The URL can be used to link to this page

01-9020� ��iNAL �r��.a.�d. - o�t. ay , aoo� Council File # p � - qp .1. �reen Sheet # � "2..3�t� PAl Presented By Referred To Committee: Date G�1 1 WHEREAS, Citizen Service Office, Division of Code Enforcement has requested the City Council 2 to hold public hearings to consider the advisability and necessity of ordering the repair or wrecking and 3 removal of a two-story, wood frame, duplex and a detached, two-stall, wood frame garage located on 4 property hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property" and commoniy known as 393 Sidney Street East. 5 This properiy is legaliy described as follows, to wit: 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2F4 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Lot 6, Riley's New Arrangement of the South half of the West 257 ft of Block 44 Brown & Jackson's Addition WHEREAS, based upon the records in the Ramsey County Recorder's Office and information obtained by Division of Code Enfarcement on or before April 20, 2001, the following are the now known interested or responsible parties for the Subject Property: Claudia Tendrup, Ceniral Towers, 20 Exchange Street East, St. Paul, MN 55101; Lutheran Social Services, 540 Park Street, Ste. 310, St. Paul, MN 55103, Attn: Jan Ferrier WHEREAS, Division of Code Enforcement has served in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code an order identified as an"Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s)" dated June 13, 2001; and WHEREAS, this order informed the then known interested or responsible parties that the structure located on the Subject Properiy is a nuisance building(s) pursuant to Chapter 45; and WHEREAS, this order informed the interested or responsible parties that they must repair or demolish the shucture located on the Subject Property by 7uly 13, 20Q1; and WHEREAS, the enforcement officer has posted a placard on the Subject Property declaring this building(s) to constitute a nuisance condirion; subject to demolition; and WHEREAS, this nuisance condition has not been corrected and Division of Code Enforcement requested that the City Clerk schedule public hearings befare the Legislative Hearing Officer of the City Council and the Saint Paul City Councii; aud WHEILEAS, the interested and responsible parties have been served notice in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, of the time, date, place and purpose of the public hearings; and -� 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 ��N� o,_q �� . REAS, a hearing was held befare the Legislative Hearing Officer of the Saint Paul City Council on uesday, August 7, 2001 to hear testunony and evidence, and after receiving testimony and evidence, made the recommendation to approve the request to order the interested or responsible parties to make the Subject Property safe and not dehimental to the public peace, health, safety and welfaze and remove its blighting influence on the community by rehabilitating this structure in accardance with all applicable codes and ordinances, or in the altemative by demolishing and removing the structure in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances. The rehabilitation or demolirion of the structure to be com leted within da s after the date of the Council Hearin p _•�..r�A�.i e.1.l. i�ac1 Y 4+� �+1.c c.ai.A.�4.��. Y4. �a T++ MHN onf ocF.iV a•e� WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the Saint Paui City Counci on e es y, ugust 22, 20 1 and the testimony and evidence including the acrion taken by the Legislative Hearing Officer was considered by the Council; now therefore BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon the testimony and evidence presented at the above referenced public hearings, the Saint Paul City Council hereby adopts the following Findings and Order concerning the Subject Properiy at 393 Sidney Street East: That the Subject Properiy comprises a nuisance condition as defined in Saint Paul Legislative Code, Chapter 45. 2. 3. Q FQ 7 That the costs of demolition and removal of this building(s) is estimated to exceed three thousand dollars ($3,000.00). That there now exists and has existed multiple Housing or Building code violations at the Subject Property. That an Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) was sent to the then known responsible parties to correct the deficiencies or to demolish and remove the building(s). That the deficiencies causing this nuisance condition have not been corrected. That Division of Code Enforcement has posted a placard on the Subject Property which declares it to be a nuisance condition subject to demolition. That this building has been routinely monitored by the Citizen Service Offices, Division of Code Enforcement, Vacant/Nuisance Buildings. 8. That the known interested parties and owners aze as previously stated in this resolution and that the notification requirements of Chapter 45 have been fulfilled. ORDER The Saint Paul City Council hereby makes the following order: The above referenced interested or responsible parties sha11 make the Subject Properiy safe and not detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and welfare and remove its blighting influence on the community by rehabilitating this structure and correcting all deficiencies as prescribed in the above referenced Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) in accordance with ail applicable codes and ordinances, or in the alternative by demolishing and removing the structure in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances. The rehabilitation or demolition and removal of the structure must be completed within €rf�ee�{�k5} days after the date of the Council Hearing. V pt�c.`t�ux�.ral z:�)�� C�80� ORfGINAL O�-�o� 1 2. If the above corrective action is not completed within this period of tnne the Citizen Service Office, 2 Division of Code Enforcement is hereby authorized to take whatever steps are necessary to 3 demolish and remove this shucture, fill the site and charge the costs incurred against the Subject 4 Property pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code. 7 10 11 12 3. In the event the building is to be demolished and removed by the City of Saint Paul, all personal property or fixtures of any kind which interfere with the demolition and removal shall be removed from the property by the responsible parties by the end of this tune period if all personal property is not removed, it shall be considered to be abandoned and the City of Saint Paul shall remove and dispose of such property as provided by law. 4. It is fiirther ordered, that a copy of this resolution be mailed to the owners and interested parties in accordance with Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code. Adopted by Council: Date Q� ,�.y 2.0�� Adoption Certified by Council Secretary By: � 3 ►' Approved by Mayar: Date �� r'� l By: Li��'r/�'[ ��!'�� Requested by Department o£ Citizen Service Office: Code Enforcement BY`V � N �� .n�a��.c`". Form Approved by City Attorney By: Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council By: ��t r�� _� EPARTMENT/OFFICElCOUNCIL . ^ Divi�ion of Code Enfarcement f+ T PE N PHON �ichael��. �'Vlare�head:266-8439 �� IUST$E ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (DAT� ' � Wednesday, Auugst 22, 2001 ,— p�} - JOTAL # OF SIGNATURE?F � � ��:, � � „ "��_ ° , HEET , C� -°lo�- No i u�� [fl� • �,� •,. .w�w p� �� ^'/� pIY�'01MCIL �_ ��.� �3i_ ^' /� Fdl `_ 'k�!�q.�� .. �NK � ❑ MYCLf11N , t, f ;s � , � .�.��. _ o�..�,�� o��.,��..,�� ❑ 4CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIONATURE)' . CTIONRE�UESTED � '. � , �- �� - � — � City Cou�cil to pass thisresolution �hi will order the owner(s) to remove or repair the referenced building(s): If t}ie owner.faals Yo o`qmp�y with the t s6lutipn, the Citizen Service Of�ce, Division o£Code Enforcemant is orde'red ,�, � to remove the building. The su ' ect property is located at 393 Sidney Street East. 'PLANNING CIVILSER�ICE COMMISSION ,. r _.._. ... _,,. ..,, ..�., .,.,.,. .. , t. Hea thia pereon/Ilrm eVer xrorked untler a wMrect /01 thi� depertment7 ' YES NO 2. Han ihis peraoNllrm ever 6ean e oMy empbyee7 , YES NO 3. Doee thie persoNflrm poeteis a Ntlll not nwmellypweeeted by eny curcent clty ampluyee? VES Nb 4. lo Mle pereon/firm e teryetetl vandoR � VES NO ✓ � ' ' � E�yleln ell yea nnev,rere on eepeiate eheet and eXeoh to reen theet ��,!�,�iRi�€�&�A4€�g�€S�R94fti��YYNM��)�'El�i�ied in Chapter 45 and a vacant building as defined in Chapter 43 of , the Saint Paul Legislaiive Code. The owners, interested parties and responsible parties known to the En£orcement .,' Officar were given an order to repair or remove the building at 393 Sidney Street East by July,13, 2001, and have *- failed to comply with those orders. � � � HUVAIVIAGE3IF AYYHWED �a,�sF The City will eliminate a nuisance. ' �" '� DISADVANTAGESIFAPRROVED The Gity will spend funds to wreck_and remove this building(s). These costs will be assessed to the proparty, colleeted as a�peeial assessxnent a�ainst the-provertv tasces. • zisanee condition will remain unabated in the City. This building(s) will continue to blight the community. AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S � ' ' COETIREVENU¢ BUDOETED (CIRCLB ON6) VEB, NO � � io souRCe Nuisance Housin@ Abatement ACTIVITYNUMBER 3326I T CouncN R�ssarch Center �i��:�„_.4.:. o � -yna REPORT Date: October 16, 2001 Time: 10:00 am. Place: Room 330 City Hall IS WestKelloggBoulevard LEGISLATIVE HEARING Geny Strathman Legislative Hearing Officer Appeal of summary abatement order for 697 Surrev Avenue. (City Council refened this matter back ta the Legislative Hearing Officer.) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal. 2. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 393 Sidney Street East. � If the owner fails to complp, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Laid over from 10-2-01) Legislative Heanng Officer recommends granting the owner six months to complete the rehabilitation ofthe properiy on condition that a$2,000 bond is posted by noon of October 24, 2001. 3. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 667 Magnolia Avenue East. If Yhe owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the resolution. 4. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properry at 299 Arlineton Avenue East. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends withdrawing the resolution. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 850 Sims Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Laid over from 9-25-01) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the resolution. � ot-�tpa MINUTES OF THE LEGISLATIVE HEARING Tuesday, October 16, 2001 Room 330 City Hall Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer STAFF PRESENT: Steve Magner, Code Enforcement; Mike Morehead, Code Enforcement The meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m. Appeal of summary abatement order for 697 Surrey Avenue. (City Councit referred this matter back to the Legislative Hearing Officer.) Gerry Strathman stated this is an appeal of an order issued to Sharon Anderson in September. The order was to remove improperly stored refuse, cut and remove tall grass, weeds, rank plant growth, and remove portion of fence. Ms. Anderson filed an appeal and the City Council sent this matter back to Mr. Strathman for a recommendation. Bill Dahn, 240 Baker Street East, representing Shazon Anderson, appeared and stated he does ttot know where the City got the list of items on the summary abatement order. Mr. Strathman asked are there tali weeds and grass. Mr. Dahn responded no. If there aze, they have grown since he was there. He supports the paperwork that Sharon Anderson has submitted. The last time she was before the City Council, they did not have the paperwork. She wants to know who aze the complaining parties. Under state law, responded Mr. Stratlunan, the City is prohibited from disclosing the complainants. Mr. Strathman stated he needs some evidence that ihe order is improper, for exaruple, photographs showing there aze no tall weeds, videotape, etc. Mr. Dahn responded he does not have anything with him at this time. The $250 for this assessment is too high and even attorneys do not make that much. It seems he and Ms. Anderson are being harassed and harassment is a bigger charge than tall weeds. Mr. Strathman asked aze there any photographs showing the property. Steve Magner responded it would be best to have Mr. Dahn or the owner meet with the enforcement officer or the supervisor at the location so they can go over the issues because Mr. Magner does not have photographs. In order to granC the appeal, stated Mr. Strathman, he would need some evidence to show the property is cleaned up, and he does not have that. Mr. Dahn responded that Mr. Stratiunan also does not have any evidence showing it is bad. Gerry Strathman recommends denying the appeal. He suggested Mr. Dahn ar Ms. Anderson make arrangements for the supervisor and inspector to look at the properly. If they look at the properry and fmd there is no reason for this order, then they will withdraw ihe order and the matter will be closed. This matter will go before the City Council. Mr. Dahn responded Ms. Anderson wants it to go before the City Councit. O 1 -10 �- LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 16, 2001 page 2 Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 393 Sidney Street East. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Laid over from 10-2-01) (Steve Magner submitted photographs.) Steve Magner stated this has been laid over twice. The property was suppose to have gone through a closing, and the new owners were suppose to post a bond. A code compliance inspection has been done, but the bond and closing have not occurred. They may be trying to have these things done by the City Council meeting on October 24. Gerry Strathman recommends granting the owner six months to complete the rehabilitation of the property on condition that a$2,000 bond is posted by noon of October 24, 2001. Mr. Magner stated he will notify George Borer, the attorney. Resolufion ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 667 Magnolia Avenue East. If the owner fai[s to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Steve Magner submitted photographs.) Steve Magner stated tlus property bas been vacant since December 5, 2000. The current owner is Vicki Adams, also known as Vicki Knight. Six summary abatement notices were issued to secwe doors, cut tall grass, remove refuse, remove snow and ice, and abate vehicles. On August 2, 2001, an inspection ofthe building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on August 10, 2001, with a compliance date of September 10. As of this date, the property remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code. The vacant building fees are due. Real estate taYes are paid. TaYation has estimated the mazket value of the land as $12,200; esdmated market value of the building prioz to the fire, $47,900. A code compliance inspecfion nor bond have been applied for. Demolifion is between $7,000 and $8,000. The owner has contacted Code Enforcement. Her last cali to the azea inspector was that she was not going to fight the demolition of the building. Gerry Strathman recommends approved the resolution based on Mr. IvIagner's testimony and the fact that the owner is not here to represent the property. Resolurion ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 299 Arlington Avenue Eas� If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. The following appeazed: Marjorie Frahs (owner Richazd Spreigl's niece) and Reneya Mayberry (Ms. Frahs' niece and Mr. Spreigl's great niece). Mike Morehead reported this properly has a long hisiory. Many yeazs ago when Highway 35 was run through, this family was relocated by the state. The City granted the new location a nonconforming use status. This properry was used as a landscaping business. The business went e �-1a2- LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 16, 2001 Page 3 defunct a few yeazs ago. Landscaping equipment items were left to accumulate on the properry so long that trees were growing tUrough the tires. A number of buildings on the property fell down from lack of maintenance. It was determined that the property was not used for commercial purposes; therefore, it reverted to residential zoning status. At that point, a11 the miscellaneous materials on the property were no longer fit for residential applications. Last year, stated Mr. Morehead, Code Enforcement started dealing with the Spreigl family. The principle owner Richard is eiderly and has not been able to accomplish the cleanup. Code Enforcement issued orders and gave the owners a deadli�e to get the property cleaned up. The owners were not able to get rid of the big equipment. The City brought in a latge abatement crew. They were limited to $3,000, which is the summary abatement limit, but they ran up a bill of $3,5�0. Mr. Morehead stated he knows he cannot assess that much; therefore, he wili assess $3,000. Seventy-Five percent of the problems were eliminated. Mr. Morehead went on to say he started the paperwork to ea�tend the abatement work beyond the $3,000 limit. That paperwork will not be on the City Council agenda unril November. The owners have until early November to finish cleaning up the properry. The owners have been given verbal orders and Code Enforcement is going to follow up this week with formal written orders. With the bulk of the big stuff removed, it is possible the family can clean up the little stuff. The $3,000 assessed greatly improved the value of their land. Gerry Strathman stated the order before him today as a resolution io remove or repair the property. Steve Magner responded there were two or three accessory structures, numerous vehicies, metal machinery, and other related items that were there. Mr. Morehead stated the buildings are gone, but the remnants and things underneath the building aze still sticking up. Mr. Stratl�man asked what Code Enforcement is seeking today. Mr. Morehead responded before he can do a substantial abatement, owners of the property are to appear before Mr. Strathman. Code Enforcement wants Mr. Strathman to determine that the need to finish up this abatement is proper. Mr. Morehead needs a recommendation from Mr. Strathman that if the properry is not cleaned up by November 7 or 8, then Code Enforcement can finish it. Therefore, he needs authority from the City Council to levy more than a$3,000 lien on the property. Code Enforcement is continuing to work with this family. What is le8 is light work; the heavy stuff has been taken out. By the time the City Council hears this matter, there is a good chance it will be cleaned up. This is just an insurance policy that if they cannot get it done, Code Enforcement wiil finish the job so the file can be closed. Mr. Strathman stated the paperwork before him is for removal of buildings that have already been removed. Regazdless of the paperwork, what is being discussed here is an order to conduct a substantial a6atement at this properiy if the owners do not clean up the properiy by a specified date. When they originally looked at this property, stated Mr. Magner, to do the cleanup would have been beyond $10,000, which included the buildings. Since the owners have removed some of the buildings or broken down the buildings, Code Enforcement has removed them under the standazd summary abatement. What is primarily left is to clean up the site, grade it, seed it, and 61 � V.o 2- LEGISLATTVE HEARING MINIJTES OF OCTOBER 16, 2001 Page 4 straw it until it grows. If the owners can accomplish that task, Code Enforcement would not spend any more money there. What is really being asked, stated Mr. Strathman, is approval by the City Council to do a substantial abatement at tlus property if the owners have not taken care of it prior to October 24. Mr. Magner added that after the Mayor signs it, it would probably be the first week of November before they could send someone out to finish the work on the property. Mr. Morehead stated the big deadline is winter. If the owners can make substautiai progress, he will let them finish it. Ms. Frahs stated they took photographs. There is some brush that has to be cleared behind the house. There is a little patch in the middle of the property. There aze some trees that have to come down. Along the fence, dirt that has to be brought down to grade. They fixed the hole in the garage. Mr. Morehead responded they do not have to take the trees down. Next to the base of the trees is a hole with items sticking out of the ground. The items aze considered hazardous waste. Anyone that hauls these items out has to be informed of this. (Ms. Frahs showed photographs to everyone.) Mr. Strathman asked aze they alright with what Mr. Morehead wants to do. Ms. Frahs responded yes, but was concemed about liens on the house. Mr. Magner responded assessments can go on the taaces. There can be another hearing when the family gets the assessment or Taxation can he called and asked to space it out. All taxes and assessments have to be paid before a property is sold. Gerry Strathman recommends withdrawing the resolution before him today and approval of the authority to conduct a substanrial abatement at this properly if necessary. The City Council will need the proper paperwork developed. If the City Council approves it, Mr. Morehead will have the authority to do more work at the properry. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 850 Sims Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Laid over from 9-25-01) (Mr. Magner submitted photographs.) Steve Magner reported this properry was condemned in May 2000. It has been vacant since August 21, 2000. The current owners are Michael and Becky Ramstad. There have been two summary abatement notices for removing refuse. On March 7, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condirion was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on March 19, 2001, with a compliance date ofApril 18. As of this date, this property remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code. Taxation has placed an e,-�t.o� LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUT'ES OF OCTOBER 16, 2001 Page 5 �. '� u, - � '. 1 111 �� i .�� .�� '� � tl �� - � � �• �� 1 11 . � � ' � u � _ '-�-- '. -�. - -� � ._._. � .-' —�-'-'-'-'--- -�-�---,_- ' � � � . "' • " - - " -' Mr. Magner stated he contacted Don VJagner (License, Inspection, Environmental Protection), who indicated an inspector was sent to the property yesterday and there was not enough work completed. Also, a plumbing and heating permit has not be pulled by a license contractor. There is no heat in this building. The owners will forfeit that bond as of today, and a new bond has not been posted. Mr. Strathman stated he received a phone call this morning from apparently the owner who requested this hearing be delayed so Mr. Wagner could look at the building. Obviously, that is not necessary. Mr. Magner responded the owners aze trying to say that they made sheet rock and painting repairs and that is more than 50% of the work. Mr. Wagner's opinion is that is not the case. Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the resolution. The meeting was adjourned at 10:40 am. � Ot �g0} REPORT Date: September 4, 2001 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: Room 330 City Hall 15 West Kellogg Boulevazd LEGISLATIVE HEARING Gerry Strathman Legislative Hearing Officer Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 393 Sidnev Street East. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Laid over from 8-7-01) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the October 2, 2001, Legislative Hearing. 2. Suuunary Abatements J0102B Grass cutting (by private contractor) during June and part of July 2001; JOl O5A Property cleanup during June and part of July 2001; J0104B Boarding up of vacant buildings during June and part of July 2001; J0104C Demolition of vacant buildings during June and part of July 2001; and 30105V Abandoned vehicles towed from private properiy during 7une and part of July 2001. 579 Van Buren Avenue (JOlOSV) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 1119 Geranium Avenue East (J0104B) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 422 Jessamine Avenue East (JOlOSV) Legislative Heazing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 811 Van Buren Avenue (J0102G) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 456 Lawson Avenue West (JOl O5A) Legisiative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 555 Blair Avenue (JOl O5A) Legislafive Hearing Officer recomxnends approval of the assessment. 914 Concordia Avenue (JOl O5A) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends deleting the assessment. 0�-�[c} LEGISLATIVE HEARING REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 page 2 250 Page Street East (JOlOSA) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment 1595 Thomas Avenue (JO105� Legislative Hearing Officer recommends deleting the assessment. 