The URL can be used to link to this page

248282 .� . ORIGINAL TO CITY CL6RK /�jl�� ' � .� CITY OF ST. PAUL OOE NCIL N0. �� OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK COUNCI RESOLUTION-GENERAL FORM PRESENTED BY - COMMISSIONE DATF Wf�REAS, it appears necessary and desirable for the City of Saint Paul to establish as soon as possible a city-wide Criminal Justice Planning Program that serves the needs and requirements of the City with respect to its Criminal Justice Program; and WHEREAS, the City of Saint Paul has provided through its usual budgetary procedures for the financing of a portion of the cost of developing a plan to coordinate the efforts of Criminal Justice Agencies that serve the interests of the people of Saint Paul ; and WHEREAS, the Congress of the United States , pursuant to the provisions of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1g68, has established a program for providing, among other things , financial assistance to local government bodies through application for funds to be filed with the appropriate State agencies ; and WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has designated the Governor�s Crime Commission, under the chairmanship of the Attorney General , as theappropriate State agency to receive � applications for financial assistance from local governmental � units; and $ .D WHEREAS, the City of Saint Paul has determined that � ��" the approximate cost of developing a Criminal Justice Planning m Program will be in the amount of �62, 115; now, there�fere, be it � RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Saint Paul, � that application be and is hereby made to the Governor' s Crime Commission of the State of Minnesota for a grant in the amount of Thirty-seven Thousand Three Hundred and Fifty-five Dollars (�37 , 355.00) for assistance in developing a city-wide Coordina6ed Criminal Justice Planning Program for the City of Saint Paul; and be it COUNCILMEN Adopted by the Council 19— Yeas Nays Carlson Dalgliah Approved 19—_ Meredith Tn Favor Peterson Sprafka Mayor Tedesco A gainst Mr. President, Byrne O � OR1041NAL TO CITY CLERK �L��/�� `. ` � CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL '� �� OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK F��E Na. COUNCIL RESOLUTION—GENERAL FORM PRESENTED BY CO M M I S51 ON ER DATF Page 2. FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Honorable Thomas R. Byrne , Mayor of the City of Saint Paul, is hereby authorized to execute , on behalf of said City, the application for funds to the Governor' s Crime Commission, copy of said application being hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference as fully and as completely as if set forth herein verbatim. RPR 8 19?� COUNCILMEN Adopted by the Council 19— Yeas Nays �R � 1�J�o Carlson Dalglish Approved 19`_ Meredith n Favor Peterson ' Sprafka Mayor Tedesco � A gainst Mr. President, Byrne P�IBIISkED APR 11 tg70 0 . , � . - . . • , c ' . ';, .� • � � ,�J'� ' iom LCA�-OLC�-5 (Revise�) �� ' . Ee�t�o�;z-3o-c� � ,� � , U. S. DEPARTMCNT OF JUSTiCE APPLiCATION FOR GRAN1 ' � °� �.��.��._•:�= LAN ENFORCE(1ENT ASSiSTANCE DISCRETIONARY FUNDS . • . ��-�:,:��'; . • . � ��.��',.,.� ADMIN�ISTRATtON � PAGE 1 , �:.::::.::� . � ' ' Application.is hc�eby nade for a grant under Sectlon 306 ' ' , . • , Appllcatlon Number Program Dlvlslon AsslgneA , � ' of the Rninbus Lrime•Control and Sefe Streets Att of 1968 . • � � (Pl 90-351) in the amount and for the purposes set forth in ate ece ve eg on ss yne , this rpplica N on. . ' . Short � e o ro ect: o not excee one typ ne ' SPECIAL CITY�WID� COORDINA7iNG CRIMINAL .IUSTtCE PLANNINd COUNCIL � . • . • . Type of pplicat on: C�he'ck 3nej . . ' �i Orlginal (7 Reviston �tontinuation of Grant No. • • . Discretionary P.rogram UnEer NM th pllcation 1s e: . D � LARGE CITY 8PECtAL GRANT� S6CT�ON VII' . ro ect urat o�n:-' , ° uppor ug t: � ' Total Length Z4 �oncns S 37�335__ . � � � . pp can or mp �nent ng gency or vermien � . • . ro ect rector ame. t t e� a ress� � , C ' , (Name� address. �nd telephone) . � CiTY OF ST• PAUL . . � CAPTAIN WM• MCCUTCHlrON ' , BUREAU OF POLICE , • , � ' ST. PA UL� M INNE80TA ." , �� • �TBMPORARY� . . inancial cer ame. t e, a ress� a t! e ne . c a ut or zed to gn pp cat on aa�e, t e.' address, and telephone) � �, i� JOSEPH MITCH6LL� COMPTROI,.LER ' ,TMOMAS BYRNE� MAIVOR � � ' � -"+ ` CITY OF ST. PAUL• MiNNESOTA � CiTY O!r St. PAUL.��MiNNESOTA � _ . ' • � '�\� ' . 0. ro ect Sunmary- - -Sumnar ze, n approx mate y vror s. t most aipor ent parts o t e s atemen o pro ect p �n presen ( � tn spplication item 22 (page 6), briefly cohering pro�ect goals and progra�n methods, tapact� scope, �nd evelwtfon. , . �',` i . ; � . . � . . � ; ' . THIS APPLICATION HAS AS ITS PURPOSE THE COORDINATION OR EFRORT AMONG • i CRIMINAL .IUSTICE AGENCIES TO SERVE THE INTERESTS OR PEOP�.E INVOLVED WiTM.: . , THE SYSTEM AS CLIENTS OR GENERALLY AFFECTED� A8 CIT12BN8� WITH IT8 � . �' � SUCCESS OR FAtLURE. ITS l3ENERAL PURP03E �S TO POIAT OUT INERFiC1ENCY IN ' • THE CURRENT SYSTEM AND TO OEVELOP REMEDIAL PROCEDURRS ANO TECHNIqUEd• . TNE PROf3RAM METHODS ARE CONSISTENT WITH APPROV[O PL.ANNINd CRI7ERIA� • . ' ' � AMPLE EVAI_UATIV6 APPARATUd IS 9UIL.T INTO T'H6 iTUDY TO INSUI!! A CONTINUITY . WITH ciO�ALS eRT.AT MIaNBR 4tVELe. C7EOesRAPN.ICAL4Y�,`fMt lTUDY�1! �ONC�RMKb , • w�TN rHS C/'TY OR ST� Pwu�. wNO Rw�is�tr CouN�r:,: ,:` ;, ' • � � . ..