The URL can be used to link to this page

264176 WHITE - CITV CLERK ^�� PINK - FINANCE GITY OF SAINT PAIIL Council � CANARY -�JEPARTMENT BLUE. ;�MAVOR File NO. � � ncil Resolution Pr � �� esented By R ferr To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date RESOLVED� Tha.t the Coun:cil -.of the City of Saint Paul does hereby authorize the Mayor to submit to the United States Depa.rtment of Housing and Urban Development application for amendment to the existing Model Cities Program so as to revise the budget and pro- vide the City with the additional Federal funding in the amount of $333,000.00 to be expended in accordance -with the proposed Budget Revision No. 5, a copy of which is attached hereto. COUIVCILMEIV Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays (� . ` Christensen �m� ' Hozza � In Favor �"�`- Levine � Rcedler A gains t BY Sylvester Tedesco President Hunt �+C � �,. Adopted by Council: Date `�C P 5 ��74 - Form Approved by C' y At mey i Certif' Pas y Council Secretary BY � � Appr d ayor: Da Appr _ M or fo 0 0 ou il sy By waeusHEO SEP 7 i97d , . . �� ST. PAUL MODEL CITIES TRANSITION FUNDING STRATEGY JULY, 1974 , �� CONTENTS I Documents II Sur�r�ary III An Historical Perspective IV Non-Programmatic Section Adminstration Staffing Status and Projections Adminstrative Budget Evaluation Health Clinics Senior Citizen CPnters � Citizens Participation Organization Communication Budget Revision # 5 'J Programmatic Section Local Development Corporation Demonstration Home Construction Project Timeline EVAULATION Evaulation is especially important while developing transition processes for successful Model Cities Projects. The Model Cities Health Clinic and Senior Citizens projects will be evaulated in relation to other city and county services. In addition to evaulating these projects against their scope of services, systems will be developed for setting human services priorities in the future, thereby establishing the framework to provide services through ongoing govermental agencies. To assist with HUD statewide evaulation, the Senior Citizens Centers will also be evaulated in relation to Senior Citizens Centers within Duluth and Minneapolis which were or are funded through the Model Cities Program. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION The citizen participation component will be restructured under the PAC arrange- ment with HRA and receive tis funding through the Neighborhood Development Program; no operating budget will be provided for citizen participation. To guarantee a continued communication link with the community during this tran- sition of the citizens organization a contract wili be implemented with a community newspaper, the FREE PRESS, for one page of space for ten monthly issues. The space will provide an ongoing opportunity for communication with the residents of the Model Neighborhood. PROJECT FUNDI�G The Northeast Quardrant is beginning to show reconstruction. Because the en- tire rnodel Neighborhood is directly related to the success or failure of that development we are giving it primary importanc�. -2- � PROJECT FUNDING CONT. Two projects, the Local Development Corporation and the Demonstration Home Construction Grants, are being ex-tended with a portion of the transition fiunds. Under the direction of the Local Developmenl Corpor�ation a shoppiny center is about to beyin construction wilhin the Northeast �uardr�nt . Neighborhood bus- inesses and employment wili become availabie through its operation. In order to provide an available clieni-ele and shelter for employees, housiny develop- ment becomes even more critically important as the center develops. An addi- tional grant will be available to each of seven Model Neighborhood families who choose to construct a new single family home within the Nbdel Neighborhood, perferably within the Northeasi Quardrant. FUNDING STRATEGY These combined strategies will allow the transition of each component of the Model Cities Program into the most viable area of activitity currently avail - able. It then becomes dependent upon each component to prove its continuing value to new funding sources. -3- MODEL CITiES PERSPECTIVE-1974 It was hoped in ]966 that the Federal Model Cities Legislation would develop demonstration micro-cities. The Model Cities Progran allowed a forum where poor and minorities could interact with public and private agencies and t� partnership develop innovative solutions i�o the problems of urban existence. The problems fihafi the experts alone were not solving were, under the new leg- islation, going to be shared with all affected factors with hope that demon- stration solutions could provide a beginning to ongoing urban-wide solutions. Not only were the d�monstration project activities to provide examples. In addition the processes wtiich were used to select, develop, monitor, evaulate, and constantly inprove 1�he� proJeets were also expected to demonstrate new systems of urban problem solving. A time frame of five Action Years was decided upon as adequate to develop and perfect these demonstrations. The premature cut; back in federal funds announced early in 1973, and the concurrent,uncertain future aborted many of the efiforts which were not yet sufficiei�tly developed to a self-sustaining status. St. Paul Model Cities, only in its second action year at the time of the cut back, was barely beginning to operate� within the full program develop- ment cycle. -4- � . . � �s4�� During �9)4 St. Paul Model Cities was ailocated iwo transition grants, These additional funds are io be used for the following two purposes: l . Project transition: transition of fiuture funding ofi Model Cities Projects to other funding sources (both public and private) 2. F'rocess transition: development ofi city-wide strategies and plan for an effiective transition to Community Develop- ment Revenue Sharing. PROJECT TRANSITION The first HUD transition grant of $250,000, announced early in 1974, was ailocated to assist in the successful transition of priority Model Cities Projects to other funding sources. The Health Clinic, Senior Citizens Projects, and Neighborhood Justice Center were given additional funds to assist them in achieving a self-sustaining status through other funding sources. PROCESS TRANSITION The current grant, announced in June, 1974, emphasizes program transition. A major goal of the Model Cities Program is to improve city-wide decision making processes--through partnership with both public and private agencies develop coordination, and pui- into operatior� explicit sys-hems to evaulate project activities, set priorities, and implement wanted and needed projects. in the past, obtaininy alternative and additional funding for Model Cities Projects has been the iask o� CDA staff alone, Currently the City Planning Department, with the coordinafiicn of tfie Office of Grants-in=Aid, is looking at the City's responsibilities in relation to such funding city-wide. -5- A special staffi task forc;e is currently beginning to develop a process fior decision making in preparal-ion of the appropriation of revenue sharing funds. Model Cities transition funds will be used to encourage coordination of public and private serv+ce providers, to clarify role relationship, and to establish monitoring, evaulaiian, and project setting demonstration systems in close interaction with the special task force. These efforts will be accomplished through the evaula-tion ofi services to senior citizens and services provided by neighborhood health clinics. By using Model Cities funds to provide the catalyst fior interagency coordination and involvement, and by utilizing the services of specialists in the field of evaulation, the develop- ment of more sophisticated city processes should be advanced . The anticipation of Community Development Revenue Sharing will be kept in mind as procedures are developed and evaulations are completed so that in-house capacity is gen- erated within the interdependenl agencies. A process is being developed by 5aint Paul , Minneapolis and Duluth to accom- plished a coordinated evautation of Model Cities Senior Citizens Projects that will provide useful planning information for each ofi the three cities as well as for the state--evaulation is a necessary component of effective planning both prior, during, and after the operation of any service orientated program. The thorough, coordinated�, evaulations of the Senior Citizens and Health Programs can provide the focal poinfi, as well as a protion of the financial opportunity, fic> assist St. Paul in resolving its role in #he provision of human services and its �elationship to the county, metropolitan area, and state. -6- It is expected fha-r ihis evaulaiion process will complement ihe positian paper describing the city'� role in Human Services which is ;:urrently being prE�pared by the Hum�3n !