„`°. �, a v -� � �° �t�"' y ¢ . `° r "�• �� . "'�a� � p �'�� '� � �_' . . a.-. � 'p o , � .� �..� � } . � 'x`° � � . .9�� s �::� �'rb^�✓',� '�' � � �� . w0'= ✓ � . � � m. �.4a •_:. � �.�s�'�. � - . �,d a � . " - �Ak - �'� ��S' � e ''� �,„' ' �'*�...:.'_ r �, , f•✓ ':�' .. ..� .�s^ :n . b �o^, . _ � ��. � ��: >ii} ?y ., "-i�oi � . �� i�,. ; `�i ._ ..... ._... . ..� *N �c '�`+i:+r8 C z.' � .1'."`,f m"`+�c.. . .' -^crt� � �� " r - � �� =�� x . . . . ..,. a�' ,�,..-c.'ti;. �# ' �� -� �� . > , . ~�..^x'.w"?'w� ��_ � �� ¢ %'� ��+ad sa} 3 ; 6f :�� _ " .. '_ � `: �'�'ser`.b �. r. . r `�'-"_,� : lir., s,��`�" +s�,.>..s;1�}==.o^--, � � �-�,r �,y„ '�"�, -�,^`""�"+"__ _ ,,, _ � � � �� br�. � � y � Y� � �,.,a � „��°`r�V..,.q`-�Y` �' „a�,,., ..,.n.r.•••_� � .� , r -�., ^� .: a:'�'e � �x s.a _. .. -a: '"'C^"�"i" .; . �c.; ��Si`� 'k s �� F 4 ��,�„.}� � . .} X _ �� '�+i_ 'cvN'�q �. �^+�--�ac�, ,`� u�s'�.�.s.. O' �, .rfl??� ' E J � v X , � .:�*.' µ' yy L^' c ` : � T, � ' F .� ... > PY T s . <'^. �`C ✓ ' , � s✓ �:� -.ti '�,� 4 '� Y� .,,� y r . . , �,.-„v eVa,,-, "' „� F ..;_ -�� '-s`A"�`..�'�-,,., , ��,5.` ° '. : � ' t '`^, a •'�;� _�.:» x+ .'` ' w v . - x ' -2 _ `�� , "'� - ro , > � A � '� r . �-.x. _ _ . . ... y .�.. . °� ✓ i i / � _ . � u, �� v- ' � � �� sX W'� : Y 4Y .�.k l_ {+ � '��`' - � ; ..- E' '�' _ � ' - w M �, ��3 -x.. 3 i_ � .. � .�.° '`°,�',�, .. .. . . ,- e ._ x Y� : � �. X k � .� � . , �. . rf . . ` - " .,: �� x ' *+ �_ --"' -w � �� - j` •:+e " ` � Ti " .. . , ._c - - . t� ✓ *� fS Y"` . ° C � — �„. v -'�' µ . .1 - °a ` �`s' 3* _ : .. _. -- ' _ . � a ,. r• $ _ v�-Y `+ x '„y - zx' • . _ , r �.� ;-,.�>=n� . .> � . . . _.., . ` _" " .: .,.' � !; q . � .. .. " �. : . ' '. � ,. � " .. P N.. :.sc"c " .. . . - .. . .. . . � ' � ., .. .. . . . y°y'�_F _ _ .� . � w . . ... . � . .. " i ` . . . ,. .i" ` . .. a . . . . z �.. . . ' . ad _ �a �°.�" ' . o �y a.?;°`�-��.',p?,��.6"�$ � .. . 4 :,, e ,-� � • - .�� . �� . _ . ...a a.. �� . . .. . .�z- 'y a - �kF�• .. . i • ' ` .. .e5 k � �� ' f � - � � ! ' - 9 �. �j Yti ' 6 � ' E' D f `y � � �O ." w s a S •� � b , � � � � � � 3 \ � �'�i ' b ' � �µ � a � a R i . . �:.�� . . � - R � �+� � Y' . . -> � •'�b �}_ . .. , ' �l .8E . �CS v +s.�i s 4 v'. � . y �. ^ �'4 @� -� b @ a` .� ' fi � .4 Y �� --. S� • �� . . " . . , i � • �a � a�. .. . � 9 .� za � � . 5 � � . _ . . £ � � � .• i y � e 0 a • �„ rt � g.�° - § � �"�-y,� .. ..�.�.' oa$�i'�'�y� • ' e k - .'# ... , . •. � $. �. '� s% ` 5" ^ a 2 . . } � � _ -k�i`. � �. � . _ • o �� i �� -. S� . � � �' .. "°�..� . . � w .�� a .�-,� � ,�� . � - . . . -�- ' * ��.-�..' _ �� ,� � ,_ � �� ,�� ., � _ �, °': �� _. � ` �-� �n '�8-�� 9'gh.. �• i �. �:1,y. . .� � � �� 'S- � � '#. a $ $.�� r °b K � M�' O� � ` �' . � � � �� , �, � < @�. ' . i d a't� � � � �,�. r r �, �;�� _. . �� _ _ �. . ��` �� '�-� 4 t!` F:w � �S'',t,A. � . . E�`�. .� .�z -.�� a .�x �y+-4 . g }� � .yg � � . � � F'Lka.�... +T i � S '�$ "W X ., � � . � "- � �� .,��yM.�Po . f. -. ^b `i �� ...1 a . .u�. n ; �'p'- °'� 3 , g ~ °, �s � " � � � ��-��,, � � �� ...� � s �' � �� ''`.� '� '�''�. , ._ z*m ` �, � . .. ,:' _ � � � 3 � � e � `,..,�. �� o �"' . � �� " �� '.'.'�'" �''�^�.� ,. � ...� °y� .� ,x• "�� °g�, _ �x x �- � �"*� ,.,a, +s �' y i S �t �+'�;�"�� '-�'�' � .£ �i ,� ia��.sti�"� �g } -� �''�aB� roy . . .'"`� .r +^,�� -.�.�.. n 1^ �, "5 x =- . s �' �` � '�� , . �- �°�'- sa � t�' ? ,, w -� x+,.. ... 't'"` � � g ,a `Y ° � '. { nr �, < �-'" �� ,- ° R �"� t��.��' �'" � � � �� t,„ p.; a�'� ,�� `�` � � '-" ��° '` �w � ' '��'°�� .��`� �' �,�y. ,�-�� "m � r � m � � � � � �_ �� .��, e' ' �` � �� r �` . Y.'".� , � p'� . s. .R'•n? r �� .. � �,4' .° �. �`..�'^r s� �� .% a 6 "� •& � ffi ' �... .� � �` �: "�i-� ''z > ° `'�. � � � "� � " . � '4= '�� „ �.. ' � `$- �.� �� " -�m��, '"r ro <"�. �. � � �, � � �` � �-$��,�.�� c� � �. � �:�, � '�-`" "�, . � �. rs ° � ° ' w, �__ . .. "Ra�^=,...; ��s... W _ �s.� .,-,__...�$ � � a - �9'� �: n � ' ,/ A ' TV3 �.x� �:�. � ; � f �� • �, .._�, w - - ,,�,+ a ' �� "v 4 �S� �9e � &.� ' "w„m f „i: . - . 4. � ^ ' w .� : a �3 ;k `� a.: � �� `;�°v.S^ � � � ' �'�,,.., .��q� h ro` . *oe.e,� .,.�. is, .."° `��' '� � �., � �.se� :..n� ��''�'- £.:. ' »'��`� � 4 `b*� ` y . � � . � ',q � .� .; ` m � ' - . ` '.�e. a '%! Ri � _ . a°. ..�`.`„g�'z' r ,-. �`^� �s . p . m " . . °7 y a - ... - , : V � � ' ° ° ' < , . �- «a,. �, & �� a-*c. � . . . : - . �. ay_' ' � � °h ,3 �,.,�. p . Ys.' � . . ' S.=...�r;'"' `>.`ba .. . .�.w' 1f � Q w . _. a b . �"c� . . �''„,�g • . �a.: �a^ , �'. ° ^ .. : ' . c ` �'�. ^ �; - � � .. � . � a ' . �� . � . . � e - *� _ . Z '� ^o � . � � �. g � � �, � �� i� . �.�� , w � � � � �'_ � �� " . � � ��x «s � ry� . ��. �� , - . � �� -. � � . �3 x€ ,;..- T' , � � �? '' �� y , ° �. - � ..".�� . '�:.+&,�'�4 �w` � �.a<.e�.'"y;n��t , ' � j ...c'�b �' �t s:�?y.. b .., ' �� . �^ � y � � a„� st »� , �, .: ,. , v 2 ' � _ �. ♦' � � i. � �, r_ � � �.� �_ _ .;� - ` d ° '.: ^',� `�'�C . �n Y -. °.� �e�.Y'� � � ' �« s q �,. g y��'+J�.�+�t.2 .: .�h �2 + a^ t - �� s �. S "h . $ tr� °µ � ._ �.sv,r's � '� � � §. l , � � � . . �� 5'rs ` ,�,�'.�� "s+� � ,y � ..' �� •. `�a � -�.'�' � `�� r � ^`� t �`'':_ ' �+' `r" :�.. �" .' :^,. a -�=s-'-w,Py�c^` „�.--'" .�..x �ig, ' .- � �., ��....: � - � ...�"°�`" . -.�.=�� x .� ,> � r .� r � E` ' ' . . = w.. ' ..- , `�*,y' -•,. a�, �s-.r� 7 - a. -!.�� s ' . " � ,� -�1 "k �'� sS � <.', �" m�. �`-'v� �'i-` . . . n. a. .: > °:- � ^ � e � � _.�� a�,. �' -�'� . . a ,.a. .. -ae'_�., � i..^��,. ,. _- - � � >y� ,� H�� p .� �-� �� a. � . — � r �, �<, --,, -_ _ . _,�.—•« < = ��_� - ��.- .��: _ _. _. . -� _ �. .-;:- . -r.-�;.- :r.- . ` �:,_ �. � . � . .. � , . �..:- ,. . �-:� . _ � . . . . � .. , . . ,. , . . >. _ - - , 0 . P ' ' - - . ' . . _ _ �.": , . .`� e : .. �.-� _.. - _ . . �.:..�. .. . . ._. .. . ... .,.. _. -. . :. �. . CiiIZEN AA€21iCi?ATf-ON DiS�AiCT.S �: �.T - -- , - ( � . , I � , ��,s 1 � � ; a .l �,�� f I � � to- cohto � ��. —� _:�� _.�_ � �_ ��Il L I�;�� t. � � � � r i . r" t ; h I S BLU�F� � , Wx�o � � }. SUNMY.8A7 � •H(GHW00 I � V � ,` � � � p�-.15\ � CITIZEN PARTICIt�,�Tit}M. PLRP(N1�YG OiSTRICTS � i.SUNRAY=6FcT7CfCRtEK�HIGH4lOQD 2. 6REATER E�ST` �.IOE . 3.41E5T SIDE , � _ . 5: PkYNE-PNlkLEN. - � ORTH f N�D . . , -.. , . NOMAS=.DALE 8,_SUMN(iT-UN I VERS ITY $ 9:�tES7�5EVE�YTH . _ �� ta` ' . iQ. COMO.. :_ f � ��0 1 ." 1Z_ST..RNTHQMY 13.MERRIAPI PK. � 14 :. 6 ROV€�AND=MACRLESTCi2•. , 15.HIGNLAN6 � i6:5UMMiT.HILL - . _ 17. DOWNT04lN : �5-�51 �? `' � � NQRTH EHO DISTRICT.6 � � � �� , rtR � �� os-IINlq�O :• R l�j � Loeb Lake Small Area Plan & 40-Acre Study ---� �-- � � l � �' �� V i i: �EEL�' _ I � I � c� �l � �i �� :.r.:1!� �� Larsen Nursery � . _.� - _ ` ..:.�Loebtake�..`:=":e .,_ ` Matydale Park �=;..i"' _ . . . . . . . � �:.'e %\� O � � Jefferson-Smurfd ;� Shiloh Baptist Chi (Union Brass) � � _UI H�N I .� \' n � �_�� ' : L L_ :� I_-'T� " ,�� - 1 : l-- I �� i � � .��- ►�E� l� I _ "_ _ � Z' W I � S � _'__— ___ _ . _ w � z. - --- � --- .. ' L�?_ � � a ' I �erru ❑ . � � ; ZD� C l� Es �/�.� '�' o� � 1�llC�dt�L �`�jEP-�SKf 0 L-i : � : L� -�� , --