639 Blair Avenue (JOlOSA) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 408 Banfil Street (JOl O5A) Mr. Strathman recommends reducing the assessment to $50 plus the $45 service fee for a total assessment of $95. 657 Dale Street North (JOl O5A) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 324 Jenks Avenue (JOl O5A) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 462 Edmund Avenue (JO105� Legislative Hearing Officer recommends deleting the assessment. 967 Edgerton Street (JOlOSV) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends deleting the assessment. 65 VJinnipee Avenue (JOlOSA) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 65 Winnipee Avenue (JO105� I,egislarive Hearing Officer recommends deleting the assessment. 605 Magnolia Avenue East (JOl O5A) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 291 Tonnine (30105V) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends deleting the assessment. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 847 Leaiin tg Pazkwav South. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the November 6, 2001, Legislative Hearing. LEGISLATIVE HEARING REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 � � � 7. Summary Abatement Order Appeal for 1598 Hazel Street North. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the September 25, 2001, Legislative Hearing. a l -qo�- Page 3 Resolufion ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 1124 Conwa�Street. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative FIearing Officer recommends approval. Resolufion ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 245 Front Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recominends approval. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 62 Winifred Street West. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officez recommends approval. � MINUTES OF TF� LEGISLATIVE HEARING Tuesday, September 4, 2001 Room 330 City Hall Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer STAFF PRESENT: Steve Magner, Code Enforcement; Hazold Robinson, Code Enforcement Gerry Strathman called the meeting to order at 10:04 am. o �-qo�- Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 393 Sidney Street East If the owner faiLs to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Laid over from 8-7-01) Steve Magner reported this was laid over in order for the attorney representing the fee owner and Lutheran Social Services to sell the property. The attomey submitted to Mr. Magner a proposal to sell the property to the West Side Neighborhood Development Alliance. They are waiting for the closing and haue to obtain a code compliance inspection. Mr. Magner suggested this matter be laid over for the closing of the sell and so 23EDA can obtain a bond. George F. Borer appeazed to request an extension of a month in order to close on the property. The probate court approved the sell this morning. The other status was cleazed up eazlier. Gerry Strathman laid over this matter to October 2, 2001, in order for NEDA to close on the properiy. Summary Abatements J0102B Grass cutting (by private contractor) during June and part of July 2001; JOlOSA Property cleanup during June and part of July 2001; J0104B Boarding up of vacant buildings during June and part of July 2001; J0104C Demolition of vacant buildings during June and part of July 2001; and J0105V Abandoned vehicles towed from private property during June and part of July 2Q01. 579 Van Buren Avenue (JOl OSi� (No one appeazed to represent the properry.) Gerry Strathman recommends approval. 1119 Geranium Avenue East (70104B) (No one appeazed to represent the property.) Gerry Strathman recommends approval. 01- qd'� LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINLITBS OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 page 2 422 Jessamine Avenue East (JO105� (No one appeared to represent the pmperiy.) Gerry Strathman recommends approval. 811 Van Buren Avenue (J0102G) (No one appeared to represent the property.) Gerry Strathman recommends approval. 456 Lawson Avenue West (JOI OSA) (No one appeazed to represent the properry.) Gerry Strathman recommends approval. 555 Blair Avenue (JOl O5A) Steve Plowruan, Real Estate Broker, 386 Wabasha Street North, appeazed and stated he was asked by the owners to check into this. They were unawaze what this charge was for. The properry has been condemned. People were hired to clean out the property, which was completed yesterday. The owner of the company that did the cleaning is interested in purchasing the property. The owners aze willing to get rid of the property for what they owe on it or even a litfle less. Gerry Strathman stated his information is that orders were sent on May 17, 2001, to clean up furniture, refuse, bike parts by May 29. The inspector went out again on May 30, deternuned the cleanup did not take place, and ordered the City to do it. The City crew went out on June 6. The total charge is $288.00. Mr. Strathman stated he could see the videotape. Mr. Plowman responded that is not necessary because the property was a problem. Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment. 914 Concordia Avenue (JOl O5A) Meredith Price, National Marketing, 12249 Nicollet Avenue South, Burnsville, appeazed and stated they never received notice that there was going to be an abatement proceeding. Her understanding is that it was sent to the wrong party. This was a vacant house. It was under renovation. National Mazketing took it over, and hauled out three dumpsters of tefuse. The items cleaned up by the City were not theirs. Some of the things cleaned up were not on her property; there is an empty lot next door. Her company has the crews to do this work. o�.�to'� LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINLTTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 Page 3 Gerry Stratbman stated the information he has is that orders were mailed on June 12, 2001; he asked who it was sent to. Hazold Robinson responded orders were mailed on 7une 12 to Ameriquest and to the occupant at 914 Concordia At the time, Ameriquest was listed as the owner. Code Enforcement did not get any mail returned. Ms. Price responded that her company acquired the property in Mazch Ramsey County may be behind in their updating. Mr. Strathman asked was the sell recorded. Ms. Price responded yes and they have title inciman�. Mr. Strathman asked who was living there in June. Ms. Price responded no one. It was unfit for habitation. It had to be guttecl. Gerry Strathman deleted the assessment on the basis of incorrect notification. The City did what it was suppose to do, but it is evident that Code Enforcement received incorrect informafion from Ranisey County regarding ownership. 250 Paee Street East (JOl O5A) (No one appeared to represent the property.) Gerry Strathman recommends approval. 1595 Thomas Avenue (JOl O5V) The following appeared: Terry Glanz and Crreg Glanz, owners. Terry stated three cars were towed ofFthe property. Hazold Robinson reported the vehicles appeazed inoperable and no licenses were visible. If a vehicle has been sitting in one place for a long time, the inspector considers it inoperable, but the vehicles cleazly had no visible licenses. Terry L. Glanz was notified at 1595 Thomas Avenue. Orders were mailed on January 25, 2001. Mr. Strathman asked what they have to show that the vehicles were licensed. Terry Glanz responded he has paperwork and his brother went through the process of getting license piates and tabs after the notices were received. They have insivance waivers. Mr. Strathman asked when did they get them licensed. Greg Glanz responded they were licensed the year before all this took place. He had the license plates on the velucle, he took them off, and put them inside the vehicle in the window. There was a problem with license plates being stolen off of cars. This happened when there was a lot of snow. He laiocked the snow off the windows so they were visible. Mr. Strathman stated once the vehicles were towed, why were they not retrieved. Terry Glan� responded he did not try because he did not know lus brother had insurance waivers. His brother said a few weeks later that he had insurance waivers and the vehicles were legally licensed but o�-ao�-- LEGISLATIVE HEARING NIlNiJTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 Page 4 could not be driven. One of the vehicles was operable. There was a transmission and engine being worked on. The Horizon was waiting for an engine also. The Glanzes showed Mr. Strathman some documents showing the vehicles were licensed, the ;n�,*ance waiver, and photographs. Gerry StraYhman deleted the assessment. 639 Biair Avenue (JOl O5A) (No one appeared to represent the properry.) Gerry Strathman recommends approvai. 408 Banfil Street (JOlOSA) Kimie Keamey, owner, appeazed and stated she has a$288 assessment for yard cleanup and she wanted to know what was done. (A videotape was shown.) Ms. Kearney stated it was four bags of recycled cans for $288. She had mowed the yazd and she is letting the bushes grow a bit. Mr. Strathman stated the storage of trash in the bags was not in compliance with City codes; they need to be in containers. Ms. Kearney responded it was her ganddaughter's recycling. Ms. Kearney had taken them out of the gazage so they could be taken to the recycling place. Mr. Strathman reduced the assessment to $50 plus the $45 service fee for a total assessment of $95. The City crew did go out, and there were some things improperly stored; however, the situation did not look that bad on the videotape. 657 Dale Street North (JOl O5A) Michael Burger, owner, 915 Reed Street, Mankato, appeared and stated this properry and two others were in a parhiership between himself and someone else. On February 27, 2001, they mutually agreed. to end their partnership. These properties were in Mr. Burger's name. He did a quick claim deed and put them all in the other person's name. The pmperry probably did need to be cleaned up, but at the time he was not responsible for the properties. He is not currently the owner. Mr. Strathman asked who was notified. Mr. Berger responded it was mailed to 1107 Jenks. That mail was retumed to the City. The City mailed it Yo another address. a l -t�'L- LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 Page 5 Hazold Robinson reported the last time there was an abatement at that address was June 29. Their records still show Michael Burger at 1107 Jenks. Mr. Robinson suggested that Mr. Burger deal with Taxation or the former partner to make sure the records get transferred. Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment. 324 Jenks Avenue (70105A) Jean Johnson, 5000 Otter Lake Road, White Bear, appeazed and stated they were on a contract for deed at the time tlus occurred. The information went to Charles Zeches because that name was still on it. She asked when this was done. Mr. Strathman responded the notice was sent on May 10, 2001, and the work was done on May 29. Ms. Johnson stated a tenant handed her paperwork on appro�mately May 30. It did need cleaning. She looked at the backyazd after she was handed the notice, and there were mattresses and gazbage there. Mr. Strathman asked who was notified. Hazold Robinson responded "Occupant" at 324 Jenks and Chazles Zeches at �77 Sixth Street East. Gerry Strathman recommended approval of the assessment. The City notified the owner of record. The occupant was also notified, which goes beyond what is required. There was an 18 day period between when she was norified and the City actually did the cleanup. 462 Edmund Avenue (JO105� The following appeazed: Wanda Bulditz, 706219th Street North, Oakdale; Marie Keyes, 462 Edmund Avenue #1; and Heriberto Garrido, owner, 7062 19th Street North, Oakdale. Ms. Bulditz stated she got a notice regarding a vehicle removed from her properry. She wanted to know why because she gaue her tenant pernussion to pazk a vehicle there. A week later, the caz was not there so Ms. Bulditz assumed the vehicle was never pazked there. Then, she got a bill. Ms. Keyes stated this was her daughter's car. She called the Police Department Impound lot. No one admitted to having the car. The tabs were good, and the car was operable. Ms. Keyes had no need to drive the vehicle so she pazked it at the properry. It was not even there three days. She brought the car there Monday night. When she came home on Thursday, the vehicle was gone. Mr. Robinson stated the inspection was done on January 26, 2001. The vehicle had an expired license. The recheck was done on February 2 and an impound order was sent in. The police towed it on February 20 with the license still e�cpued. Mr. Strathman asked did she not get the caz because she did not know where it was located. Ms. Keyes responded no one would tell her that it was towed. 01-'l LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 Page 6 Mr. Strathman asked what iriggered this inspection. Harold Robinson responded probably a compIaint_ It was towed by the poIice department. Mr. Strathman deIeted the assessment. He is unsure why the Impound Lot did not tell the owner the caz was there. Ms. Bulditz stated she is a real estate agent and l�ows that Ramsey County is six months behind in their record keeping. 967 Edeerton Street (JO105� Alexis Abreu, owner, appeazed and stated this vehicle belonged to a tenant that lived at the property. The tenant bought the vehicle, stored it in the garage for a wkrile, then moved it out. Some items were missing from the property. Mr. Abreu was going to hold this vehicle to see if he would come back. The caz did not start and he had keys. Mr. Abreu called a police officer that is a friend of his. This police officer ticketed the caz fust. He said he would come back later, and if the vehicle is srill there, he would have it moved. A few days later, the vehicle was gone, and Mr. Abreu assumed this officer took it. Later, this officer asked what happened to the vehicle, and Mr. Abreu received a bill in the mail. Mr. Strathman asked when the orders were mailed. Mr. Robinson responded orders were mailed twice: January 24, 2001, and February 12 to Aleacis Abreu and the occupant, both of 967 Edgerton. Mr. Abreu stated when he got the January notice, that is when he called his friend who ticketed the vehicle. Mr. Strathman asked if the police officer had ordered the vehicle towed, would the assessment go to the properry owner. Mr. Robinson responded it would be an administrative tow. The car is cited, towed, and the vehicle owner has to recover the vehicle. Steve Magner stated the properry owner has to be present during an administrative tow to identify the vehicle. Mr. Robinson skated if he had said to the inspector that a police officer is warking on this and it would be towed in a few days, there would not have been a problem. Gerry Strathman recommends deleting the assessment. 65 Winnipeg Avenue (JOlOSA) 65 Winnipe¢ Avenue (JOI OSV) Milt Randall, tenant, appeared and stated the owner lives in Wisco�sin aad Mr. Randatl feels he is responsible for what happens at the properry. There aze two assessments here. One invoives a vehicle that was Yowed and the oYher assessment is for a cleanup. (The cleanup was discussed fust.) During the time of this assessment, said Mr. Raudall, he was in the process of switchiug tcash companies. For a month, he had to call his trash company because they were not picldng it up. Then he got the assessment. He thought the company had finatly taken the trash, but the City had 01-Zo' LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 . page 7 instead. The assessment was sent to Wisconsin. By the time it got to Mr. Randail, he did not have time to do anything. (A videotape was shown.) Mr. Randall stated kids strip bikes and throw them in the rear of his house. The appfiances came from ius house and were suppose to be picked up by the trash company. Gerry Strathman stated the owner was notified, the occupant received notice, and it was almost two weeks between the time notice was sent and the City did the cleanup. There was opportuniry for someone to do the cieanup. Mr. Robinson stated orders went out on May 15, and a reinspection was done on May 23. The occupants supposedly called the inspector on May 23 to say he would take cate of it by the weekend. The inspector went over there on May 30, the items were still there, so he issued the work order. (Now, the vehicles were discussed.} Gerry Strathman asked about the vehicles. Mr. Randall responded the inspector told hun he had to move the cars. He put one in the garage and the other right beside the gazage on the slab. The inspector told him the plates were not current so he could not pazk it there. Mr. Randall put insurance on the car and current plates. Three days later, the caz was towed. The tabs were on the vehicle when it was towed. He purchased the tabs the day after he received the notice. Mr. Strathman stated orders were mailed on January 18, the inspector went out on February 5, and again on Febzuary 21. Mr. Stratlunan asked did he have anything showing the vehicle had current plates. Mr. Randail responded he did not have anything with bim. Mr. Strathman asked when the velucle was towed. Mr. Robinson responded he was not sure when it was towed. JOl O5A - Mr. Strativsian recommends approval of the assessment. The two appliances clearly had been stored there. The owner had more than two weeks to get rid of them. JO 105 V- Mr. Strathman recommends deleting the assessment if the owner can get him something showing the vehicle had legaI tabs and legaI plates when it was towed in February. If the owner cannot supply him with that, then the assessment stands. NOTE: Mr. Randall did bring in evidence that he purchased tabs on February 24, 2001. Upon checking with the Impound Lot, it was found that the vehicle arrived there on March 3. Therefore, Gerry Strathman recommends deleting the assessment. ��goa- LEGISLATNE HEARING MINiJTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 Page 8 605 Magnolia Avenue East (JOl O5A) Mel Guyett, owner, appeazed and stated he purchased the properiy recentty. A fence was instailed and bushes were removed. He was making arrangements to haul them away. He works about 12 hours a day and he could only do it on the weekend. He came home with a truck and a trailer to take it out of there. He has a friend who will sometimes do surprise things for t►im. Mr. Guyett thought this friend had done the work.. Mr. Strathman asked who was notified. Mr. Robinson responded Todd K. and Mary Kay Lewis were notified at 605 Magnolia Tlris was done on May 15, 2001, rechecked on May 12, and tke work was done on May 29. Mr. Strathman asked when he became tlie owner. Mr. Guyett responded about July 7, 2001. Mr. Robinson responded the orders went out May 15. Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment. When the owner purchased the properry, he became responsible for the assessment. The seller is required to certify that there are no pending assessments. If there are, the owner is suppose to take care of them. The owner has the right to go to the previous owner because they aze responsible for it. Mr. Magner added that ritle insurance should cover things like this. Resolution ordering the owtter to remove or repair the property at 847 Lexington Parkway South. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Mr. Magner showed photograplvs to Mr. Strathman.) John Kratz, owner, 1424 Edgcumbe Road, appeared and stated he just acquired this property on August 1. He would like to lay over this matter and woutd tike to attach tius pmperty ta another property adjacent to it. He would like to build a 12 unit townhouse. If that gets approved, this pmperty wi11 be tom down. The approval process is lengthy on this. He wouId Iike to do this in the fall. It is more likely to be six months. Given his plan to remove the building and given that the properry is a blight, Gerry Strathman asked, what is the problem with the property being removed now. Mr. Kratz responded ius plan would be to rehabilitate the building if lus plan is not approved. These matiers can be highly charged with neighborhood involvement Tlvs properry seems to be getting ofFto a friendlier start with the neighbors and he is more optimistic about the development. Steve Magner reported the pmperry has been vacant since March I, 2000. Eight summary abatement notices have been issued to secure tfie house, cut tail g�ass, remove t.v. antenna, and remove hazardous mud and sand on sidewalk. On June 19, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on July 1 i, 2001, with a compliance date of August 10. The vacant building fees are paid. A code compliance inspecflon has not been applied for and a bond has not been posted. Esrimated cost to repair is $80,000; estimated cost to demolish, $7,000 to $8,000. Mr. Magner would not have a problem LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 o�..�o� Page 9 with a short e�ctension, although six months may not be feasible ai this time unless a bond is posted. Mr. Strathman concurred saying that ttus nuisance building cannot stand indefinitely. Mr. Kratz stated he lives half a mile away. He has met all the neighbors. t1ll Yhe problems they had were with the previous owner. He has given them all his card, and they know who to call if there is a problem. He does not anticipate there will be more complaints. He dces not want to knock it down so soon because his costs go np so muck. He would have to haul in fill to fill up the hole and there is too much fill on the side already that he has to haul out when the new building is built Gerry Strathman laid over to the November 6, 2001, Legislative Hearing. In t6at time, the owner shouid be prepazed to post a bond and rehabilitate the property or be prepazed to remove it. Summary Abatement Order Appeal for 1598 Hazel Street North. Waiter Montpetit, owner, appeazed and stated this is regazding a wildlife garden on his properry. It is 1,500 square feet. He has a 100 square foot patch sepazated. It is part of the landscaping scheme on his properry. He received an order to cut it. It is in the backyard. Gerry Strathman stated he has some remembrance about the City amend'vng its notice to make provisions for native plantings. He asked would this qualify. Mr. Robinson responded he is not sure the norice stipulated what plantings could be in a nazive habitat. Sandy Pappas has been designated by an organization to determine what plants should be put in. Mr. Montpetit says that HarrieY Island has areas ihat look like the same type of scheme he is doing. Mr. Sirathman asked is ticere someone on City staff that can took at this properry. Mr. Robinson responded he has a name and phone number of the organization in charge of this issue. Just ta11 grass and weeds do not qualify. Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the September 25, 2001, LegisIafive Hearings In the meantime, someone who Irnows about this issue can go to the property and make a determination. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 1124 Conway Street If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (No one appeared to represent the property.) (Steve Magner submitted photographs.) Steve Magner reported this properiy has been vacant since February 2,1998. The owner is deceased. Ten summary abatement notices have been issued for vacant building, cut tall grass, remove unlawfully pazked vehicle, remove rubbish, and secure structure. On July 20, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constihrte a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisauce building �l�to�- LEGISLATIVE HEARING MII�TITTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 Page 10 was issued on July 24, 2001, with a compfiance date of August 8, 2001. A bond has not been posted. "The cost to repair is $40,OOQ to $SQ,000; estimated cost to demolish, $7,000 to $8,000. The building was condemned by the Sewer Division. The property has a septic tank, which collapsed. The groperty was condemned. When the owner purchased tfie property, he failed to check with ihe City. The City is not allowing any new sewer systems be instailed. The owner wouid have to connect to the neat cIosest City sewer, which could cost up to $45,000. Before he died, he said he would tet the property go back to the mortgage company and he wo�ld not do the connection. He stayed at the property as long as he could. Mr. Magner stated he and Mr. Robinson cut the owner more slack because he was in a terminai condition. Gerry Strathman recommends approval. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properfy at 245 Froat Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (No one appeared to represent the property. Photographs were submitted.) Steve Magner reported thits property has been vacant since July 13, 2000. Seven summary abatement notices have been issued for cut tall grass, secure structure, and remove rubbish. On June 26, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a mjisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abaze a nuisance building was issued on July 11, 200I, with a compliance date of August 10. The vacant building fee aze due. Taxation has placed an estimated market value of $22,600 on the property; estimated cost to repair, $75,000; estimated cost to demolish, $8,000 to $9,Q00. As of September 4, 2001, a code compliance inspection has not been applied for, and a$2,000 bond has not been posted. Gerry Stratl�man recommends approval. Resolntion ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 62 Winifred Street West If the owner Fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (No one appeared to represent the property.) Steve Magner this property has been vacant since July 30, 1990. There have been 20 summary abatement notices to remove refuse, cut tall grass, secure building, remove snow and ice, remove 16 velucles/trailers, and atlow occupancy of a registered vacant buiIding. On December 22, 1999, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photograplvs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on January 4, 2000,with a compliaace date of February 15, 2000. The vacant buiiding fees aze due. Real estate taYes aze unpaid in the amount of $1,659.92. A bond was forfeited on June 13, 2001. The estimated cost to repair is $25,000. There was a previous resotution to repair or remove the property; the resolution was passed by the CiTy Councii. A new owner purchased the building the next day. The City Council amended the resolution to give the new owner 180 days. They failed to firush fhe project. Mr, Magner has had little or no response &om the owner, and he is disappointed the owner is not here today. o � -�soar LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBBR 4, 2001 Page 11 Gerry Stratbman recommends approval. 291 Tonnine (JO105� Hazold Robinson recommended the assessment be deleted. Gerry Strathman recommends deleting the assessment. The meeting was adjoumed at 11:43 am. ,� MINUTES OF LEGISLATIVE HEARING Q 1�O� Tuesday, August 7, 2001 Room 330, City Hall Gerry Strathman, I.egislative Hearing Officer STAFF PRESF.AIT: Jason Btuberg, Code Enforcement; Steve Magner, Code Enforcement The meeting was called to order at IO:OQ 3_ID_ Laid over snmmary abatement: J0104AA Property cleannp at 1075 Portland Avenue. (Laid over from 7 24-01) Tbe following appeazed: Phyllis Brown, daughter of deceased owners, � 149 La�uel Avenue, and Ruth Jones, daughter of deceased owners, 1075 Porfland Avenue. Ms. Brown stated that her mother passed away March 20, and her father passed away Apri19. Her pazents lived at 1075 Portland for many years, and took caze of their own personal business matters. Her moYher was in a hospice. Her father had lung cancer surgery and had been sick during the time of this cleanuQ. Ms. Bmwn found out about ttus assessment when she was going through a lot of their paperwork. She was awaze ihat her father had a lot of excess items on the deck outside the kitchen door. The only thing she is awaze of in tfie back of the garage was the car whick she in turn towed. The family has been preoccupied with the parents' dying process and was not aware of the assessment. They have had three estate sales on May 4, 5, 19, and three gazage saies on June 22, 23, 24. The family has paid property taxes on time, paid lots of miscellaaeous outstanding bills, and aze still paying burial expenses. Ms. Brown is protesting the $306. She is not aware of what was actually hauled away by the City, She has been hauling lots of items that have accumulated through her parents 54 years of marriage in that home. (A videotape was shown.) Mr. Strattuuan stated it looks like the City removed wood, debris, and picked up the gazbage. Ms. Jones s�ed Yhey fo�f t&e nc�tice by ac�ident She did not find the listed items outside. Nis. Brown stated she talked to John Betz (Code Enforcement) and he said the items were hauled on March 27. Her mother was buried on Mazch 26. The family was besieged with more important matters at tlte time of this assessment. Gerry Stratiaman deleted the assess�nent. It is cieaz notirx was sent and that the City did the work. A few weeks bef'o�ee tl� o�xieas were Yo both die, there is a serious question as to if they were in a positirnt �r re�ogniz� tbe sggn�cance of th� notices and deal with Ytiem effectively. As an act af undezstanding, the assessaaeat sT�vld he deleteci. Laid over summary abatements: J0103CC Demo�irion of building at 381 University Avenue West, Demolition of building at 387 University Avenue West. b� -�l�a- LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINI7TES FOR AUGUST 7, 2001 page 2 381 Universitv Avenue West Steve Magner reported the building has two addresses on the front of it: 38 2 and 383 University are one building aad 385 and 387 University aze the other build'uxg. Ia Marck 2001, there was a fire that originated at 385 IJrtiveisity, It engulfed that building and spread to the neighboring building of 38I and 383 ilrtiv�. Thece was a large Eller Media sign on tfie roof of 8ie bui2ding. The sign started to collapse. T�e Fire Beparlment requested a contractor puIl the sign down and remove some of the debris so they could put out the fire. (Mr. Magner showed a photograph of the building with the sign starting to collapse.) Mr. Magner stated he went to the site at 4:30 p.m. The Fire Department ordered the buiiding razed at the time of the fice. The demolition was completed the ne� day, and the cost of the demolition was split between the two properties with the cost of the crane and more rubble at 387 Univers'sty. Tbere was quite a bit of rubble left on 385 that had to be demolished. That is how the contractor split the bill. Choua Yang, 790 Tuscarora Avenue, and Long Her, 382 University Avenue West, appeazed. Ms. Yang stated they bring business to the University area, pay taz�es, and impmved the area. They plan on rebuilding there. This assessment is causing them financiat hardship. Mr. Sirathman stated he understands ttris is a lot of money. It was ordered by the Fire Deparhnent and is cleazly a public nuisance. AII tfie City is doing is recovering the money paid to the contractor to remove the building. There is no profit in this for the City. Steve Magner stated his office has been in contact with the insurance company for 385 and 387 University Avenue. They aze making attempts to pay the assessment for that properry. Iv�. Magner's recommendation is that the owner pursues this with the insurance company. Prnnarily, the insurance company will accept this as part of the loss, pay it as a bill, and they may go after the inssurance company af the other property for reimbursement. Mr. Magner asked what did the insurance company say about this. Ms. Yang responded they have not heard back. Gerry Strathmaa recommends approval of the assessment. 387 University Avenue West (No one appeared to represent the paopetty.) Gerry Strathman recommands approvat of the assessment. o � -qo�. LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINiJTES FOR AUGUST 7, 2001 Page 3 Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 393 Sidney Street East. Hthe owner fails to compty, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Steve Magner reported this property was condemned in January 2000. It l�as been vacaut since 2-16-00. The current owner is Claudia Tendrup. There have been five summary abatement notices issued to remove refuse, �e garage and house, cut tall grass, remove lazge tree limb and fuewooa. On 6-6-�1, aa mspection of ihe bu7�g was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was devsioged, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on 6-13-01 with a compliance date of 7-13-01. The properiy remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legisIative code. Vacant building fees aze due. Reat estate t�es are unpaid of $2,97027. Estimated market value is $72,700; estimated cost to repair, $80,000; estimated cost to demolish, $8,000 to $9,000. As of today, a code compliance inspection has not been applied for and a bond has not been posted. Mr. Magner stated there haue been numerous phone calls, e-mails, letters from neighbors that would like the City to take action on ttris property. Mr. Magner and another inspector met with a representative from Lutheran Social Services to go over the building again. A pariy from a neighborhood group was ihere. Mr. Magner was okay going through the btrilding, but the inspector became ill because of the extensive mold growth in the properry. Humid weather like today, asthma, and breathing condirions can make it difficult ta handle being in the house. Creorge F. Borer, Sweeney, Borer & Sweeney, representing Lutheran Social Services, appeared and stated Lut4reran Social Services was agpointed a yeaz ago as Ms. Tendrup's conservator with the direclion to take all reasonable efforts to return her to her home. Record keeping consisted of garbage bags of decades worth of bills, inveshnents, etc., a11 of wltich have not been fully sorted out. In some of the bags in the house, problems date back to the eazly 1990's. Also, the house is titled in Ms. Tendrup's father's name, His estate was probated several years ago and the house was overlooked at that time; therefore, fhe house was not formally passed from the estate into Ms. Tendrup's �tame. She has no finances to rehun home, has no fmances for a bond, and has no assets. A physician has indicated she will not be rehuning to her home. Yesterday, the home was shown to three people, and one person indicated an offer would be submitted this week. A neighhor aPso incyicated they will present a purchase. LuBieran Social Services fias Iisted the properry with a Reaitor who indicated he has a buyer who wants to present an offer. Any offer has to cover the back taYes, assessment, etc. There aze two petifions wiuch are needed to sell the property: i) Reopen the estate. A hearing has been scheduled with no objections, 2) Probate court has to order the sell. There is enough evidence that Ms. Tendrup will not retum home. Mr. Borer sta�ed he �adea�rands this pmperry is a nuisance to the City, and he will attempt to sell it as soon as possibte. Mr. Magn�r stated t� b�'sld'mg is a nuisance a� 6he� ar� heatth issues, but he believes the building can be rehabiIitated. The issue will resolve azound the cost of purchasing it and whether they can put Yhe numbers together. I-Ie asked was there another issue. Mr. Borer responded the buyer will have to pay the assessment plus the court requires rivo appraisals, which will be $600. T'here will not be any fees to Lutheran Social Services nor attomey fees. 01-q0 � LEGISLA"ITVE I-IEARING MINiJTES FOR AUGUST 7, 2001 Page 4 Mr. Magner stated Lutheran Social Services is not looking to make moaey on tlus. There have been previous inquiries from some neighborhood groups. The neighbors ultimate concern is that the house be rehabilitated, not necessarily abated or removed. Mr. StratUman asked for a time frame. If the offers do not meet the cost to get rid of the property, responded Mr. Borer, he does not anticipate bringing the legai motions, other than a petition to ahandon. Assuniing an offer comes in, a month is all it would take. There is no mortgage on the pnsge�ty. T� owner is not on medical assistance; therefore, there is no medical assistance lien. The tifle is c3ear otl�r �hau the probate issue. Gerry Strathman recommends lay�ng ov�a to the September 4, 200I, I,egislative Hearing. At that time, if there is no bona fide sale that has taken place or in process, he will recommend remove or repair. Mr. Borer responded that is more than fau. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair t3ie property at 633 Randolph Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Eaforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Photographs were presented) (No one appeazed to represent the properry.) Steve ivlagseer sEated this property was condemned July 2000. It has been vacant since 8-7-00. The c�aent owner is the Secretary of Veterans Affairs per Ramsey County recards, but a Gordon Anderson is representing himself as the owner. One summary abatement notice was issued to remove an inoperable vehicle. On 5-30-01, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were talcett. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on 6-12-01 with a compliauce date of 7-12-01. The properry remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code. The vacant building fees aze paid by Mr. Anderson Estimated market value, $65,900; esYimated repairs, $50,000; estimated cost to dema�ists, $7,Q(JO to $8,000. There there is an issue of possible illegal occupancy with the pmperty. Gerry Strathman asked was there any communication from the Secretary of Veteran Affairs. Mr. Magner responded there has been no response from them. Mr. Stratiunan stated a Bonnie Anderson is Iisted as having "equitable titIe." He asked what that means. A dason Baoberg msponded there is a contract for deed in the interim period before the contract is �asfsed. r'Ix'• Siia�saa� ask� for the �e�tionstaip Tb�ween Bonnie Anderson and Gordon Anderson. Mr. Magner rasponded he does nc� . Tl�e fnst flooa is packed to apgro�mately four feet off the ground. The second IIoor has a large accumulafion. Mr. Anderson is a collector and a recluse. Mr. Strathman asked how the VA (Secretary of Veterans Affairs) became the owner. Mr. Broberg responded the VA is the contractor. They sold Bonnie Anderson the property on a CIT[ZEN SERVICE OFFICE Fred Owa�su, City Clerk DIV [SION OF PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT Michae[ R Morehead, Program Managu CITY OF SAIN'f PAUL Nuisance Building Cade Enforcrment Norm Coleman, Mayor IS Gf! KellaggBlvd Rm. 190 Tel: 651-266-8440 Saint Pau1, MN55102 F¢s: 651-266-8426 7uly 13, 2001 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS Council President and Members of the City Council C \ -q0}- Citizen Service Office, Vacant/Nuisance Buildings Enforcement Division has requested the City Council schedule public hearings to consider a resolution ordering the repair or removal of the nuisance building(s) located at: 393 Sidney Street East � � ,�� €'�,c��rc;� �;:,�: „ The City Council has scheduled the date of these hearings as follows: 3 �, � � 2�� i Legislative Hearing - Tuesday, August 7, 2001 '�� City Council Hearing - Wednesday, August 22, 2001 The owners and responsible parties of record are: Name and Last Known Address Claudia Tendrup Central Towers 20 Exchange Street East St. Paul, MN 55101 Interest Fee Owner Lutheran Social Services 590 Park Street, Ste. 310 St. Paul, MN 55103 Attn: 7an Femer The legal description of this properry is: Conservator for Claudia Tendrup Lot 6, Riley's New Arrangement of the South half of the West 257 ft of Block 44 Brown & Jackson's Addirion. Division of Code Enforcement has declared this building(s) to constitute a"nuisance" as dafined by Legislative Code, Chapter 45. Division of Code Enforcement has issued an order to the then lrnown responsible parties to eliminate this nuisance condition by correcfing the deficiencies or by razing and removing this building(s). o�.yo�- 393 Sidney Street East July 13, 2001 Page 2 Inasmuch as this Order to Abate has not been complied with the nuisance condition remains unabated, the community continues to suffer the blighting influence of this property. It is the recommendation of the Division of Code Enforcement that the City Council pass a resolution ordering the responsible parties to either repair, or demolish and remove this buildinJ in a timely manner, and failing that, authorize the Division of Code Enforcement to proceed to demolifion and removal, and to assess the costs incurred against the real estate as a special assessment to be collected in the same manner as taxes. Sincerely, �teve �a�rcer Steve Magner Vacant Buildings Supervisor Division of Code Enforcement Citizen Service Office SM:mI cc: Frank Berg, Building Inspection and Design Meghan Riley, City Attorneys Office Nancy Anderson, Assistant Secretary to the Council Laurie Kaplan, PED-Housing Division ccnph o� -qoa- .� .�. LEGISI.A1`IVE HEARING bate: August 7, 2001 Time: 10:00 a.m. PIace: Room 330 City HaII 15 West Kellogg Bouievazd Gerry Strathman Legislative Hearing Officer 1. Laid over summary abatement: J0104AA Properiy cleanup at 1075 Portland Avenue. (Laid over from 7-24-01) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends deleting the assessment. 2. Laid crver swnmary abatements: J0103CC Demolition of building at 381 University Avenue West, Demalition of building at 387 University Avenue West. 381 Universitv Avenue West Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 387 i3niversiiv Avenue West Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 3. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 393 Sidney Sh�eet East. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over Yo the September 4, 2001, Legislative Hearing. 4. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properly at 633 Randolnh Avenue. If ttie owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval. 0� ��iNAL �r��.a.�d. - o�t. ay , aoo� Council File # p � - qp .1. �reen Sheet # � "2..3�t� PAl Presented By Referred To Committee: Date G�1 1 WHEREAS, Citizen Service Office, Division of Code Enforcement has requested the City Council 2 to hold public hearings to consider the advisability and necessity of ordering the repair or wrecking and 3 removal of a two-story, wood frame, duplex and a detached, two-stall, wood frame garage located on 4 property hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property" and commoniy known as 393 Sidney Street East. 5 This properiy is legaliy described as follows, to wit: 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2F4 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Lot 6, Riley's New Arrangement of the South half of the West 257 ft of Block 44 Brown & Jackson's Addition WHEREAS, based upon the records in the Ramsey County Recorder's Office and information obtained by Division of Code Enfarcement on or before April 20, 2001, the following are the now known interested or responsible parties for the Subject Property: Claudia Tendrup, Ceniral Towers, 20 Exchange Street East, St. Paul, MN 55101; Lutheran Social Services, 540 Park Street, Ste. 310, St. Paul, MN 55103, Attn: Jan Ferrier WHEREAS, Division of Code Enforcement has served in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code an order identified as an"Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s)" dated June 13, 2001; and WHEREAS, this order informed the then known interested or responsible parties that the structure located on the Subject Properiy is a nuisance building(s) pursuant to Chapter 45; and WHEREAS, this order informed the interested or responsible parties that they must repair or demolish the shucture located on the Subject Property by 7uly 13, 20Q1; and WHEREAS, the enforcement officer has posted a placard on the Subject Property declaring this building(s) to constitute a nuisance condirion; subject to demolition; and WHEREAS, this nuisance condition has not been corrected and Division of Code Enforcement requested that the City Clerk schedule public hearings befare the Legislative Hearing Officer of the City Council and the Saint Paul City Councii; aud WHEILEAS, the interested and responsible parties have been served notice in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, of the time, date, place and purpose of the public hearings; and -� 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 ��N� o,_q �� . REAS, a hearing was held befare the Legislative Hearing Officer of the Saint Paul City Council on uesday, August 7, 2001 to hear testunony and evidence, and after receiving testimony and evidence, made the recommendation to approve the request to order the interested or responsible parties to make the Subject Property safe and not dehimental to the public peace, health, safety and welfaze and remove its blighting influence on the community by rehabilitating this structure in accardance with all applicable codes and ordinances, or in the altemative by demolishing and removing the structure in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances. The rehabilitation or demolirion of the structure to be com leted within da s after the date of the Council Hearin p _•�..r�A�.i e.1.l. i�ac1 Y 4+� �+1.c c.ai.A.�4.��. Y4. �a T++ MHN onf ocF.iV a•e� WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the Saint Paui City Counci on e es y, ugust 22, 20 1 and the testimony and evidence including the acrion taken by the Legislative Hearing Officer was considered by the Council; now therefore BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon the testimony and evidence presented at the above referenced public hearings, the Saint Paul City Council hereby adopts the following Findings and Order concerning the Subject Properiy at 393 Sidney Street East: That the Subject Properiy comprises a nuisance condition as defined in Saint Paul Legislative Code, Chapter 45. 2. 3. Q FQ 7 That the costs of demolition and removal of this building(s) is estimated to exceed three thousand dollars ($3,000.00). That there now exists and has existed multiple Housing or Building code violations at the Subject Property. That an Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) was sent to the then known responsible parties to correct the deficiencies or to demolish and remove the building(s). That the deficiencies causing this nuisance condition have not been corrected. That Division of Code Enforcement has posted a placard on the Subject Property which declares it to be a nuisance condition subject to demolition. That this building has been routinely monitored by the Citizen Service Offices, Division of Code Enforcement, Vacant/Nuisance Buildings. 8. That the known interested parties and owners aze as previously stated in this resolution and that the notification requirements of Chapter 45 have been fulfilled. ORDER The Saint Paul City Council hereby makes the following order: The above referenced interested or responsible parties sha11 make the Subject Properiy safe and not detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and welfare and remove its blighting influence on the community by rehabilitating this structure and correcting all deficiencies as prescribed in the above referenced Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) in accordance with ail applicable codes and ordinances, or in the alternative by demolishing and removing the structure in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances. The rehabilitation or demolition and removal of the structure must be completed within €rf�ee�{�k5} days after the date of the Council Hearing. V pt�c.`t�ux�.ral z:�)�� C�80� ORfGINAL O�-�o� 1 2. If the above corrective action is not completed within this period of tnne the Citizen Service Office, 2 Division of Code Enforcement is hereby authorized to take whatever steps are necessary to 3 demolish and remove this shucture, fill the site and charge the costs incurred against the Subject 4 Property pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code. 7 10 11 12 3. In the event the building is to be demolished and removed by the City of Saint Paul, all personal property or fixtures of any kind which interfere with the demolition and removal shall be removed from the property by the responsible parties by the end of this tune period if all personal property is not removed, it shall be considered to be abandoned and the City of Saint Paul shall remove and dispose of such property as provided by law. 4. It is fiirther ordered, that a copy of this resolution be mailed to the owners and interested parties in accordance with Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code. Adopted by Council: Date Q� ,�.y 2.0�� Adoption Certified by Council Secretary By: � 3 ►' Approved by Mayar: Date �� r'� l By: Li��'r/�'[ ��!'�� Requested by Department o£ Citizen Service Office: Code Enforcement BY`V � N �� .n�a��.c`". Form Approved by City Attorney By: Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council By: ��t r�� _� EPARTMENT/OFFICElCOUNCIL . ^ Divi�ion of Code Enfarcement f+ T PE N PHON �ichael��. �'Vlare�head:266-8439 �� IUST$E ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (DAT� ' � Wednesday, Auugst 22, 2001 ,— p�} - JOTAL # OF SIGNATURE?F � � ��:, � � „ "��_ ° , HEET , C� -°lo�- No i u�� [fl� • �,� •,. .w�w p� �� ^'/� pIY�'01MCIL �_ ��.� �3i_ ^' /� Fdl `_ 'k�!�q.�� .. �NK � ❑ MYCLf11N , t, f ;s � , � .�.��. _ o�..�,�� o��.,��..,�� ❑ 4CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIONATURE)' . CTIONRE�UESTED � '. � , �- �� - � — � City Cou�cil to pass thisresolution �hi will order the owner(s) to remove or repair the referenced building(s): If t}ie owner.faals Yo o`qmp�y with the t s6lutipn, the Citizen Service Of�ce, Division o£Code Enforcemant is orde'red ,�, � to remove the building. The su ' ect property is located at 393 Sidney Street East. 'PLANNING CIVILSER�ICE COMMISSION ,. r _.._. ... _,,. ..,, ..�., .,.,.,. .. , t. Hea thia pereon/Ilrm eVer xrorked untler a wMrect /01 thi� depertment7 ' YES NO 2. Han ihis peraoNllrm ever 6ean e oMy empbyee7 , YES NO 3. Doee thie persoNflrm poeteis a Ntlll not nwmellypweeeted by eny curcent clty ampluyee? VES Nb 4. lo Mle pereon/firm e teryetetl vandoR � VES NO ✓ � ' ' � E�yleln ell yea nnev,rere on eepeiate eheet and eXeoh to reen theet ��,!