The URL can be used to link to this page

04-545Council File # �� IJ Green Sheet # 11 ��l O RESOLUTION CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Presented By Referred To _ _, `� /t 2 WHEREAS, 7ohn Titfle, in Zoning File No. 04-019-969, made appiication for a Special 3 Condition Use Pernut for the purpose of constructing a six-unit "cluster" development, as 4 provided under Leg. Code § 60.413(13), for property commonly known as 1070 Burgess Street 5 and legally described as Kaiman's Division No. 3 Addition to the City of St. Paul, Minn. Lots 7, 6 8, 9, 22, 23, N'/z of Vac St Adj and Lot 24; and 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 WHEREAS, on February 5, 2004, the Planning Commission's Zoning Committee, havir,g provided notice to all interested parties, duly conducted a public hearing at which ali persons present were given an opportunity to be heard on the said application and, at the ciose of the public hearing, the said CommitCee recommended approval of the said permit application and forwarded the recommendation to the Planning Commission for consideration; and WHEREAS, on February 27, 2004, the Planning Commission considered the recommendation and, in ats Resolution No. 04-13, dated February 27, 2004, approved the said permit application based upon those findings and subject to those certain conditions as set for[h in Planning Commission Resolution No. 04-13, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Attachment No.l; and WHEREAS, on or about March 18, 2004 and pursuant to the provisions of Leg. Code § 64.206, the District 6 Planning Council duly filed an appeal from the Planning Commission's decision to approve the said conditional use pernut application and requested a hearing before the City Council for the puipose of considering the actions taken by the said Commission; and WHEREAS, on Aprii 28, 2004, and acting pursuant to I.egislative Code § 64.206 - 64.208 and with notice to ihe affected parties, the City Council conducted a public hearing where ali interested parties were given an opportunity to be heazd; and WHEREAS, at the close of the hearing, and having heard the statements made and having considered the application, the report of staff, the record, minutes and resolution of the Zoning Committee and the full Planning Commission, the City Council; does hereby RESOLVE, that Planning Commission committed error in its facts, findings or procedures in approving the said conditional use permit for the following reasons: l. The scale of the buildings proposed for this cluster development are not in scale with the buildings in the immediate neighborhood. This is a neighborhood of single family dwelling structures on individual lots. The height and mass of the proposed twin homes aze neither in keeping with nor compatible to the existing homes in the immediate U � iS�e�( � a 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 0�1 'S�15 surrounding neighborhood. The proposed development fails to meet the condition under I.eg. Code § 60.413(fl. 2. The density of structures resulting from a cluster development is not in keeping with the scale of density of existing stroctures on adjacent lots. The configuration of this ciuster development would be detrimental to the existing character of the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed development fails to meet the condition under Leg. Code § 60.300(c)(3). FURTHER RESOLVED, that the appeal of District 6 Planning Council is hereby ganted; and be it FINALLY RESOLVED, that the City Clerk shall maii a copy of this resolution to the District 6 Planning Council, 7ohn Tittle, the Zoning Administrator, and the Planning Commission. Requested by Department of: By: Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by Council: Date �i��G%o�,�d� g Adoption Certified by Council Secretary Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council BY: % 'G.�J% g}•: Approved by Mayor: � e � ^ � ^� � By: J � 6N �o-�- Z�- ?u, s-�,_o.� � � � Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet os�rar�wor��w,�ac u■te xdn�nea: co � �,Y.� Green Sheet NO: 3017078 co�ma r.BO� m wwne: � oeoenm�! senc To Pe�on Wt1aUDate Counplrt�ember Mo�rtgome�y 0 266�8610 p�� 1 r Must Be m Caeidl Ag�da bY (Date1: N�enber Z C9erk � 3 Routlng p� 4 S Tofallt of Signature Pagss _(Clip AII Locatlw�s for Sigrnture) ACtlon Requested: Memorializing City Council action taken Apri128, 2004, granting the appeal of the District 6 Planning Coimcil to a decision of the Planning Commission approving a Conditional Use Permit for a six-unit (3 twin homes) cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street Recomrt�erdetio�: Apqove (A) w RejeQ (R): PaBOnal SerWes CoMrads Must Answer the Followinp Questlo�: Planning Canmiasion 1. Hffi this PersoNfirm ever waked urber a contraG for this department? CIB CanmiCce Yea No Civil Service Commission 2 fi� tftis pecspMfirte ever heen a dly empbyee? Yea No 3. Dces this pe�soNfifm possess a s1u71 not normalh Posaeased bY e�Y curreM city empbyce? Yes No Explaln all yes a�wers on se{wrete sheet a�W altach to green sheet InWatlng Prablem, �ues, OppoKunih (YVhe, WhaR When. VMhere, Why): AdvaMages HApproved: DlsadvarKages Hppprovad: DlsadvaMages M No! Approved: Total Amowk of �eve�ue Budgeted: T}insactlon: Funding Souree: AetlWry Number; Fina�wtal 1�'ormaflOn: (dqilain) y CITY OF SAINT PAUL Rarzdy C. Ke[ly, Mayor June 3, 2004 Council President Bostrom and Saint Paul City Councilmembers 310 City Hall 15 West Kellogg Blvd Saint Paul, MN 55102 390 Ciry Hatl Telephone: 651-2bb-8510 ISWestKetloggBoulevard Facsimile:6S1-266-8513 Saint Paut, MN 55102 .<_ u.�'c.t�ar�l:;==.^�:^-�,�. , e�� c� ��Q�t Dear Council President Bostrom and Councilmembers: Pursuant to Secfions 6.07, b.08 and 6.09 of the City Charter, I am vetoing Council File No. 04- 545 for the reasons explained below. The proposal to build a six-unit residential development at 1070 Burgess Street has been met with considerable scrutiny and controversy. The Planning Commission reviewed the developer's permit application and approved iY subject to conditions including a condition that the units are sold as "owner occupied" units. The District 6 Planning Council appealed the Planning Commission's decision to the City Council. The City Councii, finding that the scale and density of these residential buildings are out of scale with the other residential buildings in the immediate neighborhood, granted District 6's appeal on Apri128, 2004. Notwithstanding the controversy this development has prompted in the surrounding neighborhood and the City Council's finding of error in the Plavniug Commission's decision to approve tk�e development, I am compelied, upon the advice of the City Attorney, to veto the resolution in Council File No. 04-545 memorializing the City Council's decision to grant the appeal by the District 6 Planning. As Mayor, I am constrained to follow the law. In making this veto, I am not commenting upon the proposed development, the decision of the Planning Commission or the decision of the City Council. The City Attorney has advised that the acrion taken by the City Council in Council File No. 04-545 to grant the District 6 Planning Council appeal is without legal force because the City Council's decision was made after the expiration of the time period dictated by state law witlun which a fmal decision on zoning applications must be rendered. This rule of law was only recently announced in the case of Moreno v. City of Minneapolis on March 9, 2004. The holding in that case has prompted the City to examine steps to insure that the important and valuable citizen participation process which has been a hallmark of success in the City's plam�ing process will continue to have a special place in the City's future planning � processes. Finding the proper balance in light of this Court ruling may well be difficult. I recognize that the City Council understands the burdens that this recent case has placed on the City's current zoning practices. I also hope that the City Council recognizes that the City must conduct its zoning practices in accordance with the law. For that reason, I am reriirning this veto of Council File Na. Q4-545 to you. Sincerely, y� �. Randy C. elly Mayor � city of saint pau! planning commission reso{ution � t� - 5� 5 file number 04-13 date February 27. 2004 WNEREAS, John Tittle, File # 04-019-969, has applied for a Condifional Use Permit for six-unit (3 twinhomes) cluster development under the provisions of §60.413('13) of the Saint Paui Legislative Code, on property located at 1070 Burgess St., Parcei fdenfification Number (PIN) 26-29-23-32-0�39, fegaily described as Ka(man's Division No. 3 Addition to the City of St. Paul, Minn. Lots 7, 8, 9, 22, 23, N'/2 of Vac St Ad� and Lot 24; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Committee of the Planning Gommission, on February 5, 2004, held a public hearing at which afl persons present were given an opportunity to be heard pursuant to said appiication in accordance with tfie requirements of §64.300 of the Saint Paui Legislative Code; and WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Pianning Commission, based on the evidence presented to its Zoning Committee at the pub(ic hearing as subsfantiaily reflected in the minutes, made the following findings of fact: 1. The property consists of 6 existing lots and part of a vacated street. Because the back three lats have no street access, the propefij is being developed as one parcei with access from Burgess. 2. §60.413(13) permits cluster development, subject to the foffowing conditions: a. There sha/l be a minimum of two (2) units. This condition is met. The applicant is proposing six units. b. The units shali be attached, common wali, single-famiJy, with no unit intruding on the vertical airspace of any other unit. This condifion is met. The appiicant wilt construct three 2-unit side- by-side attached structures. Each unit is a separate single famify residence. c. The parcel sha!! meef the lot area required per unif in the zoning disfrict. This condition is met. The iot area required in the R-4 district far 6 units is 30,000 sq. ft. The parcel is over 32,000 sq. ft. in size. d. The parce! shall have a minimum frontage of eighfy (80) feet on an imp�oved street. This condition is met. The parcel has 120 feet of frontage on Surgess St. e. The structure sha!l conform to the schedule af regulations for heighf, lot coverage, setbacks and parking. This condition wilt be met. The structures meet the code requirements for height, 1ot coverage, and parking. The applicant has agreed to revise his pians so that the development meets the front yard setback requirement. f. The design shall be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. This condition is met. The surrounding area is low density residential development with one and two-story structures. This development will be iwo stories on Burgess with walk-out basements. g. Individuai lots, buiidings, street and pa�king areas shaii be designed and situated to minimize moved by Fieid seconded by in favor Unanimous against city of saint pau( planning commission resolution file number 04-13 date February 27. 2004 �: ° .r r � x, -� `;• ,� WHEREAS, John Tittle, File # 04-019-969, has appfied for a Condifiona{ Use Permit tor six-unit (3 twinhomes) c{uster development under the provisions of §60.413(13) of the Saint Paul Legisiative Code, on property located at 1070 Burgess St., Parcel Identification Number (PIN) 26-29-23-32-0139, fegafly described as Kalman's Division No. 3 Addition to the City of St. Paul, Minn. Lots 7, 8, 9, 22, 23, N%z of Vac Sf Adj and Lot 2�; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Committee of the Planning Commission, on February 5, 2004, hetd a public hearing at which ali persons present were given an opportunity to be heard pursuant to said appiication in accordance with the requirements of §64.300 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code; and WHEREAS, the Saint Paui Planning Commission, based on the evidence presented to +ts Zoning Committee at the public hearing as substa�tiafly reflected in the minutes, made the foflowing findings of fact: 1. The property consists of 6 existing lots and part of a vacated street. Because fhe back fhree lots have no street access, the property is being deve4oped as one parcei with access from Burgess. 2. §60.413(13) permits cluster development, subject to the following conditions: a. There sha// be a minimum of fwo (2) units. This condition is met. 7he applicant is proposing six units. b. The unRs sha// be atfached, common wall, single-family, with no unit intruding on the vertical airspace of any other uniL This condition is met. 7he applicant wilt construcf three 2-unit side- by-side atiached structures. Each unit is a separate single family residence. c. The parcel sha/! meet fhe /of area required per unit in the zoning district. This condition is met. The lot area required in the R-4 district for 6 units is 30,000 sq. ft. The parcel is over 32,000 sq. ft. in size. d. The parcel shall have a minimum frontage of eighty (80) feet on an improved street. This condition is met. The parcel has 120 feet of frontage on Burgess St. e. The structure shall conform fo the schedule of regu(afions for height, lot coverage, setbacks and parking. This condition will be met. The structures meet the code requirements for height, lot coverage, and parking. The appiicant has agreed to revise his pians so that the development meefs the front yard setback requirement. f. The design shall be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. This condition is met. The surrounding area is low density residential developmenf with one and twastory structures. This developmenf will be iwo stories on Burgess with wa4k-out basements. g. lndividuaJ iots, buiidings, street and parking areas shall be designed and situated to minimize moved by Field seconded by itl favot" Unanimous against _ _ Zoning �ite 04-019-969 February 2i, 2004, Pianning Commission Resolution o�b —��. � Page 2 alteration of the natura! features and topography. This co�dition is met. The'steep siope on the properFy wi!! be used irt developing the walk-out basements for the units. Because of the clustering of the houses, mature trees at the rear of #he sife wilt be presetved, and a stormwater pond located there. h. Applications for cluster development sha!! include site plans, rncluding landscaping and elevations and other information fhe planning commission may request. This condition is met. The applicant has submitted plans. 3. §64.400(d) lists five standards that att condifional uses musf safisfy: (1) The e�ctent, locafion and intensity of the use wi11 be in substanSal complrance wifh the Saint Pau! Comprehensive PJan and any applicable subarea plans which were approved by the cify council. This condition is met. The use will retain the density of the R-4 district where it is located and will provide addifional housing opportunities as recommended in the Housing Policy Plan 5.4, which states: "...encourage a diversity of building and unit types to meet the diversity of the market." (2) The use wil! provide adequafe ingress and egress to minimize traffrc congestiort in the publrc streets. This condition is met. The site will be served by a one-way drive thaf wifl provide access to the garages in the back while providing adequate access and avoiding traffic congestion. (3) The use will not be detrimental to ti�e existing characfer of the development in the immediate neighborhood or endanger the public health, safefy and general welfare. This condition is met. The use will be consisteni with the exisfing development irt the area and wilt be constructed according to building codes that ensure the public heaith, safety, and general weffare. (4) The use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the drstrict. This condition is mef. The use will provide new investrnent in this neighborhood and will not have a negative impact on improvements to surrounding properties. (5) The use shall, rn all oUier respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. This condition is met. The project has gone through sife plan review and will meet ali applicable city codes. NOW, THEREFdRE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Saint Paul Planning Commission, under the authority of the City's Legislative Code, that the application of John Tittle for a Conditional Use Permit for a six-unit {3 twinhomes) cluster development at 1070 Burgess St. is hereby approved subject to the foltowing conditioRS. 1. In accordance with §64.300(e), which authorizes the planning commission to attach reasonabie conditions and limitations in granting an approvat, the intent of tfie R-4 zoning district to provide for an environment of predominantly tow-density, one-family detached dweilings, and the applicanYs stated inten6on to sell the units as owner-occupied buildings, each of the six units shall 6e sold to owner-occupants and not rented. 2. The applicant comply with ali site plan review requirements. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Manha G. Futler, Director �^� � �;-�.� CITY OF SAINT PAUL Randy C. Kelly, Mayor March 26, 2004 Ms. Mary Erickson City Council Research Office Room 310 City Hall Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 Dear Ms. Erickson: �1 � lSWu[FourthStreei Te(epfione:651-266-67Q0 SainiPauI,MN55102 Facsimile:651-218-3220 I would like to confirm that a public hearing before the City Council is scheduled for Wednesday, April 28, 2004, for the following zoning case. Zoning File Number: Applicant: Address: Purpose: Previous Action: 04-061-010 District 6 Ptanning Gouncif 1070 Burgess St., between Lexington & Oxford Appeal of Planning Commission approval of Conditional Use Permit for a six-unit, (3 hvinhome) cluster development Zoning Committee Recommendation: approve with conditions, 6- 0, February 19, 2004 Planning Commission Recommendation: approve with conditions, unanimous, February27, 2004 I have confirmed this day with Councilmember Montgomery's office. My understanding is that this pubiic hearing request will appear on the agenda for the April 21, 2004, City Council meeting and that you will publish notice of the hearing in the Saint Paul Legal tedger. Please ca{I me at 651-266-6639 if you have any questions. Sinc rely, _ �� aorx;EOr Pae�iC � �f _The sazr;c wiu c�r. City Planner cc: File #: 04-019-969 04-061-010 Applicant: District 6 Planning Council John Tittle Paul Dubruiel Wendy Lane Carol Martineau Allan Torstenson al 5:30 p.m, in. �eAo� Ba�vlevard, B�t to wusider tT� apyeslof � Cmm� W a de�d- "v� Commiaxiw+ aqprw UaeP�nat 6os a�c vse� etusteF develvpment� ak reet (betwe� L�tm� 0.� ;. .�iJ � �. �; +. r� .,� �« - L:Wmanda�ZOmna\CCdocs\04-061-OlOccrn.wpd AA-ADA-EEOEmployer CITY OF SAINT PALTL Randy C. Kelly, Mayor ?� * SAINT YAUL � AAAA� � • April 19, 2004 Ms. Mary Erickson DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Martha G. Fu11er, Dirutor � 25 Wuc Founh Street T'elephone: 65I-266-6700 SaintPauI,MIV55702 F¢csimile:651-228-3120 City Council Research Office - Room 310 City Hall Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 Re: Zoning File #: 04-061-010 Applicant: District 6 Planning Council Address: 1070 Burgess St., beriveen Lexington & Oxford. Purpose: Appeal of Planning Commission approval of Conditional Use Permit for a six-unit, (3 twinhome) cluster development. City Council Hearing: April 28, 2004, 530 p.m., City Council Chambers Staff Rebommendation: Approve with conditions District Council: Deny Zoning Committee Recommendation: Approve with condifions, February 19, 2004, vote: 6- 0 Support: 0 Opposition: 8 people spoke, 401etters in opposition Planning Commission Decision: Approve with conditions, Febmary 27, 2004, vote: unanimovs StaffAssigned: Patricia 7ames, 651-266-6639 „� Attachments: Appeal application and attachments Planning Commission pemut and resolution Planning Commission minutes, February 27, 2004 Zoning Committee minutes, February 5 and 19, 2004 Coaespondencereceived Staff Report packet cc: Applicant: District 6 Planning Council John Tittle City Council Members District Council: 6 Wendy Lane Larry Soderholm Allan Torstenson Peter Warner L:\Amanda�Zoe'mg\CCdas\04-061-0SOxpY28-OCCCCLwpd AA-ADA-EEOEmployer APPLICATION FOR APPEAL Depastment of Planning and Economic Development Zoning Section I400 GYty Hall Annex 25 K'est Fourth Street Saint Pau1, MN SSIO2-Z634 i651) 266-6589 _ _ ' � t .:_ : ��6 Feet -�' Tei�ta#ive APPLICANT PROPERTY ZoningFileName_ �plws� '('=-1--W-I.p. �f7tf—I'Z LOCATtON Address/Location 1Q�b �a,ra�5s �t' Z� TYPE OF APPEAL: Application is hereby made for a�eal to the: � Board of 2oning Appeafs City Council Under the provisio� of Chapter 64, Section 2Gb Paragraph�of the Zoning Code, to appeai a decision made by the (date of GROUNDS FOR APPEAL: e � � 20�. FileNumber:_ !3�— Qi�- Q�� Explain why you feel there has been an error in any requirement, permit, decision or refusat made by an administrative otficial, or an er�or in fact, procedure or finding made by the Board of 2oning Appeais or the Planning Commission. �h. �J�.I� l�' 0-4� - �`►e a+� r�"�e1e.+� w� ecm�, fi� � t� The us-e ��'. �+ r3 �'3) ��es de��o�r�•e� 4's no�" ap,�r� f's�e �r �F�n.�S � 9-�e � ae� c�-F��Y� z) P��.c.�n� 3�to�6 t� h�flwa-� a� ��-i- � a ��. b�'es�` `�. GQ� ��: �.�- o-� � -�.�-1�� a�.�� , � �.� p�� s�-�� s � �;� ��1 �x��,�d - h,� �.e��.fi a�f t�+� aad ��.�- ��J a� � n� �o� ��-� b�-� �s�� .�� additionalsheetifnecessary) ��.�� r�_� P „�� p IKC Applicant's Si nature l�. � 3� ( ��L� g /_ , _ _� �� Z�� Date � °- (c�- � y City Agent�_ City �i- �.� (, St. �Zip .�-� 11'7 Daytime Phone� - � �-''� � ' �r � 1) continued_ It is our understanding that cluster development as used in the legislative code was to be used to save wet lands and to mu�imize green spaces and other • amenities. This site consists of "buildable lots" * that if properly used would not have a negative impact on the neighborhood. *Nfr. Tittie's testimony at the November 25, 2003 meeting ofLITTF. 2) continued. Each of these units is a duplex, not any different than other similar structures that the city requires a lot that is at least 50 feet wide. There is no justification for creating 20 foot lots. 3) continued. Neighboring homes aze one story. Although these may not be a technical violation of the height requirement when measured from the highest elevation at the front of each unit, we do not believe that is what the code provides. When measured from the side or back, these buildings cieariy exceed the aliowabie height. 4) The requirement that site plans include landscaping has not been met. As proposed the site wiil have 5 foot side yard set backs 20 feet of driveway and 90 feet of huilding structure. This appeazs to be more like an apartment building than singte family dwellings. 5) One of the requirements of 64.400 (d) is "adequate ingress and egress". In his explanation of the condition of the driveways Mr. Tittle states that there wiil be a rise of 7.5 feet per 50 feet of driveway. The survey of the property indicates a steeper grade. Even if fill is used to obtain the 7.5 to 50 ratio that will increase the grade where the garages are to be built. How much fiil is going to be used and how will that affect the trees that Mr. Tittle has promised not to cut down? � Even at a 7.5 to 50 ratio the driveways are sufficiently steep to create problems when snow and ice are present. Wili the cars be parked on the street? There are no walkways to the back of the property. The site plan does not appear to address the code requirement that "...driveways and parking areas will encourage pedestrian and vehicular traffic safety". 6) Mr. Tittle's stated intention to sell the uzuts as owner occupied single family dwellings does not appe.ar to be legally binding. Even if such a conuact can be legally constructed for the original purchasers how would such an agreement apply to subsequent purchases? In accordance with Sec. 64.20b the District 6 Planning Council appeals to the city council to deny the Conditional Use Pemut for 3 twin homes at 1070 Burgess St. 7ohn Thoemke Chair L� CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT �NING FfLE NO: APPL(CANT: PURPOSE: LOCATI ON: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ZONING COMMITTEE ACTION: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: 04-019-969 John Tittle o�— �lt 1 3 Conditional Use Permif for six-unit (3 twinhomes) cluster development 1070 Burgess St. PIN 26-29-23-32-Q139, KALMAN'S DIVISION NO. 3 ADDITION TO THE CITY OF S7. PAUL, MINN. LOTS 7, 8, 9, 22, 23, N 1/2 OF VAC ST ADJ AND LOT 24 Approval with conditions Approval with conditions CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT: 1. In accordance with §64.300(e), which authorizes the planning commission fo attach reasonable conditions and limitations in granting an approvai, the intent of the R-4 zoning district to provide for an environment of predominantly low-density, one-family detached dweilings, and the applicanYs stated intention to seil the units as owner-occupied buiidings, each of the six units shail be sold to owner-occupants and not rented. 2. The appficani comply with ail site plan review requirements. APPROVED BY: Gladys Morton, Commission Chairperson I, the undersigned Secretary to the Zoning Committee of the Planning Commission for City of Saint Paul, Mi�nesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy with the original record in my o�ce; and find the same to be a true and correct � y of said original and of the whole thereof, as based on minutes of the Saint Paul Planning Commission meeting heid on ruary 27, 2004 , and on record in the Saint Paul Planning Office, 25 West Fourth Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota. This permit will expire one year from the date of approval if the use herein permitted is not established, 7he decision to grant this permit by the Ptanning Commission is an administrative action subject to appeal to the City Council. Anyone affected by fhis action may appeai this decision by filing the appropriate application and fee at the Zoniag Office, 1400 City Hall Annex, 25 Wesf Fourth Street. My such appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days of the mailing date noted below. Violation of the conditions of this permit may result in its revocation. Caro� �v��.X�(� i eau Secretary to the Saint Pauf Zoning Committee Copies to: Appiicant Fiie No. Zoning Administrator License inspector District Council John Tittle 04-019-969 Wendy Lane Christine Rozek 6 Mailed: March 5, 2004 • city of saint paul � planning commission resolution file number 04-13 date February 27. 2004 � � 0� - ��-5 W HEREAS, John Ti�tle, File # 04019-969, has applied for a Conditional Use Perrnit for six-unit (3 twinhomes) cluster devetopment under the provisions of §60.413(13) of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, on property located at 1070 Burgess St., Parcel Identification Number (PIN) 26-29-23-32-0939, legaily described as Kaiman's Division No. 3 Addition to the City of St. Paul, Minn. Lots 7, 8, 9, 22, 23, N'/s of Vac St Adj and Lot 24; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Committee of the Planning Commission, on February 5, 2004, heid a public hearing at which aii persons present were given an opportunity to be heard pursuant to said application in accordance with the requirements of §64.300 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code; and WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Planning Commission, based on the evidence presented to its Zoning Comsnittee at the public hearing as substantially reflected in the minutes, made the following findings oF fact: 1. The property consists of 6 existing lots and part of a vacated street. Because the back three lots have no street access, the property is being developed as one parcel with access from Burgess, 2. §60.413(13) permits cluster development, subject to the following conditions: a. There sha!l be a minimum of two (2) units. This condition is met_ The applicant is proposing six units. b. The units shall be attacired, common wall, single-family, with no unit int�uding on the verfical airspace of any other unit. This condition is met. The applicant wili construct three 2-unit side- by-side attached structures. Each unit is a separate single family residence. c. The parcel shalf ineet fhe lat area required per unit in the zoning district. This condition is met. The fot area required in the R-4 district for 6 units is 30,000 sq. ft. The parcei is over 32,000 sq. ft. in size. d. The parcel shall have a minimum irontage of eighty (80) feet on an improved street. This condition is met. The parcel has 120 4eet of frontage on Surgess St. e. The strucfure sha(1 conform to the schedule of regulations for height, lot coverage, sefbacks and parking. This condition will be met. The structures meet the code requirements for height, lot coverage, and parking. The applicant has agreed fo revise his plans so that the development meets the front yard setback requirement. f. The design shall be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood, This condition is met. The surrounding area is low density residential development with one and two-story structures. This development will be two stories on Burgess with walk-out basements. g. Individua! lots, bui�dings, streef and parking a�eas shall be designed and situated to minimize moved by Fiefd seconded by Itl faVOf Unanimous against Zoning Fife 04-019-969 February 27, 2004, Planning Commission Resolution Page 2 p- �� alteration of the natural features and fopography. This condition is met. The steep slope on the property will be used in developing the walk-out basements for the units. Because of the ciustering of the houses, mature trees at the rear of the site will be preserved, and a stormwater pond located there. h. Applications for cluster development s/�af/ include site plans, including landscaping and elevations and other information the planning commission may request. This condition is met. The applicant has suhmitted plans. 3. §64.400(d} (ists five standards fhat a(I conditional uses must safisfy: � (1) The extent, location and intensity of the use wil! be in substantial compliance with the Saint Paul Comprehensive Plan and any applicable su6area plans which were approved by the cify council. This condition is met. The use wili retain the density of the R-4 district wfiere it is tocafed and will provide additional housing opportunities as recommended in the Housing Policy P�an 5.4, which states: "...encourage a diversity of building and unit types to meet the diversity of fhe market.° (2) The use will provide adeguate ingress and egress to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. This condition is met. The site will be served by a one-way drive that wiil provide access to the garages in the back while providing adequate access and avoiding traffic congestion. (3) The use will not be detrimental to fhe existing character of the development in the immediate neigh6orhood or endanger the public health, safety and general welfare. This condition is met. The use wiil be consistent with the existing development in the area and wiil be constructed according to buitding codes that ensure the pubiic health, safety, and generat wetfare. � (4) The use will nof impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. This condition is met. The use will provide new investment in this neighborhood and will not have a rtegative impact ort improvements to surrounding properties. (5) The use shall, in all other respects, conform to fhe applicable regufations of the disfrict in which it is Iocated. 7his condition is met. The project has gone through site plan review and will meet all applicable city codes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Saint Paul Planning Commission, under the authority of the City's legislafive Code, that the applicatio� of John Tittle for a Conditional Use Permit for a six-unit (3 twinhomes) cluster development at 1070 Burgess St. is hereby approved subject to the following conditions. 9. !n accordance with §64.300(e), which authorizes the planning commission to attach reasonable conditions and limitations in granting an approval, the intent of the R-4 zoning disfict to provide for an environment of predominantly 1ow-density, one-family detached dwellings, and the appiiqnt's stated intention to sell the units as owner-occupied buildings, each of the six units shall be sold to owner-occupants and not rented. 