The URL can be used to link to this page

02-921�o�f�fn�A� RESOLUTION CITY OF SAINT PAUL.IVIINNESOTA Presented By Referred To 2 3 4 5 6 7 4 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 CouncIl File # Q�. �� e� � Green Sheet # _�.QQ � a g Date Whereas, on May 9, 2002, the Rev. Oliver VJhite made an application on behalf of Grace Community Church to the Heritage Preservation Commission (hereinafter, the "HPC") pursuant to the provisions of the Saint Paul Legislative Code for a demolition permit for property located at 873 Portland Avenue and located in the Hill Historic District; and Whereas, The Commission conducted a public hearing on June 27, 2002 after having provided notice to affected property owners. At the close of the public hearing the HPC moved to deny the appiication based upon the testimony and record before it including the following findings and conclusions as set forth in the HPC staff report: 1. When the Hill Historic District was expanded to include this area, the First Methodist Church was classified as supportive to the character of the Hill District. The church, however, was constructed during the period of significance for the Hi11 District which is from 1858 through 1930. The inventory for 873 Portland states "The design of this church was inspired by that of a Roman Temple, unlike many churches build in St, Paul ca. 1910 which followed a Late Gothic Revival Design, The building is an unusual addition to the neighborhood, and is particularly striking when viewed from the east ..." Staff views this building to be pivotal to the character of the Hi11 District. 2. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation recommend against `Yemoving or relocating historic buildings, or features of the streetscape and landscape, thus destroying the historic relationship between buildings, features and open space." 3. The Secretary of the Interior's Standazds for Rehabilitation recommend against "creating a false historical appearance ..." and against "introducing a new building, streetscape or landscape feature that is out of scale of otherwise inappropriate to the setting's historic character . . .". 4. Even in iYs state of disrepair, the building retains a high degree of architectural and historical integrity. 5. The summary under Critical Work in the Physical Assessment Summary October l, 20Q1 states "The building is shucturally, architecturally and historically worth maintaining an improving. The minimum scope of wark to make it acceptable to today's rea lations and standazds has an estimated budget of $735,000. Though this work is substantial, it is not unreasonable given the building's size, age and lack of earlier maintenance. Little of the scope of cost of the required work is directly related to any unique requirements of Grace Communiry's Mission." ao 1 ��4�,. oa-q�.� 2 :�..'G. �I�is�taAUer to retain historic buildings that aze historicaliy associated with the 3 development of the district that it is to demolish them and create another lazge hole in the 4 district or create new construction that may present a false sense of history. C� 9 10 il 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 7. The proposed demolition will adversely affect the historic character of the district and would be a great loss to the community. Whereas, Pursuant to the provisions of Leg. Code § 73.06, the applicant duly filed an appeal from the determination made by the HPC and requested a hearing before the City Council for the purpose of considering the actions taken by the said Commission; and Whereas, Acting pursuant to Leg. Code § 73.06, and upon notice to affected parties a public hearing was duly conducted by the City Council on July 24, 2002 where all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard; and Whereas, The Council, having heazd the statements made, and having considered the application, the report of staff, the record, minutes and resolution of the Commission, does hereby Resolve, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby affirm the decision of the HPC in this matter as the appellant has not demonstrated an error in the facts, findings or procedures of the HPC in this matter; and, be it Further Resolved, That the appeal of the Rev. Oliver White, on behalf of Grace Community Church, be and is hereby denied; and, be it Further Resolved, that the findings and conclusions of the HPC as set forth above are hereby also adopted by the Council; and, be it Finally Resolved, That the Council Secretary shail mail a copy of this resolution to Rev. White, the Zoning Administrator and the Heritage Preservation Commission. Requested by nepartment of: By: Fosm Approved by City Attorney sv: �'".vfs.!✓�c�'�-- ` _ /?_ o^L AdoF By: Apps By: by Mayor for Submission to Council Adopted by Council: Date �� _.Z �'app�� oa-g�.1 City Council ONTACT P6290N 8 PFM DATEIN{f1AiFD GREEN SHEET No 200728 Ce�:�P.C�31�K�3,t� A Sept. 18, 2002 M�Me6R iors �'. TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES naAaT�rt ca�csai ❑ acrwnawEx ❑ axttu< _ ❑ RuJICwLaERNCFioR ❑ w4MC1LLaFAVl1KtT¢ ❑ WYORIPRA!ffiTYMiI ❑ (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) Memorializing City Council action denying the appeal of McClay Alton Attorneys, on behalf of Grace Community Church,.to a decision from"a decision of the Heritage Preservation Commission denying a demolition permit application to raze the structure at 873 Portland Avenue (Grace Co�unity Church, Hill Historic District). (Public hearing held on July 24, 2002) PLANNING CAMMISSION GIB CAMMITTEE CIVIL SERVICE CAMMISSION TOTAL AHIOUNT OF TRANSACTfON; FUNDINC SOURCE Has this pe�son/firm everworketl uMera cantract for thia depaRment� VES NO tias mia persoMm+ever been a dbi emvb7ree� YES NO Does this persoMrm possess a sidll not riormallypossessed by d�ry current city emp�oyee9 YES NO kthia P��rm ataraeted vendoCt YFS t� COSTIREVENUE BU�GETED (qRCLE ON� ACTNRY NUMBER YES ti0 INqNCIA1INFORMATON (IXPWI� CITY OF SAINT PAUL R¢ndy C. Kelly, Mayor OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY ` ��\ Manuel J. Cervanfu, City Attorney p� � Civil Division 400 Ciry H¢!I TeZephone.� 651266-8710 15 WuiKe7loggBlvd. F¢csimile.� 65/ 298-5619 Saint Paul, Minneroia 55102 , September 16, 2002 Aand Delivered Nancy Anderson Council Secretary 310 City Hall 15 West Kellogg Blvd. St. Paul, IvTN 55102 Re: Resolution memorializing the City Council's decision to deny the appeal of the Rev. Oliver White from a decision of the Heritage Preservation Commission denying a demolition permit for property located at 873 Portland Avenue (Grace Church). City Council Action Date: July 24, 2�Q2. Dear Nancy: Attached please find the signed Resolution memorializing the decision of the City Council to deny the appeal of Rev. Oliver White from a decision of the HPC which had denied a demolifion permit application for property located at 873 Portland Avenue on 7une 27, 2002. Please place this resolution on the City Council's Consent Agenda at your earliest convenience. If you have any quesrions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, �,�1✓�/.�-_. Peter W. Warner Assistant City Attorney PWW/rmb Enclosure OFFICEOFLCENSE,INSPECTTONSAND �� ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTlON Roger C. Curtia, Director CITY OF SAINT PAUL Randy G Kelly, Mayor LOWRYPROFESSIONAL BUILIDNG 350 St Peter Street Suue 300 Saent Paul, Minnuot¢ 55702-I510 Telephone.�612-2b6-90D1 Facsimile: 612-266-°°'^ oa - q �-t V57A3FaA �QS�?7^�; �:�;•.�,�?i Tuly 2, 2002 Ms. Nancy Anderson City Council Research Office Room 310 City Hal] Saint Paul, MN 55102 Dear Ms. Anderson: /'� "'� �� - ?� � I vi1L Q � �� I would like to confirm that a public hearing befare the City Council is scheduled for Wednesday, July 24, 2002 for the following heritage preservation case: Appellant(s): McClay Alton Attomeys on behalf of Grace Community Church File Number: D02-005 Purpose: Location: Staff : Commission Appeal of a Hexitage Preservation Commission decision denying a demolition permit application to raze the structure. 873 Portland Avenue (Grace Community Church, Hill Historic District) Recommended denial. Denied on a vote of 7 to 0. I have confirmed this date with the office of Counci] Member Jerry Blakey. My understanding is that this public hearing request will appeaz on the agenda of the City Council at your ear]iest convenience and that y'Cw. 7/:i. �)U�`IISt:IIC+'.C� O. u.� 1'i�flT77g lii i..Y:� Suiri: P?.L'I T eb'»I :.�u`�.°..`. 7�:2aIliCS� ' Please call me at 266-9078 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Amy Spong Aistoric Preservation Specialist CC: Council Member 7erry Blakey owner/applicant, Grace Community Church Roger Curtis, LIEP File sa:reui.�L� ' i omo4oasi . ��. - NOTICE QF PU6LIC �ARIlRG �-, 1he Sa3nt Paul Clty Coundl mlli con- duct a puhIIc hearing on Wednesdap, Juiy 24, 2ti02. at 5:30 g.m. in the Ctty Coundl CLambers, Third Fldor ,�City Hall- Courthouse, 15 Weat Kellogg.,Soulevard. Saint Paul. MN. to consldei tlieappeai of the Rawsey Hill Assoclarion and Others ta a decislon of the Board of Zoning Appeals �antlng four varlances in order to con- strvct a carr7age hovse sduture a[ 449 Portland Avenue. Dated_ Juty 10, 2002 - �'armERSON Bssistanf Ctty Cunnctt secretary � - , [Ju1915) " � � CI7Y OF SAINT PAUL Randy C. Kelly, Mayor July 18, 2002 Ms. Nancy Anderson City Council Research Office Room 310 City Hall Saint Paul, MN 55102 Dear Ms. Anderson: OFFICE OFLICENS$ lNSPECTIONSAND D �� ` �` ENVIRONMENTAL PROTEC770N Roger C Curtis, Director LOWRYPROFESSlONALBUILlDNG Telephnne:611d66-9001 350 St Peter Street Facsimile.� 611-266-9099 Suite 300 Sa�nlPauf, Mirsnesora 5�102-i510 I would like to confirm that a public hearing before the City Council is scheduled for Wednesday, July 24, 2002 for the following heritage preservation case: Appellant(s): McClay Alton Attorneys on behalf of Grace Community Church File Number: D02-005 Purpose: Location: Staff : Appeal of a Heritage Preservation Commissian decision denying a demaliuon permit application to raze the sirucYure. 873 Portland Avenue (Grace Community Church, Hill Historic District) Recommended denial. Commission : Denied on a vote of 7 to 0. I have confirmed this date with the office of Council Member Jerry Blakey. My understanding is that this public hearing request will appeaz on the agenda of the City Council at your eazliest convenience and that you will publish notice of the hearing in the Saint Paul Legal Ledger. Thanks! Please call me at 266-9078 if you have any questions. Sincerely, �� Amy Spong Historic Preservation Specialist CC: Counci] Member Jerry Blakey ownerlapplicant, Grace Community Church Roger Curtis, LIEP File CITY OF SAINT PAUL Randy C. Keily, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: City Councilmembers CC: Peter Wamer, CAO OFFICE OF LICENSE, (NSPECTIONS AND Q�..'" (�� ENVIRONMENTAL PRO"CECTION Roger C. Cunis, Direcfor IAWR}'PROFESSlONALSUILDING Telephorte:651-266-9090 350 St Perer Stree� Facsimife:657-266-9099 Sui[e 300 Saint Pau{ bfinneso[a 55101-li10 Roger Curtis, LIEP /� FROM: Amy Spong, HPC staff(,!.'�� RE: HPC appeal far 873 Portland Avenue, Hill Historic District DATE: July 18, 2Qa2 The following attachments highlight the events that have taken place and relate to HPC review of the permit application to raze the CrYace Community Church at 873 Portland in the Hill Historic DLStYZCI; ATTACHMENT 1(pages Al-1 to Al-) The appZication materials were submitted and include: AI-1 to AI-4 1) HPC application form with tetter from McClay Alton Attorneys Zisting supplemental infarmcztion. AI-5 to AI-46 2) Physicat Assessment Summary dated October 2001 and compteted by Krech, O'Brien, Mueller & Wass, Inc. (this report also includes photos, structural engineering analysis and historic inventory form). AI-47 to AI-49 3) Schematic drawings were submitted by Mendota Homes on what they would propose to buiZd there. AI-SO to AI-55 4) Current exteriar photos and a historic postcard when zt was the First Methodist Church, AI-56toA1-59 DuringtheHPCmeetingonJune27,2002theapplicanthandedoutaletter from SK&NEnvironmental and a letter from Manillo Womack&Associates. ATTACHMENT 2(pages A2-1 to A2-S) The HPC written order to the applicant is attached. The staffreport highlighted the main fzndings and recom»zended denial of the application. ATTACHMENT 3(pages A3-I to A3-6f The approved minutes of the June 27, 2002 public hearing meeting that addresses the hearingfor 873 Portland Avenue. � ��- � �, ATTACHMENT 4(pages A4-1 to A4-2) The request for an appeal by McClay Alton Attorneys on behalf of Grace Community Church is attached. ATTACHMENT 5(pages AS-1 to AS-6) Testimonies received in writing for the June 27 HPC meeting to supplement oral testimony. Se HT ' ' ' - � . �� ^ � � CITX OF ST. PAUL � HBRITAGP PRESERVATION COMMTSSIOti` GOOFFlC£ O? UCEVSt, ISSYECtlO\5 h�D E�'V IkO�MENiAL FRDTG4TIOS , _ � 350ST.PEfERSTRfELSU1TC$OJ -. - AAAA � " �sr.eeu�nm�vfsornssioxas�o �- - � - - _ _ _ - , . .. K'WW.LISTPA61ht\.GS2f[P-_ ' . AEMOLITION PER11I't APPLICATIOi�� , This application must be compleYed in addition to the basic demo]ition permit application if the affected property is an individual:; designated landmark oc located within an historic district. This application must b: accompanied by pl�otographs showing all fa: ad;; of flie struch�re and surrounding arzas (no Yolaroid pictures). For applications which must be revizwed by the HerStage Preser��at�on Commission refer to the HPC b4eetfng schedulc for mzz±ing dates and dzadiines. Incomplete or late Demolition Permits �� ill not bc rez�ietived. ADDI2ESS OF AFFECTED PROPER7'Y: g-� 3 �y�, y �t�, _ f/^� „// _ S J a (- �"°`.(X� (�i"�fc PI20JECT DESCRIPTIOA': �4ill any fedeial moaey be used in this project? XES NO 7� Are yon appl yin� for the InvesMtent Tax Crzdits? YES_NO�/ _ Is this request foc complete or partial demolition? ' ' G� �t.� I-Q � ..� �,, (,c. � . o'v� If partial demolition, please dzscribe as accuratety as possible and submit dra« in� illustrating areas to be dzmolished. (Attad; zd;iniona} sheet5 if necessary.) Describe tl�e cmidition of the structm�e. Be specific a!id use photo�raphs to illus[rate areas of deterioration. �� tA. t �� tl'-� � SLU�:� R.w'�'¢ cf rJ.G�cs � 9f �� p�L f!�-�.,J 1 n,�- �ee�e. . �U Cpv� {- E-e.�-2 �'� '"rnG.�.n.�u-�-+'i '}'� �I �W �-B�� ff�-- !.e- � ' � Gw�� R�r� �is a�-�,.�.0 ��z_ lican,l� �1� . j3 c,,,,,f�-..- <,I,w�.,�� b.e �.-,.,�� f i sc,� G � ��a� �� ( � o �4n-.-_ ��"�- -- � a ''^ , „- � 'y�,,. ' � � w o u. t � c o . �- , ! � �S� O o�+ � � a o �- �{ o � v, aa v.{�ai2 C� °�rl�/� lLQ7t � t/c!� t o-y� . State your reasons for requestin� the demolmon of the structure. Plzase b: clzzr, conctse, and specific. CG-� -+ia 1 � (,c-�- a.��`- a 7 � �rvru.�,i tu-�-.� �.ca� �., ---- 1 �Ru.�z � c�rz..�4�-e��-u. � cr/� � �S�S �s-� �K F ��re 'Sa n.Q- ) �'Gu-i-z- c� C��^"'� {�-JL fJ a! c.t� a� o t�— s C.c-ctio � P rcoP�.�.�..-�.- . � �utime zn� proposed fiiture uses foi' the site. Pieas: indicate a time,line on ��hen tnr>e im rove ents �� ill occur. � g�.u. ��;�,,� s li..� �� b� a(.�o (, s��-�� -� �/L tZe s r�, � ay ��-�o s.�- , the undzrsio ed, understand that the Demolition Permit App]ication is limitzd to the aforementioned �vork to thz a: �ec��d ropert}�. I further understand that any zdditional exterior �cork to be done undzr m;� o�vnership must be submitted b. pplication to the St. Paul Herita�e Presen-ation Commissioik An} unauthorized �� ork wi11 be required to be remo� �� ignaturz ofapplicant ��/� , f��" Date: � O Igt�ature of o�vne��,�(,Q �Iyn�� C pate: $ p �'r' aa �a.\ MSCIfiY . ALTON, Pt.�.P arroarvEYs ROSERT M. NLCLAY BRIAN D. ALTON* *Also Licensed in Wismnsin June 12, 20�2 Amy Spong City of St. Paul Heritage Preservation Commission C/o O�ce of License, Inspections, and Environmenta{ Protection 330 St. Peter Street Suite 300 St. Paui, MN 55102-1510 Re: Grace Community UCC 873 Portland Avenue Dear Ms. Spong: 951 GRAND AVENUE Sf. PqUL, MN 55105 FAX 651 /290-2502 email: law@mCday-aito n. co m 65 7 l290-0301 The enclosed information is to supplement the Demolition Permit Application which was filed by Rev. Oliver White on May 9, 2002. On behalf of Grace Community United Church of Christ, please find the following: 1. Physicai Assessment Summary dated October 1, 2001 prepared by Krech, O'Brien, Mueller and Wass, Inc.; 2. One fult-sized set of drawings of a proposed development for the site; 3. One 8/2 x 11 set of drawings; 4. LIEP Demolition Permit Application; 5. Recent photographs of the building; 6. An undated postcard photograph. Please consider the following information in consideration of the application of Grace Community UCC. The church has reached the difficult conclusion that it cannot use the church in its present condition, it cannot afford to repair and restore the building, and there is no use to which the building can be put. The enclosed report indicates that just to do the defined "critical work° on the building could cost as much as $880,000.00. This does not include stabilizing and enhancing the building's exterior, providing any site improvements including parking, providing any interior functionai improvements, and interior aesthetic improvements. The building contains asbestos, mofd, outdated electrical and piumbing systems, an originaf oil-burning furnace which has been converted to gas, a lack of ��Z Amy Spong June 12, 2002 Page 2 of 3 tia-�a�� handicap accessibi4ity, no insulation, a{eaking roof, no fire alarm or sprinkler system, and significant exterior structural deterioration. The church does not have the money to do the necessary work on the building. The report enclosed is quite optimistic about the ability to save the buifding, but oniy if there is the money to do so. Whereas, the church would prefer that the structure not be demolished, no practical alternative exists. Even if the funds could be borrowed to do the critical work, there is no way to repay the borrowed funds and there would be no additional money to do any additional improvements. The church needs to preserve its resources in order to fulfill its mission of ministry to its community. In contrast, the proposed new structure would be as multi-family housing with 21 units. The property is properly zoned for housing and would be compatible with the uses in the surrounding area. Please refier to the enclosed drawings for one particular rendering. The renderings are not intended to duplicate the existing church, but are intended to be respectful of the existing structure and to honor that building. It is proposed that the new building would incorporate certain architectural eiements of the existing buiiding and reuse some of the stained-glass windows. The church has located an alternate facility, but it is in severe need of funds in order for the congregation to survive. It has been fortunate to have the benefit of the generosity of donors. However, the commitment of the donors has now expired. The church has made a significant effort within the faith community to find a user for the building as a place of worship. �hat was not possibfe. The sources with which the church conferred include a real estate broker with experience in buying and selling church property, and other resources within the faith community. No potential user was identified. As to the reuse of the building, there are no estimates for the cost to renovate it for commercial uses. Several factors make its use as a commercial facility impractical, if not impossible. There is no market for a building with an enormous sanctuary, no parking, no air conditioning, all of the critical work necessary, and no potential revenue. Even so, several brokers were contacted. None of them expressed any optimism that there is any market for any reuse (other than housing} or any abifity to be able to economical�y do the work necessary. /Et- 3 Amy Spong June 12, 2002 Page 3 of 3 a a- `�a� If the buiiding is demolished and a similar structure which respects the architecture of the existing building is reconstructed, there would be a positive efFect on the neighborhood. The immediate adjacent properties, inciuding the law school, a church and the fire station woufd not be impacted at all. The residential use would be consistent with the other adjacent property. In conclusion, Grace Community Church has concluded that there is no practical way that the church can continue to use the property and no viabie reuse. The church has consulted with brokers, other professionals, and potential buyers. No other option exists. In order to be able to serve its mission and fulfill its obligation to its parishioners and the community, it is necessary to request the demolition permit be approved. Please do not hesitate to call me or Rev. White if you need additionai information. We fook forv✓ard to meeting wifh the Heritage Preservation Commission on June 27, 2002. Very truly yours, �1 , , 1 , Brian D. Alton :�_ , cc: Rev. Oliver White. �� 7 '. � � � � � � � � A A � � � ? � q � � :1( a ■l � N � � � � � � � � w � � s �� .