�,�iRi�€�&�A4€�g�€S�R94fti��YYNM��)�'El�i�ied in Chapter 45 and a vacant building as defined in Chapter 43 of , the Saint Paul Legislaiive Code. The owners, interested parties and responsible parties known to the En£orcement .,' Officar were given an order to repair or remove the building at 393 Sidney Street East by July,13, 2001, and have *- failed to comply with those orders. � � � HUVAIVIAGE3IF AYYHWED �a,�sF The City will eliminate a nuisance. ' �" '� DISADVANTAGESIFAPRROVED The Gity will spend funds to wreck_and remove this building(s). These costs will be assessed to the proparty, colleeted as a�peeial assessxnent a�ainst the-provertv tasces. • zisanee condition will remain unabated in the City. This building(s) will continue to blight the community. AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S � ' ' COETIREVENU¢ BUDOETED (CIRCLB ON6) VEB, NO � � io souRCe Nuisance Housin@ Abatement ACTIVITYNUMBER 3326I T CouncN R�ssarch Center �i��:�„_.4.:. o � -yna REPORT Date: October 16, 2001 Time: 10:00 am. Place: Room 330 City Hall IS WestKelloggBoulevard LEGISLATIVE HEARING Geny Strathman Legislative Hearing Officer Appeal of summary abatement order for 697 Surrev Avenue. (City Council refened this matter back ta the Legislative Hearing Officer.) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal. 2. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 393 Sidney Street East. � If the owner fails to complp, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Laid over from 10-2-01) Legislative Heanng Officer recommends granting the owner six months to complete the rehabilitation ofthe properiy on condition that a$2,000 bond is posted by noon of October 24, 2001. 3. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 667 Magnolia Avenue East. If Yhe owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the resolution. 4. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properry at 299 Arlineton Avenue East. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends withdrawing the resolution. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 850 Sims Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Laid over from 9-25-01) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the resolution. � ot-�tpa MINUTES OF THE LEGISLATIVE HEARING Tuesday, October 16, 2001 Room 330 City Hall Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer STAFF PRESENT: Steve Magner, Code Enforcement; Mike Morehead, Code Enforcement The meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m. Appeal of summary abatement order for 697 Surrey Avenue. (City Councit referred this matter back to the Legislative Hearing Officer.) Gerry Strathman stated this is an appeal of an order issued to Sharon Anderson in September. The order was to remove improperly stored refuse, cut and remove tall grass, weeds, rank plant growth, and remove portion of fence. Ms. Anderson filed an appeal and the City Council sent this matter back to Mr. Strathman for a recommendation. Bill Dahn, 240 Baker Street East, representing Shazon Anderson, appeared and stated he does ttot know where the City got the list of items on the summary abatement order. Mr. Strathman asked are there tali weeds and grass. Mr. Dahn responded no. If there aze, they have grown since he was there. He supports the paperwork that Sharon Anderson has submitted. The last time she was before the City Council, they did not have the paperwork. She wants to know who aze the complaining parties. Under state law, responded Mr. Stratlunan, the City is prohibited from disclosing the complainants. Mr. Strathman stated he needs some evidence that ihe order is improper, for exaruple, photographs showing there aze no tall weeds, videotape, etc. Mr. Dahn responded he does not have anything with him at this time. The $250 for this assessment is too high and even attorneys do not make that much. It seems he and Ms. Anderson are being harassed and harassment is a bigger charge than tall weeds. Mr. Strathman asked aze there any photographs showing the property. Steve Magner responded it would be best to have Mr. Dahn or the owner meet with the enforcement officer or the supervisor at the location so they can go over the issues because Mr. Magner does not have photographs. In order to granC the appeal, stated Mr. Strathman, he would need some evidence to show the property is cleaned up, and he does not have that. Mr. Dahn responded that Mr. Stratiunan also does not have any evidence showing it is bad. Gerry Strathman recommends denying the appeal. He suggested Mr. Dahn ar Ms. Anderson make arrangements for the supervisor and inspector to look at the properly. If they look at the properry and fmd there is no reason for this order, then they will withdraw ihe order and the matter will be closed. This matter will go before the City Council. Mr. Dahn responded Ms. Anderson wants it to go before the City Councit. O 1 -10 �- LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 16, 2001 page 2 Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 393 Sidney Street East. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Laid over from 10-2-01) (Steve Magner submitted photographs.) Steve Magner stated this has been laid over twice. The property was suppose to have gone through a closing, and the new owners were suppose to post a bond. A code compliance inspection has been done, but the bond and closing have not occurred. They may be trying to have these things done by the City Council meeting on October 24. Gerry Strathman recommends granting the owner six months to complete the rehabilitation of the property on condition that a$2,000 bond is posted by noon of October 24, 2001. Mr. Magner stated he will notify George Borer, the attorney. Resolufion ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 667 Magnolia Avenue East. If the owner fai[s to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Steve Magner submitted photographs.) Steve Magner stated tlus property bas been vacant since December 5, 2000. The current owner is Vicki Adams, also known as Vicki Knight. Six summary abatement notices were issued to secwe doors, cut tall grass, remove refuse, remove snow and ice, and abate vehicles. On August 2, 2001, an inspection ofthe building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on August 10, 2001, with a compliance date of September 10. As of this date, the property remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code. The vacant building fees are due. Real estate taYes are paid. TaYation has estimated the mazket value of the land as $12,200; esdmated market value of the building prioz to the fire, $47,900. A code compliance inspecfion nor bond have been applied for. Demolifion is between $7,000 and $8,000. The owner has contacted Code Enforcement. Her last cali to the azea inspector was that she was not going to fight the demolition of the building. Gerry Strathman recommends approved the resolution based on Mr. IvIagner's testimony and the fact that the owner is not here to represent the property. Resolurion ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 299 Arlington Avenue Eas� If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. The following appeazed: Marjorie Frahs (owner Richazd Spreigl's niece) and Reneya Mayberry (Ms. Frahs' niece and Mr. Spreigl's great niece). Mike Morehead reported this properly has a long hisiory. Many yeazs ago when Highway 35 was run through, this family was relocated by the state. The City granted the new location a nonconforming use status. This properry was used as a landscaping business. The business went e �-1a2- LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 16, 2001 Page 3 defunct a few yeazs ago. Landscaping equipment items were left to accumulate on the properry so long that trees were growing tUrough the tires. A number of buildings on the property fell down from lack of maintenance. It was determined that the property was not used for commercial purposes; therefore, it reverted to residential zoning status. At that point, a11 the miscellaneous materials on the property were no longer fit for residential applications. Last year, stated Mr. Morehead, Code Enforcement started dealing with the Spreigl family. The principle owner Richard is eiderly and has not been able to accomplish the cleanup. Code Enforcement issued orders and gave the owners a deadli�e to get the property cleaned up. The owners were not able to get rid of the big equipment. The City brought in a latge abatement crew. They were limited to $3,000, which is the summary abatement limit, but they ran up a bill of $3,5�0. Mr. Morehead stated he knows he cannot assess that much; therefore, he wili assess $3,000. Seventy-Five percent of the problems were eliminated. Mr. Morehead went on to say he started the paperwork to ea�tend the abatement work beyond the $3,000 limit. That paperwork will not be on the City Council agenda unril November. The owners have until early November to finish cleaning up the properry. The owners have been given verbal orders and Code Enforcement is going to follow up this week with formal written orders. With the bulk of the big stuff removed, it is possible the family can clean up the little stuff. The $3,000 assessed greatly improved the value of their land. Gerry Strathman stated the order before him today as a resolution io remove or repair the property. Steve Magner responded there were two or three accessory structures, numerous vehicies, metal machinery, and other related items that were there. Mr. Morehead stated the buildings are gone, but the remnants and things underneath the building aze still sticking up. Mr. Stratl�man asked what Code Enforcement is seeking today. Mr. Morehead responded before he can do a substantial abatement, owners of the property are to appear before Mr. Strathman. Code Enforcement wants Mr. Strathman to determine that the need to finish up this abatement is proper. Mr. Morehead needs a recommendation from Mr. Strathman that if the properry is not cleaned up by November 7 or 8, then Code Enforcement can finish it. Therefore, he needs authority from the City Council to levy more than a$3,000 lien on the property. Code Enforcement is continuing to work with this family. What is le8 is light work; the heavy stuff has been taken out. By the time the City Council hears this matter, there is a good chance it will be cleaned up. This is just an insurance policy that if they cannot get it done, Code Enforcement wiil finish the job so the file can be closed. Mr. Strathman stated the paperwork before him is for removal of buildings that have already been removed. Regazdless of the paperwork, what is being discussed here is an order to conduct a substantial a6atement at this properiy if the owners do not clean up the properiy by a specified date. When they originally looked at this property, stated Mr. Magner, to do the cleanup would have been beyond $10,000, which included the buildings. Since the owners have removed some of the buildings or broken down the buildings, Code Enforcement has removed them under the standazd summary abatement. What is primarily left is to clean up the site, grade it, seed it, and 61 � V.o 2- LEGISLATTVE HEARING MINIJTES OF OCTOBER 16, 2001 Page 4 straw it until it grows. If the owners can accomplish that task, Code Enforcement would not spend any more money there. What is really being asked, stated Mr. Strathman, is approval by the City Council to do a substantial abatement at tlus property if the owners have not taken care of it prior to October 24. Mr. Magner added that after the Mayor signs it, it would probably be the first week of November before they could send someone out to finish the work on the property. Mr. Morehead stated the big deadline is winter. If the owners can make substautiai progress, he will let them finish it. Ms. Frahs stated they took photographs. There is some brush that has to be cleared behind the house. There is a little patch in the middle of the property. There aze some trees that have to come down. Along the fence, dirt that has to be brought down to grade. They fixed the hole in the garage. Mr. Morehead responded they do not have to take the trees down. Next to the base of the trees is a hole with items sticking out of the ground. The items aze considered hazardous waste. Anyone that hauls these items out has to be informed of this. (Ms. Frahs showed photographs to everyone.) Mr. Strathman asked aze they alright with what Mr. Morehead wants to do. Ms. Frahs responded yes, but was concemed about liens on the house. Mr. Magner responded assessments can go on the taaces. There can be another hearing when the family gets the assessment or Taxation can he called and asked to space it out. All taxes and assessments have to be paid before a property is sold. Gerry Strathman recommends withdrawing the resolution before him today and approval of the authority to conduct a substanrial abatement at this properly if necessary. The City Council will need the proper paperwork developed. If the City Council approves it, Mr. Morehead will have the authority to do more work at the properry. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 850 Sims Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Laid over from 9-25-01) (Mr. Magner submitted photographs.) Steve Magner reported this properry was condemned in May 2000. It has been vacant since August 21, 2000. The current owners are Michael and Becky Ramstad. There have been two summary abatement notices for removing refuse. On March 7, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condirion was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on March 19, 2001, with a compliance date ofApril 18. As of this date, this property remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code. Taxation has placed an e,-�t.o� LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUT'ES OF OCTOBER 16, 2001 Page 5 �. '� u, - � '. 1 111 �� i .�� .�� '� � tl �� - � � �• �� 1 11 . � � ' � u � _ '-�-- '. -�. - -� � ._._. � .-' —�-'-'-'-'--- -�-�---,_- ' � � � . "' • " - - " -' Mr. Magner stated he contacted Don VJagner (License, Inspection, Environmental Protection), who indicated an inspector was sent to the property yesterday and there was not enough work completed. Also, a plumbing and heating permit has not be pulled by a license contractor. There is no heat in this building. The owners will forfeit that bond as of today, and a new bond has not been posted. Mr. Strathman stated he received a phone call this morning from apparently the owner who requested this hearing be delayed so Mr. Wagner could look at the building. Obviously, that is not necessary. Mr. Magner responded the owners aze trying to say that they made sheet rock and painting repairs and that is more than 50% of the work. Mr. Wagner's opinion is that is not the case. Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the resolution. The meeting was adjourned at 10:40 am. � Ot �g0} REPORT Date: September 4, 2001 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: Room 330 City Hall 15 West Kellogg Boulevazd LEGISLATIVE HEARING Gerry Strathman Legislative Hearing Officer Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 393 Sidnev Street East. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Laid over from 8-7-01) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the October 2, 2001, Legislative Hearing. 2. Suuunary Abatements J0102B Grass cutting (by private contractor) during June and part of July 2001; JOl O5A Property cleanup during June and part of July 2001; J0104B Boarding up of vacant buildings during June and part of July 2001; J0104C Demolition of vacant buildings during June and part of July 2001; and 30105V Abandoned vehicles towed from private properiy during 7une and part of July 2001. 579 Van Buren Avenue (JOlOSV) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 1119 Geranium Avenue East (J0104B) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 422 Jessamine Avenue East (JOlOSV) Legislative Heazing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 811 Van Buren Avenue (J0102G) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 456 Lawson Avenue West (JOl O5A) Legisiative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 555 Blair Avenue (JOl O5A) Legislafive Hearing Officer recomxnends approval of the assessment. 914 Concordia Avenue (JOl O5A) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends deleting the assessment. 0�-�[c} LEGISLATIVE HEARING REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 page 2 250 Page Street East (JOlOSA) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment 1595 Thomas Avenue (JO105� Legislative Hearing Officer recommends deleting the assessment. 639 Blair Avenue (JOlOSA) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 408 Banfil Street (JOl O5A) Mr. Strathman recommends reducing the assessment to $50 plus the $45 service fee for a total assessment of $95. 657 Dale Street North (JOl O5A) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 324 Jenks Avenue (JOl O5A) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 462 Edmund Avenue (JO105� Legislative Hearing Officer recommends deleting the assessment. 967 Edgerton Street (JOlOSV) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends deleting the assessment. 65 VJinnipee Avenue (JOlOSA) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 65 Winnipee Avenue (JO105� I,egislarive Hearing Officer recommends deleting the assessment. 605 Magnolia Avenue East (JOl O5A) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 291 Tonnine (30105V) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends deleting the assessment. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 847 Leaiin tg Pazkwav South. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the November 6, 2001, Legislative Hearing. LEGISLATIVE HEARING REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 � � � 7. Summary Abatement Order Appeal for 1598 Hazel Street North. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the September 25, 2001, Legislative Hearing. a l -qo�- Page 3 Resolufion ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 1124 Conwa�Street. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative FIearing Officer recommends approval. Resolufion ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 245 Front Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recominends approval. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 62 Winifred Street West. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officez recommends approval. � MINUTES OF TF� LEGISLATIVE HEARING Tuesday, September 4, 2001 Room 330 City Hall Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer STAFF PRESENT: Steve Magner, Code Enforcement; Hazold Robinson, Code Enforcement Gerry Strathman called the meeting to order at 10:04 am. o �-qo�- Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 393 Sidney Street East If the owner faiLs to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Laid over from 8-7-01) Steve Magner reported this was laid over in order for the attorney representing the fee owner and Lutheran Social Services to sell the property. The attomey submitted to Mr. Magner a proposal to sell the property to the West Side Neighborhood Development Alliance. They are waiting for the closing and haue to obtain a code compliance inspection. Mr. Magner suggested this matter be laid over for the closing of the sell and so 23EDA can obtain a bond. George F. Borer appeazed to request an extension of a month in order to close on the property. The probate court approved the sell this morning. The other status was cleazed up eazlier. Gerry Strathman laid over this matter to October 2, 2001, in order for NEDA to close on the properiy. Summary Abatements J0102B Grass cutting (by private contractor) during June and part of July 2001; JOlOSA Property cleanup during June and part of July 2001; J0104B Boarding up of vacant buildings during June and part of July 2001; J0104C Demolition of vacant buildings during June and part of July 2001; and J0105V Abandoned vehicles towed from private property during June and part of July 2Q01. 579 Van Buren Avenue (JOl OSi� (No one appeazed to represent the properry.) Gerry Strathman recommends approval. 1119 Geranium Avenue East (70104B) (No one appeazed to represent the property.) Gerry Strathman recommends approval. 01- qd'� LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINLITBS OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 page 2 422 Jessamine Avenue East (JO105� (No one appeared to represent the pmperiy.) Gerry Strathman recommends approval. 811 Van Buren Avenue (J0102G) (No one appeared to represent the property.) Gerry Strathman recommends approval. 456 Lawson Avenue West (JOI OSA) (No one appeazed to represent the properry.) Gerry Strathman recommends approval. 555 Blair Avenue (JOl O5A) Steve Plowruan, Real Estate Broker, 386 Wabasha Street North, appeazed and stated he was asked by the owners to check into this. They were unawaze what this charge was for. The properry has been condemned. People were hired to clean out the property, which was completed yesterday. The owner of the company that did the cleaning is interested in purchasing the property. The owners aze willing to get rid of the property for what they owe on it or even a litfle less. Gerry Strathman stated his information is that orders were sent on May 17, 2001, to clean up furniture, refuse, bike parts by May 29. The inspector went out again on May 30, deternuned the cleanup did not take place, and ordered the City to do it. The City crew went out on June 6. The total charge is $288.00. Mr. Strathman stated he could see the videotape. Mr. Plowman responded that is not necessary because the property was a problem. Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment. 914 Concordia Avenue (JOl O5A) Meredith Price, National Marketing, 12249 Nicollet Avenue South, Burnsville, appeazed and stated they never received notice that there was going to be an abatement proceeding. Her understanding is that it was sent to the wrong party. This was a vacant house. It was under renovation. National Mazketing took it over, and hauled out three dumpsters of tefuse. The items cleaned up by the City were not theirs. Some of the things cleaned up were not on her property; there is an empty lot next door. Her company has the crews to do this work. o�.�to'� LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINLTTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 Page 3 Gerry Stratbman stated the information he has is that orders were mailed on June 12, 2001; he asked who it was sent to. Hazold Robinson responded orders were mailed on 7une 12 to Ameriquest and to the occupant at 914 Concordia At the time, Ameriquest was listed as the owner. Code Enforcement did not get any mail returned. Ms. Price responded that her company acquired the property in Mazch Ramsey County may be behind in their updating. Mr. Strathman asked was the sell recorded. Ms. Price responded yes and they have title inciman�. Mr. Strathman asked who was living there in June. Ms. Price responded no one. It was unfit for habitation. It had to be guttecl. Gerry Strathman deleted the assessment on the basis of incorrect notification. The City did what it was suppose to do, but it is evident that Code Enforcement received incorrect informafion from Ranisey County regarding ownership. 250 Paee Street East (JOl O5A) (No one appeared to represent the property.) Gerry Strathman recommends approval. 1595 Thomas Avenue (JOl O5V) The following appeared: Terry Glanz and Crreg Glanz, owners. Terry stated three cars were towed ofFthe property. Hazold Robinson reported the vehicles appeazed inoperable and no licenses were visible. If a vehicle has been sitting in one place for a long time, the inspector considers it inoperable, but the vehicles cleazly had no visible licenses. Terry L. Glanz was notified at 1595 Thomas Avenue. Orders were mailed on January 25, 2001. Mr. Strathman asked what they have to show that the vehicles were licensed. Terry Glanz responded he has paperwork and his brother went through the process of getting license piates and tabs after the notices were received. They have insivance waivers. Mr. Strathman asked when did they get them licensed. Greg Glanz responded they were licensed the year before all this took place. He had the license plates on the velucle, he took them off, and put them inside the vehicle in the window. There was a problem with license plates being stolen off of cars. This happened when there was a lot of snow. He laiocked the snow off the windows so they were visible. Mr. Strathman stated once the vehicles were towed, why were they not retrieved. Terry Glan� responded he did not try because he did not know lus brother had insurance waivers. His brother said a few weeks later that he had insurance waivers and the vehicles were legally licensed but o�-ao�-- LEGISLATIVE HEARING NIlNiJTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 Page 4 could not be driven. One of the vehicles was operable. There was a transmission and engine being worked on. The Horizon was waiting for an engine also. The Glanzes showed Mr. Strathman some documents showing the vehicles were licensed, the ;n�,*ance waiver, and photographs. Gerry StraYhman deleted the assessment. 