04-758City of St. Pau1
RSSOLUTION RATIFYING
COUNCIL FILE NO. O • • �S :
By
File No. SEE BELOW SQ
V
Assessment No. SEE BELOW
Voting
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
J0402A1 (8012) Summary abatement (property clean-up) during the
month of March 2004_
LAID OV&R BY COUNCIL ON 6-23-04 to 7-25-04
A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above
improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council, and
having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVBD, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects
ratified.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined
to be payable in One equal installments.
COUNCILPERSON
Yeas Nays
✓ Benanav
✓ Bostrom
Harris__ ��j��
Helgen � ,/a���
� Lantry
� Montgomery �In Favor
Thune _ ,�fjfSPiit
�Against
.3 /�d�.5e�z.`
Adopted by the Council: Date � ��
Certified Passes by Council Secretary
�
�i G"�' v4.C/�i
�Ub��e i�E� �-a � oy oy- 758
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
�� 7� �-- ��
� Departmentloffice/wuncil: i Date initiated: �
i PN/ — PublicWOrks ; o,, ; Green Sheet NO: 3019575
_ _� _
Contad Pereon & Phone:
Bruce Engelbrekt
2668854
Must Be on Council Aaen
�/
Assign
Number
Por
Routing
Order
uewrtment sent �orerson
0 Pubiic Works Bruce Eoeelbrekt !
1 Councii Marv Ericl:soo !
2 Ciri Clerk
L/
Total # of Signature Pages _(Clip All Lxations for Signature)
s�aion neques[ea:
At council request on 6-23-04 this item was laid over to 7-28-04 Summary abatement (property clean-up) during the month of March
2004. File No. J0402A1
aauons: Hpprove �H� or rce�ecc �n�:
Planning Commission
CIB Committee
Civil Service Commission
Pel'SOnal ServlCe (:ontfaCtS MuSt Answer the FolloWing
1. Has this person/firm ever worked under a contraci for this department?
Yes No
2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee? �
Yes No
3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normatly passessed by any
current city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet
; Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
! Property owners or renters create a health hazard at various times throughout the City of Saint Paul when their property is not kept up.
The Ciry is required by City code to clean up the property and charge ffie property owner for the cost of the clean up.
� AdvanWqeslfApproved:
i Cost recovery programs to recover expenses for summary abatements, grass cutting towing of abandoned vehicles, demolitions,
; garbage hauling and boardings-up.
i
Disadvantapes If Approved:
None
'�, Disadvantages If Not Approved:
' If Councii does not approve these chazges, general fund would be requued to pay the assessment.
Total Amount of 678
Transaction:
Fundinp Source:
CostlRevenue Budgeted:
Activity Number:
��',,,�°.;� G���n?'t"` f°Rr:pez
Pinanciai information: S�� Q � "���,�
(Explain) Z property owners will be notified of the public hearing and chazges.
City of St. Paul
Rea1 Estate Division
Dept. of Technology & Management Serv.
RRPORT OF
OF ASSSSSMENT
COUNCIL FILE NO_
Fi1e No. SEE BELOW
� S �'�7
O �! '��
Assessment No. SEE BELOW
Voting
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
J0402A1 (8012) Summary abatement (property clean-up) during the
month of March 2004.
LAID OVER BY COIINCIL ON 6-23-04 to 7-28-04
To the Council of the City of St. Paul
The Valuation and Assessment Engineer hereby reports to the Council the
following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in
connection with the making of the above improvement, viz:
Total costs $538.00
Summary Abatement $
Charge-Code Enforcement $100.00
Real Estate Service Charge $ 40.00
TOTAI, EXPENDITURES
Charge To
Net Assessment
C. : ��
$678.00
Said Valuation and Assessment Engineer further reports that he has assessed and
levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of 5678.00 upon each
and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefitted by the said improvement, and
in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits
conferred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto
attached, identified by the signature of the said Valuation and Assessment Engineer,
and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by him, and which is
herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may be considered
proper.
Dated �—��(��/
—�-
�' 1 Va ua� a � s'�� Engineer
.,
W
4
a
a
Q
a
a
W
C�
Q
Q
E
'i
O
m
a
H
�
y
N
Q
0
�
�
0
ri
ti
.i
m m
,� ,�
A,o ��
�,o �o
��
�.;� ,�
F i.i � N
a i
W i N i r1
W� N � N i
O I 1 I 1
a�rn �m
w�N �N
� �
� m � in
� N � (+�
U) 1 000 II O � 000 11 O�
E� o 0 o n o i o 0 o n o i
z � .�� .��
7� in o o i� u� � r� o o n ri i
O � W�I1 N 11 N � lIl (fl N 11 N �
� � Ni?Ut ii t7 � Ni?U} II t�l i
� � il � I � II � i
�i i n i
a � n � n
O� n i n i
H � n � n �
Q � 11 i II i
� ii II
W 11 i II i
O] � 000 � 000 i
[ti 1 O O O 1 O O O
H i O O O i O O O I
,Z 1 O O O I O O O
� 1
1 l(1 r-I rl 1 M f'1 "1 I
a 1 m � Ifl 1
O � N i N
N i
U i i
Q i i
W i
i i
W�000 i000 �
� �000 i000 �
i000 000
i • i • i
i ,-� oo i ,y o0
E� �+1 N ul N i
H I I
Z I I 1
a I I
I I '
1
I I
I 1
I
1 I
I
1 a I a 1
1 . �I] [� I • �] V]
� w U� � I w N� 1
1 1
I
4C <<CUU � ��U �
z� �
�rxw �rxw �
a�auu �x �
F �x> �£x>
U � �U� i �U fk �
i
w cnam � �nzm �
' �
� �
�
�� �
� � '
� � � �
�
o �o �
H � .7 � F
E i � i i
a� r�C .. m i z .. � i
��a wM �o wM�
C4 � F t� � H E+ t� i
O i • O ro i z
m � E zN � i- �`� �
w�m x �ca� z a�
Cl � m W i q �
�nC4 RC���aS �
N� aawo �zdawA
a��cwaa ��.�maa�
w� A ao � a�C ao �
a � mm � xa.� �
o�a �x � .x
a � aF� a � •F+a �
a��o o � Ho o�
� xa s � wcna a �
� � �
� � z .,
w o i
i i F .i
� � o i ¢ � o
1 H I 1 Uf f{ 1 1
� z �, � �, o� �
� O a N W in N�
� C4 .+ i � �
� W v n� u] Cl 2 M i
a� c� M o ��aE o�
w � �ow o w
� � w w�wm � a xx�r�, �
��� �>o�zaa o�
F�na � waam
i
E� `�zx��waaaQ
a � wwo � mFwac� �
o�wqoauz� Hwmz�
�
x�a "��Q i zO W V O �
w� m Z io a o z� F o F rv z�
z� �-+ao Nw � aM�Nw �
3� pwcvH.aa � pNxrnw �
O�.] W�-Imx • i:.'�03* s i
0 0 o n o
0 0 o n o
•u
m o o n m
noa� n �
�n ti +ir n io
.�+n n vr
n
n
n
n
u
n
u
��
ii
II
II
II
II
•ww ii
F ii
aE�C n
woxn
r� U U li
rxwna
auuna
�x,�7 ii O
�UP.' II N
D W W n
cnam nE+
11 U
aaanw
aaa��h
EHH �� O
�-�i � � ii a
�
R
7
�
�
N
a
w
U
�
a
N
Oy- �5;,
C
�'�M ��
O �-- - l5�
NIINUTES OF THE LEGISLATIVE HEARING
ORDERS TO REMOVE/REPAIR, CONDEMNATION5, ABATEMENT ASSESSMENTS
Tuesday, July 13, 2004 ,
Room 330 Courthouse
Marcia Moermond, Legisiative IIearing Officer
The fieuing was called to order at 10:03 am.
STAFF PRESENT: Steve Magner and John Betz, Department ofNeighborhood Housing and
Property Improvement (NH��
ResoIution ordering the owner to mmove or mpair the building(s) at 1956 Feronia Avenue.
If the owner fails to compiy with the resoiution, Neighborhoad Housing and Property
Improvement is ordered to remove the building(s). (Laid over from 5-25-04)
(Note: there are two issues regazding 1956 Feronia: one is a resolution discussed earlier and the
other is an assessment.}
The following appeared: Naomi Isaacson, 328 Fourth Street; Rebecca Brown, her attorney, 1350
South Frontage Road, Hastings.
Ms. Moermond stated tiiat when ihey left the meeting on April 27, they were mainly waiting for
financing information.
Steve Magner said his understanding from ths last iegislative hearing was that the owner and the
representative Mr. High from the financial institution had appearecl and indicated that they could
arrange immediate financing if they wexe to do it as a single family residence vs. doing the
building as originally planned. He said the City would require new plans if it was done as a
single family dweiling. The original plans were submitted to the Office of LIEP and approved
forthe multiple use.
Mr. Magner said that, except for checking the building, they had no further information at this
time.
Ms. Moenuond said in looking at the summary statement and the resolution, the estimated cost to
demolish the building is $20,000 to $30,000. She questioned if that amonnt was based on
comparable demolitions that have occurred in other places. Mr. Magner responded that the
number is over one yeaz old; it is the same nuxnber that was used for the original hearing about
1 S months ago. T1te amount would grabably be higher based on what would be found aftez the
hazardous waste abatement was completed, specifically for iiems such as asbestos. To his
knowtedge, the building is basically gu�te+3 aud he suspecLs tha# Yhere are only some smali azeas
that might isave flaot tile ttxat woutd test positive. They would also be looking for any pipe wrap.
On a baulding Pike this, they could spend more in hazazdous waste abatement than would be spent
on demolition. He feels the cost wouid be more in the azea of $30,000 to 40,000; however, since
it is gutted, it significanfly reduces the cost. A contractor would not take the brick to a landfill,
Ut� � �
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES, JIJLY 13, 2004, 10:00 A.M. Page 2
said Mr. Ma�ner. Rather, it would be taken to a recycling site which significanfly reduces the
dollars compazed to if it was all rubbie that had to be landfilled. Labor and duxnping costs are the
two primary costs that drive the demolition.
Ms_ Brown said that the bank is requiring a new appraisal and thai's still pending. (She handed
out paper work)
Ms. Maermond asked tuhere they were at in terms ofthe building use. She said in looking at the
figure of $1 million she was asse�ing they are taiking about an 8-uni# building. Ivls. Isaacson
responded that iYs a 9-uuit building. Tfie appraiser who handied it a year ago was just certified
with MI�TI. He wilt npdate the appraisal in approximately two to three weeks.
Ms. Moermond said she was looking for this to be expedited as it will be before the City Council
for a pnblic hearing on 3uly 28. She is not inclined to delay it again so she would like to see
everyihing locked up by that time. If that occnrs, her recommendafion will be to gant 180 days
to complete the rehabilitation. Otherwise, she wiil not make that recommendation and Ms.
Isaacson would have to explain to the Council why they should lay over the matter or send it
back for additional legislative hearings. Ms. Moermond did not think the Council wouid
consider granting additional time if everything is not in order because the bond was revoked
previously_ The Council may say that they will conditionally grant 180 days but the owner would
have to post addirional money in her bond. That is one of the things that sometimes happens
when bonds have been revoked previously on a project
Ms. Moermond questioned where the plans are in the approval process and if they aze ready to go
with permits. Ms. Isaacson said as far as she knew, they were ready.
Mr. Magner suggested tYtat within #he nexf two weeks the parties should contact Ed Locke and
Jim Seeger in the Office of LIEP to verify that they have everything so when they come in with
iheir band they can aiso purchase their perxnits. The first permit they will need is either the
building pemut, which will 'anclude any demoti#ion that will be done, or #hey will have to get a
demolition permit for any additional dzmo3ition that tl�ey will be doiug. After #ha�, their trade
contractors will obtain the additional required permits. Mr. Magner said it was his understanding
that the owner's brother is the general contractor on the project so he would have to pull the
building pernut if he's going to do the general contracting:
Ms. Moermond told Ivls. Isaacson that they need #o find out if Fd Locke tias finished reviewing
tke plans, if everyYt�ing is inciuded, if he has signed off on the plans, etc. Jim Seeger is the
vacant buitdiugs concact tIe �11 bri�g in a teaan to da the inspection. Ms. Isaacson said it was
her underst�ndang that it was ready to go and the financing just had to be completed.
