The URL can be used to link to this page

260525 WH17E - CITV CLERK ►`. �� 1 PINK �- FINANCE �7 COl1I1C11 j/r�� BLUERY - MAYORTMENT GITY OF SAINT PAl,.1L File NO. v��/,� � , ou cil Resolution , , Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date WHEREAS, The Ma.yor of the City of Saint Paul ha.s prepared and approved the City' s Application for Worka.ble Program Re- Certification to be submitted to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development; and WHEREAS, The said application ha.s been reviewed by the Council of the City of Saint Paul at the request of the Mayor; now, there- fore, be it RESOLVED� Tha.t the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby approve the Mayor' s Application for Worka.ble Program Re- Certification and the submission thereof to the United States � Department of Housing and Urban D�velopment on beha.lf of the City of Saint Paul. COUIVCILMEN Yeas Nays Requested by Department of: Hunt Konopatzki In Favor L.�i�e� Meredith _�� Against BY Sprafka Tedesco � Mme.President Butler JAH e��t ��77 J (J Form Approved by ,ity torne � Adopted by Council: Date Certifie a d by Coun ' y BY �. By Appro d by Mayo . Date J 2 319 3 Approve y Mayor r Su ission t c' BY By I PU6L�lH� �; _ � °k . ... . � . .. . � '. . . . . . . . . .... �.. ��F� '� • , . ... . � . . � � . .. . � . . . � . . .. , . . ... . ff(. � . . . . . . . � . . . ... . � R .�j-' . . � . . . �. . . . ' . . � � ... . . .. Fwm App�o�ed ��''°' . OMB No.63—R089T �t1a)O81 � . (t1�68j � '� �6� ��P�� -�-eo� s�2s � :%, _ � �o� � �� -��°�� -� � ��o��-�°�� Ci�:v of Saint r�;,l� ?•tinnesota. �_ (City ond (Dote oF Approval of the Governing Qody of the Community) _ (Signoture of Chief Exec�tive) I,a��7C'e7lCe ]). C.oi� .t2f '�ia�-t�r (Nome and Title) Applicorio� for Re-cF,rti f?.c�ti�n ' (insert: Certificotion, or Re-Certification} / � � `"Z � U. S. DEPARTMENT OF NOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT I � �� i . , �. � ' Nuo-�oe� : t�t�681 _ " , i AU quest[one� on the fnrm must be answered or adequate explanations given. Additional pages should be ettachod where needed to permit a full presentation of the local Program. :�af�:��it an ori�;nal ;:ncf three cop[es to the.appropciate R.egiona! Office, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. �QP�.�MENT OFyO y �� 1 �`�— 0 . �I z � � � � R� � � .�� n Z�� O� ��13a µ��a REGIONAL OFFICES — DEPARTi9ENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOP�tENT �.ion I: 26 Federal Plaza, Npw Yark, VPµ� l'erk IOOa7 (Connec±icut, 111ainQ, ir�^e�achusetts, Ne�v I;ampshire, New YorE:, Nhode Isla�d, Vermont) Telephone: 284-8068 Kogion IL• Widener �3uilctin�, 1339 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 (Deleware, District of `i Columbia, 111aryland, New Jersey, Penns��lvania, Virginia, �ti'est Virginia) Telephone: 597-3311 Region II[: Peuchtree —Seventh Building, Atlanta, Georgia 30323 (Alabama, Fiorida, Georgia, Kentucky, 1lissis- sippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee) Telephone: 52F-5585 Ke ion IV: Itoom 1500, 360 North ;11ichigan Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 6dS01 (Illinois, In�iana, Iotitia, 1Sichigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nortt► Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, iy'isconsin) Telephone: 3:i3-5G80 Region V: Fedoral Office Building, 819 Taylor Street, Fort 1�orth, Texas 7�102 (Arkansas, Colorado, Kansas, �;ouisiar.a, h13ssouri, Ne�v M1iexico, 01�lahoma, Texas) Telephone: 334-2867 Rogion VI: 450 Golden Gate Avenue, P.O. Box 360U3, San Francisco, Califarnia 9�102 (arizona, Gali[�mia, Guam, ltawaie, Nevuda, Southern [daho, Utah, H'yroming) Area Office: 909 Fir�t rlvenue, Searile, Washingtan 9A104 (Alaska, Montana, Northern Idatio, Oregon, b�ashington) 1'elephone: 5:iG-17a`? Rcgion VIt: P.O. Boz 38(39 GFO, San Juan, Puerta R.ico, Q0938 (Puerto Rico and the Vicgin-�stands) Telephone: 767-1515 � R � g"� � ."i �. . . 4�s�'' x.z �T- .. • � Na+' .��} `xs� ,� ;,y e,� f� �Y �� - � .�� r } �� '':� �' �_ � A � v $ �`` ° �� ,$ �" � _: � >a�:; � ; � ;z�. �. , ^ : � � ��A rS ��, - . . ��i� � � y ... _ YxSP�-c�. �. � q • � , . . . . K ^„�`,:c.�.}��. . ,�� Vi � 1972 WORRABLE PROGREIM �-�-�`��:�; _�' �� , �� ; � " �, � ... x . y_ � . .. . . ,,, : �` . The- City of Saint Paul's Workable Program defines the prograr�;s needed � � ��k � � �; to �eet rteeds in the area.s of housing, code enforcement, planning and � '� t �_ �' t :��' � eitizea partici.pation. This document relects the City's changing x= �` �� 'goverx�enta� structure. Both the new charter and the Taorkable Program � -�- emphasize planning and citizen participation, as well as active city govern- = ment paxticipation in housing and code enforcement policy. The Workable � - . ` Program can. be defined as the City's general conceptual plan to develop Y� . � . . . . . � more definitive strategy for the impending si�ecia? re�.�enue sharin�� programs, =�� as well as the Citp`s two year work program in the previously-mentioned L}�. . . . . . . . � . �' < areas. The planning and prograauning section discusses the establishment of � the new planning coordinator's office and the' goals and objectives of this office. In additian, the needs and problems of the City, as perceived by >� num�rous public a.nd private agencies, are discussed. ' In the housing a:ad relocation s�ction, the City and HRA present their anticiprated housing and relocation work program that projects three new � _ elde=ly hi.gh-rises and. several hundxed family housing units. In addition, "y'':; ' . approximately 600 moderate income multi-familp units are proposed but are � • . , ,,, ; contingent ugon HOD fundi.ng. With the receipt of a "701" Comprehensive ;,� Plannimg Graat, the. planning coordinator's office wi1� iaclude as part of �,., . t} their work program a housing element. From this study, a city-wi.de housing t�, , policp will be developed for the first ti.me. I�Preliminary census data, � ; which inc�udes a short narrative discussing significant findings pertaining �=` ... _ : ' - �, , ,ta �the City`s population and housing is ana.lyzed in the housing section. r . _ i. ' _'.� . . . .. � � . .. � �� X . : . ' � . . . .. �i.�. . ' , . . . - .. M,r.�:� ' • �i , . � ' . � . . .. ... ' . ... 7 ' � , ..: ' ' �. . . aP.��. . .-. . . • f .�'.� + .. . .. _ .. . . . .. . � . . . . . .. � . �t �� .. .. � � . �e L�y � � z,t{yZK.�`yt.� �'�, .. . � .. � . . . .�. . . . . . . Y �.t �� ,�vu��'�+a�~ _ i . . 1Y...:ffr�h :� f '4 4 !� ' _ � Rs '� -�' 7 S_,4!a P3�.�,' 'h�� 4 � ; _ r�,� � ��' ,�i'��,." z ' �3�`�;� :, ��€^ �� ) ,��'I "IE��L�F�'�4� ��'L 3 �"'* . � R � � C '::"�.� �.� d° '"�+,� a k.r . .. a �� N ,� � �,' "�RC . � �A: � Y � t , ..�. y . 3 ,. : ��. � . � P:. '�. �� . .. �:.� . �. �" ' . The: citizen particf.pation section d�scusses the pracedure `used to arganize P �` �� . � �� ''�": y �" ��.: � , ,� . ��1 � � -f. � $IId-. impie�ent' the �Citizens Advisory Cotranittee o�.. t.ro,-1-;�)_e� Pr�.�.r:�- -��,� outlines � '� , .�?~ the present activities of the Mayor's Citizen Participation Cou�ittee. ... . ., , ,, . i�� ' ' ' . " : , , , � ,> - The Code Enforcement section discusses the present staffing and operation � M ��..', _ - �= f -: of tlie Hnusing Code section and describes the work program for the next two- s� �.: ..- � - , . � � yeax certifi.ca.tion period. The systematic code program which has been developed �. ' :; s' ` for the next two peaxs is dependent upon five additional staff positions which � are presently in the citq budget contigency account. Such a plan emphasizes �� _ life safety standards and includes proposed policy to be implemented by the � . Building Department. This lon.g range plan and proposed policy would require ; f_ � a legislative prograzn which would require action by bath the City Council and .. * State LegislaturP. ;.� ' �` , _ � ;. �� jr._. . . -. . . _.. .... .. . . �_l . . . . . � � ... . . . � .. .. ... . .. . . . . F�.' .� .�� _ , � . .. ._ . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . '•:,.:� � . . . . . � � . . . . . � � .. - . . . � � - r ,. . . �_ . . . . .. . k�L '��. ..�,. :�.; .. . . . .. . � . � �. . �-, ....,a . . ,. : . . ... . . . � ... . . . ..�., . . , .. . . . . . . . .. � . �<. .�:�.� � .�.� . - .. � . - � � � . . . . k . .�. . . � � . . . � .. � � .. i ,� :._',}. .:� :... . .: .". � �. . . � ` . `� � ��-i`�� ` ..� - � .�. . � . .. � � ` �f �, ,� ��. � s �.�� _ � _ � f ,;.. � . . � � . . t�,' , . �, , _ HU�•lOSi .; . , p i-�a� � l _ � � CENERAL � NI�:QUIl�[;M1iF:N'I'�. (1) E�:stabli�h admini>trative mechanism resf?on�ibl�� t�� the chief executiv� for the purpo;e _------------ ' of providin� leaders6ip, supervision, and coordination of N'orkable Program acti�•ities. (2) Provide explanation for any objectives set during last period which were not achie�ed. 1. Id�ntify the per5on and office or agency designated to supecvise and coordinate li'orkable Program acti�•ities, and describe the relationship of such person and offtce or agency to the chief executive. ��illiam Q. Patton� Grants-in-Aid Coordinator. Tl�e Office of Grant-in . Aid Programs is tIle officF rc�:��on.^it>le 'for coor�li�,ating ��:or}:ahle Prorrari Activities� including the Citizens Advisor}- Committee for :vorltilble Progr<r. This office is a division of the ;;ayor's office. • _ _. . _.. _ _ 2. F'or any target, ac.tion, or timetable proposed by the commtmity and approved by the Department at the time of lhe laet certification w�hich haa not been met or carried out, provide a detailed explanation of the reasons. nr i r,iarx Th�� are th�j�::rea� in «hicn the City of St. Paul did not mec� the � co:�unit±ments ��i:ich ii: niade to I�UD at the tine os' tl;e Iast ce.rtification. - - - - Th::se areas are Code Enforccnent and Citi..en Partzcir�ation. T?;e Code . Enfai_cemen:t pror,z•ar� which ��as approved a� part of tI�e l.ast certificatia:� k*as rzot carried out for several reasons. A nei�r city adr�ini.str�tion too': office in Jtine� 1970� and suspended t?ie s}�ster:�ztic code rro�rar.,' �vhicli 1��as underv:ay in order to provide an intensit�e period of training for the inspectors. Complaint �nforce�ent a�a continue and was intensified after the training period. The housinca coae ciivisi.on was transferred fror.i the fiealth Denartment to the City �3i�ilding Depai•tt;ie�it� .�I11C�1 cor.^bi:+��'• ,�Cti✓��r�.�3 all code enforcementi,�•ithiTi ane city ane��cy. Ttzis reorcariizatzori� incl�.�d�r.r intcyegration of personnel and records� li;�ited t}�.e ti:•orlc of the di.visiori to • only coc;�pl�irit resz��otise. Tl�e details of ,o:�r pro,�o>ed s��si;er.,�tic 1?i�o�i-a�i for t}ic; ne�t t1:u ycar period are includecl in t`Ze Cc:ie Eiiforce^e:1t sectio.i of tliis docticcnent. - 1 - :• , . :. , � . . � �.:� � _ _ � ..,� . � � � �� .:� �._ .. , , _ : � �� . �� czTZ�h� zrnroLVFr�:r�� Early in 1969, the Saint Paul City Council approved a resolution desig- na.ting the Board of the Community Health and Welfare Planning Council as tne official Citizens Advisory Comrnittee to the S�.ir.t Prul ti�'or�able ProE;ram for Couununi.ty Improvement. In August, 1971, a team of HUD personnel from the Chica.go Regional Office spent several days in Saint Paul conductin� a mi.d-term review of the Saint Paul Workable Progra�. In a le�tter aduressecl -co ti�c�r. ;,:afor i.cCarty, dated � September �0, 1971, the HUD Regiona,l Admir�istrator r.ia.de the following obser- vations af our citizen involve.ment, based upoa the �.id-terra review: "The preYious Workable Prc�r�nz contained a, co�-imitr�ent, suPported by a City Council • resolution, that the Saint Pa.ul Health and k'elfare PZanning Corvni.ssion is the citizen group responsible for S�'orkable Progra.m. However, thi.s co.�mitment has been. i�;rlored. The City should seriously a,nalyze ho:� to recti�y this situation." bs �. ��esult of th? above-mentioned corYespondence from h'UD, a series of meetings were held between representatives of the ;�:a,yor's Office and the riealth anci Welfare Planning Council. It was m,utually a�re�d that the designatio� of � the �ieal�h and We1f�,re Planr�in� Council as tne official citizen's advisory groua t'or. W�rk�.�le Pro��ram should be phased out. The ori�inal plan of the �:ealth and Welfare Planning Council had been to staff the Saint Faul Association of Co;rurunities, an exisf;in�; "v�ribrella:" type community organizatior�, in such r��,nner as to enaLle tlie:n �c develop the ca.pacity to he an effective citizens advisory greup. For a ti-ariety o� rr:�.sons, � this dici not happen. T'iie process uNed b;� tiie Sain.� Pa,u1 �iealt;�i and ��'elfwre Pl�,nning Council to act�:ieve t;heir �oJectives is describes more f�lly in 1 docu- ment enLitled, "Stuci,y of the Citizen Pa.rticip�.tion in Sa,int FFi.ul's �'orkable I , ��._ �` . . . � _ , . w _ � �� - . . � . , . .. . . . � , � .. a - . . . . . � . . . . "��.- Program". dated February 2, 1972. This document is attached as Exhibit l. � •� With the decision having been made to phase aut the involvement of the Co�ttunity Health and Welfare Plannir� Council, it wn,s necessary that the City proceed to desi�nate o_ r`o_rganize a citizens group to act as the official advisory co�unittee for WorY.able program. Tine was of the essence, due to t�:e fact tha.t Saint Paul's certification was due to exqire on Ju�jr 1, 1972. If there wa.s t� be a true oppor�unity for real cit��en involv�_rcnt �.n the decision- makir� process, it was essential for the City to move quickly to desi�n�,te an official citizens advisory group. The actual assignment of this task rra.s given to �he Office af G•rant-in-tiid Frograms, w'nich is part of tn� 2�;ayor's Ozfice; , tlie -rea.san for this �.ssigni::ent beira�; ��.�w� i,he Grwc��-in-�id Cf�ic� �� responsi- ble for coordinatin; the pxepa,ration of Sain�L �a,u1's Workwble Fro�ra,m. Almoat i.:r�7;ed.iatsly upon the openic� of tt-ie �ND axea office in Oc�ober, i9��, Ci�L-�t stuif be�an i��c��ing and i,rox'�-i.r��* k*ith i:�TD persor�riel to deterraine tne • most anpropriwte course oi action. T"ne �irst i•eal step take�i tottiarcl forrsir� a nez�r, truly representa'ci.ve citizens advisoiy group, was for the City staff to me�:t w?tYi groups and organizations tha�t were ac�ive in co::�r:unity oroanizatior. effox•t.:; bo�h in the publi.c �.nd priv��te sectors. ihese groups and aa�„er�c�.es incl.udeci: Cc::umznity Services staff of the Saint �ul �iousi!� and Redevelo�r.�e�i{.; Authority, �:ealth �,nd j�'��lfa-re �lanni��; Cc�urycil, Ramsey Ac�ion Fro�rr�.�s (�he local Co�:�un:ity Action Agency), Le�al Assistance of Ra.'nsey County, and t:�e Sain�� Paul Assoeiation of Conr.iunities. A rneetin� was also arr�r�ed witn the staff of the Minneapolis Coordinator's Office, ina,s�nuch as they had recently gar�e throagh t�ie process oi farniing a riew Citizeus Advisory Co�.ittee for Tr7oi•ka,ble Program. These r�eetings proved to be quite ber.eficial and brou�;h� . ta�eth�r a1.1 ai the a�encies a.nd orgauiza,tions in -tiie City involved in ca:�uaitf � or�anizatioti effor�s. These meetit�;s alsp revea.:�ed a great lack oi knowlec.ge cat�cexnirk; j�,or�cabl.e Pro�;xam, inas:�:uch as 3�ast o:€' t.iiese or�;anizations hacl r,o , � ,, :�; : . _ .� _�, „ � . ° � - 4�, •. . . . . .. . . . �*� .. , . . . . . . � .. � . . _ ,{. . .. . . � . . .. � � . _ . . prev3ous experience or iaput in the Workable Program process. .. 4�`� In the meeting with Lega]. Assistance af Rar�sey County, the City staff became aware that another effort was underway in Saint Paul to organi�e a Citizens Advisory Grazp and that this group intended to see'r. City Council desi�nation as the official advisory �roup for ��orkable Pragram. The i�e�us Por this organizing effort was primarily dissatisfaction �,�.th housir� condi- tions and programs in Saint Paul. ihe staff of Lc�L�,l Assistar,ce of P.amsey County, through their work with poor clients, had become keenly aware of the housiug problems faced by poor people and were coorcli.natin� the organizing eff�rt. Since city govexnment itself was corsmitted to for:ain� a responsible, efiective advisoxy group, tiiere was cozlccyl'CL o;rer tiii� o�her or�a:li�in; effor�, lest we end up with two competit�, conflictin� groups. TYie concern beir� tna� if the City Council were forced to choose betw�:en �wo c3�.fferent groups for offici.a2 desigr.a.�ion, there were goin� to be ant;zy citizens wor�ing �ainst • each other, rather tha,n working to�;ether to assure si�ni�icant citizen input in the Wor'�able Progra.rn process. A meeting was held bettireen the City representa.tives ar�d the Director of Le�al �'_:sistance. In d.iscussic� our �nu;aal air.is and oojectives, �t r,�,s tiie feeling of al]. concerned tha-L- our goals were essentiall;�r tne sa.