� � i .■ KRECH, O'BRfEN � � �■ MUELLER $c WASS, INC. Architecture a Structure ■ Interiors ■ Construction Management / _�, :� .� -_,�, . -. :,: T= �.- :_: i:'.;�:��"'�'��'�� ''�3;,�:- .. , �;,,, � 3�,� ,:�,,.:+_ � _,�<�3� � � ,�,�, 7 - � � � s {"i3��Pi�'��i - ,=��,i , ; �;.r iZ ��,� 3 a' _ ,....;�;,;:;;'� � .�.�j � -.,, � ��- � 1"� � � B � � � � � � � � � � � � � C � � � �� i1 � � � � � � � ■■ KRECH, O�BRIEN, �� J.. :. _ �:`;�`.,,_ , __� '- "� . �. i: I =J. 1 October 2001 Mr. David Plumb c% Coldwell Banker Bumett Realry 4705 Cedar Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55407 Dear Mr. Plumb and Reverend White, M H� WASS, INC. .,., `,' \ � !. _ . . •, iI ,,, � . .. L • . . 1 .. ., . � a- �� Reverend Oliver Wlute Grace Community United Church of Christ 873 Portland Avenue St. Paul Minnesota 55104 Included herewith is our Physical Assessment Summary for Giace Community United Church of Christ. The contents include four sections addressing each of the requested services, followed by an Appendix. The goal of this Document is to provide you with factual information and professional opinions to aid you in making � decisions about the future of the church building. A summary of the four sections aze as follows: Define and review progrunming aoals and 'es The building has adequate space available for the Missioas to function and aliow for some gmwth. Physical improvements are required or desired throughout the building which will enhance a!! of the Missions' effectiveness. The buildin� in the lar�er commua� The building is an asset to the larger community, The 5t. Paul Heritage Preservaiion Commission has designated it in the Summit Historic District. They witl in-part guide any exterior improvements and are opposed to building demolition. The City Planning and Economic Developmeat (PED) office supports limited site development including new paz3dng, Establish a budget for critical work The cequired work for basic building maintenaace and to bring it up to ,. current regu(atory and industry standards is substantial, though not unreasonab►e given iu size, age and lack of proper maintenance. Given the preliminary nature of this assessment, we estimate a budget for this work behween $590,000 and $880,000. We have atso provided work alteraates for your information. h;vatuate the budget and ministcv relative to other existinE facilities We have considered two altemates for the ministry; Lease or purchase an cxisting building w3uch is similar in size and design progtarn to the existing. Costs associated with this option should be obtained through the real estafe industry. The second alteinate is to lease or purchase an empty warehouse type space and provide a buIId-out designed for the specific ministry needs. We estimate a budget €or the build-out work between $755,000 and $1,135,000. Significant financial resources for the ministry have not appeared with any clarity, however in addition to present and conventional commercial support methods, one possible source is through the City PED Star Grant progrnm. If you have any questions regarding the contents of this document or would like more informatioq please do not hesitate to contact me or Brian Wass of our office. Thank you for the oppoitunity to provide this service to you! Sincere]y, �� t stephen pederson � Krech, O'Brien, Mueller and Wass 1nc. f�! ^ �O � � � �1 � � a� � � � � � Grace Community Chucch of Christ, St Paut , Physical Assessment Summazy, 10. LO l, Page 2 of 9 Grace Commuaity Oaited C6arc4 ot Cdrist, St Pani Physical Assessment Summary 101.01 1 Programroing goa{s and strategies: A. Objective: oa-�a` Review the existing and anticipated ministries of the church and the physical needs Fepresented by those. Compare this information with the existing building and potential for physical change. B. Information: 1. C6urch Mission Statement: (from church documenu) � Grace Community C6urch is dedicated to aileviating suffering caused by instihrtional cacism. It secves as a refuge and forum to satisfy the deepest yeamings of all oppressed people. It seeks to serve the Living God, not idols and emotions ofhumanlcind. "Ihe church building (sLall) create a place that invites community, solace and hope. Church Mission Programs provide for: Inspiraiion; Christian Educadon; A&ican and A&ican-American history: Sancwary for Displaced Residen[s; ,. Opportunities for Persooal Growth; Activities and Guidance for ai Risk Youth and Famiiies. � 3. Mission Program Space: (Notc. ALZ dimauiav und ur«u aie cpprad,n�e! "SF."is ° sqrrarajoot°a Site and Building Qverview: � The site is 145' x 145' with an alley to the north, street to the east and south, and residence to the west. A yard, ' which is raised about 3 feet above street level, surrouads the building with open space on the north and south. There is no off-street parking. Tlae building footprint is ?3' x 112', (inctuding a large Portico, minus the axterior � stairs), with a 12' x 42' appendage at the aorth. A small basement houses mechanical systems. The Lower Level is approximately at street elevation and includes an Auditorium flanked by Classrooms and Offices, a Youth/Community Room, and a Kitchen. Two intermediate floors include one Restroom each, and a Side Building Entry. The Main L.evel is I S' above the Lower Level and includes the Sanctuary, Narthe�c, (accessed via the Portico), Secretarial Office, Pastora( Office, West Meeting/Class Room and a Kitchen. The Upper Levei is 12' above the Main Level and includes the Sanctuary BaYcony and undefined OfficesiClassrooms. Large and small Storage areas exist at numerous Tocations throughout the building. Total building size is estimated at 9000 S.F. at Lower Levels, 76Q0 S.F. at Main Leve]s, and 3300 S.F. at Upper Levels or 19,900 S.F. total. N.wasau�nyva� n.,x,�,.au s� io-�.oi.a« KRECH, O� BRIEN, MUEILER 8c WASS, k�- �- ■■ �NC. ■■ -R i � �� A � � � � � � � � Grace Cuttununity Chunch of Christ, SC Pau! . q Pfiysical Assesmxnt Summary, t0.1.01, Page 3 of 9 ��' 1�\ There is a strong interest in being responsible to the physical gifts that God has given the congegation. Relative to the building and site, ihis includes 9eaming about conservatioq sustainability, personal responsibiliry for living spaces, gardening and respect for the earih.' (See Appendix item A.) Mission Space Specifics: Inspiration: Program activity primarily takes place in the Sanctuary on Sunday momings. This is ihe only activity that routinely uses the main building entry. The Sanctuary is 5600 net S.F. including stageJaltaz, circulation and a large balcony, which ss accessed via the Narthex. It is 28' high beyond the ba3cony with a domed and coffered ceiling. Seating is estimated at 475. It is inspiring and large enough for community oriented events. The congregation has been as lazge as over 300 people, however it presently fluctuates firom about SO to 100 people. The worsiup and message are structured, motivating, relaAonship building, liberal, and affirming. The musica! group is small and utilizes contemporaty instruments. Ideally the Sanctuary would be provided with flexible means to create relatively intimate setting(s) for 50 to 200 occupants. Christian Education: This Program is presenUy minimal in activity. As it occurs, it is primarily in the West Meetiag/Class Room, (320 net S.FJ and the lower level Youth/Community Room, (S50 net S.F.). There are severa! other spaces tbat could be used for this activity as it is developed; however most of them aze in need of updating. � African and African-American History: Most of this Prograrn activity takes place in the West Mceting Room or is integrated into the other mlaistries. It does not occupy its own space Ueyond that required for dispiay aad azchiving of related infom�ation; this space couid be enhanced. Sanctuary Eor Displaced Resideats: This Progam activity takes piace primarily in the Auditorium, the flanking rooms, and the Restrooms from 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. Minimal food services are brou�t in. The physical space available to this program is adequate but in need of updating, primarily to the Restrooms and the Kitchen so nutrition programs could be developed for the entire church. Opportunities for Persoual Growth: This Program activiry takes place in several locations in the building. It is generally integrated into the other missions and is on-going through much of the week. In addition, it also utilizes the south outdoor yard and includes field trips to mu]tip]e locations and activities with related outreaches to the community. Activities and Guidance for at Risk YoutL and Families: Activities and related spaces for this Program are similaz in nature to Opportunities for Personal Growth. Other; Administrative and limited other activiries, functions and relatecl use of spaces exist within the church. Approximately 700 net S.F. of the upper level is rented to the Masonic Lodge, and the NAACP has a small office in the Lower Level. The present quantity of toilet facilities is adequate for the Missions, however the Women's coun[ is not compliant with current code for the Sanctuary. In addition, the Displaced Residcnts Mission may �:ma7�nanr�n�mansw.my �o-�-o� e« t�� 8 ■■ KRECH, O'BRIEN, MUELLER 8c WASS, INC. �� .�-- � � crace commwwury cnumh oecnris� sc paa! . � Physicai �t Siw�mazy, IO.I.OI, Page 4 of 9 »� � � o a °��-� � desire additional facilities including showers. There is no area in the buitding or gounds which is readily � accessible to wheelchair-bouad individuals. (See Appendi7c C J � C. Summaty: � AIl of the intended missions appear to have adequate space available to function, tfiough some could benefit from � � � � � � � � � � � � �. � � � .. i , � � addmonal space. However, the access to, and envuonment of ti�e spaces is limiting all of the Missions' effectiveness. Some spatial restructuring has been discussed and should be formally proposed and documented in conjunction with a circulation stndy. Wtule there may be a minor loss of space due to certain inefficiencies in building design, the only space which appears to be significandy larger thw required by its Mission is the Sanctuary; tfiough its size could be an asset to other programs and the larger community. (See Appendix for additionai comments and recommendationsJ N^Aw+me� s�m,.y �o-i.oi.aa K R E C H, O' B ►�� i � ■■ �� n P ! �� F P P P� � � � � � � � , , � � �� , 4 � � � � � � � 1 � Gcace Communiry Chunch of Chris� SC Paut q Physicul Assc.smxnt Summary, I0. i.OI, Page 5 of 9 � a— �`�\ 2. Tde targer Cammunli�: A. Dbjective: Define the larger community that affects and is affected by the church and identify the significance of the building to tbat community. B. Information: Beyond the worshiping congregatioq the Mission of the church is to the larger community. Its location and building both affects and is affected by the Mission. While the building may not be ideal in every sense for any one of the Missions, it was origivally designed for, and has functioned for a specific purpose which is not substantially different firom its current use as Grace Community. The church recognizes thai the continual demographic s}ufts of the City are largely uncontrollable by them, wlule every physical move of its building causes a disruption to its Missions and the congregation. Thus the predominant sense is that it needs to remain where it is, or possibiy move to a similar neighbo�fiood closer to downtown St. Paui where it would remain for the long term. The Missioas are supported in several ways by other church and civic individuals and bodies who see the fruit they produce but may not have the physical sgace or organizaLion to provide similar activities; thus the 6uilding and its physicai needs should be of significant concem to the Missioas' supporters_ The building is also of azclutectural and iustoric significance. It speaks to the strength and thus necessity of the Missions as it has demonsuated a continual, pmminent presence in the community for almost a century. It is recognized and protected by the St. Paut Aeritage Preservation Commissioss, (HPC), a� a significant struchue in the Summit Historic District. The HPC has indicated they aze opposed to any significant building demolition and their requirements wiil in-part guide the excerior improvements. As a quasi-public buitding with a large and aesthetically img�essive gathering space, the church is a benefit to the City beyond the Missions. As a church prociaiming to be a`beacon of hope', it seeks to be a good neighbor and improve the community and is generally well received by many of its neighbors. There ue however, potential conflicts over lack of parking and the building's negative appearance from lack of maintenance. The City Planning and Economic Development {PED) office has indicated an appreciation for the buiiding aad its Missions. They also have noted that future site development, (whether for the church, or if ever demolished in the future, as an empry pazcel), wilt be limited by cucrent gove�nment regulations. They woutd howevec support new parking, maintenance items, and aesthetic improvements. C. Summary: The building is cleady an asset W the church and the lazger community, though determining to what eactent is subject to ma�y conditions and opinions. While the aetivities of the Missions aze presently supported in part by outside resources, there is an ever-increasing need to provide financial assistance W update the Missions' building. N��m�ev�y,�t as.amm� s�m�wy io-�-o�.a« KRECH, O� BRtEN, MUELLER 8c WA55, �1 I 4 ■■ � N c. ■■ �-�-- � Grace Community Chutch of Ctuist, SC Paul physical Assessmen[ Summmy, lO.tA l, Page 6 of 9 3. Critieai Wotk: o�-�a� A. Objective: Define ihe priority of physical work for the site and building and establish a budgd for ik (NOTEt Bacmue ojuu prdi�n'urary nanvc u jrk;s �cw,�na �trtk �nae, of rernedwl xvrk rhe 6udgd stimates Acei+r wncu be rnusidnedxvkin a range ofa minimum aj[+/-j 20 %! WhcesuPPO1�8Pro8� lnjormdiott ir nd cwrattly aym7abk tu ddmnu�e a brsdgeS tlre mnoun[ indcded is b�ed ort XOb1W's recanniotded program. ) B. Information: Information is highlighted in item 1. above and in the Appendix. Based on this, the following priorities were established: 1. Stabilize the building shell: (see Appendix item D.) Scope of proposed worfc includes: a. Remove the existing roof dowuspouts; b. Remove existing roof finishes and repair substrucnire; c. Rebuild the gutter and downspout system; d. Reshingle the pitched roofand replace tLe flat roofr; • e. ResLape grade azound the building for proper dsainage. Budget estimate for construction and professional and reiated services: S135,000 2. Update the electrical service and system. * Scope of proposed work includes: a. Provide adequate and updaied service for items 3. and 5. below, aad for all Lower I.evel ProBrant SPaces and uses; b. Alleviate any hazardous conditions caused by the existing system including possible light fixture PCBs; c. Make minor improvements to exiscing lighting to eohance ministries; d. Provide fue alatm system. e. Provide altemate for updated service for a!I Main and ITppec I.evel progtam spaces and uses except foc Sanetuary and Ilarthex. Budget estimate for items a. ttuu d. construction and professional and related services: Budget estimate for alternate item e. construction, professiona! and related services: 5105,000 $35,OOQ 3. Update the mectianical systems. ' Scope of proposed work includes: a. Provide adequate and new or updated HVAC and plumbing service for all program spaces and uses, zoned to accommodate the significant daily fluctuations of occupancy; includes kitchen hoods; b. Altemate to a'u-condition the Offices and Meeting/Classrooms on the Main and Upper Floors; c. Altemate to air-condition the Lower Level; d. Altemate #* to sprinkler entire building, (new water main in item 3.a. above); e. Finished enclosure of new ducts and equipment where required for safety, and where aesthetically most desirable and feasible. Budget esticnate for item a. constcuction, professional and related services: $290,000 Budget estimate for altemate item b. construction, professional and related services: $15,000 Budget estimate for altemate item c. constmction, professional and related services: $20,000 Budget estimate for alternate item d. construction, professional and related services: $80,000 ** tt:en3av n.we.,nc s�mowr io-t.oi ea KRECH, O' BRIEN, MUELLER Hc WASS, . �t� � � ■ ■ INC. �� !'� �� A � � � y � � � � � � � h , � � �� ., � � � � � � Gmce Commwtity Church of Chris� SL Paul Physical Asse��t Swnmary, f 0.1.01, Page 7 of 9 *' (Building Sprinklers will likely be requued to accommodate sleeping in the building.) 4. Update Restroom facilities.' Scope of proposed work includes: a. Remodel two existing toilet moms for handicap accessibility including new finishes; b. Alternate for two shower rooms with two bays and two sinks each. �� , Budget estimate for item a. construction, professional and related services: $25,000 Budget estimate for altemate item b. construction, professional and related se�vices: $40,OQQ 5, Provide elevator and related modifications to circulation to provide bandicap access to all major progcam areas in the building. Budget estimaie for construction and professional and related sen+ices: $120,000 6. Further work ' items inc(ude: , a. Stabilize and enhance the building exterior. Initial goals include: 1. Consider implicaliops of removing brick veneer and deteanin�mplement possible coucse(s) of action; 2. Replace or repair damaged or deficient windows and doors; 3. Repiace or repair wall flashing, plaster, stucco and finishes; 4. Repair east steps. b. Provide on site park'sng and related site improvements, i.ocation should be coordinated with circuSation study but is initially proposed for the north side of fl�e building, utilizing the ailey as an access drive. c. Provide interior functional unprovements including any (remaining) spatiat reconfigurations and kitchen equipmeut. d. Provide interior aesthetic improvemenss. (KOMW advises the developmenY of schematic design plans incorporating cutrent bnilding circulation and anticipated spatial changes be provided before proceeding with all items except 1. above.) C. Summary: The building is stcucturally, uchitecturally and historically worth maintaining and improving. The minimum scope of work to make it acceptable to today's regulations and standards has an esdmated budget of $735,000; (includes base items 3.B. 1. to S. above and sprinklers). Though this work is substantial, it is not unreasonable given the building's size, age and lack of earlier maintenance. Little of the scope or cost of ihe required work is directly related to any unique tequirements of Grace Community's Mission. N:�nosampny.ad ns�rn� s�ry �ai-oi.a� i�M " �Z' KRECH, O� BRIEN, MUELLER $c WASS, �� I N c. ■■ ..