2. The appiicant comply with ati site plan review requirements. . � � Saint Paul Planning Commission City Hall Conference Center 15 KeIIogg Boulevard West !ltinutes of February 27, 2004 a �� - � � ��. v � � �i A meeting of the Planning Commission of fhe City of Saint Paul was held Friday, February 27, 2004, at 8:3Q a.m. in the Conference Center of City Hati. Commissioners Mmes. Donnelly-Cohen, Faricy, McCall, Morton, Shortridge, and Trevino; Present: and Messrs. Ale�nder, A1ton, Aafang, Coletta, Field, Fotsch, Johnson, Kramer, Me}ia, and Scott. Commissioners Mmes. �Zimmer Lonetti; and Messrs. *Dandrea, *Gordon, Kong, and *Mardell. Absent: . *Excused f ? �J Also Present: Larry Soderholm, Planning Administrator; Patricia James, and Mary Bruton, Department of Pianning and Economic Development staff, and Tom Beach, L.I.E.P. staff. I. Approval of minutes of February 13, 2004 MOTION: Commissioner Fotsch moved approval of the minutes of February 13, 2004. Commissionerponnelly-Cohen seconded the motion. The motion c¢mied unanimously nn a voice vote. Chair's Announcements i'i. Chair Johnson reported that the Steering Committee met this morning and discussed guest speakers for ffie coming year and stated that it is the intention of the Planning Commission to reach out to the community and make contacts with as many stakeholders and groups as possible to try to understand the needs of the citizens of the ciry better so that the commission can be effective in developing and implementing planning policies. Plannina Administrator's Announcements 11 Ciry Council business on 2/25/04: - Rezoning at Marshall and Westem for multi-famiiy hovsing was given final approvaI. - Rezonings on Wells Street and for Habitat for Humanity neaz the Ravoux high-rise aze moving ahead. - The Univeisity/L,��ngton & Snelling TOD Plan and the Universiry/Dale TOD Plan were given final approval_ - There was a pubIic heazing on the rezonings azound UniversitylDale and they were recommended for approvai on March 3x • �` - � : � Council agenda for 3/3/04: � - Accept grants for the refurbishing of Wilkins Auditorium and the Trillium Site. Grant applications for trails on Fumess Pkwy, and at Mary Puk, and for six soccer fields to be buiIt at the Sandy Lake site in Maplewood. • The Aovsing Action Ptan for 2004 is up for fmal adoption. First reading of the Stormwater Management Ordinance. Mr. SoderhoJm stated that the Ciry now has a$icyc2e/Pedestrian Coordinator, Eric Thompson, and he is setting up a Walkable Cit�es Workshop that witl take place on Friday, April 23`�. They will be focusing on the Da1e/Como/Front iniersection. Mr. Soderholm menuoned PIanning professor Bazbara Lukerman, Univecsiry o£ Minnesota, recentIy received the National Award for Distinguished Leadership by a Professional Ptanner from tfie American Planning Association. She was selected from 190 nominees. She has been a great influence on pIanning in Minnesota and has been a mentor to some of PED's p]anners. One of them is Donna Drummond, who this week was elected Chair of the Richfield Planning Commission. IV. Zoning Committee Commissioner Fie13 gave t�e Zoning Cor�i�tee report. OLD BUSINESS #04019-969 John Tittie - Conditioaal Use Permif for six-unit (3 twin fiomes) cIuster � development. 1070 Burgess St., between Le�tiaa on & Oxford. (PatriciaTcnnes, 651/266-6639) Commissioner Field stated District 6 recommends denial. No one spoke in support. Eight parEies spoke ia ogpo;ition; and 40 Ietters were received in opposition. The public hearing was closed. The Zoning Committee recommended approval with conditions on a vote of 6-0. MOTION: Commissioner Field moved the modifred Zoning Commillee's recommendation to approve the condrtionad use permit The yrwtion carried rmanimously oa a voice vote. 03-383-303 Vetmeir Companies for CVS Pharmacv - Site plan review for a new CVS Pharmacy. The pIan calls for a 13,000 sq. foot, one-story retail building on the comer of University aud Sneiling with a pazking lot a[ong Sfierburne to the north of the building. 1581 University Ave., NW coraer at SnelIing. (Tom Beach, 65I/�66-9086) Commissioner Field stated the District Councils requested a public heariug. Two parties spoke in support. Twenty-three parties spoke in opposition. The public hearing was cIosed. The Zoning Commiftee recommended approval with conditions on a vote of 3-2 (Faricy, FieId}. • � � �. XII. � � New susiness ATOne. Adjoutwnent Meeting adjourned at 9:38 a.m. Recorded and prepaz�d by Mary Bruton, Planning Commission Secretary Pianning and Economic Deveiopment Departmeni, Ciry of Saint Paul Respectfully submitted, L �� y� ... �. �� •.. ,• �.,. � .. . PED1BruWn�Miautes�February 27,.2004 _ -;� Approved (Date) e �( j� c.�- e cCali Secretary of the Planning Commission MINUTES OF THE ZONING COMMITTEE Thursday, February 5, 2004 - 3:3U p.m. '" City Gouncii Chambers, 3rd Floor � �� -�=' .� • City Hai1 and CourE Houss 15 West Keflogg Boulevard PRcSENT: Alfon, Anfang, Faricy, Kramer, Morton, and Mejia ABSENT: Fieid and Gordon STAFF: Patricia James, Carol Marfineau, Allan Torstenson, and Peter Warner The meeting was chaired by Commissioner Kramer. John TitEle- 04-019-969 - CondiYiona! Use Permit far six-unif (3 twinhomes) cfuster development. 1070 Burgess SY., between Lexington 8� Oxford. Patricia James presenfed the staff reporf with a recommendation of approvai with conditions for the Conditional Use Permif. She also stated District 6 recommended denial and 39 letters of opposition were received. John Tittie, the applicant, described the six-unit cluster development and stated they woufd selt as singie- family homes. He also stated the trees would be left fo act as a buffer to the railroad tracks. Craig Holmlund, 1059 Burgess St., stafed it difficult fos the {and at the rear of the site to be developed because of the low elevation. With fhe garages across the back Yhere would be no room for snow removal. During avy snowfalis peopie would be forced to park on the streets because of the problems with snow removal. railroad tracks wouid present a safety issue for families with chiidren. He also went on to explain fhat the eighborhood does not obJect to devefopment of the property as long as the buildings work with the esthetics of the property. Single family homes would work with access to the street so garbage cans cou4d be easity moved to the street for pick-up and ailow back yards thaf chiidren could play in. Heather Cronin Ott, 992 Burgess St., exptained that the neighborhaod has concerns that a development of this Eype wilf not attract people wifh a vested interest and longevity to the neighborhood and wiif become rental property. Connie Dearborn, represenfing Viva Thomas, 1078 Surgess St., presented pictures depicting the esthetics of fhe neighborhood and stafed the majority of houses are one-story walk-outs and the proposed buildings are two stories with fuil waik-ouis, which makes the proposed buiidings too large for the neighborhood. She also explained if the mature trees stay there wi{I be no open space and the stafif report stated fhere would be open space. Robert A. Schfosmarker, 997 Stinson St., stated there wiii be a probiem with snow removal. There is a concern about the future property being turned into rental property. Malick Hoff, District 6 Planning Council, stated fhey received numerous phone caiis in opposition and that at the January 28, 2004, meeting there was strong opposition to the project. He also handed out a document listing alf the findings of opposition, Jim Seeman, 1075 Burgess St., reiterated the lot is too smail for the buildings and with the heighf of fhe dings, it wouid not fit with the character of the neighborhood. Seigel Weimy, 865 N. Oxford St., voiced concerns with the runoff causing probiems in the neighborhood and with the esthetics of the property. He also sfated that wiid life should be taken into consideration. Zoning File 04-019-969 February 5, 2004, Zoning Committee Minutes � , Page 2 � .. . �_ . - -_ � �� Karla Holmlund, 1059 Surgess St., sfated there were tra�c safefy concerns because of the traffic coming o� Lexingfon onto Burgess Sf. She a(so reiterated the water run off concerns, snow remova(, and the design of the property which she sTated "eacn unit looks like four mobi{e homes stacked one on top of the other." At the question of Commissioner Morton, Ms. Hoimlund, stated three single-family homes would be preferable. John Tittle, The applicanT, sfated he has beerz a contractor since 1972 and there has never been an officia( compiaint filed on anything that has been built by him. He went on to explain thaf the properfy does nof allow for a wider building. He also stated he was not infortned of the January meeting at District 6. He also expfained that the snow removal issue has been dea(t with and one of the garages has been deleted so a piow can access the open area in the back of the garages. He aiso s?ated that there ca,^, bs open space w th trees. Six singfe-family homes are not a good use for the property. The building proposed is in tune with the rest of the buildings in the area. At the question of Commissioner Faricy, Mr. l"ittfe stated he purchased fhe properry from Ms. Thomas. Ne aiso explained the buiidings were designed so as not to disturb Ms. Viva Thomas' easement. He also stated there woutd be a home owners association. The public hearing was closed. Ms. James clarified that there are six lots involved with this property but thtee singie family homes could not be buiit on the rearlofs unless an access was provided. At the question of Commissioner Anfang, Ms. James stated the project would be changed if a road had to � constructed to accommodate the back lots. Ailan Torsfenson explained that the code in relaTionshiQ to this property and stated six single-family houses would not be feasible on this property. After further discussion conceming the sife p(an Commissioner Faricy moved to lay over until February 19, 2004, to work on the design of the project. Commissioner Anfang seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 6-0. Adopted Yeas - 6 Nays - 0 Drafted by: Submitted by: Approved by: \_�� .lA��_�11, /A� `, � 'i Carol Martineau Patricia James Richard Kramer Recording Secretary Zoning Section Chair • MlNUTES OF T3-!E ZONING COMMlTTEE Thursday, February 19, 2004 - 3:30 p.m. City Council Chambers, 3rd Fioor • Gity Hali and Caurt Hause 15 West Keitogg Boulevard PRESENT: ABSENT: STAFF: Aiton, Anfang, Field Faricy, Kramer, and Morton Gordon and Mejia Patricia James, Carol Martineau, and Peter Wamer @` +" G � � `m� '- J The meefing was chaired by Commissioner Fieid. John Tittfe - 04-019-969 - Canditionai Use Permit fior six-unif (3 twinhomes) ciuster development. 9070 Burgess St., between Lexington & Oxford. Patricia James presented the revised site plans with a recommendation of approval with conditions for the Conditionai Use Permit. At the question of Commissioner Field, Tom Beach expla+ned that the upstairs door would have a barrier across so it cannot be inadvertently opened. The public hearing was closed. Commissioner Kramer requested that the creation of a homeowners association be made a condition of the �rmit. Commissioner 4Cramer moved approval with conditions of the Conditional Use Permit. Commissioner Faricy seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 6-0. Adopted Yeas - 6 Nays - 0 Drafted by: Submitted b: Approved by: �-�- � n��lti� ` 1 Carol Martineau Patricia James Litton Field Recording Secretary Zoning Section Chair • Disaict 6 Planning Co�neit �`�� -� 4 � : � . . ... ,�..'�,,,.1.�_;+'`iy"'H'.u�_.w.'_•..-..--1 .t...- "'r.t---.__� � �' ^_.,..,.. ,...,,.-we...e,.x✓-w.a. :R.> _ _"... w:� ::�^""ailc.ss es�:.Fd _ ° ._.a:i� �._; ti.i.'�..-_"",_.`_:e=,n4`a»��vT"` Si �'.,..^_,"` — _.. �:.:�"�..��.` 2i3 Front Avenue St Paul, MN 55117 Phone 651 488-4485 Fax fi51 488-0343 Date: February 17, 2004 �o: Board of Zoning Appeals [IIEPj 304 Lowry Professionai Suilding Room 300 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 Re: 04-019-969 — John Tittle (1070 Burgess) Addendum Dear Board of Zoning Appeals, Zoning Committee, Councilmembers Lee Helgen, and Counciimember Debbie Mantgomery: � On January 28 2004, fhe District 6 Planning Council Land Use Taskforce met and came to unanimous vote to oppose the 1070 Burgess Condifional use permit for consfruction of 6 single family townhouse clusters development, citing strong neighborhood opposition and project characteristics inconsistent with the character of fhe neighborhood. District 6 Planning Councii's Land Use Taskforce sent a letter of opposition with nine of our January 28, 2004 meeting findings in it. After a discussion with the District 6 Planning Council Land Use Taskfiorce Chair, we wouid also like to enter these Saint Paui zoning cade findings as an addendum to our last ietter of opposition: 1) Sec. 60.413 °Principal uses permitted subject to speciaf conditions": ltem #13: "Ciuster development, subject to the foilowing conditions: Letter F: "The design shalf be compstibls with the surrounding neighborhood". Letter.G: "Individual lots, buildings, streef, and parking areas shall be designed and situated to minimize aftera#ion of the natural features and topography". C� District 6 Land Use —1 D70 Burgess addendum — page 2 . 2) Sea 64.300 °Planning Commission and planning or zoning administrator approval": Letter C.: `Review procedures; hearing and notices required. The planning commission, or the planning or zoning administrator where delegated, sha(t investigate fhe circumstances of each such case. When the a�fhority has not been deiegated fo the planning or zoning administrator, the ptanning commission shall make no decision until after a pubfic hearing has been conducted by the pianning commission or the zoning committee of fhe planning commission. The pianning commission or zoning commitEee shall send notice of the fime artd piace of any hearing to all parties who may, in ifs apinion, be affected by its decision, which shall in alt cases include a!1 owners of record of property within three hundred fifty (350) feet of the premises in question. Such notices shall be delivered personaily or by mail addressed to the respective owners af tF�e address given in the most curcent Ramsey C�unty property taxafion records. Letter D: "Conditionat use permit; gene�al standards. Before the p)anning commission may grant approval of a principal use subject to the speciai conditions, the commission shal( find that: 1) the extent, location, and intensity of fhe use will be in substantial compliance with the Saint Paul Comprehensive Plan and any appiicabte subarea p(ans which were approved by the city council. 2) the use wi�l provide adequate ingress and egress to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. 3) the use wi)i not be detrimental fo the existing character of the developmenf in the . immediate neighborhaod or endanger the public heafth, safety, and general welfare. 4j The use wiil not impede the normal and orderly developmenf and improvement of Yhe surrounding property for uses permitted in the distr'rcf. 5) the use shall, in ail other respects, conform to the appliqble regulations of the disfricts in which it is Iocated. r � LJ Q ,�t. _ r {, � District 6 Land Use —1070 Burgess — page 3 • The District 6 Pianning Council's Land Use Taskfotce would fike to adci a chronofogicai order of events on the 1 d70 Burgess matter: • Mr. John Titfle —1070 Burgess- came inEo our November 25, 2Q03 meeting for information only purposes • November 25, 2�03 Land Use Task Force voted to take no action on anything sn regards to Mr. John Tittie's 1070 Burgess projecf, because the presentation was for information-only, and the community had nof been notifed. • December 31, 2003 Conditionai Use Permit application states: "Appiicant met with District 6 Pianning Councif on November 25, 2003. The District 6 Planning Council has no objections to this proposed cluster developmenf." Again, the 107Q Burgess applicant did not ask for a vofe on this project. Thus it was incorrectly stated that the District 6 Land Use Taskforce had no opposition on the above project. • On January 28, 2004, the Oistricf 6 Land Use Taskforce meets and votes to oppose the 1070 Burgess due to severaf findings and sfrong neighborhood opposif+on • Malik Holt, District 6, Program Coordinator & Community Organizer, and several 1070 Burgess area neighborhood residents attend the Zoning Committee meeting on February 5, 2004 to state strong opposition to the above project ;. If there are any further questions or concems from any of the parties involved, D'sstrict 6 Planning Coun �I ca be reached at 651-488�485. Thank you. �"—'.... (`�-9� � G . s . Malik Hoft on behalt of the Disfricf 8 Land Use Taskforce . Community Organizer/Program Coordinator . Disirict 6 Planning Council Cced Counciimember Lee Helgen Counciimember Debbie Montgomery Patricia James. PED John Hardwick, L(EP C� 2-21-�3 Dear Plannin° Commiccion Member: We are writing as representatives for our communiry block club tfie Como Addition O� neighborhood consists of over 100 residences. We are writing on behatf of everyone who lives on Burgess, Tapping, Stinson, and From between Lexington and Chatswortli streets. John Tiffie, a landlord who owns several renral units in our neighborhood (but does not live here himsel� has recendy applied for a Conditional Use permit in order to build a cluster development at 1070 Bnrgess. We wish to voice our conoems and ask that the permit not be recommended at this time. • The zoning code states that use will not be detrimental to the immediate chazacter of the neighborhood. We feel that the current design plan does not fit with tfie existing neighborhood azchitectiue. We are a community ofpredominantty single family homes. We would like to see these types of residences be btult in our area. •'i'he code also states that the plans will provide adequate ingress and egress to m;,,;r�,;�e traffic congestion in pubIic sueets. We feel certain tt�at the proposed development will eventually become rental properry. In our experience rentai properties seem to facilitate much more slreet parking and � iaflux of tzaffc m the azea_ • The zoning code also states that the proposed deve2opment wiZt not impede uormat and orderty development and improvement of the surrounding properties. We have been casually informed that the landiord who is scekiag this permit has just made an offer to buy the properry nezct to 1070 Burgess. We fear that this will propagate more housing developments which aze not conducive to the future vision of tbis neighborfiood. • We are a blossoming commimity. Many yowng families haue moved to these three streeu witi� fiopes of raising families here. Several of these new neigt�bozs have indicazed that they may choose to leave tbis aze� if this kind of development is allowed to be built • The Zoning Committee's request thst Mr. Titt1e establish a homeowners' association does not reassnre us, and it won't ensure tbat acd�al homeowners will live at Yhe address. . We understaud that Mayor Kelly is encoucaging more housing for St Paul. Please do not mbber stamp tltis permit to m�t St Paul's housiag needs. We feel tfiat Iarger neigttbarhoods coutd better support this b�sden. As a wmmunity, we aze trying to encoiaage atl the people living in this neighborhood to become pioactive in city govanment. We want the people who live here to have a ve�ed irnerest in current and fudae issues conceming o� azea As mnch as we respect our neighborhood renters, they cleazly do not exhibit �e actions that woutd reflect a tong temx commitment to our cooperative ca¢ses. We are pleased to ttave new housing buitt here. We would welcome any new housing that is desgaed to blend m with the cmrent struct�ses on ouc streets. We feel stronglY t� SinP,le f�ilY, o��upant owned hames would better represem the syttergy we seek Thank you for yota time aud effort concerning this matter. S' y, Heather Cronin Ott Como Addition Block Club Represenhative 651 224-9197 RECEIVED � . cc: Lanri LaFavor, Como Addition Presideat FEB 2 5 2004 • � ::�, .� ; �;. � Di�trict 6 Planning Council = -- - - .,.. . � , - ;, .._ .. _ ., ,. _... .., _�_ � : ,., .. �. _ .. _ . �.. .... .. .�.. . 213 Front Avenue St. Paui, MN 55117 Phone 651 488-4485 Fax 651 488-0343 Date: February 4, 2004 To: Zoning Committee Saint Paul Commission City Council Chambers 310 City Hall 15 West Kellogg Boulevard Saint Paui, Minnesota 55102 Re: 04-019-969 — John Tittle (1070 Burgess) Dear Zoning Committee: � On January28 2004, the District 6 Planning Council Land Use Taskforce met and came to unanimous vote to oppose the 1070 Burgess Conditional use permit for construction of 6 singie fam+ly townhouse clusters deve4opment, citing strong neighborhood opposition and project characteristics inconsistent with the character of the neighborhood in addition to the following: • Construction will eliminate 6 buildable 40' lots and turn them into to 6 20' lots (city ordinance requires 40 x 120 fieet} • 6 20' foot highly condensed lots going against the character of the neighborhood • Traffic and parking issues were raised by the residents for the Burgess area • Housing density is out of piace with the immediate surroundings • District 6 Planning received over 15 calis against this construction project • Severai neighbors stated that their property values would go down and several stated they wouVd move out of the area • Neighbors and the Land Use board raised concerns about errors in the p(ans with the elevation, in addition to concems with spring water runoff into other surrounding properties • Strong neighborhood attendance and opposition at the January 28 2004 District 6 Land Use Taskforce meeting • 6 20' lots adds another possible non-owner occupied apartment buifding to the area not in character with the neighborhood �� ,/ �, -ry, �, � District 6 Land Use —1070 Burgess — page 2 � � �� ' The District 6, Planning Council's Land Use Taskforce aiso found that in the 1070 8urgess 12/31I2Q03 Conditiortal Use Permit Application, Mr. Tittle misrepresented fhe decision for his presentation at our November 25, 2003 meeting. Mr. Tittle came before the November 2003 Land Use Taskforce Board to provide information only on the 1070 Burgess projeet. Because there was no neighborhood representation for the 1070 Burgess area, the Districf 6 Land Use Taskforce did not make any motions and took no action. In Mr. Tittle's 12l31/2003 Conditional Use Permit Application, he misrepresented the November 2003 Land Use Taskforce's action to fhe preparer or assistant preparer of the application that: "Applicant met with District 6 Planning Council on November 25, 2003. The District 6 Planning Council has no objecfions fo this proposed cluster development." District 6 Land Use Taskforce expressed a major concem with this misrepresentation. If there will be any future meetings about this matter, then District 6 Planning Council and its Land Use Taskforce is committed to making sure a representative wili be at any and ali meetings to continue our opposition to this project as it is stated. If there are any further questions or concems from any of the parties involved, District 6 Planning Councii can be reached at 651-488-4485. Thank you. Malik Hoit vn behalf of the Disfrict 6 Land Use Taskforce Community Qrganizer/Program Coordinator District 6 Planning Council Cced Councilmember Lee Helgen Councilmember Debbie Montgomery Patricia James, PED r 1 � C� i 1 s�' �� , , , - �; i �1 U • Tiiere will be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the CounciI. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tittle's proposal are aua.ilable from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 aY the Depaztment of Planning & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cars wkere there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire biock is single-family homes on lazge lots. The next house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would he totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apariment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exactly like investment properiy designed to be re�ed out, not at all reflective of the curxxent neighborhood. There aze density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Const�ucting six fiousing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided da not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the froirt and back, not reflected in the buiiding plans. This plan was denied approval from District 6 Planning Council, but Mr. Tittle preseated it "that they had no objection to his plan". They had many objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed clnster development. If you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Karla Holmlund 6514871653 or Kathp Myers 651488 2750. Piace comments oa reverse side. " I am ��tQ o os �� at 1070 Burgess" �J'�! ' O V V signed� `�ri, 7e!��o date 3 J �"� � o y address �0,; g�3vr �s s ��, phone 6 s S+St 7- /G S 3 z mf �3 , -. � ;� r= �s NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS • There will be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cazmot_ attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tiitle's �5roposal are available from Patricia 3ames (651 266 6'700 at the Department of Pl annin� � Economic Developmeirt ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for b families with garage space for 12 cars whare there is now one fiome at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on lazge lots. The next house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. T'hese ta�I twin homes would be totally out of place. Tlris is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the Iaad use meeting it was said that it would Iook lke you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exactty ]ike im�estmern property designed to be reated out, not at all reflective of the cmreat neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially only 3 Iots face Burgess, 12d feet. In fitting � with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Consri�ucting six housing umts gives each one oaly 20 fezt. The plans provided do not accauaYety refle.ct the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the fro� and back, not reflected in the buiiding ptans. This ptan was denied sppruval from District 6 Planaing Conncit, but Mr. Tittie presented it "that thep had no objection to his plan". They had many objedions and so do we the aeighbors to Yhis pmposed daster developmeaL If you eanuot attend on Feb 5 please sign Uiis note and give it M Ksrta Holmlund 651487 2653 or Kathy Myers 651488 2750. Place comments on reverse side. " I am opposed to the proposed development at 1070 Burgess" � signed date y / / i address /O�z �Z-�sr ��' phone G�/� 73° �� 5� � 3 � f' � � � � • NEIGHBOiZS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a publie meeting Thnrsday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City HalI Please a#end. 7f you canaot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tittle's proposal are available from Patricia 3ames (651 266 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Developmeat ) The plan. is for 3 twin homes for 6 favilies with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of ow neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on large lots. The ne:ct house at 1078 is a s,ngle-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. Tiris is a iamily neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 gazage stalls, says aparhnern, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you pazked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of umt looks eYactly like investment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current neighborhood. There are density issues. dfficially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing s'vr housing units gives each one oniy 20 feet. The pians provided do not accurately reIIect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans, This glan was denie� approval from Distrct 5 Pla��ing �ounc�, but Pvir. Tittte presented it "that they had no objection to his pian". They had manp objections and so do we the neigLbors to this pmQosed claster devetopment If you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Karla $oimlund 6514871653 or Kathy M�ers 651 A88 2'750, Place comments on reverse side. . ii i� � r�• � �'i � � �� •� �• i� u• i 1 1� - , . . � . � .� .. .��I_ i . , �� f . ' / , r . ' .� � ' . , Y �Y . • _ J � sf.f . I��L �1� 1 1 I ' � "' �,, / � 1 V ` f y / . • N � Y ��' �3 NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT i070 BURGESS There will be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attead. ffyou caouot attend please sign our petition or send your own Ietter to the Counc�. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tittle's proposal are available from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Depariment of Planning & Economic Development ) Phe plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage space for T2 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the chazacter of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-faznily homes on large lots. Tfie n�,xt house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes wouid be totally out of place. Tliis is a family aeighboihood. One loag stretch of �2 garage stalts, says apartmem, not family. At the land" use meeting it was said that it would look liice you parked b mobite homes lengthwise. This type of umt looks exactly tike invesiment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current neighborhood. There aze density issues. Officially oniy 3'lou face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of �he homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing scr housing umts gives each one only 20 feet. The pL�ns pzovided do not aecurately refle�t the site. There is at Ieast a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected ia the building plans. T?ais Dlan was alenied aaproval froffi District 5 Planning C�uncil, bu: 1�Ir. Tittle presented i# "that they had no objection to his plan". They had many otijections and so tlo we the neighbors to this proQosed duster developmenY. If you cannot attend on Feb 5 Qle�se sign this note and give it to Karla Holmlund 5514871653 or�thy IVlpers 651488 2750. Plaee comments on reverse side. " I aa� opp �ed ta the.pro�►osed developmeat at 1070 Burgess" S�� - . aa� 1 ' `�` — ° �( • r � L J address l �3 °l � r o �-�- �� phone G 5 / - � �-`� - � � Sa • s mf �� IG��3R5 �F PROP�SED �EVE�fl�'l�l� AT 14'7� �IJi�G�,S T'here wiIi be a public meeti�g Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Council., Copies of Mr. John Tittle's proposal are avaiIable from Patricia James (651 266 6700 at the Depamnent of Plannin� � Bconomic i�evelogmem ) The glan is for 3 tu�in homes for 5 fanulies with sarage space for 12 cars wnere �nere is now one home at 1070 Burgess. V . The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is singie-family homes on lazge lots. The next house at 1078 is a singie-family low ranch. These tall twin homes woutd be totally out of piace. This is a fawily neighborhood. One long stretch of I2 garage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you pazked 6 rnobile homes lengthwise. Tlus type of unit looks �actly like investment praperty desi�ed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current neighborhood. � � There are density issues. O�cially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feat. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 housas in that space Constructing six housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at leasz a seven-foot drop between the front and bac1S not reflected in the building plans. T�is pian �vas deaie�i an�sr�val fro�a �istriei �5 P�ammin� �'a�nc:3, �a�i ?�,. Tittie gresented it "that they had no objec#ion to his Qlan". They had many objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed ciuster devedo}sment If you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it Yo Y�arla Hoimlund 551487 1653 or 3�a#hy iVIyers 551 483 2750. i'lace cammeu�ts on rev�rse side. " I am npposed ia the praposerl deve�opment at 10�0 �urgess" si�e�i �- �a�e � - � � • ad��s �0 �Ll/1� p��ne ��?. j�,Z3v � �� 3� iV�IG��RS t)F PRfl�OSEI) �3�VELflPMEI�t'i' AT i070 BURGE�S � 'There will be a pubiic me�ting T'hursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City �all Please attend. If you caffiot attend glease si� our petition or send your own Ietter to the CounciL_ Copies of Mr. Tohn 'Tittle's proposat are available from Patricia 7ames (652 25fi 670Q at the Depamnent of Planning & Economic Development ) The plaa is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage sgace for :2 cars where tbere is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on large fots. The next house at 1�J'78 is a singie-family low ranch. These tall twin fiomes wouid be totaity out of place. Ttus is a family neigfiborhooci. One long stretch of 12 garage s�talls, says apartmeat, not family. At the land use meetmg it was said that it would lool� like you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. TYris type of unit looks exactly like investment property designed to be rented out, not at a11 re4ective of #he ciurem aeigtiborhood. . There are density issues. Officiatly only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet_ In fitting with the rest of the homes on the hlock there should be no more than 2 fiousas in that space Constructing six housi¢g u�ts gives eaeh one oniy 20 feet The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the bulding plans. This plan was denfle� aupr�val iz�� istrict �5 3'lanmin� �'u�nc:l, �ut �>. Tittte gresented it "that they Lad no objection to his plan". _They had many objections and so. do we the neighbors to this propased clnster develonffieat If you canaot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it #o Kar3a Holmimad G51 4871b53 or Ka#hy 1Vlyers b51 48S 2'75fl. P3ace cammeuts oa reverse sade. . " I am opposed �o th pmposed development at 1070 �urgess" s��neri da#� � _ y _ Q � �dd��ss Ja�7 L.(`JJ�90 ��G�' p�aaa.e S/ �4 0 �� • Sfi-��- �,, J S� / 0 3 7 b�' 33 0 �- 545 • . • NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Fiall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tittle's proposai are available from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cazs where there is now one home at 1070 Bwgess. The plan does not fit the character of ow neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on lazge lots. The next house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. Oae long stretch of 12 garage stails, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you pazked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exactly like investment property designed to be rerned out, not at all reflective of the current neighborhood. There aze density issues. Qfficiatly only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing six housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not refleeted in the building plans. This plan was denied approval from District 6 Pl�nning Council, but Mr. Tittle presented it "that they h�d no objection to his pian". Thep had many objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed ciuster development If you cannot attend on Feb 5 piease sign t6is note and give it to Karla Holminnd 6514871653 or Kathy Myeis 651488 2750. Place comments on reverse side. " I am opposed to the proposed deveiopment at 1070 Burgess" sign��,..,.� �� date ' . G� address ��0 ��l�p � �Z.,L phone� .-�5�1 $ °'� 3 � 0�� 4� NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a pnbiic meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tittle's pmposal are auailable from Pat►icia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Department of Plazming & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 10�0 Burgess. The gtan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The eatire biock is single-family homes on large lots. The next house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tatl twin homes would be totally out of ptace. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartment, not family. Ai the land use meeting it was said that it wovld look like you parked' 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks e�actly like iavestmem property designed to be reented out, not at ati reflecrive of tfie cutre�t neigt�borhood. There aze density issues. Officially onty 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the bIock there shou[d be no more than 2 houses in that space Constcucting six housing units gives each one only 20 fest. The plans provided do not accurately re4lect the site. There is at Ieast a seven-foot drop between the from and back, not reflected in the building plans. This plan was denied approval from District 6 Planning Connc�7, but Mr. TitHe pmsented it "thxt they had no objection to his plaw". Thep liad manp objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed clnster developmenf. If you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this nMe and give it to Karla Holminnd 652 4871653 or Kathy 1Vlyers 65! 488 2750. P)ace commeats on reverse side. " I am op,posed to the proposed development at 1070 Bnrgess" ►_'�.� I �� address�� C� d�� phone��'��g" a�?� �-r �`�-'� 1��, �;s"lo3 • � �� 9 m� 3� � } � ^ "° a r; .,a,; -... : r � -. e �� C � NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a public meeting Thnrsday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Councit. Copies of Mr. John Tittle's proposat aze availabie from Patcicia lames (651 265 6700 at the Depaz'tment of Planning & Economic Development } - The ptan is for 3 iwin homes for 6 families with garage spaca for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 $urgess. The plan does not fit the chazacter of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on large lots. The next house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tail iwin homes would be totally out of piace. This is a family neighborhood. One long sixetch of 12 garage stalls, says apar�ent, not family. At the land use meeting it was said thai it would look like you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. Tlais type of unit looks exactly like investment properry designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current neighborhood. There aze density issues. Officiatly only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Consriucting s'vs housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The pians provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the &ont aad back, not reflected in the bi:ilding plans. This plan was s�enied aQproval #'rom.Distr9e# 5 Planna�na �ouncil, buY Mr. Tittle presented it "that -Yhey had no objection to his ptan". They had many objections and so do we the neighbors ta this proposed claster development If you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Kar3a Hoimlund 551487-1653 or Kathy Myers 65i 488 2750. P�ac� comments on reverse side. " I am opposed to the pmposed development at 1070 Burgess" .,., � ' � /��, - /` 4 . • v /``' � f f ' r �I � /�'-/ / � I I �f .� ' '� � � j 1v df' 33 ��, �� m NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 Bi7RGESS There will be a pnblic meeting Thnrsday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our peticion or send your own letter to the Council_ Copies af Mr. 7otm Tittte's proposal are availabte from Patricia 5ames (651 266 6700 at the Department of Planniag & Bconomic Development ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with aarage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. T'he pian does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on large lots. The neart house at 1078 is a singie-family low ranch. These ta[I tvvin homes woutd be totally out of place. ' This is a family neighborfiood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartment, not fami2y. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked 6 mobite komes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exact[y I�7ce investment properiy. desigaed to be rerned out, not az aIl reflective of the current neighboihood. There aze density issues. Offcially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet_ _ In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block th�e should be no more r.�an 2 houses zn that space Constnicting six housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected ia the building plans. � Tf�is plan was denied approval �rom Disir_ct fi Piaanizng Cflaac�i, bat Mr, Tittle presented it "that they had no objection to his platt". They had many objections and so do we the neightiors to this proposed c[uster development, If yon canaot attend on Feb -5 please sign f6is note aad give iY #o Karla $olmtuad 6514871653 or Kathy Myeis b51 488 295D. Place eommeats�ou reverse side. " I am opposed to proposed development at i070 Burgess" sigaed � - � date s�� address �]�J 11� f�X��c� S'{'- �phone(c�/ y�- 7� f �_J � �� !1 af' �� • � C� NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your owa letter to the Counc'sl. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tittle's proposat are available from Patricia 7ames (651 266 67QQ at the Departmeat of Planning & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with guage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborfiood. The entire block is single-family homes on large lots. The next house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neigfiborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says aparmient, not family. At the land use meeting it was said thax it would look like you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exactly like inveslmern property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the cazrrem neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there shoutd be no more than 2 houses in that space Consttucting six housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. This plan was denied approval from District fi Planning Council, but Mr. Tidie presented it "that thep had ao objection to his p4an". They had many objections and so do we t6e neighbors to this proposed claster development If you canaot attend on Feb 5 please sign tleis note and give it Co Karla Holmlund 651.4871653 or Kathy Myeis 651488 2'I50. Place comments on reverse side. " I am oppased to the proposed development at 1070 Burgess" signed � date 2 G � address / o� i-.� 5� phone �S'< ��? `�� l2 oz° 33 _ ,_ NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a public meeting Thnrsday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Couneil. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tittle's proposal are available from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at ifie Department of Planning & Economic Development ) The pian. is for 3 twm homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cats where there is now one home at 10�0 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is singte-family homes on large Iots. The next house at 1078 is a sing[e-family Iow raacfi. These tall tvvin fiomes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says agartment, noY family. At the land use meeting it was said t.hat it would look like you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This, type of umt looks exactly like �ern property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the ciurern neighborhood. There are density issues. O&cially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the bicek there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing six housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The pians provided do not accurately reflect tfie site. Tfiere is ax least a seve�foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the baitding plaus. This plaa was denied approval from District 6 Planning Council, bnt Mr. Tittle presented it "that they had no objection to his plan". They had many objeetions and so do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster devetopment If pon caanot attend on Feb S please sign this note and give it to Karla Hoimtand 6514871653 or Katby Myers 651488 275Q. Ptace comments on reverse side. " I am opposed to the proposed development at 1070 Burgess" signed_ 1 �`-� � � date �`. � - address � � �2 � � �� 5 phone 6 �' �� Z� � �� • r� L_J � t3 o�- �L � � � • UF PRQPO5ED DEVELOPMENT AT 1Q70 8 � 5 � �� There will be a pnblic mcetnig Thursday Feb 5 at 3:3(i pm City Hali Ptease attend. ♦� �:IIILf .1� :;f�� :r � UI i 1 � �� A { t � ' 1.� ' { 1 / � t " t u � • 1 " ! IFN Copies of Mr. Joha T'rttie's propasat are available frtsm Pauicia lames (651 266 6700 at tI� Dep�t of Pl�ng &�conomic Development ) The ptan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families wii& garage space for 12 cars where t�ere is now one home at 1070 Burg�ess. The plan doe.s not fit the charactes of our neighborhood. The entire block is singte-family homes on large Iots. The n� house at 1078 is a�ngie-fmmiiy tow razictz These tall twirt homes would be totally out of plaae. This is a fann7y neighborhood. One iong stretcti of 12 gazage stalls, sa.ys apaztment, not famiiy. At the land use meeting it was said ihat it w�l Iook tike you parked 6 mobile homes leugthwise. Tfris type of unit looks exactly �ike inve�t property clesigned to be rented out, not at all reflective of the carrent r�ghborhood. There are density issues. Ufficialty only 3 lots face Burge.ss, 120 feet. In fitting with ihe re§t of the homes on the block there shoutd be no more thau 2 houses in that space Construc6ng six housiag timits gives each one oniy 2{? feet. The plans provided do not acauately reflect the site. Tha'e is at least a sevea-foot drop between the fro� and back, not refl� i� ihe bu7ding plans. This plaa. was denied � aPprova! from DisErict 6 pianning Coancil, bnt Mr. Tiriie presented it `�that they had eo objection to Lis pian". They had many objeetions and so do we the aeighbors to tLis psoposed cinster devetopment 7f yon cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Karla Holmlund 65I 487 1653 nr Kathy Myers 651488 2756. Phce comcnneafs on reverae side " T am opposed to the proposed development st 107U Burgess" siga �,G' date � 3 � - t aildress f b � �o �(� �� _ � phone _�� p CY �� 0�- �45 N�IGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPIVYENT AT 1070 BURGESS • There witl be a pnblic meeting Thnrsday Feb 5. at 3:30 pm City Hall Piease attead. ff you cazmot attend please sign ont petiteoa or send your owa Ietter to the _Councit. Copies of ll+�r. John Tittle's proposal are available from Patricia James (65I 26fi 6700 at the Departmem of Planning & Economic I3evetopmern ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garyge space. for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. - The plan does not fit the character of our neighbarhood. The entire block is single-family homes on targe 2ots. The next house at I078 is a singie-famity low rancki Tfiese taIl twin homes woutd be totalty out of place. This is . a famiiy neigbborhood. One long stretch of 12 gazage stalls, says apartmem, not family. P,t tlie land use meeting it was said that it would look like you pazked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of umt looks exactty like investment groperty designed to be rented out, not at aIl re#lective of the current neighborhood. There are density issues_ Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 fcet. Iu fitting with the rest of the homes oa the block there should be ao more 8�an 2 houses in that space Coaslructing six housing uaits gives each oue only 20 feet. The piaas provided do not accuratety reflect the site. Tfiere is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not refiected in the bu�ding plans. ". This g�lan was denied appraval -fro� Distr+.e# 6 Plannin� �oanc�7, but 11d�. -- Tittle presented it "that they had ao objection to Lis pian". They had manp objections and so do we the neighbors Yo Yhis proposed clester develogmeat If qoa cannot attend on Feb 5 please siga this note and give it to Karla Hotminnd 6514571653 or Kathp Mpeas 651488 2750. Plac� comments on reverse side. ., " I am opposed to the proposed developmeat at 1070 Bnrgess" signed�.tia y��ati, 4' �� .('(/ date -�3,L�,a � -'��.—.. address 1 a o� � phone � • 1� mf' 2 _. ��d,� �� • � NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS Please attend. Ttiere witl be a pnblic meeling Tharsday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall If you cannot a#end please sign our petition or send yo�r own letter to the Counc�. Copies of IVtr, 7ohn Tittie's proposai ue available from Patricia 7ames {651 266 6700 at fhe Departumern of Planning & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 twin hoines for 6 families with garaae space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1U70 Burgess. - The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes dn large lots. The ne�rt house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These taIl twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 gazage stails, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you pazked 6 mobite homes lengthwise: This tyge of unit looks �actiy like investment properiy designed to be rented out, not at all reflecdve of the current neighborhood. There aze density issues. Qfficiaily only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 kouses in that space Const�ucting si� housing units gives each one only ZO feet. � The plans provided da not accurately reflect.the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front aad back, not reflected in the building pIans. _. This �piau was denied approval frn�ss Dis#ric� 5 Planning �aunc�l, bea# ?l�,r. TitHe presented it "that they had no objeciion to his plan". They had many objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed c(nster development _ If you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and � ve it to Karla Hoimlund 65l 487 1653 or Kathy Myers b51 488 2750. Place commieats on revErse side. " I am opposed ta the praposed devei6pment at 1070 Burgess" �� t1 c:�.�___�� , r • address l C? � O � �� ti r�e, phone (Q S►- �( $-� .�U3 � � �.. � l6 m�' 33 """ �� .,� �_ � � � 9 NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOP1kIENT AT 10?0 BURGESS -, T'here will be a public meetiag Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City HaIl Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign oar petition or send your own Ietter to, the Councit. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tittle's proposat are ava7able £rom Pah James (651 266 6700 at the Department of P �anninu & Ecoaoriuc Development ) The plan is for 3. twin_hoiues for 6.families v,nth gazaDe space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is singte-famity homes on Iarge lots. The neat house at I078 is a single-family Iow ranch. These tat( twin homes wouid be totally out of place. . This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of I2 garage stalls, says apartment, not family. " At the land use meeting it was- said that it would look like you parked 6 mobite homes lengtkwise. This type of unit looks exactly tike investme� property designed to be rented out, not at all re$ective of the ciurem neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially only 3_ lots face Burgess, 120, feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on tfie biock there sfiould be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing s� ho units gives each one oaly 20 feet. The plans provided do not accittately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the fro� and bac� not re$ected in the bu�lding pians. This plan was denied agproval from �is#rict 5 PLmm�ing Couas�l, �ai l�-: Ti#!e presented it "that they had no objectioa to his plan". They had many ob}ections and so do we the neighbors to this propoaed cluster development If yon cannot attend on Feb 5 ptease sign this note aud give it Yo Karla Holminnd 6514871653 or Kattry lLlpers 651488 2750. Placa comments on reverse side. " I a� osed to the proposed development af'lU'70 Burgess" J si�► J �,�a : �� date � % g address �7G� phone � � 3 �� 1 � a a / n U � � t> ��° �3 ,�, . .� - � • � �� NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a public meeting Thnrsday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. Ifyon cannot attend please siga our petition or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. 3ohn Titt1e's proposal are available from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Departmeat of Planning & Economic Devetopment ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage space for I2 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan dces not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is singl�family homes on large lots. The neat house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totalty out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch o£ I2 garage stalis, says apartmem, nat family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look ]ike you parkad 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of umt looks ea�actiy like im�estmern property designed to be rerned out, not at all reflective of the curreat neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, I20 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes oa the block there shonld be no more than 2 houses in that space Construcpng suc housing units gives each one onIy 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. This plan was denied approval from District 6 Planning Council, but Mr. Tittle Qresented it "ithat they had no objection ta his pian". They had many abjections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster development If yon canaot attend on Feb 5 ptease sign this note and give it to Karia Holmlund 65I 4871653 or Kathy Myers 651488 2750. Place comments on reverse side. " I am opposed to address development at 1070 Burgess" date e� ? J '; phon - L D� '�� 1� mf� 3� � � �; OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 10'!0 There �iIl be a public meeting 3'hursalny Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. s w,rui • .�f �:) •� Y; y J� f ��:�1 � t t � �::):� s� �• f �� s t' s n« Copies of Mr. Iohn T'rtxie's proposat are available from Patcicia 7ames (651 26fi 6700 at the Departmerrt of Planning & Eeonomic Devetopment ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 fam�ies with garage space for I2 cars where there is �w one fiome at 1070 Burgess. The p}an dces �t fit the cbaracter of our naghborhood. The �t'sre block is singte-fannly homes oa large lots. The next hoi�se at 10?8 is a singte-�y Iaw ranch These tall twin homes wotild be totally ovt ofplace. This is a fann'ty �borhood Oae long stretch af 12 garage st�s, says apardnem, �t fa�n�ly. At tP� tamd u� a�iog it was said that it wwfid Iook I�e yott parked 6. mob7e homes I�thvvise. This type of umt looks esadty fike investmem P�P�3' de�g�d to be rented out, not at all rdiec4ive of tl� caurent �ghborhood. Theae are clet�sity issues. Officaatly anly 31ots face Burgess, 124 fee#. In fitting with ttie rest of the �me.s on ttte biock there should be � more than 2� in that space Construtxiog �x housng units give.s each a� oaly 2Q fe�. The plans provided do aot �y reHect the �te. Th�e is at teast a seven-foot drop between the front and back, nat reHected in the bu�ding ptans. This p�r was deeieti:approvat Crom D�t 6�laeuiag Counc�7, brat Di�: T'�tie presented it �iLaf t1�ey I�ad ao objedioa to Lis P�"• T�9 � m�Y objeetiens and so do we the aeighbora to ttw proposed duster devdapment 7f poe caanot attend on Feb 5 pleaae s�e this aots and give it te Kur�a H�Lolend 65t 487 2653 or Kai�p Myers 6514� 2750 Place co�m�ts aa �+eve�se side. � I am ogpesed to tke g o� a�op� at �.mo s�� signed ` �' o'i ' date �- 3-o , �. addfess �0 3 t `fin� � N� 5 f- gLone 1� S( `I 8?� t q ba � � � � 1 q .mf �3 � • L_� NEIGI�BORS OF PROPOSEI? DEYELOPMENT AT 1070 There w�t be a pnblic meeting Tharsday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hait Please attead. � ✓.�II} 1 .11 :?� ! I J `• '!1 { f � :•� ( 1 t � .�i1.1 � I ♦ � 1 J( :1 4 . I ♦ f1 Copies of Mr. John Titt1e's groposat are avaiIable from Patricaa James (651 266 6700 at the I}eparEsne.at ofPlaumn� & P.cx�namic Develapment ) The plan is for 3 twin homes fot 6 fams�ies with garage space for 12 c�s where there is now one home at 1d70 Burgess. The ptan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The etrtire block is singlo-family homes an large lots. Tire mext house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. Tfiese tatl i►uin homes wottld be totalty out of place. Tbis is a family neighborhood. One long stcetch of 12 garage stalls, says �t, not fami'ly. At tt� land use meeting it was said that h wovtd look tike you parkecl 6 mobile hame.s leagthwise. This type of unit looks exactty like investment property designeQ m be rerned wrt, not at all reflective af the cain'mt neigbborhood. There are density issues. Officisily ouly 3 lots face But�ess, 120 feet. In � with the rest of the homes on the block there shouid be no more than 2 houses ia that sPace Constructiag s� housing uaits gives each one onty 20 fe�. Tlie plans provided do not acauatedy reflect the sits. There is at least a seven foot drop between the fro� and badc, not reflected in the bu�t� pIsos- This plan vras tle�ied.appxnva[ from Dist+rict 6 Planning Connc�, bnt Mr. Tiqie prwwented it `khat they had no objection Yo his plap". They �ad many objectioas aad so do we the neig6bors to t6is propoaed cla4tcr devdopmen� 7f you c$anot a#end on Feb 5 ptease sign this note aad give it to Kuia HoLmlund 5514871653 ar Kathy Mpers 651488 2750. Place commaeuts on r�.werse side. K I am opposed to i�e addr�ss at 147fl Bnrgess" , �K �v �r� �. �� . �/ rhone ��-� � �`� � �t�' � C� ��-�� .a m� �� NEIGABORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1a70 There wiIl be a pnblic meeting Tliursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot_ attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr_ 7ohn Titt1e's proposal are availabte from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Departm�t of Plaaning & Economic Developmern ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cazs where there is now one home at I070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our netghborhood. The entire block is singie-famly homes on Iarge tots. The next house at IO'18 is a singia-family iow ranch. These tati twin homes wouid be totalty out of pIace. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage seatis, says apartmeat, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parke� 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exackiy like iavestment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the cutre� neighborhood. There are density issues. Qfficially onty 3 lots face Burgess, I20 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in ttsat space Constructing s� housing units gives each one oniy 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven foot drop between the froirt and back, not re$ected in the building plans_ This plan was denied-approval from District 6 Plaoning Counc�7, bnt Mr. Tittie presented it "that they had na objectioa to his plau". They lead many objecEions and so do we tLe neighbors to this proposed daster developmen� If pon cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign th�s note and give it to Karla Holmlund 652 4871653 or Kathy Myers 65148& 2750. Place commeats on reverse side. " I am o ed to the r os �.�-��.� sigIICa v address �i�� l )� �"� I�l�/, �l � s�"1�� at 1070 Bnrgess" date / �� U¢' � phone J � �- ra /- /U /.� � � � 7 v 2 .i � � � 3 � 0'�� +� � NLIGI�B4RS OF PROP05'ED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 SURG] There w�l be a pablic meeting T3�nrsday Feb 5 at 3:3iD p� City Hal! �,�-. _ '-�' '- � s w.lu� .raL� �:i�� Yw ♦ i'rt�t �._'�� •s i�� r� I I" ♦ n�! Copies of Mr. John T'rtxte's proposai are availaBle from PatEicia James (651 266 6'700 at the Depaztment of Planning & Bconomic DevdoFme�t ) The gian is for 3 twin ho�s for 6 families with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home aY 1Q70 Burgess. The plan does not fit the chazacter of ow neighborhood. The entire block is singie-family Homes on large fots. The ne�rt house at 1078 is a singie-familq low ranch. These tail twin homes wovtd be wtally out of piace. This is a faa�y n�gbborhood. Os� long stretch of I2 gaFage stalls, says apartmern, nat fam�y. At the laad use meeting it was said that it would iook h'tce you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of umt looks exackiy like inveslment Pr�P�Y designed to be rerned out, not at att reBective of the aur�t neighborhood There are density issues. O�caally oniy 3 Yots face Burgess, 220 feet. In fitting � witv the rsst of the Isomes on the block ti�re should be no more than 2 flousts in ttsat space Constructmg s� housing units g�ves each one oniy 20 feet. The p}ans provided do nat accuraiely reflect the site. There is at teast a seven-foot drop between the frrnrt and back, not reflected in the buildiag glans. This plan was denied.approral from Disirict 6 Piaaning Conncit, bat Mr. T'�ttte presented it "that tleep had no objectiou to �is plan". They �ad many objectioas and so do we the ne�ghbors to this proposed cMster devdopment. If yoa canaot attend on Reb 5 piease sign this note nnd giva it to Karla Ho�6o�lund 65I 4871653 or Kathy Mpers 651488 Y150. Place comments oa reverse side. K I am opposed to �e gro� development at itt7Q Bqrgess" �►ea �.(�—G� ..� ,�R,t.:�-,.��, a$r� l- 3/- o Y � address � S�'r�'%., phoae �,� � - 9 S' �- � � � � � � � � �� mf .�� NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There wiIl be a pnblic meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you caanot attend please sign our petifson or send your own Ietter to the CounciI. Copies o€ Mr. 7ohn Tittle's proposal are available from Pairicia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Departmern of Pla„rt'ng & Economic Developmeat ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 faznilies with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home ax 1070 Burgess. The plan does not frt the character of our neighborhoad. The eatire block is single-famly homes on large lots. The next house at 1078 is a singie-Pamily low rancfi. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. Ttus is a family neighborhood_ Oae long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartmeut, not family. At the ]aud � meexiAg it was said that it would look like you parked 6 mobite homes lengthwise. 3'�is � af � looks exact(y like investment pmperty designed to be �€tated ou� n�,�jl zeflectiv� of� cumnt neighborhood. There aze density iss�s: Offi�ontp 31ots face �ta�ess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the blodc �' shouid be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing s� housing tmits g�tes �h one z�ly ZO �t. The plans provided do not accurately ne�ect �e site_ There is �t I�st � seven-foot drop between the from and back, not reflected. in the building plans. " This plan was denied approval from District 6 Pf�nning Cuieaca7, but Mr. Tittle presented it "Wat thep had no objection to his p�n". T7�ey had many objectioas and sq do we the neighbors to tLis proposed clnster development Ii' yoa cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Karla Holmtund 6514871653 or Kathy Myers 651488 2750. Ptace comments on reverse side. " I am opposed to the proposed deveIopment at 1070 Burgess" signed date ! � / O �� address �� G'�� .s'.� ,��_ phone �'S/ � 3/a� —t � �� • � . • 23 mF �3� Y � f. t� - - � ..� `, � NEIGHBt'IRS OF PRUPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 2470 BURGESS There w�l be a pnblic meeting Tharsday Feb 5 at 3:3U pm City Hatl Please attend t W. IB • .Il �( � � Y: . n yl � . �.PIII � I • ��l � � 1 � • 1 ' � " \ f � 1 Copies of Mr. Iohn Tittte's proposal are available &om Patricia 7ames (b51 266 6700 at the DeQartmevt ofPlam�ing & Economic DeveIopment ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 fann'lies with garage space for 22 cazs whete there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The .plan dces not fit the character of our neighborhood, The emire block is singie-family homes on targe lots. The aext house at i078 is a singte-family low ranch. These taU t�vin homes would be totally out of ptace. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalts, says apartmeat, not fann7y. At the Tand use m�ting it was said tbat it v�rouid loak like you pazked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exactty like iuvestment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the cuir�►t neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially oaty 3 lots face Burgess, 120 fcet. in fittiag with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more thaa 2 fiouses ia that space Consh�ud'mg six hon�ag vnits gives each one onty 20 fcet. The plans provided da not accurately retlect the site. There is at least a sevein-foot dtop between the from and bact� not re8ected in the huilding p}ans, This ptan was denied.approva! from District 6 Plannirtg Conaei[, but Mr. Tittte presented it ``that they had no objectioa to his plan". They had maay objections and so do we the neighbors to tleis proposed cluster deveiopmeat If yott canaot attend on Feb 5 please sigu this aote and give it to Karla ffolmlued 6514871653 or IZathy Myers 651488 2750. Place comments on reve�se sidc. � I am opposed� t�e�� deveiopmeat at 1070 Burgess" � �v signed...��-a-�� date / 3/ 6 addre4s /03/ ST phone `s_=�� .� •uy� �� J - 2 � ° f �3 � bF PROPOSED DEVELUPMENT AT 107U BURGESS There w�l be a public mceting Thurs@ay Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Halt � >: � � � If you r.anaot attexid pte�e sign our p�tion or s�t ycxu own t� to t� Caunc�. Copies of Mr. 3olm T'�ttte's proposat arc avat7able from Patricia 7aa�s (651 266 67W at the Departm�t ofFlaaaiug & EconomicDeve�opme�t ) The p3an is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage space for i2 cars whae the�'e is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan do�s not fit the c�racter of our ne�rhood. The eatire block is singie-fam�y ho�s an large Iots. The ne�si house at 1078 is a smgle-fam�y low ranch. These ta11 twinhomes wouldbe totai[y out of place. Tbis is a fam�ly �ighborbood. One long stretch o£ 12 garage stxlls, says apattme,nt, not fann7y. At tt� la� use me�mg it was said t�t it wc�uid look I�ce yar�. Parked -6 mob�e homes leugthvvise. T49s tppe of utnt Iooks exacxly like inve�nieat P�P�Y �� to be rearted out, not at a1l re�e�ive of the caurent neaghborhood. T�re are a�it.y iss�. offi«alty ontty 31ots sce seugess, lzo fee¢. In fitting with tt�e rest of the homes � the black there shouid be no m�e t}�a 2� in that space Co�uciing six housa� �ts gives ea� �e ouly 20 feex. The glans pravided do aat soauately reflect the ste. Thede is at teast a s�ve�foot drop between the firont and back, �t reflecked in dee tx�divg plans. T6ia �an vra4 denied-aPPrurat fi�um Distarict 6 Plsnaimg Conne�, bat Mr. T'rtth presented it "tthat thry Lad ao o6jation to � P4n' = T�eY Lad manY objections aad ao do we the naghbors to this pru� da�tv devdopmcn� If �on cannot attmd on Reb 5 pkase sign this note and give rt to Karla Holmland 6514871653 or Kathy Myas 651488 2758. Place co�tenis on revase side. " I a� opposed to �e proposed clevetopmeant at 207(1 Burgess" , �� :.-,-=---�.� L`�-, ��_�o aa� � i � y � address ,�� c{ t�r, � S S �' �- phone �/? /. `� � ` I- 6 S� .�, � � • �S m2q �� _� , - - v' • NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a pubfic meeting Thnrsday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Ple�se attend. If you cannot attznd please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tittle's proposal are available from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on lazge lots. The next house at 1078 is a singie-family low ranch. These ta11 twin homes wouid be totaliy out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meering it was said that it would look Sike you pazked 6 mobIle homes lengthwise. Tlris type of unit looks exactly like investmern properiy designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current neighborhood. � There aze density issues. Qfficially only 3 lots face Burgess, 12Q feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space ConsUUCting six housing units gives each one oniy 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. This pIan was denied approval from District 6 Planning Counc�, but Mr. Tittle presented it "that they had no objection to his plan". They had many objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster development If you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Karla Holmlund 6514871653 or Kathy Myers 651488 2'750. Place comments on reverse side. " I am opposed to the proposed development at 1070 Burgess" signed �a� � a� � l./� date �� / — � pOy address /'/> � p� p.aO .� phone � �S"/ - ��- / �/1(� • � 0�- �45 �.� ;;��' 33 NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED l3EVELOPMENT AT 1070 SURGESS There will be a gublic meetmg Thwsday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Piease attend. • w.l�l�• .1 ' f� 1 1 y ql \ IP� 1�! � 't� • 1 f' 1 "� �1 � 111' f i1M Cogies of Mr_ 7o3m Tittle's proposai are avaz'lable from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Departmeat ofPlanning & Economic DeveIopmeAt } The plan is far 3 twin homes for 6 fam�7ieg with garage space for 12 cars where there is now o� Itome at 1070 Burgess. r' a. � �t� �s i u' Ir. • •. � tr b� �s ��+ f' auu' >♦ Y t:a' Y.NI! t i l! C. ! I :1 ! t 0. t" ! a1 f 1 ;t � t!i 'f " Y.eif ♦'• :@ i ��- :I � u �,��. � s, � r. �r.l �� t � � : uw r.�n� � � •n.� a� � a �� i � - • � • �a - .� � •r.i : �r. .ur.� eu -rn � • r: a� ru u�w u ��ui • i . � ur.� � �� • � s � , i . • � ♦, al • n ra �� u.:: :�t v 1• Itr �' � nt ��.w : w �, rt ..�n� vn � ♦ > � � .�v, 9� i� ♦ �' �fl i�� • i 1 • . �� ' 1 GM� � \ t � M 1 Nfl f P 'll 1�♦ f � f � �_ .� -�.:;� � i it v. 1 •� � r..r �• 1 � nu w b �- �v � �� t� u o-. • i 1 r � r �� - . �� i' i� u. � �, u � s u �: e ��,: r • �� «n� •�n i� yi�� us w u � a i- � � ! -- �' � .n. � • .:.. .♦ i�r «�: ui�.. �' ' i� ,i v.� �� •� � 1� �� r�311 1�" 1 1 �i .1L� t: V. 1�1 :r/ i �< ❑ 11 ��! 1 111 I:Un T6is p�n was den�d�aPProvni fram Di�triet 6 Planniag Coane�, bat Mr. T'mh pres�ted it "that t�ey i,ad no abjeefioa to hi4 pl�uu". T6ey had many objections asd so do we the ueighbors to fi�ia propa�ed � devdopm�� ff yoa cannet attend on Feb 5 please sign tLi4 nott and �ive rt to Ksda Holmlund 6514871b53 or Kathy Mqers b514S8 2750. Place �mments on reverse side. " I am npposed to the pro� developm�t �t 1Q7Q Bnrge,ss" signed v �� date r. � r(1 addtsess � � � � �� ghone �� e � � �? `�- �' � � . • • � • 27 mf' �� -�- � `�� NEIGHBORS OF PRUPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT Id70 Tdiere w�l be a public mee�ng Thmsday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City HaIl Please a�ud. .. .��,�.. . . :� . . � - �� . t � �, . . , . - �,� < < � . • � � � . � . � « Copies of 113F. 3ohn T'rttte's proposai are ava�abie &om Pairicia bames (651 266 6700 at the Depaztment of Planom$ & E�onomic Development ) The plan is for 3 twin homes fox 6 families witk garage space for 12 cxrs where tl�e is now one home at I070 Burgess. � The plan does not fit the charaaer of our neighborhood. The emire biock is single-faariiy homes on large lots. The next house at ID78 is a single-f�y low ranch. Ttiese tall twin homes would betotat[y out of place. This is a family �ghborhood. One Iong stretch of 22 garage staUs, says aPartmeet, not family. At the land use meetiag it was said that it woutd toak idce you parked 6 mobite homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exactiy tike investment P�PertY designed to be rented out, not at ail reflective of the cmrern neighborhood. There are density issues. OffciaIIy only 3 lots face Bw�gess, 220 feet. In ftring with the resf of the homes oa the block there shoetid be no more ti�an 2 hovses in t6et spece Constructing sflc housing uQits gves esch one only 20 feet. The pl�s provided do not accurately reflect the site. `Thete is at least a seveirfoot drop betweea the frrnrt aud back, not reflected in the bu�ding plans. T6is pl�en was denied.approvai from District 6�anaing Conneil, but Mr. Tittie pnsented it �t6st theg hsd no objection to his plan". They had many objections and sa do we t6e neigLbors to tLis proposed dust� devdopment If you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sigu this note and giee it to Karia Holmlund 651487 i653 or Kathy Myers 651 b88 2750. P1ace commeuis on reverse side. " I am op , osed to the p' posed developm� at 2070 B ess" signed � ' `� �' ��1'�� °'�i� � date��f �� ,� ; v address ' �� '�7 phone �" � �" `7 � � � � ��3C� �� z�a m� 33 �� =�� NEIGFIBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 There witl be a public meeting Thnrsdap Feb 5 a# 3:30 pm City Hali Please attead Ff you cannot, attend please sign our petition or send your own lelter to the Council. Copies of Mr. John Tittle's proposal are a�ailable from Patricia 7ames (65 i 266 6700 at the D�putmem of Planning & Economic Developmern ) The plaa is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage spac� for I2 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Bvrgess. The plan does aot ft the charact�er of our neightrorhood. The entire block is sing�e-family hoines on large lots. The next house at 1078 is a sing�e-family fow ranch. These tatl twin homes would be totally out of place. Tfris is a family neighborbood One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartmem, not family. At the land vse mceting it was said that it woutd look like you parked S mob�e homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exactiy l�lce im�estment property designed to be ranted out, not at all reflective of the cu�rem neighborhood. There are density issues_ Officially oniy 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet_ In fitting with the rest of ttze homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing six housing units gives each one onty 20 feet. T'he ptams pravid� clo aot accuratety re$ect the site. There is at least a seven-foot dropbetween the feont aa� �k, not reBected in the baild'mg plaas. This `plan was degied approvat from District 6 Planning Council, bnt Mr. T�ttle pre�nted it "t�at they had no objection to Itis plan". They had many objectiQns and so do we the neighbors to this praposed duster devdopment If qoa caanot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Karla Holminnd 6514871653 or Kathy Myers 651488 2750. Place comments on reverse side. `� I am ogpifsed to e propused elopment at 2Q70 Burgess" signed date � � "'�t� ��/ address /da � �� Qe,s phone � /- 4�89-8�1'�� • � `f @�' �� • i • � �, - NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMEI�IT AT IQ?0 SURGESS N There w�l ire a gubiic meding Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Ball Piease atfend. • • Y.�IIf • .f P{ ! � :� `" Y !!1 � 1 / �lll � � • �I.i • �' 1 i � f - � G1 1 11 � li Copies of Mr. 7ohn T'mte's proposal are avaiiable from Patricia James (65i Zfi6 6700 at the Depaztmeai ofPlanning & Economic Daveiopment ) The plan is for 3 lwin ho� for 5 famities with garage space for 12 cars where there is aow one home at 1070 Burgess. The piaa does not fit the chazacter of our �ighborhood. The entire block is suxgle-fam�y homes on Iarge lots. The next house at 1078 is a singie-family low ranch. Tfttese #all twia homes wouid be totally out ofpIace. This is a fam�y neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garege stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use me�ing it was said that it would look Iike you parked b mob�e homes leagthwise. This type of umt 3aoks eacactly like investment grop�ty designed to be r� oirt, not at ali reflective of the current n�ghborhood. The,re ate den.tit}r issues. QfficialFy only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. 7n fittiag vaith t{�e rest of the homes oa the block there shouW be nc� more t6au 2 house,s in that space Constructiag snt housing u�ts gives eacl� one only 20 feet. The pians provided do not acatratety re�ect tt� site. These is at least a seven-foot drop between the fiom and back, aot reflected in the bu�78ing pIans. This plas was denied.approval from Disd�ict 6 Planniag Councit, bat Mr. Tittle preseated it Kthat they 6ad uo objectioa to hi.s.l�"- T��9 � m�Y objections and ao do we the n�h6ors to t6is proposed daster devdopmea� If yoa caanot attend on �eb 5 please aiga this note and give it to Karla Holmluad 6514871653 or Kathy MyeYS b51 d88 2750. Place commeets on rev�se side. " I am ogposed tm the proposed developm�t at iQ70 Burgess" sigaed Pl�� date 7 �_ D'� address fD�l ��u..A� �I�o.� phone /e-� -u�'7- 3ufl• 3�'6�3� 6 r 4 �! � w � � � l �� ° NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 107Q There w�l be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm Ciiy Hall Please attend. ff you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to tha Council_ Copies of Mr. 7olm Tittle's proposal are available from Patricia James {651 266 6700 aY the Departmeat of Planning & Economic Developmern }. The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The ernire block is single-family homes on large lots. The next house at 1078 is a single-fam�y low ranch These tail twin homes wouid be totally oue af ptace. This is a family neighborhood One long sEretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartmern, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. Tfris type of unit looks exactly -]ike investmern properiy designed to be rented out, not at att reflective of the eucre� neighborhood. There are deasity issues. Officially only 31ots face Burgess, 120 feet In fitting with the rest of the homes on �e block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing suc housmg wuts gives each oae oniy 20 fcet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven foot drop between the frorn and baek, not reflected in the building glans. This plan was denied approval from District 6 Planaing Counc7, bnt Mr. Tittle presented it "that they had nu objectioa to his p�n". They had maay objections and so do we the neighbors to this propased ctuster deve[opmenG If yon cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Kada Holmtnnd 6514871653 or Kathy Myers 651488 2750. Place commentc on reverse side. " I am opposed.to ihe proposed at 1070 Burgess" aa�e �� z/ � �� S S phone f,L$'l � 31 �. �; �� 33 r. � ��.� � NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There wiIl be a gublic meeting Thnrsday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tittle's proposal are available from Patricia 3ames (651 266 b700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 twin hames for 6 families with gazage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plau does not fit the chatacter of our neighborhood. The entire block is singie-family homes on large lots. The next house at I078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would he totally out of place, This is a family neighborbood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you pazked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. Tbis type of umt looks eatactly like investment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the cunent neighborhood. • There are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block tkere should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing six housing un'tts gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drog betareen the from and back, not reIIected in the huilding plans. This ptan was denied approval from District 6 Pianning Council, but Mr. Tittle presented it "that they trad ao objection to his plau". They had many objections and so do we the neigLbors to this proposed clnster developmen� If you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Karla Holmlund 6514871b53 or Kathy Myers 651 488 2750. Place comments on reverse side. " I am opp �ed to the proposed devetopment at 1070 Burgess" signed � � date �� l— � � • address �� f��, �5 �' � phone /a �"� � �� 3z a� �� , , �� , _ ..� -� , NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS T7iere wili be a public meeting Thursday Feb S at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If yov cannot attend please sign our petitian or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. Joha Tittie's proposat are available from Patricia James (651 266 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 famiIies with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. Tkte plan does not fit the chazacter of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on lazge lots. The next house at 1078 is a single-famity low ranch T'fiese tall twin fiames wouid be totally out of place_ This is a fam�y neighborhood One long stretch of 12. garage stalls, says apartmem, not family. At the land use meeting it was said thax it wouid look ]ike you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks e�ra.cdg like investmeat property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the currern neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet_ Tn fitting witi� the rest of the homes an the black there shouid be uo mare thaII 2 houses in that space Constructing six housing units gives each one only 20 fcet. The plans provided do not accurately reflecY the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, ttot reflected in the buitding p2azvs. This ptart was denied approval from District 6 Plauaing Caancil, but IYIr. Tittle presented it "that theq had no objection to his pfan". Thep had maay objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed clester developmen� If yon canttot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Karla Holmlund 65Z 4871653 or Kathp Mpers 651488 2750. Place comments on reverse side. " I am opposed to the address /f),S� �, devetopment at 107Q Bwgess" �� 3 � °� phone �` 7 � • �1 LJ � � o� � J � NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS � • There wiII be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attead. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. 7ohn T'rttle's proposai are a�ailable from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Development } The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 famifies with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of aur neighborhood. The entire block is singlo-fam7y homes on large lots. 'I'4ie next house at 1078 is a singl�family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a famiYy neighborhood. One long stretck of 12 garage stalls, says apartmeat, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked 5 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of utrit looks exactly like investmern property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the cutrent neighborhood. There aze density issues. Off cially only 3 lots face Burgess, 12Q feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing s� housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately zeflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the buitding plans. This plan was denied approval from District 6 Planning Council, but Mr. TYttle presented it "that they had no objection to his plan". They had many objections and so do we the neighlrors to this proposed claster developmen� If you cannot attend oa Feb 5 piease sign this note and give it to Karla Holminnd 65i 4871653 or Kathy Myers 651 488 2750. Place comments on reverse side. " i am opposed to the proposed development at 10'70 Burgess" , � signed _.�Jil/�.r.,�.� t L/l� r/°l�n � date ��3/�y address _1�`�� j ,� phone C�� I�-� 3� _.. .�� NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS � There will be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Piease attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petiiion or sead your own Tetter to the Council. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tittie's proposat are avaifable from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Depa.rlment of Planning & Economic Development ) The pian is for 3 twin fiomes for 6 fa.milies with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess_ The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood The e�xtire biock is single-family homes on Iazga Iots. The ne�rt house at IQ78 is a single-family Iow ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood One loag stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartment, not family. AY the land use meeting it was said that it wouid look like you pazked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exactly 1�7ce investment property designed to be rented out, not at a31 reflective of the cune� neighborhood There are density issues. Officiatly only 31ots face Burgess, 120 feet. 3n fitting • with the rest of the homes an the block there should be no more than 2 houses in #hat space Construcring suc housing units gives each one only 20 feet The plaas provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop beiween the frotxt aud back, not reflected in the building plans. This plan was denied approvsl from District 6 Planning Couacil, bnt Mr. Tittle presented it "that they had ao objection to his plan". They had many objectioas and so do we the neighbors to this proposed ciaster deve2opment If yon cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Karia Holmland 6514871653 or Kathq Myers 651488 2750. Place comments on reverse side. " I am vgpo ed to the propos d development at 1070 Bargess" / signe �� 1 date 2• 3 0 address ! o $1 S � „rs�,.r 5-� phone �r-5�B � �-� � � S •�tr!- ��03 • 3� �� ., • NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 SURGESS There will be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please siga our petition or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. John Tittle's proposal are auailable from Patricia James (651 266 6700 at the Depardment of Planning & Economic Development ) 'The plan is for 3 rivin homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the chazacter of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on large lots. The next house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartment, not faznily. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you pazked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exactly like invesiment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current neighborhood. � There are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet In fitting with the rest of the homes on the biock there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing six housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. This plan was denied approval from District 6 Planning Conncil, but Mr. Tittle presented it "that they had no objection to lus plan". They had many objections and so do we the neighbors to tlus proposed cluster development. If you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Karla HoLmlund 6514871653 or Kathy 1'vlyers 651488 2750. Place comments on reverse side. " I am o t osed development at 1070 Burgess" signed oI • %f� date a s°� address a a a. B,��.�� S S S�Ez--c..c -� phone ( bs t) 2a 4- a 117 . �� N�IG�B�RS t3F �Rfl�OS�D DEV�LOPMEN'T AT 10?0 BURGESS • There witl be a public meeting Thursday �eb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If yon canuot attend please si�e ovr getition or send your own letter to the CounciF._ Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tittle's proposal are available from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Departmern of P lannina & Economic Development ) The �lan is for 3 twin homes for S fanulies with ?arage space for :2 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block �s single-family homes on large lots. The next house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tatt twin homes would be tataity out of piace. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalis, says apartment, not 'fim�7y. At the Iand use meeting it was said tha� it would l001� like you pazked 6 nobile homes lengthwise. This type of umt looks exactly like im�estmeat property designed to be reated out, not at all re�ective of the ciurern neighborhood. � There are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet_ In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more thaa 2 kouses in that space Coastructing s� housing units gives ea.ch oae onIy 20 feet_ The pians provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and bacI� not reflected in the buiidin� plans. 'I'his plan was desd�3 angroval frca€si 3�istsic# fi Pla�mimms ��nnc:�, 3�a�i ?a�. Tittie gresented it "that th� had no objecfion to his plan"..They had many objections and so: do we the neighbors to this propose3 clnster developmen� If yau cannot attead on Feb 5 piease sign this note aad give it to �ar3a Holminn3 551487 i653 or Kathy NIyers b�1488 2750. Piacx cammeuts an revPrse side. " I am �pposed #o #h p se�l eve�opment at 1074 Bu bess" sag�er�_� da#e 6Z a�{/p�' f add��s� � b�� h.� �"� pho�ae � � 37 � NEIG�B�ItS �F PRflP�SED llE;dEi,flPME�'� AT 3070 BITRG��S There will be a pnblic mceting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm Ciiy Hall Please attend. If yau cannot attend glease sign our petitioa or send your own Ietter to the Council._ Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tittle's proposal are available firom Patricia Jaznes (651 266 6700 at the Department of Pl annin� � Economic DeveIopment ) � The glan is for 3 twin homes for 5 families with garage space for 22 cars wheze ther� is now one homeat 1070 Burgess. The piaa does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-famiIy homes on large lots. The neYt house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes wouid be totally out of place. This is a famity neighborhood. One Iong stretch of i2 garage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like yoa pazked 6�obile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks �actly like investment � property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the cuRent neighborhood. There are density issues. O�aaIly only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houszs in that space Construcring siY housing units gives each one oniy 20 feet. The pians provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop bei.ween the from and back, not reflected in the building plans. Z'�is nlan �s3s den:ss3 annr�val frvsn �is#sict �i P�anming ��urc3, 3�z�t '�r. Tittle gresenYed it "that ths� had no objection to his pian". They had many objections and so: do we the neighbors to this proQosed cinster develon�en� If yon cannot atteud on Feb 5 piease siga this note and give it to �a Holmlund 551 481 1 b53 or Xathy lYIyers 551483 2750. �3ace cammemts au reverse sfide. " I a�a � o d#o t pose�l deve�og ent at 1070 BurgQSS" r � �a�ei� - 1 i�$e� � �� • - 3(a�t�3'2�5 �15 � �il �vn �� ' �f��di8 b S / — l � � "� C� ` �% u� 7 $ �� "r.l NEIGHSORS OF PRCIPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 There will be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm Ciiy Hall Piease atteud. 3f you cannoE attend please sign aur petirion or send your own leitar to the Council. Copies of Mr. John Tittte's proposai aze avaiIabte from Patricia James (651 266 6700 at the Depariment of Pl annittg & Economic Developmem ) The plan is £or 3 twin homes for 6 famiIies with garage space for 12 cars where tfiere is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on large lots. The neat house at 1078 is a siugte-family tow raack. These tall twin homes would be totaliy out of piace. This is a family neighborhood: One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apariment, not family. At tke faud iase meeting it was said that it woutd look tike you parked 6 mobite hoates lengthwise. Tfris type of unit looks exactly Iike investment property desigaeci to . �anted out, not at all reflective of the currern neighborhood. T'kere are de � ssues. Officially only 31ots face Bargess, 120 feet. �Fn fitiing wifh the rest of the homes on the biock there shouid be no more than 2 houses in that space Constcucting six housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven foot drop between the frorrt and back, not reflected in the building glans. This glan was denied approval from District 6 Planning Councit, bnt Mr. Tittle presented it "that they had no objection to his plan". 1'hey had many objections and so do we the neighbors Ya this proposed clnster developmea� If you eannot attend on Feb 5 please siga this note and give it to Kar)a Holminnd 6514871653 or Kathy Myers 651488 2750. Place rnmments on reverse side. " I am oppo: signed � address� the proposed development at 1070 Burgess" date �" �/'(� phoue S�' ' �-�� • C� � �� - 1 `; i • NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 107Q BURGESS There will be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Councit. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Titt1e's proposal are available from Patricia James (651 266 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on large lots. The next house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. • This is a family neighborhood One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartment, not family. At fhe land use meeting it was said thaf it wouId look like you pazked 5 mobile hoines lengthwise. This type of unit Iooks exactly like investment property designed to be re�sted out, not at all re4ective of the curreut neighborhoad There are density issues. Officially oniy 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting � with the rest of the homes on the block there skould be no more than 2 kouses in tkat space Constructing six housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the siYe. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the builcling plans. TLis plan was denied approval from District 6 Planning Council, but Mr. Tittle preseated it "that they Lad no objection to his plan". They had many objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster development If yon cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note aad give it to Karta Holmlund 6Si 4871653 or Kathy Myers 651488 2750. Place comments on reverse side. " I am opposed to the proposed development at 10'70 Burgess" r D � signed ��Y`� ��L�i{ date � •�- address �(J��, ��/1S'C��}� phone L�S `��—��`%�'� • ZONING COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT �- -��'� � • FILE # 04-019-969 1. APPLICANT: John Tittle HEARING DATE: Febrvary 5, 2004 2. TYPE OF APPLICATION: Conditional Use Permit 3. LOCATION: 1070 Burgess St., befiveen Lexington & Oxford 4. PIN & LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 26-29-23-32-�139, Kalman's Division {Vo. 3 Addition to the City of St. Paul, Minn. Lots 7, 8, 9, 22, 23, N'/2 of Vac St Adj and Lot 24 C� 5. PLANNiNG DISTRICT: 6 6. ZONtNG CODE RE�ERENCE: §60.413(�3); §64,300(d) 7. STAFF REPORT DATE: February 5, 2004 8. DATE RECEIVED: December 31, 2003 PRESENT ZOMNG: R-4 BY: Patricia James DEADLINE FOR ACTION: February 29, 2004 A. PUftPOSE: Conditional Use Permit for six-unit (3 twinhomes) cluster development B. PARCEL SIZE: irregular parcei, 120 ft. (Burgess) x 241 it. (west) and 298 ft. (east) = 32,067 sq. ft. C. EXISTING LAND USE: single family home and vacant lots (R-4) D. SURROUNDING LAND USE: IVorth: singie famify residential (R-4) Easf: single family residentiai (R-4 South: raiiroad tracks (R-4) West: single family residential (R-4) E. ZONING CODE CITATiON: §60.413(13) permits cluster development subject to conditions; F64.300(d) lists generai conditions that must be met by ail conditional uses. F. HlSTORYlDISCUSSION: None. G. DISTRICT COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION: None received at the time the staff report was written. H. FINDfNGS: 1. The propefij consists of 6 existing lots and part of a vacated street. Because the back three lots have no street access, the properiy is being developed as one parcei with access from Burgess. 2. §60.413(13) permits cluster development, subject to the foliowing cflnditions: a. There shalJ be a minimum of two (2) units. This condition is met. The appiicant is proposing six units. CJ b. The units sha!l be attached, common wa!l, single-family, wifh no unif intruding on the vertical airspace of any ofher unit. This condition is met. The applicant witf construct three 2-unit side-by-side attached structures. Each unit is a separate single family residence. c. The parcel shall meet the !ot a�ea required per unit in the zoning district. This condition is mef. The lot area required in fhe R-4 district for 6 units is 30,000 sq. ft. The parcel is over 32,000 sq. ft. in size. d, The parcel shall have a minimum frontage of eighty (80) feet on an improved street. This condition is met. The parcel has 120 feet of fronfage on Burgess St. Zoning File # Q4-Q19-9&9 Zoning Committee Staff Report _ � � �� Pa9e 2 ° - `° `" e. The structure shall conform to the schedule of regufations for heighf, lof coverage, setbacks and parking. This condition wiil be met. The structures meet the code requirements for height, loY coverage, and parking. The applicant has agreed to revise his plans so that the development meets the front yard setback requirement. f. The design shall be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. 7his condition is met. The surrounding area is low density residenfia! development with one and two-story structures. This development wili be two stories on Burgess with walk-out basements. g. Individual lofs, bui�dings, streef and parking areas sha/i be designed and situafed to minimize alterafion of the natural features and topography. This condition is met. The steep slope on the property wi!! be used in developing the walk-out basements for the units. Because of the dusterirtg of the houses, mature trees at the rear of the site will be preserved, and a stormwater pond located there. h. Applicafions for cluster deve%pment shall include site plans, inGuding landscaping and elevations and other information the planning commission may request. This condition is met. The appiicant has submitted plans. 3. §64.400(d) lists five sfandards that ali conditional uses must satisfy: (1) (2) CJ The extent, location and intensrty of fhe use will be in substan6a! compfiance with the Sainf Paul Comprehensive Plan and any applicable subarea plans which were approved 6y the city council. This condition is met. The use will retain the density of the R-4 district where it is located and will. provide additional hous+ng opportunifies as recommended in the Housing Policy Plan 5.4, which states: "...encourage a diversity of building and urtit types to meet the diversity of the market " � The use will provide adequate ingress and egress to minimize traffic congestion in fhe public streets. This cortdition is met. The site will be served by a one-way drive that will provide access to fhe garages in the back whife providing adequate access and avoiding fraffic congestion. (3) The use will not be detrimental to the existing character of the development in the immediate neighborhood or endanger the public health, safety and genera! welfare. This condition is mef. The use wiil be consistent with the e�dsting development in fhe area and will be construeted according to building codes that ensure the public heaith, safety, and general welfare. (4) The use wi!! not impede the norma! and orderiy development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permifted in tf�e districf. This condition is met. The use wif( provide new investment in this neighborhood and will not have a negative impact on improvements to surrounding properties. (5) The use shall, in aif ofher respects, conform fo the applicabfe regulations of the district in which it is located. This condifion is met. The project has gone through site plan review and wiil meet all applicable cify codes. STAFF RECOMMENDATtON: Based on the above findings, staff recommends of the Conditional Use Pertnit for six-unit (3 twinhomes) Guster devetopment subject to the condition that the applicant comply with atl site plan review requirements. �� CONpiTiONAt USE PERMIT APPLICATION Department ofPlanning and Economic De�elopment Zoning Secfion I400 City HaUAnnex 25 West Founh Sved �`� SaintPau{ MN55102-1634 (65I) 266-6589 r� APPLICANT ��klit�.t �� PROPERTY LQCATION TYPE OF PERMIT: Appiication is hereby made for a Conditional Use Permit under provisions of Chapter 4a � . Section , Y! 3. Paragraph�� of the Zoning Code. SUPPORTING INFORMATION: Explain how the use wiil meet ail of the applicable standards and conditions. If you are requesEing modifcation of any speciai conditions or standards for a conditional use, expla+n why the modi£catian is needed and how it meets the requirements for modification of speciat conditio�s in Section 64.300(� of the Zoning Code. Attach addit+onaf sheets if necessary. �l-�� S�� 3 �� C°ocR�..c�. �-� t. � �� l�� o�. C�w+r�:. ` �n.� �.� �n-��s� �t�� `� Required site plan is atfached P //, ' Y -` � � , � ` `` a s � `�0�3 � b � �� 0 v�t � -�v�� . v � I V�`4 I V 1 Y� -�� d�� J a � � � �8 �� 3� I ApplicanYs Signature Date �� CityAgent �� `� � — csty -� r ra� Name of Owner (if Contact Person (if Address / Location Legal Description_ z Zoning � " �� 7 .--�' � y � �� /� -�, -� � 10 7 a � is�.� �. ss S c�" �.� � ��s s-.d-� � �� ,��Q �o �� _, � .�� d�S � r 6c S i n� e �c� t� ;, � �� Y� . ,/�it t2 � e cQ� � /� �S r,��} c 6 � ��1t� �e S � � r � ��EZ.�L t-�� J O � � S � � � �� S �� ,�" � � � c�.-d � /�. /9Yd S v2 �9Sc� r ,J o , ) �� S � C�9C?c�S t? �� u' � fo 1�S � � o� � r � 3 ,r � `� �..ea � � a �- � ��. � � � cSS . ,�c ��o��S�.Q �� ; l�. �; � s ��,� ��. L� . �a�� o�� , ��- �.�et l �s . �� 'd ��P� S; � �ic� ��d2av�... ��ZC�' w•'� �L V�a� ;` ciP�.s' .� E'y�L� Y � ttS ►�.�C W�f U � � �5 2:� i�� la 7� t�X � c� o �,,Jl,d �� / �'°) � ��t l� � � � � �3�� wj: ( �� s�- �' �� v.2� c��' s ,� �� f�� , �o � ��z�� l��w'� �t� er� ��h� J �L �,� � � a� �a�� 1�7� �,� �� s� �e�. °� �r.. � �-Y � �-�� -�� C_3YL.Cy Y'1 4� K-1` i`+�L�'/ � �!� � V� � l 0 ��L b�r / � � �,�� .- ct �-�. s, � ��) uw: �f b) �.�. �.K. � �.v� 1 s � ,� 1-c (.v 4 _f 1 �� v Y� �}M\ v �,... � e�� '� �:� s�� r�.�; �( �v� ,S� ��J�� co,M�o� ��: , � : � �.o �: � � v��a2�.� ci�.� �ls cQc� {NV�ry � � C'� � � 6L1�.e e.- ui; �2�:J �t�1 � S ;h -c ��ti,,..� � (,t� �-"'t" i � � i� t � ��s �o� is ' s� ooa s ��: t b�2 �; � c,�,.; �� ie� ��.��. o� 3� aaa s�. �� iS V� u, r Jl-e.�-� .�e tC9-tl c� o� �,. S �� S D vc� � . � C> pO S . � � � � a.) �) � °s (� c�/1 C°� ��-�i t� FRb�� c� la Z� �Q� �-��,� � ; �i� )�7a ��.�e .Sr� ej /� S¢��..�� c�; l� ��;�� . 9a �. S c'. (c. ��Q.z cs�C �,2 � c,�..�� a� �s � ; g� j lo �- c�� .�, � ��,� �f c� �� 4�. ry� � des ; � {� t.e�� v -c �°O� i3--�� b !� (,� �`�'V� (� �� 2 0 • v� e� �. ba2 �.�ad, � � � ,� �� (�1. C:.i� � �6� S l ��--�� a �� `C�' � L+ �Z.�7'L i V�. ; Z c ��} �� t7 K �L°C�"�R2 °�/' '�'" � b� b� �Q,� / X 1 ✓J \c�v { �, ^ S (Y W\ l CIe S s s v c�-e.�.�C � • �,) u 0"� j �. � �` �U �7 ` � � 1 � ^� Q � r � � � � `-m a` o � � � � � �� -- o � ` o� � o \� � � �^ V � � V N � � � � � � �- ��. �� 0 �� , � iz � � 3 � • � �f�1 �Of� �; ; a � e : � ,; � � : i _1_ � > � i . � � ! � , ! � I � � ; ; � � ; ; ; � , � , i i i � � i ♦� � � i � i � � i I ; ! i ' i �T �'-, ! � i ! r i , � , i i I � � � � � I � � { � � , I it� � � � �� tl � A � �� '� � � ' i I h i � I � '�� 1 j i I 4 � U � � ;��, i , , , , �' � ; , i -;�=L='-�-- ; -r--'�-_ � ; � � ; , � � ! ' �' � � r�/�./ �J�� 2 (l �d �[ �hv � �a � _ - , . � � �� l-I � � o m � � ,� r ��! S � w � � � � � �� ` � � J � � � � Q \� q , �f �� 9 � � v � � � y s H �� J � � S I- � � � Lti Y � o � � N � u � � � t� � v � � � � 0 0 � � 0 h � � � J d � � � � -y � � v' a � U V I '2S —�;F6� � _ � � �� q � � � � iJ J 4 � � . c� � � � � o � �x � � J � -� L y � � 4 O '� � � � P'$ �'+ W J � � g �. � ln `' ¢ � �a C �' � � '� @ � o,� � f� W � � `� h �� s • • ��U !��(> z� 1� �d�_- -- �=-� ; -- '�;5 � ��—�_ � _ — ` _��j� = —_' 5!72 P.^_C P,^,Cp 72' c.58tS OVERttnxG^., 2<' EAVE .OV[�2ryq,yCS `3/72 ROOF PRCH 1 Elt v�' pvE�ry i■ � _ ,.r �n � �r � � ,. � _ - � �■■� � !�( lil � _ � � � �( t1! _ ' �?1�� s � � �� _�� _. — � � � � FR ONT ��N--ALT TE 3� U� � ts 11 ORlGINAL FLAN 02-t6-64 REVIS�p p(�y X%-XX^XX { HOME IN SOTA MN: � '1Wly HOME � 4 c i i f 6r�7. RO�P CRw� t2' Q.BL: pyERkR,vCS za �ny� pv��s s MN: � TW(N HOME �`: HOME IN MINNESOTA • . =_ ,� _ 2/ _/ " __:�. - - _ �� _ — sli2 aooF aimH lIN - 72 ' �flL' G�'EftHMfGS �4' FAVE �4YANC5 / - - � � � � � � � 1 !! � � � � � � � � Z i�� I�I CI, ��1 ,�' �� Ro �vT E� MN: � t�! Jil I�I ��1 I�f �il TI O N -ALTER NAT PNIN HOtvtE H� DATES ;'� ORIGiNAL PLAN � az—is—o4 REVISED PLAN XX^XX—kX •I 1 IN MINNESOTA 0 �� s�� .. a �, ,,, �, z�� z1 �� 1 �� 3 � � �� $�� o�-4Csl��- S7V� Pz-� s _�� 9 �E� � V1 0 l� 3 � _ W �' ° a Fi °' m � 3 °' � 3 p ��E t °� _° o� v m �? °' � 05 � �S �� 9� ✓ o� m m o�y g� ��a �u m ;g "� o `o g o °i� �'v 9 '' m `o ° O ' � a E o �a „� d N� = �---��` ; � �� 9 �0 0 �m �a d � o g �' u ?'� �' H 'Y� �= � aw mga Bs �.. W �'�'°� � _ � �� ae °`°° fl =�`�W �0 3 a my� �° caa m m $` t "=�'= H �a.� sEo Sv.� ; eo � ��.5 ivfi �Om«�oa � m o � � �°� ~ c�'Ya ° w `o � 9 O° $.ti - 4�i o o a.. �/� �m� ��' =a Vl g`� .9' �,� r^ �3og ��S m y O V1 ��.uoos �, � a " W g° "m�o�°aea?.� ��m�= � a �'u�pa � .�.7�y�8ua g2 � �i_r= mm++ mo� q ry a �5 �.a p�'o a.� � a� �o 33 o. �� :a�orm«hm_•da.. U V' � w "' � n � � W � a w � � C'' � "�f � � z � x q " 0 Q � h _J � � ti � � o� � � ¢ m - ` U, C a a � ` �� V `�� M .Nii� `�� 0�- ��.� _�a`v �c`8�3 e o � u � w 'F�Cj 5°=ag eEb �ov� m a V w � 4 A ° ` e,� a8�=� s=�a= za �"s 2 � n a�'. ^ �6b i � P�me��°� II �c'� '°'c � 2y °'9 u m E�g�2,y' H3:.H�.3� '�F5o.a�a�� o `s m o .;� o� � � m 'O P 0 � � � N a 8 � y � o a $ O � a m� � ❑ .9 � O y � �� 0 ° �g a� � 6 �� N W � �� J � m se �m �° e �� O�� '� o�� `�'- "°"& Eo".E ffia „�,OK 3 n L E+1�$ � o� e 3 0 m U'� wa� "' o z$ v e�a o` C y � , y a °- 9�re ,d? � ° a � . ��'�� aS�om� -� n z < �. E'z� �4-b! °1- �?�q ______.- -------- ------- -. _ . .___. .. _.._— _ __ ------- --- -- ------ . ----------_ ._ _ ---� - - ,----- . -. ..--- - --- .�--�=- ---. . _.___ __.._.. u � ��,_ - - , -� � �---� ----- --, --- _ -----.�.__ _ .._ � .._____- -_--.-_-- -------��...�---�__...._�s._.� _ - -..._ .. __� ----..._ ..._..�-----._;. _ ��.-- ...._.---� � �. � ; - _._.-----------�.._......-�------___.---�--�- :_�--�-----...._.._----»....__.�_.T^�_�__ :_._...-._-__.---___ ---- - � _..______�_�_... _ �5: �--� -,- . -_:._.._--_-_ _ ---- j �: � n....�..�� A...��. _ .��.�— ...i...�.� � , � . , �__"__+�".y___.^..__._... � `. _.—._ � . . .. . � __ ____. '_""'_ : - . . .' ,-�-,.__�_ C/3 � S �!1. ._ �� C ....-- --; ��_. __. —..___—__ __,.. _ .. _ -------- � - � � _��_...._...,._.�__.___._.,. . r,._-I-�=- _ ------.�_. v3----�_�.___..—:-:-_._... - -.. _�.,_--- � ------ _ , . ..------ ----•;.._._. ___.._._.__�___:. ' ; � ' _.. �� }�- ...�� Q _... - ----------°----- --- ----�_ .__. -�_. ._, . ---------._.-_-. -._....,- ---'v--��--,_.... .: _...------�---- _ -,-_-_.-.�___ -----. ,.--=----:.�_ __.._ __-� -------�- �. ..-.�.�__.. : -. -- --- . - - , .� �-_-__ _�_...._�._.__�_�.._. __..___� ._��__...-...._�_:__.,_�_._.__..:. ._-----�._.-.. ' '� _' . , • , -----. ...__.---o=-'-_.�--- ; �.�. __-- � - ---- , -ti- -�-- M- - -----...- - � .. --- _. _- -•------�-_.�..-•---- -t .._ ._.. �_�_._. _.- � �� ----_.,_...._.--- ---.°"�-----.-.- ..-._._.__,� � f --r------ ._..._--- -- .. _. . � -�-- ---- ---: o --;-� ---=- � � ° ,-�°- ---- --�-- ---- 3� . __ ....---..�._._._�-_..___�.. -. � __....------_ _ _. ----------- ---•--- �-- ----._ ...---... _r_: ._ .�� _ � -.-- -- -. .._.__. ....� --___.._.,___.__:._.__�__. - --- - ---- ;� --.___�._.. ---- _- . ---- 9 —'--'---------^...'�,--_.--'-'-.. . ...;-._...-.--.�.....� . . __.....—....._ � --�-'-,�__...._..�.--- -----._,.._ �—'-'°--'.._.__._-" �._ _'_�.,_,.__`—�„"_..._.�_"__.,.-�_.._'__�__.�.._ �._, v--r ` J .................' �.._�.__...;_..._.:.._�.. ��_.i..�."___•__ � �.. �__ � « � -..- .. . . _ .� ...��_. ' �.. ,. +_- �_.�.. _� \�L.--.+ '.� -.. ` ,.--�� ._...�.. _�—..—.. v� ..---._.._----`-__..__._.._.._..,.__.�...._, .... .�. . .._ �._..� �......... -'-- � ---.—. _—_ _� �--_—"-.,:. V --'�.'--^ - - ....._'- - �'—'-'-r7J--__ . .__ . -.__., .. ."_..- _._-.�... _..'.,-_'• '__""""'.._ _�.._. . a � � ` FY .......�-'--._ ..._.._._ Q� ._ . . ' ��.�__._. _�._... .....� __..� �a..�.._....._ ...'�7..--.-__�__-_—...---='---------._.._.... � '• e .._.: . .`J...--- . -"-O°_.._ . _�_ .� �. . _�_�_.�.., � �� _: ' _' ._ j ""�'. � ""'_ C= \`'1 ____ ___—__�� . . _ �_. . . ._ =`... ., --- y -- -""�c�� , � : . .. . . -'-.._._. �=_. = ...2_. M1 �....�v 1. ,_..�. .0 � A U —� �.. __�� ^ �.� �� w r T�. _ t . . Q _.. ... t (� { __. . - f - �^ - E:3� — ----' _-'.' .....__9 �.��..._. _..__....�� !�- . �e �- ---- -- -----.-------�j --......__,-____�__ .._..- •---�------- ---�--_.�..._.__._.... .._ ..� . ,.. _ .�_.,_._ a . '_-"' . . . �-- ' --��---5:.____��, � -- ----- - . - �- - . . : _ ..:_ _..: ._..,_,._. _._....-- . . , .! , _�___.._... _: __� � � �� - _.__.....--._._._..._...------.;.---_..._...._; ._..--..��._..___�._____._...: _.._ .. ..__ --i-�--�-�--------- . _.... ___ _..__._._...---------._.--- ..- --- --�---.._...._...- - - - - _ .-___� �.:. __ . _ _ .- - - - - - . , _. .. ^ _ - _ . . _.._. _u.___.._.M ...:..._,.....-�..:�^------.-<..__;_..... ...�....�---.w___.:..--- --! � - _�_ . _..._. . .._... --- -_._..____Q . __._. ______�. .---- VY/1J/ DJ S'J.lU . �' � �. V` � � �� S �, � � i i � �''-':__�, +v�� nwu "7 ra�t a� n o .. �m 0 N Q N � � LS � � �� p��0 W� � �S • �0�� N � . z �J � vi ' }d�Q]OS U'T�5 �z. y� z 2 U �'S�$iSr� > p � Z'� � Z W "a � �i ° 3�Yn y ��o° r > ° " - p }�3t'-O � � w yc ° � ^._ 2�3y KZZb, `�z'L.I �1- 0'¢NLI�P w S O z ' �.oii�.�-oKmu�i � O Z O p a c . r.a'...��?C 0 � 11:JUJLU00U O �' �, �� ..�r�V ��V � 7�TzA-es� r /J G •� �� Q! ' � i� •° �.� o�,�. r cV � f . . - � - c.^8 �d 9Q'H 352$N . . �L �� o �� '_ r• a- ,,, � w.. j _ � S O �-= C.? � C 0 4 � � � . Y' - , � � � �� . � ! � R '� � �� ' '� �8� (. . �, �� ; 5 .� s �. � S i : r 8990't€SSit ZS�[i €@�16Zt9Q • � � � /:� �� _. �� y r.it � � �� ------�. �� _�_ 4 � � ..,. : ' ` _ ��` 1I;11:.�/� - � � . � - � ;� �; a +� N � �a X > D m � $ x a �m o� g o� �3 ?3 eri _� . im .�m a� o � �v x> x> �0 8 � o g o� ' ir O� a� �; X� ^> tl �N �I� �J NJ e/t � • • • L� W e5i ui au� Zoning Fiie # 04-019-969 Zoning File # 04-019-969 %�l �� - � � �� . } v�. �.�,. � v : � �F: , i". . �� `e :' � h �- �.v' ..,� �a,-� � t � �- � ,e ` <. h,y c�.�rs; .. � r rn�:a�� ,:.�. ,3 � � � � Y.* ° ,�i*�� '��'r" r �� ,y� ,..,� � �w� g �.�`�.�� @4 � � �2 r4 �. `� �-� ` $"� � � ;s � �' :,. ,`�'; �°� `"'` ° *�3-..;� � � s �=`—�� ° ffi� � � � _ � � _-� � ��.. �.� �:� � -' .�;:-_�. _ _ -:��__: — sr, - — `'>*...P�-c- _ .. r.,�, ,t::x_ , . :':. _ . . K' g. „ _ • • tast or site on tsurgess Zoning File # 04-019-969 Zoning File # 04019-969 � r� !,. � =, �. � -. . � • Rear of site irom auey on vxrora S" � o � � � � � • b;` ' {< �{ `�._ 'Y'a'^,.%._ : . .. . . i Vacant lots at 1070 Burgess Zoning File # 04-019-969 �a� r"y ".� " " �G" ' .. a^ � �_ � � � "�� ^k , " �^.�:�" �°-'' '°.., ' � w °�` „ � ... , ... .^.c � � � '�` ' ' g ,., � . s�� y.� ° n. ��4_�7,#.�. ':�' r�w: � � �lrF�� _�. � ��r°' �'� � � e _-,-, �. ; r t �;:: ; � . � ��. , � ..„ •� Existing dupiex, 1070 Burgess Zoning File # 04019-969 ' ` ;�'-: _ --- � �� - _ � - _�� -.� ,;- ° m - ,� �: � �*. ...� � � � . � � �::- � _. ,.'�.°w,� - = -�y - � � ' �-_ � �*� ,� �-.�< �� r^ �-. / NQRTH END DISTRICT „y ' zo . weo moo rcer •oeo woo `� ,�.. , � � r �o�-as9 •�'�g • Y� � • CITIZEN PARTICIPATIO DIS RICTS -r -' tr ' ��"° � i.SUNRAY-BATTLECREEK-HIGHWOOD _ 2.6REATER EAST SIDE 3.WEST SIDE 4.DAYTON'S BLUFF � �` YNE-PHALEN / �/T6:N�TH END `'TZFiOMAS=DAL� 8.SUINMIT-UNIVERSITY 9.WEST SEVENTH lO.COMO 11.HAMlINE-MI�WAY 12.ST. ANTNONY 13.MERRIAM PK.-LEXIMGTON HAMLINE 14.GROVELAND-MACALESTER 15.HIGHLAND i6.SUMMIT HILL 17.DOWNTOWN � � �t <D1� -Rf� i CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLANNIN6 DISTRICTS �i � � �� 0 ...� �,...� � P;�rtt 1,��,,f� A � , . . . �► . ': I � � , � tr- � ��r �i��f LEG�NO � zoning dl5lricl Lvund=_ry �' �111� suS;=_d prope„y �� o r,t,�--- 0 one (am�iy • . n corma;c;a` � ¢ h:;o tamily 4 .a.� industri=.'. c .__.___.. �t¢� muitipie tarni(y V vzcai: , v r�a a � 4 tl i il 1 , , 1 I i z v ,.. . f I � � .. . _.r �. � i .1I ( ' . . . . f'a . v�.,. .. _ .. � �tfy1. . �' � �� y �' `� _ �j.,w � �d ,��'�' , � i i �k �� . e „�� # . "V .�� . . ��'�.'""`a "'- - ��: e � �� 't�n _ �� Y+ $_ @ r �� ., � ?oik � _ �� "_' �� €d4�.5:e� _ ' . _ �°a a r' J i �� ' ��' -..' . ' . . . _ .. .:_. ... ,_ . . . ....___ �. . % -____---�_ . —'"; _. __ .. ��_.` _ t `. . b �/�� . � .._; . . � � g � 1 Ji„.� • ... . � . . .. .. . �� /�� `p : y� y . . f R rt.Q ` � tl � �� '�' ",i 1 � '+� � Y `'f'� ." �+ "" ��./� � � � �a s.'+� c•d�7. F, . � �.o.yy �" . �k.c ti ..,, .. ��.,i-. � 3.° "'. -. P�..,. = W: ��. _. __"--__ —�,.,,-,+.m+v*-;�� &� y 3� � � � F '�'�,< �'N.�\ � ��y\ �, � �! _ ......_ ___. i I � _ v.a%� '" r�'...,w.�a, ^ . ::.. _._._ ,w-,.. �. .. ,:. - . ' : '. . ___ I .n_ r .. ..... . �� ... __. = F �,.-r;..--- ��: _. ` ... � _ . � -.._. .— _�l .._ ._ '1,:.. .� . .: . - . . ._ t:' � . � — - .. . . _. . � � � �� . s�^� ��r � � •� . .. � i � �' � I. : ,—, �` � '��ta: ��; , ,.�,�: � ° = i� ♦ ��, A�r ' e �:cvr , �� :sw�: - J., . �.�:." � I � � ,�,.� % - t i:iG'. ,'r . . `s . L ':'. �e� �� ,� �� . �, � , � . ".. . � .. . I I � .,,_ .:. . . _ _._. ._ __-__� � ��. � � �� - - a � � �� I -� � � � � � _ � u� ¢ .I � v I . � ' - � ' � �^� _ '�_`— � 4 v a�� / *J �� S .�-� � � � g� ` bl'iy� �.� f d _ wu I _ �- � 'f, I i _ � : �� ''_ �, J A '�' �At I � ' �'� _ � f �� M1'�Y � � �� r. � f�.� �b i .rL'� i XM � �y, ♦ �' �-� � Yd� �` �`S I� ° I�. , '4'r' . � ..i _ -� A��iy`�M�',r ��,.� . + r m �� !�y � . � . � � � �S a: �4�`' �1.Y x i s tg } +�'� �� i .�".�,' �e/i y � % a P a k � t 4 �'�"l sy . : �. ,�.�! . r �� ,m .� llld�.:;� 3 � k :�}'�� i �� rs.+� ' t p� �'. y � �'� N I ..� .�' G y �! . � � n r„ �'{�' } . .�' ro� � i s i e, x �� c��, �� ' �r: a zi . .., ��¢ . � � � +� _. _-- � � � `� S'�' '1 �.��.� �'. J J: . _ _. .. P . .. ... . ,r—:. .: . . �—_...__. — ....—__— ___.. I i '. :t tk'?x y r � r .�o�" . ; u; �� "�`,.� e+a� "`,�*`•o ' ' i � '*F 9` �.Fp" � . ,..-.,�. $,n. �::o:i .a:,+r.<r � . , ry ; � :,. u ��j .. . _, w.5'�, � .. r , ... . � � . u ,,. . _ �� `' � '�� , � §[ - , ,� �'-� 1 . 7 � � � � "� � .� �.v � , .+ � i .,y,� ��. . �' y, � } �''. . 3�.:.» .� '�' i � :. `�. *" � .. .�.,� i.., � .. 4 ^r a � K ' -,�; �' `" '.:�! t . . ��: � � , '��"'y.k.:,"�-r�.., �.A.v'1r� �' a r� � 1 � l I� }. �. �,.�� :'. � ,Y`': �� ' ' . rs,.: � a� 1 �� u i fy ��Rer . . . � .;{` �� °i . k� �, . � �{� ` y ' �� .y � y � ' � �� i9s�- . ' . . - � � � � �_��1�� 4` � n- � � . ✓'�� .. . '?' 1'� �l � W . .. �^r b �ir,�-.R x i i �`'�..�"�-�,,� � w�'�k,`s�. ' �'' -�,>. , �w91�..�,+i.�.�,...:C� � �'�.w . .j,. �`dP-� � �. . .,. _ �'w�e�' .. �� ✓ �� ": � �� - �� y �� ._ � � � - � �o , � » ba.. \, � �� .., n � �� .�-� —r �'��, �' . . ^� �� -�—�� " �..;,: �� — . ;� . . , , - . . . r , ' ��--=� — „�� ' � _, — „ 1W �11I'X! yiir lf6�� _RL i�.� . . �._—�__ . ..: .. .. . . .. . . . � � � � . .� �� ... � . ... .. . � � - ' �� _ _ �I � - . . � � � i � � �-:i _ 9 ' �� —_. I I '�u ,�� , SY� � � a ��. q q ., E\.. A g�'.�� b 4 Y � • '� 'M' � 9- �.?��a� . 4 - '�f. �'�� '�. ,.� .�-•�.�� .�,�•�:�.... , � �. �' " . �.��R"'�p�H . . . ' .r��. � � �_ .. . �., . _. r . . .... . .. . . ��. . . . . �-. �� 'a . �a�'.F""' - '4x' . "'C � `''c• . � � +f ' �'g �. �R: ' 5�:.�. - . :� �SW � 'ST � 'X' �yS` E..n'C-�i< �@; . � ��R< �`` E \� .r ' �k<c� `�k� ��'�� '^ 's��.��' ^ "�"/.` � e- 4T,$3' - 3z `s' ! WT � (6�'r�`��. ^'.� ��ia � �'��.i . �3 �-=�v`��'t R��p,��g v'=�c�.`� r , - Er �, m i � ��+� ;`� ��1"� ..� ,?� �•. � � Fs + •s. � r . '� t•� . . � � � # p y 5't�yi, � ,o r= �' ^r" ^a' , fR�j . � �. t ��.-_ ' rs � a � a'�? ..r*�� ~ a ��+. �, . +�,'- ' e r . �� u 5,��N �` w�^' ��L x� `� .. �,«.,� � — `�.L►yecs_� �� __ Y�' V � ( s �,u � , �� ' I �i 1 �• �`: . � � -� F� �; � �-_-'�� ; � -- � - � � _ — � , ��_.a,e _ � . �u �c • � �i � . � � � a : 4' ' � �9 �. �. �' � e ' �� s .rr ,�._.._ . ti�. :iK �/ 'R �C � �� 4 � � . �� {� ti �. '` �' � � - _;s�= ;�� z_ 1.�,� � � �;. �, :.- �.�� - �=� � � IT -.:,.. o. ,_, . �. ,,_ ' — j _- , . t �{ � ...� � .t e w� ' y F ' � � � . �, _ ". �`,,,a� s k y . � �� c+��e hy�"?` G Lst ... ... _ .. y�— ___. __.... `� _ � , '�y�51� F"N'�.4� ��, .�� i V "� . -ri :� � ,$ • I � . " �'1 ... :-__ ` "`+n-.,.«:� � `��'C?aNtisx.� � ��x �;�� x '� '? ' � `" x +r z .t. �:`h;. � ' "': ,t`w`i' 4� '�,"' ^�,x .'� �.,. , ,-.......- `�'�`, t .� , > . . ..._ ,c.%'. `•;".• � .->�:;� i �� Y� :'i;. z .� : .,. � � .. � ��' . (� - ' -_ �.._ . _. .. ' � .� - ,- � � f £— . � . . . _ '. �wfmmr 5 ' , � : .. �ti� . s � � .. � ., �� ^s� ��_�/ _ „ y _ � � '. ;..,. . - _ � — O.� �, __._- _' R,'. I ' ` -- d t ' Rp � � '� € � �� ' � V..��S � � y` "3V`..�,�K/ i �� /y ��, ' � ''Jp , � `4� f��,�#''�'�� t r�h�2��tv�„�^,: ,: � f' � '. ''"� a . , �" �p..�r;�. i:= r '+3 �� "' �'.; � s c" Z:e.' 3i w nd+"+„'e t f 1 x . . -�.-'� � t r q � . 4ti�`�°'�� *• `� � . . M�� s ; c� °�•�4�' a L,t: � �'��if�"� � � „_ � ��— __ .w.,�,.,� _._:._.� _.,. i. ..WY..+in_vYt�"n -^ -. . � � yyWwoW�".�....nw . .ua....... q..n.wr « � �. .... , .. . ... � � � .. Y-t ��. � . ' ... . . . �"` " ...... .�.-.. : . . _�.._._ . J i � . . .. _ .. _ .. . � . t -.. ' . ._ .... . _ �, •_ �,�.� � ... _ ' . . . . _ . � . ' . .. .. '�'� `' � .� " � � �,, /" ��- _��, � � �t _ r3 v� ¢ � � y '�� .°, i� � � ~ �s^�� . � %�j� � . �—� � \ � �. S.i`u , .. ....� . � / �. � �� A � qr¢� ¢a F ..��tS (-� � i�� x .., '`� r _ � . �;,;, w :s ;�x _ � a'�S ..p "Y jK, 5..'A._ . . `T�� Y� � . . . tl . . �...+v1. ��.35 .,.. - � � ��,�,r,�r�`�r . �- � _ � i . I �INF VEICSFCY D� A'IIN¢FL+SB'C6" � � ��I�S1QI1' "�� MI-07059 1998 To Orc �� 11 ' � 1' 1 �" � � 's , . . 5 � � �',� ..: z „�` � ,� s < a""� x , _ _ _ a,# � x z:�� .� .�? Mathew Mega, Barbcma Lukermarm und Robet Sykes What Is Cluster Development? Cluster development is the grouping of a parficular development's residential structures on a portion of the available land, reserving a significant amount of the site as protected open space. Many communities in Minnesota and across the United States are updating their comprehensive land use plans and establishing specific ordinances to guide the development and construction of residenfial clusters. New ordinances require design standazds and identify mirrimum open space and density standards. These key changes have prompted some communities to opt for more descrigtive temrinology, incIuding open space development or conservation subdivision design, for the more traditional cluster development. Wkrile the different terminology has created some confusion, each term stitl adheres to the three basic goals of cluster develop�nent: preserving open space, protecting critical ecological habitat and preserving agricultural land. The usable open space created by a cluster development can meet a number of community goals. These goals sometimes conflict with one another. For example, the protection of wildli€e habitat may be incompatible with the preservaUon of agricultural land. However, tho key benefit is the availability of open space, space that has been preserved by clustering units on smaller lots.'The landowner and the community make the ultimate decision on how the open space is used. __ _ ___ Options for Use of Open Space The open space created by cluster developments can be used in three ways: ••• Fxcdusive use by residents (e.g., private trails, passive recreationad areas) • •Preserva8on of agricultural Zand • � •Protection of wildlife habitcrt While open space has uaditionally been used exclusively by r�sidents, a local government can encourage the other two options through its comprehensive land use plan and subdivision ordinances. Initially, the municipality needs to identify the azeas that are important to the community and develop goals for these areas. These goals can then be realized by establishing physical design standards and density requirements, and by using transfer-of-development rights or other incentive programs. � �i ""i ti i � ��` ��' � R , t _�:. a 0. „�� ' ° �`3u .` �` � � Y - ��; .� ��`i. . v R• � � � a' i � I d T �j : � " `�. s � f b . ' � ��m �,�`� f ' R� a � y �` � � � 's � 7 � ' �� -°�-£>� -X� - � i -E- ° ��. F+ � sY �� : � �' � � j Y � � <�� R��+ �f ( I �' ,: � q _ - ' �}�1 !9 � ,r�� r � -'° � �t+'�!t �ti s`"� ..7�f f' a � 5� �,"� � � - �: _ ��. c r ' { �' � .. �'":i � ' "'� tr �II�� ;I��1N�� q,�. m w� �� -" � ;. �Y£ °F' �. M' — YF. �� ..^ � �.YSX' � 5 1 °k� M4c� ?�� r- ' _ �l�,l T �'. ,� i1 �,+. ,� � - � A9 .C: l�e. X [ � i � � � � �� . `. s' �� ; ' q ° > � � �' - �""+ t �S 3�' �,( � � �;. � " „� i. �r'" '` "R"" r _ y, . � � �� ' t � � �� ,,,.,��; � � t �, :. > , � � e' �i • ` �_� �:, �_ � . 2:;, ; , 51 �. .t : x e ,: � � � ' �� F � •a .. ,— �� 4 ti � r Y F j � �TT f �� ' T�, }_ .� q � � ` .�. 4 g" �� _ �l � 1't. � f.- � &t •_ �' £ s� _ � aa> ' �^' �~ '�, "'i�... � '� t---r- -c✓e e.... i:wlh±.r-�h�k� �^- F�P`9 .: � �,. .a.. r . .v��T� ... ... �v.�� . ' . = t x y ? '9�#„� �� _ �� a s °' e �� ,' � �,„ i , £ ' -Ka � 'iT' ^� l.i"��1. .. � ,�� ^7. . I� Y•, � i ;�` �� =rA',. :� i' �� . T `, e ..}.. ��..� �. � �� Y"S � f [ �vtl �� : _ e,'a. $ dic�'. � Y3� Y. . y;� E $�, F t �" Y 1� � �t -'j'� �". Y� 9� �� 3 - � s t3A r y �l LL �� '. 3 ' �` I �' ./+� . F� � �� x �s�zs, +'� � � = P� 'ca'-x � �� ' - { r k• y �'" e.e9 �.,F '�c"`� _ �� il .�h;�.'�� p � � .�. : r. . l� .",� +" �..- r- i . fS�" !.x } : ...E � �U � � '�.�� , � � '�' y p +- d'+ A�`Ci �v � � d ^t � n '4� «�..,, �rA }_K � � °'. _ � & . 3` a � i:h . . . t[4"�:`.:.M�z'�`a....� V4/ 1J( JJ 1:J.1CI �� •. �.. �.� '-'y. ��7 E..- e V� V � � � �� . k � .'., «��000�, �t ,� � -= � � �, :.. _ ✓ -. .,�raut b� n PRICE REDL.ICEDI UPDATED, MOVE IN� READYI LIST PRICE: $179,900 a.s re �!.' �tkv,i. � . �� Room Dimens�ons: Living Room Main I 13 X 12 Kitchen Main 18 X 12 Bedroom 1 Upper 13 X 11 Bedroom 2 Upper 12 X 10 �,��"}�� , - ____ ��,.�. e.�.: � �' �� - � Home Features: � ��,� zz ��., ° :"s�= - -.�.: '�; y , � ' 2 Stall Garage � r , - ';' �,� � <� .: � �� ` 's Includes: � ` ` e ,.*.. �� _ a :; Range, Microwave, Refigeretor, Washer, � � � � Dryer and Freezer � �" _ '` `� �� : � �< y;�; Taxes: � Tax AmouM: $796 For the Tax Year 2004 ? School Districf: ; K School District 625 - St. Paul School District :� - _, . ..- ._ � %eS - � " ' � � �. - s ��. �Z,�S`I�I�?E 12,�,,�72; I.�1rC. � �� : ° _. �G,. `� r . Bernard Tutu O�ce: (952) 888-7552 Cell: (612}$04-85T9 Fax: (952) 888-7592 APPEAL AGAINST CZUSTER DEVELOPMENT ON 1070 BURGESS � , . We, the neighbors who live in the vicinity of 1070 Burgess Street, St. Paul, also l�own as the Como Park Addition, ask you, the Members of Ciry Council, to vote against Planning Commission Resolution file number 04-13. We ask you to hear this appeal based on six potenrial violations of St. Paul Building Code # 64.300. I. The removal of trees: City Code 60.413 (13g). • Approximately half of the uees will be cut down. II. Cluster development: Also City Code 60.413 (13g). • About two thirds of the property will be developed leaving an insignificant amount of open space for passive recreational purposes and destroying wildlife habitat. III. Compatibility with the ea�isting character of the neighborhood: City Codes 64.4009 (d3) and 6400 (d3). • The neighborhood does not think this is compatible. • Neither do reaitors. • Neither does District 6 Neighborhood Planning • The design of these structures ignores the design features of the homes nea�t door. • The neighbors would have to lose their own greenspace when power lines are moved. They have carefixlly preserved theirs. • All of this lost greenspace will increase noise from the raikoad tracks. IV. Tr�c: City Code 64.400 (d2). • The slope of the driveways is too steep to provide adequate ingress/egress in the winter. • This is also a noise problem with this. V. Height: City Codes 60.413 (e), 61A1, 60.202 (b), and 60.413 (13g). • These buildings are too tall. The average height is about 32 feet. • The back yard is filled in, raising the garages about three feet above grade. VI. Development: City Code 64.400 (d4). • The neighborhood fears that these will become rentals, lower their real estate values, and contribute a process of buy, bulldoze and build. � s � 4. ��?� �� f� '°F�m.y A ��'C �. , "ss� � �.�....�� `-. . ..:.. � '^�v '. w . ... . . . J �.r� � � . x4v S:> u .3'�. . . . � . � � � �. . .. ' A �� ! � c .Li� k . . .,. 4 �� 5 A p S. . . . �T b � y .. � } `l yY'a, � � ..y�. ' . . _ � �� . �� - � � . � � . . . s � � � �� fi .. i .. sr , . . ,�2 f Y . ^,: : . � "� �. . .. . � f F� ' .. ..� . .. . . . . . , 4 ` � x � ` ' �. . . § �+z `' . �k��-` � . , . �"��° '� � . ' , .. ��,, �n,. n `� �,,;:, . } � ��' g'� 3 � '� � ' . h � v ^ � , � �� x�;. � s� ` �' ��+�� .� � �� . - , � � = ; �' � � � +� � � � �� GR i , . . � ' r . S � ' � �� x �' �� #�. � . . � �, �� "3: R xk� �y d{. $ � � g � ' ` 4 .e. F. N i° .k � :. � u �e .. ? � x > ` � � , • � }M • � � �� i g ''l ✓ 'SS ' :`�"'ay�ic � $['4: � "'�' .: :y, '� .e � �� . � _ $ . .. . . .. �_ _ fr',.e— ._ . . - . . p'k , b, �* v y . 3� . J' . y �,. '$ � .: � g _ „� i .. . .. . ; "^ . . . . .. � � it4 � �f� ' � � � .v�'' ��✓' . B � ; �r i � A -4, .. . .. . . . . . . _ � � � � � g � � � � • 9 ' �� • . .. � v.� . '�... �y � g a . . � ' t".n . . . . .. �� ,... q n .� � . �. .� � . . f� � �'�. , �'� �e�� _� � � �b � � .�� .°�`.' '� �.'�, ��" - Hwy. No. 101 Minnetonita, MN 55345 Yhbne {y�2) 4"!4-"lyb4 Y'aic (y52) 474-ti26"/ ' D� j�lJ�� y� y ,) 1��.;G 1" 11J YY .1"V :C1l=J1V1Li:7r �_ : �Y FOR .FIDM� IN 11!C�11T1VES`OTA ;YED: Oc#ober, 2003 "� DRAFTEIi: flctober 22, 2003 � DESCRIPTTON: 3 in the Couniy af Ramsey, State of Minnnesota, and legally described as foIIows: $, 9, 22, 23, Nozth 1/2 ofvacated Street adjacen# to said Lo# 24 arid Lot 24, Kaiman`s n No. 3 Addition to City of �t Paul, accoiding #o the certified plat #liereof on file and of �vith the Raznsey Couniy Recorder. Abandoning existing sewar services or making �sTU+c ensctions to G5ty sewer must be done to City RES70ENCE !s by a Lzcenced Sewet Drain Contractor under � from Public Woiks Sewer Section sed 4' P.V.G S�wsr od Two )' tsr ScrWcaa- � z �ed 4' P,V,C.� 5swer �a T.o �• .� tar evvic�a-� e C 1��t�V T I � t ' FWND 3f4` I � 1 O.it E�--ee+c-�—�r-��Ze 3 ' ; 3 1 . �� .4. ,: �' . !! • , . :� ' �► I �� ►� � h .� ��i ii ' `f , l � � 4 � � � ' j' Dtb �J' e � , a iad 4' P,V,C. saw�r ar�o,. ��.��.� 3 I r "- i� FENCE v+ -- 3 z ' � N �ObND 3�1' m� n • sTa+e aeT.wais-� � NOTE: Pnvate plumber sball � install new water service out to �, property line according to Saini �� N6 5�4�� scoPE o� woxx: � I. Showing the iength and direction oEboundary fines of the sbove Iegal description. The scope ofour services does not iriclude determining what you own, w}uch is a legai matter. Please check the legaldescriprion with your records or consult with competent legaI counsel, if necessary, to-make sure Yhat it is cozrect, and Yhat any maifers of record, such as easements, that you wish shown on the svrsrey, liave beecc shown. ' 2. Showing the Iucation of existing improvements we deemed importan� . 3. Setting new monuments or verifying flld monuments to mazk the comers of the properiy. 4. Contovzs digitize� from f� sent by Dept. of Public Works of City of St. Paul and exisiing u�lities from as builYplaz�s faaced from S#. Paul Water and Sewer Depts, � 5. Preparing this prelimmazy plat for yaur;eyiew and for tbe review of govemmental agencies. � � STANDARD SYtviBOLS & CflNVE�iTIONS: "�" Denotes 112° ID pipe with ptastic plug bearing State Licease 2dtimber 9235, set, unless othecwise noted Proposed elevations are shown with a box around them, wbile existing elevations are sbown witbout a bo�c Asows indicate the pro�aased IIow of storm water on the site. � I hereby ceriify fhat this plan, specificaiion, report or survey was prepared by me or under my direef supervision and tbat I am a licensed P�fess�ai Bngineer and Professional5urveyoz under the laws of the State of Minnesota. am s H. Pazk�r F.E. & P.S. No. 9235 � � / � /� 1 � r � H � t � � � �` S 0 33'3S' E ?�. �'�( _9Q� � �� 8.45 / . r _ - t I V \ uvf �' �bj36 " 1 , �� ! 'i P tl.� �` i �./�� '�' 1 � pP�N' 5�� . > �`�� I i � � � �I � I� f / � � �. � D B 4 A 0 � / j C ,j � � � / �w y t � �/ - � � / � - � � � � �-�.,,�/f`� �-- C ° � / ..—_ 1 — � — � Pro�o sd !2" P.Y.C. Schd IO Stam'Sir�r O O.S$ fini 1 f�roslAcGd to 4' dlamotor b�ylMaatinq C P�C. vnd pcskln croun with cona�G. � � _�ia.a,_ _ =�t�«, B � 9 , e �� ---r�s � �,.r �-_ C� 1-- ��..� i�.� I- - L�. i <C u_ L / � N <C (%) N - �',_,o c^ ; � • 21.15 "' '��,S8976'40"W .' 74.14 s i � " � '` I � �� 3 f . zo c,� � y. � „� � / = � "' — toot to�d.e _ __ _ 0.0 �9 9O ( ' ' � �� O�� \ ) \ �.,_, ,�� - 7� , �,�� ` (r � � � �' .�n � � 2 — � ` I � � / .. ,., 9� 7� \ �`. 4 � GRAPHIC SCALE � p ��`- � '� \ � � y` � � n � � b � � � �_.— / ( u+ r�er ) ' S 00'27'59" E � ( I I� NOTB: Trees to be saved in the oonstruciion azea must be -----�-� �--_-_ ____`._�__ M _ � i7 f�{{W�� ~ � �1 ��1 � POWER NOTE: Upon completion af stozm sewer POLE ��llation, stonn sewer inlets shall be protected &om sediment by silt fence, 6ay bales NOTE: Adjacent streets and alleys must be swept to keep #hem &ee of sedimettt Cotttractormustmonitos �. T3vry. No: 101 "IvlinueYorika; M2+7 55345 Phone (952) "474-7964 'Fax (952) 474=8267 ""�"v j`�"� �� y � 1 1Z�::G 1 �l V' Y V ly :i 11.:11V1:� iJ �' SCOPE OF TVORK: � � EY FOR ��' IN 11171V.NESO�"A 1. 5howing the length and direction ofboundary lines of the above legal description. The scope of ovr services does not iriclude - determining what you own, which is a legal maiter. Please check #he legal,desc�iprion wilh your necords or consalt with competent 3YEI9; October; 2003 �=� v� 1} � DRAFTED: October 22, 2003 legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that i# is correct, and that any matters of recorcl, su�h as easements, fhat you wish shown on #hs survey, have bee�z showa � DESCIZIPTTpN: 2. 3howing #he location of e�usting migrovements we deemed impartant . 3 in #he County of Ramsey, State of I�nnnesota, and legally,descn'bed as foIIows: 3. Setting new monuments or veri#'ying old monuments to mark the comers of the property. �• 4. Contours digitized from fau sent by Dept. of Public Works of City of St. Paul and e�sting utilities from as built plans faxed 8, 9, 22, 23, Noith i12 of vacated �treet adjacent fo said Lot 24 and Lot 24, Kalman's from St Paul Water and Sewes Depts. : n No. 3 Addition to City of St Paul, according to the certified piat #hereof on file and of . S. Preparing this preliminary piat for your �yiew and for the review oFgovernmenial agencies. � �vith fhe Ramsey County Recorder. S'i'AN1)ARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: . Aban@oning eatisting sewcr services or tnaldng "�" Deudtes 1/2" ID pipe with plastic plug bearing State Liceasa Number 9235, set, unless othenvise noted snecpons ta City sewer must be done to City e°�°�� Proposed elevations are showa with a box around #hem, while existing elevations are shown without a boac. [s by a Licenced Sswer IJrain Contrac#or under �� Anows indicate the proposed flow of storm water on the site. : firom Public Woiks Sewer Seclion {� ° I hereby cexiify that this glan, specification, report or survey wa prepared by me or under my direct supervision and #hat I �� C` � �� i am a licensed P�fess�al Engineer and Professional Surv� nder the laws of the State of Ivfinnesota. 9 %� �� _ � ,�- / �� '�� am s�i. Park�r P.E. & P.S. Na. 9235 � a � f I � / � � h � � /� , � r ~ Ql.,� 7 = � I o � � i d & o`� � � / 1 FWNO 3J1 � � � � � �/1 '� � 1 � �' �/` � 5 00'33'36" E � � � �O.n E OF UNE�- 7� ,��j�/ / � in ) i� _ � � � `_"l� 298.45 � ' : ' �»d 4' P.v.C. S�wsr nd Tro 7• du servlcea s z sad 4' P,KF� Sexer �j �d Tro t' .� ��f tW�C�i �O � � W _ � rad 4' A.Y.G. s+w.� d 7wo Y :u a•r.,ic�a 3 1 i �� e � , ,,: ,�. .. ` ;�l � ^� : r :,, � -�-• � ►�,� , ��, "� - --� --- �i' � --�=zi � � � � � - # '�►�^f�( ,� • • [=� : �.,, � �' ' � . .. ..: . —.. ►�� .��1�� . �_►�f�l0�li�• -r_ � -: �--- _ � - -- -- , : -- ^r:� � "��'i i �\�r7 ' 3 � . /". � ` ��,�� Fili�l �. �Y� �i�� .,—i'��Il��i�"' i , 4jwa . . .:.-- i - � �� r.- ��i��l��► 1 � �� .�'�� '• ��?��'1l,•. ` ..,, � �- _ _ -- . �_. �.� . � . � � �.��•,��. • � ■�_., �,«.,... .. F��; �7 I r ' i SiEEI FENCE � n� 3 H , �OONO 3�1" � �� / � . � � � sroNe aer,waus Exisnr+ � NOTE: Private plumber shall . RESioeN� f � install new water service out to „ property tine according to Saint ..� i FLOOR � ''�- l � � PR OS �� 6 TAl �x . A � �' ; � o ef5 �+ � �� L il��_ / (_1—.� �.s .8 ^ i �.1 � Prodoxd Con�� Wd��WW� � i a to �p7.o _ ss a�t -a- � 97 cu. � 11 y � ( �� , / �� 1� �r( � � � Ii — -� � 1 .J �. �— y, '�-_,Ses�s'oo"w .' 14.14 �3 M O� N ,a _ S 00'27'S9" E vi—p J � � � NOTE: Trees to be saved in the constrtiation azea must be -----�-� '--_-_ ..___�._�__ �—� _': �Q�� b� �, , ,, / /_�� GftAPHIC SCALE � e ,o � b � - ( nr r�er ) POWfR NOTB: Upou co�pletion of stoim sewer P�LE ��tyllation, stoim sewer inlets shall be protected &om sediment by siIt fence, hay bales � �' �u V �� PP �-�Q �. �i. � � L ! A?� �� t � , l��IT�".4L�� P�aN . , �, L\J' � � ` � �� L\v � v, � (Ff� �� I� i �1 � ,la; NOTE: Adjacent st�ets anii aIIeys must be swept to keeQ them free of sedimenf. Conhacfor must molritor s ,� � � .� � � � � � . � �. � _..� � � f ' �� s ��;,�° ;:� . � ��„ `� � �� ,� � � ��a.�:�� '� � �_�;.� i,� G "�'t L.9. � � = J , �T` � .,�� t : ":� ,. -�^"" _,�.,�° � �'. ° _ aj�'C� . � °'°�- L•' � �� Q .. � O n � � � _. �� ^ � e �� I d . �� ,.,.� � I • � .� _ � . .. . .. '�`y� '." � a�� ' h� c^ _ � _ �^Iw �w �� . ...`!yl. �� !wr: i..i. , � -, � �r` �+, tr .r— r?nw �y ;S� . s = „i�iy,��.., �' � � ` ..�°=� ,` � � � H _ � .�- - �' �,:. � ,, .,0. a "�; -� `��-, � _:-,�ffi.._.. �_ ,:,. ��5::3' � ' "t ;. � � �� a , �}�'�'�.�, " �.� �� J ; �a� t , "i : � � ` �� . �� q �g � -��. n v� . � �'$x� � � � . ` g_ � z �y � - - r; � � ,�;y. , r .. '� y �g , � � #�- „ a' .i; � ^, g , � �,. s � P # i � F � � { �! ^`N „�,::.: ��.r e' R aZ^�". �.,:r �b � ��-r �:.� � x -�xP= e_'.. : '��.�.x . r _ �� -��'" : ... ' � .� �,� ' .,.- � .�'F -',' . � �:;�: � �= `�. : a .. . �,.-'. � ' � �� . . .x .,". :. j ��• . rR. ��"�: : � ��°"�°� 4 F' . ` , . . �+S1R'� . � 'iea, r . �,.!a... 4 '. . .. ' _ '�.. s . .. . ' . � Y i Y ��• � � �� 4 � . �� N v � �� . ... . . . . � k � ��` t �, .�� ;� �" �§ - :� i �� x �� v y � � ? � . � , x ' � � � �° ._ �; "� � . . 9 �� :i'P'�in. ' ;.� a � . � � ' � S' � ' �-��"�� ;� .. . . _ r„ ..,a� �� _ �, � � ,, . �,� ,.� � . , m . � � x . �� ol' . .. . �� . �2 . . . ,...w � � : �� '� y # � �� . . � . �9 " ^- . �J �.•- .,.. . . .. . . . a� _ � � 3 7 -° ;Li. � . `� "�. , _ -. . ( , ; , . , + �Ob - - - � .- _ t � __ � ��"- � � � ; .�.- ra '"� .,,,_ I ;; �� ' '�� ' w�, ! . � : ;�..._3a;�. �,._. �� ^� . - ' . , � i� �V , Q� . _ � '' . - . . . .' � . . _ �� t� � ' `_ (y � � ' �'f'� �3�' .' � _ =�3 . � . . ; :\ �� :�_ -� �;� E e: - PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood plamiing committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. 312a l� aDD1�ss !bl� � CITY �� P Al.t I_._ ZIP S� �3 _ , -" f_'_ "' PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for othars as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before constnxction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential azeas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME /Jf / � / l' /�°E �� DATF �' I ! -� ADDRESS �� < CITY ��`��-� �� ZIP �� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and a11 developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before conshuction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standazds of quality to all residenrial areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you far keeping our city a nice place to live. �� ( � J N_AME �l�W � � � 1 C � �f�F220 � (�( DATE � `� � �6 � ( ADDRESS �� CITY J ( ��j, (� [� ZIP ��I� � PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Deaz Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Pau1. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new azchitecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and a11 developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. I � NAMEC � G' C �t U � ��ss `'1 `� , ! 6 ,n o' j ✓� DATE �=x�� U � S ,�- , CITY J l� �`� '"�t �� ZIP 12�2�2� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount o£ green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one hal£ storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood plamiing committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residenrial areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you far keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME �)g9 lt � S�_ .=J� i� SS DATE 3" oZ �- � CTTY � T �Cd ( 4 � ZIP .�'� � �� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Deaz Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Pau1. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is lazger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values far others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of qualiTy to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. /� � TA�v N� f 1,�-� DaTE �la; loy aDD�ss C l� � t�`P�'r�I � ��: -. J ciTY ST �t1(Il� iM N zzr S5 r v> PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Councii: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new azchitecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and a11 developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain appzoval befare constzuction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential azeas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME �� '�1�11�, �� DATE ��'� — � �� _ Ul � CITY� � � V�— ZIP � �S � � � ��- =��5 l PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We perition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Sueet in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas ofthis city. We appreciate pow support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME �-Q�bt GIGG �1(Ad,�AV1,t✓ DATE ,� I �^ (J � aDD�ss ►33Z ,��ar5t�,�lt �/.c w �`� c1� S� �� w \ N1� z� � 5 1 D''� �- �a '� G ' -� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to trigher crime rates. We believe that any and ali developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas ofthis city. We appreciate your support and thauk you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME � (i� i''L'.vJ '� DATE� " �j'� l• aDD�ss t t Z 3 czTY �� , '� z� �5��`� �' ��' PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standazd city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new azchitecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. � F � NAME �.+ t �` � �'y � �'�"t".rr' DATE � � L/I � CITY �,A s �U� �C�LA � ZIP�� 4 �:; - - -, PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and ail developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. } 3 NAME �-�'o �x„ ,, d � � cz °�r:. ?'f`� DATB � s � �` :; ?R :_,# � �.�—: � €��i'3T�� -- { � � ¢ �" \ ,`'�'9;Y_£.r+-.� ^*/�''.e'�r'n.>' r . , ee CITY �t ` .i ZIP � .s= ' `> � '� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crnne rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice piace to live. ADDRESS � �� ° S t�`,. G. `�` ��".��._ �.� c �� . �- � 5 `. ' :�� CITY � '" ��. �_� ZIP � �% !�' PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is Iarger than the one and one and one half storey homes along this sueet and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy properry values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crnne rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before constnxction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME�_�{�Ld dr'( � Q DATE � t D ��{ CITY � �� f � ZIl' �� =; PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Memhers of City Councii: We perition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy properry values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. L►`/�� ADDRESS CITY ZIP �� -� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster de*aelopment at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that thera should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME � AATE ADDRESS / 7� / Lv C�eui..-e-�' < � �J ..� - �-�y CITY ,cg�e�t�LC4 ZIl' �-S /�.� ! � . �% PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain singJe family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amoun2 of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high densiry such as this will destroy property values far others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and ail developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construcfion and demolition of property. Furkhermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. � F' :i� ; �> _ NAME >� � �'^,; Ce� � ., t �, , �-- DATE ` �- 3 ; � � � ADDRESS J � ; �� i'� �� CITY J�`, � L,,,..`� �� l l�.s; Z �, � S l� 3 :�� ; !; J PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Deaz Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paui. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should rema3n single fanuly homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of a een space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values far others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime xates. RTe believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of propezty. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to a11 residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. i 1�TAME t0�..� �, �'��'� DATE ��2 Z f�! . < <� _ � ADDRESS � � CITY C-> �%'Y '.!� ZIP � ��G � :�� _�< PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Deaz Members of City Council: r W'e petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that nei�borhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriafe axnount of b een space surroundin� each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is lazger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as tYus will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to hi�er crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval hefore construction and demolition of property. Furthermare we hope that you apply these same good standazds of quality to ali residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. i'1 j ; � � i � `f. �' � r � 'n .� n p--t � i '; f `�- -- � 7� � ✓ � NAME ,./t= � � _. � e. i � ;,�Ir! � o DATE „ --, � . l ' ` i1 � �- ' `` � —f ( �, , r { E�D�.S'.S I � L- 1.,. 4`�wi �..-��14; F � ,?�S . E � i ,�� , J '? CITY _�"�, t� i�s.:r ZIP t J :�� :�� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Deaz Members of City Council: We petition �ou to reject cluster development at 107Q Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of �een space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should vaoxk closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to ail residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME �� ,�� DATE c� /� 0 ADARESS `Z�/ l�,�Q'�/� S CITY ��µEZ,� ZIP ��4 3 �::z ` PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT "_ _ � _ .� �^ i Deaz Members of City Council: ' J We petifion you to reject cluster deveIopment at 107Q Bur�ess Street in St PauI. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surroundin� each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes alon� this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and a11 developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you appiy these same good standards of quality to a11 residential areas of this ciry. We appreciate yaur support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. N �,(s� DATE �"�r� ADDRESS CITY S} � ��, �'i/Gtd ZIP ,��`� j • ;;� ;� ° ly "r ` � -r ,� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain sin�le fanui,v homes on standazd city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of �een space surzounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new azchitecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibiy also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to a11 residential ueas of this city. We appreciate yaur support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME ��'� ��DATE � ��` �� aDp�ss 1� �c,..c..� �-;;,.�`� czT�``�,-��-c-_ . �\ , ��1 zrn ��Sl1 � �� _3} Q�� 5 PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain sinale family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of �een space surroundina each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is Iarger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly aiso lead to higher crixne rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construcfion and demolition of property. Purthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to ail residential areas of this city. We appreciate yaur support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME� �` �� DATE �� 0 �� 13�Z ��ti� �;� � Z lo �' U (A,ux � �'') �� ZIP v " � C � �� =� . (� c= � _ _ .. Y .., . ^ PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Deaz Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new azchitecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crune rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to a11 xesidential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAMB � i C. ��Al.(� f7 ��.C� DATE f�' �Y) ��I� n�- a�� M t �v�1� tfN N�l l�c��r CITY �` �,� � � ZIP SS :�� -a• PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Deaz Members of Ciry Council: , We pefition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Bur�ess Sireet in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain singie family homes on standard city lots and tha# there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one half starey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy properry values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood plannittg committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential azeas of this city. We appreciate yaur support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. I�AME ��.�',.��nxw � DATE � ADDRESS ��D��ti 4�v�- CITY �u `- �w°r� f��'t� 2zP J f � � � �� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear ivlembers of City Council: We pefition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single famiiy homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of �een space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this wi11 destroy properiy values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. �' ✓ NANLE ��' ��✓' l AATE � � � Z - � `� �� ADDRESS �` U ��I � �'v� T �d> CITY S; .� G. �� ZIP SSfr�� :� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of Ciry Council: W'e petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St PauI. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standazd city lots and that there should be the appropriate asnount of �een space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new arciutecture which is lazger than the one and one half storey homes along tlus street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as we11 as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly aiso lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residentiai azeas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME �P s� � v n J� n��.�1 � )� c�_DATE M t� r�_ � 1� � ADDRESS � D I� � 2 v NT /} d E CITY S T: P/} U�— (V! il/ ZIP S�S` ! 0 :�� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOP1r�IENT Deaz Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St PauI. We believe that nei�hborhoods such as this should remain sinJe family homes on standard city lots and that there should he the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one haif storey homes along tlus street and we believe that housing of high densiry such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could posaibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval befare construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to a11 residenfial areas of this city. We appreciate yaur support and thank you for keeping our city a nice placa to Iive. NAME GJ/ �� '�I-� DATE .� � o ADDRESS /�% CITY �� v� ZIP S�� f d-� � �� PETITION TO ST4P CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of Ciry Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We helieve that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standazd city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new azchitecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and a11 developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential azeas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for e� NAME� �i� � �� D�SS /C� � �' �� our city a nice place to live. � -f �'-� U� CITY � � �a �� z�.�.�� .� � =� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Membets of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain sin�e family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of a een space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new azchitecture which is lazger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property vaiues for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crune rates. We believe that any and a11 developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of properiy. Furthermore we hope thaC you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and ihank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME �� L� �� I��-� iB �� DATE � �� U ADDR.ESS � � CITY _ ��F � � � � ZIP � � i.�S� � � �� o�-�� PETITION TO STQP CLUSTER DEVELt�PMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to re}ect cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Pav1. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain sin�e family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amoun# of b een space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is lazger than the one and one haif storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy pzoperty values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crune xates. We believe thai any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before conshvction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreeiate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME X� DATE � �� AADRESS l4/j ,�,L� o��y� CTTY . . r•t� ZIP ��o� :� � ��°�� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We pefition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surroundin� each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is lazger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this wi11 destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibiy also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approvaJ before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of qual3ty to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. �� =� CITY _� � �y7�i / '� �1f,� ZIP �� G� ;� � �� f' !rr� .�° � L_ C / W PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition �ou to reject cluster development at 2070 Bur�ess Street in St Pau1. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remam sia�le family homes on standard city lats and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is lazger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this wili destroy properry values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and a11 developers should work closely with the neighborhood plauuiug comznittees and obtain approval before conshuction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that yon apply these same good standaxds of quality to all residential azeas of this city. We appreciate yaur support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live, ��`�-- _ � �.� � 7 �r-� � CITY � � . �G�fr�.e.K.�� fl''L�2 ZIP � � d � < �� .. �. - � .> NEIGI��RS �F PROPOSED DEVELDPMEN'T AT 1074 BURGESS There will be a pnblic ffieeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:3Q pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the CounciT, Cnpies of Mr. 7ohn Tittle's proposal aze available from Patricia 7ames (551 266 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Development ) The glaa is for 3 twin homes for fi faznilies with garage space for 12 cars where there as now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-fanvly homes on large 1ots. The next house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a fauvly neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked 6�obile homes lengthwise. Tlus type of unit looks exactly like investment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current neigJ�borhood. There aze density issues. Officially oniy 3 lots face Bargess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing siY housing units �ives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately refleci the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building pians. ?'�is plas� Dv�s de�ie�l apqsr�val frt��aa �3istriet b P4annfiaag ��.nc:3, �ut "�-. Tittie gresented it "that they had no oi�jectian to his plan". �hey had many obyections and so do we Yhe neighbors to ihis proposed cluster development If pnu cannot attend on Feb 5 piease sign ihis note and giee it to Karia Halm�uaa� S51 487 3653 or Kathy 1;3yers S51 4�8 2750. Place cammemts ou rev�rse side. "� aa�a �p se to t3�e pr pose�l r�eve�opment at 1470 �urgQSS" �� a� !O 6 at$c�� 06`� �fo r� AvP:� c�— P�tt��e ��6 —� `f `f � ��' 33 NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS - There will be a pnblic meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. John Tittle's proposal are available from Patricia James (651 266 6700 at the Deparknent of Planning & Economic Developmem ) The plan is for 3 rivin homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the chazacter of our neighborhood. The entire block is singie-family homes on lazge lots. The next hvuse at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 gazage stalls, says apartmem, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look ]ike you parked 6 mobfle homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks e�ctly ]ike investment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current neighborhood. There aze density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting, wiih the rest of �he homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constsucring six housing units gives each one oniy 20 feet. The plans pcovided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the frorn and back, not reflected in the buiiding plans. This plan was denied ag�roval from District 5 P9anning 'T'auncil, bur ?`id�, Tittle presented it "t6at thep had no objection to his pl�n". Thep had many objections and so do we the neighbocs to this proQosed cluster de�elopment. If you cannot attend on Feb 5 piease sign this note and give it to Karia Hoimlund 551487 1653 or i�thy i�Iyers 651488 275Q. P1ace comments on reverse side. " I am opp�sed to the proposed dewelopment at 1070 Burgess" 31�IICS�� t��0 �� ' U �� address l 0 3`l � r o.-.-} �� p�hone � 5 I- LI `6 �i -�/ S� S �f �3 NEIG��RS t3F PROPOSED I3EVELflPMENT AT i070 BURGESS There will be a pnblic meeting Thursday �`eb 5 at 3:30 pm City HaIl P3ease aitend. Ifyou cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Council._ Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tittie's proposal are available from Patricia 3ames (651 266 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with narage space for i2 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. 1'he entire block is single-fa�ily homes on large lots. The nea�t house at 10'78 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked 6�obile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exactly like investment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflecrive of the current neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. , In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing six housing units gives each one oniy 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. This plan n�a� denisd apq�roval fr�€n I3Sstrict � P7anning Cts�a�cil, b�1 t°��. Tittle presented it "that thep had no ob,jection to his plan". 'I'hey had many objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster develogmenL If you cannot attend on Feb 5 piease sign this note and give it to Kar1a Holmlund b�i 487 1653 or �a#i�y lYlyers 651 488 2750. �lace camments an reverse side. " I am opposed #o the propose�3 development at 1070 BurgQSS" sab .et� f�- �N#� .� ' �7 - D 7 adc3��ss �� (/� p�aane ��'7—�,Z3v 3 nf � � NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There wiIl be a pnblie meetiuig Tharsday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend piease sign our petition or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of ll4r. John �ttle's proposal are available from Patricia James (651 266 6700 at the Depattment of Planning & Economic Development } The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plau does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on large lots. The neact house at 1078 is a singie-family low ranch. These tail twin homes would be totally out of place, TSris is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartmem, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you pazked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks e�ctly like investment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current neighborhood. There aze density issues. Officially oniy 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing siac housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided da not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. This �lan was denied agprova} from DistricY 5�lanning �ounci8, but lY€:. Tittle presented it "that they 6ad no objection to his ptan". Thep had many objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed claster development If you canuot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Karla $olmtnnd 651 4871653 or Kathy M3�e7s b51 488 2750. P1acP comments on reverse side. u I 8IIl development at 1070 Burgess" / �3ate '' �� — , � �� . < � i i_, . � r � i11t _� r�i��r � , � • %]�►►��:i�/�i� .��-- 1'3�IG�t➢IdS fl�+ �'R��S�D ��VV��Pl�� A'�" 1Q'70 B��E�S There will be a public mestia�g Thursday �'eb 5 at 3:30 pm City �3all Please attend. If you cannot attend please si� our petition or send your own letter to the Council.. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tittle's proposal are available from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6704 at the Department of Planning & Ecanomic Development ) The plaa is for 3 ttivin homes for fi families with �ara�e space fer :2 cars :�hzre �here is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighbarhood. The entire biock is single-faznily homes on large lots. The next house at 1078 is a single-family�low ranch. These tall twin homes wouid be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of IZ gazage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked 6 aobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exactly like investment properiy designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current nei�hborhood. There are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on tfie block there should be no more than 2 housas in that space Constzucting six housing units �ves each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the buiIding plans. 'T�is plaen x�s �le�n�QS� asagsraval fr�s�n �isSr�et � �'Aarmzss� �a�:�;s:�, �� r- Tittle gresented it "that they had ao oujeciion to �is plan". Theq ha� many objec#ions and so do ave the ne6ghbors #o this pro�osed cfast�r �3evelapmen#. �' you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note anc� gflv� 9t to �£a*la �o1mHu;ad 651 4871653 or �a#4�y 1�'dyee-s 531 4�$ 215J. P4ac; camunes�Es un �ev�s-se side. " I a� npposed �o t� � serl �eve�s�g��ne�a# at 1€�74 �aarg�s" �, �� 2 ��$ j �� e� � ` ��a� �_ / t �d�� .` 1! �"� �ahs�� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT DearMembersofCityCouncil: _�.;,_�y�� =-tit_; ,��f,`Z i" % Li We petition you to reject cluster developmesYt at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is lazger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy properry values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construcfion and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. :" ' • � ->, �� ?4 i t�.lii JV f�DI��SS �� ZIP_ '� f j/�`,J cITY �i"; �„l�q c� , „ _ -�, ♦, J � � G.� ,� �� ' �• ��-�. � _� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOP1t�IENT Dear Members of City Council: 0�- �4� We perition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Bur�ess Street in St Paul. We believe tbat neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standazd city lots and that tiiere should be the appropriate amount of a een space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy properry values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you far k ng our city a nice place to live. �-j� w tw t ) , � / N �G!� �. DA��22��h /d��J� , ADDRESS ��l=� F'��-T � %/�a� �t,� �� -� P��/` Z�P ��.� t� �� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT �Lr� �� W � Dear iVlembers of City Council: We petition you to rejecf cluster development at 1070 Bur�ess Street in St Paul. We beIieve that neighborhoods such as this should reuiain sinJe family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of �een space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new azchitecture �vhich is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before conshucfion and demolition of property. Furthermare we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to a11 residential areas oftl�is city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME � /� � DATE � f �' ! � �f ADDRESS �� C�'CZ� �.,� � � �I � CITY � � �� c� � ZIP ��l � � :;� _� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT �. � � 9.� _. _ - y Dear Members of City Council: V�e petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single famil,v homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of �een space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy properiy values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly aiso lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighbarhood planning comscuttees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residenfial azeas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME ��"` � �"�{�� DATE f� J z/ ADDRESS �CL� � � CITY � � ` �.�= � ZIP �C � � ;� :� � , � � PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you ta reject cluster development at 1070 Bursess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of a een space surroundin� each and every home. We oppose any sort of new azchitecture which is Iarger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this wiIl destroy properiy values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate yaur support and thank you fox keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME `-" S� ��'�1 DATE � I�'u�T aDD�ss 1003 �'rp�,.-� {�%�, CITY � I�A�� ZIP � � V� a� =�� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition �ou to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standazd city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of b een space surroundin� each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture wluch is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this wi11 destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our ciry a nice place to live. NAME � Le-v tL(1 � ce_ r#� V'l7 DATE �C ��'� ADDRESS /D � g �j-a i� t r� IT � CITY S'� �C�ca � � �I'� � ZIP �`� � � � � :� :� � �_ _; PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 But�ess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain sinale family homes on standazd cify lots and that there shouid be the appropriate amount of a een space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this sireet and we believe that housing of hi� density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crune rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning coxnznittees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate yaur support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME `� f�Sca-v�.. � c^.�y � c� � DATE J� � I CS -�� ADDRESS 1 O 1� ��d � /� v-2 CITY `�fi �czuQ1 ZTP �`�J ( d �J �� . �, + f < PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Deaz Members of City Councii: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Bur�ess Street in St Pau1. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain sinale family homes on standazd city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crnne rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residenfial areas of this ciiy. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME C%s�' �-�� =i d UbS�(�Z� DATE �—�� CJ �. ADDRESS .l � CITI' � �� `�� ZIP ��l � � � � PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Deaz Members of Ciry Council: We pefition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standazd city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is lazger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy properry values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood plannuig committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. CITY �, { . �� ZIP �� . aDD�ss l p l� ° 3 1 �1�t1�tt.9t,�e.> o�.- ��-� NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our peririon or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. 3ohn Tittle's proposal are available from Patricia James (b51 266 6700 at the Depz.rtment of Planning & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 twiu homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is singte-family homes on large lots. The next house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you pazked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exactly like inveshnent property designed to be rented out, not at ail reflective of the current neighborhood. There aze density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of ttie homes on the block tY�re should be no more than 2 kouses in that space Constructing six housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. This plan was denied approval from District 6 Planning Conncil, but Mr. Tittle presented it "that they Lad no objection to his pian". They had many objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster developmen� If you cannot attend on Feb 5 piease sign this note and give it to Karla Holmlund 6514871653 or Kathy Myers 651488 2750. Place comments on reverse side. " I am opposed to the proposed de elopment at 1070 Burgess" °��„�- signed date `F� �' , Ll r �� address 1�t� Fi°�/'��-r�� phone ��c�'��I�l� �o a�° 33 - --- ' . � °+ � �a � � � ' � NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS 'There will be a pnblic mceting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Aall Please attend. Ifyou cannot attend please sign our petition_or send your owa letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Titt1e's proposal are available from Patricia James (651 266 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 fanvlies with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire biock is singie-family homes on lazge lots. The ne�rt house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apaztment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exactly ike investment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the currem neighborhood. There are density issu�s. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Consuucting siY housing umts gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. Tbis plan svas denied approval from Distr�ct fi Plannma�g C'�vnc:i, bu2 Mr. Tittle presented it "that they had no objection to his plan". They had many objections and so do we t5e neighbors to this proposed ciuster development If pon cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Karia Holmlund 651 4871653 or Kathy Myers 651 488 2750, Ptace comments on reve�se side. " I am opposed to h proposed development at 1070 Burgess" //, �- ,,Q signed'/� ��^ date = , c7 �, address �] �] IV{ �X-FeC� S"�- p�one L�� y�"i -"7::� � 9 m� 3� �. r. S' s �. . �l NEIGI3BORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a public meeting Thnrsday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. � If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of Ivdr. Iohn Tittle's proposal are available from Patricia James (651 266 6700 at r.he Depattmem of Planuing & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 twin homes For 6 families with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does noi fit the character of ow neighborhood. The entire block is single-faauly homes on large lots. The ne�rt house at 1078 is a singie-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 gazage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meering.it was said that it wouid look like you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. Tlris type of unit looks e�ictly like inve5tment , property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current neighborhood. Thi,re are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting, with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructiiag six housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accwately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the bi:ilding plans. This plan was denied a�O�roval from D9str9ct 5 Plannena Council, but Mr. Tittle presented it "that they had no objection to his plau". They had many objections and so do we the neighbors ta this proposed cluster development If you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Karla Holmlund 551 4871653 or Kathy Myers 651 488 2750. Place comments on reverse side. " I am opposed to the proposed development at 1070 Burgess" signed f�,rtr�%t�-�'� �%� ��/ rlate address i �'7�ryz�- G�' '�;��'=�° �� p�one ,� o 7 mt' 3 3 � r� � _. -- - �. � NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:34 pm City Hall Plesse attend. If you cannot attead piease sign our pefition or send yow own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. John Titt1e's proposal are available from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Department ofPlannuig & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of ow neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on large lots. The neat house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartmeirt, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you pazked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exactly like inveshnent property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the currem neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Consuvcting su� housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. This plan was denied approval from District 6 Planning Council, but Mr. Titde presented it "that they had no objection to his plan". They had many objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster development. If you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sigu this note and give it to Karla Holmlund 6514871653 or Kathy Myeis 651 488 2750. Place comments on reverse side. K I am opposed to the proposed development at 1070 Burgess" signet! , p�: 1�� date ' � G� � address �Q�� 1� � �"� phone�b -,5��-k S ° �' 3 � NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send yow own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. John Tittle's proposal are available from Patricia 7ames (651 2b6 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is singl�family homes on large lots. The next house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked 5 mobile homes lengthwise. T'his type of unit looks c�actly like investment properky designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current neighborhoad. There are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Bwgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing six hausing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. This plan was denied approval from District 6 Planning Council, but Mr. Tittle presented it "that they had no objection to his plan". They had many objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster developmen� ff you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Karla Holmlund 651 487 1653 or Kathy Myers b51 d88 2750. Place comments on reverse side. �� I am o osed to the proposed development at 1070 Burgess" signed � ��'��'`�'� ��'�t� L��er+��date � ` � j ' � address �� nl� �}�� ; phone �� I�� c t �il� 7� �' � �� 2i � .