The URL can be used to link to this page

250947 ORIdiN�L TO CITY CL6RK . �J� � CITY OF ST. PAUL �oENCa N�. �SO�?� � OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK � COUNCIL RESOLUTION—GENERAL FORM x. PRESENTED BY COMMISSIONE DATF WHEREAS , The City of Saint Paul has had prepared a comprehensive City Demonstration Program. WHEREAS, The Council of the City of Saint Paul finds that the program is necessary and desirable in order to improve the living conditions of people livin� in the model neighborhood. WHEREAS , The Council of the City of Saint Paul desires that the comprehensive city demonstration program be submitted to the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (herein called the Secretary) for funding under Title I oP the Demonstratinn Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966; now therefore be it RESOLVED, By the Council of the City oP Saint Paul that the Mayor is hereby authoriz�d and directed to submit to the Secretary the comprehensive city demonstration program and such supporting and collateral material as sha11 be necessary. ��OR APPRO' D r . Corpora Se �GT 2 t 19�0 � COUNCILMEN Adopted by the Council 19_ Yeas Nays �� 7 ��7Q ,�•,�ee� Carlson A d 19— � Levine �' n Favor Meredith Sprafka � ayor A gainat Te�- Mr. President, McCarty PUBLISHED OCT 311970 O DUlLI.f�1Tt TO lRIN'RR .. . . ��01�� ,. CITY OF ST. PAUt �Np� NO OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK � COUNCIL RESOLUTION—GENERAL FORM ►��s�� COMMISSIONER �ATE I- WH8REA8, Th� City of Sa3nt Paul h�s hsd prepared a comprehensive City D��on�trstiou Program. WH�RBAS. Tha Council of the City of Saint Paul finds that the progra� is atc�asary �nd d�sirabl� in order to improve the 1*ring Qonditions oi peopla living in the model neighborhood. WHERTAS, The Couacil of the City of Saiat Paul desires that tht comprehensive city dsmonstratioa program be submitted to the Becr�tsry o! Housiag snd Qrban Developm�nt (herein aslled tbe S�cr�tary) for fuading ander Titl• I o! the D�aoastration Cities j and M�tropolitan DeveloDment Act of �966; noW therefora be it ; RESOLVED, By th• Counail of th• City o! Saint Pdul that th� Mayor ie hereby authorize8 snd directed to submit to the �ecretsry the eospr�h�asl�• city d�,onstratton program and sn�h supporting and eollateral material ae shall b� nsaessary. QGT. 2 7 1970 COUNCILMEN Adopted by the Counc� 19_ , Y� Na� �T Z 7 1970 Carlson Appro�l 19_ Levine `�� T„ Favor ` Meredit,h � � Sprafka AooAinat �eee�-- Mr. President, McCarty �� ABOUT MODEL CITIES The First Year Action Plan of the Sto Paul Model Cities Program is being considered for approval by the Mayor and Sto Paul Cit,y Council todaye The plan, under development for nearly twelve months, recently received the unanimous approval of the Model Neighborhood Planning Council, the citizens organization that was elected by residents of the Summit-University area to plan for a better inner-city environmento When approved by the city administration, this Comprehensive Development Plan will be formally submitted to the Chicago Regional Office of the Department of Housing and Urban Development for review by the various segments of the federal governmento This marks the culmination of the planning effort that many concerned citizens have spent countless hours developinge The Model Cities Staff with Technical Assistance from consultants and HUD has built upon the basic ideas developed in the Social, Economic, and Physical Planning Cores to develop the projects contained in the plano Model Cities is a federally aided program designed to improve the quality of life in problem areas of American citieso The Ste Paul program consisting of planning and administering a comprehensive ;�, � effort to improve the environment and the general welfare of the people of th� ' Summit-University area, will bring significant federal funding to Sto Paul during a five year periodo The erpenditure of $125,000 by the city during 1971 will result in direct federal funding of $�2,950,OOOo Used as "local share", tr.ese �'ederal. Supple- mental �znds will generate many dollars in additional fundsa With stress in the projects for the First Action Year being placed on economic and social improvements, we hope to develop an improved community and a more stable econo- mic basee While there are projects in the program relating to physical improve- ments, many other physical projects are being carried out under the separate Neighborhood Development Projects of the Housing and Redevelopment Authorityo The uupplemental Funds will be used to implement action projects and for administration of the programo The Projects Report section of the plan lists the following thirteen projects: Local Development Corporation Model Neighborhood Employment Center Community Health Program Aid for Retarded Citi7ens Comprehensiva Health Planning Board Grant Oxford-Selby Recreation Training Program T'ze Retre�t C�ltural �nrichment for the Model Neighborhood H;_grler Education Resoizrce Center and Assistance Fund S�.zp�orti,ac iducational Projects C`zild Deve�opment Pro jects C�nsultant Housing Study Rehauilitat�_on Loans and Grants 4.�ilf= thes� projects wer�� derived from and will have a major impact upon the basic problems and causes revealed during the planning process, we realize that they ��e only the first step in solving the problems of the Model Neighborhoodo The ��lan consists of eight sections in totalo The other seven sections deal with areas required by iI?JD as a part of the total Model Cities Plano The sec- tions are: Niid�Planning Statement Revision pdministrative Structure Report and Budgets Continuous Planning and E�raluation Relocation Statement of Non-Federal Contributions Resident Etn�loyment Sta.tement Summary Description Irde fe�l th��t the pro��isions of these sections will provide a basis for guiding a sou:�.d and compreheriUive programo � ` As the plarli�ed projects become operational, all projects taill be conti.nuously monitored to assure that the services pro�rided for in the project contrac�s are being furnishedo The Evaluation and ��io~�itor�_ng Comrnittee rriade up of Pfod�l Neighborhood residents and others will select pr�_ority projects or compon.�nt parts of the �rogram for evaluation cr in-depth anaiysis by our staff and by consultantso This is a furdamen�a,. p�rt or this progr�m, as it 3.�; thrcugh tools such as menitoring and e�ra:.uatio:.� tha+, tre "mnedel" or 1°demonst-ratio�i" aspects of the progr�sn are foc�zsec' unari� . ' � S ° 9`�� ABOUT MODEL CITIES The First Year Action Plan of the Sto Paul Model Cities Program is bein� considered for approval by the Mayor and Ste Paul City Council todaye The plan, under development for nearly twelve months, recently received the unanimous approval of the Model Pdeighborhood Plannin� Council, the citizens organization that was elected by residents of the Summi�-University area to plan for a better inner-city environmento When approved by the city administration, this Comprehensive Development Plan will be formally submitted to the Chicago Regional Office of the Department of Housing and Urban Development for review by the various segments of the federal governmento This marks the culmination of the planning effort that many concerned citizens have spent countless hours developinge The Model Cities Staff with Technical Assistance from consultants and HUD has built upon the basic ideas developed in the Social, Economic, and Physical Planning Cores to develop the projects contained in the plano Model Cities is a federally aided program designed to improve the quality of life in problem areas of American citieso The Ste Paul program consisting of planning and administering a comprehensive effort to improve the environment and the general welfare of the people of the Summit--University area, will bring significant federal funding to Sto Paul during a five year periodo The er,penditure of $125,000 by the city during '1971 will result in direct federal funding of $�2,950,OOOo Used as "local share", these Federal Supple- mental Funds will generate many dollars in additior_al fundsa With stress in the projects for the First Action Year being placed on economic and social improvements, we hope to develop an improved community and a more stable econo- mic basee While there are projects in the pro�ram relating to physical improve- ments, ma�y other physical projects are being carried out under the separate Neighborhood Development Projects of the Housing and Redevelopment Authorityo . The Supplemental Funds will be used to implement action projects and for administration of th� programa The Projects Report section of the plan lists the fo-_lowing thirteen projects: L�.�cal D�velopment Corporation Nl��del Neigh�orhood Employment Center Community Health Prograsn Aid for Retarded Citizer.s Comprehensiv� Health PJ_anning Board Grant Oxford-Selby Recrea'tion Trair�ing Program T:ne Retreat Cultural Enrichment fox• the �odel Neighborhood Hi_�her Education Resource Certer ��nd Assistance Fund Sup�ortivc- Educational Projects Child Development Projects Consvltant Housing Study Rehabilitation Loans and Grants 'rlhile these projects were derived from and will have a major impact upon the basic problems and causes revealed during the planning process, we realize that tney are only the first step in solving the problems of the Model Neighborhoodo The pl=jn cons�st.s of eight scctions in totale The other seven sections deal with areas rec�uired by HUD as a part of the total Model Cities Plano The sec-� tions are: r�Iid_--Planning Statement Revision 1?dministrative Structure Report and Budgets Continv.ous Planning and Evaluation Relocation Stater�e�t of Non-Federal Contributions �:esident Fmployment Statement £,ummary Description `<]e fec:l that the provisions of these sections will provide a basis for guiding a sound and comprehensive programo As the plan��ed projects become operationzl, all �rojects wi�l be conti.nuousl_�- monitored to assure that the services provided for �_n �he project con�N� c-�s are being furnishedo The Evaluation and �ionitoring Corlmittee made up of T4odei_ Neighborhood residents and others will select pri_ority t�rojects or compo�lent parts of the program for evaluation or in�depth analysis b,r rn?r staff and by consultantso This iss a fundamental part of thi� p-ro�ram, as it ��: �hrc��.t��: tools such as menitoring and evaluation that the "ncdel'' or p°demon�;,ratic��" aspects of the prograrn are focused upone ST. PAUL � MdDEL CTTIES PROGRAM COMPRI��iENSTVE DEVIIAPMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Number Section Description Pa�e,� Table of Contents i Letters of Submission �-� Resolutions vii Model Neighborhood Planning Council, Inc. xi City Council xii Introduction xiv 1 MID-PLANNING STATk�iT REVISION 1-43 • F.orward 1 Priority Problems and Causes 2-4 Problem Discription, Goals and Objectives 4-32 Strategy 33-�+3 2 PROJECTS RF�ORT 41+-1;3 . Project Summary 44-51 ''Econoraic Projects Model Nei�hborhood Employment Center 67-71 Local Development Corporation ?�+-76 *Social Projects Community Health Progr•arn 52-5�+ Aid for Retarded Cit i;�.ens 55-5$ Comprehensive Health Flanning Boaxd Grant 59-�1 • i � • The symbol on the cover denotes UNITY -- unity of a person -- unity of a family -- unity of a neighborhood. (It is an o1d Chinese sign called a monad -- rhymes with "Go Dad".) In our neighborhood of different race�, creeds and interests� achieving a sense of Unity is in great measure both our problem and our solution. • Section Number Section Description Pa�;e;y � Oxford-Selby Recreation Traini�g Program 7�-73 St. Paul Police-Community Relations Project ?7-?8 The Retreat �9-$1 Cultural Ehrichment for the Model Neighborhood 82-84 Hi�her Education Resource Center and Assistance Fund $5-87 Supportive Educational Projects 88-104 Child Development Projects 105-117 � *Physical Projects Consultant Housing Study 62-64 Rehabilitation Loans and Grants 65-66 Non-Supplemental. �Znded Projects 118-122 • 3 AUMINISTRATNE STRUCTITRE RE�'ORT AND BUDG�TS 124-1.5ja Introduction ' 1�4 . Staff Administrative Org�nization 124-125 � Citizens Participation Structure 126-127 Procedure for Tnvolving other Agencies 128-12y Appendices , 130-1�8 Budgets � 139_155a . 4 CONTINUOUS PLANNING AND EVALUATION • 1�6-190 i , Content Sheet I 156 5 R�ACATION 1�1-�00 � 6 STATEMFIJT OF NON-FEUERAL (SQNTRIBUTIONS ?01-�0� • ii Section Number Section Description PA�e,^., • 7 RESIDENT F�IPLOYMENT STATEME�TT .�a3-2��, 8 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION �C�E;-�13 s��► 206-211 �PS 212_-213 • � iii ■ ■ P I M del �t�es � . t au o 165 n dale st. st paul minn 55104 227-8726 October 2�, 19�U Mr. Don Morrow Acting Regional Administrator, Region IV Depa"rtment of Hausing and Urban Development 360 North Michigan Avenue Chicago, Illinois Dear rir. Morrow: On behalf of the St. Paul Model Neighborhood Planning Gouncil, Inc. , I submit the following Cocnprehensive Development Plan. � The completion of this Plan was made possible with the effort and cooperation of the Model Neighborhood residents and city government with the support of the state and many local agencies and institutions, and frequent assistance from HUD staff. We consider this submission as the first important step in the process of the task of improving our neighborhood and community through the development of a totally responsive and knowled�eable citi�enry in addition to the physical, social and economic renewaL We urge your speedy review. Sin ly, //w// ��_'V I�%�.wuG.�'""�.q'.'"'. . Reverend Joseph Pilate Chairman, Model Neighborhood Planning Council, Inc. v • • • M del �tres � . t Paul o 165 n dale st. st paul minn 55104 227-8726 October 22, 1�j7U - Mr. Don Morrow Acting Regional Administrator, Region IV Department of Housing and Urban Development 360 North Michigan Avenue Chicago, Illinois llear Mr. Morrow: I am pleased to join with Reverend Joseph Pilate and M�yor Charles P. McCarty in the submission of the First Year • Comprehensive Development Plan. Both the St. Paul Model Neighborhood Planning Council, Inc. , and the City Demonstration Agency �look forward to the implementation of our Model Cities Program so that we ca.n begin to build into citizens and city government the capability of reapondin� to a wide range of human needs through program administration and planning coordination. Si cerely, . .., William B. St wart City Demonstration Agency Director vi � RESOLUTION OF THE MODII, NET(3HBORHOOD PLANNIN(�, SUMMIT-UNIVERSiTY ARF�A, � ST.PAUL, MINNFSOTA, APPROVING A COMPRE��TSIVE CITY DEMONSTRATION • PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING ITS SUBMISSION. Whereas the St. Paul Model Cities Program, Summit-University Area ha3 prepared a Comprehensive City Demonstration Program. 4Jhereas the Model Neighborhood Pl,anning Council finds that the program is necessary and desirable in order to improve the environment and living condition.s of the people living in the Model Neighborhood. Whereas the Model Neighborhood Planning Council desires that the Com- prehensive City Demonstration Pro�ram be submitted to the Mayor and City Council of St. Paul, for approval and to the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for funding under Title I of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Act of 1966. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the Model Neighborhood Planning Council • that: Approval is hereby granted and the Chairman of the Model Neighborhood Planning Gouncil or his successor is hereby authorized to submit to the Mayor and City Council and the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development the Comprehensive City Demonstration Program a.nd such supporting or colZateral material as shall be necessary. In Witness Thereof, the Mode1 Neighborhood Planning Council has oxecuted this resolution. , C��—�...,.. �..� �y cn�r�,an . ' . � ` Vice Chairman . itness • j -r �� October 22. 19�0 Witness T vate x • Model Nei�hborhood Plannin Council��Inc. Chairman Rev. Joseph W. Pilr�te First Vice-Chairman Reginald A. Harris Second Vice-Chairman Gene J. Poppler Secretary JameB 0. Mann Treasurer Garland Hunter, Jr. Eloise Adams John Frelix Scott C. Aden Gary Gorman Ben L. Alexander Manuel La.gos Floyd C. Barr Rev. Elijah McTntosh � Ruth Benner Gregory McNellis Charles R. Bradley Kathleen C. McNellis Esther Brown Kathleen McWatt Paris Carter Orean Rawlings Rev. Denzil A. Carty Anna F. Reed Andre Fentress Willie Richardson Leland L. Firkus William W. Sayles Alfreda Flowers Rev. W. Mordeau William� � xi . • Mayor an.d City Cour�cil. St. Paul, Minn. Honorable Charles P. McCarty, Mayor City Councilmen • , , William E. Carlson Leon�rd Leaine Rosalie Butler Ro�ert F. Sprafka Dean Meredith �ictor J. Tedesco , / • ' � . � II � . ; � xii Model Citi�es Pro ram Personnel • P1anr�in Staf f Executive Dir�ector William B. Stewart Deputy Director ' Richard J. Thorpe Social Planner Melvin J. Hrarri�� Physical Planner ' Carl E. Ohrn (loraned fram VISTA and Ramsey County UEO) Economic Planner (Agency) Brent A. Lewis (loaned from � Department of Manpower Service�) Planning Intern Melvin Howard Gommunity Organ.ization Staff Resident Planner . Jewell Henry Resident Planner Rosetta Co�ton Resident Planner Billie Clay • Resident Planner Alonzo Luc�s Resident Planner Haywood Kemp Resident Planner Beatrice McGinn Resident Planner Delores Von F3ru�rger Supporting Staff Joanne Englund Carol Whiteis Marion Gray Sharon iveland Alice Peterson Harriet Lockh�rt Nancy Wright t�ary Lenox Con�ultants A.L. Nellum and Associates, Washir.�ton, D.C. Training Research and Development, Inc., Washington, D.C. � The Jacobs Company, Inc. , Chicago, Illinois � x i i i. INTRODUCTION • This planning document is the culmination of the combined efforts of citizens and staff to develop a comprehensive plan for a better inner- city neighborhood environment. In another sense, 'this comprehen�ive community development plan is only a threshold, for as the writer Walt Whitman said, "It is provided in the essence of thin�s, that from any fruition of success, no m�tter what, shall come forth something to make a greater stru�gle necessary." That stru�gle will be implementing the projects that will bring visible and meaningful change to the Model Nei�hborhood and at the san�e time developing a continuous action over and beyond the five year span of the Model Cities Program. We have great hopes for this plan as it deals with not just the obvious physical problems, but with the economic and social problems as well. The citizens of this part af the city have spent uncounted hours in this planning procesa. Their participation as citizens has provided the � entire basis for this program. The staff with technical a�sistance from consultants has built upon this base to develop this plan. The Federal, State and Local A�encies have also cooperated to provide valuable infor- mation and assistance as a continuing process3 whereas the St. Paul Mayor and City Councilmen have monitored the plr�nning activities and made contributions to program objectives. While some may be frustrated with a program that envisions a full year'e.> planning periad, those who have gone through the planning period reco�- nize how time consumin� a thorou�h planning effort can be. The result of this effort is this Comprehensive Development Plan for the first year of our St. Paul Model Cities Program. The plan embraces a well balanced group of projects dcaling with mariy facets of the Model Neighborhood's human and environmental needs. • � xiv The thrust of the plan is directed toward improvement of the economic � and social faundations of the area. When combined with physical pro- jects, this will bring about a revitalization and renewal of the quality of life in the Model Neighborhood Qn a comprehen�ive basis. However of greatest significance, is the ultimate �oal of the Model Nei�hborhood citizens to develop the leadership capabilities to be in char�e of their own destinies. Therefore the final objective is to create relationships between the local government and the Model Neigh- borhood citizens that will allow them to change, respect and utilize the institutions that make up their local, political, social, and economic systems. � • xv 1 � MID-PLANNING STATF�IVT REVISTON � • For� eword: Y The narrative qlaterial in this section re�ults from reana�ysis and further planning during the period between the developafent of the St. Paul Mid- Planning Statement and the present time. This material was developed partic,ularly to respond to the requirements set down in Section I of the Regional InteragenCy Coordinating Committee Hid-Plan BevieW of the St. Paul Model Cities Program. In this up-dating of the Mid-Planning Statement we have, in a comprehensive manner, dealt with priority problems and causes, goals, objectives and strategy. This narrative also addresses itself to the advisory section (II) of the Regional Interagency Coordinating Committee Review. Those Technical Assistance comments were very ueeful in our planning while moving toward thi$ submission. The Technical Assistance commente have guided our efforts and as the work progressed, responses have been woven into this narrative. We would like to emphasize that representatives of public and private • agencies and institutions have been working closely with .us in the further planning and in the development of the up-dated �tatement and the projects that are a part of this submi�sion. • • We further feel that with this extensive up-dating, we now .have a Mid- , Planning Statement which will provide a basis for producing and guiding a sound and comprehensive progray�n. The narrative ia divided into the following sections: " � . , l. Foreword � 2. Priority Problems and Causes� , � � M 3. Probl�m Descriptions, Goals and Ob�ectives � 4. Strategy � � , . • � . , . - • . , �M.id-Plannin� Statement • � ' '. . � . 1 , MID-PLANNING STAT REVISTON • Foreword: �^ The narrative material in this sectic eu7.ts from reana.l.y�is and further planning during the period between t?�� re relop[nent of the St. Paul Mid- Planning Statement and the present �1Q �e This material was developed particu�''°1e' o respond to the requirements set down in Section I of the Regiona rly xagency Coordinating Committee Mid-Plan xeview of the St. Paul Mode_ Int es Program. In this up-dating of the Mid-Planning Statement we hav� �it. a comprehensive manner, dealt with priority problems and causes, F+ '-� ob�ective8 and strategy. ;aals, . This narrative also addresses itsel e advi�ory section (I1� of the Regional Tnteragency Coordinating f,'� tO t� Review. Those Technical Assistance comments were very usef�O�l�� .anning while moving toward in o�r p� thi8 submission. The Technical A �ents have guided our sistamG+� coauV•. efforts and as the work progresse •e been woven into this narrative. , resp��nses ha�� We would like to emphasize that re resen4ativQe of �ublic and private • agencies and instytutions have bee 1 work�� closely Nith us in the further planning and in the develo �1ent �f the up-dated �tatement and the projects that are a part of t' i$ subr��++�sion. We further feel that with this extensive �p-dating, we now have a Mid- Planning Statement which will provide a basis for producing and guiding a sound and comprehensive program. The narrative is divided into the following sections: 1. Foreword 2. Priority Problems and Causes 3. Problem Descriptions, Goals and Objectives 4. Strateg,y 'Mid-Planning Statement • 1 Section Number Section Description Pa*es • Oxford-Selby Recreation Training Program 7�-73 St. Pau1 Police-Community Relatio s Project ?7-78 The Retreat � 79-�1 Cultural Enrichment� for the Mode Neighborhood I 82-84 Hi�her �ducation Re�ource Center and Assistance F`undl 85-87 Supportive Educatio�al Projects 88-104 Child Development P�^ojects 105-11'7 *P'hysical Projects Consultant Housin� Stuc�y 62-64 Rehabilitation Loans and Grants 65-66 Non-Supplemental F�ndedlProjects 118-122 • 3 ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTUR�E REI�ORT AND UDGETS 124-155g Introduction 124 Staff Administrative Olganization 124-125 Citizens Partici�ation S�ructure 126-127 Procedure for Involvin� other Agenci s 12$-12y Appendic.es ' 130-138 Bud�ets � 139-155a I 4 CONTINUOUS PLANNING ANIp EVAI�UATION 1�6-190 � � Conter�t Sheet i 156 A � �i � 5 RELOC: .TION I 191-200 _ , 6 STATEI�ENT OF NON-FEDF�2AL COPiTRIBUTIO 8 201-�0?_ I _ I , • -- I -- � � � i i } � i PRIORITY PROBLEMS AND CAUSES • Introduction: The Mid-Planning Statement as now revised focuse� on a group of six priority pxoblems and five priority causes. As explained in the following narrative, we have chosen to rank the causes, but not the problems. The planning process up to the point at xhich the Mid-- Planning Statement wa+s produced did not focu� on �stabli+�hing and rauking priority problems and causes. Tt should be emphasixed that this was not an oversight, but eame about by design during tYae wark. of the plannin� cqres and task forces. A priority group of problems was developed during the proce�s. They were noti ranked because the problems within the priority groups rrere revealed to be interwoven with each other in a complex pattern. While analyzing the problems, we were struck by the recurrence of the same basic causes in theeepara6e problem sreas. • ' , We decided to rank the basic causes in an order of priority, but ta continue to deal with the problems as an unranked group. Problems: � Each of the eight priority problems was important and 2had to be dealt with in some way during the First Action Year. To rank problems within the group was deemed by citizens and staff to be merely an exercise that would give little gositive direction toward our broad goal of solving these ma�or problems. In fact, the ranking exercise could have had a negative result by bringing out disagreements among the people central to the planning process ae there were favorite�, but differing top priority problems. Hid-Planning Statement, Priority Problems and Causes • 2 i The priority problems in random order are: � Incomer and Economic Independence • Education Health Crime and Justice Housing ' Public Facilities and Services Transportation Eecreation We have reanalyzed each of these problems attd through a new description have attempted to bring into focus the diasenBione of each problem in a detailed and comprehensive manner. The problem descriptiona 2�ave been illuminated by cbrroborative statietics and data from a variety of sources. This reana].ysis and de8criptiott has then led ua to clarit'ying and restatiag the Goal Yor each priority pro�lem area. The Ob3sctivee (formerly coneidered ae a type of goal) have also been • restated and redefined to give us specific guide poste for the firat and succeeding years. The items discussed above are in each of the separate problem de�arip- tions which follow thie nsrr+�tive. Cauaes: Through the various dimension8 of each of the problema in the priority groups an underlying aet of causes was observed to recur. A study of the problem descriptions will reveal that these causes in a direct or indirect manner do run throughout all problem areas. These major causes were ranked as the plan�ning procese evolved. The priority causes were decided to be: Mid-Planning Statement, Priority Problems and Causes • 3 1. Inadequate education 2. Insufficient income (unemployment and underemployment) • 3. Discrimination (raci.al, economic, sexual arxd geographic) 4. Governmental and institutional neglect (inadequate delivery of public and private services) 5. Ineffective Model Neighborhood resident involveroent in public policy and decision aaaking Causes 1 and 2 are priroary; causes 3 and 4, secondary; and cause 5, tertiary. The ranked przority causes were put to a practiaal use as a criteria for the rating of First Action Year Proposals. In an attempt to objectively evaluate each proposal that was received, a Priority Rating Sheet (E�chibit A) was developed. The rating process was itttended to indicate the de�ee to which these priority or major causes would be impacted by a proposal. Using the Priority Rating Sheet, the individual proposals were rated and through the numerical rating that was developed the ranking of proposals resulted. While recognized as not being completely valid, this Priority • Rating Sheet proved to be a valu�ble �ool in thi� decision making proce�s. Problem: Inaome and Economic Independence Description: This problem area encompasses a broad range of related concerne. The relationshipe m�y not have been recognized in the past, but thraugh our problem analysis work we came to reaognize that such seemingly diverse areas as welfare, business, and employment were all dimensions of tha same problem. Unemployment or undereatployment and welfare are insepa- rable as the need for welfare stems from a lack of income and a lack of income indicates an �eatplayment problem. Sixteen percent of the approximately 12,000 family unit+� in the Model Mid-Planning Statement, Income and Economic Independence • �4 Neighborhood earn less than $3,000 annually. The incidence of dependencc on welfare in all categories (23� of all Model Neiqhborhood households) • is, accordingly, higher than the city-wide incidence and than the inoi- dence in any other part of the �ity. The Model Neighborhood accounts for 35% of the persons in Ramsey County that are dependent on Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AF'DC). Similarly, the Model Neighborhood account� for 24% of the Ramsey County Welfare Department•s Aid to the Totally Aiti- abled (ATD) caseload; 25% of its Old Age and Survivora In�sur�nce (OAS) caseload; 27A6 of its Aid to the Blind (AT$) ca+�eload; 25� o� its Medical Assistance caseload. Among the problems relating to dependence on welfare cit�d by the Model Neighborhood residents are these: a. Lack of education and the absenae of training prog�am� ge�red to creating independence among recip3.en�s cause genera�ion after generation to remain on welfare; b. Welfare paymentr are too low to keep families intact; c. Social workers are raot trained to be sensitive to the needs of their clients; • d. Poor people do not have a role in planning programs to solve their problems; e. Cost of child care makes working unprofitable; f. Distant location of the welfare agency, recipient's reluctance to leave their community to face discrimination and indignities and the absence of a means of registering their grievanceg com- bine to make the recipients feel alienated froar the agency; g. Inadequate public transportation makea getting to the job difficult; h. Services to senior citizens are inadequate and ivaccessible; i. Senior citizens are discouraged from keeping their own homes and are being located in high-riee public housing inacoessible to transportation which isolate s them from the community and from services and amenities such as health centers, drug stores, Mid-Planning 3tatement, Income and Economic Independence • 5 theaters, and other sources of entertainment; �. Welfare laws discourage childr�n on welfare from bringing their • aged parents into their homes to live and be cared for. A lack of economic independence reflect�, for most people. an employment problem. The employment problems of the residents of the Model Neighborhood can be clasBified into two categories, those of' unemployment and those of' under- employment. The unemployment rate habit ally runs double that for the city as a whole. In 1965 the uneaiployme�it rate for St. Paul was ;3�. Tn 1968 the rate was 3.3�. For the same periods of time the Mode,l Neighbor- hood had b.6� and 7.5�6 unemployment rate�. Underemployment is demonstrated by the consisteat record of area resident8 rorking in unskilled and low paying �obs In 1960, ].096 of the Model Neigh- borhood residents were employed in rofe�sional and P manager�sl. occupations. For St. Paul as a whole the rate was 20� IIn+skilled occupations accounted for 4(�6 of the Model N�ighborhood work ft�rc�. St. Paul figures were 2�G. • In 1960 the atedfan fam3ly income for Mod l Neighborhood residente xas g5,3�. For St. Pau]. as a whole the stat�istic v+as $6,543. During the same period of ti�e �6�6 of al1 Model Neighborhood residents ea.rrt��l under �5,�00. The figure was 28� for St. Paul. By 1965 the median fa�ily income in the Madel Neighborhood had dete iorated to �4,168, whi1�� 51+� of the area families now earn less than $5,000 per year. For thoee Model Neighborhood residents over 25 years of age, the average number of years of formal education is 9. . St. Paul's average is 11.4. The high +school drop-out rate for 16 and 7 year olds is 16� as compered to 696 for the city as a whole. Attendance in the area vocational schools and the loca7. colleges and universities i almost non-existant. Few receive what they believe to be adequate �ocational counaelin . A ne a- B K tive self-image of their potential prevails. Mid-Planning Statement, Income and Econoraic Independence • 6 Host profess a lack of confidence in existing governmental programs rind agencies as they do not see people like themselves involved in plannin� • these programs. Many exhibit an unwillingness to seek les� secure and familiar employment outside the traditional neighborhood boundaries. Study after study has reported a crippling lack of favorable career models within the adult community. Those who could offer this hope often migrate to less unsettling and more proaperous areas of the city. Low income results in financial pressures which inhibit long range planning. Credit is often unavailable. Few own thei.r businesses; other� fail because of inexperience and lack of training in handling money, roerchandizing, and customers. Information about comparative methods of buying and family budgeting is non-existant. Experience at �pplying economic and political power is scarce and when attemped mostly uneuc- cessful. The employer force is characterized by an often undue emphasis upon irrelevant traditional hiring requirements. Civil Service practic�s are cumberso�,slow� and distant. Hiddle management remains encumbered by traditional stereotypes of economically deprived citizens. Historic defini.tions of jobs suitable for minority workers persist. Interest by small and medium sized employers in setting up job training and retrain- • ing ie alarmingly low. Area businesses are small and the number is steadily declining. From the fall of 196? to July of 1969, the number of vacant business places has more than doubled, increasing froro 20 to 4�. Of the 155 remaining businesses, 85 (55'�6) had been recommended by the St. Paul Housing and Redeve].opment Authority to be acquired for Urban Renewal. Almost 84% employ four or fewer employees while lass than 4% eatploy ten or more. Over 63� reported in 1965 (a year of gen- eral .business expansion) that they anticipated their business activity would either remain stagnant or decrease. Indications are that even that depressing note was optimistic. Most ma�or service facilities are located outside of the Model Neighbo�- hood. Information upon their effectiveness and services is most often incomplete, erroneous, or seemingly unavailable. Mid-Planning Statement, I.ncome and Econoroic Independenc� • �r Lendin� institutions, government and private, are felt to have ignored borrowers after the loan has been made. Budgeting and comparative • shopping assistance has been negligible. Existing programs and agencies, designed to aid the unemployed and under- employed historically have lacked adequate suppartive services in terms of stipends, day-care facilities, counseling, follow-up� and outreach. Job training is frequently available only during hours when the underem- ployed are working. Incorne reductions and time limitations on the number of hours one m�y work while in training have imposed severe hardship upon many. Job training programs are often characterized by a lack of variety� bureaucratic delay, and nonsympathetic responses to the needs of the�r enrollees. Goals: To gain economic independence for a11 Model Neighborhood rPSidents by: a. Providing the opportunity for meaningful and self-directed employment, except for those whom self-support is impossible • by virtue of age or disability, thereby reducing the depend- ence upon Welfare. b. Providing, for those for whom by virtue of age or disability self-support is impossible, a decent income and adequate services in a roanner which supports human dignity. Ob�iectives: (Years 4 - 7) l. By the end of the faurth year, enroll 20% of Model Neighbor�ood residents, for whom self-support is impossible, in programs which wi11 help them. 2. By the end of the fourth year, enroll in vocational education and job training programs all welfare recipient� in the Model Neigh- borhood wha could be aided by such training. 3. By the end of the fourth year� decrease the gap between the Mode1 Mid-Planning Statement, Income and Economic Independence • 8 Neighborhood average family income and the city average by 25�6. 4. By the end of the fourth year,rejuvenate existing buainessee and • create enterprises which can be operated on a self-sustaining basis. 5. By the end of the fifth year,secure placement in full-time employ- ment for all graduates of accelerated �ob training and vocational education programs. 6. By the end of the fifth year,have l►096 of Model Neighborhood resi- dents for whom by virtue of age or disability, self-support is imipossible, enrolled in programs which offer the decent income and adequate services defined by the Coalition (see First Xear Objectives). �. By the end of the sixth �rear,enroll 80,G of all Model Neighborhood residents for whom self-support is impossible in a program offering decent income and adequate services. 8. By tb,e seventh year,enroll all Model Neighborhood residents for whom self-support is impossible in programs which ofYer decent income and adequate supportive services. • 9. By the end of the seventh year,reduce to zero the number of Model Neighborhood residents who, for reasoas other than age or disability, depend upon welfare assistance. 10. By the end of the seventh year,increase to the city norm the median income level of Model Neighborhood residettts. 11. By the end of the seventh year,establish a busine8s climate, in the Mode1 Neighborhood which encourages indigenous residente to open, , continue, or expand businesses at the same time as it meets the demands of the surrounding community. Ob�eetives: (First Year) 1. By the end of year one, establish a Model Neighborhood employment center patterned after the Human Resources Employability Develop- ment Model and offering 3ob training and basic education Mid-Planning Statement, Income and Economic Independence • 9 , ' ,�' opportunities to Model Neighborhoo�l residents. 2, Create a Local Development Corpora�tion for the Model Neighborhood I • providing technica]. as rrell as eco�omic business assistance to area residents. ' 3. To form a Coalition for Adequa.te I�come from among widespread interests in St. Paul whos�e purpos�s wi11 be: a. to establish a realistic decen� annual income and adequate pro- gram of services for those Mad�l Neighborhood reaidents for whom self-support is impossibl$ by reason of age or disability; b. to secure adoption of such sta�dards by appropriate public officials and private welfare �gencies; c. to secure any changes in local 'lor state law needed to per►nit such etandards to be acted uporl. 4. Design, establish, and secure the �upport needed from private and public sources for the job trainin�, development, and placement program and vocational education pr}ograms referred to in the ob- �ectives for the period of four-to-�seven years. ; • Proble�: Educatlion Description: Fundamental to the problem of education �.n the Model Neighborhood is the underachievement of school students. Wh�,le the city-wide drop-out rate for 16 and l� year olds is 6;�� the Model�� Neighborhood has a drop-out rate of 16�;. Correspondingly, the media� achievement level is 11.4 grades for the city of St. Paul and 9.$ �'or the Model Neighborhood. Over 40�6 of the population 25 years and �ver in the Model Neighborhood have not had any high school, and only a�proximately 59b are college graduates. These figures are in sharp ccbntrast with those for the city of St. Paul � � Under-achievement then is not limited tolthose in .school, but for adults Mid-Planning Statement, Education I • � ' 1U I . �', xho have not had adequate training, e�chibite itself ae unea�ployment and • underemployment. The high drop-out rate and lov achievement level are attributed to the lack of a relevant curriculum geared to the needs of minority and low in- come children. Institutions of higher learning are not preparing teachers to work effectively with childrett having socio-economic back- ground� of the Model Neighborhood children. Teachers assigned to Model Neighborhood schoola are often young, inex- perienced, and inadequately trained in subject matter and teaching procedures. This situation brings about little deviation from the traditional approach to teaching. Because of the social temperament of the community, many of the school systems well-qualified teachers refuse assignment to schools in the Model Neighborhood. Among the teachers in the Model Neighborhood schools there is a high turn-over rate. • Many teaahers are insensitive to the individual needs of their students and express a discriminatory attitude toward them through stereotyped ideas of their intellectual capabilities. Students, as a result, tend not to be motivated, but tend to develop attitudes of reaction toward the entire educational proce�a. Furthermore, money al.locations are not sufficient to provide personal and ongoing in-service training and up- to-date facilities, materials and equipment. Buildings are aged, obsolete, and provide inadequate and inflexible indoor and outdoor space, especially for pre-school and early elementary pupils. Because of economic and other related domeetic conditions of many families in the Model Neighborhood many youths through the encaurage- ment or apathy of parents drop-out of school to help sustain the family or become independent. Students and parents often see little va].ue and Mid-Planning Statement, Education • 11 have little appreciation for an education. • Parents and community peraons are not involved in the �decision making pro- cess, therefore little or no opportunity ie afforded them to make their desires known or push for improvements in the education process of tt►eir children. Some parents and community persons do not understand the odu- cational process and are apathetic toward it. , As a result of their experiencee, roany parents have developed negative attitudes towards education and therefore transmit this attitude to their children. Max�y children are from broken homes and,/or have working parents. Therefore, there is little time spent in working with the teachexs and assisting the. child in his educational development. In recent years the Model Neighborhood has received an influx of southern Blacks and Appala- chian whites bringing to the schools different cultural and educational backgrounds with which the school system here is not prepared to deal effectively. Consequently, these new arrivals become lost in the syetem or drop-out. • Many Model Neighborhood youngsters are functioning 5-6 grades below the national norm and have developed negative attitudes towarda themselv�s and their� ability to learn; they therefore, are afforded little or no opportunity for continuing education. Goal: To upgrade the educational process in the Mode,� NeighborYiood,;in arder to provide a qual.ity education for all Model Neighborhood children and afford each child the opportunity to reach his optimum level of �ducation. Objectives: (Years 4-7) 1. By the fourth year.begin to etudy and develop plans for upgraded Mid-Plaaning Statemeat, Education , • 12 primary schools. 2. By the end of the fourth year,reduce the drop-out rate by 696. • 3. By the fourth year,develop a single innovative approach to pre-school education. 4. By the end of the fourth year,comglete planning and attempt to esta- blish a post-secondary facility. 5., By the fifth year,provide new p$ysical plants to accomodate approxi- mately 5,500 Mociel Neighborhood students with the consideration that clas� size will te limited to 25 etudente. 6. By the sixth year, begin upgraded primary schools. 7. Hy the sixth year, raise the perfor�oance level of Model Neighborhood � students to approach the national norm. 8. By the sixth year,lor+er the drop-out rate of 16� to approach the 6� . � city-wide drop-out rate. 9. By the sixth year,raiae the median achieveme�t level of the Hodel � Neighborhood 1.2 grades. 10. Provide improved vocational information and training resources. , 11. Bring about changes in curriculum which will meet the needs of • atudents in relation to changes in the world or work. Objectives: (First Year) 1. To substantially reduce the drop-out rate by: a. reducing counselor's loads. b. developing a continuing relationship between students and counselors. c. providing work situations which will enhance the student's self-image. 2. To provide an additional 180 pre-+school education slots for Model Neighborhood children. 3. To provide a diverse approach to pre-school education by establish- ing four philosophically different pre-�chool concepts. 4. To limit class size in kindergarten and first grade to 30 children Mid-Planning Statement, Education • - - --- �3 per class and to provide for more individualized instruction by making available 20 additional teachers and 40 additional aides. --- • 5. To broaden the function of the school a� a community facility through its utilization as an educational and recreational facility by providing a staff that would make the facility available after the normal school is over and on week ends. 6. In four schools in the Model Neighborhood, for 4,500 students, develop Qareer coordination centers designed to provide current vocational information and to act as a catalyst in curriculum change. 7, a. To improve the skills of all teachers in the Mode1 Neighborhood schools by providing two weeks of pre-service training �nd two weeks of in-service training. b. By providing five special resource teachera, one in each school to work with classroom teaehers on a day to day basis. 8. To improve parent-teacher-student relationships by providing for more contact between the home and the school. To improve teacher's knowledge of students' backgrounds by extablishing five home- • school liaison persons, one in each school, to wor�C in the Model. Keighborhood with the parent, teacher, and �tudent on a day to d�y basis. 