Loading...
02-100'(�mc�, e� - �-� . �, a-o o a_ �, i � � �'_ ' '�. 1 � � CITY OF ST. PAUL � i\� L° � a ��: � ORDER COUNCIL FILE NO. O.� + �00 ^p B Y --�'=/ /'/ ./LT�TL�//�- C36 File No.S02001 Voting Ward 2-7 In the Matter of sidavralk reconstruction aad/or aew coastruction at the followiag locations: 502001 - 637 South Smith Avenue, 844,870,917 Grand Avenue, 1304 Juno Avenue, 164 & 176 North Snelling Avenue, 240 Milford Street, 1528,1532,1536 k 1542 Westminster Street, 1174 Arcade Street, 1551 Payne Avenue, 1743 & 1747 Margaret Street. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. Naw construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(MOre than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100o of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. h 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Building in the City of Saint Paul. °dv -t the dav of March, 2002 City Hall and Court House 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓Blakey ✓Bostrom �bae.�� Coleman ,/Harris i/I,antry �/keiter �In Favor 6 Against � �bse�.�' Adopted by Council : Date ��. 6� a.00y Certified Passed by Council Secretary : �� '\ _ _.i1 � /.�� _ !�G�!,a�_ _ ' • �'Uf3UC Works - Sidewalk Division 1f�Z GREEN _ (CLIPALL Il OBJECTIVE? I��.�i qVIL SERNCE COMMISSION DEPAflTMINT DIRE(.TOR CfiYATTOflNEY BUDGEf DIRECfOR MAYOR (Ofl ASSISTAN'n ASSOCIAiE o �,._Zp o NO. 110440 INtTiAUDATE ❑CfTYGOUNCIL � ❑ �� CLERK ❑ FlN. & MGT. SEAYICES OIR � Council Research � Reconstruct Sidewalk R=xr�struct Croasi�g 8� C,onstruct Drivevvay Apron & Cut Curb in Wards 2, 3, 4, 5, 6& 7 0-8-02 PERSONALSEFtVICE CO?3TRAC75 MUSTANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: t. HasihispersoNfirmeverworkedunderacon'2c[fortl�iadeparimeM? YES NO 2. Has Uiis perso^ifirtn ever heen a cry °mpioyee? YES NO 3. Does this pefson.ftism possess a sidl1 not nortnalty pc _;�ssed by any curtent city empbyee? YF� NO Expfain all yes answers on separate sheet and attz:n ta green sheet � . WF1AT. WHEN. WHERE, WH'�: The probfem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multipte probtems, tree roots, poor subgrade matesiais, freefthaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These probiems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annuaily. Leftl�ncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this. project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private cqntractors generating pubiic sectorjobs as a resuit. r � r 'y �y 1iv , '(j��7' . r• � � �,� -r ? ��'�Y� Y� i�+: IFAPPROVED: Histosicalty, the sidewa4k reconstruction has created negative feedback because of cons�ruction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversiai issue. �" IFNOTAPPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wiil generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. IOUNT OF THANSACTION $ SOUFiCE O� �M-OE7 � � COSTlHEVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) �YES� xo SHEET _INIMVDA7E ✓ pa,_4ja SUMIVIARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMIV�NDATIONS Wazd 2 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWAL% N.S. W. BAKER ST. from Ottawa Ave. to S. Smith Ave. at 637 S. Smith Ave. Only. �O �O I INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with cracked and setded panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. GRAND AVE. from S. Milton St. to S. Victoria St. at 917 & 870 Grand Ave. Only. �D , no � INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. w EXISTING CONDITIONS: Ttus walk is poured concrete with multi-cracked panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. GRAND AVE. from S. Victoria St. to S. Avon St. at 844 Grand Ave. Only. 50 �/� � INITIATING ACTION.• This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved panels. 02-�� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOD�VIENDATION •11QLc' PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. JLTNO AVE. from S. Hamline Ave. to S. Syndicate St. at 1304 Juno Ave. Only. �� � INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked panels. 