�� . - . . ' . � , . � - . .i , . .. � • . . . . , . , , . • ' , . J. . M . . . . , � • . . . .. . . f , i � � . ' 1 � �.. � . . . . . . , �.� , ;} . .. . . . . ... . . . .�.. . . . . .. � . . . � .. . . . �, ,� . � �� ' . ti ,, . �� .. ` • ; , : . . . .. . ,. ; . .. � . . . , ; • ;� _ . . . .._. ; • , • ' , . � , . ,� . • .'• . ' • � ,' . Form LfAA-OLEF-5 (Revlsed) , Edlti�n 12-i0-69_ ___ • ' f"�r� "�� U. S. DGP/lRT �1ENT OF JUSTICE APPLICATION FOR GRAI� T . ' ' ,A��_..1:i '�:. , ,�`1�y�.' . � �:�:,�;�,,;;� LAN ENFORCEMCNT ASSiSTANCE DISCRETIONARY FUNDS , ..�y�,.... A a . �<.:`•��` "° ADMINISTRATION PAGE 2 � . �r.'ry-',j.r,,;�� , 1 1. D E T A I L E D P R 0 J E C T B U D G E T -- include the estlmated cost or v�iue oi e11 resources necessary.to uneerteke " the pro�ect. , . Personnel Em l�ees E A A RAI�TEE ATEGOItY , S 1 �'i a ti ion wi sat r ate n er enta e evote 1 U��'ORT Ot�TRiPUT10N T T �_�hsC..�_ . PROJECT MANAGER � lOO/� OR TIME ROR TWO �2� yi=s. $.�O�OQO iS�OOO iZ�OOO , ' . SEGRETARY � IOO/p OF TIMff ROR TWO �2 YRS. 12l2OO �]�320 4�880 � • . -�r` � .__ . . � ' �SEE CONTINUATION SHEET� • • . . . C Ret rement etc. �►T p _ �— • � � 30,960 20 640 ' 51 600 ro ess�onT�erv�ces er�ize . • • � 1 Ind:vidual Consultants list b individual or t e Mith fee basis and amount of time devote ,, ; COMMITTEE FEES � MONTHLY MEETINCd8 'Z 16O 1 • ' , ' ' AT $3�600 FOR TWO Y6AR8 . ' _ �: � �SEE CONTINUATION SHEET� . 2 Coniractin or Service Or aMzations and Assoclations s each b t e Ni h f asis and amount of time devoted) .`� . S . ' =i. . 3 600 . rave rans urtation and u sistence tem ze — ' ; 101UTOMOBILE USE AT $4�.00 PBR MONTH 1�OHO � . ;' ; SEE CONTINUATION SHBffT � . _ , . .: ' `"+ 0. E ui ,ment Itemize � TYPEWRITER �ELECTRIC� AT $S�O .S�O . NG B NE At �iYQ 1 . ' . TWO �2� OESKS� TWO �� CHAiRS AT #5�5 57b ' 1 175 ' , '. . Su lies and Other 0 eratln Ex enses com�nun cations re roduction ind rect eosts tem ze TELEPHONB �N8TALI.ATION AND S6RViCt AT $360 360 EPRODUCT�,ONS AT �� • ' 6� . • MATBRIALS_ AT•c:,,i.t1 OO 1�1 OO --- -- M ISCELLAN<01JS • AT�'�OOO 1�O ' ' � O� _....r..». 660� ' ---. � _..__..._ 60a---L-- 4+ • OT L�RO�EC�COST �� . . _.. 7so � 6 �� -7.�R.��..�� Z.i i� _ ,,_ . , . • , . . • ' ' � _. form IERA-OU P-S (ReviscA) ' • EdiNon 11-30-69� . .�� .� � � U� S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE APPLICATION FOR GRANT • �:��'�.� LAN ENFORC , ' ��i.. ;�.� EMENT ASSISTANCE DiSCRETIOHARY FUNpS �.•�"" ,°' ADM 1 N 1 STRAT I ON PAGE 3 ' �� .,��• . . 12� BUD6ET � NARRATtVE Bccln tM1oH �nd �dd �s iMny eontlm��tlon p�ges tJ�� JA� etC.) �s �nay be neccsi�ryr te rel�tt the ltenis budp�teA to orslte! 1eN�ltla� ied eanplcte tAe repuired ,�vsNllallon �nd expi�n�Non ef tAe proJeet bvAgel. . � . . • A� PERSONNEL: • ' . S/1LARIES WERE DETERMINED ON THE BA9tS OF $iS�OOO TO THE PROJECT MANAdER . , • . . AND THE CIVII. SERVtCE PAY RATE FOR A COMPETENT SECR6TARY. FRINGE sENEPITs wERE CALCULATED ON Z�L•�LS/O OP THE SAI_ARiES tNVOLVED. • . ' , r B. THE COMMITTEE WILL BB PAtD A$lO.00 FEE PER ME6TING TO COMPffN8ATE THEM " , � FOR TIME SPENT AT MEETINGd AND IN OTMBR OUTIES• OUTLINED IN THIS dRANT. BJ1sE0 ' , ' ��•� ON �L4 MEETtNGS• _ . . � C• AN AUTOMOBIL@�WILL'BE ,RURNIB�HED f'OR TN� PROJlSCT.MANAaER k'OI! TNt SUOSTANTIAL • , � , ; TRANSPORTATION REQUIR�MRNTf tXPtCTLrD♦ 'GRANrRL"WILL.'et11VICt ANO MAINTAIN _ ': �. ' THE VEHICLE• , • '' . ' �:,` . . • • r' .. . . • .. . �, . � - . . .� . . . - . � . . , ' ' D. . EQUIPMENT• • ' � , . " �. � � THESE ITEM8 ARE SASBD OI;1 dTANDARO•�CATALOa PRICICl.AND;NRC�sdARY FOR TH� ,i � ,. , . • OPERATION OF THLr ORFICE� � „ f � ' . . • � . . �� E. SUPPLIES. , • 1 . • , �`' - . ' ' , ' � . , f THESE ITEMS ARE 9ABEO ON BSTI.MA?EO NEED9 CONSISTENT' WI?H'p1EPORTA�IMEMORANDA. '. ' , AND OTMBR MAT�R1At,.S NECESdAftY'7'O'TM� sUCCESS OF THr�l!!lOp1lAIy1��TMt.OM'R1Ct ' � :' t � � GOST. IS CALCUWTlL� ON,sT.AflllARO•.f�FRICR /l�NTAI:`COSri• . t , � . ' . . , . . . ,� . � _� -�:' `� \ . � `. , �. . - � . . . � . ��'. ` ` t_; ,. . . + , ' .,.. , . . , . ' .. . . ,, .`I.' .,i �t .. , � � � � • . `;M�_ + ,� .,, , ;7 (,�: Y ' , .. . • . � . �ti. . ., t . ,.; .. • . . . . � � . ' . _ .• ;�^ � �� _� •�� . . � � , ' . . . . � ' .. � . . , � + .� . • . � . . . • ' . � � ' . f �� . �,ti � } '�, � ._ ,-j . , � . . . . . ' � . . .. 4� • �, .. ' � . � . . + "t . y ` � . . . � ., , . � . • �:•.�. � �,.. � .1��. .� ' , . � . . . . � . . . . � ' ..i ii' . . . . • . , .. � , ' • .SA{t , •. . j ' . 1 , i L` � 1 ' •... � . ' , ' � .. ' . � . r�' � �. . . . �• . . � . . , .. ' � , ' ' ... . • � , . . � • .. ' ' , . • . , ' ' : ' ' , ' - . . ' • •n_ ' ,t . , ' . •� . , ' � ' . �: . � Fo►^++ tEA.A-OI.Cr-5 (p�vised) iEdition 11-30-69L,_ _ __ . 4 ' ---_ --�- - °-�- Ar'� .ti: .