03-915City of St. Paul
RESOLUTION RATIFYING AS3ESSMENT
COUNCI FILE NO. 0 J��'� �
By
Laid over from 09/24/03 File No. 15390
Assessment No. 0072
Voting
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
3 the Operation of the Above Standard Street Lighting Systems for
the months of January thru December, 2003 for the Ford-Cleveland
Area
Preliminary Order: 02-665 approved 07/24/02
Final Order: 02-819 approved 09/04/02
A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above
improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the
Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED,That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all
respects ratified.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby
de�ermined to be payable in one equal installment as per Section 64.04 of
the Administrative Code.
COUNCILPERSON
Yeas Nays
✓' Benanav
✓ Blakey
� Bostrom
v— Coleman
� Harris
✓Lantry
Ae� �-o
_,�In Favor
�Against
Adopted by the Council: Date_L��
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
„,
, p3 -9is_
Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet
UePa�tmenUofficelcouncil: � Date initiated:
°' . TE ����'�M�agementSe�v �-ozo�, o; Green Sheet NO; 3QQ6157
� CoMact Person SPho�u: DenartmeM SentTo Person �nitiaUDate
ne
' BRUCE ENGELBREKT � 0 ecLn t ao e
. z �� ASS1gi1 ~
Must Be on Councii Agenda by (Date): Number
+� For
Routing
Ocder
,
_ . .. - -' .. .
��, . .. _. . . ..
, Total # of Sigrvature Fages _� (Ciip Ni Locatio�s for Sigmature)
� AUion Requested: � � � '
- Set da_ te of public hearing to ratify the operating costs for the above standazd street lighting projects for 2003�cn �'-��
�Wr( � �� �-r.�.
��� �� Recommendations: Approve (A} w ReJect (R): Persona! Service Contracts Must Mswer the Following Questia�s:
Pianning Commission 1. Has ihis p
�r- person/flrmeverworkedunderaconVactforthisde aRment?
CIB Committee ' Yes No
Civil Service COmmission � . 2. Has tbis person/firm ever been a city empioyee?
Yes No
3. Does this person/ryrtn possess a skill not normally possesssd by any
current city emWoyee?
� . � ” Yes No �
� � E3cplain ali yes answers on separate sheet and attach fo green sheet
InRfating Problem, lssues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why): �
,.' C ��� �,� '0 " ��� 2 y� 2c� 0 3 7� ��� Zc�a 3,
� Advantages If Approved: , - � � �
Same as above.
Disadvantapes If Approved:
Benefitted properiy awners wiil have assessments payable via the properry taxes.
Disadvantages If Not Approved: - �
, To not assess the beuefits would be inconsistent with City policy.
Totat Amourn ot � � � .
Transaction: �$ Z ' � CostlRevenue Budgeted: -
Fundin,q Source: qgSPS5Tf1@f1fS Activitv Number:
Financial lnformation:
(Expiain) . �