�-�--- Gmce Community Chu�ch of Christ, St Pau] ' c� Physical Asse�nent Suawary, 10.1.01, Page S of 9 b� `\�--� 4. Haltdtng Alteroates: A Objective: Evaluate the physical needs of the ministry and the costs associated with it relative to other e�cisting facilities. B. Information: While the Missions could continue for some time with little work beyond she most critical items above, ideally the subsequent items and attemates would be implemented as soon as funds allow. Unless the scope of the Missions was significantly reduced, a change in them wouid not have significant impact on the scope or cost of the proposed work. Altemates to performing Uvs list of critical items include: Perform little or no work on the building. This course of action would eventually cause most of the Mission to cease &om functioning or force it to re(ocate as the building continues ta deteriocate. Move, aad selt or lease the building. The buyer or lessor would tikely be requ'ued to perform a similar schedule of work as oudined in item 3. above. If the Missions were to continue undec this optioq it would force their retocation. Assuming no existing church or similar structure could be found to rent, one altemate would be to build-ait a nondescript leasehold for this pucpose. The following ouUines a comparison ofcosts: Tota! square footage of the existing buitding is approximately 19,900 S.F. Assuming a more efficient building design, (possibly on one level) Urat area might be reduced to 18,400 S.F. With a programmed reduction in Sanctuary size, and omission of one kitchen, the net required program space is estimated at 17,200 S.F. Build-out is estimated at approximately S55/S.F. or $446,000 for 17,200 S.F. The cl3aracter of such space would be substantially different, notably the Sanctuary, which could not readily be replicated for any reasonable sum, and Lhe overail quality of finishes would be lower. Other issues to consider include location, availability of a yard, maintenance and operation costs, the benefits associated with ownerslup versus leasing, and other leasehold conditions. • C. Summcrry: Immediate costs associated with maintaining the continual use of the existing building are less than building-out a typical leasehold. These costs may however, be more than those required to modify a leasehold which is already oriented towards the Missions' requ'uements. Costs for the full upgrading of the existing building will likely rival building-out a typical leasehold. In addiuon to many practical issues beyond those listed, there aze multiple community, emotional, and sensory issues tfiat unpact a decisian to use one space over another. Particulazly for a church, ultimately the matte� should be a spiritual one. N.�aa�+aeM,;c.t nz.,cm..,,c s�y �a��oi.a« AI- I 3 ■■ KRECH, O�BRIEN, MUELLER 8c WA55. IN(' �� Grace Commuaity Chuich of Christ, St pau( • �Ya� �ent Sumcmry, 10.1.01, Page 9 of 9 5. Append#x: A. "A Vision ofMinistry" B. Photar C. PreliminaryBuildingAnalysis D. RoofAntrfysis E. Hisroric Site Survey w:'owao�eny.�� w�i swm�y� �ai-ot.ea (Reverend Oliver G. White) (KOMI� (KOMW and Pace EnBineerin8) (KOMW; edited) (St. Paul Heritage Preservation Commission) K R E C H, O' B R i E N, M U E L L E R 8c W AS 5 D a---°� a\ . �CI-i� ■■ INC �� - � . r� � - �� A Vision of Ministry for Grace Community United Church of Christ Prepared by Rev. Oliver G. White April 23, 2001 (MQdified Draft) b�-�a\ �i-IS o a--��-L SPeciat appreciation is owed for the generous assistance of Sister Ellen Hart-Shegos, who rved as my conscience axd scribe in the dwe[opment of this vision statemen� Ellen is devoted ember of Messiah Episcnpa! Church of Saint Paul, Minnesota �1-l� t� a--`� a-\. A VIS[ON OF MINISTRY FOR G12ACE COMMUrTITY UCC CHURCH Introduction: As we envision future capital inveshnents in the renovation of Grace Community Church, is it important to keep our vision for minishy uppermost in our minds. Upper most in our hearts, we want to draw people to Christ through our witness and through our work. We want to address the whole person. This is what we believe we have been called by God to do, and since the first day the congregation was formed, we have exercised nothing less than a tenacious wi11 to remain faithful to that wtuch gave birth to the vision, and the journey thus far. The active membership of Grace Communiry Church is made up of an ever- growing number of young African-American families. Several faznilies became active members as a result of having slept overnight in the church's shelter when they were displaced residenu. Because of the congregation's commitment to outreach to the `least of them,' included in this growt6 are former pirostituted women and their children. Other families come from a wide variety of lifestyles and professions. Until the attendance and active members}up numbers are significantly ]vgher, the congregation understands a major effort to expand the total program will be a continuous and active process. While there is an ever-present effort to place a high priority on the functional aspects of ministry, on a carefully administered organizational structure, on a systematic appmach to fund- raising and stewazdship, a higher priority is placed on relationships, on self-affirmation, on the importance of everyone's being able to call other members by names, on developing a network of supportive and dependable help to assist in caring for the many children of Grace Community . Church, on the rights and privileges of each individual being honored and respected, and on the � sincere welcome to be an active part of the total ministry. The following is a description of what we see as our calling and our vision. Grace Community Chutch has many assets, chief among them our unique membership, our spiritual values transmitted through custom, activitties, and worship, ow commitment to ministry and service, and our building located in the heart of a diverse and vibrant community. The members and supporters of Grnce Community Church aze joined by an extended faith community (the Minnesota Conference of the United Church of Christ) who is committed to responding to the widespread concems of those in great need. Our church building urges the membership to extend our commitment by creating a place that invites community, solace, and hope. Our worship is charged with the belief that desolate hillsides of victimization can be changed into mountains of victory! We grow and thrive together. VJe nourish each other just as we believe God nourishes each of us. Together we radiate in God's love. There is no timit to our potentiai for service. The following is the beginning of the dream. The church as a welcoming beacon �� The architecture is majestic, the location accessible. The columns make it stand out &om a distance as a place of importance. Its broad steps draw attention to its doors. However, in its � � 1 �) � �� oa--� al present state, ii speaks to nrin and decay, but with regairs, it couid be a bold statement for welcome and service. We imagine the doors leading to the narthex painted bright red to invite curiosity. Using the talent of loca! artists, the columns would be painted bright Afro-centric colors, announcing The strength and presence of the city's only African-American UCC congregation. The windows, gutters and stucco would be repaired or repiaced. A rusted cross sitting atop the A-frame roof would be restored and iliumined as a sign of comfort and hope. People would feel invited in, populaz, alive, and excited to be part of a gowing community of young families that are committed to making a difference. In keeping with the vision to make Grace Community Church a"community center," the buiiding wiil be accessibte to all. Eor those who travel to the church by caz, they will fuid a convenient pazking area ihat does not require them to compete with William Mitchell School of Law for street pazking. The front entryway of the church would have the Victoria Avenue steps repaired. The public sidewalks would be repaired. The Portland entryway would be paved and painted red, green, and black, the international color of people of tlfrican descent. The fence will be bordered with perennials and shrubs creating a beautiful welcome. Once in the building, regular worslvppers and guests would find interior spaces accessible via ramps and a small elevator. There would be no barriers to wotship and service spaces. In addition to the physical accessibility accommodations, Grace Community Chu�h would be available to the community 24 hoius a day. By phone, the community will be able to reach service ministries and/or the pastor after hours in a deep emergency. There would be a staff person or volunteer to accept emergency calls and a network of after-hours volunteers to respond to needs when progrdms are not in service. ., The interior spaces are cleaned and repaired, communicating a message of value, respect, and beauty. The sanctuary would invite wazmth, peace and solemnity. Artwork and murals throughout the building depicting the contributions and struggles of the African-American community as it worked to build this country and city. The art would be a living testament of the history, heritage, and honor that the church commemorates and fosters among members and supporters. . The sanctuary can seat 500 people and would be a great asset to the community to host forums similaz to those offered weekly by Westminster Presbyterian Church in Minneapolis. The lowez area would be updated to procnote the activities of the various ministries. Beginning with the stage, the auditorium would be rehabbed to allow for the production of plays, musical events, gublic presentations, community. meetings, and celebrations. Alongside the auditorium, the room bays wouid be cleaned up and tepaired. Each bay hosting program space, discussion groups, and art displays. The kitchen would be rehabilitated to allow for the preparation and serving of food and nutrition programs. Bathrooms would be renovated and expanded to serve the needs of a vibrant service commitrnent. The bathrooms would accommodate the needs of the congregation as well as those of the displaced residents who occasionally reside in the auditorium. Once you enter the building you see every comer hosting activity and ministry. The services are provided by the membership, neighborhood volunteers, faith community partners, local non /\�^ � � �a- �a\ profit organizations, and others interested in serving those wfiose potential has been untapped. The activity wou(d foster relationships and community among the o(d and young, the poor and privileged, and the dislocated with those who have the capacity to build housing opportunities. The environment would encourage personai commitment and learning. Grace Community Church is not interested in creating more programs and services — adding to the plethora of not for profit service organizations. Nor is Grace Community Chwch interested in creating programs that would compete with others for funding that is inconsistendy available. Instead, Grace Community Church wishes to create informal service partnerships with viable, effective, existing resources that have service missions compatible with the environment and impact Grace Community Church wishes to create in the community. Ministry to the Youth Grace Community Church wants to continue to reach out to youth who are at risk and come from families with very low incomes. These include those who are in the worst condition to cope with the new demands of the warkplace, those who have dropped out of school, those who are living on the lower rungs of the economic ladder. The ministry would offer at risk youth a reason and hope for living, as well as oppommities that would challenge them to read more, think of other options to solve problems, and develop strong self-esteem, being proud of who Shey are and their rich history which shaped and nurtured them. Because of the high incidents of pregnant teens, youth would learn about early cluldhood needs and parenting skills. Crrace Community Church would offer a community that would allow youth to network and support each other. Currently, Grace Community Church offers "Mother's Night OuY', as well as several other progtams that attempt to minister to young women already facing parenthood. They come together to p3ay bingo and in the process leazn about things like nutrition, parenting, managing budgets, and heaith care Gifts such as "�quilts, diapers, formula, infant clothes and toys are donated from severa] IJCC congregations. . Other programs offer counseling, discussion groups, and opportunities and programs where young parents gather to honor each other for achieving and managing higher goals. � Grace Community Church wants to help young people face the dangers of chemical D dependency and alcohol abuse. African-Americazi youth are the most at risk for these dangers, Q hence ihe congrega6on is obligated to be at the forefront in helping them avoid or deal with this � ever-present temptation. Also, Grace Community Church wants to counteract the ever-present 3 barrage of sexually expiicit movies, television images, materials, and music bombazding youth with a community that helps them sort out their decisions, avoid the dangers of early pregnancy and � AIBS, and respect each other as human beings, not as sexual objects. Many African-Americans abide in a state of constant urgency. As a community African- Americans rarely have time to sit and shaze leisurely for long periods. Youths are especially limited in their choices to gather. They need permission from pazents who are either unable to afford activities outside of the home; or parenu who are more inclined to deprive them because of the effort required to keep their children involved. They can't drive, nor can they congregate long before told to move along. In addition, a great number of African- American youth have rarely been allowed to experience positive adventures. They usually haven't experienced sleeping in a tent, �1-19 0 3-- �--` hiking a long wildemess irail, or being close to a horse or cow. Many of them have never traveled outside of Minnesota. Unfortunately, many youth are struggling to keep up with the demands previously placed on them by adults, such as combining school with work and pazenthood. They need to learn how to relax and network witti other young adults, but in a community that respecis, embraces, enjoys, and protects ihem. Grace Community Church has had some experiences in serving youth and launching programs that promote healthy experiences and choices. Recruiting youth has never been a problem. �r fae�, even w�ien pFO�s were nvt in session, youE�r wo+�k� gaEher in ar�d near the church as a place to congregate, ever-hoping that something for them would soon take place. But over tune, Yhe youth workers have found it difficuh to mainCain ifle votunteer poot necess�y to maintaining the commitment to staff and oversight. However, parhiership arrangements wiih strong community resources is now allowing Grace Community Church to expand these opportunities. A budget has been proposed for a paid position that ensures that progruvs and resources are well coordinated within the building. Grace Community Church would like to see an expanded E��Y � F�� a�,}ust �oa� t� i�ediai� c�uch fa�1y oc immediate community, but perhaps from all over the Twin Cities. Grace would like to see a one-to-one mentoring program, especially aznong men and boys. There should always be a strong male mle modei. In the young male mentoring program, males wili learn how to respect themseives, each other, and females as equats. Youth wouid be mentored to take responsibility for their community; to learn ways of respecting the environment and aeighhorh4nci- The rommunity ww�id learn about couservaiion, sussainabilitY, � P�� responsibility for their living spaces. Grace Community Church would respond with opportunities ta teach abaat co�nnauity gazc}emng aad mrtritioa, part of the groau�s has beea set aside for .; gazdening and leaming how to respect the eazth. Youth would be encouraged to experience some level of post secondary education. The youth Teaders will collaborate with The Academy of Higher Leaming to sponsor two annuat college �P� �� ' 3Q Afncan-American soghomores and junior� Academic achievement, no matter what tevel or age of student, will always celebrated and recognized. The youth leaders will continue to reaeh oen to �oeat sehoots and educatiomal s2epport prograrns arn} invite tlreir resources onsite. Youth will also be exposed to technical schools to encourage those who are not college bound to deveIop trade skiIIs for empToyment. The youth would be introduced to the arts. They would be exposed to a variety of cultural events and the traditiQns of Afro-centric music and arts. Youth wnuld 6e exgosed ta,}azz, dance, painting, photograph, vocal and chorale music. There would be academic programs teaching about the va�ere o€ �ce a�s. "F�ps waetid be p�annec! to expose them to ttze Seienee Musetun, Ekeaters, and a variety of local resources. Grace church could become an employment access point. Local empIoyers could post job openings at Grace. Youth would have access to support services that teach and prepare them for the wocld of work and how to get ansl keep a job. Employecs would seek Gcace chuich applicants �� w A A �� w * o �- °� a�� because they would be confident in the quality of the workers and their commihnent to reliability and quality_ Fotential Partners(Collaborators/Advisors: 11� New Beginnings Center (Devin Miller) � Ellen Burrows (formerly with the Inner City Youth League � Penumbra Theatre (Lou Bellamy) Council on Black Minnesotans (Lester Collins) � Macalester Coliege (Mahmoud EI Kati) � Oxford Pool (James Robinson) � St. Paul Public School (Barbara Harris, Delores Henderson, Mary Ma6ry?) Higher Academy of Learning (Bill Wilson) w YWCA - Linda Garret Johnson � � s 4 � � A rt � � e y � � � �l Community Leadeis (Victoria Davis, Ora I.ee Pattezson, Khalig Davis) St. Paul City Council (Jerry Blakey) St. Paul Police Department (Chief Charies Finney) Breaking Free (Vemita Catter) Survival Skills, International (Dr.Geraldine Carter) Ministry to the Elderly African-American seniors are a particulazly isolated group. They tend not to have access to the senior pmgrams that cater to the more affluent They may not drive, or know and many do not know anyone with a car. They represent a group thaY has the least access to computers and the Internet. The Intemet could open a whole world that they never contemplated existed. The building, if accessibility issues are resolved, is very suited to offer computer training for seniors. 'Grace Community Church would also be a place to prepare them for how to live, nther than how to die. There would be a number of social opporiunities: senior dances, bingo, dirmecs, community discussions, activities with the youth. They woutd be encouraged to exercise, learn more about good health practices, have their blood pressure checked, and be engaged in sharing their fears and distress. In addition to the social networking oppornwities there would be an exposure to the arts, like with the youth. They would be encouraged to offer their personal histories and be a part of sharing traditions and the heritage of African American leadership and citizenship. Grace church would work with local nursing homes and develop joint programming to bring seniors oui into the community rather than isolated in theu rooms. Presendy, there is no African- American church specializing in service to seniors in St. Paul. The congregation could do a great deal through outreach and pastoral caze to those who are traditional shut in, in addition to strengthening their own hearts as a result of ofFering the special gifts of love and care to the forgotten. Potential Partners/Coliaborators/Advisors: Hallie Q, Brown Center (Theartis Williams) Urban League (Willie Mae Wilson) �f^� ...-��--- I�R � � � � � � � � � c�- -°� �-� Model Cities (AngelaWeich} Ministry to Displaced People T'he congregation's commitrnent to the homeless wilt continue to be its central ministry. Grace Community Church was the first congregation to open its doors and to say `�es" to ihe St. Paui Area Council of Churches when Project Home was created. Hence the first shelter was established in the auditorium. Two to three times a year, the congregation offers the auditorium to the gowing number of disglaced residents who cannot find shelter in overcrowded county facilihes. As primary back up shelter one monih, and then as secondary back ug sheiter tha next, Grace Community Church has become intimately familiaz with the piight of those who are displaced in our community. More than 2,000 homeless men, women, and children have slept in the auditorium since January 1498. Many of Grace Community Church's newest members have been invited &om the shelter. Their presence in the congcegation reminds a!1 that they are just one paycfieck away from being displaced themselves. It is a hutnbling ministry that keeps the core of the Gospel close at hand. - Grace Community Church would like to do more in service to displaced people. We envision assisring more with access to support programs that aid in attaining and maintaining employmea� We woutd like to support community efforks to build more affordabie housing. We would like to maintain aa advocacy and referral service to ensure families access the resources to wlrich they are entitied. A strong commitrnent wiil remain to help families find permanent housing. This is a very difficult objective given the tremendous housing crisis in our community. However, when ,successfiil, Grace Community Church will offer ongoing pastoral and outreach contact to families to ensure their hansition into a new community is smooth and to maintain contact with them as parishioners. The ouheach would include challenging famiiies to manage budgets and take personal responsibility for their mie as renters. Gnce Community Church is aligned with Margaret Lovejoy, formerty of the St. Paul Area Council of Churches. Ms. Lovejoy is local advocate who has received funding to develop day shelters for families so that they will have some place to go to during the day when ihe evening shelters aze closed. This is especially needed by families with young children, and those who have children coming from school, and are currently dropped off at the Dorothy Day center. It could be a place that offer a place to nap children, bath and launder clothes, have a day time meal, and time with social workers who can k�roker access to services through specia] transportation and advocacy resources. Most displaced people aze people of color, with the majority African American, Grace church could be a place of pride and ownership to ihose who have no place to call their own. The art, people, activity, and sanctuary could bring peace and hope to these families. The commitment to rehabbing the building wiil be critical and immediately needed. If Grace church can not be the place for the day shelter, it woald like to support the efforts io make it happen. �j- ZZ � 2--"� �-\ Working with disglaced geople offers an oppornuuty to expand Grace's outreach to include a mentoring minisuy. The families who have slept in the auditorium are generally not there because of a single bad incident, but rather because they have a iife history of poor choices or oppression like addictions, atcoholism, prostitution, and violence. Preaching and wors4up servic.�s atone will not eliminate these challenges. Ii wili require parishioners and others to work together to demonstrate or mentor life-changes. The mentoring invo3ves leaming how to take care of their health and their children's. How to value good diets, exercise. How to access appropriate medicat care. How to take care of their surroundings. This wil] require a community of volunteers, partriers, and parish lay ministers. It must be work that is shared by a team of committed people. Potential ParhiersiCollaborators/Advisors: Vernita Carter, Breaking Free Margaret Lovejoy, formerly SG Paul Area Council of Churches Ron Hubbs Leaming Center ]udge Wilson Model Cities (Beverly Hawkins) General Mills (Retha Clazk King) Summary If you were our guest on a Sunday moming, you would be welcomed and encouraged to participate in ail that we have to offer in our celebration of God's goodness. From simpie prayers, to joyful hymns, to jubilant dancing, to speaking in tongue, to elegant sermons, to serene and divine ^inoments, this is who Grace Community Church is, and our celebrations is a part of our African- American heritage, which we affirm proudly. Our challenge as leaders of this congregation is to give our youth tkat which we inherited from our ancestors...a personal sense that God is always there...listening with love and forgiveness and ready to bless us. We believe our many of our youth aze spiritually and historically deprived. Too many of them don't know who or whose they are. While we are quick to fall on our knees in prayer for them, we must be just as quick to stand up for them and develop a ministry that includes their needs as a priority. Last summer I had the privilege of perfomung a wedding for a close friend in our sanctuary. It was in the middie of a very bright, sunny August afternoon. Slowly the lower levei of the sanctuary filled up with approximately 200 young people. The sounds of babies being held by young pazents were coming from almost every pew. Most of the wedding guests were African- American, perhaps twenty or so were white. Many were dressed in bright Afro-centric colors and agpazel. The atmosphere was chazged with joyful anticipation. It was indeed one of my best weddings. I was fiuther blessed by the wedding when the new bridge and groom invited me over to their apartrnent to look ai a video of the wedding. I wasn't aware that the wedding had been recorded. The sight of the pews being filled with young, happy families, and the sig6t of ine per€orming a ministerial function for a happy young couple allowed me to see the already in the not /41- Z3 � A�' �A � � � � A�! � � � � � � � � � � � � � �� 9 1�2--�a yet. It was a profound sight. I now know what this congregation wili appear like in God's own ame. Aiso, I know God is preparing us for it now. I am forever gratefui to the following leaders, who have labored and prayed at my side_ Frances Goodlow is one of sixteen charter members who helped found Grace Community Church in June 1490. She has served as Church Council President all but 18 months of the church's existence. Her love for Grace Community Church, respect for her position as the representative of the laity, and honor and friendstrip of the minister makes her especiatly suited for her high responsibalities. Ms. Goodlow is gifled with the ability to tap into a lisiener's heart as she expresses her sincere love for the ministry and vision of the church. Trumanue Lindsey, Senior Deacon, nor his family, looked back since the fust day tfiey worshipped at Grace Community Church ten years ago. He has grown in faith, and has developed into a solid and rather inspiring worship leader. In his heart he longs to be an evangelist, and deliver messages of hope to those who have made their lives on the streets. It is the obligation of Grace Community Church to support his vision, and call to the minisiry, as it is also part and parcel of the congregation's vision to reach out and pmvide solace, comfort, and hope to tfie least. Gioria Little, Youth Leader, a tireless worker. 230 other member of Grace Community Church works harder than Gloria Little to maintain a viable youth ouhrach and Church School despite the ir issues she face in terms of limited funds and lack of a steady stream reliable of adult supporters. As much Ms. Little is also a church organization for MICAH (Metropolitan Interfaith Couucii on Affordable Housing) she is well-known and respected for her work aznong key (eaders in the religious community. She has become a s�ong asset and advocate for the overa(I ministry of the congregation, especially the muustry to youth. Cynthia Lindsey, Minister-in-Training: Like her spouse, Trumanue Lindsey, Cynthia Lindsey has been a steady member and great supporter of Crace Community Church for appro�cimately ten years. In recent years she has professed a calling to the Christian ministry, and she and her spouse have set out on the joumey to become ordained ministers. Cynthia is very gifted for worship and preaching duties. Her depth of sincerity is appazent in her voice, in her heart and in her prayers, as she has become the congregation's prnyer leader. She has also grown considerably in the craft of delivering a sermon. Nei] Aowdy, Youth Worker: Neil and his family aze new to Grace Community Church, having united with the congregation about fifteen months ago. However, his newness to the ministry of Grace Community Church has not dampened lus enthusiasm to serve wherever he is needed. He is presently concentrating his attention on assisting C:loria Litt1e with the development of a strong youth outreach. � Marguerite Dowdy, Hospitality Host: No function can be more unportant and inviting � than providing light re&eshments for large numbers of people. Marguerite is giRed in serving a delightful and attractive snack every Sunday after worship services without exception. Her big smiie and sense of loyalry to her weekly task makes her one of Grace Community Church's A ' Zy '� � �! • � � '� y N � � � ' , , � � � h , M1 h �� 9 � � �! 4 � � 4 l brightest rising siars. She is an accountant in her professional life, and has pledged to assist the congregation in the difficult area of finances and bookkeeping. „. 0 a- �1 �--� ��-2S - ..._ • . �. - ��:.�:.:.._., , .. �. � •. � � .^ �-- <:: , � � ' j ' ` " �►'�_ ' . � � a. . ,, .: _ ��.e _ ��"`\ �;Y � r i` . . r i • , __ T k� �. - .�.�zo . . . yiy, . #_"' '� � � _.� f . *� r i . � 1 �� y ...... . �- J* - . _ € . � _T-n. `��T.•E � � � � . . ' �' �' v- F �*. ' . .. �G f � C �� . � � �� f `h t • u . '-�V� � �- _ ' . . . �� . �� i �. �C�� . , { _ _ , � n � �; _ , � � . .,'!_. ,. _ :. _`M � '•v,,.... _.��_t- A��:i.. . � Ns.�[ —^'_ __ y '.�!.sti. � . . ' �. � � '' I ' � r . I �� I 1 r : � � I � y4� � i . � . � � �`f �"�a�T./ d ' I iN . � '� L " �• :� '{ ' ' -S�� . ' � � � ` � .-�af i"�+-.. � , �. •_. � �� ^ ". ' ' + � .. :.�� • ... i �'T . •.'� • . � n° �� t � . '�.�< . tt}'. f . !. •. �•_ P' . . � ..- .' . " f`� �i� � �A�'� � � `.T� . : . , h � a7• 7.i . � . �'i:%` �� j . ' f . .��_ • ♦ •.' ,/� f � • 4 . '�? ' ♦ . ��•,•` (�� • . �� ' , ✓ � � � 1 - �� 'J .�L.l _ \-'��i' G�'I'3f - . �' n N'12t 1 ? :' .� - �T. �.\� ._ -' . . .�. + � � .s _t.,.. <' � '�-...s� a:+�� er. � �' . , � ,��([. :•'r--::-. .� . n1E�`r.' �.�:;' - ` .. . 'lt; ��.4� ;� . :`s . �✓i. t.r. .f . +.�.�,_ � • • y.! >:�� i . . . ^� .. ' •-• t • ,f . � . ; ! i ' 1 - ° � � . . a.°;^.o . . J S. � . �� 3 � . - . ( � ti1r. .II �y. "� r � . ,.�`� ; ..�� , } f �:.. -`.:>'. . * S y µ � �SZ � �( ` YJ . T• J ' a ._ �r �� . ` � r� ' � �i �� . ._ =' . � . `� �;� �t. .'- `��: \ ��", �• ��?: �'`. •. ��;. r . � + r •' • �, � �' . i . ;> I "�'f ' � � , � \, }� l' ,(' . . � % . �� :4^ � . ' t Z . v e- ; +•� �' ' rt' i '' �� y � i �� ,:� + J J : -y � � i t �� `\��' '! .��+, .:�: 1� ., -! '�f��'�� ' '.+ r' _ � i , . . '� � . � - ' :r. .� � �. � �: v _ _ -- - - � _Y _ r M' � l 't: C`= � � ,:: �; ;�' w . t �,�^� 9 L 4 � . ij-, ! �i�' : �. ' �, � � �.� a I `; t ,} ' , _�.. ' .. .. '. �•'�',�i " .f ' _ . .�� .. ; ' ,` '. . ' ' . . w� . � . ' - Z ,�'+ . - .. . - ' � . . . ' . . i� ,'•. . _ . : _ � . � i R i � ' - ? � V�'�.. - . C . r f � i � � + � '��t�i� I�,��li�j ' ;' t _ i, �� . .,.�� ,� i ' '' � ! � ' _ ,: - . ,. . � _ _ : . _ ;<<; - : � � . � ; F . :� _ --. :-�, : ^- �� , , . si _ . � x � •�� — - . . . � • . � . , .:7` A�t'r' � . .dl+ �, v 5 >. � %w ' • _ -/- 'i:'�. � " •- � , \ .-.�( _ -�- \ . . �- ' J ,. l. ; �. ; .. �'� . �\' " _�.+-.�..�� . . ... ... .. ..... �_fi' �:�..� � �` -�„ ` y„ ►� _L � f } � Y:....::: �. . : . ,. .._ _; ;! �.:.. ?.`c';:...: .,.�_ . � 0 7,� \\ � �� \.� ��, ;��. .,.,,�� \ � ��' �.� � � �4 _ � ,,. � ti , ,.�� _ , � `� `� �. ; R ♦ ' , � r ,\ r� .. ' � j.�� f� �•Gii�;�l i G . y �-}'� `_: ';ti' R`�F;: �. tL�.: �s t ��. :�_�+� �!:•�:i-`: � ►,��< ��►`'=�� ., o.r F `. ..ii"'-r`�r� �_ ,,�.'`. � ,`z �,�,, >;%'- , ;�,`9��_= '.�:.�.i - ��, ;,.: , �<' , _?� '3i.� /' 'y �.c:�� y a'o ,��. r,- ' � ' 1:IS�. %i. r ..,V W ��, •. '\'•. � .? ' . ` '.� '�i �� .l' ` ,- eq • . , �3;'-��'' . ,� ';� ...� -� �.�.. . ;;�' ,: F ., r' : � fi _ YL:Nw i�tiYleuYt+WWY `. �� _ ._...�"__. -. `� � � > '. .:, , - "` � _.:..: _ - `� �,.; - _-� �'� .� � :. � � i -.�i`is : � � �i � � 1 ".."`' _ ' . �' 1 � j , � , i � 1 ir �.. i q :� _\� ';�\ �� ,``, , � __ ' j �� . i�. �� \ `\ _ 1 ' _�` \ . � � : � \ f � � �� - �:– �1 ' ' \:'__� ��1\\�� \.\'( . . y..�'�\�,: � \ \ `., . . �'.:.—, .i I � �- �\'��- . � . t � l .`\ �.' �' \ . . \. . � , \ `...�... � �– _� �._ \� �� . .` � ' �_ ,�; 1 `�`_ - ` - � . ' \.. 1\�_ �\ti ` ._ . . \ � - � � �` � ~ � ` �`�`�,.. . '_ ��`_". ._. . _ � �.. _`-_i_- . . � � �� '. o a-� a-\ Srick veneer is supported by at grade steel an�_*le, not below grad� �uasonry foundation. Veneer is cracl:in�� and fallin; away due to structural mo�ement and water infiltration from abo� e. H OII�ur�.W.4. y.p..nli i�l f ill d�n � - ��31 ■■ K R E C H, O� B R I E N, M ll E L L E R & W A S 5, I N C. �� t��-`1 � � �[ hc san�tu,try cu�liinuc> thr t�ui{�lin�_�s pr��mi�ic��c ��ith a cantilc��cre�+. hal�um. cur�in;_* «<tlls, E��t.. ati�l baiti;ter;, and thc suh;tantial u;� caf� «ooci and stain�d gla;,_ all ca�;p�d ��ith a cuff�red ceilin�r. .�. �w pf...e. �I.��.�ni.. I.1 I n. I... A!- 32 ■■ K R E C H, O� B R I E N, M U E L L E R & W A 5 S, I N C. �� - :_ds_ _ :: �:� ,;,3 >,� ; � ` ��!ii •�' � ;,i , i�� - _�� r �� E � � _. x �� ; ; , ,- � �-.► � � � ,.,., ,-,. �, ;'�;�,�.,. `�."`" � : �:�� i _ . >, . \ J p�. :. �\ _ Gr+�*�.:.�.." �� . ' u � � ,�f��'� � . i r � �� - :Rr: . � ; f" � ! ' j E. ry�1�� : .. I � - - _� ; I.I� ., �'`��III - � ��f�l�i ._____ _ � i s r _ � • : s s � � � i � �'_� � ��/� 1 �.�,�: � 5+� # fE�� ! � t I �� r / 1 6a �a� ` r p � Ai 3 `� ■■ KRECH, O'BRIEN, MUELLER & WASS, INC. �� '� rt *� K �'! '! "� � � � � � � � w! � � �! � � b �i ( � � 4 ' � �{LET'S REJO[CE nh b �-`t �---� A�- 35 ■■ K R E C H, O� B R I E N, M U E L L E R 8c W A 5 S, I N C. ■� y � � � !� � Ai � , � � � � , h � � ' � A� ' � � � � � , 1 � d---`1 a. l ■. KRECH, O'BRlEN, MUELLER & WASS', INC. ■■ „ �V ._ ". 7L'=! � �'a.9�i:le � I �'da� Gr� . 3 . . . ;. ,.,.,. '. ? sJ :.9 � � .,' _: � G f ? ( 0 J i . - J 7 '� .�• 1 1' � '( ° � � : :1 y � :! : i � ;{; .. � s . _ , MEMO To: David Plumb United Church of Christ Robbinsdale, MN c!o Coldwell Banker Bumett Reatty 4705 Cedar Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55407 DATE: 9/6/00 FROM: Daniel O'Brie� AIA, CID Krec}� OBrien, Mueller and Wass, Inc. Acchitects, Engineers, and � InteriorDesigners PRESENT: Reverend Oliver White, Pastor David Plumb, UCOC, Robbinsdale Dan O'Brieq KOMW Architects, Inc. Brian Wass, KOMW Architects, Inc. Jim Krech, KOMW Engineers, Inc. Glyde Burdick, Pace Engineering, Inc. PRO7ECT: p00340 — Grace Community United Church of Christ Corner of Portland Avenue and V ctoria Stre� 5t. Paul, M'innesota. Circa 1909 Pre(iminary Site �sit August 3, 2000 COMMENTS REGARDING'fHE GENIERAL CONDIT[ON OF THE BUII,DING: A short tour of the building was conducted to generally ascertain the condition of the building. The following comments address the stnictural and azchitecturai components of the buitding and their relative condition. An additional attached report prepared by Glyde Burdick addresses the mechanical and electrical components. Summary: The building , constructed in 1909, has a strong presence in the community and is currently heing used as a base for providing services to the local community. The Robbinsdale United Church of Christ is spearheading an efforc to assist the Grace Community United Church of Christ to cany out it's mission . David Plumb has asked KOMW to look at the building and determine if it is structurally sound. The multi-stoty_building is consttucted of masonry bearing walls, wood framed floors and a steel truss- supported wood framed roof. The exterior materials are painted cancrete blocks, partial brick veneer, painted tin fasci� asphalt shingles, and wood windows. Generally, the building appears to be structurally sound. There is some settling of the main entry stairs, some areas of the brick veneer appear to be faiting, windows need to be repaired, several "steel lintels are failing due to cust, and the shingles �f--3� � + � � 4` � v��.t , need to be replaced. There is some evidence of water damage in lower levei. The building is noi � currently handicapped accessibie. The most urgent need is for building stabilization to prevent further deterioration. � � � � � � �! � � � � � ��. � � � � i � Structure: The buiiding appears to be constructed on solid foundations. There is no apparent indication of differential settlement ai either the perimeter foundation or the interior columns. The front entry stair has settled differentially and cracks in the reinforced concrete are apparent. The cracks have been sealed with a cement product. The main e�Aerior building walls are intact and there is no indication of severe cracking or bowing. The lintels over some of the windows are constructed of steel, which has rusted. The rust has expanded and, along with the freeze-thaw cycle, forced the �oncrete blocks to spall away from the brick backup. Tempoaary patches have been unsuccessful. The interior floors are relatively level and feel solid. There is no apparent condition that would � indicate joist faiture, ie: very springy floors or excessive sagging. The condition of the _ wood floor joists where they meet the exterior masonry wa11s cannat be determined at this time. This type of connection is subject to rot and would need to be investigated in the future. T'he underside of the roof stiucture is in good condition and appears to be structurally adequate. Open-web steel trusses support the roof and ceiling over the main sanctuary space. The roof ratters do not appear to be sagging. A roof light weil appears to have been covered over some time in the past. Surface Water: The grade at the base of the building needs to be reshaped to drain water away from foundation. Currendy the water is directed to flow towards the buitding, especially on the south side. This condition has caused a"musty" smell in the lower level of the buiiding. Mold: The interior lower level spaces have a musty odor, The woodwork is buckied and warped. Darker patches on the plaster walls and ceiling indicate the presence of mold growing in the building. The area under the front stairs is particularly bad because the space is closed and does not get any ventilation. The issue of mold growing in the � building needs to be addressed relatively soon because people are sleeping in the building at night. Ext. Masonry: The exterior shell is constn�cted of what appears to be large solid masonry blocks over a � multi-wythe brick bearing wa(1. The masonry has been painted or dashed and is in relatively good shape, except as nnted a6ove at the steel (intels and at the downspouts where damage has occurred. Ext. Columns: The main entry columns are stacked concrete raunds. There is some spalting damage to the columns near the base, which should be repaired. Brick Veneer: K R E C H A band of brick veneer has been added to the perimeter of the building from grade to approx+mately 8-10 feet high. The brick is supported on steel angles that have been bo(ted to the masonry wa((s. There are no control joints in the brick and cracks have A! ■■ , O� B R I E td , M U E L L E R H� W A S S, I N C. �� . -�- D� °�a-1 occurred. Numerous patches and caulking have been applied to the brick without much success. The brick veneer is a problem that must be corrected. Windows: The exterior windows are wood &amed single glazed and appear to be the originai installation. There is significant wood rot and multiple patches have been made over the years. Some of the windows have had a stormisecurity window added. The windows will need a significant amount of restoration andlor replacement. Insulation: There is no significant insulation except above the sanctuary. There is no apQarent vapor barrier. There is some attic ventilation, wfiich may be acceptable. Atternate techniques need to be discussed for insulation, vapor barriers and ventilation. Downspouts: The original interior downspouts, which were part of the original integral gutter system, have been disconnected and replaced with exterior downspoats. The modified system does not £unction properiy and damage to the building caused by the faulty system is apparent. The gutter and downspout system need to be repaired. The originaS system inciuded copper piping with internal drains, which may be salvageable. Currently the dovmspouts comain heat cables. The originat internal gutter sysiem should be repaired or replaced. Flat Roofs: There aze flat roofs on the north side of ihe building which appear to be leaking. The roofs need to be investigated fiuther to detemvne the e�ent of the problem. The leaking was evident from inside the building. The solution may be to replace the roofing with a new built-up asphalt and gravel system and replace the associated flashings and cogings. Fascia; The fascia is constructed of pressed tin and is in good shape. It needs painting but is otherwise fully functional as a part of the exterior skin of the building. Shingles: The roof shingles are granulated asphalt tab style. We did not go on the roof although a roof access eacists on the north side of the roof. The roof was observed by standing on a wall across the street. The shingles aze "puffy" which indicates that the petroleum products have out-gassed and the shingles are no longer waterproof. The shingies need to be replaced with appropriate ventilation, felts, and icelwater shields. It is not Irnown how many layers are on the roof. We do know that the roof decking is continuous 1 x boards without gaps. There were some clay roof tiles in the attic, but no other indication of an original clay tile roof. Accessibility: The building is not accessible as it currently exists. The lower level could be made accessible by grading a walkway from the sidewalk straight into the building. This technique would affect the exterior aesthetic of the building. The other floors wouid need an elevator. The existing toilet rooms are not accessihle and would have to be reconstructed. Other accessible features would have to be added to bring the building ' into compliance with the Minnesota Accessibility Code. There are specia] features of the code which address the specific conditions of an existing building, and quite a bit of KREC H, O' BRfEN, MUELLER 8c WASS, �►' 38 �� INC. �� w � � A �; !3 � � � q � 1 P1 h � � � ' , !� � �( � 3 � 4 � e � a-�a� leeway is provided if the modifications are not technically or structuraily feasible. The main issue however is to modify the building to become as accessible as possible. We identified a potential location for an elevator shaft and equipment room inside the e�sting mechanical room. This space is already multi-story and may present some opportunities to retrofit the building without affecting the eaterior aesthetics. FTistoric: The building lies within the limits of the Summit Avenue Historic District. Any alteration or repair of the building must be approved by the St. Paul Historic Presecvation Commission. This approval does not apply to the interior of the building, However, as the major circulation and spaces in the building, sanctuary and fellowship azea aze nearly "as-built" and the finishes aze in good condition, consideration should be given to maintaining the character of these azeas. IJue to the building's designation within the Historic District, approval for demolition in order or construct a new building would be " very di�cult, if not impossible to obtain. Also, there may be a movement at hand to obtain National Historic Registration for the building withsn two years. Generai recommendations: The building is structura!!y sound and is a good candidate for rehabilitation. The complete rehabiiitation of the building could be done ovec an extended geriod of time with work orders prioritized to match the funding, as it becomes available. In the meantime, since the building is appuentiy structurally sound, the following steps should be taken: 1. Stabilize the building so that it doesn't deteriorate further. Start with rebuilding the gutter and downspout system, re-shingling the pitched roo� repairing or replacing the flat roofs, and reshaping the grade on the south side. Other work orders can be identified, as money becomes avaitable. 2. Determine the type of mold growing in the lower level and remove it immediately if it is dangerous. Determine the conditions, which are causing mold to grow, and create work orders to conect those conditions, as money becomes avaiiabie. 3. Install inexpensive battery operated smoke and heat alarms in the areas used for sleeping. They can be obtained from the locat hardware store. This is a stopgap measure but wilt begin to address some of the life-safety issues that exist in the building. 4. Continue working with Krech, OBrien, Mueller and Wass, Inc. to develop a long range plan to use the building for the stated mission. Complete renovaYion of the building will take many years of fundraising, prioritizing, and targeted construction. The building is worth saving_ Thank you for the opportunity to work with you agaia We all are laoking forwud to helping the United Church of Christ to fulfill its mission for the Grace Community Church. Please feel free to call me at any time to discuss the next step of the process. K R E C H, O� B R I E N, M U E L L E R � �- 39 ■■ Hc W A 5 S, I N C. �� N�t �'� uu ua:zaa uayae�eii euraicx �r. iaaai-�ac- �-'ACE Engineering Inc_ R.a ao,c sso (32a t71h a,rera,e rbrm� r�ins ►w ss3d3 Pnone 952�2 r,t24 Faz �g3�,.7�gr MEMO Date: 70: Projett: Project No.; Re: Au9ust 7, 2000 Dan OBrien. Kred�, Obrten, Muel[er � Wass Salnt Peuf, Minneso{a Grace Community United Churrh of Ch� 00010 Preliminary Stte y�isit Augt�.st 3, 200Q Present: Reverend Oliver yyhite, pds{p� Dave Plum, NI[r�n� UCC pan O'8rien, KOMW Architec� Jtm KreCh, KOMW An�hitecfs 8rian Wass, KOMW }�chi�ts Glyde Bardidc, PACE Enflineering, L�c. p.t � �..� �.. \ va FAX 652j451-0917 A shoit oour ofthc facility was msde. '!he bw7ding is a lmge dutrch bw7t m t909. Vacy little Las bocn doae tv up-date t�e mxLanical and elaxrit�al sysums s�ce t�rn_ � � � � ' � � � ' 1 �Y The mechsnical and dxhicai sys�s in this bwld'mg ms ald mtd, w}n7e sa71 fimdi�ing, ate poor by toeiay's codes �d ocaipaoi eacp�a4oas. 2lee flo� P� �'8� �Y m Pi'QVitk bmies 5rs access to thebmld'mg snd �� Pt'� chaages wIll also crquire mod�ans w tfit mechaaical aad elec�icai sy�ms, We y�y88� p�8 be based on ��tY �t�8 � op-$C�IIg all these sysdems, The followiag is a systcm by systcm desctipboa. I7omcstic Watu SenitarY Sewer Natural Gas i : � � r; T �'� b �va city wata' from the aty of St PanL Iittie of the system is viu�ble, howevcr. 90 Yesr old wmer pipiug will lilcely not tx saviceable. The sanitary sewer systan vras na obsav�d, h should be expated to be the age of thz hu�ding and ia qaGSCionable coadition �7te natucal gas meta is on th� southwest comcr of the bwlding. A mla$vcIy ncw 8,as wata heafer is located in tfie fumace room below Hia lafchen, Plnmbing �i�ures Fix4acs are a variety of ages sad types. 13ey are serv�cabio b� not in compliauce with enneat codes for wata euago. The kitchea fixUues sre sYaialrss steel and sPP� to be in woxking ordc. Samtiang facilities do not eaisk Fire Protxtion Sysiems 'Ihaz are no sprinklers ia the building oCl —�l a nug uv uu ua:zaa uiyaemeit nuraicK �r. ia�e�-��e-'iea•t Memo; K�, 6'Bricq MuIla & Wass, Amhciec� Cmtcc Coasmuaity IJCC, Saiat Pau1, MN 00010 August 7, 2ppp • Pagc 2 of 2 Heating .,�.:�.,, Air Conditioning EFccn Savice i� . � • . �. . . L8htin8 ..,. __. � y �..��,. ' .<.. _�� GB:gb oiaoaroo p.e b2--q �t 'Ihe 6tu7ding is Leated by a 1ar8e brick�et forced air frunace located 'm thc lowest Sevd of the aorihwesE cAmc ofthe b' �S� w b�un m�l bnt has bxa coav ��& '�is was originally �t sYstem is not expected ta cammin fue t dampas ��$ is ffievea. Th� Natival Vmtilation is provided thrwgfi cponab}a wind�w to most s�acGS, mako-�su.st Em is provided in the Yitchen widwut auy ra�e hood or tempe��d P 1he buildiag is not sir conditioaed TLe electrical service is under su.ed bY t°daY'S s�dac•ds. T6e otiginaI hufe swiiches ara sb71 in usc. Mnch of the distn�bution �ystem utiSizes the original wire. Bits and pixes of new work have been added w save spocific Iaads. ��8'�es range m age fxoat odginai ta &e Iafe 70's PCB's may b� P�ent in some ofthe 8uorescmt yy�gsts. �P� �ats are stilI in ase for cmuvl of�ho Sanc�vazy LBb�& AI-�l � � �� KRECH, O`BRIEN, MUELLER & WASS, {NC. _. � ,..,.. a•�;.,�_ = i�:�" .. :��,� �;� . , .:, , �: �-, - .. - . _ _ .. � � 1 . .' i . � J . . �. .. i 1 \ :i . . . i \ v� , .Y . � .. .. � ^ r � .Y � J .. � u .. i n i d a ,J� a-� '�'�: David Plumb . United Chwch of Christ Robbinsdale, MN c!o Coidwell Banker Bumett Rea1ty 4705 Cedar Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55407 FROM: Daniel OBrien, AFA, CID Ktech, OBrien, Mueller and Wass, Inc. Architects, Engineecs, and Interior Designers DATE: 12/6100 YRO.TECT: P00340 — Gtace Community United Church of Christ Corner of Portland Avenue and vctoria Sueet St. Paut, Muinesota. Circa 1909 ROOFS, COI2NICE, GUTTER and DOWNSPOUT ISSUES THE FOLLOWING STRATEGY AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROPQ5AL ADDRESSES 'I'HE ffiGHEST PRIORITY PROBLEM AS IDENTIFIED IN THE 9/6/00 A1�IALYSIS: THE ROOF SYSTEMS A short tour of the building was conducted in August to generally ascertain the condition of the building. A report was filed which contained a section entitled "General Recommendations". This letter is an oftering of a strategy and a proposal for services to move forward to accomplish the following: "Stabilize the building so that it daesn't deteriorate further.. Start with rebuilding the gutter and downspout system, re-shingling the pitched roof, repairing or reptacing the tlat roofs, and reshaping the grade on the sout6 side. Other work orders can be identified, as money becomes available." ��' 7 Z' Architecture • StfUCtUfal Enaineerina • Interi�r nesinn M � � � � � � � e � � � � �' � e � � � M� e � � �--°� �� The followina areas of concern will be addressed• Downspouts: The original interior downspouts, which were part of the original integal gutter system, have been disconnected and replaced with e�cterior downspouts. The modified system does not function properly and damage to the building caused by the faulty system is apparent. The gutter and downspout system need to be repaired. The original system included copper piping with internal drains, which may be salvageable. Currently the downspouts cornain heat cables. Tl�e original internal gutter system should be repaired or replaced. Flat Roofs: There are flat roofs on tf�e north side of the buiiding, which appear to be leaking.. The roofs need to be investigated further to determine the extent of the problem. The leaking was evident &om inside the building. The solution may be to replace the roofing with a new built-up asphalt and gravel system and replace the associated flashings and copings. Fascia: The fascia is constructed of pressed tin and is in good shape. It needs painting but is othenvise fuily functional as a part of the eacterior skin of the building. (also called a "cornice") Shingles: The roof shingles are granulated asphait tab style. We did not go on the roof although a roof access e3cists on the north side of the roof. The roof was observed by standing on a wall across the street, The shingles are "puff}�' which indicates that the petroleum products have out-gassed and the shingles are no longer wate�proof. The shingles need to be replaced with appropriate ventilation, feits, and iceJwater shields. It is not lmown how many layers are on the roof. We do know that the roof decking is continuous 1 x boards without gaps. There were some clay roof tiles in the attic, but no other indication of an original clay tile roof. The followinQ strateQV is offered: 1. Investigate the problems to gain a wotking knowledge of the existing details and conditions. 2, Deternune what needs to be done to fix the problem. 3. Prepaze documents to obtain budget cost figures to establish fundraising goals. 4. Raise the funds. (UCOC's task — and we'll help however we can) S. Coordinate the tradesmen's work to complete the project. Thank you for the opportunity to work with you again. We all are looking forward to helping the United Church of Christ to fulfill its mission for the Grace Community Church. Please feel free to call any time to discuss this proposal. a�-�3 ■■ K R E C H, O� B R! E N, M U E L L E R 8c W A�5 S, I N C. �� i � �( � � � � * � � � � � � � � � w � � �' � 1 � 1 �iisto�c Sites Sui'vey' 0 �-�� ( Ramsey County Historical Society Saint Paul Heritage Preservation Commission 1. Street Address/ Location- �� W Portland Avenue 2. District/village: 8 3. Common name:[7lcranian�Or[hodox Church 4. His[oric name_ Firs[ Methodist Church 5. Oziginal use: Church 6. Present Use: C.h,�rch 7. Access: yes No X�Limited 8. Period of conseruction- t908 9. Style: Classical Reviva 10. # of bays: 11. k of stories: 12. Roof style: (;ahled 13. Roof coverinq:�nhatr ch�i 14. Dorme= style &#: 1.7one 15. Chisney style, material, location a p: _Nor v;sihlr• 16. Type of fenestration: Rounded arched and rec[angular s[ained glass 17. Type o£ foundation: Not visible 18. Structural systemjmain exterior wall covering: Wood frame: clapboard shingle aluminum _asbestos Brick: stretcher bond American bond header bond X Stone: random rubble couzsed rubble random ashlar X couzsed ashlar Type of stone/brick or other bonding pattern: Smoo[h1v dressed whi[e s on Concrete block Cast concrete Stucco _Terra cotta _Cartain wall �lass/metal Other: 19. Othez significant details: � Monumental temple fron[ church vith colossal fluted Ionic columns vith ttny gargoyles supporting e pedimenc vith blind bullseye windw in tympanum and Eastern cross at top. Pediment has deatils and egg and dart and other molding. Three double leaf doors are set into rounded arched openings crith keyscones and have stained glass transoms and egg and dart molding., Urn shaped balusten . Rectangular and tounded axched stained glass window with keystone on main facade and (to 928) 20. Integrity of Design: basically intact 6 unaltered X altered slightly l alterations s additions more apparent than oriqinal original desiqn noe aQparent 21. Physical condition oF building: Excellent XGOOd Faiz Poo� Deteriorated 22. Additions and alterations: Nev bcick base, some windows replaced and covered wi[h wire mesh, letter3ng removed from frieze, stone painted vhi[e and pa[ched vith concreee. < Y n � � �i a r 0 0 a � c � � c > < � n z 23_ if a corner 1ut, describe: X NW c3E SE _SW corner o£ Portland �; 24. Side of street: Wese cross street ��, 25. Seeting: acricultura7 g residential coamieccial _industrial subusban `�` rt 26, S` gnificant siie and landscape features: , One of few buildings tha[ face Viceoria at Chis poinc -- mose buildings face the easc-west stre,eSs,, iron fence surrounds lot. � v 27. Shreats to site: None 28. Additional comments; (1l19 cont'd) sida�aalls. Building approached up wide, long sceps. Traces of lettezing remain a� Frieze. Pilas[ers between bays. . m z � � � rt N 7 H N . J O � v �k!-N� � 29. Datets) o£ si,� cybit{s): 6/17l82 0 3o. Nega[ive file numbez(s): 370/8/1 x Q 31: Map location code(iE applicable): c � n �2. Name of fieldwozker: S_ Crwnonr � 47 . ! � � � w w t � � � � � �.. L � � � aT , A , :��>:, J` �k � � � . y< � �� K � p . � : r�: � �z � �: � � �� }` � . � � � � � 3 9 � i b 35. Ptesent Ovner � Address:_ P. � oa_�a.i 36. Date buil 19a8 37. Date source: Bui1 i Permit _ 38. Legal Descrtptioa: Lots 26 27 28 Block 20 Summi[ Park Addit' 39. Building Permit fF: 50626 40. Location of architecc's drawings 41. On Na[ional Regiseer? Yes g No 42. Natlonal Regis[er potential? _'yes 43. HPC/local his[oric si[e? Yes �No yG, R No Local designa[ion potential? Yes y�N 45. In hiscoric dis[rict? �Yes No 46. Aistoric dtstrict potenti�I? �Yes _No Which? _National Reeiseer and State Zf yes, explain xationale:'Possible ex ansic Hill Districts _ of HPC Hi11 DisericC. b . ..= n�f r � , r . 47.,`�Historical background: This church was built ia 19�8 for an'estimated cast of $1GQ,0! The yhutch�was built as the home of the First Me[hodist Church aad used by the group at le. uatil 1959. By 1964 Lhe building was the home of the Saints Vo2odymyr�and Olga Ukrainian Octhodox Chucch whicfi'pas previously located a[ 700 Jenks qvenue. � f � . . ''� . -_ �� . z , �'48. Level of sigaiFicance� X Lccal State National 49. 5tatement of s3ga3ficancee:.:�" � � � d�`sign of this church was inspired by that of a Roman -Temple, unlike many churches bu t in St. Paul ca. 1910 vhich followed a Late Gothic Revir design. The building�is an imusual�addi[ioa�.�to the neighborhood, and is particularly stri ing when viewed fzom the eas[ since;'it�is sitvated at the end of Holly Avenue. : �,�. � � - . �+'� no „ ' �, . f , '3 , . �� _ SO.,SOUrces of information: .�"f� t '•4! ` � 1959�.Polk's St. Paul Citv Directory. ' — � � . : Ko:eper, H.F. His[oric St. Paul Buildin s. >St. Paul: City Planning Board, 19b4. See Historic Si[es Survey�of St. Paul and Ramsey County Architect and Conicactor File. R .f � �}� ; V •Y � �'€ ' � a �: � , - . . $ f � M � rp � t�: `� ;. � 7 ' � ,�'� Phoeographs � � y :z � , ;y ,, . 0 �S �.q yl� ' � ■� KRECH, O�B M UE L LE R �� y_ --' -..= �.' -. _. . �,: _ ...�. , , � ,,', TRANSMiTTAL Ta= Mr. David Plumb do Coldwell Banker Bwnett Reatty 4705 Cedar Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55407 FROM: PROJECP: xoMw �: Reverend Oliver White Grace Community United Church of Christ 873 Portland Avenue St. Faul Ivfinnesota 55104 stephen pederson Grace Community Church Programming 00340 WE ARE SEND7NG YOU: � �raE Fo�,owrnc: COPIES DATE YAGES 1 • 10.1.01 THESE TRANSMISSIONS ARE: COMMENT5: document DESCRIPTiON . . Programming Summary Booklet As requested for your use 8c WASS, I.NC. � ....� :.' ._ �_. _ � �� DAT'E: 10.4.01 �� First class maii If you have any concerns or questions regarding this document, please do not hesitate to contact us. We also look forward to the possibility of providing proposals for professional services to further the work on this project! , �i4� J�'C�� . m N:100IdO�TRANSMITTALdoc At-y�o Architecture . Siructural Engineering ■ Interior Design D�� z 0 � Q > �, J W Q . � � O — {— n U m > � ¢ N � Q � � �-y� oa � a,� �'li OW O. N WOW ��2 rp N � �uni�ii�uiuu uii�iii�muiiun iinuiuiomiiiiiim n� u • ��u. � J ��• ' o�; ��i` u uiiuii�i�u�m �III��II�I��III I1�� :� �� .�...... � � '' � ' � � ��mii�m��mu niin�imnimiiiin •�; . �' ��' • � ��OY� �J � , �', � I_I■ �. � I�1 �m000 u m � �■ � `�� I_I_ �� J—��'; �\��! •o��+��e �I I��I I��I��I II��I I 11�I��II��I Illu �' � �.1�� • �, , � 4' , � � ,� � , , � � �y � � � { � � z � H Q � J W � Z ¢ � J - ~ II Q ` d � 4 � � 4 �'- � V �( �l t�i- y9 :`�� a-��a� �kl- 5a } �� x� .�i � �� ' '• `" �.A'a. � x 4 � � yy✓ �(_2 . _.. �.r.� .. ` _ '�•_:� �_' _��"4'�'I� ✓ � __ '� . .. ± l— b�� +.f^G.- ... .. .� � L.��i+.%+-�n.�:4 �t ' �aS�a.r... ... - ' s�`.wr-�f"•y.-. w � ' . ". "'i�"—� . q �"'�'" _ ___ - . . �. _-� _: a . . . . , ....-�` `�..�._.� :. � ':_ _ x t . : ._ 4,,,— .r _' s��.m�9 x-._��..�a�.._ vr. . ,�a_ _ Y _ � ��- .A. �.� �..�`�'�.*3`.,yP��-r_*-+.xx- . _' — w � ,-;.- - . 7F � �. _":� Ar - �m�.n. .<'4�...� .".} - . . ..._... _ . - �= F ' ^_i " .,.......-.- . _ _ _ ' � _ _ . . � - �: � � -:�� A k : �` '��'$` u �� . �' . ..-. k" � � i , , r� r r a-y� "��' ,�� •] �'�. � ��`� .� .3 3'�� ,. "�.y "� � Y .��. 3 ."a,,��„ � �.a �. / Bfl�Y � JJ' �'V� � � ; g �, . „�-4 Y j ;: � ��,;. , r J' i t {< ' - lx`� Y * �/ �` ..�° �-��: �.` l' ;� �� ^'�:�fE i v .. ��•"s'k �s-.> 't ! < - � ., � � �. _= �/� e ��'� �; F . / �� /-� � ///_� .... ..'..1 � � ��al !�I^ 53 d�-��i �. ��-s� oa,..� a � l�� -- 55 i ytrs# �,�4�et�u�is� �I�trcl� SK&N ENVIRONMENTAL 1156 9'� AVE SOUTH SOUTH SAINT PAUL, MN 55075 oa��. To: Brian Aiton From: SK&N Environmental �s �� ' ,�� ho.�dad ko �� Co •Z�•o2 ��Ey . SK&N conducted a preliminary umspection of the Grace community Church, at Brian Alton's request. The purpose of the inspection was to identify suspect building materials that may contain asbestos and lead based paint. We also idernified other possible chemical or biological hazards. Tt� following is a summary of our inspection. under wood floor 16,875 Sq. Ft. Bofler and all Asbestos bricks Asbestos Ceiling Tile 11,250 Sq. Ft. Ceiling Texture 5,625 Sq. Ft. Fioor Tile 6,443 Sq. Ft. Mastic 6,443 Sq. Ft. Asbestos paper Lead Paint Walls 26,275 3q. Ft. All windows, doors, and wood trim Entire bwlding exterior a� possble ground contamination Mold Various areas throughout the bwlding have substantial water damage and mold contamination. Other Mercury switches Florescent bulb and ballast Various paints and chemicals After a careful review of ttvs project we have deterniined the approxiamate cost of the remediation of the above listed ha7atdous materials to be $687,000.00. This price is an esiimate only, a final price will be provided upon request. Attached you will find some areas of concern ��U �2 2001 1 �14,;,�� MATv'ir'ILLO WOI�.CK ,' & A S 5 O C 1 A 7 E S October 29, 2001 Mr. Brian Alton McClay — Aiton, P.L.L.P. 951 Crrand Avenue Saint Paul, MN 55105 Dear Mr. Alton: >jQ Gilbe[i BuiLdinQ -41? R'acouta Street Saint Paul. ivN �5 t01-19i' � �--�► a l A$er touring the Cn�ace Community United Church of Christ with you and Reverend White, John and I reviewed the KOMW study that was apparent{y begun in the summer of 2000 and completed October 1, 2001. Based upon our tour and the review of that study our conclusions are as follows: SUMMARY OF CURRElVT SITUATION 1. The building cunently needs e�cterior repairs to prevent further deterioration. It also needs modifications to meet current codes for fire, life safety, building (including plumbing and electrical), and accessibility. It may need additional — modification of the cuirent floorplan to meet the needs of the Church or any other potential user. There is no onsite parking associated with the building. 2. A rough estimate of the costs involved for remediation of some of the above concems was grovided by KOMW: a. Stabilize the building shell — including re-roofing replacing the gutter and downspout system, and re-grading the soil around the foundation b. Update the electrical service and system c. Replace/update the HVAC and plumbing d. Provide a building sprinkler system e. Recao�e! the riti�e exis*.ir.g re;t:o�r.is fa: accessibilitp f Retrofit the building with an elevator Total Bstimated Cost (+/- 20%) $135,000.00 $105,000.00 $27Q000.00 $ 80,000.00 � zs,oco.00 $120.000.00 $735,000.00 Other potential items addressed by KOMW include: a. Updated electricai service for the Main and Upper Leve] progtam spaces, except for the I�'arthex and 5anctuary $ 35,000.00 b. Air-conditioning for the Offices and Meeting rooms ofthe Main and Upper floors $ 15,000.46 c. Air-conditioning for the Lower Level $ 20,000.00 d. Addition of two shower roams, two bays & two sinks $ 40,000.00 Total Estimated Cost for Alternatives $11Q,OQ0.00 � �l-59 ho-ra.e �- �(O �E [� e� e� � 2,�- r°� � d a-=°��,�. 4. Other work that was not priced: a. Enhance/stabilize the building exterior — repairlreplace the brick veneer, repair/repiace the windows and doors, repair the east steps, repairlreplace the wall flashing, plaster, stucco finishes b. Provide on site parlang c. Provide interior reconfigurations, functional and aesthetic improvements, and kitchen equipment CONCLUSIONS Based upon the above review, it appears the Church is facing roughly $735,000 to stabilize the bui(ding and bring it up to code requirements. Such expenditure would still not be sufficient to addtess some of the building's other concerns such as its lack of parking and exter;or attractiveness. Undoubtedly this building is quite imposing, but from the inside and the outside. However its original focus as a church also precludes an easy adaptation to an alternate use — especially without an option for adequate parking. Although there has been some suggestion in the KOM4V report that parking can be developed for the site, it seems doubtful that su£ficient parking could be developed to meet today's lifestyle requirements. For a building this size, we would anticipate a minimum of 80 parking spaces (4 per 1000 sifl to make it potentially reusable as an office building. Other uses might include adaptation to a residential purpose, but we would assume that such a use would stil( require parking andfor garages. Assuming the HPC would allow only a minimal amount of modification to the e�terior, it appears the structure is best suited to be a church, a museum, or a performance venue. Unfortunately each of these options is conflicted with the lack of parking. It is possible that the facility could be sold to the adjoining Wm. Mitchell School of Law. However unless the schoot sees a need for additional classrooms or stora�e, it poses a problem for them to acquire the church. Due to the size and location of the church, demolition for parking appears to be a difficult proposition to gain HPC, PED, and neighborhood support. Regardless of the obstacles, the property could be worth a premium to the law school due to the school's landlocked situation. Se:(:ng the proge:il to someone athe; thar. t;�e :a:v school resu'.ts ia a ser�ous diler,ir,ra. Any prospective buyer would be facing the same circumstances that make the building difficult for the church. Unsatisfied parking demands and maintenance requirements wiil still be a problem. Restrictions on the use of the site, as well as the options to modify the external structure, will still need to be overcome. Accordingly, it is hard to imagine the value of the transaction being anymore than the price of raw land in that location. Presumably the church property is about the same size as two to three residential lots. Therefore we would assume $150,000 -$200,000 would be more than most buyers would offer. Especially considering the fact that they will be buying the need to obtain demolition approvals and the cost of demolition itself. Although there may be some salvage value to the pews, windows, woodwork, and the like, we don't think that it wi(1 be significant. �(- (,0 Oa- aa� ' It appears the best solution may be one that has been attempted. With the church as a non-taYable properry, perhaps the congregation could share the facility with other non- profits serving the community. Such organizations would be paying a minimum of $6 to$10 per square foot for their current locations. T'his could be combined with the renting of the auditorium for community performances. If those rent streams were diverted to maintain and operate the subject property, it might allow the Grace Community congregation to afford the location for their own services. Based upon the above conclusions, we are not sure that our services will be that effective for Reverend White and his congregation. Please consider the above discourse and let me know if you think we can be of any benefit. Thank you for considering us in this matter, I am Respectfully yours, Don Womack � � r W � OFFICE OF LiCENSE, A(SPEC7IOti5 AND EAIVIRONMENTAL PAOTECTIO` Roger C. Curtis. Direc�or CITY OF SAINT PAUL RanA}' G Kelly, bfnyor June 28, 2002 Rev. Oliver White Grace Community Church 873 Portland Avenue St. Paul, MN 55104 LOWRY PROFESSIO:YAL BUILDL�'G SurJe 300 350 Sc Peter Srreet Snint Paul, Minnesola 55/02-1�70 Re: 873 Portland Avenue (Grace Community Church), Hill Historic District File #D02-00�, demolition permit Dear Rev. White: �a- �1�� Telephone: 65J-166-9090 Factimite: 651-266-9099 As you know, the Heritage Przservation Commission (HPC) considered at its Sune 27, 2002 meeting your application to demolish the property listed above. The commi;sion voted unanimously to deny your application. This decision was based on the findmas in the staff report and discussion at the public hearing meeting. You or any aggrieved party has the right to appeal the Commission's decision to the Saint Paul City Council under Chapter 73 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code. Such an appea] must be filed within 14 days of the daiz of the HPC's order and decision. Chapter 73 states: h) Appeal to ciry cotmcil. The perntit npplicnr3t ar mry parry aggrieved by the decision of the heritnge presenn(ion cou�mission shall, within foemteen {!4) days ofthe date ojthe heritage preservation ronuaissioir's order and decision, hnve a right to appeal sucls ortler and decision to the city coirncil The nppeal sha11 be deemed perfected trpo�a receipt by the dttision of plan�iing [LIEP] of rivo (2) copies oja notice of nppen7 nnd statencerct setring forth the grounc& jor tlze appea(. Tlte division ojplartning [LIEPJ shall transmit one copy oJthe notrce oJappeal and statement to the ciry comtcil mtd one copy ta tlee heritage preservation conrnrission. The conuifission, in an}� writren order derzying a perntit npplicntion, s/mll advise !Ge applicant ojt/ie rig {:t to nppeal 7o the cir}' cowicil artd ittck�de this paragraph in a(l strch ord2rs. Please feel free to ca11 me at 651.266.9078 if you have any questions. Sincerely, �''�� !/ Amy Spong Historic Preservation Specialist cc: Brian Alton, McClay Alron Attomeys Steve Ubl, buildin; inspector �File �� t o a��. � File #D02-OOS building (in case ofparttal demolitionJ, and on surrounding buildings, the economic value or usefulness of building as it now exists, or if altered or modified in comparison with the value or usefulness of any proposed structure designated to replace the present building or buildings. " T{:e Secretary of t7ie Interior's Standards for Rehabititatian (1990) Buitdi�ig Site Recom�ner:ded: -Identifying, retaining, and preserving buildings and their features as welt as features of the site that are important in defining its overall historic character. Site features can include driveways, walkways, lighting, fenczng, signs, benches, fountains, wells, terraces, canal systems, plants and trees, berms, and drainage or irrigation ditches; and archeological features that are in�portant in defning the history of the site. -Retaining the historic relationship beriveen buildings, landscape features, and open space. -Designing new onsite parking, loading docks, or rnmps whers required by the new use so that they are as unobtrusive as possible and assure the preservation of character-defcning featr�res of the site. Not Recommended: -Removing or Yaclically changing buildings and tkeir features or site features which are important in defining the overall historic character of the building site so tF:at , as a result, tke character is t�iminished. -Removing or relocating historic buildings or landscape featz�res, rha�s destroying the historic relationship between buildings, landscape features, and open space. District/Ne�hborhood Recomn:ended: -Identifying, retaining, and preserving buildings, and streetscape, and landscape features which are important in defining the overall historic character of the district or neighborhood. Such features can inclz�de streets, alleys, paving, walkways, street lights, sfgns, benches, parks and gardens, and trees. -Retaining the historic relationship between buildings, and streetscape anrl landscape features such as a town squnre comprised of rotiv houses and stores surrounding a communal park or open space. -Designing required new parking so that it is as unobtrusive as possible, i.e., on side streets or at the rec�r of buildings. "Shared"parking should also be planned so that severa! business' can utilize one parking aren as opposed to introducing random, mtiltiple lots. Not Recornmended: -Removing or radically changing those fearures of the district or neighborhood x•hich are important ir� 2 �F2- 3 oa-�+�� Flle #1D02-005 7. The proposed demolition will adversely affect the historic character of the district and would be a great loss to the community. E. STAFF REC0IVIMENDATION: Based on the findings, staff recommends denial of the demolition perxnit. Staff wou3d encourage conducting a feasibilityire-use study that may identify potential buyers who would re-use the building, with State Historic Preservarion's Office assistance. � A2� S b�-��-1 (U�� • II o2 i o - o� +�P� MINUTES OF THE AERTTAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION CITY OF SAII�iT PAUL Room 40, Lower Level, City Ha1lfCourt House June 27, 2002 Present: James $ellus (chair), 7udith Benton, Gar Hargens, Paul Larson, Ray Meyer, Shari Taylor Wilsey, Dudley Younkin Absent: Joseph Errigo(excused), Susan Bartlett Poote(unexcused}, Lee Meyer, Richard Murphy, Dan Scott(excused) Staff Present: Julie Hoff, John Skradski, Amy Spong 1. Call to Order: 5:08 p.m. 2. Announcements: There were no announcements. 3. Permit Review — Public Hearing: �� r 237 Bates Avenue — for a building permit to install concrete over the entire front yard and to tile the concrete �vith quarry tile. Spong reviewed her staff report and recommended denial of the application. Beilus questioned what the difference between this proposal and the previous. Spong stated that this proposal includes paving the cement with quarry tile and no gazebo. Spong explained that there are two portions to the front yazd, an upper deck that covers the portion of the lawn nearest the house and a step down portion thai continues to the street. Bellus opened the public hearing and James Silen, attorney for the applicant made a presentation. Silen clarified that the previous proposai also included a ja2ebo and this proposal requests permission far a patio only. Silen stated that there are two key issues: 1) Does the patio violate commission guidelines and 2) How to handle the work the appiicant did without a pemut. With respect to question one, Silen stated that the patio does not violate commission guidelines because: The housing �vas built in 198& - it is not a historic building and it is not a pivotal building to the district's character. The quarry tile is unobtrusive and is not an alteration to the building. , � Page 1 of 10 t13-1 o�-�a 1 Hargens moved approval of the permif with the stipulation that fhe new sign match the letters and spacing of the existing signs. Wiisey offered a second. The motion carried. 475 Grand Aill - for a building permit to construct a second floor addifion at the northwest corner of the house. Spong reviewed her sfaff zeport. The applicant, Stu McDonald, McDonald Mack Architects, reviewed the proposal and discussed past alterations. The key parts to this proposal include: • Second floor addition • Mudroom wiil be pulled out eight feet and �vill utilize the existing house window • Two, double-hun� windows will be added to the back • The basement will have a child's play area and need to have an egress window added. Larson asked if the gabled win� is part of the originat construction. The architect said it is not - the front gable was added in 1993. Younkin moved approval of the staff report. Hargens offered a second. The motion carried unanimously, 873 Portland Avenue - for a demolition permit to raze a structure Spong reviewed her staff report recommending denial of the application. Bellus stated that the purpose today is to just address the demolition pernlit and not to review any new construction proposals of what might replace it. Brian Alton, attorney for the applicant, gave an overview of who would be presenting this evening on behalf of the application. He first introduced Oliver White, the church's pastor. 0liver White stated they are the oniy African American church in the state of Minnesota. The building was erected in 1904 by the Methodist Church. They purchased the building in 1494 after having moved five times. They took the building under any circumstances and were not aware of all the problems assoeiated with the building. They first realized there was no place to park—he argued with the City to get permits to pazk as they had people interested in renting space. They were only permitted ten spaces. William Mitchell occupies most of the parking and many students, faculty and staff i�ored the pazking niles. Second, the issue of the buildin�'s appearance. The steps were crumblin�. Page 6 of 10 A3- Z G�,-9 a� I White stated the church is a small community of parishioners and they cannot afford to rehabilitate the church. White stated he's also concerned about the historical significance, but when the church was built people rode horses to chuzch and William Mitchell was not there. There is a parking problem. He stated iYs impossible to use that building as a church unless William Mitcheil moves out, which won't happen. White state the church needs to move on so they can continue the good work they do. Whife stated he just would like to get out of it and sell the buildin�. Hargens questioned how large the con�regation is? White stated that theyhave about 70 members, half of that number are active. Most of the members came from the residence program White stated they are not able to compete with other established neighborhood churches. Hargens asked how much they paid for the church? The applicant stated they paid $380,000 and raised another a30,000 to paint the interior spaces. They bought it from the ITkranian Church. They have an offer for approximately $400,000 under the purchase agreement. John Manillo, Commercial Broker in St. Paul, stated they were requested by Brian Alton to look at the buiiding to see what market there was for it. Manillo stated they came to the conclusion that there are major obstacles if the church is to be saved. Manillo stated they approached it from an economic standpoint. There are parking issues and the sanctuary holds up to 500 people. They had an architect's report that estimated the stabilization to be S900,000, but it didn't include environmental hazards or a new use. He believed it would cost Sl to $2 million to reuse it. Manillo stated they had a client looking for a church, the Tibetan Community, however, they wouldn't consider it because of the parking and now they are in a warehouse in northeast Minneapolis. Larson asked if the parking issue was not there, what other uses were explored for the building? Manillo stated the first obvious use is as a church, it could also be used as a community center or a performance center. It has a lower level which is a nice space that could bz a�'eat communiry center as well. Larson stated that there are mid-sazed theater groups looking for space like that, was anyone from that community