�` � U, S, DL• PARTt1ENT OF ,IUSTICE APPLICAT ( ON FOR GRANT • ;.., _. ;� :, • . �;. r., ; a � . E :;.,:�,f�. ; LAW ENFORCEPIENT ASSISTANCE DiSCRETIONlIRY FUNDS ��:'��•�'+ ;` AbF11t� ISTRATiON PAGE 4 . � . Gui!aei?u��°<ir,jyand-i'rojc�iten _, ` • ` P�or h►o�ect rcien�� uctessive Oudget Categories Phases Phase Phases Total `� " Personnel (Salaries and Reneflts) 800 00 �0�0 ��OTi• . Protessio�ial 3crvices Ind vidua s • ; . • and Consulting Organizaticns and 1 800.00 1 800.00 3 600.00 � i+ssocir.tions � . Travel (Trancportation and Subsistente) i ' S40 00 540 00 1 080,�00� 1 Equi�.�nent 1 175.�� 1 175.�� Suppl ies and Other Operating Expenses 2 $30.00 2 330,00 4 660.00 (' . TOTAI. 1 C�IS OO 30 4 0 1 �. , . Duration of Pro,ject Phases �i� months) 1 2 1 2 — —T4-Feaeraj�iipport. N otl�er eaera support .ava a e . edera u m ss ons. ave ot cr eEeral agenc es � . for any parE of this prolectl 1'es • No n been tontacted fo assistance on tMs or s1m11ar • If yes. idenN fy and explaln: � pro3ects? Yes � No lf Yes, identify ' ' end indicate s a�s: . . .�' � . � 16. STAt�UARD GRA►�T COt1�ITI0t75 - - Applicant understands and egrees that any grant received as a resutt of this application shsil bd . � , sub$ect to and incorporate the following grant condttions: ', (t.) Repc+rts. The �rantee shall submit, ati sech times and in such form as may be prescribed, such reports as the LaN Enforcement ' 7�ss isfance Administration may reasonably require, including quarteriy financlal reports and progress reports and finat finan- cial and narrative reports. ,`� . `•,� (2.) Ccp�rights.. khere activities supported by tM s grant produce original books� manuals, films, or other copyrightable material.� ihe grantee may copyright such, but LEAA reserves a royalty-free. non-exclusive and irrevocaDle license to reproduce. pubiisA.; + .- and use such m,ate H sls, and to authorize others to do so. (3:) Patenls. If any discovery or ihvention arises or is devetoped 1n the course of or as a rssult of work performed under tMis grant, the arantee shall refer the discovery �r inventlon to LEAA, which Mill determine rrhether or not patent protection wiii • ' j , ' be sought, how any rights therein, Sncluding patent rights, wili be disposed of and administered. and the necessity of olher , action required to pratect,the publ9c interest in work SupporteA Nith Federal funds, alt in accordance with the Presidential Flemorandum of October 10, 1963, on Goverrnnent Patent Policy. ' (4.) Disa•imination Prohibited. No person shall. on the grounds of race. creed, color or national origin, be excluded 'frorn participafion in, tie refused the benefits of, or be otherwise 'subfected to discrimination under grants awarded pursuant to � P. L. 90-351 or under any pro,iect, program, or attivity supported by tM s grant. TAe grantee must comply with the provisions ' and requirements of Tit1e VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and regulallons issued by the Department of Justice and the Law Enforcemen4 Assistance Administratlon thereunder as a condition of aNard of Federal tunds and tontinued grant supportr �s required by Section 518(b) of P. L. 90-351 � 5 grapt Condition shall•not be interpreted to require the imvos tion in • : grant-supported pro3ects of any percentage'rat�o, quota sYStem. or ot�er program to acM eve racial Dalance or e�imi�ate �acia� � in�6alancr. in a law enforcement agency. � (5.) Terniration of Aid. This grant may be terminated or fund payments dlscontir�ued by LEAA where it finds a substantial failure to compfy��ith the provisions of P. L. 90-351 on regulations promutgated thereunder. including these grant conditions or . application obligations. but only after notice apd heari�g and pursuant to alt procedures set forth in Sections 510 and Sit • of P. L. 90-351. (6.) inspection and Audit. The Administra Non and the Comptroller General of the United States. or any of Lheir duly authorized representatives. shall have actess for purpnse of auAit and examinations to any books� documents. papers� and records of tAe grantee. end to relevanE books and records of subgrantees and contractors. as•provided 1n Settlon 521 of P. l. 90-351. , • • � (7.)•Maintenance_of Records. Ati required records shall be malntained untit an audit is completed and all questions a M sing • ffiere�om erc xesoived. or Lhree years after completion of a pro�ect. ►fiichever 1s sooner. . (8.) Otilizalion and Pa«-ent of fun6s. Funds awarded are to be expenAed only for pruposes and attivities covereA by grantee's approved p�o,ject. plbn and budgcE. Vro3ect funds may be aade availabte through•a tetter of credit system pu�suant to rutes . and proct�dures as to establish�ent. withdreHals� elc. lssued by the A�ainist�al,ion and Mith which grantees must ��D1Y• • Nhere grant awarEs are not sufficiently large to requ;n! this Systea�� p�y�ne�ts N111 be iaade on the b�sls of perSodlc requests � and esttmates of fund needs subnttted by the grantee. Pay�nents M111 ee �d�usted to cornct �evious overpayments or , underpayinents and dSaallowences resulting troai �ud1t. ' . fi . ' ' � � . . . � ' , � ' Form IEAA-OLEP-S (Revised) ' � Edition 12-30-69 ' � +� � ��•y� �� U� S� DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE � APPLICATION FOR GRANT , � , ' . P �'•J.,�:1 i.: � • "��.:'�,f� LAN ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE OISCRETIONARY FUNDS ,`��r.