Loading...
03-577Council File # p3 -5'q� Green Sheet #�f �CS�" � a RESOLUTION Presented Referred To OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA ^ d Committee Date Resolution to formally appoint the Cesar Chavez Street Renaming Legislative Advisory Committee 1 WHEREAS, on May 7, 2003, the Saint Paul City Council authorized the crearion of a legislative advisory committee 2 to make recommendations to the Council regarding which street in Saint Paul should be named or renamed in honor 3 of Cesaz Chavez (Council File 03-430); and 4 WIiEREAS, the Council established that the committee would consist of nine (9) members appointed by the City 5 Council. Three (3) members were recommended by the City Council, four (4) members were recommended by the 6 Mayor, one (1) member was recommended by the Saint Paul Planning Commission and one (1) member was 7 recommended by the Heritage Preservation Commission; and therefore be it 8 RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul City Council appoints the following individuals to serve on the Cesar Chavez Street 9 Renaming Legislative Advisory Committee: Peter Palacio, Ramona de Rosales, Madeline Escareno, Sam Verdeja, 10 Juan Cervantes, Vicente Luna, Milissa A. Diaz, Julie Shortridge and Michael Buird. Requested by Department oE � Form Approved by City Attomey � Appxoved by Mayor for Submission to Council � Appro � Adopted by Council: Date �\ �.o fl� t Adoption Certified by Council Secretary 03 -SRr1 DEPARTMENT/OFFICNCOUNCIL oniE�xmATEO � • CityCouncil 06l4J2003 GREEN SH.EET No 200712 COMACT PFRSON & PFiONE �nM�wDat. IMUSw�s Kathy Lantry 266-8670 oc..�rowwrw arvmuin MUST BE ON COUNCILAGENDA BY (DAT� June 11, 2003 �N NUM6EftFOR OIYAii0111EY OIYCIFRI[ ROUTING �� Aaellu�tlERVICFtdR w+Y1cMLaFAV/ACCro ❑ WYOR(ORAf4TfYlT) � TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIC�NATURE) CTION REQUESTFD Resolution fom�ally appointing the Cesaz Chavez Street Renaming Legislative Advisory Committee. RECO MENDATIONA{I{I(OV¢(A)Of EJEM(R) PERSONALSERVICECAN7RACTSMUSTANSWERTXEfOLLOWINGQIIE5RON5: 1. Has this perwNfirm evx worlce0 uMer a contract for this departmeM? PLANNINGCOMMISSION VES NO CIB COMMI7TEE 2. Has Mie pcvsoNfirm ever bem a city empbyee7 CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION vES � 3. Does fhis peisoNfirm possess a sW'il not normaiyposseseetl by any curteM city employee? YES NO 4. Is this person/fiim a tarpeted vendoYt YES NO E�lain all yea answers m separate sheet antl aCach W 9reen sheet WITIAi WG PR08LEM ISSUE, OPP�RTUNIN (Who, What, Wt�en, Whe�e, Why) ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED DISADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED �ISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVFD TOTALAMOUNTOFTRANSACTIONS COST/REVENUEBUDGEfED(C�RC�EON� YES NO FUNDING SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER FINANCIFL INFORMATION[IXPWt