D001226C I T Y O F S A I N T P A U L
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
�roved Capies to:
- City Cierk (Original)
- Finance Dept's Accounting Division
- Requesting �ept
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER
BUDGET REVISION
No:
Date:
���-V I 6-�-7_.�
.") '�
AD INIST IVE O ER, onsistent wit e authority granted to the Mayor in Section 10.07.4 o the
City Charter and based on the request of the Chief of the St. Paul Police Department to amend the
1997 6udget of the Police Special Projects Fund, the Director of Financial Services is authorized to
amend said budget in the following manner:
FROM:
436 - Police Special Projects
34102 - COPS Neiwork II
0848 - Other - Specialized Equipment
CURRENT
BUDGET
200,000
APPROVED
CHANGES
(101,500)
AMENDED
BUDGET
�: ��
200,000 (101,500) 98,500
•
TO:
436 - Police Speciaf Projects
341�2 - COPS Network il
0141 - Overtime
0219 - Fees Other Professional Services
0299 - Other Miscellaneous Services
0369 - Other Miscellaneous Supplies
0439 - Fringe Benefit
Requested
�
0 2,400 2,400
0 91,500 91,500
0 2,000 2,000
0 5,000 5,000
0 600 600
0 101,500 101,500
��%�� � ��� ����
Director Date pproved by: Budget Director Date
A040897A.XLS
G
� i�`�I��G, �8�9�
DWARIMIEMNFFICEACOUNCIL pATE MRIATED ^ ~
POLICEDEPARTMENT 4/8/97 GREEN SHEE
CONiACT PERSON 8 PHONE 1NITIAL/DATE INRIAUDATE
DEPAfiTMENTDIRECTOfl OCfTYCOUNpL
Chief Wllliam Fltlne 292-3588 ^��GN � cmnrroar+ev m CRYCLERK
NUYBERFUR
0E ON CAUNCIL AGENDA BY (DATE) ROUTING � BUOGEf DIqECTOR � FIN. & MGT. SEpVICES DIR.
ORDER � MAVOR (OR ASSI5TANn � (+���y� (}
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES � (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
ACT10N FEQUESTED:
Approval of the attached Administrative Order which will transfer budget money to provide sufficient funding in
accordance with the gtant agreement_
RECOMMENDA7fOwS: app�ove (A) m Reject (q) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWINCa �UESTIONS:
_ PIANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVIGE CAMMISSION �� Has this person/tirtn ever worked under a contract tor ihis department?
_ CIB COMMITfEE _ YES NO
_ STAFF 2� Has this pefsoNfirm ever been a City employee?
— VES NO
_ DISiRICT CoUFrr _ 3. Does this personRirm possess a sKill not normally pos5essed by any curcent city employee?
SUPPORTSWHICHCOUNqLO&IECTIVE? YES NO
Explain aq yea answera on separate sheet and attech to green sheet
INITIATING PAOBLEM, ISSUE, OPPOqTUNiTY (Who. Whffi, When. Where, Why):
The Saint Paul Police Department desires to reallocate its spending authority in the COPS Network II grant of the Police
Special Projects Fund (436).
N7AOESIFAPPROVED:
The Saint Paul Police Department spending plan in the COPS Network II grant activiry will properly reflect the
anticipated 1997 expenditures.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
None. RECEIV£[3
MAY �- 21997
.JiTY CCERK
DISADVANTAGES iF NOT APPROVEO: - �
The 1997 COPS Netwark II grant budget will not properly reflect the manner in which the funds are to be spent.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF 7RANSAC710N S 1 OI SOO.00 COSilREVENUE BUDGETEO (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDIWG SOUHCE S(J0CIH1 FilllC�,�436) qC71VITY NUMBER 34102
FINANCIAL INFORR+ATIOM (EXPLAIN) �f q �},
oyo89��# ' J v'