Loading...
235344 . _ .. , , _ . .- .. . . , �J .�� � , 2�5���� �c•. �, s +' `� COUNCII., FILE N0. ��"' CITY O�F ST. PAUL � R,esalution Ratifying Assessment By ` F�le No. ����� In the matter of the assessment of ����g� �Q��a �� �'��� �Q� 8��8 �� ����:�6 ��h bi�tuar�q,ous �m�tari�►�: AAI�TH�..�� Yro� Abe�. S�z�t ee��� t� � ci�.-ii���ac.. . i i I f t . ' � ' �_ under Preliminary Order ��73 ,approved J��'Y `l s Y96S , Intermediary Order �2�7 ,approver� �'�b ��� �9�5 -� � Final Order ��� ,approveci A�3 �i .�9�►5 . A public heaxing having been had upan the assessment for the above improvement, and sa,id assess- ment having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, be it therefore - , - - i . . .- .. - _ - _ � _ � . -_ --- � ` ' RESO�LVED, That th'e sa.id assessment be a.nd the same is hereby in all respects ratified, and the -� same is hereby ordered to be submitted to the District Court of the County of Ramsey for canfirmation. � BE IT FU TFIER RiE�SOLVE�D, That the said assesament be and it is hereby determined to be �,; payable i —equal insta.11ments. _ . . !` � �,y�.. „ .� O�I � �/. �F-- --.� � � ,� _ , � y .� . � �¢jJNCILMEN � (��-✓L�o �� x � ,�,,. Yeas ��� Nays ���T- �8�19�1 Adopted by the Council Dalglish � Hol�and ` M�son ��T"1 ;8�'1� Approver� ._ . Ted � . €�: ::��:: .::;���,.,,_.,��,;•�:..�:3::`� .� ::: ..:' ::... .:::::. _ ....;:: • . ..: .........e•� Favor B�RI�i,,� , ,� a or � � �� Against � 9 �.. Form R.2 2M 10-68 8 � .� � • �U�L�sH�� CT 21196 � . � . . � . � �� 4 r •7 •, •� ~" . j. r ~ �����';[ � � � � , CITY OF ST. PAUL ���`�L�� :-;�,��-'. :,Q�ICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF FINANGE . ,� . , ���;s�:,,,,;Report of Completiqn of Assessment ���� ,,.,�,�.:�, � File No v.�� . i � In the��iatter of the assessment of ���'�: ,���� � ��� ���' ��$ � �=��►si� �f'�h 't�i,�� �!�x`��. �A�'1°�(� �!!Y� �csa.Abrr33 ��r�� ��� ta "�i cu�:�a-��*. 1 � under Preliminaxy Ord'er �'���' ,approved +���3'` �`� ��� , Intermediaxy Order ���� ,approve� �� ��� ���� , � Final Order ��� ,approve� ��p� �i ���5 , To the Council of the City of St. Paul: The Commissioner of Fina.nce hereby reparts to the Council the following as a statement of the ex- penditures necessarily incurred for and in connection with the ma,king of the above improvement, viz: Total construction costs . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6�„�1� 92 Engineering . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ �7 �3-_ Inspection� . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . .�. . . . .. .. . . . . . $ Postal� ca,rds . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ �+ �� Publications . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . � 40 .�Q_ Collection costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . $ 81 � Court costs for canfirmation . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . � �+ � Comptroller's cost 0 50 TOTAL EXPE�NI7ZTUR,ES . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . $ '7.895 �� Chargeto . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ - � Net Assessment . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . $ '7_,,895 2� Said Commissioner further reports that he has assessed and levied the total amount as above ascer- tained, to-wit: the sum�of $ 7�$95•�5 upon ea.ch a,nd every lot, part or parcel o� land deemed benefited by the said 'unprovement, and in the ca,se of each lot,paxt or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits conferred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto atta,ched, identified by the signature of the said Commissioner, a.nd made a part hereof, is the said assessment as com,pleted by him, and which is herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may be considered proper. � Date� August 22, 1967 issio of ance. Fo� x-z zM iasa s�� � - ' i . . v-�._' i - .: J. WILLIAM DONOVAN 223-5317 Valuation Engineer ' ' CITY OF SAINT PAUL ����3�,,� ROY E. BREDAHL, Jr. �//�� — ` Ass't Valuation Engineer BUREAU OF VALUATIONS � l � 286 Cify Hall � �,,,� I $eint Peul, Minnesote 55102 .. �O � . � ���<• C� ; ' Septanber 26,' 1967 ' To the Honorable Mayor and Council � o� the City� of Saint Paul . I • Gentlemen: With reference to the grading and surfacing of Hawthorne Avenue from Abell Street east to the cul-de-sac, I find that the order came be- fore the Council on the petition of all of the property owners on the south side of this section of street, with the exception of Mr. Robin- son. The final cost and the rate per foot are in line with the estim- ates f'urnished at the hearing on the final order. � The assessment in the total sum of $1,977.03 recovmmended to be levied against Mr. IRobinson is due entirely to the substantial f`ronta.ge which he owns on both sides of the street. The f`rontages owned by Mr. Robin- son and charged for are as follows: � NORTH S IDE Owned Chaxged for Assessment � 252.9� f't. 186.4b tt. $ �,�+18.46 i SOUTH SIDE � I 1�+7.7�+ f't. 72.74 f`t. $ 558•57 Mr. Robinson's property extends east to Jackson Street on the south side and lies six to ei�ht feet below Jackson Street. On the north side his property extends to within twenty-si.x feet of Jackson Street, lies twelve to fiFteen feet below the grade of Jackson Street, and is improved with ' Mr. Robinson's dwelling on the lower level. The grade o� Hawthorne Ave- nue as constructed follows very closely the grade of Mr. Robinson's pro- perty, and the construction of the cul-de-sac has provided access to his properties on both sides of the street, which access would be extremely � difficult f`r�am the Jackson Street side. � � I Properties abutting Hawthorne on the� north side are zoned for industrial purposes, while the south side is zoned for "B" residential purposes, with the exception of the portion abutting Jackson Street to a depth of 100 � feet; which is zoned for light industrial purposes. This development con- sists of four residences located on the south side of Hawthorne at the west end of the i�rprovement, and Mr. Robinson's residence on the north side of Ii�awthorne at� the east end of the imrprovement. i Inasmuch as it is evident f�om the above tabulation that substantial a1- lowarices as to f�ontage charged have already been made, and the final i • { I 1 I I v . 1 I - 2 - September 26, 1967 i i ; ass�essmentjrate, which includes bitiuninous rolled curbing, is not excessive, I recommend that the proposed assessment be ratified as extended. In order to �reduce the burden I would f�irther recommend that the assessment be made payable in ten installments. i Very truly yours, � � ���"..'�'""�� W ; . William Donova.n � Valuation Engineer � � I FWC�jt � i I � _ , I � � � � � � - i � � � � ' i � i I � ` ^