Ms. Moermond told Ms. Isaacson that, accarding to state law, she will have 180 days with the
permit. If she is 50% compleie on the project on the 18d`� day, staff will grant her an additional
180 days to compiete the rehabilitation. Jim Seeger would make that determination.
LEGISLATIVE HEARIISG MINUTES, JULY 13, 2004, 10:00 A.M.
O�-���
� ��� ��
Page 3
In summary: Ms. Moermond recommends granting the owner 180 days to complete the
rehabilitation of the properry on condition that the following is done by noon of July 28, 2004:
1) A ciosing date has been set, 2) A$2,Q00 bond is posted.
� J0402A1 Propetfy cleanup during March 2004 (Laid over from 6-23-Q4 City Council)
922 Chazles Avenue
Kurt and Lois Speten, owneis, agpeared.
Ms. Ivloermond asked why tt2e progarty awner was appealing the assessment. Mr. Spe#en
responded that he did not feel the city picked it up. The tenants were served an eviction notice
and were asked to clean up the property. There was litter outside the fence and in the alley but it
did belong to his tenants. The tenant moved out on March 24. He asked her to have everything
cleaned up immediately, she said she would, and they took her word for it Another nofice was
received from the city on Apri17 for the same item. Mr. Speten felt by that time they had it all
cleaned up. He disagreed that the City did any cleaning because there were computers still
outside.
John Betz regorted his office received a complaint on Mazch 4, 2004 regarding trash and refuse
piied by the back o£ihe property. A notice was sent 10 the properry owner to remove it by March
16. A reinspection was conducted on March i6 and there was a TV set, garbage bags, plastic
pails, etc. A work order was sent to Pazks and they cleaned the property on March 19. Another
complaint came in on April 5 stating issues of discazded furniture, dog feces, trash,
over-the-fence containers without covers. An inspecrion was conducted and the inspector
indicated there was a lazge pile of debris at the properiy. A notice was sent to the property owner
to cornply by April 14. A reinspection was conducYed and the properry owner cleaned it up. He
said there wili be a$50 assessment fee on the paoperiy for excessive consumption of city
inspection services.
(A city cleanup crew video was shown of the properiy.)
The Spetens disputed what was shown saying they had cieaned up the property. Ms. Moermond
reminded them that a coupie of dates are involved wi#h respect to cdeauup and they may be
eonfused when they were. T1ae videcz shaw was for the cleauup done on March 19.
Ms. Maermond said she wguld recarst�temd k�t t€ae Caty Council that they approve the assessment
because she feels the videa is aceivate. She told tt�e progeriy awners that #hey can appear before
the Couneil at the hearing on 3uly 28 and expiain their situation.
1206 Cook Street East
(No one appeared on behalf of the properiy.)
O �-1 ��
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES, JULY 13, 2004, 10:00 A.M. Page 4
Mazcia Moermond recommends approval of the assessment
J0402A2 Property cleanap during February 2004 at 492 Charles Avenue (Laid over from
5-26-04 City Council)
(No one appeared on behalf of the property.)
Mazcia Moermond recommends approval of the assessment
Summary Abatements:
J0402$ Baarding-op of vacaat bnildings during March and Apri12004;
J04T1Q Providing weekly garbage service for the first quarter of 2004;
J0401C Demolition of vacant buildings during Apri12004.
1956 Feronia Avenue (J0402B)
(Note: there are two issues regarding 1956 Feronia: one is a resolution discussed earlier and the
other is an assessment.)
Naomi Isaacson asked Ms. Moermond about an order she received regarding an assessment the
City was going to puY on the property. IY was for work which she hired a conYractor to do and she
questioned why she would be charged for it Ivis. Moermond that a heazing was scheduled for
assessment, bu# a card was not returned; therefore, the file may not be available on this
assessment. The assessment was for a boazding-up in April.
Mr. Magner reported that he was at the property on March 31, 2004 and there was a broken
second floor window on the south side along with glass on the public sidewalk. A summary
abatemeiit order was prepared on March 31, 2Q04 and mailed on April 1. The order indicated that
the owner was io immediately remove the broken glass from the public walk. The broken
window was aiso noted and a compiiance date of Apri16, 2004 was requested. Mr. Magner
visited the property on Apri16 and found that the building was not secured, there were two
broken windows on the second story, and there was still broken glass on tl�e public sidewalk. A
boarding arder was sent to the City's contractor for the windows and a work order was sent to
Parks. Mr. Magner returned to the property on April 12 for a reinspecfion. The south side
window was boazded up by the owner_ A$50 consumption lztter was sent. There was no work
order at �f ti�ne. Qn Febraary 23, a phone call was received at tiie Office of LIEP saying there
was broken gtass in the building and it was falling onto the sidewalk, Magner said. He went to
the properry and found ihat windows on The secand and third floor, south and west side, were
broken out. A suinaiary abatemes;t order was issued to sec�se the windows, remove the broken
glass, and c2ean the pubtic walk. He called the owner and left a message.
Ms. Isaacson said she received notice dated April 14, 2004 which sounds the same as the Apri16
___ _
U����
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINLJTES, JtJLY 13, 2004, 10:00 A.M. Page 5
notice she received. She talked to Mr. Magner about it and an inspection was conducted on April
13. Mr. Magner told her that one was eventually boarded by owner. The one he's talking about
now is previous to that one. February 23 is when the complaint was received and he went to the
properry at the end of the day. He went to the property again on March 2 and found the third
story windows were boazded but they were boazded from the inside and the broken giass was not
removed. He told the owner that the glass would have to be removed immediately or the City
would do it. He rehuned to the property on March 4 and the third story windows on the south
side were boarded from the outside, the first story window was still broken and glass was
hanging down on Yhe public sidewaik. A contcactor was sent to board up Yhe first and second
floor windows.
Ms. Moermond recommends approval of the assessment. It appears adequa#e notice was given
that more than one story was involved.
1139 Beech Street (J04T1Q)
Martha Fowler, owner, appeazed.
Ms. Moerxnond said that she remembers that there was a praor legislative hearing on this
address. The City said they would not charge for January. The owner was charged for third and
£ourth quarter of 2003.
John Beiz reported the City was just there to pick up the barrel.
Ms. Moermond recommends deleting the assessment.
(526� Seibv Avenue (J0402B, 01-28-23-22-0i3?}
(No one appeared on behalf of ttte proper#y.)
Ms. Moermond recommended 526 Selby Avenue be deleted as the owner did not receive proper
notice of the assessment per the Real Estate.
958 Rose Avenue East (J04T1Q)
Matt Mejia, HomeVestors,1200 Forest Sireet, apgeared and stated he is appealing an assessment
for gazbage services. 'i'he properiy was acquired on November 7, 2003 by HomeVestars. There
were several abatement assessments when tlae property was purchased. He said he did not realize
that tlie trash pickup coutiuved regardtess af ownership change. They had a dumpster on the
premises Yhe emire time they were working. When the floor sanding was being done, irash bags
were left in front of the house which is how he discovered that it was still under abatement. He
received a letter from Tom Friel instructing him to remove the trash bags and also informing him
that there was continued trash pick-up at the residence. He said he was not asking that they not
oti=�5�
LEGISLATIVE FIEARING MINIJTES, JI7LY 13, 2004, 10:00 A.M. Page 6
be charged for anydiiug; however, no trash was left for pickup.
Ms. Moermond recommends approvat of the assessment When the transaction was done on the
property, some of ihe assessments appear that they wouid have been relazed to trash pickup and
hauling. She suggested that the seller could have been more forthcomiug with the buyer but tt�at
is a private transaction between them.
1304 Galtier Street (J04T1 �
(No one appeared on behalf of tfie property.)
Racquel Naylor, Legislative Hearing Secretary, stated ihat she received a call from Pam
Washington prior to this meeting. Ms. Washington said tlus was supposed to have been deleted
which Ms. Naylor was not able to verify.
Steve Magner said he thought this property was still in the problem property unit and they aze
still dealing with it.
Marcia Moermond recommends laying over to the July 27 legisiarive hearing.
1024 North Western North (J04T1Q)
(No oae appeared on behalf of the pmperty.)
John Betz reported that he was not an advocate for the owner but he had a conversation with.
He's presently in northern Minnesota but they went through the file and he is going to send a
letter to the City. This pertains to trash hauling, and the owner contends that the City, on its first
delivery of a container, chazged $50.00 and they also chazged to empTy iY on the same day.
Pnblic Works couId not explain at. Parks had no expianarion of why they did it.
Mazcia asked if this was a case of financial hazdship, Mr. Beiz responded that he didn't know
but that it couid be. Ms. Moermond said she would recommend to the Council that $50 be
deleted from the assessment and #hat it be divided over three yeazs because of financial hazdship.
Ms. Moermond recommends reducing the assessment from $420 to $350 plus the $20
administration fees for a total assessment of $370.
21 Maryland Avenue East (T0402B}
40� 3ohnson Parkwav (30402B)
767 Jessie Street (70402B)
1212 Beech Street (J04T1Q)
1004 Euclid Street (J04T1Q)
�� � ��
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINIJTES, JLTLY 13, 2004, 10:00 A.M. Page 7
775 Marvland Avenue East (J04T1Q)
(No one appeared on the above addresses. Marcia Moermond recommends approval of these
assessments.)
Resolution ordering the otivner to remove or repair the building(s) at 948 Duchess Street. If
the owner fails to camply with the resolution, Neighborhood I3ousing and Property
Improvement is ordered #o remove the building(s).
(No one appeazed on behatf of the property.)
Steve Magner reported that this is a two-story wood-frame single family dwelling with a
detached two-stall wood-frame garage. The lot is 8,265 sq. ft. The building was condemned in
April 2004 Code Enforcement and has been vacant since August 14, 2003. The current owner is
Eloise Filipkowski. An inspection of the building was conducted and a list of deficiencies was
compiled, which constitutes the nuisance condition, and photos were taken. An order to abate a
nuisance buiiding was issued on April 27, 2004 with a compliance date of May 12, 2004. As of
this date, the property remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the
Legislative Code. The City has had to secure the building against trespass, the vacant building
fees are due, and real estate taxes are unpaid in the amount of $1,554. Ta�cation has placed an
estimateeR market vaine of $45,1OD on the land and $65,000 on the building. As of July 13, 2004,
neither a code inspection nor a bond have been applied for or posted. NHPI estimates the repairs
to the structure to be between $80,000 and $90,000 with demolition between $8,000 and $9,000.
Ms. Moermond questioned the estimated amount for the demolition. Mr. Magner responded the
higher amount is due to the clutter. There is at least $2,000 worth of clean-out in the house.
When there is mixed municipal waste in a properry, it has to go to a separate landfill.
Ms. Moermond asked "afdhere was water damage or mold in the builtting. Mr. Magner responded
that there is moid, middew and waier in the basement and part of the sidewall was opening and
allowing elements to go duectly into it. The house would have to be totally gutted for repairs if it
is not demolished. His recommendation was to demolish both the house and the garage. The
foundation of the house is significantly dilapidated.
Ms. Moermond recommends apgrovai of the resolaiticm.
The hearing was ad}oumed at appro�ately 1130 a.m
me, rn
Z� � � �
c � � n n
� ^ c n :
� c 3 �
' n �e
°-, n
a e e
K n ^, -
c S
�-� � = - ? �
0
�_ _ _
��. ,,
_ � a I m
_ N .`.
O
/\ ? � p O V
� Q
� � � W
� _ ��
`� � " I �
� �
� � � o
�� �
.� `
���
�' � �
� �
�
�
�
a m
d x
n ' `']
� K
a '
� �
A o
c �
a °
�
0
G
Z
D
y
'
n z n � o
S G
° 3 a
� n � � n
o ,� �, ' � °
e � n
= ti 6 P
� v
< n �
� - > 3
� � o •
= � � �
c r", �
� ^
h
fA En
l
1
D
�
v
l
�
�
� n cn u v ss vi es
O
v
3
m
� �
w
?. .°.
0 0
' �
_�
z
?�
' a
� n'
7 G
0:
' � _
n �
� o 0
n -
e e �
3 ° �
a_
� � O C � I
. r �
� ��1V � � >
O V� a A
o �,
� � m �
s � �
= o 0
� ; �
0 0
0
�
N
W
i
� w
"I"
�
z
a
r
O
y
-3
�
�
Z
�
;�
x
�v
z
m
�
0
N
A
0
A
<n va w
O
n
�
�'<
0
(:
�
�
0�
a
�
c
a
a
�
r�
m
� n
� �
�' o
UG L
o '
� �
z a
c
� 3
., �
N !
O ,
A �
z
0
0
N
a
7
�
3
�
z
0
W
O
N
�
m
>
3
m
Z
'j
O
'-9
'j
m
a f:
= n
r pK
��'O
��a
cz
c ��
n3 c
a„
S
n
:�
3
m
Z
�
�
c
'n
m
y
l '
�
L
�
�
I
'
VI
�
b
v
0
�
V
�� (
`N
\
� V
o\
�
N
q
z
�
[h
C
�
[9
x
m
3
ro
H
Y
�
n
m
r
m
� n H H H
A��000
O��HHH
4 n ?� Y T�
mnrrr
H ii m7�[n
n F][aC
H n v[]3
O II C 9 3
H n .+ C�J Y
b ii n n ;v
r n P] xK
II
II O(]b
��xoro
iib3Y
ii L�im�
m m�•
n z
n
II
n
n
i
n
n
11
n
n
n
n
n
� II �K
������
�1 II �P O W
0� II O O W
n •
o n o 0 0
o n o 0 0
� ��E�x�.=���r�o
ro�mNa�ro�HNmC�E
� � N H �
� �� N O p H�
� z N y o y i z o ro m z�� m
i
�dnmoz�dm�� 'z
� 7 � zl]t'O17h1 O
� G] b [�] H [n � G] O O [•] [9 � :o
:VS�[=]�o � 037'.NX1
� �n[C•]:�AH � r z y � y Y
cnCC[�] � y �nH z � X
�o rrz�o<� o�ro
�GL��JL��7C � � N � K
, m o .. �rn �cn
i o 3� i-+ � o w � i�
i w 2 l7 m� w a [�J �
i N � i
� N Ul Cs7 � N �P O i
� �o �, � �o z �
� N m� H�
i o r �O i o 3�
i a O Ln � a O i
F' H �
i o b] � �
� � z� �
i� C!n '+] � E C x �
0 oya� o o��ro
� 7J a H• b� :tl .H C :c1
+ z x* r�o
i x r ro x� io m ro
� oro Yr oro o� t�7
� 7] CmG�-+ � .'�C W T� � >b
��vxr mvx��K
t '� y � � X1N
c9w30 � [i]u� i p
� sc .. (7 � se rn � m
� n� Z �� n� z H� rn
�w0 H� w0 n'
i �1H • t+ � �H i
� w t�7 0� w[ J ro��
� m•• 2 � io .. Ti �.a
� H� C�H
Oi � O
Z
� 3�
I H
I z
I •
I I
� � � 1 � � � � �
� �na"� zn��n
���� �m��o
� nnz� nnz�z
mxK� m�K�
� z
nn�� nnv��
xom� xom
vav� var�m
i 7.1 H� S'� H�
� c�v>�n � c�mm �
mm• � m�� �
� � � � �
� � �
; � �
� ; �
,
�� �
t H
N UI i N UI i �-j
� 001� i 00F� i
; . . . � . . . i �
O O O � O O O
f O O O; O O O 1
i 000 000 i L+7
1 I
1 I I KJ
� � �y
� �n
i i y
i N � N i O
N 1 � I '�1
I 4"� F� W 1 F+ F+ (Sl I C
i O O O � O O O i Z
i O O O � O O O i H
000i o0o H
i o0o i o0o i[n
� ii � ii � b
n � n � n
i n � n i y
i II � II i O
II � II x7
� n � n �
mn m� inn m y
i W 11 iR Lt N i w II L1 LT N 3�
� N II N ln N i VI 11 N tn CD � p
iW1100Wi UiIlOOU�;C
i • II • • • i • II • • • Z
i o II o 0 o i o II o 0 o i y
� O II o0o i o II o0o U}
I I 1
; lJ N ;
N � �
i N; N i 41
1 � � I '�
I I 1 1 Q
N � N � �CJ
W i N � R]
1 '�
i n� � � � H
m � a � .�
I O I O � H
F` 1 O � (J
Ol � N �
i� m m �
W
m
0
0
J
�
a
�
�
�
H
m
O
N
2
c
[9
X1
r
C
ro
b
�
Y