9. Plan with state officials for a post-secondary educational facility such as a Junior College in the Model Neighborhood. Problem: Health Description: One of the basic problems that exists in the Model Neighborhood community is the lack of an adequate delivery of health services within the Model Neighborhood community. Health statistias for the city of St. Paul show that the Model Neighbor- Mid-Planning Statement, Health • 14 hood lnad abnormally high incidences in the following health areas: • In the area of communicable diseasee, the Model Nei�hborhood accounted for 326 cases out of 926 casea for the total city ,(35.6� of the total). Records f aew active cases of tuberculosi b w 6 s et ee lg 5 and 1969 ehow that the odel Neighborhood incidence rate was 48 er 100,000 population, compared o the city incidence rate of 20 per 100, population for the same peri d of time. During 19 8 there were a total of 496 births in th Model Neighborhood, of which 85 births were illegitimate. During the same period of time there wer 5,�43 births city-wide of which �55 wer� illegitimate. Thi� indicate� that 2q�b of the births in the Model Neighborhood were illegit- imate as ompared to 13% city-wide. Educational information and services relating o birth control are not widely available, nor is the need well accepted. The infan mortality rate in the Model Neighborhood coaimunity is 31 per • 1,000 bir hs compared to 20 per 1,000 births city-wide. This rep�resents a signifi ant variation from the city-wide ratio. Prenatal. education and servi es are needed on an expanded basis. Complaint about environmental heal.th filed with the Bureau of Health durittg 19 9 showed that in the areas of housing, rodents, garbage, and rubbi h the Model Neighborhoad community ha.d the highest rate of complaint in the city. The immun"zatian rate of Model Neighborhood children and adults aas 10;b comp ed to 4(�b of the children and adults city-wide. As shown n the foregoing, there are many factors which relate directly or indire tly to the high incidence of health problems within the Model Mid-Plann' g Statement, Health • i, Neighborhood community. Health problems are accentuated by a lack of educational information about good health practices for the individual •, and the family. The present public health system is greatly over-worked, skilled man- poxer is scarce, and specia].ized manpower and facilities 'are often poorly utilized or, in fact, do not exist. There is a lack of access- ibility; staffs in many caees lack sensitivity to the needs of poor and minority people, therefore, the qua7.ity of aervice is not satisfactory. The Nodel Neighborhood lack� an economic base with which to b�y quality service. Most impartantly, the comaiur►ity's lack of political sophisti- cation prevents the Model Neighborhood re�idents from organized and effective efforts to get improvement. The Nodel Neighborhood residents feel that to be considered as quality care there must be acceptability of the service to the consumer. Good medical care ntust be continuoua and capable of addressing the total • man and his iamily. Most residents of the Model Neighborhood cannot afford private health care. In �ummary, the depressed level of health of the poor is the result of mar�y factors: profes+�ional. �ttitude, maldietribution of resourcea, fragmentation af �ervices created by categorical grants, lack of skill and education to seek out resources, and underlying it all, a lack of money. Goal: To reduce the incidence of health problems ia the Model Neighborhood to the city-wide incidence rate8. Obiectiqes: (Years 4-7) Hid-Planning Statement, Health • 16 1. By the end of the fourth year,provide arultiphasic screenfng of • 2�6 of all residents. 2. By the end of the fifth yeax,provide multiphasic screening for 50�, of all residents. 3. By the end of the fifth year,reduce the incidence rate of ille- gitimate births, the high level of infsnt mortality, contagious disease, mental illness, aad oral �ygiene problems to a point approaching the national norms. 4. By the end of the sixth year, subatantially reduce discrimination in health servicee for the Model Neighborhood. 5. By the sixth year, achieve total immunization of all pre-achool children in the Model Neighborhood. 6. By the �ixth year,achieve immunization of 4096 of adults and school age children in the Model Neighborhood. 7. By the end of the seventh year, achieve total immunization af adults and school age children in the Model Neighborhood. 8. By the end of the seventh year,build and staff a modern, centralized out-patient medical and dental clinic in the Model Neighborhood. • Obiectivea: (First Year) 1. Provide immunization to 40�6 of pre-school and school age children. 2. Substantially reduce infant mortality rate. 3. Plan a comprehensive out-patient medical and dental facility. 4. Establish a prograni that will reduce communicable disease by 30�. 5. Provide a multiphasic screena.ng for 2096 of all residents. 6. Increase the present health facility outreach capabilities to 5096 more residents. �. Plan a drug abuse and alcoholism program. • Mid-Planning Statement, Health 17 Problem: Crime and Justice • Deacription: Crime statiatic� for the city of St. Paul show that the Model Neighborhood accounts for a disproportionately high rate of recorded crimes against property and persons. In January of 1970, 266 major crimes were reported in the Model Nexgh- borhood. During the same time there were reported 1,242 similar crimes in the rest of the city. An area comprising 2.8+A� of the city's land and hous�ng 8.396 of the city's population accounted for 17.6% of the city's reported major crimes. During the same period of time, the area ac- counted for 51.99� of the city's reported robberies and 44.9A6 of its assaults. The area's juvenile population makes up 5% of the city total a.nd accounts for over 1�K of 3uvenile arrests. A survey of 209d of the residents of the Model Cities area in 1965 dis- • closed that 58.6� felt that the streets were not safe at night. In questioning residents during the last three years. the Summit-University Federation block workers found that excluding housing, crime was men- tioned most often as a major concern of the neighborhood. Many crimea in the comaiunity go unreported because of the fear of repri- sal. Attitudes condoning criminal activities are openly evident. Certain law violations (e.g. prostitution, drug and alcohol abuse, land- lord and business code violations) are openly ignored by residents as well as law enforcement officials. Tense police-community relations develop from insensitive and unthinking police actions when dealing with people that are black anc�/or poor, and the resultant over-reaction by the coa�munity. Though the minority group population of the Model Neighborhood totals nearly 30�, they are not well represented in the ranks of laW enforcement officials. Over 9� of the policemen of St. Mid-Planning Statement, Crime and Justice • - 18 Paul are Caucasian. The entire city force of 450 has only three minority police officers. � Residents feel that the police and the rules under which they operate are a threat from the outside as no one in the Model Neighborhood ha� had an involvement in the process. St. Paul has no police precinct �system. As a result� the sense of com- ounity identity with the police department, which often occurs under a precinct system, is missing. Justice often becomes injustice for people who are poor. Adequate legal counsel is either non-existant or too costly. Citizens are often unaware of the law and their rights under it. Juvenile delinquency proliferates, often there is a lack of parental guidance sometimes caused by apathy� often the result of both parents working long hours at low paying jobs. • The coromunity does not present young people with good career models, as many of the more successful people who are making it legally get out of the community. Young people find it difficult to identify with their families or with the community's institutions. Institutions often do not recognize the needs and desires of toda.y's youth. Those who return to the community from correctional institutions find it difficult, sometimes impossible, to become productive members of society. Discrimination itt its various forms, coupled with inadequate education and vocational training often creates employment problems and other forms of rejection which force them to return to the accep- tance of old friends and crime. Goal: • Mid-Planning Statement, Crime and Justice 1�3 To create within the Model Neighborhood conditione where peaple and their property are safe from criminal actions and where enforcement of the law • is �ust and equitable. Ob:iectives: (Years 4-�) 1. By the end of the fourth year, place 16 minority residents on the St. Paul Police Force. 2. By the end of th�e fourth year� provide community advocate legal assistance to area residents (especially �uveniles) who are accused of criminal offenses. 3. By the end of the fourth year,provide consumer information and counseling to area residents. 4. By the ead of the fifth year,create understanding and a unity of purpose between the community and the St. Paul Police Department. 5, By the end of the sixth year, reduce the incidence of crime in the Model Neighborhood. 6. By the end of the seventh year, affect a substantial reduction in • the number of area residents who return to penal institutions. 7. By the end of the seventh year, provide the opportunity for meanin�- ful and aelf-directed employment. Ob7ectivee: (Firat Year) 1. Substantially reduce' tension between the community and the St. Paul Police Department by: a. Making law enforcement officers more a part of the Model Neigh- borhood, and demonstrate the necessity for law by ehowing the positive re$ults of �ust, equitable, and responsive law enforce- ment. b. Recruiting area youth for police training to help make law enforcement a responsive community service instead of a community threat. 2. Substantially reduce the problems relating to parolees from the • Mid-Planning Statement, Crime and Justice 20 Model Neighbarhood. 3. Substantially reduce the number of multiple offenders from the • Model Neighborhood. 4. Provide meaningful vocational and social counseling to Model Neighborhood residents. 5. Provide opportunities for relevant education and vocational training in the Model Neighborhood. 6. Provide recreational and cultural opportunities in the Madel Neighborhood. Problem: Housing Description: Housing structures have deteriorated to the point where 23.1� of the units in the Model Neighborhood cannot be reha�ilitated for a reason- able amount of money, while in the entire city of St. Paul only 10.6� are in such condition. • Many residents who are of minority groups continue to live zn overcrowded, substandard housing becaue>e they wish to avoid the discrimination which they fear would be encountered if they moved outside the Mode1 Neighbor- hood. The overcrowding (8.3� of the city's population lives on 2.8w of the city's land) in this community is often attributable to the many struc- tures that have been subdivided into more household units than they were designed to contain. This results in having units, which while otherwise sound, have inadequate space and inadequate facilities. Inadequate plumbing facilities exi�t in 2,037 housing units in the Model Neighbor- hood. This number represents 33.4� of the housing units in the entire city that are aubstandard in this way. The condition and age of the present housing points out the deteriorative condition in the Model Neighborhood. Recent inspections by the St. Paul • Mid-Planning Statement, Hou�ing �1 Housing and Redevelopment Authority ehow that approximately 90�6 of the structures in the Model Neighborhood have some form of code deficiency. • Many of these structuree are rental housing (66� of residents rent) where both the owners and tenants lack interest in improving the struc- ture. With 90� of the area structures more than 50 years old, mt�ny code deficiencies are simply due to age and obsolescence. Code deficiencies are permitted to go uncorrected for a variety of reasons. Residents who have not had a role in setting the regulations relating to housing feel that the regulations are unfair. The high rate of unemployment and underemployment, brought about by discrimination, inadequate education and a lack of vocational training, results in low levels of family income in the Model Neighborhood. These low and moderate income families find it difficult to afford improved housing, be it simply through maintaining their present housing or buying or renting better housing, • The opportunities for home ownership are limited by an inadequate �upply of homes which the low and maderate income family can obtain. Older homes require extensive rehabilitation, the cost of which is often pro- hibitive. Land for new construction has not been available because of existing high density use (area encompasses 2.8A6 of the city's 1�►nd, but 8.3% of its population) and the uncertainty created by in-process Urban Renewal. The unavailability and high cost of financing makes the highly sought goal of home awnership a very distant goal for most low and moderate income families. The stock of rental units for low and moderate income families and the aged continues to be inadequate. Unrealistically high rents and poor maintenance on the part of absentee owners brings about a high turnover in .tenants. This high turnover, when coupled with a lack of concern and money on the part af tenante, tends to cause accelerated deterior- Mid-Planning Statement, Housing • �?_ ation of rental units. The constraints relating to land availability and financing apply to new structures for individual ownership and new rental • structures alike. Hence, new construction ha.s hardly kept pace with the demolition of substandard units. Goal• To build within the Model Neighborhood a stock of housing which, because of its utility and suitability, the iroagination of its design and the quality of open space and other amenities around it, will induce peaple to stay in and�roove into the neighborhood. Objectives: (Years 4-�) 1. By the end of the fourth year, build a minimum of 500 low and middle in�come living units. 2. By the ead of the fourth year, develop and secure adoption of zoning requirements which conform to the Physical and Land Use Plan, and meets the special needs of the Model Neiglnborhood and permits the • densities, land uses, traffic patterns, coromunity facilities, types • of structures, structural components, and structural systems those needs dictate. 3. By the fourth year, establish a Housing Information Bureau for the Model Neighborhood. 4. By the fifth yeax, achieve a level of building codes enforcement xithin the Model Neighborhood that is at least equal to city-wide standards in ternis of frequency of inspection of structures in the application of the codea. 5. By the fifth year, secure revisiona of the city building codes which will control subdivision of structures. Ob�ectives: (First Year) 1. Complete a study of the total Model Neighborhood housing situation Mid-Planniag Statement, Housing • 23 considering all possible alternatives. Develop a housing construc- tion plan for the area based upon the findings of the study. Develop • as an element of this study a program for a Housing Information Bureau for the Model Neighborhood. 2. Develop in cooperation with the St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority a Physical and Land Use Plan for the Model Neighborhood. 3. Build a total of 150 new housing units in the Model Neighborhood; 100 of them for low income families; 50 for middle income families. 4. Tdentify al.l Model Neighborhood structurea which cannot be usefully rehabilitated and eliminate 2596 of them. (Sites thus cleared for which no immediate use is planned will be used as temporary loca- tions for such amenities as small parks, pl�ygrounds and gardens.) 5. Draft a model zoning code for the Model Neighborhood and hold wide- spread hearings within and outside the Model Neighborhood on its provisions. Present the model code to local planning, building, real estate and financial interests. 6, Determine frequency of code inspections and toughnees of enforce- ment city-wide; establish what (in terms of manpower, money or • policy changes) would be required to bring Model Neighborhood code inspections to city-wide level; draft pla.n and schedule for two to two and one half year long crash codes enforcement program; secure city council adopta.on. �. Define minimum acceptable standards of subdivision of structures in terms of square footage per occupant, sanitary facilities� power, emergency exits, etc.; draft and seaure passage. Problem: Public Facilities and Public Services Descrivtion: .....__. Araong the fundamental problems of the Model Neighborhood is the deteri- orated and obsolete conditions of public facilities. The importance of this problem is heightened by the great dependence of Mid-Planning Statement, Public Facilities and Public Services • � ' 24 poor people upon such local community facilities. • Major streets, which carry a high proportion of the traffic, are inade- quate to handle peak traffic flows. The basic grid pattern of the streets encourages excessive traffic in the residential areas. Many of the streets are in need of reconstruction (over 9096 require roconstruction). Many of the alleys are narraw and unpaved (approximately 80% need dra.i.na.�Q and surface improvements). Sidewalks in the Model Neighborhood ha.ve de- teriorated to the point where approximately 60�G6 present a eafety hazard. Street lighting is obeolete or inadequate, especially in the residential areas of the Model Neighborhood, The pre8ent level of luminosity is only 5(�6 of the level needed for automobile and pedestrian safety. Because crime flourishes in darkness, citizens feel unsafe after dark in many areas of the Model Neighborhood. A survey rever�led that 58.Ei�6 of the citizens rrere dissatisfied with safety on the streets at night (the highest percentage of all items surveyed). • The land areas set aside for public uses such as vehicle parking. Off street parking lots are needed near the business areas and would be de- sirable in the narrow streeted residential areas. Utilities such as sewers were designed for an earlier era and lighter population densities. Back-up of sanitary sewers is a common problem. Sewers must be replaced with sepaxated storm and sanitary sewers. The water system is 70 to 80 years old and needs improvements such as nex water service connections. Public services such as street naintenance, street sweeping� �now plowing, solid waste and garbage removal represents another dimension of the problem. While the level of these services in the city ae a whole are not at a sufficiently high level, the Model Neighborhood in ... • Mid-Planning Statement, Public Facilities and Public Services 2� the view of the residents �uffers particularly. • Where services or facilities could be provided privately, Model Nei�h- borhood residents are unable to afford the services because of inadequate income. Absentee landlords will not try to get public improvements be- cause such demands will result in higher real estate taxes. La:ck of poli- tical sophistication preventB man,y citizens from organized and effective efforts to get improvements in public facilities and Bervic�s. The de- terioration of facilities and the ina.dequate public service brings about problems ranging from cri�ae to environmental health. Goals: To develop within the Model Neighborhood a system of public facilities and services which will be adequate to meet the needs of present neigh- borhood residents and which will encourage people to move into the area. Objectives: (Years 4-�) • 1. By the fourth year, impleroent all phases of the land use plan including appropriate zoning changes. 2. By the fourth year, improve direct public services to the area by development and implementation of a plan to train and employ Model Neighborhood people in the delivery of the services. 3. By the end of the sixth year, widen arad imgrove the major streets in the Model Neighborhood area. 4. By the end of the seventh yeas, complete reconstruction of residen- tial streets and improvement of alleys. 5. By the end of the seventh year, complete upgrading of sewer and water facilities. Objectives: (First Year) Mid-Planning Statement, Public Facilities and Public Services • �6 1. Develop in cooperation with the St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority a Physical and Land Use Plan for the Model Neighborhood. • 2. Construct as provided for under NDP �2 and NDP #3 new streets and alleys, sidevalks, curbs, and gutters. 3. Install as provided for under NDP �2 and NDP #3 new street lighti.n� and related improvements. 4. Upgrade sewer and water facilities as scheduled by Public Warks Department. 5. P7.an in coordination with the St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority staff for the physical needs of the Model Neighborhood comnrunity. b. Plan an adequate syatem of solid waate disposal for the Model Neighborhood. Problem: Transportation Descri�tion: The problem of transportation affects every area of the Model Neighborhood. • The 39.296 of families in the Model Neighborhood who do not own automobiles must rely upon some form of public transportation to get them to commer- cial, recreation.al, education, and employment centers of this Metropoli- tan area. Public transportation is not adequate in thzs entire metropolitan area. The overall prablem is aGCentuated in the Model Neighborhood because the public transportation, which must be rebid upon, is not up to the standard of other parts of the metropolitan area. The onl.y North-South bus line which serves the Model Neighborhood re- stricts its hours of service to before 9:00 a.m, and after 3:00 p.m. There is no North-South bus line which serves on holidays and weekends. Mid-Planning Statement, R'ransportation • 27 East-West service is available on Univereity (outside of the aorthern border of the Model Neighborhood) and on Selby Avenue. Service on • Selby Avenue is compounded by the necessity for multiple transfers to get to ar�y area of the city other than the downtown core. Service to the major industrial, employment, and shopping areas of the Northern and Southern suburbs is slow, requires time consuming transfers, and is most often undependable. The unattractiveness of public transportation is further enhanced by the Minnesota climate which is often hot and humid in the summer, and cold and windy in the winter. Bu�es are not sir conditioned or we11 heated; waiting areas are unprotected, unheated, and uncomfortable. Taxi service is expensive and undependable. Certain cab companies will not come into the Model Neighborhood at night. A new locaJ. cab company is attempting to improve this situation. Area residents have had little to eay about the type of public trans- portation which serves them. • Goa1: To provide to the Model City Area adequate public transportation to commercial, recreational� education, and employment centers of the city of St. Paul and its surrounding suburbs. Obiectives: (Years 4-7) 1. By the end of the fourth year, establish limited service to selected suburban industries. 2. By the ead of the fourth year, build heated shelters at area bus stops. 3. By the end of the fifth year, expand North-South bue �ervice Mid-Planning Statement, Transportation • �8 routes and howrs. 4. By the end of the fifth year, provide air conditioned busee. • 5. By the ettd of the eixth year, expand direct service to se].ected suburban centers of employment, shopping, and recreatfon. Ob�ectives: (First Year) 1. Develop a plan and secure an agreement in coordination with the Metropolitan Transit Con�mission for a transportation delivery system which, in areas of employment, shopping, recreation, and education, provides adequate transportation for all residents of the Model Neighborhood. 2. Participate in the planning of the proposed mass rapid transit syst�m not being contemplated for the entire Metropolita� Area. Problem: Aecreation Description: • The 1960 St. Paul Plannin� Board's cotamunity report noted that the Model Neighborhood had only 2.11 acres of publicly owned land set aside for neighborhood parks and 13.06 acres for neighborhood playgraunds. To meet the standards of the National Recreation Association these averages should be 32.�5 and 65.49 respectively. The same report cites the absence of a single community wide park in the Model Neighborhood and the Model Neighbarhood's relative isalation from the city's community parks. Isolation is emphasized by the fact disclosed by a 1965 study: nearly 4(� of Model Neighborhood househalds are without automobiles. Lack of money is a reason for the low percentage of automobile owner�hip, also closes the door to mar�y recreational opportunities outside the Model Mid-Planning Statement, Recreation � 29 . Neighborhood. • Although it was hard pressed to give conclusive reasons for the finding�, the Stone Survey of the Model Neighborhood residents' ,attitudes found that 55.996 of its sample was "completely dissatisfied" with the Model Neighborhood parks and playgrounds; the second highest degree of "com- plete dissatisfaction"regiatered in the entire survey. � In assessment of recreation problems, the Recreation Task �'orce of the Model Neighborhood Planning Council noted these additional condition�: a. There are few entertainment centers for youth 'in the community. b. Pla�ygrounds and equipment do not reflect sensitivity to the ne�ds of the community. c. Existing recreation centers lack staff, both in terms of numbers and adequate preparation, to provide youth with assis- tance and leadership. d. Lack of space for platiygrounds and parke compounds the other problems mentioned and relates the provision of additionttl. space for recreation to the larger problem of land use in the • Model Neighborhood. The amount and quality of infora�ation available on the subject of recrea- tion and leisure time in the Model Neighborhood is low, as is the degree of community consensus on needs and the place of recreation in the Model Neighborhood community which the programs envision. The attention which has bee� given to this area tends to view recreation as an outdaor activity (giving little weight to indoor recreation in an area of long and severe winters) and one important principally to the young. Goal: To provide year-round opportunities for use of leisure time which fit • Mid-Planning Statement, Recreation 3� the needs of Model Neighborh.00d residents of a1.1 ages and varying condi- tions of life. • Objectives: 1. By the seventh year, to have acquired and/or in operation sufficient recreation and leisure-time facilities in the Model Neighborhaod to meet the standards of year-round recreational opportunity estsblished by the St. Paul Model Cities Program and embodied in the Model Neigh- borhood recreation and leisure time activity plan. 2. By the sixth year, to have trained and employed sufficient Model Neighborhood residents as recreation leaders to s�aff the facilities that will be operative in the seventh year. 3. By the fifth year, to have in operation or acquisition sufficient facilities for recreation or leisure time activity to meet halfway the standards referred to in (1) above. 4. By the fourth year, to have trained and employed sufficient Model Neighborhood residents as recreation leaders to staff the facili- ties referred to in (3) above. • Objectives: (First Year) 1. As a part of an overall land-use plan for the Model Neighborhood, establish a standard for year-round recreational opportunity which is realistic for the St. Paul Model Neighborhood. (Development of a local opportunity standard, rather than adoption of city-, etate-, or nationwide standards for adequacy of recreation space -- is dictated by two considerations. The first is the as yet unresolved conflict between the lack of vacant land in the Model Neighborhood and what i� assumed to be the Model Neighborhood residents' etrong opposition to higher residential densities in the Model Neighbor- hood than now prevail. The second is a desire to develop standards of adequacy which iacludes, but are not expressed solely in terms Mid-Planning Statement� Recreation • 3x of, physical. space and go beyond the traditional measures of recreational. opportunity to include opportunities for use of • leisure time,) 2. To develop a plan for recreation and leisure-time opportunity in the Mode1 Neighborhood which includes: a. design of a variety of programs meeting the recreation and lei- sure-time needs of residents of all ages and condition� of life; b. location of new p2�,ysical facilities or equipment cr�ll for sucY► programs; c. planning for staff necessary to begin and maintain such pro�rams; d. relocation or redirection of existing programs; e. plans for increasing residents' access to leisure-time activities outside the Model Neighborhood; f. plans for bringing outside cultural, recreational or leisure- time activities into the Model Neighborhood at intervals; and con,sider the requirements imposed by the Minnesota climate. This plan will be a product of the proces,� of continued planning and evaluation. • 3. To begin recreation leadership training. 4. To begin development with the ethnic and racial groupa of the Model Neighborhood of a Cultural Enrichment Pr•ogram. • liid-Plamning Statement, Recreation 32 Stra�egy • The federal government has set up certain requirements that must be met in order to address the question of th� achievement of the objectives that were set forth in overcoming the problems that are to be identified. The main requirement is that the strategy statement �hould focus on the plan as a whole and not on individual component parts. Therefore, the achievement of the overall objectives established prior to this st�te- ment will require that certain strategies of program approaches be employed to attack the recurring root causes of the problems identified in Part II. These causes are: 1. Inadequate education 2. Insufficient income (unemployment and underemployment) 3. Discrimination (racial, economic, sexual and geographic) 4. Governmental and inetitutional neglect (inadequate delivery of public and private services) • 5. Ineffective Model Neighborhood resident involvement in public policy and decision roaking) To deal with these causes, basic program approaches will be employed that seek to: 1. Raise the educational level of the Model Neighborhood residents to effectively compete for earployment at all levels of the job market, for further education both vocationally and profes- sionally, and for knowledge to assume authoritative leadership responsibility in a].1 areas of the Model Cities program. 2. Increase the employability of unemployed and undereroployed Model Neighborhood residents through creation of a strong economic base by the development of a broad spectrum of local business enterprises, job training, basic job counseling and education, transportation services, and the establiskunent of new criteria for hiring residents. • Mid-Planning Statement, Strategy 33 3. Attack discriminatory practices in businees ventures, hiring� and lending policies, and achiova a levol of institutional • change in education and teaching practices to eliminate harmful racial, sexual, geographic and �ultural attitudes. 4. Make governmental and institutional agencies more responsive to the needs of Model Neighborhood residents through use of supplemental funds for prograros that most effectively chan�;e the basic social, economic and physical problems of the area in addition to improving cammunication, with emphasis on 1oca1 agencies. 5. Increase citizen participation by involving the Model Nei�hbor- hood residents on boards, cosncils, and committee of agencies; and groups conducting pro�ects and programs that affect the Model Neighborhood area, to include public policy development with special emphasis on the Model Cities program in the plan- ning and development of programs in particular. Supplemental funds will be used exteneively to finance the development • of programs that will have a multi-problem impact with emphasis on those program approaches which will produce the greatest institutional changea in more effectively serving the Model Neighborhood residents' problems. These fund8 will be used as local share monies for new program8 or ex- panded existing programs to be financed froar categorical grant programs. Supplemental funds wi11 also be used as an investment strategy that will seek a high ratio of matching funds to supplemental funds yet emphasize projects that relate to resident involvement in planning and program implementation. This approach will increase the financial aid to the Model Cities area and at the same time develop residential leadership and knowledge. Supplemental funds will be used to develop programs that will have an immediate .and highly visible impact upon the area to establish confi- dence of the Model City residents that soaiething can be done. because • Mid-Planning Statement, Strategy 34 the area has too long been in the planning state with no visible results. • Finally, and perhaps most importantly, supplemental funds will be heavily used in those programs fostering economic renewal through �obs, business opportunities and resident ownership. Special emphasis will be placed on the financing of those program approaches that will be administered by new Model Neighborhood corporations or businesses who will provide experi- ence and training to the Model Neighborhood residents. Basic Ways Plans Will Be Carrfed Out: In administration of the pro�ects and activities of the program, the city wi11 rely principally on contracts with existing public agencies who are capable and willing to undertake the operation of programs in the manner for which they have been designed. Delegation of program operation to Model Neighborhood or city-wide comraunity corporations will be considered when such public agencies cannot be found. • In the majority of cases where program operation will be let to existing public agencies, the essential strategy of the city will be to secure adept, efficient program administration while securing from the agency in question those changes in institution and institutional practice which have been identified as crucial in the planning process. The city also will use the s�rvices of existing private agencies, �arti- cularly those operative within the Model Neighborhood� for administration and operation of some of its programs. The guiding strategy here will be to use and select such groups to build conununity competence to operate skillfully in the physical and social and ecanomic areas and to bring the sometimes fragmented organizations and groups within the neighborhood together in a unified and working Model Neighborhood coalition. In this fashion, the city hopes to make community cohesion and skill products of the Model City program. • Mid-Planning Statement, Strategy 35 Beyond the building of a community coalition through the use of such existing private agencies as the Urban League, Inner City Youth League. • the Loft, Summit-University Federation, the city hopes to use these agencies to fulfill another strategy: the building of a coalition of interests among the Model Neighborhood and groups with which it can make common cause in the larger St. Pau1 and �►in Cities Metropolitan coromunities. Such a coalition will speed the work of the program and make room in its endeavors for the contributions of voluntary action� which in the city's view, are potentially very valuable. If, in the process, through the use of supplemental money and the CDA's and MN�"C's planning capacity, the city can assist the voluntary sector to come to a better roeans of matching the work that needs to be done with the or.- ganizations or groups most capable of doing that particular �ob well, it will consider that it has made an important contribution. The planning of this Comprehensive Demonstration Program has rested on a premise that is, also, an element of program strategy. That is. that a basic purpose of this program is to lay the foundation for a community • that is diverse economically, racial.ly and ethnically by improvi.ng the quality of those institutions at which people look when they are making a decision as to where they rrant to live in a city (education, retail consumption, public and private amenities, etc.). A final basic w�y in which the administration of the firat year action plan will be accomplished is the method of contracting referred to above. Each existing agency with r+hom the CDA contracts will be re- quired in the contract it signs, to meet certain performance standards in terms of results achieved and method of operation. and to agree to a clearly stated method of making changes in program operation wh�n such is indicated by the program impac� evaluation system. Program Coordination: The city approaches the question of program coordination with a strang • Mid-Planning Statement, Strategy �_ 3f� mandate from the City Council to achieve such coordination in the Madel Cities program and xith a conviction that, of all the methods of coar- • dination known to us, the surest lies in the planning process. What has been joined together in planning, we believe, is harder for man to put asunder than that which was planned asunder and later seeks to be jointed by administrative contrivance. This faith in the coordinative powers of planning rests partly on the city's definition of planning as decision making across the range of program concerns beginning with problem analysis, going through re- source allocation and ending with evaluation and continuing planning. In order for the city and the Model Neighborhood Planning Council to work and act effectively together to achieve program coordination the following steps will be taken: 1. St. Paul will strive to promote widespread acceptance far comprQhensive planning from Model Neighborhood residents, local government and the a�encies, through effective twa-way communication and exchange of information, first with each • other as co-partners in the decision making, while at the sarae time working with the agencies. 2. The authority of the Mayor in cooperation with the Model Neighborhood Planning Council has been utilized to form a Technical Advisory Committee. This Technical Advisory Cotaaittee made up of 1oca1 Agencies (nei�hbor- hood and external vased agencies) will be utilized to persuade locr�l agencies and institutions to make greater efforts at cooperation with the Model Cities program to avoid dupli.cation of agency performance and overall delivery of services. Through strong emphasis on this use of plar�ning the Model Cities pro�ram will be viewed as an integrated system of projects and efforts rather Mid-Planning Statement, Strategy • - 3? than a sum total of individual parts. With thi� "whole system reference" approach, the MNPC and the Mayor and City Council will be able to avoid • or balance ar�y claims various interest clientele and agency groups who seek to put their special stamp on the program. Roles of the Participants: _�_ The M�yor and City Council in partnership with the Model Neighborhood Planning Council must together provide the leadership to i.nsure the success of the Model Cities program. They must interpret it� meaning to the larger St. Paul community that it is a local program supported by federal funds to demonstrate new innovative approaches tn old prablems through the workability of Model Neighborhood resident participation. The Mayor and City Council are responsible for bringing the city'e re- sources together in the maintenance of the pr4gram. The CDA director who reports da,rectly ta the Mayor will have immediate responsibility for direction and coordination. The Mayor and City Council are in a position to give frequent review to program developroents and can uso • their authority to achieve coordination and more effective responee from agencies and city departments by requirin� joint working togeti�er and preparation of programs by city departments and the MNPC. The public agencies will be heavily involved in the planning through the formation of a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). Compoaed of the heads of each agency to be a source of advice and assistance on types of programs, ideas, and statistics, and to avoid conflicting policie�, administrative difficultie$ and questions of procedures in the mfa�or administrative planning decisions reaahed by the t+INPC. This second level of their involvement will be the provision of agency staff people on loan to be advisors at the planning level with the MNPC staff and on the three task forces involving the social, economic, and physical. areas. The third level of public agettcy involvement will be listed in Part II of the First Year Action programs that vill have citizens • Mid-Planning Statement, Strategy 38 involved in the pragram operation through employment opportunities. • The private sector will be contected to secure assistance in terms of funds and expertise through the St. Paul Urban Coalition majorly, and the Junior Chamber of Commerce. These two roa�or bodies will be ap- proached to plan programs to institute changes within their own areas of business for employment of the Model City residents� especiA.l.ly the minorities� and serve also as a means of further involvement of others of the private sector. In diacharging its responsibility to plan and assist in carrying out the St. Paul Model Cities program, the MNPC will concentrate on these functions: a. Continuing planning and eva.luation b. Securing widespread participation of Model Neighborhood resi- dents on planning, evaluation and implementation of the pro- gram and its components. To better carry out these responsibilities, MNPC, beginning in the • upcoming "hiatus" period, will seek training for itself and its staff in techniques required for competence in the discharge of pl�nning, evaluation and citizen participation. Reeident participation in program planning and implementation will be extensive. The NINPG staff personnel will assist and support the re- sidents in developing additional community interest, evaluate agency performance, and in the establishment of Model Cities program stan- dards and. requirements. The CDA will be reeponsible for overall program coordination and eval- uation. It will be the focal point for the production and transmission of information to other governments, to local a�encies, to the Mayor and City Council and to the residents. • Mid-Planning Statement, Strategy 3y The state and federal agencies will also participate by. providing fund� and transmitting needed information and technical assistance toward • making the program more effective. Special efforts have been made by the Minnesota State Plannin� A�ency's Executive Director of the State Urban Affairs Council to supply infor- mation on securing of matching state funds, to provide technical as�i�- tance writers for some of our programs, to share costs of hirin� consul- tants, and most significantly to establish a linkage with the other two Model City areas of Minneapolis and Duluth. Institutional Chant�e: Clearly, our planning activities have led us to a first acquaintance with areas in which we sense the need for changes in institutions and inetitu- tional practices and in existing laws and regulations. We would add to the above list aur strongly felt sensibility that changes are needed in basic law and 1aw enforcement in areas such as building, health and • zoning, general contractor bonding, insurance and lending� consumer pro- tection, equal employment opportunity and elsewhere. The requirements of the other portions of the planning process have denied us the time and energy to explore these sensibilities more deeply, to document the exact areas where change is needed, to describe the needed change in detail and to prepare a work program for the achieve- ment of the needed change. Doing all this will be a matter of urgent priority during the "hiatus" period. Finally, all local institutions tha.t are concerned with human needs must increase the scope and spread of their response to the Model Neighborhood residents by developing an objecti.ve attitude, eliminate the double st�n- dard practices, and w�ed out separate conflicting functions. • Mid-Planning Statement, Strategy 40 IACal Resource Allocations or Reallocations: • The pursuit of the first yea.r program approaches and the strategies out- � lined alone will not require reallocation of the City's Capital Improve- ment Budget (CIB) funds, or the States Urban Renewal Bond Funds for capital expenditures. These monies have already been allocated for the St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authorities NDP Year I and II ProgrAms� the NDP Year I Program having been instituted before the Model Cities Program was in operation. The future allocation will surely continue under the HRA's administrative �urisdiction, vith the Mod�l Cities Physical Core and staff working together with the HI2A staff to develop plans as a single unit body. Allocatione of some funds from the Department of HEW through the state have been channeled into the Model Cities area through the city to the Board of Education and the Health and Welfare departimenta. However, th� provision of di.rect supplemental funds to the Model Cities Program will prompt reallocation of more funds into the Model Cities area with the • help of public agencies who will secure these grant-in-aid programs as part of their 3ob as technical advieors and assistants. The Minnesot� State Planning Agency especially, and the Metropolitan Council staffs have been very helpful in this capacity. The local OEO TACC groups has also begun to work with our Model Neighborhood Planning Council to reallocate more funds into the are�. The private sector has also helped to gain funds. An example is the Community Helth and Welfare Council as the planning staff for the United F�nd allocated funds with the development of the new Martin I�uther King multi-purpose community center to receive HEW matching funds. Uther additional fund allocations will b� gotten through the Urban Coalition and other private sources. • Mid-Planning Statement, Strategy 41 _ Maximum Resident Employment: • Since an iarportant objective of the MNPC is to expand and build an economic base for the neighborhood residents, critical t�.ttention will be given to all of our projects that require of the sponsoring agency contracts that will assure the employment and reslistic training of Model Neighborhood residents for jobs that relate to the present and future market needs at all levels of the ladder from the paraprofessional to the professional level. Programs wi11 be developed which will be directed toward job training, placement, and continued education at all levels. Special emphasis will be placed upon programs to be developed which will be directed toward creating new job specifications for the trainin� of residents for jobs that have had prior requirements not realistzc in terms of ineeting and fulfilling these jobs (example, fireman - examination re- quirements). Strong consideration will also be given to cancellation of contracts if noncompliance with discriminatory praetices are detected. • That Ys in conformance with the general purpose af selecting the most qualified employees, any discrimination in the recruitment, aelection� employment, placement, promotion, training, asgignment, separation, or any other personnel action shall be prohibited. Discrimination shall include any consideration of race, creed, sex, color, or national origin as an element in the determination of any of the above decisions. Broad Based Comunznitv Support: The Model Neighborhood Planning Council will have the primary responsi- bility for widening and deepening the level of understanding and eupport for the over-all program within the neighborhood. This will be accom- plished through the resident planners working under the +ataff community organizer and through the district chairman of the r9dFC. The MNPC and the CDA will share the responsibility for developing broad based com,- Mid-Planning Statement, Strategy • 42 munity support and understandfng for the Model Cities Frogram in the city at large. The State Planning Agency and the Metropolitan Council • will expand support over the entire state and metropolitan .area espe- cially with the State Urban Affairs Council's efforts to work with the three Mode1 Cities Programs of Duluth, Minneapolis and St. Paul. This will be further accomplished with the help of professional consultants, the development of informational and educational materiale and extensive personal and group contacts by the hINPC, the Mayor and City Council and �he staff personnel. • Mid-Planning Statement, Strategy • �r j � �� .� . � � � � � � m � m � � � � � � � � � _ . � �� .�_ � � � � � � c� � .� � c°0ip' a � s qi a, w� `� � a: � � �d � � i� . � � d ° b � � � � � �� y� � �. a� � � � �+ � � aSA � � ` � U � � � Q , q •� � az° � e}� � o � $ � W � V � • w n� ciw � `-"�r .� ''� b* r�► ,� � � � � � d � � w �, p, W U � ,� � �► #A ttt �� m 00 � N � _ 'd {,� � 'd �� " +� �s �� TI 'Cf d •r1 +� M QM ri � 1 q � � a0 � � �� d Q .� � m A � � • N � .� � �tl � � � � � r-1 � � � � .ci � � � � �d A. p� eV6 � r�l � � m � N � q W� � �3V V Z •ri 4r O �-1 ++ • '�t 'd � .c: '� •.�i � � e-1 a •,, �o v +� •.� �d o � �d � }' b � a'+� .°� � � � � � a e °' �p, o � ow � °' .