The URL can be used to link to this page

04-1130._—'�-��.�'1.�, / 2� ��Q� Council File # 0'T — I �. 3 D Green Sheet # ao�� RESOLUTION CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Presented Refened To 3� Committee Date Support of City's Ability to Use Eminent Domain and Improving the Document Produetion Process for Eminent Domain Proceedings 1 WI�REAS, the City of Saint Paul believes that it is unperative that local municipalities maintain the abllity to use eminent 2 domain as an economic development tool to re-energize communities and neighborhoods; and 3. WI�REAS, the City of Saint Paui supports due process in the azea of eminent domain; and 4 WHEREAS,cunently,thelawstatesthatthegovemmentmustprovideacopyofanappraisalofapropertytothecommission 5 20 days prior to a hearing before them; and 6 WF�REAS, the problem with cunent law is that the other party is entitled to the reasonable appraisal fee of $1,500, but is 7 not required to show proof of securing an appraisal; and 8 WIIEREAS, the City Attorney wants to change the process of the production of documents before a commission hearing; 9 and 10 WHEREAS, the Saint Paul City Council is the policy making body for the City of Saint Paul, and as such, its work is 11 inextricably linked to the City's Legislafive Agenda; now therefore be it 12 KESOLVED, that the City oP Saint Paul supports the proposal of a new law that would require all documents (which include 13 an appraisal) to be pravided 21 days before the commissioner's hearing, with a paymeut of $1,500 (fee for appraisal) given 14 after that document is produced; and be it furthar 15 RESOLVED, that the City of Saint Paul opposes efforts to prevent the City from using eminent domain for economic 16 development or redevelopment efforts that will reduce blight, increase the tax base or create jobs. Requested by Department of. � Form Approved by City Attorney � Adoption Certified by Council SecreYary � Appi By: Appmved by Mayor for Submission to CouncIl AdoptedbyCouncil: Date `��R.isW`^-'�e/\ �'S �C��"I crt�t covrrca, xeig� s-ssso December $, 2004 Consent ♦/ �v,, Ve/ CA�E NNT41iED D�e"'ber',2°°a GREEN SHEET No 2063�9 MUNBER FOR ROVTING TOTAL # OF SI6NATURE PAGES � �.,,�,.��,� � �,,,,� _ ❑ �.,,,.�. ❑ �,� _ ❑ Awicwtamv�ow. ❑ qwianta�mncerc ❑ WYOR(ORAS&SSY1f) ❑ (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) Approval of resolution supporting a New 8tate Law Involving Document Production as it relates to Eminent Domain PLANNING COMMISSION CIB COMMI77EE CNIL SERVICE COMM15510N tias u�is p2rso�rtn ever vrorked w�dw a caMrxt tw this aepartment7 YES NO Has this PersoNfirm ever heen a citY emWcYee9 YES NO Does this persoNfirtn pos;xss a skill not no�maltypossessed by eny curteM i�ly employee4 YES NO I5 [his petaonffirtn e tar9eted ventlaR YES NO � ,. �G°2d"�pf«�'i �°:�Vbf€!�` V �EC 1 �fl�4 �TAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S OOST/REVENUE BUDGETED �CIRCLE ON� YES NO NDIN6 SOURCE ACTNITY NUMBER 1NCIPL WFORMAiION (E%PWN) , , .. „ .,; :, ,,... ,., _... I � �. ,�, � i „ '� r�, ' � ,� ,'„ � .. , ; , �, , � � � �, �„ ,�, �, � , � ,, � e� . , ', . , � _ E � � , , ., . � , �, � , .�� ' ' i ' ., � ' � , , . , , � . , ROU1'ING'ORDIIt �� '� '� � � � � � � � � ' � ' ��r Beiow are coiiec4 for7he suc most eu'Y, of documenfs. . � cwtin&s fra4n tYP� � " � � ��i � „ cor�rxnc�s�� st»�,z�ena�t�)'' �, courrca'.