235719 ORIGINAL TO GITY CLERK � ���� ° ��`J
CITY OF ST. PAUL FoENC�� NO. _
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
COUNCI RE OLUTION—GENERAL FORM �
PRESENTED BY
COMMISSIONE DATE -
WHEREAS, Recent communications from the Minnesota� Pollution Control Agency
indlcate the need for substantial acceleration of the program for water pollution
abatement, and �
WHEREAS, Planning for such an accelerated program� must involve coordination
between many agencies and units of city government, as well as the coumunity at
largey �
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Department of Public Works report
• and recommendations dated November 2, 1967, and attached hereto, are hereby approved
as a preliminary guideline for the aforesaid planning,4 and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Council hereby approves the establishment of
a Waste Improvement Planning Committee to advise the Council on pollution abatement
matters, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Mayor develop and bring before the Council for
consideration proposals for organizational arrangements and appointments to member-
ship for satd Waste I:mprovement Planning Committee, and
r
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the City Technical Committee is hereby designated
�as a staff resource for the Waste Improvement Planning Comnittee and members of the
Technical Committee andJall other city employees are hereby requested and instructed '
to cooperate fully and render`all�possible aid, edvic'e�and counsel to the said Waste
Improvement Planning Committee whenever requested to do so by the committee chair-
man, .and f._ _ _ � � ! ��
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the City Clerk transmit to the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency a copy of this resolution, together with a copy of the November 2, _ _,
1967, report of the Department of Public Works as an expression of the intent of the
Council, � � ,
COUNCILMEN NUV 1 O 19��J
Adopted by the Council 19—
Yeas Nays ��W 1 0 196'
��
�Dalglish Approved 19—
Holland
- Meredith • Tn Favor
.
. - -`P-e�ersorr � Mayor
Tedesco A gainst
:11f��.'P,r�esid'ent,.�Yr?�e.:�3l�i��
Mr. vicc r�cs:i��nt (�ateroon� PvBLISHED �,p�/ 1,g i967�
. -
� �� ` �22
\ ' . � _ C ' . � , . '- �
� � .. - � ,♦ _ "� _ � • a
"' . • . " " c z _ ' ' '_ ' � 1
� � . y ` - ' A _ � 4 . ' _ � _. _ ` ' . = . � '
' � . . •_ t . • - 1a. ' .. � • - , . ` _�
�. - � - ' . - '. ._" , l �vOV.- �.�� 1.�b7 - � .
' _ _ ' _ • - , z - , _ , _ � _ . - _ . ,
.- , _ - . , . . -4 " .` =, : ,� - , , � - . .�. , �, .
� . - Minnesota i'ollution Contro3 Agency., - � - � � _, ' ' ,_ ' _
, � � t�12n��ot� Dept. bf He�,].tY�,� � , � . ` _ . .. . .
_ - University Campus, - -�� . � ' - _ - • ' - � _ "
...,. Mpls. M3.nn.. 55444. : � - - - - • � - ,° -- - ` t . : �
• �ntlemer�:�- . .�- - - - _- . - ' .. . - _ � , - _� _ __, _ ` - �
:. . , - . _ - - _ " - •_ _ :,,� ,: � - -
� - � Ericlosed 3s a copy df a olution o . tYie Satnt �auZ ` _ . - -
' � . - City ConnGil, C. F. 235719, apPro � e�s a l�min�,rY�guideline� - � .
the reco�rrnenda�ions �P the ��epartme t of ltc Works� dated NQV. - � '.,�
_ _ _ , • 2, 1967,' and approving the es.ta,�liahra .� a Wast.e_ T�nprovement ' ` � ,- ��-'? '�
-_ �P]:anning Committee to adv unc n po],l.ution abetemen� � _
ma.tte�s. As.directed by e Cour� we a1Go,enclosing a - - , - '
, - � "copy of the .report� of. t Ptxblic'Wfl � Dep� tmen��dated,NQV. 2`, � - -
', 1967 a� an expressi�n the i�ten� the C�ty Courxcil. ' ' - �;
. _ , - �' , _ - - . - .
� ' - Yery�.tru?Y Your�� - , . " '
, •_ . . ' , ` •� - � _ _ - . City Clerk -. - • • , - ., '
. , . - . AO/h� . .. , ' ' - , - - _ ' -
� - _ _- . _ _ . �. .
- , _ . . � ? „ . • � • , � . _
. . ` ��� - . ` " 'i '-
_ � � _ - ' _ . ^ " ' �
� . . _ . . j�� F � ♦ • � . _
3 � • - _ ' � � ' - � .
, • ~ , • � ' • ' • • • , J' ` _
. - - • a' . - � .
. � � . - � " � � • ' " • � , • - ' _
" . � " 'l �
+ • � - '- ,, ' ' _ � • • t • '- "' " ' - ' S
. • z
' _ � . • _ !
EUGENE V. AVERY Y A ' ANTHONY J. CREA �
CHIBR BNOIN6HR � I T Y O F � A I � � P/. \ � L DfiPUTY GOMMI88{ONER y
� Capital of Minnesota � . '
DEP�,��'Ll���'�' OF PU�LIC �iO�dKS
234 City Hall & Couri� House 55102
ROBEftT F. PETEftSON �
� Commissioner � � �
' ` : .. �O
.. .. .._ _ , � ;
November 3, 1967 .
�•.. . ..,
Honorable Thomas R. Byrne, Mayor
and Members of the City Council
City of St. Paul .
Gentlemen: �
We are distributing today for your study a rather massivE amount of
� material pertaining to suggested concepts for an enlarged water pollution
control program. Implication of this program would be large and far-
reaching.
The Council obviously will need time to study the reports before
taking any action, so we suggest that the meeting of November lOth be
set aside for further discussion.
At that time we would hope that some preliminary action would be
' possible on:
1. The concept of a broad program of improvement to existing
procedures and facilities, together with partial sewer
separation, ;11 in lieu of complete separation.
2. The concept of a policy advising and coordinating group, together
with fte characteristics of inembership and procedures.
3. Notification to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency of the
Council's intentions.
,
� Respectfully submitted,
. � � .
Robert F. Peterson
Commissioner of Public Worke
RFP/EVA/dr
I
I
�
i , ,
-� : � . . , .
. , „ -
� . EUOENE V. AVERY . C I T Y O F S A I N � P A U L ANTHONY J. CREA •
+ � CNI[R�NOIH[[R DVUTY COMMt��ION[R ��,
' Capital of Minnesota � ' " ,
� � ,
� .� DEPARTMENT OF PU�LIC WORKS - ��
! � � '` 234 Ci Hall & Court House 55102 � �
, , �. - tY
� , , , • ,
' - ROBERT F. PETERSON • �
` Commissioner � � � ,
, , . . �� � . �O. � ..
November 2, 1967
L L ._a.i
1 �
Honorable Thomas R. Byrne, Mayor
and Membera of the City Council
City of Saint Paul '
Gentlemen: .
The Council has referred to the DeparCment of Public Works the Auguat 28th
directive to Saint Paul from the Minnesota Pollution Coatrol Ageacy. A copy
of their directive, marked Exhibit I, is included in the attachments to thia
letter.
The purpose of our letter at thie time ia to advise the Council of the
implication of the MPCA directive and to recomonend, in a preliminary way, a ,
program of activities aimed at achieving substantial compliance with the
directive, which is mainly concerned with improvements to our combined sewer
system. We are propoaing that in lieu of complete separation of the sanitary
and atorm sewers, a broadly based interim program of improved pollution coatrol
be developed. This would involve the maximum feasible degree of separation, .
together With improvemeats in present procedures and facilities. Such a .
program Will concern most citq departments as well as other agencies. It
will involve many factors and commuaity valuea beyond the jurisdiction of
• the Public Worke Department. ' �We are therefore proposiag that a coordinating
� group be establiehed to set policy and give guidance to these efforts. For
further background on the matter, we have assembled and attached hereto a
number of our previoua reports to the Council.
' Our suggestiona are, we believe, compatible with the general approach to
the problem being used by other cities having combined sewer aystems. According
to a recent American Public Worka Aasociation survey, it appears that about
fifty-five million persons live in communities aerved by combined aewers. In
these other atates and cities, discussions and studies are being made of
objectives similar to thoae expresaed by the Minneaota Pollution Control Agencj►.
Several of the requirementa in the MPCA letter pertain to procedural
mattera and the City can comply with a alight change in operating procedure
or policy. These changes in operating procedure require little, if any,
additional effort and this will not substantially increaae our required .
operating funda. The MPCA requirements conaidered to be in this category
' are ae followa: � '
, �
:
1. i
1 •
i `
�
� -
:
� 1. The MPCA is requiring that the city stop constructing comb°ined '
sewers in any newly developed area. This means that a t�o-pipe
separate atorm and sanitarq system must be constructed wherever
; the system is extended, even though both syatema will discharge
to a combined sewer for the time being. The areas tributary to .
� our combined system are practically all sewered; however, we are
occasionally constructing a amall extension to the aystem. Under
ithe terms of the MPCA directive, such e�cteneions muat include
� aeparate storm and sanitary sewer pipes from now on. Since these
� extensions are usually local improvementa, the additional cost
� would presumably be borne by the property ownera as an increased
► • asaessment rate.
f �_ ....,
i 2. The MPCA directive requires the Cfty to continuously monitor the
� exiating combined sewer• outlets and to operate regulators so as
to provide treatment for the magimum possible amount of combined
or sanitary sewage. Thia function ia presently performed for the
city by the Minneapolis-St. Paul Sanitary District �SSSD) and after
' consultation with the MPCA staff, it ia understood that a continuation
. of the present and currently proposed MSSD programs will satiefq
, this requiremenC at the present time. •
. , .
j 3. The MPCA is requiring the city to discontinue the operation of any -
open dump on the flood plain of the Mississippi River. It appears
that the agency directive was based on conditions existing prior
to February of 1967. The changes made in the landfill outlined in
the attached Exhibit II have brought the landfilla substantially
, toward the status deaired by the Pollution Control Agency. It .
' " appears that with certain comparativelq minor further improvements
j � and a continuation of the program now established, the operation
; of the landfills will be satiafactory. It is anticipated that the
` Department of Public Works with the continued support of the Council,
�ill be able to accomplish this without any major new funds.
4. The MPCA directive requires the City to furnish monthly operational
reports for both the sewer system and the solid waste and refuse
' dieposal operations. The directive also requires that any emergency
' or planned by-paesing of sewage to the river be reported im�ediately
to the MPCA. These are primarily matters of procedure and the
Department has already taken the necessary steps to establish a
proper co�unication and reporting system which should satisfy
this portion of the directive.
' � 5. The directive further requires the city to obtain �,iritten consent
� from the MPCA before making any major� alteratfons or additiona
to existing �sewer or solid waete disposal facilities. To comply
with this part of the directive, it will be necessary that the
. city and the MPCA establish closer lines of comm�unication and
that the city provide for periodic review of our construction �
' program and plans. With cooperation on both sides, this ahould
certainly be accomplished without too much difficultq.
� - I
I
2• I
. . i
, ; ;
. .
;
6. The city is required by the directive to�make application to the
MPCA for interim permita for all existing combined sewer outlete
and for the sanitary landfill operation. This, in effect, requires '
that the city register a list of all existing aewer outleta on the
Mississippi River and furnish certain engineering data for the
varioua outlets. The Department of Public Works is presently '
working to compile the necessary data.
The six items listed above are consfdered reasonable requirements and
St. Paul can and should comply without any serious difficulty. Aowever,
• .;,' the 1@tter from MPCA contains two other requirements which are not quit�
' so readily disposed of and which merit your close attention. These are
as followe:
L L .� �
1. The MPCA letter requires that the City of St. Paul, "wherever
reasonablq poasible, eliminate such existing (combined) seWers,
or otherwise control or treat the sewage from this source so as � ,
to be in compliance with the standards by not later than June
' 17, 1977".
At this time, We do not know exactly what is required of the city under °
this part of the directive. To completely eliminate all existing combined
sewers by June 17, 1977, appears to be a practical impossibility, both
phqaically and financially. Juat how and to what extent we may be able '
to "otherwise control or treat the aewage from thia source (combined sewer
overflow) so as to be in compliance with the atandarda," is not evident at
this time. In recognition of these difficulties, the MPCA has included
anothar requirement which follows: '
2. The City of St. Paul is required to "undertake detailed
engineering studies on eliminating the existing combined
eewers within the city and/or developing effective methods
for controlling tha diacharge of sewage to the Mississippi �
�River from this source in conformance with the atandarde,
with progress reports being provided regularly every quarter �
and the completed study report, with an improvement proposal
by the city, being submitted to the Agency for consideration
by not later than March 17, 1969." ,
By means of theae etudiea, the city is expected to produce a plan for
action to control and reduce the pollution of the Missisaippi River either
by separation of combined sewera or by alternate methods. The city's plan,
which the MPCA refers to as a "Waate Improv�ent Proposal" must include
� implementation achedules and financing arrangements. You will note the
Waste Improvement Proposal must be completed and submitted to the MPCA
within less than 18 montha.
Being somewhat familiar with the problems connected with St. Paul's
old combined sewer system, we are sure you can realize how complex and
difficult a task coafronts all of us in preparing a satiafactory pollution
abatemeat plan. This becomes especially apparent if you consider that it
� has been estimated that it could cost $250 millioa to completelq eliminate
� ell combined ae�aere as auggested by the I�CA. �
� f
, - 3.
. r .
�
.. - .
� Complete separation is probably not feasible., What is needed, we
. believe, in lieu of complete separation, is a broadly based program of
pollution control involving the maximum pradticable degree of aeparation,
as well as improvement of the present procedures and facilities. With ,
thia thought in mind, we suggest establishing preliminary objectivea 'of
• , atudy and action to •include the following areas: �
1. Ways and means of implementing the previously recaamended $43 � '
million dollar program (Exhibit V) . This represents a major
initial step toward pollution abatement and improved public .
health. •
2. Development of plans and a program for the maximum feasible
separation of storm an� sanitary se�era. The definition of
feasibi`l�ity";' from the coumunity's atandpoint, will be difficult.
3. An improved monitoring syatem to detect immediately any overflow
of sewage to the river. This could involve new equipment and au ,
expanded operating program.
4. A more axtensive program for modernization and improvement of the
regulators and diversion devices to allow operating personnel to•
best utilize the sqstem �e now have and provide treatment for the
maximum amount of aewage and waste Water. '
5. A eyetem of express aewers to convey aewage from outlying areas
having separate sanitary sewers directly Co the treatment worka. •
The �aste from these areas would no longer be subject to combined
aeWer overflow. �
6. Elimination or reduction of the quantity of waste water discharged .
� to the combined sewer system from the St. Paul water treatment worka.
7. A system of strategically located clear water sewers to accommodate
air conditioning, cooling, refrigeration or ground water and permit
the diversion of such clean water from the combined syatem thus
reducing the volume of waste.
� 8. Reduce the volume of sewage and waste by changing sewer rental
ratea from the present flat rate system to a volume basis as an
incentive to Water conservation.
9. Further reduce the volume of waste in the combined system by
• investigating and correcting excesaive infiltration of ground water.
' 10. Obtain improved coatrol over the quantity of flow and ratea of
diacharge in , the combined sewer syatem by giving the personnel
' operating the sewer syatem jurisdiction over the lake level
controls oa lakes overflowing to combined sewera.
11. Enaure that individual8 and property ownera make proper use of the
sewer system by improving coordinatioa of the plumbing code and
ite enforcement With the goals and criteria established� for the
public eewer system. �
4. ,
,
r
..' .
, � 12. Develop an improved code or ordinance regulating the use of the
� � sewer aystem for diaposal of industrial wastes and inatitute an
- operating program for its enforcement.
1 • 13. Study new methods of drainage area control to accommodate storm
i
runoff without discharging undesirable effluenta to lakes and ,
, atreama. Among the things to be considered ia the possible
future requirement for treatment of storm runoff to retard
nuCrient build-up and other pollution of lakes and atreams. �
Some of the areas suggested for inveatigation iaclude controlling
runoff coefficients through zoning and land use restrictious, ,
atorage basins and inverted wells. �
14. Feasibility studies of facilities to treat and diainfect combined
sewage when overflow to the river cannot be averted by other methods
such as those indicated above. In addition to treatment facilitiea,
storage basins to hold the combined sewage for later di8charge to
� interceptor system should be investigated. �
� 15. An acceleration of our current efforts to provide storm sewera in
, ! areas presently served by ,combined sewers. A comprehensive study
� of sewer financing procedures similar to that previouslq auggested
on Page 41 of the attached Exhibit V is considered essential. �
You will note in the August 28th MPCA directive that the city's proposal
t and the schedule for completing it when accepted by MPCA will be incorporated
s t in an agreement which will be legally binding upon both the city and the MPCA°
� It is essential, therefore, that the proposal be supported by clear public
consensus for action. We are concerned that the Engineering Bureau of the
Department of Public Works receive proper advice and guidance on city
� policy ia developing the technical aspects of the plan. Decision making in
planning pollution abatement must ultimately ba concerned with cost versus
� effectiveness. For example, the point of view that insists on complete
l and immediate prevention of all waste disposal to our streams has a consequence
� of very high costs and possible diversion of financial and economic resources
from other programs of equal or greater benefit to society. We believe it
would be desirable if the broadest posaible cross section of the cosamunity
were allowed to express opinions throughout development of the plan.
In addition, it is apparent that the plan will involve most city
departments as well as several outside agencies and organizations. Therefore, '
we recommend that the City Council establish a sewer policy advisory
committee with representatives from each city department and from the
� coc�unitq at large.
�
It is believed that such a committee could give necessary direction
in establiahing basic criteria for the studies and provide assistance
� with the neces8ary financing plana.
�
i '
� 5. .
• ,•`. ' , � ,
. , r :
You will note that the Auguet 28th directive from the MPCA recommends
that the city review and promptly advise the agency as to the city'e
abilities and intentions to comply. Therefore, if the Council be in � .
agreement with the above proposed outline of action, it is recommanded
that the Minnesota Pollution Conerol Agency be officially notified
that it is the intention of the City of St. Paul to proceed according
to the above recommendatione.
. Yours very truly,
- ;
�� _.., � � �
0
Eugene V. Avery � �
Chief Engineer
APPROVED:
��
Robert F. Peteraon
Commissioner of Public Worke , ,
' � I
� • i
EVA/CS/dr� '
I
i
Attachments: �
i
Exhibit I August 28, 1967 letter from Minneaota Pollution Control Agency �
Ea�ibit II Status Report Pigs Eye � Fish Hatchery Landfille
Exhibit III Report on Uae of St. Paul Public Se�er System
, � .
Exhibit IV Metropolitan St. Paul S�nitary S.ewerage Report '
Exhibit V City of St. Paul Sewerage 6 Drainage Report
. . ,
;
.. '' �
, � , �
.•"�
� � "' �'� � ST.AT]' OF MINN�'SOTA A�st 2S, 1967
' ''�r `�� �"� rfIIJ1�ESOTA POLLUTIOr1 COrIT�OL AGENCY EX�I/�/T Z .
.i �,;.� . ' n
, BOARD OF HEP,LTH BUTLDTIJG
. • ' UNYVERSITY CAMPU.9 � DIRECT REPLIES T0:
��1'. � MINPIEAPOLIS LYL� H. StsiTH �
' ' . 5544� � AC��NG DI:ZECTOR �
,:, � . � � y �.� � � 539-7751
'`'i%• �' „ , , � � � � .' .�
, � , • .
��' . , � . . AUG �.� f967 , �
' ' � The Honorable Thomas Byrne, Mayor UEPT, p�' '
, � ,. PUf��fC ',����f<KS -
. , , City of St. Paul CI-itEF �NGOP�F��
, ' Cit,y Hall
� ��� � St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 • •
; , • , . .
;+�;,' , Dear Mayor Byrne: ,'
'�I'' ''� ' The Summary of the Federal-State Conference on Pollution of the Upper Mississippi �
;�';,;,.;. �_,' .
�:;;;`�: .;': � River which was held in Minneapolis in February and March, 1967 is encl'osed for
;j�j �'� ��';; consideration by the Cityo Copies of the transcript of the Conference may be , ,
�';. ,�' , made available later 'if requestedo • '
;.,�' , • �
. � � The attention of the City is invited to General Recommendations Nos. 10 and 11� �
, , • on page 8, concerning combined sevrers and refuse dumps, respectively, together '
� with the Schedule for Remedial Pro�ram on page 12. It should be noted that the
� ,' matter of the combined sewers herein referred to is not new but was brou�ht to
�.• - the attention of the City several years ago by,the former Minnesota V+ater Pollution
Control Commission in connection with the adoption of standards for the reach of �
� the Mississippi River floVrin� through St. Paulo • �� � �
� In view of the interstate nature of these waters either the Mi.nnesota Po11u- '
• �- tion Control Agency or the Federal Water Pollution Control Admini.stration will, • � '
� within the next six months, revise the existing standards for the river to conform
with the recommendations of this Conference. Revisions are also made necessary
, by the Interstate Water Quality Criteria �which were recently adopted by the
, Commission and submitted to the Federal Tr7ater Pollution Control Administration � � .
• for approval. The revisions probabl,y will be accompanied by orders to abate _
' sources of pollution where the necessary action is not being takeno
J
„� The conference recommendations referred to above have been reviewed by.the staff '
' � , and more specific requirements and schedules have been prepared which we believe
, • will ensure that the objectives of the Conference are met in fullo The obliga- ,
. ' tions of the City and recommended measures for compliance are given belowa '
lo The City of St. Paul (hereinafter called the City) is not in compliance with
., . the� standards in that it does operate an open dump in the fl•ood plai.n of the
' Mississippi River and does also dischar�e major quantities of raw sewage
, from numerous combined sanitary and�or storm sewer outfalls to the Missi- •
� ssippi River in the reach abutting the City, which sewage effluents when �
discharged generally include suspended solids in excess of 50 mg/l, or
• settleable solids in excess of 5 ml�l, or 5-day biochemical oaqrgen demand
' in excess of 50 mg/l, or coliform organisms in excess of 1000 N1PN/100 ml, .
or other matters or characteristics in excess of those specified in the
. . standardsa '
. � , , . ,
. , �
.� � �� _ . �
,. . ,
The Iionorable Thomas B,yrne, Ma,yor 2—
L.�;
� .
. . ,
2. I�'or the purpose of eliminating such noncompliance, it is recommended that
the City: .
� . a. Undertalce detailed engineering studies on eliminating the existing � �
� • combined setivers within the City and�or developing effective methods
for controlling the discharge of sewa�e to the Mississippi River from
' , this source in conformance with the standards, with progress reports' • ,
being provided regularly every quarter and the completed study repdrt, �
� • with an improvement proposal by the City, being submitted to the • " �
' Agency for consideration by not later that March 17, 1969. � � ✓ •• �,
� �
' b. Henceforth construct no more combined sewers, and wherever reasonabl�t
possible eliminate such existing sewers, or otherwise control or treat , ��
I
the sewage from this source so as to be in compliance with the standards • • � �
by not later than June 17, 19770 •
� , e. Continuously monitor the outfalls and' report thereon monthly, and � � �
� operate the existing combined sewer system so as to convey in the •
interim the maxi.mum possible amount of combined sewage and storm . ��
� . � ; water into the Nlinneapolis—St. Paul Sanitaxy �District (hereinafter ' ' �� , '
�' , • " called the District) interceptor sanitary sewer and through its � ; ',
'' . ��wa�e treatment works, wherever this is not already being done, � , � � ,
� , � or will not otherwise be done by or in cooperation with the District � � � - , �
� ��� . , under its special study program; subject, however; to reasonable � ' !
� '` � � limitations which may be imposed by the District for the purpose of ,,.� � � ,, ' ��
f,��.; �� ` � � protecting its disposal� system, operations or .studies from damage , • '
'��' � ' � � or undue interference. ' -
:,. ,. . , , ,
' ' d. Construct and operate t�eatment works for 5atisfactory disposal of ' . •
" . . •the refuse and other wastes originating in the City such as to avoid '
� .; , an,y actual or potential pollution of the waters of the State or • � � �
• � air pollution. ' ' • �
� e. Submit to the Agency for approval preliminary plans for such proposed � '�•
' refuse treatment works by not later than December 17, 1967; submit
final design specifications and plans by June 17, 196g9 together with •
� adequate financing information; complete the financing arrangementsy ,
� � , � • let contracts and staxt construction of the .treatment works by •
� September 17, 196g; and• complete the construction of the system and
� � place it in operation by June 17, 1g690 � I
fo Cease and desist from operating an,p open dump for disposal of refuse
on the flood plain of the Mississippi River, and restore the existing
dump area to an esthetically acceptable condition, by not later than
September 17, 1969• ,
o Provide be innin , immediatel �
6 �� � y pro�ress reports regularly every three
months during the interim planning and construction periods as well � �
- as regular monthly effluent and�or operation reports both before and c �
' after completion of the disposal s.ystems and modifications mentioned � �
in Sections b and d above, together with. such data as may be requested �
b;� the A�ency to inform itself of the nature of the effluents9 if ar�y9
and the adequacy of construction and�or operation of the systemso , �
--- -- . .
y..r^..tno9iu�—.�,-�.,._�...-.—.__...._c,_ - . - _ ______— '�'_'_--z.—���--- _---•-• _.'.._"—� " -
I , -- �
� v �
�"��t''' Tl�e �'onorable Thomas Ryrne, I�ayor —3— � �
e;,.•-.,. • , ti
n ` ,
, ' . .
' h. Inunediatelv rcr�ort all accidental or emergenc3* bypassin� or s��illa�e �
� " £rom an.y part of the City�s s�wa�e disposal system to the Agency;
. and provide information on any planned cleaning, repair, alteration,
addition or new construction to ;the system which will or could result
, in bypassin� or discharge of raw or combined sewa�e to waters of the
state, to�ether with a plan for controllin� the possible pollution
' effects at minimum level, before such work is commenced. ' ' �
i. Make no major alterations or additions to the existin� or proposed
facilities without the written consent of the Agency and discharge� ,
, no effluent therefrom after December 31, 1969, except as provided . "
' , for under the terms of a valid permit issued b;��the Agency.
3o A�:ake application witho.ut delay to the Agency for the necessary ' � �
' interim permits, and promptl,y provide any� other reports or inform— ' �•
. ation as may otherwise be required by the state or national water �
pollution con�rol statutes or the Interstate ti�later Quality Standardso � '
, Tt is recommended that the City review these recommendations and advise this .
Agenc,y promptly as to its abilities and intentions to comply as indicated. �
� Asswnin� that the City will agree and proceed voluntarily, it is. in•the intention •
of the A�enc,y to incorporate the recommendations given above in a stipulation
� .. which when signed will be legally banding upon both parties. ,
In the event that direct discussions with the Agency are desired by the City ' �
� � before reaching a final decision, it is suggested that arrangements be made '
for an appearance by responsible respresentatives of the City before the � �
• Agency on September 12. ' .
, ' In the interim we shall be glad to meet with technical representatives of the
City to discuss these matters further at any mutually convenient time and placeo
• Yours very truly, � , •
a �
o �
• � Lyle H. Smith, Acting Director �
Enclosure Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
cc: City Couricil, c/o Harry E. Marsha.11, Clerk of Sto Paul '
Commi.ssioner of Public Works, St. Paul ,
City Attorney, Joseph P. Suu�ers, St. Paul �
City Engineer, Eugene V. Avery, Stv Paul �
City Health Officer, (Levich), St. Paul . •
' � ,
+ � ,
f , . ' �
• , , ' { . , ' , " ' ' , :�f.'� ti^ ' ' ,
: .s. :,�._. �:.,�-��. .• � � .. � � - � . -,. � , - s . .� � : � ,x� H / B % � � � ��'� -
�,;�.. t �.
' ����.�.,� � , • ' , , , , - � �� ; ,. �,. . ,�<�° � ' ;,
, i �,,;� i, ' �;
� , , • • , �� • t . . ' , , .,,�'��,�� � '„i
; '! . , - , � ` • 1 + . ' � , ' 1',: ��,h�' i
� - � ' - . , ' ' ' j +' �� , , , ;""�;1 ''r' :.. �i
' . • ' ' � ' �_�� 1'v�•�V :� I�,
i ( i�1' .r
' 1 . ; . + � , -- ,c . . , ' . � �y '� 9.�;'5,+: ;�"lr%'
I i' . , . , ^ , ' . I � �',���,�f."!'Y� j�, ,
. . , ,:�' ' , � � , . •. � , �f�;�5�' ;fr�}.a,- :'si
. . _ , _ , . I•�.,;, ,
' � � ' i ' , S � , � � . ' i � ., 'r��{yJ��;F•'�•�.�� �t�•C''�'a`.i
� ' ' ' / ' ' � � ' '�9 ,Nih�'.I.��''I'.
. , :,�.;i�F�# i
� . . ' ' , • �l�r::-.3i� :j .� .;
� . . • � • ..r't t'• �
, . , , , � . , r , r{F ��,.1
. . � � , . � � . - .:+r�j�� �. .' �
• - • . � ;! '.�'i� i' � i ,'
• � ' • � � • ' ' �i�CL�i���+� ����,
, } „ . -1`•� ���� ��
' •1 r � ' ' r �T,�, ,'�-•
� ' ' - � - ' � STATUS REPORT ' ' . - � , .E�.�'. �;�';;
. . ' . ' . • , . ' . 4 ,,.,
�� �' ,"q ` ' ' ' �';' ,Z�: ' �,`
' "'�:;����i�i' . . - P�IGS EYE AND FISH HATCHERY LANDFILLS . - '•j�� �` ' ;
-{i. �i` , ; , 'r`','t,;�`, i, .. " :.,'
� '�;j °'' . . ,. ' ., • • , < < ' . � ,�. •� f;'��
:' � �.xr`' j;�- � , , � , � . . � y � .�
7}�+�j''�'' . � . s„ � _ .,, • . '.ti:. .. f�
.. .�':;':�?ki{;� - � : . . , . • ' , ' , ' . . a . �.' � �' r 4 , ,
•�� , . , � . �, 1;:� •
�q,�� , .", , , . . ��'�. '.i�
- " � � � ' ' • • f±'�,� .r -�
. :r;K-�- � . � , . t _ ,� � , _�; . � ��
. -'£��;�. . . t '`, , ` . . . �' -;.,�. �;i;;
� • ' . �' ' " ' .. � � _., . • . ,�s.�, -
- , .4.1-,Yt,•4 • . ' 4 ` � " ." . !' .t ' " , r'Y!•,.�� . �%S.i
"rl C� ' ' ' - � . . �F�'� ' ��� 1�',
�'.4 ' . I � . - . .� , � ' � � . ' .. '1, t' fr�;f, ._
, F . , � . � ,�` i �
,tT.. . ' . ' , , . . . . "�''"r.; :i"5.
> '!.. ' � ;I , `�i.,r:• ' '
' _ _' , � , � ' ' - � t � t .�
. �.� . ' I � .. _ '• , • . ±''`��,1'' a . V ��
, . . . .j�,�, a ,'
_ ' , , ' , � F.4„�� '.
. � . 1 � . ' ' � , � • ' -!
, {� 'i•�i R`;4� ` ,�
, ��'f�r � "!
'i ` '' - •, .�� � , S j 1y�,��,',,��'�', 4'fe,�`�
i ;�; , ' . � � , , . . - '-- . � l:�� . -�, ! ;
. i y . '�1 y1;�, "�
r. . I' ' • ' ' + • f +t ' C �,�
� ' , . �� ��'��' ;f; }�Y�
. , .. , . G � . � • i . %� ,t?'.��, , ' '
. . � � . , �i�..^�j �`�;
, ' � � ' '. ,F�''}:�1. '� ' `.��.,'�,
`. , i . � ' ` '�, � �.�
• , � , ,.�. �.j;,y,
' y , ' . " �i� .
, + � :'4..tr • , r ' . , 1~ 1 � � � ' , ,. , • t �' � '' ' f,
� ' . _ .. , . , � •! ,f•�
, ! ' c .. }
i_ ` ;S � . . . � . . , ' .. .�t`..,
, . . � r � _ .:jl' , �i
• '.i,l'�• :� � , � � _ � - , � � c ; , . � `�, ' ' - i� � .. i 1 , .� t�r;�•QI� �� :'��'
���S. f �.�F-'i. . . , � • - . �. ' ' t _ ' � ' , • . ,�r.�FI•�.' � ° !
' 1 , �'�'F f � . , _ . �- " ' . . ', � � ' ' ; Jt.�' . 1 �
: ,{`�.� _ , • , ,. � ' , ' � M .
, � , ,4��' , . , � v . ' - , . � P. . —
�°�}' '":`i"� + - , . .� • ;'-,. . . '. ,�" .: � �
(! d;i(��9 ' . ' . . .' . � t. + ,t ' � ' ' , t .���� � r
, �•y {��,� � • . ,. ' . � .t� �i .� .�� � , }'�F�1 `i:
�� !� •- � ' .� �• � �_ � , � � .�. . : .
.` , � '_ - ' .r , ' . . ' , • . •,:�� .i„S:
.t,�'��. �?,'�• :�.. Robert F: P�teraon; Cbtnmfgsio�ier r : .t � � .; ' � . ' . , -i"`'��; ;
� ;�,�:'?;{" bepartmenE of Pub11c �lo'r�t� . . , : , • - 'p ' ' . • Ju�y 26� 1967 : .' '�;':. , ' 't�
-! .R;;_�._` • • ' - • i � a � •.i � � ' , � � ' • i` �R,"
, _ �"i�d � . , � , . � , ' � ' 1 ' '� � � ' .� `
.- . i ` ' . .._ " __ . � f � � , � i
� . � ,`'�.r. r' ' . . . , . , , �t _• , � ' 4- , � i. 7'
� , ' _ ;=3,c � , . • �, . � - . , .
It :i.° • - . . . , � ' ' , , � �•i�, .
i. � ;' �-j.;�M.; , � . • . � . , . . . „ -+: . •
� . �� •t: ' � � . , ,, , .
. i. . , r '' , -t
, � -�; � � 5UMr�nnY • � ��±`�`„ • ` .
� , . �„,
4 F . •;••- + , �
. t•� ��',
� • .,:�_, '- Collecti.on of �ees �,t the Pi.gs Eye atsd Fish H�itch�ry L�ndfills was beg�n" ;±':,'.�� ', , ,
; ,.`��„�;, last r9Arch 13t11 pursUant to City Counc3l r�uthoril-,y and direction. The level �- • : •� : ;�
" �-'; ` .' of fee initiated at th�t time ancl continue.d to date is 25� per ct�bic yard of ,='��i+: .., ,; 1
, ' ".`.s enterin� truck capdc�.ty. Pick-up trucks ahd sma11 trai.ler� are cliarged for ' ,�,� .:� , :'s
- � �- ` ' at a f lat r��e of $1..00; autos are 50G. ' ' ,,� ,-:h�'
� , _ • . . •,� ' '
,� . �xl.iiU9.t I, the ten wee�C repor.t on receipts t�rough rlay 20t1i; illu�trates '� . • �1
• � �the pAttern of daily and weekly vari.Ation. 'Th�.s �;eneral petCern is contintiing�` ��` . , ,
� Fx�ii.bi.t II is a tHuulal:ion �ho�.ain� the Landfill receipts by w�ek's thro�i�h ,� ` . �� �,�
�• Ju1y 15rh. � ` j,• i
. ,
- , . ��,�i .�;: ; ? �-
' rxh3bitG III and IV p.resent rhe 19G7 ahc� 1968� bUcig�r.s. We, are reeommeH�- ;�� �� '�- �
in� th�it the present .fee schedule be conti.nued through 1968. It wil.l be no��ed L�E� ' .'•, •
� �, �
th�t the �nnual hud�Qts tht�ou�h 196t� are far �e�s than the amount df $484,600�Od'" ; ,?�
recommended by the firm of Consoer-Townsend & Asaociatea. , � ' . ' . . .'"�
, � . ,; . ����';j�`�
, , Upgr.ading of the l�ndff 11 operat�.ons is being' pUrsUed as rapidly as ,`,�,�. i�: _ _'�
- ' possihl.e. Considerable progress has been mAde as is 111uet.rated in the fo1- �,°�.; ''r ,,;
, lowin� report. Further background is available in the Cons�er-Townsend repot�t ��`' }�:� � ,�.. ';
; � ' '� . � and our repor.t. of February 1, f 967. , � - ,� =a
� .�., : . ADDIT7.ONAL LAND • . , . ' '' 1 � '~ �•. '��
r . - . .. , - .
; �?°:��_;�,;��, � Pi�s Fye Lancliill . ' ; �•;,'r=�` ,� `''
.;i,;� , � _r�.: :�:
�:.,'�"_�':_,�� The i�se of 160 additional acrea has �beeh,acqi�ired from the St. Patil • , �• ;;,. ; }- ;
r � .
.� ,k °�{�'.,,s; % • . Port Authority. Witt� use o£ r]ensif�i�cation eryuipment w�ich is being pUr- ,' ', =
�,4 '`� chased, 'and the adoption of the cell system, we estimate the liFe of _ �
� ` '� ' thts 1 nd � '` � . ,���
';;,';~ a fill at ,�bout twelve years. ,. a= .
',i . , .� 4 •
:�s,- . , „- .
. •
,� '�f��� '. F'ish Hatchery Landfill ' . _, a � „
:'� . ,
,
wt: _ . , ,
�. .
� ,�51. . 't�t� •
.i
. ,i°
�
. � N . , �
e oti ri ns wit the St te of Mi.nneaot nd t P A i •
a o h a 1�e art uthor t e
,
a a ar
.
�}; . � g Y �
� " �.,;_. nout in progress to acqu�re acreRge east of the existing landfill to be �,;,���,,. . , „
� , �., ,�
,.�,�_` used for disposttion qf demolition material, brush and trees. This land- � ����' � i' -�
f i 11 is now se r te i s - �s � .Y, , ;;
. k ; � �; �-,. pa a d nto two area , th� southwes ter.ly being for resi , 7 . {,+,
�; •; ,
. dential refuse and the easterlv aree bein Used for demolition wastes �
, � , `�� . L� � .
� � � and tt�ees. �he area further east, the tise of which we expect to obtain, �_` • ' "
f , has bottcim characteristics and is so located that reuse of the lend for °"' ±� � �'
, ;„ •,,...,,� -w:_�
F�; , , _ commercial or indlistri�l purposes is ncit contemplated. The iilst&bf�it)► �• =. • ' ���r
� , , of the demolition and tree fill is therefore not a problem. An ideal '!�:�' , .
;;
�: ' use di thP land would be for recreation�l and open-spmce purposes. � , , � t ' , ;'
� � . . ._ ,��:.�
' � � C011ER r9ATERIAL �� �'
'�� . . ' �',lk „ ' '�'' ;.
,� t , . , ��� :. ,
� �,� � � � A contract �is in effect wfth Reh�ein Landsca in Inc. for furnishin �' • ��k��,`'�����-' ` ,'
P �� � S ,., • -'��
i. �-, � a�t estimated 5�,000 cubic yarcls o� m�teridl at 84G per cubiC yard. As of =��:���`+r��''� ; ;`'��
'' ��� lasti �aeelt, nearly e11 of Pigs Eye is Co�iered� so in the ft]tUre the material ��' �'ai�`=��-;' '�'� ��
' ' wi11 �� used for the dai�.y covering.af ceLl�. Alib�t 25,000 cubic y�.rds h�s . ;,,�}�����., .'�.,�;
been pUrchased from Rehbein and abotit 3,400 cubi� y�rdd from the Barton , - �'= ,���' ,! , ";
. r. � `. S
� � � � � , ' . � ''�� I�.
� � � . • , r � � �y ' ' � " . ' • ( �� � - �'''�i
' + • , �'' `' � •k �
_ "k _�� , . � . . . 1 • " j . ' , . � . . '.. ..�,'�.;"�' �
, ,J.tl .�:', ,. . , . , � ' ' .' ' . , . . • .
i.._..tts'�1(: � � . . . . � _ .. ' � • '..
'• ' ' ~ i�=�" •�
♦ � ' ' !. . � • �
, • ` , , . , � I � �t.r° !� �` �
' '. • i �
. . � • ' � '�� �iir , �,
Comp�ny at 45� to ROC p�r ci�bic yard depending on the locat�on ahd availa- ' �;;,,;,�. ���:� ,
� ' bility. GJe fnCend to continue supplementtnP the purchases from Rehbein with " ;; '" `'�� .�
q ', � �
, ,, purchases troin other sources as they may become available,. � '�' `; �
, s , . , • ' �:; , � a
'' ". �� , The Fis1i Ff��chery site has been ne�arly self-sufficient with material ' ri r, �. ;� �
. " , ' coming in from various conskruction jo�s . The entire are� is cover.ed ancl a �'•; ��`� �• �•
. � • ' �;t, . srockpile is at the site. � � .. '+`` '� - - ,
� _ .��, , . . ..�y
��, „�?;' CELL SYSTEPf � � . ' j -�,�, . , ,
.� ° _ , " , ,
" " 1 � ' �xpe.rimentation has been conducted with regt►rd to the cells. The most , _ � „',: " ' .
�•�---���'{' � workable size for t1�e +-iL•ies involved seems to be 150 foot 1en�th, 50 '. ' ' ' ,
, quan_
" ' . '• foot wi.dth and 8 foot depth, provided Minnesota Mintn� inaterial �s still � � • �� : '}. .
. �- � separnted from the other re£use. The excavr�tiori of sUch a ce11 can be made. ��� 1j_; �,� _ �
� ; �.� ";� � in 1z days with a one-cubic-y�rd machihe. It would take al�out 2'�'days to , ; '� ,
: ftl,l this area c•�itli the incoming material. We hAVe been constructing the ' t .
,- ' ,.' , ' sidewctlls with exc�vated material, hhus saving t1�e hauled in matPrial for � ? `�, �
emergencies. This is expected to reduce the reyuirements for imported ' `� _ ,
. . ,' . _ . cover material subskantielly. ' '2�� �. '
.� F, .
� ROADWAYS ' •
, �•
, ' . � � At both Lhe Fish tiatchery anc] I'igs �ye l�ndf.ills , the interior roadwa�b �. ' . � ;
� hnvc� been shaped, bladed and oiled to minimize dust and to m�ke a more suit- � �' �� � `
' , ab1�� riding st�rtac�. : ' • ' '
I �•�i;= , •y,� ' '
� ' ' The Pi.gs Ey� approach toad and the. area a�ound the fee station have beeii ; ';`, � ;�
_�y'': ` sUrfaced wiL-h a bituminous mat. Cosr taQS a roximatel � ' ' ''
pp y $11,000.00; financing , .�• ; �,
� as shown on �xh�bit III, w�s from cnrried-over capital outlay funcis rather ` �,;is�; � ;
�„
• than �rom landfill fees. • ' ' �',a �,�r,; ' •
, �,},�: �
I . '';i'�i�; A I
� BU ILDINGS � :'1 . �
, ' . �i,.
At the rish Hatchery site a fee collectors building has been moved in , . � - , ` .
ancl rev�mped. Two. openin�s , one an either side of the struct.ure permit the � " �'
� same fee collectors to collect fo.r and route demolition material. and resident ' � ,;
. ' dumpi.n� to separate areas. This building has Lights , is het�ted, and i.s work- ' i;
. . ing aut very satisfacL-orj.ly. On this site we also have a structure that • ! � ,
; � houses doaer equipment and a f lUSher. '�k' - � ' '
, � . , , .
. ' '-�• At the Y igs Eye s i te we moved in a s truc ture f rom one of the Publ ic � - ' .�
� �;�:�, Work� right-�f-way areas �nd converted it into a supervisors office, a fee � ,
' � collect�.on st�tion; a washroom and a lunch t�rea for the men. 7.t has been • � � '
.•:�i, �� arren�ed so that drivers of incoming vehicles may tr.ansACt th�ir business � �` ''� '
. � � without leaving their units. The building include3 sho.iaers, washrooms; and . � � _ �,,
.'� ' � An interior partition. � - , , � �
. . - , , .+ , �
. - , � $ome of �he existing structures on the site have be�n repaired and house , •
;.,, �_� a comp�essoz �nd a light plant, which hnd previously been left- outside. �� ��„ -'
� ' Another structure w�s moved from the now-�ompleted Wakefield site to the ;
. ' , . ', disposal area for the housing of eq�ipment. - . � , • � , � .
, •�' EQUIPMENT . . � _ I
' � - � " , 4, � • j
. \ A H�w �h'ree-cubic�yard t��tcto"r shbve�� eqtlipped with ateel compaction �-• '
. � - , } " ti . . �� �
' ' � - � = f , • � � ' ' ,'
� . 1 � , , ,
• • ,' _ .
' R� , �� i, • � � , ' _ ' ' �
� J � - , � � . , -,
. ` ' � � + `I , l�
' t � � _ • ` t�'•"�•�[i� �
. , . . ' '���t=-
. , �T } . ��')
'' .�.'1�.. ' . M�� f
�_ � , .� , wheels ove� rubber tires has been purchased. We expect that,use of this � ,� �� ' ' . ; �.;;�
. - ;, � eyui�ment will ne�rly cic�uble the densifieAtion o� the r-ub�ish material in . , �, ';�', zi
; t�e cell system. The dozing eyiii.pment has been checked and is now being , � ;1,',�.''` � ',' i
bi " � repaired for the comin� wintet� • , , - ��'� �
,3 - �� , .
° The o�d flushers hnve ueen traded �.n on new ones with better perform- ' _�� ",;��, .�,
� •�� • ance c�pabil.ities. Tliese will be stationed at euch site for fire fi�hting ; 4,', : ,��a-'' s' ��r�
= ,i ., , purposes and will be available al�o to the police and fire departments, -�.r,`•���;`;�! ;:;:, ,�
��, �- - . . . � - ,;"';.;1, i� , �
' A motor patrol h�s been stationed at the site for bladit�g and shaping ;,: ,:,'�;-: '
�_�:� roedways at the disposc�l site:. ' ,,.��t�, .; .� �
,, . , ' � ' ' ' ��
�, ��� . � Deodorizing equipment "is now used weekly to spray for unpleasant odors ' r �. . ; ' °+-'
� and elimination of flies, � � ' ��� '"
, .
._ . ' - � - ` . �; � � ..
�
� �• STAi'I'ING . . � ' i . '''s
.
� . .. .
.
� . ' . , . ���.
' � .' At the present time watchmen aze collecting fees, t+ut t1�e Civil Service ? [' i ';'
• . .
. .. .,, ' • _ _ . . i
, � Bur.eau lzas re evaluated all �o�s. For those persons working on the landfills, "' 1, �
,�..; ', ;: �-'- • -._ they have sUggested the title of, "Landfill Cdretaker," and an increase in � , • ' �'
. • " ' � grade for these individuals from 39 to 4J.. Those persons having the title, � � � �
" �� '' �" '°� of "Watchman II" will be blanketed in automatically, but all those having , '�' � ;
_ ;s ; �_ _ _" the title "Watchman I," will be required to take, an er.ami�nRtion. , _ � 4�' , ,:
' � . , , . ,.
-<<'' . a.���;r._ � •
_.,{'_�;;•;,'�,:.� The collect.ion job seems to be in the category of "Field C1erk I'� ' � . '
,x. , ._... . a� .
"� '�'����>v '�•�°�'� according to Civil Service and this exam will also be posted. � ' • .
ij�=�.:;'Z�f�.,e;:i5. ,' .-. - ��,
�>- ¢ -� � The chAngeover�of f.ive men in each title will �e ne�ded to complete the . •
'��' � �� . operation. It is expected E�ctt the cortipletie proaess may be completed by . � , ' „ •'•�
� � , f_)ctober lst, , ' • � • • � - . :, �'
:+. . , ,? , A - .�
� � . , '�� At the presetit time we are using the operators of the dozers and shovels - �„ ���' '' .'
, �• , - that were empl�yed prior to; the new cell �ystem. We may; however, need an ; , , �
, , - , � additi.onal, roan for exr_avatton of neia cell� a� all times. Eut £or the present, ';" �� � �
� , • � we are trying to operate w�th no �ddition�l pe�marient people. Lde have hirecl , .,, �- �
� � • an add�.tiohal dnzer aperator temporarily during the p�st month to f�ciJ.itate • �� '
; : � ��` �'�� cons truction chang�s and to provide for vRCation and s ick leave re1 ief. � •� qb ,';� � , '�t
,� - 1'" . , - ',` .t I,
� � � DIF�ICUJ�TI�S AND DEL9YS . •�•. � , , r '
. , „ .
1 ' , � �'
� {' Durin� t�e week oF June 20, 1967, Ghe newly-r.emodelecl col.lector station ., ' , ; � �� i'��
`, ; was struck by libhtning. It was necessary to rewire, f�e-ledd the water pipes` ' „ '� � "
"' ` . and com letel refurbish the int rior of t�e m i o A et st ' ��`, � ��� � ..�
. p y . e a n fl or. d ailed li in� ,,,, ��
• of the damage and cost or repa.i.rs is being compiled and will be submitted to � ' • �';,
. � � ; � ,: ,
the �iisuri.n� agent at A later dare. . � •
� - , . -
, . , , ; � , r.
- On June 30th L-he seve�re windstorm thaL- passed through the City collapsed � .;
- .-r a pre-tabricated steel ehe11 that housed L•lie dozer at the disposal area. Thi� " � � ,
" w411 be set up a�nin by the brid�e crews in the .near fui;ure. , J , ,
AddiL-ional pi.ping �for e f.�.re 11ne ancl .revampi.ne o.E the existing one are �
� , , under considerution at tlie present time; but it is nec�ssary that we L-i.rst ' '
_ Lirmly dec�.de tli� new cell system len�ths and �izes for optimum operation. , � '
� ,'.f�� . � - 3 - } ' , ' , • �, � �.
, , . - - , ,� � ,
°� � � . , • � ' �- . '
-- ', . ' ' � . , - E . � _ � � � ,
- .�.- '.- r-..�-�..�,....�...��.__�, .�.. ......��.w �..r+..a...�...�.......ut...�......�........�.r... n+:'�a.. ...... .. .���r..�.., f.r`......... .....�...�. _ .�- � n , �+ -a�.4•-� �. •
r� ' � �c . 1 i ` •. ' � .
� t . • � ! t ��1���'� i • ,
1
. . . (1 � .
+ J �
� , f� , • •Irl • .
� �' •• }I
lde exr�ect tliar this �vill be done rand that all oP the piping changes wi�ll be � - - � ?
i�ccomp�ished ior use durin� l-hc winter months � � , � ' ` , ,
. . _ . � , .,
5ince I:li� I��rks De��rtmenC h�s been perfotminp windstorm cleAnup, the ' � �
. . � . •� �.,
� , Fish Fl�tcliery ].�nd�ill has received berween 80 ancl 120 L•ruck lands �I tree �
.`� " • d�ebrts claily, six clays per weelc: This l�as imposed �n unexpeeL-ed burden, ' • # , � , '
" � from t-lie st�ndpoint oL' equipment ancl operator time and for cover material ' ° . ' �
: � ' requiremenLs. ` . , ' '-
� A r.eduction in the tot�l amourit of hours that the landfill's will be� ' � ' ' ` '
.� , ' __ ',,�,_ -��_.� open is under consideration. We expect to carry on further, study of �his ' � _ ,
.I-�� �'� "',�° � matler, winc �otinsel from the' J.andfil l users . A �hortenin� of hours could , � „ ��
� � be a considerable economy, especially wh�n one cbnsiders that the equi.pmenr ` �� �
' . operators must stAy on ehe site on� hour afLer closing to f.u11y cover a r_ellc ,�, �
� ` .� . I'INAPIC ING . '' , ` - ' ' .
� �, • ,` .` ,
• � ' • As sho�on !.n �xhibit II, ' the l.andfill receipts thru July 15th have , �
. � - avera�ed $501G.00 per weelc+ '�he range has been from $3800.00 to, $5662.50 • ;� � ' '
� , � per week, witih A lower income having been in March� ' , . _ ' � � ,
� , ., The avera�e weekly receipts tv date are somewh�t higher than the £i�ure ; ;� ., ,r
, ' of $4320.00 set £ortl� �s a minimum in our report of Februar.y 1, 1967. How- � � � �
ever, durin� the winter months we expect the average to drop. So we are , , � � ' , .
, , ' recommendin� continuance of the 25� �per cubic yard) fee through 1968. �;' : , : �
, .
' I:�chi.bits IJI �nd 1\� i.ndicale the estimated receipts and the proposed � �
. usa�;F of the funds durin� 1967 �nd 196�3. 7n a necessarily conservative , � • �
� ' apPr.c�dch, ancl talcing into accounk the expected drop in revenues durin� the � � � ,'
; winter mvnths , tl.�e figure of $4800.00 per creek Y�as been used f.or. purposes � �.,'�, '`ti '3
_ � • �t,. .,. ; ,,
� of projecting revenues . . ,j,
. � '.; ;�;. a i�' �'�. ,
� • It will be noted from ,Exhibit II7, that certain capital outlays in 1967 , � ' � �' �
are being financed from carr.yovers and not being charged this year to the „-,4# •� .
landfill account. Howpver, for 1968 the•figure of $25,000.00 is recommended, '„ _ .
. for an equipmeht reserve. ' . ' - '
1 � � . . �
� . . ;I ,
t . � .
� �' •� . . ''' ,
� . . -
i � . •
� . � ' ,
� . . , ,
, E
, _ . , . _
,i , , ,
� � ' . , , .
� . , ,
; , . � ,
� . ' � ' . ' � .
� • , � , .
� � . . , �
� � � ' � . . 3
. . • ' ' ',
; . � , -
.i� . • . � . , ' . �
; - � - 4 - • , . ,
� > , . , ,
r , r . .
� • ` ' �
� - � .
:=�� � . . y EXh�/B/ T / '
. , �
THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
OF THE
. ci�r oF sr. PAUL
INTER-OFFICE COMMUNICATION
May 29, 1967
T0: Commissioner Robert F. Peterson
E. V. Avery, Chief Engineer
FROM: James F. Schwartz, Departmental Accountant
The following is a report of the receipts at the Landfill areas from March
13, thru May 20. This is ten full weeks of operation. L �
C HAYLG�
Tota 1 A��ouN rs To ta 1
Week Cash Caeh -�ra�e� Both Arees
� ,
Fish Hat. Piqs Eye .
3-13 to 3-18 457.00 791 .75 1 ,248.75 2,551 .25 3,800.00
3-2 to 3-25 511 :75 717.75 1 ,22g.50 2,718.00 3,947•5�
3-27 to 4-1 763.50 1 , 16g.5� 1 ,933.00 2,958.50 4,8g1 .50
�+-3 to 1+-$ 931 .25 1 ,310.00 2,241 .25 3,289•75 5,531 .00
4-10 to 4-15 926.00 1 ,257.00 2,183.00 3, 179•25 5,362.25
4-17 to 4-22 768.75 1 , 184.75 1 ,953.5� 3,063.75 5,017.25
4-24 to 4-29 865.00 1 ,091 .25 1 ,956.25 3, 152.75 5, i0g.00
5-1 to 5-6 793.00 960.75 1 ,753.75 2,954.00 4,707.75
5-8 to 5-13 808.00 884.75 1 ,692.75 3, 130.50 4,823.25
5-15 to 5-20 594.00 g44.50 1 ,538.50 3,3�+�+.50 4,883.00
TOTAL ' 7,418.25 10,312.00 17,730.25 30,342.25 48,077.50
Daily Average (60 Days) �
123.64 171 .87 295.5� 505.70 801 .29
We�}dy Average (10 Weeks)
741 .82 1 ,031 .20 1 ,773.02 3,034.22 4,807.75
JFS:jh
;
' ' i
' , ;
. �
, � .
1
. .�._._TM . . ' _ . . . I .
� „
�. �
. 1
0 .
O -_ .�_.. ._ . . . '" ' ' _�. _...,�_. ____ _._.. .... ._.. ' " '.. � . ., ...... .. ._ , . .. rn
1 vi
...... .. ... . ... . . . . . . , ,..- - --
_..._ .. . .., ._., .. ._ ._� _._ _ ... - -�
3- . . . _ - - • • - '
� - - - -- - - - - r
W -- -- -- -- -- - -- - - - - - � - � - . _ �
3 -� ._ _ _... .__ .- --- -- ---� �-- - --- �-- --�-� --- :. . . ._ �-- --�- ---� - - � - -— -� --
_ �
m Qd� -- --- - -- - - - -- - -- -- - --- - - --�- -- - - - _- _- •� �
W =_ -- - - -- --- - -- -- - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - a
- - �
. W - - - --- - -- - - -- -- - -- - - ` m
3 - -- - - - -- - - - ----- --- - - � �
c0 _ _ �
-- - - �
� - - - �
� , m
� _ N
�
� - -- �
� - - - �
W �
N
w - - - - - �
• � - - �
N.
� - - - - - �
� S - - O .
w , W �
� w � J
Q � -- � � �
_ �
J � m Q
�
t�. W . - �
Z � -
t - - - o
I - �
, , i '
� I , ,
� .
;
'F "
- ' ,�, ,., .. , , . ' ' �xh i b i t I 1 . . ' �' _' :�i • �
... ,�. .. _ . � , ' '. ,_
� y , ' , ' �''�� , ,
. ;���;� i96� LANoFi�L k�cEi�TS , � , � � . �
� ' i
' � . � � Landf 1 1 1 Rece i pts - From Mai-ch 13 to Ji�ly 15, 1967 � n�'�i ; Y-' • j ';
� 1 0 6 Op en D ays - 1 8 Wee k s , ' •'�� '
� � • :: �
,: ; Cash ' ♦ G ��-"� ^t` , . ,R;.:,
�. ; G�ia ry � _.
Week �ish Hatchery Piqs Eye total Cash �61C��7�3 Total Both Ai'eas ' ; 't
, ��
� 3- 13 to 3- 18 $ 457.00 $ 791 .75 $ 1 ,248.75 ' $ 2►551 .25 $ 3,800.00 � .,. : �J
3-2 to 3-25 511 .75 717.75 1 ,229.5� 2,718.00 3,947.50 ' ,t 1'.' " .
f i�1 .14 � �i
� �
3-27 to 4- 1 763.50 ' ' � 1 , 169.50 � ' 1 ,933.00 2,958.50 4,891 .50 � '�''ak'�1,:'t.;4'i
4-3 to 4-8 931 .25 � � ,310.00 , 2,241 .25 3,289.75 � 5,531 .00 � '4. ,, =.:�,���:
' 4- lo to 4- 15 926.00 1 ,257.00 � 2, 183.00 ; 3, 179.25 5,362.25 , "�,,.�;� ',';�;,�
4- 17 to 4-2z 768.75 1 , f84.75 1 ,953.50 , ' 3,063.75 5,017.25 � .� :� ,�.,! :��
, 4-24 to 4-29 865.00 1 ,091 .25 � 1 ,956.25 � 3, 152.75 5, 109.00 ,: ;'.; �'�;'�;.�` �;
� ' S� 1 'to 5-b 793.00 � � 960.75 � �: 1 ,753.75 . , 2,954.00 4,707.75 .., .�',' ,:;•':'�
, 5-8 to 5- 13 808.00 884.75 1 ,692.75 . 3, 130.5� 4,823.25 ; ,` . ,,
�_ .� 5- 15 to. 5-20 594.oo �� g44.50 1 ,538.50 . ' 3�344.5� 4,883.00 �� . ' ' ,;`
, 5_22 to 5_27 906.50 937.25 , ' 1 ,843.75 • 3;216.00 5,059.75 2 �'' '.,. ,�,'�
, , 5 29 to 6 3 913.50 948.75 1 ,862.25 z,659.5� 4,521 �75 -� . �_.� '';';���,
`' � 6=$ to 6- 10 g22.50 $50.65 , 1 ,773. 15 , 3�095.25 4,868.40.� � „���<
^�`- 6- 1� to 6-17 1 ,362.00 ' 990.75 � 2,352.75 3,3�9.75 5,662.50 � ','•'.�. " '.;
�., 6- i9 to 6-z4 1 ,z35.25 � 913.00 2, 148.25 y 3,330.75 5;479.00 ��,.',.,�.'.'� � .
, � �6-tb to 7-2 �� 1 ;328.70 . 909.00 2,237,70 3,418.00 5,655.70 ��``: �.' . � .
f
'.;'s �-3 to 7-S i ,573.75 ' 797.75 •� 2,371 .50 ` 3,�9�+.50 - 5,466.00 - � �.'��. ; �
��y��.j
;. f �-i0 to 7�' 15 1 ,5I7.50 758.0(1 . 2.275•5� ��251 .Oi7 S,SZb.50 " - • .,:.;:;,
. - :.3 1 j,`i
� � � . 70i'�LS $17, 177.95 � $17,4t7. �5 $34�595. 10 $,�5,717.00 $90,312. to � . � � ' � r
s . ' • � �1 r i ��'-t��
_ �, ` �� Y
/ - ' . .� '
; Da i 1y Average , �",� .; , - ,
'' s (lOb Days) $ 162,00 $ 164.00 $ 326.00 $ 526.00 $ 852.00 ,�'' ,`.;' . '''
.r. ! '
�'_i, W��k�y Average � , ' . '�"��'g?`�' ' � ;
��: ' �1$ Weeks) $ 954.00 � g67.00 $ 1 ,92j ,00 $ 3,n95�00 $ 5,[�16.06 't�i'�'"''-�' � , �`
��. •�
_i_ , . , � . , .
;,' . , . , �,,•',s,�;;� .. t•
, ,k� , • ;��'r1� • � "�
~�V `x . ' r 1 k . , � ':'1"�14�� ' .-S,
;�; =1/• �'ree Dump i ng Week ' � , : ' � _: , . , ��� � :��,�,
;,��,� 2� Cjbsed May 30th . '' , � • �ri"�j ' � ''�;
,-:�;�:_�j Open Sunday due �a storm ' . . � ,� • II ' , ,' � ��,,'�'�;;.:,;' ';�
#''��"4� Closed Ju�y �#th , , ' . ; , • ,'�;; r:�,,,i�� n^�
�"� '� ` ,
_,�;�;_ . - '�� , , . � ,�.,, 1,- .�:.
, - , . . _. < , . • ' ,',� , ..•,;
, _ . . . , - . - '�$'�• . ; .+.
, • . , , . , ' , ;N;�; ` '>:
u ` ` , . , t . • . ,` 1 ,�; ; .
, � , . , . , , '; t + ,
, . r, � � ;�' " ' • � • �l '��••
i �, � ' � � . , ` � ' . �' '!',, ' ��I
,y •; `'�., ,_,�- _, ' ' . ' . , ' � : r ' ', ` � . t•�, �j i, 'i '+'�
:> ', L�r'��L . . . - �, � , i t - , � , . . , vi , j �
-O�F �YI',1,1�✓ � - ! I J . i �. � � 1 . � . � � � t .
:.�..�r�_i�i. �..rri�t� . , . � , , � �T . 1
3 �y 1 f .�y�A.. - _ , .' ' .
_�-�� �/1����.y. ,-' . f � _ ' ' 1 -� 1 � • � . � ,
�r�i��:1 �1��'4 ' l � � . fi�'.
.. t �_ . . � . , ' • r .
� T'�..r;i�7.�' � � � , 1� ,. . ' n , � . � • ..
��Y� �
�:` � � ' . . , , � i ' , n . • �
�� ' .-' . '`• � ,� c ' , ,_ • `1 ° , ,. • , . . ' .�
�,..; :�: i ,
�F{ F� � 5 j: • ' � ' -� . • ' , , .
�.�_ � t; .`��� ' � ���� ` .F' '1� ' ' � ; ' ! ' ' . . . � , � ;i
, 5 1 • ' , ' �.' , -, •
` , ' .. , F .r t i . , � r . , . � � �� �. . ' . � .
+ _ . - _ '' • ; , . - . ' Y t �
' � , ' . ' . . �. . . . i ' „ '. . �
.� � E- ♦hw.a�v.waw..Mu.w..�.r..rc�_ .�1`lV.-:...i1Sr-. --�. :.._-_._�' _ '_ -�� _ _"_ ..(f�r-. ft�' _ _ ' _ IiliLL "
_ . .. �. . . .. . � _
.. .. .. .. . . .. . . _-_.`.._.._.�.....�,_._._.� A, -W . .,.� .
d' ��N i ' � , ' � � , ' . 'r • , '�Z1i ,. 1y� �.
j ',�,'i• =.. , ' ' . : ' . . f � '' , �xhlbit '� I I � . r�� ' , ,. �.
' . ..A� • • , ' � .� ' - , - ' • ; � �,�� . i��,.r
;',: • . AF; . ' , '' ' . . ` �'! � 'f'
+ ' �! - ANT I C i PATE D fi 967 R EC�I PTS '. ` ' , ' � ,`� ';
. ` ' + � : � , � ,
. • +� • ' - ' � �� �
• ' . . �ncome to Da te (7- 15-67) � . ' ' � ' , $ 90,312.00 ' �.�,
- • , . , , , , ?;
,� .;�,
, . �, ProJected Ihcome (2� Weeks at $4;800 per Week) . � . 1 10,400.00 ' •.; ,
' � ; , , ��
_ . ;.
To ta 1 1 ncome -� 1967 �s t�ma ted F • $200,�12.00 : "!
. , . '�',I
Less,Paymeht to Geheral Fuhd �or Ci�y Budget� ' � - 90.000.00 . ,�;!
� � Ava� lab�e for Operatlohs - 1967 Year �• . $110.��2.00 ° •
. • � ,
, ' • , ' ' , '.. ';.'�, :�
� � � � � � . ,. " � � ��
I � �� ' I 1
• � . • . ' PROPOS�D �967 EXPENOITURES . ' � '� '��
, . . ,.{,. . - � . � Y ', .���� . i
,�,:.� - . r ,
; •
, � '���: . - • .'i . ,, ,
1 :! i 'I ' � • ' ' 'r��' .��
d5
-�4 " �iql�'i 1 , . ' • ' � • :}�. .',,I
. � `?:';�r=`'- 5 Watchmen fo►- � Month� , � $15,000.00 ' • , �r� •' -t �
�, ,a,.,�;.; :�� �
;, �.�.'�y��`;'°''� , Miscel laneous SUppl ies � • • �2�000.00 ' � . .' ' � . . � ,
' �5°'�'�!j'�:''' Remode 1 i n of Of f i ce a t P , , . , ; , . • '
, _ .,; g ijs �Ye 5�500,00 ; . . I
` -'.�' ��' � pff i�e �c�uipment � ' 1 �000:00 1� ' " 4" �� `
, s' � , . ,
.' % , r�'�'t�� �' Cover Ma te r�a I , - .65,000.00 � � ,;� .,i
• �;' -
� � � •, r Reserve for Heavy �quipment 2) 500.00 , ' ' �,E
. _ ,
• 'T r.' � , - � '�.:�
; •' j ' . Subtotal (from receipts) � , � - $110,000.00 , '-?
� , ,,i
. , � �� �67 eudqet Appropriatior� °(from General �und� � � $113 484i0b 'a�„''t
. , , : , � ,,
} :'; � ' . . �.
r, ; ' ' �67 Cap i Ea 1 Out lay Expend i tures - Fi-om Cat-ryovers* . $ 51 ,OOO.bO �'� ��
� ,
� � ,
' . � TOTAL PROPOSED 1967 EXPENSE ' " ; �274,48�+;00 �• :�
. ' , . , . ; ' �;�1
r,
, , � , � �, ' ''i �'� ''� � ,f. .r
. . - . ' '�y' . ;�
, , � . �,�j:�j �1�
• 1 - � ' � ,'��j;'(I�y • �'��y
� � , , .!�, LL F.4 i. ���3
' ' 1 i � �i�
• ' li Y a • }
. , � . . �' �/
� �For Road IMproVement an� Dozer Compactor � . , �,� ;�' '���• �� ^�
. , T . r 5' ,
. � .,
, , ' ' • ` ;'.;'�'+^.' '�: ,
' , ' , '.°..ti.�. .�,,t;
, .. , " . , . � ' . , , _:—°��`�;s`��. �'T+��
• �'� . . , � ' ' � ' ' , ,� �} _t� . '�.
�',L `�rt - � " ' � , . �; , ' �„ � '�:
"; �a ';'•?�r ' . , '': - , e• 1� ._ " � . • ?Jl ..4�• � j ` ,i
'�t ��lc�V„J�.. , •• _ � ° : '�;' `, i � Ij � , •(jfi J'' , '{.'
t➢��� . � t ' i.� .. , I •� 1;[
=� •
:=�� . ��=�;;;r'W - � ' ' , ' ' ' ' � , : • , ; . , • . , � , ,.1.,,,,� . .
- S�• :;�.,��4,,. . � . . . �. - . •:t -; i', .. , , . ,is,�;1, u
• . .r.7; � • , � . s. : , ' p" ' ' ��;~ �:
° , • t=�.� . , � ' ; ' k 'r � ' , J, {'l`k,�� `� .
� �,� , _ C • - a . ' l .�k9� �!
� .. . . , 6' - •' �. � '' , ; ' „ ' � ,� f �� �� '
f ..». .. ` .. � ' . � i% .. . � .� ., i . ' I ' ` ' ' ' '- ". ' '
, � . • , • , .
� . - � �, . . , ,_ � - - .,, �xh i b i� I V � � �F ' � . . °�
_ .. .. . ` , ' , � , , , ' , , � - '� , -Ct. I ,
; � , ' ' 1968 LANDFILL BUbGET � � '� � . � . :' '� ��-� ' �
+ ' . .' . • ' ' �. , , n � .F�Ra,�ttq.'i�i:�.,,1 `.!
,�T- �EhSONNEL , , . , , �� � ;�; . �:E� f
. . �i��{�'�, ;�:�1,' r'. ;,;
; , . . ' � i,,'. .` , ;i
� �1) Supv. of Itefuse D�sposal . . ' ' , $ 7,850.00 ` . �'.' �:�f�:`; r�" '�
. , . ���.:�:��.,�,�.: ;���.��,
' �5) M.E.O. - $8,205/yr: � � $ 41 ,07(�.00 ' , . � ��F�;.;: ;`' ;i+ Y
. Vacatioh Replacements � �� t , 3,537.�� ' ' ' -, '`- ;,' �1 �
. - Ove�-time � , .. . .. . _ I .000.00 . - :.�-;,s�'.' � ;i;.t .,
. . --- , $ 45�6o j:oo' " . ,�,��_�, -,�� .t
� ." (5) , Cof lectors - Field Clerk � - $5,804jyr:i - $ 29,020.00 . - .. ;� �,.�'i " I.y�
. , Vaca t�on Rep 1 acemen ts , �• _� 2 232 00 � `,;,�'{,�� ' "�;�
�;�°� • ° Overtime - , 1 ,000.00 � . ', .�t, .''��
.�EF.� �� . � . • , $ 32,252.00 ,;�' .- ' ';
t �i ���,;�(S�, ' IJatchman I f - $5,472/yr': ' , . • ��. ' $ 27►360,00 �, � � - ' �,� „` � '`;;�
y ,ty•. •�°'��� . Vaca t i on Rep 1 acemen ts =� ' ' . . 2 f 105.00 � � � , ��r'
. � ; .-,I Uve r t i me � ; � ° , � • f ;000.00 '. � ,. . ' : , ..,. ` ' �'
,f� ; � T.�E �,i'�'
. :.k', - , , � 30�4b5�00 . ��• , •,-;++;
' k.�_ . '�: ' - ,. , ' ' , , , ' � j ' -,";'i4
;,.; � �'f�T�1� P�RSONN�L. , . , � . ,� i r ► . ., i� •. . $ 116� 171F.00 .N'
�.�:;_ �r, ..> � � ' ' , ' r ' . , ' ' . . •'}.� „?
:;�.� -� � � � , . , ; . , : , , �i
. i
Ma i fitenance and Repa�i- of Motor �c�11�pmen� �� • . . : . . $ 18 000.00 �
,' „� ��
;',�a . r , , f:
s
' , . 'i
�;���� �rtrtting� Telephone, Electi��city, DUpI icating 5ervica, etcc . . . " �i000.00 -,:;�
`���' F�e�ting Fuels. . . ' . , ; . ' ':� , .- . ' . : 2�000►00 , `5;'=
-b�ri ' ' . . ' ,
;l,�� �tiver M�terial � : , ; c • _ . ; ; ,� : � � 80,000:00 -
, �.. . � , , .� , . , , ,
r' �� � 1��Couht�h� Servi�es. . : � � , . i , � , � 3,000.00 'S
��:�. � - • � . • � � �
,;,�:,-..- , . �
,���-� aeserve fof Heavy Equipment . , . . . ; • � ' . � . ; 25,000�00 • �''�
" . �,,
.;�.��,y_� _� . , � - � - �, � ;�::
`�:;�r'�(SrAL EXPECTED EXPEND�TURES - 1968 Yea�; , � - ,i ; -. . ,�, . � ' 'z . . $ 247 � ��1.00 �;`�;:
, � ,�,
, t - , . �� ..
.f�•�
r�;M� ��ROJECTED 1968 INCOME (52 Weeks at $4,80b.00) + : � • � - i �+ $ 2�+9;600'F00 ';,,�'
�: i, , � . ' _ , , � � ' j.;tii, �; ,��,
,..'.�- � ' ' � • ' S-i!'i� ? I t lF
.�"'._ ,�.
. Notei No provision has been made fdr salary �ncreases which may � • � . ' ' ;:j� '�',`;; ;'�f;`
. mater ia 1 ize ih 1968. - � . ' " • .' - ; �':���,F��; ,t�+
� ' , s � ' ' � , ' i 'rY, ,; _ ` ��I `;
� Note:' No prov is �on has beeh m�de ftir pa�m�nt to Genei-a 1 Furid for ' , , , ;.{; •.�;�,, ;'�°,,;
Y.',� �; C i ty �udget a� was done ih 1967: ' � . ' . ' ' ` . . .; ' "�,
..:r.� .� "'�in.':j , , � , , . � ' . . ' 4 �'.i�- s i��r.;
13!Mr,�4�[it`;�` " -- ' f � . - ` ' _ -. ,'i i ' ``i•'C}i •
:F.d'. �'�� ,t��j, � . . . � , � .� � ,., � ' . . � �'' ;J-, ' },
.#',�SS'�` i'�.`r�4.. - . .. � . . . , . � .�., � ., . °��:; 7` '��i
;w�s ' .�'F� , ., :. . - �; ,� •, • .� ' • , . . � ,� , !`::,
i�t.t ;{, �-1'•' ` . • • .. , . , '� � , 'tir� � � r. ;'s,
, ; f � '�r.:�,�j , , ° , - . �., ; . , , ., . �,�� �`; : r�. t
;�.:aq.` - i'��-�?; � - � , ; '` � � , , - _ ; , :. , , � , l j.�.
� i� �.�; , , ;x'� .tf t�,� .�.-•, ., . � . , � �± .i,
- � �"q�r• � , . - � i�_.. .� - • ' 4. , � , . � � , ;�r � .
`+ . y,��y ,r.} . , . ' : ` �, : , ' : I , . ', , , , . � ;",�ti:�:'4 ? . .
- ..} . ���,� . -A • - � , ' ',i p � . . ., 1 } �..,.'.;.'r.f'. . � •-�'
j � . � . . . I,I.�/' '. G
�i '_; �i��.MV� ' . _� '. ;.. � ,, _ 7 _ � ' • � • � .. # lr' t•,F' �
t, �44;�4 _ . - , ' . _C. i . , , � , + , , .i �;r�� �
.. b��;. I,r ' . - � .. -' , , �• � , , - , f., ':y,.�5�1._. ,
. i1 �•'t1. _ , , . ... � ' � . r , 1 i ti : . I • �e.'�i` ,t; , �a
. ' �i i:�: ,`��� . •. � � , �J � ) ! -,�`y�4a: � � ; .1
�� �St'., �� i � . . , . �, _ . , t•,'.^ ' ,' +�
ii ' . ;��1� 1. . — ' ; .. � .. . , , . ;:�� '''+
'y � '� �Y: . � : 7�. 'r - • ' �� . , � „ ..7�':, . 1' i
� 7��,,,1• ' . y ' + �'. . �,� � ± .. • , . ` � - � ` v �. r_ � , i :
4 . ,�'... . . . ,_l .. ., r ` .. � . . , . • , . . �' ,_+' , [ •�
. � � . '. , �. • . � , �I � � � � , � � 1
.. . '.:f:�;�., . � , � . � � aE�Ai�i�r��r�•� cs= a��c.�c aro��cs �, � ��ii ��,U /.�T� ' �.��
•`' .��� ' C 1 YY E)P 51�13 t��' PAU l. ' : .:, . . •. . , ,, � ' . ' ,
� ` � � � tVc�v��r 6. 1963 .,,, � .�� • '� ' � ' °,�' ' . '�� �� ,'�': '
. � . , . . . , • •� . ,,. i , .; ; , . , . . ;;" � ' ',
. . , . ��
, .� ' • a. � , . , . . • ' , ., � ' �
�, ' , • . � . . i
. � \
� � C�r�ui sa i o;�or PSi 1 tan Ras�n � � - � � . . � . . .. '': : •
� , , Dopar¢��n� o� Pu�11c �Jorks ' . •. ' • ' • '.
' `�, C i ty ot S�i nt P�u t � , ' �'.: .. .
. .. .G ,`•
. , � ' � . Oear Car�issioacar Rosan: • �� ...''�' � ..
, . . • � �� . . .
• � � A�t,.chod is a �a�y of �ho g�t�bor 31. 1963, raport of Ptossr�. Omsl.ouriars .��.� ��'; �.•,
' . .'• ond S�r�Suc o: tt�ts tlr�arQrac�e ond Wr. ErQcksan og th4 l3ui iding Unp.�rtm.cr�t. Tho , .. , •
•� • r�p��� �oncerns Yi1c u�o ofi 2iio �t. Paal publ ic sa:�ror systvrn as rota�ad •co �ha �� � '
,� , piurr�in� Cocl�. iF�a rogort� in part, is a ro�ort af en int�o����n�i�� og prec7lcos > . ,' .
� � � in t;cdison ar�d i�i le�suf�cco aad. in par�. a considoroble arraunt o� b�ckgro�nd cna2oriai , - �
, ' bnci rcc���onda�to��s roi�a�tvo 40 �t�m 5�. Faui situ�tioai. { Isoliava sciza2 tMis is an ; '
�`.� �' � excvllo�� .rc,�or�' nnd c1:S6Nm9 O S�UV�� ruf� only by yau�-svlF, bu¢ by esct� �rr�or o� � � `��•�
. �� tl�o Ccunci 1 r���d �lso by nr,y o�i�or p���i�s cs�ncornnd w(�� 1on�-rongo pler�ning or • � .
� , ' , �inar�cing in St. P�ui. This is ot�c �� cwr mo�Q sQr�avs probla,sGu�. un�or4urrat�ly, " ,
as no2�c9 in fitzo rcapor�. tharo aro r�ny v�hor �omands For c�2y funds to crea2c+ pro• ` : .
� . ,jxts wtiict� prc�uccs acoro vfsibZ4 end a��r�ctivo rosulEs. t��► �ro co�tinui�g to �ka�' � � .�
. . �• , serch i�rGVCr��n�s as aro �us�iE�l� wi4E� tt�0 liu�Itod fiu�cS� �h�t �re svai la�oto, ezzd ' �� ' ' .
' ,. �. wo wish to ro��ond str4ngly �0»t cS�Q considoretion 6o givc�n to 4ho scrnor prc►i�icra � ' � �
,,, � in eny lvng-rar�go flnancing �tudios. , � ; -,
• ., .
' . � � , , . .
, • t!o ��ve 6�Qn ae�o�r�43ca9 to v,�rk elosQiy wi�h 4ho �.�iidfng Qaport�nt o� . ' ��
� � ���°��' � �this probtou� n�d wo o,y�ct 4h�Q cos���ncaod ofrorrs toivarc� coor�i�+��ioa and coaper� , •�� ' ,
���.,.:'��.�,'� �4ion wi i i �asul� f� s�me, ir�rwod pol tates. Hoaa�r,vor, thoro is gr�tc noad for .- • .
.� �` • �ddtt�onai Por�sYruction fundso � � , . � �, �� ..
�. . .� , A� you �ncxv. co�rohenslvo �cac�rer studi�� an� pians era ur,d�rway aitli sci�raa � �
. .� ,� �objec�ivos: �. � .
, . . . . ,�r . .
:,� . . . ,
�� , � " �' . 1 o A����cato sac�i tery. s�rror c�cityr �or �outiyi�g �vat�unt2ios as wml i � •
� � ' ' ,: as S�. Paut. � � ' . � . .
, �
. . ;. . . .
,� �� �'� ' 2. Rolto�r 4o inaduq�atmly si�ad cwr,�vina�d so�,�ors wiehin S4a Paui ra� � ��
. � cau�irx� d�-^.a4� and nuisa�vo ba�ca��a og bacGc•up�. ',
� �'�� . 3. Elinlaa�ion ar suts��an�tal r��uction ofr c�atar pollution. .,
.,` , �i�� ,
' , 1 n cc�i ng raon2E�s, wo 0ss�acfi �o bp ��oki r�� a co�, re�ans iva ropart i d���i�y� � � '
'`� inc� i� Ga�nii a 5aria5 of neodad pro,��8s �to 6o s�co.::�li��rci wor a �criod ot � � �
, � ' yoars, cvQ� �6tcu�h ftaancirog ot ��as� pr��c�t� wi 11 i�o �Izc� c:�a,jor p��ovlcn. �:�•rar0
'' � � isc ts aR��ran� �E�a� cem�?o2o ro�iaf Frcm ovarfo�dud camuir�ed seor�rs e��i 11 probWbiy . �
' ` ��.'' � �to� ba rin�ncia�iy faasiblo �For msny ycr�PS and in �t�a F,r�an7i�o �11 pas�i6lo r�a�uros �
" �izaa��d ba �nRon �o .e�ayte S�: P.�u1 cJ���Qns ¢o bo�.�ar 3 ivo wt� �E�a si��a¢ione • •
� �� Co�ias og tho ag��c�od r�rt h�vo bean �on� �o tMo 0�oi Ddtng Dapart�c�� a�d s� �
.,� ; a�aat �o bo for�wlatiaQ ,�ofntiy t.o�a �os�ib0o chnngos in scttc3 cod8s and �uiictmso
' � . . ' '� � �
,. � � , �, . . ' � ; � ,' ; � Ywn s vory Qrt�ly. .-� , '
• ' . �... , . . ., , '.' . � � � � : : .
� � ', ' ' . ' Eu en0 V. Rvory. . . � .
. . CVA/�v � Chief Enqt�xaer � '. �� � . `. '
. Attachs 1 � � ... � , . . ' , �
. � , . , ' . . . ° � . : � , , _
�� . � . . , � , , � � . . � • � : .
� , � ; . , . .
, • ;�• • • . , ' • , ' • ,
, ,
.�' •• . ,
�_3 • . . ,
-� .� REPORT ON ' ' ' ' � •
• � ' THE USE OF THE SAINT PAI�. PUBLIC SEWER SYSTEM -, • .
� ' AS RELATED TO THE PLUNBING CODE � "
, , INTRODl�TION � � '
•' � Under the methods of operation followed in recent years, the primary '
� responsibility for inspection and control of plumbing installations which
� , connect to the public sewer system has been with the Buildings Department
. ; ' rather than the Department of Public Works. Over the years there appears
, • to have been a gradual lack of co-ordination and a divergence of goals.
, In some instances plumbing arrangements have•been installed which are not�in
, accordance with the best interests of the public sewer system as a whole.
. � The ur ose of this re ort is to review the °
„ , p P p present practices and ,
� • outline areas in which the most serious �problems exist at the present time. � .
, ;,', . ,
• � „ G91��BINED VS. SEPARATE SEWER,� , ' , •
� , ' The sewer system of the City of St, Paul has developed over the past
' one hundred years and today most of the• system is combined sewer. "Combined '
sewer means a sewer in which one pipe, conduit or structure is designed to
carry"both sanitary sewage and storm sewer flow. It is universally
� recognized today that such a system is inferior to a separate system wherein
. there are two separate pipes one of which is designed to carry only
. sanitary sewage and the other designed to carry only storm sewer flowe . ' •
The major disadvantages of the combined sewer system in Sto Paul are as -'
followss �
(1) SEWAGE BACK-UP D URING RAINSTORMS - Many of the sewer lines
� • in the Sto Paul combined system are grossly undersized. The pipes are
� adequate to carry the sanitary sewage during dry weather but when a rain . .
storm occurs the pipes become surcharged and a mixture of sanitary sewage '
• and rain water is forced into ,the building basements through floor drains � �
• and basement fixtures. This sewage backup is a menance to public health, �
is costly in terms of property damage, ie at best a serious inconvenience
to the property owner. The property owner as an individual is unable to
• cope with this pr�blerrio Continued back-up of sewage will often cause
' decreasing groperty values, as the individual property owner will move on
, to a different� nei;hborhood if possible, rather than invest money to �
� improve a home which is frequently flooded. �
. . Sewer back-up during rainstorm is not a problem on all combined '
' � ' sewers in St. Paul, however it is more widespread than generally recognized.
� �� (2) SEWAGE �REATN�NT COSTS. Back during the time when most of the . .
• ' Sto Paul o�mbined sev�er system was constructed sewage and storm water were . •
, , freely discharged to the Mississippi River at the nearest and most c�.t�o .
- convenient locationo As ptipulation increased and the river became more
' foul, it became apparent that sewage must be, treated before discharge
to the river�. .
,, r .
' . •�,� • . � ,
•,_ ,
-2- , •
. When a separate sewer system is provided the ground water, rain water,
' melting snow, air conditioning water, uncontaminated process water and other .
' � clean water may be discharged directly to the river without ill effect. With
' . a combined system such as that in St. Paul this clean water becomes mixed . �
� ..' . with sewage and must be canveyed through the interceptors and sewage treatment
. ' • plant. Since sewage treatment costs are apportioned between Minneapolis
• , ' ' � and St. Paul on the basis of volume of flow, the cost to St. Paul is greater
• � � than it would be if separate sewers were available. St. Paul's share has '
' , ' risen from 33v�6 in 1939 to 45� in 1963. Unless sufficient separate sewers
, . are built and these sewers used properly, St. Paul's share of plant expansion
, � . and treatment costs will continue to rise.
�;. . •''' , •
�'�'�•,, ',;��.�,` . �3) WATER POLLUTION. The system of interceptor sewers and the •
�� • �`; �� sewage treatment plant could not be economically built with capacity to �
. " handle all of the sewage plus all of the storm runoff during a rainstorm. �
. � Therefore the mixture of sewage and storm water must overflow directly
� into the river during, all but the lightest rainfallv So far river water use •
. ' . in the St. Paul area has been primariljr for navigation and the population � •
. � tributary to these points of overflow has been such that no serious problem �
, • has resulted from this condition. It is not necessary to project one�s .
• � imagination too many years into the future to conclude that this may not �
�� • � always be so. Thus considering water pollution, we see that the elimination � �
of combined sewers has another definite, though somewhat more remote benefit. �
� �� Since the sanitary 3nterceptor system and treatment plant were , '
' conssructed in the late 1930's there has been a gradual increase in emphas�.s �
' , on converting certain parts of the combined sewer system to a separate '
system. For example, in 1941 and 1942 a separate system of storm and
. sanitary tunnels was built in Minnesota Street to serve a portion of the '
, central business district. While these tunnels were constructed under
extremely difficult conditions and at a tremendous cost such a project �
was justifiable due to the large amounts oE air conditioning water which � •
can be intercepted inside the buildings and be discharged directly to the �
river without burdening the interceptor system and treatment plant. In '
other areas the ratio of costs to benefit might be such that the L
construction of seperate sewers could not be recommended, at least at this
time. IN GENERAL, HOWEVER, TNE LONG RANGE PLAN FC�R THE ST. PAUL SEWER
� SYSTEM SHOULD BE TO PROVIDE NDRE AND NpRE SEWERS OF THE SEPARATE TYPE. �
THE SEWER SYSTEM AND THE PLUN�ING CODE �
• � Until September of 1963 the St. Paul plumbing code did not recognize �
this separation problem. The only restriction on mixing of clean water -
and sewage was that roof downspouts should not be connected to sanitary
� '" ' sewers. As e result almost all of the buildings being constructed in St.
�, � Paul had a combined plumbing system. In some instances roof downspouts �
from new buildings were connected to combined sewers already overloaded ' .
' making back-up problems even worse. If separate systems were to be installed
, at some future date, only partial separation could be achieved without going
inside each building and making changes in the plumbing system. Even where .
a combined and clear water sewer were both available to a property, the
code did not clearly require the owner to dispose of clean water into the
clear water sewer rather than the combined sewer.
I
. r• , _ •
� A �
w �
�1 . ' .
� . �^� •
• ' . In September of 1963 an amendment to the Plumbing Code was passed '
• , • under C.F. 214457, Ordinance 12548. Th"is ordinance revised tHe plumbing code � �
• • � '. to require of all new buildings other than one and two family dwellings to � ,
' have a separate storm and sanitary plumbing system (presumably a cort�bined � . � , � �
' �'; • system is permissable under the code for one and two family dwellings) � • .
,. '� VJhen storm and sanitary sewers are both available the separate plumbing �.
' ,' systems would be directly connected to the separate sewers. Where only a � � : .
� • combined sewer was available th�e two systems would be combined together at ' , � �
, , ' the property line and connected to the combined sewer with a common line. � • '
. ' The amended code further states that when. a storm sewer is provided� at a '
� , later date the property owner shall disconnect the storm sewer from the ' � �
' combined sewer and reconnect to the storm sewer. The amended code also ' • �
• ' requires that buildings existing prior to the date of the amendment other ' � • �
• than one and two family dwellings shall have necessary revisions in their . � •
'. • ' plumbing to provide a separate system whenever a storm sewer is made � :
, available to the premiseso• ' �• � '
." . Due to the complexity of the sewer system, there are many different , ,
situations which occur, each having a different combination of problems. - •
" ,' � IT IS DCTREIV�LY DIFFICULT TO PREPARE A CONCISE SET OF REGULATIONS WHICH ARE �
NOT CONIRADICTORY AND YET ARE APPLICABLE TO EACH SITUATION ENCOUNTERID. ,.
Since it was known that' this smae problem has confronted many other cities
' in the past, particularly the City of Milwaukee, a trip was made to Madison �
.' '� • and Milwaukee, Wisconsin on October 17 and 18 to confer with the appropriate '
� � officials of those two cities. The following is a list of the persons with
• •�•' v+fiom the problem was discussed:
. , , ,
,; .
� �� • , . .�'r.�TY S2E .MAQL�QN� WT�ONSTN ,
, ; - - .
., , .',
�, ''�i;��� , . Mr. Edwin J. Duzynski, Director of Public Works � �
� . ���,'�� � . � Mr. Arnold Milke, Sewer Engineer • . .
' '� ��� � Mr. Larry Drifke, Chief Plumbing Inspector • � � �
. .:�• .
' . CITY OF IuQLN1AUKEE� WISCONSIN
' , . Mr. Herbert Goetch, City Engineer �
Mr. Ted Prawdzik, Assi,stant Sewer Engineer
' . Mro Ozzie Cludius, Assistant Superintendent of Plumbing
• . MILWAUKEE SEWERAGE COMMISSION
�, , �Mr. Lawrence Fsnest, Industrial Wastes Engineer .
� As a result of these conferences it can be concluded that these � '
� cities face much the same problems as St. Paul. IF THF�E IS ANY ONE FAC'POR
. THAT CONTRIBUTES MJST TO THEIR SUCCESS IT IS NOT CLEVER OR LENGTHY WORDING
OF CODES OR ORDINANCES BUT RATHER A �VERY CIA SE WORKING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEIV
, PLUJv�ING INSP�TION AND SEWER DESIGN DEPARTMENTS. In both cities these two
offices were directly adjacent to one another and there appeared to be
� close cooperation between the departments. Thus each installation which �
appears to present some problem in the disposal of storm water or sewage is
handled in an individual manner, within ,the general framework of the code, of �
. ' �
f
� •: • ;�
:.�'.,; '� � . . �.
"' � ' -4- �
� . , � �
, �, . ; •
,; . .
' course. IT SHOULD BE OBVIOUS, THAT ADEQUATE PERSONNEL HAVING A THOROUGH ' .
` ' KNOWLEDGE OF THE ENTIRE PROBLEM AND HAVING THE ABILITY TO EXFRCISE (�JOD �'
� � JLOGEMENT MUST BE AVAILABLE TO STLDY EACH PROBLEM CASE. This is always � � � t
the major obstacle to this type of code enforcement as the amount of work � , � �
' involved for the administrating department is much greater. . • �
' �'i- � '. , To illustrate the problem a little more clearly there are.listed ' • � '
• � below five typical sewer situations which could be encountered in St. Pauls '
�� lo SANZTARY SEWER ONLY - NO STORM SEWER AVAILABLE " • '
. . s
• • ' A. ONE AND TN�O FAMILY DWELLINGS In the State of Wisconsin it is
' � •• a violation of the State Plumbing Code to connect any roof . .
, ' . ' � downspout, area drain, foundation drain or other clear water � ' • �
. �
, , waste to a sanitary sewer. In Madison where there is only �
; . � � a sanitary sewer available in an area of one or two _family �
' , residences the roof downspout's would be discharged onto the ' , •
' ; ' ground at grade. If ground water condit�ons required �
. , foundation drains, the drains would be run to a sump inside " �
� , . � the basement and a sump pump would be provided to discharge
� out onto the lawn. This is also the practice in most of the
' ` . suburbs of Milwaukeeo If local conditions in an isolated •
�' . � , .� ' area were such that nuisance or icing conditions resulted from '
� ,. . . - , such a practice every effort would be made to construct a '
�`• •• , . � � storm sewer to serve the area.
;� . . • . . . � . ' .
' ;, , � In the City of Milwaukee the standards of their Public Works
'� � � ' �' • Department have until quite recently required that both
' ' sanitary and storm sewer be constructed to serve every bit
" of frontage on the street. Thus the above described sewer
' • . situation is very rare in that City. During the past year .
. ' , � , year or two they have, under pressure from developers, �
•� , ended storm sewer at the last catch basin rather than �
. , ' • continue up the last block to serve all the frontage. They
, • indicated that there have been complaints by property owners •
. . � of nuisance conditions resulting from the neighbors clear or �
' storm water. It appeared that the Department would prefer
to revert to ti�eir former standard b� two sewer connections
. for every building. It should be pointed out that the soil ,
' in Milwaukee is for the most part clay, and foundation drains
and sump pumps are required for nearly every building. .
It is of interest to note that the suburbs ad�acent to Milwaukee
" do not require a storm �sewer connection toione and two family
dwellings.
Under the present plumbing code in St. Paul the rain leaders
could not be connected to the sanitary sewer. However, `,
foundation drains are not specifically prohibited by the code
and it is believed that if foundation drains were required
. they would be connected to the sanitary sewer. AS THE "SANITARY
ONLY" SYSTEM IN ST. PAUL CONTINUES TO DEVELOP THIS PRACTICE ,
CO ULD BE DISASTROUS TO THE OPERATION OF THE SEWER SYSTEM AND
� IT �IS RECOMMENDID THAT THIS PRACTICE BE'OUI'LAWID.
' I
. , " : ...�os�n���.j7• I1{
1�
, � i�
. . . . {!
, t ��
�
i �
• . . ' �:
�
' • �' , ii
. B AP 0 ��:Ia ` S L::BUI D ...���� � '. ' �i
. AR�'M�NT.."
• , '; � �
� ' It appears to be quite generally agreed in all areas that for ' , ��
� ' apartment, commercial and industrial areas a sanitary only • ,'
' ' � . , sewer is not adequate. If satisfactory drainage is to result � �.
� �;� i� � � h a storm sewer also must be provided. In isolated, sparsely � 4
built-up areas roof downspouts may be discharged out into i
' . ` � • water courses and in Madison dry wells have even been used �
. , , as a temporary measure until storm sewer is available. '
� . . � • These are exceptions however, and if commercial development '�
� . i. � �� � will obtain any density. a storm sewer usually has to be • � �
,. ., , � ,, , ,
, -�I ,; �. provided. , �
;,'' . :.';� ,,' . . '
� '' 2. SANITARY SEWER lh'ITH SKFLETON STORM SYSTEM � � '
' ' ,' ', . ' , � ' �
� '` � Where a separate system of sewers is constructed the most cortgnon ,
'.1;;;'.
,,, ��.:,, .���, :��' , � � practice is to build a sanitary sewer to serve all of the street frontage '
���:;'' �' ��I . and build only enou h storm sewer to serve all of the street catch basins • , � ,
I.:., '•�. 9
,�;�;',,��.'� ;';i; +!.• in the gutters �at street intersectiono Thus a particular lot may or may not �
"'�'''""' �'i�° �': have a storm sewer available. This is often referred to as a skeleton , :
i��i,�`�:i,.��'�' � , , storm sewer system. � ,
��;.�.� •i;U, ' ' ,
;!i;; ;. ,,�.;. • ,., , � •
�1�,,,,:, �,j , ,, , �. � , A. ONE AND TV10 FANQLY DWELLINGS � .
;�,.�,• •,� . ,.
����.,,�,.:. ,;,�• , � . .
!;; '. �`,� �• � � The common pTactice in Madison is to discharge roof downspouts
•" ��'� � ' � � �� out onto the 1 awn where the water can f ind it s way overl and ,
��,��.' .�,.a , � '
','� :' '�'� � • ' , � to the gutter and down• the street to the catch basin at the ,
��� , � ,'i , , � ' ` corner. This appears to be the most common practice in the . ,
'�'•�, '•f� ' � � • majority of modern residential subdivisionsa If landscaping
' " . � . is such that this roof drainage would cause a problem for
� .,�� '�'�� , , � ad]acent properties a shallow storm sewer is built to discharge �
- .� � � to the gutter through the face of the curb. Foundation drains
; ... ', would be pumped out onto the lavm or into the shallow storm
line. As previously mentioned Milwaukee has not usually �
. � built a skeleton system so this situation is not common there.
• . B. APARTIV�NT. COMMERCIA�.. AND II�IDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS
,,. ;` ,. , .
• � ' As was mentioned above a storm and sanitary connection are
, � • both essential to provide proper drainage from buildings of
this type. In addition to rain water and foundation drains
� � commercial buildings often have air conditioning, cooling,
condensing or procees water which must be disposed of to the
' storm sewere
' In the City of Madison when a building in this category is '
� proposed, the City levies a storm sewer connection charge. If
a storm sewer is not ad�acent to the property the skeleton '
, �system is extended using City Forces to such point as required
to provide a connection for the building. The cost of ,
extending the storm sewer is paid from a fund maintained by
� � these storm sewer connection charges. Details of this system
are indicated in the attached poliCy statement of the City
of Madison. , ' .
'-- � n
- i �• � .
��, � ' •'i .� � � .
+ �
.� � , ' . , -6-
� ' , , , , ,
' ,,'�' � ,' � Since storm sewers are usually shallow, foundation drains ,
� - • � would have to b� pumped. The method of connecting inside •
• � ,� ' rain leaders was not entirely clear. Apparently the plumbing �� .
•, � , ;;; ' ' _' , from rain leaders has to be "hung" at the first floor level. •
""'� � Most of the suburbs of Milwaukee have only a skeleton stor.m ' ` '
� � �'' ; . � • sewer system. Commercial buildings are constructed with • �
�� '' ' � rain leaders discharging onto the ground. Any air conditioning , � �
, : •���;�. ' or refrigeration equipment would have to be mechanical cooling. . �
° � ' If nuisance conditions develop the storm sewer is usually
,� ��'��' � • ' extended to serve the building. The Metropolitan Sewerage ,
.�,� , ' Cortmission of Milwaukee County has an inspection, division
'� ''� � which vigorously enforces the code prohibiting discharge
� �,''�'`,'� ��� - � � ' of clear water to the sanitary sewers. ' , •
. ,; . . , ,
�� � • ' ' � �� That part of St. Paul which has sanitary only sewers is
''�' generally provided with both sanitary and storm (i.e. Minnesota
�,��. '' ,
, "•� � � • Street et. al.) or is primarily residential and provided with �
3�'�,� • a skeleton storm system (viz. Battle Creek area or east of �
� �i , � Lake Phalen) . In those areas which are unsewered, if a
' property is zoned commercial the skeleton storm system could • �
, be designed and built to serve the property. Cost could be � . �
. assessed accordingly. If the owner requests a change to .
:, '� .. ; commercial zonit�g after the skeleton storm sewer is designed
'�„ . "',; . ' and built, some arrangement could be made to extend the sewer
' '` +� ' � rior to rantin '
,�.i,,.� ,.;;.�; , p g g the rezoning requesto .
,.,.,, „� �, , ,
�:;,.� ,,.� .
:'i�'•'°. ;;:�; :�• .. 3. SANI7ARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER '
';'� , ��+�'� . . . ..
'' '�' ,�;��� . ' The most desirable type of sewer service is to provide both storm and
',',,. ,.;_,,�, , , .
�,: �.,,. ,��i�" ,' � sanitary sewers in front of each property. This is the practice in Milwaukee. • �
;;,; - r;' The cost of course, is greater than for the skeleton system. It should ��
�,� _ ;�
;�+�•��• ;i',.`i{, ' ' be�noted that Milwaukee has a fixed sewer assessment rate of $5.00 a front foot '
��t,�,„ �,,..�
;�; ;;'�''',;�±;;;;:.i '' for sanitary and $4.00 a front foot for stormo The balance of the costs �'
"�';'';; �` +'`'" p g g general ro ert taxo Their '
;,.�,;,..: .,.I :,•�; are made u from bud et funds raised throu h p p y � .
�I��I�t;i;,'i;lj;;.±!�!,i current budget funds from the property tax for sewer construction alone ; ' '
�'��!����� �� �� � amount to $5 million er ear. Thus the are in a somewhat different
,,�.���� �. +:� �� . p Y y , .
'i����:';'.�`i���:�;. �• � position than St. Paul. It would appear that St. Paul will have to continue � ,
� ': .•'��i , the practice of building a skeleton storm sewer system. Most other communities
�:���� " • are in this same financial position. • -
�'i:' ':i - .
',; � .
���';��� '�,� ' .
i;; ,",.'��f::� ' , Even with the skeleton storm sewer system there will be some streets '
��{�I';'��'�,:;��:
,�i,� �„� � , , which have both sewers. There must be some policy regarding the plwnbing
;����-�.�' � � of buildings' in these streetso � �
��ii';;• �j;�I�'��� ,
�,{I i.,:�„� ,I;� , �
! �''�`�,I�`�,'",''� ' '� A ONE AND TVYO FAIuQLY DWQ.L '
I ���,,, �� ��;���;, � ' • INGS
ii�j i.fii��,,,f�i _.�; ,, i,� .�,: - - • •
'i1�j' ���i � ' 1 ' .�?, •
.ii���';� �;�i;•.,; �• . �� ' In the City of Milwaukee every building including single
:�'.'����'' ���' �" �'''° famil residences is re y �
p,,. :.. ;;,, . , _ y quired to have a storm and a sanitar
:;���: �`•• ��:i'" ,� � sewer connection when storm or combined sewer is availableo
���j ; ; . The storm sewer connects to rain leaders and the foundation
�i�' � sump pump. . . .
. 1
�
�
- , ,. . . � ,. _, ._ , . .. �� . , . , . • . � ��•.�*, _ . ,� � . .., .. :a �. .�
. i_
b ` ;`
�
' �'r -?- �
• ;
In the City of Madison and in the suburbs of Milwaukee one and �
two family dwellings are not required to builcl a storm sewer �
connection. Rain leaders and sump pumps discharge onto the
• � ground provided they are directed to flow to the street or �
' • . . alley without nuisance or damage to neighboring property. i
. , If nuisance conditions result a storm sewer connection could � � .
. � � • always be built. ' {
. B. APARTIu�NT, CONUdERCIAL AND IIvT)USTRIAL BUILDINGS
� • The most common practice and one that appears most satisfactory � ,
� is to require that these buildings have a storm and a sanitary ' � '
� , connection where both sewers are available. It should be. '
. recognized that in St. Paul there will be a few instarices �
' ' � where both sewers are sandrock tunnels and two connections •
' '�` ' ' will be quite costly for a small building. Such occasions will '
' ' be very rare as most of the buildings constructed in these , �
. • - areas are of substantial cost and the two connections will ' �
,' , ' ` not be a hardship. . �
� For the ma�ority of installations the storm sewer in the • � '
street will be of relatively shallow depth having about four �
or five feet of cover. This �oill rec3uire special consideration �
f;
in the design of roof drains. Foundation drains where required, �
:� , and any other clear water from basements will have to be pumped.- ;' �, -
� t5
1�
;: , 4. COPBINID SFWF� OF F�FASONABLY ADEQUATE CAPACITY � p
, ' , . ' . �s
':� � • j;
. '' Most of St. Paul is sewered with a combined system. The merits of ?i
� p combined and separate sewers have already been discussed at the beginning �� ,
i
, ;� �:' ' of this report. Where these combined sewers are of adequate capacity and ' ' � �
±�� •, back-up is not a serious problem, City finances will probably not permit �� •
•, ; any new sewer construction, at least in the forseeable future. There will be : ' � �
:,;', , �'; many exceptions to this however, where process water, air conditioning water �
�'i;�� ��;'� �' or ground water are present in such quantities that separation pro�ects can
,���' ; `�,;�' � be justified on the basis of treatment costs alone. Also there is no way of
;�,;,'��� � ;;� , knowing at this time what State or Federal regulations regarding water . � �
; �. ..
'��,� !,;,� pollution control might be enacted and enforced in the next fifty years or so. � �
, � ; `.'. . THEREFORE ANY NEW BUILDINGS SHOULD HAVE A SEPARATE PLUIUBING SYSTEM IN ORDER �
;',.� ' ` ,� THAT SEPARATION OF SANITARY. WASTES AND CLEAR WATER HIQGHT BE ACCOIV�LISHm �
; ';�� _ WITI�UT MAKING CHANGES INSIDE THE BUILDING IF SEPARATE S�NERS ARE PROVIDID •
;�'�'; �:3 AT A FUTURE DATE. � ;
; 1, �
r "a
� ' +:„ i
i'I����'�`' '''°�` ' �� A. ONE AND TNA FAMILY DWII.LII�3GS
' �! ' • .
�I�+��., '"''� ,, . �
�`', � . !
i����'�'' '�� In the entire State of Wisconsin it would be a violation of
';; ��;"� ';
j,�?��,� ��;,� • , - � the State Plumbing Code to construct combined plumbing in •
!�!� � ��.;j�'�,,. , , � • . any building. The present St. Paul plumbing code presumably • '
'�'' � " � ' permits combined lumbin in one and two famil dwellin s and '
� "I.'': � � . P 9 Y 9
;,,ij;,�„�,jii , , prohibits it in all other buildingso COIV�INED PLUMBING SHOULD •
��, � . . BE PROHIBITED FOR ALL BUILDINGSa As has been discussed in
�i�''�'�'" 'i�'' ' other sections of this report the rain leaders from one and ,
lj;i;��;���li'��� , � ' ' two f ami l w 1 �
' y d e lings can be discharged onto the ground in 3
� �� �''��" ' ' most residential areas without creating serious problems.
Lj ' ! •, ; .
!;� � ' "� � . The use of foundation drain tile is probably the exception ?,
. �
, . , ;.
, • +�
• ,�
,
,;
., . . . . ., . _ . . . .r , , . � . , . . . . ,,.. w. ,. � . ... , .� . ._. . , .,,.�.,.. ,;
. , • , ,'
ti � � '
�, � ' . .
� ' , r8,. , � � .
. . ' ' I •
, � ' � � � _ rather than the rule in the St. Paul area. Thus except where � • ; ,�
_ . . ' ground water conditions require foundation drains the typical
. . � � ' " one or two family dwelling will need only a sanitary sewer � �
• ' .. . ' connection. When foundation drains are required they should
, , be installed in such a manner as to permit future separation
, , when a clear water sewer becomes available. �
' . ' � '�� .
'• ' � • , . � B. APARTMENT. COMMERCIAL AND I1�USTRIAL BUILDINGS �
. _ _ , , . � � The present St. Paul plumbing code requires a separate plumbing
•�,• _ � . � system in all buildings other than one and two family dwellings. �
. .� :., ; .. Where a combined sewer of adequate size is available the two .
' � � , , � , � systems would be combined at the property line. If such �
' " separation is to be of future benefit when a storm sewer is ', � '
�"�_ �� .� . � , . ,. � , �
� ., . � provided the storm building drain cannot be deeper than the �
- � .' future storm sewer o � � ; �
" ,. . • � , In some instances the future storm sewer would be shallow, .
. • . • in some instances deep. Therefore a set rule cannot be � �
" � '' ', applied for the depth of the building storm sewer. In the
, _ ' ' , downtown commercial and industrial districts of Milwaukee
�� � . new sewers are usually built as sanitary sewers, deeper
than the combined and the combined are converted to storm
� sewerso This, of course, is more expensive than building a
shallow storm sewer and is practical only when the existing
' � • combined sewer has adequate capacity as a storm sewer. •
• • However, it does eliminate the problem of "hanging" rain
, leader plumbing and installing sump pumps for foundation
. � , drainso AS FAR AS ST. PAUL IS C�NCERNID THERE IS NO ONE
CORRFCT SOL UfION WHICH APPLIES IN ALL INSTANCES AND THE '' "
� ' 'D EPTH OF STORM SEWERS WILL VARY. This will make it difficult �
' �' �' , to administer the new plumbing code in an effective manner. �
�; ,
•� �� � 5. QONBINID SEW�R OF INAAEQUATE CAPACITY
� �, �, � In a modern American city of 300,000 persons it is not unreasonable �
� . • ,. . ' to expect that each building should have an adequate sanitary drainage , �
��� , system which will function effectively on a year around basiso It is an ' � � .
,, ' , . ' unfortunate fact that there are vast areas of St. Paul which are served � �
• ' �� by combined sewers of inadequate capacity to carry even moderate rainstorms.
. � ' �� ' Many of the properties in these areas are protected by manual or automatic .
back water valves. However if there is some malfunction of the valve or -
` �'� '_ ' if the homeowner is absent and fails to close a manual valve there results � ' �
; , a back-up of sewage and rain water into the basement. The property damage, � • � ' -
�• ` , danger to public health� and the effect on property values have already � •
�•' ' �! � been discussed in this report. ' � •
,,� ,.,, .
,;;�; . •
'`�F '� ���� y� ' The only true solution to this roblem is rebuild that '
I;;;;., �':a�''.. P portion of the
��� '• ��I', ' � • sewer system that is inadequate. This i�volves a tremendous expense and
''�'����" `''� 1 ' while gradual progress has been made it has been very slow due to financ3.a1 '
,.�i ;,'
• ,'; • �, limitations. There are many other demands for City Funds to create projects
� �' '� which produce more visible and at�ractive results. A great deal of err�hasis ,
�".:�;� '`,,' „ . is presently placed upon the use of Federal and City Funds for renewal of
,; ' , ' „ some of the older bli.ghted areas of the City. It is believed that funds '
�i • . �
'.i I'� • .
"� . • .
� -- - ----- - �-- � - --. �a _�_ _ _._ ..�. .----- — ._ . . ..... .- - ' ' I � _. . � . ., . , .. . . . . - .
,I. .:d:�-.. ,rL. ..n.
ti .
y . : , . � �
� -9- ' •
. � used to rebuild some of these inadequate sewers could perhaps arrest the
spread of declining property values and fu�ther blight before it becomes ' -
' , so bad that total removal of all buildings and complete renewal is required. � .
• ', , These •inadequate sewers are quite widespread and occur in local areas
�• • , all over the City and not only in areas which are considered blighted. Thus ,
' , there are many new buildings being constructed which have as their only sewer .
' � serivice one of these overloaded combination sewers. �
. �, ' THIS IS THE M�ST SERIOUS PROBLEM FACED BY THE S�lhIER DEPARTMENT TODAY. � .
,,, ,. •.;:,. S � : AN OVERLOADID COMBINED S�VJFR IS IN SON� WAYS WORSE THAN NO SEWFR AT ALL. �
� �c ' ' The property proposing a: new connection can protect their own basement from ' ' ,
.;_���,.�''' back-up by use of back-up valves ox special plumbing arrangement, however �
� .�'� ;� the older buildings presently connected to the same sewer will experience even .
' � - more frequent and serious difficulties. If the new buildings are commercial,
, or apartment houses and rainleaders are connected, the roof downspouts serve
' �;;, : as standpipes to "head up" the combined sewer and flood basements in spite �
��� ` ; of ineasures taken to protect them. . � '
� '.� +�, _• .�� The City of Madison has no combined sewers. However, their Director of �
' PUblic Works, Mr. Duszynski has had experience in other Wisconsin cities '
� which have this problem. He indicated that in .order to reduce the back-up
' problem that they would discharge all rain leaders in these areas onto the
� �, ground and restrict the openings in street catch basin leads. During intense . '
, � rainstorms the clean rain water would thus be impounded in the streets. This �
, � was considered preferable to impounding a mixture of rain water and sewage �
��� in the basements of buildings. THIS IS IN GENERAL THE APPROACH FAVORID BY
" ,; ;,,�, . ' THE ST. PAUL SEWER DEPARTMENT, HOWEVER, IT APPEARS THAT IT IS CONTRADICTORY , _
�; ��� � • TO A STRICT, LITERAL INTERPRETATION OF THE ST. PAI,Q. PLUMBING CODEo + �
• ',:i
, ' �� •' In the City of Milwaukee, the older portion of the city is sewered with � ,
. combined sewers. While there are some of these areas in which the sewers are ' �` � �
�• ,
" • !;; � too small and back-ups occur it did not seem from our discussion that the
�,';��„ �",; � � problem was as extensive or severe as in St. Paulo When a new building is '
';;;; ' :;i' � proposed in a "back-up" area in Milwaukee the Sewer Engineer working through ' � ' .
�;;�+•,• , �+ � the plumbing inspector requires that the drainage from all fixtures and
''i'�.',�. '��!� drains below street elevation be drained to a sump and pumped or ejected into
���';' �;��• ' Therefore there is no way for the combined sewer to ,
;�� the sewer connection. •
, ..'�: • back up into the buildirg . This arrangement functions more positively ' �
. „ than a back-up valve. If it appears that there is going to be quite a bit of �
�� ' �.� building activity in one of these "back-up" areas or if the existing problem
. seems severe the necessary relief sewers or storm sewers would be constructed
� using general funds. There was mentioned as an example one particular area ' '
. , where some multi-story apartment houses were proposedo Knowing this to be � � . �
' � •, � a back-up area, the sewer department built the necessary storm sewers and
,' � corrected the situation before the buildings were completed. This, of •
� ' course, is the only real solution to the problem however, in St. Paul the �
, financing of these projects is not so readily obtainable. THE MILWAiACEE
;� OFFICIALS DID II�ICATE THAT WHERE THE OVERLOADING PROBLEM COULD NOT BE
� SOLVED READILY THAT NEW BUILDINGS AND OLD SHOULD HAVE RAINLEADERS DISCHARGED
' , � ONTO THE GROUt� RATHER THAN "HEAD 'Up" THE CONBINED S�IIVER AND INCREASE
• "� THE S EVERITY OF BACK-UPS.
�� -
' :� �;i , ' .
. � �
� • .
� •n. ' .
� I
. M�a ,
, .
OONCLUSIONS A1�ID RECOMhtENDATIONS • �
• It is not considered within the proper scope of this report to present
� '� any specific changes or revisions in codes or ordinances. However, as a ' •
result of considerable study, experiences with the present system, and the
recent �conferences with officials of Madison and Milwaukee the following �
• , conclusions are offereds -
� � � . l. St. Paul should adapt and pursue a policy•of separation of clear. '
, , water and sanitary wastes. It is not sufficient to merely enact ordinances
, ' , requiring separation. THE NEXT STEP MUST BE IDUCATION AND R�ORIENTATION IN �
, ., ,' THE THINKING OF DESIGNING ARCHIT�TS AND EIVGINEERS, BUILDERS, PLUNBERS, �. � '
, , • PLUN�ING INSP�TORS, PUBLIC WORKS OFFICIALS AND ANY OTHERS INVOLVED IN THE • ,
CONSTRl�TION AND OPERATION OF BUILDINGS OR SEWERS. The present practices, . •
� policies and thinking have evolved from the use of a combihed sewer system � �
�for over one hundred years and will not change overnight. Finally there .
. must be a certain amount of enforcement. Inspection of a building plumbing �
' system at the time of construction can insure that the system is separate' at
� • that time. However, the experiences of the Milwaukee Sewerage CortBnission have � . �
, ' . shown that spot-checking and occasional inspection of the system in operation ' • , �
are necessary to assure continued separation. ANY SEPARATION POLICY SHOULD -
' , APPLY TO ALL B UILD INGS. ' .�
2. The problems resulting from overloading of existing combined sewers • �
, , ; become more prevalent each year. As undeveloped land and residential land ;
„ . � �� are converted to commercial and apartment use together with required parking �
,.;,,. ';;,,;;, lots, �hespescentagenof�.�otal•�rain�al�.•that.;r•eaches,.the :sewers constantly �
, ��,' �';,�',`' - increases making these back-up areas even more extensivea
':��:;''' ��i;l;�� ,.;'� � The onl reall satisfactor solution to the � • ,
,,,, .,, ;, , Y Y y problem is to rebuild these -
' ��.�• ������' � overloaded and outmoded portions of the sewer system. This is, of course, �' '
�+,; '''''�:'" • • , ' � ,
;���;,�?��„���+l�;,,, ,� a very costly undertaking and the financing problem is a difficult one. :� . �. '�'
��'', i;. ,., However, the future of a large part of the City at least partially depends �
,.�i!'•� � ' � upon it. Whenever the financial needs of the City are discussed and evaluated '
;�'i';: .;;�,� , ,
� � �'�' � funds for providing adequate relief sewers should be given high priority. '
,,,,.�„�..•�: ,. _ �,
i
��!l��.�.;���:�i��` ��' '� ,'" � ,
�����;+��;';��';;'��� �,'' � 3. If the existing 'St. Paul sewer�system is to be utilized in the best � �
���:�';i, „ , , .
'�'.I;.,, =,,J �+ ,' possible manner in a way which is also compatible with plans for future
�i�����`'��"'���"' `' ' i�rovements, a great deal of cooperation is required between designing � � �
,i�I����',, .ii!i�r :,
'I-;��� �"�''' '" '; architects, the St. Paul Building Department and the Public Works Sewer ' '
�I�ii;�;..' ';iu�;;,.�' ,
,,,I�;;;,+;� ;i;�� �. . Engineering Department. Each building involves a slightly different set of '
•��i,f;+;,.,?I;�,_•;;, � � circumstances and must be evaluated separately. ARCHITECTS SHOULD BE
•,�, ;;�; ,;�;� • ENCOURAGm TO CONTACT THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT EARLY IN THE DESIGN STAGE OF EACH " '
;,;� ;.�' �;��'.� �' • BUILDING IN ORDER THAT THE PROPER SEWER CONNECTIONS NQGHT BE DETERIVQNID. In �
',�,', .. ',;!�,� '� • some instances the Sewer Design department will' have to make studies and some .
� � delay will result before the final answer is available. As more sewers of the
,,,,� ; '�if , separate type are constructed additio�al staff�tn the Sewer �gineering •
, �- ,• section of the Department .o� .Public Works will be needed to assist in
`. : �� ,, determining the, proper use of the Cityts sewer system.
• ,', . .
; , , , ' ' Respectfully submitted - 10-31-63
� • John.A.:Des� Laurier�;~.SeweT Engineer .
' Clarence G. Sprague,-Ass�: Sewer.En'gi,neer
, G1er��Ea�ieksdpy Menh��ical Enginee�;-�• t•
Building Department
. . . � .� . . . 4 t. e. - -� .. .�. s .... .. .. . . . .. i i �.. f [ __. •st ._ [ �_ t . _ ... . . . .
. • . �
� ' . +'
� '•� � ; . � � . • ' � �i
� . -11- ' ' ' • ' ' ' �;
. :_
. . i,
. ` • � • . 1f
, APPf-NNDIX " . . , � Is
' , CITY OF MADISON �
� POLICY ON STORM S�1NER OONNECTIONS •� ' :
, . • • ., .
, , ,
. ' The City of Madison has adopted the following policy, effective immediately, �
� reiative to storm sewer connections. This policy will provide clarification � '
.' �;! on the City's position where storm sewer connections are required, pursuant to � •
� Section 18.33 of the Madison City Code of Ordinances wherein property owners � � '
�` ' . , are required to make surface and rain water connections ,to storm sewers.
,. �•��:• . ,
.. ±;.�� � , � � .
� ;'�0'� This olic su ersedes an '
, P Y p y previous policy under which the City of Madison has
• � handled storm sewer connectionsa .
� �� . , , ,
„ �, ' '_ I. Storm sewer connections will be requireds ;
� � �' • r � A. Residential "D" zoning. •
,;; � . .
� � , , B. Comercial zoning (all grades)o
,�' � .i� , �
, j
, . C. Industrial zoniag (all grades)o ;
� ;
� �, ' , D. The Engineering Department may determine exceptions and permit
- • emptying of storm waters at the curb face where storm sewers ares �;
S:
. 1. Unavailable (for the time being "unavailable" shall mean no
�'.�' , �,,, storm sewer within approximately 500 ft. of the probable ,
. • location of the connection)o �
, :�'
� �' ,;� 2o Overtaxed due to submerged outlets. ��
�;
� „ 3o Of insufficient deptho I�
!; ' ;,.. ,
;�;,. ,' ., � II. City standards relative to storm sewer connections. ,
�i`f�;;°,'.'. ''.i + ' � .
;��i�l!:,:��:��j �; � � � A• Storm water line or storm sewer installed in a public street shall
I��'±�„�, .; �,,, ,. not be less than 12 inches in diametero
��,,�', , � I, ,
'�;�'�� �' : ��� Bo Manholes shall be installed according to standard practices with
, ;, .
;����j .. ,,�' " � respect to changes in line and grade.
,;, , , ,
;,:�� .�� �,,.. . .
jii+;;;��,:;,,�!�, . • Co City shall have' the right to connect storm water inlets to any storm • �
;;��i;,,;. !;�;,� sewer line brought up to serve a specific property if the Engineering '
,��i; , �,. • �
��,���,;±,�.;,;1�; ;' ; Department deems that the storm water inlet is in the best public
,�i�+y,! •��,,,, . ' interests.
i�,,:�,v �i;f�� . . .;. t
. ;i!;!", .;�!:,' , .. '
.��;�:;;` .� • ' � Do The city shall determine the location, direction of flow, depth, size, � � '
,i��. ;� ,,;,,�., ��. ..
�1 �, and type of material to be used in the storm sewer. , ' � � ,
;���,�,� , , .
� .� � ' ��
'� �� Ea The city shall determine whether the storm sewer is to be installed '
;.; ,
�� ,' " „� by city forces 'or private or•public contractor. � , �
�,�"1 :,�,' . , , �
��. , ,
, , :; . , �
� �3
� -i , � ����,���.
� � .
h �' �
� ' -12-
� F. Storm sewer mains installed in public street right of way shall be the . '-
, property of the city, and the city shall be responsible for their �'� �
operation and maintenance. '.
G. The storm water lateral or connection from the property line to the , .
storm sewer main shall remain the property and responsibility of the � � ' � '
property owner, similar to the 'sanitary sewer lateral policy. . °
- � , IIT. Storm sewer connection charges. � , ' '
• Where storm sewer connections are required and ordered9 they shall be
, , � financed in the following manner: � �
� ; A. Property requireing storm sewer connections shall pay to the City
� of Madison connection charges as follows:
' 1. $10.00 per inch diameter squared for each lateral connection �
• coming from the property. This storm sewer connection charge
. . is for benefits received and may not necessarily bear a direct �
� • relationship to the cost of each individual connection. This
shall be applicable for laterals up to and including 10 inch
diameter. For laterals larger than 10 inch diameter the -
following charges shall apply: ,
' � 12 inch diameter - $1,300.00
. 15 " " - 1,600.00 '
, � , � 18 " " - • 1,850.00 '
., ' + 21 " �� - 2,000.00 ,
' 2. The property owner or his agent shall sign a work request form,
. � r ' at the Office of the City Engineer, stipulating agreement that
' . the city perform or have performed necessary work for a specified ,
. � , • amount. �
. ;;.
, : , ,
��'� ' �''�' " B. Property owner's responsibilitys
,I�.. , ,�:
I ';;', �.
i�ji�:,�, .I� , .
'' '�� :,i • lo The. property owner shall be responsible for the installation ' "
��' '' '" , of the storm sewer lateral from his building or yard area to
• ' the property lineo ,
;; � ,',� 2. The property owner shall provide the pipe, jointing materials,
� � �,i and labor to lay the storm sewer lateral from the property line ;
�,�.'"+ ��; '° to the storm sewer main, as directed by the cityo � � '
;i'�,:�• ,,;; , � ' ,
�°�{,' ,'�;;{ � 3o The storm sewer lateral maintenance shall always be the �
,:.
' !'�, responsibility of the property owner. �
� �.,, . � -
;: � ;.�.• C. The city's responsibility:
j • - .
' 1. The storm sewer main shall be installed and main-tained by the F
,' city (main installation to serve a particular property may be
limited to approximately 500 lineal feet) .
. ' ' � � �
, _ - • ,
' � . ' , , �. ,
. ' � , ,
""�n - �. , , , �
- . ,. _ ...,, n , a. . M1., ..� . .. . . , . ,, , ±
r � �
, , . -
� • �� _ � I
. , 't � . • , ' ' , ' ' •
, . � —1� . � , , ' '
. 2. The city shall provide all labor, exclusive of that necessary � ' '
�, , , , , for pipe laying, to install the storm sewer connection from � " �
the property line to the storm sewer main. This includes the ' o .
' ' • �. , tap and connection to the main. ' � ,�� � ' . . '
• � ,
. , �' •
� 3. The city shall provide all materials, exclusive of pipe and � , '
� ,]ointing material, to install the storm sewer connection � � • �
� from the property line to the storm sewer main. This includes . �
backfill and street restoration where required. ' .
,� � � • ; �, ' '� ' , � � , � • � � .
. , . . - , .. . .
�. . � , , . .. •
� � ' • . . � ' �
.'� ' ' �
� ��' ,. , � � , � �
� ' . � •
,, , •
,i, , � , • .
� ' �. •
�, � � � . � � .
.,, .. � • .
'�� - . . ,.
,. . .,, . ,
,' , „• ; �. • ' �
�; . �+'� •. � ' .
,�� � `'I� ' � , • , ' .
, , ,
„� �a � . .
,h � 6 ., ' ..��,i;. , . - ' � ... , �. . • '��'- � -�f•�, � ., . .� R.� , � �� . n.��.. - * �t�',. � , . . . o�. •a , .. .:r',;:�, �i',
�C.�-��-��--- J>����V'' ��� ' �.,�'--� 'L!'�� i v.e �/'��v �amber���,- .::� QrO �
ti 4'�'�.
�AVE �` UHE AVE. � �9 v �` � �,9 �J-�*p/G 6 II; �
VE. 0 9u t Hdl S`_ 1 �' te�`'��.. �� ���` 1 J� �„p o t ,,� � � KEN CK1
�- O S-IO HIAN rAYE. �� " ty' .1' Yicu .`,�Ypb-?���,F4'c ' 2, oo�+��` T�u
��'b' m r - u�� .d +k �
_ � � :..-'• web.ter .S-� p`� ��tt�• p .c. h �- �o `{
< i.N1a .:�a Sehoal o AVE. �, \ ,a� ,/� i \� �.TN ' \G�- 5`�st �� rJG Q� � F. St ���� BAYFIFL
�V .(,
. vE � �. A�� A G^� i op ��� ��� " �
6 flTU1N N N NALE P - a fk Y~ �� '!j7! �
� � �PO u • �
• orH c.s. -126 ��C3" <�n,�,o �r� .� �.Q �� _ l �
AVE. �T ��t `i. ,��2` ,,�� 0VY�• � � �
� '� � �� 'ru '��U ��� ~�'' ��' `� �� \ 1
,€ CI�, � � �
"_ - ve �N �I� ��.°�a��tw `� � ?�g�� v �m + ' ,��� -.v_ :.,l, 'e,�° g� ;:
4� 89•r� 6 �.' P S� 3�i��� :':�
��F ,G_'� ��Q . �r �r � o-+�v Q��,� M �,., a '1� .,�rs`` ��-/..�`u c
`�J` . •� �,,--w ��� `�° �-� ,+,y�'�p;�a8� �• �n/� ����'�� � .::�fi n
�� � _ _ PP�a STl1RG1.¢-ST. �L���W � , .'�� • �P� o �
��� � O� tJ�e`' � e Qo� �� �o�,,'.t� `��. 4�.Y,D l �+� �J ! �,;..�,'� �':.y .
Q�1VE. ��,��yy VE.-- ���'^ ♦ P" " �Iy ^ • �
o � S-IZ T�,�s~y\\ W �� G' 1' �� . �' � f i� {^ ^ �� \J
ry�-r ann � si. t ,�;� � ,� s r�� �i �` ` � Y /��° .
AVE c` Qs °~'��a ■I �]m o. . �5 sa / �� 4 ''4 4�r��,�� �`������5� '�
- �04;;: r ', 000HU � 1�sr�� � �' �` :. �%�k��c'�' ����. . t. L .
�yl� P F�10 a-ST. ��-Js J S �, ^ 2 - � ���yyy/// S.
�e�G- o�' a uv[F �F G. i , ♦ '�P 6 / , pS . 5Z
�L_I P ' •�` � ���O��5 L�� � / �� ��, O t , SPECT pE�-LJ �� ����pp
y + `E HI F c5 - , ' F� �� � _ ,♦ : 'do .e ` + / ,.:.<<'-• W. OL � � J� �O. ...•� "� ' • -
- � ; .� Q F ,/�� C�' D
,j .. ., .,,�„Q`, k'.'C�E�t� , =�9 .A�'.'�' , �� � ...S�� �L.�J����� � ..� �(
STATE s ��..•, �� .'. .�..
� .. �/ O Olj � � � � : \ fi .:....
` .`.iiF . ;-. Hah rSd e' , ' i '''�...` i:�' � ....• . � _ .. ::
'.:'.L'i","o o / ■Yr.
+ _., :
:, . .. . •
�.., � q � t�rer � � p P R ,..�,• s�e v('E�. .� .�t•�.
1.LJ � 6. C � �.:. 1y •..
N / p' , S � 0O $tE $ . r��� fe•. "�������a�,�,V ' �i . �»' ': .
AT er �� �'.. E55 p �v a � +
� � unou- 000 ,� •�' � 1 I� � O.� �, '..
-R .
h� '�� ��D�����z�H�o,.b. o00 00 �� I I �-ww a �wia� V'{ � � °
ar. OOil Q,d, ,� - ���Ch'x,. I� �,�7 �c
4 r . V O " '[SriYS � ,� F�O: 9T. 1' �lV� / � 4
�" � P.el.a�d � � 9 O �� ,� �:}� a �h�• ��:� D � f �o
�a�, .Pie�gi� a D��� rc i o�,�C -. _ � g w � � . T e
� p ':� W P ♦ 0�^'� I � � � �r � vfl
I�A�CE�^� 1 s E '� � , \� ❑ ' ry W V� '` �
� W��Oe�'1 m o _h��7',�W Av / �, � �� �� STE N � � » �1� iew"� / � 2
�� � Jr. 8 Sr.�zI 1 ¢ �( � ♦ �'.��v;� Doo a"
Q��:";: LH. 5.J;U���� LJm �g �i� y/�``/ '.. �o� � i st. =s7. - �HosP. 1qIW��
C�'� (`� , /.JE'^` � ��
7; 1❑� AI 1� � D VF S��� � / - ,.):i:' ' ' ' � EIIZAB H LIU T w+ -I
G � cY`=;.
'�"� 4 �� - ..� �. ��`���` 6��l�l 0�:,. �
, �"
J L_J Q ��,� � p I`: ' � �S r.ft.$. ~a K R T.
7 � � � / ♦ ��0 I '� �'a0/ .��^ ❑ BkKER �v1 . � HER .5 ER a F�.
/ o . Q i
�� � 1/ Snl `L�J y=.ti:. i� ,.S' - �'a:,,,,^7 � >•r� '_,7 .'"r;sr. � Mo�ori sr. ara �sr� D�� E r+o�rr���
QQ �r.P �'�� ,, -" '•'': .g � �+ s�e: o l� `s'"'C, P A(3 E T`
.�:: ��� kVE• OY��.4, o ;� ' ',� �` ', , W O�-W PAGE ST. 6E v�� -I'L .�r �
'.'I� ':'r.y6 N A . p h P 'i � � •���.'"�. °wJ: �I o m � W SJ S I x Co. � 3 �� -
.:l::•:::: � $ '� �a�'r I _"`w�yr � � I �� � t ' _
+ �,'r J o �� �- ;_�. S.�•'� ��
t"'" ��� +-!� w , �� cu i� u T , ��� lverv e s,�:
�
c• ,s� „, _ �
�::�.::`�.+� i x � _.,."g:;. �� � � ,o
:P�a� ` �
� I1YAR LP �`f � -w- 1 ; _'�:; 3 ` y n,.� e�v[�ERE s7 ° eE�vio Grd.�- 3�j
�.> .C'•,itr T„y_ �w.wm \ . .^�3 u'7 f� tu C I I° ' c�
�'.•.
F ^� �W...�,.� ��U 0
�� �lc�1t' � J�.' / Y'.' 2 Q WI A . � F INON ��, �INONA,Z +¢ r�`
f��. �.re i t =o�' N ��. I`! � w.�,.� Q.•:` w rc � �, fa ./� +
�'•' •� ' rQ, � � � . //'�.� ,. �
>: �::• � `�� / ,�,�?--�'7� �s -`` " �` � " 1 - ��
I W '�� � Q `u • 5T, YpMIN a�r(yB
.;�';�, a' 6 , I.C O U N Y BOUNOARY I . a'C
�:at.•_•: .� �� `� � �� � -
:� :�:�.{�<.:::o .r J�� //,,� y ,`�S� � oTrA �� �o� �r�o a� o u-, � U
':...Yt�. �,�f` � . .J \J�///,��" • ���',�-','� V+9 w'o.. }uI' � U iot�`u o�r�� HU� RLEY�> �
�•.:�:. \) `
f7 �F lA� ��O• P� �V � I ,1F•+ � r' I• �rM N�t AV. . � IHAS EL „'TST. ul w w rLHA EL ��
� ��1 f �1 � . t g y� Q 4 � � j > > +1E E ST I� �����Ja��1 � G Q� r �16�1
��. " �; \ M < < �2 Q F-
��• ..�: �
t�' J L �� Y w wo,�K � si, vi mn+NZea
� ��^` e G�4 '31�. s -l• a <
f: �:.• � �_� ¢ �� �� I I �� � n � 1�
��r. � � ,� 3 , < < ����f't��p�7� L ' L� i f 1
.�;?,���.. .. r ^ c, q �? s, • c�
. �:pf.;..• • w � �\J � ',rr 1`� ,Z•� IJ f I ODeod eC S �II I1 � o � 1I���!I!I!I
� � CE 7ER3 �r � �. �` G� $ � '. iD1eY I P e u'J �x .:::.0;o Sch,e �~l-J�`
'••.r•'•::' A� Y ,l
.. �', • �+��LL�.1�aN G � �'���t�' "`�y�P� < O� Scl�. I�A�ah'� ����� JUL- N EILE N
p,.
�.� v ` � - �---�
� r
/ i' � �� � f"�� Q'\ JU�C^ �fll -�41/E j � � Z N F•Afl10N-� W
/� � � SL M�OONALO E �, � II � T �
�r I a „ _ �.�. .�,,�� �-�`�� �G1� V' o �III m �`.���
� oF A$,i �� ,�,'s' �_� ���!�3 � EFO�E _ �p �ON '', ��°xa 1 �� ±��3�C'�W �� � _ ���3 ��
I��.11 l�l� U\L &T t n'``�� .5.'u'� � �����3�y�`� ^ y _-' l� ��^°IBU7LER Q ' �- �rv�. - � � ��� qf
� ` _ 1 'L- • �� '"� I P J �Y� W 3 2 Sc O�SC}l.b 4 , � � • NY � �
'ta`� J < 2 1 I v1' � CiL ST. CONVEP
, � ���'9`'-� ���` + y ,qSN�e����o�'"�2� w�oL.! � �oV� onnc � •r�i T�2 SOrL ,
I Q � F i '� �CY; c=tORA/E VE �Z �����T I RMi
�Q �� o BEea�, o I � � C, keL
l ,JO r'. ,� ' 4� I�I ��a� �,.� ti� yI `t's,cuee,F � FABEI
�O � �q � �� � . R ��tORELA� _ `-MOR[LAHD-C�V. I___ _--_-
�� 'a°y r ;.�nIi��l W � .'' I�� K C-�V 3� I `W d f. `�i 52 ' �--
� �E ` �� � , ,��._F�„s_��_,�R�� � -,Inr----in� n `����� �
� �r.�`'. I �u4>�� �I I
�
a p,,� � �i��'1.�,�,`�'} ?�` k�
�� ,O " + 6y t''s
�G �� .�.�` 13 � �� ,�;,��.`` 1 . �
`� • -- - _ _ •..�w,,, _ '
� :�,;�,� ,���, �. � �� t PROPOSED SEWER FACILIT
r P. [�(�'
'��„N... l_1L CITY OF SAINT PAUL
I !�������,��3;�,�. ���
''?<���`�Il�;"" � � �� ( DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS •
� F������rJ�4j�` ` � " ROBERT F. PETERSON, COMMISSIONER
� � °=��{�%i:�. : -
��\z I EUGENE V. AVERY, CHIEF ENGINEER
�v�� `���,. � � � . JANUARV, 1967
�
- � -, - - -���',°°' � , � LE GE ND
Z�� y+ CNTWONT v �_
�n1� \ i,�A � ` ` � PROPOSED SEWER �OPEN CUT�
S�a � ;�p � �� . I�i��ll�1�����i PROPOSED SEWER �TUNNEL�
� • S-I100 PROJECT NUMBER
tS shown for relief and storm � �������������� gOUNDARY OF SEWER MAP �1��= 500��
>tems are based on preliminary -` ; � SB����NUMBER .
1
�n and data. Check with the � ° �` '` �'` �4 �~"`
,
�rks Sewer Engineer for most 1 a ,000 .��e F°°` ���� .��� .���
�tailed street locations. . � M.�. a�iMOacr,oe�.
;
MADI•
J L 0
MAP LOCATION PROJECT N0. NAME ' MAP LOCATION PROJECT N0. , NAM&
. . . . . .C-13 S-1311 MACALESTER PARK RELIEF SEWER SYSTFZ�i . . . . . _ . . . . . .D-8 5-1287 RIVERVIEW DISTRICT,
.B-11 S-1314 MACALESTER-NILES STORM SEWER SYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . . .D-10 S-1288 RIVERVIEW DISTRICT,
. . . . . .P-6 5-1273 MCLEAN-GRIFFITH RELIEF SEWER SYSTFM. . . . . . . . . . . . .Q-6 5-1178 ROBERT ST. , Fourth
. . . . . .P-5 5-1206 MAGNOLIA AVE. - Walsh to Weide . . . : . . . . . . . . . . .0-3 S-1323 ROBIE-BIDWELL STORM
. . . . . .P-5 S-1253 MAGNOLIA-tiAZELW00D, Extension near Ames. . . . . . . . . . .S-3 5-1209 ROBIE ST. OUTFALL S
. . . . . .P-2 S-1250 MARYLAND-BRAINERD RELIEF SYSTII+i. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .N-3 S-1283 ROBIE ST. SANITARY
. . . . . .Q-2 5-998 MARYLAND-GALTIER RELIEF SEWER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .K-2 S-1004 ST. ALBANS-ASHLAND
. . . . . .F-12 5-798 MARYLAND - Ruth to Nokomis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .U-2 5-1280 ST. ALBANS, Pleasan
. . . . . .K-8 S-1277 MILTON-ST. CLAIR STORM SEWER SYSTFM. . . . . . . .� . . . . .G-8 S-1261 ST. ALBANS-CARROLL
• . . . . . .H-2 5-1304 MORGAN-RETURN COURT STORM SEWER. . . . . . . . . . . .C-13 S-971A ST. ANTHONY HILL RE
• • • • • •Q-6 S-1303 MT. HOPE-PAGE STORM SEWr3t. . . _ . . : • • • • • • . . . . .N-10 S-971C ST. ANTHONY HILL RE
. . . . . .L-1 S-1254 MYRTLE, Glendale to Cromwell . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . .A-4 S-971G ST. ANTHONY HILL RE
SEWER. . . .E-3 S-1278 OAKLAND-KENT RELIEF SEWER. . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . , .J-7 S-971H ST. ANTHONY HILL RE
• • • • • �•E-2 5-1242 ORCHARD-GROTTO RELIEF SEWER. . . . . � • • • • • • • •H-3 5-1263 ST. ANTHONY HILL RE
. . .
• • • • • •Q-5 5-1317 OTTO AVE. , W. 7th St. to Misaisaippi River . . . . . . . . .H-10 S-1264 ST. ANTHONY RILL RE
• • • • • •R-2 S-1217B OXFORD CENTRAL STORM. SEWERS, CONTRACT B. . . . . . . . . . .F-6 5-460B ST. ANTHONY PARK ST
. . . . . .A-1 5-1245 PARK-IVY RELIEF SEWER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .L-2 5-460C ST. ANTHONY PARK SZ
. . . . . .G-9 S-974 PARR ST. - Sycamore to Jessamine . . : . . . . . . . . . . .L-4 5-460D ST. ANTHONY PARR SZ
. . . . . .E-9 ' S-1265 PORTLAND AVE. - Dale to St. Albans . . . . . . . . . . . . H-7 S-460E ST. ANTHONY PARK ST
. . . . . .N-3 S-1308 PORTLAND-WESTERN RELIEF SEWER. . . . '. . . . . . . . . . . .J-7 S-460F ST. ANTHONY PARR SZ
• , • • • •B'9 S-991 RANDOLPH, Mississippi River to DaverniAve. . . . . . . . . �.B-9 S-460G ST. ANTHONY PARK S7
' ' ' ' ' 'F-� S-1136 RIVERVIEW DISTRICT, Ohio St. Subdistrict . . . . . . . . .L-9 5-1005 ST. CLAIR AVE. , Mac
. . . . . .J-3 S-1285 RIVERVIEW DISTRICT, Oakdale Extensions . . . . . . . . . . .N-9 S-1290 ST. PAUL AVE. SANI7
- - - - - -�_� ,. ,..,.. .._........�r... ,.",.,,..t„m � ,--1---..-- 4--..._..�,._.. . _N_in s_97184 SELBY-FARRINGTON-AF
I
- •�% �.,�;���� "�;;� �. . �� """� � �e+��''�nu��r�'„n.��f ,j " ��;�j � �ATik�'�R�J�/ST� �r,•,.
'��� �0 � ,•,•I���1 � '�'� _�•'l�''^"1` �/��� � 1� 816118Ty �j 9n��4 �� 1'!'�~, `I ��.mar��llw..+�i,O I L'�`�
K£ CK I� I �� j C�1y 'a 1� ,v{� Sw�j'�, � u' F 1 ' t��
�� < <l -.` � '- !y ��L� 3 � .� _p h�i,.N.a�,c m ,9^+��•„�. y�
A fFYi sT. „ Sehp ,e,�I �'�a' � S�1291T, � -�++- -�"� 9 c1 ��',��; - � _ � = ,m"�11'��i�rY'��m.{ e ,JY, ~��'�
� L '
sr � Bam�EFoelc� � � T „�, � �04 � S + s ' . �. ' Z i ,,� �'
+10� -S WHB '�L�_ �,? I .-lf- 4�IE �}Y- s � '� � zv a
� � � BAYFIFLD 5T.3 ��' � m�nl I _ -�. �- , ��� J �� ~ ��_ 1`(iqs_ q �N �
. .... ..^... �\\ ,, �i �'�c ' ` ��� �-�- I •�.•.. i ,
� �.p �T ° _o � �` � -- •'�;.' `� "r• :_; .f ....
•::y.... �o {�, o ' C.B.&Q.R.R.��` :;� , ' �` '$ef.tl` GYee
_ � : :,:.: � :
,�, •• . .'� , �
.p � � � s�... =4:�-i :o..��' ' � .:,r. - H co •:!� •Sch'.:
:�:��;:�.`;•::�::: � � .y ,. . Yards '���:�:�'`'� I�= t�:::
��� , s} � � , -u� �- �'` r.E s�, .�:...:• _
: � �'��. � -IL'- =�- I 'W' �',t.,�. EE �sll :�:WN, .. �:'�;,•'` �oNi
�. .�f.t• �T A I R RT\� "��j' `� '' , _;rr ��"' �fA�e ,, I3a` -
:•:t:•;:•:'• � � ' °4L .M.S .P.&P. R. -uE 1 � �:;::�:"J � � ,
:.�.: ION � � d 61 �;�:::'s:..•:. ..N� , .����,.,,��,,,,,,, �J
, \ • 4 i Yards --- ,. � ���`''�.�,,,������' � �
� •I F �- .�;�.•' „%� �.�:::: 3 s
. � � I
JL= � � .�' 'us. •
::kt� MAN �L.D �� �i� � ' �µi� '•
, -"�- .�_�:• �? f'
� , �� � z�� ����• i :� �
, � � �.. � �' . �;;:;: ��{���r``c r`
...� TH BOUNDARY LINE 0 SEC . ' � 8,�9,10,11;TOW 28,RfANGF,,,� _ ( � �'`�'s _ I `�=
�� �rc e� -w- � j� �'�°+� �'z, f'(`n• ��o,,,,,...-�'
� �U . - 7;.{:'.. _' - ' ' � `\ / � r � �. ;.S� a
� S ..... .':.'1.".::�'•• I � \\ -�- � -�- 11F . Ll ~�/ I�
' ye_ �.. � I `\ ' ��� .'< 1, $ ����,,���_i�lp �
. .... . ..` :..�:.:..
t !F � MI��
.°�'. •�' � } � � � 41 � `I� „yi. -�±�� �-kk- '''G `4s ' ��"%p1'+'`'.��. oc Q u
,;'rf� fi:.: '` � �� 111- Q i � -i�' '!-F � �6i}��„ H�pM1 ����
. YJ � I x'- -SLL- -!� = �I �l � .�°q� -�- �: 6` EP,I�F� �
� V Q � � p Si• : 11; _�u �r' 'r �'Ji`' -?�c � , .a } ��� zo a ' o M„
� � � � � � -F� �_ —��- +� F � � � 1/ j •u T � M' / e+ �
��1� f a � � i � � :c� n � �,. � .�.. � �
�. e° i w . l� �tee � �lE�. I ��'�� ' �
�5T . e ,� T. �.. �- �I EE` a � 11. 1 _� _ � a. 'C
a
� �ti 'eTw�'r � � -u+- —� sui- w � : ii ' -�`" —I� � ��S , , �I T�s
M
f''�. �t'osp fA� � T ' �- i I �g : � 1" � ��y. Q � �_ � � I O
�� p , � JL � �� �
�/� • � _ �-�L J�! fy{j � 1
� �s �� �,27 y b �G/ry � ll - �,yp � iL m
-� � } ' ^T.- F 8T-� �i��� ^ �177T�7 f� � f 1'f1T�7177 T �f r1t�r � �i �
��� �e. rsT..��(��€����� j Q : �.: � �` " � =
L.�1 1�::�. � 9 /� 1 q • ��� �. ,'y� � �._(( \
7� uom � �'t T,�, ��Q�IE� � ■. I fnneaDONs-3t.Pau� o I ��� , N 4' ��w""�'
W � �� � t � �� �Pnftar�j'D\atrlat -�. o°, � �
a� 1J L.J
Tq�, A6E � MINE A 3T.� b . ry �
�R�L� 12 .`r ' i I3e�aay�Dl�pqaq!Plant y � .�� ""� „
� � � �
� i or+ �� �� � 6,,
� ,�� � I �� 'Y 7
. �
• , �e• � verv e .:: �., �� s,�Op� � I I� � �� � Td � �a.
� BE�� �'�%,: ���� ���� k �Nf� I� �II ,r �, .z -Ji4 k- N `�� kBIDf
� � y_� �
��� 3 F ; -� �� y T�- �-
�::;..: .
-��--� ;J� .r ';��1 ��� � . � �i .� � _ � _ � )
BOUNDARY rpMIN «�B� -� i � I\ -�' :.�c." :: ;- .....:.. L•::::•::::.-..:,,, j �
� I - .:: ./i�-�..,. • PQ
� .+.ewG�em: I i .;;;t:,._...:':}..: :�.....;^�{y,,.�..
� 4--------- — � -:�'`:-'::..:_ �t
U T � -0 y ; � :. ' �'.'�,. 7
• .;�;::.�''::�•�
�,o .�� �� � w� � ��� .:+4:•`::•:`.:: � .�.•.;::' Lu�._- �::::. . �
—��A_ ��� , . I � 9 � ��- o �,� � , `:�: ��:�� p,, �':.�:�::..:: ', ::��:::. . ;. W
y( ! 1' � �•':�,-4,",::: :"::.�F."..' � .�.Vf:: � 3L J
_"" EL��� . I L I �� �'�1 . :.�T:..' �
' '�' a� '�C �u �:'.'.'tl' :..'�.. � �'.::." � ' Y
y �P ' 1 F � '�'�•:kC::....:" ."Kti•:�':�. � �'•;�:':.'. K
�� � � � �� I . .. '�.t::::":' , -W .•:.. .....
i � � _ ( � • '.., .
y� ♦ I 11� i :r'f;i'r.;:. ::i•: .�,'� �•:d.'Lci:: -
� �J;E.. ':�'.�'�-.�'.'•i:i�.::: ::.::iv:.::•::� �
E N Sr-L� � ��� I � �:.�:?.�.'.:.^.' :'..Y. ' :.^.i• ..:.^r.'::.:: ,
0 kdala � I I' �n �a 1 � ..'y::::•::"�...
:w:::. '�.�•
�^ ;•. Seh. '� n U . � y� ,", r � 1 .... � '......,f:..:�.:�• •:;:�r:•::.�v::: 1SH
Il1L• �' EIIE yj-AYE in � 7� �, ���a �`� . � 1 � ;�.;'� ...Yrk--•: �`- .•:.-r::::.�... �
�� ::�•:''��� ����'<� Z '� .,. �}, �,� 4u.- �' _,r;:: h �'�:�....:;��_ .
� �� �� ,;. � .i
ARION- AVE. C�'� � �•� � \. � :.'.4.'.'..�. �
a �� •:. .. .;
��ur�; �-A "�� 4" C7 � •.:: ,
��0� �C� -_ � �, - ,' �",� •��.� W .���..��::;�::::. ':.;`...:: �,
� STANL•E �`��� � N _ �.�(p� ! �__ O� ,'� '�'_' �-JF I � _n:�.'..,, .'.�;�'•.��., _� .':::::::: S4
3 � ,r �._ . ." • .�.......'.. .•.�•�'Yf+W:^�• �
�� � �
p • �-a� �I f �{��JTI.� 'r'11i •i �'I� '�� � J14, ..\-!4.'lr:.'.'•..�.'.•.'... ��!/�� a:.:.�::.':.' �
LE.I�� q I E� � � 1 IV��L.. �*� �f � i;...::• • ^:F.�`^7^.(, ,
] J Q W �� ,,�CY' �E���` ��� I_ JE .:�F.':...J6;:'.,'::.�...". . . ' •;::�L'..�'. ��
. I� � ��.� .1�!- :'.. ':'.::... •• ,,
;ft N,b 1. CONVEfl 'r � � �CDNVE� �oPAJ�IU�F" 56 �i �� �` '�`'.. ': " ii'•:. : � �
�� Tham son��� `��� �'i° � �_ -''� "u- . �n
d �i I �RMc� AVEr y RM � /�'� � r i1� `♦ ��"� -�:�- yL- �- _!1� -L-
�' 9P kel-1 'x � �si,� .� �� 0 °_� �� � -w. �� -� � �-I I ,
k'E�TLHE67F � FA9Efil fr �-FABER C��,OJ�� ;• i �1� p� �. ��' �� ,
I________ --J � �r��y � �� 1 1 ' 1 \ � �`- -C= �� I r
�IAOR[I�ND--�V. . • O y i � F9 � ~ -�`� `E. `\\-Sif -�Y�1�. �4- � -�- � �
52 n -----J r '��c I `�J .k.• -w- si!- -u -u
-�K�t `Si�a� � _ � o� ��� � '�. ��,,�`� �,. 1 0 � !�- ,T,. I c
�I 1� r-----i �o:::::=.�•. . _ ��' i RIVE SI E �1u-
ar.' '���� � a& �° � � `� �.. -�, � � �
,, 6P,�..,,�:';'' � I . Hir � �_,•�` � ,�•.�-� .u- � �- � I
�'€•%: "' � S ' "�1Y� I � ���T, -� .�y
J.�!�. Q = � � a � � n. a ♦ . �
�.,, •�r. �o . I W � y o°�j J� Jl1t �11- -� i
r-- v — <- 1 FFHi11HiH�tHlFf�_M-Hi�tF�fi 1 _�t�Hfi��1#�H��
. . �ACILI-TIES ���� � . - m P� � �� _ _��
t T '�. � a � � � � y ��-°- -� I �T.� m
*�i N �c��j ��(p�Wl�' ��` �u '� �� Jlfa "_ ,� -u -u I 4i� i
P A U L �� � �`-� � t�� '�.;,, � �� � �y �=�` -� T��-� �
�RKS ������ TR` u� �o � I�•� �`4. � ,. ..':ti.►:.: -s� :::.
I + o ��. �;:::�::•:.� .,,, ...
�y� ��� ( __..� �:;,�.. ;. :�:•::•:x
ow p� �` ' � .�:::.: 1 .M�,,.c.-.
i. -IV ��� �_ �•::�:::::... :�•s.�::••
ONER �p�, �f � 9t `��� -�'���`-:�;:�:. '� ::�x.�.:tiL4:i:
INEER • l��l—ll��a��U� LJ� � � , — :��• .
� � ��... .,:�:.::�::
q ♦ `�n I T � '�� �:;�;::•:;9E,•:•;
q (� l� {f� W M �I_ GE��_ .vk.i•':':
� I�E-�'Ii�'� 7�c �� ��' � �<< , �• i -� � '!::':.::•..'•:
�U L�u�L�J��U� _ N'6 �.J '2� �`` ....�_ :..:�• T.':::
. �
� ��----. ...:�.. :: ::..��
7 — �x'w° — W ' ''rs �., :�•,�•:::�,.:: ,,
�:•::'::.
� � . �' �0� '` �� � F � �:., .::.:�..:�: - ,-��`����
� \ � '� , yl0/ 1�T. •�Y.':.':: {1`. .'�+.":..
� � �''t„ SNp FaR�ro` :.��: . x' l:o."...�:::.
� - � �� Piy � 0�r � a,�``;:.;1�" .:: :,.-:•:...•..
18° ������ .{,.�:t.:� .�::::.::
x.::..
.. j` ;...�: :.�
�' soo') �a. r ,� o OD � ;�. - :�:.:.��:•:
I :.x''� '�''
"1=• a' �'� Q V�, Y .
iy
\ , � p '�`i;":�:y� p �i A`ft � ��
�MILt V ��_ la������ ���'p:' � 4 .gL;Y t� ♦
. � � Nv 5T. , 60N I� ::•7� 8 0 � �� ��� I
.k ; y
�o � c ' I t��H1�{+ ���� ' � 8 / �4Y !,�� t �``� ,```
t et � � � � ����� l,i, ! r ,� t'LL� ��ii
�� ���t.._�� - .. ��,� � �
IE
0 P R S T
CT N0. NAME MAP LOCATION PROJECT N0. NAME �
7 RIVERVIEW DISTRICT, Humboldt' � Hall Extensions . . . . . . .M-9 S-1036 E. SEVENTH-GREENBRIER RBLIEF SEWER SYSTFS�i. .
8 RIVERVIEW DISTRICT, Dodd Road Extensions . . . . . . . . . .M-10 S-1325 W. SEVENTH ST. , Otto to Kellogg. . . ., . . :
8 ROBERT ST., Fourth to Sixth. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �.M-7 5-1238 SHERMAN ST. PUI� STATION � FORCE MAIN. . . .
3 ROBIE-BIDWELL STORM SEWER SYSTF�4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .M-9 S-1279 SMITH AVE., W. 7th �to Mississippi River. .
9 ROBIE ST. OUTFALL SEWERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .P-10 S-1310 SNELLING AVE. , Goodrich to Lincoln . . . . .
3 ROBIE ST. SANITARY SEWER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0-9 S-994 SNELLING AVE. - St. Anthony to University. .
4 ST. ALBANS-ASHLAND RELIEF SEWER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .H-7, 5-1258 SL]NII�iIT-PIERCE-PORTLAND RELIEF SEWER. . . . .
0 ST. ALBANS, Pleasant to Goodrich . . . . . . . . . . . . . .H-8 S-1246 SYLVAN, Nevada to Iowa . . . .- . . : : : • :
1 ST. ALBANS-CARROLL RELIEF SEWER SYST�t . . . . . . . . . . .H-6 S-1315 SYNDICATE, Niles to Bayard . . . . •
A ST. ANTHONY AILL RELIEF SEWER SYSTF�I, St.Albans-Thos. ZwnnelH-S S-1257 TF�iPLE COURT RELIEF STORM SEWER. . . . . . .
C ST. ANTHONY HILL RELIEF SEWER SYSTFM, Carroll-Grotto . . . .A-6 5-1274 TROUTBROOR SEWER, Mississippi River to Mary1F
G ST. ANTHONY HILL RELIEF SEWER SYSTFM, Lexington-Thomas . . .G-5 S-1007 ITNIVERSITY AVE. , Prior to Lynnhurst. . . . .
H ST. ANTHONY HILL RELIEF SEWER SYSTF�1, Dayton-Milton. . . . .G-7 5-986C VAN DYRE ST. , Old Audson Rd. to 3rd. . . . :
3 ST. ANTHONY HILL RELIEF SEWER SYSTEM, Western Ave. Tunnel. .J-5 S-1318 VILLARD, Cleveland to Return Ct. . : : : : .
�4 ST. ANTHONY HILL RELIEF SEWER SYSTEM, Western Ave. Trunks. .J-5 5-1255 WABASH, Cromwell to Vandalia . . . • •
�B ST. ANTHONY PARK STORM WATER RELIEF SEWER, Contract B. . . .A-4 S-1316 WATSON-MILTON STORM WATER RELIEF SEWER . . .
IC ST. ANTHONY PARK STORM WATER RELIEF SEWER, Contract C. . . .B-3 5-1267 WESTMINSTER-YORK RELIEF SEWER SYSTEM . .
ID ST. ANTHONY PARK STORM WATER RELIEF SEWER, Contract D. . . .A-2 S-475C WHEELER-FAIRMONT RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT•C .
IE ST. ANTHONY PARK STORM WATER RELIEF SEWER, Contract E. . . .B-2 S-1275 WHITE BEAR-SIRTH RELIEF SEWER. . . . . . .
)F ST. ANTHONY PARR STORM WATER RELIEF SEWffit, Contract F. . . .D-3 S-1312 WILDER-MARSHALL RELIEF SEWER SYSTEM. . . . .
)G ST. ANTHONY PARK STORM\WATER RELIEF SEWER, Contract G.� . . .B-4 S-1322 WINIFRED-HALL STORM SEWER SYSTEM . . . : : :
)5 ST. CLAIR AVE. , Macalester to Wheeler. . . . . . . . . . . .D-9 S-1305 WINSLOW, Wyoming to Dodd Rd.' . . : . .
�0 ST. PAUL AVE. SANITARY INTERCEPTOR CONNECTION. . . . . . . .C-12 S-1319 WORCESTER-MORGAN RELIEF SEWIIt. . . . . . .
iR[� cu1.RV_FARRINGTON-ARUNDEL STORM SEWER SYSTFM. . . . _ . . .K-7 5-1268 YORR, Jessie to DeSoto . . . . .e.� ���
���—"(o]��'�a� ��77,, < . " " � w � 3 ° �, ' � �, ' r' . °° �
Ei `� .�. � > a� .� � v� � 'a a
M ddlH 3A YM3dd1 �P '� � � � (n ry� ,.,/ �/
. ;...;..r:..:•. 070� q,� Q �w � tl W � W � �
.... ,..�.. i p �s� o. C� �u ., Cn � � O d W � Q � � �
��;`'•i:�i.::::; .:.:�::
�.,Y' ' �� _ `•, F � ��� m � - f� a� ti {�] 15v O O � O 3 cn u �
� w
��H=. .., . = J w �+ �+ K H w x [� w w
� �:::��i, : ' � • H OG {Y7 � I�i H O � (� cn U c/] Gu •
� �' o �,J �.] OH m � ,..7ZHH W i�
� a � � � � a � �
�O� =` `a �' .P�• � � � Dc7 � An AP�'+ � � �+ HW � H
��,�. ��;t 3n ��h. � ���I Pa, � y �+ � x
a°'' ���%/�{�ti� � ' v - �apC � � �i �ixN � � � aoH ^ a
`�l� �//,��• �y� 8 d I a , � � H � �7zH +� d H3
�,� �jj� E ,� H H � rl �p ' �
Y} '��' �� �f�ll/r �'x � i . w � F�+ D N � � U P � � � O
�,��, d
�p ' •-��'.. - - - F1 6� �
p� p� pq 1 H a ^� � "
� � .
�oo` ���'� xy � `y��'��/�r,� ' ,�, ' `� �.y,l U U U� � I� �� � I H H C�'J �' �' A A A z � O p�] ?. A d Uq
�. �''`��il ` I PC
p ��� �' i+�Y `��a�� ` �i ':� ��'� �J� � � r.`� w z a a o x � � Q
. � � . '� � x z � � � H a �
_� �i
�a� �. �. ��� ��,,�;.9f�^ ;,..�`s ] o � � �7 c7 C7 a � fa-+ o N � a H �C
� �„ • ,�, a, � �,;.� �;..r,'� I r � ~' z � � � � � � � � � � � � 0000
, ,,� ' ' `� ? ��� �°���� ��' o E v t n t�
,�� � � � � � �� �� I I� O C +- 0 U .-� �i' c�1 �o N1 O 1� �Y' c�1 .7 a0 N 1� �
�y W .-i r1 t� O v1 �/1 DO a0 1� O O �!1 t� � rl �-1
� � � � ���1��`'� r�l i ," N •E t � . �f M c�'1 N N N_N C� O� N t�1_c�l:N_N N M N
,�z� :i�� �W p ,-� .-+ .-� r-1 .� .-� rn 1� r-1 .� .� ,.-i �-+ .-+ r+��r
� 7�tib ;�` � 1 l - � — � � ~ ~ � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1' 1 1 1 1
�''�--9 � Sr� �� �,���n, _ H311H�r,�— oc a 3 ,� c a, c n �n c n cn v� �n �n �n v� �n cn cn cn cn v� u
♦ 3H �"� " Y • O _. ..
I
� ., ��i ; ---- . ��'�' ym,.�`,� c c� ' ' • =
�.: + 7 :���#� � �� „�wy�R`���_°��um���u, N � m 41 C ' . . - .
a �,� =F ,�i
Q ° �� `y�ll;���� � _ t C V
tr'��i �W F �F►�, kf ��' t�,' ,,,`.� 'C c'� .-� N ..
� �'"4r, �oi7• z �►t ��. �. I ��"��� � � V '� O "�-� r1 r-1 �D �/1 v1 N N r1 00 N �O rl c*1 N v1 N
( W �.[ �O � g�� L Q 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
rJb 6' 'I t�' ���i V ��p�' �.l WyZ ~ ' ''S� � ' L 0 Q C rt� �-+ c� w w w a a o-w aG x a�-a a�a aa_a x
.�� �xb. �i � � I ��h�=�` � O � y"" � � � . . . • . • . . . • • • • • . •
i �_ � a �
�. .
� � I ►p qc�r..�V'°,w � � 'C N +�- O
a .�.� � �jiy � � ,.�r.� C L- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
�
�3
a '��:.•. �.�nj�O,tr Y1� � 'ay\ d� ��F�'jM1� Q O � N � . • . • • • • • • • • : � • • •
, ...... ':.�' ....`����_" 1. -.r_/�„� � ,���� .� I � E G � �
':•::•., '• ;'j(6i;� :,�'• .r::::;::,`.i;tit;Q�'•� ' ' � N N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. "' ......; :Q:•�:•`�.'�'4'l4• ``�`l `` � ,/1 d _aH_ -fJl N ,�t 0 . . . . . . . . �
���'•9`:':`.':. 1�Ti�e:4� eY•. 0+,.�3... ` �' _\ _ ���r�,�� �`- � �., .- ti.. . . . . . • �
':::+... .-w+.•a !�i-=�-- O N C �..
.:�. f�;;i'';•:'•{'' ;;::: ;-T � _'�3� qir,ti � � (n C O d . . . . . . . . . . . . . �
C�;:��'• j;;.i•: '� ♦ � p +-
::C�:•:.. ��i' • , ti'•. � �I�� y , r T � � • ���''"
� O�.•...4..'� O G+',ys���'= I �°+.,� 9 ��� d N E � +" . . . . . . . H � . . . _ . .
•' O o' 0.,,�,�'ti � •� r �o, a, Y � ti. � V C . . . . . . �, C9 H
1��' ; ;, � i 4 �"� p Q o`•s; ,�'�'�`• °`F.. �'y3#`� � C � V . . . . . . . W ~ . . • � • .
J= `�� syoo ° ;; `#�w; ! � Y�, a.,,�_ �,�� s a3i c a ;� G'i � ►z-+ , z ,
i � hbo �r, o � �� � � `�~ ��� F" �' ' , � . . . ° '� . . . ° . .
'. � •o � �°'h• � � .. . . . . �, a
� <'�J'_ � '` �nw � � �`",, � � (�J . . . . . . ,,g `� . • � • �'
_ 0 �•� ,, ^"- � _ • �-1 p�
O ,'.�'` I oe v '�� O . . . � . . . O ,'t+ • i� � 'JE��
.,..,. ,,; � ,ti. '� ' .��.---_ I ----' � u�y Z . r.{ . . . . �..� � • Cf] t
1�gi„t!�;i�...,'.�. �,,. .M``'•.�.'�'•''�.� '�o .. 1'` M1 --�-— � � L = . 3 � � . . H � . � p� � p� t
k�;'� �. � '�;KFi. °�'':':.y' `=.. � � � h.s �� �i . 1J • W cA �j W • A C/) C3Y7 t
:�. :���'��.�: �.�,�:.. x �i �z' �~ �
,�a^�v J.: :.�: �:�;� � ��,. .3 �i�,�,, ' . o � [�j � • a4 �i CZi ;
. ..... '.
:.�•�; .• . ��..., � � — 1 d� �� ' �j �Nn''� s O � H v] W H � H � �
- � .�o fi �%�':`, V,��i - � a �` ! � .� nM„•�� a� a.+ o cn � � � H A � 1
J� ��� Q� °��.�~���� ��y� `�i� � . ����ii �+ � �t +� y+ P+ O U LT+ <
�` �, '�y 5.; t� ''a`, ���'���, '� a'� xz �i W v� E-� u v� P�7
n Y��� �r•��� ga.,:c�::�ti�:� :�, d '�w_ •��?Q�y.y � I ? ' �$, �'f� ,'i O t� Cl� � ,?+ �`�i Q� �Q.� � � H I
, 3� ti'������': iS::'�'�� _��{ �` �I � � � Q1 1J d (�4 � f"a 54 'd �-I t'� Cn �1 �
� I ' a-7s-n ° �;. 4<::�. ' _ ` M�1
Y-3001 �.<,�, :.�'E ♦ •1 ♦ ��
y(�i'+:t .e;::�:::'•. g+ �.Jy T +.5, \� YI h � � (/] rl F1 W C!1 V] � .'� C�+ U� "�i �'+
� � Q�j 4.4_ �•.'.n'9:'�., �.t'�i�'��. ;�?i � `,�76 - ` I Q � �� 'b A W H H H cd ''.-�' p Q.' P4 L
4S� z—>,-�lv�wN � �:,..�,��,�. '��� ya�:�:�' ,� !, y. � =f ` r+ Q U � � C
�•�•'s w�::: ..s�`.'•::`-:::::;��,:. , �f = , a r� o d oo a w w
� o W = `��� ,..., ,,. ::::•��%��,., �� I w o o s� ora w w � z �,�--� � x� c
� s c7 s � . �a: �;i;..�;•: o "F2 :.�,. � H 3 P4 �d P4 H H G4 H
_ �, ;�s�l•.� _ � ::r.::;:tii''• r.��'�:�:�:�:... q, ..��::r \ , 2 �-1 �+' a �-1 c/] W W H � � � P�4 �
� w = =F�7 8 �•f �� '.r.��+*;,t;�:. ,, �.,s:.'t".'., -— ---- y W ^Z A W W H �" Z H �
! r � 3:::: . tn HS� � OH �
;���,,`}::. •, � � p4 ?� � t H P4 P4 U W ^O C7 �
,a:t.•.fi:��l�:.:C.:ir;t.:.c•. ,>o �;p :'i;�:l:�:�°.E':x. ..l$J • v.1•�•.�!•.• r,: � �
;';�;y.�:�e �.�,;,,,•.,�:;•.:;;% . Q �
�t::. � �::.:_��•:':. H � Q'.
Q .,�:�:i:::. p
.:;• �:�,:: ; U° ��::�'::':.: ..,•.:�:., � , ca �i w 3 • a
;:ti :.�.:::::••.�� _,�;:.:. '� t�] � � H � � i H � Is] d U C7 �
..� � �
'�8.
_ \��`'•g
_ �
��:�;
`�
�
� c
�n Cd
��a��� w H o
:•�:
1 fl�
r •;a ►'� :'t
•.-•�. �1
.�.:
;•.�.. �♦
Y.
..�••.
�
(
.L W W
�
� � � �
:::�:�. � � �
!�� ,� '��'• .a � � d � 04 ,
�i° .�: :.a" i,t;•`.i:'?;•":� 'id� � . , P� H H H H � H H O H �+ ,7'-� U
.^:i^,i:�';;i;�;.. ;i•.::;�.•}'::`::•�Z:i_ •'.:••.:: :X '• HC . �i ` i
1 n i:':::i�':r.::?:;:,t::'•.�ot���,t:i�;.;:•�•.;5; 'rr:;r•:r o�';;;:;:: . o ��'::� A V] V] cn u] DG P4 � f� H N
J��4-1 !o<:;:...:�,_:� .��,;.:•.: , ::_. ....� I a a w w w w z A w � I
f' ' .a• ' ti•• W O O H `�+ �
� r ,;•` •t�j;'.'rty��;;;�:-`.'� �::�:� •oa •ex:•: ' N w x a a a x �
_ :�;:; ::�;.�:;r:, '�j�'� •:r� .�i o H o 0 0 0 o ap c� a ;
..x:: �;.���:�:,�:: � ��•�. � �
�� •;y z Fi+ fs+ L*r (� F*a (s+ � C7C� C7C7Ch � �
�i - _ ;;if�-•?3;� •`'�'.,t;•. ,
.'�`�fr� :w�'d``•+°�' fy:::r ?,:c.;e;i��i• �� '::::•..' ��.
��� � >:�:,; �:r,:�� . ��::::' �' E-� oa
�z;s ~; ,'h` �:" :s:.' `A` .. I � U O �D O W a0 �D r� rn .-� W �t1 �O N �
�'G:^ti?�. .�.�;.�_. � ..'•::..:. ■.��.�
� ': •:•::;`, at.r :,i�.:>�>c:,. . W N 1� O� f� C� � N O� O � � O� f� O I� �
;.�•� ~�J . , � r•.,•..�:
tj ` ��. ;: `�i:.c„ ' q,•r ::M:•
� ,.
� �?. j:�;;.:.,.; '�r'�".r �, r'7 M 1-�1 00 N 00 N N N c'� N o0 I� �-i M N i
:�':•�4.c��'�"•.
: �:•-r;,.;: �, a
■3� • \ ..�:L=X.'`;:•4;�.:u:�:.' =�;7:'�;^•"� ""� v •ie --• -—"-_- O ri r1 O� rl O► �-1 rl r1 rl r1 O� O� r-1 r-1 rl �
, .. ... y.. ., _ nia - p(, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
�3 W � , '� .:a . .•�. lEL�I p� V] V] f!] (1] V] V] Cn� Cn U] C/� C!] V) Cl] (!] Cn �
�� ���d �L-1� ' y .. ��•y� }.' , �
Y ��,.' .' sI
S7 •'.'y '� ;.•: �4'::.�.' � %
•• wr/ ''q0 : � ':.;,.•. ,Q;.. ..� �,�5
c�S'cp? :•'.•�'... ;•' ;•:::•:.�..�••.•�:••. .0.�..,::�::•4. �
a•� q ��T� ��,' �e.: p� •':.w`?•::•:' � Y. N O '
1 I UU� ��a�L'�,1 �� am � 5'. m N O� �O � U1 00 V1 r� 1� �-1 �t 1� N �O O\
•�.:.... ...
M , cW 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1
� m
� � �b � zwwaa4o-x � � aox � xtia
v, m o • • • • . •
? > > '�
, I � � � � H . . . . . . . .
� 3 :o ���� f� � � �� H . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
,.......{6 .:.:.: ��... � a �1��J a M• ; �'' � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. .... ... •.:: ' Z � • dO1111 � � a , . :
:� :� •::. �:: �:��:�•::: � � � ; �; � � a
�.•:: �:;•:�::::����� Z & : � `� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
•:s::• r •a�::., �:::•: �:�;i::�'• m � •y.�t1�n96 �
:�.•::•: W 1��� , N� ; �. �>I T . . • . . . . .
•: ::. . ... .•:. ...•:'.
.:.
... � . ... . ... ...�... . ..
• ... .... . ... — (� • • . .
. .... ... ... . ... �hV flTtflR/ ' . ._ m�u = C.' N� • • • •
• �.��,,..- ` � �{._� :_: �p� �bp ' �.f.i ! r4
�� y�; 'p' tl
•; ' • ' � °�.S ��`-'�'•� • . • • • • . . • . . . . . •
:i{..tar �°'�7w �. fn j�y;', � � '�' ' 'O . . • . . . . . • • • . • • .
0•, � ...o a �F3n� r','l�e:.' » , �. °
� ° �iio�6`� i 4� W �� � :/ 3 e°�'� m . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
��___;] ..l�L 1��3 OH � F �
„'"°" �`.�� d� ,� $ N �� d 4iJ a , � �V 1���� V . . . . . . . . H . . . . . .
' � n aoid ��' m �: i . . . . . . . E..r � . . . . . .
3 w �:i i�',. D J t.�•�� �,'�jt��BtlON Q U� 19 Y3�•� � ` � � ~ � • • • • •
� '�+'�`d �,A�pJ� 31131 , S � � r • • (� • • Z � •
m 1 'e,.r..:. �,e1t� ,t' a� � N 4 1 • • • . • • "'� • • .
•
;� s w o � 1S � , ` � U H O s�
.. o,. :: . .
. .. .. �� �y� > �n. �i > �dt � e y� u . . . . . . [� 1� . H . .
..... 1tM. . _; �oB < � � 4 < i �d �� � • JJ U V] . . . .
'�''�.� ' �� "" a cs • � ' w �+ • �+
!•"{Q:•:.•:.5..:..:::..:..::••:::::::::::::: h - - — - —- . � �p Cl .0 � � ,� V]
:.... a 3 � �+ . . .
f`::: ':''`°`�':: � '�1 � - w� Fddt6StS �► " ['a U �.1 U � �" �rl !Y7 . .
. L:; � L•� i�.o„ v � • r„ � �. , 3�� • cn m � cn x a H �"i • � •
p NNI S a •15 _ • �J] , "'� (,� 0 (� H �r�1 �1 W • • � �"
W � . Gj � 1.� .7'� QI LL U) Cn W
' � < � n •:: o � , � ��'"� �i o o v� w a �' • �i t-�
� �� � J � m °U � �� �,�' � ,� � � � � " a� � y� � o�ow3w � � `n �+
�-woe� � � f� �� � ;: '�_m-. ' ��`�� �� .�`'``�� 3 � v] 'G .0 H 3 � � W � O W W �
�'�+5�rs' �- — - /� _ �''y � rvi w .-� �a � w �z � �n 6� w �n ►-�
o Z � �--_- ♦ \ ��w �,;r�� .�.um "'Q,; `� / ��` � W -� 'c cn r-+ y a4 �p
� � - fA � \\ �:. � fs+ W H � d � x ''� � Z � � 04 H
o g _` _ ,, �� � �� �0 � & }� � W H �d � v] W � H O H v]
T. P. H �7d ,'� G H
—E q � ^�'' NM� '�1;_ ' 1�� . r J��"" � ai 'P�1 E"� F'� � '��W-7 H �' ,� Zi
� ��� �,`�, ^fi. N� , i � / p�G a cn �� � � v�i � a4 z w a�4 a~a 3
G• 3�.�
'�...,;�'b �� �,. ,��� '..�N ,• � 1 � � H f� d' H H tA W ", � � � ✓ � �
� ' C �i ,,:':`'� ♦ a
� ''� r:• . Z Z � `� i� ZyP�'+ � P�'r WAw .HC� C
�!t► .�'' �• } O � �j �nOUC90 UZH � Ha7 �i" Cc
u�ii a�aw�tal�.luia �' e•� � _�' = e � � t- � � � H H v� cn �n e� a �
_ .� �: rV ,. � , W a Q H c� � �s � wa � � zaa�
� W � 0 C
J .'',�� 5;�� � �� ' �� '� � J � W � HZ Z � H � � � f� �
�m ''�'�.-� �, ✓. '� .��;• �;- , — w ' o � aa ca �p � � > � w � � at � �j
��';t` 0"m� `�l��� �� � ♦. , o . . � � W 7. Qi Qi � 6 d �. �i � P�) P�1 P4 U U V �
�b�1C .?✓;.,,.;•:::.�F_ w "'i;"•• . .:_.�':�•.�,. :, �n�A�l'• �.. wt8 0� "7� I � �
o•••� ;�. ' o , H
. a_ `rN�o..`:�'::.•.;:y:� . .�+,' �.. G s', . .��� L�' u U C� CA � I-I r�i O Vl r-1 �' O� �y' N N r
� �' ��,r:;:'.��; r,�a.� � s�3nn� � " j W M N cr1 �t t� 00 �O a0 C� 00 U1 .� u1 �O !�
��.:, c. Y., • SlIWl7 z �-1 N O� 00 N N N N r1 N N N N N N c'r
�� ,.,.'•� ;_4a�p; :-�°';'�•.� _ � . .—�=.3A�'_'_' O � C+ rn .--t � .-+ �-+ � � ,-� � .-� � '-+ �
4
C� � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
� M p� �n cn cn v] v� �n �n cn cn cn cn cn u] �n U
� �
- . ,� _...�-„�__ . �_ ...�..u... _ , _ . _� �_�_- - ___�_.._.. _.� . r . . _ _... __' - ----