03-1070Return copy to:
Real Estate Division(lal)
140 City Hall
RESOLUTION
OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Presented By
�Z
Referred To `�\ � �/ Committee: Date
t WHEREAS, on Mazch 26, 2003, the City Council of the City of Saint Paul adopted Council File #03-306,
z said Resolution being the Ratification of Assessments for Summary Abatements (Properry Clean-up) from
s part of July, 2002 through part of December, 2002 (File No. J0207A2, Assessment No. 0996), and
s WHEREAS, the property at 576 Kent Street, being described as:
Lots 1 through 5 and Lot 18, Block 2, Denslow's Addition to the City of St. Paul,
Ramsey County, Minnesota,
�o with the properiy identification number of 25-29-23-32-0012 was assessed an amount of $270.00 for
>> cleaning up the property, and
�z
13
�a
is
16
i�
is
19
20
u
zz
WHEREAS, it has been discovered that the Ramsey County address record for the owner of that property
was incorrect, and therefore the City's norification to the owner was improper, and
WHEREAS, due to the notification problem, the Legislative Hearing Officer has recommended that the
assessment be deleted from this property record,
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the amount of the assessment for this property be deleted, and
BE IT FiJRTHER RESOLVED, that the reduction of $270.00 be funded by the Exempt Assessment Fund.
Council File # p'�- lDl
Green Sheet # �1�11�
�► °�°
Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet
DepartrnerMloffiee/councii: Date Initiated:
TE ���o���a��t�. ,�-NO�� Green Sheet NO: 3007755
Co`rtad Person 8 Phone• Deoartment Sent To Person In' iaUDate
BIUC2 Engelbrekt � 0 echool and Maoa ment S Bmce n elbrekt �� �
Z�'�� Assign 1 " Attom M han Ril �� �������p�3
Must Be on Council /�enda by (Date): Number Z echnolo and Mana emeot S Karen Johnson � t�v �0
B � D � �( ROUting 3 ouncil Marv Ericksoo v
Order
ToWI # of Signature Pages _(Clip All Lowtions for Signature)
Action Requested:
Delerion of the Summary Abatement assessment for cieaning up the property at 576 Kent Street.
Recommendations: Approve (A) or Reject (R): Personal Service Contrects Must Answer the Following Questions:
Planning Commission 1. Has this personffirm ever worked under a contract for this departmenY?
CIB Committee Yes No
Civil Service Commission 2. Has ihis personffirtn ever been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this persoNfirm possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any
curtent city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet
Initiating Problem, issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
An assessment was approved to recoup the cost of cleaning up the property. Due to an enor in the County's ownerslup records,
owner was not given proper notificarion of the work that needed to be done. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends delerion of the
assessment due to ir�roper nori£cation.
�'-"=a �'.."- ,'r ;, -- - _' i; `
N n �@ .n � g , y �
AdvaMages If Aparoved: �. �,� `a,�� � � �:'� �, ?,�'
Assessment would be deleted from ffie project record.
� o� 4` i �'- �'�c��
: ��� .. n -w-c-.�v �s, a � e° c
Disadvantages If Approved: � � � � � 5 � � � � �
Cost of clean-up would have to be covered by the City's Exempt Assessment Fund.
Disadvantages If Not Approved:
It wouid be conhary to City practice to assess for costs incurred when insufficient norice was given of tfle' work that needed to be
done.
Total Amount of 270 CosURevenue Budgeted: �
Transaction_
Fundins�Source: ExemptAssessment .4ctivitvNUmber: GL001-09051-0542 ��
Financiallnformation: FU1ldS J���� � 3
(F�cplain) _ G �
��
.,��
