The URL can be used to link to this page

04-1133��-�Gr - ��3 r�l ��o�{ RESOLUTION CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Presented Refened To Support For Ramsey County's Legislative Package 1 WHEREAS, the City of Saint Paui is the lazgest City in Ramsey County; and Council File # � 7`" �� 3 Green Sheet # °� b � � �� Committee Date 2 WI�REAS, Saint Paul is deeply affected by county policies in such ueas as: public health, human services, public 3 safety, transportation, communication, workfarce development and fiscal policy; and 4 WHEREAS, whatever happens in Ramsey County happens in Saint Paul; and 5 WHEREAS, the Saint Paul City Council is the policy making body for the City of Saint Paul, and as such, its work 6 is inextricably linked to the City's Legislative Agenda; now therefare be 3t 7 RESOLVED, that the City of Saint Paul supports and urges legislative passage of the following: 8 9 Supporting the Ramsey County Legislative Package except where Saint Paul has a stronger or different 10 position. Requested by Depaztmeut of: Adopted by Council: Date 4�` � e '��'� �� a �O� Adophon Certified by Counci] Secre[ary By: ,�//. .' / � Approved by M o: Date � By: k%�°G�✓ � Form Approved by City Attomey � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council � (�-1\'33 DEPARTMINApFF�CE/CpUNCJL CATE7NIMTEO c��cou�vcu n�ber�,2oo4 GREEN SHEET No 206383 COMACT PERSON g P(pNE In�tlaYUffia NIWVOffie Councilmember Lee Aelgen 6-8650 oE,,ue,�H.nn� cvrcanea NNST BE ON CAUNCIL AGE]JDA BY (OA'TE) December 8, 2004 Consent � NUMBEAFOR tlIVATiOPMEY PIYEIFRI( ROIfi11Hi ORDER ❑FHnerJnLaERV�CFiol2 AIaNC+�LEFnV�4tCrC ❑ WYD1fl�lV&SIA11T) ❑ TOTAL # OF SiGNATURE PAGES (CIJP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) CTION RE�UESTED Approval of Resolution Supporting Ramsey County's Legislative Package RECAMMENDA IO Approve(A)orReject(R) PERSONALSE2VICECONTRAGTSMUSTANSWERTHEFOLLOWINGQUESiIONS: 1. Has this person/firm ever worked undx a contract for this depaRment? PLANNING COMMISSION YES NO CIB COMMITTEE 2. Has ihis cersoNfi�m ever been a cily empbyee7 CIVIL SERVICE CAMMISSION YES NO 3. Does this peiso��m p�sess a sldfl roi namallyposseased by airy cwrent ciry employee'7 YES NO 4 Is this person(firtn a targetM vendoR YES NO EXplain a11 yes answers on Sepafate Sheet antl atfach N 0� sheet INITIATING PROBLEM ISSUE, OPPORNNITY(Wfw, What, When, Where, Why) ADVANTAGESIFAPPR�VEO V�J'n,sf a�GS��,!C!'4 r`�!1#,�. DEC 1 ��0� DIS AGESIFAPPRO`JED DISADVANTAGESIFNOTAPPROVED TOTAL AM011NT OF TRANSACTION S COSTiREVENUE B11DGEfED (qRCLE ON� VES NO FUNOMGSOURCE ACTNITYNUMBER FlNANCIHL MFORMA'f10N (IXPWN) �� ;. � -� � � � � � � , . . � �� , � � � ROUTINC70RDEB � � � . BelowarecoirecYrouhn ffiithes�most&' ofdocuments. ' „ BS eqaenttYPes � � � � � � �� , � �� „ � � � � . � � , O b . „ � C NTRt1GTS (as'sutnes,authonzed udget exists) ,, COi3L�CIF,I2FSOLUITON (afc�endbYdgeXslaccept gazit�) � � 1.�Outside,ABwc�` 1 Dbp'a�mentDicector,' � � � � p�,� �` � '�„ � „ � � �:�'�Department'�Ilirector , � � Z. O�ceofEmaneialSuaipesDirector , � � 3_ Citp Attotney ` ' � � � � � � ' � 3. � Ci4y � � � � � � 4. l�ayud�nt (for coaMncis ovca $25,000) 4_ lufa�rodAssisYa¢t ' � � � �� ' � , � ��S.�Auman�Ri' "��forooNractsover$SQOaO 5: C"��Co�ci'L � � � � B� < , ) rtY , . - � � 6.� 6. � Office'ofFinencial Seivices -'Accoimtin 09"ice a�F$�aacial',Sercices - a � , B Accounhn8., � � i i � i ' � ' �i4�' � ' ' i ADMIIJISTRAIZVE ORDIItS (Budget Bevisiou), ; COUI�CII. RESOLUITON (all ot�tts aad Or'd�ances� ,, , L AchvitylviatiagerotDepazhnenkAccountant 1 DepartmentDuector 2 D¢pmS(mentDitector . , 2. CityAttotney',,. �, � 3.'OfficeofFinanci9lServicesDirector 3. Mapor/Ass�stanb , , � � ' 4. Citp OPedc � � � 4. Cilg Cbtincil'� � � � � � � � „ „ , 5. Offce �Financial Seivices -AccounUn � � ADIvfINIISTRATiVEORDERS(a}LothersY, ERECUTIVE'ORDE[t � 1. DepartnientDirector � � � 1."Dep�inneotDireitor � � � � � May 2,�ty A{tomey 2 CStp!