639 Biair Avenue (JOl O5A) (No one appeared to represent the properry.) Gerry Strathman recommends approvai. 408 Banfil Street (JOlOSA) Kimie Keamey, owner, appeazed and stated she has a$288 assessment for yard cleanup and she wanted to know what was done. (A videotape was shown.) Ms. Kearney stated it was four bags of recycled cans for $288. She had mowed the yazd and she is letting the bushes grow a bit. Mr. Strathman stated the storage of trash in the bags was not in compliance with City codes; they need to be in containers. Ms. Kearney responded it was her ganddaughter's recycling. Ms. Kearney had taken them out of the gazage so they could be taken to the recycling place. Mr. Strathman reduced the assessment to $50 plus the $45 service fee for a total assessment of $95. The City crew did go out, and there were some things improperly stored; however, the situation did not look that bad on the videotape. 657 Dale Street North (JOl O5A) Michael Burger, owner, 915 Reed Street, Mankato, appeared and stated this properry and two others were in a parhiership between himself and someone else. On February 27, 2001, they mutually agreed. to end their partnership. These properties were in Mr. Burger's name. He did a quick claim deed and put them all in the other person's name. The pmperry probably did need to be cleaned up, but at the time he was not responsible for the properties. He is not currently the owner. Mr. Strathman asked who was notified. Mr. Berger responded it was mailed to 1107 Jenks. That mail was retumed to the City. The City mailed it Yo another address. a l -t�'L- LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 Page 5 Hazold Robinson reported the last time there was an abatement at that address was June 29. Their records still show Michael Burger at 1107 Jenks. Mr. Robinson suggested that Mr. Burger deal with Taxation or the former partner to make sure the records get transferred. Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment. 324 Jenks Avenue (70105A) Jean Johnson, 5000 Otter Lake Road, White Bear, appeazed and stated they were on a contract for deed at the time tlus occurred. The information went to Charles Zeches because that name was still on it. She asked when this was done. Mr. Strathman responded the notice was sent on May 10, 2001, and the work was done on May 29. Ms. Johnson stated a tenant handed her paperwork on appro�mately May 30. It did need cleaning. She looked at the backyazd after she was handed the notice, and there were mattresses and gazbage there. Mr. Strathman asked who was notified. Hazold Robinson responded "Occupant" at 324 Jenks and Chazles Zeches at �77 Sixth Street East. Gerry Strathman recommended approval of the assessment. The City notified the owner of record. The occupant was also notified, which goes beyond what is required. There was an 18 day period between when she was norified and the City actually did the cleanup. 462 Edmund Avenue (JO105� The following appeazed: Wanda Bulditz, 706219th Street North, Oakdale; Marie Keyes, 462 Edmund Avenue #1; and Heriberto Garrido, owner, 7062 19th Street North, Oakdale. Ms. Bulditz stated she got a notice regarding a vehicle removed from her properry. She wanted to know why because she gaue her tenant pernussion to pazk a vehicle there. A week later, the caz was not there so Ms. Bulditz assumed the vehicle was never pazked there. Then, she got a bill. Ms. Keyes stated this was her daughter's car. She called the Police Department Impound lot. No one admitted to having the car. The tabs were good, and the car was operable. Ms. Keyes had no need to drive the vehicle so she pazked it at the properry. It was not even there three days. She brought the car there Monday night. When she came home on Thursday, the vehicle was gone. Mr. Robinson stated the inspection was done on January 26, 2001. The vehicle had an expired license. The recheck was done on February 2 and an impound order was sent in. The police towed it on February 20 with the license still e�cpued. Mr. Strathman asked did she not get the caz because she did not know where it was located. Ms. Keyes responded no one would tell her that it was towed. 01-'l LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 Page 6 Mr. Strathman asked what iriggered this inspection. Harold Robinson responded probably a compIaint_ It was towed by the poIice department. Mr. Strathman deIeted the assessment. He is unsure why the Impound Lot did not tell the owner the caz was there. Ms. Bulditz stated she is a real estate agent and l�ows that Ramsey County is six months behind in their record keeping. 967 Edeerton Street (JO105� Alexis Abreu, owner, appeazed and stated this vehicle belonged to a tenant that lived at the property. The tenant bought the vehicle, stored it in the garage for a wkrile, then moved it out. Some items were missing from the property. Mr. Abreu was going to hold this vehicle to see if he would come back. The caz did not start and he had keys. Mr. Abreu called a police officer that is a friend of his. This police officer ticketed the caz fust. He said he would come back later, and if the vehicle is srill there, he would have it moved. A few days later, the vehicle was gone, and Mr. Abreu assumed this officer took it. Later, this officer asked what happened to the vehicle, and Mr. Abreu received a bill in the mail. Mr. Strathman asked when the orders were mailed. Mr. Robinson responded orders were mailed twice: January 24, 2001, and February 12 to Aleacis Abreu and the occupant, both of 967 Edgerton. Mr. Abreu stated when he got the January notice, that is when he called his friend who ticketed the vehicle. Mr. Strathman asked if the police officer had ordered the vehicle towed, would the assessment go to the properry owner. Mr. Robinson responded it would be an administrative tow. The car is cited, towed, and the vehicle owner has to recover the vehicle. Steve Magner stated the properry owner has to be present during an administrative tow to identify the vehicle. Mr. Robinson skated if he had said to the inspector that a police officer is warking on this and it would be towed in a few days, there would not have been a problem. Gerry Strathman recommends deleting the assessment. 65 Winnipeg Avenue (JOlOSA) 65 Winnipe¢ Avenue (JOI OSV) Milt Randall, tenant, appeared and stated the owner lives in Wisco�sin aad Mr. Randatl feels he is responsible for what happens at the properry. There aze two assessments here. One invoives a vehicle that was Yowed and the oYher assessment is for a cleanup. (The cleanup was discussed fust.) During the time of this assessment, said Mr. Raudall, he was in the process of switchiug tcash companies. For a month, he had to call his trash company because they were not picldng it up. Then he got the assessment. He thought the company had finatly taken the trash, but the City had 01-Zo' LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 . page 7 instead. The assessment was sent to Wisconsin. By the time it got to Mr. Randail, he did not have time to do anything. (A videotape was shown.) Mr. Randall stated kids strip bikes and throw them in the rear of his house. The appfiances came from ius house and were suppose to be picked up by the trash company. Gerry Strathman stated the owner was notified, the occupant received notice, and it was almost two weeks between the time notice was sent and the City did the cleanup. There was opportuniry for someone to do the cieanup. Mr. Robinson stated orders went out on May 15, and a reinspection was done on May 23. The occupants supposedly called the inspector on May 23 to say he would take cate of it by the weekend. The inspector went over there on May 30, the items were still there, so he issued the work order. (Now, the vehicles were discussed.} Gerry Strathman asked about the vehicles. Mr. Randall responded the inspector told hun he had to move the cars. He put one in the garage and the other right beside the gazage on the slab. The inspector told him the plates were not current so he could not pazk it there. Mr. Randall put insurance on the car and current plates. Three days later, the caz was towed. The tabs were on the vehicle when it was towed. He purchased the tabs the day after he received the notice. Mr. Strathman stated orders were mailed on January 18, the inspector went out on February 5, and again on Febzuary 21. Mr. Stratlunan asked did he have anything showing the vehicle had current plates. Mr. Randail responded he did not have anything with bim. Mr. Strathman asked when the velucle was towed. Mr. Robinson responded he was not sure when it was towed. JOl O5A - Mr. Strativsian recommends approval of the assessment. The two appliances clearly had been stored there. The owner had more than two weeks to get rid of them. JO 105 V- Mr. Strathman recommends deleting the assessment if the owner can get him something showing the vehicle had legaI tabs and legaI plates when it was towed in February. If the owner cannot supply him with that, then the assessment stands. NOTE: Mr. Randall did bring in evidence that he purchased tabs on February 24, 2001. Upon checking with the Impound Lot, it was found that the vehicle arrived there on March 3. Therefore, Gerry Strathman recommends deleting the assessment. ��goa- LEGISLATNE HEARING MINiJTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 Page 8 605 Magnolia Avenue East (JOl O5A) Mel Guyett, owner, appeazed and stated he purchased the properiy recentty. A fence was instailed and bushes were removed. He was making arrangements to haul them away. He works about 12 hours a day and he could only do it on the weekend. He came home with a truck and a trailer to take it out of there. He has a friend who will sometimes do surprise things for t►im. Mr. Guyett thought this friend had done the work.. Mr. Strathman asked who was notified. Mr. Robinson responded Todd K. and Mary Kay Lewis were notified at 605 Magnolia Tlris was done on May 15, 2001, rechecked on May 12, and tke work was done on May 29. Mr. Strathman asked when he became tlie owner. Mr. Guyett responded about July 7, 2001. Mr. Robinson responded the orders went out May 15. Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment. When the owner purchased the properry, he became responsible for the assessment. The seller is required to certify that there are no pending assessments. If there are, the owner is suppose to take care of them. The owner has the right to go to the previous owner because they aze responsible for it. Mr. Magner added that ritle insurance should cover things like this. Resolution ordering the owtter to remove or repair the property at 847 Lexington Parkway South. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Mr. Magner showed photograplvs to Mr. Strathman.) John Kratz, owner, 1424 Edgcumbe Road, appeared and stated he just acquired this property on August 1. He would like to lay over this matter and woutd tike to attach tius pmperty ta another property adjacent to it. He would like to build a 12 unit townhouse. If that gets approved, this pmperty wi11 be tom down. The approval process is lengthy on this. He wouId Iike to do this in the fall. It is more likely to be six months. Given his plan to remove the building and given that the properry is a blight, Gerry Strathman asked, what is the problem with the property being removed now. Mr. Kratz responded ius plan would be to rehabilitate the building if lus plan is not approved. These matiers can be highly charged with neighborhood involvement Tlvs properry seems to be getting ofFto a friendlier start with the neighbors and he is more optimistic about the development. Steve Magner reported the pmperry has been vacant since March I, 2000. Eight summary abatement notices have been issued to secure tfie house, cut tail g�ass, remove t.v. antenna, and remove hazardous mud and sand on sidewalk. On June 19, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on July 1 i, 2001, with a compliance date of August 10. The vacant building fees are paid. A code compliance inspecflon has not been applied for and a bond has not been posted. Esrimated cost to repair is $80,000; estimated cost to demolish, $7,000 to $8,000. Mr. Magner would not have a problem LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 o�..�o� Page 9 with a short e�ctension, although six months may not be feasible ai this time unless a bond is posted. Mr. Strathman concurred saying that ttus nuisance building cannot stand indefinitely. Mr. Kratz stated he lives half a mile away. He has met all the neighbors. t1ll Yhe problems they had were with the previous owner. He has given them all his card, and they know who to call if there is a problem. He does not anticipate there will be more complaints. He dces not want to knock it down so soon because his costs go np so muck. He would have to haul in fill to fill up the hole and there is too much fill on the side already that he has to haul out when the new building is built Gerry Strathman laid over to the November 6, 2001, Legislative Hearing. In t6at time, the owner shouid be prepazed to post a bond and rehabilitate the property or be prepazed to remove it. Summary Abatement Order Appeal for 1598 Hazel Street North. Waiter Montpetit, owner, appeazed and stated this is regazding a wildlife garden on his properry. It is 1,500 square feet. He has a 100 square foot patch sepazated. It is part of the landscaping scheme on his properry. He received an order to cut it. It is in the backyard. Gerry Strathman stated he has some remembrance about the City amend'vng its notice to make provisions for native plantings. He asked would this qualify. Mr. Robinson responded he is not sure the norice stipulated what plantings could be in a nazive habitat. Sandy Pappas has been designated by an organization to determine what plants should be put in. Mr. Montpetit says that HarrieY Island has areas ihat look like the same type of scheme he is doing. Mr. Sirathman asked is ticere someone on City staff that can took at this properry. Mr. Robinson responded he has a name and phone number of the organization in charge of this issue. Just ta11 grass and weeds do not qualify. Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the September 25, 2001, LegisIafive Hearings In the meantime, someone who Irnows about this issue can go to the property and make a determination. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 1124 Conway Street If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (No one appeared to represent the property.) (Steve Magner submitted photographs.) Steve Magner reported this properiy has been vacant since February 2,1998. The owner is deceased. Ten summary abatement notices have been issued for vacant building, cut tall grass, remove unlawfully pazked vehicle, remove rubbish, and secure structure. On July 20, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constihrte a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisauce building �l�to�- LEGISLATIVE HEARING MII�TITTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 Page 10 was issued on July 24, 2001, with a compfiance date of August 8, 2001. A bond has not been posted. "The cost to repair is $40,OOQ to $SQ,000; estimated cost to demolish, $7,000 to $8,000. The building was condemned by the Sewer Division. The property has a septic tank, which collapsed. The groperty was condemned. When the owner purchased tfie property, he failed to check with ihe City. The City is not allowing any new sewer systems be instailed. The owner wouid have to connect to the neat cIosest City sewer, which could cost up to $45,000. Before he died, he said he would tet the property go back to the mortgage company and he wo�ld not do the connection. He stayed at the property as long as he could. Mr. Magner stated he and Mr. Robinson cut the owner more slack because he was in a terminai condition. Gerry Strathman recommends approval. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properfy at 245 Froat Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (No one appeared to represent the property. Photographs were submitted.) Steve Magner reported thits property has been vacant since July 13, 2000. Seven summary abatement notices have been issued for cut tall grass, secure structure, and remove rubbish. On June 26, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a mjisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abaze a nuisance building was issued on July 11, 200I, with a compliance date of August 10. The vacant building fee aze due. Taxation has placed an estimated market value of $22,600 on the property; estimated cost to repair, $75,000; estimated cost to demolish, $8,000 to $9,Q00. As of September 4, 2001, a code compliance inspection has not been applied for, and a$2,000 bond has not been posted. Gerry Stratl�man recommends approval. Resolntion ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 62 Winifred Street West If the owner Fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (No one appeared to represent the property.) Steve Magner this property has been vacant since July 30, 1990. There have been 20 summary abatement notices to remove refuse, cut tall grass, secure building, remove snow and ice, remove 16 velucles/trailers, and atlow occupancy of a registered vacant buiIding. On December 22, 1999, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photograplvs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on January 4, 2000,with a compliaace date of February 15, 2000. The vacant buiiding fees aze due. Real estate taYes aze unpaid in the amount of $1,659.92. A bond was forfeited on June 13, 2001. The estimated cost to repair is $25,000. There was a previous resotution to repair or remove the property; the resolution was passed by the CiTy Councii. A new owner purchased the building the next day. The City Council amended the resolution to give the new owner 180 days. They failed to firush fhe project. Mr, Magner has had little or no response &om the owner, and he is disappointed the owner is not here today. o � -�soar LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBBR 4, 2001 Page 11 Gerry Stratbman recommends approval. 291 Tonnine (JO105� Hazold Robinson recommended the assessment be deleted. Gerry Strathman recommends deleting the assessment. The meeting was adjoumed at 11:43 am. ,� MINUTES OF LEGISLATIVE HEARING Q 1�O� Tuesday, August 7, 2001 Room 330, City Hall Gerry Strathman, I.egislative Hearing Officer STAFF PRESF.AIT: Jason Btuberg, Code Enforcement; Steve Magner, Code Enforcement The meeting was called to order at IO:OQ 3_ID_ Laid over snmmary abatement: J0104AA Property cleannp at 1075 Portland Avenue. (Laid over from 7 24-01) Tbe following appeazed: Phyllis Brown, daughter of deceased owners, � 149 La�uel Avenue, and Ruth Jones, daughter of deceased owners, 1075 Porfland Avenue. Ms. Brown stated that her mother passed away March 20, and her father passed away Apri19. Her pazents lived at 1075 Portland for many years, and took caze of their own personal business matters. Her moYher was in a hospice. Her father had lung cancer surgery and had been sick during the time of this cleanuQ. Ms. Bmwn found out about ttus assessment when she was going through a lot of their paperwork. She was awaze ihat her father had a lot of excess items on the deck outside the kitchen door. The only thing she is awaze of in tfie back of the garage was the car whick she in turn towed. The family has been preoccupied with the parents' dying process and was not aware of the assessment. They have had three estate sales on May 4, 5, 19, and three gazage saies on June 22, 23, 24. The family has paid property taxes on time, paid lots of miscellaaeous outstanding bills, and aze still paying burial expenses. Ms. Brown is protesting the $306. She is not aware of what was actually hauled away by the City, She has been hauling lots of items that have accumulated through her parents 54 years of marriage in that home. (A videotape was shown.) Mr. Strattuuan stated it looks like the City removed wood, debris, and picked up the gazbage. Ms. Jones s�ed Yhey fo�f t&e nc�tice by ac�ident She did not find the listed items outside. Nis. Brown stated she talked to John Betz (Code Enforcement) and he said the items were hauled on March 27. Her mother was buried on Mazch 26. The family was besieged with more important matters at tlte time of this assessment. Gerry Stratiaman deleted the assess�nent. It is cieaz notirx was sent and that the City did the work. A few weeks bef'o�ee tl� o�xieas were Yo both die, there is a serious question as to if they were in a positirnt �r re�ogniz� tbe sggn�cance of th� notices and deal with Ytiem effectively. As an act af undezstanding, the assessaaeat sT�vld he deleteci. Laid over summary abatements: J0103CC Demo�irion of building at 381 University Avenue West, Demolition of building at 387 University Avenue West. b� -�l�a- LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINI7TES FOR AUGUST 7, 2001 page 2 381 Universitv Avenue West Steve Magner reported the building has two addresses on the front of it: 38 2 and 383 University are one building aad 385 and 387 University aze the other build'uxg. Ia Marck 2001, there was a fire that originated at 385 IJrtiveisity, It engulfed that building and spread to the neighboring building of 38I and 383 ilrtiv�. Thece was a large Eller Media sign on tfie roof of 8ie bui2ding. The sign started to collapse. T�e Fire Beparlment requested a contractor puIl the sign down and remove some of the debris so they could put out the fire. (Mr. Magner showed a photograph of the building with the sign starting to collapse.) Mr. Magner stated he went to the site at 4:30 p.m. The Fire Department ordered the buiiding razed at the time of the fice. The demolition was completed the ne� day, and the cost of the demolition was split between the two properties with the cost of the crane and more rubble at 387 Univers'sty. Tbere was quite a bit of rubble left on 385 that had to be demolished. That is how the contractor split the bill. Choua Yang, 790 Tuscarora Avenue, and Long Her, 382 University Avenue West, appeazed. Ms. Yang stated they bring business to the University area, pay taz�es, and impmved the area. They plan on rebuilding there. This assessment is causing them financiat hardship. Mr. Sirathman stated he understands ttris is a lot of money. It was ordered by the Fire Deparhnent and is cleazly a public nuisance. AII tfie City is doing is recovering the money paid to the contractor to remove the building. There is no profit in this for the City. Steve Magner stated his office has been in contact with the insurance company for 385 and 387 University Avenue. They aze making attempts to pay the assessment for that properry. Iv�. Magner's recommendation is that the owner pursues this with the insurance company. Prnnarily, the insurance company will accept this as part of the loss, pay it as a bill, and they may go after the inssurance company af the other property for reimbursement. Mr. Magner asked what did the insurance company say about this. Ms. Yang responded they have not heard back. Gerry Strathmaa recommends approval of the assessment. 