-;esources i?I ann i ng Stai fi �or the C;i ty's Sen i or P�lanage- ment Team. '` coordinated is defined as the involvemenl of all agencies ( public and private) and all yovermental instiiutions (on ali (veveis) involved in the delivery of Human �ervices as well as al � impacted agencies, proyrams and neiyhborhoods. -7- A C.D.A. ADMINISTRATION � Based up.on the strategies outlined in the "Revision Submission", which was developed in May, 1973, the CDA Staff have ei-�her been incorporated into other city departments, have resigned, or have been ter.minated. The staff outline included in the Revised Submission ( pg. 89) listed twenty-seven (27) staff positions. Following is the same list showing the current status of each individual . Of the twenty-seven available positions assigned to City �ffices, two were never filled. Of the twenty-five individuais who • were then employed' ' 11 (44�) resigned from City employment ( includes two indivi•duals who positions were eliminated) 7 (28�) transferred to permanent positions on other City payrolls ,.,�,, � 2 � g�� were promoted within Model Cities 5 C20�Z hold terroinal positions with Model Cities but have transfer options to other City departments � pend ing : W'ttfi. transiton fieing the primary task, and constantly less Model Cities Staff �ti,th eth.i:c[� to accomp I i sh i t, coord i naton through ongo i ng govermenta I operat i on r 6ecomes even more necessary. Also, close rel ,tionship with City �ffices is beneficial in that it assists in creating a b tter understanding of Model : CCties obJecttves, accomplishments, and pitfa Is, by those who will be respon- si61e for the more complex systems requ.i:red t most effecti�rly use revenue sfiaring funds. -8� , ` � �� CDA STAFF OUTLINE I . Current �status of positions assigned to City Departments in May, 1973. Grants-in-Aid STATUS JULY, 1974 Model Cities Coordinator Resigned � Assistant Coordinator Pfomoted to Coordinator ' Evaulation Director Not Filled Evaulation Coordinator Resigned . . Evaulation Coordinator On loan to School District #625 Evaulator Coordinator Promoted to Assistant Coordinator Monitoring Technican Resigned ( position eliminated) Monitoring Technican On loan to Manpower Planning Secretary Transferred to Human Rights Clerk Typist Resigned CITY PLANNING Economic Planner Resigned . Social Planner _ Transferred to City Planning Assistant Social Planner Transferred to City Planning Assistant Social Planner Half time vrifih Model Cities Assistant Community Organizer Remaining with Model Cifiies Typist Transferred to 165 No. Dale Street HRA � Project Coordinator � Resigned Planning Assistant Resigned � MANPOWER Economic Planner-Manpower Transferred to Manpower Planning Clerk Typist Transferred to Manpower Planning CRfMINAL JUSTICE Project Coordinator • Resigned (postion eliminated) CONSUMER AFFAIRS � Planning Assistant Resigned � . F I NAr�CE Accountant Resigned Accountant Net filled Accounting Clerk Transferred to Finance Department Clerk Typist Resigned C[V(L SERVICE � Civil Service Liasion � Transferred tc Eivil Service -9- As the City Administration progresses toward revenue sharing decision making capacity. those, individuals and responsibilities which have been transferred from Model Cities into City departments are proving vauluabe in the following ways. � C f TY PLANN WG The City Planning Department has hired two Model Cities Planners and is utlizing their skill in the area of f�uman. service planning. These two indivi- duals will continue to work-closely with the development of procedures for revenue sharing. OFFICE OF MANPOWER PLANNING The Office of Manpower Planning has hired the Model Cities Manpower Planner and one Clerk Typist. It is also expected that one para-professional current- ly on loan to that office will be hired before the end of September in a professionai capacity within Manpower Planning. One Assistant Social Placnner currently working half time within th� CDA structure, is also expected to be accepted in a half time position� wi-thin'Manpower Planning once the position becomes operational--hopefully within the next_ two months. `F fNAI�]CE DtPARTMENT The Accounting Clerk has been tr�ansferred to the Finance Department payroll and will continue t�n that position on City funding. � -�0- FINANCE DEPARTMENT CONT, Her job responsibilities will continue to include purchasing and payroll for Model Cities until such responsibilities have expired. She will progressively phase into more Finance Department responsibilities as the Model Cities task decline. The accounting responsibilities for Model Cities are the full-time task of one accountant employed by the Finance Department and the part-time responsibility of at least two other Finance Department Employees. The project audits will continue to be handled through contract arrangemen-t�s with . a private accounting firm, thereby providing a third party objectivi.t.y as � well as concentrated availability when necessary. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION One Evaulation Coordinator is on loan to School District #625. Her educational training, evaulation skill , and Model Cities experience are being utilized in drafting curriculun proposals for a new and creative progran which is to be implemented within a Model Neighborhood elementary school . These curr- iculum building activities will continue through the 1974-75 school year. It is expected that the school district will fund this position and employ her to continue the development of the curriculum and to implement a portion ' of the new program during the 1975-76 school year. CIVIL SERVICE DEPARTMENT One employee is now a certified professional within the Civil Service Depart- ment. He is working primarily with the testing systems but also handles Model Cities requests and personnel questions or problems. -11- GRANTS-IN-AID Those individuals orginally assigned to the Grants-in-Aid Oftice were later brought toyether under the supervision of fihe Model Cities Coordinator who reported d i rect I y to the C i ty Adm i n i strai-or. A "m i n i-(;f�A" Adrn i n i stral i on was thus established . The direct line of responsibilii-y to the OfFice ofi the Mayor, throuyh the City Administrator, wiil continue with the remaininy three CDA personnel--Coordinator, Assistant Coordinat�or, and Sec:retary--throuyhout the remainder of the Model Cities Program. The Assist��ni- Community Organizei� remaining on Model Cities staff and currently working as Eomrnunity �iasion will be terminated Uecember 31 , 1974, Hopefully he will be appoinfed to ihe St. Paul Police force before that date. (he Assisfiant Social F'lanner currently wot'king half time in the P�odel Cities Ofiice� on the �ompletion of the Progress Report will be terminated December 3l , 19J4� unless a iransfer becomes avail - able to the Office of Manpower PLanning sometime this iall . The Grants-in-Aid Department, with a similar relationship ic� the Office oi the Mayor and with a similar coordinatiny function, will be primarily respon- sible for the coordinated development of a city process to determine needs and to allocate revenue shariny resources. As time p�;rmits the CDA staff will become more involved in city-wide revenue shar,ing responsibililies as these develop �"� special Stafif Task Force, within thc� !'Iannin<a fiepartrnent and under the coor d i nai i on ot the (�ran 1 �,-i n-A i ci Ot f 1 cc��, i•_> c:u rr ent I y deve I op- ing the process for decision making in relaiion lo re,�enue �haring. The .CDA staff will be closely involved with responsibiliiies c� the iask force and the development of the proce�s, -12- � � � � � cn � c� cn �c� m -o -v c� cn � c� m pJ !D V1 O fD N O < J J O fD N O � � f� !n O f� N O iL � � � 3 (� N O �J � J� � � J� ^� J � � � � �S J. � J (D N C1 —1 �l fD VE CL � �� ('� N Q. O � O --I 'rl c+ c+ �' O Z c+ �+ �' --1 T'I SL J• �.3 ct c+ --'• � fi O � Oi SL � c+ �• O+ A� � N O J ct � � �• s.0 � � CD rF �• � � SL A1 � `S � Q7 Ar f'1' a. J.C'.] '� f'h "S � � fD J J A1 '3 O �� `� (-i' C+ � � ip � � O f�U � � O � .� � D � J �� O (D fD C7 Z C7 —S Z fD N t/� C� :� � O W O �• <� N tn O G A� OJ O (D O l'J 'v'7 O J. J. p p Q' fD � � � N (D O Vl N � "S O � �- fD D.. � 'S c+ c+ fl.. S= � N J• -h J. J. (�Uy �.. (,]J {L J• . � � � �• � � �1 �J' .� � � � J• � � � n �' � �"f � � � � � � � � � � � l�'F' � � � � � � ��V~ � � � � � " � �.7. � � p, c� -5 rr � � J. J• � N � � � � � �. . N � cy- O n � �--� � � �--� � 0 � —+ SL N N l�N N N N G� � � � I I t 1 1 1 1 ci� (D Q Q W W W W W W W CD � (p t-� � O�--� � �-+ � (�p � N -S �-+ V c-h J. I V1 c+ V �-+ Q �-' �� N 1 I -fi ►-' A� O �. N r-� F-+ C.7'1 c+ � fl. � W W V� � t-+ � � v N�--+ N Ul �f-+ � O G lD C� 00 O N �P►-+ c+ W U� �1 � V c+ • lfl v N W W Ul O� W � (") � � 01 f-+ � Cn� O v �I w O CJ� O < w al Cn h-� �I l� O .A Cq -�. � m fD -P W t0 CTi 01 a-� C71 J� V � �• Ol O � � 00 l0 CA O �.+ c-F N 3 C"') pr . . � . . . � � . . � -p �. N U'7 C31 O CT7 U'� N 00 N � r-�t--+ 1 '.L] r-� � lfl J O N �A J N W —' c"f N O� 0� 000 1 � � JO (7 W � �--' OOOCT'i00 � �--' O �. tn W O �• '�G (D � � � � � p' 1 V C� l0 fD C V (.Ti � �I � e+ CJi !D -P �t t-+ tn N CL V W W "� O 1 1 I 1 I N N CTI V iJT N Ul I F� 1 N (�'� T � I 1 1 I 1 -p W Ul Ol Q (D -� J�O ! U� I -P W V O � I I I 1 1 CO O W N � � 00 W 'J I I--� 1 W �l W "'' v. p 1 � 1 I � V � V OJ Ol - C.'�� c.Jl V � N � W O 01 C fD C'F I 1 1 I 1 • • • • • � • � • • p n i 1 I � � N W Ql .P .}� � l�6� � O � � O CO c-F' � 1 � � 1 i � .PO00 � 00 1 O i 000 -'. [D I I I 1 1 O -h � � N !D n t-h N N �% N r-` �O Ql W W V lfl N W �l 00 C3� 6� N H-+ CT� W Ol 00 � 00 O N �t-� OO OJ �-' O V � r N W OJ U'i O V � --i �G d1 �--� 00 C37 O U7 00 V W V N l0 C3i � �O � A O N O � W l0 C3'1 al lD � N U'� O r-+ CS� tD �A O tD N O t-� c-t n . . . . . . . p� O Cn tl� tP Cn Cn O O O cJ� tJ� � � U7 J O N O O O � v� 00 OOU00 � U'i000 � r-' OOOU� O � O c-f O fi V% _ - ...0 'n � �. !� SL SL O C ..�. �' � � � Ct G O z7 "C3 �• � �. O O O C� Z � � � fro � �p ru ro o Z � v m ..,. �• ro 3 tn � -�1 T� �J (�; C} � _. p� � Z Z SL SL i O (p -�� r+ � Cl � � � � N r+ �. �. ro rn (p � 7 � � N � c� r+ c+ I Ili_AI TH (_'!U?( FVAiJLr'`,� :OfJ The ��?id-i'I.j��ir��:; ;,ta !�.me:n�i , iru. Iir �i �>tatemenf o� problems, goals, and objecl �- i ves dc�v� I c:E�ed f r�r o�,_;h 1 hF: P�io�i�I C i 1 i es i,rocess, cd I I ed ior� a hea i �t�h .c I i n i c. Page seven t y-or�� ; r� I es i,n�aer� I r�u r 1�> >ever�� Ye�,r Goa I s. In I;,; ec� ye<3rs �,ui Id dnd staf f a rnodern, cenlerai ired, out- pai ic;n ! mE:di�-_� I <�nd denlal cl iri� in the P�1odel Neicahborhood. The firs�f prc>jecl lis!ed ir, the (�irs1 Year Aclion ''lan is Ihe "Community Hea I t h Pr oc�ram" . i�es� ;ned I�-> t i i I t he yaps i n meci i _�a I and denta I ser v i ces w i 1 h i n i h�� ModE�I Ne i y��b�:�r �,��:�:�j , t he pro jec 1 was to expand f�he thEn present 0. L .0. ef 1 or i �s and ev��n��i,�I I y I o ��r<�v i de compr�hen<s i ve ser v i ces t hrough a neW I y cc>nsiru�.-l�ed ia��.i I ity , L'��✓ ; he ;>econd /�ct�ion Year�, the St. f'ai.; l E3ur�eau of He31tt�� had �_�� :_e;� led tP�e < <��,�.�ur,s � bi I i ly ��f adminisle� iny i�r�e p��oject, the h�iari i n Lu�ther�� Ki ny Cen�fer h<;d been choosen as i�he s i te, 1 he equ i pment had been purc:hased, and st<,f f i r�� h��d begun. Continually perceived as a high priority need by ihe h1odel Neighborhood f'lann- ing Council , painiully slow in beyinning, but quick to become a mode) demon- stration projec:t, thr, - linic has estabiished itselt as a needed and respected servic:e wi thin the cornrr:uni iv. HUI) �fransiion iund�,; ��nd cify eont�ributions ara beiny used io tund the clinic throuyh fviar�_n of 19�`� . F�y Ih��i time i fi is hopFd if�i��jt addii�ionai ci ty funds w i I I be :�v�,� i :��',� I e ;-� con t�i �;u�� ;erv i ces u nt i I t he ro I e o F the � i �ty i n the pro- vision oi he�� tn care h�-3s be��n determined. it is anticipated Ihat Community [h-;ve I oprner�t !?eve�uF Sha r i ng w i I i a l so be ava i I ab l e by m i d-1 975 . -13- The �:I ir�cs �nr i:i �`��.; .,t��sc:,r,,�e � wi �� t;e direci ty involved throughout the evau I a}- i;>n roc�;� . f!,a , i n--nc,"se capnb i I i ty i s estab I i shed `or� on�3o i ng ev�ulation by bot�F� '� hr c� iiri�_� ard the ci1�y, and for- tuture project dnd servi�:e prior� i iy ��et�� n-' r��.� �or;s. Si�atfi of� the City, �ounty, and Metropol itan �ounc i I w i I I bc: con I � no,..s i ; � r��vo! ved i n 1 he evau I ai i or. oroc:ess to i r�sure mutual ayreement of rv�:: rei,.� i � onships and plannirg and implementation responsibilities among govermenia � bo�lies. -15- . �6�� SENIOR CITIZENS--AN EVAUL.P.TiON PLAN The tnree Model Cities programs within the State of Minnesota have received addiiional HUD funds. -fhese fiunds are to be used for 'transitional ' purposes. This includes iransitional fundiny of programs as wef ) as transifional plann- ing. The cities of Minneapolis, Duluth, and Saint Paul all operate multi-purpose S�nior Citizens' Centers ( in the case of Saint Paui this involves two centers) , under the auspices of the Model Cities Program. HUU is requiring that each city evaulate its services to senior citizens as provided through the multi- purpose centers. The evaulations are to be done simarily so that a state-wide comparision can be compiled. It is hoped thaf a cooperative and through evaulation of the Senior Ci�tizens' Programs in all three cities will meet several objectives' 1 ) provide a report for use on the state level that will indicate successes as well as failures; 2) be instrumental in providing each of the cities with a basic evaulation design; and 3) provide the basis for conversation between the various agencies (both public and private) which are funding or operating Human Service Programs ( in thi� case Senior Citizens' Programs) Ii- is further i;oped that this evaulation can provide each city with a demon- stration model 'cr overall planning and programming and, in particular, for Special Revenue �haring Funds as they become available. -16- A number of agencies and Ciiy departments will be contirously �involved in the compilation �f da-ta as well as the actual writing of the evaulation report. This involvement should include the foilowing: City Planniny Office, Grants- in-Aid Office, Department of Parks and Recreation, Mayor's Office, Ramsey County Welfare, Metropolitan Council , Governor's Council of Aging, Ramsey Action Program (RAP) , United Way, and �iider Foundation. A thir� party should also be involved to provide evaulation specialization, coordination and overview, timing requrements,and the �roduction of .fihe"final report. This will be a neutral party such as a human services consulting firm under contract to Model Cities. A team composed of representatives of the above groups wil � review available and qualified local firms and will agree upon the evaulation provider. -17- �� CITIZEN PARTICIPATION-ORGANIZATION The Model Neighborhood Planning Council has requested funding from the Housing and Redevelopment Authority as the Summit-University Area PAC under the Neighborhood Development Program. In proportion to funding for o#her PAG's this would amount to approximately $60,000 for NDP year VI , The boundaries of the Model Neighborhood area would be enlarged to be conter- minous with those of the NDP Summit-University Area. Representatives of community agencies and of previously unrepresented areas of tt�e community would be appointed to the twenty-four now vacant MNPC seats thereby reorganizing a viable community representation of forty-one members. Both the ordinance establishing the Model Neighborhood Pianning Council and the resolution est- ablishing the Project Area Committees would be redrafted and resubmitted to reflect the necessary changes. An election in conformance with established PAC procedures would be held next year. If accepted by HRA, the City, and HUD this process will allow adequate time to redevelop community interest in a citizen organization so that the election next year will be both meaningful and representative. By using an appointment process at this time rather than an immediate direct election the experience gained through the Model Cities Process would not be lost. The for�r;�-one member interim body would determine the future size of the organization and the election process to be used next June. -18- CITIZEN PARTICIPATION-COMMUNICATION The citizens component is no lonyer publishing its own newspaper, "TQGETHER". Because of the premature expendiiure of -the citizen participation budget, the support staffi positions will be terminated, effectively July 31 , 1974, and the 165 Dale Street Office will be closed. The citizen participation function is expected to continue with funding through HRA Neighborhood Development Program. As the community residents reorganize under the PAC guidelines, it will be important for that