}ttomey " � 3'. 'Offce ofFidenciaE Sercnces Direetot ' " , � 3 oi/Asvstant� ' ' � 4. �{p Cfeik 4 Citg, CY�K ` � � � � . � , , � �� , TO�TALNUMBER�OFSIGNATtJREPA'GFS � �� Indicste &e � of pages on wlrich`si 'goetiues aze,required aad papercli� orttag each oEtheae pages. ; , � � „ � � ACTIOI�REQUESTED� � � . � � ° �� `` " Descxebe �the Prol��Nest,seeks'to accomplish �n �ther cLronological order or ocder ofimpoitance, wbichever �s ' „ appropnate' vs�e- Do n' co� I , o �� m + forth� otwri� letesentences'',Beg�n�eacfiiteuL�uiyour]�stwdha've�b ' RECOIv1MENDATIQIJS ', 1 ' ' ' �CoffipletetFiheissuem,qaesfionhas" �beenP��OLe�?Y�3SP�licorP�vate- � � � ,� „ , � � �� , . PERS�NAL SIItVICE CONTRACTS. _ „ �� '17�is i�oimation ' vsed 4o determine the - ''s liabili for wortc�s ' �on cl " t�es � eev� Wilt4z , awi.�, P�P� , � criY , LS` �compensah � � � � . servic�hu�ngrnles , ,' . , , � INIZ7ATING PROBLEIv� F$, SL7E OPPORT[7NITY � � � � � �� Eicplain the sctoati6n or vonditioos that 'crcated a need' faryourpmject oc Icquesk � ADVANi'AGES IF6IPPROU�D , � � � � � � , . S�dicatewhethei,tbisissimpl„anaanualb iocediuiereqwredbplaw/cliarterorwheth�there,arespecific,waysin,,�- Y �Set P . wluch she City ofSa�ntPanl arid its citizevs will benefitfrom t]vs PmlecUaction'' DI$ADVt1NTAGES IE APPROVID i Q4b'at" beeffectda�' `or to or ast mi this ffiCts assed �Fe ma� exi4in8 88� �ProJ t�ues�Pmfi�ce P ue8ah c6�Ses P P� (e.g.;'haffic delays, no�se, �tss inaeascs or as�essments)? To w�hom� WfienRFor fiow l,�g? DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED � VJfiat,cviIl'be'the negative consequences if the promised action is not approved� Inabildp to deliver I seivice7, Continae ,' ; - � „ , high�4affic,noise,�acci3enY�rate? T.oss�ofzevenue?' � � � � � � � � FINANCIAL IMPACT � � � � � r�, � �� " AIUloughqou,masttatior.fhemfo�ationyanpmvidehetetothe'issue7rouaceaddre�ng;mgeneestyoumostanswet � � t+NO �ons:�FIoiv,much is �t going�ta cost? , Who is, S��g � PaY? �, , � „ � � � — � � „ � � , � � , , � �� , x � � � ., � � � � � � � � � � �� . . „ �� . � �� . � � � � � � � � � � � � � �1' i�,, � � ��, i,� � � , , � � � � � i ��'. „ �, t i �. � � �� i � i , . „ , , � i � � . , �� „ �, � �,�, „ ��z'� , e � L h�� . , , . ..,a p �H i ., �w a -,. � , r A�„ , � . .', , ' �, ' w;A c „�un��..,i,,,i..i.nF_,,,'�„ ..�,�:, «;,,v�� « . . �. , �. , , . � .. ��., .n,,.. i! , n, �.� � �, ,,.� .�, � Council File # - \, 3 Green Sheet #�C�Y� RESOLUTION CiTY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Presented Referred To Committee Date Support For Ramsey County's Legislative Package 1 WHEREAS, the City of Saint Paul is the lazgest City in Ramsey County; and 2 WHEREAS, Saint Paul is deeply affected by county policies in s azeas as: public safety, uansportation, 3 communicauon and fiscal policy; and 4 WHEREAS, whatever happens in happens in Saint Paul; and 5 WI�REAS, the Saint Paui � ounci] is the policy making body for the City of Saint Pau1, and as such, its work 6 is inextricably linked e City's I.egislative Agenda; now therefore be it 3] that the City of Saint Paul supports and urges legislative passage of the following: Supporting the Ramsey County I.egislative Package. Requested by Departrnent oE � Form Approved by Ciry Attomey � Adoprion Certified by Counci] Secretary By: Approved by Mayor: Date By: Approved by Mayor for Submission to Councii � Adopted by Council: Date