-�.,� ADM i N i ST RAT 1 0N PAGE 6 ' . . ti....�,,. • s.::.:,::J , 2z• PROJECT PLAN AND SllPPORTtN6 DATA ' � Please state clearly and in detall� NitMn tee pagcs 1tpo ss161e, the �ims ot the pro�eet� preeisely wh�t will be done, �iw will be . _ involved �nd what is expected to resuli. Use the folloNin9 �nt�or headings: . P. 1. Goals � . . .: � P, lt. impact and Results - P. IIt. Methods and T1�aet�ble • � ' P. IY. Evalvallon • P. tl. Resources. . • . • Ik+�be� subsequent pages consecutively� i.e.� Appite�t/on ��e 7� ApP11at1on P�qe e, ele. See aqa 6 lnstruet/ons tor fuwre yulAence: ' • , ; . � � . . ', �� : , � � � � , � .' . . , ' . � : • .` � . • . � . 1 , �. ' �- ' � . � , • •�. ; _ . , � , , -,�. . �!� � ' . . . ; , • ,# ' ' • , , � . . , . , . i ;. ,�� . . r y i � 1 F , . • . . • . , � , �,t • ' . 7 � ' ' . . , ' � . . .. , i '� r . .. . . . � � , • . '�' .,. •..�. �.'�' �:� . . � � . . ' � �.. i � . . . . .. . � . � . � . .. . . ... . . . . . � '' 1�� ' � . � � � . . � ' ' �i r . .. �� . . . '. , . � � .. . . . . � . ; . , � .�.. .. . .,...; :. . .. , . .. , , .. . . . � , �'. . . ,, . . � ' . - .. . ' � ' . � ' ., . �1 1 � �. .� . . ., � . , • ; . ' � ' t.. ` ' ' .�. , �. � �� ' . . , . . .. ' . ' �t.. � , . • ' . . . . .. . � ,' � . , ,�., . � ' ' • , .' . � . . . � ' . . . . •. .._ . �� .. . , . . . � � ' . . . .. . . . ' ,�i. .. . . �. . � . - . � ,. ' � . � ... . ,. .i ,.. � . . ., � �. ' ' ' - � • � . - .. . \' . � . ' , �" . . .. . ' . , . � � � � � . . , � . . . '� ' . . . '_ ' . .. . . . � � • � . . � . . . � � . .. �.. .. ' . . ,. . . . � � • . . . . . , ' , . . . ' .. . . .� . �...• . .. . . .�..�. . � , ' �� . � , • � , � � - , 1. GOALS " �, A• INTROOUCTION; , • , RAMSEY COUNTY IS LOCATED IN EAST CENTRA�. MINNESOTA. IT COMPRISE6 • AN AREA OF ABOUT 17O BQUARg MILES ANO AN ESTIMATEO POPULATION OF • 470�000. BY 197.5 THE POPULATION HA3 BEEN PROJECTEO TO 640�000. • ,, ST. PAUL� THE CORE C1TY� IS THE CAPITAL OF MINNESOTA AND THE SEAT • OF COUNTY GOVERNMENT. ITS POPULATION i8 319�000 PEOPLE� OR 7O� , OR THE COUNTY TOTAL. IT IS A COMPACT CITY OR 54.4 SGUARE MILES� � , COMMERGIALLY IMPORTANT AS A TRANSPORTATION AND MANUFACTURINO • , � CENTER. SiXTEEN MUNICIPALITIES ARE LOCATED WHOLHLY IN RAMSEY COUNTY AND THREE STRADDLE AN AOJACENT COUNTY. N�f N6 OF THE BIXTECN MUNICtPAL1TIES HAVE INDEPENDENT U►W ENFORCEMBNT ACiENC1E8. THE DISTRICT COIIRT IS HOU860 IN TNE ST. PAUL COURT HOUSE WiTH S�yEN . COURTS OF LE38ER JURIBDICTION IN ST. PAUL ANO THE SUBUR98. � , . THE POLICE AGENCIES AR6 NOTABLY COOPERATIV6 WITH ORGAN12E0 INTER� • � � A�iENCY CONNECTIONS AT EXECUTIV6 ANO OPERATIONAL LEVEI_d. FORMALIZED MUTUAL A8818TANCE A6REEMENTB FOR EMERGENCY dlTll/tTiONS HAVE LONO ' EXISTED AND HAVg BEEN HONORED WHENffVER REQUESTEO. A CITY�COUNTY CORRBCTIONS AdENCY sUPlRVIS!• CERTAIN CONlrINRMlNT � • RACILITIES AND TNB PROBATION AND PAROLt RUlICTIOI�M ARt UNOiR TMt JURISO1CTtON OF tHt DIdTRICT COURT• � . . B• G6NERAL STATEMENT OF NEEDS; ' . I. THE PRESENT AND PREOICTED ESCALATION IN POPUl.ATION CiROWTN. .' MOBILITY AND DEN8tTY REQUIRES IMMEDIATE ATTRNTION TO MUTUAL . PI..ANNtNC3 BY LOCAL. COUNTY AND REGIONAL'L�VELd OR aOVBRNMBNT� , FOLLOWING GUIDELINES AND CRIT6RIA CONSISTBN'1' WI'f'N TH[ STATE , OVERALL F�ilIMINAL.jUSTIC6 PLAN. �L• THE ANALYSId OF PRE8ENT AND FtJ'1'URE DEMANDd UPON 7HE CRIMiNAi.. � ' .JU8TIGE dY8T6M MUST 9E MA06 TO DIdCOVlR WtfRKASL! sYSTEMS AN� ' • ID�NTIRY THR REOUIREO TtCHNOLO0ICAL ANO MUMAN R�fONRCtf 70 • . ' ' K�lP I�ACt WITM sUCM b[MANDS� ' , f • . . , ' , � - -�- .3• DUPI_ICATORY AND OV6RLAPPiNCi BERVICEB MU9T B6 INVESTIOATEO , TO BEEK S�UTIONS WITH A PROMISED ECONOMICAL COOROINATION ' OF JOINT EFRORTS. - • , 4. DEL�NEATION OR COMMON INTEREST AREAS B6TWEEN SEIiMENTB , OR THE CRhM INAL .�USTIGE dYSTEM Td aTANOAROiZE PROCEOURES� ' • DOCUM6NT8� RECORDS AND TO INBURE tASiLY ACCRlf1�Lt INRORMATION E)CCMANGE TECNNIQUEf� • ' C• PRINCIPLE O9JECTIVEB; � ' 1� L.AW ENFORCEMENT. ' . � A� DEVELOPMENT OF PLANS FOR A CENTRALI2ED RECOROS BANK Ad A , REPOSITORY OR CRIMINAL RECORDS� INTEI.LIGENCE DATA� WARRANTS • AND FUGITIVE RILE3� RIREARMS REGISTRATION AND OTHER RILES • � OR CiTY� COUNTY AND REGIONAL IMPORTANCB WITH �.INKA�iE TO . FEDERAL AND STATB CRIME iNFORMATION SYSTEMS. • �l� UNIFORM RORMS DESIdN AND TECHNIQUE PLANNING FOR CON� SISTENT INPUT AND OUTPUT PRACTICEB. � • , , • ��L� DEVELOPMENT OF EMERGENCY PLAN8 TO MEE7 A VARIETY OF SITUATIONS WHICH WOULD B6 RESIOENT IN KIL6S TO BE RETRIEVED OPON DEMAND TO MEET CHALL6NffING aiTL1AT10Nd� �3� PLANNING TERMINAI.. LINKAGEB AND 8Ydt6Md TO MAXtM,ItB , • INRORMATION FL�W AT MiNIMUM HUMAN AND DOLLAR COST. • • Z• .�tJDIC1AL.. • ` A� THE 1969 REPORT OF MINNEBOTA COURTS RERLECTED THAT 1.3�I1 JURY CASES WERE P6NDING ON 1�L�l/G9 WITH AN AVERAGE OELAY OR ' 7.S MONTHS� 643 COURT CASES WERE PENDING WITH AN AVERAGE _ , DEI.,AY OF 9.S MONTHS. .