The URL can be used to link to this page

261531 WHlTE - CITV CLERK CO1111C11 251��1 PINK FINANCE CANA'k2C' - ARTMENT GITY OF SAINT PALTL �� V� BLUE OR File NO. � C.=1�:.� le"'�-71-0425:6 • • e uncil Resolution , Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date �a WHEREAS, The comprehensive city demonstration program (herein referred to as the "Comprehensive Program") for the model neighbor- hood of the City of Saint Paul was approved by resolution of the - City Council; and WHEREAS, A grant agreement with the United States of America was executed on June 22, 1971, providing for Federal fina.ncial assistance under Title I of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966; and WHEREAS, The Second Year Action Program, amending the Compre- hensive Program, was approved by resolution adopted November 15, 1972; and WHEREAS The submission to the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development �herein called -the "Secretary") of a proposed Second Year Action Program, amending the said Comprehensive Program, was authorized by resolution adopted Ma.y 4, 1973; and WHEREAS, The Secretary has approved a Second Year Action Program and has tendered a revised grant budget providing for an additional grant and said budget ha.s been accepted by the Ma.yor; NOW� THEREFORE= Be it resolved by the Council of the City of Saint Paul tha.t: Sec. 1. The Second Year Action Program (which is attached hereto and made a part hereof)� including the projects and activ- ities set forth in the revised grant budget, is hereby approved and the Comprehensive Program is deemed amended thereby. � Sec. 2 . The Council of the Ci:ty of Saint Paul assumes full responsibility for assuring tha.t all grant funds will be used in _ an economical and efficient manner in carrying out the Comprehensive COUfVCILMEIV Yeas ��, Nays Requested by Department of: Konopatzki In Favor Levine Meredith Against BY �d��t �tl�i3+!! Tedesco Mme.President �' �� Form Approved by Cit Attorney Adopted by Council: .Date Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY By Approved by MaXor: Date Approved�u Mayor for Submission to Council �,�� r By BY _ WHITE - CITV CLERK CO11IIC11 2s1��1 � PINK - F ANCE GITY OF SAINT PALTL CANARV - � . ARTMENT �� BLUE_ - M..VOR File NO. � " Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date 2 . Program, as amended, and assures the necessary non-Federal sha.re of the cost of Program Administration. Sec. 3. The Mayor is authorized to do all things necessary to carry out the Comprehensive Program, as amended, including the submission of such reports, certifications, and other material as the Secretary sha.11 require (and the approval from time to time of revisions in the grant budget, including revisions which increase the total Federal grant and the necessary non-Federal share of the cost of Program Administration) . Sec. 4. The Director of the Department of Fina.nce and Mana.ge- ment Services or his successor or delegate ma.y do all things required to be done in order to obtain payment of the grant, including but not limited to the selection of a commercial bank to receive payment ,vouchers, the submission of signa.ture specimens, aRd the filing of requests for payment. COUNCILMEN Yeas � Nays Requested by Department of: Konopatzki � In Favor '�n�.' J Meredith Against BY � $O!�! Tedesco Mme.President !� �t � ,lua a? Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by Council: Date Certi ' P sed by Co ary BY By Approv y a at C.J� � A ed by Mayor or Submission to Council�� By ��3"'� Pu�ca 01973 . . �� . 1 OIiM A��f•ItC�V��1 �.�. . .. Iil�t�Gt 1 I�r��(1 �11 /:�., i.t_.�1:: ! CiTI � u. �. t�E r>nRi�►.!t t�� or f��usir:�; ��.rzr• �rr•.�;r,r� nr.��r i_or�:t�i�i • CItY Dt:.lOr:STd:Alli:id /;:•t k('1 i!Ut)i�t f __.$..t,_PHIl.�_,�.._�"�1�I1j°�O.td,. • ` � . � GUN1 HA(, I t:UR:L�I_H Ul.1 E _ • QUDG�'T SU;�;:!��f;Y . M.P. ?_?.-0�3 MaY 15, 1973 � ` ItEVISCD hC t�li�� 'LAFtS'—� t � . , �HC,ea: 70:� . �S� {__�Orininal Su{:;nissivr.! (:�Rcvisi;+n t:�.i 2 __ _ �ctober, 1472 June �9711 , - '�---'------- (Al.l, f�lGUftiiL Ihi TIibUSANI?; ROUNhI:I> TO TH[: I:F./ll�ES7 "itf0:1.`,�.W(.11 CAIfGUF.Y �— L::7 r_'�_i_.__._�_....__,_ � __ ____ i•r,i�,r< < ��",: Rev�sion t<rOU[STt'f� r�iuus cun,.�i.,- CGPF f•F20GF7AM.GA'�6'GOF2Y Yi'RA•. n��'�'O�'�.: � ^----- � �OTAL :t�[. Tc;tw�. NUYLi�:° 1�!:[�GF 7, , MC � �i VC �;F+e�,; � � ��c 6r:��,r Nc>N �tllu MC 1'UhUS /(:� . 1'Ui.::.,g �AC C�tANT G1�/�t�l -- I. f'VN::�S rurrt>s FE::JE_F.>l. GTA�E LOC:IIL �fit��0) � _"'-' -- .. .. �Cu1..��•l�+: � (t)_ __ t2) l�) (t) tS) ftof (GLI (6c) T (71 � (e) 10 rdUCp1�6� --� ' 188 �IO 619 >> Hcolrh — — �2�3.��._ +1 l04 5R9 �54 �s SaialSrn•iccs — --_-- -- �.48 . 192 +g8 84 370 338 te Rccrcativn - Culture ' ~ �� --- ------- _�+34 _ 150 _ -60 � �a �o�+ �z� ; » Crimc - Dclinqucncy ' 1 Zo F!a��ond�o„ 59 7q . _±4E� _ 310 __43; t E4 � DC�•CIOFt:��nr 275 59� -2G2 �+6 38o bo9 � 2ti T Fconomic end 6usiness � i - � Dev�lu��nt 169 434 +24 � 458 (��7 90 }{ousing ' _ 7�2 325 -72 253 lo1S � at Rolc:ation � , ' � Zrc�nsperlc;fion - Cuninvr.icction ' 33 Environ;�ent�l Protc:tlion ond Developn�ent - ' ao Cititen Port;cipa:ion . 141 237 +lf� 253 � 39��:�, �o Evaluotion u�� — — I�fo�mat�o� 137 �87 +39 8 134 . �2�3 � sveTOTa� 2 q6 2,595 � -64 750 3,381 5,227 so Progrom Ad:�inistrotion � —� 3 t+ _ 255 +64 131 450 �7� .._� GRAND TOTAL i ------ 2,950 2�950 -0- 881 3,831 � 5,900 I ------ — -- �CI.EAF�A�lC[ SECTION ......1 CITY _ _ � HUD AF'PF20VhL � ' - ( • . r APP�oved Total -- » � Gront Amuunt : b_____� It is h.r�r�y ctr�ified that t_:ty 6udci•ting praci�cc. hovr k.•tn 1�1l�wcJ nn� tFot ull ju:!it�cat.vns ond i,or.k•„-�T,nt�•rict rc:ivircd L. �it• _ , � , pro,.t�cc r.��d k.y H111� is �.n f�l'_ - v�ith t�:� Cit.� �..,d i�, ovoilo!.Ir for inapPtt�un pw�.�.n�t fo t��n (.rcr.7 /��r..�:i@nf, �� ..�Tt S�cri�t: r.F �r.D r�rLt. Gr C;7r•sc��i��rc��ca�. or�F�cn�� M/.1��nali�ir/ --------- � ____.______._I-:__- ______ __�._ _ SueNissic�� <u�i+��ei7.ario:�: __...._",. �•A l I '�"'.._..._--� .'./�.1.11 f ll:�l. AIJL 17 f l 1 •il r.1• /'S f.111I � / /I ! ��_ ��"'.� ��.�.�.•��.� ""'..��+.� �ii�it �.i � N_i i. . �/ lutr/� HU✓•7Gd.9 �7-7J� �rev�..•�� wd��eon is o6:ole�e - . �—�"' . _ __ . . . ... �.g. ._.... .._ . • �� . �� ST. PAUL MOUEL CITIES PROGRAM • REVISED SUBMISSION MAY, 1973 • �61�31 i � TABLE OF CONTENTS I . DOCUMENTS II . INTRODUCTION III . NON-PROGRAMMATIC SECTION Administration Citizen Participation Evaluation and Planning Relocation Budget • IV. PROGRAMMATIC SECTION Planning Process Continuing Projects Terminating Projects Environmental Assessment V. APPENDIX . Expenditure Breakdown MNPC Ordinance Staff i ng Management Plan • �� ''` � �� 1 '1'1' O l�' �.� I N'1' ��.1 I' I. � <>>��-ir�: <>>� 'ct� �: .�.��-c>>t I..��•irrvc,�: I). (��ui;� �� v�,�� rr�y is, 1973 Mr. Thomas T. Feeney, Area Director Department of Housing and Urban Development Minneapolis-St. Paul Area Office Griggs-Midway Bldg. 1821 University Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55104 Re: St. Paul Model Cities Revised Plan Dear Mr. Feeney: • �nclosed please find the revised plan for the use of the remain- ing Second Action Year Model Cities funds. The City Council and I have reviewed this revised plan and have concurred that it meets the HUD requirements and expresses satisfactorq strategies for continued attempts to solve urban problems, as well as transition strategies toward revenue sharing. The citizen participation group set the priority areas for the revised plan and have been continuously involved in the plan's development. We expect that this revised submission meets the requirements as expressed in your letter of March 6, 1973, and will be quickly reviewed and approved, Si ilcere ly, �� LA ENCE D. COHEN Mayor LDC/klm • cc: Mr. Frank D, Marzitelli Mr. William Q. Patton 'L 'l'l • , 502 c i ty Ha 1 1 St. Paul, Minn. 55102 29$-5595 May 16, 1973 Ti�e Hc�norable Mayor Lawrence Cohen �h,' C i ty Ha1 1 St. Paul , Minnesota 55102 Dear Mayor Cohen: We hereby submit to you the revised� plan for the use of the remaining Model Cities funds under the Second Action Year Grant. After extensive discussion and negotiation among those involved in the development and implementation of the St. Paul Model Cities process and of overall city government this transition package was completed. The revised F>lan carries forward basically the same priority areas and implementation � strategies as were established under the Second Action Year Comprehensive Development Plan. The major changes will be primarily in the number of projects which will continue to June, 1974; the CDA staff relocation, coordination and direction of effort; and the independent contract status of the citizen participation structure. These changes are intended to make maximum use of the remaining funds and at the same time best prepare for the transition to revenue sharing. �he number of ongoing projects are being reduced to eleven, which includes a new Citizen Participation Unit project. Each general program category has been considered and a continuing strategy has been developed for each area. Because of the urgency in meeting the HUD deadlines, as stated in Mr. Feeney's letter to you of March 6, we request that you review the plan as quickly as possible and forward it with your approval to the HUD Area Ofi=ice. Sincerely, � . �`\ rt i?�� \ 1 �� ,J...` r�{4�1e�..J� .. . .�• .�a.�3W"r William L. Collins , Jr. Model Cities Coordinator WLC : Ifm • cc: E3i 11 Patton Robert Hickman Frank Marzitelli 3 � CITY OF SAIhT PAUL OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY May 21, 1973 KENNETH J. FI?ZPATRICK Mayor Lawrence Cohen City of Saint Paul 347 Building Dear Mayor Cohen: I have ex:-�mined the City' s revised submission for the second a�:tion year comprehensive City Demonstratio� P-robram, together with the resolution of the Council of tha City of Saint Paul, approving the same and authorizing and directing you to submit the program to the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, and • in relation thereto make the following statemenfis: l . I am of the opinion tha.t there is no �egal objec- tion, based on all pertinent Federal, State and/or local laws, to the carrying out of the projects and activities set forth in the action plan. 2 . That there is no pending or threatened litigation which would challenge the City' s autholity to �ander� take the administration and carrying out of the action plan. 3 . The resolution of the Council of the City of Sain:: Paul authorizing submission hereof was duly adopte� in accordance with the Cha.rter of the City of Saint Paul . Res tfull sub tte , _ JER �I}� . As s i izt y J t ney • JJS:,r City Hall, Saint Paul, R�linnesota 55�oz 612 223-5121 4 ...;y'..,.. , _, -. . , . � � �"`�. i �' - ...•:l.'.. � � 4. `�4;�., � • � � � r_.� -' ' . .. . . 500 Laurel. Ave. St. Paul, Minn. 55102 227-8726 Mr. John Rutford Referral Coordinator, Metropolitan Council Suite 300 Metro Square Bui ldtng ' RE: Letter of I�tent 7th and Robert Streets St. Paul .- Minnesota 55101 Dear Mr. Rutford: St. Paul Model Cities has coatpleted its strategy plan for the extens�on of the remaining Model Cities funds through June of 1974. The plan is to be submitted to the St. Paul City Council for their • app roval toward the end of this week and is expected to be ready for review by the Metropolitan Council before May 10. This review is ' requi �ed under the Councii 's responsibility as the local A-95 Clearing house ag�ency. If you have any further questions or any other specific requirements of whi�h we should be awa�e do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, lX.��a��9�.�.l1`1`,�. o �� Wi 11 iam L. Col 1 ins, Jr. Coordinator WLC: cdg CC: William Patton Garland Davis Fties (2) • 6 K'1117t -�C�i I P C:I_6Jti� - ♦ � ��Nn ._ � �"��;��^^�-��, �iITY OF �AI NT ��ALTL Council ��C�� rar��:, . p�..��n�; 1 Nl.l�.�....—.. MAY�_..., Fll@ �O. _ _... � � ` . Council Resoluti�� , , : t� ►�t��a 13v --��_�u �� ---- -----___ __ - --- � � P.efc�rr��d To -------_ Committee: Date ---- -------- -- __ __ __ _. Out of Committee BY--- Date ------ __ _ ____..__� WHEREAS9 The Com�rehensive City Demonstration Progr�.m, herein- ,�'",_c�r ccferred to as 'Comprehensive Program'; for the Model 1Vei�h- !�c��-,�o��d of the City of Saint Paul was approvecl by resolution of t.h� Ci_ty of: Sai.nt Ya�il , and a Grant Agreem�nt (ME-22-003) wit}�i the l�,�i.te�l Stat..��; of America was entered into providing for f inanci<:�? �issi.sLancc under Titl.e I of the Demonstration Cities and Metr_�pol- i t.�� ll�vc�loPir�ent Act of 1966, which Comprehensive Pro�ram Grart ,�k�,re�rricilt ��as amE��lded and an amended Grant contract and revise� C.r-ant budget providin�; for an additiorial Grant �aas receivF�d ��y th� C� ty- and approv�d �y City Council Resolutions 260139 and ;?61_1G7; ��nd WH�i��AS, The U?iited S�aLes of America, acting through its Sc�cret�ry of th� Department of Housing and UrUan Develop��ent, lias ��or_ifi.ed Lhe City of Saint Paul that its Comprehensive Pro�r�-r. ;aill_ �1�t be extended beyo�zd the Second Action Year and that it �;�ill 'r,� n�::�s5ary for the City to revise its approved Model Cities ' Proj�ct.` ��nd Budoet so as to extend ttie expenditurA of th� City" s Model • Cit�es Supplem��i�al Funds through June 30, 1974; and WHE�EAS� T'he Ofi'ice of the Mayor ha.s prepared proposed revised 3L�.d;;et and Projecr Scope of Services for submissio�n to the Ur.ited States Department of Housing and Urban Development for approval, aud the Mayor has requested that the City Council concur :in h-±s ��ruposals contained therein; naw, therefore, be it RESOLVEll, B�= the Council of the City of Saint Paul, that the re�vised Secoud AcLion Year Pr�gra.m, together with the revised Bud�,�t, �,��_ci: :i_s attached her_eto �nd m�.�de a part hereof, inclttdin�; tl-.e I'rr�jects and activlties described in the approvtd Sec��zd ac�.ion `�"� _�� 1'ro��am and amt��lt��ents i:hereto as hereiii pr��posed, i s hereby ��t'P��ved, and t.he prop�r City o:�ficers are hereby author�zed and �ji i-��eL-cci to i�ransrr�it th� proposed changes to Comprehensiv� Prog�ar�� t��iti�t'(I,111�;N � 1��:,•. Butle�r N:�ti�� Requested by Department of: IEJ�[➢C F��,,,,�:�i.l:� --------- In Favor — ----------- ---- _--- I.� ii�.,. 11�•��•�I�IIi . `�,�Z Roedlex — ---- -— A gai ns t BY ----------- --------__ —- _ _—_---- 'i'r�icsa� 11in�� .I'r�•;id�•nl �je�p[ I�i,itr Form Approv�d by Cit� Attorney ,1��,�: Ly l'��unc�il : [)titc __ _- ------------- �'�•rtili��f l'us��.��1 b}' (:�,uncil Secret�.iry $Y ''r4- __.---------------.-- !i`- _._ - ---- ---—_ _----- -- ' A��pr�,��r�l l>5 117.�y�c,r: D.�te• ._______------ ' --- '`�PProv d y ayor ubmission to ' � �� li�,' _ .___ _—�- ------ ------}- BY - — _ ,,,Y`•'+,-�.� .,.�.,...,.,.-.. ��nv � n 1(17'� '. ,:. �iITY OF SAINT PAITL Council � �- y n+e'N T �� =w,,.�'°'�....,,. File N 0. _ �s� "� _ - Council Resolu`tiorz i�R��•a �y --- h�°f��rr�d To ----_________ ----- Cotnmittee: Date -----._------------__. __ Uut o1 ( ummittec� BY-._ _ _ Date — -- --- -------_ _ —----—._. --------—. 2 . <3nd I3udget to �h� UTiited States Department of Housing and UrbQn Ucv�lopMent, and the propt�r City officers be and are herehy <tut.ho�-ized to accept aizd execute on behalf of the City of Sair:t P�;�il_ Amended Grant Contract and revised Grant Budget as approvL��a �%y �he Utzited StaLes D�2partment of Housing and Urban D�v�lop�nent . • --___ ------- - - ------ � ��l'�� 'ft.111?N — — --------- ------- — — �`�'"' utIET h '�'` ( Requested by Department of: f�� i��,:il:�lci � : -- ------------ -_ ___ — - _.__. __ _._ In I avor I �� iii� _ ___--- �Uri��!ith � , �c�otioc Rcedler . _ ___ Against BY --------__ _..._.___----_ .--- -- _ . . ._ --- fz-ctr�+- 11m�•. I'i�� .i�!� nt]� 1�1t ,�,�„�,i,•,� �,� ��„t��.��: 17,�t�, MAY 4 �973 Form Approved by City, Attorney _ _ ----- (��11�i,�scd I�y l'ututiCil ��u!"ary $Y _--- / __'/, ,�//, ,.;" ' � __..__ — �,f. -� fiV' �.�._ /�.� � ��w� / �,s/-f,l�l_��—__-C '�!'1��'�•�1 '�1:�ycf: p�,t� ________ _ Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council �y� - — - - BY _�— � RI}BLISHED MAY 12 197 .� • INTRODUCTION ' The Second Action Year of the St. Paul Model Cities Program began October� l , 1972. Many changes have taken place since the completion and submission of chat Second Action Year Comprehension Development Plan. Some local chanyes were already underway when the HUD announcements of a shift in federal emphasis began appearing. City reorganization under the new City Charter continued to bring changes in the process and emphasis of city government. After discussion and negotiation the City Council gave their approval to an amended Model Cities Ordinance which more clearly defined the advisory role and responsibilities of the Model Neighborhood Planning Council , and added eleven at-large appointed representatives to the MNPC , thereby • allowing broader city-wide representation. Interest developed in the idea that the MNPC operate under contract with lhe City as an independent operating agency. Emphasis was put on develop- ing an operating agreement and budget. A� about the sametime the decision was reached to close the office at 500 Laurel and move the remaining CDA staff into existing city departments. By March 16th these moves had been completed. The director' s resignation w�s effective shortly thereafter. Operation continued, although with much reorientation and reorganization on the part of both the effected city c�tfices and the Model Cities Staff. The positions of Model Cities Coord- inacor and Assistant Coordinator were developed. These two positions �hall • exist For the remainder of the program and have now been filled through the upgrading of two Model Cities personnel . R� • ADMINISTRATION Inadequate and ineffective interaction with city departments has been �� handicap throughout the history of the Model Cities Program. Becau.�e of this, and with additional factors such as the funding cut-backs, early termination of the Model Cities Program, a vacant director's posi- tion, a newly developed and recently appointed city administrator posi- tion, and an active process of government reorganization, it was determined to disperse the CDA operation and incorporate specific Model Cities func- tions into their relative city wide functions. WiCh transition strategy stated as the first priority for the remaining life of the Model Cities program, it was felt that the immediate in- • corpor�tion of staff into city departments would assist them in orient- atirig themselves to the overall city operation, as well as assist the existing city departments to learn from the Model Cities process and personnei . Neqotiations will continue with Civil Service and city decision makers lo develop strategies which will assist Model Cities personnel in moving into certified Civil Service positions once Model Cities funding is g�ne. (5ce �ippc.nclix I I I ) • ll • CITIZEN PARTICIPATION The Model Neighborhood Planning Council is now operating under an amended City ordinance which more clearly defines their advisory role. The biennial electian is scheduled for June 23 of this year at which time the thirty seats wilt be refilled. The new ordinance calls Ior the appointment of eleven additional at-targe representatives of community groups and interests. An agreement is being developed with tlie City which will allow the MNPC to operate as an independent agency with its own budget allocation. The above changes, in addition to the staff relocation, will create a • more formal citizen-city working relationship. The additional positions on the Council should assist in achieving greater multi-interest representation from the larger St. Paul community and provide a broade?- based platform from which to project community opinion. It is expected that the independent structure under city contract will E�rovide the MNPC with more latitude in their choice of operation and personnel . A budget allocation is included for consultant services. L,�ck of consultant services, other than the city in-kind provision, fias E>reviously been a continual point of contention. A city wide plan for citizen participation in the decision process has been developed by an appointed committee. This committee, appointed by • �he mayor, was selected to represent all facets of citizen concern. The draft form is now completed and has been submitted to citizens groups 13 • throughout the city for their review and comment. Public hearings have been scheduled and are being held during the month of May. A member of the MNPC was one of the representatives appointed to that conun i t lee. • • 14 • CONTINUOUS PLANNING AND EVALUATION 4Jith the dispersion of the CDA staff into city offices and the shut- down of the office at 500 Laurel , the remaining administrative and evaluative functions must play a different role. Cut backs in funding and emphasis on �ansition planning have changed the expected direction I�rom preparation for Third Action Year Model Cities planning ta develop- ing a methodology for incorporating the lessons learned through Mode1 Cities into the ongoing city processes. Th�� city has recently submitted a 701 application for second year funding . Thc Overall Program Design (OPD) includes the assignment of the Grant-In-Aid Office and the City Planning Office to the task of developing planning , • e�valuation, and citizen participation strategies in preparation for re- venue sharing. The majority of the Model Cities planning staff are assigned to the City Planning Office. The Grants-In-Aid Office operates in close coordination with City Planning. It is scheduled to develop into a much nu�re comprehensive function of community development wich will include the new city-wide citizen participation process. The Model Cities Coordinator, �ssistant Coordinator and Evaluation Staff are assigned to the Grants-In- �icJ Coordinator. The job of Model Cities Liaison has been eliminated. This funccion served as intermediary for the Mayor with the MNPC and CDA Director. With Lhe Coordinator now located in City Hall and the staff assigned directly Lo city cJepartments the Model Cities liaison position is unnecessary. Plegotiations are proceeding to place the individual who was formerly assigned • co the liaison position into a new position which will provide a simiiar function on a city-wide basis with citizen groups in each section of the city l� -z- � as they are developed. The tvaluation Uirector position is now vacant. (t is being coi�tinued iri tt�e Model Cities budget and is expected to be filled in the next few months. The person hired for the position will be responsible for the development of city-wide evaluation p rocesses as well as the continuation of the Model Cities evaluation process as it relates to the ongoing projects. • • 1 'u • RELOCATION PLAN The Relocation Plan found in the St. Paul Model Cities Comprehensive Development Plan for the Second Action Year will be continued intact fram the First Action Year. However, the main emphasis will be directec! Coward the Northeast Quadrant (major redevelopment section in the Model Neighborhood to be developed in action year two) . �11 Relocation activities executed by St. Paul Housing Redevelopment llutl�ority in action year two will be in compliance with HUD Relocation Handbook 1371 . 1 . Relocation benefits will be extended to all families, individuals, and • business displaced by undertakings identified as activities carried out in connection with a Comprehensive City Demonstration Program, whether or not the activities causing the displacement are funded in whole or in part by a Model Cities grant. All of the relocation provisions of Section 114 of the Housing Act of 194g, as amended, and as implemented �y �he consolidated regulations are applicable to those displaced by activitics identified in Comprehensive City Demonstration Program. All �-elocation activities will be executed by St. Paul Housing Redevelup- ment Authority in co-ordination with Model Cities Physical Core. • 1 � � ..( ' 1 t)11M A1'1•Iec�Vfl� ��._......__.�_......"_' '�"�'"'"'•.�.. ��.�...�..�.��. �llllr�:l 1 1�111t1 A11 /1.� � ,�� C�T � ,��.�� t�� I�,�(trMf t�l c1� �1�,;,�ir.; Ata;, ,,I:� nN nt vl � (1f�f,+t.r�T � C11 Y PI '.IU1J`,f I�,;I I��t7 i:; l " 1 (�tl��i'•t f ---�•__P�.11L�.M1 S.Otd.,__.___.._.� CGN1 HAc. f NUM�+I R l)\f �_ � � BUf)v:_T $U�+;;',,�.�:Y M.P. 2?.-OA3` MaY 35,_1973 � NEVISfO AC 1 IUN �L• A►tS�' �HOM: TO: ' ---'. :)�i;_�na! Svbinissioi:_ �_xl�cvcsion t��,: 2 _ October. 19 2 J�une 1974 - __ �____1_____�__.__l (AI.L F�IGI)Rii.'� IfJ 1'hlC)USANUS RCfUND!-.l� TO THF NEAttES'f 1NUU;41:i�1 ��Af�.L()4'i I�I:IV!/" "Clll+.;l.l:l".T_�� "'. .�� _�� A, ,,,,o�,_�,'Rev�sTon �i�.UUFST[-1J ru��us ��.�,�. CUf�� f�R(>L:NAM CA'rtGOFi\' vP,sr.•, ---- fOTAL rivt :'::.ia��• �::�"1i. :' ��.UGF-I, MC Nl)N NUU MC ►-L1NUS I(�u�. M(_ �:Ital+T ! �..� ..I:n;. f'Ut�C.,i �AC G1:\7J 1 G/rANT � -- / �,�Nt)5 • � — _ aur,t�s Ff.'pEF:AL !;TATE LOCAL �*'i(,i - ---- ,c„r..r,.J„ � --(11_ --l� f21 (3)--- — (t) (5) fEa) 1661 (6c) (71 I61 iQ CduCOfi011 � r� :� 188 40 619 >> Ncclrh -------- 1f�2.__335._ + 104 SR9 654 ,s� sa�oi 5��«: ------ --.._...48... _ 192 _ +98 80 370 338 - �e Rccrcatiun — Cullure r � --� -------- ---�34--- 150 -60 _ � 14 1�4 524 j ^» _ Ciimc - O�linqucncy 59 �q +46 _ � _Mai�pm«��a�d Jo1,-- _. 310 435 184 2O � 27S 595 -262 46 _ Dcvclo �r.cnt . 3S0 G09 21 � Fconomic and 6usiness -- � no��to.T��r 169 434 +24 458 b27 �o _ Houst�q_ 7(�2 325 -72 � 253 1015 si Rciccation � � 3z Trun�pertution ! ' — -- Co��imunication 33 ��t�'�on:nenfo� NrOicction and Develcpment °O Cititcn Participerion _ 141 237 +16 253 394 �o EvaTuotion ar��--�-- -- (nformation 137 $7 +39 8 134 2E►3 SUB T 07A L — — 2��_ 2 695 ' -64 750 3��81 5,227 90 Progrom Ad�inistrotion ___ _ 354 255 +64 131 450 673 - GRAN� TOTAI — Q,9SO Z�95� -0- S8� 3s83� 5�900 __.._______. __ __ CLEARANCE SECTION ' CITY MUD APPROVkL , Approved Toral Grant Amount : � __ _ ._ __ � ___ It i: I,�,��,f>y ccri�licd thr�t C�ty hua,�•�m�� prc�ihcc: hcvc F.�rcn loll�wud und thol all ju:ti(�cot�..n•. und i.ock•�ip m�t�•nut rr.q��ired Lv f��ty pror.t�cc a�i� ►:y F1111� �s <,n file . • wilh 1��,. rily c-� i�. uvoilM.l� �nr in•.pP<:1�un p��r•.�:nn1 1L ihn (�itant /��crni��i�l. � .'l�►f(_ �_"_'— SIGI 4 f 4. n+. 111 , t' I .s .Irll f�•Fl`.C'A�. _' ��----- .—.�.� '" .. _ _ _ __ _ _ __ .- (. ' ` o�•.�c� - _' N /.tii�;nWU�r•�. -�'�`�'?:3_. f�_�� __lC�--��cc.�e.�._.� SUCMIi;IQ!1 t,UTHGkIZaTtON: ~ � _ . -- -- - - • . — --- . .... '•� ' � �I�,:,I�f�t, Itr� I �,1 r �. , — —� r,� � .�, N 11� '--'�'..._..__ �^ •_ .—'----�. ` ) (I�l//f'/ �� \ � " ��.."'� 1.`�-_7 �� NU;� /Ga•1 t/ l�/, {'r�vi..��s ••f�hv�� i� i..•.�.lete -�� . . . . �.9. _... . .. . . � . . � f-ortr..� no�i•i:�,�;i:t� . � Uul��.0 � li�. ;1�,�1� rin. i i._.. i . ... .�....r.�..r�..._.�..�" � crTr U.S. !>EPARTM('NT UF IfOIJ$ING AND URBAW,DFVfilO MENT ' C17Y DEMONS7RATION AG[NCY BU�GET st. Paul• Minnesota _____ _ _____.,__ PROG2AM CA7CGORY - PROGRAM BU GET f'ROGRAM CATFC.ORY —_- � • Education -- — — (!1L'L FIGUti :.5 IN THOUSANDS ROUNUEU TO TNL" NEA�:[_ST 'f��C�U`�!Ni.).' ' NUD PROJECT pR�p� CURRE T REpUESTED FUN[>i; USE TITLE� YEARS APPNO ED • "— ONLY MC GRANT BUOGE ; Z NON MC GRl�NT FUtJD,__ _ TL��.: FUI�DS MC GR NT MC GRANT � �r'-.1 t ! ;� FUN FEDERAI STATE LOCNL ______ ttl t2> (s) (4) (so) (sb1 (scl - (P1-- Home School Liaison 30 36 ;*19� " 5 17 Kindergarten • Second Grade 206 105 -�. 30 75 Headstart -0- 36 -�b -0- Montessori Pre- • School Day Care . Center 4� 30 -7` 69 23 Wilder Day Care Center 11. 15 �3 84 28 Red School House 37 �,�� 74 GRAND 70TAL 2 ;� '� �H� 2�] �,.,. � . �Capitnl Projects must bc identi(icd by underlinfng thq Project Titl . Prior tq,s#at1 of.construction, the CDA must have on �ilc for possibl� hIU�� review a detniled capital acquisNlon and construetFon tost budgef r each�A!b{ett auppo�ted by specifieations ond drawin,s (ond ory su� r • qucnt chanq«ordcr:.)which must hovc becn reviewed:qipd opptoved y the Clfq�a"�trqineer,a quolffied enginecring conc�,itr.nt c,r the Op�r �,:; ngency'r. �(echin(cal Stoff. At t{ie time of submissitin e►f this budge echeduFl� FY'Is necessa►y lo hove budget eshmate, d�:�e�oped ir occr��-�ce with local capitnl bud�eting prnctir.c, ond these eaNrnp#es shal) be etolned�,qo fi�4by the City fo►possible HUD review. 2Any prop��r.�•d us�• fo cont�o�:f ond consultoM serv(Ce9;it� an oCtivlty Sha�� be justl�{!e��y o norrotive Stotemenf sctting fc>rtl, flie servic�• tc �,e rr.nt�orrtl under fl�e COIt��OCf Of1t� 1I7cr I�osis for the cosf��+trstimote. Th• statem.�nt shulJ�bo�lncluded os paH oF the appropriatc wnrk pro�;r�•n. HUD-7030(1-/0) f'reviuu, adilion is nbsolcle NUU Wash., n.�: 1<i 1;;,•� *Tot�i rev i sed HUD �: '��t Grant 20 . . . . .. � - 1'Uftl.t AI'1'I:..iVl�() ' [�Ut�c:l. T 1�11l1i nll IJ(). r,�� .' � . � �� - 'C 1 T Y , ..,.... •� .-�-� U.S. [�E"I'ARTMENT OF HOUS•ING ANU URBbN DCV[LOF'M[NT CITY DEMONSTRATION AGfNCY �JDGE7 M�t1f1QSOLa _` _.__ _.._ PROGRAM CATC_GORY - PROGRAM BUDGET PROOHAM carE�oaY (At:l FIGUFtES tN 7HQU5RNU5 RG�UNDED TO TNE NF_AI;CS i l'11C)USA�iCi� - _..------ ..__._ . . NUD p�OJECT �'i��dR APPROV[D REQUESTED FUNC?C: ___ � USE TITLE� YEARS BUDGET, ,{g NON MC GI-2ANT FUNUS Tc`1 ��' ONLY MC GRiAIVT„ MC GRANT M��t� - ---- ---- ((',+J. l 1 . * FUNGg FUNDS t?, FEDERAt. STATE LUC/��_ ---l— -- tt1 f21 t91 {'� csal fsbl cscl l'"' - Experirnental - Counseling 2 Speclal Reaource Tea che r YO Youth Servtng outh 61 _ � _._.--- -..---._ __� • Con�ity Schoo) Coordinator 2� GKAND TOTAI �O'� 2 °"�'� . j 88 ?�Z� �Cu��ital Prnjoct�, rnust be identilied Ly �mderUning tfie Project Title. Prior to stor►of construction� the CDA must h�ve on filc for po ,r.ibl� F"';; revi�w n detailed c.opital ocquisilion and ronstruction cost budget for eoch projett suppo►ted by specificotions or.�i drawin�s (and a^y ��f • • quent �.hon��e ordor�:) which muc.t hcrve Lecn reviewed and approved by the Clt:y�S Eng��+ce►,o yuolified engineerii�g consult 1 er tLc U�,�r . A��:n�y' . fvc hinicul S�ofi. At rhe tim�, of subn,iasfori of thi� budget schedvto, 'it is neeessory to hove budpet estin orrs d� ��•��E�cd in uc� � � with I�c�,l ropftul budgefing procticc, ond these c�tirtiates sholl bc ratained on i�I�a by ihc City for possible HUD review. �l.ny �,nipo�.e�J use to c:oniro<1 unil con�ultant servfees in an oCfivlty ahull be ju.ri(ied by a narrnlivC stafcment setling (ortli tiir servic�• to k�• n�nd�•��d un�lor 1h�• cr,ntract nncl I' - bosis (oi the cotif estimare. 'The stulr.met�t-.shall bc includod as port of the appre,priate vrorl; pro�rarr.. iiu�;-io.io r�_�o) I�,��+�,��. r��i�,�o,�, ,�t,�;�,1„r„ HUD-wa;h.,p.G _ '•:'i' - *Tat�►{ ravised Ht1A "� �lr. 6rant . � 21 ro«r.+ ni rr,ovt�n � Ill1ll(.I 1 !:1'I.I_All fi(.'. �� +�' �� tiTY �� U.S. I>[PARTGIENT OF NOUSRIG AND URBAN DLVIIOPMENT ` UTY DEMONSTRA710N AGENCY 8t3DGET SL. P�1�� , Ninnesota ______ PROGRAM CA?EGORY — PROGRAAI� B�DGLT pHOGRAM CATE�+URY — • Nealth _--'— (At_L FIGUR[S IN THQUSANDS ROUNDED TO TME NEARF_ST l'HOUSAND) HUD PFtOJECT PF210R CURRENT y REQUES7ED rUNOS USE TITIE� Y[ARS APPROVF_D — -�--- ONLY MC GRANT pUDGET, }� . :� NON MC GRANT FUniD� 70't�.�. FUNWS MC GkANT MC' A --- ---`-----"-- (Cnl. J i � * FUNDS FEDERAL STATE LOC.I�L_ _ til !21 l31 i(�4) ' (so) (sb) lsc) lr;)` � 1�.._�� Comn�unity Health . C 1 i�i c 12? .. . 306 *l�k 34 460 i d for , velopmentally Disabled #2 30 �; �r. 70 2S • . GRAND TOTAI. �Copilal Prc�jects must be Identificd by undetlininy 1h4 Project Titie, Prior frf �if�f'eonstruction, the CDA must have on fiic for possibii• H�:C review a detailad capitn) acquisitlon ond construcCibn tost budget for eath '��t.�tr�pocted by spetifications und drov,�in,as (and ony -ul • qucnt chanqc oidcrs) which must havc bcen reviewadatnd app roved by the C�'�:� ngln�er, o quoliffed engineering con.ultcr.r or thc Op�riti��: A9ri��y's Y�CI11nIt0I Sio(f. At rhe time of submission'of this budpet sthed r�nrtcetsory to hove budget estimatr_s de,��op;•d in acc r� • with local capitul budgeting practice, ond these eattm�tes sfioll be retained-�G.�s by 14c City fw possibie HUD revicw. 1 Any pro��os��d usr to contro�:t and consultont servltes !n on activlfy sholl be�d�silfi�d by o narrollve sfotement sc•tting fort'i thc service to E? ICll��cr��:d undcr th�, confroct and the bosis (or tho Cq.sf esflmGte. The atotcrn.cN!tt s�toi.l �e lncludcd os port of fhc oppropriatc wurl< progrorn. HUG•7040 12•70) I'reviuus eJition is obsolci� HUD•Wosh.� . L : i4;l�C � +�TOts� ��f�3�d H{#! �ri�� nt 22 � .. - � � � . . r�i,r,� ��;-rv��.n . � �i�ii�r.E.t �:it:� ni� r�r�, � i-•�' C 19'Y .._.--_...,._.. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING ANh URBAN UEVELOPMENT GTY DEMONSTRA710N AGENCX BUDGET St. paU� , Minnesota___ ________ PROGRAM CATEGOI2Y - PROG�AM BUDGE7 `p�OG�AM`ATF`°`:Y • So i Se rvt s _�a�__- _ (AL.:L FtGURES IN 7H�USANUS ROUNDED TO THE NF_/�f2C:ST 1"HOU,.l�N(') HUD PROJECT pR��}� CURREN7 REQUE5IED FUNI�S USE TITLE� YEARS APPROVED '—'-- ONIY MC GRAN7 BUDGET, � � � NON MC GRANT FUND> __,_ 'i C?i ti_ * FUND3 MC GRANT MC SMRR19`7' (l�r,L I i��,� FUNDS :- ��DERAL STATE l_bCAL (t) (2) (8! - : ��{7 (Sa) (56) (5c1_ _(51 J 606 Smlby Drop-In . Center 30 �� `` 5 27 Comp�ehensive Senfor Citizens 43 1�i2 +�p1 75 263 Aim 5 � GRAND TOTAL �ii I92 � 8� 29O �Capitnl Prc�jectr. muat bc idenli(icd hy undorlinirtg the Projr.cl Title. Prlor to 6tqrt of construction� the CDA must hnve on fil�� (ur �� .��>I '".'D revfew a d�•tnii��1 capital aequisilion and eonstruttiotreost budget for eoch proieefsuppurted by sp�eifieafions und �rawi � �. (oi�! n��y � - quent chanqe ordcr�:) which must liavo been rrvic•w�d oe+d approvcd by the Cfty's Engineer, a qua1H(ed englnecring con ��I+ � �,r thr• Ci, � �� /1g�•ncy'� Techinicol Stoff, At the time r�f submis�lon af this budget scfiedule,it is neceesory to have budget rslimat� d� ��p�,l in o .� !-�-�- wit!� local capitul budgeting practicc•, and these estirtlotes shafl be rerofned on 1(1c by fhc City for possible HUU r��vi��w. 1Any proposrd use to contracf and consu�lant serviCes'in Ofl activity shall be,jvaHfiedby a narraHvc stotement sefling foitl iho s�•�vicr• tc, k�. rundarod under the contrott ond the bosis tor thc cost estimate. The statembrtf ahal! be.included as port of th��appiopriot� �:o�ic ��r:��: �. NUCi•/040 (2-7�) I'ruviov; editic�n ��. oi,�oi�� HUD•w�»i�., �.�. �---"'J "l�i!.C;•� *To�te� 14evi sed HUi� � Y r. C rant , 23 r�,i;�.� n� i�„�.�•i ; .. .. .. � nui.��.i � �,i.i � .�n . � .,. , ��.�.�.-__..��.+��.�........�.�.� — � � . �� C.l1 Y � U.S. t?(�PART1.1[ NT Ot' NOUSING ANU URElAN DEVELOPMENT CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET St• P8tl� , Minnesota ___ _ _ _ PROGRAM CAT�GORY - PRt�G1�AM BUDGET pRO`'RA"'`AT�:�okY " T'�__'' • R+acreation 8 Culturte T--- - J � (ALL FIGURES IN THOUSANOS ROUNOEO TO THE NE'A�zC_5'r 'fr:��u;Atd['�' HUD p{ZOJECT PRIOR �-URRENT REQUESTED FUNUS �USE � � APPROVED � � — "" TITLE YEARS pUDGET, NON MC GRANT FUND; iU .- ONLY MC GRAN'i' ��1'��2 — -- _ FUNCiS MC GRANT MG.fiFGA�'1�' (�.�� r +L * FUNDS FEDERAL STATE IOCAL `_ (tl (21- (31 fKl (5a1 (56) (Scl __�I�) Comprehansive Cultural A�tLs 150 '��'� -�� 4 Summer Projects 347 Inner City Youth League Cultural Arts Program 6+� 1�� 5 63 Hai l ie Q. Bro�wn , Cui tu rai En�i chmsnt �� Program 2� ��;:,_ 9 27 ;:�,. ;;_ ,;., � � ;��. ��. GRAND TOTAL � '�� 1 9� �Capital Project:, must be identifiod by underlinfnq 1he Projec� Title, Prior.(u s�rtof Conafruction� 1he CDA must have un file (or �ossil� I",:G review o dclailed copital acqulsition ond tonatruetfon.Fost budgot for each�to;ect cupported by specifiwtions and druwings (ond ony -.ut : • quent �hanqe ordr.r;;)which must have boen roviowid o�pd approvod by the C�1�rr8 E11g1fipQf� o qUClifled engineering consultnn� or the O�,.r�r r; Agcncy'•. Ycchinical Staff. At the �ime of sc�bmisalon of�his budget sched ry�:is necessery to hove budget estimotes de�c�oprd in o�.c�r,o�,:" with locnl capNai budgeting proct(ce, and theee �s�irtwtes sho(i be retainoc�;�an fFle.by the City fo�possible HUD review. �Any propo�.ed usc to contra�:t and coiuultant servlGe4'i� an acllvify shall bt'�vltf+ifed by o norrative sfofement settinq fortl� tl�r ,ervic�• to b�. n�nd��red under th�� u�ntroct and the bosis for thc ca4t esHmnte. The stoterrylltlt'S�►o}I be f�itluded os part of the appropriotc work proqrc�n. HUp•7040(2-70) f'revious cdition is ob;olcte HUD•�ash.� ' � 1��"� ' ��l fkvised i��,�Gpc� Yw. Grsr►t �:��. � � ; 24 , a; , . . � FfIP�.+ Af�t•It(�•:! 1� � � � 1\tl{)l:l�l- i��itt�, A: �:.' ,. � � �� . . .. . . . .�..� . . �.._.__.� . C'iTY U,S. C�E:P�RTMf'NT OF HOUSING ANt7 URgA�t'DEVFLOPMENT - UTY DEMON57RATION AGENCY B#1DGE7 SL. P�UI , Minnesota____.._._ _ .___ PROGRAM CATEGO.ZY -- f'R�GRAM BUDG�T ��OGR`'M`�Tt-`oRY V_ �� • tALl. FIGURLS IN 7HOiUSAN:US ROUNOEO TO TH[ NL.nftF:._;T �H��lt';��r:i_1 _ _ NUD pROJECT pq�p� CURfiEN'I REqUE57[D FUNpS USE t APPROVED : �–' "--""-- TITLE YEAF{S BUDGET, �V NON MC GRANT �UNUS TUin� ONLY MC c;RANT -------- Ft1Np5 MC GRANT MC � :pgDERAI STATF LOCAI. ��'`�" ' { � * FUNDS -- — (1) (21, l3) : 4� (Sa1 (Sb) (Sc) _ � (61^ COdMNJf1I t�/ RCt IbaL � House S$ ; � ��►4 ,�'�!�, , �� 25� 110 4 -- Neighborhood Justic� Center 15 64 15 • � � . GRAND 70TAL �O t2S �Capifol Proj�cl, must bc identified by undorlining 1ht�i'rojett Ttlle. Prior to at'dert oi tonstruction, the CDA must have on (+Ic for po:•<_i�': '��'';G rrvi<�w o Jc•toiled cnpitel acquisitinn and cnnttructlun cost budqet for ooch p�,t{+Cxt supported by speclficot{ons onJ �!ru.vi��;-. f�id nny r� • • u nt chanqc ordcrc) whir.h must hav�: b�en reviuwed and opptoved by ihu CiJr"�.�ngin�pt• a qualifted enc�ineering con;��lirnt or thc U� r � Rq�•ncy'•. 7cchinlial Sro(f. At �h� �ime af subm(ssfatltoF th(s budget achedtl�� 1f`ts n#tessory to hove budget cstimc�t�: d�•��:Tup+•d in a�c �: �c� with locul cnpltul budgeting praclicr., ond thoso astl�lrtms shell be retoinoe�;°p�r#iJq.by the City For possibla HUD �evir.w. ?Any Nrupo�.��d use tu contract und con�ult�nf servlca�F in on oefivfty shall bb jus �cd 6y a nnrrutive statement settiny forib the s�rrvic.c tc �� rr�nd�•r�.�i under thc cnntract and Ihc La:,is for Ihe eoat e5tfmote. The stoteinertt s�fl be included as parf of thr, appre�priotr wo�k pmyro�•�. 11Uf)•70AU (?-/0) I'icviuus edition is uLsnl�rro HUD•Wash,�. ^ " � � *Totel 11ev�� I1t3� 2nd Yr., �t . �� . . f l.�l.l• 1�1'I��"- \'I�11 . (��;.�.1-� ' 1.1 All ti:,. .. �. � . ._....._" • � C 1 T Y --- ._�.___...�...._�.�__""`__J U.`,. [�( i'ARTMEtJT OF HUUSING AND URBAN D[VGLOPMENT CITY DEMON;TkATION AGf.NCY BUDGE7 St. PBU� , Minnesota_ _ ____ __ _ _ PR�GRAM CATEGO;Y - PROGRAM QUDGET �'ROGRAM CATE(iURY • Manpower - Job Oev�elupment `^.. (ALL FIGURF.`, iN THOUSHNC)S kUUNDED TO THE N( !•ilE`, f Ti'.OU�nr1�:i HUD P�pJECT PRIOR CUF2FiEN"t REQUESTED f I.tNU:; USE 1 APPROVED --.^- --�'-"--- TITLC YEARS gUDGET, �Y S �y� NON MC GRANT FUNC�S �U'%,'. ONLY M�UNDST MG GRANT MC GRANTZ -"" -' -`""' -" (l , ?. i ' * FUNDS FEDERAL S7ATF LuCAt. ---�__ ._.___.----- � -- — ----- — �-- __ _---_. ti1 f2) (3) (4) 150) (56) 15c1 ("! Model Neighborhood Employna�t Center 194 139 -�2 117 Summit-University Recreation Trainin Project 81 161 -1 iS . 46 Res i dent T ra i n i ng Prog�am 150 -1Q5 9 45 Mat ropol i tan • Teacher Education P ro�rsm 39 ' 13 37 26 Th i rd Wo rl d Commun 1 ICat i ons Cente r 107 -107 -0- 5 umme r Youth . Esployment -0- �+�Op 100 GRAND TOTAL 2�S 596 •Z6� �+6 334 I �Cupilol Prr,�ect�,, must be idcntifird l�y undorlining the Project Title, Prior to sfart of ennstruction� fhe CDn rnu�t hnv•:•nn fil • 1�� ;�r ik I. '+' ;; � revicw a drlailed �apita� pcyui�,lfion ond consirucflon �ost E�udget fUt cach ptOjet.} supported by specifications �ind drawii� , (��!d y � •� quen� �h;�nqc� urd��rs) which mus� hove b�en reviewed ond opprov��d by the City'6 Engineer, a qualified enqinecnng ron� ilt i ��r t'� �J� �.' • Ar,;•n�,y'. -(�•chinical ;tu(f. A� thc timc ul submisslon of this budgct schcdulc� it is necessary to hnvc Lud��et � t�,�:r,t�,�. d�•�.�.F� .! i u� � - � wi�h locol �npital LuJgetiny practic.•, and these esMma�es shall be retaLied on Iile by 1he City (or possiblc HUU revi�•w. ?Any propn,�;l u�.�� fo cmitr�,�_t a:�d consultont services in an activity sholl be justified by a narrative stutcmenf r.�11ii'�':I f,��ti� tl�� ,�:�rv��,: '� ', rends�re d i:ndcr rh�� cu��+rocr ond ihe bosis far the cUSt estimate. The statemenf shall 6�: incluJr.d ns part uf ihe ei��>n�p�ir,t� �v-,r'r: �,r+q:�� . IIUD-7040 (L-70) I'rrvir,u� c�li�ion i:, ol�tiolcic HUU•Was�t.� �.�. -�_. _ +^a�—�'� ' ~' �fotal Revised HllO Znd Yr. Grant 26 � . � ��c,i;n� ni�i�i:��i�n 1�1�1��.1 1 lltil'1 �1�� li. .' �� . . ..�. �.'��....�.�...��.��.._:��. ...��.....�� ..��.,.�.....��.�....�...�.... �_..,. �.�..,.�.....i . . . c�Tr II.;, I I I'l,i;l��l t�T O! IfOU;ItJG AND URDAN DEVGLOPME:NT CIT1' U[�'Ot:SI HATION AGENCY BUDGET MinneSOte.____.____._. .__ __ . Pf:('GF�,��h4 C/�Tf=G�t.Y — f'ROGRAM SUC3GET PR��""�T�.`'°�� f Economic b Business U�velopment__I • � ^+ (AI.L FIGUR[5 IN THDUSAMDS ROUNDEC� TO THE NCAf_[_ST l_tiOUb.P,�;l�) ` i HUD PF20Jf:C.7 PRIOR CURRf_N'( REQUESTED i UNC'�5 US[ TITLE� YEAFiS APPROVED ---- "–"' ONLY MC GRANT BUDGET, OE� NON MC GftAN7 FUN�)5 T�?'7 + FUNDS MC GRANT MC diRAN't' �(.��i � � * FUNDS F[D[RAL STATE LOCAI� _ __ tt1 c2► c3) (�1 tsol lsbl (Sci _ — _ (f;)--- Local Development Corp. 169 Z92 +��i� 308 Hous i ng Deve lopment Corp. lk2 + '$ 150 • , r.GRAND TOTAL � k I� ;� ^ 458 --� �Cu�nlul ('rnj,•cls must be IJontificd k�y underlining the Proiect 7(tle. Prior t0 start of tonsiruction� the CDA mu•,t hnvc on �il�� Inr �a_�.ik,!� li�!D revicw a d��ail,rd capitul a�.quisition ond e:onstruction tost buaget for each proje t supported by specfiications und druµinq� (o•�t� cny �.�� u�•nr chn��J�� ordors) which mu�t hovc hr•en reviowed and approved by the City�• �ngineer� o qualified enyi�eerin,� cons�,ltn t r,r th�� OE. r��i :� • ��qcn�y' . f cchinicul Sta(f. At Ihr time of submissfon of this budget schedvlo� lt is nacessary to have bud;et er.timnte:. J� :c�rp��! in ac.� r . ,e c wit!� lo�al cnpiral budyetiny practicc, ond these estimptes shall be refoined i!R�ile by'the City for possiblc HUU rcview. �/�uy �;r:,�•.,•.�J �,�,� t�, �nntru�t anJ consultont scrvices In on attivify sholl be justiiicd by a narrativc stotcmcnt scttin, turil; t!,,. .,�.r,,i, , tc, L� r�:n�l�i��d i�r,J•r tl��• c�,i,tro�t r.nd thc f;asis fur thc cast ustimatc. Thc stateme►�1 sholl bc inr.ludrd as part of thu ap;,r .;,rial�: wur4 �,r�.,��c:��, HUG-/G40("l•!�)) ('�cvii.u�. r�dnic,u i•, uL,ol�tr 1111D•Wosh.� b.�. �–...—•_ [:7i:, , *Total Rev�s�d NtfD 2nd Yr. 6r�rnt 27 rorir.� ni�i�i��+,;ru . � 1\�II��..I'1 Il�llil All t;G�. ' ..t:� _ ._.._... �...__. � � �C I'1'Y - ._ .�_._... U.�. f�f f'ARTMfNT OF HOUSING AND URBAN QC:VEL OPMCNT CITY DEMONSTRA7IQN AGENCY f3UDGET �t,g ._________.._�__ _ PRUGRAhti CATCGORY - PROGRAM BUDGET �'R°`'�A"' `''T`_`'°�:Y • __ -----._ ..__. —.._._ _ ---- -— --_--- IAI.I. FIGUIiCS IN TNf�USANDS ROUNOEh TO lli� NI: � I;I 7 Ii�c�ti,nri(il _...._. __ _ _.._. HUD (�fi0.11?CT �pf210R <-URRrNT REQUE;TEU 1 UNI-- USl TITI_E_� YEAR; APPFiOVCO � -- — -�'-'— ONLY MC GRANT �UpG['1; d � :{� NON MC G11AN f f Utd[� 1 i l ,�. FUNDS MC GfiANT MC Z3RANT ------ -- _._____.__ �( ! i ��t FUNDS FEDERA� STATF l OC.��^ _ __ �__ (t) (2i (3) fAT (SO) (5b) (��) (��) Rehabilitation Loans 8 Grants 12 125 -17' 108 Dertwnstratton Home Const ruct i on G ran t 100 -'�5 45 Consultant Housing Study 25 • Model Neighborhood � Swimming Pooi ]2S 1Q0 100 GRAND TOTAL �6'� 3'tS + _ �,__ �CaF�ital f'r„j�•ct,. must be identified by undcrlining 1ho Project Title, Prior to stort of eonstruction, the CDA must havo c�n rii�• l�>r pu:..il:I� 11'") rovicw u �I�tniled eapital acquisition ond conshuction cost buAget For each ptojeet supparted hy specificotions und dra�i ��, (a��d a��y •u' - • quon� rlian�o urdan.) whlr,li must Itnvc bccn rcvicwed nnd opprov�d by the C1t��S [ngi�recr, a qua�ified cnginccrinG con:.ulrnrt or �'�r� ('�� r�t � Ag�•n�y'•. �c�.hini�ul S�ofi. M the time of subruission of this budgel schedule�it Is necessory to hove budyct c•Iirnat��-, d,.••c��p •�1 i�, n� , � . � � with lucnl capifal budgetiny prec.ticc� ond iftese esfimotts sholl be rotoined pn flle by the City fat possihle HUD r�•vicw. �Any p�o��•,s�d u�.c fo coniroct nn� cnnr:u�tant sr.rv�tes In on ac.tivlty shall be justifieJ by o narrotive st�tcfnenl setfinq (ortli th�• .ervic�� in '. rend��! �ind�.�r the convnct und thc Uosis (or the cast ostirnote. The srotemmt shall be included os part v( the c�ppropriiilr :�nrl; �,rc,q<<��n. ., __.,_._...._.._... HUU-/04U(2•70) I'rcviou: edil�un ib uLSO�ete �{�J(�•4Yash.� ('1.C. • ., � - . *Total R�vlssd HUD 2nd Yr. ;i�an� � 28 � � . 1�<117Af AI'�•ft�`VI'�l . . . �l�il.��.l l I�.ilf�i-Ali li,. . . . CITY U.S. I�EPARTMLNT OF HOUSING AND URBaN OEVELOPMENT CITY OEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET SL. P UI Minnes�ta__�?.___.+_.__ � PROGRAM CATEGORY - PROGRAM SUDGET PR°�HA"' `ATf`'oRY • �-�-----__ (ALL FIGURES IN TW USANOS ROUNDED TO TNE NEnri[=5l" C�iO!J` ��:t % � ------------------* HUD PROJECT PRIOR CURRENT REQUESTED FUND; USE TITL[� YEARS APPROVED ^-- •— —'-- ONLY MGGRANT BUDGE7, �r�� NON MC GRANT f'U�:DS TO � MC GRANT MC 6RA -- ----- ""'— !:, i * FUNDS FUNDS FEDERAL STATE LOGAL � _� I11 (2) (3) ({) (Sa) (56) (5cl (`' Citizen Participa- tion 141 2;7 +�6 253 � GkAND TOTAL �� 'l }�� 2rj3_ �Coui�al !'iojcc�:• must 6e idcntifi��d by underlining the Project Tifle. P�ior fm start of construction, the C�A must havt�on iilc 1or po:.:�!;Ic H!i; � • rrview a de�ailr.d capital a�yuisttion and construction eost budget for each prgjett supported by specfficotion�. and drawings (and any ��:!::.- Rurm �ha��q�• ordcr�:) which m�rst havc becn revicwed a�d appraved by fhe City s Engineer, o qualified enginecring con•,ultn�is or tl��• Op�r:.•�• -; g,n�y' . "fc•�hi��icai Srofl. /1t the timc o( subn,ission of �his budyet schedule� It is necessary to have budyet estimates cicvc�op�J ir; acco: ,: :e with I„�ul co�,ital Ludg��ting practic:c, and thesc estimates shall be rotained on !i!e by thc City for possible HUD revicw. 1lv�y p��,n,�•�) usc tu conh�icf ond con•.u�fant scrviee, In an activify shall be justified by a norrntive stnicment sciting (ortL �ho tcrvic�• to !.i ri•nJci��; un�l�•r 1he conira�t un� tho Lasis (or the cost estimate. The s}atem�+M shall be Inc�udcd as port of the oE,prnpriate we�rlc pn,��ra^i. �_�..�. ��.�.._�.. ."",..J IfUI�-/04(� !;.Ip) I'�cviu��•, cditiun is, �l��.olrlc HUD•Wa�h.� U.C. -., . - . �T'otat �vtsed HUti 2� �t. Gra�t 29 . . . ' I�l1I'l.l '1 1�1�1';-All tl�i. � '• .r7� ' G i T Y ��.�'� U.S. nC PARTME.NT QF Fi0U51NG AN(3 11�tEll�r#t DEVELOPMEN f � MI�11hCSOta CITY OE:MONSTRATION AtGENL"�"`I�tIDGET y St. PaU� � _ PROGRAI.4 CATEGORY � PROG�7�#� �F7VD��T pROGHAM CATtiGUftY � 1AR,L �1GWRE5 IN THt?�JSAhtDS ROUNDED TO 7HE NEAREST TN�3uSAr:i_1 � MUD PROJECT p��q� ' GURF7ENT REQUESTED FUNDS �v � 11SE TITLE� Y�AfZS AP�f'�OVED -"" ONLY MCGRIWT BUOGET, NON MC GRANT FUNDS __ TOTA_ FUNGB MC GRANt , (( ,�!. ! i ; * F NOS _.,r "' fEDERAI. STATE LOCA._ 111 (21 ' (91 �- lSa) (561 (Scl l01 E val uat i on i�. :`;. 8� t� 8 126 � `^'� � � ,}� � °.n,'� ,f 1: � � .� � a....:-i �. . �M;, i GRAND TOTAL ' r a �Z6 Ji _ _ i .; ,.. , . ,.:. � �Copi�al Project�. must bc identilicd by undcrlininqtfie.Projscl Title. Prior'�o A�crt oi conslruction� thc CDA must havc con fil:• f�.r po�.�.i!:�,. F'_ _ � review u d�,tniled �:npitol acquislNon and ronslru�tNO}►;tost budget !�r etlGfi �j+�� suppotted by speeifications und �Irawingr, (unJ �ny v�: i qurnt chnnq�• urJ��n•) which musl havr hecn revi ��d opptqved by the C��WI npiACe�, a qualified enqiricerinq ron�.ultrnt or th� 0� r. �•; Agcncy'• '(�•�I��uicul `�ro(f, At thr timc of subroi�tiA f ihle budqet sehedui;e�#t•if'ntc.etsory to hovc 6udyet estirnaic�. do��r,prd ir� ac�-c� �= ' I with loc�I �.upit.�l budqetiny proCticc� and these 4sH�QS sficfl bc rcto�ned.qati'ft[i!by fho�ity for pos,iblc IiUD r�vicw. � �Any pr��,.�,.rd us�• to c��nirocf und consultant serv{e0�'.�P olf octivify shnl) bb{��,V;�tl#iad by a narrot{ve statement settirig (urfli tl�o �.crvic� tu 6e � rcnd��tf i�nJc•r Ihe cor�trocl und thc f>osls for tfte Cuxt,�tst(rf4o4e. The stote�rill�N ih4k1;6e incfudod as part of the upproprinto `or'� progro-n_�-J iIUD•70.IU li•7Q) I'�cvir�u�, �•clilic,n is obsulcte f1U�•�O��•r ! � ii;�., - ��'.�� ;:�.��i� �t 30 . . . . 1 �,ItA� :�.r I'i.� �1 � � . .� . � 11111' � 1 1;1 ,�1' ' . • • � � . .,., . . .. . �� C 1 1 Y .. ��.�..- � :._.._..- --.�,.......� . .,:t U.;. Ut:l'ARTAICWT Of' 110USING ANn UF261W pGVC.LOf'ME:NT St� P�� Minnesota I CITY D[MUNSTItAT10N AGENCY�:BUDGET PRUGRAM CA7EGGRY — PRQGRR�AI+h BUDGE7 P"°`:RAl.' `-Ar` `.;>i1�� - �=`-_�=�-�i � (A1.1. FIGURES IN T►iOUSANUS iiOUNC?EU TO T�iE Nt Arz[,'�T�� i� :'� _ ,�� HUD p�yp�ECT PF2tOR CURRENT REqU[STEU FUN�:S USE 1 APPROVEO ----- --."'' TITLC YFAfiS OUOGGT, I� NON MC GRANT PUhC: T�"-' ONLY MC GRANT MC GRANT MC '�fINT' —'^ '—'— —`— -� �� .:: - * FUNDS FEDERAL STATE l.(�C%� ' FUNDS ____, --- (t1 (2) l3) � 14j (so) (sb? c:;c1,-- —_( ,' Admi n i s t rat i on 35k 255 �1' 13 j 319 GRANDTOTAL � � � ` �Cn�,itol Prnj��r.i•, irwst bc id�nti(ied Ly und�rlining the Project TiUe. Prior to staN of ¢onstruction, thc CDA must h�v�� un filc (o� pos�.i�i^ �S'.;D revicw a detuil�:d cnpitnl ncyuisition ond construcffon tust budget for eath pro{etf supported by speci(ico�ions anJ �Irowi �7. (und <�ny �•u! .. • qucM nc�in�gc ord�•r.:)whirh inu•.t hav�: been reviewed and opproved by the C{ty's �ngineer� o quolified engineerinq cuns�.iltc�i! n� tLe Uprr Aq�nry'�. l rc hini�nl Stu(f. !1t tLe time ol �.ubmisslon 0� this budget schedule� ft is necessary to heve budget e>Ume�tes d��o��..p�a in ucc � . � with lu�r,l capitcl budgctin, proctice, anJ these estimotes shull be retoineA on fi�e by tho City for possible NUD reviaw. ?/�ny prn��„�.�•d i,-.�� tn c.,n!in t �u�d con•.ultant r.rrviees in an activify sholl be jusHUrd hy a norrative statement settin� furth tli,• scrvice to k:c r��ndcr�d �r.:d�•r ih�• ci,ntrue.t und th� i,osi; far tfie cost CS1IIIit11P. �I1C statemont ;holl be included os pari o( the appropriate werk �,rr.,grcm. HULi•7040(1•7U) f'ivvinu, r.��lilioi� i: c;��,o��tt HUD•Wushv U.�.. . '1�71.. � *Tota1 Revtaad I+�b �nd Y r. Grant 3� paF�e 1 ST. :^AUL �DEL CITIES 2:�p ACTI(1� YEAR 1`.EVISEI) BUAGET � •, Total Pro,iectc�d �Y f�n[ici��t��! R��*i�ed i.�, 1',__t_____._ • Expe.ndiCur�s Amt. needed Uctob�r l.� ??7l October I , 19'2 :�41y 1, 1973 ,Iunc ?0, 1"i+ __._____ ------ -Arx'iI 3n, 1973 _T�ene� 3(1� 1.G7k _�._____�.._----.- Senior., Citizens 60 ,106 � 203,000 2b3,10� I.11C 108,263 200,0�0 30�,263 EiDC -0- 15G,000 150,C00 r,ehr.b :.oasia G c,:..nts 53,123 ,y ,,SB IG7,72i nemo/ll��me Const. --0- 45 yU00 �i5,0�0 Nealtt; Clinic 7.13,894 34�,072 459 59�56 �� 1.1 ,7h2 15,OO�J 26,7C�2 r:nn � 14,978 i�,0�0 2G,97�i t,IM (ited :;chool Iio��ae) 23,559 S0,l�()0 73,959 �7�ZdeY 10,45fi 17,33d 27,7�4 Nonte�•sori 17,706 5,20� 22,906 r-2 56 ,8?.5 18,OQ0 74 ,825 !lome School T,iaiscm 13,3.0� k,0(30 17,1q8 '�('.IIdS C 1T� . .-n� ��-. _0_ � f:mpl.�ymcnt Center 103,625 14,�d0 117,G?S �/U Kec. b T�.��ir.�nf� 28,176 18,335 k6,S11 i�mmer F.mployment -0- 100,000 10(�,000 "URA (Resident Trainin�; Pro�;ram 45,000 -0- 45,OQU (:eereat 49,535 60,200 109,135 � Jei�hborhooci Justice Center -0- 15,000 15,000 Chird 1+lorld -0- -0- -0- !i-Teps 25,$S 1 -0- 25,851 ^amr. Cul.ttcr.e 62,].8$ 27,766 89,954 :�xford Pool 100,000 -0- 100,000 �itiz�n Participatic:it 86,1U4 1G6,615 252,729 ldministration 174 ,297 144,783 319,080 3valuaeion 41,722 $4 ,G25 126�1��7 ` 1,,200,276 1,749,7?.4 2,95!� ,�00 T'(MDS: iUU GI:ANT 2,9SU ,OGO � , ��_ 3�-s 1'a f;e 2 ST. PAUL !�tODEL CITIFS ' 2ND ACTION YEAR � RF.VISED BUDGET Mticipat�d Amt. needecl from Pa�;e 1 - 5-1-73 to 6-30-74 1,74R ,?24 City ContriUui:ion FY '72 25,000 City. Co»tribution FY '73 114,Q00 139,000 I'1locati.an of 139 ,000 City Contribution: Adminf�traticm (A) 131,000 Evaluation �B� �+�� . Z,888,7?.4 Allocation of proposed City Contrib ution for FX ' '74 - 31,902 = (C) Ad,nln�.�tration � 29 ,891 # Evn1 uation 2,011 . 1,920,G26 A. '„ocal Sh„s�e �s shown on �IIJD AdministraCion Budget. }i. 1.oca1 Sh:�re as shown on HUD Evaluation Budget C. P�•upas��d T.ac?1 Share for etie period 10-1-73 thru 6-30-74 to come out af City r'X '74 Buci�;et Wi1tCt1 has not ns yet heen approved. • 31-b • -2- Evaluation team and the Resident Planners were, at the same time, in contact with the project staff and beneficiaries so that up-to-date evaluations would be included in the condensation process. It then became the staff responsibility to develop the most effect- ive transition plan from all of the above information. The following schedule was finally determined: Projects which are scheduled to operate until June 30, 1974 and are designed to carry most primary areas of Model Cities emphasis forward through the transition period in anticipation of revenue sharing or other funding assistance. Senior Citizens Program Local Development Corporation • Housing Development Corporation Rehabilitation Grants Demonstration Home Construction Health Clinic Red School House Wilder Day Care Retreat Hoase Neighborhood Justice Center Citizen Participation Unit • Projects scheduled to terminate on September 30, 1973� at which time their existing Second Action Year contract expires. 606 Drop-In-Center S-U Recreation Training Summer Youth Employment Project Projects scheduled to be terminated at a specific prior date. Aid to Developmentally Disabled (8-31-73� Montessori (6-30-73) Nome School Liaison (6-30-73) Comprehensive Culture (6-30-73) - Kindergarten - Second Grade (6-08-73) Employment Center (5-31-73� Resident Training (4-3�-73) � M-TEPS (5-31-73� 34 � _3 The following projects have not begun and are not scheduled for operati�n. Headstart 7hird World Communication Center • • 35 • NAME_ C�F PROJECT: Sen i or C i t i zens Program �� (:OMPONENT NAME ' Social (Social Services) ADMINISTERING AGENCY: Ramsey County Welfare Department SUBCONTRACTING AGENCY: Wi llows Nursing Home/Hal1 ie Q. Brown MAJOR CHANGES: This on-going project will remain essentially unchanged during the Second Action Year. The single major change involved will delegate Ramsey County Welfare Department as the Administering Agency, thus replacing the Willows Nursing Home and Hallie Q. Brown, the two Administering Agencies of the First Year program. The Willows Nursina Home and Hallie Q. Brown will assume the role of Subcontracting Agenc�es. ' The Willows Nursing Home will continue to operate the Day Care program and the Home-Delivered Meals program; in addition, at which time as supplementary funds become available, Witlows will administer the In-Home Services Program. Hallie Q. Brown wilt continue the Recreation program, the Center Meals program, and will assume responsibility for the develop- ment and execution of the O�treach program. • The beneficiaries of the Program shall be the isotated Senior Citizens of the Model Neighborhood. ( Isolated Senior Citizens shall designate th�se residents fifty-five (55) and older not residing in high-rise facilities.) SCHEDULING: This program shall operate five (5) days per week, Monday through Friday. , The Willows Program shall 4perate from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ; Hallie Q. Brown facility shall operate from 9:00 a.m. through 3:00 p.m. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION : The recently established Senior Citizens, Ir�c. , shall act in an advis��ry capacity to the program. RESIDENT EMPLOYMENT: Model Neighborhood residents will be given preference in ernployment; when feasible, Senior Citizens will be given priority in hiring. Employ- ment shall be inplemented through the facilities of the Model Neighborhood Employment Center. • Senior Citizens Program PAG E � OF 2 ______.---._..__--------------- - ---__.__.._ _____._. 37 • FUTURE FUNDING: The two subcontracting agencies, the Willows Nursing Home and Hallie Q. Brown, have established distinguished records in the Model Neighborhood for the delivery of health and social services to the elderly. This Program will be coordinated with other Ibdel Cities projects; these shall include, but not be limited to the Health Clinic, 606, Inc. , an� Comprehensive Cultural Arts. Future funding shall be sought through the Minnesota Commission on Aging, the United Fund, the Ramsey County Board, the Ramsey County Welfare Department, and the City of St. Paul . Hopefully, a commitment will be forthcoming from HEW/AOA of a three (3} to one (1 ) match to provide the meals portion of the Program. ASSESSMENT: An evaluation of this Program completed during the First Action Year re- flects the following: The Willows component has maintained an excellent record of delivery of Day Care and Home-Delivered Meals and Administrative responsibility; a waiting list for the Home-Delivered Meals was established; the agency has complied with the time-line as designated in the Scope, Hallie Q. Brown has been somewhat negligent in the area of Administrative • and Fiscal responsibility; however, the Center Meals portion of the program has attracted a growing number of Senior Citizens and is a very popular component of the program among the recipients. It should be pointed aut that the two agencies were restricted to a reduced monthly spend rate and that this was a significant contributing factor to the limited development of some aspects of the projected Program; with increased funds, full �ro- gram development seems assured. This program was given top priority by the Model Neighborhood Planning Council . • Senior Citizens Program PAGE 2 OF 2 ~ 3$ ON-GOING PROJECT • NAME OF PROJECT: Local Development Corporation COMPONENT NAME: Economic (Economic and Business Development} ADMINISTERING AGENCY: H.E.L.P. Development Corporation SUBCONTRACTING AGENCY: None MAJOR CHANGES: 1'liere are no ma�or chaages in this pro�ect. This pro�ect was funded late in the First Action Year and imperatives for Second Action Year remain the same as for the First. SCHEllULING: 'i'he normal office hours of this corporation are 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday. The staff is also available by appointment during the evening hours and weekends. Tlie various com¢nittees (Loan Eligibility, Project Selection, etc.) mE�et as their services are required. , 'I'iie staffing pattern which began late in First Action Year, s.hould be completed within 90 days of Second Action Year Contract execution. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: Model Neighborhood residents will be able to participate as incorpora-� tors of the Local Development Corporation and as members of the Board of Directors. As members of the Board, they will have every opportu- nity to influence the project's planning, evaluation and administration. RESIllENT EMPLOYMENT: Insofar as is possible, all positions created by this project will be filled Uy Model Neighborhood residents. 1'ROJ1:C1 STAFFING: '1'tiis pro�ect, wtiich enables para-professionals from the Model Neighb�r- liood community to work in tandem with professionals to develop those skills that are needed to operate the program, represents a new vent�ire for the City of St. Paul. As such, there is no known or existing organization that has the capabilities or the will to carry out a coordinated business venture of this magnitude. Therefore, Help h:ncourage Local Progress in the Summit/University Area, Inc. was • l,ocal Development Corporation PAGE 1 OF 2 39 • formed in 1971 and was subsequently named the Administrating Agency of this project. Corporation policy is set by a Board of Directors which also directs a staff consisting of one (1) Executive Director, one (1) Market Research Analyst, one (1) Business Development Specialist, one (1) Budget Accountant, one (1) Administrative Secretary, one (1) Secretary. FUTURE FUNDING: 'I'his corporation will be financed from supplemental funds throughout tlie life of the Model Cities Program. Ma,jor expenses include staff, plans and studies, and "seed" (equity) money to secure loans from the Small Business Administration and other sources. Additional money will be sought from the public and private sectors to expand the seed capabilities of the corporation. ASSESSMENT: This project, though it has not had a formal evaluation, has a high level of MNPC interest and should be continued. In addition, with its seed money, the L.D.C. could cause the investment of at least one million dollars in businesses in the MNA. This means additional jobs and a boost to the MNA's overall economy. . • I,uc;il I)c:veJ opment Corporation PAGE 2 OF 2 4U NEW PROJECT • NAME OF PROJECT: Hous i ng Development Corporat ion COMPONENT NAME: Phys i ca 1 (Hous i ng) ADMINISTERING AGENCY: Request for Proposal (RFP) SUBCONTRACTING AGENCY: PURPOSE AND BENEFICIARIES: The purpose of this project is to offer the residents of the Model Neighborhood a housing service which does not exist at ttiis time in the Neighborhood. The Housjng Development Corporation (HDC) will offer technical assistance to sponsors a�d developers in an effort to increase the number and quality of housing units and may also directly serve as a sponsor of low, moderate, and market rate housing. It will also offer services to renters in terms of serving as a clearing house. � CONTENT AND OPERATION: The major activities of the HOC wi }1 include the following: l . Study and report on the housing situation in the Model Neighborhood. 2. Increase the supply and quality of the housing stock in tlie area. 3• Offer technical assistance to sponsors and private partiesti builders, developers and the like. 4. Work in conjunction with the efforts of Project Rehabilitation and act as the area's contact group. >. Involve itself in Code Enforcement in a scheduling and coordination capacity. Ei. Offer technical assistance in the packaging of housing applications , mortgages and the like. 7. Involve itself in consumer protection and quality control with respect to housing. tS. Offer financial counselling and possibly loan consolidation • services. Nousing Developmen[ Corporation PAGE � OF 3 41 • 9. Offer educational programs which relate to housing. )0. Act as a housing sponsor if possible. 11 . Offer home repair services to Senior Citizen homeowners. TIMETABLES: The project will start immediately after a contract is signed and will continue th�ough Model Cities phase out period. FUND I tJ6: Supplemental funds will be used in this project. $13$,381 wi11 be allocated for administrative expenses and $11 .619.00 for seed money; the total amount allotted for this p roJect is $150,000.00. PROJECT ADMINISTRATIUN: The administration of this project will be determined at a later date under a �equest for proposal arrangement. COORDINATION: The tiDC will coordinate all its activities with those of tt�e St. Paui • Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) � and all those agencies in the Model Neighborhood and throughout the city which are concerned with providing housing. MONITURING AND EV�LUATION: The St. Paul Model Cities Program will monitor each supplementary funded project. The projects will be monitored on the basis of planned versus actual achievement in terms of objectives , content and budget. An Information System will be designed and implemented and will act as the mechanism for rhe monitoring process. CITIZEN PARTICIPATIUiV: A policy board composed of Model Neighborhood residents in addition to representatives of the HRA, will be established. The criteria for the board composition and selection will be determined by Model Cities in light of existing guidelines. KESIDENT L-MPLUYMENT: Preference for employment in all staff positions will be given to Model Neighborhood resid�nts. Only in the event that no qualified residents become available for the positions, will persons from outside • Housing Develapment Corporation PAG E 2 OF 3 42 • ttie area � considered. MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT: Supplementary monies used in this project are for additional services not able to be provided by using local funds. • • Housing Development Corporation PAGE 3 OF 3 43 ON-GOING PkOJEGT' • NAME OF PROJECT: Rehabi 1 itation Loans and Grants COMPONENT NAME: Phys i ce 1 (Hous i ng) ADMINISTERING AGENCY: St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority SUBCONTRACTING AGENCY: None MAJOR CHANGES: This project will continue to provide basically the same services as were programmed for the first and second action years. The maximum allowed per grant is $1 ,250. Preference will continue to be given to owne r occupants in "Demonstration Blocks" and in the Northeast Quadrant. During the remainder of the project there will be no restrictions as to income level, Grant priorities will be determined by the Grants Committee. SCHEDULING: . Grants will be awarded by the Neighborhood Coamittee at its regularly scheduled meetings to be established by the Committee. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: A Neighborhood Committee will contjnue to function in the same nanner as that which took place during the First and Second Action Years. RESIDENT EMPLOYMENT: No direct employment opportunities will be created by this project. PROJECT STAFFING: No new staff positions will be created through this project. The Administering Agency will utilize its existing staff, therefore there are no administrative costs fncluded. FUTURE FUNDING: The budget through June 30� 1974 will be $54,598. The project wil ) function until all of the available funds have been expended. The fun�is allocated will be expended only for grants. • Rehabilitation Loans and Grants PAGE 1 OF 2 k4 • MONITORING AND EVALUATION: The St. Paul Model Cities Evaluation Unit will monitor each supplemen- tary funded project throughout the Second Action Year. The projects will be monitored on the basis of planned versus actual achievement in terms of objectives , content and budget. An I.nformation System will be designed and implemented and will act as the mechanism for the monitoring process. ASSESSMENT: The project had a late start because of contractual problems, which were all resolved. There was a need for this project during the First Action Year, which was reflected in the number of applications received by the Administering Agency. ( t is anticipated that the need for this service will not diminish, but rather, may increase. • • Rehabilitation Loans and Grants PAG E 2 OF 2 45 NEN( PROJ ECT � • NAME OF PROJECT: Demonstrat i on Home Construct i on Grants COMPONENT NAME: Phys i ca I (Hous i ng) ADMINISTERING AGENCY: St. Pau I Hous i ng b Redeve I opment Author i ty SUBCONTRACTINGAGENCY: None PURPOSE AND BENEFICIARIES: The purpose of this project is to enhance the quality of housing constructed in the Model Neighborhood. THe beneficiaries of the project will be those future owner-occupants who construct homes under the various Federal single-family homeownership programs with- in the Model Neighborhood. Other beneficiaries will be the Model Neighborhood Community at-large and the City of St. Paul in that they will both benefit from the heightened quality of environment. CONTENT AND OPERATION: I . $1000.00 per bedroom per home will be granted, with a maximum grant of $3000.00 per home. • ?_. The grants will be awarded with respect to the following criteria: a. Preference will be given to homes built in the ' Northeast Quadrant. b. Those displaced from the Northeast Quadrant be- cause of redevelopment will be given first pre- ference when rebuilding in the Northeast Quadrant. c. Model Neighborhood residents not displaced from the Northeast Quadrant will have preference over non-residents. d. Grants will be awarded in conjunction with quality home design. TIMETABLE: The contract for this project has been signed but has not become operational because of the uncertainty about Model Cities cut-backs. It will now be made active but with a reduced budget of $45�000. • The agreement will run through June, 1974� and will function until the � expenditure of reduced available funds. Demonstration Home Construction Grants pACiE 1 OF 2 46 FUNDING: • Supplemental funds will be used for the grants. The maximum amount � allotted for this project will� be $45,000.00; the maximum per home will be $3,000.00. There will be no funds allotted for adminis- trative expenses. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION: The project will be administered by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of St. Paul . There will be no administrative charge for this service. COORDINATION: AIl community agencies will be informed of this project's provisions and methods of applying for grant funds. MONITORING AND EVALUATION: The St. Paul Model Cities Evaluation Unit will monitor each supplemen- tary funded project throughout the Second Action Year. The projects will be monitored on the basis of planned versus actual achievement in terms of objectives, content and budget. An Information System wiil be designed and implemented and will act as the mechanism for the monitoring process. • CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: The Physical Core of the Model Neighborhood Planning Council (MNPC> shall review all project grants as a part of its review of renewal land dispositions. RESIDENT EMPLOYMENT: No new employment opporutnities will be created by this project. MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT: Supplementary monies used in this project are for additional services not able to be provided by using local funds. • Demonstration Home Construction Grants PAGE 2 OF 2 . 4� FUNDING: • Supplementai funds will be used for the grants. The maximum amount � allotted for this project will be $45,000.00; the maximum per home will be $3,000.00. There will be no funds allotted for adminis- trative expenses. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION: The project will be administered by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of St. Paul . There will be no administrative charge for this service. COORDINATION: AIl community agencies will be informed of this project's provisions and methods of applying for grant funds. MONITORING AND EVALUATION: The St. Paul Model Cities Evaluation Unit will monitor each supplemen- tary funded project throughout the Second Action Year. The projects will be monitored on the basis of planned versus actual achievement in terms of objectives, content and budget. An Information System wiil be designed and implemented and will act as the mechanism for the monitoring process. • CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: The Physical Core of the Model Neighborhood Planning Council (MNPC> shall review all project grants as a part of its review of renewa{ land dispositions. RESIDENT EMPLOYMENT: No new employment opporutnities will be created by this project. MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT: Supplementary monies used in this project are for additional services not able to be provided by using local tunds. • Demonstration Home Construction Grants PA(3E 2 OF 2 � 47 ON-GOING PROJECT • NAME OF PROJECT: Model C i t i es Commun i ty Hea 1 th Serv i ce COMPONENT NAME: Soc i a 1 (Hea 1 th) ADMINISTERING AGENCY: St. Paul Bureau of Health SUBCONTRACTING AGENCY: None MAJOR CHANGES: This is a continuation of the First Year project. The name of the project and the Administering Agency are the only major changes from the First Action Year to the Second Action Year. Because of Adminis- trative problems between the Administering and Operating Agencies during the First Action Year, the Administering Agency was changed to the �. Paul Bureau of Health; it will also be the Operating Agency. This project was to be an expansion of the Target Area A Community Health Program, but this clinic was closed because of financial problems within Ramsey Action Program and St. Paul Bureau of Health. The purpose of this project is to fill the gaps in medical and dental services within the MNA and to establish a health information plan- ning system. The facility will operate at a more centrally located • area in the MNA than had previously been the case. It will work with tf�e schools , senior citizens housing facilities, community service agencies, and supportive projects of the CDA. This program will provide training for Model Neighborhood residents for various positions in the health field. During the operation of this pro- ject, planning will be underway for the establishment of a complete comprehensive medical program. It is anticipated that a function of the Center will be to bring a wide range of supportive social services to the recipient of the medical services provided through the clinic. The residents of the Model Neighborhood area will directly benefit from the clinic with the City of St. Paul and Ramsey County indirectly benefiting. SCHEDULING: This is an on-going project. No disruption of services is expected as the Program continues through June, 1974. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: There will be an eleven (11) member appointed Board to establish policy for the clinic, with one representative from each of six (6) community • agencies: Urban League, Capitol Community Service Center, Inner City Model Cities Community Health Service PAGE � OF 2 4� Youth League, American Indian Movement, Ramsey Action Program, and Model Neighborhood Planning Council , and; five (5) clinic users as • well as the Executive Director. RESIDENT EMPLOYMENT: Preference will be given to MNA residents in hiring staff for this project. Notice of positions and screening of applicants resulting from this project will be done by the Model Neighborhood Employment Center. PROJECT STAFFING: All nineteen positions have been filled primarily with Model Neigh- borhood Residents. If vacancies occur Model Neighborhood residents shall continue to have priority. FUTURE FUNDING: The major costs of this program will be the salaries of Clinic, Planning and Evaluation staff. Model Cities will fund the project with $346,072. The St. Paul Bureau of Health will be providing sup- portive funding in supplies and in-kind contributions through their Maternal and Child Care Program, Family Planning, etc. • ASSESSMENT: This project was late in becoming operational because of a number of factors. The First Year Operating Agency did not wish to operate the project as described in the First Year Plan; negotiations with the new Operating Agency took more time than expected. There is a strong need for this project in the Model Neighborhood; therefore, it was recommended that funds be altocated for it in the Second Action Year Plan and continue through the transition period. • Model Cities Community Health Service pAGE 2 OF 2 • . 49 ON GOING PROJECT • NAME OF PROJECT: Red School House COMPONENT NAME: Soc i a 1 (Educat i on) ADMINISTERING AGENCY: S t. Pau 1 Amer i can I nd i an Movement SUBCONTRACTING AGENCY: None Major Changes Ttiere will be no major changes in the continuation of this program. Scheduling There are sixty (60) students in the Red School House whose ages range from pre-school through high-school . The class schedule is far from rigid� in the traditional sense of the word. Although the commonly accepted aspects of education are taught (i .e. reading, mathematics, etc. ,) issues and problems p�esently challenging the Indian community are also included in the curriculum. Teachers do not enter the classroom with a �pecified frame of reference • as to what constitutes an activity, but view the classroom situation with a conceptual frame of reference that may be considered as "fluid"; it is felt that this approach may insure maximum interaction between the instructor and tbe student. Ttiere are� however, certain activities presented within a more traditional frame of reference. They are: ti:30 am to 11 :4U am - Reading, writing (English) , mathematics, history (both European and Indian) . 12:OU n to 1 :00 pm - Lunch. 1 :00 pm to 2:00 pm - Mon. � Wed. , Fri . ; Arts E Crafts. Tues. , 8 Thurs. ; Tribal Cultures. 2:U0 pm to 3:00 pm - Physical Education. 3:UU pm - End of Class Day. Citizen Participation The Recl School House has a School Board with a total of eleven (ll) members. There are seven (7) parents of students, two ('L) students, and two (2) non-parent members. Parents are obliged to spend two (2) hours a week in helping capacity at the Red 5chool House. • Red School House PAGE � OF 2 5U • Resident Employment Positions are filled primarily by Indian MNA residents and will continue to be so done. The school has a total staff of twelve (12) . Fund�n9 Model Cities funds will form the greatest part of the support monies used in this project. St. Paul School District Nb25 has expressed tlieir desire to incorporate the Red School House,as a cultural center and school � under their auspices and direction. Monitoring and Evaluatian Tl�e project will be evaluated, in terms of teacher interviews, intervi�ws with parents, the �umber of children who rema�n in the school during the school year vis-a-vis those children and youth who drop out , and other information as determined by the Model Cities Evaluation and Monitoring component. An Information System has been designed to serve as the mechanism for the monitoring process. Assessment and Maintenance of Effort This project provides a service not p�eviously available to the St. Paui area. • In ou� contract with the Red School House� we have been very impressed by tfie total comnitment to the program by their entire staff. In reviewing the budget history of the school to date, it becomes apparent that it has been run, literally, on a "hope and a prayer". Many of the staff have been working for little or no compensation� and they propose to keep the schoo) open for the summer on a strictly-volunteer basis. It is tt�e recommendation of the Evaluation Staff that tt�e program be budgeted at its current level of operation (not what was budgeted in the First Year Scope of Services) , through June of 1974. There have been firm commitments on the part of other funding sources, and we believe that if we continue to fund this program through June of 1y74, it will achieve its ultimate levei of content and operations under its own auspices being absorbed by any other organization. • Ited School House PAGE 2 OF 2 5i ONGOING PROJECT • NAME OF PROJECT: Wi lder Day Care COMPONENT NAME: Soc i a l (Ch i 1 d Devel opment) ADMINISTERING AGENCY: Ramsey County Welfare Department SUBCONTRACTING AGENCY: Wi lder Foundation MAJOR CHANGES: There are no major changes in this project which is being continued from the Second Action Year. SCHEDULE OF ACTIUITIES: This program will provide funds for thirty-five (35) Model Neighbor- hood children to attend the Wilder Day Care Center which is located — within the Model Neighborhood area. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: • As advisory committee composed of parents of children in the program has been o-eated to help determine the policies of the day care pro- gram. RESIDENT EMPLOYMENT: All positions made available as a result of ifiis project have been filled by Model Neighborhood residents. If vacancies occur during tFie �rar,sition period, Wilder Day Care Center will expend every effort to hire Model Neighborhood residents. PROJECT STAFFING: The staff in this proJect will continue to work directly with the Wilder staff within the day care facility. The Model Cities funded positions are now filled. Efforts are being made to continue these positions through the Wilder Foundation once Model Cites funds are expended. FUTURE FUNDING: Funding is as follows: Social Security Act Title II , Sec. 2A, will provide 75� �52,006.00) of the project cost. Major items include staff and materials. Model Cities monies will provide the remaining 25i � 17,330.00) of the project cost. Wilder Foundation has begun to seelc • Wilder Day Care - Child Development PAG E � OF 2 72 • sources of monies elsewhere in order to continue this project after Model Cities funds become no longer available. ASSESSMENT: The Evaluation and Monitoring component of the St. Paul Model Cities Program has uihesitatingly ehdorsed the Wilder Day Care Center for continued funding. • • Wilder Day Care - Child Development PAG E 2 OF 2 5� ON-GOING PRUJECT • NAME OF PROJECT: Ret reat COMPONENT NAME: Social (Crime and Justice) ADMINISTERING AGENCY: Commun i ty Ret reat Corporat ton SUBCONTRACTING AGENCY: None MAJOR CHANGES: This project is a continuatio� of the First Action Year Project. The major change that there will be a strong counseling emphasis � along with a de-emphasis of institutional restrictions. Another major change is that this project will provide educational and vocational preparation inside and outside of the Retreat Nouse needed by clients during the period of adjustment. It will also provide an effective delivery system of Health and Welfa�e Counseling and Services for ex- --affenders. Another major change is that it will try to plan and develop a drug free detoxification program geared to the needs of the ex-offender with drug problems. • Irr addition to the $15,000 which is remaining out of the second year budget, an additional $45,000 is designatsd for the Model Cities phase out period so that the Retreat Praject remai�s eligible to recelve additional LEAA funding. SCHEDULING: The services of thls project will be available to its clients on a year round basis, seven (7) days per week, twe�ty-four (24) hours per day. Help for Model �leighborhood residents who walk in will alsa be provided on a daily basis. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: A Citizens Advisory Board is the policy-making body for the project; also a Project Advisory Team, composed of educators, social sc:ientists, and other professionals advise and give guidance to the program. It also has an Inmate Advisory Board which has a composition of area residents, which advises on program matters. RESIDENT EMPLOYMENT: Prese�tly all of the positions are filled. In the eve�t any positior�s are created through the vacating or development of positions � Model Neighborhood residents will be given pr$ference in filling these positions. • Ret reat PAGE � OF 2 54 • PkUJECT STAFFING: The Administering Agency will remain the Cortmunity Retreat Corporation. The project provides for sixteen (15) staff positions. The staffing pattern will consist of the following posltions: Project Di rector ' Admi�istrative Assistant Accountant Secretaries (2) Direcsor of Research and Training Director of Counseling Counselors (6) Chef and Assistant FUTUKE FUNDING: Supplemental funds will be sought for zhis project through the Minnesota State Department of Corrections, Community Retreat Corporation� Governor's Commission on Crime Prevention and Control , Ramsey County Welfare and through other sources wh�ch may become available. Model Cities funding shal ) be contingent upon the approval by LEAA and tt�e Governors Grime Commission for the 73-74 funding year. The project • must be revised and resubmitted to the MNPC for reapproval if the anticipated LEAA funding is not granted. ASSESSMENT: According to the CDA Evaluation Repor,t , the project has successfully met all goals set forth in the Scope of Services. The CDA Evaluation Staff recommends refunding of this project wlth the expansion of its services to comnunity residents already released from prison prior to the conception of this project. • Ret reat PAGE 2 OF Z 55 NEW PROJECT __� • NAME OF PROJECT: Nei ghborhood Just i ce Center COMPONENT NAME: Soc i a 1 (C r i me and Jus t i ce) ADMINISTERING AGENCY: Ramsey County Lega 1 Ass i stance SUBCONTRACTING AGENCY: None PURPOSE AND BENEFICIARIES: The Neighborhood Justice Center is a project designed to meet the specialized needs of the Selby-Dale criminal defendant. While pro- viding him with the hest possible legal defense, the aim of the Center is to provide deterrent services prior to any charge being made, suppl2- mentary services if the defendant is hetd, and alternative services if he is found guilty. The underlying premise of the project is that specialized and mmprehensive help is required to assure the defendant. that he is fully represented in the courts and given the best possible alternatives w rehabilitation should he be found guilty. Through this process and the eventual confidence of the community, it is believed that the Center will prove to be a positive force for reducing the crime rate in the Selby-Dale area by showing the residents how the system can be made to work for them and the concurrent necessity for their support- • of the project. CONTENT AND OPERATION: The project includes three (3) attorneys who will provide the actual legal defense for individual clients. They will also present infor- mation accumulated by the community workers selected from the Selby- Dale Community. Representing clients in Juvenile, Municipat and Dis- trict Courts, the attorneys will be required to be more to their clients than legal advisors. Part of the job of the attorneys would be the definition and resolution of the problems that lead to a defendant 's co�tact with the criminal system, and an attempt to alleviate or elim;nate them. In short, the attorneys will need to possess sensitivity to tf�e problems of the community, sympathy with the plight of the individual defendant and a dedication to the goals of the project which will require a total committment of their energies. Approximately 50�-75% of the attorneys time will be spent in court. The remaining time will be spPnt working with the clients. The Community Workers will form an integral and invaluable part of the Project in hel�ing the individual defendant from pre-arrest to post conviction phas'es of the case. They witl basically make the initial contact with the client; act as liaison between the client � lawyer; serve as an investigative agent; supply resources for alternative sen- tencing facilities; provide post-conviction services (follow-up of � client primarily for the benefit of family) ; and educate the community Neighborhood Justi�e Center PAGE � OF 3 56 of criminal justice metters. Their time will probably be spent as • follows : The mornings will be spent in the office; afternoons , in court ; and evenings, in the community. TIMETABLE: This project will become q�erational on August lst of 1g73. FUNDING: In addition to supplemental monies, funds have been requested from the Governor's Commission on Crime Prevention and Control . The Neighborhood Justice Center proposal is expected to be approved and funded in July anticipated LEAA funds are therefore expected to come to the project Aug. 1 , 1973. Supplemental funds wilt serve as a portion of the local share required under this particular funding program. Major cost items � are qualified legal staff and resident community workers. Sources of monies other than supplemental funds will be sought for the project 's continuance during succeeding years. Model Cities funding shall be cun- tingent upon the approved by LEAA and the Governors Crime Commission far the 73-74 funding year. The �project must be revised and resubmitted to the MNPC for reapproval if the anticipated LEAA funding is not grante�. • PROJECT ADMINISTRATION: This project will be administered by the Ramsey County Legat Assistance Program. COOaDINATION : This project will be coordinated with all legal assistance and criminal justice agencies within both the Community and City, as well as with relevant social agencies. MONITORING AND EVALUATION: The St. Paul Model Cities Program will monitor each supplementally funded project throughout the Second Action Year. The projects will be monitored on the basis of planned versus actual achievement in terms of objectives, content and budget. An Information System will be de- signed and implemented and will act as the mechanism for the monitoring process. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION : Efforts to involve the community and to encourage MNA residents to use • Neighborhood Justice Center PAGE 2 OF 3 57 • the services of the project will be a joint function of the Model CitiPs Program and the Administering Agency. The Board of Directors will be composed predominately of representatives of MNA organizations and agencies. RESIDENT EMPLOYMENT: When filling positions created by this program, every effort will be made to hire Model Neighborhood residents. MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT: Supplementary monies used in this project are for additional` services not able to be provided for by using local funds. • • Neighborhood Justice Center PAG E 3 OF 3 58 NEW PROJECT • NAME OF PROJECT: C i t i zen Part i c i pat i on Un i t COMPONENT NAME: Soc i a 1 ADMINISTERING AGENCY: Model Neighborhood Planning Counci 1 SUBCONTRACTING AGENCY: None PURPOSE AND BENEFICIARIES: The purpose of this project is to provide the means by which the Mode2 Neighborhood Planning Council will incorporate as a project embodying a citizen participation full-time staff to facilitate the MNPC in the carrying out of their charges. It will also serve as the functional arm in implementing the coordination of communications within the Model Neighborhood. It shall be the principal advisory body to the Mayor and City Council , representing the Model Neighborhood Community. It shall utilize all the means available to assist in the formation of plans and making of de- cisions affecting the lives of the Model Neighborhood residents. CONTENT AND OPERATION: • The major activities of the MNPC will include the following: l . Hire and fire MNPC staff as may be provided to the MNPC by the City Council . � 2. Be the principal advisory body to the Mayor and City Council , representing the Model Neighborhood Community. 3. Identify problems of the Model Cities area, establish priorities for correcting the problems, institute proposals and develop project concepts within the Model Cities Program guidelines. 4. Review and make recommendations to the Mayor relating to al � plan, programs, projects and budgets included in each annual Modei Cities Action Plan, including supplements thereto, presented by the Director prior to submission thereof to the Mayor. The Maycr shall submit his proposed Action Year Plan to the Council together with all cortxnents and recommendations submitted by the MNPC. In pre- paring each Action Year Plan the Mayor shall attiempt to include all recommendations made by the MNPC. 5. Receive and review quarterly reports on the activities of tt�e MNPC as prepared by the Director. 6. Maintain complete and accurate minutes of its meetings on file � Citizen Participation Unit PAGE � OF 3 59 with the City Clerk and Director. • 7. Adopt such procedures as it may consider necessa ry for the efTective performance of its duties. 8. Create appropriate committees for� the carrying out of their res° ponsibilities. 9. Review, upon request of the Mayor and Council , any policy recom- mendations having an impact on the Model Neighborhood commun� ty. 10. Provide to the Mayor and Director information relating to thF interests of the Model Cities area. 11 . Any other powers and duties that may be lawfully delegated from time to time to the MNPC by the Mayor and City Council . 12. The MNPC shall submit an annual report of its activities to fihe Director, Mayor and City Council on or before the first day �f January of each year. 13. To establish a comprehensive, multi-phasic communications/Infor- mation center that will act as the focal point for collectior, analysis and dissemination of information for and about the community. • 14. Utilize all the means available (i .e. electronic media, newspaper, public relations, etc.) in bringing the necessary information to and from the people to assist in the formation of plans and making of decisions affecting their lives. TIMETABLE: This project will start May l , 1973 and run through June 30, 1974. FUNDING: This project will be funded totally by Model Cities monies in the amount of $166,400.00. Every effort will be made to acquire additional funds to continue after June 30, 1974 from other public and private agencies. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION: This project will be administered by the Model Neighborhood Planning Council . COORDINATION: This agency shall work towards setting up a communications system with all agencies within the Model Neighborhood Area. MONITORING � EVALUATION: • The St. Paul Model Cities Program will monitor each supplernentally fun�ed Citizen Participation Unit PAGE 2 OF 3 60 • project throughout the Second Action Year. The projects will be monitored on the basis of planned versus actual achievement in terms of objectives , content and budget. An Information System will be designed and implemented and will act as the mechanism for the monitoring process. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: This will be accomplished through the Task Forces, Cores � MNPC meetings. RESIDENT EMPLOYMENT: When filling positions created by this program, every effort will be �rade to hire Model Neighborhood residents. MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT: This is the only new project submitted in our 1973-74 revised submission and it is hoped that as a major principle unit in the communications e`fort of the MNA that future funding can be of a joint effort of neighborhood organizational already existing. • • Citizen Participation Unit PAGE 3 OF 3 _ — 61 ON-GOING FRUJI?Ci • NAME OF PROJECT: Summit University Aecreation Training Project COMPONENT NAME: Economic (Manpower Training) ADMINISTERING AGENCY: City of St. Paul, Department of Parks & Recreation SUBCONTRACTING AGENCYNone r1AJOR CHANGLS: 'I'he Oxford Recreational Center carried on three major activities dur- ing the rirst Action Year which they proposed to continue and imp�ove in the Second Action Year. These general areas of activity are: 1. To provide a variety of wholesome recreational activities for all age groups in the Model Neighborhood. 2. To continue a training program for recreational leadership. 3. To provide employment opportunities for Model Neighborhood residents. The pro�ect will, through these activities, not only maintain a wide range of recreational activities, but Model Neighborhood residents will also be trained for � future recreational leadership opportunities. 'llie major changes shall be: a. An insistence upon a greater financial contribution by the Parks Department of the City of St. Paul as outlined in the First Year CDP. b. Cooperation with the Comprehensive Cultural Program so as to secure arts, crafts, and other cultural services at the recreational center. SCHEDULING: l. Activities shall include: a. Seven (7) football teams in the f all. b. Gymnastics classes in various areas several times per week. c. Game room activities weekly. d. Sewing classes weekly. e. Ten (10) winter basketball teams. f. Movies weekly. g. Volleyball. h. Four (4) summer basketball teams. i. Ten (10) summer baseball teams. • j . Track teams in spring. Summit University Recreational Training PAG E 1 OF 2 63 • k. Weight training program weekly. i. Archery club and classes. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: The Oxford Fund Raisers act as the citizens' participation group for the project. They are active in special events held at Oxford for the general public and also in securing contributions for special activi- ties. The staff is made up primarily of residents and minority persons who reside in the community. RESIDENI' EMPLOYMENT: i�ositions will be filled by MNA residents whenever possible. PROJECT STAFFING: 'l't�e Administering Agency shall remain the City of St. Paul, Parks and Itecreational Department, provided that there is a greater commitment of the Department's resources to the pro�ect. 'llie Parks Department shall begin to pick up the cost of the professional staff and some of the Recreational Leader I's, as well as providing the facility. The Model Cities Program shall besr the cost of some of the Recreational Leader I's and the Recreational Aides. • FUTURE FUNDING: A total of $18,335 is allocated to continue the project through 9-30-73. ASSESSMENT: According to the CDP, "the Department of Parks and Recreation and Public Buildings will be able to shoulder more responsibility for fund- ing during year number two and thereafter". Less supplemental funds stiould be granted this pro,ject in the Second Action Year. One potential problem area is that the Operating Agency is also a Department of the City. Thus far, one person has passed the Civil Service Examination fcr Recreational Leader I. Other funding sources should be used to maintai.n l�igli level of recreational services. • Summit University Recreational Training PAG E 2 OF 2 �� NEW PROJECT ` • NAME OF PROJECT: Surtuner Youth Employment Project COMPONENT NAME: Economt c ADMINISTERING AGENCY: Un i ted Way SUBCONTRACTING AGENCY: Ramsey Action Program Purpose and Beneficiarfas The purpose of this project is to provide summer employment for low incort►e Model Neighborhood youth. This project will conform to the Policies and Guidelines of the City Wide Youth Employment Project for 1973• Content and Operation: l . To provide meaningful work experience to 325 youth 12-21 for eight (8) weeks during the sumner of 1973• 2. 7o provide employment fo� 22 young adults (at least high school graduates) as crew supervisors. • Timetable: This project will commence approximately two weeks after school recesses and continue for eight weeks of the sumner, to end no later than 9/3/73• Funding: $1U0,0U0 of supplemental monies are allocated for this project. No future funding sources have as yet been identified. Project Administration: The project will be administered under the guidelines and policy set by the city Manpower Planning Office and administered by Ramsey Action Program. Coordination: This project will coordinate its activities with the City Wide Youth EmF�ioy- ment P roject for 1973• Monitoring and Evaluation: The City Manpower Planni�g Office and the Model Gities Office will be responsible for monitoring and evaluation of this project. • . Summer Youth Employment Center PAGE 1 OF 2 65 • Citizen Participation: , Input from client--u�ers will be obtained from the Youth Employment Task Force of the Manpower Area Planning Council as well as the Modei Neighborhood Planning Council . Resident Employment: All persons hired on this pro�ect will be residents of the Model Neighborhood Area. Maintenance of Effort: Not applicable. s • PAGE 2 OF 2 ` Summer Youth Employment Prpje�r 6b • PROJECTS BEING TERMINATED PRIOR TO JUNE 1974 TERMINATING SEPTEMBER 30, 1973 l . SUMMER EMPLOYMENT: Being onty a summer activity,� this project terminates in correlation with the beginning of the school term. 2. SUMMIT-UNIVERSITY RECREATION TRAINING PROJECT: Much of this project's activity is scheduled for the summer months. It is scheduled to operate through the summer for that reason in addition to the possibility that the City Departments of Parks and Recreation and Civil Service will , by then, be able to continue it in some form in an ongoing manner. It will terminate at the end of the existing contract. • 3. 606 DROP-IN ASSISTANCE CENTER: Other funding sources are scheduled to continue this project after the expiration of the existing Model Cities contract. TERMINATING AUGUST 31 , 1973 l . AID FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED CITIZENS: Other public and private funding sources are scheduled to continue this project in an ongoing manner after the Model Cities termination date. TERMINATING JUNE 30, 1973 l . MONTESSORI DAY CARE: Continual adminstrative problems caused this project to receive a low priority rating. It was determined to funnel Model Cities day care efforts through the Wilder Day Care Project which has proven to be successful and whose administrating agency is committed to continue its project once Model Cities • phases out. The Model Cities Planners are working with the Montessori 67 • -2' personnel to find alternative funding sources so that the center may continue without Model Cities funds. 2. COMPREHENSIVE CULTURAL PROGRAM: Negotiations never sucess- fully made this project operational under the planned administering agency, the St. Paul Arts and Science Center. Separate contracts for the period March 1 to June 30 were recently signed with each of the operating agencies, the Inner City Youth League and Hallie Q. Brown. The Project received a low priority rating by the MNPC and staff partly because of the contract negotiation problems but also because higher priorities were given to other social concerns. • 3. HOME SCHOOL LIAISON: This project was considered successful enough by the school district so that it will attempt to con- tinue it under other funding for the next school year. Model Cities funding termination coincides with the end of this school year. 4. KINDERGARTEN-SECOND GRADE: Although considered successful in concept, the administration of this project, as well as the coordination and morale of th e staff was far less than desirable. It will also terminate with the termination of this school year. Efforts will continue to urge committment from the school dis- trict for future funding. NOTE: Negotiations between the school district and the CDA staff over these two projects have been almost constant, but the pro- • blems of administration, communication, and staff morale hav� not bU � -3' improved despite the CDA staff efforts. The position of Model Cities Coordinator, as in-kind contribution by the school district, was vacant for much of this projects opera- tion. Although under constant negotiation, contracts remained unsigned during the greater part of the school year. The success of these projects was directly due to the efforts of the individuals hired in the positions of K-2 Aide and H.S. Liaison. TERMINATING MAY 31 , 1973 l . EMPLOYMENT CENTER: Although employment continues to be a priority concern of the MNPC, the high percentage of Model Cities funds spent on the Employment Center did not generate the • additional job and training results which were anticipated. It was decided to request that the administering agency, the State Department of Manpower Services, continue to supply the servic.es the Model Neighborhood which were provided before Model Cities funding assistance began. Because of the short time remaininy in the Model Cities program no alternative employment effort will be designed. Efforts will continue by the MNPC and CDA staff to provide improved employment and training opportunities to Model Neighborhood residents through non-supplementally funded sources. 2. METROPOLITAN TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM (M-TEPS) : This project is planned to end once the payment of spring quarter tuition has been completed for the project beneficiaries. TERMINATING APRIL 30, 1973 • RESIDENT TRAINING PROGRAM (CURA) : A controversial project from 6y • -4- its beginning because of high administrative costs . High expense per individual beneficiary, dissatisfaction with low student committment, and poor reporting response from the pro- ject administration have also been taken into consideration in determining the project's low priority rating. This project has operated under a ninety day contract plus a thirty day extensian and is being allowed to expire at the end of that extension. NON-OPERATING PROJECTS: It was decided to discontinue efforts to implement projects which have not yet become operational . The following projects, despite many meetings and hours of negotiation, • were never resolved to the satisfaction of all involved parties so that contracts could be signed. l . HEADSTART 2. THIRD WORLD COMMUNICATION CENTER • 7U • A SPECIAL ENVIRONMEENTAL ASSESSMENT HUD FORM ECO-3 A. Applicant ; City of St. Paul (3. Project Name and Location: St. Paul Model Cities Social Core Program 1. Health Clinic 270 North Kent Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 2. Senior Citizens Program a. Hallie Q, Brown 270 North Kent, St, Pau1 Minnesota b. Willows Nursing Home 420 Marshall Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 3. Retreat House 532 Ashland Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota • 4. Neighborhood Justice Center St, Paul, Minnesota 5, Wilder Day Care Center 670 Marshall Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 6. Red School House 375 St. Anthony Street, St. Paul, Minnesota C, HUD Program: Model Cities D. HUD Project Number; ME-22-003 i;. The six (6) Social Projects were established to provide residents of the Model Neighborhood Area (MNA) with those social services heretofore not readily available to them and thereby to improve the general quality of life enjoyed by those residents. These six (6) projects shall deliver essential services in the areas of comprehensive health care, 1ega1 aide and counseling, day care, ethnoeducation, and comprehensive geriatric prograumning. F. The six (6) subject projects will not adversely affect any natural systems. The projects will adhere to applicable land-use plans, existing neighborhood densities, and will • not place a burden on the existing infrastructure. 71 • G. The nature of the projects is to improve the quality of life enjoyed by the Model Neighborhood residents: 1. Comprehensive health care at a centrally located, neighborhood clinic facility 2. Comprehensive senior citizens progra�ning to include health care education and recreational opportunities, meals, and social services 3. Day care to develop learning and social skills and 4. The Red School House to provide ethnoeducational experience 5. The Neighborhood Justice Center and 6. The Retreat House to provide legal aide and counseling H. The six (6) projects will enable a more effective use of the human resources of Model Neighborhood residents. Effects • sha11 include a general upgrading of health standards to the level of the City of St. Paul; a decrease of the drop-out rate characteristic of Model Neighborhood children, especially among the American Indian population; more equitable treatment under the law; and more emendatory conditions for residents of the community designated as senior citizens. I. There were no alternatives proposed for the subject projects. The six (6) projects were developed as per the needs determine:d by the citizen participation component of the St. Paul Model Cities program. ,T. The six (6) projects will ameliorate the existing social en- vironment of the Model Neighborhood, and thereby enhance the general quality of life enjoyed by the residents of said area. K. The six (6) projects were initiated, modified, and drafted with the cooperation of the L.P.A. , and the local citizen participation component in a series of public meetings. L. The applicant hereby certifies that the information furnished in this special environmental assessment is true and accurate to the best of his (its) knowledge. . ' �� , 6 �..__��• � �. ` o `, Date May 15, 1973 Signature�,'�_\`��', `,��j�,� �- ` �� , • Title Model Cities Coordinator . 72 • SPECIAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT A. St. Paul Model Cities B. Economic Planning Unit Project: (1) (1) The Local Development Corparation (L.D.C.) C. Mode1 Cities Supplemental Funds ll. ME-22-003 �:. The Economfc Planning Unit of the St. Paul Model Cities Program is proposing one project for the Second Action Year (see B.) The area of eco�omic thrust eovered by this project is: I. Businesa Development The Local Development Corporation - This pro,ject will up-grade the business climate of the Model Neighborhood Area by making available • econanic resources which will increaee the member and quality of the Model Neighborhood Area buaineasee. The project deals with the sxpansion of old and the development af new businessea. The effect of these enterprises cannot be determined at this time and individual environmental assessment statements will accanpany each new venture. F. The project sponaored by the Econotaic Plenning Unit will not adveraely affect any natural systeme. The project will adhere to applicable land-use plane, existing neighborhood densities and will not place a burden on the exieting infra=st'r,ucture. The pro,ject is deaigned to increase the income levels of the Model Neighborhood residents and it is expected that because of this increase in income� the aeathetic 8apecte of the Model Neighborhoori in terms of the general appearance and structural quality of the camnunity will be heightened. C. The nature of the project is to i�prove the quality of life of the Model Neighborhood reeidente. 1. To develop the entrepreneual ekills and to exploit and to take advantage of opportuintiee of private and public agencfes that were not available to residents of the Model Neighborhood. • 73 • H. The project will wnable a more effective use of the Model Neighborhoo3 human resources, improve neighborhood cammunicationa abilities and improve environmental conditions of the cc�amunitq by a lesaening of crime, by heightening beauty and by iatproving the paychological climate of the caimunity. I. There was no alternative propoaed for the subject project. The project was developed as per the neede determined bq the citizen participation. component of the St. Paul Model Cities program. J. The project ia apecifically designed to enhance the quality of the environment through the increase in f�aily ittcome which will buy the environmental and social change necessary to improve community living. K. The project was initiated� modified and drafted with the cooperation of the L.P.A., and the local citizen repreaentative group in a series of public meetinge. 1.. The applicant hereby certifiea that the information furnished in this special environment asaeaement is true and accurate to the best of his �its) knowledge. • 7 a \ 6 �� ' � G : �, Date Ma1r 15� 1973 Signature� o J � ` Title Model Cities Coordinator • 74 • SPECIAL ENUIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT A. St. Paul Model Cities B. Physical Planning Unit Projects (3) � (1) Rehabilitation Loans and Grants Project (2) Demonstration Home Construction Grants Project � (3) Housing Development Corporation Project C. Model Cities Supplemental Funds D. ME-22-003 E. The Physical Planning Unit of the St. Paul Model Cities Program is recommending continuation of the above three Second Action Year Pro- jects (see B) . The Rehabilitation Loans and Grants project and the Demonstration Home project will not take place at one specific site, but rather, will take place at a number of sites. The Rehabilitation project will be used to partially finance the rehabilitation and physical upgrading of existing residential , owner-occupied dwelling units. The Demonstration Home Construction project will offer financial assistance to those who build their new homes in the Model Neighborho�d. • Homes built under this project will conform to all building, zoning and other applicable codes. The Housing Development Corporation project will consist of a staff to assist prospective housing developers. It will be housed in existing office space to be determined at a later date. Any housing which is proposed as a result of this project will be accom- panied, individually, with an Environmental Assessment Statement where applicable. F. The three subject projects will not adversely affect any natural systems. The projects will adhere to applicable land-use plans, existing neigh- borhood densities, and will not place a burden on the existing in- frastructure. All three projects are expected to heighten the aesthetic aspects of the Model Neighborhood in terms of repairing, conserving, and improving, where necessary, the general appearance and structural qualities of the residences. G. The nature of the projects is to improve the quality of the existing environment. The short and long-term benefits of the projects will be to improve existing residential properties in need of repair and to foster the development of new quality housing for area residents. The extent of noise resulting from these projects will be that normally generated during generat residential carpentry work, new home construction, an� clerical office work. H. It is expected that the projects will positively affect the man-made and aesthetic factors of the community; the projects are not expected to • adversely affect the natural environment. The short-term effect during the period of repair or construction-may produce some negative effects such as debris, building materials and delivery traffic; but, this will 75 _2_ • be offset by the long-term positive improvement to homes and the general upgrading of the community. It is expected that no structures listed on, or being considered for nomination to, the National Register of Historic Places will be affected. I . There were no alternatives proposed for the subject projects. The three projects were developed as per the needs determined by the citizen participation component of the St. Paul" Model Cities Program. J. The three p-ojects are specifically designed to enhance the quality of the environment through the rehabilitation of substandard dwetling units and the eventual development of well designed new dwelling units. K. The three projects were initiated, modified and drafted with the coop° eration of the LPA, and the local citizen representative group in a series of public meetings. °,,`,`, � • Date Mey �5, 1973 Signature � a � � ' � , Title Model Cities Coordinator • 76 APPENDIX I . ST. PAUL MODEL CITIES • EXPENDITURES FOR PERIOD 5�1�73 THItU 6�30�74 Terminstioa Total Amoua.t Needed Pro ect Ds,te 5_1 73 - 30 7 Senior Citizens 6-30-7�+ 203,000 r,nc 6-30-7� 2oo,oao HDC 6-30-7� 150,0:�0 Rehab Loans & Grants 6-30-74 5�,�9$ Demo/Home Const. 6-30-7� 45,0p0 xealth Clinic 6_30_7�+ 3�,p7g 606 9-30-73 i5,000 ADD 8-31-73 10,000 • AIM 6-3a7�+ 50,400 wilder 6_3a7� 17�33p Montessori 6-30-?3 5,�00 K-2 6-30-73 18,ot�o Ho�ne School Liaison 6-30-73 4,000 Headstart _ _ bnployment Center 5-31-73 14,p00 s/U xec. & Training 9-3�-?3 i8,335 Suna�er �lo�y�ment - lpp,�pp � 4-30-73 - Retreat 6-3a74 60,200 Neighborhood Justice Center 6-30-74 15,4�0 Third W�rld _ _ • M-Teps 5-31-73 _ 7� • Termiaation Total Amount Aieeded Pro ect Date 5 1 73 - 30 7 Couq�, culture 6-30-73 27,766 Oxford Pool _ _ Sub-Totai 1,353�3�L Citizen Participation 166,6z5 Admin:i.stration 30y,b74 Evaluation 94,�+36 sub-Totai _ 1,920,626 �'Leas City Contribution 31,g02 TOTAL 1,888,'T24 • *City Contribution to cover period froan January 1, 1974 to June 30, 1974 • 79 N, �. ci,v ci..rr+i< Council �l � „ �;�,�N,:�. �ITY OF SAI�TT FALTL � 4� ,,,; ��`E�A�z�,�,�-.�.,, File N0. _._ _u[ —nnnvor2 � y�a ,}��y,p� Q / '' t • � o/ fZi/`�L/`C�", Ordinance N�. r •�_�`� �'-__ _ � � / APPENDIX II . res�d I3y /_' �'-'�7 �- '-� -- ,; ✓ Keferred To _—___._ --- Committee: Date ---- - tlut c( Committee By_ _ Date ----- --- - - -- AN ORDINt1NCE AMENDING ADMINISTRATIVE ORDINANCE RELATING2`�'OCTHE�EXECUTIVEABRANCHDOFUGOVERNMENTZ� Or THE CITY. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL DOES ORDAINo Section 1. That Administrative Ordinance No. 15132, C, F. 258816, as amended, be and the same is hereby further amended by adding the fol.lowin� theretos 1 . 11 Model Cities Program. A. Definitions . As used herein, , • "Model Cities Area" means that area of the City of Saint Paul set out in the map attached hereto and ma.de a part hereof by reference; "Model Neighborhood Planning Council (NINPC)" means the body of citizens established by this resolution; "Model Cities D�stricts" means the subdivisions of th� Model Cities area set out on the map attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference, numbered consecutively from one to six -- ��s provid�d therein; "Adult Voter" means anyone who on the date of the election i_n which he seelcs to vote is eighteen (18) years of age or olc�er, ��i7ci �aho ha.s lived within the Model Cities area and the district �.��.i=hin �aizich he wishes to vote for at least thirty (30) days ; ai1d ('l?C�^�('f(.'�11'::V Requested by Department of: Yc:i:; Nays; iliuit h„n�� ,t;I:� _. _ _____.___._ In Favor ------ ----_.__ __ . _------_____- l,��ru��• M<�r��d�i�, _ Against BY _—_._ __ _ _ ----------- S�,r:ifka ---- A— Tedesco h1mc� .l'res:i�l��nt liuticr . Form Approved y y Att ney t\d�l h� (.'uutic•il: !).tte _ ____.____— — Certiticti Putiscd by Council Secretary, BY — - - -------------._.— � '�'W�.. . ~ �\ "�l ."��` _. __ .._.._._....__._......�_. -_-_. .-_'-_ .'_'_-�. �. _�. . . _ ( •1 b M� ��r: D-xt� ' Appro d by Mayor Submiss:�,i�u ," v Y � ' --._ __- --- � . . .: ,, . -� r . .w,x , _ _ ._ . _ __----- -- __ ° I By -.� .__ __.._�_ __. _- :` t c� ' _ � � �� +�.�� • 2 . "Youth Voter" means anyone who on the date of thc e]_ection in which he seeks to vote is sixteen (16) years of age or older, and who has lived within the Model Cities are�� and the district within which he wishes to vote for at le�.st thirty ( 3C) days . B. Declaration of Po��.ic� The Council of the Ci.ty o£ Sai�i� Paul finds it necessary, ed—siraUle and in the best interests of the Czty to establish a Federal Model Cities Program to carry c�ut a program for Madel Cities area planning and implementation in accordance with Title I of the Demonstration Cities and Metropol - it�n Development Act of 1966 and administered Uy the Unitecl S�atc� Departr.ment of H�using and Urban Development . C. Model Cities �Pro ram_. The Model Cities Program, ��.s escablishe pursuant to-,I`i e I of the Demonstration Citie~ .�iid Nletropolitan Development Act of 1966 to implement the plan for re�.Tit�.lization of the Model Cities area sha.11 be under tlze admiil- istrative supervision of the Mayor. The progra.m shall deve.l�p a comprehensive plan for elimination of blight and for th� overall im�rovement of the quality of life in the Model Cities area. • D. Model Cities Director. The Mayor shall appoint, with the co.zsent o t e Counci , a irector for the Model Cities �Program, �ane srall be in the unclassi.fied service of the City. He sl�zll lie chosen on the basis of his qua.lifications and experience, shall satisfy general qua.lification guidelines adopted by the MNPC, aii�l sh.all have such other qualifications as may be provided Uy ordi_n�ncc, . The Director sha.11 be accountable to the Mayor and sha11 adminis�cr a1_1 programs with respect to the Model Cities area in accordance wi.th the policies established by the Mayor and City Coiincil_ . E. MNPC Created. The MNPC is hereby created as the ze��rc- �entati.ve-T�ody to pTan and assist in carrying out a Mod�l Ci t..:i_c�s I'!-ograrn in accordance with the interests, preferenc�s and neecls <�f the residents of the Model. Cities area and in partnership wi.tlz �_li�_� City. The MNPC shall be composed of thirty (30) elected members, and also, not to exceed eleven (11) at-large members reprc�se�iti�z� ` :::i.�ni.ficant community minority groups and other interests noi� represented among the elected membership. Each elected an�! �ippointed member shall have one vote. The elected members, I�y ,� 'rna.jority vote thereof, sha.11 appoint at-large members . The MNPC shall establish rules and regulations of the conduct of ils r�i1=<�� r� . • � Ut ' ' `,�' �'�'`��C'� � . ��W�° '�.�,r( ? • 3 ' The MNPC sha11 consist of five (5) members elected fron� eaclt of tlie six Model Cities Districts, and sha.11 coiisist of the rcll_owing categories : (1) Youths: One (1) member from each district sha11 be a y-outh. A youth is defined as a natural person between the ag�s of sixteen (16) and twenty (20) , inclusive, as of the date of_ th� election. (2) Adults - S ecial: One member from each distiict shall be elected as��a pecia dult" member. For purposes of t�lis re�olution a Special Adult is a na.tural person twenty-one (21) ye�rs of age or over; whose total family income for the previous c�.l`nd��r year does not exceed the low income maximum public hous- ing occupancy limits set by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Ali such persons ruYining in this category shall be adults and shall submit to the election officials, at the time of their filing th�ir Petition for Candidacy, a written statement of th�ir fami.ly inr_ome and family size. A person who meets the qualific�.r.ioY�s o£ tr � Adult Special category may, at his option, run as an Adult Special candidate or as an Adult General candidate, but no one n�ay • ruri in both categories at once . (3) Adults - General: The rema.ining three members from each d.istrict s e twenty-one (21) grears of age or older, as of ti,e date of the election. F. Terms of Office. All elected and appointed members of thc MNPC s a serve or a term of two (2) years and until their successors ha.ve been duly elected and sworn in; provided, however, that at the election to be held in June, 1973 the Youth member r�nc �he Adult-Special member elected in each district shall t�e �lected to a one-year term. In the case of vacancy, any N1NPC tr,�;uber who has filled a vacant seat shall serve for the r_�maincler o.� �he unexpired term of the member he has replaced. Ther� shall be no limit on i:he number of consecutive terms which an individual e�ay s e rve on the �PC. G. NINPC - Powers and Duties. The NIlVPC shall have the f oll �w- ir�g �owers an uties: (1) Shall hire and fire MIVPC staff as may be provided l.o th� MNPC by the City Council. (2) Be the principa.l advisory body to the Mayor and City Council, representing the Model Neighborhood community. � . t32 - . � � : . . �� • 4. (3) Identify problems of the Model Cities area, establish I�riorities for correcting the problems, institute proposals and d�velop project concepts within the Model Cities Program guide- lines . (4) Review and make recommendations to the Ma.yor relating to all plans, programs, projects and budgets included in each anr,ual Model Cities Action Plan, including supplements thereto, and also make recommendations concern�ng evalua.ti.on reports pre- sented by the Director prior to submission thereof_ to the Mayor. ' The Mayor sha11 submit his proposed Action Year Plan to the Coun- cil to;ether with all comments and recommendations submitted by the MN�?C. In preparing each Action Year Plan the May°or shall attem��t to include all recommendations made by the MNPC. �5) Receive and review quarterly reports on the activities of th� MNPC as prepared by the Director. (6� Maintain complete and accurate minutes o'" its meetings o�� file with the City Clerk and Director� • (7) A.dopt such procedures as it may consider necessary for the effective performance of its duties . (8) Create appropriate committees for the carrying out o£ their responsibilities . (9) Review, upon r�quest of the Mayor �nd Council , any pal- ic-_y recon�nendations ha.ving an impact on the Model Neighborhood community. (10) Provide to the Mayor and Director informa.tion rel��.tiizg t.� the interests of the Model Cities area. (11) Any other powers and duties tha.t ma.y be lawtull.y del- egated from time to time ta the MNPC by the Ma.yor and City Council . (12) 'The MNPC shall submit an annual report of its ac �iv- i_ti.es to the Director, Mayor and City Council on or before the f_i r s t day of Janua.ry of each year. H. Election Procedures. (1) The following procedur� sha.11 be used �.n the election of inembers of the MNPC. The election of the first members c�i� t.k�� NiNi�C shall. take pl.ace the fourth Saturday in Jurre, 1973, ��ct annual_1.y thereafter. Members o� the MNPC sha17 ttzl:e alf i.cc:: ri��c,�► � � A �3 f e,�-,��_- , , . .. - . . .r�Y.:'► . • 5 . the certification of their election by the Election Committee 3I1C� shall hold office until a successor is selected and qualities . (2) The Election Committee, as defined in Subdivision 6, sh�_tl_1 designate a clerk of elections . The clerk sha.11 bring and �n�ilcc available nominating petitions . In order for a candidate ' s r��n►c to appear on the hallot, he must return the com leted nom-- i��:�ting petition to the clerk no later tha.n three (3� weeks licForc tlze day of the election. The clerk sha.11 arbitrate dis- I�utcs over Lhe acceptability of any nomina.ting petition. Any nomi.natin� petition not rejected by the clerk by notice ma.iled to the candidate witliin forty-eight (48) hours after submission thereof shall be conclusively presumed to be valid. (3j All candidates regardless of their category shall be resid��nts of the Mode1 Cities area and of the district they wish to represent. �4) Any natural person may be a candidate f or his district upan; (a) meeting the requirements of the category in which he ch�:oses to run; (b) submission of a nomina.tin petition to the • clerk bearing the signa.tures of at least �.en �10) persons who would be eli�ible to vote for him in the ,district in which the person is seeking office. (S) No later tha.n three (3) weeks before the date upon wli;_ch the election is to be held, each candidate may submit to the cl.erlc a biography not to exceed seventy-five (75) words, and a picture of himself. The clerk shall arrange for such biographzes �3nd, iF practicable, the pictures to be distributed in a manner cicsi�ncd to obtain the widest possible exposure while treating a i. l c�andidates equally. Ar le::�.st two weeks prior to the e i_ection th. �lerk shall make avai�.able to the candidate, for his own use, one �housand (1,000) copies of said candidate' s biography. A ca;iciidate may car�paign by (a) �assing out eopies of the bic�graphy �;iven to him Uy the clerk, and (b) word of mouth calnpaigning. Tklere shall be no expenditure of ntoney by or on behalf of any c,�ndidate for his campaign. The MNPC shall refi:,.se to seat any c�ndidate knowingly violating these rules. (6) The polling in the election to the NINPC sha.11 be con- c.lucted under the supervision of an Elections Committee composed of one representative chosen by the MNPC from persons other than it,s own members, one representative chosen by the Mayor, and the City Clerk as chairnian. Except as provided here�.n, and except there shall be no party designation of candidates or voters, all • polling sha.11 be conducted in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, . gy - ' ��°�5�; � . . . ��. . �' 3 • 6. Sections 203. 12, 203. 13, 203. 14, 203 .18, 203.22, 204.04, 204. Ob, 2U4. 13, 204. 14, 204. 16, 204. 17, and 204.22, which are hereby ' incorporated herein by reference, and such further rules not iiiconsistent herewith as the Committee sha.11 impose, to include s�ich proof of eligibility to vote as the Committee sha.11 determine . A complete statement of all rules governing polling shall be r�ade Public by the Committee at least one week prior to the electian, �3nd posted in a prominent position in each polling place. (7) If a voter because of a physical disability cannot go to the polling place to vote, said voter ma.y in writing apply to the Election Committee for an absentee ballot. The application for an absentee ballot sha.11 include the voter's name, address, age aiid the physical disability. The application sha.11 be sub- r�itted to the Election Commi�:tee any time prior to the day of e) ection. Tr�� Election Committee sha].1 determine who is eligible .for au absentee ballot. The Election Committee sha.11 have the duty to see that each eligible person requesting an absentee ballot �hall rec�ive a ballot and that the absentee ballot is • counted. In order to be valid, an absentee ba.11ot must be post- marked or delivered to the Election Cp�attittee on o� before the day oi election. - (8) Separate ballots shall be printed in different colors f or euch category (e.g. , "Youth", "Adult-Special" and "Ad�alt- Geiieral ) . The ballots sha.11 contain the na�e and address of each canc'_idate arranged in alphabetical order. (9) The election of inembers .o the MNPC sha.11 be held or.. the faurth Saturday in Ju,ne, 1973 and annually thereafter. The polling places shall rema.in open from 8:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. 'Th� Clerk of Elections sha.11 select a polling place withi.n each of the si.x (6) districts in the Model Cities Neighborhood. If a ciiStLi.ct contains a polling place used in regu�iar elections, the Clerk sha11 designate that polling place to be used in the ?�I�del Cities election. If a district contains more tha.n one regular polling place, or if the district does not contain a regular polling place, the Clerk shall designa.te a polling place conveniently located within or adjacent to said district. (10) Each adult voter may cast up to three (3) votes for three candidates running in the "General Adult" category and one (1) vote for one (1) candidate running in the "S ecial Adult" category. Youths ma.y cast one (1) vote for one (Z) candidate • rwining in the "Youth" category. A voter may in any event cast only one (1) vote for any one candidate, including write-in votes, . g5 � � �`��"�� ' . t�'•.s: '�" � 7. ii any. When the votes from each Model Cities district have been counted, the Election Committee shall p�epare for each Model �ities district a list of all the candidates whose na.mes appearecl or� the Uallot . The names of the candidates sha.11 appear on t11is li.st: in the order of the total votes received by each, the crindidate ha.ving the highest total being listed first. The top thr.ee candidates in the "General Adult" category shall be declared clected, the top candidate in the "Special Adult" category shall k�e cieclared elected, and the top candidate in the "Youth" cate- gory shall be declared elected. In the case of a tie a flip of a coin shall determine who is elected. The Election Committee shall retain the lists fo� the purpose of filling vacancies in accordance with Article VI, Section l, of this resolution. ( 11) All election costs sha.11 be paid out of Model Cities i un.d s . (12) In the event that insufficient candidates file to fill tl��e available seats on the MNPC or, in the event of a vacancy, if rio othc�r persons are available from the elections list referred • to above, the sE�at shall rema.in vacant until the next electior� or, at its option, the MNP� may call a special election to occur ne less than one month from the date of the election call. No special election sha.11 be called if fewer tha.n six months would elapsE� between the date of the special election and the date of the next general election. Special elections sha.11 be conducted according to the same polling procedures use� in general elections . T . VacaY cy. If the seat of any member of the MNPC shall become vacant 1_T1 any manner, the £inal list prepared by the Election Coi�nitt�e fc�r the district from which the vacancy occurred sha.11 be used for. £il_:�ing t'ze vacancy. '�he f.irst �lterna.te in the category iii which �here is a vacancy sha.11 fill the first vacancy, and so Ie�rth. In the case of a tie, the fli� of a coin shall determine �t�o is the fi.rst alterna.te. ' A seat on the MNPC sha.11 become vacant if: (a) a member ciic�s, (b) a member. submits a written resignation, (c) a member i� recalled by his constituents as provided herein, (d) a member is exPelled Uy the other members of the NIlVPC, or (e) a member n�oves from the Model Cities area. A seat on the MNPC shall become vacant if a .member is re- called by the voters in his district. The Recall Petition must be � � . 86 , . �G.iJl. ��, '' � �: /`�'-�� , � � $. �igned by a number of voters equalling or exceeding 25% of the total votes cast in the district in �'he last election. There- after, a special election in the affected Model Ci�ies District n�ust be called by the MNPC within thirty (30) days after the fi.rst Saturday on which the MNPC ha.s in its possession the Recall Peti_tion. If at the special election at least 2/3 of the votes cast favor the member' s recall, he sha.11 be recalled from the MNPC and his seat declared vacant; provided, however, that if the numUer of votes cast in favor of recall does not exceed 50% of the total votes cast in the affected district in the last election, he sha11 not be recalled. A member of the MNPC ma:y be expelled by the other members of the MNPC in the following ma,nner: (a) A petition, signed by at l �ast sixteen (16) members of the MNPC, must be submitted at a rt�gular MNPC meeting, to the members who are nresent at the meeting. Notification of the submission of such a petition must be �;iven to all members of the MNPC who are not present at the meetin�. Such petition shall state the complaints or cha.rges a�ainst the member named. Complaints or charges sufficient for • �xpulsion must involve gross neglect of" duty, c?r gross ma.lfeasance in office . The petition must specifically identify the act or a�::ts upun which the complai.nt or charge is bas,ed. (b) No sooner than two weeks nor more tha.n four weeks after Lhe first delivery of the petition, the members of MNPC shall conduct a full and fair hearing upon the complaint or cha.rge. At such hearing, the accused member sha.11 bE afforded an opportunity to be heard, and may be represented by counsel. If a majority of the members present at the close of the hearing vc.�e to dismiss the petitio.i, the petition sha.11 be dis�nissc�d. If the petztian is not dismisse�i, the MNPC will convene no sooner tha.n a week, and no later tha.n two weeks after the hearing. At this meeting, tl-e MNPC members by a 'Z/3 vote may determine that the member be e.�:pellec?. Should this occur, the sEat sha.11 be declared vacant. Sec.tion 2 . That Cha.pter 65 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code be and i�h� sacne is hereby rescinded in its entirety. � , 87 PiNK. � yfi�NANG-E �� - �.Ol1IIC21 - CANAHV -• OEPARTtdENT� ' �" � A�uF � -- �,�:-oR ITY 4F AINT AuL �ile N0. ' r"��-'1 , - , , , . . , ��/ !'re�icd 13y ._ ' __ .----- E2efc�rr�,d `lb ___.__.____,_ — Committee: Date __,---- -- Out af Committee By__ _.__ Date -- -- 9 . . Section 3. This ordinance sha.11 take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its pa.ssage, approval and publication. � C'nUNCILh1E1V Requested'by Department of: Ye.�>; Nays �F{rt�1_.. - t:��r,�,��t.k� — In Favor -------- - I,e.•vin�� A1cr�_��iith �, �_ Against BY -.-------_—�__ �RvedCe T'edesco �C� �+ Mmc.I'residcnt t3uticr G � v �� ' Ado �le•d bv Council: Uate _�_—.__. Fotm,Approve by ty Atto ey C'e •d ,ed by Coux�-S y / Hy i .!�s�'"�'' c��'C ' E�Y -- �-t --- \ Ap�ruve b,y Mayo . pate — App;oved'by Mayor for Submission to Council 88 By _ � By _�.r_ nnn�i�e�rn CCD A A 147� APPENDIX I { I . CDA STAFF OUTLINE • Positions Assigned to City Departments GRANTS-IN-AID: Model Cities Coordinator Assistant Coordinator Evaluation Director fvaluation Coordinators (3) Monitoring Technicians (2) Secretary Clerk Typist CITY PLANNING : Economic Planner Social Planner Assistant Social Planner (2) Assistant Community Organizer Typist HRA : Project Coordinator Planning Assistant • MANPOWER : Economic Planner - Manpower Clerk Typist CRIMINAL JUSTICE : Project Coordinator CONSUMER AFFAIRS : Planning Assistant FINANCE � Accountants (2) Accounting Clerk Clerk Typist CIVIL SERVICE � Civil Service Liaison • tig . . . z w • ~ � J � �'- '"� W' U a F- U c� Z W N C..) � W ►-� O � N �y U � ` �... J ►-r - V > � • U � _ � N � W ►-+ N ` � Q i� l� Q • � Q U ` U � L�. J . tL Q Z U ~ �--� r-� N 0 _.i !-- p � N � N Q _ � � rW-+O U '7 V V 00 r~+Q • 3 _ U U� . O -� ��-+ Z W� � � JQ fU W � �. � p p. � 1-- � } Z � N �""� � � f•+ � V C..) Z � Q LL. � Q � F-- N = Q 0 L) � • O Q � � O V� � Q � �- r-Z-� � � G F- Z LL- � � � • . Q a U J F- z d � � Q N 0 � U Z � Q oG , . C7 M n 9U a. c i , ' :s \ �"�M • CITIZEN PARTICIPATION STAFF OUTLINE Title of Position: Neighborhood Resource Coordinator Community Organizer Public Information Specialist Task Force Developer Reporter-Photographer Resident Planners (4) Executive Secretary (MNPC) • Core Secretary Receptionist Janitor (part-time) • 91 • N W O ]L W C.,) N U J Q OC J ta_ C� F—O � Q �,,,,� V � N � � � N c,� _ r 0 O Z a. F-- � � C� _ N N H Z w O .-. N w � r--I �� o ¢I Z o � o � o �O W = � c.7 � YN � m ►-+ U r N� O 3� Q �a J U m O� � � � U F-- � _ ---i I N ° c� �� .� W � U� d� Z� J �I W 0 0 N N saJ CG W � av � c.� z � I.L .J p N � � � 0 � ]G W ¢ ~ ' p W N C� � � � V O a � • �� V F- O ►V-� LL I � I li Z � O . Q U Q �- W � N U 92 ' °� APPENDIX lV. ;`;'y,�:�'�, '`'f DEPARTP�1ENT OF HOUSIhG AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT `, , i� �'; � MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL AREA OFFICE c� ir I,�� ,:G y} n � yi:�{y�� Gh'IGGS—MIDWAY BUILDING, 1821 UNIVERSITY AVENUE � ��i,�� a° ST. PAUL MINNESOTA 55104 �';r.�in N�` . � .. MAR ti ;. ��/3 . �.:�,��,� � !1 ��c:S ll:�ck,�r 1'riv� C.�{:�r,��;n, I:!innic o0ci0n IN F2F_PLY kEFER TO: � F ionorab�e La��rrence Cohen � Nia;,�or of St. Pau]_ , 347 City FIall Si�. FaLiL, P�lisinesota 55102 � ;" ; I�e�- P�.ayor Cohen: :I am pleased to confinn the telegraphic announcement of Rcgional ncim�_nistxator C�orcre J. Vavou].is that you will be �ermitted to re tain all of. your curreritly available Nbdel Cities fLmds to continue yotir program through Jime 30, 1974 if you so desire. It is anticiputed that ttie Lme�.ndzcl fLmds remaining from your c�.trrent action year all.ocatian wi.11 provide sufficient resources for you to continue at a :r.ate of s�nding approximating that previously established in your proc�-am. To cletexmisie the appropriate funding level ft�r each city in the Region, �:�n analysis was made of the perfornti-ulce of each ci.ty throughout -the Life of its N�del Cities effort, including an examinatican of ear.-zyover kk�lances avai.lable at the end of eac11 action year•, the 1P�gth of each • action year, the demonstrated ability of each city to reprogram fi.�^zds f.ra�n ti�successful to operational projects, and the amoLmt o�` funds availGbl� from the curreizt action year allocation. P�ithin the limits of the funds available, we enaourage you to ��or}� aut the method of transition m�st suitable to your progr�n. We will not c�ct or require that all ftmds be �xp��ded by July l, 1974 if �°our. transition plan should call for a rrore gradual phasing into C�rnmity Developrn�nt P.evenue 5haring. Conversely, should you choose you may c�penu all �tmds by any point prior to Jtme 30, 1974. Since it is cui�].C.��tr�.�t t.iZcz� yOLlr j'�.rc1l7S1t1.0:1 S�'cZ.�'..�..y'y W�l�. ..�`J° 1'�f�...°.t:.•�''.r,•7 ±n a crrant budget substantially different from that naca approved by this ikpart�nent, a revised grant budget should be subac�.itted to this Office no later than 90 days from the date of this letter. This budget slzou7_c� be supported by a narrative statement describing your tr�-uzsition �L-rateyy, lunited to the level of detail called for in Planned Variations �:�ibrnissions as described in Assistant Secretary Floyd Hyde's memQr-�ndtun oC F'e��ry 23, 1972 entitled "Submission and Review of Projec.t Infor- mat�ion in Planned Variations City-Wide Model Cities Programs." For your conv�n�.ience I hav� enclosed a eopy of this m�morandlun. f� `> • 93 • ^2 • 7�l.though we are determined to permit maxinamn flexibility t;o you dwriYig this transitican, let me e�hasize that basic program requ.irements ' remain �n effect. I would like to particularly highlight two areas of oantinuing concern. �he maintenance of an adeqiaate administrative capability, includ9ng on-going nnnitoring and evaluation, is an essential element of a successful transition strategy. Such capacity will permit you to make maxumnn use of fimds now avai.lable, and to strengthen your ability to manage Gcs�mtmity Developm�tit Revenu�e sharing. In addition, the delegati� of responsibility to local officials in �he develo�e►tent of an effective transition strategy of course includes the continued inwlverrent of your local citizen pazticipation organizatidn in the decisian-making prooess. Locally established procedures im�le- menting this process are ea�ected to resnain in effect as your strategy is developed and thmughput its implem�ntati�. My staff stands ready to assist you as you effect your strategy during the caming m�nths. As ad.ditional infozmation regarding procedures to be used during this period becoanes available, we will transmit it ta you at the earliest possib].e moqrnnt. - 5incerel.y, • Thomas T. Feeney Area Director Enclosure cc: ,..�....a.... a , C�.1A Director C�.irman Citizen Participatiari Organization :� , } • 94 (i 1 't'`,' (> 1' �`+.t I \ '1' � �_� I' i, � ', ,,� . ' , `, c�►-i�tc,i: <►t' 'r�t �: �t .»•<>�: . '\ `�`( ' . . � � � � June 11, 1973 :., _ - �•` ,..� ..-°_ 1..��•�ri:xc,i: 1). (;u��i:x �Inv��ir Mr. Thomas J. Feeney, Director IiUD F�rea �ffice Gri�;gs htidc�aay 1�uildinF 1821 Urii.ver�ity Atienue Sairit I'aul , P7inn�sota 55104 D�ar M.r. F�eney: . �UUJL'CT: Tlociel Cities Managemcnt Plan In �.�esper�se to your letter of May 22 , 1973 , requesting a viabs_e pl.an for the r.i��nagemFZ�t af the Saint Paul. Mad�l Ci.ties Pro�;r.�m �t1ir.�C)llti?,1; �.•�s �t�cx�m:i.nt�..�t.ion in June of 1974 , � submit to you �Gl�e f.�t��.��,ai.r,�; ��e��c;r�t:. Iix�cken i.nto the four g�neral areas of CC.`T)Cf-.'.x�n � w:a:ic1� ar�c: ��:pressed in ,y*our letter, I believe it �i�ti�c�r�� -�� all. �:)lc �;uidel:ines �at�i.ch are st�ted in CDA letter 10A. Because of the restz�ucturing of ca.ty government itself into a. more sophisticated system many new processes have not y�t b�come forri�alzzed and some not yet even determined. For exactly tl:;.s rc,.iscn i�t is rnost in►};a.rtant to have the Model Cities persozinel involved ari �� daily i�asis with the development of these ne.�a s�t��^ucturPS so that the Model Cities eyperience can be inciucied in t1�,e decisions and actions which will set the precedent fcr the Saint Yaul of the future. The rtc�del Cities non-programmatic, including ad�niz�istration and ci�t:i.ren participatiori, and programmatic components sliall e��ch continue througl��out the termination of Model Cities, bLit witli a constantl.y �reater emphasis on transi-l-ion into newly develcping; or�f*ain�; systems . Mode1 Cities will have my continued suppor.t to sec� t:liat -th� :1_essons learned and �the �ervices needed are nct l�s� b�it: <3re , z�i.:tead, �xpanded into other areas and operations of -klie citV . � You may wish �to review the "701" submission, �ahich has recently 1�een rc:ccived in ycur office, �n conjuiiction with the P1ode1 �.ities 1zev:ised �ul�missi.or , and fihis more detailed enclosure in ox��r. to � � ,:r;,� ..,,z 95 i;r. Thomas J. ��°r�ney � Jux�c 11 , 1°73 �� Pa�e 2 befiter� understand t�heir interrelationships . If I can b� of fui�ther assistance in clarifyin� any aciditional questions , please cal l OIl me . Wc: loo}: fc�rwarci to your revi.ew and approval of both the abov� rnentioncc] ��ubm?.ss�ians . Sincere.ly, f-�r . L!-�ti t� CE U. C HEN � Mayor I�DC: 'lmp enc�losurc :�1i�. Fa,r�n?: D. r`.a,.r�;i-l-es:l:Li � � i�1r. ti�JilJ.i�::1T1 (::n:l.lins rir. l�obc�a�t }lickman i , • 9b S � . P A U L M 0 D E L C t T I E S M A N A G E M E N T P L A N �une 8, 1973 � RELATIONSHIP TO THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND LOCAL (30VERNING BODY The St. Paul Model Cities Program remains directly under the Office of the Mayor. Although the position of Director has been abolished the positions of Model Cities Coordina+:or and Assistant Coordinator hav,e been established. These positions have been filled by upgrading personnel from within the CDA. These positions have the di�ect support of and access to the Mayor. The Mayor was instrumental in creating and filling these positions and has supported th� Model Cities administra.tive staff in clarifyin� their re- lationshin with other city departments. The Mayor has ea-- pressed his committment to phase into the city the lessons Iearned from Model C3ties and ha.s shared this committment • with the newly appointed City Administrator as well as other city offices. The Planning Department, as it develops, wi11 become the comprehensive implementing arm of the city in relation to planning, coordinating, and evalvating both publicly and privately administered pro,jects and their interrelation- ships. Through the newly appointed Planning Coordinator, who is also directly responsible to the Mayor, a much more comprehensive and coordinated city-wide planning effort wi12 be accomplished. Ongoing mana�ement of Model Cities pro�ects, as welZ as the extensive community and program � planning experience which Model C3ties represents, will be tied into city planning and management activities as ovt- lined in the city's Overall Program Design �OPD� wherever a direct functional relationship is identified. The Maycr, being responsible for both programs , will. insure that this • is accomplished, as it is the expressed intent of the Mayor, as we11 as the City Administrator and the Planning Coordin- ator, that the phase out of Model Cities as a separate pro�tram with its own identity be accomplished throu�h in- 97 2 . • tegration of Model Citiea program planning and manageraent with city planning and management activities. The City Council has shown support for the success of Mode] Cit3es, The President has called Council meetings specifically to be well informed on Model Cities actions and transi.tion priorities. A good rapport between the City Councii. and the CDA staff is anticipated. With the staff now more physicai.ly convenient a greater interaction rrocess has already begun. The recently estab?ished Joint Planning and Coordinating Action Unit is a committee representing both pub�.ic and private service provider agencie�. It has been charged with the task of reviewing and establishin� priorities among soci.al service programs affected by the many recent • federal funding and a.ction constraints. The Mayor ap- pointed a representative of the Model Neighborhood Planning Council to that committee, Most of the continuin� programs under Model Cities fall in the planning program category "Hvman Resources" (OPD category 0900� . A representative group will be designated t� �uide human resovrces pla.nnin� a.ctivities and continue the functions of the present Joint Planning� and Coordin- ating Action Unit. The nature and make-up of this group has not yet been determined, but whatever technical and/oz� citizens' advisory groups are estab�.ished for human re- so��rce prann3.ng will inc]Ude representation from the Mods� Cities Program. • 98 3. � RELATIONSHIP OF PIIBLIC AND PRIVATE AGENCIES The development of transition strategies is a primary activity in many facets of today�s St. Paul City govern- ment. With the new city charter as the oratline, the City CoUnci.l has been deeply involved in the deve�.opment of im�lementing ordinances. A more simplified departmental framework and the newly anpointed position of City Admin- istrat�r set the base for a more organizationally coord- inated city governmenta? structure. The City Administra- tor and the directors of these more comprehensive depart- ments are engaged in drawing up workabl..e programs and more efficient f].ow processes, The Planning Department has recently submitted the Overa.11 Pl.annin� Desi.gn, as application for 701 assistance, to • HUD and is awaiting response. Addressed to the need for greatly increased plannin� coordination among city depart- ments, public and priva.te a�encies in St. Paul and Ramsey County, and various other governmental units, it will in- troduce unified city-wide coordination of components such as social service planning, citizen participation, and evaluation. As a macrocosm of the Model Cities process the Plannin� Department has the most to benefit from ths experience of the Model Cit3es staff. The experience of the personnel from both the planning and evaluation com- nonents of the CDA will also be of benefit during the development of a centralized policy formUlation process. The Model Cities Coordinator, with assistance from the Office of the Mayor if necessary, will insUre that Model Cities experiences are included and vtilized in the fur�her development and implementation of the Overall Planning • Design (OPD� includin� the city evaZuation capability. The Citi.zen Partici.pation component of the Planr�.in� De- partment and whatever citizens' structure is finally 99 �. • designated to replace the previously mentioned Joint Planning and Coordinatin� Action Unit shall have direct citizen representation from the Model Neighborhood. The newly ooerational Office of Consumer Affairs has one Mode) Cities person assigned to it. He was immediately included and has been active in the development of that fvnction, includin� the opening and staffing of a branch operation with;n the Model Nei�hborhood. The city-covnty offices of Manpower Planning and of Crim- ina.1. Justj.ce each have ModeZ Cities staff assigned tn them. Already serving county-wide coordinating functions, but aleo with active concern about the Model Neighborhood, these offices immediately began utilizing the special capa� • bilities of their Model Cities staff and included them in the area wide planning process, thereby each person bene- fiting from the knowledge and eaperience of the others. The Department of Manpower Plannin� is unique in that its director was past Deputy Director of Model Cities. Another emnloyee, breviousZy on loan to Model Cities from the Min- nesota Deoartment of Manpower Services, is also knowledge- able of the Mode? .Cities concept and pro�jects. Again the Mode? Cities lessona are on their way to being used in city and county-wide activities and planning. fI�t�s3.ng deve7opment represents a ma3or portion of the pro- jected Mode' Cfties activity, and the Overall Pro�ram De- si�n (OPD) 7ndicates a ma�jor emphasis on housing planning f�r the City, An appropriate person wi)_1 be appointed to serve on the Technica) Advisory Committee for Housing. • (The Technical Advisory Committee represents a primary mean far integration of planning with departmental and a�ency activities in various fvnctional areas. ) Model. 100 5. � Cities experience in housing planning and pro�ra.m develop- ment wi21 be drawn upon wherever relevant. Support for all on�oin� programs will be considered in resource all�- cation planning for the 1974-1975 program year with a view toward meeting ob�ectives determined on a city-wide basis while not ignoring previous commitments or encour- aging diseconomies by abandoning existing pro�rams serving usef�al ends. Two Mode? Cities personnel are assigned to the Summit- University (Model Neighborhood� Community Office of the St. Pavl Housin� and Redevelopment Authority. They wi1:1 conti.nue to work for the success of the ongoing Model Cities pro,jects related to housin� and will also be in- volved in the sUCCessful transition of these concepts into other funding methods. • • 101 6. • PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION, COORDINATION, AND EVALUATION The Second Aetion Year Revised Submission is based upon the fo2lowing criteria for ongoing pro�jects: 1. Successfvl pro�jects which can smoothly continue ta show a high rate of effectiveness. 2. New pro,jects which anticipate quick and effective start-up and meaningful oUtput within one year. 3. Pro�ject em.phasis in a main area of social, economic, or physical concern. 4. Pro�jects which are svccessfu2 concepts and have the most likelihood of being phased into another fursdin� source in 197�. and for pro,jects being phased out : 1. Pro�ect�s with extremely difficult or unsuccessful • operationaZ or administrative negotiations. 2. Pro,jects which could quickly find other funding sources. 3. Pro,jects given Iow MNPC priority rating. 4. Pro�jects duplicating� simi.lar ongoing activities. The Pro,ject priorities automatically set the time pattern for implementation, being tha.t pro,jects already ongoing or perceived to be quickly and effectively operational were the ones chosen to be continued. The Model Cities Coordina.tor, appropriate Evalua.tion Coordinator, and Accountant each will be required to sign off on a7.1 reimbursements to operating agencies, thereby ins�arin� that pro,jects continue qvality performance wj.thi.n the confines of their "scope" and budget. • BecaUSe most of the ongoing Model Cities pro,jects wi?1 eventvally fa11 under the responsibility of the Planning Department , the Mode7. Cities Coordinator and Planning Co- 102 �. � ordinator will together, now and throu�hout the next ye�x, determine the best use of the Model Cities Planning and Evaluation staff. These determinations will be based b�th on the betterment of the Model Neighborhood and on the skill development of those personnel in relation to the Overall. Program Design. Two Pro�ject Monitor positions have been created on the CDA staff and are now filled. These indiv3dvals will be in continuot�s an-site contact with pro,ject operation and beneficiaries. They will assi�t the Evaluation Coordin- ators i_n comp� �.in� data for pro,ject and program e�raluations. Ongoing evaluation of Model Cities pro�ects wiZl continue throvghout the program. It will not only be directed at prn,ject operation in relation to the scope of services, but pro�jects wi].Z be looked at in relation to similar • pro,jects in other parts of the city, thereby grooming them for top priority status in competition for other funding sources. Program evaluation wil.l also be included. Progra.m effect wi11 be evaZuated as it relates to the development of city-wi.de citizen participation, comprehensive planning, and eval.vatj.on processes. • 103 8. • STAFF ADEQUACY AND AUTHORITY The crea.tian of the Mode1 Cities Coordinator and Assis- tant Coordinator positions wil2 provide continvous survei�- lance, direction, and coordination throughout the remaining year of the ModeJ Cities Program. Attached is a copy of the function statement which was presented to the Mayor, at his reqvest , from the Office of Gra.nts-in-Aid previous to the creat.� on of these two pos3tions (see attached memo� . The b4�de� Cities Coordinator is now, with the support of the Offi.ce �f the Mayor, nego�iating rea�istic salariss for six personne.2 who have e3ther ha.d a recent salary re- duction or are now working in a more responsibi.e ,job cate- gory. Positive resolvement of this issue wi11 a11ow ade- • quate �job slots and personnel to satisfactoril.y follow through the Model. Cities transition process. Because the certification and sal.ar3es of the CDA staff and of city operated oro�ect staff a.re sti21 a concern, the M�de1 Cities Coordinator wiZl continue to work i.n cl.ose association with the Affirmative Action staff with�.n the Department of Human Rights and with the Civil Servioe Denartment so that no acceptabl.y performing staff are ?.ost to the city because of transition processes. For the remaining year the Model Cities staff assignmen�s will continue to be determined and coordinated by the ModeI Cities Coordinator, even though these individuals are assigned to the supervision of other city offices. The 3.ntention is not to remove these personnel from Model Cit�es related assignments but , instead, to give them • more insight into c3ty-wide probleras and processes, thereby allowjn� them to be most effective in the long ran�e benefit t� the Mode? Neighborhood while simultaneousZy developing� and en.lar�3n� their ot�m �job experiences and knowl.edge. lU4 9. � The city at la.rge, aa well as the Model Neighborhood, should benefit by having these individuals involved in city-wide planning and pro,ject development. These benefits wi11 come about only if the offices to which the staff are assigried are cognizant of, respect , and vtilize the unique and valuable experiences and knowledge of these individuals. Some offices have im� mediately realized this interaction potential and havr� positive output evidence of its effects. OtYier offices will take longer. Providing individual staff, within their specific depart� ment, enough authority to share those lessons learned throvgh the Model Cities process, so that city depart- ments do not have to wastefully re-learn them will re- • quire perseverance and constant interaction of the part of the Model Cities Coordinators and intercession by the Office of the Mayor if necessary. But , without the staff phy�ically located within those departments it would be Unlikely to happen at all , given the general attitude about the Model Cities Prograra. The Citizen Participation staff, located at the 165 DaZe Street Office within the Model Neighborhood, are as yat under the direction of the Model Gities Coordinator. Once the contract is signed for the Citizen Participation L1nit Pro,ject , these staff wi]1 be directly responsible to the MNPC, the incorporated and elected resident body representin� the Model Neighborhood. • i05 �o. � Because the city-wide citizen participation structure has not yet been agreed upon, it cannot at this ti�e be known how the Model Cities Citizen Participation staff or citi- zen organization will phase into that potentially correl- ated city-��ide concept. The Model Cities Coordinator has al.ready been in contact with the Community Organi- zation Director, who has recently been hired under th� Office of City Planning, and will continue to work closely with him in relation to citizen participation, program emphasis, and sta.ff direction. • • 106 ; , , (iI7'l' <� l'' �.� i \'1' ��.1ii i. "' \ . ;� ' `\ . �►1•1"1(11: l/l" '1'lll: �I.�l'O1� . i ` •• ` i '� . . �< � • ". . l..�wt:�:�ci�: ll. (�c►t�i:x ?Iw��iu Memcrandum To: Mayor Lawrence D. Co�en 1. • rrom: William Q. Patton(nd Richard J. Thorpe�`� � Subject: Coordination of Model Cities Rransition Uate: April 6, 1973 As � result of our meeting with you Wednesday, April 4, we have thoroughly discussed thc Lurtl�er direction .of the Model Cities Program in terms of administration and coordination needs. We fecl that the following needs must be met: • 1. Effective use of the remaining Model Cities funds, This includes: a. Entering into continuing contracts reflecting the priorities that have been agreed upon. b. Termination of projects to be phased out. c. Negotiation with agencies, city departments, and the Model Neighbor- hood Planning Council relating to foregoing contracts. d. Coordination relating to legal and budgetary aspects of these projects contracts. 2. To provide to the Model Neighborhood Community information about new develop- ments in community programs and to interpret to them their role in the transition from the Model Cities Program to Coromunity Development Revenue Sharing. 3. To serve as liaison between the Model Neighborhood Community and city govern- ment in relationship to community problems. Tl�e foreboing describes in general terms the basic future needs. It will be apparent �a anyone who is familiar with the Model Cities Program that there are, in addition, many other challenging responsibilities inherent in these general atatements of need. • 107 '+M�i►�2'L