03-202City of St. Paul
RfiSOLDTION APPROVING
FIXING TIME OF HEARING THSR&ON
.i �. .7
COUN L FIL O3 `� a�O.'1.
�
By
3�
Fil No. 18980 .
Assessment No__5029
Voting Ward 2
In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and e�enses for reconstruction
of areaway abandonments in front of 212 East Seventh Street
(PIN 31-29-22-44-0051) and 218 East Seventh Street (PIN 31-29-22-44-0425).
The assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection with the above
improvement having been submitted to the Council, and the Council having considered
same and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects approved.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That a public hearing be had on said assessment on the 23rd dav of
April, 2003 at the hour of 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chamber of the Court House
and City Hall Building, in the City of St. Paul; that the Valuation and Assessment
Engineer give notice of said meetings, as required by the Charter, stating in said notice
the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement, and the amount assessed
against the lot or lots of the particular owner to whom the notice is directed.
COUNCILPERSON Adopted by the Date: �� �� �,' '
r-- cx
YeaS Nays
��� `,�,-+� Benanav
✓Blakey
✓BOStrom
�/Col eman
�Harris
�Lantry
�Reiter
Certified Passes by Council Secretary
� In ��.ve,r By
O Against
� 'Ah5 ��.�"
�`'� s f �
Public Hearin : A ri123, 2003
T.M.S./REAL ESTATE DIVISION
ontact Person and Phone Number:
Gienn Picha 266-8851
os[ be on Council Agenda by: March 12, 2003
Council Research OtTice
Date February 14, 2003
EPAR7MENTDI
Cl'lY ATLORNEY
���
gsrt �.3 ���.:�,
Green Sheet Number: 204102 �
1
' OF SIGNANRE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
xEQuESrEn: Setting date of public hearing of the ratification of assessments for reconstrucrion of areaway
�nments in front of 212 East Seventh Street and 218 East Seventh Street.
RSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER TAE FOLLOWING:
Has the person/firm ever worked under a rnntract for this department? YES NO
, PLANNINGCOMMISSWIi
A STAF£
Has this person/firm ever been a City employee?
CML SERVICE COMMISSW[i
Publie Health
YES NO
1 � — Does this person/firm Qossess a skill not normally possessed by any YES NO
current City employee?
, CIBCOMM111T1'EE VaenetBldgs.
Explain all YES answers on a separate sheet and attach.
I ITIATING'PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, W6at, When, WAere, Why?) �
fAGESIFAPPROVED:
as above.
SADVANTAGES tF APPROVED:
:n0fitted propert,y owners &ave assessmen£s payable via
SADVANTe�GESIFNOTAPPROVED: �_ , . �
� not assess these benefits would be inconsistent with Ci
AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION:
IG SOURCE:
'L9L INFORMAI'ION: (EXPLAIN)
Z DiODCI'LS' OWllEiS W1U
$4,274.59
ASSESSMENTS
�.�6Y.,;�,.�i �.vr'��:
��� r°;
... ::3'
��� � � ���
ti '
tases. _.� .—
,
COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE)
ACTIViTY
NUMBER:
and
YES NO