group to have access to an ongoing information outlet. To guarantee that the Model Neighborhood Community has access to information about the Model Cities Program as well as all other activities affecting the Model Neighborhood and its residents space is being purchased from the "FREE PRESS", a newly organized and operational community newspaper. Publi.shed monthly, the FREE PRESS is delivered free to each home within the community. It is sponsored by many of the churches, social agencies, and businesses;: including financial institutions, within and surrounding the Model Neighbor- hood and had developed a sizeable group of advertisers. , The stated purpose of the FREE PRESS is "to facilitate communication among residents and workrs of the Summit-University Community and their neighbors." -19- . �� CITIZEN PARTICIPATION-COMMUNICATION CONT. Although only five issues old, it has gained the respect and enthusiasm of many individuals and organizatons within and without the Model Neigh- borhood. The staff has participated in the Urban Journalism Workshop and works closely with Minnesota P�etropolitan State College. Currently the paper is receiving supervision and intern staff assistance from the MMSC. Through the par.chase of one page of space per issue for a period of ten months, the citizen component will have; access to a regular and freely distrubuted publicity medium. By mid-�975 the reorganized citizen organ- ization should be well enough established to reassess its communication needs and determine whether to continue the coni-ract with the FREE PRESS or to choose some other communication alternative. , � , -20- _e0z_ . _ •� � c� � � � --i o cn z N m � N � � cn O � z c�D O —�I d �I -r �I 't Cn T O �! �I O —i � � 3 n a i � i u, m m �. i i �-• � � ( � � o n, --i � I 1 I � • � n I I C� -D-{ � y Z7 U1 y 7 J �l �l 7 O -h -F J J -I- — -• (7 -� -►- p Z tn �n �n � cD -s ? ut .!� cn O c� — � cD cn '�7 -F � -F C7 C7 < -� � � Z -F c � -H (D -i N O O O Oi -• - ni O O c -• � � - -+ � -+ -• � .a O o- S O O O --� O� --• n. -• 7 - -- O� -• � -• -I � � Z < N I N N -• CU N 1 -i- � — 3 CD I W 1 O CD (� -F ► W lA �� O T CD � tr� O W� 7 lA O W O Q Z � + = I J 1 � C� 7 I J -• (p 7 J VI J �l (p (n J Ul �7 (7 � d. V'I � -} 7 U'I � Q N - '-F "1 � O CD 0� � n 7 � 7 . = Ul ln -{- 1 N � (D � � � � �� '� O O \\ C J �1 3 � � N X � � C N c� r � _. � a � + (D �. n- Oo .. 'r+i N N -• � W O � �O O� A � �I ln p� O 01 'S � � � � � � � 000 00 00 O O� O �! Z O O O O O O O O N -+ A C n O O O O O O O O 0 o s i � (D 1 C -I 'T � � m � o C") D Z m � � -< � � m co ^ N N '-� N N N O (D � �r7 �t N OD O� QO � N O O - W --I � � O O O d O O O O O � v O O O O O O O O O -f� ... _, � CD J U1 Ul � � d W N (D lr1 � J, N N W W �P � N O � � n O O O O O O -• � � O O O O � N � -� O -F� � � n -+ O � ln .A O� < �D Ut ln N -. r + 0 0 � Q � � � � O � 0 � � 01 T � y� � G �p� f'' iP O � 16 € iP � 4 O M .x l�C O�f O � iC ~ � X Og 4 B f+• F+� Og O 'O� � � � W ,1. �j � � F+ � a � ��y �w O B H W pWp A 1~-� p � Ge7 Ap� F' �'! A p O 9 � H a W B R Q � N� c�►. e�+ p~. � . a m e�+ � W � ►�f H P � H O a�p � F+ [ W � F' F' � �N K b7 a � K l~i O y � � F' 9• A 0 �N y 7 - y g p� er 13 p �Oy 00 cyf H A O �' p �+ cp+1 �16y eh t'� �A 1 ��j H 09 w �J 6 f' ~' p 1 �y P O � � Cr W N 1P O 27 < L�7 C O 4. F � �y N 4�` �y Sd p �p H �9 p � . e� p�, � � F� � l6 er � n O W t! t+ m c+ � F+ 1-' @ H 2D c� d m �f O F'• F'' �G v . �'+ tl � � �'+ e µ .+ a� � o °�x° a w �a r c � c �e m � �p, m � Yi' � o � ~ � �y � ►'' �• q� � F�+ p � K� w a O O H � � ��y m W er ►1 {p K F+• �! d' Oi G O R� O C H 1P O x � 4 ►f �"! � 9 p y� A7 F� W O AO y � 'd O m cp► � g � � � � O f] W P� w p I�C 01 � n � � � p. �4 F' O � G µp� � � o .� . � �y D� to W B F� C OV s� O M• er p er �! N � W C) � O O e�► A K H � O � H ^ K H C t> O cf h� W W er I+ L� 09 � p � . C� O � w 6 � E�+ � p !! h ��py h �{y� Wq P 9 9 ►h+� y yp. � t�i ~ p p � ' L1 J . � �- y � � p w p � � � a � O W �9 P n m K a m ~• y W $y x � b � � � m � a � � , y O O � �3 W F'' p . � � 6 8 p � � N N �y • O F � � � � I V� N F-� N V� �O � � V�i N � V W V� N � V F�+ O N � V� O N � � N � � � � � � $ I I• � 0 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � . , N N . �pO� v r tC+� F+ N N F' N �j � VI p� IV Oo ~N WN �N � N �y N N 1v F' W � � O Oo O V+ �n Oo �O �M V� �6 � �O N I� F+ �O O V� O� �7 Vt � O N �n V� O O t V � �O 1�-' � p� � 1 1 1 1 � � O v V V O 1�-� O V1 � F O � � � � � Oo F' V 0~o O �n V v { � j ' N N � , .�... � �il N VNi �1 N �~Jl � Q 'N X I-' Q ONi O � !-' 1~-' O� N t � N V F+ N N tD � � O� W t V O �n v O� V� Vf v W Oo Oo V O W �t O� O V� V1 V 4� Oo . � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � i 0 � � � � f � � � � � � N N �' oN. � �O o�'o $o � .°Di w " ro^'. '.b' � S �"''' � `Nl-�' �V,+ � � .�o v �' i a' Iv' �N++ G' ~ � 7i � a�o f+ � w � r��+ � 2$ $ � g � � '� v�i v~i � g v�i � •� � N .�o i i � � i = � { N = �o � � � � Hq r �a � 1 N 1 O � � � w .F v � V� V�i � � � � � O� � W O �O�+ � � � VNi VVi V W ONo � `" � ii � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � i � � t � � � � � � � � �, � � ! i { f $ � � � o � � � + + + + + �� W 1--► N N N + W � O � � p , � • � • Y O O � O A O O O O O• � O „ . � • ., � '000`££5`£ o�. �ue,�g .�ea� uol��y puo�as ay� 6u�sea,��u� 000`£££$ ,�o UO1�2�0��p Q�H Leuo��ppe Moys o� tiL6i ��n� pas�h.ab � � ' r oi+n� ni�r�a�v� n . ._._�._�_...�.,..�.�� ._.�..�......��.._"__.�.._..._..�.+.__�....�..�_�...�' �� I71111 f.t.' 1 1�1/H L A 1: t:�.). r: .:� � . , � ...' ' (:(T Y �'— ' !!. :.. (`! I'ARTht� tJT Ut tf t �: ? Ui:l�l,N D!.VCLOf'f,!I Nl St Paul. Minnesota CIT1 I�(iLl•;)tv�lf`i..11_�1! Ai.;1.f,. Y HU!)Gt-�. I CUN�iftAC'f NUML3f_I2 UATE �--��. ' I3U�:��C SU��":':��t�RZ' M.P. 22-003 �Jul 23 1974 i FtEVISED ACTION YLqFiS � � —i—�"�"'� I ifi(�M: I T� . c ;;1 iq;nal S��L•miss;c-: ;xi Rc;-i� �� Pd�,. S _October 1� �,972 June 30� 1975 ( 1_ __ �- ------.---_ _. __._ _ ___ __ _.____._�— ___l��__------- � ( _ (ALl F-I�UllES IN 'fHUUSANDS RpUNDE:p 7p 7HF NEARC5�T 1'HUUSANf�I ; �, h f ir%��i 1'I:It.lt CIIF2f•F�_NT _"_ IjV'QUE.ST�E.(,l 1= �� $ � �f - PfiUGf1AM c:A�T:-"c;C..�ny � t ai:> n�`�-� OV('b � • 'TOTAI. �i�L�+... � ( i � , � �,.�? r.nc c,�n� ; u�.�n;l:.l. n�C NON FIUU .+r ��:e � . M(- CISAtJT - f UN()S ��,�I�. - ' 1-tlNl-: r+ftAlJl --� '�- {" --- ----_�__�._.___._,._ r uric�s !'E:D'cFCr1L STATE LOCAL. {(:�.l..t•1.� � _. ---- - --- -_ __�—�_ .—. --_�.�i__ -------(21� __— — (31 --- --�4)_ _ ISIi f6ol (6b1 16c1 (71 lei ,� rd��,��,.; � — — ; � _ 402 217 -0- 696 1 315 619 >> Hcolth A__ _ _ 169 _ 665 _ -0-_ 224 1,058 834 ts $ocia� $ervices � — ---._-------48 _ 401 -0;- -- -- 140 _589 449 � ie. Recreatiun - Culture 434 90 -0- 207 731 524 � ----- ._------ ._----- ----__---- --- - , » Crime - Delinqucr�cy--- �----- --+ - � ___�_ 59 140 —0— 675 15 20 909 199 �o hla�puwer ond Job _�_, Development _ _ 275 290 —0— 51 151 � 767 565 � 21 Economic and Business __ Devclopme.nt _ -�- 8 958 • 2 513 677 ia Nousing t ----------- ---7�� — _ 237 1 422 1 185 ! 3� — Relocation � �3�, Transportotion — - ---; Communicotion 33 Environ;nental Protection and Development ' 4O Citizen Participation _ 141 253 +2 65 4fi1 396. �o Eva u-� atio�n an�— - ` Information _137 109 -0- 16 262 246 — SUBTOTAL � 2�596 2,876 +222 1,553 66 2,714 10,027 5,694 �o Program Administration ' ---_--_--.------_---- 354 _ 324 _ +111 239 1 028 789 GRANDTOTAL �._ _.._.__._.__ +._ 2,950 3,200 +333 1 553 66 2 953 11 055 6 483 ___�______..___ __ CLEARANCE SECTION ____' � CtTY __. i_ HUD APPROVAL ' Approved Total � Grant Amount : b ___ __ _________ _�T it is h��reby cvrtificd tFiat C�ty budgetiny proclices hovr 6ecn (ollowed and thot �II �ustifiration: ond !�ack•up n,olcriul tcquircd by City {,ror.ti<c ar�d by HU[i is un (ilc � wit�i f�;� Cify m�t� i�.. ovai�ot,!e for inz�iAction pui�.uan) to th� Grunt A.�rerment. G4�('E � SIGNaTI.RF:. ANU i1�fLk[ f R C:"f V'S G�IIFf� /'ISCAL OFFICIH I.tiL({/I([fllli•J _— _ --_",__'—��_.._ ._.. __'--_.".__.__'___. _ ____�._ SUUMISSION AUTHORIZATION+ --------- �- ---- ---__-- --.__ _.._..__...._. ____ ___�_.-----�---- _ ...__._.__�.. •,�r r , :��:r;� iuv,i� ai�i, t�rt.i �.r ..i� . , r:��n��- i ri t.�irii� �.i � u.� �. � I�Nr/ ..__'�_- HIJG 70GQ I?-14i Gre��..us e��li�n ia obsolete /�♦ T--' '-- °- '- ' ^- - - - - - -- ~ f��i)HM Af'1��;,�'.;1 �, . �._-��.....��._. ._.�_-.�� .�.�.�....._.. _�...._... ...�.�_� �_i t I 1�< 1.T �i i I' 1� �... . t) �1'I Y "` .. .. .�.�....._.�..��__ �._ U.S. I�LPARTI.'I NT Of NI�USIK�, nldU U�:G;.'� ['iEVEI.Qf''r.1CN1 CITY DCMONSTI:A71:�N AGi:�sCl" LUDGET S'C. Paul, Minnesota PROGR�'�.'.'� C��TEGO!il' -- PRJi.�E�'/.1i BUDG��T �'�to�;r:��<.nrc.;c��:� -- Education (ALL FIGURL`� IN TIiOU:;�,11,:�6 ftQUN�)F_D l0 THc: NF'AF2li".T TFIOU:,t.NC�) � NUQ PROJFCT PRIOR GURFiENI�^ ------ -•---�— —.'— USE � APFROVEU ReV1SlOT1 REQUESTEG FUNUS ! TITL� YEA�,� . ONLY 1.1C GRANT �UDGf_T, � NptJ MG C•RANT FUNflS TOT/�L � FUNDS M� GRANI MC GF2ANT ---��— ------- —�--• ((.. r.. _ FUNDS FQUrRAL STA1'E ! OCAL (t1 (2) (3) 14) (Su) (SL) (SC) (6) Home-School Liaison 30 17 -0- 11 17 Kindergarten- � Second Grade 206 75 -0- 78 7g Montessori Pre- School Day Care 45 23 -0- 204 23 Center Wilder Day Care Center 11 28 -0- � 117 28 Red School House -0- 74 -0- 21 74 Experimental Counseling 2 -0- -0- $ _p_ , Special Resource Teacher 20 -0- -0- 3 -0- GRANDTOTAL �Copitol Projects must bc identified by underlinin,q the Project Titic. Prior to start of construction, the CDA must huvc on file(or possibic HUD review a deroiled capirol ocquisition ond construction cost budget lor eoch projetf supported by specificotions and drawings(and nny subse- quent cho�y c orders)whirh must hovc bcen revicwed and approved by thc City's Engincer, o qualified enginccring consultont o� thc Operating Agency's Techinical Stoff. At the time of submission of this budgel schedule, it is necessory to hove bud�et estimates deve�oprd in accordonce with locol copital budgeting practice, and these estimates shali be retained on file by thrCity For possiWe hIUD revjew. , ZAny proposud use to controct ond consultant services in an octivity sholl be justiFied b� a norrotive stotement setting fortl� the se►vice to be rendered under the conhoct,•3nd ihe bosis for the cost estimute. The statement shall be included r.� port of thc oppropriote work progrom. HUD-7U40(2-70) Previous edition is obsel�e� unn_w...�, • n r • .,.....,. _ f"ORM A('I�i.:.�•�.�1 �� . � . �...-��.��-.-�_..�._. __�.�.....�..��.r-�.��..�...��...... �....,�. . .��_. �.....��-r 1 11�( !.T�. ��.��..�.....�..........�.�..._.._.....1 1 . CI"I Y u.s. ��F�nr:T�.�,i ri r or ,��n�,i�a;, nr:�> u�:��;.�; or:vr.i.er..;�rai CITY DLMONSTRaiiu,� ac�:r:c•r [;unG�T St�Paul, Minnesota __ PROGR��','; C��TEGOfi`i' -- PROGF�'/-:1,� BUDG�'C �>�<o<;i<��.��.��t.;��:� . _.r._ _ Education (ALL FIGURL`: IN TIiC�U:;AIlL`S RpIINUF_C� l0 TFIL NEARI�.'.:T l'FIOUS<:ND) HUD p�pJECT GUi�HENI �—._ .--_...�____.__�_ .__ • ._ —_— — PRIO{� USE � AFFROVEU ReV1S1011 REQUFSTflG FUNGS TITLE YEAf".� ONLY r.!c c�enr�T �UDGF_7, �_ NUH MC GPoANT FUNO�. TOTAL * FUNOS MC GRAIJI MC GfiANT2 -------� ----------- --•� (, FUNDS FCUERAL STATL` ! OCAL � � x� (1) (2) (3) (4) f5�) --- (5U) (Stl (6) Youth Serving Youth 61 -0- -0- 2 -0- ommunity School Coordinator 27 -0- -0- 252 -0- j GRANDTOTAL !{Q2 2j� —Q- 696 217 �Capital Projects must be identified by underlining the Project Title. Prior to starf of construction, the CDA must hove on file (or��ossible HUD review a derailed capirol acquisition ond construction cost budget for each projetf supported by specificotions and druwings(and any subse- quent chon9 c ordr.rs)whir.h must havc bcen revicwed and opproved by the City�s Englncer, a qualified engincerin$ consultont o� fhc Opc►ating Agency's Techinicol Staff. At the time of submission of this budget schedule, lt is necessory to have budget estimates deve�oped in occordonee with lornl capitol budgeting practice, and these estimates shall be retained on file by the City for possible FIUD review. ZAny proposud use to comroct and consuHont services in an activity shall be justified by o norrotive stotement setting forth the service to be rendered under the contract ond Ihc basis for the cost estimate. The statement shall be Included r,• port of �he app►opriotc work program. fI�ID�7Gd0 12.�01 {�revious ndifinn is n6cnl�.t., ul�n_W...1. . fl(' - ' e�7�..r. e � I�i)I:MA{'1�� :� I� . �...-.��.-..�_..�._...__�.__.�� ....... -_..._. . ._�.. �..�� 1�11-�.�.��...� 1.1` ...�,._�..�........��_.�....�.1 1 �_I I Y u.s. n�►�nr:Tl.'I Ni 0� rii�,�s.ir,�. �i:n �.ir.i�;.�; r,cvf�_er�.;�iai GTY Df_MONSTI:a�I:�N aGi:kCl' [iUDG�i S�_paul. Minnesota __ PROGR�ti'.': CATEGO!il' -- PR�C�Fi'�:t,i BUDG[:'i' �'�:o<;r:�� .��c�;��f:� Health � (ALL FIC•URL`� 7N TIiC�Ii';i�tl�`; (tOUNfiED l0 TFIE NF.ARI�.':tT THOU:,�NC) HUD �--- ---- -------..--------- -•- ' -- — AROJECT pR�p�j CURkENI REQUFSTF_G FUtJUS USE � � APFROVEU � � � TITL[ YEAF.S --- � ONLY f.1C GRANT �UDGFT, 2 NUIJ MG GfiANI" FUNC)5 TOTAL FUNOS MC GRAIJI MC GHANT ----� —'------—�--- ((• r. FUNDS FCUERAL STA7'E ! OCAL .(11 (2) (3) ` 14) tSo) (Sb) (SC) (6) Community Health Clinic 127 640 -0- 152 640 Aid for Develop- mentally Disabled 42 25 -0- 72 25 , GRAND TOTAL 1 —Q— 224 665 �Copitai Projects must be identified by underlining the Project Title. Prior to stort of construction, the CDA must huoe on file for possible HUD review o detoiled capitol acquisition and construction cost budget (or eoch projetf supported by spetificafione. and druwings(and nny subse- Ruent chany c orders)whir.h must have bcen revicwed and opproved by the City's Engincer, o quolified cngincerin� consultant or thc Opc►oting gency's Techinical $toff, At the time of submission of this budget schedute, it is necesso�y to have bud�et e,t�mates deve�oped in accordonce with local copital budgeting proctice, and these estimotes shall be retained on file by the City for possible hIUD review. 2Any propos�d use to controct ond consultant services in an activity shall be justified by a norrotive stotement setting fortli the service to be rendered under the contrott aid 1hc basis !or the cost estimate. The statement shall be includvd r,• part of the oppropriotc work program. HUD-7U40(2•70) Prcvious cdition is obsolctc HIIn.Wes6.: n.('_ ' �ni�wn_o ` 1-O 1 U.A A f'I�� .-..��.�_..��_'.."�_'-�� ..�..�..�. __...._._ �� .�►�l I I�( 1.T� �-��.�..._�.._...«.�_.�.«...1 1 CI"I Y u.s. n�F�nr,Ta�:i r�r or t+��,�s.��;,. nr:u ur.i�;.�: D[Vt:LQP�.tierai CITY Df.MONSTI:atl:1�� AGi:1aC1' GUDGET $t. Paul, Minnesota PROGR��:'.': C�TEGO�il" -- PfiJC�Rh.l,i BUDG[�'(' '"1tOC,a��.+�.nrc.;c��:� -- _ Social Services IALL FIGURL.`; IN TI�iC%t.�';��hl�'t, IaOIINt)FD 10 TFIE NF'AR(�.1:T l"NOU:,AND1 HUD PROJF_CT CURHLNI� - -------'----- .•- � —' — USE P��U� REQUFSTf_D FUNUS TITL[� YEA�., APFROVEU ONLY h1C GRANT �UDGET, � z NOIJ MC: C•(�ANI'�FUNf�S TOT/�L * � FUNDS MC GRAfJI MC GRANT ------ - —�--�----.--.— ��, ��, FUNC?S FCD[RAL STATL ! OCAL (11 (21 (3) (4) ISay i (SLl (St) f6) 606 Selby Drop-In Center -0- 27 -0- 5 27 Comprehensive Senio Citizens 43 374 -0- 135 374 AIM 5 -0- -0- -0- -0- , GRAND TOTAL [F$ /�,�1 —�— 1(E� (��1 �Copital Projects must be identifled by underlining the Project Title. Prior to stort of construction, the COA must ho:e on (ile (or possible HUD review a deroiled capito) acquisition and construction cost budget for eoch project supported by specificotions aod drowings(ond nny subse� quent chony e orders)which must havc bc>en reviewed and opproved by the City's Engineer,a quolified engineering consultant or the Operating Agency's Techinico) Staf(, At the time of submission of this budget schedule� it is necesspry to heve budget estimotes developed in oecordonce with local copital budgeting practice, and these estimates shall be retoined on file by the City For possible hIUD review. 2Any propos�d use to tontroct ond consultont services in an activity shall be justificd b� a norrotive stotcment setting fortfi the service to be rendered under the contract ond the basic ►or the cost estimate. The stotement shall be included r,� part of �he oppropriate work program. HUD-7U40(2-70) Prcvious editeon is obsolctc �IUD-Wosh.; D.C. _ 209_ � 21�1�U•P * Total Revised HUD 2nd Year Grant � � f-i)I:M A{'I�i:i�`.1 t� I�lll�< t.T �'t1!'! i.l� �.�...• . il . �....�..�.....�_�_ .'-__-._�� .�.��_.... . � L I'I Y '.�,.��.�_.�... .. ... ._.,...._..�..�.�.........._ U.S. f�CF�nr.T�.�.� rir or �ic�,��.i�;�. .nr:�� ur:i�;.r; C'iEVP.LO(��.,�rai CITY DLMONSTI:a�i:,;� ac�.i:cti �u�c�i St. Paul, Minnesota _ PROGR��:'.', C�aTEGORI' -- PRJi;R�.l,1 BUDGi.=�C �'�to<,�znr��.�re,;ut:� Recreatxon and Culture IALL FIGURL':, IIJ TIiO�.�:;i;1�lUS f:qllNhF_D l0 Ttic NF.ARl:.ST THOUSAND) � . NUD pHn if::CT --- PI"21UI�t�� -Ur`�F1LNl'��R@V1S10II-------REQUESTF_G FUfJUS � � � . USE TITI.(:� 1'EAf.'; AFFI70VEU �...__ �� _._.... , . ONLY 1.1C GR�1NT ��UGF:I; NfUtJ MC: GRANI" FUNCI` TOTl�L � FUNDS MC GRAIJI MC GRANT� ------� '---- �--• (Cn FUNDS FCUERAL STAI'L" �! OCAI. ftl l?1 131---- (4) Isa) � (5L) (SC) (6) 4 Summer Projects 347 -0- -0- 187 -0- Inner City Youth League Cultural 65 66 -0- 9 66 Arts Program Hallie Q. Brown Cultural Enrich- 22 24 '0' 11 24 � ment Pro ram � GRANDTOTAL 434 9� —�— �� 90 �Copital Projects must bc identiFied by underlining the Project Titic. Prior to start of construction, thc CDA must huvc on (ile (or possiblc HU�D revicw a detailed capifol acquis)tion ond construction cost budget for eoch project supportcd by speciFicotions ond drawings(ond c�ny subs� quent chony c orders)whir.h must hove bcen reviewed ond npproved by the City's Engincer, a quolified engincering consultant o� thc Operoting llgency's Techinical Stoff, At the time of submission of this budget schedule, it is necessory to have budget estimates deve�oped in occordonte with local capitol budgeting proctice, and these estimates shall be retained on file by the Cify ior possible HUD revfew. 2Any proposcd use to contract ond consultant services in an octivity sholl be justified by a norrative stotement setting fort6 the service to be rendered under the controct and the basis For ihe cost estimate. The stotement shall be Yncluded r,• port of ihe appropriote work p�ogram. HUD-7U40(2•70) Previous edition is obsolcte HUD•Wash.; D.C. 2�»��-P * Total Revised HUD 2nd Year Grant -20h- ' I-17f.1.1 Af'1'i;�)'�:1 �� ' e-��......�_.�._..._..��. .�...��.�.._. __.__. . ��.��i 111�( 1.1' :�!�......��........�...-.+.._.�._......I 7 t:l'1 Y U.S. (�LF�nr;T�t� r�r or H��;is.ir;,, ni;�� uai�•;.r� nEVt-.t_or��.�eiai CITY D[_MONSTI;a�iu;� ac�:rsC1' GUDGET St. Paul, Minnesota PROGR�t'.': C�TEGO!�1` -- PROCyF�'/.I,i BUDGc'C �'�to�;�:n`�:��.�rc.;c,�:ti.- -- _.r_ ._ Cri�ne Delinquencv (ALL FIGURL':, IN T�iO1.i:,i,�dUS RQUNhF_D �O� ThIL NFARL;T 1"HOUi>liND) , . HUD -- ^— - ----. ---------- •- . __.._ _ PRn�F..CT p��pk C:URkENI R�EQUF.STED FUNUS - - USE TITL[� YEAF,S APFi'10VEU IaS.�,Qn_ _,_�,��, ONLY t.1C GRANT �UDGh=T, 2 NUtJ MC: GRANI" f�UNI)S TOTAL FUNDS MC GRANI MC GF2ANT ------ ------ -- ��,�� FUNDS F[CUGRAL STATL" �! OCAL (i) (2) (31 14) (Su) ' f5�) - (SCl (6) ommunity Retreat House 59 110 -0- 429 20 110 Neighborhood Justice Center -0- 30 -0- 246 15 -0- 30 , GRAND TOTAL 59 1�+0 —�- 675 15 2� 1�F� �Copitol Projects must be identifled by underlining the Projec► Title. Prior to stort of construction, the CDA must hc�ve on file(or possible HUD review o detoiled capitol acquisi�ion and construction cost budget for eoch project supportcd by speci(icotions and druwings(and ��ny subse� quent chon c ordcrs)whir.h must have bcen revicwed and approved by the Cify's Engincer, o quoliFied engincering consultant or the Opc►ating /lgency's �echinicol Stof(. At the time of submission o(this budget sthedule, it is necessory to have bud�et estimates deve�oped in occordonte wirh local copitol budgeting p�actice, ond these estimotes shall be retai�ed on file by the City For possibie HUD �eview. 2Any proposed use to coMroct ond consultant services in on activity sholl be justified by o norrotive sfotement setting fo►fh the service to be rendcred undcr the tontract and the basis (or Ihc cost estimotc. Thc stotemNtt shall be intluded r,� port o1 Ihc oppropriotc work p►ogrom. HUD•7U40(Z•70) Prcvious edition ie obsol�tc HUD•Wash.� D.C. — I— � 2471�U-P * Total Revised HUD 2nd Year Grant � �'or:r� n��i�. . �,.._�..�._..�___ _._....._._ ^-��.�._. __._._. ._.�,. t��.r.��...�.T � . ... � t� U.S. f�LF�nr,T�� r;r or ri��u<.i�;�, n.i;u ur;i�;.r: r,r_vt_�_er;.,cr�i �-�,v .—""'-- _ .. ._._.._...._._._ _.. UTY Df.l.lOIIS71:a�i;�;� ac�:r<c•r �;unc��7 St_ Pau11 Minnesota PROGR�ti''. CATF..G0�;1' -- Pf��C;�/;1;1 SUDGi��f ��`tO"`'"'� `.";`;;,�':° -- _____ ____ __ Manpower - Job Develonment (ALL FICUFiI:`, IN TIiUI�';nl�l;.�t, Itn1.�NfiF_D l0 TH._ NE'ARI�.'17 l"HOU:�Attpi HUD PFtOJFCT ----- GURFttNI ^ ._.�._._.____. . ----�---__ -- � PRIO(2 USE � qPFRObEU V_�,�„1011 f2EQUESTf_G FUNUS ONLY TITL[ 1'EA1'.; gUUGET, ��-- �� h'C GFZAMT� NUtJ �dC; C:f2ANl- J=UNC)�. TUTAI* FUNDS MC GRAIJI MC Gf2ANT� -----��--� -----------..._. C��I.�`ix� . FUNDS F�CUERAL STAI'L ! OCAL � J (11 (2) _ (3) _14) 15u) (SL) (SC) (6) Model Neighborhood Employment Center 194 73 -0- -0- 73 Summit-University Recreation TYainin 81 46 -0- 83 46 Project Resident Training Program -0- 30 -0- 9 30 Metropolitan Teache Education Program -0- 26 -0- 59 26 Summer Youth Em- ployment -0- 115 -0- 51 -0- 115 , GRANDTOTAL 2J5 29Q —Q— 5]. 151 290 �Capital Projects must be identified by underlining the Project Title, Prior to start of construction, the CDA must hove on file for possible HUD review a detailed capitol acquisiiion m�d construction cost budget ior each projecf supportcd by specificatione. and drowings(und nny subso Ruent chony e orders)which must hovc boen reviewed and appioved by the City s Engineer� a quolified engineering consultont or the Operoting grncy's Techinicol Staf(. At the time of subrnission of tliis budget �chedule, it is necessory to have budget estimates deve�oped in accordonce with lor_ai capital budgeting practice, ond these estimates shall be retained on file by the City for possible FIUD review. 2Any proposud use to contract ond consullant services in an activity shall be justified by a norrative stottment setting fortli the scrvice to be rendered under the contract ond Ihe basi; (or the cost estimate. The statement shall be included r,• port of Ihe oppropriote work program, HUD-7U40(2-70) Previous edition is obsol,.��c HUD-Wash.; D.C. ' �q��.P * Total Revised HUD 2nd Year Grant -20.1- r�,i:�a nr� . � i, i�u�" i r :��, , _. . „ — _._.._...�..�_.- - ------�� _.____ . . . . _.._._ ....__....__..,. .....r.� _.._._».�......__.�..._ ,.._ �_I 1 Y u.s. n�F�nr.T,.+� rir or �ic�,�<.ir;�, nr:;> ii�:i�:•.r; r�rvrt er��.�,era7 GTY DLIdONSTI.a�I;�;� aGCt?c1 LUDG�1 St. Paul, Minnesota PROGR�e'.'. C��TEGOrI' -- Pf�J%;f��':t:1 BUDGi��C �'�to<,«n�.�<.��c�:��t:�— —` __ Economic and Business Development (ALL FiC•UR�:, �N 'iiiC',1�:;��N:.��, ROi.ir�tiFU �O T1��: NE'AF2l�.'.:T l"HOUi,l�NDi HUD __-- _ --- -------- _----•---- - ----*-- --- USE �'Rn iF..CT p�-21UH—_ CUi-tFtt=Nl �,,`�' REQUESTf_C� FUOJCS TITLG� YEAf," APFf10VEU 1�.S.Y.4, 1011 �„__,,,___T,_ ONLY 1.!C GRAF�T �UOGET, 2 NUtJ IdG GRANT FUNC7�, TOTAL FUND<; MG GRAI•�l MC GRANT ---__�— ----°- -- ----- ((,� . FUNDS FL'6ERAL STAI"L ! OCAL ftl l21 (3) --- 141 ^ 15u) 15L1� (St) (6) Local Development Corp. 169 308 +200 878 958 508 , GRANDTOTAL 169 3�8 -�2QQ 878 958 508 �Copitul Projects must be identified by underlining the Project Title. Prior to start of consfruction, the CDA must h<�rc on file for�,ossibie HUD review a detailed capitol acquisition and construction cost budget ior each projecf supportcd by speci(icotione. mid drowings(und emy subse� Rucnt chong c orders)which must havc bcen reviewed and approved by the City's Engineer� a qualiFied cnginccrinQ consulinnt or thc Operoting gency's Techinical Sta((. At the time of submission of this budget scheduie, it is necessary to have budget estimates deve�oped in accordance with local copital budgeting practice, and these estimates shali be retoined on file by the City For possible hIUD review. 2Any proposed use ro controct and consultont services in an activity shall be justified by a norrative stotement setting forth Ihe service to be rendered ��nder �he controct and Ihc basi� (or the cost estimate. Th� stotement shall be Induded a• port of Ihe nppropriotc work p�ogrom. HUU•1U40(2-70) Previous edition ia obsolctc HUD•Wash.; D.C. -20k- ' 2a�i�eu•P * Total Revised HUD 2nd Year Grant , 1'i)I:M AI'I�:;��,�..� �, ,�. _— . ..�..��._.��._.�.-....�._��-. ...�_._..."�� .��..._.._. 1�1 I I�t I.1' "l 1 i-� :, ... . ... � "'.......y. . 1 . �.. � � �.1 i.1'I Y .._�.. .�.�.w��.._.._. .. ._.�..�.....--...- .,.. U.S. [?LPARTf.'I Ptl Of Nl�;l<.I.'!,. n.ldi) Ui:!'.%J7 CiEVFLOf''t.sClJl GTY Gf.MONSTI:h i IUN AGEI�CI' GUQG'cT St. Paul, Minnesota PRUGR/4'.'. C��TEGO�:� -- PR�%5��`;1,� BUDG[='C ��ro<,r:��:��,;oi:,`—" -- -- _ � __ Housing , (ALL FIGUR�E:, IIJ Tiic'�U:,��,I-!:.>., �rOUNtiF_U �O THc: 1Jf-;AF2l�.'JT THOUSn�iC�i NUD Pkp�FCT p��pq—� C:UitF1ENl � R@V1S1011 REQUt�T.STE_Ci FUNCS USE � AF'FRO�.'EU TITLL' YEAF.S ONLY t.!C GRAt�IT ��UGE7 � ? NUN MC� GRAPlI. FUNC�T. TOTAL FUNDS MC GRAFJI MC GI-2ANT --------� ---------- ---- �(• r. FlINDS F�U[RAL STAI'E ! OCAL (t) (2) (3) -- (4) — -- �5ay -- (56)a (Scl f6) Rehabilitation Loans and Grants 12 108 -0- -0- 108 Demonstration Home Construction Gran s -0- 45 +20 -0- 65 Consultant Housing Study 25 -0- -0- -0- -0- Model Neighborhood Swimming Pool 725 100 -0- 237 100 Housing Developmen Corp. -0- 150 -0- -0- �.50 , GRAND TOTAL Q �-20 23] 423 �Copital Projects must be identiRed by underlining the Project T)tle, Prior to start of construction, the CDA must hove on file for possiEle HUD review a detailed copitol ocquisition ond ronstruction cost budget for eoch project s�pportcd by specificatione. and drowings(and any subse� Ruent chony e orders)which must havr beer� reviewed and app�oved by the City's Engineer, o quolified engineering consultnnt or the Operoting gency's Techinical Stoff. At the time of submission of this budget schedule� it is necessary to have budget e;timates deve�oped in accordonee with lor_ol copital budgeting proctice, and these estimates shall be �etained on file by the City For possible FIUD review. 