0�-\0 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOD�IlVIENDATION Ward 4 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. N. SNELLING from Hague Ave. to Selby Ave. �O� at 164 N. Snelling Ave. Only & E.S. N. SNEL.LING AVE. from Selby Ave. to Dayton Ave. & N.S. SELBY AVE. from N. Snelling Ave. to N. Saratoga St. at 176 N. Snelling Ave. Only. INITZATING ACTIDN: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with undulating panels. o _ �oa SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATIONS Ward 5 �� ►r � 1 �1 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRIICT SIDEWAL% RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK CROSSING. CONSTUCT DRIVEWAYAPRON& CUT CURB S.S. MII,FORD ST. from Galtier St. to Marion St. at 240 Milford St. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDZTIONS: No driveway access for new gazage. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. WESTNIINSTER ST. from E. Arlington Ave. to E. Wheelock Pkwy. at 1528, 1532, 1536 & 1542 Westminster St. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with settled panels. oa-� �oo SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIMENDATIONS ,,� 5ozool 5p2oo I PRO.IECT: RECONSTR UCT SIDE WAZ,K E.S. ARCADE ST. from E. Rose Ave. to E. Maryland Ave. & N.S. E. ROSE AVE. form Arcade St. to Mendota St. at 1174 Arcade St. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Tlus walk is poured concrete with settled panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. PAYNE AVE. from Pazkway Dr. to E. Hoyt Ave. & S.S. E. HOYT AVE. from Edgerton St. to Payne ave. at 1551 Payne Ave. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with multi-cracked panels. oa._\a0 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMI��NDATION Wazd 7 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWAL% N.S. MARGARET ST. from Flandrau St. to N. White Bear Ave. at 1743 & 1747 Mazgaret St. Only. � O�"� ( INITIATING ACTION: Tbis order was initiated by a request from the properry owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled and cracked panels. '(�mc�, e� - �-� . �, a-o o a_ �, i � � �'_ ' '�. 1 � � CITY OF ST. PAUL � i\� L° � a ��: � ORDER COUNCIL FILE NO. O.� + �00 ^p B Y --�'=/ /'/ ./LT�TL�//�- C36 File No.S02001 Voting Ward 2-7 In the Matter of sidavralk reconstruction aad/or aew coastruction at the followiag locations: 502001 - 637 South Smith Avenue, 844,870,917 Grand Avenue, 1304 Juno Avenue, 164 & 176 North Snelling Avenue, 240 Milford Street, 1528,1532,1536 k 1542 Westminster Street, 1174 Arcade Street, 1551 Payne Avenue, 1743 & 1747 Margaret Street. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. Naw construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(MOre than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100o of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. h 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Building in the City of Saint Paul. °dv -t the dav of March, 2002 City Hall and Court House 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓Blakey ✓Bostrom �bae.�� Coleman ,/Harris i/I,antry �/keiter �In Favor 6 Against � �bse�.�' Adopted by Council : Date ��. 6� a.00y Certified Passed by Council Secretary : �� '\ _ _.i1 � /.�� _ !�G�!,a�_ _ ' • �'Uf3UC Works - Sidewalk Division 1f�Z GREEN _ (CLIPALL Il OBJECTIVE? I��.�i qVIL SERNCE COMMISSION DEPAflTMINT DIRE(.TOR CfiYATTOflNEY BUDGEf DIRECfOR MAYOR (Ofl ASSISTAN'n ASSOCIAiE o �,._Zp o NO. 110440 INtTiAUDATE ❑CfTYGOUNCIL � ❑ �� CLERK ❑ FlN. & MGT. SEAYICES OIR � Council Research � Reconstruct Sidewalk R=xr�struct Croasi�g 8� C,onstruct Drivevvay Apron & Cut Curb in Wards 2, 3, 4, 5, 6& 7 0-8-02 PERSONALSEFtVICE CO?3TRAC75 MUSTANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: t. HasihispersoNfirmeverworkedunderacon'2c[fortl�iadeparimeM? YES NO 2. Has Uiis perso^ifirtn ever heen a cry °mpioyee? YES NO 3. Does this pefson.ftism possess a sidl1 not nortnalty pc _;�ssed by any curtent city empbyee? YF� NO Expfain all yes answers on separate sheet and attz:n ta green sheet � . WF1AT. WHEN. WHERE, WH'�: The probfem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multipte