��e and th�,L eve?T,� reasonable effort should be made to work together to fox�m an efa�eci;ive citizen ' � advvisory group, which could truly begin to ;�.ine-�ion and receir-e official desi�- natio:i atid status from the Saint Paul City Council. 2n hopes oi gettin� off to a.n orderly start, initial contacts z�rere mar.e pri.m.ariZy with: (1) ca�umzrzity �roups located in areas alreac�y ha-rin� federal_;,r- assisted pro�rams, (2) tenant organizations frarn punlic housir� areas and (3} . representa.tives of various ininority groups in tYie Ci�y, ir.cluding �lack, %.exican- � American and American Indian �roups. 2'he first ir�ee�ing of this �roup was held ` on Dece:nber 15, 1971, at �he Wes�t Seveuth Street Project Area Co:runi.ttee affice. .. i ,�„� , .,� . . . ; *�� ,:, ;. � ;;�. : . ' �.•• ��. , _ � � ,,, , ; This initial meeting wa.s attended by representatives frum ten differeat .: � : groups and agencies. For �his initial meeting, the staff of the City Grant- � ` in-Aid Office spent considerable time explainin.� the overall purpo�e of Workable Program, concentrating specifically on the role oP citizens grrnzps in assisting in the preparation of the new Workable Program. F�nphasis was also placed on explaining tha.t the new citizens co�ittee would be an on-goir� organization and would be responsible for :::or�:.tori;�; and evaluatir� the manner in w'aich the City wa.s carrying ov.t its Workable Program. A temporary cha.irma,n wa,s ehosen, Mr. John Brauch, Director of Lega1 Assistance of Ramsey County, to work with the City staff in defining and structuring a t;emporary Citizens Advisory Committee for Workable Pra�rara. ihrot�;n tiiese efforts, sub-cor.�nittees were appointed for each of the four flznctional areas of Workable YrograYa; codes and code enforcement, planning and program�ir�, housing and relocation, citizen � involverr�ent, as we11 �:s a fifth sur-ec>r�mitt�e to de�.l ��-�_tn Affirmative Action Progr�cs. There wa.s general a€;reement that initial emphasis must be placed upon citiL�n participation itse:lf, and the development of' membership criteria. At the January, 1972 meetin�; of the terYporary Citizens Advisoiy Cornmittee, the group deci�ed tnat memoership should b� �pen-Pnded, at least until there was some indication of how mar�y and Vrhat types t•.ou1.d beco:ne im�olved. As of tr.e January :�eeting, there wcre 20 differer�t groups represented. City staff was � requested to contact other co:�ua�znity organizations in an effox~t to build a broadly-base�3., representative cztizens group. A. list tras compiled fror� va.rious sources numbering some 60 ar�ar�iz�tions of active co�ununity groups throu�hout tY,e City. This list is attached ws �;ahibit 2. Attached as Exhibit 3 is a letter which was sent to each of these organizations e�:yulai nin� h'orkable Proeram and encoura�in� thern to becorne part of the Citizens Advisory Cammittee. This Zetter � was followed by a telepr.one call i�om City staff requestinF; an opportunity to meet with each group, iii order to furtner explain h'orYable Pro;ram a.nd its �: t. . . °�, imcportance to the City of Saint Pa.ul. ' � At the February 3, 1q�2 neeting, bir. Thomas Schaenzer, representin� the Joint, PAC Council, was elected the permanent chairma.n. By tne time of the 2�iarch, 1972 meeting of the Citizens Adviso�y Coanmit;tee, so�e 30 organizations , had formally �oined the temporary organization. On N�.rch 7, 1972, the Saint Paul City Council adopted a resolution designa.ting the Committee formed by the Office of Grant-in-Aid Pro�rarr:s as the official Citizens Advisory Commi.ttee for Saint Paul's-Zdorkable Progra,m. A copy of this resolution is attacaed as Fanibit �F. � The ma.jor work of tne Citize�s Advisory Com�ittee ha,s been performed ia the various sub-com.'nit�l;fes which w�re for.�.�d iri �ti�: i.;�?c-.,ior�,1 area,s of Workabie ' Pra�ram. The housing and Relocation sub-co�::.'nittee held a nam�er of public hea.ri�s which k�ere very well attended �.nd served to £ocus a great deal of' public atter��on on the housing prablem.s of tne �oor and elcl�rl.y. �ne Plannin; anci Prot;rar.^nin�; � SuI�-Go.^u:��it;tee met w-ith each of ine ��.jor public and private plannia; bodies in the City and the results of �hese tteetin;s are described in the section of th�s documen� dealin; with plan:�ing and pra�rG.r.�anin�. T'r�e Co34s and C�c.e Enforce:.:ec�.t Sub-Co�anittee n.^..s kortied with thc C��ty Bu:ildirk; �partr:ent to assist in deve�_a:�- ing an ef fective sy sternatic code enforce�uent program for t;he Ci�;;�. As of Ju7�y 1, 1972, 33 ox•�atiizutions have eecome mE:Mbers of the Citizens • Advisory Ca.�rni.ttee. A current r�e�nbersnip list is attact:e3 as Exhibit 5. On June 6, 1972, a new ch3rter �:ent inUo ei'fect in Sa�nt Paul. Tnis cnar:,��vr � -t6i�.� s�r� f c. � and �;he chan�es it w-iZ1 bring to ci�y governnient, az•e clescribed in "'�.. �� of this d�cum�r_t. Th��ou,�ii tiie r�eti, adr.li�iistrative and ' 1e�;islative codes k°hicn are beic� adapteu to zmpler�.en�, ti_� new chwrter, provision is being zr�.de for a f4rir.ali;e3 c:i�;izen paxticip�{,:L�;i role in �;he decision-�.�:i��; � procesUes of local goverr;�Ji;.�nt. Once �his z:arn;.:l.i.,eci s�ructure is i:nple�en�ed, the present Citizens �'ldvisor-,� Cvl;��ittee for Z•7ork�oie �'x•c�r�n will be �.bsorbed _-___ _ _ . ._ _ , .� . };, �, �` , ° into the new system, since the new citizen str�cture wi11 have a asuch bro�der ��,.� � _.� role than just Workable Program (in the HUD co text). While at the time, of : a � this writing (DECember '15, 1,72), the final role of citizen part;icipation in city �overcunent has not l�en determined, sever�l positive steps ha,ve been ta.l%en to ensure the establishment of co�mnunity counc�.ls as an inte�ral part of the : total planning process. i � To implement this pro�rw.�n, the P�Id.yor, or� une :'�, 1,�72, appoir.ted a ; � representative citizens corrunittee to: (1) determine what the city's role ia the forma.tion of the community couacil structu�e snould be, (2) determ.ine how camrmznity councils should be structured to be �ruly representative of all areas of tl�e eity, (3) determine the poz;�rs and duti�s or' �;�ie co:r�:unity councils, , and (�+) determine the relatiunship of the caun ils to the City, includii� the �T LT � nature and ar�ount of fU.ndin�, and staffin�,. Althou;h the ca-amittee is still delit�er�.th.r_�_,, tr:e scope of a com�unity �:' councilts powers and responsibilities will pro�ably include: (1) the ri�tit to reviesi and ev�aluate all planning proposals (wl�ich directly asfect that coi�t*�raciii�y) devela�ed by city departments, bureaus a,nd cor�iss:ons; (2) the right to review and evalu::.te al:l proposed zonin�; chan�es, publlic i.r�rovemer�ts, urban rene��.l plans, ete. , before these matters reach the City Couricil for iiaa.l legal actiou; ' and (3) the right tn su�gest sl�,tes of no?�i.neds for appointznen� to the Plaznin; _ CoAUaission and the various ias�c Forces af the C�.pital. Ir.iprove:.ients Coanrr�tte�. The Corsmutii.ty Councils will relate tc, t;h� City Council in an advisory capacity on legisla,tive m.�.tters arid �o the r:ayor's Oifice on ac3��zinistrative �.tters. All final decisior�s �iust, af course, resnG,in with the Couzr_il and .:a,yor ry st;ate 1aw, but major propasals regarding p�hogran, plans �nust first be revie��e� and evaZuated by tae Comrrunity Councils. Iii �.cid.itiou, ar�y proposed federal or state progrum effectin� a specific �ee�raphic a.rea, c�i the City will be reviewed and eva.luated b th� Commur��t Council in tt��wt ar I y ' y � i a, before the Council anci�or hiayor � gives the Program final �.Ppro�,ra,l. ,� _ , � ; - — __ ._ ,_. _ _- - - -- �_ ;� . �: , , ;:: - k �.. �.:-i ;-. .� : ,�• # - � . t . Citizens of the West Side � � ' Da1e-Western Improvement Association East Side Citizens Civic Couneil Target Area "C" Target Area Advisory Board St. Paul IIrban Coalition ' Target Area "B" Target Area Advisory Co�nittee Target Area "A" Target Area Advisory Conanittee � _ � � l ` � d t • ... . . . � . � . � ,. � . . . � � . � . .. _. �r.y��.,:., ..� ' . . . .. . . . . .. . � . � . � . S . . � . . ��T* � . . . . . . ♦ � . . � .. � '��l`` -! 'i . . . �.. . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . � .. • ��' �: .s . . . � . . � ��y.t`)J`.;� .� � . . % � . . � � ;:c � �. . ' . � � . , - . . . ,.`.e,s.: + . . . . .. . . .� �. .� . . .. �8 " �� . . . . ,:4 . , . . . � � � . � � . . . ' .. � . . . � . _ � . , �ITY OF S�INT PAUL ; � OFFICE OF GRANT-IN-AID PROrRA^AS 918 City Hall 612-223-�5E6 Cha�t�P.McCarty William Q.Patton �1ayar FebT1lEtTy 1�+� 1972 Coordi�,::tur � Allan F.Ede:s.on � � . � . . . Assl�lG�if C��:r.fl'�1iJ7 George R.111c�v?ahon Cotannurl; U�;��>;�,��e,;r The City of Saint Paul is cuprently in the process of' preparir� an � application to the Department of Hausing a.nd Urban Developmerrt for the Saint Paul Workable Pro�,r��sn. Workable Progra.m is a statutory provision of t'�e Ha�.asing Act of �9�+g; and every two years the City of Saint Paul, and. al.l. other major cities, must subnit an acceptable Workable Program � to FLUD ?n order to continue to be eli�ible for a wide variety of HUD � pra�r�:ms. �ie �1�S�PLV level of HUT) �rr7.i,nr; �.n S�.ii;u Paul is between 15 axi�i 20 n�llion dollars pex year f or all pr�;rax:�. One of the most importarrt �.spects of preparing a Workable Pro�razn applic�:ti�n is tha,t thEre be szgnificant and �eanin�f�il citizen partici- pa,tiorr. �he Ofx"ice of G.rant-in-Aid P�rogra.ms of the Gity is charged with � the responsibility of prept3xing the Workable Fro�r�t agplication. The stafi of thi.s affice in recent y�eeks has been involved in the process of formin� a Citizens Adv-isory Co:��roittee f'or Worr.abl.e Pro;ram. Our initial contaets were priTM�axily �th COmMi�n�'ty' gY'6LIPS� either located in an area having a federal pro�ram or representi.n� e. specific ma.r.ority cc�nity. The HUD guidelines make it quite clear tY�a.t co�muLities directl,y affected _ by federal progr2ans and the poor and minorities r.:ust have an o�portunity to _�articipate in .+.he Workable Fro�ram process. Thus, we felt it was appropriate to begin aur efforts with tnese areas ar�d these graups. Since the ef".f'ects of the Workable Pro�ram are city wide, hot•rev�er, it is very impartan-� and very desirable for this new Citizens Advisoxy Ca�rsni.ttee fbr Workable Fro;ram to be bro�.ci�y representative of the entire City in its m�.ke-up. We are, tt.erefare, invi.tin� yaur organization to beca�e �.n active psrt of this group. We are attachir�, for your information, a short su�..�x�y taken directly f�a� the HUU �ui.delines of the ma,�or elemants of tne ��orkab"le P±�a3rara. We are also attaehin� a caoy of the mc,eting no�ice for the next meeting which wi.21 � be held thi� Thursday, February 17, at 7:30 p.m. in the County Basxd Room, 356 City Ha.11 and Court Hoase. k'e hope that vcur or�axuzation wi11 be *� �,, �. /z ,� ..,:.>,; �. �,j ��• J / .'' � � . , t � � y . .4 � . . .. .. . . . . .. . .. ... .. . .. . . � . . . . .. ... �� i �� : _ . .. � .. .. � � � .. � . . . ,. � . � f . . � . . . � . . _/�_ . .. . . . . . � . . . L , . . .. . .. T{� .. .. . . . . . . . . � I . . . � � � . � . : • �. .�. . . . . .. . � . , � . . . � � � � .. � . . . represented at �his meeting. We �u1,8 a7,.so invite you to contact either � � Mr. George McMahon, Assistant Grant-in-Aid C di aor nator, or a�rself, and we vill be happy ta discuss Workable Program and the Citizens Advisory Ca�unittee with you. Sincere]�y yrnirs, WILI.IAM Q. PATTON " Coordinator : WQ,P�k2m _ Attach. � ; ' , i � ,I r;� iWt1U1Tt�0�!EtICtlq ,.' �� x `s� {S; � , ` . , � `,� � , 3 G,, Or ST. PA�L f�� F'�� l�r • O�FiCL ~ TF;= �� F°��cc�t nC� � � e � �� , O CITY C� �,� .� '�` COU�C�L ^'�� =F ;_` �:-�0 .:TIOL—�_\'c.^./�L �CRVt �+ �QR�y'�'GY a, .. . . . . . . .. ' � COlhM1S510NEp _� DA'� ., :� - ----_. �T� the C ty . T•T'�.ti.:� S, i o� °��:; F,��? �., c::^�;��,... ` � e,� . -�_- o� c�t_� r��-;i c:.�^r:c� :,o �:i.•r� ci;rec�i�n to tre °�i,--� �:.i .. . , . _.. F ;,c��.,:'_e a�-...,,....� �.,,� -;.�- ---� t?y'-'�'-u��'.+� ��@ .�'.��rf G+° u:^_^ C.�w:C3 � o C��-::--_n-t�c' Pro�� :�.^s b��z ...'.:��:i:�L'?�' C..�1•^°r'13� Z'T�� V^w�'� C�.:._'.; �'_ �- ' - '•'.,,... � « �, ' -'•��.� v°: .. �v��_v��_..^.:�-v �+=�= CTa:��'Q f=a.�.. � � ~ . v�..�`, � � . . . �.�i.i. �:'�?'�,Z!�� 'R'�'1ne. , ; � �--. �e e�or�s ^ C�'-;.,...,., , . �! �^' v....��..1..,, riCaY:.'..'!�7'Tir Cp`•-�`-hi Nv�.n. y��. I.�C�^��.` �n T � ?� ��rT �..�� t^� bcen �'��'� �„ . , �..� ::��:�1�, �?�� .�c�� of �'^^ ^-,t;L,,.... .,,; �- v•- _.... t..�:-C�"tr C�-».ws�' ^ • _ �n�+ �..., �'n:.:^.�:�n ^-r+.,....,.�r� 'e. - ..J�.u.,.. 3.,,� l�� COi�..�,1:1'�s Z:i�� "'..�, ^^^''.� `..r.r•....,.nri�...+.� ,.�� ,t, /, � y C.._.�.... .+.��.:� �:�w�.�.,.�1..:_,i� � l t�1- GI.: L:�A U.'��ry Z'.�`�1 !`•�'� . �t �.• .� C'-�_'=^:.� i.1.'�:� r; . /��t. p .: . V"�.....+.Ci.�a:� \i_L Cry C..n�^- -+-�7«`-.. -..�.n..,�r-,' ��-... V.,._ .:1: `-'r? "�'�'1� r v�� G�CL� �� Qy '� n �- - �--- n:.., •, �,�_ � ,.'rr•_�•�'i e1 �"�sr.,ry....r� � - - __ + ..,�..�..:..j (;^r `a^ •'�� -.,� ^+„t.n J.,,C,._..,,y�_`� ��;v,^..:"'� �:C� �'C1""�`......t�.,,. . ' . ^ J� _�� , ... .r��, ^!'1r1 �n�I'��+.�..•r�,•i� r_.... � ' ''.�, ..,"' . .... , . . ..-,..'"-'�„��''(�' An � A _i�n `.. ...... _ ....'�� .r �`'� L^�-��M=�r,r...:. .n .��,r... '� � _ .__ .;:i C�_ _.. .._:'^` =.:2.� v�.`^*_ �"�V''+'�,,,�-tin,�!- . . .. �.,. i,_�_,1�. ,,i� T�� J� � .....�� '�:.�r�1�V.:/1 ��s� d.�a -� --� ��r.`�.� .i 1 �= �. n.. � ,, •--:eJ� _'v.� �� Lr:...... �,?1(� -...�:�;'�`'.'.^ j'�r_"--- �...y r f+..�«_ �• {� _ .-... . .�... � .dJ��r uv„ ��a�'_!1��P1 i�1+� n� ��..� ..� � � .�n n.+.�^f»'..^. �r •L• /� .�• r . . . _ .. . __ . .._. ,.. ��J ,✓�� V.r....�� '~� l .'.:'.r..r".�.`_� �..... ��n^�--n�•,•, 'n n ' -- ..�• ..__.9 _._ _�^«C'.`r C^_ ....i�,-•'n.� �, _. v � -. � �„� J,�'•C /'"n.ny�:�17 •t�..�.�r! /{f• • .,-♦ v L• r. G�LV _ li .1r.�i��:.� �'_�-�'��v�^^.f �f`�... . /1 n�1'S .L r.``�1 •♦ . . -. �ii:... 4�..w�nJ .. . � �.�_....,.� . . . TMn.-�J+�`..�• • 8 F, . • �/1 T�'n+T�rT ♦ ,_ . . , - • �. _-�.�_•� licio^lec? by �?�e �'o�,u�c:'_ •n ��.,; �,'avs ';'�,1.��±� , . , ,n �. , - � '� '. . i ....��: . �"n^,��'.. � � � � _ _---�.` � ��rocec' '�_— .. I .. '�,n�,i�n � � � . . � � . . . . I � ,� � � �� \ � . r T,� �'<<'0I' .l^�e.e��i'-' � �n ` � ry'ni '" / n,.�.» . :l_;^ _ , _ � � �l'l.�:;CU ..2L:S?S� ltr I�r,.qic:�r.`, :VicC�erty . �,.-- � � � ; r t� � r , ..�.1..,./„�:t�; .- L--�3' '''' ! Y/ '" y � , �� -��" I °-,�i� . � t. � f� f� ' � ,�j . �i.�U�. [:i�i �.�i:c E_C1'J:1 �uj �r �.y,uicililt:�;� ¢�� it��Iei�:�t.itc i'i�f}'iz'tt� � � � . � : . . L•1�-.tl�r.c'.1 41i.�:,a��7 s,=�d.1. 7�,�:ti:= � . . � � . f:�i�i�t� i:t�� lil �:t��Vi�y� i'3}�► t�..�.,.�i.�[ i.�11 _ l.:a��e�; �k��:31� 1't�.�� i;�� J iiu. ; _. . . i:l''��;� �l3� `��E�WC�-P ��tl'at�l: I;v:�tl.�� l . l:ll=}� �I,�c j��aj(lat�l- l�,�eiti. i ! � lii,(�pr_+Ja�j 7�CU.i,ir_��- I;t�iui�l ! t:.za� ;:c:Vct1{ l� .:i } c . __, , i .:l i,,:. c':��i"r`_i 1 y'_a�t �4{!�� l El��'cstiott�. ll: (�-1}� 1.r.a,:ifa ;��ioct. k..;lt ��:ii...il t�c,:��l. :t . . . � :� , _. , i .i t� ;l �'[ ..t . E'_a�tl � ,.........u:. .- 1��ttL i't ,!�.. . :1; , _i l'�,,,,,,..:i i ..:.cc 'I "r.1,'.�:.:i �tic.:t _ , • ':;,.� ,. !'1::t11::•.:��, L,,1:�.!,.t ? ° 1.1l:1.� (�1 �}. �•`1`: . i .._ .,.. . .:4a t��: 1l . e ..'.�'i. L'. �-� �L. . . . �i�� t�.. . :'�4-\�.v�.� ` .._ . 4•�. _ ..... . . � . . .{.� : �� + l: :r-�. �`�� ♦A'. . . .-_. •• � � � �'� .�. Y�=� . . �. .!C'.'.. .... � . . . _ . . � � '• %.'�.=5 .:�.. .. :�s . � � � . . . '..1 ,.1,..:Y: ...i'r '1 . .�.' ..t: . .. : . � . . . � - ,.G, , .l; �.�\. .. ♦r . .\..= - . .. _.. ..,.. :G ,. -C'. . . .. . � . � � .. � � . . . . . ,. .. . . . . ..... . .� � . � i . . . -. . . � . � . .. . . � .'.t� ,}: • i. � .... . . � . �. � _ . � ' � . � . . � . � I . .. . � .; , .- �. � :., . � . . _ Nat�'1 Association for Advm`t Colored PeopTe. : � West End South Highland Citizens Co�nittee Phalen Area Co�nunity Council : Rio Vista Citizens Planning Council Edgcumbe Playground Neighborhood Association Archdiocesan Office of Urban Affairs St. Paul League of Women Voters St. Paul Area Native American Health Center i ' Health & Welfare Planning Council Minnesota 87, Ramsey County Chapter � • :� � i i ; � � ._ � , �= , ; -: � `,` :Ntl�•i081 t�i-ae� � 11��crib� lhc ur�in�r.ments or workin�'rr.iationships set up to provide groups and individuals opportunilies fur uccc+x:� l�► and partic;ipxl,ion in decisiun-mak�ng in the applicable HUD-assisf.ed pro�r-ams. _ � c A � a /�- '� ��o �� -°r � S � ,� ; � �. . 3. Ue�cribe the sleps which have been taken in reg�rd to the applicable programs to provide participating groups and individuals sufficient information ar�d technical assistance. �° /��s � � f.4 � f � ��, �, �.� �' �,"� u A. Debcribe tho nature and range of issues relating to the applicaGle programs with which participnting groups and individuals have dealt; the cecammendatio:�s subsequently made; and the specific results and accom- plitihment:� of the� participation. �� '," ' � s 1� �° l %�p �� , � ' G� '✓ , � - 20 - . .. � . U.S. GOVflRNMFM PRR:TiNC;OFFICF.�It17t O-�IJ-0Ofi � � � . � . . . ... . . . . � . . . . . Y �. � . . . I . . � . . .. `�Y ' .�"t ;r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a. � � . .. . . . .. f � . . . . II. � � . . .. NttD-1081 - {I1�8� � � '� CODI:S AtiD CODE ENF'ORCE'►1L\T t{E;��''�RI:Mh:NT. 7'he two primary requirements are: a. The ad�►ption of lhe lateyt published edition of ono of :!:a nationally recognized model housing•, building, plumbing, olectrical, fire prevention and related cod�r ��d ordinances, as amended, or state or local codes with comparable standards. � , b. The eslablishment of a� effective code enforcement p,,.�ram. � � � 1.� CumPlete tho following schedule for codes adopted by t6P �:ommunity. I Steve Il:eda CODE TYPE OF CODE GIVE TITLE AND DATE OF LATEST EDITION GIVE DATE OF (�:hecl[�ne) - LATEST ANNUAL ADOPTE� OF MODEL CODE ADOPTED SUPPLEMENT MODEL MODEL LOCAL COOE AGOPTED ,, ca o e ase on merican u ic atest oca Houying. . .. . X Health �?cs'n. Basic Principles :'mendment 1969 Ruildin�. . . . . � State Bldg. Code - 1970 uniform Bldg, --------- se�e-. I'lumbin� • • • • k� State Plumbing Code t�:lectricat. . .. X 1971 National Electrical Code �1'revonlion 1' _ 19L�� AIA.Fire_Prevention Code October 1966 'l. Uescribe hriefly the psocedure established for periodic r�eview, evaluation and updating of the adopted codes and urdinancc�s. Building, pl�unbing, Electr�.cal, _and Mechanical Codps are contained in Minnesota State Building Code. These are under continuning review by Cor�nittees appointed by State Co�unissioner of Administration. The City of St. Paul has representation on all co�r�mittees by employees of Bureau of Public Buildings, Consulting Engineers, Architects, Representatives of contractor and Labor Organizationsa Code Hearinos for updating and revision are scheduled several times each year. ' The Housing and Fire Preveni:i.on Codes are reviecaed and evaluated by personnel of Bureaus of Public Buildings and Fire Prevpntion. The Board of Appeals and revie4r, appointed by the rr�yor and approved by the City Council, also acts as a review body and recommends to the Mayor and Council any changes needed to maintain modern enforceable codeso i I � ° The hou tn code must be o ted at lepst six monthB lor to certFfication. c � ad p pi' _ 2 _ t. � � .. . . . . . � . � . � . . . � •. . . . . �. . . .� . . . . . ... . . .. . � . .., ,." . ' . . � . . 4 �..� y:� . . .. - . ,, . . . . p _ . �, .. . � .. . � . � . �. � '�„ f:;� , � � � . . .. .. . . . . . . ... . � . . . . MU0-1081 . , (11-68) �,. ' � 3. ldentify und:justify any major deviations in the codes adopted by the community from the standdrd� set lorth _ in thc nationally recognized codes as amended, exctuding minor administrative change� and revisions. ��e �+xtra� rshe�l,� if neceysary. Bnilding Dept. " ;,��:� �- � 4. lloscribe in general, and to the extent possible quantifiable, terms the tonger-ra.nge plans and objectives for u�ing housing, building and related code enforcement to help eliminate and prevent the formation and spread of slums and blight. Grants and �uilding Dept. , �.�� ?_, ,',�;� �J-.. � �p �� .. ,"`�, ;�% � ^�°' Ci. I)atic:ril�e the community's plan of xction during the n�xt period for effectivety dealing with areas and/or ty�pes of uniL�: huvi�iK higl� priority need for code enforcement, including b�th programs to stop blight in sound but dotc�riarating area� ancl program� to deal with serious thrEats to health and safety in slum areas. Grants and F�uilding Dept. , � �� t'' ^�"r' :� "fP % � � w .�� . „-' ;a .� ,:- ! �t (a) I�:xptain the basis for I,he areas and prc�gram strategies selected. (Attach maps, charts or other intorma- lion a:� may be necessary to explain the context for the ptan of action.) Grants and E3uildinc� llePt. } ' `s :1 ;� _ f�! �� i .A. / f� �J f� `� 'j ' '�' .) d' " l _ ,^ '�,� 6• l �• - 3 - _! _ __ _ _- -- __ T_ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ Y � �.:e . : . . � � . .. .. . � � . .. . .. • . .. ._. . . . . . � . . . .x. .'' .. . ' . . . .. � . , . . . . . . � �� . . . .. .. � � � � . C O D E E N F O R C E M E N T In e, letter dated April 6, 1972, then Mayor McCarty iaformed the Departmeat of Ho�using and Urban Dev�elopmerrt tha,t "due to a number of local factors and problems, the City is not caxz^,�ing out a systematic code ' enforce;meat program in aqy area of the City." This letter wa,s ia response to a HUD letter clated March 24, 1972, asking for a r�port an the status of the City's systematic code enforc�ent program. Aawng the reasons for the City's t'ailure to ca.rry out a systematic code enfvrcemerrt program has been the la.ck oP a w�orkable systematic code enforcer�ent plan, an inadequa,te rn�nber of housing code_ inspectors to implement such a plan, and the laek oY an adec�u.a.te record-keepin� system � to efPectiv�ely store geographic-based housi ng code data. Also, and perhaps ; the overriding reason for no�t carrying ant a systematic program, has been the extremely negative reaction to code enforce�aent by maqy of the citizens o� Saint Pa;�l. The �ity's Buildir� Departa�ent requested 15 housing inspectors and m�oney to 'build a record-keeping system with both microfilsn a.nd data processing casapotients in its 1973 'budget request. Based on total budget reqnest aad aatual fluiding, the follm�r3.ng documerrt wi.11 deal with both lon�er ra,nge and short range code enforcement planning. Longer range plans, as vu�lined, are based on the assumption that the Ho�using Bureau nri.11 ° � r+eceiv�e all of the ft�.nds it }zas requested for budget year 1973. This plan titill focus on the establisYimeat of a decentralized district approach to � enforce�ment and ca�pl3.ance. While fti.nding for all of these additional positions is highly unlikely during budget year 1973, it is quite probable _ �.. . y '. .� • . '... . � . .. . . � .. .. . . ,� :,. .. ... . . . . . � . . . . ... . . � .. . . . . ' ,i ' ` �:� • , ��F- �� - :° that the� 8+o�a�ing Bares� xil7. receive adequdte; fluuLtng to add fiv�e additior�sl -t - ; , . inapectors to th�ir esLsting six-man staff. : ' = ` To com�lement the ePPorts oP the Aausiag Bureau in atta.ining t�ei.r ob�ectiv�e of gvaranteeing the citizens of Saint Paul a safe and sanitary ha�asing stock, the City's Building Departm,ent ead Fire Freveation Bureau xill mait�tai.n stafP capacities able to meet this goal. - Dariag btitdget year 1973, the Build.in� Department has been allocated ft�ads to maitrtai.n a staf'f of 43 inspectors. Of these, at least four xi12 be assigtLed to the egisting Certificate of Occupancy program to increase the effaLciency aad effectiv�eness of iaspecting buildings of three or mere dw�elling units. The Fi.re Prev�ention Division, which provid.es not on�y inspection services , ' but �tensive educational prograaLS rela.ting to fire safety, will coatiriue to ; be ftinded at existing levels. To perform these tasks ad,equately, the City ' � Council has a rov�ed a staff of twelv�e fire i pp nspectors for 1973. Fezndtt� for a geographic-based da,ta processing aad micrnfYlm system has been included in the approved 1973 budget.. Taking these available reesources iuto consid�eration, a short-range plan has been develvped which wil7. allaar for im�uecliate intensive syst�matic enforcemsnt in high priority areas. The short-range plan then is an interi.m attempt to flalfill long-range ob�ectives. IANGIhR RAI�GF PIAN (4) It can be easily seen that the d�ev�elc�pment oP a systema.tic cod,e enforce- sLent plan carries �ri.th it the problem of generatiag a, positiv�e public response to that plan. T�plementation of a systematic program which xill accamm►odate a built-in public relation factor is essential to its ulti.�mate effectiv�eness. � The fallowing longer ra.nge strategy is broken into tw�o sections, those of an B�nfo�cement Plan and a Ca�pliance Plan. While the Enforcement Plan deals � strict]�y xith overal.l inspection procedures, the Ca�pliance Plan cLeals �3.th s� �. : �. � ` public relations t�rithin the enforcmient plan, governmeatal responsibility ' � xhich could directly and iadirectly affect coaoapliaace and local legal authority as it relates to code ccxnpliance. �NP'ORCEN�NT PI�IA By adding 15 new hort�sing inspectors to the existing six-man staff, ' the City will be able to caxry out an effective enforcement proTr�m thrcrugh the use of an area-based inspection staPf. The proposed axeas will be determined by f�agmenting the City's 76 census tracts into 18 home improvement districts (Exhibits 1 and 2). Each district, to be determined by census tract and housing data avai�able to the Build.ing Depa.rtment, will be the responsibility of one district inspector, who, in turn, will be answ�erable to a field supervisor of the Housing Division. Each o� three field supervisors will monitor housing inspection activities � � ' within six districts. District Inspectors will concentrate efforts within their awn axeas on Isystematic certificate of occupancy co¢apliance,l windshield surveillance2 aad �econdary ecunplaint follo�w-up. In districts which are ca�prised of pre- do�►inste�y multiple family unite and caa��ercial structures, a systema.tic program of certificate of occupancy inspection will be empha.sized. Windshield surveys will be conducted in neighborhoods with district inspectors paying close atterrtioa to saund areas which show exceptional deterioration in specif`ic dwelling units (with survey follaw-up on that type of unit). Inspection of - 1CertiPicate of occupancy includes enforcement of hausing, building, pl�bing and electrical codes in structures of three or more units. ` - � 2The rea�ons for using the windshield method are: (a) a better utiliza.tioa of ava.ilable maupower, (b) creates better relations in the co�unity by nat inspecting good, t�rell-maintain�ed structures, and (c) the ability to concentrste on problem homes in the axea. j I ��?-. ' � ;; - � .' . ; ` 1 , a cae¢p].airit ne.ture xill be handled by a responsible field supervisor, vho -� �rill t�en, if necessary, refer the co�plaint to a fl�ill survey by a district inspeetor. � As part oP this omera.11 enforcement strategy, each district xill be rated as to its ov�erall deterioration, xith high priority giv�en to area.s which exhibit high need for caa�pliance. It will be the duty of the chief hortising inspection supervisor to dev�elop a timetable and to reassign district inspectors from basically-sound axeas to high priority areas on a regulax _ pre-determiaed schedule. Such a schedule will be based upon need and feasi- bility. T�zus, intensiv�e en�orcemerrt can be accomplished in extensively- deteriorated axeas, while maintairu.ng a surveillance check on ba.sically-sound housing. The above-described prograin will undoubtedl;y augment existiag en�orcement � programs in NDP and federalltiy-assisted code enforcement areas. While districts will be d�esigaed on a priority/workloa,d basis, they will also be designed to take ftrto considera.tion the geographic boundaries of e�.sting federally- assisted axess. COMPLIANCE �LAN Systematic cocie enforcement does not in itself insure code cou�pliance. Campliaace, which is the desired end result of enforceme�rt, can be acco�plished thraugh decentralized pablic relations ansl education, financial and other incentiv�es, and finally, le�al action. Publie Relations and Education Bffort must be made to rela.te the positiv+e objectives of hansing � code eaforcemeat to ev�ery citizen in the cemo�inity. This task will lie with � each district inspector and f'i.eld supervisor. These individua.ls will have I . Y..�.� . � . . � .. . . . . � .. - . ... . .. .. . . . . . . �uF,.. . . � � . . � � .. . � . � . .. .� . . � .��.: .. .�.. . � . . . � . . . . . . .. . ..1". . .. . � . . . . . . . � . _ � � . " , - the vppo�nnity and. responsibility to iaform and advise the citizens on code ,� eampliance. Since each district inspector will. xork wi.thin a specific geo- graphiC area, that person will becoene awa.re of the needs, prnblems and f�astrations within his district. Distz-i,ct inspectors �i.11 perform a serv3.ce, as t�neelZ as a, duty, by distributing information sheets which present advice and tips on ho�r to r�pair and maintain paxts of the haome. Iaformation she�ts cauld discuss methods of ra.t aad pest control, ��ow to pa.int a hause, hort�r to repair cracked and chipped plaster, etc. Again, the indiv�cival. inspector would be most sensitiv�e to the a�eec]s of his district. . One of the proposed fea,tvres of the net� St. Paul City Goverarneut co�uld be the establislmaent of neighborhood-based comrma.nity councils which could be an officiel part of the gover►�errtal structure. One of the first duties of thesc conncils will be to dev�eltyp a pr�ogram to in�orm the co�munity of th�e ob�ectiv�s of the eaf'orcement plan. • Goverrnneata:i�nsibility I . � While a pro�gram of public rela,tions and educa,tion may in itself de�elvp �n iacan�ive to caanply, other incecrtiv�es mus'e be offered. Conse- qnences of proper cod,e enforcem�errt can include intensivie rehabilitation, ciea�olition, relocation and increased �eatals or tax assessments. Fed,eral, atste and local gov�erm�errts have a responsibility to both praperty a�rners and renters. Federal 312 anel 11.5 Zoe.n aad gracrt programs are carrently available in �P and code enPorcement area,s. Mac�y parts of the City, oaxtside of fedexall.y-assisted areas, eghi.bit an increasin� need for code enforcement, yet it is difficult to enforce in an area where the tools for co�pliance � : are lacki.ng. EfPort m�st be mad�e to coordinate intensive enforcemerrt �rith � incentive pregs-ams. Forthcaming program�s like Project Rehab and Co�unity � sa�Td�,�_-�efa�r..�-.e.:..r+w=. .a..��.�::rw _ . .,. .. . _ .. . . .. , .. _. . . .,. . . . ._....._...... �' � ...:.v,,. ` . . .. � . . � � . . . . � . . . r e. . . .. . . � .. . . � . . i � . � � .. � � � � . � � � . . ..�� .. � :'...� '. ._ . . . . . .. . , . . . . . - - . . �. . . . �� QVbl Il�i �T/rqLLC 81'14T� : � opme ag, coupled rrith existing "701" Co�prehensive t• ' Plaqnir�g, xill help to alleviete ttm constraint impoaed by the 8ee6raPhic baund�xl:�e of I1DP areau. !�e►qy prope�ty o�rriers may not quali�y or apt for tihe above-described pro�x�e�m�. ldar�y praperty o�tners who sre able to bear tt� cost of campliance � #'+�ced vith sn increane in asse,�sed praperty vr�lluation. Praperty ta�oes, se enaated by the State of' M.tnaesot�, are asseased in �rect praportion to praperty value. With praper support f�cun C�ty officials, effort anist be me►de to reatructure th:ie rGgressive teuc to allow for tax abatements or cn�itirn►ia� axistin� asae�sm�nts for hoa�eoWners who hav+e broa�ght their hames �n�o eaim�li�nce. Such a pragram haa alreac�yr �een instituted in Wilmingtoa, lb�,�►�xe. Ia tha� Gity, a.1:1 pro�erty improvemetrts are tax exempt to the �xtent o� �.5�', far a ft��-yea�r geriad. • ��upl�d �th tt�.i s Q2'�fc�rt. cons i d��rat�rn sh�uld re �iven to the estab- listua�nt o� re�nta� lim.it�s on Gad�-cnfarred buildir�s and the encoursgement a�` ldcal land:ir� inatitutioas to provide lo�r interest lasns far building caW�ra Who malcc Gt�g+liance r�pairs. al Au�barity ; I� �� the oqainion of thc City's Buildin� l�egart'.ment that the certifica►te az� Qccup�ancy �rq;ram. as ado�ted by ordir.an:e, is an e°fective te,�aZ a�aa�a of aecurin� cc�liance ia a�ulti-unit stz�etu.res. 1�aristions af �n�a� px�;,x�eum vou�d yield a naeans Par b��h vtaluutsr�r an3 me�nc3atory code cc�pli�ttcel. �'E�Q '�2i� �s't tZLi`C@ RDQC1"�hg. t',�e City Counci3. Caamt��ty De�v�e'_og- na�� Cc�a3tta� h�as L'�een cor�::derin� t:� pv�ssi�i�.L3 oi a requiz�emeczt far rr�:ist.ar�►ti�z� Qx' stre:c�u.^ea az� t�: s c�z-ti��c�� a� ccxie :�aaqalisac� te • rst�uiz�e.� oa aII neev �nta�.a ar ugon tra:LS�'er Qf Fropertr. Slzch a �re�,'ram �.4 i�.2`�t�1' TJ@42� 3.Lf.4L��ti�� '� �'ite` ��"�: C►..r �`C. i+QRZ1S �'3r�. I�B�CCSdCB 8Bd � � � # _._.i. ' .,... , ;.� . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . .r _ .. . . . ;. . . . . . . . {s '� . . �. . . � � �.. . � . �.' . . � ... � � . � � � .. . . � � . . � .. . . ,ti'.'�.�... -��_ . ... � . - . � .. . . � . . � .� � � ' -'� could be valuable as a tool for code eaforcement. It ha,s also been praposed �`°�� that a voluntary code cooipliance;program be established �rith certiPicates issued xhea_ caa�liance is secured. T�hile it is desirable that compliance be the end result of educa.tion, persua,sion, aad incentiv�e, in mac�r instances, co�pulsion is the oa�y lever available fa� its achieve�ent. Le�al action by the City's Bureau of Public Buildings �ill include the condemna.tion of dangerous structures, condemna,- tion of d�nellings or mu.ltiple dw�ellings as unfit for human habitation, tagging e,nd sunmoazy abatement proceedings. In d,eveloping the City's Administrativ�e Code uader the new City Charter, reco�mendation has been made to separate the now exi.sting Board of Appeals ! into a technical and non-techtlical board. While the non-technical board wrnzld hear cases relating ta honsing code variances, the technical board would deal tirith variances regardin� Life Safety Codes, Fire Codes and the • Uniform Building Code, as they relate to ca�mercial structures. Such a divis�on of f'tinctions �uld alloar for a more �ust and equitable means of gra,nting vaxiances and w�u1d also allaw each board an expanded apportunity to revi�w eaisting cod.es aud ��ake rec�endations to the Mayor aad City . Couacil oa Housin�, Building, Fixe Preveutioa and rela.ted code matters. • f �� . ... . . . . . � . � ..� a_ � : ; i` " �� . '� � s' ' ' �� SFDRT RA�E PIAN (5) , �2 ��.� The longer range goa.l of administering the City's hvusing code is to protect and to pro�note the health, saPety and welfare of all citizens of St. Paul. Short range ob�ectives �owa,rd that �oa1 are three-fold: (1) to i.�plemetrt an enforcement strategy which xill a11aW for enforcement specific to interim geographic needs; (2) to dev�elop a corrtingency program for the issvance of permits for occupancy transfer and transfer of awner- ship; and (3) to begin and contimte in the develc�pment of a geographic- based data processing file. Short Rang� En�orcement Strategy (5a) . Tn order to perform code enforcem�ent activities� �;ia the most efficient means Qo�sible during the 1973-1975 period, the City has been divided irrto three geagre,phic areas of lc�r, moclerate and high priority. Ea.ch area, a.s def�ned in the attach�ed ma.p (Exhibit 3) Will receiv�e enforcemerrt treatment � � sgecifi� to its i�mediate needs (Exhibit 4). Appeaded to this document (Exhibit 5)�is a list of definitions which autlin�e a portir,n of the adminis- trative and p�dural element� within the scvpe of the short range plan. � Hi�Priority � � Tliose are of the City xhich exhibit a high priority need for enforeement are i part defined by th�e baundaries of the existiog Aeighbor- hood Develop� and Code Enforcement Program areas. In those areas in ahich specif`3.c re�l plaas hav�e been dev�elaped, the City•s N�ousing Code Bureau � S �rl.11 coYrti r to enPorce minimum housin� code stanc�ards on a camplaicrt basis. ; \ ! ;f :..:..o.. . ..�:�". ....... '. . . . .. .. . � . � � � . . . . . � . � R .- .� ,�. :. . . . . .. . . . A � . . _ � . . .. . . . . . . . . . � . � , .�'... ..,. .. . . .. . .. . . . � � ,�. . . . .. . . . . . . ' . . . .. � . ��f. . .... . . . � � . ' .. .. " .. . . . . . . . . . � As e resnit oP caref�]. analy�sis of cmtplaint and census tract data, y }�.,� �� .. . . . ... ..� ... .. � � . . . � . .. ' `� evidence indicates that ather aon-renewal areas exhibit a high need for enforce�nent attention. These areas includ,e Dayton's Bluff, Payne-Minnehaha, the Rice Street area aad Selby-Uc�iv�ersity (Tract 334)• Within these areas, entorcemeat will be focased on a systematic program of certificate of occupaneq inspection. EnPorcement will also include co�lairit response ' �rith possible s�rwey or certificate of occupaney follaw-up. Extensiv�e wind- shield monitoring* will also be carried out in these areas. MQderate Pr:iority � In order to adequately respond to the enforcemeut needs of those areas which are determin+ed tc be of moderate priority, a systematic approech will be instituted. It is anticipa,ted that in the next �tw�o-year period. pri� �'ocus on enforce�ent will be dixected tc�ward structures of three � uni.ts or more within modera.te priority axeas. S�ich enforcement surv�eys wil.l be �x'�'ec:ted thrrnagh the use of the existing certificate of occupancy program. ITnforce�errt will also include c laint res oase and possible certificate of , � P ��cupancy or surv�ey faLlo�w-up. Lo�ar Priority while la�w� priority a.reas do not present aa ia�ed.iate need for er�a�rceme�t, these areas will receive periodic yrindshield exami.nation which srill aid in data gathering and vltimately providing a basis for problem a�a.reness sad for diagn�osis. �nforcement �rill include co�pla.int response and possible certi�icate o� occnpancy or survey follort�r-up. � �Thile enforcement/campliance capabilities are limited in these areas, it is ia�postant that statistical data be collected concerning ha�sing conditions to gain d�ocumented problem a�rarensss. - � .I_,. : : �_ :: , , � : _. . . ,�, - . , � . , w .+ . ;,i °� : 4cc�upancy Transier and TransPer of OKnership �; � f 1 � As mentioned previously, stnc� is naarbeing made a�s to the passibility � of inspection and re�istration of structures oi• d�,,l�i:�., units upon chaage of xcupancy or transfer of o�vn,ership. . The desirabil.i.ty of such a program �rould be tva-fold: (1) it xaald provi.de flor continn,ed msiatenance of a healthflil. and sanitary conditioa of the City's housing stock and (2) it wnuld provide an assurance to the indiviclnal purchaser or renter t2�at the unit or stracture he vishes to occupy is in ca�apliance �i.th city code. Before such a program is i�cple�mented,' ho�w�ever, mar�r problems �st be e�,min+ed and solv�ed by th�e Develvpment Committee and the City's Buildiog Departmeut. An ordinance chan�e is only one of mar�y steps xhich �ust be taken to imp].ea�ent occupancy registration. Provisions for registration of Scontract for c'Leeds must be made through request to the current state legislature. Provisions must also be made for violation abate�ent betw�en bu�rer and seller. Guidelin�es must be dev�elvped which will take into consideration provisions for the program's a8ministra.tion, as s,nell as possible dev�e].a�ment of xcuparrt load sta�aards. Data Processing It is particularly important that proper program�ning aad data coordination be developed��within the next t�-yeax period. At this time, the Citys Build.ing D�partment is working with the Housing and R�dev+elop- meYrt Autharity, the offices oP the Iiamsey Caunty Auditor and Assessor, the Departmerrt of-Public Works and Opera.tions Research, in develcping a ca�plete hrnasiag information system. Specifications have been d.etermin�ed for hard- � �aare and it is expected that tYue departmerrt will begin to feed information in early Febru.ary. ' ; I : - , : . f,;� . . < Snch a system �r.t.11 be e�etreme3,y important within the ne�ct twe-year c �� period, since it w3.11 be a am,�ar step toward alleviating a data va.cuum which noRt eaists. This system �3.11 eventual.ly insure a flaw of current info�mation as w�ork progresses to allaw for enforcem�ent program adjustmerrts, � if necessary. It must be stressed that the validity and wnrkability of the short-raage enforcement strategy is directly reliarit upon the availa- bil.ity of accvrate data. ' � ; • � i �.._ ; : �.� :j� i'� . . . .. . . . � . �... � � � . �� . . . �. � . ._, . . .. . � � ... . . � . . . .. ... � .. . � . . .. . . . C�ARISON OF SCOPE �6) The proposed pla.n of action for 1973-1975 has a broader scarpe than that of the previaus period, ciue to use of the wi.ndshield survey, concen- . trated use of the Certificate of Occupancy, co�rplaint response and follo�w- up aad possible implemecrtation of an ocrupancy permit program. This = i sweepi.ng approach, along s,rith increased inspectional staff and data proc- essing wi.11 alloar for aa increa.sed munber of total dwelling unit inspections. In gra,dually-moving awa3r f�oen the present complaint/respoase/follow-up approach through implementation of the proposed plan, the City is atte�ting to make the achievem�nt of its longer range goal an activ�e ra,ther thaa a � passiv+e effort. (7) � As indicated above, the Ho�asing Bureau �rill et�plo�y a totai of eleven hc�u.�ing inspectors within the first quaster of 1973. While the rnunber of to�tal units whi.ch will be inspected in the next period is contingeat upon actual sta.�P distribution and numbers of co�plaints receiv+ed, sev�eral assua�ptions can be made. It is estimated that approximately 12,000 complaints will be receiv�ed by the H+at�sing Bureau withi.n the ne�ct twaa-year period.. Such ca�nplairrts ra.nge fra�m minor rubbish removal to mnre serio�u.s infractions of the hausing cods. Oa thi.s assu�ption, it is eacpected that the &rusing Bureau wi7.l per�orm 36,000 caaaplaiirt-type inspections (three inspections per ce�mplaiat during the n�ext period. It is haped that by virttie of the enforcemetrt '� pla.n, as a�tlined, camplaints will be sizeably redueed in m�mber. � '{ � �� -� .� ' � � ~ ° It is assumed that the aboqe-described caanplaint calls wiLl gen�erate _, -�.. '�v ` epproximatelY � �33`� ��re is consistent vi.th previaus experience) � initial surv�ey inspections. These total suiw�eys will represent 1,000 inspectional ca17.s (l iaitisl and 4 recheck). The Certificate of Occupancy program will be conducted by faur to ffv�e fli11-time building inspectors. It is expected that these persons will . inspect 1,000 stru,ctvres per year, which wi11 contain an esti�ated mini� of three dwell.ir� units per strueture. In,moderate priority aseas, it is estimated that there are 8,753 units in stru.ctures of three or more clwelling units a.nd that in hi.gh-priority areas there are 3,0�+ such uaits. Therefore, it is esti.mated that in the high and modera.te priority areas, 1,000 structures containing aa estimated 3,000 d�t�t+elling units wi11 be inspected per year or 2,000 structures and '• 6,000 dwelling units during the next certiPication period. During the shart rar�e program period, it is expected tha.t ma�ow+er allocation will be distributed 60°fo moderate priority, � high priority (this ra.tio will nndvu.btedly fluctuate in the longer range). On this basis, within the 1973-�9'r� certifi�ation peri�., approxisna.°tely F�6 structvres will be inspected in high priority areas and 1,332 will be inspected in mod,erate priority areas. ' �Dne ttiT.l-time equivalerrt will be assign�ed to per�'orm windshield monitoring activities during the next period. Approx�.ma.te7,y 185 windshield surveys per day can be accamaplished wi.th a1lc�wances for write-up of spin-o�f's to certificate of occupancy and surv�eys for buildings which eghi.bit an ezc�ptional need for i�oediate attention (anticipated 60 units). This r�presents �+0,000 xindshield surveys during the next two-year period. � See �clzibit 6, � t,� , . � _,;:�:.: , . ._. - . . s . � � � EXHIBIT 1 `f+ . � � N � . � ; � � . � . � . � � . .. • . � N ' . - . . � J N . . .1 � � - . ... . . . r 1 � . _ . . _ . . . . . 1 � . .. _ �...�' . -- � - � � . � . . N O . .:.0. � � .. � ' . ... . . . . . . . � . . . � �� .. . . .. . .A . . . . � ��!' ' . . � O� . . _ „1. � � � �-' 1� � . . � - � � J/i��....i . , . � . 1')i�M.�.. . �-�,r,,.,'_ i . - / � .i� Y a 31 �j ^� � Q ` � ,\.J �j� � . . �` � � • ♦ � s� T J . � ` . :S . � eo�.��t � A l b . t�l < � /,�6� ) _ � LL .♦ �� ` i�f .. � _ � b an.��• � O . . � ° � �, x � � � y ^ b +� _..... a> N U � N � � /N � ..�,.. � �� _ ' � a .�u ° o �n a ,.,, -..--,--, � •�' �s s � �"sl F+ A � ,,,.� o, ,., CO _ p ,� � '^ ' T +.� � o �, . '_'i � c� P.{ � ; � a , a � - � �-1 03 ia ' 1� 9 � � � F � ' . cC O bD � � �+ O � ' �� a ° �-°i � �-. -.._., � ; _ ..��. \\ E-1 F-1 �./ . • � n `'° � U, \` . m '�-,� : � . 0 7 '�' " n v+ I '� � � � , � � � - ��.r¢�= n ^' � �o� . \ . e � � � � � 'I • ._ _ o " '' � l � N N b •Q � ,�� . .e...• „f . � N � � O �— ._..._, ,� �, � � .. � � � �_ �- o �, . o �, _ � � ` �, t..,. � � ��+� ��, ---- -_ � . ._. . .. , -" � \1:. N `\ � � � - ^ •.• ., � . . N C� . O � � . � � � `` �--\ . �a . . � � — . � � �'°_• . . . v � �yy,,,��` � 4 � �' I� � •\ . . � �•�\��\ j ...� ' ' . ' C . /'� � -r O . �\ � �l �.• •• � � 'i.',` � - j � . � � ^I; ,/� •� o ' _ .{ o � '-,� ; . _. � � �� - �1 � - : -� . �� -- ,J � ,/(� � �- � ._...-� � Q ..... �,�, M � �I(' i ,�,-�---'-:-- .:-1 +,I "c---�—i _ ;I '� , � ' � -� �' :'. � `� -� ° �i�� . _ '�f m �-f ^�. � .� � . 7. '� M �r � � �"i? ��. . .. �' ` \\ �f � . -----� '� ,�,��—:_�.__� ('" - � �-i- � � —.�-:.`�-�-- �:.�. - , .j.. � ' —.- � ° � P. �: 'i A . . � v—, �'--T'•.. ( ,.� � c� � G? � \\' - o. " " ^. - -- . - . i�� l Gj��r 1 � ' �_� _ ._ ` r M1 a ^ ,, � .� o j� � ;� p ;—, m + 0 ° f � � � . .� - .�� ` �-; r� J � ; cD� � — .�'. � � . _ ---- , • • •. . � ` J � . l� . J, __ .--. —.: i � -� - , . ;. • , � o� i . •� , � � . . . .. 1^ _ , . _ _. . � _� _ ; ` .� ' ,� _ .; .' : EXHIBIT 2 .: � ,-� � � r„i t� r+ � o s� : ' � � U d N�]., C� � � 'd � r-1 U � � � � m , 4i A � O H N � O tl! �� 0 O U pq � � � f� - -� ' ' ~ � -F� : � O � G� a � VO2 � H � � � � � � � � �1 U� � s A � � 0 � � , � � o � m o � � � � � � , � N r� O m .� � � � � � A � I � • � _ . _ � � t - .�Y` � -- ~°`-r -,.� . � � _ �l _.,.,,�%" � _ �°— . . _ �` --,,,. / — -. v , � : . . �. `,..:�' 6._. � i � �_�� : � _ � �' �� - � ,�,,-.,.�_ �-�=� ;�- , . �- .,,. �. � a :�� +� :.-- " "' 1 � , . i ' y'�\_o � ��. ° � -+ •':�• `,,. �, = - _ :�� , � � r- , •'� • _ { �:. e -- . �-- : �., - • �, .. . ._ , � ,.j � � , � � � o , . ,, , . . .. . . � . � �" ` �- . -,. � _ � .. _� . �� . : : . ,, . � , :��: '<:�_ , . . �.e . �, . . . . . � .. , _ � :. . . s: - . . = . �.� -_.:: �:: � ' � .� r �. �, `; ..,� .. .... ,. •. , � , .... _ .. ., .__. . .. � . r _ _�.r Y .. .. . ..__..._..__.l..y __. ... i [ � . � � i .,,t...� . . . � 1 ! Q. . p....... .�_.._�..._..,. _. ..... ...�_.y. .. � _.�.�..�.. � _ ..,_.. _ r � - - . --�v. i ?' , . ` i• � i lY � .. � ` , � ...�. .� ` . tli n, y F_...... .. _ .�•-.-�_...T-t.__....� , � F (t' _mf ��V-►-�—'� �`'_:''-`�! � ) t �~ � .: - - p - - ,� g _„� - � �� °�. � � , , � � � ,.. _. __, . � .,.:r.-..x _ _,.,...f � �' t`��: \�. , • . � 6.....s..w.-••• �' �- -,--__ .�:-T:,, �t` -- � 0"w�'�... ��"�"r .�. .... _ " ` . . � r. : _ __ .y.._::.v�.�.._. .. _ _. -- _ : _. M �. �. _. . _ _ _. ; . • _ - . � - � EXHIBIT 3 � • ' : . . • N � O p ' @ p +, ^ � M ' f�1 mvw � 7w Y�' �wr� � � � ��,,,, ; ,..•..+�i � • � ` o ! m s g h . �.: � � d :, a. ... ,� "� i'' � o - n • � �.:... � i a � ,a, i n � +r j' � .� i � � O I, �•� T � U � � �� ` e p \ � � ,,,,� ,o . .. . ■• * U �.fl N � P • A1 � � O � U . . � �� Y I � . � � � I ;o ,�, J� � . � , N tf1 i�. I w� . tio: . � � �o � � � �' � '� ,n :+'.' N O� c0 O� ' ".�.; � r, '� � � � � v . I " • d a`�i �, � :� �':��`.• � 3a a-+ N I • � � •s ' :�'�::�'�'�'�'• � ... � � � � , : y n•• •jj�� :`. •' � tA i.�� '� i o �' �!':�: ;�� ' Q�' �rl �-I .f-� ,., '° •r'. :'J•?;;'�� 3�+ W rl s rH�i �:�-`��s,. \� n � � -N O . . tttt•• •. •.::, r--I i.l i� rl . . ._. ..; ::�;:....;:: ;�«:�::. ' �o a �o �+ ':��: �:;:; :ti�::::��:��. ':4::: � � �'~- a�i .� a�i a ;� f :� � ::�:��:••. � � «�° � o � � � , : .Y�� i c ,, w x � a • ' �:;i�: � � s r�= ::�::::. •�?� :�\ � \ � \ • � .S. t �� li�� I�; �.r,J I' . .!•' "'�".��}�:�~�`r .�. t .\, �� +�� I . � :::� }�}::::'.;.::i,., t[t::ti a:c:cctc:� . t ��:' '�:�: i ..ti' o ,r l ;',Y�� :•.} : �.`}:::r.;; •ryitt:c::i:t:::.i:c:l:c �• .•r::: � ;^ �..,`�,�Y.•y.�Y•• .:�.•''� .•t.�� N � . i' �� .... .. "� b . . . �• � :1: .................... . . � �� . . �1 . �O . . . N. �!1 �O � �f Mf N O ^ � N N }' N N f+f y� �p r r.�j � .� ' . N - � O H.� .� .. ' �O T ^ Q � fh � n - p M wf � � O �'q y "� e� . . ' f • .. . y M �; ,., � o ..•.. •; ^'' , ., r, ' '': � t : ^ . o� n . - -- • }; '. . ' a �:::�::: •'''•' ^ .':.:'.':'.�..:'.'.•' N O �• �•�'�'� �•�;;�•• �^• � . ��. . . � � � .n :'�t . � � , �. EXHIBIT 4 � PROPOSED HOUSING CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES Housing Code Administration .�._�_ Complaint Owner Response Requested (city wide) (city wide) � Certificate � Windshield of Monitoring Occupancy (NLoderate & High (Low & High Priority Areas) Priority Areas) •: , � . _ � a.. < ; .. � ' -f : � .•,., a E1�iIBIT 5 � D E F I N I T I O N S Compliance means that the f'ile is in total compliaace, as of a specific date, with Hausing and Building Code requirements. Condemnation a,s Unfit for Hiunan Habitation sha.11 mean a�r stracture or unit which has major deficiencies. Will be ordered vacated and not approv�ed for reoccupancy until those conditions ha.ve been abated. M�y result in a structural condemnation procedure if conditions xarrant. Enforcement shall mean the methods used to bring a unit, item or structure into co�pliance and will include Ordinance Viola.tion tickets, � Summary Abatement or Condemnation on the basis of �ither unfit to live in or structural hazards. Ma�or Deficiency in a residerrtial unit will be the lack of a basic facility such as heat or an accumulation of a considerable aumber of items of general d�eterioration, which result ia the unit being considered as not fit for human habitation. Minor Deficiency will be an item of code requiremeat tha,t is considered to be not hazarclous to the occupant, such as the lack of one corrven3.erice outlet. Structural Condemnatioa shall mean a building condemned as bazardous and unsafe with the purpose of either structural reha.bilitation or removal. . ..�.��.,...,....�.�.. _ . _ ,.. _� � _ : �{ r< _ �' � t nti C liance r Subs a al aaap will mean that the p operty does cwt conform to all requi.rements of the Housing and E�z�.ldir� ;r�?FS as of a specific date, but that those items not ia co�pliance are considered to be of a _ . minor nature and do not require the legal enforcement procecture, as d,efined ia the Hov.sing and 8ailding ordina.nces. Those files axe to be marked "Closed" and a letter of notice of minor deiicieacies sent. Surve� means an inspection of all parts of a unit or structure conducted by a single individual to determine its general co�apliance with Hausir� and Bvilding Code requir�aents. Team SurveY means an inspection by a group of specialized personnel individual�y determini.ng whether certain eqv.ipment and/or the strncture • axe in conformance with Building and Housing Codes. A team survey is more detailed than a one-maa survey. Windshield Survey is an inspection made of the exterior premises, usu�.11y in a block-by-block system where certain key items axe looked for that �ould giv+e an indication of the overall condition of a specific piece oP property. A windshield survey will be used as pa,t-E of the strategy to make a check of lanr priority areas in the City to determine isolated, deteriorated structures which mey require a surv�ey. � � : ; , ` EXHIBIT 6 x , , g� � �d � '"' '"' '�` � � � � � � _ R R .� � .� ti O ^ � � � � � � � t� � ° '� "� � '�' '�' H U O � � � � � � v � U .S$ � a M °° . � w .., � H � � r=i�DI(t1�1� � N N "' � 3 � ,� � � � � � o a A � ��,i v .C�{ � � � M O � O � F� � � � W � N �O U p i� .eC v d .d u � �i . � �d m d er : � � � � � � � � �, . � .� � m a � � � � � � ,� � � �'� � � � � � �, � � � � � � � � a � a � � � � � � °° � � � a �� H � � � _ � N H s �.� �.:. . . � .. � . ' �. � . . . ... . _... .... . . . ..... ...._ 3�.� . . . . .. . . � . � . . . . . .. . ta . . .� 'f:. .!... . . � �. . . . kt� _ .. '. . . � � . � . . . . . � � � . �. . t. ' . . . �. . �� .. . � . . � . . . . . ,' � � � . . .. . . . ' . .. . . . . � FLANNIP:G AND PP,OGRAI��NG Status of General Planning The Comprehensive Plan for the City of Saint Paul was completed in 1963. This plan was approved by the Saint Paul. Plannin� Board, but the City Council has never formally adorpted it. There ha.ve been no ma.jor f changes in the Co�prehensive Plan since the last Workable Pro�ran was submitted. The status of the overall planning pracess in Saint Paul, includir2g the various ca.�!poner�ts of the Co:�rrprehensive Pl�,n, will be de- scribed 3_ater in this section. As indicated in Saint Pa.ul's last Wor�;able Progrars, a new zoning Mardinance is being prepared. Since th4 l��t �•?c�.r=.able Pro�r�� 4,us sub- � mitted, the fi2 st draf't of the new �rciina,nce h2.s been con�pleted. Durin; , ! ; the yrinter and spring o� 1972, �. series of six (6) public hearin�;s were held ±hroughout the City. The purpase o� these hearings was to perr.�it members of the planning boar3 s�a£f to e_xplain the propose3 new zonir� �rdi.tia,r.ce. These hearings Yrere well advertised �.nd a�tendar�ce was excellent. Co�unity groups, as well as in.lividua)_s were encouraged t� react to �he proposed orczinance. Over 100 groups and ind.a.viduals did respond in w�•itir� with a wide variety of su�gea�ions and coreunents regarding cnan�es in the propose�. ordina.nce. The staff of the P].annit� Ro�xxd considered thcse changes and ma.de their recoY�raenciatio�s tc� the Bo�.rd. The PlannirY; Board appx•oved the proposed ordic�.nce in tY:e fa.l.l of 1972. � ��.�� i , ,...,..,,,.,..t ...._-�..�..� _,.:_. _ _ . .� _ . ,. � . • - . � . . . ' A The Planning Boaxd ha.s transmitted the pro�posed ordinance to the t�'ayor. +. �. As of this writing (December I5, 1972), the City Attorney's Office htzs been studying the proposed draft, and is preparing �o tr�ns::�it it to the City Council for their consideration. It would agpear f�om the study of the ordi.- nance thus far, that so�me changes will be required. It is anticipated, ho�r- ever, that the City Counczl, after due public hearings on the ma.tter, will adopt a new zoni.ng ordinance in �973• Studies Either Com�leted or Underway or the h�a.jor Problems and i3eeds Facing thA City of Saint Faul l. St. Paul Independen� School District "Ba.sis for Pecision" Wi�i�e�•, 1972 - Completed 2. St. Paul Housin� & RedeveZop�:ent Authority Housing Report No. l, "An A na�ysis of the 1970 Census" h;�.y, 1972 - Campleted Cer�sus Reports and Analyses, "Series � oi' StudiPs far t�i� i��Pt s anci IrAner City i��i�'tibornaods" Sunmiit-University �l.uUust, 1g71 - Campleted Sum�!it-IJr,.iversity September, 1971 - Co::�le�e:i Stut�tni�-University Se�tnrabir, 197?_ - Cci:AUleNC:� �� 'i'ho:nas-Da1e Septembzr, 1972 - Ccr,�:pleted = :v�st-�eventh Septe:uber, 1�72 - Cc�le�ea Wes�-t�iid�,�ay Sep�er.-wer, 1G72 - Co�let�d North E�c�. Sep-Ler.iber, 1;72 - Co�plet�d Payne-:f•ir�ner,�.ha October, 1972 - Ca�-�leted Code Er,forcement Area-Census lracts 9 and lU Oc�o1aer, 1G(2 - Ca;:�lei.e� Su�r,.•nit-Hill t•�.Y� 1972 Cotnpleted "A Study of Occupa.n'; Characteristics of Selected 236 F'rojec-ts in the t�ie�ropolitan �xea" i'a.y, 1972 - Cor�plete�t Public Iiausing I�eed, Studies of Lc,w Incor,�e Renters and i o�rez�ty in 1��-�e Ci��r of Saint Pa,ul (Report Tr'o. 1) E�uE,�'us�, 1972 - Cample�ec;. (I2epax•t iro. 2.) Sept;er,�er, 1y72 - Cor.ipleit,u The Housir�� and Eea�ve�i.o�nzeat �'�uth�rity hG:J re�ained a consul.�ant � to update '�he eeono�:iie and r.�arxc�4 si;uc::ies for the P:DP ttreas. The co�isult�.ri�;, Loz•imer anci Ciia.�do ��as pr�pai�ed stiudiES cnn::ernit� Sw�ai.t-U�iiversity, University �vcnue and ��est Scventh Street. �_. �;1 :�... � �° ',- 8,} �_ , :.�. , 3. Health;& Welfare Pla.nning Council ` 1 "Towa.rd the Development of a . � R i h rh d " - _ e g bo 0o Service System February, 1970 Completed "The West Si�e Healtn Stuc�y, An Assessment of the Area's . Health Needs" Ma,y, 1971 - Co�pleted "Stuc�y of the Citizen Pa,rticipa�ion in Saint Pa.ul's Woxkable Pro�ram" February, 1972 - Completed ~ "The Multi-Serv'�_ce Center, A Study of West Seventh Stree�" S�iring, 1972 - Co�pleted �F. Chamber of Comrnerce Operation "85" � Pa.rking Fr�posals for po-,*nto��m Saint Pa.ul December, 1972 - Completed Housing Praposals for po:rntown Saint �Paul December, 1972 - Coff�leted A Residential Choice Housin� D�cember, 1972 - Com�Iet�d � Survey Furttier Course of Action, Project "85" D�cernber, 19'I2 - Complet�& 5. Saint Pa.ul Plannit� Baard 197I CIB Report Au;ust, 1970 - Co:npieted 1972 CI� RePor:. Au�ust, i971 - Co�leteu _ "Mississippi River S�LLC�", a joint study of the Plannit�; Board a.nd Port Authority by Eckbo, Dean, Ausi:in and WiZliams Compar,�v Februaiy, 1970 - Co�pletec� I�ee�s �.nd Pr�bleir�s Tne preceding section lists the studies thwt ha�e been or are beir� r.��de c•arrently of the major pY�.�sical, social, .racial, and econo*�ie prablem.� which � exist in Saint Paul. ,,,_ � The Planning and Pro�rarianir�, Sub-Co�::u.ttee of tize Citizens Advi�ory Co�nnittee for Woricrsble 2'ra�r�,sn, dttrir.� tr:i wititer and sprin� of J.972, held `'y � � ` f _ �.:_ , ,_ _. �. �.,:- ,,..; .-�- � : � . ,. . ; . � �;a series of ineetings with the ma.jor public, quasi-public and private plauning �1. bodies in the City. The sub-coamnittee discussed with these groups the planning -process as they see it, to leaxn what they see as the ma.�or problems facir� the City and to diseuss what they plan to do in the next two years to alleviate the existiqg problems. Meetings were held with the following groups: St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority St. Paul Plannir� �;oard Metropolitan Council � Ramsey Action Programs (OEO) � St. Paul Health and Welfaxe Planning Council Mode1 Neighbornood Pla.r�tu.r�; Cauiicil South St. Anthony-West 2�'fidway Project Area Coramittee Thoz�as-Dale Project 13rea Co:�i�:-�ittee West Seventh Stree� Froj�ct Area Cc�,m.i�tee • Rio Vist�, Citizens P3.ann�.ng Council - � � A�ot�g the citizens groups, the mo:t corsistently-stated position wa,s that tlsexe needs to be a fo-r�L.�,lized pr.�cedure in S�,int Paul City Go�;�rrr,�n�c, ��hich will �na.ble them to effectively �articipaf;e in t�e decisions which affect their individual co.��unities. Tkie plans now being m2.de to give citizens groups a �reater voice in th� pla,nnin� grocESS are described in the sec�ion ' of �his document on citizen intirolvement. In efi'ect, they w�re sa;�ing that �he p2annin� process its�lf, or the 2ack oP same, prevented ther,�► frosa ha.vin; ad.eauate input. Arnon� the-public groups, the organiza'cion �os� directly invGlved in carrvir�g out action pro�raans to all.evi��te slum.s a.nd bli�h� is �:he St. Paul H�usino and Redevelcr�ment Au�hority. �:�t;achcd r�.s Lxllibit Ya. l is �aterial � prepared t�y �ne FI� st��fr `r:uch: (1) d�scri�ies -tlie prace�s by k:nic}i IL'�11 develops its plar�s and pro�,raJUS, (2) describes th�� nceds -to �ar.a.ch �i.�A wil_l address itself in the ne� tw�o yeurs, und (3) lists the pro�z,aan st�r:li~�,ries far th� last two r�P year.s. - .. �. � C.-' .. � . . . . . . .. . .. . �. This attached ma.terial was prepared for presentatioa to the Planning and � `� . Prograa�nit�g Sub-Com¢nittee of the Gitizens Advisory Committee for Worka,ble : ; Program. This ma.terial describes the major problems facing Saint Paul in terms of slum and blighted axeas. As this ma.terial indicates, the lack of - adequate housing seems to be the ma�or problem indicated. The section of this Workable Program document dealing with Housing and Relocation wi11 detail tne housing problem which exists in tYie entire city, not just the .�P �xeas. Attached as Exhibit No. 2 is the Three Year Camrnu.nity Action Plan of Ram.sey Action Programs, the local OEO Co�nity Action Agency. This action �.. � plan defines priority problen areas to which RAP will address itself in tne - next three years. These Rl�P priorities are of particular i�portanca because the RAP target a.reas include most of' the federally-assisted areas in the City, the l�.rge public housit� projects, as well �.s the remaining bli�nted areas in the Cii�y z•rhich do no� currently have aqy type of �ND-assisted prc�ram. One � of the r,�,jor advuntages to the nEw Planning Process in Saint Paul t'na.t wzll n��r be described, i� that there w�.11 be a mechanis� for coordinatin� all of the plannin� flznctions in the City, pY�ysical and sacial, so tha,t valuable input fro:n agencies such as RAP is consider�d �n the development of over�,ll city pla.ns. Such input ha.s been largely lackirag in the pwst. Descript�.on of Planning Process In November of 1970, the voters of Saint PauZ approved a new city cnar�er. This r,e�,r cha,rtcr pro�rides for a strang r�,yor-ca�ancil f'orm of governrsent, wi.tn tt�e ir,ayvr beir� the chief execu�ive officer of the City. ihis n�4T charter too�: , effect oi� ,Tune 6, 1972. The princinal featuz•es of Sai«t Paul's nez� goverc��a.'r:� will bc; (1) the centralization of aciministra�tive res�onsibility in ttie Office � of the hiayr�r, (2) the centralization of all pla.nning f`�inctions in the Ofii.ce of t;he Nfa.yor, (3) thc estabiisn.�uetZ�: of Conununity Councils as wn ir�te�ral part . . � . ' .. . , 4r'., .�.`0.` , � .. . Q . __ � > ,� ;. . , � of the city planni.ng process and (�+) the coordination of the plannin� efforts � of other public and private agencies. Under the former city charter, the I�layor ar.J City Coan�i 1 �;er� all intima.tely involved in the planning process because each councilman also fLinctioned as head of one of the city departraents. In addition, the Council � � had final approval powers over Housing and Redevelcmment Authority and other HtTD-related pragrams. The Council served as the City's policy-ma,kir� boc�y and k�a.s responsible for evaluating and apFroving tne budget developed by the elected Co:xptroller. � Through its corr�.ittee on P�;snagement �.nd Rese�rch, it �as responsibZe for developing go�,ls and s�rategies to deai with inner-city cleterioratiori and m�nitored hoth public and private activities related to tn�s. Under the new City Charter, the City Council will il.znction as a pu�rely � la�-�-m��.'r.i:°zg bt��}r. `!''ne .•''�yctr ;Y�11 c�e �ta.e City's c;:aief exe^utive and ��rilZ be responsible for the aperations of all ciLy departments. The Counci.?�.�en, thei�e�ore, �rill have not�hir� to do witn the ct��.ily ac3�:zinistrwtion of i,ne cit��'s dep3.rtr�e tlts. The r;k'3,]pY' CYIB,Cl�;f� ir. the process in tahich plannin� ��oZicy decisicns �rill be mu,de lies in the char:�;e �o a stron� ma.yor form oi city government. This gives thz �yor broad authority in t'r.e fornulation of planr�in� goaiy a:�d �u�;et pro�QOJGIs and centralizes the irnplementation pracess under the aeais of his ofi'ice. The cen�r•aliz�.tion of adr�Linistrative autharity in tn� Office of tile i-:ayar will serve to coordina,�te muny of the liitherfo divergent, and sa�etimes �confiict- in� activities of the vai•ious cif;y ueparf;ment.s. i'he clla,n;e frors a co�r�ission foi�r► of �overn�~ent to a, s�r�.�.�; n�.yor syste:n w�.s irz c'�irect response to the � reco�nized need for a less cumber:ome �.nd ut;-;:ie7.dy n,e�hod of o�eration in city government. The office cf Cit;y Adrr�inistr�tor will be 4.irectly ur.der tlie h'.ayor ,� � ... �'� 4. �<�_ �:�� .,.-,�... . . . . � . � � � . . . . . . . . � . . � and wi.11 be responsible for the day-to-day aperation of the city departments. �� The office of �Plannin� Coordinator will also be directly under the N'ayor and will. provide a needed ser.se of direct�on for the Cit.y's plannic�, efforts. ' Under the City's rear�anization pian, the plannin� staff tirill be respoa- 'f sible for all planning activities done by the City And will serve as the coordinator for planners f�om the private and public sectors. It will coordi- ttate the plannir� efforts of the Co:��unity Councils to r.�a,intain tre city-wide overview that is essential to avoid a limited and parochial approa.ch to solvin; urban problems. �- � � .;, The planninU staff wi11 provide the necessary coordination to insure ��.a� Saint Paul�s planning process effective?y utilizes trie resources of' each of the incli�i.du�.1. a�encies under its purvie�r and gives relev�nt direction to the / ; _ acti.vi.ties of alZ city depar-Lm.ents and a�encies, as well as private a.�encies � ar;.� c�,�kr-cuci�.ty grau��v. In, order to accoi:?plish fhe goal of coordinatii� 'che tot�.l plannin� process, the cr.tire plan�ing departm�nt is beir.� i•estructured and e�-oanded within the ExeC�z�ztre Departrn�.nt of cit;� gove�runerl��. Under the clirection of the Plann�n�; Coordinator, a newl,y created pasition, the Plannir� I12p�xtmen�; will t�e divi.ded , into tr�re� clivisions, as inclic�,te3 on the chart on Pa.ge . This structure w�:L1 r, -� ensure, during the new certification period, that current planning, social plannin� arid Compr.ehensive F?atlning will., for tYic; first ti.me, permit the efiec�- . ive utilization of city resources, rather tnan the so�ewh�,t f`ractured process tY��t has been the ct�se, �.t least in recent years. In terms of the Compre?iensive Plan itself, �;he City intends to tal:e f1i11 adv�,t�ta�e of' the a�portunitics prese�itecl f;}�ol:�;h tlie new ctzarter and �overr:r::ent rcox�ani�.ation. Tilrottgh the city reso�u•ces �.*hich will be a.v-ailat�le, �.nd ti�z•oU�n � �Lhe as�ista,nce of a "701" Coruprel��nsive �':L;�nnirk; Gr�vnt from TIJD, wor'r. will 'ue ; ° st€irted on the upclating of tlie 1;�3 Co��iprehensive Pi.an. As indicated in the . .. . . � . �. �,.�j � . . . . `�_ .._. ,' . .. . . . � � . : .. r : . ; , ' "701" plannin� application submitted to HUD on June 9, 1972, emphasis in the �� , first yeax of this upd4.ting will be on the initial. forc�ulation of a housing component, the updating of the transportation corsponent, and of vital ia�portA:ice, the develapment of Co�nity Cauncils for citizen irrput into the decision-�ir.g proeess. This citizen participation process, when co�npleted, will assure the opportunity for meaningflil participation for all residents of the City. � Thus, while the status of our Cc:rrorehensive Plan has not cha.n;ed over � the last two yeaxs, the next two years present us with an unequaled opportuni�y to modernize and update not only our Co��r.prehensive Plan, but indeed to modernize, update and coordinate our entire planning process. Durin� t;he past ts�;o to tt�;�ee years, expenditures for city pl�.nnir�; purposes has oeen r�nn�r,o at a�out �150,G�J to $2Q0,000 per yeax. The 1973 city planning budget is about �y275,00U. Incluci�:�; the "701" grant, the City �rill have a pl�.nnin� budoet of between $�00,0�0 to . y��+25,000 in 1973. The number of professiona-1 staff r.�embers in tre ci.t� plannir,�, � dep�.r�ment as of April, 1972, h*�.s four. Sinc� �he plannir� departr,�ent reor�,a�:- ization ha,s s�arted, several rnore pra�'essionals r,ave been hired and an active recruiting car�,ai�n conducted. With a combirzation of the city �lannin; bud�e� a,nd the 't70i" grant, there axe 1.�+ prc�fessional positions �,utnorized, as t•rell. as suppc�r-tin,� para-professional and clerical staff.� In �,ddition to thas, discu�:,-io?ls �,re curreytly beit�; held with a�her public �encies such as F�'� and ;,he schoo� ; ,�, �; district, re�arditk; the desirability of their assignic�; �,i least one p1�.nner e�,ch i:o the City Plannin� Depwzvtment. Sitn;lar discussions axe alsa b�i*�; he2d �.��h priva�e or qu�,si-public ��enciES, suc.i �,s i�he H��ali�i and. `r'elfaxe Flar�nin;; Council and tne Ra�^ise� Action Fragra,�: (0�0). : Na;jor e�h�,sis tirill also be glacea on dezTelo�ir�; tile capacity oi Sain� f; �.ul to ha,��dle Cai�ununity Dt�velo��r:ent :�ever.ue Si�^r.ir�; y;�ien this be:o~:ies a r�alit;,r. � �fihe planning a:id pro�rar,��i.n� bud�et iar the Fiousir�; and �edevelopr.lent �utl�ori`ty 5.� zr��iva�a i_n tY�e annual TIDr ap�l.ication. 'ri�e City Ca�i�al. Jr::�rovet;�cnt iuc�;eG, �:nieh is c��rG.inal:eu by thc Ciiy l'lani��r�; De��r•tment, is ti,�t,5��000 antival?��. _ � ., �-. : f' y � �.s, ' ,� — 'Recognizing the major irrcpact that Com¢�unity Develop�eat Revenue Sha.ring will + �� have, the City has einplayed as its new Planning Coord.ina.tor an individu,al who • : wa:s foraierly the Renewal Direc.�or for the St. Paul Housin; and Redevelopm�nt; � - Authority and is totally fa.miliar wi.th the various categorica.l pro;rams whicn will be replaced. In addition, St. Paul. ha.s been fortunate in beir� able to arran�e, under the nobi7.ity provisions of tne Intergovern.*�ental Personnel Ac� of 1g�0, to obtain the servic�s of a key HUI) st�.f.f ::��:i�er for a 12-mon�h period, to assist the City in making plaas for Co�nmunity Devela�ment Revenue Sharing. I � , � i .. . - - � '� E : . � ....,.,---- � . . ,. _ �. : �C . � ; . � + i '� '� ' � � . , � � . �_.�..__ t _ ' � . . � ti .. . � . . . .. � .. .. � . � �; � `V � � � .� .� . . . � . . . G � , . �. � � � .. .. . C� � � . . � . _. . . . � ' . .. � � . ( ...� _ _ .��+ �\ ± ._._,.. .. ..__ .. . _._._ _. �...� �...,_.�.....��—'��.�_�' �.�� .�.��.._._ + a � � ' . , � r •; C�, ; , �, a; , : ' � � �i � . t __�.___...� , � _ - . , - � � � � � , , . ► � ► � f ..�..,�_�..�.��. I . J i � 1 � i � � '`' � , i � � �,: � � � ' � � � .J � , � r � � ': � � -� - �� ....-. ..� ... _.__----- ' _ .__ _. v ` ` .__..._..�____. _ ._n__........__...,..r...... ...,;. _.. �. .. ._.._ ._ . ,..5. ��_..... . � �, � � 1 �. � C' ; � ,� � j � �: Y� � . � � C� �� ___ _.�_._____ ; � � : , �� , � � : �---- i �._.�..�__"' •� � i � � � � LC\ � ' �` :' � � � � V C \ �► � . '� • . !d � ; � � � � � i 1;� `l -- - � � . j � ~ � � , � � : r � � ; �� _ '`� ; . � , -- -�- - � i ` j i __ � � ' t� � .._... .��.�..w_-.-----.� r_ -- � ; _' -� � ' _ - - .s..�.-�--_,.... $ U ` , ..�.,.s,��.>- r � _`...._..... `� � :� � �) t ,;� �;� � �_ t` C � . _ t ��v_� i r� _ . . � � , . itul�•1081 ; (il-6a1 .. . , . ~ �� HOUSING AND RELOCATION IU:(j'.!lf{F.A1I�:N7_5. Thi.S element contains requirenents w�ith reepect to t��.h t��e cu:. ,nunitr's need fur housing � and lhe need for effective relocatian programs, which are treated separately betow. Ranieri liOI��INC Ident,ify and analyze the gap between the community's low- and moderate-income housing . RE(�UIItE11!?NTS. nceds and thc resources avaitable to meet the need, and devetop and imptement a meaning- ful action program to help bvercome the gxp. l. On i.he bayi:� of presently available information and locally determined standards, provide an estimate of thc numbor o[ low- and moderate-income families presently living in substandard housing, by race, and the num- I ber of r�tandxrd housing units presently vacant and available at prices or rentals sach families can afford to PgY• � 'l. I)c��crihe how lhe above e�timute w�ati made, and H�hat plans the community has to develog on a continuing h:i�iti an accurate im�entory of low- and moderate-income housing needs and resources. .� - - 10 - ; . ',. MUD-t�3E1 � (11-68) :f. Uc+Kr.ribu in yuanlifiabl�+ t��rmH to the extent paseibie, the community'H target�s !or accumplirshment, and thc� � � r+pur.lfic r+trpy and uc�tion� il intendy to take in Eho next cartification period to expand the �upply uf I�,N- und muderatu-�ncome hou�sin�;. (Such description ahould include identification of lhe �pccific F'ederal ar oth�r aid pro�,�rams to be used, the sponsorship of the prop��sc�d arn;-ram-, statu� uf fin��,cial commitme�nt�. fur the projocte, and estimated dates for initiation and completion of constniccion or rehabilitation.) � � 4. ller�cribe the gteps taken and the accomplishments made during the last period with respect to expandin;; the aupply nf housing for loH�- and moderate-income familieg. 5. 1�l�•utify lhe pubiic u�ency or official responsible for overall direction in formulatin� and impl�m�ntin� thE� hou�in� prc►�;ram, und de,cribe the relationsitip of such agency or official to ttle rhief executi��e �f thr cummunil,y. � - 11 - � �� ,,,, „ ;� . �ia�.... - . . . , . � �. . . .. . .. � . � l _ � . � � . . �` ', ..� .,.� �..:� . . . .. . . � . � .. . . . . . r,. ^•n''>.... .._..: '..� .. . . . . . . . . . . � . � . . .. � . '�y `."` ..�... ..�, .. � . . � . .. . . . . . 9 �MUateei •, (t�.be) � �aycrib� lho plan5 ��f�cuch agency or officia! for mobitizing all avaitable public and private resources in acd�n I�n hc►1p.�►vcircumc tho hou:�ing gap in the community. Ranieri and Newman Rh:I.00ATION The development of a centrally-administere±i or coo�dinated relocation program for all families RH;QUINF:11[�:NTS. and individuals displaced by governmental action in the community; the provision of a suffi- cient volume of decent, safe and sanita.ry housing within the means of such displacees in appropriate unit eizes; and, the provision af sen�ices to such displacees comparable to those under the urban renewal program. I. R`itti rQypoct to a�encies having responsibilities for relocatian in the community, give the following infornia- lion: � a_ '1'he name oP t.hc• local agency administering the reloca.tion program under urban renew�al, inciuding the determination of rehousing needs, developing plans to meet such needs �r,d providing relocation assist- anc�. b. 1'he name of lhe local agency administering the relocation program for those displaeed by other govern- men�ul arliun, including the determination of rehousing needs, developing plans to meet such need_ and providin�; relocation assi�tance. . , � � - 12 - I �; �. . � - �� * �; . ,.'- NUD•108T , (11�8) �' �� c. tf the answers to a. and b.above indicate differ • r' � 'n ent agenc�es, de�c ib, i detati ho�• their respect�ve reeponsibilitios are coordinated as to need determinations, program planning and lhe provision ot reloca- tion assistance. d. Uescribe in detail what steps or actions the comr�•��ity proposes to take in the next period to review, evaluate and improve coordination among the ager�c�as mentioned in c. above. �. If lhu community has displaced families or busines�esfrom HLD-assisted projects and/or otherguvernmental actiun program� during the proceding t�vo-year period end;ng give the following information; ont an YearJ NUMBER OF NUMBER OF OF TOTAL IN COLIJ�dNS A + B, LiST IJUMHER OF FAMILIES REl.OG4TED TVPE OF FAMILIES DISPLACED BUSINESSES � iN SuB-STa��paku GOVERtJMENTAL ACTION ( (A) (D) IN STANDARD HOUSING HOU5ING'�� (NON- MINORIT (NON- MINOR�TY (N�h MIhO.r;Ty MwM�T'E Y) GROUPS� DISPLACED RELOCATED M�HIT'E Y, GROUPS* �f�yORITY) Gii0UP5�` WHITE � IIl1U-astiisted Projects. Codo l:nforcemenl. . . . ' Il�ghwuy (;unstruction . Otht+t (Idr,tc�/rl • 7'otal. . . . . . . 't' IQenti(y as to Spsnich-American, Alegro, American Indian and Oriental �,rovpa. �• NouslnQ �rhtch ia not in conforcnity with coeies in eftect in the community, - 13 - �. ; � _ � . >;• '„vu-�oe i ;�ild8j` _ � � i)�•.c�ibed the kind� of rclucalion :�a�vices being provided by the community to per-ons and t�usinr;;�s being �f�:ptue•ed, (�`.�.in�p�•clion of huu�in�; avuilubl�� for relocation, intervieK�ing and coun�elin� uf pt�rson: bein�; - �}�,r�ac�•d, ,y�trm for I►andlin�; rnlocation pa�ment�, e,tablishment of hou;infi und c�ther referral ;��r►ices), :,nd Kive tfir xmount of funds available to pruvide the services. � _ �1. If the cummunit�� will displace families and businesses frum HLiD-assisted projects and/or by other Govern- mental action programs during the coming two-year period, give the following information: TYPE OF NUM6ER OF FAMILtES APID �USINESSES TO BE DISPLACED - TOTAL � . GOYERNMENTAL OCTION � (NON-MINORITY) � _ WHITE MtNORITY GROUPS* BUSINESSES IiI!U•a-s�i4ted !'roject� . . . . . . t'��<l�� F:n[orcument . . . . . . . . . ili�;hway ('on�truction . . . . . . . flthi�r(1Jr„ri(y) . . . . . . . "'"° ��<<Y p� t� S oni h-Am • ro 'v tim te of ro orlions p s erican, Neg , American Indin� nnd Oricntal groups, and gi e es a s p p . whrrrvur pusaible. � - 14 - r.� .-��. � �. �. . . . .. . . � . ,- � ... . , �. . ' . .. .. . . . F":a . . .. . � � ' . . . . � � . . . . . . . � �.:,.. �..� . . .. � � . . . . . . ♦ � � ' . . � . .. . _ . . . . . . � x , Huc-�cai - c�i�e, � 5. hbr th� num6r.r�►f famitie� e�hown in 4 above, indicate their iRCOme brackets and the number of ytandard h�uKing unity, buth new and existin�;, thatwill be available for such families di�placed during lhai per�od. Identify tho Kaurces of data . � s�. I�r►r ali new hou5inh to be available to displaced families, as indicated above, identify the num�er uf unit� for homcownership or rental, project status, estimated comptetion date, and for tederally� a��isted pro�,rram�, the project number if assigned. � 15 ._.__.;a�.> -• � .__.. . _. .. . _ .�- - MUO-108T �1I-bd) : ' , � - _ a. Uthe ��ummunity wilt di�place single persons by E3liD-assisted projcct� and/or other governmentai action duritr� the folluwing two-year period, gi��e the following information: the rtumber to be displaced, their race, the incume ic�vels of those to be disp{aced, the t}'pe of huusing resuurc<�� U:� be a��ailahlc {e.�. n;umin� and boardin� hou�ey, residential hotels, housing and homes for the elderly, other). � 7. IVhat are the current vacancy rates in the community for ths inventory of standard low- and moderate-income hou�ing units, by number of bedrooms and rents or moa�thly housing expenses? How �vere the rates deter- mined? � - 16 i . .o. - . � _ . . J ��Y�/•::'�� . . � . . ... �. . . . - . �0. -:. � - , _ �. . . � . . . . 4^t, a . ' . � . . _ . . . . � . . . . � . � i� .•A � - . � '. . . � � .. . � � . .. � . . . � �i.L �• . . . .. . . . �.. . . � ' . � . . n ' :.Y.�. . .. . � . . . . . . . . . . � .. . . �.. .;lr � . - . '_ .. . . . . . . .. . . - .. ir� �� H 0 U S I N G The City of Saint Paul, through the Housir� and Redevelopment Authority and the City Building Department, 'r,as been abZe to deter��ine � . - housing needs and housing conditions. However, these methods do not provide a continuous ind.icator of the City`s housing stock. To remeqy this situation, a series of coordinated projects axe bein� initiated. In the recently-f�nded 70i Comprehens�;re Plzi:�r�i:� Grant, the housi:�; element includes a city-�i.de survey of housing con�itions. To supple- rnent this stuqy, d�ta f�o� t�:e �ti'elfare �e�iartment concernic�; client's � rESider:ce will be correl.a,ted. Resul�;i.r.; iz�o� �t.�_s r.^.e�hoci, a t;lpolo�7,�• delineating housir,� puality ar:d S,reliare recipier�-� will be developed. E:n additiona2 phase of t'c�is stuciy would be � s��ple survey of the o:;eu- pants of substan�:a,rd haa.sin; to deter.:ai.ne socio-econo�ic charac�eristics. 'lne stuc�y desi�n a:�d ir:plement�.tior� silould be the resoon�i�ili�,� o° thc Plarining Board. Fiel� workers could be recruited f�om tiie n�^e-rous colle;es located withir� St. Paul, and if properly traine� and supervised, c�uld be beneficial to the project. Currentl.y, condition d.ata for a1�_ IvDF's and portior.�s of the City has been collected but �,r�ere is no carrel�.tian to the resident o� each unit. The ��A maintains a keekly report af public housir.� �.p_a'icar.�s, which now i.ndi.cates a �itinr; list of appro}_ir:�s�ely 700 for elderiy pt�bl=c � ho•asinb and 300 for no�i-elderly f�r�ily pubiic i�.ousir.�. With the publicatior_ of fourth count census da,ta, the :�i,A deti�eloped � neeci stucly (App. I) based l✓r` (1) r, ��: ., ` . ._ .�._ _ R. . . . . .. . . . _ _ . .. ._ . ,�,,� i a� � � . — • --- --- - -. �. __ i � � "-��`r t=� � � . rF � _ . � ;.- �.. - .� ' �2� ,� . � . - on this data. A similar study was developed by the �Setropolitan Co�.zncil. � �om the HRA stuc�y three � - � ma�or conclusions can be made. First, the need _ for hausing a,mor� Ioy, _r_c:�r.:e f , , .. _ _ ar:i �e: -�r' �r -,nce�trs.,��: :n tne or�e- to-three bedroom units. Second, approximate�}r 2�3 of a1i lor.� income Paaiiie;; are headed by a woma,n and mu.st be considered in determinir►g uni� Iocation ' and program type. Finally, approxima,tely �+,000 of those who �ould be eligible by income for non-elderly puui�I.ic hausing are not qualified beca�e . they live �lone. Federal statutes limit housing to sin;le occupants who are eitner � displaced by publzc action, 62 or over� or h�.ndicapped. Therefore, ma,rLv residents are ex_cluded. It can be �.rguect, but not qua,ntified, th�.t martiy of tl-.ese households have tr.e �bility ta increase their incomes -- students, youn� t.rarking w6�en, etc., and ►�i11 reduce this need. �iowever, relocatior� � i•epor�ts of the i�'�? ir:a;ca�e {;'ri.�; ��7.3;; o�` a.11 »e !o�ation cases for Year IV � and precECii.ng yeaxs are in3ividuals. Of these 311 cases, 131 are non- e�_derly indi�ri�ua.ls. I�ar�v of these sir.�le occu�an� rel.oca�eES possess social probl�*�S t�k:t i�+�eae the ability of I-� �3 firi�3 suit�:31e reloca��o. resources. In ta r�.,aray cases, special social services axe needed to supple�ent th� nou:i�; resorarces. AeaLizir�; this need for housino and services, HRA, with local flinds, ha,s purcha.sed a faciiity in the West Seventh .,ID? area tnat will provide this need. Social services will be provided b5- an agency thrott,�,�n a contract with IiRA. This progr�un shou3.,d be operationa.l dux•ing �973• The Hausing and Fedeveiop�ent tluthority h4.s been desi�nated by the City of Saint Pa.til. as the Ci�;y's central r.e.lucation ��;ency, ar.d by state- � enablin� legislation is responsible for redeveiapment and public housing pro�raxns. With these responsibil.i.ties, Y��.� lias deve).oped a variety of i�- ,.`•� �/ • � f � � . . .. .. ' ��.. ,� r� ,• � �3) �,„ r , _ �. .`� i..�9�� ..:.�S . . . .. ' .. . . � . � . `� *`";� plans and policies to be �Pl�ented during this certificgtion period. k `� , � ,-,' During 1972, HRA was authorized by HUD to increase its supp�y of f�i�y � � �t�`' `public housing uaits by 1+30. Of �hese units, ?C� k�1 � 1 be le��ed tir;ule _ the remaining 2$p yri,ll be scattered site units. The scattered units �riii be either new construction or existing structures. The provision of : these units will actua.lize an HRA-adopted policy that has the ob�ectives • of locationa.l dispe.rsal, design co�wtible kw;;.: t;-:e ;:�i.ghborhool Aad � � priva,te sector involv�.ment. DISPERSAL � To achieve this �oa1, HRA requ�res th?t r.o rore than one unii; or lo* be purchased per block face. Giv�n unit �.nd deve?_op�ent costs, �ir�. can purcha,se existino structures in most neighborhoods of the Cit�T. HRA mani�ors the purchase oi all units or lo�s to insure that no neighborhood !