02-545�S
City of St. Paul
RESOLUTION APPROVING
FIXING TIME OF HEARING THEREON
Voting
Ward
2
0
�']
Assessment No. 5014
In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for construction of
traffic related improvements as required by the Environmental Assessment Worksheet
for the US Bank office development located at the northwest corner of Robert Street
and Fillmore Street.
Preliminary Order: 02-265 approved March 27, 2002
Final Order: 02-355 approved April 24, 2002
The assessments of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection
with the above improvement having been submitted to the Council having
considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED,That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all
respects approved.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That a public hearing be had on said assessment on
the Auaust 7, 2002, at the hour of Five thirtv o'clock P.M., in the Council
Chamber of the Court House and City Hall Building, in the City of St. Paul;
that the Valuation and Assessment Engineer give notice of said meetings, as
required by the Charter, stating in said notice the time and place of
hearing, the nature of the improvement, and the amount assessed against the
lot or lots of the particular owner to whom the notice is directed.
PF16USiifU
COUNCILPERSON ,�` 8 ,�
Yeas Nays �7�
✓�Benanav
.Blakey
✓�ostrom
Rbs•..�'+Coleman
q � ry }..-Harris 5 In Favor
✓Lantry
rReiter � Against
a Ab3W.�C
Adopted by the Council
Certi
Passed by the
Date � 5 O�
Counci Secretary
File No. 18969
a:
�' .
r
Public Hearin�: 08/07/02
T.M.SJREAL ESTATE DIVISION
�ct Person and Pho Number:
Roxanna Flink �"� 266-8859
Date: O (� �D
� Z, Green Sheet Number: 113053
1t1MENf DIItECTOR CTTY CAUNCII,
ATi'ORNEY C1TY CLERH
:EC DIItECfOR TECH. & MGT. SVG DIIt
(OR ASSISTANT)
T� OIl COilIICll
# OF SIGNATURE
ALL
FOR
tiag date of public heariag for the ratificatioa of assessments for the
structioa of traffic related iaiprovemeats for the IIS Baak office
elopment.
e No. 18969 Assess�ent No.5014
�NDATIONS: APPROVE (A) OR RFJECf (R) N� � ��� �ST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:
. Has We person/firm everworked uoder a contraM for this deparhnent? YES NO
rLnAn�uvcco�marssioN � A srnvr
: _
crvassrtviceco��ox
cm coutmmrE
Has this pecsodfirm eva beeu a City miployee?
FJoes tLis pa�fumpossess a skill not normally possessed by aay
c�reat City employee?
YES NO
YES NO
CING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, WLat, When, Wpere, {yyy?);
ect is aeariag com�letion. Ratifiaation is necessary ia order to begin
ecting assessments to help pay f,or #.�e �raject. _
�--"_
acES ar arruavEn: � �¢@Rn=� � ..
as'above.
- JUN 14 �QO�
NTAGESIFAPPROVED:
itted pz^8perty owae� �ave as�es,�ents pa�,ab�.� via property taxes.
DVANTAGES IFN{3T -
aot assess the beae£its would be inconsisteat with City policy.
AMOUNf OF TRANSACTION:
soultcE assessments
L II�k'ORMATION: (EXPLAIIV)
ACTIViTY NUMBER
5
$BZS�OOO.00 COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIItCLEONE)
9
YES NO