Loading...
05-527�l'�'t���� �lCS/aoo� RESOLUTION OF SA{NT PAUL, MINNESOTA Psesented Referred To Council File # �S 'S �� Green Sheet # 3p� S Committee Date BE TT RESOLVED, that the Council of the Ciry of Saint Paul hereby certifies and approves the May 17, 2005, decisions of the Legislative Hearing Officer on Appeals of Letters, Coaection Notices, and Correction Orders for the following addresses: Prooertv A aealed 919 Dale S7reet North (Appeal withdrawn.) �� Apnellant Anthony and Donna Mahmood 275 Summit Avenue Judith McLaugJilin, owner Decision: Limit attendees at any future events to no more than 100 occupants on the Deficiency List dated April 13, 2005. i5� t52`} � Carroll Avenue Troy Allison (Recommendation is forthcoming.) DQcisiva�: be.n,iu.E o�-f4� c�Pea.Q_ 1265 Stanford Avenue Mary Huot representing Tammie Head and Teri Head Decision: Appeal denied on Code Compliance Inspection Report dated Apri127, 2005. 509 Fred Street Albert Oertwig, owner Decision: Laid over to the June 7 Legislative Heazing. Yeas Nays Absent Benanau ✓ Bostrom ,l Harris ,�- Helgen ,� Lantry ✓ Montgomery ✓ Thune ,/ 7 C� O Requested by Deparirnent of � Form Approved by City Attorney � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council Adopted by Council: Date ��� �S� aOD� BY � Ada By: :.. . _ bs- Sa� � eet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet � �� �. ... _ ... ._ . _ , . � _ �� y reen eet Green Sh Departme�Uoffice/oouncil: Date Initiated: co -��� o��� Green Sheet NO: 3026775 Contact Person 8 Phone: DeoartmeM SeM To Person InitiaUDate Marcia Mcertnond � 0 uncit 266"856� Assign 1_ ouoc0 De artment Director Must Be on Council Agenda by (Daie): Number 2 ' Clerk For Routing 3 Order 4 5 Totai # of Signature Pages _(Clip All Locations for Signature) Action Requested: Approving the 5-17-OS decisions of the Legislarive Hearing Officer on Appeals of Letters, Conec6on Notices, and Correction Orders for the following addresses: 919 Dale Street North, 275 Summit Avenue, 1522 Carroll Avenue, 1265 Stanford Avenue, and 509 Fred Street. Recommendations: Approve (A) or Rejed (R): Personal Service Contracts Must Answer the Following l�uestions: Planning Commission 1. Has this personffirm ever worked under a contrect for this department? CIBCommittee Yes� No Civii Service Commission 2. Has this personffirtn ever been a city employee? Yes No 3. Ooes,this Qersonlfirm possess a skill not normalty possessed by any current city employee? Yes No Euplain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why): Advarrtanes If Aaarove[i: . � DisadvantaqeslfApproved: Disadvantages If Not Approved: � Total Amount of CosURevenue Budgeted: , Transaction: " Funding Source: Ac6vity Number. Financial I nformation: (F�cplain) � D� Sa�' �I2 NOTES OF TF� LEGISLATIVE HEARING LETTERS OF DEFICIENCY, CORRECTION NOTICES, AND CORRECTION ORDERS Tuesday, May 17, 2005 Room 330 City Hall, 15 Kellogg Boulevard VJest Marcia Moermond, Legislative Hearmg Officer The hearmg was called to order by Ms. Moermond aY 1:35 p.m STAFF PRESENT: Phil Owens, Division of Fire Prevention; Steve Schiller, and Steve Magner, Neighborhood Housmg and Property Improvement O�ce; James Seeger, Office of License, Inspecrions, and Env'sonmental Protection Appeal of Deficiency List at 275 Summit Avenue; owner: Judith McLaughlin. (Division of Fire Prevention) The Appellant, Iudith McLaughlin, was present. Phil Owens stated that the occupancy load for the house is a major concern. Orders included an approved emergency lighting system; approved directional e�t signs; the swing of the door must be changed to swing in the direction of travel; approved panic release hardwaze on all e�cit doors; additional means of egress due to an inadequate number of e�ts; post the occupant load on an approved sign in a conspicuous location neaz the main e�t ofthe room; and approved fire extinguishers in accordance with Fire regulations. Ms. McLaughlin stated that she has been at this location for 35 years doing private, on-site catering, and that she has never done off-site catering. Mr. Owens noted that there has never been a Certificate of Occupancy for this property. Ms. McLauglilin responded that she has reapplied for her catering license for 35 years but has never been informed that she needed a Certificate of Occupancy until now. She said she is 12-18 months from retirement, this is her home, and this will continue to be her home when the business ends. She noted that the house was budt in 1901. She said she is willing to put up signage and to rearrange things to comply, plus add a second e�t to the main floor. The front door is 8 feet by 42 inches; she has talked to two contractors and there is no efficient way to reverse the doors. One contractor suggested that the entire door be moved so that the inside ofthe door would be outside. She said there is no way the doors can be reversed without destroying their historic character. The side door is 7 feet by 32 inches and the possibility exists that the door could be removed and a new door attached on the outside. She said the front door is a major issue. Ms Moermond discussed the occupancy number for events currently scheduled on the property. She questioned Ms. McLaughlin as to whether there might be fewer than six events currently scheduled where occupancy will exceed 100. Ms. McLaughlin was unsure as she did not have her event calendar with her. Ms Moermond requested that there be no more events added to the current calendar which would exceed 100 and Ms. McLaughlin agreed to that request. NOTES OF TI-� LEGISLATIVE HEARING OF MAY 17, 2005 Page 2 Ms. Moermond concluded by statmg that no more 100 occupant-load events can be scheduled for the remamuig sixteen (16) months m order to remain m co�liance or before the properiy is retumed to residenrial use. She requested thaY Ms. McLaughlin notify her of the dates of events presently scheduled which will exceed 100 occupants. Ms. Moermond said the decision is effective now and a Ciry Council resolution will be processed Appeal of Correction Norice and Summary Abatement Order at 1461 5t. Clair Avenue; owner: Roger L. Johnson, Jr. (NHPI) (Note: The 5ununary Abatement Order has already been appealed.) Steve Schiller appeazed and said he is the inspector ofrecord. His supervisor appeazed at the previous meeting. Ms. Moermond said it is her understanding that Mr. Johnson had received no notification ofthe meeting. Mr. Schiller said he inspected the property the previous day but he did not take pictures as the previous pictures taken were still valid. He said the gazage is in a very deteriorated condition. Mr. Johnson responded that it is a usable gazage. Ms. Moermond noted that a Summary Abatement was ordered and that this is a Summary Abatement appeal. She explained that a Summary Abatement charge would come back to Mr. Johnson in the form of a property assessment and that the most affordable option would be for the owners to do the work themselves. Mr. Schiller stated that the main concern is the roof. It is literally at grade level from the yard and cluldren will be exposed to a dangerous roof at grade level. Mr. Johnson noted that the roof is rotting out and a tarp has been placed there to keep out the elements. Mr. Schiller added that there aze rotted roof support beams. Ms. Moermond said this stnxcture needs to come down and if the City takes it down, an assessment will have to be done as to whether there are hazardous materials in the budding such as asbestos. The City would need to follow PCA procedures before demolition could occur. This would be an additional cost to the demolition. If the demo is handled by the City, the owner will receive a tax assessment notice which can be appealed. She stated that the last time she checked the City's interest rate, it was 4.5%. Mr. Johnson said the garage has been in this condition for 20-25 years and he questioned why it is being addressed by the City at this tune. Mr. Schiller responded there was a sweep in the alley at which time this was noticed. Ms. Moermond added that the City has been doing sweeps of alleys in particular. Mr. Schiller stated that these sweeps are direct orders from the Mayor's Office. Ms. Moermond said the Mayor's order can be appealed to the City Council. She informed Mr. Johnson that the City will be looking for corrective action and that he has until July 8, 2005 to take care of the situation. She stressed that this is a public health and safety issue. NOTES OF THE LEGISLATIVE HEARING OF MAY 17, 2005 Page 3 Mr. Schiller informed Mr. Johnson that he is allowed to pull a permit and install a new roof but the work cannot be done without a build'mg permit. Mr. Johnson responded that he has appointments this week to talk with garage builders and thax he was just trymg to avoid the cost. Appeal at 1522-1524 CarroIl Avenue; owner: Troy Allison. (NFIPI) (Note: it is unclear what is being appealed at this property.) Steve Magner noted that his o�ce did not receive the appeal application. The inspector was to the property on March 2, 2005, and found the house to be vacant and the structure was water- damaged. Troy Allison had indicated he was the owner of the property and was sent a Vacant Building notice. Mr. Allison responded that the house has not been vacant, that he has owned it for over two years, and that one unit is a Section 8. He stated that inspector Dennis Senty informed him and the neighbors that he has a sworn, written statement that the house has been vacant for six months. It was sold to Dadders Holdings on Febn�ary 28, 2005. As of May 4, 2005, Dadders is still receiving notices that it is on the Vacant Building list. If the duplex had to be brought into total compliance it would be very costly. He said the inspectors are not telling the truth about being given sworn statements. Mr. Allison said he has 250 units in the City of Saint Paul and his houses are inspected once a yeaz by Section 8 officials. Ms. Moermond stated that the Vacant Fee letter was issued on May 4, 2005, and she doesn't feel she has the necessary information regarding this situation. She said she will lay this matter over for one week in order to review the file and make a decision. Appeal of Code CompGance Inspecfion Report at 1265 Stanford Avenue; appellant: Mary Huot, representing Tammie Head and Teri Head. (LIEP) Ms. Moermond noted that this was a condemnation with an order to vacate and there was an emergency abatement (cleanup). It has been declared a nuisance property. She explained that the declaration of a nuisance structure gives time certain to bring the building into compliance. Legislative Hearings will be conducted to discuss the plan to remove or repair the building. She said she can answer questions about the process but will not be conducting a heazing about the appeal at this time. She said in looking at the appeal, the things that are most likely being appealed are the code inspection Sndings. Mary Huot introduced herself as a probate attorney. She has been working on the case since Betty Head, the owner of the house, died. Ms. Head's daughters, Tammie Head and Teri Head, the heirs to the estate, have been in special classes their entire lives and their mother took care of them completely. She requested that this hearing be continued and she would prepare a plan. She said it will be very difficult to reach compliance with the orders as it would devastate the daughters financially. She has a hearing in Probate Court the week ofMay 23 regarding this issue. The probletn will be transferring the title but once that is done, Tammie and Teri Head wili have letters and Ms. Huot will wotk with them regarding financing for the repairs. NOTES OF THE LEGISLATIVE HEARING OF MAY 17, 2005 Page 4 Jim Seeger, Office of LIEP, noted there were many areas m the structtae contamioated with feces, animals, and dead animals. He noted that the walls are probably filled with dead and young anunals. It is very bad 'm the basement where the water heater is located There are many hazardous areas with no tempered glass and many, many more health and safety issues which need to be addressed There are low areas where water could be seepmg mto the basement. The electrical areas were mspected by the electrical mspectors. He noted they are only looldng for minimum housmg standards to be met. Ms. Moermond noted that she has received phone calls and e-mails concerning tivs properiy and requesting mformation about the struchire - whether the buiid'mg will be removed or repaired. She eaplamed the $2,000 performance bond to be posted which would be necessary and would be refundable upon completion of the work. A work plan will be in place, evidence will be needed of the fmancial ability to execute the rehab (such as a letter of credit from the bank), vcant building fees will have to be paid, plus any outstand'mg citations, real estate taxes, etc. Ms. Moermond e�hasized that she needs to lrnow there is an understand'mg of the depth of this project, that this is a dangerous structure. She stated that some people choose to sell tbe property to someone who does the rehab, some choose to demo the structure, some fmd someone to do the necessary work. In terms of code compliance, the deficiency list must be addressed and the work must be completed. The large problem is the health issue with the feces and the dead animals in the wa11s. Ms. Huot noted that both of the Head daughters haue places to stay. Ms. Moermond stated that the appeal is denied and that the major issue is bow the repair or removal is handled. Appeal of Deficiency List at 919 North Dale Street; owner: Anthony Mahmood. Phil Owens stated that he spoke with the inspector of record and with Anthony Mahmood, the owner of Aesop's Table, regarding the deficiencies. It is his recommendation that continuing use of the existing system be allowed until such time as repair is needed, upon the annual inspection. Ms. Moermond noted that agreement has been reached and the appeal is withdrawn. Appeal of Deficiency List at 509 Fred Street; owner: Albert Oertwig. Ms. Moermond stated that the Neighborhood Housing and Property Improvement Office has requested that this item be laid over to Tuesday, June 7, 2005, and the layover has been agreed to by the Appellant. Ms. Moermond adjourned the hearing at 2:43 p.m. .. �l'�'t���� �lCS/aoo� RESOLUTION OF SA{NT PAUL, MINNESOTA Psesented Referred To Council File # �S 'S �� Green Sheet # 3p� S Committee Date BE TT RESOLVED, that the Council of the Ciry of Saint Paul hereby certifies and approves the May 17, 2005, decisions of the Legislative Hearing Officer on Appeals of Letters, Coaection Notices, and Correction Orders for the following addresses: Prooertv A aealed 919 Dale S7reet North (Appeal withdrawn.) �� Apnellant Anthony and Donna Mahmood 275 Summit Avenue Judith McLaugJilin, owner Decision: Limit attendees at any future events to no more than 100 occupants on the Deficiency List dated April 13, 2005. i5� t52`} � Carroll Avenue Troy Allison (Recommendation is forthcoming.) DQcisiva�: be.n,iu.E o�-f4� c�Pea.Q_ 1265 Stanford Avenue Mary Huot representing Tammie Head and Teri Head Decision: Appeal denied on Code Compliance Inspection Report dated Apri127, 2005. 509 Fred Street Albert Oertwig, owner Decision: Laid over to the June 7 Legislative Heazing. Yeas Nays Absent Benanau ✓ Bostrom ,l Harris ,�- Helgen ,� Lantry ✓ Montgomery ✓ Thune ,/ 7 C� O Requested by Deparirnent of � Form Approved by City Attorney � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council Adopted by Council: Date ��� �S� aOD� BY � Ada By: :.. . _ bs- Sa� � eet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet � �� �. ... _ ... ._ . _ , . � _ �� y reen eet Green Sh Departme�Uoffice/oouncil: Date Initiated: co -��� o��� Green Sheet NO: 3026775 Contact Person 8 Phone: DeoartmeM SeM To Person InitiaUDate Marcia Mcertnond � 0 uncit 266"856� Assign 1_ ouoc0 De artment Director Must Be on Council Agenda by (Daie): Number 2 ' Clerk For Routing 3 Order 4 5 Totai # of Signature Pages _(Clip All Locations for Signature) Action Requested: Approving the 5-17-OS decisions of the Legislarive Hearing Officer on Appeals of Letters, Conec6on Notices, and Correction Orders for the following addresses: 919 Dale Street North, 275 Summit Avenue, 1522 Carroll Avenue, 1265 Stanford Avenue, and 509 Fred Street. Recommendations: Approve (A) or Rejed (R): Personal Service Contracts Must Answer the Following l�uestions: Planning Commission 1. Has this personffirm ever worked under a contrect for this department? CIBCommittee Yes� No Civii Service Commission 2. Has this personffirtn ever been a city employee? Yes No 3. Ooes,this Qersonlfirm possess a skill not normalty possessed by any current city employee? Yes No Euplain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why): Advarrtanes If Aaarove[i: . � DisadvantaqeslfApproved: Disadvantages If Not Approved: � Total Amount of CosURevenue Budgeted: , Transaction: " Funding Source: Ac6vity Number. Financial I nformation: (F�cplain) � D� Sa�' �I2 NOTES OF TF� LEGISLATIVE HEARING LETTERS OF DEFICIENCY, CORRECTION NOTICES, AND CORRECTION ORDERS Tuesday, May 17, 2005 Room 330 City Hall, 15 Kellogg Boulevard VJest Marcia Moermond, Legislative Hearmg Officer The hearmg was called to order by Ms. Moermond aY 1:35 p.m STAFF PRESENT: Phil Owens, Division of Fire Prevention; Steve Schiller, and Steve Magner, Neighborhood Housmg and Property Improvement O�ce; James Seeger, Office of License, Inspecrions, and Env'sonmental Protection Appeal of Deficiency List at 275 Summit Avenue; owner: Judith McLaughlin. (Division of Fire Prevention) The Appellant, Iudith McLaughlin, was present. Phil Owens stated that the occupancy load for the house is a major concern. Orders included an approved emergency lighting system; approved directional e�t signs; the swing of the door must be changed to swing in the direction of travel; approved panic release hardwaze on all e�cit doors; additional means of egress due to an inadequate number of e�ts; post the occupant load on an approved sign in a conspicuous location neaz the main e�t ofthe room; and approved fire extinguishers in accordance with Fire regulations. Ms. McLaughlin stated that she has been at this location for 35 years doing private, on-site catering, and that she has never done off-site catering. Mr. Owens noted that there has never been a Certificate of Occupancy for this property. Ms. McLauglilin responded that she has reapplied for her catering license for 35 years but has never been informed that she needed a Certificate of Occupancy until now. She said she is 12-18 months from retirement, this is her home, and this will continue to be her home when the business ends. She noted that the house was budt in 1901. She said she is willing to put up signage and to rearrange things to comply, plus add a second e�t to the main floor. The front door is 8 feet by 42 inches; she has talked to two contractors and there is no efficient way to reverse the doors. One contractor suggested that the entire door be moved so that the inside ofthe door would be outside. She said there is no way the doors can be reversed without destroying their historic character. The side door is 7 feet by 32 inches and the possibility exists that the door could be removed and a new door attached on the outside. She said the front door is a major issue. Ms Moermond discussed the occupancy number for events currently scheduled on the property. She questioned Ms. McLaughlin as to whether there might be fewer than six events currently scheduled where occupancy will exceed 100. Ms. McLaughlin was unsure as she did not have her event calendar with her. Ms Moermond requested that there be no more events added to the current calendar which would exceed 100 and Ms. McLaughlin agreed to that request. NOTES OF TI-� LEGISLATIVE HEARING OF MAY 17, 2005 Page 2 Ms. Moermond concluded by statmg that no more 100 occupant-load events can be scheduled for the remamuig sixteen (16) months m order to remain m co�liance or before the properiy is retumed to residenrial use. She requested thaY Ms. McLaughlin notify her of the dates of events presently scheduled which will exceed 100 occupants. Ms. Moermond said the decision is effective now and a Ciry Council resolution will be processed Appeal of Correction Norice and Summary Abatement Order at 1461 5t. Clair Avenue; owner: Roger L. Johnson, Jr. (NHPI) (Note: The 5ununary Abatement Order has already been appealed.) Steve Schiller appeazed and said he is the inspector ofrecord. His supervisor appeazed at the previous meeting. Ms. Moermond said it is her understanding that Mr. Johnson had received no notification ofthe meeting. Mr. Schiller said he inspected the property the previous day but he did not take pictures as the previous pictures taken were still valid. He said the gazage is in a very deteriorated condition. Mr. Johnson responded that it is a usable gazage. Ms. Moermond noted that a Summary Abatement was ordered and that this is a Summary Abatement appeal. She explained that a Summary Abatement charge would come back to Mr. Johnson in the form of a property assessment and that the most affordable option would be for the owners to do the work themselves. Mr. Schiller stated that the main concern is the roof. It is literally at grade level from the yard and cluldren will be exposed to a dangerous roof at grade level. Mr. Johnson noted that the roof is rotting out and a tarp has been placed there to keep out the elements. Mr. Schiller added that there aze rotted roof support beams. Ms. Moermond said this stnxcture needs to come down and if the City takes it down, an assessment will have to be done as to whether there are hazardous materials in the budding such as asbestos. The City would need to follow PCA procedures before demolition could occur. This would be an additional cost to the demolition. If the demo is handled by the City, the owner will receive a tax assessment notice which can be appealed. She stated that the last time she checked the City's interest rate, it was 4.5%. Mr. Johnson said the garage has been in this condition for 20-25 years and he questioned why it is being addressed by the City at this tune. Mr. Schiller responded there was a sweep in the alley at which time this was noticed. Ms. Moermond added that the City has been doing sweeps of alleys in particular. Mr. Schiller stated that these sweeps are direct orders from the Mayor's Office. Ms. Moermond said the Mayor's order can be appealed to the City Council. She informed Mr. Johnson that the City will be looking for corrective action and that he has until July 8, 2005 to take care of the situation. She stressed that this is a public health and safety issue. NOTES OF THE LEGISLATIVE HEARING OF MAY 17, 2005 Page 3 Mr. Schiller informed Mr. Johnson that he is allowed to pull a permit and install a new roof but the work cannot be done without a build'mg permit. Mr. Johnson responded that he has appointments this week to talk with garage builders and thax he was just trymg to avoid the cost. Appeal at 1522-1524 CarroIl Avenue; owner: Troy Allison. (NFIPI) (Note: it is unclear what is being appealed at this property.) Steve Magner noted that his o�ce did not receive the appeal application. The inspector was to the property on March 2, 2005, and found the house to be vacant and the structure was water- damaged. Troy Allison had indicated he was the owner of the property and was sent a Vacant Building notice. Mr. Allison responded that the house has not been vacant, that he has owned it for over two years, and that one unit is a Section 8. He stated that inspector Dennis Senty informed him and the neighbors that he has a sworn, written statement that the house has been vacant for six months. It was sold to Dadders Holdings on Febn�ary 28, 2005. As of May 4, 2005, Dadders is still receiving notices that it is on the Vacant Building list. If the duplex had to be brought into total compliance it would be very costly. He said the inspectors are not telling the truth about being given sworn statements. Mr. Allison said he has 250 units in the City of Saint Paul and his houses are inspected once a yeaz by Section 8 officials. Ms. Moermond stated that the Vacant Fee letter was issued on May 4, 2005, and she doesn't feel she has the necessary information regarding this situation. She said she will lay this matter over for one week in order to review the file and make a decision. Appeal of Code CompGance Inspecfion Report at 1265 Stanford Avenue; appellant: Mary Huot, representing Tammie Head and Teri Head. (LIEP) Ms. Moermond noted that this was a condemnation with an order to vacate and there was an emergency abatement (cleanup). It has been declared a nuisance property. She explained that the declaration of a nuisance structure gives time certain to bring the building into compliance. Legislative Hearings will be conducted to discuss the plan to remove or repair the building. She said she can answer questions about the process but will not be conducting a heazing about the appeal at this time. She said in looking at the appeal, the things that are most likely being appealed are the code inspection Sndings. Mary Huot introduced herself as a probate attorney. She has been working on the case since Betty Head, the owner of the house, died. Ms. Head's daughters, Tammie Head and Teri Head, the heirs to the estate, have been in special classes their entire lives and their mother took care of them completely. She requested that this hearing be continued and she would prepare a plan. She said it will be very difficult to reach compliance with the orders as it would devastate the daughters financially. She has a hearing in Probate Court the week ofMay 23 regarding this issue. The probletn will be transferring the title but once that is done, Tammie and Teri Head wili have letters and Ms. Huot will wotk with them regarding financing for the repairs. NOTES OF THE LEGISLATIVE HEARING OF MAY 17, 2005 Page 4 Jim Seeger, Office of LIEP, noted there were many areas m the structtae contamioated with feces, animals, and dead animals. He noted that the walls are probably filled with dead and young anunals. It is very bad 'm the basement where the water heater is located There are many hazardous areas with no tempered glass and many, many more health and safety issues which need to be addressed There are low areas where water could be seepmg mto the basement. The electrical areas were mspected by the electrical mspectors. He noted they are only looldng for minimum housmg standards to be met. Ms. Moermond noted that she has received phone calls and e-mails concerning tivs properiy and requesting mformation about the struchire - whether the buiid'mg will be removed or repaired. She eaplamed the $2,000 performance bond to be posted which would be necessary and would be refundable upon completion of the work. A work plan will be in place, evidence will be needed of the fmancial ability to execute the rehab (such as a letter of credit from the bank), vcant building fees will have to be paid, plus any outstand'mg citations, real estate taxes, etc. Ms. Moermond e�hasized that she needs to lrnow there is an understand'mg of the depth of this project, that this is a dangerous structure. She stated that some people choose to sell tbe property to someone who does the rehab, some choose to demo the structure, some fmd someone to do the necessary work. In terms of code compliance, the deficiency list must be addressed and the work must be completed. The large problem is the health issue with the feces and the dead animals in the wa11s. Ms. Huot noted that both of the Head daughters haue places to stay. Ms. Moermond stated that the appeal is denied and that the major issue is bow the repair or removal is handled. Appeal of Deficiency List at 919 North Dale Street; owner: Anthony Mahmood. Phil Owens stated that he spoke with the inspector of record and with Anthony Mahmood, the owner of Aesop's Table, regarding the deficiencies. It is his recommendation that continuing use of the existing system be allowed until such time as repair is needed, upon the annual inspection. Ms. Moermond noted that agreement has been reached and the appeal is withdrawn. Appeal of Deficiency List at 509 Fred Street; owner: Albert Oertwig. Ms. Moermond stated that the Neighborhood Housing and Property Improvement Office has requested that this item be laid over to Tuesday, June 7, 2005, and the layover has been agreed to by the Appellant. Ms. Moermond adjourned the hearing at 2:43 p.m. ..