_ � is buir�; cor�centrated �*itiz unwts. IA�SIG�,' In the construction of new ur�its, HRA st;aff has develop�d criteria that encourages cozripatibility with the r.eighborhood. The construction of these �nits will begin a.n the spring of 1973• PRIVk� SF.CTOR IIdVOLV��;2fENT Durin� 1972, the I�A s��.ff surveyed alI vacant lots located �rithin the City. Ea,ch lot suzVve3*ed �-a; evalua,f;ed as to its suitability for housir�, �nvirounental cI�axacteristi.cs, potenti�.l c�sts and location to public ser�rices. As a resul.t of this sur�rey, �+00 lots Yrere inventoried. The ne.� phase of this prot ram was ta contact t�ie lot's o��,r�?ers to ascei-tain the � potential Yor-sale. This pha,se rroduced twen�y lots which should be under construction du-rin� the �wimer of 1973. Excessive purchase price, extensive site iaiprovements and �dverse envi.ronmental chsracteristics were factors tl�t linzited the purchase of lats. However, IiIt�: has not d.iscarded this data but .--�- _ � r ,. - `�►, . . � �; .�. � �s,_ wr. �, _ �-L --" �• � • � � � „"; s.� �4� a �: , �� ' � 'has develbped a program tha,t reduces the time needed to pro3uce a unit and iY '.�• �. � . . . . . .. � � : . .. . � . � �y .� Yias the potential to pl.ace additional farnily units on the private market. .� The probability of tne �.�;,.x�.�i.:ation c� t�iiu . _ � ..._� i;t�:. � .._ ..�ed by j�_. - recent attorney genera.I's opinion that ha.s increased the property tax on . undevelo�ped residential zoned property by 7.5ro. - HRA arrticipates that 150 to 200 public housin�, units and possibly u� . to 100 private ma.rket units can be provided. This pro�ram wi.11 be�in in the spring of 1973. With increased subsid3► flinds for Ieasing units, �RA will 'oe able to disperse these units throu�hout the Czty in newer a.part�ent build:r�3s. , This r�eti- leasing authorization is �eing impler�ented as of Deczmber 1, 1972 and should continue for a portion of the entitlement period. The 1970 census reported that 16� or 49,b00 of the City's population � was a�e 62 or aver. In tt�e :'��Lt�:, ap�,r�xii.�.at,�i;v' =-�,� o° the Sta�e 'is of this a,��e, while less tha,n I.Oro of the metropolitwn area is 62 and over. A cor_ceniration of elderly also lives in N:inneapol_i.s, where approxima�ely 1.F3.O�u of the residen-rs are 62 and over. Fux�her anaiysis indicates th�,,i, 2j 3 of tae Saint Pa.ul elderly o•.m their hom�s. Of these 18,000 units, approxi�.�,tely 8,C�OJ are occ.upied by one person. The 18,000 units represent approxi�aately 30.0`� of all awner- occupied ur�fts in Sa.i.n% Paul. Ma.ny of these owner-occupied units are located in th� Diacalester- Graveland and Phalen neighborl�oods. The �njor cor_centration of elderly renters is found in the rin� encom�assing the centra� business d.istrict. This area includes the portions of �hormas-Dale acid SLU:unit-UiLiversity east � of Dale, the eastern section of Sn'est Seventh, and th� lower East Si�e, � including P�yne-b�inner�,ha and Dayton's Eluff. In tri.is area, �hich is . mostly renter-occupied, it co�tains ma.c�y of the City's older structures, �;� C/ �,F,.y -�: �- , _ ., - .,:� . - . . . . � � ,� :-.-. . ... � � .Y. � " ., - .. . ... � . �� ' ' �.. - � .4-. .- .. . � � . �4 �� , � y. �b r''' • ,�. ° � - (5) .2 ;: _ . •. ; t�rhich oPfer Iower rents and are easily accessible by pubiic tra : nsit to ` :� - dawntown. � To assist in the ho�„ _-�_, ��.^ ,. - - ,4.; c:.:.. .: ccl to _ � 8 Proposal for 1,2pp elderly public hrnzsi ng un.its. Subatitted in 5eptember, 1972, the proposal is awaitir� HUD aPProval. Uari cextification eriod n8 the next P , HRA will begin construction �,nd co�plete s,rork on three high-rises. The buildir,� 1oca,ted at the corner of Edgerton and : �Ferrks Streets, on the City's East Side, wil.l be available for occu an P cy ia the spring of 1973. , A unique feature of this 22�-unit strv.cture is the inclusion of ' a di.�nostic health clinic to be staffec� by doctors f�o� FL�mSe Count Y y �'ospital. The clinic will not on7,y serve the residents of the builciir � �ut those f�om the nezghborhood. A 186 unit structure of one-bedroam uni�s will be under cor.str-�action c�tzrir.� 1.G13 in t1;� ?';�st ,��id�.y-South � S�. Anthoqy Nei nborh g ood Develop�ent Progra�� area. Z�is buildi ng (J�:inn, I"27} w�-ii �e the first high-rise in the City's aortYr„restern section. The remainir�; 2p$ units of �he cvrrent prc,�ra�n �,uthorization s•ri1Z be utiliz�d in 2�.inn. 1�-26. This s;;i�Ctzure, i;� be ivc�,;,ed on the �ormer campus of the St. Pa,ttl. Ea.ble Coll.ege, should be under construction in either late i973 or e�zr],y 1�7�+, • - A� af December 1, 1972, architects have been chosen for the West- tiid•.�ray and Bible Colle�e sites, whiie, as of thi.s da.te, the Ed�erton- Jenks buildinn is proceeding accordin� to schedule. During this certi- fication period, IiRA, in cooperation with social service a�;encies, wi.11 develop plans for units that include facilities for soczal services. Part of this plannir� process will include efforts to sectire private : � funds for the services ar cons�truct�on. HRA s�aff r� part that as the residents advaace in years, their ca�,acity to ma,ini;ain a household declines. Such services as meals and hrnisekeepic� stzoul.d be de.veloped. Ho�,�ever, , } - - _.___ - - - -_..__ •, ,�-_ _ __ , � . .__� _,_ . :_ _ �4� ��.� ^A�y• . � - . - � .. . . � . . � _' . ' . . ' . . _ . .. . �-�},'s'j.�...;�; �.�:;;. . . . .._ .. ,. . ._.._-��,.._'. —�..-� �~'� " . � . . . . . . .. . . . . . . A ♦_ �.� ..� * � � (6) r+, r. . . . . . . . . , . L _ -. receat cuts in So�ial Security Title IV f�nds and public hou.sing subsf�cs ' h , deter the develapment of such progra,ms, HRA su6mi.tted three proposals to the Ramsey Coun�y Welf - - _ �'-''� ;�. ",-'.^ �'j v.: _.:i.__ ..__ . . _ ��J • ,. _ , _ The proposals included aot only services for elderly, but also programs Por _ families and relocatees. As of this submission, the status of these pro- grams has n� been finaZized. _ Since 1968, the xRA ha,s been opera.ting Neighbori�oad Development Pro,jec�� : (NDP) in six neighborhoods. In four of these areas, the pro�ect area com- ! mittee (PAC), in eooperation vrith HRA, ha,s included in the YDP plan specific pruposals for modex•ate inec�e ho9ssing, As of L��cer��?�r, 1972, three propos�,;.��s - had been svbmitted to HUD for processing. If approved bf HUD, t,�2 additio:��l "236" units will be t�.t�der construction durin� tnis certification pe-riod. F. descr.iption 4f each praject fallows: 1 - � �'ILDER PitOP�.:�TIES Snonsr�red by tn� Wil_der Fa;znda,tion, a n�in-profit operatin� founda.tion loc�,t�d in St. t�,ul, �;he project will contain 3�5 "236" units :in a �arie�y of arr�i�ectu.ral �ty*les; •�ta1k-u� a�;urt.��n�s; hig'n-r;s�s anci to�,+�i�i:�uses. Ti:e �8 t!�ree-oedroom townhouses wi11 be o�fered as a cooperative, ii�e spansor has expressed a strong co:nmi�m�nt to not orzly homeownership but also to a socio-ecanamic mix a.uc�r�r, the residents. To realize t.kii.s goal, the sn�nsor has requested a wai�*er from HUL so that a proportion of these units cauld be offered at the economic rate. The �,ralkup apa,rt��n�nts z�,y a�.so be cooper�- tive and wwill be on� and tho bedroam units, �.�hile the hi�h-rise srill contaiu 137 one-b�droom rent;al units. The sponsos�, e�•perienced in rousic� �anagerseat, �; iatends to manage the praject and proti2de, �t its own expe:�se, social services . and a coa�unity center. The latter facility wii.Z sez�ve -�he can,-eunity as we?1 e.s the hcrusing project. As of December I, 1972, the l�.nd was cler�xec3, and the , . 2013 �s submitted to Ht1�. i ,- ✓- �. , �.:_ � ,._ . � � _� � ' - - _ ,, � �� .3 � � ' - - �___., _ •� _.._. �.�.� . c �� ' (7) i� �% � LOTQIVIE ADKINS COURT � `� y This 77-uait two and three bedroom tawnhou se pro�ect has been sub- , mitted to HU� �nd is ak�;i',.,i.r.- ��r' . ,��. rsity : . rtDP, this pro�ect has been in the planning process since 1968. The laad - has been cleared as part of the NllP program. " F•AI✓,PD�N COURT The West N:idwa.q-South St. Anthoqy Park P�3JP neighborhood group, in con'junction with HRA, h�,s devel.oped plans for a "236" project th�.t will contaa.n 100 one and two bedroom �,ra,lkup units. As of December, 1g72, the ' Ian cleaxed, �, �t_ - . , • . d has been �v�-,�.0;�,2• .. . , . i ;,U �:,� : . :��.:_.;c��:�: �.ra_3 tr:e .:t �tas _ .,;�� Leen subnlitted to H�JD for approv�l. If these 236 projects are approsed, the City wi1l be able to pro�rid� �+:32 additioria,l raoderate-income units for the far�i.lies and elderly. In ia�ld'tion, �t�ese ut�i.�:s and tne �+:i0 fa.�ily 4r�ci eiaerly public nousing units w�.l? be av�,ilable as a relocation resa�arce ror those d;splacea by P�'DP �,c:d �t'r.er federal action. T�: prov�de additional 1c�� anc? moderate hou�in� units �.*ithozit conce�i- trating units in o�e ?c,cation and reha.bilitate th� City's a.gir� hoasir� stock, th� City of Saint Ya.ul has been designa,ted as a "Project R�:"r,ab" city. Although the Cit;� is the official designated agency, the project's operation xTill be tiancii_ed by the Ca•rmiunity Housing Corporation (CHC). This local non-��ofit corporatiou is f12r�ded by priva�;e srnarces such as business, inciustry and indiviaua,l and is no�* profes�io:�ally staffed. Duritk; the certification period, the CHC will reha.bilitate a substanti�l ntL�uber of single-farnil.y and multi-family units. ?'he ex�ci. r�umber of units is contin- � gent upon HU� ftzqding 1.evels. Since design4tion in tii` sprin� oi 1972, Project Rel�a,b has acca�?�,lisl�ed th� foZlowita; ph�.se� that are prere�u.isite �� , . _ , - . .. . : _ _.,. . ,, , 2 - +cE.y : • ,. ; _ .Ar'* ~ �� « �8� .� ' �� r }S`. VO gGt119.1 hOLlS� � ng production: (1) A professional staff, including a � .<' - ,, : director, program ma,t�ager and an econonic opportunity officer hn • � .�� hired; (2) T}�i... �� r ,�_ s oeen _ ��a..� . ., co .��t.c " :"o�:,� ... :�out the City to explain its program and determine if units within thei r neighborhood axe eligible for reha,b, and if the neignborhood grouD . or _.. another group will sponsor rehab in tha.t area. As of December 1, 1972, � '�he Pha.len Area Community Council, a non-:�P group serrrir� a ma,jor . _` portion of the EASt Side and t�ie West Seventh PAC, have agreed to become - sponsors; and (3) To faiuiliarize the neighborhood groups, develapers and public ageneies with the rehabilii,ation nrocess, CHC conducted a two-d�y � workshop seminar durin� ;lovember of 1972. Re res �- --.- p en�at�ves from tiuD �n� , HRA �erved as panelists and semina,r leaders. With the completion of thes e Prj�`��S and much internal organization, coupied with contactir.� labor le�,ders, develovers and b�.i,kers, C�L i c r.ow p�•c.��:.z•i ri:; �o pa��;e �roposals � �'�� urizt-� Tt�� rteed to rehabil:;�tate St. Paul's housir� stock is ^ affii-rced l��,r 1�70 ce�?s�a; c�,�t�, tha,t indicates tha.t 2�3 of a1I uniis wexe constructed pri�r ta 193g• When coi�ple�e3, these units tai1Z a,lso be available as relocpt��oa r�scrai•ces. The iIRA has eacour�,,ged the corzstruction c�f "235 hames in the NDP areas. hosrever, ina,dequa,te cost li.mitations pronibit the dcvelopr�enti of desirable knits. To assist ia the production of m�re desirable units, the St. Paul t�fodel. Cities has developed a grogram whertby ��del Cities sup�lemental Sla.nds axe used to prov�de grants to flr.ture hame-owners wh.o consti-uct their l�c�e� under the various federal sir�le�family hQ,-�e6�ership pi•�;r�� w�jthin the T�:odel Neighborhood. A grant of $1,OOp per bedraclm will be gran�ed, witn �' ��"'""'m pf �3,000 per ho:ne. Preference will be �iven to homes built in � �he Northeast Quadran�; those displACed fro� the Idori;iieast Quadrant and r.odel Cities residents over non-residents. Hf2A yriZl administer the pro�ram . / �� ' _ ..�. _ . _ _ _ . ,_ . - _, _ - . _ _ _ '�•'G'L :K'?S��,• . . . . . . . . . . . _ _ r. �: : �9, � ti �=; � . :, ' � ��' - which taill begin when supplementa _ 1 funds become ava,ilable. x .' This Program �� . � _ is in response to a cammutti�y criticism of y '��' the design of 2 � f1t].IY, the s 3S hornes. Hope- � upplementn.l. r � t¢..�l tlt$ �11 1��"C?.T� f.�r �n,.;,T . � ''i With the receipt of a Ol �'':�lity, 7 planning grant, the Cft y of Saint pa�� t�'�b its reorganized P7,anni p � �e artment, is nok developing a car�p�_ _ ' hensive plan. As Pa� of this housi�g stu�y, � �s �o�Ieted an aaalysis oP the 1970 census. e�e�l''e This dt�,ta�' h�.�l provide a basis for detailed analysis to be conducted by th� 70�, p�elimina, � � s�u� conducted by h,�,e concludes that the City's pvpuZation is agirig, while li ' i hou,sing stock. �� in an agi� The 701 rlousing element, bascd oa tne i'iricuug of this data, �*ili address itself to not only the question of the hausing and populati Q but azso yn,Zl include the foll.owing issues; °� �e i 1• �e lrunigration of the post-high schoole.rs who aut_mi. � fi.xre grate with,�n y�ars; a strategy to retain ttzese y�u�g f�ilies; �. The effec� of i�roved Pub1-ic facilities to hoiisir� and neighbor- haod stabi.lity. �< The under-utilization of ho,;si r.�. �+• The relationship between Iaxge, oldei• ht�mes and sr �.11er fac;u.lies; a s$raze�y ta best utilize this housir� stock. {4 S. The development ef facilities to hcuse the elderly who are f nvt abl� to live independently. • This 7.ist is not aII inclusive but will serve only as a st �� artin� point ln the 'devel.a�.,�ent of a housing plan. � � � �iuch of this data is prESented in the �.ppendix. � � �° - � � , . -----. ---— ___--,- -- ___— ___ - ___ __ __ .. ..._. ....._�.__ __ . _ _ r�— :,�� .. . � .. .,. �_.... .... . _ . . � . . . .. ... . . � ..� . .. �, ..,.A Tr�,:,,,.,b,+. — . .. .. .. . . . . - . . . _ _ . �.. . — . . _. . ` h �:' '4 . . . . . . . . . � V� � `> ta (11� � .;4,. ; � �� SUl��+IARY r . � The Housing and Redev��r.;;L;�,, ,iuLhority i:> _ _ _ ..._ _., ,.�� _.,. . :al housing and renewa.l program.s, as well as relocation affected by public actior.. Daring this certification period, the HRp will provide 280 family public honsing uni�s 2 on scatter�d sites throughout the City and an additional 200 leasing nnits. For the elderly, three new high-rises wi11 be o�pened, while an application for an additional 1,200 units has been submitted to HUD. In the .development of nioderate incoMe units, HRA has assisted three develapers in preparing applications for 236 hausin:-s. Ail tnree sites axe located in NDP areas and axe part of NDP ac�tion year plans. If these projects receive FiUD approval, �82 units in a vaxiety of architectural, styles, wit`h sa^ie heing available for owner occupancy, will be cor,rpleted duric�; t'uis � certif:ic�,�a�on period. Depend.ing upon the HUD flzndiag level., Project Rehab shauld add single- f'aau.ly an3 multi=fa,mily low �.nd moderate-income hausi.ng units to the City's stock. Proje�t Rehab's vperating boc�,v, the Cor.r.nuni.ty Ha•asin; Ccrporatio:�, is a non Frof'it privateiy-flAnded corporation establisned in �darch oi 1972 �o ac'Imi.nister this program. While operatin� fta.nds ori�ina.�e from private sourccs, HRA has co�nitted technical assistance and write-doun. f�znds. The City of Saint Paul h�,s also flzrnished technical assistri.nce, especia.11.y for hausin� code problems. The HRA is the i�lementir,g agency for housiu; and renew�.1 prograr�s, as well as having a r.ia.jor policy-ma.kin; rale. S•�i-�h the reor�anization of - ci,ty gorert�ent th,wt h:3s resulted in a reorgar.ized planning department, the � City of Saint Paul assisted by a 701 plannic�; grant and substantial loc�l /� - i � .. : .� � .., � :°`.�'+ r":�,._: ', _ � �.� � � :}"` �� ' (12) ,. - � a� �:_budget, xill take a more active xole in planaing 8.nd formu } ' lating policy for �-.� . housiag in the City of Saint P�ul. A portion of this planni j„ri �8 11 f avolve liaison with the M�tropol�', :.: ^ -:, _ _ ,.... .�c t-�._ . � �� with - this agency can be ma,intained. :�. � � � _ �✓ -, / '� � , ;� ; _ _ ,k�,y��,�. �r };rt.. - �'. ` � s � Tr�. .�:.,y r+ , �. . .. �. , - . (13) i �� _ , , . , .., . . . y _ \ .: . . . . . . . . . . . .. ., ;; ��,..-::, ._ f, ..�. . . . . . . . � . i. 1 . - � . ... . . . . �y . . . � � � .. . . � . . . . . . y�. .... � - � � . . . - . . . FOOTI�IOTES l. On December 15, 1972, the Plumbers Non-Profit Housing Corporat�on submitted to HUD �. development pac�a�-e (2013} �cr 141 "23�" subsidized housing units. All of these -units will be one-bedroom and wiil be lacated in the eastern section of the Thoma.s-Da,le PdDP. If these : units and all previous�y-mentioned units are approved, the Ci1.y of Saint Pa.ul wi.11 be able to add 623 "230" un�ts to its supply of iaw and noderate-income housing. � 2. 1`h� �30 units axe inclu3ed in the ne�aly-authorized leased housing � prograzn aud developr:,r�ri� pr��r�:� :•u.uu. 1-21; :`�.r.n. 1-23, ar.d I�:inn. I-2j. � 1� - �� , ,.�,,.�.,,�-.�,.--�-.... , _ . ___ _. . ._ , � .«.-.�.