D001322CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER No: �`�J�I
� City Cler BUDGET REVISION Date: �-1
Finance
3 Dept.
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER, Consistent with the authority granted to the Mayor in Section 10.07.4 of the City
Charter and based on the reqaest of the Director of the Department of Ptanning � Economic Deve{opment
to amend the 1997 budget of the PED Operations Fund. The Director of Financial Services Office is
authorized to amend said budget in the foltowing manner:
Current
Budget
126 PED Operations Fund
3607� Director's O£ce - Administration
12636010-0557 Transfer to General Fund
126-36010-0857 Computer Hardware
Net Change
•
\J
$0
$43,454
Amended
Budget
$4,803
$38,651
$0
p ved by: Budge�ector '
�� � ! �
M:ADOOBODG.4YKt 10/93
Change
$4,803
($4,803)
LvL
� � 1�(�(� ( ?�21
DEPAR7MENT/OFFICE/COUNqL DATE INITIq7ED •
rlannmg & E�o�mu ne�ebpmeot � osn1/9� GREEN SH N_ 2 3 1 6 5
iNma � wiruvoare
CONTAC7 PERSON & PHONE ' . � 1 � , n DEPAq'f}�EP7� DIRECfOR CRY COUNCIL �
Carole Otte 266-6(35 _ � � `�I ` "� ASSIGN � CfiVATfOflN�Y �CfTYCLERK_
NUYBER FOR gUOGET DIRECfOq FlN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR.
BEONCAUNCILAGEN�ABY(DA7E) - pOUi1NG
NA " ' OBDER � �/pYOR (OB ASSISTANn � C.�O PED
T,OTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES � (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATUR� � '
qCfiON qC-0UESTED:
Approval of attached Administrative Order Budget Revision to transfer funds of $4,803 to the City General F'and for the
PC Replacement Program. ,
RECAMMEN�A7IONS: Approve (A) or Reject (P) , PERSONAL SERVICE CONTFiACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
_ PLANNING COMMISSION _ CNIL SERVICE COMMISSION �- Has this persoMrm ever worked untler a contrad far Mis departlnent?
_ CIB COMMITTEE YES NO
— 2. Has this perso�rm ever been a crty employee?
` S7AFF — YES NO
_ DISTRtC7 CAUR7 _ 3. Does this persoMfMm possess a ski11 not nonnaNy po55essed by any curtenf cily empbyee?
SUPPORTS WHICH CqUNCIL OBJECT�VE? YES NO
Expla�n ell yes answers on separote sheet and atteeh to green sheet
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITV (Wiw, What, When, Where. Why):
PED will participate in the PC Replacement Program by replacing an addiUonal 6 PC's. $4,803 will be transferred from the
PED Operations F�nd to the City General Fund
ANTAGES IFAPPROVED:
DISADVANTAGES IFAPPftOVED:
RE�EIVED
��� � fl ���
CITY CLERK
DISADVANTAGES IF NOTAPPflOVED:
_�_
TOTAL AMOUNT OF 7flANSACTION S COS7/qEVENUE BUDGETED (CIFCLE ONE) YES NO
Fund 126 PED Operations Fund GI�126-36010
FUNDfNG SOURCE AC7IVITY NUMBER
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) ]vQt Qf[gCY f0 tF10 19I�I b11dgQY IS Z070. �� 1� 1
V�
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
•
Approved Copies to:
- City Clerk (Originaq
- Financial ServicesAccounting Division
- Requesting Dept.
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER:
BUDGET REVISION
Na: � I 32�
Date: j� ; ; n—,
-� j---�-q-�-
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER, Consistent with the authority granted to the Mayor in Section 10.07.4 of the Ciiy Charter
and based on the request of the Director of the Office of Financial Services
to amend the 19 96 budget of the Capital improvement Bond fund, the Diredor of
Office of Financial Services is authorized to amend said budaet in the followinq manner.
CURRENT
BUDGET
SPENDING BUDGET
CIB Bond Sale Costs
925-90096-0601-70003
Ali 0ther Spending
C J
FINANCING BUDGET
Interest Eamings
925-90096-6602-00000
Bond Proceeds
925-90096-6201-00000
equested by: Department Director j ��
��F/� Vu---�.s�. c,!'a
� ,
Approved y� Bu get Director
APPROVED AMENDED
CHANGES BUDGET
65,000.00 43,614.23 108,61423
17,595,000.00 17,595,000.00
17,660,000.00 43,614.23 17,703,61423
160,000.00 218,61423 378,614.23
17,500,000.00 (175,000.00) 17,325,000.00
17,660,000.00 43,61423 17,703,61423
9 �� �- � �
Date
Date
!- /a" `��'
Date
Office of Financial Services
Kantorowicz, 266-8836
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES
`�00 t �3�,� .
GREEN SHEET _° 3 3 813
._ . ._ INRIAL/DATE � _ . . .. . INITIAIJDATE
� CIiY ATfORNEY �CITY CLE
� BUDGET DIRECTOR � FIN. & Mi
� MAYOfl (OR ASSISTAPfn � �
(CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNA7URE)
DIR.
Administrative Order to revise the budget for the_1996 Capital Improvement Bonds,
construction account.
_ PtANNING CAMMISSION _ CNIL SEFVICE CAMMISSION
__ C�B COMMITTEE _
_ STAFF _
__ DISTRICTCOUflT _
SUPPORTS WHIGH COUNCIL O&IECTIVE?
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER TNE FOLLOWING �UESTONS:
7. Has this perso�rm ever worketl under a contract for Mi5 departmeM? -
YES NO
2. Has this persoNfirm ever been a city employee?
YES NO
3. Does tftis personlfirm possess a skill not normally possessed by any cuRent ciry employee?
YES NO
Explain all yes answers on ssperate sheet and attaeh to green sheet
PROBIEM.ISSUE.OPPORTUNIN (Who. Wf�at. When. Where, Whyl:
Bond sale costs were higher than budgeCed because of the need to sell these bonds in two
parts. The change in proceeds reflects allowable underwriters discount. Interest earnings
received were greater than expected.
properly reflect actual spending and financing for fund 925 activfty 90096.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
None
RECElVED
$�� � � ����
�=fT�' CLERK
Budget will not provide a clear representation of what actually happened.
TOTAL AMOUNT OFTHANSAC710N $
43,614.23
COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE)
YES NO
FUNDING SOURCE AC7IVITV NUMBER
FINANqAL INFORMATION (EXPLAIN) � �