387 University Avenue West (No one appeared to represent the paopetty.) Gerry Strathman recommands approvat of the assessment. o � -qo�. LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINiJTES FOR AUGUST 7, 2001 Page 3 Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 393 Sidney Street East. Hthe owner fails to compty, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Steve Magner reported this property was condemned in January 2000. It l�as been vacaut since 2-16-00. The current owner is Claudia Tendrup. There have been five summary abatement notices issued to remove refuse, �e garage and house, cut tall grass, remove lazge tree limb and fuewooa. On 6-6-�1, aa mspection of ihe bu7�g was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was devsioged, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on 6-13-01 with a compliance date of 7-13-01. The properiy remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legisIative code. Vacant building fees aze due. Reat estate t�es are unpaid of $2,97027. Estimated market value is $72,700; estimated cost to repair, $80,000; estimated cost to demolish, $8,000 to $9,000. As of today, a code compliance inspection has not been applied for and a bond has not been posted. Mr. Magner stated there haue been numerous phone calls, e-mails, letters from neighbors that would like the City to take action on ttris property. Mr. Magner and another inspector met with a representative from Lutheran Social Services to go over the building again. A pariy from a neighborhood group was ihere. Mr. Magner was okay going through the btrilding, but the inspector became ill because of the extensive mold growth in the properry. Humid weather like today, asthma, and breathing condirions can make it difficult ta handle being in the house. Creorge F. Borer, Sweeney, Borer & Sweeney, representing Lutheran Social Services, appeared and stated Lut4reran Social Services was agpointed a yeaz ago as Ms. Tendrup's conservator with the direclion to take all reasonable efforts to return her to her home. Record keeping consisted of garbage bags of decades worth of bills, inveshnents, etc., a11 of wltich have not been fully sorted out. In some of the bags in the house, problems date back to the eazly 1990's. Also, the house is titled in Ms. Tendrup's father's name, His estate was probated several years ago and the house was overlooked at that time; therefore, fhe house was not formally passed from the estate into Ms. Tendrup's �tame. She has no finances to rehun home, has no fmances for a bond, and has no assets. A physician has indicated she will not be rehuning to her home. Yesterday, the home was shown to three people, and one person indicated an offer would be submitted this week. A neighhor aPso incyicated they will present a purchase. LuBieran Social Services fias Iisted the properry with a Reaitor who indicated he has a buyer who wants to present an offer. Any offer has to cover the back taYes, assessment, etc. There aze two petifions wiuch are needed to sell the property: i) Reopen the estate. A hearing has been scheduled with no objections, 2) Probate court has to order the sell. There is enough evidence that Ms. Tendrup will not retum home. Mr. Borer sta�ed he �adea�rands this pmperry is a nuisance to the City, and he will attempt to sell it as soon as possibte. Mr. Magn�r stated t� b�'sld'mg is a nuisance a� 6he� ar� heatth issues, but he believes the building can be rehabiIitated. The issue will resolve azound the cost of purchasing it and whether they can put Yhe numbers together. I-Ie asked was there another issue. Mr. Borer responded the buyer will have to pay the assessment plus the court requires rivo appraisals, which will be $600. T'here will not be any fees to Lutheran Social Services nor attomey fees. 01-q0 � LEGISLA"ITVE I-IEARING MINiJTES FOR AUGUST 7, 2001 Page 4 Mr. Magner stated Lutheran Social Services is not looking to make moaey on tlus. There have been previous inquiries from some neighborhood groups. The neighbors ultimate concern is that the house be rehabilitated, not necessarily abated or removed. Mr. StratUman asked for a time frame. If the offers do not meet the cost to get rid of the property, responded Mr. Borer, he does not anticipate bringing the legai motions, other than a petition to ahandon. Assuniing an offer comes in, a month is all it would take. There is no mortgage on the pnsge�ty. T� owner is not on medical assistance; therefore, there is no medical assistance lien. The tifle is c3ear otl�r �hau the probate issue. Gerry Strathman recommends lay�ng ov�a to the September 4, 200I, I,egislative Hearing. At that time, if there is no bona fide sale that has taken place or in process, he will recommend remove or repair. Mr. Borer responded that is more than fau. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair t3ie property at 633 Randolph Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Eaforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Photographs were presented) (No one appeazed to represent the properry.) Steve ivlagseer sEated this property was condemned July 2000. It has been vacant since 8-7-00. The c�aent owner is the Secretary of Veterans Affairs per Ramsey County recards, but a Gordon Anderson is representing himself as the owner. One summary abatement notice was issued to remove an inoperable vehicle. On 5-30-01, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were talcett. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on 6-12-01 with a compliauce date of 7-12-01. The properry remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code. The vacant building fees aze paid by Mr. Anderson Estimated market value, $65,900; esYimated repairs, $50,000; estimated cost to dema�ists, $7,Q(JO to $8,000. There there is an issue of possible illegal occupancy with the pmperty. Gerry Strathman asked was there any communication from the Secretary of Veteran Affairs. Mr. Magner responded there has been no response from them. Mr. Stratiunan stated a Bonnie Anderson is Iisted as having "equitable titIe." He asked what that means. A dason Baoberg msponded there is a contract for deed in the interim period before the contract is �asfsed. r'Ix'• Siia�saa� ask� for the �e�tionstaip Tb�ween Bonnie Anderson and Gordon Anderson. Mr. Magner rasponded he does nc� . Tl�e fnst flooa is packed to apgro�mately four feet off the ground. The second IIoor has a large accumulafion. Mr. Anderson is a collector and a recluse. Mr. Strathman asked how the VA (Secretary of Veterans Affairs) became the owner. Mr. Broberg responded the VA is the contractor. They sold Bonnie Anderson the property on a CIT[ZEN SERVICE OFFICE Fred Owa�su, City Clerk DIV [SION OF PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT Michae[ R Morehead, Program Managu CITY OF SAIN'f PAUL Nuisance Building Cade Enforcrment Norm Coleman, Mayor IS Gf! KellaggBlvd Rm. 190 Tel: 651-266-8440 Saint Pau1, MN55102 F¢s: 651-266-8426 7uly 13, 2001 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS Council President and Members of the City Council C \ -q0}- Citizen Service Office, Vacant/Nuisance Buildings Enforcement Division has requested the City Council schedule public hearings to consider a resolution ordering the repair or removal of the nuisance building(s) located at: 393 Sidney Street East � � ,�� €'�,c��rc;� �;:,�: „ The City Council has scheduled the date of these hearings as follows: 3 �, � � 2�� i Legislative Hearing - Tuesday, August 7, 2001 '�� City Council Hearing - Wednesday, August 22, 2001 The owners and responsible parties of record are: Name and Last Known Address Claudia Tendrup Central Towers 20 Exchange Street East St. Paul, MN 55101 Interest Fee Owner Lutheran Social Services 590 Park Street, Ste. 310 St. Paul, MN 55103 Attn: 7an Femer The legal description of this properry is: Conservator for Claudia Tendrup Lot 6, Riley's New Arrangement of the South half of the West 257 ft of Block 44 Brown & Jackson's Addirion. Division of Code Enforcement has declared this building(s) to constitute a"nuisance" as dafined by Legislative Code, Chapter 45. Division of Code Enforcement has issued an order to the then lrnown responsible parties to eliminate this nuisance condition by correcfing the deficiencies or by razing and removing this building(s). o�.yo�- 393 Sidney Street East July 13, 2001 Page 2 Inasmuch as this Order to Abate has not been complied with the nuisance condition remains unabated, the community continues to suffer the blighting influence of this property. It is the recommendation of the Division of Code Enforcement that the City Council pass a resolution ordering the responsible parties to either repair, or demolish and remove this buildinJ in a timely manner, and failing that, authorize the Division of Code Enforcement to proceed to demolifion and removal, and to assess the costs incurred against the real estate as a special assessment to be collected in the same manner as taxes. Sincerely, �teve �a�rcer Steve Magner Vacant Buildings Supervisor Division of Code Enforcement Citizen Service Office SM:mI cc: Frank Berg, Building Inspection and Design Meghan Riley, City Attorneys Office Nancy Anderson, Assistant Secretary to the Council Laurie Kaplan, PED-Housing Division ccnph o� -qoa- .� .�. LEGISI.A1`IVE HEARING bate: August 7, 2001 Time: 10:00 a.m. PIace: Room 330 City HaII 15 West Kellogg Bouievazd Gerry Strathman Legislative Hearing Officer 1. Laid over summary abatement: J0104AA Properiy cleanup at 1075 Portland Avenue. (Laid over from 7-24-01) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends deleting the assessment. 2. Laid crver swnmary abatements: J0103CC Demolition of building at 381 University Avenue West, Demalition of building at 387 University Avenue West. 381 Universitv Avenue West Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 387 i3niversiiv Avenue West Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 3. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 393 Sidney Sh�eet East. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over Yo the September 4, 2001, Legislative Hearing. 4. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properly at 633 Randolnh Avenue. If ttie owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval. 0� ��iNAL �r��.a.�d. - o�t. ay , aoo� Council File # p � - qp .1. �reen Sheet # � "2..3�t� PAl Presented By Referred To Committee: Date G�1 1 WHEREAS, Citizen Service Office, Division of Code Enforcement has requested the City Council 2 to hold public hearings to consider the advisability and necessity of ordering the repair or wrecking and 3 removal of a two-story, wood frame, duplex and a detached, two-stall, wood frame garage located on 4 property hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property" and commoniy known as 393 Sidney Street East. 5 This properiy is legaliy described as follows, to wit: 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2F4 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Lot 6, Riley's New Arrangement of the South half of the West 257 ft of Block 44 Brown & Jackson's Addition WHEREAS, based upon the records in the Ramsey County Recorder's Office and information obtained by Division of Code Enfarcement on or before April 20, 2001, the following are the now known interested or responsible parties for the Subject Property: Claudia Tendrup, Ceniral Towers, 20 Exchange Street East, St. Paul, MN 55101; Lutheran Social Services, 540 Park Street, Ste. 310, St. Paul, MN 55103, Attn: Jan Ferrier WHEREAS, Division of Code Enforcement has served in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code an order identified as an"Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s)" dated June 13, 2001; and WHEREAS, this order informed the then known interested or responsible parties that the structure located on the Subject Properiy is a nuisance building(s) pursuant to Chapter 45; and WHEREAS, this order informed the interested or responsible parties that they must repair or demolish the shucture located on the Subject Property by 7uly 13, 20Q1; and WHEREAS, the enforcement officer has posted a placard on the Subject Property declaring this building(s) to constitute a nuisance condirion; subject to demolition; and WHEREAS, this nuisance condition has not been corrected and Division of Code Enforcement requested that the City Clerk schedule public hearings befare the Legislative Hearing Officer of the City Council and the Saint Paul City Councii; aud WHEILEAS, the interested and responsible parties have been served notice in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, of the time, date, place and purpose of the public hearings; and -� 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 ��N� o,_q �� . REAS, a hearing was held befare the Legislative Hearing Officer of the Saint Paul City Council on uesday, August 7, 2001 to hear testunony and evidence, and after receiving testimony and evidence, made the recommendation to approve the request to order the interested or responsible parties to make the Subject Property safe and not dehimental to the public peace, health, safety and welfaze and remove its blighting influence on the community by rehabilitating this structure in accardance with all applicable codes and ordinances, or in the altemative by demolishing and removing the structure in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances. The rehabilitation or demolirion of the structure to be com leted within da s after the date of the Council Hearin p _•�..r�A�.i e.1.l. i�ac1 Y 4+� �+1.c c.ai.A.�4.��. Y4. �a T++ MHN onf ocF.iV a•e� WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the Saint Paui City Counci on e es y, ugust 22, 20 1 and the testimony and evidence including the acrion taken by the Legislative Hearing Officer was considered by the Council; now therefore BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon the testimony and evidence presented at the above referenced public hearings, the Saint Paul City Council hereby adopts the following Findings and Order concerning the Subject Properiy at 393 Sidney Street East: That the Subject Properiy comprises a nuisance condition as defined in Saint Paul Legislative Code, Chapter 45. 2. 3. Q FQ 7 That the costs of demolition and removal of this building(s) is estimated to exceed three thousand dollars ($3,000.00). That there now exists and has existed multiple Housing or Building code violations at the Subject Property. That an Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) was sent to the then known responsible parties to correct the deficiencies or to demolish and remove the building(s). That the deficiencies causing this nuisance condition have not been corrected. That Division of Code Enforcement has posted a placard on the Subject Property which declares it to be a nuisance condition subject to demolition. That this building has been routinely monitored by the Citizen Service Offices, Division of Code Enforcement, Vacant/Nuisance Buildings. 8. That the known interested parties and owners aze as previously stated in this resolution and that the notification requirements of Chapter 45 have been fulfilled. ORDER The Saint Paul City Council hereby makes the following order: The above referenced interested or responsible parties sha11 make the Subject Properiy safe and not detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and welfare and remove its blighting influence on the community by rehabilitating this structure and correcting all deficiencies as prescribed in the above referenced Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) in accordance with ail applicable codes and ordinances, or in the alternative by demolishing and removing the structure in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances. The rehabilitation or demolition and removal of the structure must be completed within €rf�ee�{�k5} days after the date of the Council Hearing. V pt�c.`t�ux�.ral z:�)�� C�80� ORfGINAL O�-�o� 1 2. If the above corrective action is not completed within this period of tnne the Citizen Service Office, 2 Division of Code Enforcement is hereby authorized to take whatever steps are necessary to 3 demolish and remove this shucture, fill the site and charge the costs incurred against the Subject 4 Property pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code. 7 10 11 12 3. In the event the building is to be demolished and removed by the City of Saint Paul, all personal property or fixtures of any kind which interfere with the demolition and removal shall be removed from the property by the responsible parties by the end of this tune period if all personal property is not removed, it shall be considered to be abandoned and the City of Saint Paul shall remove and dispose of such property as provided by law. 4. It is fiirther ordered, that a copy of this resolution be mailed to the owners and interested parties in accordance with Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code. Adopted by Council: Date Q� ,�.y 2.0�� Adoption Certified by Council Secretary By: � 3 ►' Approved by Mayar: Date �� r'� l By: Li��'r/�'[ ��!'�� Requested by Department o£ Citizen Service Office: Code Enforcement BY`V � N �� .n�a��.c`". Form Approved by City Attorney By: Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council By: ��t r�� _� EPARTMENT/OFFICElCOUNCIL . ^ Divi�ion of Code Enfarcement f+ T PE N PHON �ichael��. �'Vlare�head:266-8439 �� IUST$E ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (DAT� ' � Wednesday, Auugst 22, 2001 ,— p�} - JOTAL # OF SIGNATURE?F � � ��:, � � „ "��_ ° , HEET , C� -°lo�- No i u�� [fl� • �,� •,. .w�w p� �� ^'/� pIY�'01MCIL �_ ��.� �3i_ ^' /� Fdl `_ 'k�!�q.�� .. �NK � ❑ MYCLf11N , t, f ;s � , � .�.��. _ o�..�,�� o��.,��..,�� ❑ 4CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIONATURE)' . CTIONRE�UESTED � '. � , �- �� - � — � City Cou�cil to pass thisresolution �hi will order the owner(s) to remove or repair the referenced building(s): If t}ie owner.faals Yo o`qmp�y with the t s6lutipn, the Citizen Service Of�ce, Division o£Code Enforcemant is orde'red ,�, � to remove the building. The su ' ect property is located at 393 Sidney Street East. 'PLANNING CIVILSER�ICE COMMISSION ,. r _.._. ... _,,. ..,, ..�., .,.,.,. .. , t. Hea thia pereon/Ilrm eVer xrorked untler a wMrect /01 thi� depertment7 ' YES NO 2. Han ihis peraoNllrm ever 6ean e oMy empbyee7 , YES NO 3. Doee thie persoNflrm poeteis a Ntlll not nwmellypweeeted by eny curcent clty ampluyee? VES Nb 4. lo Mle pereon/firm e teryetetl vandoR � VES NO ✓ � ' ' � E�yleln ell yea nnev,rere on eepeiate eheet and eXeoh to reen theet ��,!�,�iRi�€�&�A4€�g�€S�R94fti��YYNM��)�'El�i�ied in Chapter 45 and a vacant building as defined in Chapter 43 of , the Saint Paul Legislaiive Code. The owners, interested parties and responsible parties known to the En£orcement .,' Officar were given an order to repair or remove the building at 393 Sidney Street East by July,13, 2001, and have *- failed to comply with those orders. � � � HUVAIVIAGE3IF AYYHWED �a,�sF The City will eliminate a nuisance. ' �" '� DISADVANTAGESIFAPRROVED The Gity will spend funds to wreck_and remove this building(s). These costs will be assessed to the proparty, colleeted as a�peeial assessxnent a�ainst the-provertv tasces. • zisanee condition will remain unabated in the City. This building(s) will continue to blight the community. AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S � ' ' COETIREVENU¢ BUDOETED (CIRCLB ON6) VEB, NO � � io souRCe Nuisance Housin@ Abatement ACTIVITYNUMBER 3326I T CouncN R�ssarch Center �i��:�„_.4.:. o � -yna REPORT Date: October 16, 2001 Time: 10:00 am. Place: Room 330 City Hall IS WestKelloggBoulevard LEGISLATIVE HEARING Geny Strathman Legislative Hearing Officer Appeal of summary abatement order for 697 Surrev Avenue. (City Council refened this matter back ta the Legislative Hearing Officer.) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal. 2. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 393 Sidney Street East. � If the owner fails to complp, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Laid over from 10-2-01) Legislative Heanng Officer recommends granting the owner six months to complete the rehabilitation ofthe properiy on condition that a$2,000 bond is posted by noon of October 24, 2001. 3. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 667 Magnolia Avenue East. If Yhe owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the resolution. 4. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properry at 299 Arlineton Avenue East. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends withdrawing the resolution. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 850 Sims Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Laid over from 9-25-01) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the resolution. � ot-�tpa MINUTES OF THE LEGISLATIVE HEARING Tuesday, October 16, 2001 Room 330 City Hall Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer STAFF PRESENT: Steve Magner, Code Enforcement; Mike Morehead, Code Enforcement The meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m. Appeal of summary abatement order for 697 Surrey Avenue. (City Councit referred this matter back to the Legislative Hearing Officer.) Gerry Strathman stated this is an appeal of an order issued to Sharon Anderson in September. The order was to remove improperly stored refuse, cut and remove tall grass, weeds, rank plant growth, and remove portion of fence. Ms. Anderson filed an appeal and the City Council sent this matter back to Mr. Strathman for a recommendation. Bill Dahn, 240 Baker Street East, representing Shazon Anderson, appeared and stated he does ttot know where the City got the list of items on the summary abatement order. Mr. Strathman asked are there tali weeds and grass. Mr. Dahn responded no. If there aze, they have grown since he was there. He supports the paperwork that Sharon Anderson has submitted. The last time she was before the City Council, they did not have the paperwork. She wants to know who aze the complaining parties. Under state law, responded Mr. Stratlunan, the City is prohibited from disclosing the complainants. Mr. Strathman stated he needs some evidence that ihe order is improper, for exaruple, photographs showing there aze no tall weeds, videotape, etc. Mr. Dahn responded he does not have anything with him at this time. The $250 for this assessment is too high and even attorneys do not make that much. It seems he and Ms. Anderson are being harassed and harassment is a bigger charge than tall weeds. Mr. Strathman asked aze there any photographs showing the property. Steve Magner responded it would be best to have Mr. Dahn or the owner meet with the enforcement officer or the supervisor at the location so they can go over the issues because Mr. Magner does not have photographs. In order to granC the appeal, stated Mr. Strathman, he would need some evidence to show the property is cleaned up, and he does not have that. Mr. Dahn responded that Mr. Stratiunan also does not have any evidence showing it is bad. Gerry Strathman recommends denying the appeal. He suggested Mr. Dahn ar Ms. Anderson make arrangements for the supervisor and inspector to look at the properly. If they look at the properry and fmd there is no reason for this order, then they will withdraw ihe order and the matter will be closed. This matter will go before the City Council. Mr. Dahn responded Ms. Anderson wants it to go before the City Councit. O 1 -10 �- LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 16, 2001 page 2 Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 393 Sidney Street East. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Laid over from 10-2-01) (Steve Magner submitted photographs.) Steve Magner stated this has been laid over twice. The property was suppose to have gone through a closing, and the new owners were suppose to post a bond. A code compliance inspection has been done, but the bond and closing have not occurred. They may be trying to have these things done by the City Council meeting on October 24. Gerry Strathman recommends granting the owner six months to complete the rehabilitation of the property on condition that a$2,000 bond is posted by noon of October 24, 2001. Mr. Magner stated he will notify George Borer, the attorney. Resolufion ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 667 Magnolia Avenue East. If the owner fai[s to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Steve Magner submitted photographs.) Steve Magner stated tlus property bas been vacant since December 5, 2000. The current owner is Vicki Adams, also known as Vicki Knight. Six summary abatement notices were issued to secwe doors, cut tall grass, remove refuse, remove snow and ice, and abate vehicles. On August 2, 2001, an inspection ofthe building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on August 10, 2001, with a compliance date of September 10. As of this date, the property remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code. The vacant building fees are due. Real estate taYes are paid. TaYation has estimated the mazket value of the land as $12,200; esdmated market value of the building prioz to the fire, $47,900. A code compliance inspecfion nor bond have been applied for. Demolifion is between $7,000 and $8,000. The owner has contacted Code Enforcement. Her last cali to the azea inspector was that she was not going to fight the demolition of the building. Gerry Strathman recommends approved the resolution based on Mr. IvIagner's testimony and the fact that the owner is not here to represent the property. Resolurion ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 299 Arlington Avenue Eas� If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. The following appeazed: Marjorie Frahs (owner Richazd Spreigl's niece) and Reneya Mayberry (Ms. Frahs' niece and Mr. Spreigl's great niece). Mike Morehead reported this properly has a long hisiory. Many yeazs ago when Highway 35 was run through, this family was relocated by the state. The City granted the new location a nonconforming use status. This properry was used as a landscaping business. The business went e �-1a2- LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 16, 2001 Page 3 defunct a few yeazs ago. Landscaping equipment items were left to accumulate on the properry so long that trees were growing tUrough the tires. A number of buildings on the property fell down from lack of maintenance. It was determined that the property was not used for commercial purposes; therefore, it reverted to residential zoning status. At that point, a11 the miscellaneous materials on the property were no longer fit for residential applications. Last year, stated Mr. Morehead, Code Enforcement started dealing with the Spreigl family. The principle owner Richard is eiderly and has not been able to accomplish the cleanup. Code Enforcement issued orders and gave the owners a deadli�e to get the property cleaned up. The owners were not able to get rid of the big equipment. The City brought in a latge abatement crew. They were limited to $3,000, which is the summary abatement limit, but they ran up a bill of $3,5�0. Mr. Morehead stated he knows he cannot assess that much; therefore, he wili assess $3,000. Seventy-Five percent of the problems were eliminated. Mr. Morehead went on to say he started the paperwork to ea�tend the abatement work beyond the $3,000 limit. That paperwork will not be on the City Council agenda unril November. The owners have until early November to finish cleaning up the properry. The owners have been given verbal orders and Code Enforcement is going to follow up this week with formal written orders. With the bulk of the big stuff removed, it is possible the family can clean up the little stuff. The $3,000 assessed greatly improved the value of their land. Gerry Strathman stated the order before him today as a resolution io remove or repair the property. Steve Magner responded there were two or three accessory structures, numerous vehicies, metal machinery, and other related items that were there. Mr. Morehead stated the buildings are gone, but the remnants and things underneath the building aze still sticking up. Mr. Stratl�man asked what Code Enforcement is seeking today. Mr. Morehead responded before he can do a substantial abatement, owners of the property are to appear before Mr. Strathman. Code Enforcement wants Mr. Strathman to determine that the need to finish up this abatement is proper. Mr. Morehead needs a recommendation from Mr. Strathman that if the properry is not cleaned up by November 7 or 8, then Code Enforcement can finish it. Therefore, he needs authority from the City Council to levy more than a$3,000 lien on the property. Code Enforcement is continuing to work with this family. What is le8 is light work; the heavy stuff has been taken out. By the time the City Council hears this matter, there is a good chance it will be cleaned up. This is just an insurance policy that if they cannot get it done, Code Enforcement wiil finish the job so the file can be closed. Mr. Strathman stated the paperwork before him is for removal of buildings that have already been removed. Regazdless of the paperwork, what is being discussed here is an order to conduct a substantial a6atement at this properiy if the owners do not clean up the properiy by a specified date. When they originally looked at this property, stated Mr. Magner, to do the cleanup would have been beyond $10,000, which included the buildings. Since the owners have removed some of the buildings or broken down the buildings, Code Enforcement has removed them under the standazd summary abatement. What is primarily left is to clean up the site, grade it, seed it, and 61 � V.o 2- LEGISLATTVE HEARING MINIJTES OF OCTOBER 16, 2001 Page 4 straw it until it grows. If the owners can accomplish that task, Code Enforcement would not spend any more money there. What is really being asked, stated Mr. Strathman, is approval by the City Council to do a substantial abatement at tlus property if the owners have not taken care of it prior to October 24. Mr. Magner added that after the Mayor signs it, it would probably be the first week of November before they could send someone out to finish the work on the property. Mr. Morehead stated the big deadline is winter. If the owners can make substautiai progress, he will let them finish it. Ms. Frahs stated they took photographs. There is some brush that has to be cleared behind the house. There is a little patch in the middle of the property. There aze some trees that have to come down. Along the fence, dirt that has to be brought down to grade. They fixed the hole in the garage. Mr. Morehead responded they do not have to take the trees down. Next to the base of the trees is a hole with items sticking out of the ground. The items aze considered hazardous waste. Anyone that hauls these items out has to be informed of this. (Ms. Frahs showed photographs to everyone.) Mr. Strathman asked aze they alright with what Mr. Morehead wants to do. Ms. Frahs responded yes, but was concemed about liens on the house. Mr. Magner responded assessments can go on the taaces. There can be another hearing when the family gets the assessment or Taxation can he called and asked to space it out. All taxes and assessments have to be paid before a property is sold. Gerry Strathman recommends withdrawing the resolution before him today and approval of the authority to conduct a substanrial abatement at this properly if necessary. The City Council will need the proper paperwork developed. If the City Council approves it, Mr. Morehead will have the authority to do more work at the properry. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 850 Sims Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Laid over from 9-25-01) (Mr. Magner submitted photographs.) Steve Magner reported this properry was condemned in May 2000. It has been vacant since August 21, 2000. The current owners are Michael and Becky Ramstad. There have been two summary abatement notices for removing refuse. On March 7, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condirion was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on March 19, 2001, with a compliance date ofApril 18. As of this date, this property remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code. Taxation has placed an e,-�t.o� LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUT'ES OF OCTOBER 16, 2001 Page 5 �. '� u, - � '. 1 111 �� i .�� .�� '� � tl �� - � � �• �� 1 11 . � � ' � u � _ '-�-- '. -�. - -� � ._._. � .-' —�-'-'-'-'--- -�-�---,_- ' � � � . "' • " - - " -' Mr. Magner stated he contacted Don VJagner (License, Inspection, Environmental Protection), who indicated an inspector was sent to the property yesterday and there was not enough work completed. Also, a plumbing and heating permit has not be pulled by a license contractor. There is no heat in this building. The owners will forfeit that bond as of today, and a new bond has not been posted. Mr. Strathman stated he received a phone call this morning from apparently the owner who requested this hearing be delayed so Mr. Wagner could look at the building. Obviously, that is not necessary. Mr. Magner responded the owners aze trying to say that they made sheet rock and painting repairs and that is more than 50% of the work. Mr. Wagner's opinion is that is not the case. Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the resolution. The meeting was adjourned at 10:40 am. � Ot �g0} REPORT Date: September 4, 2001 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: Room 330 City Hall 15 West Kellogg Boulevazd LEGISLATIVE HEARING Gerry Strathman Legislative Hearing Officer Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 393 Sidnev Street East. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Laid over from 8-7-01) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the October 2, 2001, Legislative Hearing. 2. Suuunary Abatements J0102B Grass cutting (by private contractor) during June and part of July 2001; JOl O5A Property cleanup during June and part of July 2001; J0104B Boarding up of vacant buildings during June and part of July 2001; J0104C Demolition of vacant buildings during June and part of July 2001; and 30105V Abandoned vehicles towed from private properiy during 7une and part of July 2001. 579 Van Buren Avenue (JOlOSV) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 1119 Geranium Avenue East (J0104B) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 422 Jessamine Avenue East (JOlOSV) Legislative Heazing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 811 Van Buren Avenue (J0102G) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 456 Lawson Avenue West (JOl O5A) Legisiative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 555 Blair Avenue (JOl O5A) Legislafive Hearing Officer recomxnends approval of the assessment. 914 Concordia Avenue (JOl O5A) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends deleting the assessment. 0�-�[c} LEGISLATIVE HEARING REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 page 2 250 Page Street East (JOlOSA) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment 1595 Thomas Avenue (JO105� Legislative Hearing Officer recommends deleting the assessment. 639 Blair Avenue (JOlOSA) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 408 Banfil Street (JOl O5A) Mr. Strathman recommends reducing the assessment to $50 plus the $45 service fee for a total assessment of $95. 657 Dale Street North (JOl O5A) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 324 Jenks Avenue (JOl O5A) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 462 Edmund Avenue (JO105� Legislative Hearing Officer recommends deleting the assessment. 967 Edgerton Street (JOlOSV) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends deleting the assessment. 65 VJinnipee Avenue (JOlOSA) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 65 Winnipee Avenue (JO105� I,egislarive Hearing Officer recommends deleting the assessment. 605 Magnolia Avenue East (JOl O5A) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 291 Tonnine (30105V) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends deleting the assessment. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 847 Leaiin tg Pazkwav South. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the November 6, 2001, Legislative Hearing. LEGISLATIVE HEARING REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 � � � 7. Summary Abatement Order Appeal for 1598 Hazel Street North. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the September 25, 2001, Legislative Hearing. a l -qo�- Page 3 Resolufion ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 1124 Conwa�Street. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative FIearing Officer recommends approval. Resolufion ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 245 Front Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recominends approval. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 62 Winifred Street West. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officez recommends approval. � MINUTES OF TF� LEGISLATIVE HEARING Tuesday, September 4, 2001 Room 330 City Hall Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer STAFF PRESENT: Steve Magner, Code Enforcement; Hazold Robinson, Code Enforcement Gerry Strathman called the meeting to order at 10:04 am. o �-qo�- Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 393 Sidney Street East If the owner faiLs to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Laid over from 8-7-01) Steve Magner reported this was laid over in order for the attorney representing the fee owner and Lutheran Social Services to sell the property. The attomey submitted to Mr. Magner a proposal to sell the property to the West Side Neighborhood Development Alliance. They are waiting for the closing and haue to obtain a code compliance inspection. Mr. Magner suggested this matter be laid over for the closing of the sell and so 23EDA can obtain a bond. George F. Borer appeazed to request an extension of a month in order to close on the property. The probate court approved the sell this morning. The other status was cleazed up eazlier. Gerry Strathman laid over this matter to October 2, 2001, in order for NEDA to close on the properiy. Summary Abatements J0102B Grass cutting (by private contractor) during June and part of July 2001; JOlOSA Property cleanup during June and part of July 2001; J0104B Boarding up of vacant buildings during June and part of July 2001; J0104C Demolition of vacant buildings during June and part of July 2001; and J0105V Abandoned vehicles towed from private property during June and part of July 2Q01. 579 Van Buren Avenue (JOl OSi� (No one appeazed to represent the properry.) Gerry Strathman recommends approval. 1119 Geranium Avenue East (70104B) (No one appeazed to represent the property.) Gerry Strathman recommends approval. 01- qd'� LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINLITBS OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 page 2 422 Jessamine Avenue East (JO105� (No one appeared to represent the pmperiy.) Gerry Strathman recommends approval. 811 Van Buren Avenue (J0102G) (No one appeared to represent the property.) Gerry Strathman recommends approval. 456 Lawson Avenue West (JOI OSA) (No one appeazed to represent the properry.) Gerry Strathman recommends approval. 555 Blair Avenue (JOl O5A) Steve Plowruan, Real Estate Broker, 386 Wabasha Street North, appeazed and stated he was asked by the owners to check into this. They were unawaze what this charge was for. The properry has been condemned. People were hired to clean out the property, which was completed yesterday. The owner of the company that did the cleaning is interested in purchasing the property. The owners aze willing to get rid of the property for what they owe on it or even a litfle less. Gerry Strathman stated his information is that orders were sent on May 17, 2001, to clean up furniture, refuse, bike parts by May 29. The inspector went out again on May 30, deternuned the cleanup did not take place, and ordered the City to do it. The City crew went out on June 6. The total charge is $288.00. Mr. Strathman stated he could see the videotape. Mr. Plowman responded that is not necessary because the property was a problem. Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment. 914 Concordia Avenue (JOl O5A) Meredith Price, National Marketing, 12249 Nicollet Avenue South, Burnsville, appeazed and stated they never received notice that there was going to be an abatement proceeding. Her understanding is that it was sent to the wrong party. This was a vacant house. It was under renovation. National Mazketing took it over, and hauled out three dumpsters of tefuse. The items cleaned up by the City were not theirs. Some of the things cleaned up were not on her property; there is an empty lot next door. Her company has the crews to do this work. o�.�to'� LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINLTTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 Page 3 Gerry Stratbman stated the information he has is that orders were mailed on June 12, 2001; he asked who it was sent to. Hazold Robinson responded orders were mailed on 7une 12 to Ameriquest and to the occupant at 914 Concordia At the time, Ameriquest was listed as the owner. Code Enforcement did not get any mail returned. Ms. Price responded that her company acquired the property in Mazch Ramsey County may be behind in their updating. Mr. Strathman asked was the sell recorded. Ms. Price responded yes and they have title inciman�. Mr. Strathman asked who was living there in June. Ms. Price responded no one. It was unfit for habitation. It had to be guttecl. Gerry Strathman deleted the assessment on the basis of incorrect notification. The City did what it was suppose to do, but it is evident that Code Enforcement received incorrect informafion from Ranisey County regarding ownership. 250 Paee Street East (JOl O5A) (No one appeared to represent the property.) Gerry Strathman recommends approval. 1595 Thomas Avenue (JOl O5V) The following appeared: Terry Glanz and Crreg Glanz, owners. Terry stated three cars were towed ofFthe property. Hazold Robinson reported the vehicles appeazed inoperable and no licenses were visible. If a vehicle has been sitting in one place for a long time, the inspector considers it inoperable, but the vehicles cleazly had no visible licenses. Terry L. Glanz was notified at 1595 Thomas Avenue. Orders were mailed on January 25, 2001. Mr. Strathman asked what they have to show that the vehicles were licensed. Terry Glanz responded he has paperwork and his brother went through the process of getting license piates and tabs after the notices were received. They have insivance waivers. Mr. Strathman asked when did they get them licensed. Greg Glanz responded they were licensed the year before all this took place. He had the license plates on the velucle, he took them off, and put them inside the vehicle in the window. There was a problem with license plates being stolen off of cars. This happened when there was a lot of snow. He laiocked the snow off the windows so they were visible. Mr. Strathman stated once the vehicles were towed, why were they not retrieved. Terry Glan� responded he did not try because he did not know lus brother had insurance waivers. His brother said a few weeks later that he had insurance waivers and the vehicles were legally licensed but o�-ao�-- LEGISLATIVE HEARING NIlNiJTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 Page 4 could not be driven. One of the vehicles was operable. There was a transmission and engine being worked on. The Horizon was waiting for an engine also. The Glanzes showed Mr. Strathman some documents showing the vehicles were licensed, the ;n�,*ance waiver, and photographs. Gerry StraYhman deleted the assessment. 639 Biair Avenue (JOl O5A) (No one appeared to represent the properry.) Gerry Strathman recommends approvai. 408 Banfil Street (JOlOSA) Kimie Keamey, owner, appeazed and stated she has a$288 assessment for yard cleanup and she wanted to know what was done. (A videotape was shown.) Ms. Kearney stated it was four bags of recycled cans for $288. She had mowed the yazd and she is letting the bushes grow a bit. Mr. Strathman stated the storage of trash in the bags was not in compliance with City codes; they need to be in containers. Ms. Kearney responded it was her ganddaughter's recycling. Ms. Kearney had taken them out of the gazage so they could be taken to the recycling place. Mr. Strathman reduced the assessment to $50 plus the $45 service fee for a total assessment of $95. The City crew did go out, and there were some things improperly stored; however, the situation did not look that bad on the videotape. 657 Dale Street North (JOl O5A) Michael Burger, owner, 915 Reed Street, Mankato, appeared and stated this properry and two others were in a parhiership between himself and someone else. On February 27, 2001, they mutually agreed. to end their partnership. These properties were in Mr. Burger's name. He did a quick claim deed and put them all in the other person's name. The pmperry probably did need to be cleaned up, but at the time he was not responsible for the properties. He is not currently the owner. Mr. Strathman asked who was notified. Mr. Berger responded it was mailed to 1107 Jenks. That mail was retumed to the City. The City mailed it Yo another address. a l -t�'L- LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 Page 5 Hazold Robinson reported the last time there was an abatement at that address was June 29. Their records still show Michael Burger at 1107 Jenks. Mr. Robinson suggested that Mr. Burger deal with Taxation or the former partner to make sure the records get transferred. Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment. 324 Jenks Avenue (70105A) Jean Johnson, 5000 Otter Lake Road, White Bear, appeazed and stated they were on a contract for deed at the time tlus occurred. The information went to Charles Zeches because that name was still on it. She asked when this was done. Mr. Strathman responded the notice was sent on May 10, 2001, and the work was done on May 29. Ms. Johnson stated a tenant handed her paperwork on appro�mately May 30. It did need cleaning. She looked at the backyazd after she was handed the notice, and there were mattresses and gazbage there. Mr. Strathman asked who was notified. Hazold Robinson responded "Occupant" at 324 Jenks and Chazles Zeches at �77 Sixth Street East. Gerry Strathman recommended approval of the assessment. The City notified the owner of record. The occupant was also notified, which goes beyond what is required. There was an 18 day period between when she was norified and the City actually did the cleanup. 462 Edmund Avenue (JO105� The following appeazed: Wanda Bulditz, 706219th Street North, Oakdale; Marie Keyes, 462 Edmund Avenue #1; and Heriberto Garrido, owner, 7062 19th Street North, Oakdale. Ms. Bulditz stated she got a notice regarding a vehicle removed from her properry. She wanted to know why because she gaue her tenant pernussion to pazk a vehicle there. A week later, the caz was not there so Ms. Bulditz assumed the vehicle was never pazked there. Then, she got a bill. Ms. Keyes stated this was her daughter's car. She called the Police Department Impound lot. No one admitted to having the car. The tabs were good, and the car was operable. Ms. Keyes had no need to drive the vehicle so she pazked it at the properry. It was not even there three days. She brought the car there Monday night. When she came home on Thursday, the vehicle was gone. Mr. Robinson stated the inspection was done on January 26, 2001. The vehicle had an expired license. The recheck was done on February 2 and an impound order was sent in. The police towed it on February 20 with the license still e�cpued. Mr. Strathman asked did she not get the caz because she did not know where it was located. Ms. Keyes responded no one would tell her that it was towed. 01-'l LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 Page 6 Mr. Strathman asked what iriggered this inspection. Harold Robinson responded probably a compIaint_ It was towed by the poIice department. Mr. Strathman deIeted the assessment. He is unsure why the Impound Lot did not tell the owner the caz was there. Ms. Bulditz stated she is a real estate agent and l�ows that Ramsey County is six months behind in their record keeping. 967 Edeerton Street (JO105� Alexis Abreu, owner, appeazed and stated this vehicle belonged to a tenant that lived at the property. The tenant bought the vehicle, stored it in the garage for a wkrile, then moved it out. Some items were missing from the property. Mr. Abreu was going to hold this vehicle to see if he would come back. The caz did not start and he had keys. Mr. Abreu called a police officer that is a friend of his. This police officer ticketed the caz fust. He said he would come back later, and if the vehicle is srill there, he would have it moved. A few days later, the vehicle was gone, and Mr. Abreu assumed this officer took it. Later, this officer asked what happened to the vehicle, and Mr. Abreu received a bill in the mail. Mr. Strathman asked when the orders were mailed. Mr. Robinson responded orders were mailed twice: January 24, 2001, and February 12 to Aleacis Abreu and the occupant, both of 967 Edgerton. Mr. Abreu stated when he got the January notice, that is when he called his friend who ticketed the vehicle. Mr. Strathman asked if the police officer had ordered the vehicle towed, would the assessment go to the properry owner. Mr. Robinson responded it would be an administrative tow. The car is cited, towed, and the vehicle owner has to recover the vehicle. Steve Magner stated the properry owner has to be present during an administrative tow to identify the vehicle. Mr. Robinson skated if he had said to the inspector that a police officer is warking on this and it would be towed in a few days, there would not have been a problem. Gerry Strathman recommends deleting the assessment. 65 Winnipeg Avenue (JOlOSA) 65 Winnipe¢ Avenue (JOI OSV) Milt Randall, tenant, appeared and stated the owner lives in Wisco�sin aad Mr. Randatl feels he is responsible for what happens at the properry. There aze two assessments here. One invoives a vehicle that was Yowed and the oYher assessment is for a cleanup. (The cleanup was discussed fust.) During the time of this assessment, said Mr. Raudall, he was in the process of switchiug tcash companies. For a month, he had to call his trash company because they were not picldng it up. Then he got the assessment. He thought the company had finatly taken the trash, but the City had 01-Zo' LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 . page 7 instead. The assessment was sent to Wisconsin. By the time it got to Mr. Randail, he did not have time to do anything. (A videotape was shown.) Mr. Randall stated kids strip bikes and throw them in the rear of his house. The appfiances came from ius house and were suppose to be picked up by the trash company. Gerry Strathman stated the owner was notified, the occupant received notice, and it was almost two weeks between the time notice was sent and the City did the cleanup. There was opportuniry for someone to do the cieanup. Mr. Robinson stated orders went out on May 15, and a reinspection was done on May 23. The occupants supposedly called the inspector on May 23 to say he would take cate of it by the weekend. The inspector went over there on May 30, the items were still there, so he issued the work order. (Now, the vehicles were discussed.