+� � 4, r� b � o ��pp � �o il F, A •.� � 00 i�i '� � +' � W �� A C7 y � � d P� N � +� � 10 A O �0 d � �s +� .o � �� a� b b � � •°i �s�r-r'i a a �' + o � c, a d �aq A m �a � �'� 'd � � .-� +� � �, � � m � c� � a� � a m a..�► • ro �,, � m �d � � n a � � v � �� '� � �s cva �v � � N A� °° � �� °o � � � > ti ++ •.� � a� � . +� +� w � v � Q a+'0 a.�.► +q� o N � p � � O .� 'd t0 N •ei N • .� y g •r�l Q{ •� W O C�� {� � �"i f0 �� Q 4/ � � .'s � r-1 r-1 r� � � V H C3 � O p � C� q Gl U O i� •.�1 � V f7 � •.�1 � � C7 4� t� 00 •rl � ''d d .0 O � A •rl O t0 •�+ •� a •.+ +� m a, .-� m a •� •,� a, . b N +� o a .b a� ..+ a� � � � q w n� •,� �, +� .c o as m � :7 U +� !H +� +� �p d � rl m +� t) N I� +� di � � � t� q W O' al J3 t� �i fG i/ �y RS • � � O m ,-�� 'C! 4��i .q td � � (0 ti � � � e� � � ,,;� f0 f� � � � � � � � �p, � O � O C� � � Fi � �V d V ��, a.� � d +� Q q t. $ 0 •A .c7 00 R7 LL a� � � p td � v O w �o H °d .o° C3 c°� ° � � m � � � rt� � �'.�-� � f�." o o � � � � � q � 4�i O � y � ''� �y3 � q � `� ,*� W �� 00 s � � � � U � a+' � � � � .� mmca'n � .�; � • � � o � � � � � a � � +� s � a d � � � � o � m `� ++ d c� m '-� u c� � � � � '� �� '� � .� a � � � �'� �� w � � .� � o � � � o e sc� 4. � c� o� sxc� 44 � ti � °' eo '� m +� � � rcwb da a o � � • � b � � 80 � b � � � � i'�i 8 U � � � ap � � � " c� � � N s a , �� d � b �; dx � m � 'g as. � � � a �q� � � a E � � •� � F�i � H .0 3 � � d .,� V O O � � ryyl C7 p�' Q• p«� 'L7 -t 1l� O� X M tA � � d � � pF � •O O � t!1 O f� V r-I (]� w P'I 1A iR s�'► .� � a b � � ' � '� � � d � � � �. � ° o � � b � o � oo •�, �� '� ti � �, . d .� a, a•� �d +°� �i m +° •�+ .� �° w � �OC'�. .� �,� • a a, w o m • � x � m � s, •.� � � r-+ +� �.�+ a� oo d �Q as p m m•• v •�+ � +� cG � N � o-� fS •r+ r1 d O V +� q ,y t� A u�•rl fi +� q x P, O J7 �i C�i N +� � � �� r-� � ~ � h�'�d O •� +� �v fti � � 'C7 � 'b �. ',s� t0 t7 O i7 C� r-I C� �ei � •rl t0 R r-� fti �7 Q� � d O G� 41 C� ••.i • O 41 .� N� +� S �rz ,'ia o0 o � � +� �o r-+ 04 cs a •.+ '� rv �. ►e m 3 o m o a � � � +'.� s� •.+ � o d •r1 ,� m .0� o d +� �ri � +� •rl L7 W ••i G� fy r-1 f� �+ d 0�0 r-1 t-�1 •�Q v� V � � � f��i W � O 'd � p � O 10 r-i � � � 64 O p N �� fy � N v C� � � � •� ¢� d Q� •r1 b cd � ri !r 4� l0 L� rl 'O Q p r-1 "� � 41 R 1 q{ (0 t0 ;r a C) W G� • fti� O • V •ri �-i O p, e-{ q W G� .-i �! 01 6 'd � as � N � p 4-7'i t�i V q �.,�i � � � � � �,�i y � Rf �tr A yb =.. `� � w o �' q �v� w � �d qq� � � O a�i a� � m�' � •� �. � +� a�i � 'O Or' O N t0 A Q� e�' pp R�i Cl O"� � � B V N � � � V O �F '7 O .� q � � x .�v Op•rl H ir CU1 �•r�1 +�i 00 C�, � ty P� O � 3 0' � O r�l o,dd p ��rl O � � � i�t � 'd •r1 � U° u� w° �o o � c, •� .;� .. � '� � � � m .�'-� c'' � ,-� .«� a� o c'�i �' �v o� o w � . tp� p �+ q o co � s w o .0 �s �.a � a� �+ y� � o �.+ a� e af �� a1 � p� 0p0 .� A1 •r1 3 +� Da � O 'Lq7 •rl .-... +� � �. 10 c) ,4' r-1 c0 � r-1 f0 �i,' •r� m � W � O � .C� ��a 'C � 10 � N v v � (0 O +� •�� 1d `� +� O P�•r1 v P+ � ^d a1 P4 � .0 t) W O • 00 .�a � +� •rl Q 01�O a�i �' o � aa �° c° �c �da�i m = � � � .°a �'� '� .° aoeo� a� � � °e�`� do o a�'i +' m r°, `' ob ° s � � w �' �` � �' ,-� ogo �'"q .� eom � oa�imw `" �ov� a, °r�v � wd �c3', aboa ..► d ,g ,� a, d �da �d � > +� +.� b, c� ti a ao•�+ � t, .� � •� .q o w � � +� c, ro �0 •�+ •� a� co q t� +� �A U � � � � ir � r��1 � �q f�r O � � � � � O nq� �i d P�i� Oai bq �q .q � � A -� 6 D 3 R I P.+� +� �J] � v D F 3 +� i� � V i r W a +� t 0 a► .� U� 1 r-1 p � Ap � �7 � a�i �a O � N � � �. ac'' H �oa. a ti � eo � w 'a q O � U Q g O � • d � � � � EH � � � � � H � � Q � O H a0 • ►..7 W • 00 c� • d � '� •q o 1_i � s7 c�i � q � �q c�'i � �C O Ti 0�0 A � m O P� O ��y � � a� ga U < �C C� � O � eax zp e < aa� 45 x � �s • � a aqi m � � � a:« � � � +� gop' � � a � � q O �y 3 A 0� 00 • Q � N d V �i �� a s� � a° � d .�, ri U � ' � N � �'. O� O x �. � � � $ Q 0 o rn � ' � U � � � tyt a..� �� b � a�i . at i � � m w � +� c, d •�+ � a� �ct w o � � � q •.a ci oQ Af W a� W f, t� +� q q c6 � oQ t0 •.� q d +� � � 4-� � O d W c� •r� a6 0 a o o ,-i ;° x °a .� °� '� !� a a� �« q w +� s, e � � •.� m � m o 0o e000 m+� io a� +� �v as a � a a � � o � �'� ova dv w o � riw a� ° m °' °' ''� .� m •� o m � � •., o � � '�5.. o •,� � a� � � � �'' '� � �� +� ,-� .,� m 4. d o •,� a•, b o •o •,� •� �o o �o �b � � � •a �'� o�.� � ° � s�, .� 'm�•� m � � a' � � � +'� �' �' � m a� " H a� ti +� +� o � � .� �, .� .v •� � . a eo � ma casa c, .omp m � +� w � • � c, a� a� +> •�•. da atdi �° a eo-� °' e o 'e`�'`' � a`�i �� a�i o s�i a o ti � A .� .'ri`� "� v ,� �� b �� •a `�' � � `� �va � �•� � �' . .°� �+� 'sa �� ,'� o � a� m •� .� +� � . .� � +� c. a � mw +� w � � s� � a� cs � � v� o o a,�o +� •�+ w +� tit, c. tia� � v +► •� � .o •�� a H wd � � tia� �rt � •,� o� m � m +� o •� '� oda � +� w e� +� c� b a� •� m •,� s ti .a o� a �, .N � ti, +� o p a� � � d �o � �P .a � � oa � '� a ° � �' 'd � p' a � °� mc`°. �+''► � � � � � x � E°, � � �. •., � +� � d ax � w .-� � d a� � •� � a+� •.� •� eo as t, a� o •� m s� � +� a �, as w �a a.c� a. .°c� m a P p c. � m � � .c w •�1 � o p� > m +� t, •� +� +► •� p � •ri +� 3 d +� 4y0�_ � r-� W td t3 a�i � 4�i � � �q �= q � 4-� � Cxi +> �" O O • +o�► � � � •� 1a .c7 � �-i � r-i � '�"� W O �d O O yt •ri L� r-I V W 7� 00 V q rl C� � Ci i� O O � +> L� 'O +� O � c{S 3 V C� �i d a�i m +�► �O q � a� a> ++ � a, P at A a► a� a> a� q +� ++ c� •� +� b •.+ a, ao o a� co �d +� o � a► m �v m .a -d d •.� a ,� +� r. +� a, o e d ti a� �, v� �d ,�q �v N � �d o� a� . o � co o � �. x � ti o � •� � � m •� o � �, ,� � +� e +� a�+ ►� � � ti .� aa � o �� w� � .�c � ,� � � a�i' d m api � �N mw '�N a c. a b �b ara a +►... � � � � � 4, • q � x C► � � p .d � � � 00 � N a�+'d � � 00 � U H � � '� � � � +� � � .� �5� � � � a• � • 'o �1 � � � �a �,-'�i � � � c`�. �a � °+�"`ia A � � c� a4 �a �A co c� A � �a � � N a x H •.�i � a, � �G •� a x � U .� q o •� � �e qq� •� HG4 � s°aa i0 � � �.� v � � Oi4 �d E00 U W s e a 46 i s� ti a � � •'� • a� = o .� .G U Si � A A m ;' o Q'� o a�o � � � • � � � a! ,+c►� +► � P� +� 0�0 • y q � � `� �oa a °�a tip °w � v • Q � �� U o0 00 � �' a�� e�.� � .� � � � m .,., � .� � � � � U � ri U • • . O � � � � II�t �4 sA i� •O O � � � � V � � N � tM! p� 1 O O p 1 � � � ri 41 •r1 • �ff •r1 1 c0 +> y r1 O � V 41 O i� G1 W •ri 'C! Li Q •10 •r1 ro •�+ +.� +� •.� a �b m m a� . a► m +> xR �� o ci°, a � c, `d�� +� � �' �' O� .c '� � a.°►� ° go� °o .� �''.� • d o a a� � c. a, ..� a o �' zs �b+� •,� y x .� +� ,� .4 a, m .� +� +.� •.� �o +> a� •� ti o .� e d �o °c� o c. o •.+ w +� o � +� d � �� c� o +� o 0 o s� o .� �v •.+ '� � a a b a► a a� as .� � a� � a-� .rt �+ � c. +� +� � d .$ a� •.� .° •� � � •� •� o � °' +' >° ti � � . � '� � w' •� c�, a � 'ib '� '� � � � � ci �. o s d a� � �° ;' � � '�� : � .�n �� a�i o�i � � �° b � � � •� •� m a, .N ,-� oo� � ��, •�, � w� e o � o .a � q � �� •� +� eo +� ++ � w m • A •� .+� a� .►� n► s. q d o� ri af af aS q� +� d Q t> q •� �-1 �-I � � cd � w eD • o Wpy a� t� A b �� 'd '7 +�+ � � 4r N � .�O �i rl � l+OV � �d �A t� � 6 0 �d O � •� ++ d •.�1 +� � Q Q1 Cl � O T4 G� O a0 4�-� ��y �. � t0 10 t�i 1d ri U w � �� '�! �� t�C �f�y � • C� N C) f�r � � � 4� �0 O +� •rl r�i � v � � � � �Pa � 'd tr +� � � � � pN .�w eo '� � a +� �+d w � a � ao � a, m � c�i co °' +°�' � a� o ti a� 'a`�� c+� � � o ss •.� ++ .o w m G .«�.� o �a a, o � co c, '� o > s, � q � o co •.� m c 7 a`� �.. w � � o eo �,•° � � ..� � q.°� �a''o �� wd � � °' �o�dx ti o ' at u�•.� as $ � +> a 5�o w o� •� •,� ,� m .d ,� •� � a� � t, +� �v a., mpp +� •� d o w+ �.+ d o o �o a� zi � at W q O v •• 1� � �� O d � O � � � � � 'd t0 � .t'S � V O � � 'tl L�, •n .� �7 m tq �i �p tG 4-� S � W W p q r1 W rl +�► O O t� O .!4 fr !r q EO ir C> q •.1 4� {O� V 4� 4� tti O W �tl �p d � � b0 fr ir `.E � O � +� � •A 'C Z �� P� � � �O G�i 'd � � t0 <d U O � � � P, at f� = ,q N +� ,y tr r-I 0� pr (A 'c7 i� (0 .0 y � •r1 +� F�i .t��7 4� ^ dOq U � O � � 8r-Irl +� � •e-1 O +� b � O W �d •ri �F, O � �x e � �o' ►-f � a w s s �d �d 3 N ►� �d � m r� L�i 4-�i c�'i e� s � f-�i o .�o � • d � � >, O � � H ,a � � � ~ W� A �rl � d � � • � y e � a�i 7�C c�." O O S t, i � U � W e � � � +�+ O ", w '� � •� �+� v � � 'i � aa�'i � � U d � � s� O � ap ~w � OOt� � HOtc�/� U UWx d < P� U dC � 4 47 i bm � °� • ° � � � odo � � � � � � m � � � � � � � . � � � .� � � � -� � � � � � o . . . ,d U � '� �' x � v v � $ U CJ d � � V � P�r1 �r�-i � , � N N • i� � N � d �d "d � +> Q 4r � • �"i tl .ci •O � r�-I 4� 4i W � O�i � QO � 0�0 O � q � •e� • �� Oq� �0 y E+ �•rl O O +� N �O � 'd � � •rl N N W • +� c) 'd t6 +> • "' a �` w � d � � '� x a � a a �s'�. o� a�i � °+�' a`�i � . w � a ,�' � .� �, � m �d +� a a .� o �. � c, •,� •,� cd �d +> at m •� k' •., m •� .°c3 � w •� �, °' e " m � i � a � m a � � °' a� x� ° +� a s .a c. .a m � o +► +� sa o d r+ a� m •� a� � � � .c � o � m o � � m.a.� � s � � c '�+ � '�� w � c, •�+ +� ,-� .n •.� a� m a o� a� '� � e o � x .� �. •� .a �v a �n q1 o o .a •� •� � �d +► a� d W C1 .4 r-1 � _ •rl � 1� �QI G C A i� fi C) 4-1 FI V q r'1 C �' V e"� rl •�-1 •n t) O •ri L� �r1 •rl 'Lf +� f� +� 4� �Q 41 N O O ld �00 � t�0 � c. ow .� c� w � ,..� � dqa a� b � z� � w +� c, s � � ti o z � o .� dy �o b a� b � i csm •� � s +� � a "� +� � "d 4'i B �0 N Q� +� N RI +� w O 'd Cl � (0 +� 'd L'i � w � '� � •�+ am a� � � • � � rawo�i + c'�io " 'a a�ia�i •� `� ow A W r-1 Q� v 'i� 47 � •ri r� r� � � ia R� P� '�� ►�•� V V � '� •n L�i •r1 O • "d •rl Q► t7 O r-1 or 'O � O W • O F� N W q c0 (A ++ V d +� 0> c� ++ .G iy H :� � � � � iL Q • N a� W r-� .� c� f� N ty +� �d td � f�. !� A� • � O � a O • 'c! U i� c� +� R 3 � t r N •r 1 N C� �p t Q •r 1 •rl +� G> v � rl V 1 0 W br h0 fy •.�1 Cl � O G O 'LqS 'd H +� A Li N G� � 00 +� Q .[ .� � •.�1 fr O � � � � 00 q �U ad � cE .�o � � t0 � �d O � � t7 +� cd d � b +� v W N •.� � � � a� .� .� a o a m o � �v •� a� �^�y d N .�e v� d > �a ,.� b � •1"� � �1 � �'1 � = b � � � � � W � Ql �' � {y .� 4"1 QI q Q) }� (y � �N � � S i� o Q � N P'� � � 4�1 fy C� � � �0 Q1 •rl .C� •rl 4� ^� ir O d V fy E� i� p +� • �.{ .Ci � •ti 60 +► d � � 4a +► V N O A � i� q G1 t�0 � tC 3 Gf +� O C� � W A �0 � `-+ o '� � � ° a .b sa a� o •.� a� a � ca a +� m z� o �+ c� c� +� � o � +� o `� +� •.� m m p A a� •,� � � � � o c�i � v'•c� °p > d � w �� q v e0 � O c� �d � � •�i � �+ O � w y •� �i '�b � � a�i �-�i .� do ° '� � � ►� `� •� s� oc°» �,,-�i �� a�'im � woomc'�d •�+ c. w �o o s. w cr a a� t� +� a� c� a� c� •� .� wp� .a w •�+ +� d � a� � w � � .r�C � +� � t�i �d b � P � � •O •� .V'�. x 3 �•>a c� � � VN r-�i ?�a.D 8 � w � +� = t� af O O O O � � � a�D 4�i � Cii H N � H � Pa U +�.� � cn 3 � � �O � o •.� m aa cq a R � e c� 1 W O � A.o WH � � � � F'i �NQ N .m Ei C� �j p� 'd � � �a • •r"'� +> A [H� R� +� 'T! +� �p •r�l :�a•6 pG r�1 �a � � b 40 N �' �.:� � �^qd � < db t�r2H � ¢ r-4A 48 • w . a � � � � m d •.� .. .. ,-. ,.� U � O O O O � V � � � ' O N � � � � v �.�i v � +� R � a �, � � ., � � ° �, ' � � «� � � � +� • m .. .� m n w a�i � o i a a +°� '� � � � • d t°. .� '� s� � qo •� � d a, �v co .a q +� � a r°� �d .a� c°'o c°� � u o � •� w ° � ea� o� � •.� oa a � o � � �° � � m� � • m � a�i � � �`� o � ° o a �w � o �°p2s +> c� . � .o a td� b �v •.� �o o n .c d +> o c. � af c� � a ai � ','�d q etl at r-1 a � +� •rl ,t,'" •rl �-i o G� i� Cl • a .+� '� c�o .cs � �d � a � a ao � S �. o +° �� w° � '� +�+ 'a 'e�+o s, •� a� ti � � �, w° �,o � � a � � .� .°am � �' •� s�+ ii � •� .� w �a, .�i' edo s � m r-�i a� a� m m �d ap ,q� n�i m � +' � . � � ,.� p'� o L� � .1 � m 3 � ��rl t, � � ,i �� 8 00 3 .�' � � � � � i�i V 'd O T7 63 .��i W � O 'i�� N Q .G � O c 0 O Q 1 •rl 1� GI ,�f. O N � O W q O f� y .c7 +� C� � as t� �= a0 •e�"�i �' � •q A .=i L� Ct � � � .Dr� a1 .T'a 4{ ii +> A �d t) 00 q �d 'd C� � +� O d d 0� �1 � a) � l� �7 m �' �A� � � W FS N a 00 rl • +� G� C� J'w � 'd W O 'C7 fr O W� tr • � m W O � aw .� � m � cb. � � � `� � a, c� � o +� .� a � c�i +� � � ci �w � � x °+p�' ° o a tiq� o o° � Ts .°„ � �b+> �cs �c •., o • a •.� a� � �v � ¢ •r1 � � t'�'�i o0� rl U � ipr �� q � (N,� ,� 'd r-�I � o�D �� 00 00 � U � V �ro � � C � C L7 r'� O +� C � .0 fa r'1 � � O +� +� FI A Cq � •►i Q1 '.� f.l �' >+ m a► ++ `� m �d o m � a a, •,� o +� m s� .� a d •�, a� a.c � a, c5 •,� � 'e� a o +� �s o d 5c +� c� +� � � m +� � m d ti a� a� ra a� +� H � +� as+� as .cl � � �v 'aS � asp a � m o +o� .a ,c� (� � at as V •�-1 tSi � � y W � +� O •�I +� 0 � t!1 al � � �i W V O � U � d � U � ,� rn � °�''� � � � .� .� a, � � � � q � � �� '= '�o o �i �� mx � o w � �o a � w � +� t, � � at co e d � o r�1 +�+ q�m � � °' � � a�i .c ;' u�"i � � "'x � �a ��> i b +''° +°>' � �; a � a•� •�, o �a +� m +� � +� .� � d � � •,� • d +� e � � o � •� °o � m � a'� ° O �,,�q q .o q � q •� p .� •-1 ar!� +> �' a� � o c3 � .ci � m .0 � .n r-1 •�+ a� �+ H •� ad ►-� � •� .q U Cq � �� D� � a'�Q � v a�i � �= m A � � �e 3 � �� v � z � � U a� •n O � 49 � . m � A N R�� 3 6� • � � A � � '� �C m � � avd � � � � � � ti � c! aq� � 3 s d � W C�i .� �� v Q � � H .c3 � � � � � CJ 0 O O � Cj g r-�1 U I+l �,. ' O O N N �D M .-1 O� � e� aa � � v�a � �. .,. .. .-. � aUi +� � � � $ ;. O O � � ~ � �y � � � W V b4 � � � � � v v v �-► t ir" +� OC •rl 1� Q Q • 1 G�+) • i� 4� 4�1 G�i ��,y � � �I � 'd � •rl i7 'd i�" ��j ri O � r-1 f3 CJ A N W •r7 f•r 'C3 lr +� +� +� � l0 • 8 +> O O •ri l� r1 � W �q � r-I a� �v a� o a,-a •.� i m +� •� o w.c7 w •,� 'd •r� •r� 0� o N •ei • C> o tl r-1 11f C7 +� d N = . C� L� � 9 Fr � a ,� c� � .� .c vi c. �e .� > s a� a� o d ti a .c •� � � o •� o m ° �� .►� °o o +� taa� +� � +� o� � � S ti � � � �' y a� w � m 4, i �•�, a .� be . �. m � • dti � d � a� a� •�, a� a� � bs +� a� m a c. +� � oos� oa� o a•�+ � o � .� � o . ..� o •� . .c b •,°a � � � • a �i .°cso; �° m .� �" o �, � � ,u .°c� w � .. ° �a � � c°. a� � � � w a � �sa� e �O0' oa� �wo +' °"� o � .�ao °oma�. e, �' odm '� a qw' �b•� •.+ d +� o a� �.p m o s� •� � �, � i .� o �+d as o � o s a� c. � � .a > y+ {.� a � a� o y d ++ as � e a ,n •�, ,� w �, �d C1 I A � 41 i� t�D 00'O W '�7 � ri • 3 �0 f. ad f0 +� �y .-1 O N t�. a] •.� W +� � • N A C> •rl G> N B � • r-1 CO W 4-� 't3 W ri t0 N i�. •r1 .G; f. fr .ti a� A A �ci .� +� C� �d �Cf •� q O � O q �-+ > a 3 3 ••� +� a� O A N ti +� �C! t� � m d O � •�1 +� d •�1 q O � I!�•�I v �i � f� o r-, a� c. � b .c � � +� o., a� � +� w a� � .� a •�, b +� b ..> � � c°� ° � c�i ��o � � m �q �p, s� � a�i a�'i . q � � °a a � o �om �baai ��' � � . � a d o eo o d o -�+ c� >4 0 � +� ,q a1 •� •.� e' o ,� o af o 6�o cd eo � •� m 0 W N r-1 � R � c) ?i o u� •rl +� •.-� � � O •r� W t) .G i� � f.. O 3 � � �°, :� � o° � b � � � °' a o � os � a � m ° � .� a �a +� a �w �' :� +� .. c°7 °� �'� c°o o w 'a � `� �d o -° � � �' w � � m � � � � ° d "�' � o ° �d o � °' � •� wtim oo � o � +> � �s � b °� c. da� oTSa �bw � � dosd � ..► a w ti +� a as ,� w c� o �+ o �i s7 �,w w V � a t� +� �O V � � o •� aa� a� aa� o o •.� � � � � o �a d � aa� •� a� o .v .� .� m .� m � � .� �d � p d � .� +� a� .� �t s � .. �y •� o w •n O W Ft � >s ••ri •.i �d O a� a� c� 6 � 8 F7 O N +� r� ty +� 'C! A �o o �e7 R p s� 4+ d af O m q q O o d � o ao •� a, � � � o A o a► o � a � o a� +� � q .� � d v � � � .[ e0 � 3 .� � •� � o a� � `i ��+�+ '� � ao� aqi � o ��n � a� � �.� a°�i . cn �� ao m o � � � +� a�i � �o •� s +� � .n °� o o � +� � o w � i +> a �s a� ti .-� �a -o �° a ti � .o � •`•�° �° � � m ar� � + a � aacn � r� � � �b� acw °e � o : � 0 � � , � °o c°> o .� m W �, � � t�A � b C�i c] N � W N O Q p .� • V L� � r-1 +� �tl •r� G:�+ V � +� � � V '� +°+' a3 a�i � � � +� t`�, a �i o�i o � �o � A �+ .� � �� a >> a�i •� a � �+ a � � � � � +� r� o o at, o o +� •.� � o � � m �O w � m� ,� � mo �O � � c� a a c c� ca cn a ►-r ca c� a c.� c� s �n 50 • � a � � a� �n m w �• � � a � � � +� •,� ,.� U � Q� o p .-i C� r�-1 d� �1 � l!1 '� v � O�t L# � � � � � � O � � C� V d .}� �. • « �. •O O t11 N tfl � � � ti � � sR a�► � � � � � � � Q v .Q O +� • �� O 4> � N � tA � a .e •� a� � � iri o � � c�. c� oo�i °' o a° o �tiV oa °' � b °o o JJ°yyQ' N ti U � � � W � � � A O {0�� TJ 1 iti N 'O � qS A O O � .� 6 U � q c0 tSS co z � o .� � o '� o� ,-� � � �-+ A � m °1b � c� •d � �o c�'i i a� .o .° � � � °+�' Ci x ��r+ W �.-�� B � U i��. t�i ''"� O 3 •r� ,r�. �$ rl r-�1 ri � .L�". O 'Lf Sr +� Fy �] G� d fA c� � � c� w e�i w° 'm o aa� L� +� t� O � (Q L; � W U � � � � � Q to� � � v �+�' � �v � aa H4�r � x � � � H O Z a�i a O t�r � H 'c� •� +� a� V • •� 3 � t�. A t�p � h�j '� p OL, +� +� N iQ,► �L c�i 'd O U W U A �+ �C � C1� � A � v � y� � �..� 6�00 � � � .� ^ � � H 4f�ecl� � AU UQ �jl • NAME OF PROJECT: Target Area A-Community Health Program-bcpansion ADMINISTERING AGIIdCY: Ramsey County Citizen's Committee for Economic Opportunity SZTBCONTRACTING AG�ICY: St. Paul Bureau of Health PURPOSE ANll BENEFICIARIE.S: The purpose of this project is to expand the present Target Area A Community Health Facility to fill the gapa in medical and dental services within the Model Neighborhood. This facility, presently operational on a very limited basis, will serve to provide comprehensive primary medical and dental care� including preventive care, diagnostic treatment, and rehabilitative service for a period of approximately two years. As a component of the community health clinic program, there will be a health mobile unit working at schools and senior citizens housing, ete.� focusing toward providin� preliminary screening and preventive health care and immunization. The mobile unit will offer basically those same services that will be provided by the health clinic, but will ;�ave more flexibility to provide needed service for youth and senior citizens by • going directly to the schools and senior citizen housing pro�ects on a scheduled basis. This program will also provide training for Model Neighborhood residents for various positions in the health field. During the operation of this pro,ject, planning will be underway for the establishment of a complete comprehensive medical program. In addition, it is antieipated that a function of the center shall be to bring a wide range of supportive social services to the recipients of the medical services provided by the clinic and mobile health unit. CONTENT AND OPERATION: 1. Madical services: The Community Health Clinic will be open 5'�i days and one evening per week. Three medical clinics will be scheduled each week when a doctor Will be present to provide examination, diagnosis, treatment, and referral. Heart disease, diabetes, abnormal growth and development, mental retardation, hearing disabilities, and ill or disabled persons will be treated; referrals will be made for maternal and infant care, alcoholism and drug addiction, mental illness, emotional illness� behavioral disturbances, hospitalization, more specific diagnosis, home care, and ather services. Other medi.cal services provided throughout the week by the nurse include: prophylactic immunizations, reading af Mantoux teste, limited emergency servir,es, intake and making of appoint- • ments, referrals and home visits. Ta�et Area A-Communit�y_Health Program-E�xpansion age of 3 S2 2. The mobile health unit will provide the following services on a g to 5 basis to adults and children: examination and treatment of upper • respiratory infections, akin infections. simple digestive system dis- orders, limited first aid, preventive health including. but not ].imited to, edncation concerning nutrition, dental care, immunization, mantoux testing, hes�ring and vision screening, and other aspects of health education and services, drug abuse, veneral diseases, hopefully in the pediatric age group some counseling in regard to child rearing would be given, and dental facilities with emphasis on preventive measures. 3. Eye Services: One eye clinic will be held each week to test and provide prescriptions. When needed, referrals will be made to other organizations which will assist in the purchasing of eye glasses. 4. Dental Services: Three dental clinics will be held each week to examine teeth with x-ray and oral prop2�ylaxis, restore decayed and permanent teeth, test pulp, care for mouth infection, extract teeth, and perform limited surgery; topical flouride will be applied. 5. Family Planning: Through the Bureau of Health, a weekly family planning clinic will be held to inform residents of and prescribe different methods of birth control. 6. Preventive Care: Proceduree will be established to promote and imple- ment a preventive health care program, including medical examinatione for children at ages 8, 10 and 12, anei for adults annually; eye examinationa for children at age 4, and dental examinations. • ']. Follow-Up: Patients who need clinic service�, Mho have made appoint- ments, or who have been referred to other health services will be followed up to assure that they are able to, and do follow through and get the help they need. Home visits will be made, transportation to and from the services will be provided. etc. 8. Mobilizatian of Resources: Sources of health services will be con- tracted and encoura�ed to increase their resources being directed into the target area in order to expand the Community Health Clinics, improve the delivery of services to the areas, and expand medical facilitieg in the area. 9. To insure the newborn with proper nutrition in the Model Cities area, it is proposed to supply all mothers who do not breast feed their children with a prepa.red formula that contains not only the essential nutrients, but also the required vitamins and minerals. TIMETABLE: With the hiring of staff and acquisition of additional equipment, expansion of this existing program will begin i.mmediately upon receipt of Model Cities supplementary funds. FUNDING: • It is anticipated that apart from t:�e Model Cities supplementary funda �hat are to be invested in this project that some funds will alsa be forth coming � Target Area A-Contmunitv Health ProAram-Ex�ansion Paae 2 of �i 5� from the local CAP agency, a local cancer detection program, as well as contributions from the St. Paul Bureau of Health . �� PROJECT ADMINISTRATION: Responsibility. for project administration will be. assumed, by the Ramsey Countq Citizen's Committee for Economic Opportunity �with the operation being contracted with the St. Paul Bureau of Health. The St. Paul Bureau of Health has historically been responsible for health education and infor- mation, environmental health services, parent and child health programs, and variety of other health services in coordination with the Board of Education. The St. Paul Bureau of Health has beeri operating the present coonnunity health program which we plan to expand in alpartnership with RCCC. • I COORDINATION: Efforts are in the process of being initiated to involve all health serving agencies and other agencies that might serve to provide services supportive of this program. Services will be provided as needed to the Supportive Education Project, Child Development Pro�ect, the Model Neighborhood Employ- ment Center� and other pro�ects and agencies as approp�iate. EVALUATION AND MONITORING: The St. Paul Model Cities Program will monitor each su�plementally funded project throughout the first action year. The projects will be monitored � on the basis of planned versus actual achievement in terms of ob�ectives, content and budget. An information system will be designed and implemented and will aat as the mechanism for the monitoring proce�s. Three to five pro�ects which relate to problem areas of high concern to St. Paul will be selected for in-depth evaluation. CITIZEN PARTTCIPATION: , Through a board structure residents of the Model Neighborhood will be involved in planning and administration. RESIDENT EMPLOYMENT: I Residents of the Model Neighborhoad will be recruited and employed at all levels of the pro�ect. '� MAINTENANCE OF EFF'ORT: Supplementary monies used in this pro�ect are for addi�ional servicea not able to be provided for by using lo<:al funds. I • � arget Area A-Community Health Program�F+�cpansion Page 3 of 3 �� • NArit: UP' ��k(hTt�;CT: �'�id for iletarded Citizens t'+DP,Ifd"!S'i't:}tING �G1�,IdCY: ST. P��ul 1�ssoci�tion for �letarded ChildrFn (S�'i�'rt�) �Ui3-CG�:'i'ftr';C`PIPdG AGLI�I;Y: None �=IJR��o�r, i�i�D Br�t��IC:IEIRI�: The purpose of tr�i� pro�;ram is to: � a. Searcti out �nd identify the residents of tYie <�re�.� who have f�roblem:; arisin� from mental retardation. b. Form an are�a committee supplemented by staff' to voice tr�e sf�ecir�l needs of the retarded citizens and theirfamilies. c. Coordinate efforts to }rin� exi:;tin�; cammunity resources to bear on the needs of retarded citi•r.ens of the ar.ea. d. t�lor•k with existin�, a�;encies to modify serviceF� whic}i dc� „ot reco�nize tYie difference between t}ie needs of tho�e sul'ferin�*Pf�om or�anic retard�ition �s opF>os��d to tt;o:�e w�io are functiun��ll.,y ret;;�rdc:d as a result of cultural, soci�l, economic <�nd ott►er forms of environmental retardr�tion. _. e. Desifrn and obtain speci��l services for the retarded citi�,en:� <�f Ghe area based on needs cliscovered in the inve�ti�;ati.ve ut:i�'E:fi of ttie project. f. Serve to provide speci�al services to ap��r�oximr,tel,y lyOO rF�sidf�nt:� 01' the area who are tecof°nizably mentully retarde�d. `I'he beneficiaries will be: a. T}ie unkn<>wn riumber of citizen:, wYio are fianctiorii.n�; i�t ret�arded levErlf� becau:se of social, econornic� cul{;ural, �and ather form:� 01' deF,rivr�t,ic>n. b. TY�e parents, r<�lat ives, anci ot}:ers who ��rf� r..l�r,rf;ed ti.�i t}i t}�e res�.orYSibility ��nd care of botYi tyt,es of' r•et�ard�d ci.ti•r.en:�. CUI�'i'E;1JT �:;:1) (�1 :�i�A'i'IOI;: 1'rof�;ram operations include: a. Fbrmation of a standin�; committee to become ��n intet,�;rF:�l. J;r�rt c>1' the Bo<:�rd of Directors of St. 1'aul l�ssoci�tion for i:ett3rded Cilildren and corisistin�r, in its entiret,y, of' re�:aicaerit;; c�;' ttze� Piodel Cities ar•e��. �'his g�•oup will en�ble t}le :�t. 1'aul l+i,soc� ir�tion 1'or xet�r.ded Cr1il.drNr, to better reco�nirc� ancl uneier:,t<�rid functional. retard�,tion ais�r.� from soci��l, cultizr�il, <<nd Ecc,riomic deprivation. b. M oun t i ng of ,-xn intensivc- effc3rt to ideritif,y tliose area r�er;ic.- ents who ne�d a:,sistance wit:� }�roblems arif31i1� �'ORi menta� � retardation. N;o�3e1 Cities 1'ro�ir�m - Aid for Iiet�:rded Citizen:�s 1. c-�f 55 • c. k'or the purpose of coordin.xtin� their effort.:� i.n the hiociel. Ci tif�.; cor.imunit,y. t;stab:isl�ment oi' contract with existiri�; r�ut,lic rznc� t�riv.3te socir�l welfare a�;encies tt�ut offcrr s�rvices needed t>y i;tie mentally retarded. d. Identific�ation of ga:ps in the existin�; s��r•vices �and c.�e:�i�r,n of' ra plr�n to fulfill indicated needs. e. Sec�kin� and employin�r ttie assist�ince of ��rof'cs:>ior�,:,l auti��x•i tiet� conversant with mental retr:�rdr�tion who in turn wil..l intG�rr�ret tht> needs of both or�;anic �uid functionally retarcied to 1,oth 1�rc�fe:s.�- ional und general publics. f. Searchin�; out sources of pro�ram and financi.ril r�ei�� to initi�te needed services designed specifioally for mentrxll.,y z�etr:ir�leei citiz.ens of the Tlodel Cities ��rea. TItiL'1'Ai3J��;: �'irst thirty day.:�: a. Qrg�znization and <�loption of workin�; }:olicie;� 'of the committre of residents. ' b. Est�blishment of workin� relationsiiips with Tiodel Citie:� urid ottier• ��ublic and private r:Qencies. c. Initiation of inten5ive study of Niodel Citie� :_�rea to identif',y t�nd classify problems of both or�ranic and functioiial returdecl. • d. Iliring and orient�tion of needed staff. Next ninety days: a. Cuntinue identification and work with other �encies. b. Consolidate results of the previously r;�eritic�ned �udy und ir�dicr�ted methods whereby the probler�s arising ma,y be S?zced by the re�ident.:; of the cornmunity. Based on findings, e:;t�:iblish need� F:an�.i :,c�t l�rior- ities on proposed metY�ods of solving the identified ��roblemt;. i�emainder of the Yro�;ram year: a. Interpret tkie needs to professional r:�nd �;encrr�l F�ublic�. b. Work to initi:�te new or ctreri�rthen existin, s<�rvices 1'or ttit• mentally retarded. c. llevelop plan for communit,y-based sc�rvices tu the ment�,lly r�e�tarclr�d of the hlociel Citit�s corr,munity. �'l�IV lilivG: M�jor co:sts are vested in staff �and consultant servir.e��. Tt is ex,�er,ted that by the third ye�ir of ttie projei:t the St. 'r-'aul �+:z:saciut:on for l�c:•tr�r�le�r� (%i�il.dren will h�zvc founci non-supl;le:�cntr.�l funds for• cont irivance of tl;r? �>rot^ran. • Modal Cities ��ro�rrarn - Aid for Reta��sed Citizens < <�f' 4 56 PROJDCT ADMINISTR.ATION: � This project wi?1 be administered by the St. Paul Assicoation for Retarded Children. St. Paul Association for Retarded Children is an organization of developing services for the identification� education, and training of the retarded. During the past three years, SPARC has come to realize the nature of the � problems in low-income areas more acutely than in the past. Two residents of the Model Cities community have been elected to the SPARC Soard of Ad- visors, and two residents are presently on the SPARC Long-Range Planning Committee which is devising a plan for reorganization to meet changing nseds and concepts-. The project staff will consist of an Executive Director, a pro�ect coor- dinator, a program developer, and a stenographer-receptionist. Thia etaff will be governed in policy matters by a �tanding committee to the SPARC Board of Directors composed entirely of residents of the Mode� Cities com- munity. This committee will report regularly to the Board of Directors and will be an integral part of the SPARC organization. The SPARC Executive Director will sit ex-officio on the pro�ect coaunittee and wi11 supervise the d�,}r-to-day activitiee of the pro�ect etaff. COORDINATION: � The aid for Reterded Children Pro�ect will be coordinated within the parent sponsoring agency. It will be a referral source for Model City achool, health, employment, and other related projects. MONITOxING AND EVALUATION: The St. Paul Model Cities PTO$T8D1 M111 monitor each supplementally funded project throughout the first action year. The projects vill be monitored on the basis of planned versus actual achievement in terms of objective�, content and budget. An information system will be designed and imple- mented and will act as the mechanism for the monitoring process. Three to five projects which relate to problem areas of high concern to St. Paul will be selected for in.-depth evaluation. CITIZE1d PARTICIPATION: Policy direction of the pro�ect will rest with a committee compoaed of residents of the Model Neighborhood. The committee will act as a stand- ing committee to serve at the pleasure of the St. Pau1 Association for Retarded Citizens board of directors. RESIDENT E�(PLOYI�+�NT: Residents will be utiliZed in every pos 'ble position. Part of the respon- sibility of the project will be to deve p services for the mentally • Model Cities Pro am - Aid for Retarded Citizen� of 57 � retarded which will, in turn, �velop empl yment op��or•tunities. �'or extar;iple, the initiation of a day activity center f r the ret��rded could well. bri ng opportunities for residents in such jobs soenter director, te�ctiE�rs, teract�e�r�� aides, and clerical positions. I�iATNTF:N�12�iCE UF' �F'OHT: 5upplementary monies used in this project are for �dditional services not able to be provided for by using local fu ds. N t�:odel Cities Pro ram - Aid for Retarued 'itizens �+ of M 5$ � �'ROJECT NAME: Comprehensive Health I anning Board Grant ADMINISTII2ING AGENCY: Metropolitan uncil SUBCONTRACTING AGENCY: None PURPOSE AND BENEFICIARIES: Planning services related to the soc al core problems of the Summit- University community will be perform d on a demonstration basia by the CHP and general staff of the Health oard and Metropolitan Council respectively� utilizing one professi nal metropolitEtn comprehensive health planner and two health planni g interns as liaisons. The express purpose and j4b responsibili ies of �hese three Board and • Council employees would be to relate Model City concerns and interesta to all relevant aspects of Board and Council ende�vors, and insure that input and feedback on criticnl olicy-making matters is � twa- way process between the organization . This proposal is addressed to the hi toric�lly inadequate delivery of public a�d private health services disadvantaged communities� govern- ment and institutional negZect of s h communities, and ineffective Model City resident involvement in policy nd decision making. Tt is bttsed upon � six general strategies or objective : (1) coordinate existing program� and agencies; (2) increase citizen articipation by involvement of Model Neighborhoad residents on Metropoli an Council boards, advisory cammittees, and task forces conducting studies hich affect th� co�nmunity; (3) increaae employment opportunities for Model ity residents (two interns would be from the Model Neighborhood area) ; 4) generate, for application in other communities, successful ideas and p ograms that result from the proposed Model City activity; (5) develop ad itional projects on the b�sis of current experience which promise mu .ti-problem impacts; and (5) focu� on strategic health service, facility, and manpower projects which offer reasonable promise of near-ter•m and visible impacts. The project proposed herein meets a 1 nine criteria for project �election enumerated in the St. Paul Model Ci ies "essential considerations" format for grant applications. The interns will be involved in ana ysis of such questions �s the followi.ngt (1) haw will the Board's health pl and those plans bx•ou� before the Board for review be in the best itit rests of the general public and th� residents of disadvan�aged neigh�o oods? (2) will ede�uate st�ffing and financing be available? (3) will a. ropriate nei�hborhaod, city. county and state health and health relate interests be involved in th� plannin�7 (4) will the size and nature of p oposed facilities be adequat�: to community needs? (5� are the prc, osals consistent wi.th present and pro- jected population sizes? (6) Is en ugh known c�ncerning ot}�er fnrceE whir.h . Comprehensive Health Plannin, Bonr Grant Page 1 of '� 59 mi�ht influence the productivity of any p n that mi�ht be ��tnb].ishc:d? � and (7) are adequate resour.ces available o carry out the obj�ctivei.� af proposed plans? CONTENT AND OPERATION: Current plans call for the employment of professional health pinnner and two interns who will be responsible f r the formulation of a �lan to establish the desired comprehensive heal progrnm. Thi�s program wi7.1 be designed to: (1) provide the c�ptimum in ervice in relation�hip to nPed, expectations and demand; (2) strengthen ooperative w�rking relationahipr; betweeri community professionals, health gencies and the comprehensive health program; and (3) serve to better efine needs as well f�a demf�nds. The interns will receive full exposure t the CHP Program, attend all significant policy meetings, and be give important re�ponsibilities, commensurate with their inter�sts and gr wing sophistication in planninp,., processes. TIMETABLE: Personnel will be recruited for this pr gram immediately upon fundin� for the project. Preliminary work prio to contract initiation or �*i•Ant receipt has already been initiated. FITNDING: N During the two (2) year projected fund' � of this project it is �ntic.i.pFat�d that funding shall be entirely in term of supplementary Model Cities dollars, save for contributed Metropol'tan Council and Health Board st��ff time. The planning board, however, is ex�ected to plan for the fi].i.ng of an application to FHA for financing un er the �roup practice t'AC1.I.1t1Pf; insurance program. In addition, appli ation will be made to HUD under the Neighborhood Facilities section of P. . 89-11� to secuz•e a grant to r�id in the construction of the propos::d he lth center. By coupling Mc�del Citier� �upplementary funds, group practice f ilities funds under the Her�lth Uervice Development section of the Public Hea th Services Act, Neighborhood Fnci.l.iY.iee funds and CHI' funds (P.T�. $9-°749) a c plete and comprehensive her�lth F�r•o- gram can be real.ized �nd the coordina ive pruposes of the Model Cities program advanced. The budget for the first two years sh 11 total $20,000 in supplemental Model Cit,y funds, and decre�se to to financial support fx�om thi� source during the third, fourth, and ifth years of the CHP program span. Of the total budget during the first two year period, $16�CX)0 shall be earmarked for staff and int n retention and $4�000 for tr•ave1., equipment, overhead, fr•inge benefits and other mi�cellaneous costs. Non-cash contributions by the Metrop litan Council wi11 effectively double the funds available for the p oject purposes. PROJDCT ADMINISTRATION: N This project will be administered by the Health Board of the Metro�olitr�n Council. The Metropolitan Council i an organization eetablirheci b,y thP Minnesota State Legislature in 196� to plan and coordin��te sacial� phyricr�l , and economic development in the sev n county metropolitan area. Since Com rehensive Health Plannin Board Grant f�PP a��'� r<. publir. and private health �ervices have proven to be historicall.y inade- quate within the Model Cities area the Health Bonrd will� within the e.,even � count,y area and with a view to ins ring that �dequate hE�lth fiP,�V1CF� wi..11 always be �vailable in every secti n of the Metro area, �fter the first two years continue to coordinate h �lth serviGes. COORDINATION: The Health Board will draw all of he health �erving agencie8 to�eth.er :in order to facilitate to planning an operation of the heal.th pr•oRram. ;inc�: the existing resources will be int �rated or closely related to the proC�o�� program, a built-in relationship b tween the St. Paul Bureau of He�1th, Ramsey County OEO� and all of the ther cooperating agenciee can be a�:��ured. MONITORING AND EVALUATTON: The St. Paul Model Cities Program ill monitor each supplementary funded project throughout the first actio year. The praject� will. be monitared on the basis of planned versus act al achievemc�nt in terms of objectives, content and budget. An informatio system will be designPd �nd implemented and will act as a mechanism for th monitoring pr•oce�s. Three to five projects which relate to problem a eas of high concern to St. PF�u]. wi]l be selected for in-debth evaluation. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: N It is the plan of the Metropolitan Council to increase citi7e�n p�rticipation by involvement of Model Neighborho d re:idents on Metropolitan �ouncil, bocird�:, advisory committees, and task fore s conducting studies which rzffect the community. In addition,by sponsor n� rep;ular• meetings in lecr�l neighbc►rhoodf;, working closely on ma�or projects ith locally elected council.�, and �ervi.np as a forum for dialogue between co sumers and providers, the Health Board intends to bring the CHP program t thP Model Neighb�rhood Community. RESIDENT EMPLOYMENT: This project will result in the em loyment of two interns fr•om the r.ommuriit,y during the first year, and additio a1 persons in the succeedin�; ,years. MAIN`PENANCE OF EF'FORT: Supplementary monies used in this roject are f'or additional s�rvicec� nat able to be provided for by using 1 cal funds. � Comprehensive Health Plannin. Boar Grant `�}'�� e 3 af 5 61 � P+.�I,c: Ul�' I'':UJL;C'I': Consultant �iousir:�; a udy i.Df�',INI::'I'L11IPdG t+GLt�CY: City Uemonstrat on h�ency S[J13-(;GIu'1'Itl;C'iIPdG� �'�U�,I�vCY: Housin�; Con�u tant �'irm 1'ill;l'G��; �I+ll t,EI'dt��'ICIE;itIr;S: To develop a housing construction plan and to write a profcr.�m I'Ui' Ff �Io�a.sir��; Information Bureau to be meated during the �econd ��ction Ye��r by studyiny; the local housin� situation and by usi g all fe�sible hou.�iri�; alternr�tives for t}:is area. The project will serve to educate tt�e 1'tiysical Cor� mE�mbf�ri:� and the r'�odel tJei€;hborhood residents t the pi•oblem> <3nca altern��tivez� of the housin�; problems as the plan is be'n�a developed. CON'i'Etd'i' ANU 0�'�;I;f�'1'IUPJ: Main �ctivities to be aecomplished by t housin�; con:�ultarits ��rr.: 1. `I'he desi��;n of a i'oiir year pro�; �m to improve the quality of hou.;in�? tlirough use of su��pleme�ntal, N '�hborhood llevelopmen� �'l.an, �nd other available fun<<s. 2. After study, det��rmine which fe eral pro��;rams meet ttie need� c�f' the area ��nd should be used �nd wtii h }�ro�;rams need to be exp��nded oz• • ci��.nged. j. :ieek chan�e in the current buil in� codes in oraer to redur_e the cost of housing and improve the c�uAlity of exi.:.�tin�; housinf; by the iritroduction of new anci ine pensive huildir►�r, rnutcrir�l ::�n�l riethoci:;. 4. The settin�; of a realistic sclie ule of objectives f�r a hou��inf� ��ro�r��m that has to be followed by various �+E;e�nci�:s :3nc: �our�.a :�uct� a:s the Housir��; and i;edeveloprnen tiuthority, thc: !�'ederal liousin�* Adn;inistration� the contractor� consortium, priv��te 1•;rota�,s r,ncl indiviuu�=ls. �. `1'}:e determ�n��tion of the de:sire of the resi��ent.s re�*.�rdin�r t�ome owner�hi�, riome �tyles, the� sire of the housiri�; units .�nd costts i,y merins of' sacrplin� 10'� of the oc �ir�ant.a. 6. 'i'he develo�ame;nt of a Housinp; In ormation I3ureau for �c hiodel fdei�;hborhood which will be run v an exi�tin�r a�;enc,y who will hire and train residents to become e r_erts in iiousin�* ��rof;rtams. 'Phe consultant:� will compile all of �the informatic�n and devf.loi.� u work pro�rr�rn describing the optimum unction of' the hureau. 7. 'rhe educution of the 1�]odel Nei�r borhood f'lannin�; Counc�i.l, ttie 1'hy.�ical Core Committee, the P•;o el Tiei�;hbonc��od str�ff, �arid t}�r� residents to tlie alternatives o tt�e housin�; r�rablems of' the arer�. ' I�;odel Cities Pro.�ram - Consultant Housi Stud 1 of' ; 62. `i'lI��TI',I3LL: � The consultant� will be hired as soon ��:, funcis are av��ilable. '1'hc� roce:s:; }� of interviewin�� consultants and devF�lopir�z; a ��ontractean be caai��l.ete;d durin�r the time the First Ye<�r ��ction 1'lr�n is b in�r reviewed. `l'}ie reF�ort :skic>>>ld bca co�upleted wittiin a period of six(E,) morit} s. `i'he reco�;imE:;nrl�ations th,:t a�ii be stcarted immediatel.y will be ;;ut into f'fect dur•ir��; the rcm<�i.ziir�f; pt•ri od c�f the r'irst ;�ction Ye�ar. `i't�e remaininp; pr ject� will be implemen!,F>d �iizrin�� the �econd :ictian Ya<_�r, and the 'i'i:irc� ;de frhboz•tiood Devel oprr.erit !�L��n Ye.ar f'roF;ram. FUNllIPJG: llemonstration fundin�; will be szcured ent rely aut o'_' t}ie J•�odel Cities funds as a ��art of the adm inistrat:ive co:�ts for cor�.>ultant fees. '�he co„t of tli<:� pro�-;ram will be approximately '��,000-'>3 ,Ot)O. �':iUJ�C`I' r+llP��iP�I�TRr�TIGFd: The project wi11 be administered by the lannin��; staf'f of the Cit,y 1�Erncm�:�tr�+t- ion ��;ency with tr�,e work bein�; performed by a hou:,ir,,�; con:�ult��nt firm. '.i'}�e F'hysical I'lanner will recornmend the cons lt<�n�,s and rnonitor their wu.rk to acquire knowledge and to control its dir �ction, coo��vzraa�i�zur��: � 'Phe report will be bas�rd u��on informatio su}��lied b,y the St. 1�aiil Hc�i,:�icifT ar.d l�edevelopment i+uthority and other ag�ncies involved in houcsit:l,�; in the area. It will te the responsibility of t �e biodel Nr:i;*libor}iood ��l��r�r�i�i�; staff to assure th .t coorc�inr.tion of thc rriajor partie:s concerned wi th hoizsin�; is adhered 'bo by the consult�nt;s thr•olzE:�h provi:�ions of tl�e contract. 1.L';aT`.i'O}iIT�;i: r1Pdll �,1/„i,Ui;'I'IUN: `Phe St. l atzl h?odel (;ities Program will ni.tor each sup��l��me,ntully funded project thr.ou�;liout the first action yea . '.Phe projects will be inoni.tored on the basis of planned verstis actual a iic>vement in terrn:s of' objcrct;ive:>, eoni,ent and bucl�;et. e�n infor•mation sy:, �m will be �le.�i��ried ��nc� irriF,leme�ntc,�3 r�nd will act �s the rnechr�r�i�m for the m< itorin�r ��rocess. '1'hree tc� five projects which relate to problem areas f l�ip�h concerii to :>t. l�aul wi ll be selected for in-depth evaluation. CI'1'IGl:td 1'rtt�'1'ICI}'��'1'IOr�: The r:odel Nei�;hborhood �'lannin�; Couricil will k:e ir�volved ii4 i:he :selection of the Housinf�; Consult�ints firm and uls ttie eval.urxtion oi' the re��art when it is complt�ted. R1�:�;IU::Td'i' 11�it I,vYt�::;NT: �,very effort wi:1 be made to hire resici nts to hel_p conduct an,y survey work necess��ry for the corr;pletion of ttie liou in�* re�ox•t. '1'}ie: }[ou:;inf* Tcif<�rmc�tic�n � Model Cities �ro rf�m — Consu�tant Housi Stud 2 of � 63 � Bur•eau, once formed for the ?;odel TJei ;hborhood, wi.11 l�irf:� �anci tr,�in r��:>icierit::, to become experts in housin� pro€�;rr�ms 1�1��1:PJ'1'f�IVi�IJCE G�' F:t�k'0}t'i': 5upplement.�r,y funcis used in this proj ct az•e for �zdc�iti��n€al scrvicer:� not able to be provided for by using loce� funds. � � t•:ouel Cities l�ro_ram - Consult��nt :ic,u in Stuci i �i� „`� 64 • ' NAME OF PROJECT: Rehabilitation Loans and G ants ADMINISTII2ING AGENCY: St. Paul Housing and R development Authority SUHCONTRACTING AGENCY: None PURPOSE AND B�TEFICIARIES: The Urban Renewal Program in the Model Neigh orhood has been roaking federal loans and grants available for rehab litation. Generally, there is a delay of 30- g0 days before Secti n 312 Loans are approved by the Housing and Redevelopo�ent Authority d the Department of Housing and Urban Development. In some cases, the 1 an or grant is to be made to the property owner who must make emergenc repairs. However, he me�y not begin work until his application for f e ia approved. In some instances, the 30 - 90 day waiting period r quired for loan and grant processing is a great inconvenience to the roperty owner (i.e. , the grant is to be made to a person whose furna e has gone out and it is January.) Our proposal is ta set aside a s pplemental fund to be utilized at no interest charge for emergenc work. These funde would be available to the property owner until th loan or grant is approved. • Supplemental funds will also be utilized to assist in rehabilitation ' funding in cases r+here low-incom�e or �elderl property o�+rners find that the section 115 rehabilitation grant is not sufficient to complete the work properly. At the present, if the wor to be done costs more than the grant, and the receipient of the grant does not have personal funds available to make up the difference, it is impossible for him to obtain a grant. CONTENT AND OPERATION: Supplemental funds will be ueed to provide monies to residents who have applied for Section 115 Rehabilitation Gr ts, and Section 312 Rehsbilitation ' Loans but because of delays have not rece' ed the loan or grant. When the loan or grant is approved the supplementa fund will be reimbursed. In the possibility that the loan is not approved the administering agency would locate a local lending institute to purch se the note. The difference be- tween the open market interest rate and t t of the 312 Loan would be payed for from the revo�.ving account. The maxi wn amount of a loan wauld be �5,�• In some situations the 115 grants do not over all of the work that ie required to be done to receive the work. These low-income people cannot afford to obtain loans and therefore add' ional funds Kould tae used as grants to those people to complete the t tal rehabilitation. The sugpla- mental grants will be limited to a maxim of �1,000. � _. Rehabilitation Loans and Grants 65 TIMETA$LEt • The mecha�.nisms can be set up for implement'ng this progrem during the review period. The program will be put in o effect as soon as supple- mental funds become available. The progr will run for the remainder of the First Action Year, FiJNDING: An account of x50,0U0 will be provided far both the emergency loans and grants. The loans wi11 be payed back to t e fund as they ere approved and ,granted by the Department of Housing d Urban Developfnent. The ad- ministrative co�t Kill be borne by HRA as his ie part of the Neighbor- hood Development Program. PROJF�CT AI�MINI.STRATIOH: The St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Aut ority will carry out the ad- ministration of the pro�ame Tlney now iss e the 115 grants and 312 loane in the area. COORDINATIOAi: All commtinity agencies r�il1 be infornied o thie project�8 provision and methods of applying far fuinde. MONITORING AND EVAI.IdATIOAI: • The St. Paul l�odel Cita.ea F'rogra� will mo itor each �upplementally funded pro�ect throughout the �ir+�t action year. The pro�ect� will be monitored on the basis of planned vers�us actua]. ach evement in terme of ob�ectives, content anci budgete An information syste will be designed and implemented and will act aB the mechanism for the awn toring process. Three to five projects which relate to problem areas of high concern to St. Paul will be selected for in-depth evaluation. CITIZEIV PABTICIPATION: A Board wi11 be appointed by the MNPC to ork with the St. Pau� HRA to review applicants for the interim loans o grants. This Board will be made up of residents who sft on no other arde of local organizations. When a need for additional grant money is d�termined the applicatian will be brc�ught to the Citizen's Board for rev'ew and recommendatioa. ItESIDII�iT Et4�L0'YMENT: No new emplo�ment opportuaities will be eated by thie pro,�ect. MAINT'ENANCE OF �F'FORT: Supplementary monies used i.n this projea are for additional services not able to be provided for by using local f ds. • Rehabi�.itation Loane and Grants a e 2 of 2 66 • NAME OF PROJECT: Model Neighborhood E ployment Center ADMINISTERING AGENCY: Minnesota Depar ment of Manpower Services SUBCONTRACTING AGIIVCTES: Mir�nesota In ependent School District #b25, Ramsey County Citizens Committee for E onomic Opportunity, and the St. Paul Urban League PURPOSE AND BENEFICIARIES: Residents of the Model Neighborhood of St, Paul are on the nverage undereducated, underemployed, and unsk lled. As compared to the aver- age St. Paul resident, almost three t mes as many Model Neighborhood students leave high school before grad ation. The average resident is over 1}� years behind the general popul tion in educational attainment, his reading level is inadequate, he is employed in half as many pro- fessional or managerial occupations, d 409� find themselves in the ranks of the unskilled. The Model Nei hborhood unemployment rate habit- ua11y runs more than twice as hi�h as hat for St. Paul. The family in- come varies between $2,000 and $3,000 ower and almost one-fourth of �11 households rely upon some form of wel re assistance. • The purpose of the Model Neighborhood mployment Center is, by attacking its causes and treating its results, o al.leviate unemp2oyment and under- employment in the Model Neighborhood f St. Paul. CONTENT AND OPERATIQN: The work program is, with modificatio , patterned after the Human Re- sources Employability Development Mod 1. Using six (6) employability development teams composed of one (1) employment counselor, one (1) Manpower Specialist (eorabination empl yer relations specialist and job developer), and two (2) coaches (indi enous outreach-follow-up work�ra) coupled with extensive staff and clie t training possibilities, the center provides a vehicle for: 1. Providing to area residents central comprehensive souxce of counseling and �ob placem nt. 2. Providing basic education, w rk orientation, professional and vocational training whic meets the needs of area residents. a. Basic Education l. Remedial and develop ental reading 2. Written and or�l co unicatians skills 3. Remedial and vccatio al oriented mathematics 4. Consumer education Model Nei hborhood Em 10 ment Center 1 of �' • 6,1 • 5. GED preparation (High Sch ol Equivalency Certificate) 6. Pre-vocational instructio b. Work orientation 1. Interviewin� 2. Securing and advancing i employment 3. Business English, conduc and dress c. Professional and vocational raining 1. New careers 2. MDTA 3. Job Corps 4. NYC 5. College and vocational s holarship (from Higher Ed- ucation Resources Assis ce Program) 6. Other training as neede 3. Intensive efforts toward breaki g down unrealistic hirin� re- quirements, whether caused by m sinformation, racism, c�r other prejudice. 4. Coordinating and altering exist ng efforts designed to e].imi- nate unemployment and underempl yment. (MDTA, NYC, Job Carph, NAB, AIC, I.EAP, etc. ) 5. Seeking programs which are not ow available in St. Paul (New Careers). 6. Specialized efforts at placing minority individuals in apprenticeship jobs. • TIMErABLE: During the first two (2) months after f nding is awarded. supervisory staff, two employability development te s, and the basic educatian unit will be hired. A building will be scquired. During the eight (8) months ta follow, the other four ( ) teams will be nssembled and trained. It is anticipated that the c ter will be in full operatic�n ten (10) �nonths after funding is award d. The program is planned to continue throughout and beyond the lif of the Madel Cities Project. F[JPiDING: Where monies and c>taffing are not avai able from the Minnesota Depart- tnent of Manpower Services, Ramsey Coun y Committee for Equal Opportunity, or other existing agencies, supplemen 1 funds will be used. The Minne- sota Department of Manpower Services as tentatively committed itself toward supplying some stafF and equip ent. The Ramsey County Ci.tizens Committee for Economic Opportunity Ex cutive Committee has made a simi- lar pledge. Ma�or cost items are hiring and train ng the six (6) teams; the basir, education component; and, where exist ng programs can not help, client training (see attached budget surnmary . In subsequent years, funds, Model Neighborhood Employment Center 2 of • ! 6$ especially from the Department of Labo , will be sought to re�lace • Model Cities supplemental funds. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION: The primary contract for project admi istration will be with the Minne- sota Department of Manpower Services State Employment Service). The personnel slots from its �xisting sma 1 satellite area office will bc� merged into the teams at the new cent r. Three sub-contracts will be awarded. One will go to the St. Paul School District �625 for expansion of its MDTA financed (3uidance and Occupational Center. The expanded ba ic education unit will be located in or close to the Model Neighborhood Employment Center. The teams will continue to work with each clien as they progress through training. The second sub-con�ract will go to th Ramsey County Citizens Committee for Economic Opportunity. Transferrin its existing small area office into the employment center, its major responsibility wi11 be to coordi- nate supportive services and make th readily available for u�e by the center's cl�ents. It will also be r sponsible for providing the �ix (6) manpower specialists which are a integral part of the team conc�pt. A tliixd sub-contract will be with the St. Paul Urban League for expnn- sion of its Labor Education Advancem nt Program (LEAP). Deaigned to • recruit, prepare, place, and follow- hrough with clients who would not otherwise have had the opportunity t enter apprenticeship in the building industry� t,�te LEAP staff w 11 be increased to include two indigenous recruiters specialized in recruiting for the construction trades. A fourth possible sub-contract may b with the Ramsey County Welfare Department for administering a New C reer�s pro�ect. Negotiations for that service will be the responsibil'ty of the prime sponsor. ESccluding the basic education unit d LEAP, staffing is expected to include four (4) counselors, two (2) counseling superviaors, twelve (12) indigenous coaches, four (4) c erk-stemographers, three (3) c].erk typists, two (2) follow-up aides, o e (1) clerk, one (1) bookkeeper, one (1) test technician, six (6) m power specialists, one (1) deput,y director of operations (also team t aining specialist), one (1) deputy director of administration, one (1) Apprenticeship Inform�tion Center specialist, Job Corp representation and one (1) director. The basic education unit aill inc].0 e twa (2) clerk-f�tenographers, one (1) remedial reading specialist, on (1) pre-vocational specialist, and one (1) mathematics specialist. (�f the 53 total employees, 20 will. be Model Nei hborhood Em lo ent Cente �a of • �9 I I � • furnished by existing agencies while � will be funded by Mode.l Cities. LEAP staff, probably housed at the ne �rby Urban League Office, wi11 in- clude a secretary, two (2) co-directo �s, and two (2) recruiters. Only the recruiters will be financed by th St. Paul Model Cities Program. COORDINATION: ; � Project Coordination will be the res �nsibility of the R��msey County Citizens Committee for Equal Opportu �.ty contract. It will include coordination with other Model Cities �rojects such as the Community Health Program, Aid for Retaxded Cit �ens, Operation Careers, Experi- mental Counseling Pro�ram, Labor Edu �tion Advancement Progrz�m (Urban League), the Retreat, Police-Communi �y Relations Pro�ect, Oxford- Selby Recreation Training Program, D �y Care Pro�rams, and the Higher Education Resource Center and Assist ce F�nd. Cooperation with arPa agencies such as the Opportunities I �dustrialization Center, the Inner- City Youth League, the Loft Teen Cen er, Capitol Community SPrvice Center, Hallie Q. Brown Center, the rban League, Summit/University Federation, Ramsey County W�lfare D artment, Work Incentive Program, Minneapolis Concentrated Employment �rogram, the Minneapoli� and St. Paul Skill Centers, National Allian of $usinessmen. Jewish Vor,a- tional Service, Minnesota Division � Vocational Rehabilitation, and Family Services of St. PAUl will be �ought. The services of the Minne- sota Department of Manpower Service � Job Bank System will be provided to the center. • MONITORING AND EVALUATION: The St. Paul Model Cities Program '11 monitor each supplementally funded pro�ect throu�hout the first action year. The projects will be monitored on the basis of plann versus actual achievement in terms of ob�ectives, content and b get. An information system will be designed and implemex�ted and wi �. act as the mechanism for the monitoring process. Three to five �ro3ects which relate to problem areas of high concern to St. Paul $.11 be selected for in-depth evalua- tion. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: i The administering agency will be r �sponsible to a policy making board composed of one (1) representative ;from each participatin�; agency, plus an equal number plus one (1) 'f Model Neighborhood Planning Council. (MNPC) appointed representatives ( tn �;erve one (1) year, �/z to serve two (2) years). The policy makin �board, in order to further coordinate its activities with the greater c npmunity� will have at its disposal an advisory committee composed of un'�n, business, educntion, anci govern- ment organizations which could ai �the Board in making policy and op- erations decisions. Model Nei hborhood Ear lo ment Cen r o�' � � • I �a RESIDENT EMPIAYMENT: • Residents will be employed at all levels of the organizati.on. It i� expected that from 20 to 30 residents wil be employed in the center by the end of year one. The following clause will be placed in th contract with each �ubcon- tracting agency: "All non-professional employses wil be Model Neighborhood residents. Professional qualificat'4ns wi11 be re-examined with the goal of hiring the maximun feasible number of Model Neighborhood citizens. Where minor ty professional employees are not now available, the gosl wil : be to, within one (1) year completely integrate the profe sional staff. Formal recruiting will be conducted whene er neeess�ry to achieve this goal. Year Two Funding will e dependent upon achieve- ment of this goal." MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT: Supplementary monies used in this proj ¢t are for additianal service� not able to be provided for by using 1 �al funds. • Model Nei hborhood Em lo ent Cen er � of �; • � 71 • T��tiJ°it� U�' PHC�JI�.C`1': Oxford-Selby Recreution Tr• �nin�; Yro�;ram tiUt�iINI�`L'�:1tINC; tiGLPJCY: City of at. Yaul, llep . of Y�irkU and ilec,r.eat�.on �nd Public Buildin�;s :�UF3-CUNTIl!'�ClI1JG AG1�PdCY: None PU1�rU:�� ttND BErd�.I�'ICIr;1�I1::�: While offering expanded recreational opport �ities to P�lodel Nei��hborhood residents, tl�iis project is designed to esta �ish a trr�ininp; pro�r,r�im for recreational leadership and provide additio al employment opport�xnities for N�odel Nei�rhborhood residenY.s. COTJT�:NT AfJD UP:i.Ht1Ti:UPJ: Tkie intent of this program is to provide, 'tiiin the t�iodel Neif*hborhood, a vehicle for trainin�; residents in recreat'wnal leadersY,ip nnd f'crr emC;].o,y- ment within the St. Yaul llepartment of Par and ltecre�tion, anci i�ublic Buildin�;s. The Uxfor.d Nlay�round ltecreation � Center wi11 be the foct�l point for this trainin�. The project will a. 1'rovide an opportunity for residen employment in city civil ;ervice positions. • b. Yrovide on-the-job recreation�l tr ining. c. Provide institutional recreational tr.ainir��r. d. �'rovide part-time ernployment to s dents :�nd �ult� durin�; school months. Durin�; the summer provid 'full-time ernployrnent. e. Frovide continuing employment opp �tunities tiirou�;h promotion and% or transfer of neighborhooci resid �ts. f. Open recreational f�cilities whic would nat otherwise be availrxble to Niodel NeiFThbortiood residents, `i'Ii�iETaI3LE,: The mechani.sms will be set up during the eview �eriod for implementing this pro�;ram. Tt will be put into effec as soon a5 supplement��l funds become avail��ble. The project will be f nded on a one yer,r�±monstr<�ti.on basis. Year two fundin�, if granted, ma include �4n even f�reater emphasis upon institutional tra�.ning grA ts and setic�l��rstiipe, c�c3mi.nicterc�ci on a work/study basis. �'l1NllI1•JG: First year fundin� will be entirely out f Niodel City funds. Flajor cost items are for staff and staff training. It is expected tk�at the i)ep<srtm�;>nt of Y�rks and ltecreation, nnd l'uUlic Bui ings will be able to st�ou�,�ex• • r�or•e resaonsibility for funding during ear number two and thereafter. t�iodel Cities Pro��ram - Uxford-Selb,y Hecr��tion 7.'rairiir�l; Yrof;r�.�rn 1 of :' 72 BROJECT ADMINISTRATION: • The project administrator, the City of St. ��au1, Uep�rtment of' �'arks rand kecreation and 1'ublic tiuildinE;s, is presently resE�onsible for operr.�tion of St. Yaul's recreation program. They have aome experienr,e in tr�iniri�{ Fieople in the areas of employment funded by this project. Stz�ffin�r, will include one project director, one recreation ].eader III (t�ss't. llir�ctr�r•i , seven recreation leader I, two recreation aid��, and two custcxlit:�r,s. CUOxDINATTON: Coordination will be affected with other area educati.onf�l and recreritionfal facilities in the city and in the riodel Neig}iborhood. They include the are�.� }:�iblic and private schools, the Loft 'reen Center, Hallie 4Z. Brown Hotzse, C�pitol Community L`enter, Opportunities Inciu:�trializ�tiori Center� St. i=au1 Urb�n Ler��;ue, area churches, and the Inner City Youth League. Close coordination will he achieved with the i�iodel Pdeia;hborhood �nt��lo,yr.�r.�nt Center and the Higher �:ducation Resource (:enter �nd �+ssi:;tance fi�nd f�s well as with other h�odel City projects. I�,GNI'i'OkING i.T�U LVi�:LUt+`rIUN: The at. �'aul r�iodel Cities �'ro�ram will monitor each supplementally funded project throughout the first �tion year. The project� will be monitorecl on the basis of planned versus actual achievement in termF� of objectives, content and bud�;et. An inform�ation system will be aebifrned �.ind imJ,l�smE�ntE:d • and will act as the mechanism for the monitorin�; i�rocess. '1'hree to f'-ivc pz•ojects which relate to problem areas of hi;�h concern to St. 1'e�ul wi].1 be selected for in-depth evaluation. CI'l�It:i:T1 'r'��I:`i'TCIYr:'PION: A twelve person Model Nei�;hborhood citi2en advi+�ory group will be appointe�i jointly by the Oxfor•d Booster Club, the Department of I'�irks �nd i�eci•e��tian, and the N;odel Nei�;hborhood Plarining Council. It will .�erve at the E�le<xc;�a:�e of the project director. �;i�:;IDi��lrl' �',� LUYA1'r�i'r: In-so-far as is 7�os�ible all 13 �ositions created by thi.� F>r.oject will t�e f'illed by h�odel Nei�;hborhood residents. r�E�INT�IVi;NCE OF �'�'OkT: Supplement�lry monies used in this project are for additi��nal services not able to be provided for by usinp� locnl funds. • t�odel Cities Pro�ram - Oxford-SeZby itecre�+tion `i'raininf*, !'roFpr.�m r c�f' ? 73 NAI�i�; UF' PHOJ�CT: Local Development Corpor�ation • r;lir;IPy�I:;T:�tING NUr:NCY: A citizen formed corporate bod3� SUB-CUNT�CTING �G�TlCIF.S: None have presently been identified PU��O�� kND B�1EE'ICIAFtI'ryS: By making available economic resources which will increase the number and quality of Model Neighborhood Business Services, this project wi11 up-grade the business climate of the Model Neighborhood. Wtlile stimulating biasineas opportunities for Model Nei,ghborhood residents and creating relev�int and me�n- ingful jobs, the corporation will seek to reverse the tide of <�conomic erosion in the Model Neighborhood. It will provide needed technic�zl ��nd economic resources to expand and improve the capabilities of are� residents to c3evelop their own businesses. CUN`I'�:tdT AP�D Ut'�tNTIUN: Major activities of the Local Development Corporation will include: l. �;mployment of fulltime sta8f to assist in the development and coordination of existin� and new businesses in the fdodel Nei�hbor- hood community. 2, Identification of those financial resources, w}iich are obtain.�ble for �onomic development projects from federal, state, and x�riv�te • sources. 3• Establishment of a consortium of minority can�ractors with which to develop and improve their managerial and 1�►bar skills and to make it possible for them to compete for anticip�ted N;odel Neighborhood Construction Projects. 4. Desegregation of present business ownership and mana�;ement by providing training to potential minority entreprenue:s and mana�err�. TII�ttETABi,E: The Loca1 Development Corporation wi11 begin operations r,s soon as aup��le- mental funds t�re available. It will continue throu�h and beyond the exi�tance of the Nlodel Cities F'rogram. The project will operate in various pht�ses; 1. Under the guidr�nce of the Small Business Adrninistration �%��3A), incorporation of a twenty-five member governing body com��osed of Model Nei�hborhood residents, some of who►n have business skill� and knowled�e. An ad visory group of other St. Puul residents such as bank officials, company president�, etc. , will serve at the pleasure of the board of directors. It will be structurea a� a non-profit organization w}iich meets the requirements of aection 502 of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958. Model Cities Pro�ram - Local Development Corporation l of .� • �� 2. Election of a five to seven member board of directors. • 3• xecruitment of Staff and� identification of funds which can be used for �onomic development ventures. 4. Initiation of a school of small �usiness manr��;ernent and development of the consortium of minority contractors. FUNllING: The corQoration will be financed $rom supplemental funds.. i�lajor costs will be expended for �taff, plans and studies, nnd "seed" money to secure loans fr�om the Small Busine�s Administration and other aources. PH(hJ FCT ALMINISTRE�TION: This project, which will enable paraprofessionals from the Model Comrnunity to work in tandem with professionals to develop those skills th�t are needed to operate ttie pro�ram, will represent a ncw creative venture foi• the city of St. I'aul. As such, there is no known existin�r orgariization that h.as the capabilities or the will to carry out a conrdit►r�ted bi��ine�s develapment venture. The corporation will be controlled by a bo�z�d of directors wt:ich will direct a �aff consistin�; of one �1) director, two (2) proe;ram coordinators, two (2) assistant pro�*ram coordinntors, one (1) market research analyst, two (2) secretaries, and one (1) bookkeeper. COORDINAT:UN: • The Local Development Corporation will relate to all business development� consumer education, and other related projects in the Model Nei�;hborhood and will serve as a coordinating mecYianism for existin� agencies such as the Small Business League and others which seek to stimulate business develop- ment within the Model Nei�hborhood Community. N10NI`l'OItI�tiG ANll E1/ALUATIUN: The St. Paul Model Cities Program will monitor each supplementr�lly funded project throu�hout the first �tion year. The projects will be monitared on basis of planned versus actual achievement in terms of objective:�, content and budget. An information system will be desi�*ned und implementPd and will act as the mechanism for the monitoring process. Three to five pro- jects which relr�te to problem areas of hi�;h concern to .�t. F'uu1 will be seleci:- ed for in-depth evaluation. Ci'1'IGEId ��HTICIt'/��ICiPd: Model Nei�hborhood residents will �e able to Participate as incor�orator� of the Local Development Corporation and as members of the Aoard of Uir- ectors. fis members of the Board, they will have ev��ry opportunity to influence the project's pl.anning, •v�luation and administration. riodel Cities Program - Local Developr��ent Corporation � of 3 • ?5 x�;szr��v�r �Pi.o�ErrT: • Every effort will be made to employ Model Nei�hborhood residents F�t <All levels of the Loc�l Development Corporation. For the residents, the project will provide� throu�;h its business development potentials� numerou:� other employraent and ownership opportunities. N;i.IN'i�IVATJLE OF F,F'F01�`i': 5upplementary monies used in this project are for additional services not able to be provided for by using loc�l funds. • Model Cities Pro�ram - Locnl Development Corporation 3 of 3_ • 76 • NA1� OF PROJri,CT: St. Paul Police-Community Relations Pro3ect ADHINISTERING A�ENCY: City of St. Paul, Dept. of Public Safety SUBCONTRACT?NG AGT�NCY: None PURPOSE AND B�NEFICIARI�.S: This pro�ect is intended to do the following: a' establish an expanded effective police-commuaity relations office in the Model ATeighborhood. b. reduce the ho8tilities, antagoaism, and polarization which have developed betwe�n the community and the police by reducing misunderBtandings between the Police Deot. and the Model Neigh- borhoad community. c. recruit Model Neighborhood residents to become policemen. d. develop mutual reepect for 3ustice and sensible law enforcement. CONTF�IT AND OPERATION: The pro3ect rill ittvolve th� followimg activities: a. recruitment of sixteen t4odel Neighborhood residents to begin an intensive training program which will qualify them as apecial • security police. b. development of an intensive trainittg program designed to enable residents to pass the police civil service entrance examiaatioa. c. extablishment of cooperation between the civil service board and the proJect, which, as a part of their cadet training, will enable trainees to be teeted for exposure not grades. d. assignment of Mode1 Neighborhood police candidatee to speaking engagements, social detail� (dattc�ec, games, etc.)� traffic de- tails, and athletic functicns. TII�TABLE: �� The mechanism will be eet up durfng the HUD review period for implement- ing this pro3ect. The project will be put into effect as soon as �upple- a►ental funds are available. If successful action will be taken to extend the pro�ect beyond the first year action program. F[1NDIN(�: ...__.....� The Police-Com�unity Relations project will be financed primerily with Model City supplemental funde. These funds rrill be used for ealariea and administrative costs. Money for training and equiga�ent will be ob- tained through the St. Paul Police Dept. Law B'nforcement Aid Unit funde. The pro3ect wi11 be oa a one year demonstration basi8. Additioual. fuadfng • St._ Paul Police-Communitv Belations 1 oi 2 -- �_... ....._._.. 77 wi11 depend upon ita success. Funds beyond this period will be sought on • a matching baeie from state Law Enforcemettt A�sistance Administration block grants. Following exhaustion of Hodel City funds the pro�e�t is expected to be totally funded by the St. Paul Police Dept. PROJF�CT ADMINISTRATION: The St. Paul Dept. of Public Safety, which has the responaibility for admin- istering the Bureau of Police, will be the administering agency for thi� pro3ect. The Dept. hag agreed to submit their actions to an area advisory committee and will adhere ta its recommendations for the development of thiB pro�ect. Staff will include eixteen police trainees, one profeseional police consultant, and oae full-time bookkeeper. COORDINATION: Working closely within the police department� the Police-Community 8elations Unit will make its program known to all area residents and agenciee. Definite relationships will also be set up vrith the St. Paul Urban Coalition, the Metropolitan Council and the Minnesota State Planning Agency who have been i.nvolved both in planning and coordination of Law and Juatice programs under the "Block Graat" Syst�m of the Oranibus Crime Contral and Safe Streets Act of 1968. MONITORINC� AAID I�1/ALUATION: � The St. Paul Model Cities Program will monitor each +supplemental.ly funded project throughout the first action year. The proJects vrill be monitored on the basis of planned versus actual achievement in terms of ob�ectives. content and budget. An information system will be designed and ioaplemented and will act as the mechaai+em for the monitoring process. Three to five pro�ects which relate to problem areas of high concern to St. Paul wi11 be selected for in-depth eveluation. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: A citizens advisory boax�d will be developed to aseist in the identification of problems, recommend solutione, and otherwiae serve in an advisory capa- city to the pro�ect. RESIDENT E�IPIAYI�NT: Residents of the Model Neighborhood will be hired to fill the sixteen police trainee positions created by thie pro�ect. MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT: Supplementary manies used in this pro�ect are for additional servicea not able to be provided for by using local f�nds. � Sto Paul Police-Community Relatioas 2 of 2 78 • i�1At1�: C)1' F'1tUJ;:CT: 'Ttie Ketre�t � Alli�1:iNIS"1'1SIZIPZG ACENCY: Minn�:sota 5tate llepartme�iit r�f C;orr�+c.t:i��ns �iJI3C:ONT[t�1CT]:NG AGi;CvCIES: Not Applicable YURPUS� AND IiiiNEF'ICIARIES: Crirnin.�l habituation is a disease and as suct� should receive� the same basic kind of treatment as one would �ive a medicr�l Fl1LCI1(`f7I.. t)ur society has l�een very la�;g��r.d in comin� ta the re:<ilizntiun that, criminal activity (law brenking) is somethin�; cl�,suly ali�ne.d �.�.it.h other forrns uf socially induced sicicnesses. It iti iinl ike ly th�it ,:i man deliberately starts out to tc�llow a caireer o1 criaic. F��r.ces �v��c whi.c}i the individual has little or no control tarcc hi.r.� i'r<��u :�ne� arxti.- social act to anot}ier until 1je is so cor.�pletely �rimeshecl i.n :� we�t� �,t criminal circu�nstances that he is ui�able tc� I"ree himsnlf. t;�.�ctx tr.c��t- n��nt as Chis can be nothing less [han productiue in the cae� oE tlic� ex-convict who is usually thrust ri�ht b��ck 111LU the s��me climatc� whicti precipitated liis initial law breaking. An effective way to prevent an ex-convict fr��m gravitaling back intu • liis previous l.aw breaking activities is to provide hin wi.Ch an al�er- native. The ex-convicts who have been involved in planiiin�; thia pro�ram contend that the primary reason for the higli level c�f. rec idi vtr�m is t1►at the parolee has na pl�ce to �o oth�r ttiari b<�cic tc, th� 4nvirur�- ment tltat contributed to his Iawlessness. ; � To quotc� the revised Mid-Plannin�; Statemet�t, "Those wlic� return t� l.hc� community from correctional institutions f�inci it diflic�ilt, f+omc�tiine�e; iu�possible, to Uecome productive members c�f socie.ty. L'uiplvyrnc_��it l�ru- blems and ottier fc�rms of rejection often �re�:te rc:tactiu�►s �_�hicti i:orcc: ttiem to r�::turn to the accep��nce ol old f.j�ier►ds ac�cl crin�c." Consequently, the creation of a new envir�nmental. sitia�tion will e�Ctord the ex-convict the opportunity to makc a jsmo<>th transitior► tro;n ��ric;c�n to the cocrununity. This project is an explez�irnent in gr{�up li.vici,; fc,r thr ex-convict just released from prison or �y�sigi�ec! to �1►e work relcrise pro�;rarn. I I CONTLN"I' A1VD OYLRATiON: ' 'I'he K�Lreat will serve as a place wtyerei� ttle aiar� wt7c> has „+.�cn sepac��cii] trorn 5t)C1E.Ly can gr�dually aclju�t to his� tiewly �;ained lr�eci�m. 5inci� ,a The Retreat '± Pa>e 1 ��f' 3 • ._. ;. � _.___ I j 79 I li II • � !I rnan s criminal tendeticies ce�n be clirectly �ttributec� lo hi�� envirun- mental �ituation� it is intended tc> locate t}ie ]trtr��it c�uLsi_dc ��f t.lic 5timmit-University area. Scrvices to l�e providc�i arc} <�:� fc�ll�w;:: 1. Yersanal Counseling-performed Ly prc>Cessi.on,�l <<ncl �>;,ra- professional (rekiabilitated convicts) co�lns�l<�r�s. 2. Family Counseling-performecl by px�ofes:�ic�nal�� nd ��r.�- proFessioaal counselors. 3. Vocational Counseling-a manpower liaison m�n will l�� inair�- tained as a permanent rnc:Ril��;r of the staft ,�ncl primririly responsible for Linding jobs for the ReCre�t' s rE�sider�t,. � 4. Ysychological Counseli.ng-a psycholc��ist �vi;�ll l�e ra�t.F�inc•d f.or the especially difticult and inbrainec�' psycholoF;ica1. problems. II Since the causes o£ crime are subtle and ciifficulY: t.o p.tnpc�int i.n ciu academic serise, the iletreat will be staffed t�y rel�al>ilit:3tec:i ex-cunvict.; who kiiow and understaitd the problem. �epresentuth.vcs ot t.tic� c<�rrcct.ic�n<�l a„encies will ;>erve on the: advisory board c>f. t}�r ��Zetrcat. tr� c>rc#��r t�� start affecting a parolee's adji.istmerits pr.ior to ;ttis rel.ear;r., st,faf C members of the Retreat� workin�; wi.th probation ��r�<i p�rolc, ui�f icer:i wi.l.1 • have access to the inatitutions. ! TIhiETABLL: Upon receipt of supplemental fuzids, the pra ject �ail l 1>eg:in. T'ti� ��7c�j��r �>roject activities are scheduled as follows: I lst rlonth a) itire c�ordinatc,r �i b) Secure space � c) t{ire �;uPportin�; g�c�tf 2nd rlonth a) Dev�lop work pro�3�,irn b) Be�iri str�ff trainiin�; 3rd t�lonth ?: After a) Corititiue traini��'I pro�;r.��n b) Keceive r��leasce� FUNilTVG: � In addit.ion to supplemental monies, funds will�� be rec�uestc�d it�oui thc Govenor's Corrunission on Crimc: Preventior� an1�i Contr<�1. ii�.i�,��l��i;�t��L�zl funds will serve as the local Fl�are ree}uired w'nder ttils �>arGic:�l..,r !e,�+clf,�;�, pr��;rarn. i-lajor cost iterns are statf and sp�cc�. S<�urce, r,f �:�->r�i,r,� -,r'�cr ti�an supplernental f+.�nds will be sou�;ht far. tll� �roject':-� cc,r:t,ir:�.-�c:c:c: durin� �ucceedin� years. � w _. Thc i�etreat Ya le 2 of 3 , i 80 I i - I � i �<.� PROJLCT AllMINl,.TktATIUPd. . The SLate Uepartme:nt of Correcti.ons will act �s the administcri►i�; � ar;ency. This adency has repcatedly denionstra�ect it�1 ci�� i.r�: tv pur:;uc evcry avemie of criminal r��habili.tation �ossil�le in crrdc�t tc, ;��hi��vc � i>ro"ress in alterin�; the pr.evailir►� r<ite o[ ri�ci.divism. 'Phe �idc�i.ni.r,tcrinE-; a�;eticy i�as indicated its willinbitess to re-;tvaluatc c�xi st. i�k; ��c>1;� ;:,;�i�a in order to free sc.aff needed for tliis Proje�ct. 1'hc• ;aF;��»�y will rc.r;p„�,�1 to an advisory board composed of Model N�.:ik;ht�url�ood re�si.cicrit<�. C00[2lliI�iAT10N: I 'This project will be coordinated with �11 ot'I tt►c peiial �ind w�,xlcli�_�u.:�� icistitutions in the ar.ea; develc�pin�; a worka�>l,e� :�tructurc:� wil.h tli�� probation officers in referring rel�asecs tc�j Lhe pro£;rc�m. '1't�e �u.,�i�x,wr�r liaison a�;ent will relate directly ta t}ie �ludel iV��ighborlic��ci i.inpl��y��ic �� Center. Otlier coordination will include Cor��nuttiity HE>altl� i'rut;ra�n, ili�,l�e:r 1•:ducaLi.on Resourcc� Cent�r. arid Assistace Func�, ai�d ottu�r coinmuui ty ;.incl c i i.y ��rojccts. ; riONL'TOit�ING At�D LVALUATION: � i The St. Paul Madel Cities Pro�r�zm wi.11 rnoni�.or eactl 5up��lc:iue:n�all.y f:ti��<ic��l project throughout the first action year. '�'}le: projc,ct.ti will be� aiuiiitur-c��1 ort the l�asis of. planiied versus actual actitelveo�eni. i�i Cc>riris c�f' �,I� ��cLive�,�, conte��t and bucl�;et. An inforrnation systern �iL? i�ce dcsi`;ned a�icl i.�npt.A;��,�nt.t��i and will act as the rnectianism for the monitjox�in� pr<�cess. '1'hr.ec� t.0 f ivt.� • projecLs which relate to problem areas of lji�;}i c�ncern tc� St. Paul wi 1.1 b<• selected for in-depth evaluation. ; CITIZEN PARTICIPATtUN: I `I.'he adrninistrating agcr�cy will respond t� }a citizcn advi:;ory �rcup c.c��p�:>�;��cl oC Nl�>ciel NeighborhoocJ resiclents. ; � it�?SIUEI9T LNlYI.OYMf�NT: � '�Jhen filling posi.tions created by tt►is prc��rarn� t�vczr.y eftox•t v�ili t>�� macle to hire t4odel Nea.ghborhoad re�sidents1 r�1.F3INTi:NANCE OF IaF1�ORT: � ' Supplementary m�nies used in this projectlgre for n�iditional. �ervicc� nut. able to Le pr�vided for by using local fu�nds. II i � The Aetreat � � ;� N�>c 3� of 3 • r r� I 81 I � I i . NAME OF PROJECT: Cultural Enr ,• ichment for the Model Nei�k�borhood ADMINISTERING AGENCY: Hallie Q. Brown Co�arunity Center; SUBCONTRACTING A��lICY: None . PURPOSE AND BENRFICIAR • I IES. I This pro�ect is iatended to create a comprehensive cul ural program for the Model Neighborhood by drawing upon all of ite dive se resources of minorities, age groups, and nationalities as raw mater al. The existing culturally related groups and orga.nizations are willin to make their facilities and staff available for programs in the "i er city" which the residents feel relevant to create a varied program con entrating on art, music, and drama. ; CONTENT AND OPERATION: Th ' ii e fuuction of the prograte e �taff will be to coatact� all groups now in the Model Neighborhood involved in culturel endeavors � d groups in the larger community that are iavolved in the arts. les of these groups would be the St. Paul Arts and Sciences Center, the U�{iversity of 1linns- sota and Nacalester College. The first year will be devoted to drawing • these resources together to create a comprehen�ive cul�tural program. The programs and classe� will be ofYered at a varietylof locations to involve all the people of the Model Neighborhood. ItiiB thought that after a period of two (2) years a central locatioa wi l bo availat►le to operate all programs. At that time these diverse gro ps will come to- geth�r to learn and work together on similar pro3ects�. TIM�TABLE: i �.� I The pro�ect will start i�ediately after aupplemental'� funds are avail- able and will continu� through the remainder of the I�'irst Action Year to draw all oi the resources together to create a co rehensive cultural program. The staff will build upon the services tha�are available and fashion an enlarged program for the Second Action Ye�r to operate at a cantral location. ; FU_ ND��N(3: Supplemeatal funding will be used to supply a coord'latin staff for the 6 program with a total cost of l�23,300. Additional fu�hds will be made Cultural Eariahment for the Model Nei hborhood �I 1 of � • �I 82 � I� �I � �I �'I • available for a limited amount of consumabl�e aupplies� travel and publi- city totaling $6,000. Space for program8 i the Model Neighborhood wi11 be obtained as in-ki�d contribution. Offic� space for the staff will be provided by the sponsoring agency. The secc�nd year funding will be supplied by Model Cities snpplementary fund�with the remaining matching funds to be obtained by other private source . After the ?lodel Cities Program no longer has supplemental funds, pr�ivate monies will totally finance the program. �i PROJ�CT ADMINISTRATION: �'� �i The coordinating staff r►ill be placed in the �dministration structure of Hallie Q. Brown Community Center. The Center�lis a United �nd Agency that has served the Model Neighborhood for ma��}y years and wi11 move to the new l�artin Luther King mu].ti-purpose cent�r in 19?1 after completion of construction. The coordinating staff will ��onsist of one program coordinator, one coordinator trainee and a par'�-time secretary� and will change its priorities to reach out to all port�ons of the Model Neighbor- hood to enhance the cultural heritage of each �;roup. COORDINATION: The basic idea behind the program is to coordin�te all cultural programs and resources of the Minneapolis-St. Paul �letro�olitan area to develop a coAprehensive cultural program for the Model Nei�ghborhood. Therefore, it • vill iaclude coordination vith such groups as tt�e Minneapolis Art Tneti- tute, Walker Art Center, The St. Paul IIrban Coal�ition, the St. Paul Arts attd Sciences Center, the University of Minnesota� St. Catherine's College and other private and publ_c groups. Cooperatio with tbe Model Nei�h- borhood area agencies such as the Inner-City You h League, the Loft, the Urban League, and the St. Pau1 Opportunities Ind strialization Center will also be sought. �I EYALUATION AND MONITORING: �''� The St. Paul Model Cities Prograar will monitor eaqh supplementally �'unded project throughout the first action year. The pro�ecta will be monitared on the basis of planaed versus actual achievement n terms of ob3ectivee, content and budget. An �.nformation system will be�'�,des3gned amd implemented and will act as the mechanism for the monitoring p�ocess. Three to five pro�ecta which relate to problem areas of high conc#ern to St. Paul will be selected for in-depth evaluatfon. I CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: '�� To make sure that the cul.tural program does reflect ��,the ideas of the com- munity, an advisory board will be set up to select al staff and to direct C ultural Enrichment for the Model Nei borhood 2 af _ — .+ � • I �3 � . the program. j � 1 The Citizen's Cultural Board will have fifteen me�bers selected by a cora- mittee of Model Neighborhood Planning Committee d Iial.lie Q. Brown's Board of Directors. Eight of the members vill bejresidents of the Model Neighborhood. The remaining seven raembers will rlepresent groups from the metropolitan area that are concerned with cultursy� programs and activi- ties. These members may come from the faculty of� local colleges and the University of Minnesota, St. Paul Arts and Scienqea Center and the Guthrie Theater. RESIDENT EMPIA'Y?�IENT: A resident of the Community will be hired as an ide and trainee to the program coordinator. In addition, any secretari�l staff that i� needed will be hired from the commianity. The program c�ordinator will need numerous abilitiea to draw the cultural progrsm ogether. A person rill be sought who is familiar with the arts and scie�ces and, more specifi• cally, this person will be familiar with the art� and sciences programe available in the Twin Cities area. NAINTENANCE OF EFF'ORT: j Suppl�mental monies used in thia pro�ect are for� additional services not able to be provided for by using local fund�. • I I �.,.- Cultural Enrichment for the Mode1 Neighborhoodl 3 of 3 � 81+ � • NAME OF PROJECT: Higher Education lt�source Center and Assistance F�nd ADMINISTERING AGENCY: Model Cities-Urban Coalition Appointed Board SUBCONTRACTING AGENCY: None PURPOSE AND BENE;FICIARIES: In many cases students and their parent� do not know about the great number of colleges and institutions that open their doors to many students besides thoae in the upper quarter of their high school clasees. Additional scholasships go unclaimed because those people who qualify do not know they exist. The Higher Education Resource Center will provide information about schoole and scholarships to students and their parents. Scholarships will be pro- vided for a limited number of residents who cannot find funds from other sources. CONT�'N"P AND OPE�tATION: The Higher Education Information Center will provide: • 1. An information c�nter in the community to diapense data about schools, echolarships, and student qualifications. Make information available to parents and students at all levels so they can plan and look forward to educational opportunities beyond the public school level. 2. Counseling and planning assistance to those seeking information on career opportunities in post high school training institutes. 3. Assistance to residents in securing admission to poet high school institutions. 4. A six week sumtner "Higher Education Transition" seminar for persons anrolling in institutions of higher education the following fall. This seminar would be mandatory for those students selected to receive assistance under the Education Assistance F�nd. Staff and counseling personnel for the seminar would be provided by colleges and universities in the Twin Cities area. 5. Assistance in securing grants, scholar+�hips, and loans available through the institutions of higher education, foundations, and grivate industry. 6. On-going follow up and counseling to those residents enrolled in institutions of higher learning. • Higher Education Resource Center and Assistance F�nd age of 3 85 7. Financial a�sistance (grants for a maximum of twenty-five residents per year who, after resorting to all other sources of financial assistance available, are unable to enter upon or complete their chosen higher • education program.) TIMETABLE: The information program will begin as soon aa Bupplemental funds are available. Grants will start to be dispensed when applicants are contacted. If the program is successful, it will be continued through and beyond the life of the Model Cities Program. FUNDING: In addition to Model Cities supplementary funds, that rrill be used ta establish the Education Resource Center, the Urban Coalition has pledged funds to establish the Education Assistance �nd which are not to be used for operational purposes, but are to be held in trust and made available only for grant assistance. Major costs for staff and scholar- ships. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION: Model Cities, in conjunction with the St. Paul Urban Coalition, will establieh an independent agency with a board to be respansible for the pro�ect administration. The Pro3ect Coordinator will be directly responsible to the Board. Details of the Board Structure will be worked out at a later date. • COORDINATION: The Higher Education Resource Center will work to inforaa �ell related organizations of their program. Thia will include the local schools, youth organizations, service agencies, and churches in the Model Neigh- borhood. Post high school educational institutions, foundations� and industry throughout the Metropolitan axea will be informed of the center's operation and the areas in which they may contribute assistance. MONITORING AND EVALUATION: The St. Paul Model Cities Program will monitor each supplementally funded project throughout the first action year. The pro�ects will be monitored on the basis on planned versus actual achievement in terms af objectivesf content and budget. An information system will be designed and implemented and will act as the mechanism for the monitoring process. Three to five projects which relate to problem areas of high concern to St. Paul will be selected for in-depth evaluation. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: A Higher Education Council will be �ointly selected by representatives of Model Cities and the St. Panl Urban Coalition. This body will be responeible for the administration and operation of the program. The council will be composed of twelve (12) citizens. At least six members will be selected . from the Model Neighborhood. HiRher Education Resource Center and Assistance F1xnd age a 86 RESIDENT EI�LOYMENT: • Every effort will be made to fill the poeitions created by this pro�ect with Model Neighborhood residents. MAINTFNANCE OF EFFORT: Supplementary funds used in this pro�ect are for additional $ervices not able to be provided for by using local funds. • • Higher Educatian Resource Center and Assistance fl�nd Pa�e 3 of 3 $7 SUPPOATIVE EDUCATION PROJECT • An Overview Conclusions drawn from the Mid-Planning Statement indicates that curriculum is not often relevant to the needs of students attending schools in the Model Neighborhood Community, nor does it sufficiently reflect more of the ethnic groups living in the community. There has been a lack of personnel needed to test and evaluate inidividuals needs in order to implement new methods in education. In some instances teachers have stereotyped ideas about low-income and minority children. Some teachers have low expectations of the children in regard to achievement and behavior. Others fail to use innovative, communicative, and motivative approache� ta learning. A few teachers isolate learning to sub�ect area rather than integrating the skill� and information required. The purpose of this pro�ect is to improve the present educational delivery system to adequately meet the needs of the students of the Model Neighbor- hood as defined in the Mid-Planning Statement by providing funds to the St. Paul Public School System to finance demonstration projects which would otherwi�e not be operable. Coordination will continue to take place between Model Cities and the St. Paul Board of Education to either expand or provid� ssrviae$ through the Supportive Educational Pro�ect. The components of this pro�ect are as follows: • l. Operation Careers 2. Experimental Counseling 3. Special Resource Teachers 4. Youth Servin� Youth 5. Community School Coordinator 6. Home-School Liaison 7. Kindergarten and l.st Grade Demonstration Pro�ect A Supportive Educational Pro3ect Advisory Co�arnittee will be established to assist in policy decisions of the project. Supportive Educational Project, Overview � • 88 • NAME OF PROJECT: Supportive Educational Project PROJECT COMPONENT: "Operation Careers" ADMINISTRATIbTG AGIIVCY: Minnesota Independent School District �625 SUBCONTRACTING AGENCY: None PURPOSE AND BENEFICIARIES: To develap career coordination centers, in the Model Neighborhood schools. designed to provide current vocational information and to nct as a catalyst in curriculum change which meets the need of school students in relation to the changing world of work. The project is intended to originate in four schools which serve the Model Neighborhood; two high schools, one junior high school, and one grade school (total enrollment: 4,250 students). CONTENT AND OPERATION: Major activities will be accomplished by a team of consultants located within the St. Paul School System. They wi11 include: • 1. Training of school staff to effect attitude changes relative to a greater appreciation of all occupations. 2. Development of goal oriented curricula in broad clusters of jobs and occupations, integration of these curricula with post high school programs, and correlation with job mai•ket projections. 3. Research and assemble existing career information, includinp audio-visual information. 4. Work with various school departments and classes in selection of materials, content, methods, and activities which would help students to become career conscious. 5. To aid the school counselor in helping students to se].ect �nd schedule skill development classes. 6. To determine the effect part-time employment has on a stu- dent's occupational goal. 7. In cooperation with the Model Cities Employment Center and the Minnesota Department of Manpower Services, to research the need for and author the establishment of skill training classes. TIMETABLE: With the establishment of a central control team (project con�u].tr�nt, curriculum and research consultant, student services consultant) and • Model Cities Pro�ram - Supportive Educational Pro�ect, Careers 1 of �.- 89 followed by the assignm�nt of one career consultant to each of the four • local schools, the pro�ect was scheduled to begin in September of 1970. FIJNDING: All operating expenses with the exception of one, will be covered by Minnesota Independent School District #6?5• Supplemental funds wi1.1. be used for student field trips to job sites and payment of speakers (Career Models). PROJDCT .ADMINISTRATION: The pro�ect, administered by Minnesota School District �625, provides a service to students which, in the pa+st, has not been provided. Staffing is described under "Timetable". COORDINATION: Information and job placem�nt activities will be closely coordinated with the Model Neighborhood Employment Center and other pro�ects re- lating to occupational satisfaction. MONITORING AND EVALUATION: The St. Paul �lodel Cities Program will monitor each supplementally • funded project throughout the first action year. The pro�ects will be monito.red on the basie of planned versus actual achievement in terms of objectives, content and budget. An information system will be designed and implemented and will act as the mechanism for the monitoring process. Three to five projects which rel�te to groblem areas of high concern to St. Paul will be selected for in-depth evaluation. CITIZEN PARTICIPATIQN: An advisory group will be fairmed to evaluate and strengthen the pro- gram. It will involve representatives from industry, labor, educa- tion, employment, and the community. RE5IDEIVT EMIPLOYME�VT: Every effort will be made to hire residents to fill pasitions at all levels in the project. It is probable that associate employment training programs can be financed for Model Neighborhood residents by the Model City Employment Center. MAINTENANCE OF EFF`ORT: Supplementary funds used in this pro3ect are far additiona]. services not able to be provided for b,y using local funds, • Model �ities Program - Supgortive Educational Pro ect, Career�; 2 of � • NAME OF PROJECT: Su ortive Education Pro 'ec � PP � t PROJECT COMPONENT: Experimental Counseling Program ADMINTSTERING AGENCY: Minnesota Independent School Dietrict �6?_5 SUBCONTRACTING AGENCIES: None PURPOSE AND BENF�'ICIARIES: The program is intended, as a demonstration program aimed at 1.5� tenth grade high school students, to determine whether or nat cutting the caseload of H. S. counselors from the present 350 to 75 students will. significantly increase the retention of potential drop-outs. CONTENT AND OPERATION: Two additional high school counselors will be assigned to the Central High Schaol counseling staff. Their caseload will come from 1,50 Model Neighborhood tenth grade students. Those students which are moBt apt to drop out of high school will be chosen first. Intensive �uidance service will be provided to the students. Where necessary or ndvis- � able, curriculum chan�es will be made which will more realisticall,y conform to the needs of the individual student. At the recommendation of Model Cities, other �ovative counseling approaches will be taken. TIMETABLE: The program is a three year demanstration program to start when r�up- plemental funds are available. Year one will be aimed at the sopho- more class, year two at the junior class, and year three at the senior class. FUNDII�G: Demonstration funding will be almost entirely from Model Cities funds. It is expected that major changes in the high school counseling system� prompted by the success of this pro�ect, will make funding beyond the third year unnecessary. The ma�ox•ity of monies will be invested i.n project personnel. PROJEJCT ADMINISTRATION: The project will be administered by Minnesota Independent School District #625. The School District will, on a demonstration basis� � Su ortive Educational Pro 'ect - Ex erimental Counsel n � tif - g1 � make several changes in its present method of counseling. 1. Reduce caseload from 350 to 75. 2. Assign counselors to individuals for the full. three ,yeare, of high school rather than for one year only. 3. Provide counseling services throughout the summer months. Staffing wi11 include two counselors and one clerk. COORDINATION: Tt is anticipated that the counselors will use any and all means a.f coordination with other projects which they feel will enhr�nce the position of their counselee. This will include "Operation Careers", Community Health Program, Model Neighborhood Employment CentPZ•, Higher Education Resource Center and Assie,�:�,uice Fund, Youth Servinp� Youth, and other community and city projects. MONITORING AND EVAI,UATION: The St. Paul Model Cities Program wi11 monitor each supplementall,y funded project throughout the first action year. The pr.ojects will be monitored on the basis of planned versus actual achievement in terms of ob�ectives, content and budget. An information system will be designed and implemented and will act as the mechanism for the N monitoring process. Three to five projects which relate to }�roblem areas of high concern to St. Paul will be selected for in-depth evaluation. . CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: The program will be guided by a Model Cities appointed advisory • committee. RESIDENT EMPLOYI�NT: When filling the three positions created by this project, every effort will be made to hire Model Neighborhood residents. MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT: Supplementary monies used in this project are for additional services not able to be provided for by using local funds. Su�portive Educational Project - r�cperimental Counseling ? of �? N _ _ �� NAME OF PROJECT: Su ortive Educ tion Pro ' � pp a al �ect COMPONENT NAME: Special Resource Teacher8 ADMINISTII2I�G AGENCY: Minnesota Independent School District #625 SUBCONTRACTIN(� AGENCY: None PURPOSE AND SENEFICIARIES: The purpose of this pro3ect is to improve the skilla of the teacher+s in the teaching of reading by providing in-service training for teachers ue�ing new materials and techniques with eraphasis on proven Special Learning Disability methods, to improve the ability of children to read and comprehend by ex- ploring various methods of the teaching of reading� to make available as resource people teachers who have demon�trated expertise and success in making education relevant to the needs of the students, and to improve the ability of teachers to relate to and respond to the individuel needs of children. CONTIIVT AND OPERATION: The responsibility of the five gpecial resource teachers assigned to this N pro�ect will be to establish effective teaching procedures in the three primary schools of the Model Neighborhood. This will include assistance in the revision of curriculum; provision oP continuous, individual in- service training for teachers; basic research on and development of additional supportive materials and supplies; and establishment of other procedures which will result in improved relevancy of education to Model Neighborhood students. TIMETABLE: The mechanisms can be set up for irttplementing this pro�ect during the review period. This pro�ect r+ill be put into �fect as soon as supplemental funds are available. FIINDING: Most costs of this pro�ect will be covered by Model City supplemental funds and will include payment of etaff. Coets are pro�ected to be relatively constant. It is anticipated that the St. Paul School System will eventually asswne full costs of the pro�ect coA►ponent. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION: The pro�ect will be administered by the Mitzaeaota Independent School District #b25. Specific control will be vested with the administering M Supportive Educational Proiect-S�ecial Resource Teachers a6'e Q 93 authorities of the three Mode1 Neighborhood primary schools. Model Cities supported staff will consist totally of five Special Resource � Teachers with qualificationa needed for fulfillment of the work program as outlined under "Content and Operation." Other staff (two special learning disabilities teachers and two regular primary education teachers) will be contributed to the pro3ect by the administering agency. COORDINATION: Inter-schoal pro�ect coordination will be established by the adrainistering agency. MONITOI7TNG AND EVALUATIOM: The St. Paul Model Cities Program will monitor each suppleraentally funded pro�ect throughout the first action year. The pro�ects will be monitored on the basis of planned vers�s actual achievement in terms of objectives, content and budget. An information system will be designed and implemented and will act as the mechanism for the monitoring process. Three to five pro3ect8 which relate to problem areas of high concern to St. Paul will be selected for in-depth evaluation. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: Citizen paxticapation will be accomplished through a neighborhood Nstaffed Supportive Educational Advisory Committee. RESIDENT EMPLOYMENT: Consistan� with the requirements of the �ob, Model Neighborhvod resid�nts will be given preference in the employment of the 5pecial Resource TeacherB. MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT; Supplementary monies used in this pro�ect are for additional services not able to be provided for by using local funds. � Sunnortive Educational Proiect-S�ecial Resource Teachers Page 2 of 2 9�+ PROJDCT NAME: Supportive Educati�nal. Project • COMPONENT NAME: Youth Serving Youth ADMINISTERING AGIIJCY: Minnesota Independent School District �6�?5 SUBCONTRACTIIaG AGENCY: Neighborhood Youth Corps (NYC) PURPOSE AND BENEFICIARIES: This project is intended to help the student in the secondar,y level of school who may drop-out, by building his ability through teaching ,younger students and his self-confidence by seeing himself succeed. The younger student will be given individual attention and help to improve hi� re�ding and language skill. CONTENT AND OPERATION: Four tutoring centers will be established in the Model Neighborhood. Qne of these will be continued from the original program st�rted in the e�ummer of 1970. These can be located in either schools, or local meetinp places (agencies, churches, etc.) The funds for the original wi11 be provided from the Neighborhood Youth Corps and the Board of Education. The three additional centers will be funded from supplemental funds. • The pro�ram will be run for two hours each week day afternoon. Friday wi11. be reserved for training of the staff. This will be a part of �n on-g�inp training process that wi11 start with a four week, two hour a da,y program that all staff will attend. A project coordinator wi11 supervise all four centers. Thi� pPrson wil.l be a Special Learning Disabilities (SLD) teacher. He will train a].l othQr st,aff, set up each center, and assure the efficient functioning of the tot�l pro�rr�m. Each center will have a super•visor who w311 be a 5LD teacher or a reading ar language �kills teacher who will be trained by the coordinator. It wi�.1 be the responsibility of the person to supervise the tutoring pro�ram and carry on a continuous training program for the staff of that center. Each center will have two teachers aides. These people will be �ithpr �ld�r tutors, those who have worked .in the program before or community membere. They will share the work of the supervisor. Ten tutors will be assigned to each center. These people will v�ry in age and �rade level. Seventh grade will be the lowest level. They wi.71. be responsible for tutoring two youi�ger students, at least three Prade levels below the tutor. In some situations these students will. function as teacher aides within the schools or recreation supervisor� for youn�;er children. These people will be students from the junior or �enior hi.gh schools in the area. • �u�portive ucation roject- out erving Yout P�zge 1 of 3 95 They will be selected with the help of the Gu dance Coun�elor:,. The main qualification will be that the student h s a good attitude t�w��rd the program and the ideas it is puttin�; forth. • The tutored will come from the lower grades nd will be selected on Y,he basis of the difficulties they are having in school. In addition to the paid staff and students, he ilniversit,y of Minne�ota will contribute a research assistant to each center. It wil.l be the duty of the person to gather data on the program nd look into new ide�as for tutoring. TIMETABLE: At present one center is operatin� in the Mo el Neighborhood. Thi:; wi7.1 continue to operate through the aummer and he school year. The three centers will be�in operation as soon as fun s become available to hi.re and train the staff. The identification of prospective tutors can bep;in during the first few weeks of school. FUNDING: The major costs of this program will be loc ted in the salaries of �stnff'. Additional funds will be required to suppl the centers with equipment. supplies and afternoon snacks for the �tud nts. The cost of �AJ.ariee and other related items for a fourth cente will be provided by the Neighborhood Youth Corps and the Board of ducation. The facilities will be obtained by in kind contributions rom the Bot�rd of Education • and local agencies or churches. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION: This project will be administered by Minn sota Independent School District #625 with a subcontract for operation to o to the Neighborhood Youth Corprs (NYC). At present NYC is partially respo sible for operatin�; f�ur tiztorin� centers in St. Paul. They will be contin ing these throu�h the 19�O-'J1 school year. The three proposed centers ould be identical to tho�;e riaw in operation except they would concentrate o the Model Neighboi•hood. NYC has committed themselves to providin� supervisory support r�nd space. For Job Descriptions see "Content and Ope ation." COORDINATIOH: The Nei�hborhood Youth Corps now works v ey closely with the St. I'aul Board of Education on their existing pro ram. It wi11 mr�ke full usc� of other projects and programs as necess ry. MONITORING AND EVALUATION: The St. Paul Model Cities Pro�ram will onitor each suppl.emental.l,y funded project through the first action year. The projects wil.l be monitored on the basis of planned ve sus actual achievement in • terms of ob�ectives. content and budget. An information sy�stem will be designed and implemented and wi 1 act as the mech�nism for Supportive �dcation Project-Youth Serv ng Youth Pa�e 2. of � ! � 9� the monitoring process. Three ta five projects which relate to problem areas of high concern to St. Paul will. be selected for in-depth ev�lt�ation. • CITIZEN PARTICIPATTON: Citizen responsibility for this project will rest with the Supportive: Education Advisory Committee. RESIDENT EMPLOYMENT: Preference will be given to Model Neighborhood residents in hirinp �;t�ff for this project. All tutors and teacher aides will bP re�idents of t}�e Model Neighborhood. MAINTENANCE OF EEFORT: Supplementary monies used in this project are for addition3�: s�rvir,et; not able to be provided for by using l.ocal funds. - • • -- Supportive Education Project-Youth Serving ou a�o�—�� ._._ - 97 • NAME OF PROJECT: Supportive Educational Project COMPONIIVT NAMF: Community-Scho.ol Coordinator ADMINISTERING AGENCY: Minnesota Sndependent School District #6?5 SUBCONTRACTING AGENCY: None PURPOSE AND B�tEFICIARIES: The purpase of this project is to improve opportunities for ut�Lizatior, of business and community resources, to increase underetandin� and responsiveness to the educational and recreational need� of childi•en and adults in the Model Neighborhood and to explore. va�,lOtlfi method� f'or better utilization of school facilities for educa.tional and recreatiori- al purposes. CONTIIVT AND OPERATION: The project will involve the use of four community schools as r•ecrea- tional and educational centers, 5:30 p.m. to �:30 p.m. , M-F, and $: ;'.,0 to 12:30 p.m. on Saturdays during the school year. During the ::ummer • month.s the schools will be open 8:30 a.m. to 5:j0 p.m. Monday thr�u�;h Saturday. This includes use of classrooms, dafeteria, kitchen, lor,ker• rooms, and auditorium ax•eas and their related facilities. Recreati.ontal. and educational programs will be initiated by the four coordinator:�. TIMETABLE: The mechanisms can be set up for implementing this progr.am durin�r the review period. The program will be put into effect as soon as th� supplemental funds become available. FI1NDIl�: The major item of cost is for the four community school coord:inntor... Fiiture costs are expected to rem�in relatively constant. If succe�;s- ful, it is anticipated that the St. Paul School system will seek out and locate other funds for continuation of this projec:t. PROJDCT ADMINISTRATION: The project administrator, Minnesota Independent School Dic>tr�ict l�62��, has pledged ex.panded use of its facilities and faculty tow�rd succe:�- ful operation of this pro�ect. The staff will consist of four Supportive Educational Project, Community School Coordinator 1. o.f ? • , 9$ • Community-School Coordinators. COORDINATION: Special efforta will be made to include in this project those on-fioinP educational and recreational projects located within the community, such as Adult basic education, Tutoring progrnm, homemaking CJ.F:1f38E'Fi� etc. MONITORING AND EVALUATION: The St. P ul Model Cities Pro�ram will monitor each supplementraz•y funded project throughout the first active year. The pro�ects wi11. be monitored on the basis of planned versus actual achievement in terms of content and budget. An information system will be desi�rned and implemented and will act as a mechanism for the monitoring process. Three to five projects which relate to problem areas of hi�h concei•n to St. Paul will be selected for in-depth evaluation. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: The Supportive Education Advisory Committee will be responsible for• the r•esident input into this project. RESIDENT EMPLOYMETiT: • Neighborhood residents will be hired to fill all four positions cre�ted by this project. MAINTF�VANCE OF EFFORT: Su�plementary monies used in this project are for additional services not able to be provided for by using local funds. Supportive Educational Project, Community-School Coordinator ?., of s • 99 • NICME OF PROJECT: Supportive Educational Pro�ect COMPONENT NAME: Home-School Liaison ADMINISTF�RING AGENCY: St. Paul School System SUBCONTRACTING AGENCY: None PURPOSE AND BF�tEFICIARIES: The purpose of this project is to improve parent-teacher-student relation- ships and to increase teacher's knowledge of their student's background by providing a home-school liaison in each school in the Model Neighborhood. CONTENT AND OPERATION: Essentially, the Home-School Liaison would help parents ralate themeelves more effectively to their children, to the school and to the larger community. The kinds of assignments that the Home-School Coordinator will perform include: a. Acts as intermediary agenct in many school-home-community situationa. b. Relays school information to home and home information to school agencies. • c. Visits new families who move into the local school district. d. Helps mother to establish good housekeeping tecfu►iques and procedures. e. Encourages parents to participate in school activities. TIMETABLE: The mechanisms can be aet up for implementing this pro�ect during the review period. The project will be put into effect as soon as the supplemental funds become available. It will run for the remainder of the First Action Year. Refunding wi.11 be contingent upon the initial success of the program. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION: The pro�ect will be administered by Minneaota Independent Schonl District #625. They have pledged themselves to provide supervisory support to the pro�ect. They have indicated that the goals of this pro3ect will receive top priority Action. Staffing will include four(4) Community_�ch.00l I,a.aisons. COORIDINATION: It-is anticipated that the Home-School Liaisons will utilize any and all mesns of coordination with other pro3ects which they feel will enhance the positian of their clients. This wi11 include "Operation Careers," Community Health • Supgortive Educational Proiect-Home School Liaison Page 1 of 2. 100 Program, Model Neighborhood Employment Center, Higher Education Resource Center and Assistance Fhnd, Youth Serving Youth, and other related community • and city projects. MONITORING AND EVALUATION: The St. Paul Model Cities Program will monitor each supplementally funded pro�ect throughout the first action year. The projects will be monitored ou the basis of planned vereus actual achievement in terms of ob�ectives� content and budget. An information system will be designed and implemented and will act as the mechanism for the monitoring process. Three to five pro�ects which relate to problem areas of high concern to St. Paul will be selected for in-depth evaluation. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: A Supportive Educational Pro�ect Advisory Committee will be establiBhed composed of Model Neighborhood residents which will assist in the policy decisions of this pro�ect. RESIDENT EMPLOYI�iT: All four (4) of the Liaisons will be hired from the Model Neighborhood. MATNTF�IANCE OF EFFORT: Supplementary monies used in this project are for additional services • not able to be provided for by using local funds. • S�rtive Educational Pro�ject-Home School Liaison Page 2 of 2 �.al • NAME OF PROJ�;CT: Supportive Education Project � COMPONENT NAME: Kindergar.ten and First Grade Demonstrr.�tion I'ro jer.t ADMINISTERING AGENCY: Minnesota Independent School District #625 SUB-CONTRACTING AGENCX: None F'URPOSE AND BENEFICIARIES: The purpose of this project is ta provide Model Neighborhood children with a program calculated to continue the educatinnal momentum �;ained from their experience in Head Start or Pre-Schoal I'rogr�,ms. The �ro- gram is designed to assist these youngsters by dia�nosing and trer�ting deficiencies in language, number concepts, verbAl :�kil.ls, phyeical state, psycho-social state (including especially the self-concept) which would handicap the child in achieving a sixccessful per•fox•mr�nce pattern in the primary school,and cwnulatively, thereafter. The pro- ject will be aimed at all publicly supported kindergarten and first grade classes in the Model Neighbvrhood. It is designed to achievc better utilization of the strengths of teachers and teach�r aidc� in working with their classes �ay making possible a small teache.r-�upil • ratio. CONTENT AND OP�2ATION: The plan for this demonstration project is batsed on a model from the Ypsilanti Demonstration Project in Xpsilanti, Michi�an. The dr�ta from this project indicates that children will benefit from any structured curriculum that is based on a wide range of experiences and that provideE; foz• close attention to the needs of individual children r�nd invol.v�ment of the staff in the total operation. Other data from follow-�hrou�;h type pro�rams in the country shows similar results. This pro�oct w:il.l be an experiment in team-teaching and staff differentir�tion. It wi11: 1. reduce clas� size by }/z. 2. double the number of professionally trained persannel. teaching kindergarten and first grade in the ModPl NFi�hbor- hood. 3. assi�n one Model Neighborhood teacher aide to each of the classes 4. modify curriculum 5. achieve a more flexible ezse of time and student grouping�� 6. explore the use of aide� in small group instruction util.ixin�; a wide vaz�iety of audia--risual. equipment and approx�riate Kindergarten and First (�rade bemo^stration Pr•o�ect 1 of � • 1U?_ • software 7. provide consultant services of a speech therapist, � psycholo- gist, a school social worker, a school nurse, and � home econo- mist to help design and implement special ��rogramF to �,revent learnin� problems. 8. lengthen the kindergarten day. It is anticipated that the sma11 ratio of teacher to students, coupled with the use o.f aides and supportive help from the re�t of thc� sta.ff will allow the school to concentrate the first two years of school on the areas of language development, readi.n� readiness, reading be�;i.nning instruction, motor skills development, and correction of het�lth px•ablem.. TIMETABI,E: The mechanisms for implementing this pro�ect will be set up during the review period. They will be initiated as soon as suppler:�entr�l func��-� become available. Designed to be a three year demonsti•ation of changE:d teachin� techniques this project is expected to be funded there�ft�r by <the 5t. Paul School system. FUNDING: � Most monies for this project will be expended for the hiring of stnff. Future sources of funds will be sought from within the St. Paul. �ychool. sy�tem. • PROJECT ADMINISTRATION: The project will be operated by the present carrier of public ediication in St. Paul, the Minnesota Independent School District �6?_5. Tt�3 scl�ool. board has indicated its willingness to undertake the chan�es outZined in the'project work statement. Staffin� will include: 1. Qne project director will provide administrative leadership and be the liaison with the building principals. He will be res- ponsible for coordinating and providin� pre-service and in- service training, coordinating evaluation and research, com- piling project reports, scheduJ.ing observers and organizinq the diagnostic instructional program. He shall be resp�n�ibl_e for dissemination of all pro�ram material. 2. 20 classroom teachers who will act as base teachers and be responsible for scheduling' of the direct reachin�; experienc�� and the development teaching program. (These teachers wi]_1 be in addition to present classroom teachers in o.rder to keep class size at 15. - 3. Forty parents aides who wi11 assist the instructional team in routine classraom duties, playground supervision, rr•ep�rrj- tion of equipment and'materials for audio-visual, �rt �nd Kinderg�xrten and First Grade Demonstration Project �� of '� • 10;� rhythm activities. The aides will be given training in nutrition and child development. Whenever possible, aidee will be parents • of children in the program and/or members of the community. 4. One language-speech remediation specialist who will evaluate speech and lariguage problems, plan remediation programs. and re- mediate speech-language probleme of children. The therapiet will also consult with parents and team members. 5. One language speeah epecialist (ya time). 6. One home economist (y�itime). ?. A school nurse, on a half-time basie who wi11 be reaponsible for the physical well being of the studente. In addition to routine classroom observatiott, she will arrange for a complete physical check-up, medica7. and dental, for each student. She will con- sult with parents and other team membere. 8. One secretary. COORDINATION: This project is a component of the Supportive Education Pro�ect and will be closely coordinated r+ith all other Model Cities related pro�ects. MONITORING AND EVALUATION: The St. Paul Model Cities Program will monitor each supplementally funded pro3ect throughout the first action year. The pro�ects will be monitored on the basis of planned versus actual achievement in terms of ob�ectives, content and budget. An information scystem will be designed and imple- • mented and will act as the mechanism for the monitoring process. Three to five projects which relate to problem areas of high concern to St. Paul vill be selected for in-depth evaluation. CITIZEN PAKl'ICIPATION: The pro�ect will receive citizens input through the Supportive Education Advisory Committee. RESIDENT �LOYMEIVT• Al1 teacher aides will be hired from the Model Neighborhood. Every effort will be made ta involve citizens in all positione created by the program. MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT: Supplementary moaies used in thie pro�ect are for additional services not able to be provided for by using local funds. Kindergarten and First Grade Demonstration Proiect 3 of 3 • 10t+ CHILD UEVELOPM�.TIT YROJ ECT • tin Overview tis an effort to provic.ie a comprehensive and diverse a��F�roach to met�t t.t�e pre-school and e��rly educational needs of the Model IJei�Thborhood cl�i]_drE�n, four demonstrational components have been combined to cornj�ri:�e t►ie St. Yaul t�lodel Cities Chi1d llevelopment I'raject. From tf�is c�pproac}i, it i.� .rnticip��tec3 thr�t successful activitie� from each component wi11 t�e extracted and developed into a sin�le innovated approFtch to cl�ild develoF�- ment. '1'tie purpose of tYiis project is to continue and incre�se opportunities wtii_cti will ent►ance educational and social development oi' t�iocael Nei.�rhbarliood child�•en to more adequately prepare them for their :social experirnce rand social development and to provide hlodel Nei�;hbor}iood riott�ers witt� d�a,y c�+re services for their children thereby allowing them to re-enter tt�e l�{bor mr+rket through the development oi: new skills and trainin�; b,y pr,�rticiF�,jtinF� in the em��loyment tr�ainin�; pr o�;ram bein�; established by hlodel C itie:�. Mothers actively involved in the r;odel Nei�;hbort�ood L•:mplo,yment Cerit��r� w:ill receive first priority for day care slots. This project will be a well-rounded pro�;r��m of activitie�; approprir�tc to the cliild's a�;e �oup, including activities designed to promote intt>1].ect- ual development, soci<�1 and lan�;u�3�e skills with a �tronE?; emph«�i:. on • p:�rent involvement. It is reco�;nized th�at �11 c�3rly ler�rniritT dc�e.� not take pl�.ce in the school; therefore, it is essential th�t �i �;reat ��al of attentian be focused on the p�rents and their ral.e in the tot.�l .�elf- concept. �+11 child care i�cilities will conform to federal and st;:�te dr,y carexequirements. `i'he sponsorin�r, a�;ency for �.liis project will be the �amse,y Gount,y '��elf��re llep-,rtrrient. The rtamsey County welfare will sub-contract with ttie :�t. Paul i=ublic :�chools, Headstart, Nlontessori Pre-:�chool Uay Cc3rf� i'rok';rram.� t�nci Wil.der li��y Care i�ro�r�zmty. Chil.d llevelopment Components wi11 be cc�nti-��ct«±�i with exi5tingcentf;rs pro,.:rams or whenever indicated, new centers. Supplemental funds will be used as tYie local si��are to OhtAlIl two-thir•�� matchin�; from ti,e Social aecurity Act, '.['itle IV, Section 2. t,;onitorin�; of child care services under the public welfare ��ro�rr�m wi l l conform to ttie federal and �ate u��y care stancl��rds. The moriit�r•ir►� wil:l consi�t of' such thin�s a:s assurinfr th�jt the ?,rotection and s�fety of' the ct:i.ld i� u�,held; that str�nd,�rds far health and fire protection r�rc> mr+in- tained; tl,at tY�e child is adequate.�y superviaed, fed, and cl��tt�ed; <.�r�<i th��t adec�uate �;rowth experiences are provided. In riddii,ion, thc ��rof�rr�m will. be monitored and evaluated by t.��e Coi:�prehensive I•':oni torznt*, and • Child Development Proiect, Overview loy � livaluation Pro�ram of the City Demonstr�tion Agency. t+ chilc� llevPlopm��nt Yroject tiuvisory Committee will beestablished to assist in ��Ui��y decis- iaris of the project. The components of this ��roject are �as follows: 1. Nilder Day Care 2. Yre-School Educ�.tion f'rogram 3. i�lontessori 1're-.�chool Day Care 4. �teadstart This project reflects 1cS0 slots to be obtained for r;odel Neit;hbor•}rooci children frarn the various day care pro�;rFams in the P`iociel Neiy;hbc�r•Eic�od community. • • Child Development Proiect, Overvi.ew � 1C�ti � . r. y I • NAME OF PRQJ�T: Child Development � � PHOJECT COMPONENT: Child Development - Wilder Day Care ADMINISTII2ING AG�ICY: Ramsey County Welfare Dep�artmerit SUB-CONTRACTING AGENCY: Wilder Found�tion PtJRPQSE AND B�fi1EFIC IARIES: To provide day care for 100 children of Mode1 Nei�;hborhood w�rkin�; �az•ents. CONTENT AND OPERATION: The program will provide funds for 100 Model Nei�;hbarhood childr��n to attend =the Wilder Day Care Centers in the area. Fifty childrrn r��ri�;iri�; f-rom a�es three to five will be enrolled in a full day pro�rr:im. FiFty o.Lder childr•en will be cared for before and aft�r i•egular school. hou:•:.�. TIMETABLE: • This Project will begin operation as soon as supplemental fundC are� made available. As this is a one year demonstration project, it .i:s scheduled to ter•minate at the end af thE� fun@in� period. FUNDII�: Social SPCUri�y Act Title 4 Sec. 2A will provide 75i�6 o.f the aro;ject co��t. Major cost items include staff and materials. PROJECT ADMINISZ'RATION: The project will be administered by the Ramsey County Welf�r�e Depart- ment with the operation being sub-cqntracted to the Wilder Founde�tion. The Wilder group has been providing 'dny care iri the Model N� i�hboi�- hood for the past 20 yer�rs and is fully capable nf crir:ryin�; out th�.;� program. The project includes the services of a social worker, nur•:�e, doctor, child psychologist, nutritidnist and a trained educr�tion��1 staff person. COORDINATION: ' '' 'It is anticipated that this proje�t will be coor•din�ted with c�the�� Model Cities projects with speci�l. emphasis in coordin�tin�; with the Child Development - Wilder Day Cat•e � 1 of' �' • - . �.__......_..__._ __.___ 10� • proposed Employment Center and the Ram�ey County Welfare/Minnc�sratfl Ue- partment of Manpower Services sponsored Work Incentive Pro�;r�m. MONITORING AND EVALUATION: The St. Paul T4odel Cities Program will; monitor each supplementr.illy funded project throu�hout the first action year. The project.� w:i11. bf: monitored on the basiU of planned versuU actual achievement i.ri tc�T•m.; of objectives, content and budget. An information FsyFtem �,ri].l be dc�- signed and implemented and wi11 uct as the mechanism for the monitorin�* pz�ocess. Three to five projects which relate to problem arf�� of' h:i�rYi concern to St. Paul will be selected for in-depth ev�lu�tion. RESIDENT EMPLOYMF�IT: The 1rJilder Foundation will be required to hire a majority of it;; F�t:�ff from tMe Model Neighborhood. A social balance will be demanciec3 in relationship to that of the Model Neighborhood. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: An advisory counail composed of parents of children in the prrogrr�m wi].1. be created to help determine the policies of the day care �.r•o�;i•,�m, MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT: • Supplementary monies used in this project are for additional .�ervicer; not able to be provided for by usin� local funds. Chil.d Development - Wilder Day Care 2 of �? • • �.08 • fJ1�M� UF' YkOJi�C�'; Child Development Yroject !%iZOJl�CT CU�it UN�:T�T: Yre-�School Education �'ro�;ram� Co�;nitive and Unit li,af:�cd Curriculum AllP�IIi�I:�T::1:INU ��GLIVCY: Ramsey County Welfare Dep«trtment NU�3-CUNTit.�C2'ICJ� AG�NCY: St. .�'aul School 5y�tem f�Uki'Ot�� i+PdD �3�:NF,FICI;i1tIF.::�: This project h�s been developed to assist students from the blociel Nc�iE�;tibor- hood in reaching their maximum czpabilities prior to entex•ing elementf�ry school. �:�xisting pre-school pro�,rams have been suecessful in obta�1TllTt�► thi:, result to a de�;ree. This program will help`tne hlodel NeiE;hborhood �ucz�tional Task Force evaluate different methoc:is of pre-sch�ol educr,tion. '1'he information obtained will �ielp to decide which ty��e of ��re-:c}�r�ol. curriculum will be used in tlie Second tiction Year. CUN'I'i1dT tiPlD UPI�akr+TZart: `I'he pro�ram will use two types of pre-school education; tY�e uni t b<ze�t�d currir.ulum and the cognitive or project curriculum. Une faci.li_t,y will be • obt��ined <:�nd the tr,ro pro�;rams will be operated at this loc;.�tion. Fifteen students will attend each of the two classes oper�.�ted in tt�e :nornir�F; to reinforce �ch other with their individual talents. Two teachtrs wil.:l be used f'or each f?;roup Econorna c qualifications will not be� re��uired. �►11 personnelwill receive :�peci�il trainin€* to acc�uaint tliem wit:h the method,� anu tectiriiraues of the curriculum. TeachE�rs will ��JOrk with ��urent:� ��r►d ct�ildren after school Yiours on individual project5. ll�ta �;�.�ttiered by th�, I�ionitorin�; and Evulu�ztion pro�;ram will be used to detei•rnine the �osi t;iv�� and neE;�:tive aspects of the pro�rram. `t�'I]•i�:'Pi�BL�:: Tl►is project will be�*in operation as soon as supplement��l funde �zi•e mt:��le available. �s ti�is is a one y�ar demon�tr�tion project it is scht�luled to termin�ate ��t the enc' of the funding period. r'UfJllTP;G: Dtoni��s f'or the pro�ran� will come from Supplemental �'unds. Socia.t-1 �ecurit,y Nct 'Pitle 4 Sec. 2A will provide 75�6 of the project cost. F'iajoi• coe�t items include staff�d educational muterials. T9ode1 Cities Pro�;ram - 1're-School Education I'ro�rram, Co�ni t.ive ��nd Unit Based Curriculum 1 oi' ��' � 10� • ��uJ�c�r ��;�W�zr;z�>�l�x.��PIUN: `l'he project will be administered by the kamsey County 'r+elfure lle}�t�rtment with the operation being sub-contracted with t}-ie �t. 1'uul Schaol .>,yc�tem. `1'he School System of St. Paul has involved itself in the pre-school education ir� the early years of Headstart. Their experience m��kes them a 1o�ical oper�ting agency for the project. COORUIN�TIUN: Iri order to independently compare the different concepts presented by tliis project, no proEr;rammatic coordinr:�tion will be sou�;ht, other ttriAn with the Work Incentive F'ro�;ram and the proposed Eanployment Center for the emE�lo,yment; of parents. h.UNI'�"UIYI�JG t�1D EVtiLUi�`l'IGP�� The St. Paul biodel Cities Program will monitor each su��lemetitally fundeci project throughout the fir�t action year. �1'he projects wi11 be monitoi•c�d on the basis of planned versus actual achievement in term� of objer,ti.ves, content and bu<i�et. �n inform�tion system will be desip�ned rind implementeci ard will �ct as the mechnnism for the monitorinF; process. 'I'}iree to five projects which relate to problems of high concern to :�t. l•��ul wi Ll be selected far in-depth evaluation. CI`1'IZEN Pi�RTI(;I�'�TIOPJ: • A Bo�rd will be crented to advise and set policy for the pre-�ctinol ��ro�;rar;�:.. T}iis Board va,ll be made up of eleven members. Seven of the me.•mbe>rs will. be residents of the �ea. The other five members will be per:�ons who z�re or have been involved with cfiildren's education and care. �The I3Aard wi11. l�e cl,osen by a wmmittee rr,ade up of NiPJyC members. 1t'r�I1�FdV'r Eh;PLUYAtLNT: An attempt will be made to fill all po+�itions with qualifiediesidents. MAINTENANCE OF EF�'ORT: Supplementary monies used in this pro;ject are for addition�l services not c�ble to be �rovided for by usin� local funds. Model Cities Yro�ram - Pre..School �:ducation Program, Co�nitive and Unit Based Curriculum Z oi' ? • 11� • fd,;t1l� 0� Y�OJECT: Child llevelopment ri�(iJt��CT CUI�'�YUNETIT: 1�lontessori Pre-�chool I7�,y Care I'rogram ADI��IPdIS'1"1�.:HING i�G�TvCY: Ramse,y County '�Jelfure Dep�artr�ent �UB-CUNTktiCTING AGi,IvCY: payton Avenue I�resbyterian Church Y'UiiYGSE AIVU BEN:t�'ICIt��{I�S: This program will provide �� qu�lity educatiori�l experience r�nd d�:,y crzre for a number of children iri the Model Nc-�i�;hborhood. The informatic�n �;F�the�red about t}ie prof�ram will be used to evaluate it in corn��,�rison with otFier pre-school pro;-,r�:�ms fun::ed by A9odel Cities. Ultiroatel,y t:hi� inform�xt;ion will be offered in the I��odel Nei�;hborhood durin�; the Second r+ction Yf�r�r•. CUNTi�sdT ANU UP:.;iA�I'iUPJ: An education progrdm will be offered :�y trained teacher:� usin�* the I�iontes:�ari method. �;ach child wil.l be allowed to use educ�tion��l materi�al:> that �'itrs riis level of development. Three hours of the day will be aevoted to t}�� educutional period. '1'Yie remainder of' tYie time will be occu,,ied tiy :;ial��r- viseri activities. `i'2ie children will befed breakf��st and lunch. l�.zaah • mornin� they will be �;iven a brief health check. Tl�e sciiedule c.xl:l.s for the children to be in attenciance from �:(� or ��:(K) u.m. until j: >(? in the afternoon. This will be sufficient tir�e for workint; p..�rents to drop off cl�ildren before work and pick them up after work. TIriE'i'�BLr�: This project will be�;in oper�;tion as soon �s supplemental funds are made availr�ble. As ttiis is a one year demonstration �,roject it is �ch��dulf�d to termin�zte at the end of the fundin� f�eriod. �'U IvllIPJG: Social Security Act Title 4 Sec. 2A will provide 75`b of the project cost. hlajor cost items include staff nnd educational materi��l�. YkUJ�;CT AllMINI5`1'R;;TIUN: `1'he project will be admini:�tered by the Hamsey Count,y l�elfr�re Dep��rtment with the operation being sub-contractc:d to Dayt<,n Hvenue �'resbyterir�n Church. Dayton Nvenue Presb�✓terian Church is the pr•f.setit .;pan..or• of � Model Cities ProFram - A7ontessori �'re-Sciiool Du,y Care Yrc�t;ram 1 of �? • 111 • hiontessori �'ru�;ram in the I�lodel I�ei��;hborhood. `l'heir exx>erience nirxke�s t.tic�m �� logical operatinf; a�enc;,� for the project. CUCkllZI�r�TICid t In order to independently compare the different concepts presented b,y t.lii;� project. No pro�rrammatic coordination wil�. be soutr,t�t, other th�:n witti t}ie the lvork Incentive l'ro�rr,rn and the proi�osed Er.�r,lo,yment Center f��r the employr�F>nt of parents. 1;iiI'�I'i'OitIiJG tiNU EV��LU;,TIOId: `i�he St. Pt�ul hlodel Cities Pro�;ram will monit�r each su;r;E>lement�l.ly funded project throu€r,hout the first r�ction year. The project; will he munitored on the basis of planned versus actual achievE.Ric�nt iti te7•r:�s of obje�ctivr�:�, content and bud�;et. An infarmation s,y�tem wi11 be de:�it;nc:d ��r�ci irrip.l.emt�nt<�d and will act as tlie mech<,nism for the rnonitorin�; proce: s. 'i'tirt�tr to f'ive projects which relate to problem arer�s of high concern to �t. l'r:�ul wil.l be selected for in-depth evr�luation. CI`l'I[,rfil PiutTll:Il'a'i'IOPd: :� Uay Care Policy tiGVisory Committee wi11 be est�blished to a:ssist in x>olic,y decisions of the pro�;ram. This policy committee will be r�ade up of represent�tives of the Dayton kvenue Yresb,yteri�.�n Church, Lil�erty f'laz��, Inc. , the Niontessori Foundation, representatives of the ll��y �are School/C�nt;E�r • f��cilities and residents of the area. �t all times resiclents o#' the r�o�el r�Pi�*hk�orhood will comprise a majority of tlie Committee. LFM�Ili�I�`i' �T':F'LOYr'f��NT: Nide positions will b� fillcd by resiuents of the area. �ualified tf�ach�yr� fr�rr; the Niodel Nei�hborhood will be �iven preference. t�:tiIN'1'i.IJ„PJGr; GI�' �'F'O,;i': Sur�plementary monies used in this project are for add:itioi,r�l services not able to ue provided f�r by usin�; locr:l funds. Model Cities Program - Montessori P�e�Schc�ol I)<sy C�are I'ro�;rr,m �' uf �' • 112 • NAI�9E OF PROJECT: Chi1.d Development COMPONENT: Head Start ADMINIST£�I2ING AGENCY: Rsmsey County Citizens Committe.r. f'oi• l�c�rtc�r;�i�� Oppoi•tunity SUB-CONTRACTIPdG AGL'NCY: None PURPOSE AND BENEFICIARIES: , This project is designed to provide the Head Start educationul e.:pr�r.ience.; and d�y car•e to pre-school age childr�en in 1ow-incomc f�mi.lier, wh<? r�re ri��1. eli�ible for the NEW funded Head Stzrt program in the Mode1 Citir;; �r�n. Tt will--benefit 60 such children. The' objectives of the child development project are to: ; 1. Provide pre-school a�re children with developmentaL r�ctiviti.��s designed to imprave their motivation, attitude:;, ,kil_1� ��nd abilitiPS. ?_. Prepare pre-school a�e children to communicate successflll.ly • with their peer�, teachers, and fi�ures �f authority. 3. Provide pre-school a�e children with cultural enrichment experiences that will improve their understanding of ather pea�le, ethnic groups and the wor•ld they live in throiigh field tr•ii:�:�, curriculum, and associations with various voluntef�r F*rou�s. 4. Provide pre-school age children with medical, dental � �sycholo}�i.cia.l , and nutritional services that will improve their he�al.th and personal hy�iene habits through a scrPening far immunizatiorz:,, dc�nt�,l. , speech, hea:ing; and eye checks. 5• Addr•ess the problem� of male identity for man,y pre-schoo] �aPe children through the utilization of more male teachers rznd volunteers. 6. Provide low-income parents who wor•Ic or attend cschool �r who have other special problems within their home with adequate c�re for their pre-school age children. 7. I�rovide families with social services assistance �dequnte t�� olve their personal problerns �nd help them impx�nve their ryocio- economical condition. 8;:='Assist parents develop r.ew skills and pre�are themselve;> for r�ew careers through educational glv�tncement and emPloyment ir� thcr progr•�m. Mode1 Cities Yro��ram - Child Development 1 oi' S • -�-____. 11S 9. Help parents contribute to the development of their chil.d, • orj*,anize cizltural and informational prof*,r��r�c�, �nd become invc.�l ved in the continuing education.,l development of' their ct�il.d. 10. Involve parents in the activities and operation of the profrr�+m� the individual Center Parent Groups� and ttie ci�y-wide i'c�li.r.y Advisor.y Council. 11. ]tequire parents to spend one day per month, either them:selvc;� or by arrangin�; for representative to take t}ieir ��lace, zri t}�e classroom as tuition time. 12. �:stablish open communicution between parent:s and ��roject ._�t.lff. �l'he project prepares particip��ting c}�ildren for soci��l and learnin� experiences they will encounter in the public shcool s,ystem. CON'r�i'dT i�A!D OFF:kl;+TIUN: Major activities performc:d by the project include: 1. �:nrollment «ctivities: The soci��l service st�ai'f will review all applications, interview eligible families, detcrmine �?riority of need, and explr�.in the project to those parents concernE�d. '1'he social services aide and the head teacher will be ,joint.ly resF�on:s- ible for the children accepted into their center. 'Phe child will • be accompanied to the �nter on liis fir�t ttiree visits in order t� assist in the adjustment to the center and tY�e sepFir�.�tion f'rorn ttie �family. 2. Child lievelopment Center �+ctivities: Children will p�irtici��r:a te in cl�ild development and cultural enrichment ��ctivities. '1'hree �nd one-hal.f hour sessions will be held dail,y on a five-day-�-weck, full year basis. The curriculum will include �;ames, prof°r��ms and equipment to promote maximum development for each ctiilc3 .,oci.�all,y, emotioni�lly, intellectually, and physically. Sr;ecirzl atterat.ian will be given to language development, eye-hand coordin��t:ion, the ability to r•el�ate to pe��rs �nd adults, developm�rnt o1' cof;r�itive skills, and a�;e appropriate emotional developme�nt. Chil.dren requiring extended �lr�y care will continue the morning c}ii.ld development session and remain ��t the �nter for the day c��re activity. Those children not r•equirin�r extended d�y cr.�re wi:l1 :l.e�,ve after the noon meal. 3. �ocial aervice ��ctivities: Social :iervice w'orkers �nd �tides will work with the family to help solve f�+mily per:�c�nal arad community �:roblems, obtain services to which the famil,y i.7 entitl.ed, take advanta�;e of opportunities and bec�me involved in their ci�ild'� educational development. I3ack�round information on t►ae f�:,,:+ily r,nci tt�eir sacial situation will be �thered ta helc; ti�e te�ch�•r r�rui project workers understand the needs of the child and oth<:r merr.l�er.:; of the family; soci�il etiorkers will serve ss r•e:souT�ce ic�r rrfrrr��I • riodel Cities Pro�*ram - Child Uevelopment 2 of' > 114 • problems and handle problern cASes involvin�� children ��nd Fr<,rent:�. Home visits will be made ��t least three times pe>r year• f'or �+11 enrollees. Yarents will be encouraged to p<�rt:ici�r�te i�� chi.ld development pro�;ram �+nd Center �'arent Committees wi11 be �,s:sie;tc�d. 4. Health aervi.ce .'�ctivities: Luch child muct }►ave �� medicr�]. �xfam- ination prior to enrollment. This examinr:ttion is to be arrtzny;ed by the parent with a private E�hysician or• dvr,e t}irouf•;ti the :�a:int: l��aul. Rams�y's Cllildren's Hospit.�l Clinic. The �>ro�rr��m nurse will ,�u}�er•- vi�e all needed follow-up on immunizations, treatmF,nt to co�-�•�ct problems, und health observ�tions; each child wi_il rE�ceive n rnorning health check befor•e his p�rent leaves the cent<:r; pedi�:a trici�ans will be �:�ssigned to two or three centers e�xch, to work with sE�ecir�l health problems� health education, F�nd pai•ent groups. l�ye t�nd ear �reening will be conducted b,y the ileci Cr•o.�:.� ��nci the ��int Paul Speech and }Ie�irin�; Cc:nter, :ipeech evaluc�tion will be mr,ade available by the Saint f'aul 13ureau of Health u�on enrollrnent and referrals will be made to priv�ate �ientists or the Burer�u of t�e�.lth for either immediate care or ao�ntal check-up; the nurse will. :Coll.ow- up on all referrals �nd ensure that pror�c:r t;reventativt; and restorative treatment is received. Tooth brus}�iuy; wi11 be dane at least once daily in the centers and there will be �nnu��l fluoride treatments. Special realtti educatior►�1 aci.ivities will be r�rran�ed for the children. Ysyc}�olo�ical consultation and serva.ccs will. be dvailable to the teachers, cYiil.dren, and �,arents. 'l'he • nutritional needs of the children will be evriluated Fan<i c}iilclren will be certified as eligible for participation in the �:mer�e�icy r'�;od and �'rescription Foocl F'rograms wYien needed. .iUp��02'�1VE: services �baby��itting, trarisport<�tion, etc.) will be �?rovided tn help parents get the medical services needed; ev�:�ry f,�mily wi11 be helped to estrlblish relati.on�hip� witti ;;hysicir�ii: and clinic::� th�:t will x�rovide continuin�; care and treatrntrnt. All ��roject employees will be required to h�:�ve annual p1�yUicUl ex�r,iir,��tinn,�. 5. Parent Activities: Yarents will be helped to F�r..:�i�t ir� tt�e aeve:loza- ment of their chilrt throu�h em��lo;:rnent, volunteer eervicErs, ��nd educatiori��1 pro�*rarns. �'arents wi:.l be rx:,z,i.sted in pf�i•tici}��ti.riEr in and carryin� ttieir respon�ibilities in t}ie (%enter• 1�arcant Committees and the lYamse:y County 1Iead :�tart i'olicy A�:vi:�or;,r Cc,unci.l. �ducation r�nd information pro�rams will be carried out r,;, nl<znned by the parents. �'arent-child and iamily-lif'e �iiscussione, ses:si.c�n� will be Y►eld. Gooperativ� babysittin�; will be or�T��riired to hc:.LS� parents particip�.te in classroom and other activities. Yr�rent �;roups will be continued after the child enters kincler��lr•ten :,o ttiat parents will become more involved in the z•eEr�zlr,r .�chool ;;y:}ter�. 6. Nutritional :�ervices: r:��ch chi.ld will receive �: sn�ack r�nd a lunci� c�r�ily. Breakfast will be served to chil.dr•en who corne I,o thr. cent,c,r hun�ry or witt;otat havin�J; hr�ci breakfa�t before 1e��v i n�; iiomr�; • Model Cities YroErram - Child Devel<,�,ment 5 ��f 5 . 7..15 . � sul�plemental afternoon snack wi11 be �riven to �r�ilar•E�n in ci,:�,y c�+r•�:. Pr•escription foods will be �>rovided to chilcirF�n who r,re ir� n��4�c1 of s��eci: 1 su,�plf:mentar,y fooc3s. Consul'tant., wil:l. plari menu,�, coraduc;t parent education and demonstration classes, trz�in coc,k::,, r�nd work wi tl� the children. Centers will be located in the Model Cities ar•e��. t+t le��st one riew cetitf�r� will be opened and existing He��d Start Centers will t�e exr�r-,ncied to acr,om�di�t�� project participants. 'Che Head �t��rt learnin�; experience is �i thre�e <�n�i ��nca- ��jlf hour session be�inning at 8:;50 a.n�. each d�xy, five d�,,ys z� week. (,c:ntc�r str,.ff is sizpervi:�ed b;� a Head Start '1'eacht�r who is resf;onsit.�le i or the operation of the center. The Iiead ;�t<art Teacher i:� su�,ervised hy ttit� ti�zmisey Coiznty Head Stdrt i'ro�;ram Uirector and receives curriculum pl��nrai.ri�r �i;:�Ui:.t��I'lC;@ from the pro�ram Education llirector. Tlt�l�.Tt;�3Lr.: Tl,is project will begin :s soon as supplemental fun��s arf> rer,eived ,xncf will run to the end of the fiscal year. The 3iead �tart 1-'rof�ram i:s i ri ppcY'iitloTl in the t�todel Cities <3rea at the present time so that tt�c:re will bc� no dii'ficulty in st<:�rting the �>roject as s�on as funds ��re rec� ived. ��<�rc�nt �or.ur;ittees are currently hein� formed at each He�ad atar•t CE�j�tc�r. �t,; :;oc�n as the project b�.tTins, parents of project partici}�ant:� will be ur�;ed ,and encoura�ed to particip��te in Committee �ctivities. l r,rent:� wi:ll .i.l.:�o t�e irivolved for �,.}ie pro�*rar.i i'or tkie next Fiead :�tart ftzndin�r ye��r. • FUP+llIt�+G: i�iajor costs will be for personnel. PRGJE;CT ADMINISTRaTION: The ilamsey County Citizer�s Committee for Economic G} � or•tuni ty, Inc. , ttie local Community aletion r'+�ency, will adciinister• trie pro�rrr�m. `!'his rx��enc,y has successfully operated the Head St<�rt 1'ro�;rexm tor the pr�st threFr ,yer,rs. F'rovided that existin� centers can be acp��nded to accomodrate �ixt,y c:�i 1 c.lren, a total of our teachers and four �acher aides will be rer,uired on cz b.�:�i�s �f' two paid employees fur �ch fifteen cliildren. CGO1<DINtiTION: It is anticipated that this project will be coordin�xted with otkier• Mac3�1 Cities projects with special emphasis in coordinatin�; with the E>rc�J,o::�ed EmF�loyment Center and the kamsey County Welfare, I�Iinnesotr:� Ue�aartment of �9anpower �ervices s;�onsored 4Jork Incentive Yro��;ram. MOIJITUitTidG IYND �;UkLU��'rIOTd: 'Phe St. Yaul hlodel Cities Pro�;ram will monitor each supplementally fizn��:ed project throughout the first action year. The projects will be rnoni?.ore�� on the basis of planned versus actu<�1 achievement in terms of abjectives, content and budget. An information system wi11 be ck.>iErn��d ��nd impl��:n�nteci • and will act as t�ie meclianism for t}�e monitorir�� F�roces:,. '1'Firr-.r.. to f'ivc� projects w}iicti relate to probler� F�re<,s of' hig�i cc,ncF�rn to �t. ��r�ul wi.11 t�Er tu;odel Cities Pro�Tram - Cnild Develo;,rre�t 4 oi' `� 11F� • selected for in-de:�th evaluation. CITIGEIY P�+KTICIPATION: Yarents and members of the community will be ax�pointed to :�et an the city- wide Head Start i�dvisory Council. RESIDF�NT F�IYLOYM�NT: All aide positions will be filled by residents of the hlodel Cities ��rea. If qualified teachers can be located in the areu these residents will be given employment preference. HIHINTENNNCE OF' EEF'UkT: Supplemental monies used in this project are for additianr�l service:� not able to be provided for by using local funds. • A�;odel Cities Pro�;ram- Child Develox�ment 5 of � • 11'1 . • NON-SUPPLED�iTAL FVNDED PROJECTS 1. Community Action Program-The purpose is to mobilize and coordinate resources in an effort to comb�at poverty. The operating agency is the Ramsey County Citizen's Committee for Econoraic Opportunity, Inc. The agency has developed almost a full range of programs dealing with the sociail and economic ills of the Model Neighborhood (Target Area A), including: Community Organi�ation, Neighborhood Service Center, Job development, Headstart, motivational tutoring, medical care, emergency food. legal assistance, youth deve- lopment, senior citizen's service, VISTA� USDA suppl.emental foods, and Welfare Day Care. Model Cities will, for certain service�, contract with the CAP agency which will insure a degree of programatic coordination. Model Cities and the CAP agency will have a reciprocal referral relationship and programmatic duplication will be avoided. The funding level of the CAP Programs having impact in the Model Neighborhood has been secured at approximately $418,000. Target Area "A", which includes the Model Cities area, has been • established a Target Area Advisory Council composed of residents whose responsibilities are: 1. Make all ma�or planning recommendations for the target area. 2. Establish priorities. 3. IntervieW and make recommendations for professional staff. 4. Participate in the evaluation of the total pro�ect operation. PreBently, there are approximately 60 residents employed in this pro�ect. Bylaws require that neighborhood residents be considered first for a11 employment. NonpSupplemental Funded Pro��ects • 118 NON-SUPPLEI�4'SITAL FUNDED PROJECTS • 2. St. Paul Qpportunities Industrialization Center-The purpose of this pro�ec is o provi e asic emp oymen s i s and educational traini.ng to dieadvantaged unemployed and underemployed persons. The pro�ect offers pre-vocational training in the following areas: -air conditioning repair -drafting -computer programming -auto brake repair As supportive to the pre-vocational areas, the project offere services in the following areas: -basic education -general education diploma (GED) preparation -methadone drug treatment -emergency food -�ob development -�ob placement -counseling and follow-up The operating agency is the St. Paul Opportunities Industrialization Center. At the time of this writing, Model Cities cannot indicate how and to what extent the two pro�ects will be coordinated. It is antici- pated hoWever, that the OIC program will be a referral source for the • Model Cities Programs, especially OIC's Methadone drug treatment program. The Model Cities Program will be an obvious referral source of supportive services for OIC. OIC enrollees will have benefit of the day care services, health services and facility, and the �5nployment Center as well as other proposed Model Cities Pro�ects. It is further anticipated that a contract will be negotiated between OIC and Model Cities, requiring OIC to pravide services to the proposed Model Citiea Employment Center. Details are to be worked out and finalized at a later date. Currently, funds have been secured at a level of approximately $130,000. Efforts are underway to increase the total funding leveZ to approximately $400,000 by submitting f�znding requests to various Federal� State and Local agencies. The OIC Program has a Board of Directors comprised largely of Neighbor- hood residents rrho are responsible for the planning, evaluation, and admini- stration of the over-all pro�ect. The present staff of OIC is approxinately 9096 neighborhood residents. It is the agency policy to hire neighborhood residents whenever feasible. If a contract is successfully negotiated between OIC and Model Cfties, a stipulation will require hiring preference to neighborhood residente whenever feasible. • Non-Supplemental Funded Proiects 119 • NON-S��TAL FUNDED PRp�TECTS 3. The Ramsey County Welfare Department-The purpose of this pro�ect ae it relates to the Model Neighborhood is to provide assistance for a percentage of Model Neighborhood residents in maintaining a aubsistance level while attemptin� to aid them in becoming economically independent. In addition to categorical aid to Model Neighborhood residents, this agenc,q and the Model Cities will enter into a grantee-contractual relationship in the Model Cities proposed Child Devolopment Pro�ect through the utilization of Social Security Act, Title IV, Section 2A funds. The Work Incentive Program (WIN) sponsored bq the Welfare Department will reserve 10�6 of a total �00 slots for Model Neighbor- hood residents. WIN will receive full cooperation from the proposed Model Cities Employment Cen�er. Model Cities anticipates a contractual agreement for aponaorghip of the New Careers Program with the Ramsey Caunty Welfare Department which currently has a limited New Careers Program. A21 fuading of the Ramsey County Welfare Department is on a county- wide basis and allocations are not prorated according to neighborhood or area. However, on occasions special consideration is given to particular neighborhoods or areas through programmatic arrangements • such as reserving 10;� of the Work Incentive Program slots for Model Neighborhood residents. Programs having Model Cities funding mither administered� sponsored or having input of the Ramsey County Welfare Department will have advisory groups comprised of Model Neighborhood residents that will be responsible for the over-all planning, evaluation, and adrainistration of the pro�ects. Some pro�ects sponsored or to be sponsored by the Raarsey County Welfare Department are geared specifically for the employment of Model Neigh- borhood residents: e.g. New Careers, Work Incentive Program (WIN). In these pro�ects Model Cities will encourage Model Neighborhood reeident employment at all levels including administrative. In those projects receiving Model Cities funds a contract stipulation will require first preference for hiring to be given to Model Neighborhood residents. �_ _— Non-Supplemental. Flinded Pro3ects ..�_ • I.LO NON-SUPPLEME3dTAL FUNDED PROJDCTS • 4. The Saint Paul School S� stem-The purpose of this agency is to provide educational opportunities for the citizens of St. Paul. Model Cities and this agency's liaison person has jointly developed pro�ects that will be sponsored and/or administered by the St. Paul School System and coordinated with other pro3ects of the school system. Included in these projects are: basic education for the proposed Model Citie� Eroployment Center, Supportive Education Program, Kindergarten-First 6rade Demonstration Program, and a component of the Child Developement Program. In addition to the normal school system education commitment to the Model Neighborhood schools, the following special programs wi11 be provided for schools in the Model Neighborhood and a senior high school on the boundary of the Model Neighborhood at a total approximated cost of $116,650. Theee funds have been committed by the School System and the activities will be on-going prior to the receipt of Model Cities funds: a. Curriculum Modification-unique curriculum that has been designed to meet the particular needs of the students. b. Material, Supplies and Equipaent-In addition to the average expenditure for other �unior and senior high schools in the city. • c. Film Workshops- involve students in a way that enables them to define and translate their thoughts and experiences through the media of film. d. Special Prograrp-for children who hGve difficuluty learning in a normal school setting to provide them with highly individualized curriculum and instruction. e. Hwnan Relations Training Program-for teachers and admini- strators. f. Careers Stud�v Center-for the entire school district, to eerve �unior and senior high schaol students who are not experiencing success in the typical high �chool setting by providing an experimental program with a greater degree of flexibility in content, scheduling, methodology, and procedures. � Those programs having Model Cities fundin such as the su 6 pportive education pro�ect will have adviBOry groups comprised of Model Neighborhood residents that will be responsible for the over-all planning, evaluation, and admini- etration of the projects. • Nonsupplemental k�nded Proiects 1?_1 NON-SUPPLEI�NTAL FUNDED PROJECTS • 5• The Saint Paul Bureau of Health-The purpose of this project is to provi e pu ic ea services for the citizens of St. Paul. This agency and Model Cities, through an agreement with the local community action program, will provide the residents of the Model Neighborhood with expanded services by increasing the functional capacity of a Neighborhood Health Clinic. In this center, the Bureau of Health will procide staff, equipment, and the following services: a. Family Planning;information, medical examinations, and medical supplies. b. Maternit and Infant Care: pre-nat�l and post-natal care until age one and dental care. c. Immunization Assistance: for diptheria, tetnaus� whooping cough, polio, small pox and measles. d. Tuberculosis Control: mantoux test, chest x-ray, cheat clinic, and free medication if necessary. e. Ceroical Cancer Test: pap smear. • F�nding for the St. Paul Bureau of Health is on a city-wide basis and allocations are not prorated according to neighborhood or area. However, on occassion special considerations are given to particular neighborhoods or areas having a special kind of problem. Any St. Paul Bureau of Health programs having Model Cities funds will have advisory groups comprieed of Model Neighborhood residents that will be responsible for the overall planning, evaluation, and administration of the pro�ect. Model Citiss will require, through a contract stipulation, those programs receiving Model Cities funds to give first consideration for hiring to Model Neighborhood residents. Non-Supplemental Funded Projects .�.._. • 12?_ NON-SUPPLEME�ITAL FUNDED PROJECTS • 6. Minnesota De�artment of Manpower Services,Selby-Dale Emplo,�ment Office- The Minnesota Department of Manpower Services has, for the last three years, operated a small satellite employment office located on Selby Avenue near Dale Street. In July of 1969 the office was expanded to include a supervisor, a test technician, a counselor, an MDTA selection and referral officer, an apprenticeship specialist, a Job Corp counselor, two out-reach workers, two clerks, and three interviewers. Its �oal has been to seek-out, cnunsel, and place area residents in employment or training situations. The Department of Manpower Services has agreed to transfer those slots to the Mode1 City proposed Model Neighborhood �tployment Center. It will act as the prime sponsor of that pro�ect. 7. Housing and Redevelopment Authorit�v- The purpose of this project is to coordinate provisions for public housing for indigent persons, to manage public housing, and to oversee over-all provisions of urban renewal. The operating agency is the St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Au- thority with the current responsibility for providing the following services: l. Administration of relocation grants and rehabilitation loans and grants that are received directly from Federal disbursement. • 2. Site clearance which includes etructural demolition, water service cut-off, and street removal. 3. Project improvement which insludes etreet and alley improve- atent, storm sewers� street lighting, and tree planting. 4. Public faciiity support for the Martin Luther King Center and Park and for the Oxford Pl�yground and Park. 5. Land acquisition relocation and preliminary design fees. The funding level of HRA prograins having impact in the Model Neighbor- hood have been secured at approximately $3,265,245. Model Cities and HRA will enter into a �oint effort in coordinating the development and implementation of a comprehensive physical plan for the Model Neighborhood which obviously affords a degree of resident involve- ment in planning� eva],uation and the administration of this project. Projects receiving Model Cities funds such as the proposed Rehabil.itation Loans and Grants of the First Year Action Plan, ever3r effort will be made to ha.re Model Neighborhood residents. • Non-SUpplemental F�nded Projects 1?3 ADMINISTRA.TTVE STRUCTURE REPORT • I. Introduction The St. Paul Model Cities Program - Summit-Univer�ity AreA functions as a partnership between the city of St. Paul and the residents of the Mode1 Neighborhood. The working agreement between the city and the residents was evolved through a �low and difficult process of negotiation. The finalized agreement became City Ordinance No. �43�4. With its approval on November 22, 1969, the City Council created a Department of Model City Area Development, The staff of this new department then becaate the entire staff for the pro- gram, including the CDA staff function. The City Council and Mayor ultima- tely have the CDA voting power. The citizen participation structure is based upon the Model Neighborhood Planning Council. This 30 member council is made up of five (5) resident� • elected for each of the six (6) districts of the Model Neighbox•hood. The MNPC, directly and through staff, coordinates the work of the Planning Corss and Task Forces which are made up of Council members and other res�.dents. Through the separate narratives and the charts which follow, we hope to explain the various functions and provide insights into the: working rela- tionships between the various functions. II. Staff Adminis�rative Organization Having completed the planning for the First Action Year, the St. Paul Model Cities Program raust expand its Administration Organization to meet the additional responsibilities which are to be carried out during the First Action Year. Administrative Structure Report • __ ___. _.. _,._�_,.. 1?_4 The present agency staff, with Technical Assistance through HUD, the help of consultants, and the review by citizens has designed an overall adminis- • tration organization and staffing pattern which they are confident wi11 provide adequate administrative machinery to carry out the program plc�nned for this year. The basic staff functions of planning� connmunity organization, and internal administration will be expanded to include project operation and coordina- tion, project monitoring, program and project evaluation, development of matching Grants-In-Aid, accounting, training and public information. Certain existing functions must also be expanded to meet the new needs. To provide for these additional responsibilities, a four unit agency organi- zational structure has been developed for the First Action Year. The four units are: Project Planning and Operations, �baluation, Monitoring and Data, Administrative Services, and Community Organization. An Organiz�- tional Chart depicting this structure is part of this section (See Appendix • I). The Staff Outline details the staffing pattern in terms of types of' positions projected and the number of employees in the various classifications (See Appendix II). Functional Statements for each of the organizational units have also been prepared (See Appendix III). The relationship of the Model Cities Staff to the city government is based upon the City Ordinance creating a Department of Model City Aren Development. This department has the responsibility for caxrying out the program. Both the Model Cities Executive Director and Deputy Director are appointed by the Mayor upon the recommendation of the Model Neighborhood Planning Council and with approval of the St. Paul City Council. As a regular city department head, the Executive Director reports directly to the Mayor. A1.1 agency �taff members other than the Director and Deputy Director are hired by the Director • Administrative Structure Report ��`T � 1�'`�� in cooperation with the MNPC Personnel Committee. A11 staff employees are pZaced under the Unclassified, F.Scempt Status of the St. Paul Civil Service • (See Appendix IV). The Model Cities Agency is sub�ect to the joint supervision and direction of the Model Neighborhood Planning Council and the CAA (City Council). 7'he Executive Director reports at least bi-weekly to the Model Neighborhood Planning Council and the MNPC Executive Committee. The entire staff work�a closely with the MNPC and Citizens Committees providing coordin�tion and technical assistance to support the planning effort of the residents. III. Citizen Partici_pation Structure Both the city ordinance creating the Model Cities Agency as A separate city department and the HITD requirements call for residettts being involved in all aspects of the program. The 30 member Model Neighborhood Planning Council ie the group elected by • the residents of the Model Neighborhood to represent them. The Model Neighborhood wa,s divided into six districts and five people were elected to the Model Neighborhood Planning Council (MNPC) from each district to serve for a term of two years. To assure representation of the community, procedures pex�m3.tted the election in each district of three candidates over 21 years of age (cl,assified as Adult-General), one limited income candidate over 21 years of age (Adult-Special), and one Youth candidate between th� ages of 16 and 20 inclusive. The MNPC functions as an entire body and through an Executive Committee consisting of the officers; appointed chairmen of the Personnel Committee and Eeonomic, Social, and Physical Cores; and a repreaentative of each District and of the Youth, (if not otherwise included among tha officers of Core Chairmen). Administrative Structure Report • l.��E, The MNPC meets bi-weekly at schools, churches, activity centers, and • residences for the elderly within the Model Neighborhood. The meeting� are open to the public. Residents have ample opportunity at these meeting� to express their support or displeasure about the leadership And the direction the program is taking. Since the responsibilities of the agency are increased during the First Action Year, it is necessary to revise the citizen participation structure to insure that residents have an opportunity to be involved in the new responsibilities. Although the Model Neighborhood Planning Council is incorporated, the Model Cities staff will continue to supply the needed staff support rather than funding a separate staff for the non-profit corporation. Organization Chart: An organizational structure which allowa the i�U�1I'C and other residents to be involved in continuous planning, monitoring, coor- dination, evaluation and coromunity arganization was developed. (See Appen- dix V. ) The community organization unit shown on the chart is part of the • staff, but its functiom is to lend the needed staff support to the ca.tizen participation structure. In addition, a new permanent committee is being formed, the Evaluation and Monitoring Committee. The purpot�es of this committee is explained in the Continuous Planning and Evaluation Section. Procedures for Involving Neighborhood Residents in theO�eratio�s of the Program: While the other parts of this plan describe the relationahips between the Model Cities staff and the Model Neighborhood Planning Council� a summary of these procedures is set forth in Appendix VI. Plans for Training and F�nploying Model Neighborhood Residents .in the Admin- istration of the Model Cities Program: The proposed administrative struc- ture for the First Action Year includes a Community Organization Director, an Assistant Community Organizer, a.nd six Resident Planners. It is under- stood that the residents of the Model Neighborhood will be employed in • Administrative Structure Report � y�� 1;J thase jobs. This unit of the staff will undergo a training program re�ating � to community organization and special training for their work in Monitoring and Evaluation. To the extent feasible, residents of the Model Neighborhood will be employed in other staff positi�ns. In order to build local s�aff capabilities, an �ployment and Trainin� Officer has been made a part of the organizational structure. This person will plan, develop, and coordinate training for residents employed in the admin�stration of the Model Cities Pro�ram and i� the projects operated under the program. Other parts of this plan such as the Resident E�nployment Section provide further information. N. Procedures for Involving Other Agencies in the Model Cities Program Since a major goal of the Model Cities Program is to bring about institutional change and because in most cases the program will have to depend upon existing agencies to operate Model Cities projects, it is important that institutions and a�encies inside and outside the Model Neighborhood be involved in con- � tinous planning. While many of these groups have worked very closely with MNPC and staff during the planning period, it is recognized thnt increaaed' involvement is necessary. The following are guidelines for involving and seeking the support of the agencies. 1. An inventory will be made of all institutions and agencies operating in the Model Neighborhood and the larger community. The responsibility for coarpleteing this inventory will be assumed by the Community Organization Director and the Resident Planners. 2. The Model Cities staff will continue to seek technical assis- tance from agencies. These people should be participating in the various Cores and serve as technical advisors. In this way the agencies will be involved in planning projects which :they may be called upon to operate. The staff responsibility will be as�igned • Administrative Structure Report �__A` _M 12�i to the Project Planning and �eration Unit. The T�chnical Advisory Committee will be the focus for this activity. � 3• The Model Cities staff wi11 actively seek loaned staff, espe- cially from the state agencies and the State University. Staff on loan would be especially valuable as part of the planning unit of the staff. It is intended that the four (4) positions on thQ Organi- zational Chart identified as Assistant Planner Agen� (See Appendix 1) will be staff inembers on loan to Model Cities. Loan staff from the University could be helpful to the Evaluation, Monitoirng, and Data unit and they could also assist in identifying anci seek:ing funds for projects and writing proposals. 4. Before any technical advisors or loaned staff are taken on as part of the Model Cities Program an orientation program wi11 be developed. This program wi11 include among other things, precissly what is expected, who is to supervise loan staff and general know- ledge about the St. Paul program and the meaning and purposes of the Model Cities Program. � 5• In addition to the foregoing, the MNPC and Model Citfes 8taff will develop a means of communicating on a continuing basis with the various institutions and agencies. � Administrative Structure Report _ � y �� 'w 129 b � � � o � � N o � I �'• fn,,, u• �+ � ~ � C�i ?> H � � �,' � � p �+ c: tn �, 09 b t' � � � b " �' � � � � � � � � c7 p• �� °' �+- � � � � �* N' '� n y � a4 ►�-� � O C�11 y �j � � � � � f+. � t" �- ht� � w xa ' x � � � a � � a � aa ' a i aa~ a � � � � � tD Cn � tD m � Cn I Os � 09 � � � 1 t�D O�i f U�i ti � W fn ( Q�, Cn � U1 � Uf � N [n 1 � � � I-' t� 1 () � A �1 '."! L7 N `d � c+ c+ � c+ cr � • c+ � � cr I � c* � e+ � � c+ c+ y w o I 1 ( ►d ►d lD O �0 i a � � r � w � � o � � � � � � � � � � � � � i � ; � � i � , � � , � � ; � ; � � � � y � � 'C K � �'f I '4 I K � �'i � �-f �'i � � laD �� - - - �" -- - -� L - - - p� - - -- F-' O � � tD c* 'i � �-t N. m O, �� p � �i � cr r• �+ N• � . � � � o � � � tn �. Ry � c� n � `� �'' C � � � � � � p' m � � �i � o � tu ti �* 0 ti 9 � � � � � a � �� • A ~ `'s� 0 � � f�D W� c� � � �• y � � n W Cy �?, � �' � o � � � � � � . a � � � r• c� � A fp • pl � O O � � c'�D m N c�D � rn �n �n m �n m � F,,. f,,, f,,, f,,, �, f.,. . H a a a o. a ri � � � � � � w � W � N � ►-�� ►� � �+' �• � � ~ � � m o �* � � � � � y � � O �,, NK �-S y � � � �y cr c~i� F-�• O �C � ".� n � 1 T:. h;. a��rrnzx zz � Staff Outline Position No. Grade Salary Range Executive Director 1 ,54 $15,561 - 19,864 Deputy Director 1 50 13,81� - 1`J,654 Planning Director 1 4'7 12,64y - 16,'133 Economic Planner 1 45 11,y08 - 15,236 Physical Planner 1 4g ��,90$ - 15,�3� Social Planner 1 45 11,908 - �5,�36 Assistant Planners 4 22 6,3�� - 8,0$6 Program Developer 1 38 9,685 - 12,350 Project Coordinator 1 3$ 9,685 - 12,350 Evaluatian Director 1 45 11�y0$ - 15,23G Information System Specialist 1 24 6,?3�+ - $,55�+ Administrative Services Director 1 3$ 9�68Z - 12,350 F�nployment and Training Coordinator 1 30 7,� - 9,9�+5 � Accountants 2 30 7,�0 - �,945 Accounting Clerk 1 22 6,357 - 8,0$6 �rypists 3 �4 5,070 - 6,409 Stenographers 3 22 �,357 - 8,086 Receptionist 1 16 5,369 - 6,786 Secretary 1 24 6,?34 - $,554 Public Information Supervisor 1 26 '7,'13'7 - 9,048 Community Organization Director 1 38 9,685 - 1?,35U Assistant Community Organizer 'I 22 6,35? - �,�� Resident Planners 6 14 5,0'IO - b,40� Total. Positions: 36 Maximum Annual Salary: �357,22? Fringe Benefits Factor '14% 011 Total Personnel Cost $407,23t3 � Administrative Structure Report _ � ��l,� ,__._._.._._.._.._ 131. I APPENDIX III Org�nizational I►nit DescriAtion _' -------------__.__, The J�Iodel Citie� staff is organized as sh.own in the accompanyi�g p�.��i_ zation Chart. Four basic units make up the structure: Planning �d Project Operations Unit; Etir�uation, Monitoring and Data Unit; Aarninistra_ tive Services Unit; Community OrgAnizatio n Unit. Each of the units have a unit head which reports directly to the Ue ut Director, who in turn •reports to the Executive Director, who has the y ultimate responsibility for overall supervision of the entire staff. The Director has a two-fold responsibility: ane is to the Made1 Nei�hborhood Planninp Council, and secondly, as a Department Head of the City Government. .�ie r�lso has a direct responsibility in reporting to the Mmyo�r, Each of the uni.t heads will have the responsibility of carrying out tho$e delegated responsibilities on the behalf of the Director and the Deputy Director in implementing the decisions and having direct responsibility for overall superviUion of staff within eACh respective unit, In addition, the unit heads have a responsibility of coordinating their activities with each other through the Deputy Director. Plannin� and Pro,Zect Management Unit Thi� unit is headed by the Planning and Operations Director who eupervisea the three core planners and the Project Operations Coordint�tor. Thir� unit with input from the planning cores, task forces, and technical advisors i� directly responsible for all phases of project planning and operutiona for the Model Cities program. This unit with the aid of residents identi- fies and interprets the problems of the Modell Neighborhood and develapr proposals for soiutions. This unit is responsible for coordinating th� I Administrative Structure Report ""'"'° ' ____._.__-____.___.______.,____ ---._._._._. �.I�) Jr... , � � a�i � � a � bp � H � �O ctf +� � � U a � � < �i � � A O � � U �+ A � a a a � a� <s o Ga � a � w � H � � o � - - cHi �a � m A � I a a � z � � t_ � �� A W � a b o � H � Q � � A O � � � o � � [� H LYi � a � � H � � A A A A V a N :z�,l� � ati +� -a v a� a� a� ' ' � � a� a� a� � +� +� � V� r-� U +� +� +� •rl •rl N C2 •�e-y1 �rl •eri U �1 �� Q � Q � � U 4-� 'Lq! � CON V U U +' U � � cd •� � r-� t� 60 .] +� +�.� � +� +� N O f� •��-1 .t7 � p�,�� i .� •� � ,-� > O U f�-� I ,�.-{ t�. V .�uil `'r a �A yC pr I ,� ; H ti p � � � '� !►..k:�i...L � ^�s o �Z � •� o +� a +' b + � d ----- ,� � '� a °� � � I °' �s � .� � � O U Lo� • ��ri ��rl � �i ��rl � �i � � Ea C� t� U U U V U fJ � � � Q V � � U I � � � � U � a � •�+ u m � c�i c�i v � v � &• � � � � �� `� �`� �� dq w �d ui -qc2 A U � m oD m u�i W�1 ttS � �� u W � � A � � � A w � � t� F7 O� V � � � Q� t0 RS A � '6ri � � � � � � 9s � Gi H 41 � � 0 1 I I I I ( � a�-+ 'g � M � � , � � � � � � � a � .� ; i i i i i i „ �° ro � � Q� � �+ M � � � � YI R � � a � ,� a�i a�i o�i I a�', v d ° A � � •� U � m � � � � � � � � °,� .� o. � o � t� � � w � w ti � �' a � � a a a u � b �'� �no � � � ''� � b v°' •d �v va� �w •,� � o » � •,� •� •.� •.� •,� •,� d � a� �� a�i a�i a�i a�i a�i a�i v�i �`� � y �a � a a a a Ac a a � u a� o � � •° +� �� ''a +� � c� °�' � c°'. ai ��p � � � U � * r * fr A c�, G� r-� � +r r r O '''� CJ Q U � �� .c7 f-�Y+ O j-�i O d � � � � uHj� � I U � U � r-i A • � �' '� ,� � � � � � a � .� � � � ,ca�� oa +3 �-, � q '� 'u�j H c�a � i �� 0 0 � a W � � « • + w r N • � � , � � Q Q 1 3�� APPIIdDIX VI � Procedures for Involving Neighborhood Residents in Continuou� Pl�nning, Coordination, nnd Monitoring Under the city ordinance creating the Department of Model City Areu Development, the Model Cities program is subject to joint supervision �nd direction of the City Council (CDA) and the Model Neighborhood Plannin� Council. The ordinance charges the two groups with the responsibility for coordinating all activities relatin� to programs. Further, under the HUD ' quidelines the City is required to develop procedures for fully involvin� residents in continuous planning, coordination, and monitoring. The following summarizes the procedures for satisfying the above mentioned requirements. Contin,uous Plannin Staff Responsibilities (Project Planning and Operations Unit) 1. Assist the Cores in identifying, analyzin� and propoaing .solutions Nto the problems of the Model Neighborhood. 2. Write proposals for projects and programs and the comprehensive plan. 3. Research the possible sources of funds far the proposed projects. MNPC Responsibilities (Planning Cores, Task Forces, District Councils, and Executive Committee) 1. Identify, analyze, and propose solutions for problems of the Model Neighborhood. 2. Review operating projects and programs on basis of evaluation and monitorin� reports. 3. Recommend continuation, revision, or dropping of operating pro�ects. , Evaluation, Monitoring, and Data Collection Staff ResPonsibilities (Evaluation, Monitoring, and Data Unit) � Administrative Structure Report ' � 1.36 1. Desi�n and implement evaluation r�nd information systema. � 2. Develop system for monitoring operating pro�ects. 3. Research special information needs for programs. �. Supply staff support for resident Evaluation and Monitoring Cortunitteo. MNPC Responsibilities (Evaluation and Monitoring Committee, Executive Committee, and Cores) 'I. Review evaluation reports and identify information needs. 2. Review and make recommendations concerning monitorin� reports. 3. Assist in collection of data from residents and agencie�. Project Implementation and�0 eration Staff Responsibilities (Project Planning and Operations Unit) 1. Coordinate and perform tasks necessary for the implementation of projects. 2. Coordinate the operation. of the pro�ects. 3. Assist operating agencies in recruiting employees from the Model MNeighborhood. MNPC Responsibilities (Cores and Executive Committee) 1. Review contracts with operating agencies. 2. Serve as members of advisory boards to operating agencieS. 3• Review operata.ng reports of projects. Training Staff Responsibilities (Administrative Services Unit) 1. Identifying training needs for agencies. 2. Develop on-going training programs. MNPC Responsibilities (Executive Committee) 1. Identi.fy training needs of MNPC. 2. Assist in development of on-going training program�. � Aciministrative Struct r � �4 ~�^ u e Report, Appendix VI, cont. �3'l Administrative Services � Staff Res onsibilities (Director, Assistant Director, Administrative Services Unit) 1. Coordinate activities of all units of the program. 2. Make necessary administrative decisions to carry out agency poli- cies. 3. Supply necessary administrative services. 4. Develop administrative procedures. 5. Recommend budget needs far administration. 6. Develop job descriptions for staff positions. 7. Supervise agency staff inembers. MNPC Responsibilities (Executive Committee, Personnel Committee) 1. Assist in setting policies for the Model Cities Program. 2. Recruit, screen, and make recoromendations concerning the employment of all staff. 3. Assist in the preparation of the Administrative budget. � 4. Review and make recommendations concerning job descriptions for staff positions. � Administrative Structure Report, Appendix VI, cont. �� 1.?>8 FORM APPROVF.n BUDGET dVREAU NO. 09-R1211 CITY U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT �� P8U1 Minnesota CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET CONTRACT NUMBER DATE BUDGET SUMMARY REVISEO ACTION YEARS FROM: TOi [_JOriginol Submission [�Revision No: (ALL FIGURES IN THOUSANDS ROUNDED TO TNE NEAfiEST T1i0U5AND) CATEGORY PRIOR CURRENT REQUESTED FUNDS CUMUL.A- CODE pROGRAM CATEGORY vEwR3 APPROVED TOTAL nvE 7or��. NUMBER MC GRANT BUDGET, MC NON HUD MC FUNDS �(,U�, MC GfYANI" MC GRANT GRANT �UNDS FuNOS FUNDS FEDERAL STATE LOCAL 'S{�� L�/„;{��,5 (1) (2) (31 (4) (S) (6a) (66) (6c) (7) IB) io Education 201 1 1 441 � >> Health 521 22 543 521 ts Saial Services �s Recreation — Culture 9$ 9$ 9� +� Crime — Delinquency 166 5$ 11 235 166 2O Manpower ond Job Development 499 109 380 1?0 1�108 49y 21 Economic and Business Develo ment 227 227 2?_7 3o Housing 90 �0 �U 3i Relocotion 50 5� 50 � Transportation — Communicotion 33 Environmental Protection and Development ao Citizen Participation 112 28 140 112 so VO �t�on an Information 11$ 'j0 148 11� Emer�ency Action �1 61 f,.l SUBTOTAL 2,661 310 4j$ 712 4,1'+1 2,f,t�1 so Program Administration 269 6? 3 jFi 2(>9 GRAND TOTAL 2�9�j(j j10 4j$ 7�19 4�l17'� 2��j0 CLEARANCE SECTION C�n HUO APPROVAL Approved Total Graot Amount : E _._i_.__ It is hereby certified that City budgeting practices have been followed and that all justifications and back•up materiol required by City practice ond by HUD is on file with the City and is available for insp�ction pursvant to the Grant Agreement. OATE SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CITY'4 CHIEF FISCAL OFFICER �-�({R/3lfK!'� SUBMISSION AUTHORIZATION: DATE SIGNATURE AND TITI.E OF CITV'3 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER �7Ip1 HUD-7044 (2-70) Previous editien is �6anl.+. i � FORM APPROVED BUDGfi7 BUREAU NO. 49—RI"ttt U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT �TY CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET �S P U�. Minnesota PROGRAM CATEGORY - PROGRAM BUDGET �PR06RAM CATEGORY 'Education (ALL FIGURES IN TNOUSAND ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST THOUSAND) MUD PROJECT CURRENT USE � PRIOR APpROVEO REqUESTEO FUNOS ONLY TITLE MC GRANT BUDGET, NON MC GRANT FUNDS TOTAL FUNDS MC GRANT MC GRANT2 ��,�� {,�� FUNDS FEDERAL STATE LOCAL fi) 121 (3) (4) ! ISoI (6b) (Sc) (6) E-1 Wilder Dqy Care 29 88 117 E-2 Pre-School Educatio 13 ; 3$ 51 Cognitive Based Curriculum E-3 Montessori 14 41 55 E-4 Headstart 11 34 45 E-5 � Home-School Liaiso 23 23 E-6 Operation Careers 20 lb4 184 �� Experimental Coun- seling 45 $ 53 GRAND TOTAL ee ac en o �Copital Projects must be identified by underlining the Project Title. Prior to atort of construction, the COA must hove on Nie !or possibla HUD review o detailed capital acquisition and constroct�on cost budget For each project supported by specificot(ons ond drawings(and ony subeu- quent chan e orders) which must have been �eviewed and opproved by the City's Engineer,a quoliifed engineering consultont or tho Oprrodnq Agency's �echinical Staff. At the time of submission of this budyet schedule, it Is necessory ro hove budget esttmotes deve�oped in accordance with locol copital budgeting practice, and these estimates shall be retalned on file by the City Eor posslble HUD revlew. 2Any proposed use to controct ond consultant services in an activity sholl be justified 6y a nanritive statexnent aetting Forth Iho service ►o be rendered under the controct and the basis for the <ost estimate. The statement shall be included as port of the opproprfote work program. HUO-7040(2•70) Previous edition is obsolete HUD-Wash., D.C. ��.� 24�180-P � FORMAPPROVEO BUDGET BUREAU NO. 69—N1211 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AMD URBAN DEVELOPMENT �ITY CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET St• PSlll� MlIIII@80t8 PROGRAM CATEGORY - PROGRAM BUDGET PROGRAM CATEt30RY Educatian • (ALL FIGURES IN THpUSANDS ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST THOUSANp) HUO PROJECT PRIOR URRENT REQUESTEO FUNDS USE TITLE� YEARS APPROVED ONLY MC GRANT BUDGHT, NON MC GRANT FUNDS TOTAL FUNDS MC GRANT MC GRANT2 FEDERAL STATE LOCAL ��'��'��+'� FUNDS (1) (21 (e) (aJ (sa) lsbl fscl 161 E-8 Special Resource Teacher 73 34 10� E-9 Youth-Serving- Youth 61 2 63 E-10 Community-School Coordinator 49 254 303 E-11 Higher Education Resource Center 55 55 Assistance Fund E-12 _ Kindergarten and First Grade Demon- 3� 39 383 � stration Project GRAND TOTAL ?� ZOI. �j01 1��Fl. O �Capital Projects must be identified by underlining the Project Title. Prior ro sta�t of const►uction, the CDA must hove on file for poasible HUD review o detailed capitnl ocquisition and construction cost budget for each project supported by spedficotbns and drawings(and ony subaa� quent chen e orders)which must have been reviewed pnd opproved by the City's Engineer�a quolified engineering consultant or the OperoHnp Agency's �echinical Staff. At the time of submission of this budget schedule, it is necessa�y to have budget es►Imates deve�oped in occordonce with loca) capital budgeting practfce, ond these estimates shell be retoined on file by the City for poss(bie HUD review. 2Any proposed use to contract and consultant services in an activity shall he justifiad by a norrotive statanent setting fotth the servicc to be rendered under the controct and the basis for the cost estimote. The statement shall be i�cluded os part of the appropriote work progrom. HUD-7040(2-70) Previous edition is obsolete HUD-�Nash., D.C. .�(�� 2�7188-P FORMAPPROVED BUDGET BUREAU NO. �3—R1211 CITY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT St. PAU�. M1I121@BOtffi UTY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET � � PROGRAM CATEGORY — PROGRAM BUDGET �►+ooRAM��rEOORr , Health (ALL FIGURES IN THOUSANDS ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST THOUSANDI HUD PROJECT PRIOR CURRENT REQUESTEO FUNDS USE TITLE� YEARS APPROVED ONLY MC GRANT BUDGET, NON MG GRANT FUNDS TOTAL FUNDS MC GRANT MC GRANT2 �;�i�� ¢4..� FUNDS FEDERAL STATE LOCAL � � ' 111 (2) (3) (4) (50) (B6) (Scl (8) H-1 Aid for Retarded 40 12 52 Children H-2 Community Health 4g1 451 Clinic �-3 Comprehensive Health Planning 30 10 40 Grant GRAND TOTAL �jZ]. Zc� �j'�i3 �Capirol Projects mus�be identified by underlining the Project Title, Prior ro start of construct(on, �he CC1A musi have on filc fur possiblr HI1p review a detailed copitel acquisit(on and construction cost budget for each p�oject supported by spetificafions ond drowings(ond nny subso- quent chon e orders)which must have been reviewed and approved by the City's Engineer, n qualified engineeri�g co�sullant or the Opevatinq Agency's �ethinical $taff, At the time of submission of this budget schedule, it is necessary to have budget estimates deve�oped in accoidance with locol capitol budgeting p�actice, and these estimates shall be retained on file by the City for posslble HUD review. ZAny proposed use to coniracr and consultant services in an activity shall be justified by o narrotive statement setting forth the service lo be rendered under the contract and fhe bosis for the cost estimofe. The statement sholl be included as part of the approprlate work progrom. HUD-7040(2-70) Previous edition is obsolete HUD•Wash., D.C. �d719o•P '111? FORMAPPROV�U BUDGET BUREAU NO. �9—H1�11 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING ANO URBAN DEVELOPMENT CITY CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET St. PSLil� Minnesota PROGRAM CATEGORY — PROGRAM BUDGET PR06RAM CATEGORY Recreation and Culture (ALL FIGURES IN THOUSANDS ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST THOUSANO) HUD PROJECT PRIOR CURRENT REQUESTED FUNDS USE TITLE� YEARS APPROVED ONLY MC GRANT BUOGET, NON MC GRANT FUNDS TOTAL FUNDS MC GRANT MC GRANT2 FEDERAL STATE LOCAL ��''��• 4f'iJ FUNOS (1) (2) (9) (4) (Sa) I56) (Ec) (6) Oxford-Selby Recreation Trainin 69 69 Project Cultural Enrichmen for the Model 29 29 Neighborhood GRAND TOTAL 9$ �J8 �Copital Projects must be identified by underlining tha Project Title. Prior to stort of constructlon, fhe CDA must have on ffle for possibla HUO roview a derailed copita) ocquisitfon and construction cost budget for each project supported by speciFicotions ond drowings(ond any subse- quent chan e o�ders) which must have been reviewed and opproved by the City's Engineer� a quolified engineerinQ consultant or the Operatinp Age�cy's �echin(cal StafF. At the time of submission of this budget sched�le, it is necessary to have budget est�mates deve�oped in accordance with local capitai budgeti�g pructice, and these estimates sholl be retoined on file by the Ci►y For possible HUD review. 2Any proposed use to Controct and consultont services in an activity shali be justified by a narrotive slofement sefting forth the service ro be rendered under the cont�act ond the basis for the cost estimate. The stateme�t sholl be included as part of the approprlate work prog�om. MUD-7040(2-70) Previous edition is obsolete HUD-Wash., D.C. ��;� 2J71B0-P � FORMAPPRpVEO BUDGET BUREAU NO. ES-R1211 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CITY CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET St• P&Lil� M1IlT1@BOta PROGRAM CATEGORY — PROGRAM BUDGET PROGRAM CATEGORY Crime and Delin uency (ALL F►GURES IN THOUSANDS ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST THOUSANO) MUO PROJECT PRIOR CURRENT RE UESTED FUNDS USE 1 APPROVED Q ONIY TITLE MC GRANT BUDGET, 2 NON MC GRANT FUNOS TOTAI. FUNDS M FUNOST MC GRANT FEDERAL STATE LOCAL ��'��'`�+�� c�1 t21 131 la) Isa) (sb) Isc1 (61 Police-Community Relations Project 109 11 120 The Retreat 57 58 115 GRAND TOTAL 1.66 �j'g 11 235 �Cnpitol Projects must be identified by underlining the Project Title. Prior to stort of construction, the CDA must have on file for possible HUD review o detailed capital acquisition and construction cost budget for eoch project supported by specificafions and drawings�ond any subso- quent chon e orders) which must have been reviewed and app�oved by the City's Engineer,a qualifled engineerinQ consultant or the Operating Agency's �echinicol Staff. At the time of submission of this budget schedule, It is necessory to have budget est�mates deve�oped in accorda�ce with local capital budgeting practice, o�d these estimotes shall be retained on flle by the City for possible HUD review. ZAny proposed use to coniroct and consulront services in an activlfy shall be justified by a nanative stotement setting forfh the service to be rendered under the contract ond the basis for the cost estimete. The statement shall be included os part of the oppropriote work progrom. HUD-7040(2•70) Previous edition is obsolete HUD-Wash., D.C. ^� � 2dT180-P � RORM APVNpVI:p n��uar7 nun�'�U NO. ea-rt�tl� U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT tITY GTY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET St. P&111� Minnesota PROGRAM CATEGORY - PROGRAM BUDGET PR06RA�A C�LF60RY v t (ALI. FIGURES IN THOUSANDS ROUNDED TO TME NEAREST TNOUS.+r:Dl UO PROJECT PRIOR GURRENT' REqUESTED FUNDS USE TITLE� YEARS APPROVEO ONLY MC GRANT BUDC3EZ Z NON MC GRANT FUNOS TOTAL FUNDS MC GRANT MC fiRANT (Col.4+S) FUNOS FEDERAL STATE LOCAL Itl t21 l91 (a) Isol (sb1 tacl (s1 Model Neighborhood � Employment Center 499 109 380 120 1,108 � . • , � i ' • GRAND TOTAL 499 Zo9 3� lzo 1�10� �Copitol�Projects must be identified by underlining the P�ject Title. Prior to start of construct(on„ the CDA must hove on file for po�sibt�HUD eview o de�oiled copitol ocquisitlon and construction cost budqet For each project �upported by sp�c(Fication� ond drowinya(ond a�y �ubsa ' uent cbony e orders)which must hove been reviewed and opproved by the Clty's Enginex,o quoliff�d englneeriny consulfant or the Opsrotinp gency's Techinicol Stoff. At the time of submiss(on of this budget schedule, It is neceasory ro hav� budget e:timat�� deve�oped fo occordance with local capital budgeting practice,and these estimates shall be�otained on f{le by the City for po�slbls HUO�evlew. �Any proposed use ro cootract ond consultont services In on activlty sholi be justifisd by o narrativa stotement settiey Fotth th� s�rvlc� �o be rtndered under the controct and fht bo�ia:fo�fhe tost esfimat�. The starement shvll b�Included as po�t oi th�opprop�lote work proyrom. MUD•7010�(2•70) Prw{ou� �ditfon i�obsolq� HUD•M�o�h.,O.C. ��10�-p , fONM APPNOVF_O OUDGCT OU1IF;AU NO. ��-1�1211 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING ANO URBAN DEVELOPMENT ciTr CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET St• PSUl� Ml2'1T1680t& • PROGRAM CA?EGORY - PROGRAM BUDGET PR06RA�.�t CALa(yORY �` Economic and Businese Developmeht (ALL FIGURES IN THOUSANDS ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST THOUS.•,r:D! UD PROJECT CURRENT USE � PRIOR APPROVED REqUESTED FUNDS ONLY TITI.E MC GRANT BUOGET, NON MC GRANT FUNDS TOTAL FUNDS MC GRANT MC GRANT2 (Col.4+SJ RUNOS FFDERAL STATE LOCAL l U t21 181 14) (bal 16b1 (bt1 (6! Local Development � Corporation 22� 22� . i . . i GRAND TOTAL c�27 22'� �Copitol Projects musf be Identified by underlinl�g the Project T(tle. PrJor to start oF consttuttio�� the CDA must hove o� file For posslbla HUO revisw o detailed copital ocqvialtion and construction tost budget fo► each projett cuppo�ted by specificotions ond drowinps(ond o�y subaa ent chon�ye orders)which must have been revlewed and approved by the C(ty's Enginser�a quolifled engineering consullont or the Operotinq pency'a Techinical Stafi, At ths tim�o(eubmtssion of thia budyet achedule, it is oecesw�y ro hova budget �stimote: deve�oped in occorda�c• wl�h locol capltol budgetln9 proctice, ond th�te �sfimotea shoil b�reto(nad on fll�by�h�City fo�pos�ibl�MUO r�vl�w. , 2Any proposed use to controct ond consuitont services In on octivifq shall be justified br o norraNve stotenent sMtlny fo►th the aervice to M rendered under the contracr ond the bosis for ths cost estimate. The statement sholl b�Intluded os port of the opproptlaf�wo►M pro9rom. HUa7010 Y2-70) Previous edition is obsolete HUD-Mrosh., D.G � 2�171AO�P , � ; 14a� FONM APPpOVED OUDGET DURCAU NO. e7�q1;11 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF MOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ��TY CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET St. Paul, Minnesota PROGRAM CATEGORY - PROGRAM BUDGET PR�aRA�A C�TFOOf7V Housing (ALL FIGURES IN TMOUSANDS ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST THOUS.:��O! V� PROJECT CURRENT USE � PRIOR APPROVEO REQUESTED FUNDS ONLY T�T`� MC GRANT BUDGET, 2 NON MG GRANT FUNOS TOTAL FUNDS MC GRANT MC GRANT (Cnl.4+Sf FUNDS FED�RAL STATE LOCAL (f) (21 (9) (4) (50) labt (6t) (6) Consultant Housing . Study 40 4p � . Rehabilitation Loans and Grants 50 Sp GRAND TOTAL � f� �Copitol Proiects must be identified by underl(ning tha Proiect Tltle. Prior lo storf of const�uct(on� fhe CDA must hov�on ifle for poss(ble HUO �aview o detailed capital ocquisition ond cqnsfruction cost budget for eoch project supported by spotificotions ond drawinqs�ond ony cubsa ent cHan e orders)which must hove been ►eviewed and opproved by the Ci�y's Engineer�a quolified enginseriny consultont or the Operotin gency's �echi�ical Stoff, At the ttme of submisslon of this budyef schedule� tt Is necessa►y to hov�budpet estimotes deva�oped in accordonc� with locol copital budgetiny proctice, a�d theae estlmotes shall be retolned on file by the City for posslble HUD ravlew. 2A�y proposed use ro co�troct ond conaultont services In an octivity sholl be justifled by o no►rative stotameot settinp torth �he s��vica to be rendared unde� the controct and the bosis For the cosf es}(mata. The afofement sholl be includ•d os part oi fhe appropNafe work proprom. MUO•TOAO Z•70) Pr�vlou��dit�on U obwl�t� HUD•wo�h., D.C. ��,� Z47i�0•p 1`pWM A��1�uqVl+l� 1}�,1f�13!' f Ilii/tk All NU. „1 � 111.'l l . C I T Y U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSINC AND URBAN �EVEIOPMENT UTY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUOGET $t• p&Lll� Minnesota PROGRAM CA7EGORY - PROGRAM BUDGET PR0f31iAM � A Tk G(1p�Y -------- ... ......._s�.._..__._ Relocation __. .,...... (ALL FIGURES IN THOUSAMp5 ROUNUF':C� TO TNF NlAit[:ST TH�7U'�ANUI r+uo —� _.__.__,_---__ _--.,____.._._ F'ROJECT pR�pq CURRENT REpUESTEI� 6U►�05 USE � APPROVED ONLY T1TLE YEARS BUDGET MCC;RANT • NUN MC C:FANT FUNU`� �trtA�. FUNOS MC GRANT MC GRANT2 —._________._ .._ _.. �1 ��1. I I �1 UNDS . F�pEqAL. S�fATE� lnr.Al ___..�_.._. �....__ _ .. _ _. ___._...,....._,,. 11) (21 131 141 ISnI 1561 I�� 1 l61 r Relocation 50,000 50,CX� � This amount is pro osed ta rovide f r additi nal relo ation se vices an assistance. Great r detail will be one into at the c mpletion of aur final Relocation P an at th end of he 90 d period. See pag 197, ice _______ GRAND TOTAL �QQQ ��CXX) �Copilol Projects must be Idmtifled by underlining the Project Tltie. Prior ro stort oF conshuciion, fhe CQA musr ho�r un file I„r po�.;�61rr NI!l� rev�ew a deloiled copital ocqulsition and construction cost budgef for eoch projrct supported by specificoriuns pnd draw��qs(or�A �+��y s��l:�.e� quen� chany e orders)which musl hove besn revirwed and approved by the City's Engineer, o qual�fird enr,�ne�•��n�� c�n•.�,Ir;,�•r „� �h� f)p++r,��i��.a Agency's Techinicol Siaff. At the timr of wbmis:;ian of this budget scfiedule� it is neressory ru hovr budgr� r,t��ni��s d,•��•I„p�•,I in ��-��r�+�i��.. wl+b locol copiroi budgeting procticc, and �hese ��sr;matns sholl be retained on File, by thc Ciry for p.��•.ible lIIIU r�•rirw. `A�y propused u�e to controu and consulrant scrvicos in an activfty shali be �uaNfied bv � na�ni�i�r �.r��ane:�i r.cr�in:,; 4,�r�1� �b�• �..•rvi� �� f.• �endrred under the conrrocr ond rhe 6asis for the eust estimo�e. The stotement shull b� Inciudod us pu�� oi rh. nppropriu��• worl� ��oqr,�"•„ N�;!)JOSV:2-10� i',,..�ou•. cd�tion is obsoleta h1UD-Wosh.� p.�. 14� 7a71H0��' FORMAPPqOVED � � � 9UDGET BUREAU NO. �8-M121) CITV U.S. OEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT St• P8U2� Minnesota CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET , PROGRAM CATEGORY - PROGRAM BUDGET PRO�RAM `ATE°°RY Citizen Participation (ALL FIGURES IN THOUSANDS ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST THOUSAND) HUO PROJECT pR�aR CURRENT REQUESTED FUNDS USE TITLE� YEARS APPROVED ONLY MC GRANT BUDGET, 2 NON MC GRANT FUNDS TOTAL FUNDS MC GRANT MC GRANT pEDERAL STATE I.00AL ��1'�� FUNOS (1) (2) (3) (4) (Sa) (56) (5ci (8) Citizen Participa- tion 112 28 140 GRAND TOTAL 112 2$ 14O �Copita) Projects must be identiFied by underlining the Project Title. Prior to stort of construction, the CDA must hove on file for pos:ible t1UU revfew o detoiled capital acquisition and construction cost budgef for each projecf supported by specifications ond drawings(ond any subsc- quent chan e orders)which must hove been reviewed and approved by the Clty's Engineer, a qualified engineerin� consultant or the Operoting Agency's �echinlcol Staff. At the tlme of submission of this budget schedule� it is necessory to hove budget estimates deve�oped in accorda�ce with local copital budgeting practice, and these estimotes shall be retained on file by the City for posslble HUD revfew. 2 Any proposed use ro contract ond consultont services in an activity sholl be justified by o norrotive statanent seiting forth tha service to be rendered under the contract ond the basis for the cost estimote. The statement shall be included as parr of �he appropriate worN progrom. HUDJ030(2-70) Previous edition is obsolete HUD•wash., D.C. ��.+<1 �a7�8a•p FORMAPPROVED BUDGET BUREAU NO. G8—R1211 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ciTv CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET St• P8Li1.� Minnesota PROGRAM CATEGORY - PROGRAM BUDGET F'ROGRAM CATEGORY Evaluation and Informfation IALL FIGURES IN THOUSANDS ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST THOUSAND) HUD PROJECT CURRENT USE � PRIOR APPROVED REQUESTED FUNDS ONLY TITLE MC GRANT BUDGET, 2 NON MC GRANT FUNOS TOTAL FUNDS MC GRANT MC GRANT ((:u�. 4+iJ FUNDS FEDERAI. STATE LOCAL (1) {2) (3) (4) (Sal (Sb) (Sc) (6) Evaluation and Information 118 30 148 GRAND TOTAL ].1H �jQ 11}$ �Capital Projects must be Identified by underlining the Project Title. Prior to sta�t oF construction, the CDA must have on file for possibie MUO review a detailed capital acquisltion and construction cost budget for each proiect supported by specificafions ond drawings(a�d any subse- quent chan e orders)which must have been reviewed and app�oved by the City's Engineer, a quolified engineering consultan� or the Operattng Agency's �echinical Staff. At the time of submission of this budget schedule, it is necessary to have budget estimates deve�oped fn accordonce with local copitol budgeting pracfice, and these estimates shall be retoined on file by the City for poss(ble HUD review. ZAny proposed use to contract and cons�itont services in an activify sholl be justified bv o narrotive statement settlnq forth tl�e service to be rendered under the contract ond ihe basis for the cost estimate. The statement shall be included os pnrt of the oppropriote work program. HUD-7040(2-70) Previous edition is obsolete HUD-Wash., D.C. 247180•P �c,r i � FpRM APPRpVED �VDGET BUNEAU NO. e�—Rltl l U.S. DEPARTMENT Of MOUS�NG AND URBAN DEYELOPMENT Ci'rY UTY DEMONSTRA710N AGENCY BUDGET St• Paul� Minnesota PROGRAM CATEGORY - PROGRAM BUDGET PR06RArA CAT.a60RY Emergency Action k'und (ALL FIGURES IN TFi0U5ANDS ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TMOUS.'.�•OI UD PROJECT pR��q CURRENT REqUESTED FUNOS USE TITLE� YEARS APPROVED ONIY MC GRANT BUDGET, NON MG GRANT FUNOS TOTAL FUNDS MC GRANT MC GRANT2 REDERAL STATE LOCAL (Cnl.4t5) FUNDS 111 121 18) (41 16a1 15b1 (bcl {6) Emerf;ency Action Fund 61 , 61 . � � . GRAND TOTAI E)1 f;.L �Capital Projects must be identiffed by underlining the Project Titla. Prior to start oi constructlon, the CDA must hove o� Hlt fo�po�sib�e HUD review o detoiled copltal ocQuisition ond construction cost budget for each project supported by specfficotio�s o�d drowi�gs(ond ony �ubss� uenr chany e orders)which must hove been reviewed ond approved by the City's Engineer,a quoliFied engineerin�consultant or �he Opsrotiny gency's Techinical Stoff, At the time of submission of this budget schedule, it Is necessory ro have budyet eatimates deve�oped in actordonte with local copitul budgetinq practice,and these estimates shall be re►oined on file by ths City for possibls HUD revlew. 2Any proposed use to controct ond consultpnt servlces In an actfvity ahall be justified by a narratfve stotement settinp (orth ths sarice to b� rendered under the controct ond the bosis For the cost estimafe. The stotement shall 6e(ncluded as port of fhe opproptfote work proyrom. HUD-7040(2-70) Previous edition is obsolete � HUD•M�aah., D.C. �5,� 2��1e0-P FOAMAPPRpVEO � OUDGET BUREAV NO. e�—i�121I CITY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT St• P$Ul Minnesota CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET � PROGRAM CATEGORY - PROGRAM BUDGET PROGRAM CATE60RY Program Administration (ALL FIGURES IN THOUSANDS ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TMOUSAND) HUD PROJECT CURRENT USE � PRIOR APPROVED REQUESTED FUNDS ONLY TITLE MC GRANT BUDGET, NON MC GRANT FUNDS TOTAI. FUNDS MC GRANT MC GRANT2 ��,�� 4�,�� FUNDS FEDERAL STATE LOCAL (1) (2) 19) (4) (Sa) (56) (8c) (6) Program Administration 269 6� 336 GRAND TOTAL 269 67 33� �Copitai Projects must be identified by underlining the Project Title. Prior to stort of construction, the CDA must hava on file far possible HUD review a de�ailed cop(tal acQulsition ond construction cost budget for each project supported by speclficotions ond drowings(and any subse- quent chon e orders)which must have been reviewed ond opproved by the City's Engineer, o qualiffed angineering co�sul►anr or tl�a Operoting Agency's �echinical StafF. At the time of submission of this budget schedule, it is necessary to have budget estimatos deve�oped fn accordance with locol copital budgeting practice, and these estimates shall be retained on file by the City for possible HUD review. 2Any proposed use to contract and consultant services in on activity shall be justified by a na��ative statement setting forth the service to be rendered under the controct and the basis for the cost estimate. The statement shall be fncluded as part of the oppropriote wo�k progrom. HUD•7040(2•70) Previous edition is obsolete HUD-Wosh., D.C. ,�� 2a7if10•i� . FORM APPROV�D � BUDGET �UWEAU NO, ea—r��2�+ U. S. DEPARTMENI' OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT REQUESTED ACTiON YEAR CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUOGET FR��"�' TO: FUNDING ITY St. Paul, Minnesota TABLE A - SUMMARY OF LOCAL CONTRIBUTIONS LOCAL CONTRIBUTION HUp FUNDING SUMMARY CASM IN�KIND TOTAL OTHER MC FUNOS TOTAL (i000) (10001 (ipp0) (i00oJ (jppp) (i00oJ (1) (21 (3) 4 Progrom Administrction (7 269 33h Copital Projects and Acn�iti�s ?12 748 2,681 4,141 TOTAL 67 �12 748 2,9g0 4,4?7 TABLE B (Status o(MC Grant Ftends Cumulative throu h the Re uested Action Year) OBLIGATIONS� MC G A PRIOR YEAR REQUESTE� CUMULATIVE ADDfTIONAL CURRENT qCT10N TOTAL THROUGH LATEST MC GRANT CUMULATIVE YEAR YEAR (Cols. I+2+3� MC GRANT REpUESTED ACTION ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE BUDGET YEAR (11 (2) (8) (4) (S) (el 2�950 2 950 2,950 RECAPITULATION: 7. CumulativeMCGrants through requested action yeor(cols. 5+6) . . . � 2+9`� 8. Total obligations through requested action year (col.4) . . .. • 2�9`j0 9. Estimated unobligated balances at end of requested action year . . . TABLE C (Comparisnn ojObligations and Expenditures of Model Cities Grant Funds Through Requested Accion YeorJ EXPENDITURES 2 MC GRANT OBL.IC3ATIONS CUMULATIVE TFIORUGH PRIOR YEARS CURRENT REQUESTED TOTAL REQUESTED CUMULATIVE YEAR ACTIOPI_YEAR Cols. 1+2+3J ACTION YEAR ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE (F�rom toblc /i, Col. 4J (ll (2) (3) � (4) (6) 2.950 2,950 2.950 RECAPITULATION: 6, Cumulative MC Grant obligations through requested action yeor(Col. 5) a 2+95� 7, MC Grant expenditures through requested action year(Col. 4) . . . . . . .- 2�9� 8. Estimated u�expended obligations at end of requested action year . . . . . �Obligatio�s. The term "Obllgatton" used herein refers ro Firm commihnents by the City to an expenditure ol fu�ds. It �e(ers to omount of fu�ds commited under oll executed contracts(or memorond�ms of understonding) with third porty operofi�g ogencies. With respect ro admin- istrotion expenses ond ptojects Qperated by the CDA stafF, it�efers to the funds budgeted ond eormarked for expenditure for such oct(vi�ics. 2 Expenditures. The term "ezpondttures" as�sed heref� refers to disb�rsements of Model Cities Grant Funds made by the City to an ope�o- ting ngency o� contractor or payments mode for other eligible expenses incurred in operating the approved Comprehensive Demo�stration Program in accordance with an opproved Grant Budget. HUD.7044.1 (2-701 Hi in.W�.ti. � r ,.-. .- I ' 1'Ul7M At•{iN<lY1�11 nVf�GR�r [��HP�� r�V. n� -wi[�� CITV � U.S. OEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CITY DEMONSTRATIpN AGENGY BUDGET S�• P8lLi1� Minne�sota _ __._ __._.___ ___ ._ _.__._.....__ PROGRAM CATEGORY - PROGRAM BUDGET r'p06NAM t'ATFGORY 90 Day Budget-Program Administratior __. ......_. IALL FIGURES IN THOUSANpS ROUNOF.O TU TNE NtcAH@S7 T"IIU11'�ANUI HUD �_..�..___.____._____ . ..,.._.___ _..__ U5� PROJECT pq�pR CURRENT REVUF5IEU �'Urt175, 1 APPROVED ONLY TITLE MC GRANT BUOGET, NON MC GNAN f F I1N1!ti f�i i A! FUNDS ►�1C GF7ANT MC GRANTZ °------— .--. - �� ,�I. I 1 �I UNDS FEUERAI_ STAT'E � �(�i�Al __.._._.._�._ �.__..___.___... __ . _....._._..._.._. Itl 121 131 (a> (5a1 1!ihl 1•��1 Ir�1 90 Day Budget- Program Adminiatra tion 120,000 ?9,476 149,4'I6 GRAND TOTAL ].20 �� 9�4�6 �.49�47�i �Copital Projects must be(dentified by underlining the Project T(tle. Prior to stort of const�ucrion, fhc CDA m�s� hove �an f�lc l.�r p��.�.�t.�., �till� revlew o detailed capifal ocQuisition ond consrruction cost budget for eacb projecf supporied by specificotiun, o��A draw��qe in�d �nr +��h�a- queM chon9 e orders) whith musf hove been revirwed and opproved by the City's Engineci, a quul�Ncd enyinerring �:o�,�..�Ira��r „� +�:�� iy�r,�rin� Agency's Techinicnl Stoff. Af the tlme of submission of this budget schedule, it is necessary to hovc b�dq�� e:++��n�r. •1��„��.�J ��+ �� •� wirh luca) copital budgeting practice, and these rstimates shall be �efained on file by thr Cify for pu�+ibl�• HUL) r�•vi�•w, , `Any propased u,e to controct ond consultant srrvices in on nctivity sholl be jusfi{ied bv �� i��rativr �.�ulcmrnt �.r+tin,� fu�rb tli�• •.�•r�i�� i� �� endered under the controct pnd the bosis For Ihe cust estimafe. The stotement shall be in�I„drd as p��rt of il�r �,ppru��ioic wnrk ��,s��nm. N � Prcvious cdition is obs��lrre 7d71Hp �' U�•7040 f2J0) NUD•Wash., D.C. � 1�;>�i Statement of Consultant and Contract Services • Followin� are brief narrativ� statements justifyin� the purpose for which various consultant and contractual services are to be used during the first action year. Program and Project Evaluation The Eva�l.uation and Monitoring Committee will study the program's evaluation needs with the assistance of the CDA staff. They will identi.iy areas of the program to be studied in depth and as,k private firms with this sort of capability to make proposals for such evaluation. The CDA will contract with such firms to provide the services required. The cost is estimated on the basis of similar work in other Model Cities programs. �35,000. Planning Training and Technical Assistance The CDA will contract with a private consulting firm having experti�e in • training techniques, urbsn plannin� and Model Cities to provide training to the NINPC Council, core and taskforce leaders, and CDA Staff in the plannin� process. This is necessary to develop a more coordinated and more professional approach toward on-going planning and planning in the coming years. The cost estimate would cover the consultant's fees r�r►d expenses for a series of ineetings and seminars. $20,000. Communi� Organization Training and Technical Assistance The CDA will contract with a private consulting firm having expertise in Community Organization in programs such as Model Cities. The firm will provide broad technical assistance to the MNPC and the CUA Staff and specific training to the �eight members of the CDA Community Organ- ization Staff. Cost estimated by takin� into consideration the mag- nitude of the work and the normal charges made by consultin� firms. $10,000. � Statement of Consultant and Contract Services F 1�7�> Data Collection and Survey Techniques Trainin� and Technical Aasist�nce • The CDA will contract with an individual or a private consulting firm having expertise in the techniques of data collection, surveys and related skills for developing statistical information. The consult�nt will train the staff of Resident Planners and others so that information gathered in the Monitoring and Evaluation process will be statisticFil.ly valid. The cost estimate covers the consultant's fees and expen�eU for a series of ineetin�s. �7,000. Lega1 Serxices The CDA will retain a law firm with expertise in drawin� and ne�otiating contracts to write contract provisions, review proposed agreements, ne�o- tiate with the administering agencies. They will also provide other necessary legal services durin� the year especially relating to land use. The cos� is estimated by taking into consideration the work projected and legal fees in this area. $12,000. • Conducting of Surve�s These costs would be incurred as a part of the Evaluation and rionitoring activity. To develop baseline data, project data or program stati.:�tics, it will be necessary to engage individuals or firms to conduct statistical surveys in the Model Neighborhood. The cost is estimated on the basis of usual costs for this type of work. $7,500. Other Professional Consultant or Contractual Services This is a fund intended to pay the cost of services of the type (but in addition to those) detailed in the foregoing. The specific nature of these services can not be anticipated at this time, but the need i� expected to develop as the action year pro�resses. �6,700. � Statement of Consultant and Contract Services 1';�;�.a . CONTINUOUS PLANNING AND EVALUATION Table of Contents • I. Relationship between continuous plarining And evaluation A. Model Cities Planning-Evaluation atructure B. Continuous Flanning and Re-Planning II. Evaluation Overview A. Resident Involvement 1. Evaluation and Monitoring Committee 2. Citizen Employment B,. State Involvement C. Municipal Information System D. Operating Agency Involvement III. Program Evaluation A. Strategy for Program Evaluation B. First Year Activities C. Baseline Data IV, Pro�ect Evaluation A. Criteria Evaluation V. Project Monitoring * A. Concept of Project Monitoring B. CDA/IS 1. Project Analysis 2. Reporting C. Use of Monitoring Information VI. Administrative Structure for Evaluation VII. Work Program for Evaluation VITI. Bud�et IX. Exhibits I-A Priority Rating Sheet III-A CDA/IS tasks III-B Project Analysis Worksheet III-C Agency Reporting Package III-D Report description, frequency, and distribution VI-A Administrative Struct�.�re for Evaluation Continuous Planning and Evaluation • 1�;6 Introduction � The Continuous Planning and E�valuation Statement that the St. Paul Model Cities Program has prepared is intended to be the first version of a continually evolving structure for evaluating and re-programming the efforts of this program. lafhile this statement cannot be precise in all matters, it does present the basic principles of evaluation to which St. Paul intende to adhere during the course of the next five years. I. Relationships Between Continuous Planning and Evaluation A. Structure EWaluation and continuous planning are really the reverse sides . of the same coin. During the planning period, the St. Paul Model Cities Program analyzed the conditions of the Model Neighborhood and determined the needs to be met through program activities. Based on this definition of needs, core area objectives and pro- gram area objectives were developed. In addition, prograra stra- tegies were formulated for the achievement of these ob3ectiveg. • The final product of the first year's planning activity was the development of projects that comprise the First Year Action Pro- $ram. Without this planning process there could be little evaluation. Evaluation is compriaed of the following elements: 1. Project Monitorin.g - This activity measures the progress of each project's operation and compares this progress to the project's plan. This element of evaluation is basically concerned with pro�ect efficiency. 2.. Project Lnpact Evaluation - This element is aimed at deter- mining whether or not che project accomplishes its objective. This type of activity :is normally on in-depth study of the project's results. Th:i.� will be done for only a few project� during the First Action Year. • Continuaus Planning and Evaluation � ^ �-57 3. A$gregate Core and Pro�ram Area Impact - This element of evaluation focuses on measuring the changes that took • place in a pragram area (such as education) and in the core areas (such as social services). Once the aggregate changes have been identified, analysis can be undertaken as to the causes of these changes. During the First Action Year, we wi11 focus on Assembling a comprehen�ive set of baseline data for use in identifying aggregate changes. It is not contemplated that we will be able to pursue analysis. 4. Evaluation of Program Strategies - There are several items that are included itt this element. Examples of some of these activities include: a. Ebaluation of the Model Cities organization and operating procedures; b. Ebaluation of citizen participation in the decision making process; c. Evaluation of institutional change in the operating agencies so as to be more responsive to the needs of • the people they serve; and d. Coordination of services. F`igure 1 illustrates the relationships among these elements of evaluation. Each of the above elements is addressed in this statement and the relationships between each element and continuous planning identi- fied; these elements will be more precisely defined by the evalua- tion committee and staff during the next two months. The lack of definition at this point is due to two major items. 1. There is no evaluation staff director or information spe- cialist on pexmanent staff; 2. There has been minimal, ad hoc citizen involvement (a formal committee will be organise� in th�e nea� f�twre). • Continuous Planning and Ebaluation � 1Y;�3 B. Continuous Planning and Re-Planning Model Cities is of its very nature a continuous planning proces�; • residents are daily planning for their individual lives; MC ataff is forever planning for a�ency cooperation, improving resident/ staff relations, and alleviating some (at least) of t}ae myriad political barriers faced locally and nationally by all Model Cities programs; and it must be remembered that HUD Regional and Central are involved in maintaining and planning for the very existence of the Model Cities Program in terms of Federal accep- tability and funding. But we are raost concerned, of course, with planning on the local level; and in this respect time ia invariably the most crucial aspect. Soon after submission of the CDP, localities are made aware that the re-planning process is lurking in the not-too- distant future. If carefully time-phased, and coordinated with evaluation and monitoring, this process, which undoubtedly was a frustrating experience during the initial planning year, could prove to be a most effective cata].yst for real change in the • Model Neighborhood. Re-planning will� in point of fact, cease only when HUD is no longer funding Model Cities. The re-planning process will be initiated in the winter, when the resident task forces and staff will re-examine conditions, needs and objectives of the St. Paul Model Cities Program. This pro- cess should last twa months, allowing time for consideration of each problem area of the Model Neighborhood. By this time, the Model Cities Program should have received at least two monthly reports from various projects as part of the CDA/IS. Thia feed- back should provide a partial basis for rethinking of areas af concern to the residents and possible revision of etrategies. As part of the monthly reporting process, re�ident plannera will submit monthly narrative reports to the manitoring and eveluation Continuous Planning and Tvaluation • , �C�CI 7 committee on the projects most directly affecting their geographic areas; in this way there will be continual "reports" from the � r•esidents - those people with whom we are most concerned. Again, at least two of these narrative reports will have been received from those projects which are operational. Mid-Planning S�atement The cores, which would have been receiving several of the monthly reports, and the evaluation and monitoring committee, which would have been most directly involved in utilizing the infozmation from the project monitoring system and data collection process� will develop recomraendations for submission to the Model Neighborhood Planning Council for its approval. As the MNPC approves of the individual recommendations, the Model Cities staff will prepare the Mid- ' Planning Statement for submission to HUD. When the final Statement has been completed, the MNPC will again have the opportunity to approve the up-date, this time viewing the entire package. Subraission to the City Council and then to HUD will follow. • Second Year Action Plan Core committees should begin to re-examine and select pro�ects for inclusion in the Second Year Action Plan during the seventh or eighth month of the First Action Year. Agencies submitting new projects will be required to complete A project description format, which will facilitate action by the task forces and recommendations by the Model Cities staff. The format will be loosely based on the Project Analysis Worksheet - a form included in the CL1A/IS. Al1 operating agencies should include with their proposals complete budget r�tatements, utilizing HUD formate; this also will facilitate examii�ation by the Model Cities Program. As proposals are received, a sy�tem of cataloguing and routing them Continuous Planning and Evaluation • l.E�� • � �i � � � � � b a. a' a' � A O .? � � � a � ci' � � eo a a •� o � � o � d +� � � c� `� '� � � .� � � � '� ,o � � ��q � v a ci � � � � o � � � W 1 • W •� t0 � � 4� � � �� a�0i � � � o �°. a . '� e .� c`�i °' � o p, . c°�i aUi � o c�'i .� � `� r�i .0 +�+ t0 n CUi o 1 f74 O Fi � O rl •� H a H 4��1 c� �n W y 6'0 .� w a� �° � o d m .«� d c.> � •� m � � ��, c�i .N aUi U � o � � O S � � � � • Z�Y to appropriate staff inembers and Cores will insure thorough exam- ination by those responsible for the particular problem areas. • The procedure will be developed during the first part of the action year. When the MNPC has selected projects for inclusion i� the Second Year CDP, the staff aill prepare the Action Plan for sub- mission to HUD. As with the Mid-Planning Statement, the com- pleted Action Plan will be reviewed by the MNI'C and approved by the City Council. It should be noted that the process of re- planning for the Second Action Year should last five months� allowing sufficient time for necessary re-writing of the CDP. II. Evaluation Overview A. Resident Involvement As soon as possible upon submission of the First Year Action Plan to HUll, an Evaluation and Monitoring Committee will be formed. The committee will be made up as follows: Chairman (of MNPC) Vice Chairman (of MNPC) • Nine (9) Representatives of Core Committees, including: Six (6) members of the Model Neighborhood Plaru�ing Council Three (3) residents, not members of the Council Two (2) Representatives of operating agencies Five (5) Advisory members such as: State Urban Affairs Council Municipal Information System Business Community Representatives (3M, Control Data, etc.) Metro Council University of Minnesota City Council Members On1,Y MNPC members and residents will have voting ArlvileRes; all others will act in an advisory capacity. In addition to the abooe, membership will be open-ended as a means to encourage active par- ticipation on the part of all residents. Those residents who are Continuous Planning and Evaluation • 1(,;, absent for three consecutive meetings will lose voting privilegP�. We truse that including representatives of operating agencies, bus- • iness groups and the University of Minnesota wil]. provide data and possible training of resident planners, as well as persons aware o#' evaluation and decision-making on a broader spectrum. The committee will receive monthly and quaxterly reports, and make recommendations on changes in output measures or narrative information to be submitted. It will also work with the Evalua- tion Director in revising and up-dating baseline data and selec- ting projects and "impact" questions for an in-depth study. The staff of Resident Planners, whose functions entail primarily community organization duties, will be used in monitoring pro- jects. Up to 50� of their time will be devoted to monitoring projects from the citizens' point of view. They will receive traini.ng in programming, survey techniques, and other skills which will be useful in evaluation and monitoring of the Model Cities Program; funds have been included in the proposed budget • for training purposes. We also anticipate that assistance will be obtained from advisory members of the evaluation committee in training the planners. Whenever it is deemed necessary to conduct a survey for collection of data, Model Neighborhood residents will be used as surveyors. F�.�nds for stipends have been included in the proposed budget. Re- sidents will work under the supervision of the Evaluation Director. Resident planners will work under the supervision of the Commun- ity Organization Director and in coordination with the Evaluation Director. B. State Involvement The Minnesota State Plannir.g Agency and Urban Affaire Council are Continuous Planning and Evaluation 163 • interested in coordination of the three Minnesota Model Cities Programs both in terms of common problems and data gathering • and will be directly involved in the St. Paul evaluation pro- cess. A representative of the Planning Office will �it in $n advisory capacity on the Committee, and the Planning Office staff will make recommendations for "impact" evaluation based on their knowledge of the Duluth and Minneapolis Model Cities Program. This agency will also be a convenient and suitable vehicle for coordination of recommendationa among the three prograrps, securing baseline data from various sstate agencies, and possible reservations of state funds for the St. Paul Model Neighborhood area. C. Municipal Informat3on System The city of St, Paul has received funds from Hud for the imple- mentation of a Municipal Information System and is in ths pro- � cess of so doing. We eacpect to cooperate with this newly cre- ated department in receiving and providing data which vill be useful in planning in the Model Cities Area. We have proposed • that a representative of this department act as an advisory member on the Evaluation Committee in order to maintain closer contact. The Municipal Information System will provide a source of baseline data that can be used to evaluate program and project accomplishments. D. Operating Agency Involvement Thoae agencies operating Model Cities supplementally funded pro�ects will participate in the pro�ect analysis phase of the CDA/IS, and w�ll be reporting to the CDA on whatever basis is determined prior to contracting. It ha� also been recom- mended that representativee of two operating agencies be non- voting members oP the Eva].uation Comrnittee; such membership might be rotating, to permit participatian on the part af ..__�._, Continuous Planning and Evaluation • 164 the several agencies. • Operating agencies, and those not funded through Mode1 Citieb during the first action year will be asked to pravide ba8eline data; project statu& reports (for projecte serving Model Cities residents but not receiving supplemental funds), and other infor- mation requisite to the planning and evaluation process. III. Program Evaluation A. StrateKSr The intent of Program Evaluation is to test the assumptions that were developed during the planning period. Specifically, program level evaluation facuses on the amount of and reasonr� for change in the core and problem areas. In addition, this level of evaluation looks at the accomplishments of various strategies, such as citizen participation, increa+ae in atate and federal gran.t monies, and service coordination. • There are several steps to conducting program level evaluation. These steps include: 1. Refinement of core and program area objectives in terms of identifying the variable that will be used to measure achievement. 2. Identification of those progx�am strategies that will be given in-depth evaluation. Figure III-A illustrates the relationship to program strategies. 3. Identification of data needs for evaluation accnm- plishments in core and program areas and of program strategies. 4. Analysis of existing data and data sources. 5. Development of a pl.an to acquire required data. 6. �.ssessment of chan�e over time. • Continuous Planning and Evaluation 1F�, � • � � 0 � � a .,� m � 0 va a � 0 � � � � o b� � � W __ � ,m � � a�i N a ca +� � v) H 10 f-, a' � • � ~ � 1-� � � � � � �.� � x .� � w � � � � � a � � �a o a� a� � � � a � e 0 � � W c� �° o m -d .N +� •� � � � � �� + � o "� b � •�+ � ow a� +► U W U O f� v2 • 1 E;F, ?. Analysis of change over time. • B. First Year Activities When the Evaluation Committee is operational, its initial task will be the selection of impac� evaluation questions and areas of concern which will be studied in-depth during tY�e first action year. We would like to stress that we do not expect revolutionary changes to occur during the first action year of Model Cities; neither do we anticipate that the in-depth evaluation of programmatic questions will affect decision making to a considerable extent. However, it is imperative that considerable thought be given to selections of impact issues, as a means of clarifying the position and long-range goals of St. Paul Model Cities. In the Mid-Planning Statement and the Revisions of the Mid- Planning Statement a number of ma�or problem areas were identified; such a listing of areas of concern might be • a basis for selection of impact questions. Examples of impact questions are: a) Coordination of services and institutional change; b) increased influx of federal and state grant allocations to projects and pro�ams in the Model Neighborhood; c) success of the citizen parti- cipation structure as devised for St. Paul. C. Baseline Data After the CDP for the First Action Year has been submitted. the Evaluation Director, together with the Evaluation and Monitoring Committee, will re-examine the Mid-Planning State- ment and the data which has been collected since the comple- tion of that statement. Concurrently, the Pro�ect Anal.ysis Continuous Planning and Eval.uation • 1G7 phase of the CDA/IS implementation will be taking p1acF; during this process, both data requisite to monitorine of • projects and eources of other data will be mF�de known. Hc�w- ever, Project Analysis shauld not be the sole source nf dat� needs determination; other factors are: selection of impact question and priority pro�ects, and evaluation plans for the next five years. Should it prove necessary to secure aertain kinds of information about the Model Neighborhood Area, the Resident Planners (trainerl in survey techniques) and other citi2ens of the area will be used as collectors and compilers of data. Funds h�ve been inclucied iri the proposed budget for this purpose. Upon the recommendation by the Evaluation Director, consultants will be used for trair,inEr, of Resident Planners in survey techniques, or for administrr�tin� partibular surveys. Although we shall attempt to have available for inclusi.on in the Mid-Planning Statement a current, reliable set of baseline data, � the collection and coordination of such data will be a continu- ous process lasting the duration of each Action Year. The desired result of the First Year's Pro�ram Evaluation acti- vities is that a comprehensive set of baseline data will be available for assessing program impact during the Second Action Year. IV. Project Evaluation A. Criteria Evaluation At the same time that the Evaluation Committee and MC staff are • Continuous Planning and Evaluation ZC,B selecting impact evaluation question�, they should �cl�ct bctween three and five prior•ity projectb f'or in-de�>th evaluatiori. 'I'hc� same criteria used for selection of projc�cts to be inr:luciec� i�� the • CDP wi11 be used, with the following additional con..icic�ration:,: 1. In view of the fact that eifectivE: evaluation mu�t bc� , based on adequate monitoring of the project�, the pro- jects selected for in-depth evaluation should be those which will be operational for a sufficient period oi' time to provide feedback data. 2. Projects selected should relate to those problem�s �reas defined as of particular concern to St. Paul. ( e.g. ; If the area of employment is viewed as important, the Model Neighborhood Dnployment Center Project mi�ht be selec- ted for in-depth evaluation. ) In addition to the data collected via the Information System, the Evaluation Director and the E valuation C ommittee wi.11 determine the most effective means foz• in-depth evaluating of priority projects. Such evaluation might involve utili•r.ation • of consultants or others with technical cap��bility in the parti- cular area (housing, employment, etc. ) V. Project Monitoring A. CDA/IS The St. Paul Model Cities Program will monitor all supplE�mer�ti�lly funded projects throughout the first action year. Yrojects wil.l be monitored on the basis of' planned versus actual actiievc�ment in terms of budgets, objectives, and content. An Tnf'orm�ztion Sy:�tem will be designed and implemented, and will act as the mec}iariism for the monitoring process. The initial phase of implementing the Inf'oi-mation System is "Pro- ject Analysis" (See Exhibit III-A). During this process� e3ch project submitted to HUD for funding is analyzed in terms of' ---- -----___.._._ • Continuous Planning and �aluation � l.f",s� . objectives, elements (work packages), beneficiaries, output me�sures, and narrative information selected for reporting purpose:�; Exhibit • III-B is a sample Project Analysis Worksheet. Initially, ttze Model. Cities staff and Core Committee represent�tives will rjnalyze the projects; the operating agencies will be aksed to do the �ame; upon completion of both analysis, there will be a reconciliation, if deemed necessary. The information is thereupon transferred to a Project Information Sheet, which serves as the basic document for a listing of reporting information. This document might be atta- ched as an addenda to and referenced in the Contract which was drawn up between the Model Cities Agency and the operatin� �gency, thereby "legalizing" the reporting system which will be required of all agencies. Exhibit TII-C (1-7) is a sAmple "Agency Report- ing Package" which St. Paul might utilize. Titles, descriptionc:, and frequency of prototype reports are found in Exhibit IIT-D. The Ebaluation Committee will recommend to the MNPC which reporte will be submitted to the Cores and the full NIIdPC, for monitoring • purposes. Distribution to the various staff inembers wi11 nlso be determined at this time. Reports received, and data collected will be included in the D�ta File System to be set up as part of the Information System. As a means of coordinating data collected from projects within program areas, and in order to evaluate program areas, the st�f'f will summarize certain data on a ''Program Area Summary Report" each quarter. . ° Evaluation Director will be responsible for the Management Report Package, to be designed by TRD consultarits in consort with Model Cities staff and Core representatives. As part of the nationwide contract for installation of the protatype • Continuous Planning and E�raluation i--z--T '_� 1�c� City Demonstration Agency Information System (CDA/7:;) , :�t. P;�u1 will receive technical assistance from Training, ker�e�rrh, and • Uevelopment, Inc. TRD tias provided this assistdnccr in f'our•tec�n first-round Model Cities in the Chicago re�ional rarea, and iE: , in the process of providin� the same assistunce to fifteen second-round cities in this region. Technical a;;si:�tance wi:l.l. initiate shortly after the CDP has been submittF�d. The Information System, which is viewed as servin�r a so:lely "monitoring" function within the contest of an over��].] ev�lt�r�- tion plan, actually can be utilized to provide a v�,riety oi' data used in program-wide evaluation and deczsion-makinF;. In this respect, for example, pre-determined narrative quest;i.on�; of programs with concern can be used on the narrutive r•eport, formats designed for use by the operating agencies and resi- � dent planners. The evaluation committee should not be content, however, with monitoring measures and nr�rrative questions throughout the action year without at the samt time considerin�; the validity and/or usefulness of the reportinP data. Uecisionc; � made at the inception of the Information System implementation should not be held sacred; indeed, there should be a cnntinual evolution. VI. Administrative Structure for Evaluation It is anticipated that the Evaluation Director and Information Specialist will be employed as soon as the Letter of Intent is furnished. The Resident Planners are already on permanent �staff. The Evaluation Director will be responsible for administration and implementation of the evaluation plan and CDA/IS, and for directing the efforts of the Evaluation and Monitoring Committee. The Evaluation Uirector will make recommendations to the Committee on baseline data to be collected and suggested sources of such • Continuous Planning and Evaluation ]J1 dnta; he(she) will maintain liaison with operatin�r a�encies, ar,d with organizations from whom assistance mi�ht be ��ined, and with • whom contact should be mnde. The Evaluation .Uirector will de>vic;F� a prototype Project Evaluation Pl�n for projects selected ars i.n- depth priority projects; coordinate the efforts of con:sultani,e, used for assistance in evaluation; and prepare a lon�r r�.�nge c�val.uFi- tion strate�y for the five year funding period. Directly responsible to the Evaluation virector, is the Informr�tion �stem Specialist, whose principle tasks lie within the re�lm of' the Information System. This specialist will tnAintain the vatF� Files, assist in devising report formats based on the Prototypc System, and assist the Evaluation Director in implementation of of the CDA/IS. There are six full-time Resident Planner positions. Fifty percent of their time will be allocated for monitoring of projects oper- ating in their districts. Their duties waulci for this �urpoFSe be coordinated by the Evaluation Director; they will be responsible • to the Community Organization Director as they are now. The Community Organization llirector will be only indirectly ir.vo7.ved in the evAluation and monitorin� process. The six Resident Ylanner�� wi11 remain responsible to him for purposes of overr�ll direction and specifically in terms of their capacity as community organzzer.�. The Deputy Director and three pro�ram area planners (physical, social and economic) will be responsible for carrying out various phases of the CDA/IS implementation process, including project anal.ysis and developing "A�ency Report Packages" for the operating agencies. Depending upon decisions made by the St. Paul ,�taff and evaluation committee regarding reporting requirements, they may also be responsible for completing various summary and ma.nagement Continuous Planning and Evaluation • 1��? reports included in the CDA/IS prototype. � �II. Work Program for Evaluation On the following page is a Work Porgram for our Evaluation and Continuous Planning. It must be kept in mind that this wark �ra- gram will be made more specific as elements of this st�tement are more precisely defined. � Continuous Plannin� and Evaluation I � il l l_i I VIII. Proposed Evaluation Budget�: � Staff: � of time Position allocated Salarv Evaluation Staff Supervisor2 100;� $ 15,000 Inforroation Specialist lpp�b $�spp (6) Resident Planners � i8�ppp Community Organization Director 2�916 3,000 Assistant Community Organizer 2y% 2,U00 Deputy Director 2y�6 3��5p Project Operation Coordinator 2y� 3�000 Physical Planner 25� 3�75p Social Planner 25� 3�75p Economic Planner 25� 3,7�p Total Staff Expenditures: $ 64,500 Miscellaneous: � Training of resident planners in data collection, survey techniques, programming, etc. � planners ! 51,000 ��ppp Hiring .of Model Neighborhood residents as needed for conducting surveys ?,5pp Consultants as needed for special pro�ect evaluation �$,ppp subtotal �C1o4,000 General Office Expense (estimated abave) 33.5� Grand Total �14�pp ..._.. ...