probtems, tree roots, poor subgrade matesiais, freefthaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These probiems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annuaily. Leftl�ncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this. project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private cqntractors generating pubiic sectorjobs as a resuit. r � r 'y �y 1iv , '(j��7' . r• � � �,� -r ? ��'�Y� Y� i�+: IFAPPROVED: Histosicalty, the sidewa4k reconstruction has created negative feedback because of cons�ruction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversiai issue. �" IFNOTAPPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wiil generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. IOUNT OF THANSACTION $ SOUFiCE O� �M-OE7 � � COSTlHEVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) �YES� xo SHEET _INIMVDA7E ✓ pa,_4ja SUMIVIARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMIV�NDATIONS Wazd 2 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWAL% N.S. W. BAKER ST. from Ottawa Ave. to S. Smith Ave. at 637 S. Smith Ave. Only. �O �O I INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with cracked and setded panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. GRAND AVE. from S. Milton St. to S. Victoria St. at 917 & 870 Grand Ave. Only. �D , no � INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. w EXISTING CONDITIONS: Ttus walk is poured concrete with multi-cracked panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. GRAND AVE. from S. Victoria St. to S. Avon St. at 844 Grand Ave. Only. 50 �/� � INITIATING ACTION.• This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved panels. 02-�� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOD�VIENDATION •11QLc' PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. JLTNO AVE. from S. Hamline Ave. to S. Syndicate St. at 1304 Juno Ave. Only. �� � INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked panels. 0�-\0 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOD�IlVIENDATION Ward 4 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. N. SNELLING from Hague Ave. to Selby Ave. �O� at 164 N. Snelling Ave. Only & E.S. N. SNEL.LING AVE. from Selby Ave. to Dayton Ave. & N.S. SELBY AVE. from N. Snelling Ave. to N. Saratoga St. at 176 N. Snelling Ave. Only. INITZATING ACTIDN: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with undulating panels. o _ �oa SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATIONS Ward 5 �� ►r � 1 �1 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRIICT SIDEWAL% RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK CROSSING. CONSTUCT DRIVEWAYAPRON& CUT CURB S.S. MII,FORD ST. from Galtier St. to Marion St. at 240 Milford St. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDZTIONS: No driveway access for new gazage. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. WESTNIINSTER ST. from E. Arlington Ave. to E. Wheelock Pkwy. at 1528, 1532, 1536 & 1542 Westminster St. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with settled panels. oa-� �oo SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIMENDATIONS ,,� 5ozool 5p2oo I PRO.IECT: RECONSTR UCT SIDE WAZ,K E.S. ARCADE ST. from E. Rose Ave. to E. Maryland Ave. & N.S. E. ROSE AVE. form Arcade St. to Mendota St. at 1174 Arcade St. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Tlus walk is poured concrete with settled panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. PAYNE AVE. from Pazkway Dr. to E. Hoyt Ave. & S.S. E. HOYT AVE. from Edgerton St. to Payne ave. at 1551 Payne Ave. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with multi-cracked panels. oa._\a0 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMI��NDATION Wazd 7 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWAL% N.S. MARGARET ST. from Flandrau St. to N. White Bear Ave. at 1743 & 1747 Mazgaret St. Only. � O�"� ( INITIATING ACTION: Tbis order was initiated by a request from the properry owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled and cracked panels.