�URY CASES INCREASEO ev 338 OVER i9G8. � • EACH .IUDGE IN RAMSEY COUNTY HAD AN AVERAGE Oi= G4 GOURT • • � . CA8ES PENDING� iS7 JURY CASES AND AN AVERAGE OF Z�L CRIMINAL CASES� � • OR A COMBINEO AVERAGE OF �L�L.3 CASES PER JUD(iE� ST• PAUL MUNICIPAL CCUR7 StM ILARLY HAb BG1 COURT ANO JURY CA86S PtNDtNG ON iG/.71�9. , , TMIS' 1• A �TA7[MtNT OP TH� PROSL�M� MOPItl�'1JI.LY� COQRlC'1'ASL! � /Y ACCOMrLIdMINO 71K ROLLOWINO b�dlC'1'IVt!= . . . � ' � ' . . ��` �1� TO EXPL,ORE COUNTY-WIDE JUDICIAL SYSTEMS LINKINCi COURTd� • . � POLICE. PROBATION� PAROLE AND CORRECTIONS A3ENCIEB TO � • DETERMINE WHAT TYPES OF INFORMAT{ON ARLr OP COMMON • INTERE8T AND [iESIGNIN6 EASILY ASSESdED MLTHOOS OP . � ' � INRORMATIONAL EXCHANC3E. , ' �Z, TO REDUCE THE CUMBERSOME PROCESS NOW EXISTENT� TO REDUCE DELAYB� IMPROVE SCHEDULINd. MONITOR CA�JE BY CASE PROGRESS OP CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CAt_ENOARB. . . � \S�• DEVELOP A MULTI COURT MASTER CALBNDAR OR ALL TRIALS - , ANO PROCEEDINGS� PREPARIN6 DOCKET REGORDS� NOTICES. DOCUMENT3 AND ACCOUNTING RECORDS OR FEES� FINEB� BONOd� E TC. �4� COORDINATING WITNE38 AND ATTORNEY APPEARANCES� COURT � . COMMiTMENT8� ANALYZING AGEING CASES� ABNORMAL DELAYS� . SENTENCINCi PATTBRNS� DELAYED PROdECUT10N ANO siMILAR . MATTERS'THAT CAU86 CONRLICTS AND OELAYS. ' ' - (5) To oEV�s� MEANS ROR MORE EFF1CiBNT •6LECTION AND IM� , PANEtLING OR JURIES ANO DtTERM1NIN0 TH61J! ��t� AN� PRINTIN{i ' • CHECKS AND RBPORTB. ' . I I � 3• CORRECTIONS. • �, . i A• CORRECTIONS INSTITUTIONS AT THE COUNTY LEVEL OFTEN REPRESENT I _ THE FIR37 CONFiNEMENT FOR THE INDIVIDUAL AND I..00i1CALLY THE • POSSESStON OF CERTAIN PERSONAL OATA MAY BE INSTRUMENTAL IN , � '. PL/►NNINd REHABILITATIVE PROGRAMS ANO PROVIDE BA818 FOR M6ANINCiPUL , FOLLOW�UP EFFORTS� PROVIDINCi USEFUL DATA IN THE EVENT OR � SUBSEpUENT EPtSOCE3� AND RELIEVING PERSONNEL OF THE TEDIOUS ' ACCOUNTING ROUTINES REqU1RED. THE STORAGE ANO RETRIEVAL CAPASILITY � OF A CENTRAI_ SYSTEM A8 SET FORTH HER61N WOULD PERMIT MORE � � . ' STAFF TiME TO THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OR THE CORRECTIONS UNIT. �l� DEVEI.OPMENT OF INMATE FILE WITH BASIC IDENTIFIERS� CRIMINAL HISTORY� SENTENCE� DETAINERS� INBTITUTIONAL CONDUCT REGORO� � PAROLE ELICi1BtLITY DATE� RELEASE•DATE� HEARIN38 DATE� PAIlOLi • PERFORMANCE DATA� WARRANT DATE AND OT'HBR US6FtJL AND � , � NEC68SARY DATA. ' • � �Z� DAII.Y INMAT� C6NSU8� WORIC REI_sASB OTATUS ANO RINANCIAL , R[PORTd� StATUS CMANO! REPORTd� AND ACCOUNTINO ROR TM! . CORRtCT10Nf A06NCV ARi OTMtI! Os.flCTIV!!� . � _a_ ' � � � � \3�% INP'OPlMA'i'10N'INTGROHANaC W1Th1;QTNCR;CRIM-IMAV.JUOTICIIi MZ31MtD tL'S MN'D fp�py��qry�(�r�:i q��p.�MND 9'T'1JU 1 E S �US[PU L TO REd6ARCN6Rf ANO CTHQR HIONtR {,tVtL, CORRECTIONAL AO[NGILf� ' 4• PROBATION AND PAROL.E. . A� THE PROBATION AND PAROLE AGENCY� TO BE FULLY EFFECTIVE IN • THE FACE OF HEAVY CASE LOADS. MUST HAVE EASILY AVMLABLC • H13TORICAL DATA� OFTEN ALREADY RESIDENT IN THE FILES OR . " , OTHER CRtMINAL .JUSTiCE AOENCIEB. �N TURN� MUCH USEFUL . . PERSONAL AND PERFORMANGE DATA 19 OEVELOPEO IN CASE WORK , THAT MAY HAVE SUBSEQU6NT VALUE TO ALL PARTiCIPANTB IN THE � CRIMINAL JUSTiCE SYSTEM IN iNVE8TIGATIVE SENTENCING AND , • PR06RAM PLANNINf3. TO ACCOMPLiSM THId TH� POt„LOWINO OB� ' ' JECTIVES ARE DE8IRABLE. �1� TO DEVELOP LINKAGES BETWEEN CRiMINAL .JUSTICE AGENCIES � FOR OISSEMINATION OR TOTAL HISTORICAL DATA UPON DEMAN� . CONSISTENT WITN SECURITY AND TH6 RECO�iN12BD REQUIFIEMENTS • OF MEMBER AIiENC1ES. � , , �L� DEVELOPMffNT OF CBNTRALIZED FIL6S CONTAINING IDENTtR1ERd� SENTENCINCi PERRORMANCE� R6LEAaE DATE ANO OTHEq CASi DATA. � B. REPORT3 OF CURRENT CLIENTELE� VIOLATORS� ABSCONOQRS� . . CONDITIONS OF PAROLE AND STATUS FOR fiENtRAL CRiMINAI. � .IU3TICE AGBNCY REFERENCE. . C. RBPORT9 OR AGENT WORKLOAD� SCHEDULINO Olr VISITS ANO ACCOUNTINQ.FOR TMB AGBNCY. -D. DEVEI.OPMffNT OF INTERRACE CAPABILI7Y WITH sTATE AND I.OWER fiOVtRNMtNYAL�LiVlL, rROdATiON I►ND rAllOLR AplNCIlB� �� `: • . , + , ` , , �,. , �, ' r �,� , . , . . , . . ... �. , ., , F . � , x. „ ,.,. , . �. r.r�,..� „ . • ... ... , .. :,•.., • _�. ,. ._.:�.. �.,..�n . . .,� .� .. ... . ,_ . . .. .., . . .. . .. . ., .. .. . .. ....,a- ' • . . , , ,il. METHODS ' . A. INrROOUCr�oN. . TNE METHODS FOR DEVEI.OPINCi THE PLAN IS IN ACCORD WITH (iENERALLY ' ACC6PTED PRINCIPLEB. THE COMMITTEE PARTICIPANTB WILL BE DRAWN FROM PER30NS KNOWLEDOEAB�.E IN THE CRIMtNAL JUBTICE SYSTEM AND • , WITH A STAKE IN THE SUCCESS OR AN ERRICIENT ANO EFFECTIVE CRIMINAL .�USTICE SYSTEM. THE COMMITTEff ANO STAFR WILL (NSUR6 THAT PLANd . . EMERCi1N6 FROM THIS STUDY WILL SE CON80NAHT WITM METROPOLITAN • COUNCIL AND STATB aU1DLLINEd� � B• PRELIMINARY PLAN. • � THE MAYOR OF ST. PAUL WILL SELECT A iS�MEMBER COMMITTEE� BRIER , . THEM ON THE PURPOSE OR THE PROGRAM AND SELECT A CHAIRMAN WHOSE • DUTY IT SHALL BE TO ADVI86 THE MAYOR OR ITS PROGREds� THE CHAIRMAN 8HALL BE RE8PON81BLE FOR TH6 DiLIGENCE OR Hls PRLLOW MEM9ERS ANO AC7 Ad l.lA1SON BETWEEN THg mTAFF AND COMMITTEE. C• �PLAN IMPLEMENTATION. 1• THE COMMITTE. UPON SELECTION� SHALL MEET TO HIRE A PROJECT � MANAGER. THEY 8HALL DETERMINE THE REQUIREMENTS. IN TERM8 OF . ' EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE� TO SATISFACTORILY CARRY OUT DUTIES OF THE POSITION. EMPHASIS WILL BE PLACED ON RESEARCH EXPER16NCt ' ANO FAMILIARITY WfTH6F21MINAL .JUSTICE SY8T6M8. 2• THE COMMITTEE WILI. AC3REE ON THE RREpUffNCY OF MEETINGB� BUT IN NO CASE WILL MEETiNGS BE NELO AT GREATER THAN ONE MONTH � 1NTERVALB. � 1 . .�• UPON SELECTION� THE PROJECT MANACiER IS At1THOR12ED TO HlRE A ' • STENOGRAPHER. PURCHASE 8UCH SUPPLIES AS H6 MAY REQUIRE AND � , ESTABLISH AN OFP'IGB. �I•� THE DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE HROJEC7 MANAGER SHALt. INCLUDE� BUT NOT BE LIMtTED TO THE ROLLOWINd: � A. MAINTENANCE OP CL08E LIAISON AND COMMUNICATION WITM THE COM M I TTE E. • . . B♦ ARRANCiE COMMITTEE MEETINIiB� PREPARQ AQ�tNDA ANO MAKB OTNER NECESSARY ARRANO6M6N78� • � . . ' t•� C• PREPARE WBBKLY RtP01lTS TO 7MR CNAIIlMAN OR Hlf PROORtSS ANb � . ' PI.ANS�'. ' � . . . ,. .,1.� . ' �6. . . � • O� PqQPARE REpU1RE0 RBPORTS TO THE GRANTINO AOtNCY Ae PRESCRIBED eV THE CONDITIONB OR TNE GRANT. !� TO PREPARE A FINAL V1►ORK PRODUCT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR . THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A CRtMINAI.. .�USTICE SYSTEM. . , R� PERFORM THE NECESSARV RESEARCH THROUGH BURVEYS OP THE ' APPROPRIATE LITERATURE� (NTEqV1EW8 ANO dTUD16s WITH MEMBEp!{ ' ' ' OF THE CRIMINAI,. .�USTICE•SYSTEM WHOSE EXPERTIdE Is NECESdARY � ROR UNOERSTANDtNG AND RELAT6D ERPORTS� • O. H6 BNALL ot RESPONat9La TO ANO RtPORT '1'O TM! CONdTITUT�O • • COMMITTtl� eEEK TMtllt AOViC� ANO ADVIlt '1'MlM� /1� R�QUtRtO• • . S• TIMETABLE POR FIRST YlAR. • � I A• OP[NING Op' OPRICt• ' •. 'I . I (1) MowrH oNe. � � � • �I►� DEVELOPMENT OF DEStGN FOR FIRST PHABE OF RESEARCM , ' PROJECT. PREPARATION OF QUESTIONNAIREB� SURVEY . . • ' INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER INFORMATION GATHERING DEVICts• �B� COMMITTEE AND STAFF EFFORTS TO PUBLICIZE THE ' PROJECT WITHIN THE CRIMINAI_ .IUSTICE COMMUNITY AND MAKINCi EVERY EFRORT TO 6AIN COOPERATION OF THE OFFICML9 AND PRORE3810NAL8 INVOLVED. �C� CONCURRENT COMPILATION AND REVIEW OR THE APPROPRIATE � LITERATURE� AND THE I�EVELOPM�NT d� (NFORMATION •OURG�! ' RESPONSIVE TO CORRESPONDE�}CR CONTACTS. • � �� MONTH TWO� TNREE AND FOUR. � , � INTERVIEWS AND MEETINGS WITH APPROPRIATE EXECUTIVES .- � . IN TNE CRIMINAt_ .IU8T�Ct6.SYSTEM T0.4,E'1'ERM�NF.,T.H�IR N6BD8� THBIR IMM�DtAT�.OHORT /lANGE N66,DS� CQMR!IL6 • . � , iNRORMATION RlLPRtstNTAT11/t �R 7NlIR LONfi RANOt OOALd• � . ,; ANb Ad�IRATIONl. . , . . , , , „ „� � .i;� � � .,�: 1`�i� ,.�, ,.. � �./� � �i�,��. . � „'� � i� � :, , . l l') �',.� ,.,. ��' . , . . � . `.•.� . �� . � f i� �i� �� 1,.�� 1 .q< 1 1�, .1 I�f 1.. • ' 1 1 ••� . . 1�� f . . 1 1.•1� ..1 .1�l1 � 11�•1111:.1� . 1 1� 1 1�f f i.1 1 .. . � �.� .. 1 1 1� 1.1.� '�1 /•r i 1 � � �.� . . . � . . - 1 � � . . ,. � , . .. • • , .`J. , . . • ' �S� REVIEW OR DATA DEVELOPED 1N THIS Tti1ME8TER WITH • ' EMPHA818 ON UBER GOALB� GOMMON iNRORMATION NEEOS� . WHICH WILL 8ERVE AS dU1DE TO SUCCEEOINO WORK, ' �C� PREPARATION OF AN OUTLIN6 OF SHORT ANO LONG RAN�E GOALS 9A86D ON INFORMATION SECURED IN THiB TRIMESTBR� , �D� REVIEW OR THE OUTLINE BY THE COMMITTE[ TO INSURE • . COMPLIANC6 WITH GUIDELINES ANO TMAT INVEST10AT10N IS � • , PROC6EOING IN AN ORDERLY DIR6CTION. - �3� FIFTH, SIXTH AND SEVENTH MONTH. � �/J EMPHASIS ON THE STUDY OF PROCEDURES WITHIN EACH AGENCY� � ; ' IDENTIFICATION OF NEEOS AT THE FIELD� MIbDLE AND UPP6R • LEVELS OF ACiENCY OPERATIONS. TH18 WILL BE TIME CON� , ' SUM ING AND IT IS HNVISAdED THAT THE OIRECTOR SHALL • � , ACCOMPANY CASE WORKER3� POLICE OFFICER9� COURT . � , EMPLOYEES� AND CORRECTtONAL PERSONNEL TO DISCOVER ' , SPECIFiC NEEDS THAT SERIOUBLY AFFECT THE OVERALI.. OPERATIONI Olr TMI • ACiENCY. . ' . �e� THE EXISTINCi SYSTEM8 IN FORC6 WITHIN E/1CM AGENCY WILL OB . BTUDIEO CAREFULLY TO IDENTIRY VNtAKNEdSES� DUPLiCAT10N • AND OVERLAPPING OF EFFORT. , � . �C� THE COMMITTEE AND STARF WIl.L REVIEW PROCiRE88 MADE IN , • THIB TRIMESTER� UPDATE TMQ BMORT AND LONO RANG6 OUTI_INES � AND MAK6 SUCH MODIIt+ibAT10N!! OR TMES� OUTLINts /1s JUSTIFI[� ' , BY BXPERIffNCE. �4� MONTH EIaHT� NIN6 AND T6N . • � \�A� CONTINUATION OF SY87EM3 l3TUDIES WITHIN INDIVIDUAL � , ACiENCIBS. �B� REVIEW� UPDATING AND OESIRABt,.E MODIP'ICATIONS O/r THE LON<3 AND SHORT RANGE OIITLiNES BY COMM ITTEB AND STAFF� " \S� MONTH E{�EVEN 'AND TWELVE� �A� PREPARATION OF� A REPORT EXAMININCi TME CRIMINAI. • , � .IUSTICE STRUCTURE� RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE YEAR �I STUDY• .�� .REVIEW OR TFIB REPORT� dU9M18910N Of GOPILS TO TME • • �XtCUTIV6s OF THR CRIMINAL .IUSTIC! AO�NCIiB FOp COMMENT• • , AND RtVItW� TNt MAY011 OR ST• PAUL AND TM! COtlNTY BOARD� "•'�w,e- J. � � . . . . ., , , � ' .9 • �C� A COPY OF THE INTBRIM RtP011T WILL •i dtNT TO TN[ � • � GOVERNOR�d CRiMt COMMI�f10N POR RtVI[W AND COMMANt�� , , ' • ' . 6.• TIMETA9�.S FOR SBCOND YItAR• , , A� OUTL.INB WORK FOR dBCONO Y�AR. �1� .REVIEW OF RBPORT. . ' , �2� CONSIDERATION OR REVIEW BY GOVERNOR�s CRIME COMMissICN , . STAFR. ' ' �' �3� DETERMiNATtON OF MORE SPECIFIC DiR6CTiONS ROR STUOY ' BA8ED OH RIRST Y6AR EXP6RIENC�• • �A� REtNFORCEMENT OF COOPERAT'IV6 ERFOIlTS eY ACiENC1ES iNVOLVEO BY STIMUl.AT10N METHODS� �A� DISTRIBUTION OF REPORT TO EXECUTIVEB OF INVDLVBO A�iENC1ES� �9� MEETING8 WITN EXECUTiVE LEVEL P6RSONN61� OF (NVOLVEO . AGENCIEd ROR ADVICE ANO COMM6NT• �C� PUBLIC NOTIFICATiON OF STATUB ANO PROdRE88 THROUGH MEOIA. �D� ENCOURAG6MENT OF COMMERGIAL� CIViC AND SOCUL GROUP3 TO ' . SECURE STARR AND COMMITTEE RtPRESBNTATIVES AS dP6AKER8 _ . AND PANEL REPRESENTATIV68� . �E� OTHBR PUBLICITY CHANNELS YHAT WILL dQRVE TO 6NLIGHTEN PUBLIC . ON PROGRAM GOALS• �S� CONSIOERATION OF MOOEL AND SIMULATION DE9IGNS TO TgST EFFICACY ' OF lROGRAM• � �/►� THE UTtLIZATION OF PRES6NT RESOURCES AVAl1..ABLE WITH EXtSTEN7 C�ORIMINAL .IUSTIC�SYSTEM TO OEVE�.OP MOOEL8 AND SIMULATION�• . . ts� AGR66MffNT UPON AREAS� GEOGSRAPHIC ANO STRUCTURAL� ID6ALLY ' SUITEC FOR TBdTiNG MODRLS AND sIMULAT1ONS• . ,. �C� StCURtN�i PERMIdd10N 0/r Ap<NCY EXlCUTWtd AND lMrl.dYE�s . . rARTICI'ATiNO iN TlsTS� • . . / . .9. . • ' ' � �D� TRAINING OIr [MrLOYtt• 0/r AOrNCI[� INVOLViO. �E� MONITORINO OF T6STS TO IN�URS COMPLIANCL �Y AO[NCILS ANO ` � EMPLOYEES� � , �G� REVIEW OF RESULTS� . t/1� VALIDATION OF OATA. , �B� CONFERENCES WITH A06NCY EXECUTIVES ANO EMPLOYEES INVOLVeO ,' � AND STUOY OF THEIR COMMENTd ANO V16WPOINTd• ' � • �C� MOOIRICATION OF 8TUDY dOAL8; AS REQUtRED IP WEAKN6SSES M� � , DISCOVERED� OR� t0 dTREN<iTHtN dY�T.tM IF ��TT[R WAY! TO ACN16V6 d!lCCtldFtlL RtsULTS AIlR IrCUNO• �• FINAI. REPORT. �1� FIRST DRART• � . . � �I►� REVIEW BY COMMITT6E AND sIJGH MOOIFICATIONS AS ARE DESIRABLE• , �B� REVIEW BY GOVERNORTd CRIME COMMIds10N TO /NSURE AOMERENCE . TO STATE Pt,.AN. � �C� REVIEW BY EXECUTIVES OIr THt CIIIMINAL.IUSTiC� S1fST�M FOR IriNAL . COMM6NT�� ' . t� PINAI.. DRAF�SJ'. • �A� PRINTING AND D18TR1BUTION. � .. �B� �NSURANCE THAT .PROGRE88 AND FISCAL Rff�ORTB AR6 SATI8RACTORY� • . C� IMPI.EMENTATION. , , �1� FINALIZATION OF OPINION BY CRIMINAL .IUSTICE SYSTEM EXECUTIVES� , .� tZ� STUDY OF LE6ISLATIOh AND INTER�JURISOICTtONAL AGREEMENTS . NEC68SARY TO dE1NG AN ACCEPTABLE SYSTEM TO RRUITION. �.�� DILIdENT PURSUIT OF 09JECTiVEd TMROUdH RAMSEY GOUNTY ' ' DBl.BOATiON TO StAT� OOV�RNMtNT Ai�'RAMStY COUNTY JIJRISDIGttONS � � AIrP'SC'1'60� . ,�-,. - • . • . . . .1�� . �I• LIAISON FACTORS; , , • INTRODUCTION; ' STUDIES ARE NOW PROCiRE831NG TO COOR�INATE ANO CON30LIOATE COUNTY GOVERNMENT OVER A BROAD SPECTRUM OF SERVICES. CONSIDERABLE RESEARCM BY METROPOI�ITAN COUN9lSt5 HAS BEEN UNDERTAKEN� WHILE THE APPROACH TAKEN HA8 BEEN OF A GENERAL CNARACTER� A CON310ERABLE AMOUNT OF . RESE/1RCH DA7A AND I�ITERATURE HAS BEEN ACCUMUI..ATEO. NECESSARILV� IN , � THESE STUDIE3 WHICH ENCROACH UPON AUTONOMY AND JURtSDICTIONAL IDENTIFICATION RESISTANCE HAS BEEN REI.T AT BOTH THE CORE CITY ANO � SUBURBAN LEVELS. IT IS WELL TO POINT OUT THAT THE PHILOSOPHtC OIFFERENCt• A1�t ' LESS PROBLEMATIC IN THE �IMINAL .IUSTICE SYSTEM DUE TO CITY ANO COUN7`Y LINKAdEB IN SEVERAL AREA'J. THE POt..ICE ARE NOTABl.Y COOPERATIVE ANO ALREADY AWARB OF TMR ADVANTACiEB OF UN1lr1ED SY8TEMS ROR tNFORMATION EXCHAN�3E. • � IR SOME SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF A WORKABL6 COORDtNAT6D SYSTEM� INVOLVINO A COMPARATIVELY SMALL PART OR TM[ OOVtRNMENTAL STRUCTURE BEINO SHOWN ° AS ECONOMiCAL•AND EFFECTIV6. E!r''OR'fS TO MtRfiR LAIl�iER dYSTEMS MAY �t '' , FAVORABLY REC6IVED. • A� HBTEROCiENE1TY OP COMMITTEE. - �1� THE IS �MEMBER COMMITTEE WILL BE COMPOSED OF PROFESSIONALf ' REPRESENTATIVE OF THE AGENCIES WITHIN THE CRIMINAL .JUSTICR SYdTEM AND ELffCTED OFFIC,IALS WMO RBPRBSENT THE INTERESTa +' ' OR THE GENERAL GOVERNMENT. � �A� THE MERdINCi OF ,CERTAIN ACTIVITtEB HAVE BEEN D1SCU83ED � ' • BY RAMSEY COUN7Y POLICE AGENCIES FOR SEVERAL YEARS. • THff POLICE� NOWEVER� CANNOT HOP6 TO ACHI6VB THIS �OAL� � A1..ONE� WITHOUT 6ENERAI� GOVERNMEN7'AL 8UPPORT. ' �B� THE COMMITTEE ALONE� AND THROUIiN ITS 6TAFI�TS ACTIVITY� � CAN �TOPEN DOORS�Tf AND� THUd� sRTTR!! COMMUNICATB WiTM DECISION MAKERS. � Y• a../►TERIAL COMMUNICATION3. • . �1� TH6 PROBATION� CORRECTIONS ANC DisTRICT COURTS NAV6 COUNTY� � � WIDE AUTMORITY REOUIRINA NO PION6t1liNa iN tSTADWSMINd A _ ;.� . • oROiAD COMMUNICATiONf CONNtCTIdN� , ', • . • , � ' . • .11� . . . . . _ . ' �� POLICE AGENCY COMMUNICATIONS CHANNELS AR� NOW EXIBTENT, �S� VERTICAI. COMMUNICATIONB ARE REASONABLY A89URED BY EXPERIENC6 � ' ' OF PRIOR GRANTS�,AND TH6 PRESENCE OF POLIC6 AND JUOICIAL M6MS[11S ON STATB�I.EVEI. PLANNiNG AGENCIES• ,�4� THE REVIEW FEATURBS OF THtB GRANT APPLICATION SMOULO ASSURR A CONTINUtTY OF PROGRAM PROtiRR�s CONStsT6NT WiTH STAT6 PU1N!• �.5� TNi PU�LIC WILL S6 INRORMtD TMRdJfiM Mi�IA 'RiSEM'ATIONS� , drtAK[I!• AND R<LATiD MtANf• , %. ' i : . . ' � � , . , . �� .. � .. , .�. � �v .. . r ., '' � . � , � , . � .. . . ' . � . . .. . . ' .. , . ,. , i . . . . . , . ' . . . � . . . . - . ..' � ' � . . . . , .- .. .. .. . . . . . . - . ' . . . . ' ' 4 ,. , . , . , . . . , � . . . , � �, � �.�. ' � � � . � .. ..,. . �..` . , ., . . . . . .� . , � � � � � � � � . , . � � .• ..� � ' . . . . . � � . . , . , . . ,, .. . � . , . � . . . .., ,.... . ,. . . , �; , .. . �_ � . . _ � . . . , . . . . . � �� , � . . . , . � � � . • , :I � t , 1 . • � ` 1 - ' ilt. RESULTS RESULTS ARE BA3ICALLY THE DEl3REE TO WHiCH HOPES ARE dIVEN SU98TANCE AND APPROACH A SOUGHT�ARTER IbEAL. TH18 PROJECT� IN ESSENCE� WILI� ACT � AS A CATALYST TO BRINti TOGETHER THE CRIMINAL .�USTICE AGENCIE8, TNEIR • INFORMATION SYSTEMS ANO OTHER RE80URCES IN AN ERFORT TO MODIFY THEIR ' � HISTORICAL INDEPENDENCE. INASMUCH� AS A COMMON CLIENTELE IS SERVEO THE MERGINd CF CERTAIN RII..E9 AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROCEDURES THAT • � tNSURE A i1THROU6H�FI.OW« OR iNP'ORMATION SEEMS INOICATEO. , IOEALLY� THE DATA DEVELOPED FROM OR161NA4:tON OF A FriLE AT ARREBT� THROVOM ADJUDICATION� CONFINEMENT AND PROBATION ANO PAROLQ SHOUI�D BE RESIOENT � 1N TOTO AT A SINGLE REPOSITORY RATHER THAN RRAGMENTEO AT EACH LEVEL• , EACH PARCEL OF DATA I8 IMPORTANT TO THE COMPLETE PROFII..L► OR THE CLIENT. THE PROJECT MANAGER WIL�. PERFORM A DUAL SERVICE; THE INVESTiGAT10N i AND REPORTING OF BETTER WAY3 TO 00 THE JOB� AND� dECONDLY� BUT NO LE88 ' IMPORTANTLY� TO BRIDGE THE dAP BETWEEN AGENCIES• SHORT RANGE ANO LONG , RANGE PLANS Wll.t,. BE DEVELOPED THAt POINT TO COMMON OOAl.B WHICH�MOPE�IJLLY� NONE OF THE PARTICIPANTS CAN AFFORD TO I�iNORE. THE FINAL PRODUCT SHOULD PO1NT OUT MEANS BY WHICH 7HE RESULTS OF EACH ' JUDICIAL BRANCHtB WORK CONTRIBUTtON SHOULD BE MUTUALLY AVAtLABLE FOR , SUBSEpUENT 3TUDY. A C6NTRAL RECORDB REPOSITORY WITH EACH ACCES8 TO ' CONTRIBUTOR3 SHOULD 6E AVAILABLB� VERTICAL (NQUIRY CAPABtLITY MUST NOT • BE OVERLOOKED. . THE DISPROPORTIONATE WORK LOAD OF GERTAIN COURTS MUST BE 6ASED BY THE SHIFTIN�i OF BUROENS THROUGH BETTER SCHEDULINO� K7TIRICATIONB O}r � ' ' APPEARANCE TO LAWYERS AND WITNB83E8 AND TH6 SIONALLINO OP' AGEING , CASES ARE A PART OF THE IMPROVEMEN7 80UGHT AND SHOUl.O 9B oROUGHT INTO FOCUS A9 A RE3ULT OF TH19 STUDY. THE REHABI LITATtON OF OFFENDERS� WHERE P0831BLE� IS BETTER 8ERVED BY A ' COMPLETE HISTORY OF THEIR ACTIVITY� AND THE INTERESTS OR THE PBOPLE ARE A1.80 SERVED BY INSURING TMAT UNWISE RELEASES AR6 H6LD TO A MINIMUM• , THE R68ULT� OF THIS STUDY dHOULD DE A MAJOR CONTRI�UTION TO TMt UPIiRADINfi AND EFFECTIV<Ntds OF 7Ht CRIMINAL.IUSTICt .SYSTeM• ` . • t��. ' � . ...� , ..�.., . , , ,. ,, . . .,> , ,,.,, . . . , , ,..,_ ,, _,,: W .:,.��;.�, � ., ..,-;�_. . , _. . .,. . ,.. . . _ .� .�._....�.� . . ��j.� <<.�i j� DUP�ICATE TO PRINTER �j��r'f CITY OF ST. PAUL FOENCIL NO. OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK COUNCIL RESOLUTION-GENERAL FORM PRESENTED BY COMMISSIONEIL DATF WHER�AS, it appears neceseary and desirable �or the City of S�int Paul to establish as soon as possible a eity-wide Crimin�l Justice Planning Program that gerves the needs and requiromentr oY the City with respeet to its Criminal Justice Pro�ram; an�l WHEI�LAS, the City of Saint Paul has provided th�ough its usual budgetary proeedures f��^ the finaneing of a partion qf the cost of developing a plan to coordinate the efforts of Criminal Justice Ageneies that serve the interests of the people of Saint Paul ; and �J��RLAS, the Congress of the United States, pursuant to the provisfons of the Omnibus Crime Control and SaYe Streets Aet of 1968, has established a pro�ram Yor proviciing, among other things, financial assistanae ta local government bodies through appliQation Por funds to be filed with the appropriate State agencies; �nd WfiEREAS, the State of Minnesota has deaignated the Governor' ss Crime Commission, under the chairmanship of the Attorney General9 as the appropriate State agency to receive applieatians for f3nancial �ssistanee from loeal governmental units; and WHLR�AS, the City a�' Saint Pau� has determined that ttze approximate cost o�' developing a Criminal Justiee Planning Program will be in the amoux�t oY �62, 115; now, thereo��re, be it RESOLV�D9 by the Council of the City of Saint Paul, that application be and is hereby made to the Governor' s Crime Commission of the State of Minnesota for a grant in the amount of Thirty-seven Thoueand Thr�e Hundred and Fifty-five Dollars (�37,355.0(?) �'or assistanee in developing a eity-wide Coardinrabed Criminal Jua�tice Planning Program for the City o�' Saint Paul; and be it COUNCILMEN Adopted by the Council 19— Yeas Nays Carlson Dalglish Approvec� 19—._ Meredith Tn Favor Peterson Sprafka Mayor A gainst Tedesco 1V.[r. President, Byrne O +:.�i��L�.h�L1�� DUP:ICATE TO PRINTER ` $.,,� CITY OF ST. PAUL couNCi� NO OFFICE OF THE CITY� CLERK FILE COUNCIL RESOLUTION—GENERAL FORM PRESENTED BY Cf)MMISSIONER DATG �age 2. FURTI3�R �t �SOLV�D, that the Honorable Tho�nag R. �,yrane, Ni�yor of the City o�' Saint Paul, is� hereby authora.zed to e�.ecute, o� beh�lf of said City, the t�pplication for funds to the Governor' s Cri�e Commissic:°.g copy o� said apPlication bein� hereto at�;ached and incorporated herein by reference as fully and as �ompletely as if set forth herein verbatim. ��r� a� �� COUNCILMEN Adopted by the Council 19_ Yeas Nays �,?��° ��'`f�} ;r�.. � .. Carlson Dalglish {� Approvec� 19—_ Meredith \. Tn Favor Peterson Sprafka `j Mayor Tedesco A Sainst Mr. President, Byrne O