-. - - • ;} _ _ HOUSING AND RELOCATION SECTION i�. STATISTICAL APPEYDIX CITY OF SAIi�i FALL AN OVERVIEW , The City of Sairrt Paul's 1970 popu]_ation was 30g,930 or 1.� belo�r the 1960 count of 313,�+11. Hokever, analysis of Table I concludes that from 1900 to 1970 the City's population aged, as evidenced �y the follcrrin�; facts: (1} The number of children under 5 in 1970 �ras 26,208 or 2>� below the 1960 fi�ure of 3�+,637. This decline can, in fact, be attributed to changing social attitudes, as we11 as out-mig��ation pa�terns. (2) `rdhile the City e�:perienced an in-migration of post �u.gn schoolers (a.�e 19-24} wno moved t;o Saint Pwul �o attend schoal. or find er�loy�uer.t, there is an ou+- migrLwtion of the younv f�.i].y G.�e group (25-;�). I:ri 196G, �+��,521 peo�le ' 2ged 15-2�+ tived. in Saint Paul, �;�iile in 1G7�, 35�i 39 Person� aged 2j-3!� r�esic�ed in tY�e City. inis reprr set.t;s a decrease of 8,92� per.o.is or wppr��;Y_ i.nately 3,C�0 hause'nolds. (3) �he City's �lderly �aaulatian increased b3� appro:ima,tely �+,CO�. Analysis of �.11 avuilable cer_�sus and otr�cr s�•uc�ies conc7udes that t:�is trend «a.s affected �y the incz•ewse in life exp�ctanc�r and not by in-rriigration. In 1960, 37,2�1 persons 65 and over 2ived in t:ne ' -City, wniTe in 1970, 1�1,136 pe-rsons wez•e af thi.s a.�r�. II6wE:Ve2�, the only increa.se k�.s r�pox^�ed in the 75-and-over �r�:�p. The 65 to 7� w�e greun ir, Z9`(0 �r��.s 940 less than the I.;vO figure, i�u� the 77-�nd-ove� gr�u� in Iyi'0 increasE,d by �,£33>, with 2,/3 ai this group bei.n�, z:ro�:�en. ihese pogul�:�iot1 t�cii:7.s iiazre dii°e.ci�l�~ �,r.:��t�.e.r_ceci tiic City's hou�ir�; �to��'::, i £1,S 4Te11 aS 11:5 5U;:10 E:CO!10:i11.0 S��CGl:2`G. `�1':2�T'�i'Gri:� �'["lE t1OL1:iC'� e�ei:'��[1i, Oi tne 70i wi1]_ acidrL�s it�elf to �cile isaue oi' ''cii�: �_ti�,r�;in� popul�.tio:�. � _ � TABI� I CITY OF SAINr PAUL - STATISTICAL APPENDIX Pcrpulation Count of Persons by Age for 1960 and 1970 1970 POPUTAT�7N 1�0 ?"�''�TT�ATION Total � of Total °� of 1960-1970 Age Group Papula,tion Total Population Total Change o - 4 26,268 8.5 3�+��637 1�..0 - 8,369 5 - 9 27,682 8.Q 29,781 9.5 - 2,09; lo - 1�+ 28,u3 g.1 26,3�+8 8.� + 1,765 15 - 19 29,399 9•5 23,572 7.5 + 5��2'7 20 - 2�+ 30�539 9.8 2i�9�+9 7.0 + 8,590 25 - 3� 35,739 11.5 3�+,859 u.l + 880 35 - � 27,435 8.8 36�363 11.6 - 8,929 �' �+5 - 5�+ 32��+35 �::.: 3r��'5� z�.E - 3��2� 55 - 59 16,�+25 5•3 16,706 . 5.3 - 281. 60 - 6�+ i4,8og �.8 15,699 5.0 - $90 65 - ?�+ 24,105 7.8 25,0�+5 8.o - 940 75 + 17�031 5.5 12,196 3•9 + 4,835 To�� 309�980 313��i - 3,�+31 �� . � TABLE II liOUSEi?OLDS EY 7"iPi:, ..GE Or }i::�+D, T�':Ut2E CITY Or`' S�i:�L P1UL, 1970 • • • I Qsmcr � Rent I 7btal i TYPe and AEe Count % I Coisnt % Covnt % � � HusSan�l - tdife ' r • Less than 25 816 1.9 4,510 24.5 5,325 , fi.6 25 - 29 3,330. 7.7 4.259 23.2 7,599 ' 12.3 . 30 - 34 3;857 8.4 1,923 10.5 5,780 9.4 35-44 5,2�1 19.0 1,7D2 4.3 9,473 16.1 45 - 64 ' 19,286 4�..4 3,F16 20.7 ' 23,102 37�4 " 65 + 7,855 18.1 2,180 11.8 ` 20,035 16.2 Total . 43,k15 1II,40� 61,815' Qther t�+.ale IIeaded " In_ss Lhan 65 988 63.6 749 85.1 1,737 71.4 65 + 565 36.4 131 14.9 696 28,6 � � Total 1,553 880 2,433 } • Femalc Y,eaded , Less than 65 3,325 68.5 4,635 85.2 7,960 77.5 65 + 1,510 31.2 E05 14.8 2,315 22.5 Total ' 4,835 I 5,440 10,275 � - . I . Primary I�id ividual � . . Male - Less than GS S90 11.2 �,059 29.2 7,049 23.8 � Male - 65 + 1;122 12.7 1,576 7.6 2,698 9.2 Female - less than 65 2,3k9 26.5 7,041 33.9 9,390 31.7 • • Female - 65 + 4,391 49.6 6;059 29.2 10,450 35.3 . • Total g,852 100.0 � 20,735 I 29,587 100.0 L - - - - -- - --- - � • TOTALS: Husband-tdife 43,415 74.0 18,400 40.5 � 61,515 59.4 • Other t-;alc lleadud 1,553 2.6 8R0 1.9 2,433 2.3 , . Femalc lipaderi k,835 II.3 5,440 12,0 10,275 4.8 . Primary Individusl _!3,it52 _15.1 -20,735 45.G 29,587- 28�5 { Totul 58,655 45,��55 100,0 104,110 100,0 _ . . � . . . . . . �..�I . . . T�"W'�.. �. `� , �. . . . � � . . .. . C-�. " . . . . �.. . . . .. . , .... � . . . � . ��..�.. . . . . TABLE III ! NUI�BER OF PERSONS IlJ UNIT, TENURE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, 1970 ' Number of Persons Qwner Renter Total in Unit Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent 1 8,054 13.7 18,582 40.9 26,635 25.6 2 14,478 29.8 13,823 30.4 31,301 30.1 3 9,418 16.1 6,109 13.4 15,527 14.9 4 8,663 14.8 3,561 7.8 12,224 11.7 , 5 6,329 10.$ 1,632 3.6 7,901 7.b !� 6 4,099 6.7 � 888 2.0 4,987 4.8 7 2,514 4.3 � 448 0,9 , 2,962 2.9 8 I,059 1.8 194 0.4 1,253 1.2 � � 9 1,041 1.8 , 219 0.5 I,260 1.2 . Total 198,414 1Q0.0 99,056 100.0 297,470 100.0 Average Number 3.4 2,2 : 2�g Persons/Unit � . » • - ---------- - ------� --------�---- -- - - _ . ' .. .'"'_'.. _ .`_. _._. _ . T i � r---- � ` ; I � � r 1 � �. o �, .� o � ,� o �, .� � 4 . . . . . . . . . . � � � o � � o o � o .� � � �t u'1 O �t �ri O N � O M �O C � ,•a .� .-� rr . � . .. r�-1-. 41 �.+ E� +� � N � M Q� f� �O N �7 �D �'1 N V1 � 00 C� t� I� �O �T �f1 �O .-a .-r N M p i� C� 1� r1 .-+ v1 U1 O� u'1 v1 r+ �o V f� N N Q� N 00 QJ �D � � � . . _^ � � r-1 .� r-1 N f ►�L'�+ � � x z o .t .o o c., ao o r, � o u, �n o p � . . . . . . . . . • c/� d� � c•1 �O O � M O O � O u'� � O W � .7 u1 O �t � O N � O c�1 �o O � ,..� .-. a � � �' � F�-+ o a � O � CL' � N � �O u'1 t� N �' O� f'1 .-+ O r+ � c'1 V1 CU �.^, C� V'1 r-� N � .-a t� 00 W � p r� O� �D M O �7 u1 O� �Y' �O Q� �n U .-a �t U1 O� � v1 1� �O .--r OC � � . .-+ .-+ O O � � U v� cn O � a, O � ri o .� .7� o � . . . . . . . . . . � \ t� N O o0 .--+ O u'1 �7 O t�'1 �O O � �t O N � O N t� C N !� O .-� �„� '"1 '-� . � � d � � � bA G O n 1� �t Q �7 00 u1 c�'1 N N �7 � V1 t�'1 CO .� a0 O� trf ch t� O v� v1 p o0 O o0 O O O O� w O U N N r--I � �11 r1 �O � � .. �� - x �ap �j � W �O tf1 � '�' 'f' � � . . d � ,'� d 1 N � � rfl �D � � 1 � N 1 �!1 �O �O R7 u'1 �'1 1 �!1 N � � � 1 N C1 N N -- 1 GJ 1 a1 � � d C �0 p c0 C N 41 41 � c0 �0 d � � � .-+ aS E cC i.+ e0 .-+ � a� � � � E+ C E 6 � � [--�. i�.+ E+ a�.� � f=+ E' � G`' E'' O � � O — . • C+ �O �/1 N o0 O • . . O N c0 O � O .t .-+ t+1 O � .� O� O c�1 �D I� v1 .-a t�'f c'� C� .-� u1 M � � O� 00 �O N O� �O O � N N c'�1 � r-� W H O �-+ .�+ c�'� � U e-+ �t c+') c�'1 al O � • • • • • • pq N r+ t� v1 ch O a ;� c� r+ �n o � � a� q � • z a�i C .�t � � � � � � o.�. � 00 r+ o� rn C� 00 � � � v cv ,-� �o � a > � � , L� H �+ I� u'� c'� t� � O �t � O � � � � . . . . . . . . H � c+1 M Q� �O �O O � C� O O 3 o c� �n c� o �n � o � � " �' d F"� 3 a.+ O�i vl �rl u1 � O t� ul O �1 x U d � O � � t�; O CO C U M I c�1 �7 Q O .-+ .—+ �n o0 O o0 0� �O r� V •--� •—+ U � � � M . . x� � .. � � � . w `° o �, �a �, •-� -r+ � � � � ' , ...� .--� � ..+ f �+ � �v V � k+ RI � ►"� '� � fz+ '� 1-i W d Cl � cd � 3 �o a�i E � � z r'' � .c �..+ a ,� E-• 0 '�°' � 'a °�' °a °+ > a �+ a�, � � m .-�+ � .-�a � 'o H � G i�.+ � � x � w � wH ° � i H x � � . , � TABLE VII COUNT OF PERSONS S YEAItS OLD AND OVER BY RESIDENCE IN 1965 CITY OF SAINT PAUL j , City Residence Count Percent Saate House 160,952 56.7 Different House in Saint Paul 63,575 22�4 Different House in SMSA 12,280 4.3 Different House outside SMSA 26,343 9,3 , In Foreign Country 2;514 0.9 ' i � Pioved, Residence not Reported 18 275 • 6.4 � � � I � � Total 283,939 100.0 1—_ ( � i , i I —_ ___ _-- --- -—_ ____ —__ __ _._._�__ _--------------------- -----_._ _ _ _ _ Cauut of Families by Family Income � City of St. Paul, 1970 � , � • TABZE VIII . City , Income Count Percent under $I,000 I,254 1.7 $1,000-$1,999 1,406 1.9 $2,000-$2,999 2,524 3.4 , $3,000-$3,999 3,094 4.1 $4,000-$4,999 3,323 � 4.4 � $5,000-$5,999 3,218 4.3 $6,000-$6,999 3,854 5.2 $7,000-$7,999 4,625 6.2 � $8,000-$8,999 - 5,422 7.3 $9,000-$9,999 5,584 7.5 � $10,000-$11,999• 1-1,345 15.2 $12,000-$14,999 12,534 16.8 $15,000-$24,999 � 13,053 17.5 " $25,000-$49,999. 2,834 3.8 $50,000+ � � 714 1.0 Total , 74,784 100.0 � � , .' � ; _:��_ -,�. ,�. ° _z�, Y � � ;� �e,� _ : '� '��""' m o i i c"�v �`�p N � a .� co m m rn �n � i t'°�°�Y j- �_ . . �� M l!� N O� � .�-i 4H' O � .� � M N � a s�" 34� -r �p r-I t t� N L� �►'�y.''��. H N M .-� �-I � p H I W � O� o J �O c0 � r.,. �: r-� ,Y,�y�"� Y"'•:. . . . . �.j�,.+1" �, . .�� "�k�� ' . y,� 4'�' ;.1� : . . 'F {. ��r{.� . . S O � tf� [� .� � �O O � � ti� ��'J � � N . . �. �: �� i�' . � �' �' `��+. �� -._� � y � Tr �±' � ��> � I� N V' �� C`,� O r-M1 tN � N � � � `� r-1 M � . '� : � O1 M U c'� .� a .- M \O L O O �-I O� M �-1 C� �O O� OO n'1 N N �-1 N M O r-! N N �-I N O .�c � ,� O �E. I' � � �-` j� �,.:y:-:, - �_. � , � °` c � � h .�' v7 �G �Cp� U,J �O �rO-I � �J 8 .� .-I CO N .-! y��s: . � i � � cD � m Cm- .7 O � C M � � � � � �r � � � v O �'`:Y". �� g �a �= .� � �� , �: S � M M N M �` H N �-1 x� � r^. � O � �� ,.�,.,� ..ac �� c� �., — c� cc u� � cv `� "� � o m rn o . . � i � � m co c� � o � �D w c �O p� L ir� t L c+-, � � f,`�'"'e_- � � � CO M •J M N -+ � a 8 M r-I r-7 r� r-i O r-1 ,� � � �' N t� � C> � � J F^i �'I I ,`� "'�� "�l '}� '. 3 . " � . , _ � u\ r-1 � N �D .;7 .. a � �=i ,� . .-� � `^� 'J :T � � r- M �fi L� � �O - F� �% F' r-'� p �'.. M -7 .- M �p U� a 1 � C� N �O M rl M ti �'�'?C � . E. .O H � � c,'l .-7 . � � S N �' . � p ti ::� O u� +� .;� c'] � H - � 1I „..•` ..,1 L iT �-+ � � �p u� ..��.��a�� . � � l � N p �t� c� CS� O -i �O O �O c0 -7 �� O N �� ri r-I �D � '� �: n.! �O !'n ' �'� =t .7 r r-i r-i f-- H ...7. . �-. . r.�. :,�. � a, O� :r� -*� �a f� O� r-1 CJ ..y� , .� � �� .�� (J �-n �. � M ��9 ti �y�: � � ��-.�. � �. . ��'" ;�''' _ O (`J CJ M �'1 � c CJ '� N Clj O r-1 N � M � ��= '- U � 1 M O � .-� .-� OJ 1 ^ ^ ^ , k -:.��„ �,..:� . O ;n N .�J S �a � N �V. �r.�:s� .,� � �-'� . O . . . �. `..� . . . r4, � C ',r s rn .� � m � �t rn u, � �n cv u� m �R �.� � � � o° v `�i � � � �g � � o � �o ti .o �' �_�� i: « _.. :i ,-� �n �� N � �. m cv ,� � � � � � »� � � `sP�4. � , � . =�1` - o � o H � i�R' .: � Q � . � ^ � � � � w �i � � Fd-1 � �. Q � - �a �„�r, .�� O � ,--t N M .* t[� �O Hp � O � � N M .� tt� �p O � �.>. �'� T" a E-+ f� a� H � � a �_. .«' .. F`SEF''. .. :k.: �.. ., :*��W � �: �« �F � ;. q � ��r ,.a a''�o c�i � `� m .� � :;+�.-�. 4y � ''_ �I � w .-i � �o ti .� F,- t_� �� n � ri � � u� ��` `�1. �-1 ra ,� .�� k '- .i,. :y:. �� + � ��.� Y .s,�.+... � . y . �O � � M N [ .� .�a, � O� N �O i^ N N c0 � `� � �7 � �. y N a.� a. ; if',c*� -._ ; �� <t , w � � _ � .�)'�_. Q1 N O � � r�-I ��-I c�+'1 g � .�?, � ,� s N t1� ` �qp�„f..". 8 rj N F. ��..� ,�' � i � }��' � i .Y�� 8 `° N � � -- 3 . '� Q1 N N t7� M .� � 8 ri M rl ri C- x�; '�� o �"�`. ,�>r �r: � � .: , i N � "3 � � �°n o �� 8 N N r� � x� � ,� �- �' , , '� " ,�`s w 3. H t. ��^ +� y � a I c '-� .; _ �, .� c; • �n ,, ; , �- - I � �D lf\ (rl C'J CV �. CJ ��.k � � � 1 O� .—I 'L .7 N N CJ J° r Q � V W 8 N N � ' �,,= � � ' �+�s � S '. � � � � - t , H c. �, i �. L cp � .. .��: � � N ..7 O M � � �N '<a. . . I, � O �D N G^i -7 ^J .—+ tf\ ,� '� � M N `- ro i Ts�� "�� i c�! �-Mi m� � � � � m i � c�. m � � � � � � N �^7 , � � T.� i �:.i y,�. - .. � . � � . a�. .�,�� •s�4' � +1FY�: . . � . �O� O M ' O v� Q cC M rl tt1 N C1 �p ;� ,.. r � S �O �-I .7 ('�J tn t +� N 's"�. �i` N N I.f1 .—I [� � � � . ., �. : . . � . . . i.:..,. -�t �`_•,>�. - �. *",�� .. �� . . � .,a�f�:; '�i�.` � _ � y w` .� ti,,;�... 0 � ..�� . „sa•k� . . � . . . .c�e..�'a-�- : .. . �1 j . � . W ' �4-1 ] T:-�1�y` �� O � rl N M� � tt� � H . � .. f+ � H � � �r.�$ �.'' �9k' "' J tk� . .. . . t. J�.. � � h � � �-. /� . . . . . . ., ... � - . - .., � _ � . . y �F t �•`A 'rt��h� � �� . . . . . . . . . . . � � .. ... v S + xi � � � � � ...� � /t . . . ..� :.±.:. r.�. .� .. . . . . . . � � . . . .� .. .. .. . . . - �. s . .., �.� .'. .. . .. . . .. . . . . � y�� .. . • . .. � . .. . . . . . . . . � � �� I .... ` . ..' . . • . . .. .. . �. � . T�TKT TM� � . ... � . .. . . . �a. � ., � ....iil✓JiY � ' . . . . . . . ,� . . � . . � . � � � . .� �� . Y�s.•�. . ' � . . . � � . . . � . .. . . _. . . _. � u:, t �:� . . . - � . . � . . . `_� ` ' PROFILE OF THE PO[IF�Ty FA1�IILIES LIVI:�'G IN SAih'T PAUL - 1970 ' - > Household Type: Total Number Chi��{r�r 1 or More �umber linder io Childre� Under 18 Male Headed 2,407 1,323 1,084 Female Headed 2,369 340 2,029 Tota2 4,776 1,663 3,113 Household Type by Percent: Total Number Children 1 or More fiumber Under 18 Children Under 18 Male Headed 50.4 79.5 34.8 Female Headed 49.6 � 20;5 65.2 Total 100.0 100.0 I00.0 • Count of Children Under 18 by Total t�•u^b�:- �� ?_�drer • Children I;ousehold 1�n�; Number i;nder 6 6 - 17 Male Headed 3,070 1,156 . Z,914 Female Headed 5,339 2,016 3,323 Total 8,409 3,U2 5,237 . Ccunt o� C:�ildren Un3er 18 by Total ` Number Children Children ,;`,��;��d ' Tvne: ?vu^�er Under 6 6 - I7 Male Headed 36.5 36.4 : 36.5 �enale Headed 63.5 b3.6 63.5 .: Total 100.Q 100.0 100.0 : . r , Averac>e ;�u�ber oi Children/Porert_y Family by Sex of Head To:�1 Cnilare- . ' � .�? P� ' . _ �-it� C::. � . _ �� - bfale Headed � 3,070 1,084 2.8 � _ Female Headed 5,339 2,029 2.6 � F�,, a� � _�,� MM�" k . - . � . .. .. .. � . . . . w . � J'� Y�!� �, } �. .�r tie � 1'�`R � � �4 � � � � � � � . � � . � ��-. ^ " �� ,:' � . o�. . . . . . . . . ... . � 7� � � � - � . .. . . . . . . . . ,. �F 'pP+ � �y. . , . . . � . .. � . . .. . . . . . � , M � +:�.. ' ..,y � �� .. i . . . .. . . . . . � . ... . � . .. ` .. c. ' i. � <. ...�i - �. ' � . .. . . .. .. . . ... - . . . . . �� ..� . �. . . .. ... .. . � . . . . � � .. . .. i �' .. : . . . . . .. . . : . . . . . . � . . � . . � �X: ... . . . . � .. �. .. . . � . . . . . . . .. � .. � . ... tl.�,. . . . . . . . . . . TABLE XII ._ COiriT n,^ �C"ifE^ OCCU_°IT_:D LnIZTS FO? F7fiICT.f T;L'fIT IS TA2'^i.!'.TrD BY I',iCO�' h��D GROSS P,F*�T C.S % C^ 7•*r,�� r _ . -- �$�..�l,T:: �.tit :�l!.i:'il� ).i::t.i i7c?� . '.'�_'.'_^�------ P.,d^r 2G"; IO-I4", 25-?S? ?Q-24� 25-34% 35°'.�- ►:at Co:^o•:t.ed Totai t;:t��r $�,��00 0 0 16 110 576 6,Ot�7 8G7 7.:5�3 ;.'.,'-'''�-t�2,9S% 4 29 • 13S 23I 538 2�G86 99 3,7�u :'�,'`::�-'v"':,9�: 28 325 573 1,Gu5 . 2,6G2 2,621 224 7,49u �'� i '",c:c ; le� �,., 1 ,'S� �'�r ` �._ ' - 57_7 1_0 6,f,?� `,;,CC;.i•-;;`•,':;9 614 2,5G0 2,y�r`) 1,u56 728 233� 201 9,03G ' C�^,G�O-SZ4>S+?9 1.3?0 3.435 2,2r.0 518.. 155 27 170 7,EGo =t.'" n"�.;"�,�T''% 8.°8 7,U�0 222 79 25 0 70 2�.35�, . S25,G�G!- • 345 . 77 31 . 6 0 0 25 4°v 1'otal 3,3?5 S,i75 7,859 5,5Ei1 6,589 12,035 1,716 45.332 .i : , .s : -. : • � TABLE XIII C�UNT OF RENTER OCCUPIED LR�IITS BY AOUSEAOLD TYPE AND AGE OF HEAD, AND BY INCGME - CITY OF SAINT PAUL, I970 (SOURCE-U.S. CENSUS 4th CQWT, ITEM 110) Uc.der S2,(?OQ- $3>6^:r- $S,C�ZO•- $7,Q�'JD- $10,0^0- 4tS,UtJ!1- $25,�Q� T)�ne _ S2.GG'0 2,999 1:,99° E �,gq � 499 1�� SS9 2[• ^� � �---., __ s.___ , , __,�� and .L•ave Tota2 Husband-?�Tif.:: P:::,:iiy: llne Lt;c`.=r tU lF9 183 G:'1 1�2/;7 T,E17 2,f»<", 719 34 8.779 • Age 30..4'-, /;7 , 57 7_C; �:16 1,Q2`? 1,371 450 47 3,f,25 A;� 4�-�;-+ 101 62 252 r,.�5 S3I 2,371 5Ei 2E4 3,816 Age fi:-�- lE3 388 G07 36�: - 273 i21 � S9 50 2,180 Uti:�r 'ra-:._ly 992 695 l,'a'�i 1,C�39 I,036 773 261 G3 G,320 Pric1<ry It:�i:�ic�:�Z 6,Cf'1 2,3=�2 4,24"3 3,424 3,C64 1,345 26�: lOb 20L735 TOTALS 7,578 3,731 7,�?_c� b,S20 9,050 7,°G� 2,364 484 45,455 � � TITLE XIV F?OUSI?3G LTNITS BY NLTiBF,R OF OCCUPAiITS 1960 and 197Q 1960 1970 DIF�FER�:�CE 1960 - 19i0 • Persoiis Nuinber % of Number '/o of idumber % of in Unit of lin�ts To�al of iJri.ts Total of Units Di£fnrer.ce 1 18,732 18.9 2o,bOcs 25.5 + 7,f376 + 42.0 2 29,577 29.9 31,295 30.1 + 1,718 + 5.8 3 16,477 16.7 15,565 14.9 - 912 - S.S [� 13,884 14.1 12,193 11.7 - 1,691 - 12.2 •S 9,432 9:6 7,970 7.6 - 1,462 - 15.6 6 or more 10,b02 ?0.8 la;�.97 1o.2 - 105 - 0.5 TOTAL � 9f3,704 10U.0 104,128 100.0 5,424 5.570 � . �� - -- " .. WHITE - CITY CLERK � - - �� PINK - FINANCE � �-7 COIII1C11 ~ � BLUERY--MAVORTMENT GITY OF SAINT PAl1L. Fll@ NO. �� - � , ou cil Resolution , Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date WHEREAS, The Ma.yor of the City of Saint Paul ha.s prepared and approved the City' s Application for Worka.ble Program Re- Certification to be submitted to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development; and WHEREAS� The said application has been reviewed by the Council ` of the City of Saint Paul at the request of the Mayor; now, there�- fore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby approve the Mayor' s Application for Workable Pragram Re- Certification and the submission thereof to the United States � Department of Housing and Urban Development on behalf of the City � of Saint Paul. , - COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays Hunt Konopatzki In Favor L�.� Meredith U Against BY Sprafka Tedesco Mme.President Butler �AN 2 3 1973 Adopted by Council: Date Form Approved by ity torne � Certifie a d by Coun ' ry BY By � � Appro d by Mayo . Date J 2 319 3 Approve by Mayor r Su ission t c' - , By By � . -- _ .