�soirii•rox��abuas��s�) � � � � � � ,� a 2 ' , D �n� t��vii�ecfor z �ce�ofF��mn ��sarcncesDiiecto'r ` ' ' , I ; a ,, � � � � � � 3: ��i �Atko�ney, � � 3 Ci� , '�� i �, . ' ' L3' �� 4: IvFay�-rAs�st�t<farconuact�ovec�2s000� 4. h4ay�rA.�s,st�rt u ., � "' � � 5. ' �fas coutaacfs e�-$5E? �000 � 5. � Gi � � ��otmc�! � - ' � �� . ' �8� � } tY ��i .. �� , � �' 6;,,OfficeofFi�ncialSeri�ices Ao'oo`nnttnS , , 6 Office'ofFinancisl:Services-Aewcmting � Se i � � � ��r� ' �,i�� , „ r ADMINiS ' TIV�'ORDERS v�ston COi}NCT[:ItESOLU7TON atl andOridi�cances Re otLe�s � }' �8et � , Y AchvityM�agerorDepacfmwtAccoantant , � I 17eEartinentDueator 2 D'g�ac�me°4 ',Eait'ector t � ' � 2 Cilg tk{f �i�ey � � � � ' �'3. ; �GeOf�i7I12tiW8lSCI4IC�S�]LCC�Ui �'�� , , 3. Y4I8y01'/'aemdsmt � �� ,�"� � i � 4_ CI CI� � ,� � 4; Ci �Cotmefl � �,, � !Y t5! , , � „ � � , 5: Office ofFiuencial Services - � � � � � �� ,, � Accovnfin8 i' i, , r� "'i � ,J, ' nf, i ' � i�, r �,�„ , ' , ' , + d � �v i e oxv ' avr�ma�Srtza - oii�Eas att wt� � Eti � �� (' ) ��„ ,� , ,., ,, � � �� t D;reFwr" 1. D,rector r i D'ePai�ent Depaitment� �, . � � H �. i i . �c.i - � , � � „ i , �h ' , , e � � � , ",�r � �� 2. G�Attcxney' , � r �, ; 2 CtigAttocmeg � � 3' O�ceofFmeucialServicesDuzctor. 3 Magc�f'i4_�s� ' , �? ' � 4. Ci'ty CIetk � � � � r � i 4_ City'ICtak �� r � ' il � TO�AL rTCRvfBEtt OF SIGI*iA PAGES �� , , � �� , .� � � � Tnd�cste tL'e � ofpages cm which s�guat�ues sre requued �d �sPetc�iP or flagieac& of�tfiese pages:„ „ ��' ,� � � i ��' r�� i�� A�1�ONREQI7ESTED i ' I ' � ��.,� �. �� , � �, � . "be seeTcsto I"u4h,ineithe.r cal os �. whiclievec�s ,, '� I3esai tvliatthe ordet otdet � � , t pro�ect/reqnest accomp , ehionnlogi tml�ortmmce i � , ., , i � Pt� V i � �. �. i . i n � i-� i i i. most appropriate for the �sae. Do�tw'rite complete sentences "Begm e�fi' it� m your l�st with avecb � �� .,�. _, �. i � �, ` RE6�ZI��TIONS , � �' � ,, � �� J , � � � �„ � � ' � � — Complete'�€ffieissuein'questionhasbeen.present�d'tieforean9.�9 Pulihc',oapnvate ' � � , � � �� ,'.��,� ',�' , , � , ,,�„'' '�;,�� , ,�:�, ' �'�, ,i, �"r J '��q�i ,',��'.' ��„�,�; ,�� PEttSOI3Ai.,�EAVIGEC4NTRACTS>� � , , � �y � � � � � � �� , , � „� � !,'�� dr� s �liis,i�ormehanw�tbeu�sedfodeteiminetfieeity'slSab�it�forvaosicerscompensahonr3aims,taaces;and,pmpercivil �' � , �eci.ic� h�ri�ig,mles � ��i � , � � '� �'� � r�, �.�� ' i � � � „ � � �� INll7ATINGPROBI.EM,.ISSUE, OPPOI2TCIhRTF , u ; ' , , , ; � ��", 'E ' }amflnesimationorco�'tionsthatcieated needfor "ectoc � �s � , aP Y� P�l �� "� � � �� ' � ° � .� , � „ ' . „ � �� ,j � � „ „ � � � � � e1DVAIy'Pe+.GES 3F AFPI20�VID� � � i �' � � � � � � � � ' , �" � � � � — , ��, , , ' Indtcate w�ethentius vs s�mplp an anduat,budgeNproced5re reqmied by law/chmter or'whetiter there aie specific waps �n d � w1�icT�lfiaCntpa��SawtPamLand�tse�tia:ens��wili�bene�t'Ycomthis'r�ojeCf/ac4ion. � � � � �� , , i., �, i i � ,,, � i , l i , � � � � , � � �'� � � ,!' ��., �� , DLSADiVAt3'EI��S1F �1�OVED' ; ' � �, � � � r. VJtiaf' ��ges�to'e�psUng�}aastprocess'esmi'ghtlhrs�projecUiequestpr«luFerfzt�spassed � � � , , , Ce-S;ivafficdelays,noTSe,tazmcceasesoras�essments)� To `,wfiom7 �When2ForiliowZong? � , � �,'' , , "ti. , , � � �� i �, DISt1D�TANxAGES 1F NOT A?PROVID' � �, " ,, � Wliatccnll thenegahpe,hanseque�ces iE,the �p�'mised achou is nok approved� Tnab'rlity to �fivec sernce,T Co�mue � � � Irig$ 'haffic, noise; accidentiatery� Ysoss dfieve�e7 ^. � : , ,�� •� '� � ' �� I.'I �i �� V .i, �' , � Fn�i,�ANCr�tt ��gcz � � �� , ��,�. � � �„ ,.,� � � � , A1tfio??Sfiyoumustta7or�it�oimatngtgouprovideher,e"totheissueyou;are.add�tssing;mgerierai,youmustanswer � twoqaestlons:ITotvmnc�h'isiYgomgYd;cost`� Who:is�to.pay? ' �� '� � � � � � � �� r , , . � �� , � � - . , � , � r, � � � „,� �. . i ,i ' ,� � ',��. �f�'� i� , � , � � � , l � , , '�� , � , , i � � � � �, i�' , , � , , , � , „ � . � � . i 'i , �� ,� , � , �,, � . , � � �� . +�n r . � „ i r � „ , � , � . _ , , a . ., �,i�` i . � � � f ,� I I i,' I i� h i � � h 1�i � � i i I I� i i „ i I I i� Y i � �� Il i'i i �� ';I I @ � . � , �„ '. . , t�., � � i�,r�.� , , C�hu ii w��;,.'.!.� ii , �J,,,�., � d� ,.�I��'��', u,t, � „�,4,�w��,110.'.I,u�� tilJ,��i:�,1tl��lhu.�l� i�ii�ul�S�.�,,ii�V' ,�� id . _ _ i lJ .l '. � t�^a Councii File # �� Green Sheet # 20C�3�-�i RESOLUTION SAiNT PAUL, MiNNESOTA Presented Referred To Support of New Law Involving Document Production as it 12elates to 1 WHEREAS, the City of Saint Paul supports due process in the azea of 2 WHEREAS, currentiy, the law states that the govemment must 3 commission 20 days prior to a hearing before them; and and Domain copy of an appraisal of a property to the 4 WHEREAS, the problem with current law is that the other " y is entitled to the reasonable appraisal fee of $1,500, 5 but is not required to show proof of securing an appr ' al; and 6 WHEREAS, the City Attorney wants to cha e the process of the production of documents before a commission 7 hearing; and 8 WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Cit ouncil is the policy making body for the City of Saint Paul, and as such, its work 9 is inextricably linked to ity's Legslative Agenda; now therefare be it 10 RESOLVEU, th e City of Saint Paul supports the proposal of a new law that would require all documents (which tl include an a aisal) must be provided 21 days before the commissioner's hearing, vrith a payment of $1,500 (fee 2 for appr ' al) given after that dacument is produced. Requestad by Department of: Adoption Certified by Council Secretary By: ApprovedbyMayor: Date By: � Form Approved by City Attomey � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council � ______ _ �._.��__.�n___�_ ------- Adopted by Council: Date `.� 1 ��_1_ CouncilFile# Dy �,� �Z � I 2r �/�,r.� Green Sheet # a��OJ � 7 � j RESOLUTION CtTY O�INT PAUL, MINNESOTA 3 � Presented Referred To Commtttee Date Support of City's Ability to Use Eminent Domain and Improving the Document Prodaetion Process for Eminent Domain Proceedings 1 WI�,REAS, the Ciry of Saint Paul believes that it is imperative that local municipaliries maintain the ability to use eminent 2 domain as an economic development tool to re-energize communities and neighborhoods; and 3 WI�REAS, the City of Saint Paul supports due process in the azea of eminent domain; and 4 WHEREAS, currently, the law states thatthe government must provide a copy of an appraisal of a properiy to the commission 5 20 days prior to a hearing before them; and 6 WHEREA5, the problem with current law is that the other parry is entitled to the reasonable appraisai fee of $1,500, but is 7 not required to show proof of securing an appraisal; and 8 WFIEREAS, the City Attomey wants to change the process of the production of documents before a commission hearing; 9 and 10 WHEREAS, the Saint Paul City Council is the policy making body for the City of Saint Paul, and as such, its work is 11 inexiricably linked to the City's Legislative Agenda; now therefore be it 12 RESOLVED, that the City of Saint Paul supports the proposal of a new law that would require all documents (which include 13 an appraisal) to be provided 21 days before the commissioner's heazing, with a payment of $1,500 (fee for appraisal) given 14 after that document is produced; and be it further 15 RESOLVED, that the CiTy of Saint Paul opposes efforts to prevent the City from using eminent domain for economic 16 development or redevelopment efforts that will reduce blight, increase the tax base or create jobs. Requested by Department of: � Form Approved by City Attomey � Adoprion Certified by Council Secrerary Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council By: � By: Approved by 4a r: Date i�� C,�� !/'7 � � Adopted by Council: Date `��F/l �'S� �l�`l narm�rro�icercaur�cw crcRr courrcb RACT PERSON S PFiONE Councilmember Lee Helgen 6-&650 IT 8E �1 CbUNCIL AGQJDA BY (DATEJ December 8, 2004 Consent TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES c�t-�� December 1, ZA04 GREEN SHEET No 206379 � �.,,�,.�� . _ ❑ utv�noRNEV ❑ anetF�IX ❑ Fwucw.awusrsoirt ❑ F.wxa,tsom�ccrc ❑ WYOR{p0.K98TAlfi) ❑ (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) �. AQproval of resolution suppurting a New State Law Involving Document Production as it relates to Eminent Domain PLANNING COMMISSION CIB COMMITfEE CIV4L SERVICE COMMISSION Has Mis perso�rtn evervrorked under a contrsd tor this Oepartment7 VES NO Has th� OersontFittn ever been a G[y employee? YES NO Does Uus De�sonfi�m P�%a sld4 not nam�INW�� M any twrent citY emPbY�? YE$ NO 4s this Ve�Mrm a targeted ve�daCt YES NO sheet ana ettach ro areen shee[ C ��.� �QRGh9/;�9 �dHi�� : � t.'' 1TAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION COSTIREYENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONEj YES NO NDIN6 SWRCE ACTNITY NUMBER WCW.INFORMA'iION (EXPWN) ROi3TING ORDER: Below aze cosect ron6ngs for the si�c �st frec�uent types o£dactime6ts: �� CONTRACTS (ass�mmes auihorizad budget e�asts) COLTNCIL RESOLUTION (amend bvdgetsfaccept gents) Y. OutsideAgency , 1.-DepmVnent,Diiecfoi', � ' � � �2'.� Dep�YI)irecto'r � 2." OfficeofiFroanci§1 Servioes.Director , � � � � � 3. CityAtC�ney'- � � �� 3. Cit�AttorIIey � � , � � � 4. Mayor/AssistanY (for contracts over $25,000) 4., Mayar/Asststsnt, 5. FZun?an Rights (for oontacts over $50 000) 5. City Cofficil , 6. Offxce ofFihmiciat Services'-''Acoounting 6., Office ofFi¢ancia! Services -'A000nating ADMINISIRAITVE ORDEItS (BUdgetRevision) ' COI7NCILkESOLiTFION(all,ottbeeis snd CJcdioances)' ��i. FictiviigM�ager"or,IJepaztmenc,Accountant 1. DepectinentD'ireeror � � � � � � � 2. DepadmentD¢ecto� ' ` 2.'CitgAtEumey , � � � , � �� 3. Office ofFinancial Seivices Ditecror � � 3. Mapor/Assistant ' , � � � � � � � 4: City Cieik � 4. Citp Co�cil �� , � � � 5. Ofiice of �inancial Services - t�ecountin8 , �� ADhi1A77STRA'CLVEORDIIZS.(ailothers)� � EI�Ci7TLVEORDIIZ , � � �, � 1., DepazwneqtBirector � � � � I. Depazlmentl7ireetor� �� 2_,�CityAttornep. � 2., CityAttome9� �°. � � �� 3.,OfficeofFinancialSezvicesl}irectcx 3. Nfayo,rlA'ssistant 4: City Cledc � � � Q. City' Ciedc , � � �� TOTAL I3UIvIBIIt OF SIGNAT[IRE PAGES Indicate"tfie # dfpages on w}rich signahaes are required and paperclip orYfag each oft6ese Pagea. � ��, � � � � ACTION REQUESTED � � � � �� Desen'be wfiat the projecUreques[ seeks fa eccamplish.in either'c}�ronoYogical order oi order' ofimpcui�ce, wluchever is — most appcopri8te for the issue. Do notwrite complete sentences. Begin escfi item in pour list witfi a verb. RECOMMEIJDATIONS . Coviplete ifthe issae'in questionhas liee� presented befote any bod9, Putilie or pr�Yate. ,� �' � � PERSONAL SIIt�IC& CONIRACTS: � � � �� - ' Tliis infoimation will be u§ed ta detetmine the city's fiability foi wozkers, compensation cYsims, tszces'and pmper civil ,, , servicehiringcules. ' � �� , � � � II3ffIATINGPROHLElv1,-ISSUE, OPPORT[JNiTY � � , ` ' ' � � � � Eaptain'thesiU�arionorcond'itionsthatereateda�foryonrpmjecta�reqaest. ' At�VAI1TAGESIFAPPRO,VED �� „ � Indicate'whethe�filps is simgty an annual budget piaoedise reqiured by law/charter ot whetha there ace sQecific ways in ivhich'the Citq� of SamtPanl and its citizeIIS wilYbene&t from this pmj�Uacti'on.,,� � °� �� DI3ADVAAITAGESFFk1PPROsIED � � �� , � � � � Wbatnegati've effects or major clisnges to eatistinS �P� P�'�� J��P�t PS�ce ifrtis pas5ed' (e:g., traffic detays, noise, tax increases or assessments)? To whom? G�heu?k'or how lon�! ,,, DISADVANTAGES IF NOT AEPIi�OVFD Whatwillbe,thenegati�econseqaencesiffhepromisedactionunofappm.ied7 fnabiliryta,deficetse�vice? Contin¢e ' � �ig6frfraffiqnoise,�accidentcate?'Loss'ofrevenue? . � � � " , � � � FINANC7AL A¢E?ACT ; ` . ATthoughyou musttailor the informalion yon provide here to ihe, issue yon arc addaessiug; in ge¢eral qou musf answes , two qnestions: Howmuch is i� BomS;o cost2, Who is gcring to, pay9 : �� , � � � � �� -' � � � �� , �� '4� �,1.� , � �� Council File # .��=�i GreenSheet# �Olo3�� CITY Presented Referted To RESOLUTION SA{NT PAUL, MINNES07A Support of New Law Involving Document Production as it Relates to 1 WF3EREAS, the City of Saint Paul supports due process in the area of 2 WAEREAS, currently, the law states that ffie government must 3 commission 20 days prior to a hearing before them; and and Domain copy of an appraisal of a property to ihe 4 WHEREAS, the problem with current law is that the other y is en6tled to the reasonabie appraisal fee of $1,500, 5 but is not required to show proof of securing an appr ' al; and - 6 WHEREAS, the City Attomey wants to cha e the process of the production of documents before a commission 7 hearing; and 8 WF�REAS, the Saint Paul Cit ouncil is the policy making body for the City of Saint Paul, and as such, its work 9 is inextricably linked to t ity's I.egislative Agenda; now therefare be it 10 RESOLVED, th e City of Saint Paul supports the proposal of a new law that would require al] documents (which 11 include an a aisal) must be provided 21 days before the coxnmissioner's hearing, with a payment of $1,500 (fee 12 for app ' al) given after that document is produced. Requested by Department of: Adoption Certified by Council Secretary By: Approved by Mayor: Date By: � Form Approved by GSry Attomey � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council � Adopted by Councii: Date