2Any proposud usc ro comra�t and consultont services in on activity shall be justified by a narrativ� stotcme�t seHing forth the sctrvice to be rendcred undcr the contract ond Ihe 6asis (or thc cost estimatc. The statcment shall be included� part of ihc appropriotc work program. HUD-7U40(2-70) Prcvious edition is obsolutc riu�•wash.; D.C. � 24)l�i!•P * Total Revised HUD 2nd Year Grant -20m- . �� ,��:�� ,� :.,,.., „ . ��, � , � �.�� , : , ,�; . , . .. , —_____.—_ _ ��.__..�._..._...��....__ .�._.,_._._T_ _. ._ __ .._._._.._...__ _ _ ___ - . __._.._ �,1�I Y . . u.s. n�F>nr:T�.�� r,r or rii��i ,. �..i;,> u�.i��.�: r,rvt�t �r!.;e�ai CITY DLt�40�iSTf:�:�lif;� AGi:1�C1' GUDG'�-r St. Paul, Minnesota PRUGRl;'', C��7EG0�:�' -- PR+�(;f:/,1.1 BUDG�'C ��r��,�:��-�,t,:<�F:,-- ----- _ ^_ ___ _ Citizen Participation IALL FIGURLi, ItJ 'i1iC;t.�:,.�,11;.`b ltnUNlif=D l0 TFIc NE'ARI�';T l-HOUi,F�NDI HUn p{1pJF"r�.CT PRIOt3 '-�-Ur�F1L.Nl-- —�-� R@V1S10II----�REQUE$Tf_C� FUNG:i ' -�- — USE 1 AF'FF"10`JEU �r..... ..�___._.__��.. TITL[ YEAf,S - - ONLY 1.!CGF2��F�T ��UGf-T _ NUIJ MC: G(QANI" fUNI>ft TOTl�L * FUNDS IvIC GRAFJI IdC GF2A.NT� -----...---� -------- -- ---•-- - FLUERAL �STATL ! ')CAL ��'�' � � FIINClS (1) (Z) .(3) ----- (A) - -- (So) --- I5�) _ . . (SC) f6) Citizen Participat' n 141 253 +2 65 255 , GRAND TOTAL ^ Z�FL ZS3 '}2 6S ZSS �Copital Projects must be identified by underlining the Project Ti�le. Prior to start of construction, the CDA must havc on file for possible HIID review a detailed capitol ocquisition and construction cost budget for each projecf supportcd by speciFications and d�uwings(nnd �my subsc Ruent chony c ord�rs)which must hovr bcen revicwed and app�oved by the City's Engincer, o quolified engincering consultont or thc Operoting gr.ncy's Iechinical Staff. At the time of submission of tliis budget schedule, it is necessory to hove bud�et estimates deveioped in accordonee with local caP;ral bud9erin9 p��crice, ond these estimates shall be retained on file by the City for possible FIUD revicw. 2Any propowd use fo controct ond consulront services in an octivity shall be justified by o narrotive stotement setting forth the service to be rendc�ed undcr thc controct and thc basis for thc cost estimotc. Thc statement shall be included a port of �hc appropriotc work progrom. HUU-7U40(2-70) Prcvious edition is obsol�tc HUD-Wash.� D.C. � 24�1�0.P -20n- * Total Revised HUD 2nd Year Grant ` � 1"C)I:Id AI'1�; I I, �.�. �. . .�.. �....�r....�_..�.. ...�,_._.....�.�.� 1 i I I I�� 1.7' � �,��_i : � .. . � � .�.��.�.�... �_...._. . ....��.. �.�.�.�. �. .. ..`.�...._.�.�__. _... � u.s. n�E�nr,Tr.+; rir or t+��,��,i�:;, �,r:u u�:is;.�; r,rvt��_er-.ivai `"�,v UTY Df_�dONS71:,:�i:,;� �c�:r:c•�� cunc��T St. Paul, Minnesota PROGR�� .'. C��TEG0�:1" -- P(�OGR�`,1.1 BUDG��r �''t°"�;"'" ` ",`,;"':, - _ _ ____ __ Evaluation and Information (ALL FIGURI`. IN 'i�iC�i.��,��;.��, t<OUNtiFU lQ THc_ NF.:nRI�.•'.T� l"NOli:,k,iCi HUD PROJf:CT PRIOR—' GUitFtF:NI-- --...-----�---�---'REQUFS7f_C� FUClUS �— --- — USE � AF'FROVEU ' ReV1S1011 T I T L E Y E A f„ ------�—•-- • ONLY I.1C GF21MT �UUGFT, NUt� tdC: GRANT FUNC)8 TOTf1L� FUNDS MC GRAP�I tdC G14ANT? --------. —.----�---- ----- ((. �, FUNDS FCUERAL STAI'L ! !�CAL (tl (21 (31 --- (4) 15a) 15�) (SCl (6) Evaluation 137 109 -0- 16 109 1, , GRAND TOTAL _0_ 16 109 �Copital Projects must be identifled by underlining the Proiect Ti►Ie. Prior to start of construction, tlie CDA must hove on lile for�,ossible HUD review o detailed capifol ocquisition ond construction cost budget for eoch projett supportcd by specifications ond druwings(ond ony subse� Ruent chony c ordr.rs)whir.h must have bcen reviewed and approved by the City's Engincer, o qualified engincerin� consultont or thc Operating grncy's Techinical Sta((. At the time of submission of this budget schedule, it is necessory ro have bud�et estunotes deve�oped in aecordonce with Ioco1 capital budgeting practice, and these estimates shall be refained on file by the City for possibie hIUD revlew. 2Any proposod use to controct ond consultant services in an activity shall be justified by a norrotive statement setting forth the service to be rendered under the controct ond the basi: (or �he cost estimate. Th� statement shall be included r,• port of Ihe appropriate work progrom. HUD-7U40(2-70) f'rcvious edition is obsol�tc HUD•wosh.� D.C. � 2471�U.p -200- * Total Revised HUD 2nd Year Grant . I"Cil:l.l AI'1��.,'r'�,i �� 1�111�� 1.7' i.l ..• • •1 _ . ._._..�. . C 1�1 Y '--.._. �.�...�.� � _ .._._...._._.�._..- --` . U.S. I�LF�nr,T�.�i rii or ric�,�s.ir; , n.r;,� i.�r;i�;.�; r;r:vt-t_or7.+�i�i CITY DLtdONSTI:�: �i:�;� tic�:r:c�r su�G�T St. Paull Minnesota �� _ PROGR��'.'. C�i7EG0.:`i P(�Ji>Fr'�.1.i BtJDC[�T ��+o�,�;n��.�7c�;c��:; - �' ' -- Administration (ALL FIC•URE:, IN TIiUI�';�117;.)t, ItOI.JNfiF_D l0 TFI�: NE'ARI�.'.1T� THQUi,htlL�) NUD PR��JECT ------��-CU�.kLNI'-� ._.-----'_�_. _. .___. --- -- P�`��'�� Revised �EQUESTI_C� FUNUS USE TI�TL�� 1'EAF.; AFPFiOVEU � ONLY f."C GR1htT �UDGh:Y, � N(UtJ M(: G(?ANT FUN!)°t TOTAL FUND`., MC GRAPlI I.AC GI-2ANT� ----�----� ---�--'---- ---• FUNDS F[=DF_RAL STATE ' �)CAL ��'�� (i) (21 (3) --- (4) 15u) (51�) (SC) (6} Administration 354 324 111 239 435 , CRANDTOTAL 354 324 +111 239 435 �Copital Projccts must bc identi�led by underlining the Project Titic. Prior to start of construction, thc CDA must h<�vc on lite{or�,ossiblc HIID review a detoiled capitol acquisi�ion ond construction cost budget for eoch project s�pported by specificotion:. and druwings(nnd any subsc Ruent chon�gc orders)which must hove hcen rcvicwed and approved by the City�s Engincer, o qua�ified enginceri�g consultnnt or the Operoting gency's Techinical Staf(. At the time of submission of this budget schedule, 'tt is necessory to have budget estimotes developed in accordonce with lor_�I copital budgeting practice, and these estimates shall be refained on f(le by the City For possible FIUD review. zAny propos�d use to coMroct ond consu��on� services in an octivity shall be jusliFied by a narrotive stutemr.nt setting forth the service to be renderad under �he contract and the basi:, for the cost estimate. Th� statement shall be included a port of Ihe npproprietc work progrom. HUD-7U40(2-70) Previous cdition is obsolctc HUD•�Nash.; D.C. 2d7180•P *Total Revised HUD 2nd Year Grant -20p- , �V�� ON-GOING PROJECT NAME OF PROJEC�': Local Development Corporation COMPONENT NAME: Economic (Economic and Business Development) ADMINISTERfNG AGENCY: H.E.L.P. Development Corporation SUBCONTRACTING AGENCY; None MAJOR CHANGES The Second Year Action Plan contained no major changes in this project. Con- tinously becoming more professional , this project promises to become ongoing and self sustaining through wise and comprehensive business interrelationships. Transition funds shall be used to continue the administrative funcTion with the primary action focus being the development of a community sized shopping � center within the Northeast Quardrant of the Model Neighborhood Area. The project is planned by H.E.L.P. Development Corporation with assistance, advice and consultation of. three organizations� which are experts in -hhe design, construction and management of shopping centers. These organizations are the International Council of Shopping Centers, Dayton-Hudson Properties/ Target, and H. and Val J . Rothchild. The general contractor will be Kraus/ Anderson Construction with the architecturai design done by Surenda Ahuja of James M. Cooperman Associates. Interim and permanent financing will be provided by H. and Val J . Rothchild. -2l- The St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority is responsible for acquiring and vacating the necessary land for the shopping center. Following is a breakdown of the expenses incurred to prepare the site for redevelopment. Public improvements Street construction $29,000.00 Street removal 18,000.00 Sewer rerouting 7,500.00 (paid with local funds) $54,500.00 Acquisition $1 ,336,687.00 Relocation 489,741 .00 Acq. & rel . total $1 ,826,428.00 TOTAL COST $� �gg0,928.00 Cost of H.E.L.P. Development Corporation for acquisition of the land. 387,000 sq. ft. at . 14 per sq. ft. $54,300 The City of St. Paul is also researching further irrkind contributions such as the foilowing : 1 . providing a waiver of the development fees and/or permit fees. 2. Providing manpower training for entrepreneurs will be housed within the shopping center. A salary of $10,000 for one staff position has been allocated through the Ofifice of Manpower Planning. Additional benefits will develop as that person determines training needs and assisi� � in implementing training programs fo such entrepreneurs. All other activities within the previous scope of services shall continwe or be expanded in relation to opportunities which become available. Coordination of economic and physicai development will become a greater responsibility. -22- SCHEDULING The shopping center is scheduled to be completed in �975. Meanwhile the LDC will be seeking and training po�t�entially qualified Model Neighborhood residents for management posit�ions with franchised businesses to be located within the center. A portion of the budget is allocatEd as "front-end money" to negotiate franchises for those trained individuals who prove cap- able. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION The agency shall be broadly representative of the residents of the Model Neighborhood Area. Par�ticipation will also be sought from the broader City Community. Participation by private business, individuals and agencies with particular expertise in economic development will be provided in an advisory capacity. RESIDENT EMPLOYMENT Insofar as is possible, all positions created by this project will be filted by Model Neighborhood residents. In addition, the project will provide, through its business development potentials, numerous employment and owner- ship opportunities. PROJECT STAFFING Stafting rema(ns basically the same as iri the Second Year Action Plan, but with greater emphasis on business develop�ent, land planning, public relations, and coordination of housing development activities. -23- FUTURE FUNDING By the end of 1975, H.E.L.P. Development Corporation expects to be self sup- porting through its own efforts, commitment and by private investors, and through re-cycling and spin-off benefiis from its track record of accomplish- ments while under contract with the city. ASSESSMENT Economic development, by its very nature, is s�ower to show measureable progress than some of the less complex projects. H.E.L.P. Development Corporation has accomplished the interest and respect of the larger metropolitan economic community and the govermental agencies with which it interacts. With the completion of the shopping center H.E.L.P. will have accomplished the beginning of economic rejuvenation for the Model Neighborhood and will have provided a catalyst for housing construction and rehabilitation. -24- . � d��;'L�� . � ON-GOING PROJECT NAME OF PRQJECT: Demonstration Home Construction and Emergency Rehabilitation CCt�1F'�NENT NAME: Phys i ca I ADMINISTERING AGENCY: St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority SUBCONTRACTfNG AGENCY: None MA,J OR CKANGES This project will provide similar services to those provided by the two Second Action Year projects administered through the Housing and Redevelopment Authority: Rehabilitation Grants and Demonstration Home Construction. The Demonstration �lome Construction Grants will be reduced to a maxium of $2,000 each which will allow an additional seven grants. The purpose content and operation of the grants remain the same as in the Revised Second Action Year Submission, and will continue to provide incentive for quality housing construction by Model Neighborhood Residents within the Model Neighborhood. The emergency grant portion of the previous Rehabilitatiqn Grant Project will be continued with an additional $6,000 allocation, and will , thereby-, continue to provide a means of saving some of the existing housing stock within the Model Neighborhood. Emergency Rehabilitation grants up to $1 ,250 will be used only when no grant funds are available (under emergency time constraints) . �25r SCHEDULING Grants will be awarded by the Grant Committee at its reguarly scheduled meet-� ings. Awards will be allocated upon a first come basis or upon the choice of the committee when a choice among applicants is necessary. Emergency grants will be allotted ai the discretion of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority after seekiny concurrence of need from involved social service agen- cies and afiter de1-ermininy that alternative funds are not available. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION A Neighborhood Com�ittee w,ill conttnue to function. in the �am� manner as th�t which took place during the First and Second Action Years. RESIDENT EMPLOYMENT No direct employment opportunities will be created by this project. PROJECT STAFFING • No new staff positions will be created through this prqject. The Admintstertng Agency will utilize its existing staff therefore there are no administrative cost included. FUTURE FUNDING The budget through June 30, 1975, wili be $20,000. The project wiil fu�ction until all of the available funds have been expended. The funds allocated will be expended only for grants. � -26- ` �� MONITORI.NG AND EVAULATION The project will be monitored on a monthly basis throughout the contract period. it will be evaulated on the basis of planneci versus actual achievement at intervals throughout its operation. ASSESSMENT Physical development and restoration of the existing housing si�ock has a high priority with the Model Neighborhood Planning Council . The previous Demonstration Home Contract successfully instigated high quality new housing construction by fifteen Model Neighborhood families. The rehabilitation of �50 homes has been assisted by the Rehabilitation Grant Project since its inception. These accompiishments have required no supplemental funds for administrative expenses on the part of Model Cities. AIl administrative costs have been absorbed by the St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority. -27- . i . � -8Z- . . =c� �9 � � O A A � ��y+ E � O ~o O � � O e�D X 6 Ap O '� X� M- O }�py O � G CC •_. C � W C� O- 9 �+ H ►� �+ .i O 7 Q d ? 0. � � ►e O B C �e '[f 7 B > 27 r � ' � - t7� a O r� O q y r F+ .� ee s e+ L' O '� F� O M B � n n O. � �d .• a .- � 7' w a d � 0�1 V� cr�] �C w ^t F� O O' F+ t! F�- M Cb 'S yF�• '4 10 q A 19 �7y.. O OY 7 O '� �► p "' p. �C Y � C. !! � F� Z n � � F 1+ N F+ B OG � '7 "t V 2 ZC '7 �i e► 'tf O •! F+ y A j O r� • O r• ro y O Z Cz .� {7 O y 1 O 0� W O N � '1 i+ < ry r+ W1+ ^ � O '�.a �i '�1 9p p M O O V O 'G' p � � O(] O < n !�7 'y7 J ~ V• � R7 "�J' b.' .1 � � F� ~ K p' C W Y 7 N� m ~ O M��+ y � �0 ~ � zg ` o � � �� c� b�' o° � '� o � n r�• o �r° �' "o' o � "o "m � � o'o c � � � a � o � (n C7 �0 G � y M e� G � A '/ ( N O '1 O V � G m� w '� p � r o b� °a �J c� � :� w s p _ o � � o � � o � � N � � r 5 � .� n r � oo m B e Ei �• � \ p .+ � � o � c� d c a� � � � � n3i� � � �°e w " � /9 � � � a � ►s � o e � °' � � °e� � i �o o a o � `e o. c � � e n � � ti o c� y H N w .� o � o m � � .. r� �e o a r r � r+ o O f+ \ O y m O N ti 0 0 �y � V G O 9 �7 0 1+ N O O y� H p �� "�� n O d 00 O 1� .'� b �'l G 'q F� 'c7 N �1 A F+ 9' �O �'f O iL' e� � y �. -, � � � B." \ �a W � y � 60' N t7 t! r J ey+ �G y�y � n � o � �yy 1-� O. aO� 1 F� 3 �+ d \~t-� � � N rQ � V \r � �N A '7 O� y � v N t 01 C7 V e► W N AC e* v Q 6 O� > 1-� 1 � \ h' 1-� \ F � v �gy F� O� � • Gi � \ O O �! m � [�J N 1 ff e�► O \ W � 5' 1-' W N M N \ 'S M O J 1-' O V e'► p� 41 \ \ ' � e* CS N er M• N N � O a es 1 R! M M' �O \ f� 7 M' H �7 1V � r. w O� O � 1 h• O � F� W W .. C p 1 � .y � 01 m O � � N 1 �! ! ~ O` C7 Cu o \ z r ---�O D \ p —+ O� tiy .* \ �O � � J vN � � tl W \�1 �.. �yy n N .. V�N ~ \ � m p v O � F+ � \ v ~ � \W � � N f+ � �1,1 �� O W F+ O r� 1 V GJ'1\ 9 \}+ � Ni� e� Oq � G1 O �y r 1 \ O a�� x \ p.j 0 �M � y� 1 J �O W 2 N \ ��N R V V \ y 4� 'f \ \ 1 O� 9 � �N - � °z�$ �w Wz � � �� C w � � b � v � � � " � � � � �53 � � � � � - — r'� � � O � � �N s � � N o � G� r � ►J � u+ � w v Z W � v � r�+ v � \ w � � � � .o 00 'C •.• •• •• m 'b'qTu � _' V � cWi �O � r w}. W� W o� r � N v � � F ■•, \N t77 .. p1 r. \ ,�v \ B O �W \ � v � � � \ � p W v v-W.+v� W � \ w}+ v � V \ 1 � F�+ N F+ ( \ Q �7 \ \ (j1 �] v . 1 1 v � V v V O v v � �i �' �\il � �O � \ � � ... ...� �' � � � � � r \ N O� v v v � w y ,� � v v (T� � � � � w C v � v r �71 � _ v � �. V � � 0� � '�^1 � � O '1^ , � j �i _ � 0 I N , � � o . w � . o � � � � � . � . w M