mazketed? Maniilo stated that parking is the issue again and a theater couldn't afford the operating costs. There are theaters out there that wouid love a spacz like that but not many that can afford it. Stephen King testified that he did a� isual env9ronmental inspection of the building and passed around a preliminary estimate based on the assumption that any possible asbestos and lead containing materials would need removal or encapsulation. He figured approximate quantities. He also did a visual survey of the following items: • Extensive mold and �cater damage due to the leaking roof Soil contamination Paoe 7 of 10 A3 - 3 a�-� �� Mercury Flourescenttubes Paints and Solvents King stated that all of these materials need to be addressed prior to demolition or rehabilitation and perhaps may require further compliance with other PCA standards for demolition. He stated that prior to demolition all frlable materials would have to be removed and the EPA even wants lead to be encapsulated prior to demolition. John Mathern, Mendota Homes, testified that a couple of months ago they were asked to look at the building for potential reuse as housing. He stated the site is 145' by 145'. He thought if the building got reused that about 8 to 12 pazking spaces could be added on site off the ailey. They looked into adding parking in the basement but that is restricted because of the steep slope. He felt it lacked economic viability. Mathem stated, they like the lot, they like the location and the site and they like the facade of the church. Younkin questioned how many units they felt could be put into the existin� building? Mathern stated about 12. The windows are not egressable on the second floor, they are lovel}' and are stained giass and the congre�ation flooring slopes. Bellus questioned what other similar re-use projects Mendota Homes have worked on. Mathern replied they have done no renovation only new construction. Alton stated that the HPC must consider historic guidelines, the demolition �vould not affect sunounding buildings bein� the law school, the fire station, the church and the residences, new construction, of similar size and detail, would not affect surrounding buildin�s and that the economic value of the current structure is gone. Benton asked if anyone has approached William Mitchell about buying the building. Aiton stated that William Mitchell is only interested in the site for additional parking but they have no interesYin this. Beth Louden, William Mitchell, Director of Physical Plant, stated that they considered buying the church but they are not willing to pay as much as the owner ��ants. They ha��e looke� at their needs for office space, congregational space and exercise space for students. When they looked into the property awhile back, they estimated $950,000 to stabalize the building. Louden stated it sounds like the Church's current interests are willin� to pay more than the college �vould be willing to pay. L,ouden stated if the price was right, they mi�ht consider it. Louden sfaYed then they looked at demolishing the building and adding parkin�. Given the site size, the cost of demolition, they figured �IO,OOO/pazking space which is too high. Louden stated if the price was right and tax credits were availabie there might be an interest at William Mitchell, they certainly would not want to stand in the �uay o£ Rev. WYute and what the church needs to do. William Mitchell is neutral at this time. Page 8 of 10 A3 - y aa_��.( Howard Oransky - owner, 877 Portland - stated that he is opposed to the demolition because he does not feel secure that his home will not be harmed during the demolition - either from pollutants, vibration, dust or drainage problems. Oransky stated the following concems and reasons for his strong opposition: 1. His property values would be impacted and he has spent a good deal of money upgradin� and preserving his own property. He moved to the historic district because of its character and urban neighborhood. 2. The distance of the overhang on his property to the overhang on the church is about eight feet. The possible loss of the building could have a negative impact on the house. 3. What will protect his property from falling debris? 4. What will protect his 100 year old house from vibration of demolition and new construction, what standards are in place? When concrete goes down, and gets pulverized the lead dust cloud will travel into the alr. Will it travei ten feet? 5. What wil] protect his property from water and drainage issues when a large temporary hole is formed? 6. He believes people will try to salvage things allegally from the building site and it will become an attractive nuisance. 7. His house was previously owned by the LJkranian Church which o«�ned the church and its possible the riuo properties could be connected. 8. How will the character of the neighborhood be altered when 21 or 24 new units will be added, which will add about 63 people? There are presently 15 people on th3s block. What will happen if the demolition is approved and the housinb plan is not approved? Will there be a vacant lot, posing an attractive nuisance? 9. He has enjoyed living next to tbe Ch�irch and is sorry to see them leave. The public hearing was closed at 7:45 p,m. Bellus asked if Mendota Homes is the proposed purchaser. Alton stated that they are not - it is a limited liability partnership of which Mr, Mathern is a partner and he believed Sherman Rutzcik. Several cammissioners commented that they could not support demolition until all pQSSible reuses aze exhausted. Hargens moved the staff recommendation. He also encouraged William hlitchell to look into it and until that possibility is beaten to death he will support the motion. Benton offered a second. Benton stated that the building has not been a�gessively pursued from a real estate perspective. Younkin believed the applicant did as good a job compiling the information as he has seen on the commission, but he also supports Hargens statement. He also stated it is a � ery signi5eant building for St. Paul. Page 9 of 10 ��S � ��,'"� �` � Larson stated that he is sensitive to the economic perspective presented tonight but is also sensitive to architectural history. According to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Places, there is no possible �vay to not view this properiy as a critical site for the district. He is also holding out hope that Yhere will be a group to take on this project and with some outside financing, but also pay the con� what the building is worth. Bellus stated he views it a little differently-- that it is a very significant building and he is not swayed by the arguments made tonight. He stated he might have voted differently if a competent firm that has extensive experience in adaptive re-use were utilized and hoped that a complete extensive adaptive re-use study had been presented. He is aiso not swayed by the environmental cost estimates, either way the costs have to be paid. He stated he hoped for more substance submitted on economic feasibility. The motion carried ananimously. 4. Staff Announcements: Spong requested that commissioners give her comments on the sign togo by 7-3. Bellus summarized his meeting with the Deputy Mayor and Roger Curtis. He stated that he believes it is likely the Mayor's office will support the addition of another staff person and the Mayor's office also wants to see the ordinance revised because it is too vague. 5. Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 7:52 p.m. Submitted by: 3ulie Hoff Staff Page 10 of 10 ��J' CO �d-`t �-\ M�Ctt1Y • ALTON, e�.�.e AnORNEYS ROBERT M. M4CLAY BRIAN D. ALTON* 'Also Ucensed in �sco�sin July 1, 2002 Roger C. Curtis, Director Office of License, inspections, and Environmental Protection CITY OF SAINT PAUL 330 St. Peter Street, Suite 300 St. Paul, MN 55102-1510 Re: Grace Community UCC 873 Portland Avenue File No. D02-005, Demolition Permit Dear Mr. Gurtis: NOTICE dF APPEAL 951 GRAND AVENUE Sf. PFAJL. MN 55105 FAX 657/290-25�2 e-mail: IawCmcday-alton. com 651 /24�-0301 On behalf of the AppGcant, Grace Community United Church of Christ, the decision and order of the Heritage Preservation Commission to deny the Application for Demolition Permit is hereby appealed. This appeal is based upon the following grounds. 1. The Findings are not supported by the evidence presented to the Heritage Preservation Gommission. 2. The building has no economic value or usefulness and the owner cannot afford to repair or preserve it. Through diligent effort the owner has not been able to identify any buyer, including William Mitchell College of Law, who would buy the property at a price reasonable to the owner and preserve it. The owner is in dire financial circumstances and must sell the property immediate{y. There are no other options. The church needs to obtain a demofition permit and to sell the property to be able survive, serve its missio�, and fulfill its obligation to its parishioners and the community it serves. 3. The evidence before the Heritage Preservation supported the foflowing Findings as set forth in section 73.OE Code of the City of Saint Paul: Commission of the Municipal Architecturai and historical merit of the buildinp. The building is classified as supportive to the character of the Hiil Qistrict. ��— � �cat� �- • z o z Roger C. Curtis July 1, 2002 Page 2 of 2 The effect of the demolition on surroundinp buildinqs. There wil! be no effect on fhe law school, church, and fire stafion surrounding the building. �th the exception of the house to the west, aI! of the surrounding structures are across a street or alley. They have iitt/e or no relationship to the building. Once it has been demolished, there will be no effect on the residence to the west. There will no effect on the residence to the west if proper precautions are taken during demolition. The efFect of anv proposed new construction ... on surroundinq buildinqs. The new construction, if constructed of similar size and detail will have fhe same effect on the surrounding buildings as fhe existing building has now. The economic value or usefulness of the building as it now exists or if altered or modified in comoarison with the value or usefulness of an�proposed structures designated to replace the present building or buildinqs. As is the church has no economic value or usefulness. Doing nothing is not an option. lt will cost over $9.5 miNion just to make the building safe and usefui for its present purpose as a church - and much more to adapt it to another use. The Church has fried and failed to find another user for the building. There is no indication that the building can be usefuf for any other purpose given the overwhelming structural, accessibilify, heating, e(ectrical, and environmental problems with the buiiding and the lack of parking. ln comparison, the proposed new structure wouid provide much needed new housing with substantial economic usefulness. Please advise our o�ce immediately if for any reason yau do not consider this appeal to be properly perFected. Also, please notify our office of the date and time of the City Councii hearing in this matter. We would request that the matter be put on the agenda for the first available date. Please do not hesitate to call Rev. White or me if you need additional information with respect to this appeal, truly yours, D. Alton BDA/sks cc: Amy Spong, City of St. Pauf Heritage Preservation Commission Rev. Oliver White. � c�- -`� a. A'�- Z- - 873 Portland Avenue demolition Page 1 � a--� � l From: Paul Cousin <da!lcuz@sprintmail.com> To: <qmy_Spong@ci.stpaul.mn.us> Date: 6l25l02 9:44PM Subject: 873 Portland Avenue demolition m Dear Amy, Last week we were dismayed to receive the postcard about the possible demoiition of Grace Community Church. While it is apparent that the building is in disrepair, it still has an attractive facade and adds to the neigh0orhood's character. We would hate to see it demolished. Has anyone explored alternative uses for the building? Perhaps it could be converted into housing; there are several other former churches and synogogues in the city which have been converted into housing. We are unabfe to attend the meeting on Thursday, but wanted to voice our concerns. Thank you. Carol Dallman Paui Cousin 877 Ashland Avenue St. Paul, MN 55104 �45 -1 Q�-�i�.l June 27, 2002 Howard Oransky &77 Portland Avenue St. Paul, MN 55104 Amy Spong Heritage Preservation Gommission Gity of St. Paul Office of License, Inspections and Environmentaf Protection 350 St. Peter Street Suite 300 Saint Paul, MN 55102-1520 Re: File No.: D02-005 873 Portland Avenue Grace Community Church Dear Ms. Spong, As a homeowner and property tax-paying resident of the Hiii tiistoric District i would like to express for the record my very strong opposition to the demolition request. Attached to the demolition request is a supplementai letter from the firm ofi McC{ay Alton, Attorneys. The letter notes that if the building is demoiished, "[T]he immediate adjacent properties, including the faw school, a church and the fire station would not be impacted at all:' The house in which I live, next door to the church at 877 Portland Avenue, is not mentioned in the letter. Our house is immediately adjacent to the west and would be seriously impacted by the demolition. Five years ago my partner and I bought the home that is immediately adjacent to the Grace Community Church. We did this after looking at 75 homes in the Twin Cities. Because of extremely high housing prices, home ownership was never a realistic possibility for us in New York and Los Angeles, the cities we'd {ived in before moving to Minnesota. The house we bought offered the best of both worfds: iYs on a quiet, peaceful street, but only a five minute walk from the activity on Grand Avenue. Like most people who are fortunate enough to own a home, this 100 year-old house is not oniy the piace where we live but it is our primary material asset. We made a major financiai investment to buy it, we have spent a good deal of time and money to improve and maintain it, and we carry a long-term obligation to the bank that financed our purchase ofi it. AS-Z �..�.,�;�,�.n r,�.28-02 Dd-°��i I hope the aitached photos will show that the church is considerably bigger and talier than our house. The base of our house is 11 feet away and the base of our garage is i0 feet away from the base of the church. Given the overhangs on both our house and the church, I'd say these two build+ngs are actually separated by about 8 feet in the air. By contrast, the law school is 125 feet away from the church and the fire station is 85 feet away from the church. f do befieve that the demolition and possible condominium construction coufd have a negative impact on our house. My concerns are appropriate, I think, given the Guidelines cited in the HPC Staff Report: "in the case of the proposed demolition of a building. ..the Commission shali make written findings on. ..the effect on surrounding buildings, (and) the effect of any new proposed construction. ..on surrounding buiidings. .." I have the foilowing concerns about the effect of the demolition and proposed new construction on our house: #1 Falling Debris The 9/6/00 report from Krech, O'Brien, Mueller & Wass notes that "[T]he multi- story building is constructed ot masonry bearing walls, wood framed fioors and a steel truss-supported wood framed roof." The exterior materials include painted concrete blocks. What will protect us when the wrecking ball hits the concrete block walls and steel truss system 10 feet away from our house? WiA the owner build a protective structure between the buildings? Will it be as high or higher than the church, which is considerably higher than our house and garage? Will such a structure damage our yard when it is installed and removed? I am opposed to the demolition request because it offers us no protection from falling debris. #2 Vibration What wi{I protect our 100 year-oid house from vibraiion damage when the demolition is pertormed on the existing buiiding and when the pile driving is done for the new construction? What vibration standards wili the current and new property owners respect? Wil1 they agree to follow, for example, the Vibration Griteria for Historic and Sensitive Oider Buildings written by Walter Konon and John Shuring and distributed to the field by the American Society of Civil Engineers? This report notes that "Historic and sensitive ofder buildings require special attention to protect them from construction induced ground vibrations." Will the current and new property owners agree to the placement of a seismograph in my house with third party monitoring and switch to less disruptive demolition and construction methods should their vibration exceed recommended levels for protecting historic buiidings and older buildings? 1 am opposed to the demolition request because it offers us no protection from damaging vibration. � A5- 3 � a.v� a � #3 Environmental Pollutants The appfication materials note that the building contains asbestos, mold, and possib{y light fixture PCBs, which could pose dangers to health. We've heard today that fhe building contains lead-based paint. Wi!! the owner have these and any other poientially dangerous substances removed prior to the demolition? When a building is demolished the concrete and masonry is broken apart and in the process puiverized, creating a powder that rises into the air. Anyone who has ever witnessed the demolition of a building knows this. Will a cloud of mo{d-bearing or lead-paint bearing powder drift 10 feet info our house through the windows or land on our yard, ihen get tracked into our house? Will the health of our neighbors and their children ae protected? Even if dangerous pollutants are completely controlled, our house will be covered in dust and dirt produced by the demolition. I am opposed to the demolition request because it offers us no protection from environmental pollutants, dirt, and dust that can released during the demolit+on. #4 Water Seepage When the building and its foundations are demolished a crater wiil remain. Unless the owner has a drainage pump installed in the crater or fills the crater with earth and provides alternate drainage, the s+te will fill with water. Water seepage from the demolition site into our basement is a disiinct possibility. Is the owner prepared to instali a drainage system to prevent water seepage into our basement? The application materials indicate that the proposed new owner wifl excavate an underground parking garage. This excavation will lower the depth of the pit even further. Will the new owner take these or simifar measures to prevent water seepage into our basement? I am opposed to the demolition request because it offers us no protection from water seepage. #5 Saivage Nuisance While the demolition is in progress the site will become an attractive nuisance. It is a realistic concern that some people interested in architectural salvage may try to enter the site after hours to remove building elements they consider valuable. This attractive nuisance wiil pose a safety concern in the neighborhood. What security measures wiil the owner take to protect us from this nuisance in the neighborhood? i am opposed to the demolition request because it offers us no protection from the nuisance and safety concerns that accompany iliegal salvage. #6 Possible Connections Our house was previously owned by the former Ukranian congregation and I suspect there may be vestigial system connections between the buildings. This possibility should be researched before the larger building is demolished. #7 Neighborhood Character � �� 7 oa�� Lastly, I have some concerns about fhe character of the neighborhood and how it might be affected by the demolition and proposed new construction. The appiication materiais propose to demolish the church and in its place construct a building of the same size containing condominiums. I have heard the proposal could be 21 or 24 units. Using the lower number of 21 units and assuming an average of 3 people per unit, the residents of this block of Portland can expect an increase of 63 residents. The are presentiy 5 houses on this biock of Portland. Using the same average of 3 per unit, we have about 15 people on this block. How will the traffic patterns and general character of the block change when the number of residents increases from 15 to 78? I agree ihat residentiai development is preferable to a gas station or fast food restaurant, but is it necessary to add so many units? As a means of comparison, a few blocks to the north at Victoria and Marshall there are multiple family dwellings on the corner lot. This corner has 6 units, not 21. Wil{ the new condominiums be priced to reflect the economic diversity of our neighborhood or wilf they be priced at a levei that limits ownership to only those with substantiai weaith at their disposal? Has the current or prospective owner received provisional encouragement from the City of St. Pauf for the proposed development? What if the demolition permit is granted, the building is demolished, and the condominium proposaf is denied by the City? We couid then be left with a very large vacant !ot on our block, presenting an eyesore and an attractive nuisance. I have enjoyed fiving next door to the church for these last 5 years. The church has been a valuabfe asset to our neighborhood, providing both spiritual and material comfort to many in our community. I support their mission and would be sorry to see them leave. I understand that ths building is in need of massive repairs and I understand that the cost of these repairs exceed the financial resources available to the church. i agree that if no possibiiity for reuse in fact exists, then residential devetopment is the preferred option. But for all the reasons I've listed here, I oppose the demofition and proposed new construction as presently described in the application before us today. A thorough engineering and structural study that includes specific steps the owner wili promise in writing to take to protect the immediately adjacent neighbors during and after the demolition could provide a very different picture and a different response. Sincerely yours, ��/�� L/��7� Howard Oransky / �"'"� L�'l�` G'� •f �� I: �( 7'f f�'�Y✓ � ! '� y f �E ��'"'�'*��` ''�� : . "� `` . . .