Loading...
266220 P COUNCIL, FILE NO.`—����0 City of St. aul RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT By '='� ° �J � '// ���._. File Na i�i�►3'�G In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for ��� � p��� e�. •11.�► s. 11wek �. tfaw�rott hro. st�� �i. r.� Mw.i+sr sa. under Administrative Order �i� approve� ���� l� 1�73 Preliminary Order ��Ol� approverl /�►�1 i, 147� � Finat Order _ 361tii approved 1M�► 3, 1979 A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore,by it RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified, a^� ''�� °°--�� '° '"-°'�" O�FE�Cf9�—tn kP ci�h itta,7 � �7. r��— • ^ �ii�� ��i 'r'nH "----`� E�i leetriicv ioi cei:i=' tinn, i' i RESOLVED FURTHER,That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in `S equal installments. � � `h� �' v }-,� OCT 2,1 1g75 COUNCILMEN Adopted by the Council: Date Yeas Nays OCT Z�2 1975 ` �istense� Certi asse Council Secretary zz1 � �'�� � In Favor By � �� i�'o?dler� U Against � Sy i��ste� Mayor �� 'SHE� O�T $.� 1975� , . ^ Cit of St.Paul COUNCIL FILE NO. �����0 Y Of�ce of The Director of Finance By REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT • File No. t��"d In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for �� � ��� �� iil� !a llo� t, 1��slt t� � R�l. tt�r ili�elrrtc tt• under Administrative Order ��= approved �� �' i��3 Preliminary Order ��� approved �'Z `• =p� FinalOrder �`xf� approvecL � �* ;9�a To the Council of the City of St. Paul: The Director of Finance hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz: Total construction costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ �,483_5� Engineering and Inspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 522,52 Valuation and Assessment Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 69_67 Postal Cards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ �.3n Finance Accounting Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 31_5� Publications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 31_50 Collection Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 63.00 Court costs for confirmation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ TOTAL EXPENDITURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4�207_99 Chargeto. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ .............................................................................. $ Net Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4�207.99 Said Director further reports that he has assessed and levied the total a�nount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $ ����� oo upon each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefited by the said improve- ment, and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits conferred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, identified by the'signature of the said Director, and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by him, and which is herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may be considered proper. Dated Sentember 23, 1975 Roger A. Mattson Director of Finance & Msnagement Se�'vicea � � 26�220 ����°°� ____ Cdou�l 7Y1e No. � -- �}7 $1� HunL-- .' Tn the ap�tie�' o� � °� bi�se�tf„oo�!a�pd e�s»eae��a�i� n� thq aiLy��s ;i3 k +v�'4� d� ��4�A.: 4� Pes�le�t7' AATU 4. 19�3 $�ttsl Ort�' ffi1188,JaD- proved�MeY�� lfl'tx � Th� assessrnent of b�x►eSffi.-eos£and expenses for aiid �n Cunnection �� the above impmve�e nt t►�vfn8 .b�en' s^ubmitted to the Counoil, and_ the. cuncil 1�CVing considered �ame and Wund the said a�ses�ment satiaPgctoz'Y, there�Dre.be it . Aesolv That the :SAid aseea�mbnt �e snd g� ,same ls .11er�by fn ell �pe�cts a�fp ed. .;�ieeolved- er. thkt': a puplic� yed be���a3d a8�lessmgnt.o�► •hg oi OCLatler 1 S 8 t�e �o�r of 10 o'cio A.M. iYi tlze'CounCil GR�dt�►ber'04 tli+���irt �iouse and Cit Qalll SuildinS in ttte Gi#�i�ts�ei �1vC CI�t¢the D�recto of tim�eC�d$gf8et qt�1�x�. the��tt re c# tlse.iai�rovem�6al. an tlta a�Ap�.� a�ssed agafnst the Iot o! ldts o! '�lud parti¢ulsr owaer,�q wl�om the notice f($ItwCtl+d. - !ik PTo. 178e3-G. Ad��pted bY '�'�u� �I �, !lrb: • ' 'e°�r°ro�a a��i'i��ii