� l 0 3 PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as tlus will destroy property values for others as well as add a certaiu degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before conshuction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAM$ 1.��Zr�s �i �;,� niSo �- DATE 3/G G ADDRESS _ _ � �� 'I � �' = � ie_ � .� �" Nc. CITY .S �' �� / � fy,� ZIP SS/� 3 NEIG��RS fl�' PROPOSED DEVEI,�PMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a pnblic meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Piease attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. John Tittle's propasal are available from Patricia 7ames (651 26fi 6700 at the Department of Planning � Economic Development ) The glan is for 3 twin homes for 5 families with garage space for ? 2 cars whare there is now one home-at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our single-family homes on large Iots. The next house These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a faznily neiahborhood. One long neighborhood. The entire block is at 1J78 is a single-family�low ranch. stretch of 22 garage stalls, says apartznern, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you pazked 6 rnobile homes lengthwise. Tlus type of unit looks exactly like investment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 12Q feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the biock there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Canstrucdng six housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the fronT and back, not reflected in the building plans. 'i'his plan ava� deniea3 a�mr�val ires�a �asts�c# b�4annnng ��n�i3, bz�t '�-. Tittle gresented it "that they had no objec#ioa to his ptan". �hey had many objections and so do we tbe neighbors to this progosed cluster development. If you caunot attend on Feb 5 pHease sign this note and giv� it to I£ar9a Holmlund 551 �871653 or Ka#hy �Iyers b51 488 2750. P9ac� camments an rev�rse side. ' , G� ta the �roposed development at 1070 Burg�ss" �3a� l� , , : E'F" � �� :F'�f E.t.... �� . � N�IGI��RS ��' �ItOPOSED I)EVE�.Oi'ME�d'I' A� i070 BURGESS There will he a pnblic ffieeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Ha31 Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send yow own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tittle's proposal are available from Patricia James (b51 26b 6700 at the Departmern of Planning � Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 tw�n homes for 5 families with garage space for :2 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is singie-family homes on large lots. The next house at 1078 is a single-family�low ranch. These tall twin homes wouid be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stails, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked b rnobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exactly like investment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houszs in that space Construcring six housing units g'ives each one only 20 feet. The pians provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. 'd'his plan �r3s de�niee� a�apr�val frn�e ;isir'sci b �'ga�:ffieaeg �'¢�nc;3, ��8 �r- Tittle gresented it "that Yhep had no objection to �is plan". They had many objec#ions and so do we the neigLbors to this proposed cluster development If you camnot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it Yo Y�ar9a Holmda�n�i 651 487 1553 or Ka#�y �Iyers S51 4gS 2754. Ptac� comme�ts an rev2rse sede. " 3 am apposed #o a entfdt 1070 BurgQSS" ��g�er� �"° � da#� _� � e� �c�� f�'� � f '�° p�one �% 7��fG � �, �- =7 �r. °ti PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We pefition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in 5t Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is lazger than the one and one half starey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and a11 developers should work closely with the neighborhood plaxuiing committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate youz support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. %`r`_-� „��_ t, j'�- _ ADDRESS � � �" : ? -, � n CITY �"� ��`�"� n ( .�2- Z�i}/ �i':�v . � — ; � -. � � — ,�i.� � _5"S fG ; , �- w� _ �� ° - � PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT a.� �� o �u r� �ss ��-, Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of a een space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as weli as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and a11 developers should work closely with the neighbarhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential azeas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. r� NaME ��rr;U ��I_ � DATE ' .� L' lI � ADDRESS /� � iS� � /�.�J� i�� v� .S � CITY –:-�9��i�� `��.,��/� ' ZIP /,'S` / lJ `�i— z m �' � 3 NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS Tt►ere will be a gublic meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you catmot attend please sign ow petition or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. 3ohn Titile's proposal are available from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Degartment of P iannin° & Economic Developmern ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the chaxacter of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-fatnily homes on large lots. The ne�rt house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 gazage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meering it was said that it wouid look like you pazked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. Tkris type of unit looks exactly like investment properiy designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially oniy 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing six housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. This plan was denied approvat from District 6 Planning Council, but Mr. Tittle presented it "that they had no objection to his plan". They had matry objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster developmen� If you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Karla Holmlund 6514871653 or Kathy Myers 651 488 2750. Plate comments on reveise side. " I am opposed to the proposed development at 1070 Burgess" signed ' i date o �' address �l�.�z ��ss .��_ phone �� 73o,//Uq ,�S/d� � �� j NEIGHBORS QF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tittle's proposal aze available from Patricia James (651 266 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 5 families with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The emire block is single-fam'sly homes on lazge lots. The ne� house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long suetch of 12 garage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exactly like investment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the currem neighborhood. There aze density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there shoutd be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing six housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. This plan was denied approval from District 6 Planning Council, but Mr. Tittle presented it "that they had no objectiou to his plan". They had many objections and so do we the neighbors to t6is proposed cluster development. If you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Karla Holmlund 651 4871653 or Kathy Myers 651 488 2750. Place comments on reverse side. " I am Q g�o ed to��he�'o� os de � lopment at 1070 Burgess" l�+� —'� k�^s�^� signed �, `��: 7 u�. date 3 l �"Q_ �, � Y address /C�.S� � T3�.- �s s ��, phone 6 s yS 7- /L- S� 3 � �-�' 3 3 NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Piease attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tittle's proposal are available from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Department ofPlanning & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 tvrin homes for 6 fanulies with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on large lots. The neart house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartmem, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you pazked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exacdy like investmem property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the cwrent neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially onty 3 lots face Burgess, 12Q feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing sui housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the huilding plans. This plan was denied approval from District 6 Planning Council, but Mr. Tittle presented it "that they had no objection to his plan". They had many objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster development If you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Karla Holmlund 651 4871653 or Kathy Myers 651 488 2750. Place comments on reverse side. " I am opposed to the proposed development at 1070 Burgess" signed �%'/I_//h,r,�i < ��.�� date �/3/��l address � `7� ,� phone �� -�� 3z a� �� O�` �4� NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS Tiiere will be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tittle's proposal are available from Patricia James (651 266 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Bevelapment } The pian is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on large lots. The ne�ct house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a fanvly neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you pazked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks e�ctly Sike investment property designed to be rented out, not at all reAective of the current neighborhood. There aze density issues. O�cially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing s'vc housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. This plan was denied approval from District 6 Planning Councii, bnt Mr. Tittle presented it "that they had no ob,jection to his plan". They had many objections and so do we the neigfibors to this proposed cluster development. If you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Karla Holmiund 651487 1653 or Kathy Myers 651488 2750. Place comments on reverse side. " I am opposed to the proposed development at iQ70 Burgess" signed� / �� date Gr.�l ,� � a� address jG',$�� /�LL�'C�'�S � phone lP "`�� % 7 3l �f 33 r�T. �,� �;. �_. ` .,,� � NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tittle's proposal are available from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 faznilies with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of ow neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on large lots. The ne�ct house at 1078 is a single-£amily low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 gazage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks e�ctly like investment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current neighborhood. There aze density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing six housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. This plan was deuied approval from District 6 Planning Council, but Mr. Tittle presented it "that they had no objection to his plan". They had many objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster development If you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Karla Holminnd 6514871653 or Kathy Myers 651 488 2750. Place comments on reverse side. " I am opp ed to the proposed development at 1070 Burgess" signed_ � � � � // date l � �l — C� � address �� 5 5 ��, �S� � Y phone l� 5� — 7 �J � 3� �°� 3 � - : ,.. _ -♦ lk NEIGHBORS OF PROP06ED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send yow own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tittle's proposal are available from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Butgess. 'The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on large lots. The neact house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. Tlus is a family neighborhood. One long skretch of 12 gazage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you pazked 6 mobile homes iengthwise. Ttris type of unit looks exactly like investment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the eunent neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on �e block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing siY housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. This plan was denied approval from District 6 Planning Council, but Mr. Tittle presented it "that they had no objection to his plaa". They had many objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster development. If you cannot attend on Feb 5 please siga this note and give it to Karla Holmlund 651487 1653 ar Kathy Myers 651488 275Q. Place comments on reverse side. �� I am opposed to the proposed develo�nent at 10'10 Burgess" date /� 3L� - � L f C, �S �' phone /�'�>- y �`�-��o l z � o� �� _ � NEIGHBQRS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a pnbfic meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Plesse attend, If you r,annot attend please sign our p�ition or send your own letter to the Co►mc�. Copies of Ms. JoS�a T'rttie's proposat are avaitabie from Patricia. 7ames (651 266 67d0 at the Department of Planning & Economic I�velopmeat ) Tt►e plan is for 3 twia homes for G families with garage space for 12 cars where tkere is aow one home at 2070 Burgess. The glaa does not fit ffie character of our neighborhood. The entire block is siagie-fami(q homes on large lots. The ne� house at 1078 is a singie-f�nrily low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartmc�rt, not farnily. At the iand use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked 6 mobHe homes 2engthwise. Tiris type of wnt looks exactly like invesUnent property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the cwre�nt neighborhood. There ace density issues. Officially oniy 3 lots face Burgess, 120 fc�eY. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Consuucting six housin� units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accivateIy reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the from and back, not reflected in the buiiding plans. This plan was denied.approval from District 6 Planning Council, but Mr. Tittle presented it "t6at they had ao objection to his. pian". T6ey hxd many objectious and so do we the neig6bors to t6is pmpased daster devdopment If you cannot attend on Feb 5 pleaae sign this note and give it to Karla Hof�nlund 6514871553 or Kathy Myers 65i 488 2750. Place cos�ments on reverse side. " I am oppased to d►e proposed development at 1070 Burgess" g,�ea ��D� a�� / - d� address �G y� iSr 7,�� 1,P� l phone /�� _ �rk7- � U�' z� �f` 33 NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:3Q pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send yow own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. John Tittle's proposal are available from Patricia 7ames (65l 266 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of ow neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on lazge lots. The ne� house at 1078 is a single-faznily low ranch. These ta71 twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you pazked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks e�ctiy like investmem properiy designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing s"uc housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between ihe from and back, not reflected in the building plans. This plan was denied approv$t from District 6 Planning Council, but Mr. Tittte presented it "that they had no objection to his plan". They had many objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster development If you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Karla Hoimlund 651487 1b53 or Kathy Myers 651488 2'750. Place comments on reverse side. " I am opposed to e proposed elopment at 1070 Burgess" signed � date�'a address /�� 1��`0,�� s phone (Q� /- �8'� 8�1".�� 27 m� �'� Q�+ NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT id70 BURGESS There will be a pnblic meeting Thuisday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. ff you caunot attend please sign our petition or send your own lettea to tfie Couac►�. Capies of Mr. John T'rttle's propasal are available from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Develapmern ) The ptan is for 3 twin homes for 6 fam7ies with garage space for 12 cxrs where there is now one home at 10�0 Burg�,ss. �,/ �� The plan does not fit the ct�aracter of our tteighborhood. The entire block is single-famity homes on large lots. The nart house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes woutd be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says aparunent, not family. At the land use nneeting it was said that it wouid look tike you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. T}ris type of unit looks exactly like investment propeaty designed to be rented out, not �t all reflecrive of the euneat neighborhood. There sre density issu�. Qfficially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fittin$ with the rest of the homes on the biock there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing six honsing writs gives each one oniy 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the from and back, not reflected in the building plans. 1'his plan was denied.approval from Tlistnict 6 Planning Coune7, but Mr. Tittie presented it "t6at theq had no objection to his plan". They had manp objeMioas and so do we the neighbors to this prnposed duster development N you canaot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note aad give it to Karla Holmlund 6514871653 or Kathy Myers 651488 275t1. Place comments on reveiae aidw K I am op ed to the p�oposed devetopment at 1070 Snrgess" � ''f' i�� '`�� iM d�te��/ �� signed f; �:'; � � �� l /,,)/� c , address l �� 2� phone vC � 1 " `7 � � :� �� I �.� m � � �- � �`'� `�� NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1fl70 BURGESS There wiIl be a pnblic meeting Thnrsday Feb 5$t 3:30 pm City HaIl Piease attend If you cannot att�d plase sign our pe�irion or send your owa letter to the Couac�. Copies of Mr. lohn T'rttle's pmposal are available from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at t6e Departmeat of Planning & Economic Dc.welopmeat ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for b famt'lies with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The pian does not frt the character of our neighborhood. The emire block is singte-family homes an large lots. The next house at 1078 is a singie-family low ranch. These tall Ywin homes woutd be tatally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartmem, not fanvly. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look l�ce you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. Ttiis type of unit looks exactly like imreshnent property designed to be rerned out, not at all resective of the current neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially oniy 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more thaa 2 houses in that space Consuudittg sQC hou�ng umts gives �ch one only 20 fcet. The pIans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at teast a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in ffie building plans. T6is plan was denied.approval from District 6 Planning Coancil, but Mr. Tittle pre.senteci it "that they had no objecYion to Lis plan". They had many ob,{eetions and so do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster developmen� If yon eanaot attend on Feb 5 pkase sign thie note and give it to Kada Hotminnd b:514871653 or Kathy Myers 651488 275t1. Place comments on reverse side. " I am oppos � t�e pr�a�� development at 1U10 Bnrgess" � �v G signed� �-,-�v date � .3/ 6�/ addr�ss /03l ,.�� sT phone �� 2 Y o �' �� ;—, .;� NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 107fl There will be s pnblic meeting Thnrsday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot atte-nd plesse sign our petition or s� your own letter #o the Counc�. Copie.s of Mr. Jolm Tittie's proposal are avaiiable from Patricia laa�s (651 266 6700 at the Departmem of Planning & Econonric Development ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 8 farnilies with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plaa does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The ernire biock is singi�famiiy homes on 3arge lots. The ne�rt house at 1078 is a�ngte-family low ranch These tall twin hoa�es would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. O� long streteh of 12 �arage stalls, says apartmem, not famiIy. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked 6 mobile homes 3engthwise. This type o£ unit looks �xactly Sike investment propaty designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the currem neaghborhood. There are density issues. Offiraally only 31ots face Burgess, 124 feet. In fitting' with the rest of the homes on the block thete should be no more tban 2 houses im tUat space Conspucting six housing units gives each one only 20 fecx. � The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at teast a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not re8ecxed in the building plans. This ptan was denied.approva! frnm District 6 Plann�g Conneil, bnt Mr. Tittle presented it "that t6ey hnd no objection to h� pjan". They had maffy ob,iections and so do we the neighburs to thi� proposed ctuster d�etopment, ff you canuot attend on Feb 3 pleare sign this note aad give it to Karla Hatmlund 651 4891653 or Xathy Myers 651488 275H. Place comments on reverae side. K I am opposed to ffie proposed deveIopment at 1470 Burgess" signed '�w� L �� t.� �� d$te �� /� > L% 1 J �--�--- �--;=— ,� �� address � � � . � �i ��c � �, Phone `� S/. ,� l- � S� �z m� 33 NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please �ttend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send yow own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Titt1e's proposal aze available from Patricia James (651 266 6700 at the Depamnent of Planning & Economic Development ) The pian is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with gazage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Bwgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on large lots. The ne�t house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. Tiris is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the ]and use meetiRg it was said that it would look like you parked b mobile homes lengthwise. �his ty�ie af unit looks exactly like investment properiy designed to be i#nted out, noi�t-all reflective af 3he cmrent neighborhood. There are density issugs. Officiat�,only 3 lots face Bur�ess, 120 feet. In fitting with the re�t of the homes on the block �re should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing six housing units g�ues �h one valy 20 �'�t. The plans provided do not accurately reflect Ehe site. There is at least .a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the bnilding plans. This plan was denied approval from District 6 Planning Council, but Mr. Tittle presented it "that they had no objection to his pl�n". Thep had many objections and sa do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster development If you cannot attend oa Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Karla Holmlund 6514871653 or Kathy Myers 651 488 2750. Place comments on reverse side. " I am opposed to the proposed development at 1070 Bargess" signed , E�� date ! .3 � o address �� ''��i �� phone �-��' NEIG��RS fl�' P12f�POSED DEVEi3OPMEP�'I' AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a pnhlic meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm Cify Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our perition or send your own letter to the Council._ Copies of Mr. John Tittle's proposal aze available from Patricia 7ames (651 265 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic DevelopmenY ) The plan is for 3 iwin homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home. at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on large lots. The next house at 1�J78 is a singie-family low ranch. These tall twin homes wonld be totally out of place. This is a family neighhorhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. Tlus type of unit looks e�ctly like investment properiy designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the curtent neighhorhood. There are density issues. Officially oniy 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes an the block there should be no more than 2 housas in that space Constructing six housing units gives each one oniy 20 feet. The pians provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. 'd'6is plase �vas denf�� a�a�raval fr�rsa �i�tr',cz ��4anneaeg �'e�JSat33, but '�-. Tittie gresented it "that they had no objection to �is plan". They had many objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposecl cluster developmenL �f you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Kar3a Holmlunrl 551 48� 1b53 or Ka#�y iVIyeas S51 4�S 2750. �tac� camments an rev�rse sfide. " I a� opposed �a #h �r poses� �levelopment at 1Q70 BurgQSS" ��es� �a�° � �7 �dd��ss � �.J � � .Dr:'l5Z ; p�n��a� —�� Q�-� �45 NEIG��iZS ��' PROP+OSED 33EVE�,L)PME�'� AT 1470 BUIZGESS There will be a pnblic meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petitioa or send your own letter to the CounciI., Copies of Mr. 7ohn TittIe's proposal aze available from Patricia James (651 2b6 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Development ) The glan is for 3 twin homes for 6 famiiies with garage space for :2 cars where there is now one homa at 1070 Burgess. The glan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-fasnily homes on large lots. The ne�rt house at 1J78 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked 5 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exactly like investment properiy desi�ed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the cutrent neighborhood. There aze density issues. Offcially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing s� housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. '�'his pias� �as �leni��3 a�nraval fra� 33dstsict � P]as��ing +C��sc9�, �� ir�~- TSttle gresented it "that they had no oi�jeciion to �is plan". They had many objections and so do we the neighboas to this proposed clnster deuelapment If you cannot attend on Feb 5 g�iease sign this note and give it to Karla Hoimla�nd 5�1 487 1b53 or �athy Myers 553 188 2750. P9ace cammemts an rev�rse s�de. " i am �ppos;�� to the proposed / C s�g�aet�_ �dd� t at 1070 l3urg�ss" �� _�� , p�o�e �� —Q��`�'-- �, �a'_ -�,�.� NEIG��RS �� PROPOSED �DEVELO�ME��3' A3' 347Q BIJ�ZGESS There wiIl be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Council, Copies of Mr. John Tittle's proposal are available from Patricia James (651 26b 6700 at the Depattrnent of Planning & Economic Development ) The glan is for 3 twin homes for 6 famiiies with �arage space for 12 cazs where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is singie-faanily homes on lazge lots. The next house at 1078 is a singie-family�low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 gazage stalis, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked 6 rnobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks e�ctly like investment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current neighborhood. There aze density issues. Officiaily only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the hlock there shouid be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing siY housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the buiiding plans. T3sis pian �va� tlen:es3 a��sr�val ?'ra€�s �istr9c� � �4as�mdaea �a�ssc3i, �z�� `"�?- Tittle gresented it "that they had no objection to his plan". They had many objecfions and so do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster develo�Oment If you cannot attend on Feb � piease sign this note and give it to Karla Holmla�na3 551 487 1653 or Ka#hy i�Iyers 551 4$3 2750. �'3ace cammemfs an rev�rse szde. " I am opposed �o t� raposed development at 1070 �urgQSS" s�g�e� * ►"�"�"-'� �at� ) 0 � � `� �d�� ( ��—�� ' phan� � '�1 �� _ - � �7 PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Deaz Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is lazger than the one and one half starey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of shess to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and a11 developers should work closely with the neighborhood plauning committees and obtain approval before conshuction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to a11 residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME �,.��,,�, ��_AATE � /` � � v `� � � CITY��Gr� � �-��e,�-,1 ZIP�� 5 / C� � _ -; ', NEIG�flI2S ��' PROPOSED �3�VEi,�PME�'T AT i070 BUI�GESS There will be a pnblic meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our peUtion or send your own letter to the Council._ Copies of l�r. 7ohn Tittle's proposal are available from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Depariment of Planning & Economic Development ) The pian is for 3 twin homes for 5 families with ?arage space for :2 cars whare there is now one home-at 1074 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on large lots. The ne� house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes wouid be totaily out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of IZ garage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you pazked 6 rnobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exactly like investment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current neighborhood. There are density issues. Officiaily only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houszs in that space Constructing siz housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The pians provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. �'his plan zvas deniesl a�a�sr�val fro€s� �3isiri�ct ��4anmen� ��rc33, ba�� ?rl-. Tittle gresented it "that they had no objection to Lis plan". They had many objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster development. If ynu cannot attend on Feb 5 piease sign ihis note and give it to Karla Holmlund 6514�7 1553 or Kathy 1Vlyers b5i 4�3 2750. P9�ce camments an rev�rse sfide. "� am opposes� �a #�e proposerl deve�opment at 1010 �3urgess" ��g�e��9,.,.._ ��i� oa- �m -o �i �c��ss n >q�� „ ��n�aie 956-v9o-38? I i�+ IG#�ORS t�I+' PROPOSED �ETJEI.i�PME�'I' A�' 1070 BURGESS There wsll be a pnblic ffieating Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attead. ff you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own let#er to the Councit. Copies of Nfi. John Tittie's proposai are available from Patricia 7ames (651 2b6 6700 at the Depattment of Planning & Economic Development ) The glan is for 3 twin homes for 6 fazr,iiies with garage space for :2 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on large lots. The next house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 gazage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it wouid look like you parked 6 rnobile homes lengthwise. Tius type of unit looks e�ctly like investment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current neighborhood. There are density issues. Offciaily only 3 lots face Bnrgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 hauszs in that space Constructing s'vz housing umts gves each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building pians. �3is plan w�s a3enie� a�aqsroval fra�a l3is#ric# � P!annflmm� �t��nc:l, �� °ri�. Tittle gresented it "that thsy had no objection to his plan". They had many objec#ions and so do we the nesghbors to this proposed cluster develonment If you cannot attend on Feb 5 Qiease sign this note and give it to Karla Holmleanrl 651 487 1553 or Kat�y iVIyers 551 4�3 2750. �4ac� camments an reverse snde. "� am opposed #o �he proposed deve�opment at 107{� �iurgess" 5��4ESa -------� L�� c�a_ lo_ o�/ �t�� l03 �`� �� e,.. , pincraae 65i-��3s- �o� � �- PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of properry. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards o£ quality to all residential areas of this ciry. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME �Q�J2_. G��,�o�'�� DATE � �1—�� crTY �� j/ zrn 5 5 I�f � t7 �� NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign ow petition or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tittle's proposal aze available from Patricia 3ames (651 26b 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Developmeni ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of ow neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on large lots. The next house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it woutd look like you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks e�ctly like investment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Bwgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing six housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accwately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. This plan was denied approval from District 6 Pianning Council, but Mr. Tittle presented it "that they had no objection to his plan". They had many objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster development ff you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Karla Holmlund 65148� 1653 or Kathy Myers b51488 2750. Place comments on reverse side. �� I am opposed to address development at 1070 Burgess" ' + F !�� ,�J date e� � ��, � �L � � ��1 � � � phon � - L b 1 "-�� 1Sa�F'�� d ��.� - NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a pnblic meeting Thnrsday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of Nir. 7obn Tittle's proposal are available from Patricia 3ames (651 266 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes dn large lots. The next house at 1078 is a singie-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. Tlris is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exactly like investment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflecrive of the current neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should lie no more than 2 houses in that space Consuucting siY housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. Ttiere is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. This Qlan was denied a�proval fro�n Dis#rict S Planning �Cau:�cil, aut ?�Ir. Tittte presented it "that they had no objection to his plan". They had many objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster development _ If you cannot attend on Feb 5 piease sign this note and give it to Karla Holmlund 651 487 1653 or Kathy Myers b51 488 2750. Place comments on reverse side. " I am opposed ta the praposed development at 1070 Burgess" signed�T �� o� �,LQ Q.c = c�ate ;,� - ( -O address l D?� O o� �� r,c, phoBe (p �j- i( $"�j -03 �� : . � �-- � � . � PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there shouid be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is lazger than the one and one hal£ starey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy praperty values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood plam�ing committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of properiy. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standazds of quality to a11 residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. � i � NAME ✓� �„� ,� ,� � �'�' DATE o _ , / rn CITY �- �(� /� � 7 2'�l . ZIP �-�I a 3 �� lY ��' �� ~�`:� NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a pnblic meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sgn our petition or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of l�r. 7ohn Titt1e's proposa! are available from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Depattment of Planning & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the chazacter of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on lazge lots. The next house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartmern, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exactly like investment . property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the cutrent neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting� with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing siaz housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in th� building plans. This plan was denied approval from Distr'+c4 6 Plasenin� �'ouncil, but 1VIr. Tittle presented it "that they had no objecYion to his plan". They had many objecrions and so do we the neighbors to t6is proposed cluster development If you cannot attend on Feb 5 piease sign this note and give it to Karla Holmlund 651 487 1653 or Kathy Myers b51 488 2750. Place camments on reverse side. " I am opposed to the proposed development at 1070 Burgess" �"� r -2 sigue� �'1'{✓�0, �%ylr�t,�, 9 _� � �ate _��n address 1 � D � � phone 3 6� ��u _ . �� NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a pnblic m�ting Thnrsday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall 1'lease attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Cou�1. Copies of Mr. 7ohn T'rtt(e's proposal are available from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Departmem of Plamm�g & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cais where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The emire block is singie-family homes on large lots. The neacx house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. T`hese tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartmern, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that h woiild I�k like you parked 6 mobile homes leagthwise. This type of unit looks esactly like investmem property designed to be rented out, not at all re8ective of the curreut neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there shouid be no more than 2 house.c in that space ConstYUCting si�� housing units gives each one only 2(} feet. The plans provided do not accauately reflect the site. 1'here is at least a seven-foot drop between the from and back, not reflected in the bw'lding plans. T6is plae was denied.approval from District b Plsnning Conneii, but Mr. Tittie presented it `°th$t theq had ao objectios to his pian". They hAd manq objections sud ao do we the neighbors to this pmposed duster development If yoa cannot attcnd oa Feb S please sign this note and give it to Karla Holmlund 6514871653 or Kathy Myers 651488 2750. Pl�ce comments on reverse side. " I am opposed to the proposed development at 1070 Burgess" sign ��12.I��i1L�� date � � � � address � b} �o �1��(�('�� phone � ( — �� z �z� 33 NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City IIall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign ow petition or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. John Tittle's proposal aze available from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Departmern of Planning & Economic Development ) The plan. is for 3 twin homes for 6 fanulies with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Bwgess. The plan does not fit the character of ow neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on large lots. The ne�rt house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These ta11 twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked 6 mobile homes tengthwise. Tlris _ type of unit looks c�actly like im�estmern property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the cun'ern neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially oniy 3 lots face Bwgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing six housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. T6is plan was denied approval from District 6 Planning Council, but Mr. Tittle presented it "that they had no objection to his plan". They had many objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster developmenL If you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Karla Holmlund 651487 1653 or Kathy Myers 651 488 2'I50. Place comments on reverse side. " I am opposed to the proposed development at 1070 Burgess" signed V `�-`�"`� � �� date � — � _ address � � �2- � � �� i`N � phone �y �' y�7 `(� � � � C� l� �� .�� ./ NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 107Q BURGESS There will be a pnbfic meetiag Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hali Please attend. If you cannot attend please siga our petition or send your own letter w the Counc�7• Copies of Mr. Jolm Tittle's proposat are available from Patricia 7ames (651 26fi 6700 aY the Departmern of Planning & Economic DeveIopment ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cars where �ere is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes an large lots. The neact house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a famity neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartmern, not faznily. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exackly like imestment prop�ty designed to be rented out, not at alt reflective of the curreat neighborhood, There are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 fect. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the bloek there shouid be no more than 2 house.s in that space Conswcting siz housing units grve.s each o� only 20 f�t. The ptans grovided do not accauate�y reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop be�ween the from and back, not reflected in the building plans. This plaa was denied.approvai from District 6 Planning Coanc�, but Mr. Tittle presented it "that they had no objection to 6is pisn". T6ey 6ad many objections and ao do we the neighbors to this proposed ciuster development ff you csnnot attend on Feb 5 please aign this note and give ft to Karla Holmtund 651487 1553 or Kathy Myers 651488 2750. Place eomments on reverse side. " I am opposed to the prg,posed development at 1070 Burgess" � � S �� j�� ` ;�--�' date �- 3- o , addt'ess �)�� `f"orr �� 5 5� phone 4� S f `f S 2� �� 1� b� J > � � s � � � NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send yow own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tiitle's proposal aze available from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Development } The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on large lots. The next house at 1078 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of piace. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks e�ctly like investment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the currem neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing siY housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. This plan was denied approval from District 6 Planning Council, but Mr. Tittle presented it "that tdey had no objection to his plan". They had many objectiops and so do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster development If you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign t6is note and give it to Karla Holmlund 651.4871653 or Kat6y Myers 651 488 2750. Place comments on reverse side. " I am opposed to the proposed development at 1070 Burgess" signed 1/�� date � L �` / a`ddress t o� �-,, 5� phone �S'( ��7'��1� n�F- �}�F� �I��a12S t)F PI��3P�S�D �E��,fl�'l�E�� AT 107fl BIJ��E�S :s There will be a pnblic �►eeiing Thuasday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm �ity Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Councii. Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tirtle's proposal aze availabie from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Department of Flamvng & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 famiiies wit� �ara�e space for :2 cars wfiere tnere ;s now one homeat 1Q70 Bur�ess. The plan does not fit the charaetar of ow neighborhood. The entire biock is single-family homes on large lots. The next house at 1078 is a sin�le-fanuly'low ranch. These tail twin homes would be totally out of piace. TYris is a family neighborhood. One lon� stretch of 12 gazage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you pazked 6�obile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exactly like investment properry designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current neighborhood. There are density issues. O�cially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing s� housing units gves each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. '�'flz9s wlaa a�as ��n�s� a��r�val fr��a �as8�et ��s��a�n i'��:s�:l, ba�a ?�r. Tittie gresented it "that ttaey had no md�,�ection to his plan". �hey had man;� objee#ions and so do we tine neighbors to this g�mposed clust�r �evelaomen#. �3' you cannot attend on Feb 5 nlease sig� this note and aive it to �ar?a Ho1�3errid 551 487 1�53 or �a#hy l�yers 5j1 �8� 2754. �'9ace sauam�uts a�n rev�ssa sfide. " I a� �a a d �a t �o�ose� deve�ap ent at 1070 �aa��ss" �i et� ' �✓�Q - , % ��,�. , . � � ; 9 � � __--�� d�a�� -�- C�� d��-�� f �� ' %�-°c�r �� p�a�ae 6 S /� �� T ° � � �� P' �q � �� u� �� NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There w�71 be a pnbiic mceting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Plesse attend. If you c�nnot attend please sign our pe,tition or send your owa letter to the Cotmcxl. Copies of Mr. Jo}m Tit#le's proposat are available from Patricc�aa 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Department of Pianning & Economic Developme�t ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan dces not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire biock is sing►e-famiiy homes on large lots. The next house at 1098 is a single-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a facnily neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartmern, not family. At tt►e land use mceting it was said that it would look like you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exactty like investment property designed. to be rented out, not at all re8ective of the current neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially oniy 3 lots face Burgess, 120 f�t. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Consuucting six hwsing units gives each one onSy 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the froirt and back, not reflexted in the building plans. This plan was denied . approval from District 6 Planniag Conncil, but Mr. TtitHe presented it "that t6ey had no objection to his plan". T6ey 6ad many objectioas and so do we the neig66ors to t6is proposed dnster developmen� Tf you cannot attend oe Feb 5 pleaac sign this note and give it to Karla Holminnd 6514871653 or Kathy Myers 651488 2�50. Place rnmments on reverse side. " I am opposed to the �roposed elopment at 1470 Bnrgess" siQned � ,� , �i�-�-��-- date �- � � � � � , ` Q address � C� �� < �� l�ll�� (/� ��phOne �o�� c�`' � �� `� 2a m� �'�j ��`=- �� NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a public meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Council. Copies of Mr. John Titt1e's proposal aze available from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Developmem ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families with gazage space for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of ow neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on lazge lots. The next house at 1078 is a singte-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. Tlus is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 gazage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exactly like investment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current neighborhooc�. There are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Bwgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing siY housing units gives each one oniy 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. This plan was denied approval from District 6 Planning Council, but Mr. Tittle presented it "that they h�d no objection to his plan". They had many objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster development If you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to Karla Holmlund 651487 1653 or Kathy Myers 651 488 2750. Place comments on reverse side. "Iam to at 1070 Burgess" date % �3i v � � address �� f � � �s�� 4�� s �"1 �� phone �S � - r � / - �U / � � i a�` 33 u '` r . � .� _ �'^, �- NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a pnbfic meeting Thnrsday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send yrnu own Ietter to the Couma�. Copies of Mr. 7otm Tittle's proposal are ava�able from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Dc,wdopmeat ) The plan is for 3 twin homes for 6 families wiW garage space for 12 cars where there is now one home st 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit ffie character of ow neighborhood. The entire block is singie-family homes on large lots. The next house at 10�8 is a single-famiSy low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totalty out of place. This is a fam�y neighborhood. One long strztch of 12 garage sta3ls, says apartmem, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks eaiactly like investment property designed to be rented out, not at all reftective of the currern neighhorhood. There are density issues. Offtcially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 fcet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there shoWd be no more than Z houses in that space Constructing s'vc housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the frorn and back, not reflected in the building plans. This plan was denied . approval from District 6 Planning Conncil, bat Mr. Tittlt presented it "thAt they had ao objection ta his plsn". They had many objections and so do we the neighbors to t6is proposed duster developmen� If yon c:nnot attend on Feb 5 please sign t6is note snd give it to Karls Holminad 6514871653 or Kathy Myers 65I d88 2750. Piace comments on reve�ae side. " I am opposed to the proposed development at 1070 Burgess" signed �C�-f",-<,�� . � ��,� �.�-�-.,.�,�,L, date 1- 3/- � `/ address � � � �-� � o S h,� ghone �,� � - �I �/ �- ( = f / PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Deaz Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standazd city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new azchitecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will '� destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone \� which could possibly also lead to highex crime xates. We believe that any and a11 developers should wark closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before conshuction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to a11 residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you far keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME�``S �zv� r� C�'� r ' F -�, � DATE �J I �a �t ADDxESS 1 U � "I �-1 ` ,ti "� �,ni � `� �C' Q. CITY �-� � 2 J � ZIP � S I �_� OF PROPOSED T�EVE3.OPME� AT 1070 BURGE�S There will be a pnblic meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall � Please attend. If you caunot atteud please siga our petition or send your own tetter to the Councit._ Copies of Mr. John Tiitle's proposal are available from Patricia 7ames (651 255 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Development ) The pla�Z is for 3 twin homes for b families with �ara�e spaca £er :2 cars whare there is now oae home. at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on large lots. The neat house at 1078 is a singie-family low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 gazage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would look like you parked 6 rnobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks exactiy like investment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of ihe homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constmcting siY housing units gives each one oniy 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop beriveen the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. asis plan wa� �e�nie�d a�a�sr�sal frzsrn �isir'sc* � Planneae� �e�ance3, �a�t P�a-- Tittle gresented it "that thep had no objection to �►is pian". They had many objeciions and so do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster developmen� If you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and g9ve it to Karla Holmlund 551 487 i653 or Ka#hy 1Vlyers fi5i 483 2750. �4ac� samme�#s an rev�rse snde. " I a� opposed #o the proposed rievelapment at i070 �urg�sa" �ig��t��G'� ��'d�/� �a�� -�� g�'s �5��,� . � �� .�� s �IGHB�RS t�F PROPOSED DE�Ei,�PMENi' AT 1070 BURGESS There will be a public ffieeting Thnrsday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you canno# attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Council._ Copies of Mr. 7ohn Tittle's proposal are available from Patricia 7ames (651 266 6700 at the Department of Planning & Economic Development ) The glan is for 3 twin homes for 6 famiiies with �arage spaca for 12 cars where there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The plan does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is singie-family homes on lazge lots. The ne� house at 1�J78 is a single-Pamily low ranch. These tall twin homes woutd be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartmern, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it wouid look like you parked 6�obile homes lengthwise. Tlus type of unit looks exactly like investment properry designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the cuirent neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitting with the rest of the homes on the block there shouid be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing six housing units gives each one only ZO feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. 'd'H�is plan �vas de�ied a�agsraval fr�s�ie �ists�ici fi �]ann�aeg <C��rcSl, ��t '�Ir. Tittle presented it "that they had no objec#ion to his plan". They had many objections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster developmenL If you cannot attend on Feb 5 piease sign this note and give it to �arla Holmdund 551 4871653 or Ka#hy 1VIyers 55� 4�S 2750. Place camme�ts an rev�rse side. " I am oppose�3 #a #he �ra oser� development at �070 Burg�ss" Sig3iei� � ✓l�fi`� �� i��i� 6�'lU � �l �� ll��S S�r�sa� S� SSto3 �,�Q��6S/-yfl7-lsyy � PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPIVIENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new azchitecture which is lazger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy properiy values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval befare construction and demolition of property. Furthermare we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential azeas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you far keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME �/!�/fS �� DATE ..3' �7°'d� �, ADDRESS �.5� � � � 7�� 5 7. CITY �� `��1/ ZIP ,f�Oc.0 g �� :�_ �� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Deaz Members of City Council: We pefition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood plamliiig committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermare we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to a11 residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. [� :/\� I�1 �� DATE `�� '°�� ' 41 CITY�_ -, JI /"w�, ZIP .�'°�'�� ' .4;� ,� �� 4� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Deaz Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighbarhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new azchitecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values far others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolifion of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential azeas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME �i Y�'� .Jo ��! DATE 3 I� ADDRESS ��c, �� i�n; � u vvi V�V CITY � �-�� v l ZIP 5� �� 7�, � mi� �7' %' � � `==° 'i ^' �, 1�T�IG�ORS O�' PROPOSED DEVELOPMEi�i'I' AT 10'74 BU�2GESS There will be a pnblic meeting Thursday Feb 5 at 3:30 pm City Hall Please attend. If you cannot attend please sign our petition or send your own letter to the Council._ Copies of Iv�r. 7ohn Tittle's proposal are available from Patricia James (651 266 6700 at the Department of Plamming & Economic Development ) The plan is for 3 trvin homes for 6 families with �ua�e space for 12 cars whare there is now one home at 1070 Burgess. The pian does not fit the character of our neighborhood. The entire block is single-family homes on large lots. The ne�ct house at 1078 is a singie-family�low ranch. These tall twin homes would be totally out of place. This is a family neighborhood. One long stretch of 12 garage stalls, says apartment, not family. At the land use meeting it was said that it would looi� like you parked 6 mobile homes lengthwise. This type of unit looks e�ctly like investment property designed to be rented out, not at all reflective of the current neighborhood. There are density issues. Officially only 3 lots face Burgess, 120 feet. In fitfing, with the rest of the homes on the block there should be no more than 2 houses in that space Constructing six housing units gives each one only 20 feet. The plans provided do not accurately reflect the site. 'There is at least a seven-foot drop between the front and back, not reflected in the building plans. This plan �vas denied apgroval fr�an T;is#r3ct � P�anniaeg �a�nc:l, ba�t '��. Tittle gresented it "that they had no objecYion to �is plan". They had many ob,jections and so do we the neighbors to this proposed cluster development If you cannot attend on Feb 5 please sign this note and give it to �arla Holmiund S51 487 1653 or Kat�y R3yers 5�1 4g3 2750, Place comments an revarse side. " I am opposed io s��er� proposerl development at 1070 Burgess" lD l � (�� Y �aa�-�� Sr �r� �w ��a� daa� � ' �/ � 7 p�one � 5/ �D 0 OG � � � -- -- =� ` _ „ y PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT � �o�a �u,� �� Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this shouid remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new azchitecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and a11 developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our ciTy a nice piace to live. NAME C�iU�f/k,y, �(�h�� DATE � �lv'o�l�C� ADDRESS CITY �- j�� ZIP r S�� 7 PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is lazger than the one and one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which couid possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before consmzction and demolition of property. Furthermore wa hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We a�preciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME ¢�'�i''t C.� �`R� DATE ��)� � 7 �� ADDRESS ` CITY �' �� / �� ZIl' �Q PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Deaz Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy properiy values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. �� , �ci�e.�� DA� 3 ��o�f aDnxESS Z�S (l.)eS-F�, }I�- /�� '{6� CITY �1-, } p� ZIP �5 /0 � 0�- �45 PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is lazger than the one and one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME �(!�(/�, �. I �t XIQ,��('] DATE J� �� ZG��I :-��' crTY��,� ,t , � z� �5 � � � �� " .� �'i' � � _ PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster developmeirt at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy properiy values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas ofthis city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME �� i L /1 �VYJ�� DATE � 6 b� ADDRESS � ��C� �✓LC6�Yl i c� !7 (!Cr . CITY � '� • �G-i� � ZIP � � 6 � `T .� _ `_ �` � �.f PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Sueet in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one and one half storey homes along this sueet and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our ciry a nice place to live. DA� �b 6� ADDRESS CITY � � V � ZIP �� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amoum of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME t t�S�2.� DATE�Q� f - � CITX� 1 WJLQ-�D �1S ZIl' �� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Sueet in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy properiy values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construcrion and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. DATE �/ ' � � ?� ADDRESS S � � ��. r _ , CITY !9 l � � ZIP � �/ '�� S �, PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential azeas ofthis city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. CITY ZTP 5 �� . � PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy properiy values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to a11 residential areas of this city. We appreciate yow support and thank you for keeping our ciry a nice place to live. NAME '`% vx.� �Ra��'/' DATE 3- I D- �'� ADDRESS / 7 � / G �J �. 'Z� �3 CITY �vs��Z.�ts /la/'✓ ZJp r'S�I3 PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Sueet in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new azchitecture which is larger than the one and one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to evzryone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME__� DATE � � � ATII�RFCC f 7�P ! / �� / ) CTTY ��`� � r�. I� ��. ZIP S S�� " ��+� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one and one half storey homes along this street and we belieee that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of propetty. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and t ou fo keeping our city a nice place to live. NAS�f� DATE �� l' / / 1 ADDRESS �JC .---� � � � CITY a ZIP �� < C � d � � � ' � � .3 PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is lazger than the one and one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construcrion and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our ciry a nice place to live. NAME � c/� � ra+ �.` �; v y.� DATE 7/II - a t f ADDRESS l ��J ) �(J V1 � (�r v-2� CTTY (�Q � ti� � i'vi �/ ZIP ..S'�/ / PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of suess to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. Ni�d support and tty�nk you for keeping our city a nice place to live. DATE � �d b .�� 2 �� CITY �Y��J ! 1 / G� ZIP �.�� —� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster developmern at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new azchitecture which is larger than the one and one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furtliermore we hope that you apply these same good standazds of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NaME 4�,.�� a�� a� 3 l� � 1 0� ADDRESS 1� �\ 4� C�� '�?c 5 `� CITY `��:RV�\\-z M�� Z� �\� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Deax Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Sueet in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress ta everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping ow city a nice place to live. 1 �-� NAME --��> `c � !� yL c� ,� DATE 3 - / cJ � � ADDRESS � � / ,� �✓,S �� s S �"' _ CITY Gc�;,�c�-c�. �� I ,/l/ ZIP S � � � PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Sueet in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standazd city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new azchitecture which is lazger than the one and one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residemial areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. Nt1ME_ 1��^-- DATE � `�� "'� ADDRESS ��j� � CrrY \Y�p�PC�;G lUV�J Zrn SSIl�+-, PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new azchitecture which is lazger than the one and one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy properiy values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and a11 developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standazds of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate�our support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. ��%t. CITY /�1 ZIP S �2 C,e PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT at 1070 BURGESS Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one half storey ho�es along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME � ��U DATE `� — I S�Q y � 7S /( � �,,,, ti�� r� �rZ � czT�� v�( N z� SS��y , � � PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and thax there should be the appropriate amount of green space sunounding each and every hame. We oppose any sort of new architecture wluch is larger than the one and one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as well as add a certain degree of suess to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before construction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas ofthis city. We appreciate your support and thauk you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME� �� 1 1 I�v�E'-�St9'h DATE-�� ` �QF `y �D�ss 1�� Ma�l��ll t��-e �� iTY S� ��u �, M N Z� 55 i�� PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Deaz Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this shouid remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of green space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy property values for others as weil as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before conshuction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. NAME � 12� G�!'.� S"7 °1—lJf. �t�� DATE �—�- I— O� r_��r��xy Q, � t�o�' . CITY � T � � �� ` ZIP S � � b � ��m �45 PETITION TO STOP CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT Dear Members of City Council: We petition you to reject cluster development at 1070 Burgess Street in St Paul. We believe that neighborhoods such as this should remain single family homes on standard city lots and that there should be the appropriate amount of geen space surrounding each and every home. We oppose any sort of new architecture which is larger than the one and one and one half storey homes along this street and we believe that housing of high density such as this will destroy properiy values for others as well as add a certain degree of stress to everyone which could possibly also lead to higher crime rates. We believe that any and all developers should work closely with the neighborhood planning committees and obtain approval before consiruction and demolition of property. Furthermore we hope that you apply these same good standards of quality to all residential areas of this city. We appreciate your support and thank you for keeping our city a nice place to live. rraa��,�i��-�i�� c�G!'` DATE � � 'O� .��. . CITY /! t� �Cl�i �� /� ZIP ��