� r"{'k'�. r- %��` y�'��'� P �•.F � R R E��'� � y � �`rh��'C� '� ��- ��'� �. , '�£:`F��y jT7i'� x�r-,�u.t. '�' it n . � � r5-�'` .ir ts. � � c � c� "': - a1:"�ti F . . r �� ., � '. � r ::. .� t •�` �� ^ �` es � V �, i`�,stlY �r.s j , , � ''�i� � . - . . '� �� ' ��F , s'. . _.. � _.��. �, . ..,�. ' . ,, -- � ' �� " s : � . . . ..��3i f �� t �. .;{:t �� .�:�.� f � !?. . . . ``n� . • n � T� • �� V� , • . � . �• ' .`Per��' x�' .' �. � . ; w � _ _ (�� ti ;" 1 - ' . . "t.�. l� _.: >�,�k �' ', . ., i- , f ��« `' r+ > � ��i��.�T��, , r. . � X '�' �! Y iw AT/fr •*'�r a.r;l�.... "' ., �, ., ` u:�. � ::.i� ' :' { '�e i � [ F � � •.''�.. ': F "' S _�. "� Y '�• .. - yr ' i -�. � K � `y � I:n.�r' ..» :AC�,✓�: . • � - . � 9 nt . . „;� a .�r' N lt iyr� � l'y C ':�'t�y .. � �t1 Y� � • , t �� f ��~ � �e•n� y s� f " • � 7 '�'ri�. +r,1 ' ; �,, -; � . �-rdlF �...� - . ��-ar;,,r �" _ t, �.. , ;� . t. ,, • • y � 7{ . �� : « : _ > � : �. t�� 4 - � . � �A. :� I ,. ,, � � 'J ' '' t a i.. . ``\` . , � +' r. $� � :� ?k � +f � a yv"' ,.� _ -_>.,�. �iti:: �� y : r ,p f -�' t� Xa :,�a , _, ; � ; n � :,r. � � �c � . � , � � � �� _ _ %:. H+' .. � �� „� ��; -� �� --� - a�..�!- - .Q�:-- n �',:,�. � . 's �' 4 :Grs-.Y' ,�� . � �� c.�t� _ ..,t-- ._ . f:._ . f: . � . : � . . � c °a .. �, ,. '::� -. � c , ; + �."'s� _.�-�/ ...,_ � -+�+5 �'y . 4 �:�. � . S.n'. � ^ �� y' - - . . +�. N Y. � 'L+� u v`. ' . . ��5: �f.��.i tti:.." a t � ��y..;t ��Ec�'�?t . . 7'Y'3; �S .i ; � � ��. ti+-' ••:` ; '' :) � `l _, .Y' • r } ...` _ _ . . i'�" _" , . � � ,. .. . - Ld�`i 4 d�, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Saint Paul City Council will conduct a public hearing on Wednesday, July 24, 2002, at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, Third F1oor, City Hall- Courthouse, 15 West Kellogg Boulevard, Saint Paul, MN, to consider the appeal of McClay Aiton Attorneys on behalf of Grace Community Church to a decision of the Heritage Preservation Commission denying a demolition permit application to raze the shucture at 873 Portland Avenue (Grace Community Church, Hill Historic District). Dated: July 11, 2002 Nancy Anderson Assistant City Council Secretary Page 1 of 1 6 a `� a Nancy Anderson - Publication of Public Hearing Notice. From: Nancy Anderson To: Johnson, Luci!!e; Moore, Shari Date: 7/11f2002 3:40 PM Subject: Publication of Public Hearing Notice. 1 have also faued the attached puBlic hearing nofice to Ne Legal Ledger. file:1/C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\GW}00004.HTM 7111/2002 *��x+t�:�,u�*�+k�x:� -COMM. JOURNRL- MODE = MEMORY TRANSMISSION FILE NO.= 129 N0. WM HBBWNTWK STATION NAMEi TELEPHCU� taJ. �1 OK <01> LEGRL LEDGER IIRTE JUL-11-2002 w.�x:w� TII'� 16�09 w,sv< p.01 STRRT=M,-11 16�08 ENI�M-11 16=03 PRGES PRG.NO. PROGRAM NRME •�+ �.i -Gty oi Saint Pxu1 - ��M��'m��**��+r�� -City Council - *�*� - 651 266 8574- ��*�** � e•• • l � CITY OF SAINT PAUL OFFICE OF TFIE CITY CAiJrICIL FACSTMfLE 'TRANSMISSION CQVERSHEET TO: 1�'ROM: FAX #- � � \ n' � , t xE: {� �t �•�.-_�; �_��,..-�- : DATE: �� 2ao� � Note: Facsimile operator, pkase dellver Uus transmission to ffie above addressee. If you di$ not rueive aCl of the pages in good condition, please advEce Janie I,atrenz at (651) 8560 at yonr estl5est rnnvenimee. .. T4aek yon. NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): �` ba-�I �,\ CCIY HALL THIltD FLOOR SAINT PAUC., b4NNESOTA 55702 � amxma�r«raaaaom� 6a�� l PETITION WHEREAS, any build'mg demolition, preservation, renovation, or construction in our neighborhood has a direct impact upon the quality of life of the neighborhood residents; WHEItEAS, the Greek Orthodox Church, located at 873 Portland Avenue, is within the Summit Avenue Historic Preservation District boundaries; and WIIEREAS, many interested neighborhood residents t�ave not had the opportunity to provide u�put into the decision avaldng process regazding any proposed action regarding the Greek Orthodox Church; THEREFORE, the undersigned petition the St. Paul City Council to postpone any action regardiug the Greek Orthodox Church until such time as the Minuesota Historical Society conducts a re-use study regarding said Church, and the neighborhood has the oppominity to provide input into any proposal. ' [t��, , , � i� r � � . ,:�'�f� .- .�, . � � o:c"� �r � �� ?s'� ,��,t' �( �SS�D� Z2� '�sJ�� / �� -1 s� Gs i >s�o�( ��- �� '- ZS �r��= Z�� ay �� E,z�� a� jy.�./ �--t � �t� J_a9a -��33) �2$�$ � ��y� - �� c�-" Ic� ( PBTIT`ION WI�REAS, any building demolition, preservation, renovation, or construction in our neighborflood has a direct impact upon the qiiality of life of the neighborhood residents; WF�REAS, the Greek Orthodox Church, located at 873 Portland Avenue, is within flae Summit Avenue Historic Preservation District boundaries; and WHEREAS, many interested neighborhood residents have not had the opportunity to provide input into the decision making process regarding any proposed action regazding the Greek Orthodox Church; THEREFORE, the undersigned petition the St. Paui City Council to postpone any action regarding the Cneek Orthodox Church unfil such time as the Minnesota Historical Society conducts a re-use study regarding said Church, and the neighborhood has the opportwuty to provide input into any proposal. � 3. <�_ 4. `�� 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 12. 12. 13. 14. �r7�drl�� a9 '/ �sl�/� �� orua� '-y��/ � - �s� �c � �__ � � 2. ��,��,� C`��-��.n�ps ��r RS�IaN�i ��10 -o�t-7 6��►�-1 PETTTION WF�REAS, any buitding demolition, preservatioty renovation, or construction in our neighborhood bas a direct impact upon the quality of life of the neighborhood residents; WI�REAS, the Greek Orthodox Churcb, located at 873 Portland Avenue, is witivn the Suuunit Avenue Historic Preservation District boundaries; and WFFIEREAS, n�xny interested neighborhood residents have not had the opportunity to provide inpu# into the decision making process regazcling any proposed action regarding the Greek drthodox Church; THEREFORE, the undersigned petition the St. Paul City Council to postpone any action regarding the Greek Orthodox Church until such time as the Miuuesota Historical Society conducts a re-use stucly regarding said Church, and the neighborhood bas the opportunity to provide input into any proposal. � �� l 3. ,�+'� l �� 1 � 4. i �=.-�k�-� � �� ,� , � � � �� 5� s. �:�-� � �i��..-- 6_ �-,S_ � � lU� i ��S �� l � �, � � �. �� g.�?Q�v�� sl � 9. ,��'�L{�' �� ia. ii. iz. 13. 14. �-0.�;.�-�-. �- L ��if � 1 /�� ' �7 �a ,Z`� - 6 5 i �� z��_ ��r� z �� - �"� I � A ��'t � ��% � � � �,2-v5�,�7 � �2 —�,�;� � � �� -,�� PETIT`ION WFIEREAS, any building demolition, preservation, renovarion, or construction m our neighborhood has a direct impact upon the quality of life of the neighborhood residents; WkIEREAS, the Gzeek Orthodox Church, located at 873 Portland Avenue, is within the Summit Avenue Historic Preservation District boundaries; and WHEREAS, many interasted neighborhood residents have not had the oppornuuty to provide input into the decision making process regazding any proposed acYion regazding the Greek Orthodox Chureh; THEREFORE, the undersigned petition the St. Paul City Council ta postpone any action regarding the Greek OrYhodox Church until such time as the Muuiesota Historical Society conducts a re-use study regarding said Church, and the neighborhood has the opportunity to provide input into any proposal. Name Address Phone 1. 2. 3. 4. ,� " s. >�,', f , r 6. i ja, 7, � 8• `,�s , � 9. � j r 10. ____�� 11. 12. 13. 14. ��V �C,�YiC� , ��1� L�•N-�L �,. /� l � �Q a�r /�r �; �'lC 3 � �ti �� s ( — �G. > _�3 � � J r •7 r- �1 <� —=s;� r "'' ' �%�/ �C `,�-ul�> 3� ' l J 1 f t � J � � -�1�a� 7�Z�' :>` P��- �f � � � , �` f',r,K-� S�,,.� —� �� s�z � _�'�`� j��^-.'u�� i. aa � �,i PETITION WHEREAS, any buiiding demolition, preservation, renovation, or construction in our neighborhood has a direct impact upon the quality of life of the neighborhood residents; WHEREAS, the Grcek Orthodox Church, located at 873 Portiand Avenue, is within the Summit Avenue I-Tistoric Preservation District boundaries; and WHEREAS, many interested neighborhood residents have not had the opportuniry to provide input into the decision making process regazding any proposed action regazding the Greek Orthodox Chwch; TI�REFORE, the undersigned petition the St. Paui City Council to postpone any action regazding the Greek Orthodox Church until such time as the Mimiesota Historical Society conducts a re-use study regarding said Church, and the neighborhood has the opportunity to provide input into any proposal. �� 14. �:�. r ��t v�-�-�. �-�c�me;f�`- Q� C,v w a �',� . (a61. �� y� �`1 ct��l aa�y�-� PETI'I`ION WHEREAS, any building demolition, preservation, renovation, or conslruction in our neighborhood has a daect imQact upon the quality of life of the neighborhood residents; WF�REAS, the Greek Orthodox Church, located at 873 Portland Avenue, is within the Summit Avenne FIistoric Preservation District boundaries; and WFiEREAS, many interested neighborhood residents have not had the opportunity to pravide input into the decision making process reguding any proposed action regazding the Crreek Orthodox Church; THEREFORE, the nndersigned petition the St. Paul City Council to postpone any action regarding the Greek Orthodox Church urrtil such time as the Mnmesota Historical Society conducts a re-use study regazding said Church, and the neighborhood has the opportmiity to provide input into any proposal 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. l Oy 11. I 12. 1� 14. �� l 2� Name Address Phone ��.�� • Grace Community United Church of Christ 986 Forest Street, St PanL� M'vmesota 55106 Rev. Otiver G. White, 5enior Minister 651/771-7649 Faa 6511771-7810 July 23, ZOOZ Ward 6 Council Member Dan Bostrom Suite 3206 - City Hall 15 West Kellogg Boulevard St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 _�__ s � ,� � �`. ;� � tJ tr- � : Dear Council Member Bostrom: 1v�! � Tnr _ F_u(s'� Cd��V4�.L. �`s��v 4 i I am writing on behaif of Grace Community Church, formally located at 873 Portland Avenue. We are Minnesota's only African-American congregation affiliated with the United Church of Christ. Because of the building's age and lacation, events regarding our efforts to sel{ the properly have recently been brought to your attention by the Historic Preservation Commission, which recently denied us a demolition permit. You are perhaps already aware that the 6uilding, erected in 19Q9, was the home of the First Methodist Episcopal Church. In 1964, it became the home of a congregation known as St. Volodymyr and Olga Ukrainian Orthodox Church. By 1980, the demographics of the community changed entirely, and the Ukrainian congregation dwindled to just a few families. Lack of inembers and diminishing finances made it impossibie for the congregation to perform routi�e and preventative maintenance. On November 18, 1994, the building...as is...became the home of Grace Community Church. Grace Community Church began on July 1, 1990. After having moved to four different locations in as many years, we searched diligently for a permanent church home. When we held our first worship service at 873 Portiand Avenue on December 21, 1994 and began an aggressive outreach to the community, we were very happy; however, being much more aware of the building's major problems, in hindsight, we would not have made such a purchase. We have tried in vain to prevent further deterioration; however, the costs are far beyond our financia{ abilities. The decay is an eyesore for the community and unsafe buiiding conditions prevail, a view expressed often by St. Paul Building Safety Inspector Steve Armstrong. � The William Mitchell School of Law is located directly across the street. Without a doubt, when classes are in session, the law school occupies the greatest majority of the parking spaces within a three-bfock area...day and evening. The burgeoning parking problem is a major nuisance for the general neighborhood, and on many occasions the dosest iegai parking space to Grace Community Church may be as far away as two blocks. The parking issue and driv+ng maneuverability on Portland Avenue is greatly exacerbated during the winter season, when the street is narrowed between the curbs by piles of snow and ice. � )- o �.�� - � • significance. We talked at length with a host of developers who dreamed of tuming the buiiding into a concert hail, theater, or community gathering piace. We also talked with persons who expressed an interest in tuming the property into apartments and condominiums. Inasmuch as the buifding is our first church home, we would have been gretefu{ if a buyer had stepped fonvard who had the abifity to restore and maintain the building and presented an offer backed with terms that would have allowed my congregation ta move to a new location. But we could not afford the luxury of waiting for a'selective buyer.' Nor would it have been fair in an open market. The building was for sale to the first person who met our terms. No congregation sought interest. Sherman Rutzick, a developer with whom you are well acquainted, has made an offer to purchase our properly and build a housing unit on the site, taking under deep consideration the presence the building has established in the community. We accepted his offer because it met our terms, and it will aflow us to move to another location. No one should expect anything less from us. Our congregation is very committed to the community. Over the years we have become strongly invoived in prov�ding a refuge for displaced residents in partnership with Project Home, a program sponsored by the St. Paul Area Councif of Churches. Grace Community Church is the first congregation to aflow its facilities to be used as an ovemight refuge, which now includes 30 congregations, both white and African- American, who are bound in an ecumenical ministry of inercy to the least and the last in our community. We are also committed to providing a safe place for at-risk youths. � Grace Community Church, which provides a food shelf and free clothing, is also widely known for its outreach to seniors. I am no stranger to you. In addition to a variety of boards and agencies whose boards I actively participate on, I served two terms 2s President of the St. Paui Interdenominationaf Black Ministerial Alliance. My commitment to help make St. Paul a better place is not in question. That we wiN be able to continue a unique and much needed ministry in 2 new location that offers our congregation the richest opportunity to continue its great work, this euening I stand before you to appeal for a demolition permit for the property known now as Grace Community Church. While I appreciate the fact that we had tH2 opportunifij to woric and wdrship in such a historic site, meanwhile we live in � wbHd that has seen many chan jes since 1909. I pray you wiii choose to sustain a gre�t ministry to the Aftican-Ameri��n community, as opposed to maintaining a monument that has served its purpose. t t�h�nk you for your time and consideration. Faithfully yours, f ! ��10/ , Rev. Oliver G. White r +t�- — �� ,,•'�� w � �-e �i►� � F � Ramsey Hill Association 900 6FLYY iVExUF. SU1TE Y, 6AIN7 P0.UL, NM 65102-9500 TFLEPNOxE: OS).221.020E July 22, 20�2 Council Member Dan Bostrom Room 320 B, City Hall St. Paul, MN 55102 Dear Council Member Bostrom, On behalf of the board of directors of the Ramsey Hiil Association (RHA) T am writing to encourage you to vote to uphoid the decision of the Heritage Preservation Commission regardiny a demolition permit for 873 Portland Avenue, Grace Community Church. The issue is No. 50 on your agenda for the ]uly 24 public hearing. Although 873 Portland does fall outside the official bounda�ies of the RHA it is within the Hili Historic Hiil Distrlct that also encompasses most of our area of • focus. At the last public hearing of the HPC the member of the commisslon gave very serious consideration to the issue of granting the permit to demolish the building. After doing so, the commission members voted unanimousVy to deny the appiicatlon. We respectfully request that you affirm that decision. There can be no doubt that the members of Grace Community Church find themselves in a difficult situation with regard to the costs of maintaining and restoring the historic structure that houses their conyregation. But it wouid be a terrible precedent for the long-term stability of this city and its important hlstoric neighborhoods for the city council to allow a properly owner to demolish a pivotal structure within a historic district having done so little to try to restore and preserve th�t structure. It was quite obvious during the publlc hearing before the HPC that not much efFort had gone into exploring reuse possibilities for this building. It is our understanding that should they be granted the demolition the congregation has an agreement to sell the property to a real estate developer intent upon building some sort of housing on the site. T would you to page three of the stafF report to the HPC regarding this proposal. staff "Findings", Item 6, "It is better to retain hlstoric bulldings that are permit, refer Unde� `' - � �� . � -°. 2as�f D �-� a. � Zto•a znzQ# z�ossx aa�t�san�t� � x�33S�1RN NL1 Q��,s�� z•znr