—,� Based on of total supplemental funding required by HUD. ZWill undoubtedly have to be budgeted on the 80-20k basis; taska will involve primarily programroatic evaluation in both case�. Continuoua Planning and Evaluation � 1�t� . y 0 z . EU o � � H• ' t� ( � � � • � I � ( � I � I � � I � i i i i I � � � � , I i � � I i � � a x a � I I o � I � � 3 1 I � x .° � i � i � ( ( 1 • I � "'""'_____ w � i i � i � a . � I � n � � I I � i . I i � I , A � � � 1 I ( i , t � o ; � � i � � z i I I � i i � � � H � � ( I ai 'q r1 � � � I 4��i p G� � '�T�. > i�.� 4r O +� V � �-�i 4� . � o �-�1 '° •,°� � •� a v �., .., a � n� a •,� b c0 +� +� 00 '� 4-� 4> �«+ a0 +� 0� a� 'n W � �,, � • d O O 4r 'd O � � N 't� O � 'q � �i � t� � � p � W N � �0�0 V � F. ?a r-i 4J t) ri • � � � Rf +► U � � � a � � (� O '� O q L: t3 O � � .i y t]' 'O � N U i. .r � C." r-1 �"� O •r1 C: '� Gi N Li {�" � 'C� 10 (� � •rl W C7 •{ti +� (a� 0l 1 +� t.7 Q •.i �"� a eo a� o� � +> �o a� o o � o a� a�o.x w a. e,� v F� a� •,� .N o a� •� o o �.c� a � � a� a cd +� •�, +� A +� oa +� a � c. v ,� ... � c� A � •� � 8 p •.� •.� o +� +� .�.� •,� •,.� .,� a •,� ci a1 uo ++ •� •� +� •.� as a� Q u� w v� o +� & �, •.� � •.� b � �s a c. m ••.� o .n q i •.� �; a, �n 1 4� � tr Qf W .f. � U LO q �Fr G1 H � fr i� .-1 f� 'LS � � O +� � (((�� C7 'C1 G, Li U O .D p� � Q! � 4-�i � ''� � G7 � O O R7 �n Q � cQ N N fA L� G� A �-{ � IA t� � � 1 G� N H 4� •.t U � r"� U •e-1 •''1 � Q'. O W i� i-� fq }1 Q� 0 I"'� (� •r/ O 0 �'i Q1 r� �� N U G1 +> > q o a�i � ti � o +� �, s7 A F, a� a� co �a a� as o .n � > • A a. U c. �«. ��, • cn cu ,� c.� � �nw ►-, w .� aa � w �ua •�, � aavQ caA � � arv� w a+ .n � ' ' ' ,� . � _• i•,�, �, �, ,.� .,. .. . i � i z � . E I � � I � �. � I I � � � ; I I � � � i i � � � � � � � � � � � a I � � � � 0 3 O x � ( � � � I . > � � W ri � • � a x�.. I • ►-, i � � . . � A . o � z � I � m �'' - a� +� � 6 �.+ p tA � +�i A n N � A C� O •� � J� a� � O HO •n o0 � � � � Li � � 4� �0 +� 4� (� � � � O 'd � O R: ri O V O r-1 � O a � ��n •�+ a o '� � Y+ +� a a. a •�+ a +� +� +� o a� m o � � a m o m w q v c� .� A li� � � � U � •e��1 q o C� N o C� � � o .�+,a, •., m o t, a+� .-� o� •� � .� '�o o t�, �«+ w o •�+ � y+ � o a� as a `� c� m a� c� a� ••� o � o a, � c� a� m ' �� v vi�.' a s� � +� o �� b � '� d � �" o . .v o a,� •.`�+ � i ��•�+ a� v� -v .� a a c, +� e a .-� a a, x ti vi ti � � a. 17e � •.� d a� a� a� a •�+ .Q cv a c, � ,-, w a �'' a� •� s� ,c� i � dKw � � � >+ ea c� � ov, c, asa� a� a c� v a � � � a a� a F+ � v� � r=, u� E+ a ra � a a �n ,,]( 1./l) � _• ': EXHIBIT 1-A PRIORITY RATING SHEET Pro3ect Titles � � a � °a �°a' � m W I. Inadequate education �* m a, Will the school curriculum be made to addreas itself to the needs of the Model Nei hborhood? b. Will the educational level of citizens be raised b the ro am? I. Insufficient income a. Will significant Model Neighborhood employment b created b ro ects? b. Wi11 the average income of the Model Nei borhood be increased? II. Discriminatiott - based on race, economics, area and sex a. Will discrimination be attacked in housing, education em lo ment etc? b. Will discrimination be attacked in existing ro ams and a encies? III. Ineffective Model Neighborhood resident involve- ment in policy and decision making a. Will residents be involved in the policy makin of the ro ect? b. Will existing board and policy making bodies • be e anded to seat Model Nei hborhood residents? IV. Inadequate delivery of public and private services a. Where one is able to change and/or increase the function of a.n existin r4 am IV. Government and institutional neglect a. Will government and institutions be required to make chan es ia their existin rocedures? I. Considerations that relate to a number of causal areas a. Where there exists a multi-cause i ct b. Where it is a necessary preliminary to a long ran e lan c. Where high visibility exists; programs with which the communit can relate and identif V. Other program considerations a. The ro am will continue after Hodel Cities b. Where there exists a low need for Model Cities su leatental (bonus) funds • 1"l7 �xzBrr zzz-a � 0 �. � � �' TASKS In-House Anal sis A ene Anal ►sis � , E�►aluation Spec. Review Taslc Force Review Reconciliation Task Force Review CDA Director Review Pre are Pro . Info. Sheet _��____�_r..� �_.._ �— Prepare Contract .. __ Citizen Board Approval Cit Council Approval Establieh Procedure for Agency 8eporting: A enc Reference Form Narrative ReQort , r Participant Beneficiar�r M Output Measure Attainment _ Forecast OutputMMeasure Bud et Line Items Work Program - . Operating Agency Statement _ (Cost Control) Establish Procedure for CDA Reportin�: Pro ect Status Report r_ Participant Beneficiary Re ort Work Program Report �� Pro 'ect Narrative Submission and Approval - Reports to Evaluation Staff ; 1'7$ 1 � • � � U +� � a •n � O � aq +� � a� o i q •.� �.� o +' t> U .� �� a A aa o .c� U t!] •� � � O tA a� a �.� a� � � � x w o H �` _ N � __ �---- . � � � '� •� � ') .� � � � � � O n � ao � a� �o a -------- ----._ � a� � a � �. �o 0 s, a � U N •n O ti a • 1 J`) Exhibit III-C • AGENCY REH'ERENCE FORM Project Title F�znctionsl Area Agency CDA Staff Liaison Address Name and Telephone Number of Director Name and Telephone Number of Model Cities Contact Address of Project Office • Other Projects Administered by this Agency in Model Cities Area Title Project Director The following reports are to be submitted by this agency on the� third workin� . day of each month/quarter. • 2An Exhibit III-C, cont. � MODEL CITY PROGIlAM MONTfiLY OUTPUT MEASURE REPORT Project Title _ Administering Agency �__ _ _ ___ Functional Area ^_ Prepared By `y_ _ __ Pez•iod Covered Data Pr•epr�red �_�� _r___ Project Elementl0ut�ut Measure Monthl� Attainment , � E � � ! I � � N �, � I ( � � .. � o •• a� U ?� �a U Cq cd a a ' a� rts a� > � � p`",, � e � �. a� � a o a� +� c. �. ti c� � a a A z ! � � � � �. N � � `� � � H H � t�. � � z � ( � , N � � cd r-� N a � . ,..� I � 0 U (� � N O U N �+ •�i I � Q � H +� U1 F-f �rl r-{ � H E-+ � �, F: +a +� O •ri U •rl � •• � �n U .,�.� � � � � W Q. [� � ctS � F 1�i�' ti � � � 0 0 ,r., ,..> � .n .. y, .. .� � � +� � -- _ ___�.__.___ __ __.__ __...__._._�_._..� a� c. a� �3 � � r-+ a •• � o 0 +� � �+C � U •r1 rl W U E-1 ttS QO *S � 'd � +� o u� •� E A U •� �+ +> ttS a� +� cd N fi U 'n U tl, F, 40 m O � G) N O ++ a � a �' a -n _.__ ___._.. �.��.__..._..: __. � ,� a� � a� .n � U C'. I � � '� � i _,_.Y......��..�.._._______._. _�._. �.__ _ _.._. _ � � �a � � � : � I r^+'� �i U � � � a � `. �._.._. _ ___.__. z N aH �+ a � � a � O U � � � +> +� � � fs4 N 'b � � � � ( ^ -��----- __�_._______._.....__._�..___.�_.�� _ 6 r-I � • O +� +� i+ •� � � O O � U •.� . r-i U � H Q .a H U �-' H +� r.{ �+ .,.i ,� p � � � I � [j � { U � ��:a�� Exhibit; III-C, cont. Praject Participant/Beneficiaries �unction�l Area Program Account f�r•o ject _�_� Period Covered 1)r;te Prepared `___..______�..-------- YreparE�d By .Y_.___...___.______-.---. _____. �_._- --�._______._�_____ �._,_ __._._....._. ._�_.....___ _ _.__.._._._---___. . ..___�_. ._. ._._.__. P�rticipants/Beneficiaries To1,a1 i � ` I _V ' Characteristics P�rticipants "� � �+> �� c, c. +� � H c. Beneficiarieri ° � °' °' ° � °' °1 � I� � • ,' F, ,a . �� 3 � A t�/� � 3 � A � � ..'�'�.. U � � � � U � � .-- --- - - - .�--.�__._.___._..__.___�..�.__. _�_.___ . � I � I I � I � � • � I I � ( ! � ( � I � � 1 � • 1 � � ,�'fi I I • � a� � � c�' � � � 0 w � . a� � � m' � c, .,.� � H � v u�j � � . � � � m' O •r1 'J� G4 fr P� 'd Pa'� (Yi Ul N V •rl �} Q7 � � .r-1 p� � . � � � �' � � � U � � W O � � � � H w W � .� � � w a� � c� a� � +� a � � w � m � � a� a�i d o�i a�i � W � R� � W � � � �a a . u� a� •n � � •n a0 4� O i-~i O � � Rf w+ �--t t) {�r 00 A l ' . �., � ti a, +� � � c�' � � � _ 0 w ti U .1..> � � � cd �t m' U N 6D � � A � O •ri }� .,.� � � N � H � ti � � �l � •� t, c� f, cd �ri G� a a � a� ?-o� 4 � � � H U R � � � '� � � � � @' � A +� O a� v t�o a� �d o� � � � � � CD' � � ti .,i W � +� .,� m � � � 'ci tp N a� 6 � � � � a +� +-+ w a o� '� . nUi a�i �'' � O •r�i �+� '-� Gu � �A H �-7 ►--1 � O �O +> H O jr � � H U p4 r-nz �Igz� 1�;f� �' a� � o •� � •�+ � +� o� � aa r. �: +� • � �. � +.> � :� � � � 0 ,d �'-+ � � � � N 'O r. w � � a� a u � N G w � i-� � � C�'' 'ty s. •r1 .�-�. � $ � 'a � a a. ,-. x � a � O �.Ni :3 • (,� � - �� C� p' a ,v _ � 0 U N � .-. '� � . � � � a v +� L, Ra �t +� � CD' � 1A L� .,q � � p � >a E •�-�1 � v � � � .� w > �� U U �� 7 � . � � O � r� p C' N rs v tw x l.'ri f � ti � a a�i � o ai � cj � ,�-� � .i ...� a� � N � Ni7'- 4� � 4�. .-1 4i F. 4, r-� � '� � Q1 'r1 C� � {� RI � �. ;ia'� ',�a'ri +� (/� .►�F c/2 +� +� U +� . � � � � �h1 •� Fi 'I'1 �i Q� .'3 Q� � •r� "� . c� •�+ � v •,� � +� a +� a w F, +� a, a� c� � as o o cd +� � +� w � •v ¢ Q 4 A OU � O � � tr � i� � � � ��, i c, i a� +� � .., � a� a� � � s. •v �, �u c. � b a v v � o +� o +> +� +� a� �v a� a, a� s. a� � c. � N a � a �n � �., .-� �.. c, as '� �. � � a a a a. �o c�. •,� •,� a� •,� a� -.a o > •,� o � a � a � •� � � wa wa Qoaw Ac� w 4H a ►-+ c=. ►-+ � .,� � a� a� a� �, O c� U 1 +� -i A O •.� v A � � t, 7,� O cd N >a +� cd W � cC 'O s, � +� � �i a ti +� � a �o c. � � a, �c�. � A. °o m� a z 6 m � � � s aUi ,-� '� c: w w � .. d �d a� .n oo •,� � a� •� o a� +� N 6D y � N � F..r � � � h0 � N +� � ir � fr as +.� � +� m •�, •,� a� �o •� u� •� +.� s � a a � v •�+ � � +� E a� +� +> c° .v a�i w eo c°� � N ,-p1.,+� .-� •p�-1 cd N Ta g� c. c6 m � +� a� b � 6 � � K� G�i c�U +� 6 R� o�i t'+'0 .a .� •� �.�. m q � oc, o •.� :� +� � � u� a � � a, o � ou� W � '� � �n �n �'v� a �n a o a o a a�o c� 6 �xi +.� i U �"�p �+' � ir N q •r1 'd � a� �►-� N d (A � � A i. U O ir � P+ t�, � � a O R. 3 � � R � U � N [Yl �..' U� � � V Li r'-1 rl �'. 'd +� F: O •r-� 'C3 +� O L� f. � 'ia ��-{s G� � N •ri � � Q� 4-� •� � � � � �3 � G) P�W � r-1 � f� O �.�-� +, +� � � � C� +� E cd t0 ctS +� E 00 > � � A � f. r-1 O i�, clS r-I O Li C) � O O O [�-, d U �ri .t) 4 U •.� t, CD' C3' � � � � +� p d � v tfl E +� � +� � � � y O � a �n +� a� x s a ti � � U W O L� +� G�i •r�l � � 0�0 � � � � a p � a a � ~ a "� > � z a � a� +� ,.� .,� a ..� .�+ Ca � N U � � OD � � c�tl H �i U O N p � .� � �" y H •� r-I P+ d � Z � � 7'-. O H N j,.� H �U 1-1 +.� Q • • s • ��2, • • • H p � r-i N Kl .� O r-i N ►�'1 � • • `; PU 1�� . a�i o a�'i o a�i o m � � � � � � � a � a � a � a +� w .� a °1 w +� � 's'�, o 's�. o '� o '�, O U • O U • O U • Q aQcn ac� �n aQVQ' a' . o � w d a�i •rl i� �o p +� r. R��q3 +� � � �,�, +� •� ,c7i v c6 N 'd N O � q � c� m �o co �o a � ,-a u� �, v •� a.•� w a� a m �a �,�°.� �+ 6 as o > •� o go � � � aUi o c°� c°'. •r� U � •ri � F� •r'1 RS W N «S � GO +� � 4� N p A +� � N U 'd •rl �'', .L', +� i.> . � . +q� 01 O 'C 'D � 8 cd 4� U OD r-I � cd � �6p., u�1 i,�" �c� U � •d � t�0 p •p m'O Np � c� A O � •� .O cq � 00 A .. .,� .d U 00+� cd �a •.i cd L� r� t0 �d � O O � O � � U � � � 4-� � U r� � � �' r-�1 L� r-�i r-�1 � � �� fy +� �� +> U t�i � � •� •d •� � aS � H L�0 � H O CD' � �0 y N �.� � � @ � U l� ,'� .� W � +� v O � +? N � � O - � � � � � ° �' a O. 3 � � � •r+ +� c0 •.i U ++ U +� cd � .rl f� Q� � U qS � R� •O 'U ir � a a c� a�a r° z� o . . . r-� • �- u� .o c` i � H � � 1_�;�) a� � � � a � .� 0 a 0 U W ti Ct � � a '� .�, U O U! �.r � F"� � N �i � a > w �, a �a r° � H (s� a ? �i � � � � � U � H � �' a � � o a .d � Q O U � H U � y� 'O W � � H ir A 'b � A � � �' a � A � � U � � A O ?a d � � F� � O � A � h � ,� A � � � ,V � �N � 'ty W � i� W � a c0 � � cd � � � � � � � w � W � V N l�� INTE�RIM RELOCATION PLAN • Comprehens�ve City Demonstration Program This interim plan ie beiag aubmitted as a part of the Compreheneive De- monstration Program in lieu of a complete Relocation Plan, which xill be transmitted within ninety (90) d�ys after HUD approval of the Coarprehen- sive Development Plan. (a) The CDA hereby acknowledges and adopts the baaic policiee and re- =q�i�ements set forth in Handbools MC 316g.1 (CDA Letter No. 5, Re- vised) regarding the relocation of individuals, families, busines�ee, and nonprofit organization,e, xhich ma�y be displaced by the Model Cities Progratn. Tn particular, this acknowledgement and adoption includes Paragraphs 2 and 4 of MC 31bs.1 as followa: 2) Policies and Require�ents far Model Cities Relocation (a) No family or individual will be displaced from ite residence by a capita], pro�ect or activity included in the Nodel Cities • Program until. that individual or family has chosen and has acquired the present right to occupy suitable relocation housing or has refused a reasanable choice of identified �sui�able relocation houeing. If a family or individual is offered and acc�pts suitable relocation houaing wh3ch xill become available within one year from its displacement, it may be teniporarily relocated into housing which meets the standards for temporary relocatiott housing eet forth in Paragraph 4 of MC 3165.1. If eviotion becomea necessary, it will be carried out in accordance r+ith state and local law and approved relocation standarda. Relocation housing wi11 be listed for referral by the Hausing and Redevelop- men� Authority's section as the designatar administrating unit only when it: (1) ia available on a nondiscriminatory basis; (2) meete the physical and accupancy �tandarde defined in Paragraph �+ of MC 3165.1; and (3) ia within �he Interim Relocation Plan �' � 19� financial mesns of the family or individual, al�o def3ned in Paragraph 4. • (b) Program displacemen� will not result in a permanent reduc- tion in the supply of 1ow- and moderate-income houaing within the city. Federally assisted low- and moderate- income hou�ing currently programmed or under construction will provide a substantial increase in the +supply of stan- dard low- and moderate-income housing in the city. The number oP units to be provided will be subatantially in excess of the�gregate number of househalds displaced as a result of the Pragram and other dieplaceroent activity in the Pragram area (NDP Code Enforcement, etc.). Attached at the end of this plan, is a table listing housing re- sources which will become available through rehabilitation and new construction during the next two years. Additional sites for multi-family attd single-family housing in the Model Neighborhood are presently under consideration and will be identified in the subsequent submiasion of th8 complete 8elocation Plan. Because of the lead time involved • in the conetruction or rehabilitation of housing, diaplace- ment of individuals or families and th� start of rehabilita- tion or new construction may not coincide. Hut those displaced will have access to suitable relocation housing, as required above, by the time of their displacement. Ftiirthermare� tbe ph�vsical start of new constructien or rehab- ilitation will be not more than one �ear behind the removal ... - of units from the housin� market. (c) Business concerns and nonprofit organizations diaplaced by . projects or aativities included in the Program with service and assistance to aid in their satisfactory reestablishment. (d) The CDA will coordinate its Program to the maximum extent feasible with other activities causing displacement in the city to avoid competition for the same housing units. Interim Reloc ation Plan � �9� (e) The Model Neighborhood citiz�n participation structure re- quired by CDA I,etter No. 3 in the policy development� pl�unning, • and execution phases of relocation, will be provided through the creation of an MNPC Relocation Committee composed of 3 MNPC members, 2 residents of the Model Neighborhood, and a member from a local internal agency heavily involved in housing (sugge�tion: The St. P�u1. Urban League). Thie com- mittee will be responsible for monitoring azr,d evaluaition of the relocation program and for determining procedures for hand- ling relocation grievance+s. The committee will review and recommend propo�als for relocation and rehousing assistax►ce to the MNPC Pbysical core, to the Executive Coromfttee� and finally to the MNPC body. (f) All families or individuals displ�ced by pro�ects or acti- vities included in the Program wil,l be offered housing avail- able on a nondiscriminatory basis within a broad choice of I neighborhooda. In the implearentation of thi$ policy, the CDA will avoid relocation housing pro�ects contributing to • the development or perpetuation of housing patterns which concentrate large segments of the population by racial or economic oharacteristics. The Program is dir�cted towards providing decent, safe, and sanitary low- and moderate-income houeing both Withitt and outside the Model Neighborhood. 3) Organization for 8elocation Administration: (1) Administration OrAanization of the Local A�encq (a) The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of St. - Paul, Minneaota (HRA) will be the loca]. agency responeible for administration and coordination of all relocation acti- vitiea in the Model Neighborhood area. The CDA hae not executed an agreement with the HI�N, pending the determination of additional relocation aseistance to be Interim Relocation P1.aa • 193 provided by the CDA. Proposals for additional services • and assistance which are adopted will be included in the agreement and the executed agreement will be submitted with the complete Relocation Plan. (b) The St. Paul HRA is responsible for the provi$ion of re- location assistance to all families and individuals dis- placed as a result of any governmental activity, fir�s, or other emergencies occurring in the City. The agency is responsible for administering both the urban renewal and public housing programs. The relocation staff is included within the Community Services Department of the agency. Also included under Coromunity Services are social services staff for residents of public houaing and community organization staff. Menr bers of the three components provide advice and consulta- tion as needed by other staff inembers of the department. • The Director of Community Services reports directly to the Executive Director of the agency. Attached is an or- ganizational chart showing the structure of relocation personnel at the present time. (c) The Model Neighborhood is included in the Summit/Univer- sity Neighborhood Development Program Area. The Model Neighborhood Pl�►ruiing Council also serves as the Project Area Committee for NDP. For a description of the acti- vities of MNPC in NDP planning, refer to ND 50$, Citizen Participation Report, and supplements thereto, Bubmitted with the NDP application for the second year's program (5/1/7� - �+/3�/71). (d) Refer to Relocation Activity Report ND 507, of the second year NDP submission for the informational process used to • Interim Relocation Plan _l.�)�+ provide continuous information to displacees. Reference should also be made to ND 50$ for a de�cription of the • Block Contact Program being carried out in the Madel Neigh- borhood. (2) Workload Data on displacement-causin� pro�ects and activities has been submitted for the period from Ma,y 1, 1970, to April 3c�, 19�1� with the NDP second year application. Revised data will be submitted documenting any additional die- placement reeulting from the designation of any additional housing sites now under consideration by the MNPC. This dnta will be included in the complete CDA Relocation Ylan. �3) Techniques for Providin�Relocation Assistance • (a) Maximum opportunity for choice in total housing supply: The Summit/University NDP area contains approximately 85% of the non-white population of St. Paul. Since the str�rt of relocation activity in July, 1g68, under an Early Acqui- sition Program, 25� of the non-white displacees moved out- side of the Suromit/University area. Also, better than a third of the white displacees have remained in the Summit/ University .neighborhood. This would seem to indicate that a trend toward deconcentration has begun to develop. The selection of sites for the construction, acquisition or leasing of low-income housing has resulted in a widely separated distribution of this housing throughout the community. The bulk of the HRA�s low-income units are located outside the areas of greatest minority concen- Interim Relocation Plan • L<)', trations. The assignment of these units, whether the,y are located in family projects, elderly hi-rises, scattered • single-family houses or leased unite, . has been a consis- tently open-occupancy basis and has indeed resulted in the integration af non-white families throughout the community. Additional sites for the development of Feder�].ly assisted moderate income housin� have been proposed for all resi- dential NDP areas. The HRA has discussed the need for this housing with the Project Area Committee in each of the areas and has received their support for this type of development. The HI2A has provided information and guidan.ce to a number of community groups in and outside the NDP project areas in an effort to promote the development of additional low- and moderate-income housing throughout the community. Although there has been a great deal of community interest • in various housing programs, it is difficult to maintain a high level of activity in the face of the critical shortage of Federal fuuds to support the needed volume of construc- tion and rehabilitation activity. The State of Minnesota and the City of St. Paul have enact�d fair housing legislation which ranks among the most progres- sive in the nation. The City's Department of Human Rights has worked diligently to enforce the City's ordinance rind has developed an effective information program which the HRA has helped to disseminate. (b) Assistance to business concerna and non-profit corporations: See sections cited above for staffing. Additional assistance will be proposed to enable displaced business concerns to Interim Relocation Plan � � 7��f; remain in the Model Neighborhood and to enhance their operations. • (c) Additional Relocation Assistance: An amount of $50,000 is proposed to provide funding for additional relocation services and assistance. Among these are proposals for psyment of excesa moving expen�es, legal assistance, homemaker and home maintenance counsel- ing and services, transitional housing, interim emergency repair loans, and employment of reesidents in the reloca- tion process as relocation and maintenance aides under career development programs. 4) Relocation Housing and Ability-to-pay Standards: The CDA has adopted basic housing standards in conformity with the local housing code to be applied as criteria for determining whether a residence constitutes suitable relocation housing. These standards • are the same as those which are used as the basic elements of housing standards in the urban renewal program. Temporary relocation into housing meeting these basic housing stan- dards will be provided for a period of up to twelve months if relo- cation to perman.ent housing meeting these standaxds is not posaible at the time the move is required to be made and if such permanent hausing is scheduled to become available within one year. Use of temporary relocation housing will normally be limited to displacees waiting to return to rehabilitated or to enter newly constructed housing. Permanent relocation housing will be located in n�ighborhoods con- taining adequate commercial a:r�d comntunity facilities. Permanent relocation housing shall not be in a neighborhood slated for Interim Relocation Plan � Lc�7 clearance in the near future, or in a neighborhood characterized • by significant environmental deficienciee if these cand�tions are not being remedied, or are not scheduled to be remedied in the immediate future, by appropriate governmental or private action. Displacees will not be offered a choice of relocation housing for which they are expected to pay more than 25 percent of their annual gross income for rent and utilities, excluding telephone service. For this purpose, gross income is defined as total family incomc excluding all income of minors and minus �300 for each minor. Neither the exclusion nor the �300 exemption applies to a minor spouse. (b) Relocation P�vments All eligible recipients of relocation p�yments as defined in Paragraph 6 of MC 3165.1, will receive no less than the urban renewal relocation pa�yments provides for, at the time such � • pa�yments are approved, by section 114 of the Housing Act of 1949 with respect to projects assisted under Title I thereof. If the displacement is caused by a Model Cities project or activity for which there is no specific provision for relo- cation p�yments, the CDA will make relocation payments equal to and not in excess of the level of relocation payments authorized for urban renewal relocation. • Interim Relocation Plan l�)8 FEDERALLY A.SSISTID HOUSING PROGRAMMED OR UNDER CONSTRUCTION • �rpe and Locatio.n Number of Dwelling Units Demonstration-Rehabilitation (FHA 235) NDP 1� Site "A" - Summit-University NDP 4? (FHA 236 Housing) 5ite "B" - Summit-University P1DP � (FHA 236 Housing) Site "C" - Summit-University NDP 9? (F'HA 236 Housing) Torre de San Miguel - Concord Terrace (Minn. R-3�) 142 (FHA 236 Housing) Disposition Parcel 6� - Concord Terrace (Minn. R-3�) 5U Single Family Lots in Concord Terrace (Minn. R-37) ?5 (F� 235) Single Family Lots in Summit-University NDP 25 (� 235) • Minn. 1-12 (Leased Public Housing) �?� Minn. 1-13 (Elderly Public Housing) 14$ 1743 East Iowa Street Minn. 1-19 (Elderly Public Iiousing) 193 10 West Excha.nge Street Minn. 1-24 ('p.derly Public Housing) �-45 Jenks-Edgerton Mi�. 1-21 (Scattered Sites Public Housing) 116 (Sin�le family housing to be suilt and/or acquired) Skyline Towers (FHA 236 Housing) �6 Battle Creek Apartments (FHA 236 Housing) � Total Federally Assisted Housing �',23�+ • Interim Relocation Plan l�)�) • In accordance with the memorandum of December 5, 196g, "Interim Relocation Submission and Procedures for Model Cities", paragraph 3, this Grant agreement should contain the following provision: No displacement shall take place from any project or activity (if funded in whole or in part by Model Cities supplemental grant funds) prior to HUD approval of a relocation activity work program and budget. • Interim Relocation Plan � • �'(iti � Form Appruved BudQef lfuraNU No. 63K11i7 U.S. OEPARTMENT OF HOUSING ANO URBAN DEVELOPMEN7 MODEL CITIES PROGRAM STATEMENT OF NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION TABLE 2 - CAPITAL PROJECTS (O�her thun Public� Nuusrn ) NAME OF CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY AND STATE: NAME OF MODEL NEIGHBORHOOU AREA (/j�rrrlincr�ll: St. Paul, Minnesota Summit-University Area % WITHIN IF NO FEU. REQUIRED 1. FEDERAL AGENCY 2. PROJECT NAME AND OR NO. OF DATE OF COMMITMENT, '��"�UNI' OF NON— ANO TYPE OF GRANT NUMBER MILES FEDERAL GIVE DATE FEDERAL FEOEFAL FROM MNA COMMITMEN7 �� GF2ANT SHARE APPLICATIO ��) (3000) A B C D E F HUD, Urban Renewal NDP Year I (69-70 10096 5-1-69 10,6C�, 0 NDP A-1-1 Summit- within $3,CX)0,00() University Area, S/U St. Pau1, Minn. M.N.A. (includes S-U R-4 ) HiJD, Urban Renewal NDP Year 2 (70-71 100% 5-1-70 3,260� NDP A-1-1 Summit- within SI,600,C University Area, S/U St. Paul, Minn. M.N.A. ......::;:•r:;:; . :•r:.; TOTAI ;'�•: •':•:�•:• ;•;{:�:;:•,:::�';:;:� :ti�::�:�:::�°•:;:•,'� : $�+s fiOC)�( BMITTED BY: 8-23-70 Director W. B. SteHart (DateJ (Title ojCDA O(fiuiul) (Signature o/CDA iJfJiccall Form Approved BudQet 8ureau Nn. 63/11117 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN OEVEI.OPMENT MODEL CITIES PROGRAM STATEMENT OF NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION TABLE 3 - PUBLIC HOUSING NAME OF CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY AND STATE: NAME OF MODEL NEIGNBORHO00 AREA �erttn�nt : St. Paul, Minnesota Summit-University Area % WITHIN OR DATE CON- ESTIMATED PII.OT REQUIREQ NON— PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME NO. OF MILES STRUCTION LOCAL (Puyment in FED. SMARE: FROM MNA STARTED TAx J,�pu n� 'f�=Ces f (SO00) Is000l (I�—F' .Y �01 A B C D E F Central Apts. 10096 within 6/62 19,264 800 64,W0 Duplex 1 - 5 M.N.A. Neil Apts 100% within 7/62 16,856 700 56,Ono Westside Duplex M.N.A. . ........:....v• ..;,}:•;•:•:;;:��J. . . ... TOTAL �•�;.�:.�:•::�:.•::•:.•'• � ':�::�: ':•:�::�:�::�r::�.,�;.,�;. :.•:::�:::•: 150C) 120,(XX) ��.�:�: UBMITTED BY: 8-23-70 Director W. B. Stewart (DateJ (Title ojCDA OjjicialJ (Signature nf C/)A O�fi�•irif) � RESIDENT EMPIAYMENT STATF�NT • Polic : �� This policy recognizes that the Model Neighborhood does not have r� lot of residents who possess a vast array of professional or other vocatiorial training and experience. However, this policy assumes that posi.tions created by Model Cities projects or programs will be open to Any Model Neighborhood resident who is trainable either unemployed or underem- ployed. Therefore, to develop maximum employment opportunities for Model Neighborhood residents in Model Cities projects is one of the most important ob�ectives of the Model Neighborhood Planning Council. By providing new and better job opportunities as "spin-offs" of Model Cities projects and through realistic training programs that relate to the pre- sent and future labor market needs, the St. Paul Model Cities program can then use this approach as the first step of a series of steps in expanding and building a new economic base for the Hodel Neighborhood. • Projects aimed at job training, placement, education, or other such pro- grams facilitating the employment or employability of Model Neighborhood residents will receive special critical attention in pro�ect monitoring and eva.luation. Model Cities will require those projects or agencies receiving Model Cities funds to give Model Cities residents first priority in all hiring. In addition, Model Cities will actively pursue firm application of the 1964 Civil Rights Act with all prospective employers in the City of St. Paul, which summarily reads as follows: ". . . . in conformance with the genera7. purpose of selecting the most qualified employees, ar�y dis- crimination in the recruitment, selection, employment, placement, pro- motion, training, assignment� aeparation, or any other personnel action shall be prohibited. Discrimination shall include ar�y consideration of race, creed, sex, color, or national origin as an element in the • Resident Employment Statement ��cij, determination of any of the abone decisions." • This policy of maximum resident employment in Model Cities projects i� understood and accepted by the mayor�and city commission, Model Neigh- borhood Planning Council, and prospective sponsoring agencies which wi.11 operate the programs. Model Cities will actively coordinate, solicit from other sources, and whenever possible provide supportive services such as health services, day care services, etc. for employed Model Neighborhood residents there- by assisting them in retaining employment. Enforcement: The mayor and Model Neighborhood Planning Council has charged the CDA with full responsibility for implementing the resident employment policy within HUD guidelines. The CDA Director and Model Neighborhood Planning Council will review all projects to make sure there is comglete corapliance. • In addition, the Model Neighborhood Planning Council will have contract responsibilities to review and eval.uate on all pro3ects. The review will deterarine if all contractors are in complete compliance. Deviation from the policy will be discussed with the operating agencie� to take undo consideration before appropriate action is taken. "Appropriate actinn" is interpreted as further contract review, contract compliance or non- renewal. In serious cases, the r�view could lead to contract terrnination. Recruitment: The Model Cities Program and agencies contracted to operate or administer Model Cities projects must seek to attract a maximum number of applica- tions from Model Neighborhood residents for employment in Model Cities programs and pro�ects. The Model Neighborhood Planning Council will have aontract responsibilities for dissemina.ting �ob information on available • Resident Employment Statement 2U4 positions, duties to be per�ormed, salary range, speciaJ. qualifications, • training to be made available and how, when and where applications can be submitted to the various agencies. The Hodel Neighborhood Planning Council will use all available media including daily newspapers, posters, flyers, radio, television, and work-or-mouth in neighborhood or�anizin� activities. Trainin�: Delegate agency contracts will provide, wherever possibl.e, that eupervi- sion and training of Model Neighborhood residents will be vigorous, re- sourceful and considerate. It will seek to motivate and inform. Training policy will provide Model Neighborhood res�idents with on the job training so that such residents will come to the realization that they have access to the full range of promotional opportunities. • , • Resident F�r►ployment Statement ��r.� SUMMARY DESCxIPTION OF THE PLAN • The St. Paul Model Cities First Year Comprehensive Development Plar� has been developed as a desi�n for a coordinated attack on the basic problems and their underlyin� causes affecting the Summit-University area. The Model Neighborhood, often referred to as the Summit-Univer- sity area is an inner-city neighborhood approximately 1000 acres in size and the home of nearly 27,000 St. Paul citizens. The Area Map depicts the boundaries and land use features of the Model Neighborhood (See Appendix I). The Location Map illustrates the location of the Model Neighborhood in the St. Paul Metropolitan Area (See Appendix II). While the implementation of the plan will direct its impact on the Model Neighborhood and its 27,000 residents, it will also benefit the larger community by demonstrating the workability of neighborhood citizen involvement in the actual planning and implementation process for developing an improved environment for the people. The effective e3cperimentation in some projects such as: the neighborhood business development, the special resources for teaehing, the rapid advance of educational capabilities, and a mobile health unit for area schools, • could provide the basis for application to all areas of St. Paul. The thrust of the Model Cities Program First Year Comprehensive Development is directed toward improvement of the economic and social foundations of the Model Neighborhood with activities of the St. Paul Housin� and Redevelopment Authority under the Neighborhood Development Programs Years #1 and #2, providing the base for renewal of the physical environment. While the activities under these HRA programs coordinate with and compliment our program, an.y extensive use of Model Cities Supplemental Funds for physical projects is not required during this first year. The Planning Process 2'he Model Neighborhood Planning Coi�ncil, an elected 30 member council � Swnmary Description of the Plan ` 2C)G representing the Model Neighborhood has strived for widespread citizen participation in the planning o:f this program. The Model Neighborhood • Planning Council organized three planning cores, Economic, Social and Physical, and within the cores ten taskforces for the purpose of studying, identifying and analyzing neighborhood problems. As each core and taskforce conducted an extended series of regular working meetings that were publicized in the Model Neighborhood, a large number of neighborhood residents, representing a good cross section of the community were involved in this aspect of the planning process. Representatives of agencies from the neighborhood and agencies and departments from the lar�er St. Paul community participated and were welcomed as resource people. The ideas and directions evolved by the cores, taskforces and committee� were developed and translated into specific action projects by the Model Cities Pro�ram Staff. The staff was assisted, particularly in the pro- ject planning phase, by various consultants and by representatives of the various agencies, departments and institutiona having a role in the • Model Neighborhood, Nei�hborhood Conditions The planning groups in the course of studying, identifying and analyzing nei�hborhood problems found the Model Neighborhood to be seriously af- fected by a lack of adequate and relevant educational opportunities, hi�h unemployment and underemployment, a lack of resident ownership of housin� and business, extensive physical deterioration of private build- ings and public facilities, inadequate health care, a disproportionately high rate of recorded crimes a�ainst property and persons, poor police community relations arid a lack of recreational and cultural programs for residents. These and other problems were revealed to be interwoven with each other in a complex patteru. � Swmnary Description of the Plan 2C�� However five ba$ic causes evolved out of this complex pattern and were identified as directly or indirectly underlying all the problem area�. • They are: 1. Inadequate education 2. Insufficient income (unemployment and underemployment) 3. Discrimination (racial, economic, sexual and geo�raphic) 4. Governmental and institutional neglect (inadequate delivery of public and private services) 5. Ineffective Model Neighborhood resident involvement in public policy and decision making. Strategy In order to achieve ob�ectives relating ta a reduction and elimina�ion of the priority problems, strategies will be employed that aim directly at the underlying causes. During the First Action Year Program, approaches will be employed that seek to: • 1. Raise the educational level of the Model Neighborhood residents to effectively compete for employment at all levels of the job market, for further education both vocationally and profession- ally, and for knowiedge to assume authoritative leadership responsibility in all areas of the Model Cities program. 2. Increase the employability of unemployed and underemployed Model Neighborhood residents through creation of a strong economic base by the development of a broad spectrum of local business enterprises, job training, basic job counseling and education, transportation services, and the �stablishment of new criteria for hiring r�sidents. 3. Attack discriminatory practices in business ventures, hiring, and lending policies, and achieve a level of Insti�utional change in education and teaching practices to eliminate harm- ful racial, sexual, geogr�phic and cultural attitudes. � Summary Description af the Plan �?��$ 4. Make governmentiAl and institutional a�encies more refiponsive to the needs of Model Neighborhood residents throu�h use of • supplemental funds for programs that most effectively change the basic social, economic. and physical problems of the area in addition to improving communication, with emphasis on local agencies. 5. Increase citizen participation by involving the Model Neigh- borhood residents on boards, councils, and committees of agencies; and groups conducting pro�ects and programs that affect the Model Neighborhood area, to include public policy development with special emphasis on the Model Cities program in the planning and development of programs in particular. Supplemental funds will also be used to implement projects that will have an immediate and highly visib.le irni,act upon the area so as to establish the confidence of the Model Neighborhood residents. Tt must be shown that something can be done, because the area has too long been in the planning process with no visible results. i In a number of situations, pro�ect operation will be contracted to exist- ing public agencies which have the capability of efficiently carrying out the project while bringin� about crucial institutional changes. The services of existing private agencies, particularly those operative within the Model Neighborhood, will be used for operation of some of the projects. This will develop competence within the community and will tend to bring the organizations and groups within the neighborhood together. All project contracts will require that the administering agencies assure maximum employment and reali.stic training of Mode1 Neighborhood residents. Through improving the quality of life in the Model Neighborhood, we hope to lay a foundation for a comn:unity that is diverse economically, '� Summary Description of the Plan ! ?O�) racially, and ethnically. • Action Projects � Fourteen action projects have been designed to implement the first year strategy and achieve planning objectives. The following key action pro�ects illustrate the approach that the program is taking. Community Health Program - Provides a comprehensive medical and denta�. facility, including a mobile health unit. Model Neighborhood Ilnployment Center - Offers counseling, job placement, b.asic education, vocational training, and other services. Oxford-Selby Recreation Training Pro�ram - Establishes a training pro- gram for recreational leadership in the entire Model Neighborhood area. • Local Development CompanY - Provides technical assistance and obtains funding for revitalizing existing businesses and developin� new businesses in the Model Neighborhood Description. Police Community Relations Proiect - Establishes a training program for a group of minority residents which will qualify them for work with the St. Paul Police Department in the Model Neighborhood. Consultant Housing Study - Studies the neighborhood housing situation, considers all feasible alternatives and develops a housing plan which is crucial to many dimensions of the neighborhood renewal. Professional consultants would be contracted for this purpose. Supportive Educational Pro_j�ect - Supplements present public school . Summary Description of the Plan �lr) efforts in Model Neighborhood by providin� key staff per;;onnel for more individualized work with students, far.nily� and community. Pr�avide:; up- � to-date equipment and innovative training material.s for• neighbortioocj schools. Child Development Pro�ect - Provides pre-school educatiional opportunity on a broad scale in the Model Neighborhood. Simultaneously �rovi.des �iay care services for mothers who are workin� or bein� trained. Projected total funding of this first year program is $4,46�>,OC�U from all sources. The federal supplemental funds grant 1'rom IiUll wi:Ll provide $2,950,000. The city of St. Paul will contribute approximately $1,'S,00C1 for program administration. Emphasis on economic renewal and social development is il_lustrntecl by the fact that $�26,000 in supplemental funds, or 31�, will be dcvoted to employment and business development projects and $1,4��,ODU, or 629b, in Supplemental Funds will be devoted to health, education, and othFr socially oriented projects. Certain projects relatin�; to the physical • development of the neighborhood will be carried out under Model Cities sponsorship. They will use $159,000, or 790 of Supplemental F�nd�. The objectives which relate to physical projects will in the main be carried out with funds provided by the Neighborhood Development Programs under the St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authorit,y. As the planned projects become operational, all projects will be con- tinuously monitored to assure that the services provided for in the project contracts are being furnished. The Evaluation and Monitorin� Committee made up of Model Nei�;hborhood residents and others will �;elect priority projects or component part.s of the program for evaluation or in-depth analysis by our staff ar�d by consultants. This is a funda- mental part of this program, as it is through tools such as monitoring and evaluation that the "model" or "demonstration" aspeci:s of the pro�ram are focused upon. • Summary Description of the Plan �'l l. , � �.�� ' , � . x% {� �/' � !7[�_. � � �` • •�'' '�'�+ a � , � �';� 6R� �� ti • �� .i! ;�3 � � . � � � �1 '� ��►: ,�, .. �� M �� a�� : t- ..,. � 1 2 ■� u rrc: � �c �� ' : �� E�� r �; � � �� = ( � � � -„ � ��''��,� 1� //: � � �i. _'`�/., � � � � � � � _u4 � 7 w,� r� � / �� i � � � •� �M �� . � � -� �� --� 1j p� ' � �Q 2 ' �1�, S ./// � � �' , , �: �� 2p �� , � � 5 1 '""� �.'n'� ff��tt r �}7 1�1I �L� �: A.- �NYI �o.. '° 1� ■ w � .fr:f.� �� ^' • M%%�7�i� .�+.l�1 � .p,p. � �� - ro�o rks� � � � (�� .n' �':� �r� Rai �nii n1Y�w Q�• n��r� � � �� .p � ' � � ��. � � �:� :.3� ' -��r, ' '�I�i � �� t �'� �w � ��6 � � ;,� � � � �� m #� QI. ��. � '::�6 �P; `' a�'��' � �� '�' � � �� '"� � � �y CSS p{ •� �y �� ■ ,� !� � � �� DOt �� ,� � , �g a� � : V �M _ � � I � � �„�}� ..' � : �$ I�:',=' T,. �, � '� w� � �� ~ //15 , �� M � +..,�. " '' .v � ■ �. �80 � �"�' "'� � • � �' �=� �� t � 11�� '� � �,,,,� � �� .:.R � �� X: _� �� qq��'i � � � x� � :�� x M �c � ^.� � �� ,� � i�'�� IRII � =� � :� �� :� �" � .. � Y�?o" _. = Q0� � f ii• � .� i� .�� .. � ,�i� j:t�J # � � � +•'� �p � N � � �� ".. Rf '',��. �... . �¢. v� � � w wo/i t Y� � � � M �I « ^' � � ^ F� �.�j i � `� �, x '. ,r � .r.... '/ �,v Y Y4' � �iSo �:� i � i��:�'-��N1�1.� IIIII�11 r �� NNi � 'P t' 'f� . �l..T. .r-,.. a ,. �: �� y � '' � ��: � � = . . .. � . � � =� . �. �- � = � � � �„ �� YKK �� . �� . r�� %/�.'�.' �Sy2lf ��` �f � 1 � .:r,. I � n .� ��,;' �t ;'� ��g :,� I � ,,G„ � �' _ �° , � �� 8 4'it� �.� �$B � � � MMI��/N NII� i r�••• � 'e ', � � �� ''� � _'", �111 � � � � ' a �.^,, / � � -�: � � � � � �' � ,oi ; %�. � ..'��IINti � � i� � � r � ~ � M� � ; ta � ■x N�� '�� ..'�.• * _�- r � � � �, �I �' ' .W . � -� �„ • �,� �.��^ -$� �� A r •� � � ; � '.1�_ l � '� , � �.'�� ,,,� .n r. .t • �._ �'"j � �"�I � � �i ��.. � z �� i. � � � �,�'cae � %%�._r i _�11 g� p�p�� 1 ��, �� I F4R�� . �.�•�� Y �RRj Myi � / ' - , .�� .. x: r �� a� �'�aaia � -�; `�;� � � ��^�.� w�g �� — .�. ��« , . ;. �,�,. � a Q � � �;� � � �� • L•'�r�� o � � •� �� _� � c n � .� ,.�. . . . � � � �� . �j .. �. , � . � ,��I �� , _ � •, .,,�� 1 � lii' �1 .,,, q � ,� _.�,,,�"' 1 . � :iui�i� H !;�; yf � � n � i � • 11 11 � ` � '� � i � � , � � ,,� � �. .- r � .� n � � � � � �`�I�Il�li' i � . � ■ ' ''_ ''`� � ,�r ' t nii =j jl� � � _ � . � i i � �� .u� � � �.1 , .: : . � � ��i� ! �� i��iiuiri�i�i��r�'� �� : _t �1 �Itl �i /1��1 IIIIN��:I_ ' r � • : 1 I��lf�1�1! RU►H 1�1 ♦ .•♦ ' � .�� r �u � ■ �•��-`��i►�� ,�� =��Y' > � �. � . ,�iu `,��ir��=�t�i=�� ,�. _ � ■ ■ na ■ �. � ♦ • 1►I��i�i��!��i�ii�i�� '��•`o• 7 �• �� - i ��.e► _ �� r_' • •. t I � . ,. '�.tl:�l.••.�� \. __.��1�, ;:!i�� _ � / .��.I i �� ue��S��l1i�=w0 \ �u�� . _ I ■.��n �� ■ � �� u�r...r.��,' � . !111111 � �J�� •� r n��rc � � � 1 11l11�� i ~�'�;:;.r �� I��'�-��i��iiii ; s , \`� •�_ � •G � �� •�11�� a 1 lt!lpr�l�i.'�.�,�Q.�i�j��• ..��*,� i��w� �i�o�n; s � �'�' �,i.��• �� '�p��r��r �/\�►�/I I►�. �"��♦ �� t/I.�U:��....a ' I �� !•`��1ii ti1�!;.. � `�1�11.�� ' 1�11l1��/��` I.�•'�'• �._',�� '�8�� 1 � • _ � `��s�i�i^�i!'<:i � � �� ►I r�►� � ■r��' � � � � =��I��;•;.•�:..,.��;j,. , ��l��iei�i , . ��r��i��-i ....I�,e1,� . � �;3.z......., � � � �,� ��'��r A en �Tr.,� i � �� a 1�3/I�Illlu\� �11�� 4,��i \ ` '•..■Z'� ��■ ��!_ � �� ■■■• � • � �� /��,�+a�i'!if�` ��►�� I�Za��=�� •��a;r_ � 1!��1. i::a�:.:ll" ::::il�`Yr"�11��.�'ri.>' 1111 . ��n uu��• n-��u� n � ......11 .�...... ,� . ..�.Z� YIIIi ��► � : 1111111 °Ili�"��yl It�,. \III :� , ' � � ��' '��f iilllll :IIII�i�(=�1�1t�1�� =L � � 1� 1111111 -1111 IIGI�11:.1�� • e:��, i1�I f111111 1111�1111�11.1�1� =� .• ..,� /� e`...:1= a �� 1111111 IIIII�IIIIIIt:: /�„�''� ,_=��,!` � � � ��n��mr� ,_� nf� � . i .. r 1111111C::�=��n�uuF111��/I ��! • � ` � � IIYs�► � 11111111=uiiiiii ° � • � /�� O�"�� 1� � � � �`v -r. � �� 11�� ■._ �� .:�n��i� n�-��' u� �'►� ►�� f► °c= �� u ��E=� �� n �� i � �� ='::u iw��i=�t��= ur� � �_� ��I� ��`,, i � .�J�..1! �Illlllllt:a ��n �Ni�r�� I�r� �u�� .� � 11111111/Iihr1 � IA ■ � C� ��•►. ,� • ��I��1111111��1�111��_�� i�i�i;: '+�: ' 1111 1111111 C��I 1 11/ �i/ 1 11111n 11� II�D �„ / Illiilllillll��l 1� �II��I�CIII �1 �II�IIIH1� ■� 1111'1'1 ��1� 1��111111111� 1 111 ' •, �f ' 1 :_:��iiii�ii I�I��I�I�I�S 11 111� ` �`� , � ■ �oi� � � � ;� �1 � �� ■..n=�� • I�/��Ill��i��" ` 1 � �i ��iY., U1� � �i �.�� /1��1 �i� !- �� 1/1 /1111� 11 � � „� � ;_ � . =�D7�� :� • I I� I• IIII I� III� �� • � __��':�� ;' ' ` '� � �� III .�,.,/�Ilill�'� � .t•i i'' : u �� ■ : Ili�i�� ' � d.l�' � � ° ��_� :. ��i �)` .�.�i� �.� � u� �! �.�tl �� s�'I � � � �1��,' ,��I/%/ 1 � � � 1 1;1 � _ � I � � �� , �. �►�� . .� �� . :��, s �� N � i � � ■