03-1068Return copy to:
Real Estate Division(lal)
140 City Hall
RESOLUTION
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
1a
Presentea By 1
Referred To
Committee: Date
i WHEREAS, on October 22, 2003, the City Council of the City of Saint Paul adopted Council File #03-960,
z said Resolution being the Ratification of Assessments for Suminary Abatements (Property Clean-up) during
s the months of May and June, 2003 (File No. J0305A, Assessment No. 9934), and
s WHEREAS, the properry at 349 Rose Avenue East, being described as:
Lot 19, Eidsmo Addition,
v with the property identification number of 29-29-22-22-0038 was assessed an amount of $300.00 for
�o cleanmg up the property, and
n
�z
13
14
is
16
17
is
19
20
u
WHEREAS, the Legislative Hearing Officer has determined that a miscommunication between the properiy
owner and Code Enforcement staff may have resulted in a notification problem with the owner, and
WHEREAS, dne to said notification problem ti�e Legislative Hearing Officer has recommended that the
assessment be reduced to the amount of $200.00,
T$EREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the amount of the assessment far this property be reduced from
$300.00 to $200.00, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the reduction of $100.00 be funded by the Exempt Assessment Fund.
Council FSIe # (��j' ��� D
Green Sheet # 3007794
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green
03 � Sheet
Departmentlo�celcouncil: Date Initiated:
TE — TechnologyandManagementSrn 14NOV-03 Green Sheet NO: 3007794
Contad Person 8 Phone- Deoartment Sent To Person �InitiallDate
BNce Engelbfekt � 0 echnolo and Mana ement Bruce En elbrekt .�, n I 1 N��
26E8854 pu�9n 1 itvAttornev MeehanRilev �-C�.�
Must Be on Council Agenda by (Date): Number 2 echnolo and Mana ement S Karen hns n D�D
For
RoUting 3 ouncil Ma Erickton
Order — - -- - . - ---
�
, , , . �, .,._ ,.
1{"� a �� L.�
Jv�
ToWI # of Signature Pages �(Clip AII Locations for Signature) `� �' "' ��` °
.+-� . „ .
Adion Requested: � �
Reducing the amount assessed for a Snmmary Abatement for cleaning-up the property at 349 Rose Avenue East, File No. J0305,
Assessment No. 9934
Recommendations: Approve (A) or Reject (R): Personal Service Contracts Must Answer the Following Questions:
Planning Commission 1. Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this department?
CIB Committee Yes No .
� Civil Service Commission 2. Has this person/firm ever been a cityemployee?
Yes No
3. Does this personffirm possess a skill not normally possessed by any
current city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet
Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportuniry (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
A communication problem between Code Enforcement and the owner of a property needing to be cleaned may have resulted in a
notification problem regarding the work requued to remedy the problem.
�
Advantaqes If Approved: _ �����a�
Amount of assessment chazged to owner for work done would be reduced. � �'�/'n¢�
eilo��� �P�si
Disadvantages If Approved:
The reduced amount would have to be made up through the Exempt Assessment Fund.
Disadvantages If Not Approved:
Owner would be responsible for entire amount assessed, which would be counter to the recommendation of the Legislative Hearing
Officer.
Total Amoun[ of 100 Cost/Revenue Budgeted:
Trensaction:
FundinpSource: ExemptAssessment ActiviriNumber: GL001-09051-0542
Financiallnformation: FUfld
(expiain) Amount originally assessed: $300.00
Recommended assessment amount: $200.00
Amount of assessment reduction: $100.00
--- _- --_.._ .--, ------.__� _ _-- ---___� �-----_____. _.__..__ _._ ..----. __�_..__. _�__.__--...__.__ . _. ._.. ______ �
Louise_Langberg - Two addresses that have already been ratified __ _ ____.__ ___. __.___ ___ Page 1_ j
��-/D�,�
From: Racquel Naylor
To: Engelbrekt, Bruce; Langberg, Louise; Robinson, Kim
Date: Fri, Oct 31, 2003 1029AM
Subject: Two addresses that have already been ratified
I have several addresses that need to be changed through resolution. These addresses were ratified by
the City Council on October 22. In the past, Roxanna Flink preferred that your o�ce draft these types of
resolutions because she wanted to make sure they were worded perfectly. If that is not still the case, I will
need someone to teach me how to do this resolution so it is worded to your specifications. Here are the
changes:
593 Rose Avenue East, 29-29-22-12-0104 (J03046) - The police department took a window to get it
processed for fingerprints due to a burglary. A contractor was called in to replace the window and the
owner was charged for this assessment. Ms. Moermond recommendation is as follows: delete the
assessment of $354.50 because the assessment should not have been sent to the owner as this
incident was the result of police action. Furthermore, the City should not doubly victimized the crime
victim. (We have the police report for this issue if that will help.)
r--
349 Rose Avenue East, 29-29-22-22-0038, (J0305A) - Ms. Moermond recommendation is as follows:
reduce the assessment of $300 by $100 to make the total assessment $200 as there seems to have
been miscommunication between the owner and Code Enforcement staff. �
If you need further information or if you would like me to draft these resolutions, please let me know.
-Racquel, 6-8573
CC: Moermond, Marcia