02-1015Return copy to:
Real Estate Division(lal)
140 City Hall
Presented By
Referred To
Committee: Date
i WHEREAS, on 7une 26, 2002, the City Council of the City of Saint Paul adopted Council File #02-584, said
2 Resolution being the Ratification of Assessments for property clean-up during part of the month of Mazch,
s 2002 (File No. J0202A, Assessment No. 0939), and
s WHEREAS, the property at 727 6th Street East, being described as:
Subject to easement to street, the southeasterly 90 feet of Lot 18, Auditor's Subdivision No. 72, St
Paul, Minnesota,
�o
ti
iz
13
14
is
16
»
is
19
with the property identification number of 32-29-22-14-0013 was assessed an amount of $1,205.00 for
properry clean-up at said property, and
WHEREAS, it has since been discovered that no work was completed at that property, and
WHEREAS, the Legislative Hearing Officer has recommended that the assessment be deleted,
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the amount of the assessment for this property be deleted, and
BE IT F'[JRTHER RESOLVED, that the reduction of 1,205.00 be funded by the Exempt Assessment Fund.
e
��S"
Councii File # (�'�„ �p�s
Green Sheet # 111674
RESOLUTION
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
�
cs��
� o �,- to�s
T.M.S./REAL ESTATE DIVISION Date: October 17, 2002 Green Sheet Number: 111674
Coniac[ Person and Phone Number: �.� T 2 DEPAR'I'MEN'1' DIRF,CIO 4 CIfY COiJNCII.
��) ;yJ
PeteT White`C��"t' 266-8850 � ''" 1 CIIYATTORNEY M_ �, crrYCLexx
r l � j � l/ � ��
Must be on Couocil Agenda by:
^" � BUDGEI' DIItECfOR OFFICE OF FINANG7AI. SVCS.
��� 3 MAYOR (OR ASSISiAN'C) REAL ESTATE DIVLSION
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIPALLLOCATIONSFORSIGNATURE)
ACITON REQUESTED: -
pprove a Council Resolution to delete the amount of an assessment for property clean-up for tLe property at
27 6th Street East.
RECOMMENDATIONS: APPROVE (A) OR REJECT (R) pERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MI1ST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:
1. Has the person/firm ever worked under a contrac[ for this departmen[? YES NO
PLATTIINGCOMMISSION A S'IAFF
2. Has ffiis persoNfirm ever bee� a City employee? YES NO
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
3. Does this persoNFrm possess a sldll oot normally possessed by any YES NO
C�sCOm,yrrrEe current City employee?
Ex lain all YES answers on a se arate sheet and attach.
SUPPORTS WHICH WUNCII.OBJECTIVE?
COUNCIL 7 DISTRICT PLANNING COUNCIL 4
ARD 5
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNI7'Y (Who, Whay When, Where, Why?):
The property at 727 6th Street East was inadvertently assessed for clean-up work done on the
nei hborin ro e . Assessed amount needs to be deleted from the record.
ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: ,e ��S°�'°�'�
,�� r'U'
Erroneous assessment would be eliminated. �, ,�� ��"'� �
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: p,. ,', �"��v'`�>
��� � �
Reduction would have to be funded by the City's Exempt Assessment Fund.
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
A ro e would be assessed when no work was done, which oes a ainst Ci olic .
TOTAL AMOUNT OF'I'RANSACTION: $ 1�ZOS.00 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDING SOURCE: EXCIYIpt ASSOSSII1CLt FUII(IS A�Tn'ITY NUMBER: GL OOI-O9OS1-OS4Z
F[NANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN)
A`i C. °vr�?S (�,
OCT-04-2002 12�16 CODE ENFORCEMENT
n M randum
I`�' C SATNT PAUL
TO:
FROM:
� � ����
��
�
RDX8IIIl3 �13IljC
Andy Dawkins
SUBJECT: 727 6`" Street East
DATB: July 10, 2002
651 266 8426 P.01/01
O�-�O\S
This witl confirm my official request that you prepare a City Council Resolucion to
cancel the abatement assessment approved by the Co¢ncil on Jy�'y,'26, 2002 regarding
727 6`" Street East (Jeff Lucas, property owner). ����,.
The brief history is as foIlows: my field staff did issue a conection order to clean up
wood. Mr. Lucas did in fact do the correction work in a timely manner. I-Towevez, a
work order was issued for the property despite Mr. Lucas' ttaving completed the work,
and when che abacement crew azrived on the scene they found no work to be done on
Mr. Lucas' property and mistakenly decided to clean up the properry next door to Mr.
Lucas' and assess it to Mr. Lucas.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
TOTAL P.01