The URL can be used to link to this page

04-924City of St. Paul RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSSSSMSNT COIIN � FIL . D�r"/�! File No. 1597$ Assessment No. 5043 � Voting Ward In the matter of approving the assessment of bene£its, costs and expenses 2 for improving the a11ey in Smedley's Addition Block 1 (bounded by Curtice, Sidney, Brown and Andrew). Preliminary Order: 03-175 approved: February 19, 2�03 Final Order: app.roved: March 26, 2003 A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it RBSOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified. RESOLVPD FiTRTHER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in one thru Twentv equal installments. COUNCILPERSON Yeas Nays ✓ Benanav ✓ Bostrom ✓ Harris ✓ Helgen ✓ Lantry � Montgomery ✓ Thune � In Favor � Against Adopted by the Council: Date dL�UL � a�LY�' Certified Passes by Council Secretary � Mayor City of St. Paul Rea1 Estate Division Dept. of Technology & Management Serv COUNCIL FILE NO. � ` � il-� RBPORT OF COMPLSTION OF ASS8SSM8NT File No. 18978 Assessment No. 5043 Voting Ward In the matter of approving the assessment of benefits, costs and expenses 2 £or improving the alley in Smedley's Addition Block 1 (bounded by Curtice, Sidney, Brown and Andrew). Preliminary Order: 03-175 approved: February 19, 2003 Final Order: 03-315 approved: March 26, 2003 To the Council of the City of St. Paul The Valuation and Assessment Engineer hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz: Total construction costs Engineering and Inspection Valuation and Assessment Services Miscellaneous Administration Fee - Water Dept. Administration Service Charge Abatement Service Charge TOTAL EXPENDITURES Charge To: Net Assessment $ 15,283.20 $ 4,584.96 $ 1.390.77 $ $ $ $ $ 21,258.93 $ $ $ $ 21.258_93 Said Valuation and Assessment Engineer further reports that he has assessed and levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $ 21,258.93 upon each and every 1ot, part or parcel of land deemed benefited by the said improvement, and in the case o£ each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the bene£its conferred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, identified by the siqnature of the said Valuation and Assessment Engineer, and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by him, and which is herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may be considered proper. � `�'\ 1r r —� Dated � )(J � � � V luation and Assessment Engineer t City of St. Paul RESOLt7TION APPROVING ASSESSMENT AND FIXING TIMB OF HEARING THERBON FILE o. ae-��S o`l By No �' r9 Assessment No. 5043 Voting ward In the matter o£ approving the assessment of benefits, costs and expenses 2 for improving the alley in Smedley'S Addition Block 1 (bounded by Curtice, Sidney, Brown and Andrew)_ Preliminary Order: 03-175 approved: February 19. 2003 Final Order: lJ3-315 approved: March 26, 2003 The assessment oP benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection with the above improvement having been submitted to the Council, and the Council having considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects approved. RBSOi,VED FLtRTiiBR, '£hat a public hearing be had on said assessment on the 22nd dav of SeAtember, 2004, at the hour o£ 5•30 o'clock P M in the Council Chamber of the Court House and City Hall Building, in the City of St. Paul; that the Valuation and Assessment Engineer give notice of said meetings, as required by the Charter, stating in said notice the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement, and the amount assessed against the lot or lots o£ the particular owner to whom the notice is directed. COLRSCILPERSON Yeas Nays �/ Benanav Bostrom � �� / Harris � Helgen ,� Lantry r j In Favor Montgomery_ ,��,, � Thune �Against d //6se�t Adopted by the Council: Date / � Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY_,�/_///��il i,c!si/i./ Mayor __--.��_.___�_____..,.,,,�,—.--�._-._..�._�__�.-_� _k.x_�_..___.._._.__.-.. _.�____- - - N ��. - 9 �a-o� o�- �z� � Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet � p1(�/ — Public Works Confact Person & Phone: Peter White 266-5850 Must Be on Council Agen '11-AUG-04 29-JUL-04 i Green Sheet NO: 3021356 � I Deoartment Sent To Person 0 I � Assign I 1 � DenartmentDirecror Number 2 , � For Routing 3 _ 1 MavorlAssisffint 1 Order 4 �ouncil 1 5 Citv Clerk i Citv Clerk ToWI it of Signature Pages _(Clip Ali locations for Signature) 1. Set public hearing date of September 22, 2004, for rarification of assessments for the Smedley's Addirion, Block i Alley Paving Ptoject, Real Bstate File No. 18978. 2. Ratify said assessments. Kecommentlauons: npprove (a) or KeJea (K): Planning Commission CIB Committee Civit Service Commission CosURevenue Budgeted: � Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why): � Project is completed. Ratification of these assessments is necessary to begin collecting the assessmentsto help pay for the project. i i Advanta57es ff Approved: Assessment amounts collected will help pay fox the project. � I DisadvanWgeslfApproved: ! Property owners benefitted by this project will have these assessments on the property records until paid. Disadvantapes {f Not Approved: �, Funding would have to be found to cuver the amounts not collected fluough assessmenu. Also, to not assess these benefits would be ' inconsistent with City policy. Total Amount of 21258.93 Transaction: Fundinp Source: Q,gsessm2nts Financial Information: Total Project Cost (Explain) Assessments Personal t. Has this person/firm ever worked urtder a coaVact for this department? Yes No 2. Has this personffrzm ever heen a city employee? Yes No 3. Does this Qersonlfirm possess a skif( not normally possessed by any current city employee? Yes No Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet Activity Number: $21,258.93 21,258.93