} Gerry Strathman asked about the vehicles. Mr. Randall responded the inspector told hun he had to move the cars. He put one in the garage and the other right beside the gazage on the slab. The inspector told him the plates were not current so he could not pazk it there. Mr. Randall put insurance on the car and current plates. Three days later, the caz was towed. The tabs were on the vehicle when it was towed. He purchased the tabs the day after he received the notice. Mr. Strathman stated orders were mailed on January 18, the inspector went out on February 5, and again on Febzuary 21. Mr. Stratlunan asked did he have anything showing the vehicle had current plates. Mr. Randail responded he did not have anything with bim. Mr. Strathman asked when the velucle was towed. Mr. Robinson responded he was not sure when it was towed. JOl O5A - Mr. Strativsian recommends approval of the assessment. The two appliances clearly had been stored there. The owner had more than two weeks to get rid of them. JO 105 V- Mr. Strathman recommends deleting the assessment if the owner can get him something showing the vehicle had legaI tabs and legaI plates when it was towed in February. If the owner cannot supply him with that, then the assessment stands. NOTE: Mr. Randall did bring in evidence that he purchased tabs on February 24, 2001. Upon checking with the Impound Lot, it was found that the vehicle arrived there on March 3. Therefore, Gerry Strathman recommends deleting the assessment. ��goa- LEGISLATNE HEARING MINiJTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 Page 8 605 Magnolia Avenue East (JOl O5A) Mel Guyett, owner, appeazed and stated he purchased the properiy recentty. A fence was instailed and bushes were removed. He was making arrangements to haul them away. He works about 12 hours a day and he could only do it on the weekend. He came home with a truck and a trailer to take it out of there. He has a friend who will sometimes do surprise things for t►im. Mr. Guyett thought this friend had done the work.. Mr. Strathman asked who was notified. Mr. Robinson responded Todd K. and Mary Kay Lewis were notified at 605 Magnolia Tlris was done on May 15, 2001, rechecked on May 12, and tke work was done on May 29. Mr. Strathman asked when he became tlie owner. Mr. Guyett responded about July 7, 2001. Mr. Robinson responded the orders went out May 15. Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment. When the owner purchased the properry, he became responsible for the assessment. The seller is required to certify that there are no pending assessments. If there are, the owner is suppose to take care of them. The owner has the right to go to the previous owner because they aze responsible for it. Mr. Magner added that ritle insurance should cover things like this. Resolution ordering the owtter to remove or repair the property at 847 Lexington Parkway South. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Mr. Magner showed photograplvs to Mr. Strathman.) John Kratz, owner, 1424 Edgcumbe Road, appeared and stated he just acquired this property on August 1. He would like to lay over this matter and woutd tike to attach tius pmperty ta another property adjacent to it. He would like to build a 12 unit townhouse. If that gets approved, this pmperty wi11 be tom down. The approval process is lengthy on this. He wouId Iike to do this in the fall. It is more likely to be six months. Given his plan to remove the building and given that the properry is a blight, Gerry Strathman asked, what is the problem with the property being removed now. Mr. Kratz responded ius plan would be to rehabilitate the building if lus plan is not approved. These matiers can be highly charged with neighborhood involvement Tlvs properry seems to be getting ofFto a friendlier start with the neighbors and he is more optimistic about the development. Steve Magner reported the pmperry has been vacant since March I, 2000. Eight summary abatement notices have been issued to secure tfie house, cut tail g�ass, remove t.v. antenna, and remove hazardous mud and sand on sidewalk. On June 19, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on July 1 i, 2001, with a compliance date of August 10. The vacant building fees are paid. A code compliance inspecflon has not been applied for and a bond has not been posted. Esrimated cost to repair is $80,000; estimated cost to demolish, $7,000 to $8,000. Mr. Magner would not have a problem LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 o�..�o� Page 9 with a short e�ctension, although six months may not be feasible ai this time unless a bond is posted. Mr. Strathman concurred saying that ttus nuisance building cannot stand indefinitely. Mr. Kratz stated he lives half a mile away. He has met all the neighbors. t1ll Yhe problems they had were with the previous owner. He has given them all his card, and they know who to call if there is a problem. He does not anticipate there will be more complaints. He dces not want to knock it down so soon because his costs go np so muck. He would have to haul in fill to fill up the hole and there is too much fill on the side already that he has to haul out when the new building is built Gerry Strathman laid over to the November 6, 2001, Legislative Hearing. In t6at time, the owner shouid be prepazed to post a bond and rehabilitate the property or be prepazed to remove it. Summary Abatement Order Appeal for 1598 Hazel Street North. Waiter Montpetit, owner, appeazed and stated this is regazding a wildlife garden on his properry. It is 1,500 square feet. He has a 100 square foot patch sepazated. It is part of the landscaping scheme on his properry. He received an order to cut it. It is in the backyard. Gerry Strathman stated he has some remembrance about the City amend'vng its notice to make provisions for native plantings. He asked would this qualify. Mr. Robinson responded he is not sure the norice stipulated what plantings could be in a nazive habitat. Sandy Pappas has been designated by an organization to determine what plants should be put in. Mr. Montpetit says that HarrieY Island has areas ihat look like the same type of scheme he is doing. Mr. Sirathman asked is ticere someone on City staff that can took at this properry. Mr. Robinson responded he has a name and phone number of the organization in charge of this issue. Just ta11 grass and weeds do not qualify. Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the September 25, 2001, LegisIafive Hearings In the meantime, someone who Irnows about this issue can go to the property and make a determination. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 1124 Conway Street If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (No one appeared to represent the property.) (Steve Magner submitted photographs.) Steve Magner reported this properiy has been vacant since February 2,1998. The owner is deceased. Ten summary abatement notices have been issued for vacant building, cut tall grass, remove unlawfully pazked vehicle, remove rubbish, and secure structure. On July 20, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constihrte a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisauce building �l�to�- LEGISLATIVE HEARING MII�TITTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 Page 10 was issued on July 24, 2001, with a compfiance date of August 8, 2001. A bond has not been posted. "The cost to repair is $40,OOQ to $SQ,000; estimated cost to demolish, $7,000 to $8,000. The building was condemned by the Sewer Division. The property has a septic tank, which collapsed. The groperty was condemned. When the owner purchased tfie property, he failed to check with ihe City. The City is not allowing any new sewer systems be instailed. The owner wouid have to connect to the neat cIosest City sewer, which could cost up to $45,000. Before he died, he said he would tet the property go back to the mortgage company and he wo�ld not do the connection. He stayed at the property as long as he could. Mr. Magner stated he and Mr. Robinson cut the owner more slack because he was in a terminai condition. Gerry Strathman recommends approval. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properfy at 245 Froat Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (No one appeared to represent the property. Photographs were submitted.) Steve Magner reported thits property has been vacant since July 13, 2000. Seven summary abatement notices have been issued for cut tall grass, secure structure, and remove rubbish. On June 26, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a mjisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abaze a nuisance building was issued on July 11, 200I, with a compliance date of August 10. The vacant building fee aze due. Taxation has placed an estimated market value of $22,600 on the property; estimated cost to repair, $75,000; estimated cost to demolish, $8,000 to $9,Q00. As of September 4, 2001, a code compliance inspection has not been applied for, and a$2,000 bond has not been posted. Gerry Stratl�man recommends approval. Resolntion ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 62 Winifred Street West If the owner Fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (No one appeared to represent the property.) Steve Magner this property has been vacant since July 30, 1990. There have been 20 summary abatement notices to remove refuse, cut tall grass, secure building, remove snow and ice, remove 16 velucles/trailers, and atlow occupancy of a registered vacant buiIding. On December 22, 1999, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photograplvs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on January 4, 2000,with a compliaace date of February 15, 2000. The vacant buiiding fees aze due. Real estate taYes aze unpaid in the amount of $1,659.92. A bond was forfeited on June 13, 2001. The estimated cost to repair is $25,000. There was a previous resotution to repair or remove the property; the resolution was passed by the CiTy Councii. A new owner purchased the building the next day. The City Council amended the resolution to give the new owner 180 days. They failed to firush fhe project. Mr, Magner has had little or no response &om the owner, and he is disappointed the owner is not here today. o � -�soar LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBBR 4, 2001 Page 11 Gerry Stratbman recommends approval. 291 Tonnine (JO105� Hazold Robinson recommended the assessment be deleted. Gerry Strathman recommends deleting the assessment. The meeting was adjoumed at 11:43 am. ,� MINUTES OF LEGISLATIVE HEARING Q 1�O� Tuesday, August 7, 2001 Room 330, City Hall Gerry Strathman, I.egislative Hearing Officer STAFF PRESF.AIT: Jason Btuberg, Code Enforcement; Steve Magner, Code Enforcement The meeting was called to order at IO:OQ 3_ID_ Laid over snmmary abatement: J0104AA Property cleannp at 1075 Portland Avenue. (Laid over from 7 24-01) Tbe following appeazed: Phyllis Brown, daughter of deceased owners, � 149 La�uel Avenue, and Ruth Jones, daughter of deceased owners, 1075 Porfland Avenue. Ms. Brown stated that her mother passed away March 20, and her father passed away Apri19. Her pazents lived at 1075 Portland for many years, and took caze of their own personal business matters. Her moYher was in a hospice. Her father had lung cancer surgery and had been sick during the time of this cleanuQ. Ms. Bmwn found out about ttus assessment when she was going through a lot of their paperwork. She was awaze ihat her father had a lot of excess items on the deck outside the kitchen door. The only thing she is awaze of in tfie back of the garage was the car whick she in turn towed. The family has been preoccupied with the parents' dying process and was not aware of the assessment. They have had three estate sales on May 4, 5, 19, and three gazage saies on June 22, 23, 24. The family has paid property taxes on time, paid lots of miscellaaeous outstanding bills, and aze still paying burial expenses. Ms. Brown is protesting the $306. She is not aware of what was actually hauled away by the City, She has been hauling lots of items that have accumulated through her parents 54 years of marriage in that home. (A videotape was shown.) Mr. Strattuuan stated it looks like the City removed wood, debris, and picked up the gazbage. Ms. Jones s�ed Yhey fo�f t&e nc�tice by ac�ident She did not find the listed items outside. Nis. Brown stated she talked to John Betz (Code Enforcement) and he said the items were hauled on March 27. Her mother was buried on Mazch 26. The family was besieged with more important matters at tlte time of this assessment. Gerry Stratiaman deleted the assess�nent. It is cieaz notirx was sent and that the City did the work. A few weeks bef'o�ee tl� o�xieas were Yo both die, there is a serious question as to if they were in a positirnt �r re�ogniz� tbe sggn�cance of th� notices and deal with Ytiem effectively. As an act af undezstanding, the assessaaeat sT�vld he deleteci. Laid over summary abatements: J0103CC Demo�irion of building at 381 University Avenue West, Demolition of building at 387 University Avenue West. b� -�l�a- LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINI7TES FOR AUGUST 7, 2001 page 2 381 Universitv Avenue West Steve Magner reported the building has two addresses on the front of it: 38 2 and 383 University are one building aad 385 and 387 University aze the other build'uxg. Ia Marck 2001, there was a fire that originated at 385 IJrtiveisity, It engulfed that building and spread to the neighboring building of 38I and 383 ilrtiv�. Thece was a large Eller Media sign on tfie roof of 8ie bui2ding. The sign started to collapse. T�e Fire Beparlment requested a contractor puIl the sign down and remove some of the debris so they could put out the fire. (Mr. Magner showed a photograph of the building with the sign starting to collapse.) Mr. Magner stated he went to the site at 4:30 p.m. The Fire Department ordered the buiiding razed at the time of the fice. The demolition was completed the ne� day, and the cost of the demolition was split between the two properties with the cost of the crane and more rubble at 387 Univers'sty. Tbere was quite a bit of rubble left on 385 that had to be demolished. That is how the contractor split the bill. Choua Yang, 790 Tuscarora Avenue, and Long Her, 382 University Avenue West, appeazed. Ms. Yang stated they bring business to the University area, pay taz�es, and impmved the area. They plan on rebuilding there. This assessment is causing them financiat hardship. Mr. Sirathman stated he understands ttris is a lot of money. It was ordered by the Fire Deparhnent and is cleazly a public nuisance. AII tfie City is doing is recovering the money paid to the contractor to remove the building. There is no profit in this for the City. Steve Magner stated his office has been in contact with the insurance company for 385 and 387 University Avenue. They aze making attempts to pay the assessment for that properry. Iv�. Magner's recommendation is that the owner pursues this with the insurance company. Prnnarily, the insurance company will accept this as part of the loss, pay it as a bill, and they may go after the inssurance company af the other property for reimbursement. Mr. Magner asked what did the insurance company say about this. Ms. Yang responded they have not heard back. Gerry Strathmaa recommends approval of the assessment. 387 University Avenue West (No one appeared to represent the paopetty.) Gerry Strathman recommands approvat of the assessment. o � -qo�. LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINiJTES FOR AUGUST 7, 2001 Page 3 Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 393 Sidney Street East. Hthe owner fails to compty, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Steve Magner reported this property was condemned in January 2000. It l�as been vacaut since 2-16-00. The current owner is Claudia Tendrup. There have been five summary abatement notices issued to remove refuse, �e garage and house, cut tall grass, remove lazge tree limb and fuewooa. On 6-6-�1, aa mspection of ihe bu7�g was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was devsioged, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on 6-13-01 with a compliance date of 7-13-01. The properiy remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legisIative code. Vacant building fees aze due. Reat estate t�es are unpaid of $2,97027. Estimated market value is $72,700; estimated cost to repair, $80,000; estimated cost to demolish, $8,000 to $9,000. As of today, a code compliance inspection has not been applied for and a bond has not been posted. Mr. Magner stated there haue been numerous phone calls, e-mails, letters from neighbors that would like the City to take action on ttris property. Mr. Magner and another inspector met with a representative from Lutheran Social Services to go over the building again. A pariy from a neighborhood group was ihere. Mr. Magner was okay going through the btrilding, but the inspector became ill because of the extensive mold growth in the properry. Humid weather like today, asthma, and breathing condirions can make it difficult ta handle being in the house. Creorge F. Borer, Sweeney, Borer & Sweeney, representing Lutheran Social Services, appeared and stated Lut4reran Social Services was agpointed a yeaz ago as Ms. Tendrup's conservator with the direclion to take all reasonable efforts to return her to her home. Record keeping consisted of garbage bags of decades worth of bills, inveshnents, etc., a11 of wltich have not been fully sorted out. In some of the bags in the house, problems date back to the eazly 1990's. Also, the house is titled in Ms. Tendrup's father's name, His estate was probated several years ago and the house was overlooked at that time; therefore, fhe house was not formally passed from the estate into Ms. Tendrup's �tame. She has no finances to rehun home, has no fmances for a bond, and has no assets. A physician has indicated she will not be rehuning to her home. Yesterday, the home was shown to three people, and one person indicated an offer would be submitted this week. A neighhor aPso incyicated they will present a purchase. LuBieran Social Services fias Iisted the properry with a Reaitor who indicated he has a buyer who wants to present an offer. Any offer has to cover the back taYes, assessment, etc. There aze two petifions wiuch are needed to sell the property: i) Reopen the estate. A hearing has been scheduled with no objections, 2) Probate court has to order the sell. There is enough evidence that Ms. Tendrup will not retum home. Mr. Borer sta�ed he �adea�rands this pmperry is a nuisance to the City, and he will attempt to sell it as soon as possibte. Mr. Magn�r stated t� b�'sld'mg is a nuisance a� 6he� ar� heatth issues, but he believes the building can be rehabiIitated. The issue will resolve azound the cost of purchasing it and whether they can put Yhe numbers together. I-Ie asked was there another issue. Mr. Borer responded the buyer will have to pay the assessment plus the court requires rivo appraisals, which will be $600. T'here will not be any fees to Lutheran Social Services nor attomey fees. 01-q0 � LEGISLA"ITVE I-IEARING MINiJTES FOR AUGUST 7, 2001 Page 4 Mr. Magner stated Lutheran Social Services is not looking to make moaey on tlus. There have been previous inquiries from some neighborhood groups. The neighbors ultimate concern is that the house be rehabilitated, not necessarily abated or removed. Mr. StratUman asked for a time frame. If the offers do not meet the cost to get rid of the property, responded Mr. Borer, he does not anticipate bringing the legai motions, other than a petition to ahandon. Assuniing an offer comes in, a month is all it would take. There is no mortgage on the pnsge�ty. T� owner is not on medical assistance; therefore, there is no medical assistance lien. The tifle is c3ear otl�r �hau the probate issue. Gerry Strathman recommends lay�ng ov�a to the September 4, 200I, I,egislative Hearing. At that time, if there is no bona fide sale that has taken place or in process, he will recommend remove or repair. Mr. Borer responded that is more than fau. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair t3ie property at 633 Randolph Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Eaforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Photographs were presented) (No one appeazed to represent the properry.) Steve ivlagseer sEated this property was condemned July 2000. It has been vacant since 8-7-00. The c�aent owner is the Secretary of Veterans Affairs per Ramsey County recards, but a Gordon Anderson is representing himself as the owner. One summary abatement notice was issued to remove an inoperable vehicle. On 5-30-01, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were talcett. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on 6-12-01 with a compliauce date of 7-12-01. The properry remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code. The vacant building fees aze paid by Mr. Anderson Estimated market value, $65,900; esYimated repairs, $50,000; estimated cost to dema�ists, $7,Q(JO to $8,000. There there is an issue of possible illegal occupancy with the pmperty. Gerry Strathman asked was there any communication from the Secretary of Veteran Affairs. Mr. Magner responded there has been no response from them. Mr. Stratiunan stated a Bonnie Anderson is Iisted as having "equitable titIe." He asked what that means. A dason Baoberg msponded there is a contract for deed in the interim period before the contract is �asfsed. r'Ix'• Siia�saa� ask� for the �e�tionstaip Tb�ween Bonnie Anderson and Gordon Anderson. Mr. Magner rasponded he does nc� . Tl�e fnst flooa is packed to apgro�mately four feet off the ground. The second IIoor has a large accumulafion. Mr. Anderson is a collector and a recluse. Mr. Strathman asked how the VA (Secretary of Veterans Affairs) became the owner. Mr. Broberg responded the VA is the contractor. They sold Bonnie Anderson the property on a CIT[ZEN SERVICE OFFICE Fred Owa�su, City Clerk DIV [SION OF PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT Michae[ R Morehead, Program Managu CITY OF SAIN'f PAUL Nuisance Building Cade Enforcrment Norm Coleman, Mayor IS Gf! KellaggBlvd Rm. 190 Tel: 651-266-8440 Saint Pau1, MN55102 F¢s: 651-266-8426 7uly 13, 2001 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS Council President and Members of the City Council C \ -q0}- Citizen Service Office, Vacant/Nuisance Buildings Enforcement Division has requested the City Council schedule public hearings to consider a resolution ordering the repair or removal of the nuisance building(s) located at: 393 Sidney Street East � � ,�� €'�,c��rc;� �;:,�: „ The City Council has scheduled the date of these hearings as follows: 3 �, � � 2�� i Legislative Hearing - Tuesday, August 7, 2001 '�� City Council Hearing - Wednesday, August 22, 2001 The owners and responsible parties of record are: Name and Last Known Address Claudia Tendrup Central Towers 20 Exchange Street East St. Paul, MN 55101 Interest Fee Owner Lutheran Social Services 590 Park Street, Ste. 310 St. Paul, MN 55103 Attn: 7an Femer The legal description of this properry is: Conservator for Claudia Tendrup Lot 6, Riley's New Arrangement of the South half of the West 257 ft of Block 44 Brown & Jackson's Addirion. Division of Code Enforcement has declared this building(s) to constitute a"nuisance" as dafined by Legislative Code, Chapter 45. Division of Code Enforcement has issued an order to the then lrnown responsible parties to eliminate this nuisance condition by correcfing the deficiencies or by razing and removing this building(s). o�.yo�- 393 Sidney Street East July 13, 2001 Page 2 Inasmuch as this Order to Abate has not been complied with the nuisance condition remains unabated, the community continues to suffer the blighting influence of this property. It is the recommendation of the Division of Code Enforcement that the City Council pass a resolution ordering the responsible parties to either repair, or demolish and remove this buildinJ in a timely manner, and failing that, authorize the Division of Code Enforcement to proceed to demolifion and removal, and to assess the costs incurred against the real estate as a special assessment to be collected in the same manner as taxes. Sincerely, �teve �a�rcer Steve Magner Vacant Buildings Supervisor Division of Code Enforcement Citizen Service Office SM:mI cc: Frank Berg, Building Inspection and Design Meghan Riley, City Attorneys Office Nancy Anderson, Assistant Secretary to the Council Laurie Kaplan, PED-Housing Division ccnph o� -qoa- .� .�. LEGISI.A1`IVE HEARING bate: August 7, 2001 Time: 10:00 a.m. PIace: Room 330 City HaII 15 West Kellogg Bouievazd Gerry Strathman Legislative Hearing Officer 1. Laid over summary abatement: J0104AA Properiy cleanup at 1075 Portland Avenue. (Laid over from 7-24-01) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends deleting the assessment. 2. Laid crver swnmary abatements: J0103CC Demolition of building at 381 University Avenue West, Demalition of building at 387 University Avenue West. 381 Universitv Avenue West Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 387 i3niversiiv Avenue West Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment. 3. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 393 Sidney Sh�eet East. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over Yo the September 4, 2001, Legislative Hearing. 4. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properly at 633 Randolnh Avenue. If ttie owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval.