04-920City of St. Paul
RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT
COUNCIL FILE NO. D� � �
BY �1��/���-- S �
File No. 18744 & 18746
Assessment No. 0150 & 0151
Voting
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefitis, cost and expenses for
6& 3 the Arcade/Case and the Grand/Snelling parking lots operation and
maintenance costs for 2005.
Preliminary Order
Final Order:
�
�
A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above
improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the
Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all
respects ratified.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby
determined to be payable in one equal installment as per Section 64.04 of
the Administrative Code.
Adopted by the Council: Date �.>2�-//�
Yeas Nays
✓ Benanav
✓ Bostrom
✓ Harris
✓ Helgen
✓ Lantry
✓ Montgomery
✓ Thune
�In Favor
�Against
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
By �IG�G� �is. i.�t�iz�
�
Mayor
' City of St_ Paul
Real Estate Division
Department of Public Works
COUNCIL FILE NO_ O� � / �"`�
RBPORT OF COMPL&TION OF ASSBSSMENT File No. 18744 & 18746
Assessment No. 150 & 0151
Voting
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
6& 3 the Arcade/Case and the Grand/Snelling parking lots for 2005.
Preliminary
Final Order -- approved --
To the Council of the City of St. Paul
The Valuation and Assessment Engineer hereby reports to the Council the
following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in
connection with the making of the above improvement, viz:
ARCADE/CASE GRAND/SNELLING
Total costs
Engineering and Inspection
Valuation and Assessment Services
Administration Charge - Public Health
Re-Check Charge - Public Aealth
Abatement Service Charge
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Charge To
Net Assessment
$1,495.00 $15,521.00
$ 105.00 $ 1,086.00
$
$1,600.00 516,607.00
$1,600.00 $16,607.00
Said Valuation and Assessment Engineer further reports that he has assessed
and levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $1,600.00
for the Arcade/Case parking lot and $16,607.00 for the Grand/Snelling parking lot
upon each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefitted by the said
improvement, and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with
the benefits conferred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that
hereto attached, identified by the signature of the said Valuation and Assessment
Engineer, and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by him, and
which is herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may be
considered proper.
Dated 1���� /�""�L �q���U"�l.f/�M'
� a d Asses ment Engineer
(ratcostptp.wpd)
�� 7- �a a�
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
r. . / Q �1 n
0`I f��05o (l�T � ( /`--`�
Depar6nenNoffice%ouncil: Date Initiated:
Pw -P�b,;�Wo� 0&JUL-04 Green Sheet NO: 3019897
CoMact Person 8 Phone• Deoartment SeM To Person Initi�
Bcuce Engelbrekt � 0 ublic W B n el rekt Q�
2668 `&x} ASSign 1 ouncii Ma Eric n
Must Be on Councii qgenda by (Date): Number 2 � � hari Moo e
�'- ! �-auv-af For
Routing
Order
ToWI # of Signature Pages _(Clip All Locations for Signature)
Action Requested:
Set date of public hearing for the rarificarion of the operation and maintenance costs for the Arcade/Case and Grand/Snelling pazking
lots for 2005.
File Nos. 18744 & 18746 Assessment Nos. 0150 & 0151
Recommendafions: Approve (A) or Reject (R): Personal Service Contracts Must Mswer the Following Questions:
Planning Commission t. Has this persoNfirm ever worked under a contract for this department?
CIB Committee Yes No
Civil Service Commission 2. Has this person/firtn ever been a ciry employee?
Yes No
3. Does this personffirm possess a skill not normally possessed by any
current city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet
Initiating Problem, lssues, Oppartuaity (Who, WhaG When, Where, Why�:
Revenue is needed to operate and maintain the lots.
Advantapes If Approved:
Same as the above.
DisadvaMapes H Approved:
Benefitted property owners will have assessments payable via property taxes.
Disadvantages If Not Approved:
Pazking lots could not be operated or maintained.
Total Amount of ,� $Zp� CostlRevenue Budge[ed:
Transaction:
Fundinv source: Assessments Activity Number:
Fi nancial I nformation:
(Explain)
City of St. Paul
RESOLIITION APPROVING ASSESSMENT AND
D�! 9 Zo
COUNCIL FILE NO. , � t
B ���9���h��
ZY
FIXING TIME OF IiEARING THEREON File No. 18744 & 15746
Assessment No. 0150 & 0151
Voting
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
6& 3 the Arcade/Case and the Grand/Snelling parking lots operation and
maintenance costs for 2005.
Preliminary Order: -- approved --
Final Order: -- approved --
The assessments of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection
with the above improvement having been submitted to the Council having
considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all
respects approved.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That a public hearing be had on said assessment on
the 22nd dav of September, 2004, at the hour of Five thirtv o'clock p m, in
the Council Chamber of the Court House and City Hall Building, in the City of
St. Paul; that the Valuation and Assessment Engineer give notice of said
meetings, as required by the Charter, stating in said notice the time and
place of hearing, the nature of the improvement, and the amount assessed
against the lot or lots of the particular owner to whom the notice is
directed.
Yeas Ad�+s}�h�/�
✓ Benanav
�'Bostrom
Harris ✓"
✓ Helgen
✓ Lantry In Favor
Montgomery ,�-- �} b�-e:,t
,�. Thune AgairF�t
Adopted by the Council : Date Jti � y'� I a oo y/
Certified Passed by the Council Secretary
BY_ /r�iatr ��,�vfii�-/
Mayor