Loading...
265595 WHITE - CITY CLERK PINK - FINANCE COUI1C11 ��5595 CANARY - D�PARTMENT � GITY OF SAINT PAIIL BLUR -MAVOR File N . ncil Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date RESOLUTION APPROVING REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM, CD YEAR I WHEREAS, by its Resolution, Council File No. 2'63275, adopted March 21, 1974, and approved by the Mayor March 25, 1974 , the Council of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota approved Redevelopment Plans for the areas comprising the Neighborhood Development Program, Minn. A-1, �aint Paul, Minnesota, and the conditions under which relocation payments would be made under said Program to be carried out with Federal financial assistance under Title I of the Honsing Act of 1949, as amended; and - ' . WHEREAS, the Housing and Community Developmenti Act of 1974 consolidated previous housing and categorical g�nt programs, i�cluding urban renewal, code enforcement and neighboxhooc� development prog�Cams under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, by providing municipalities such as Saint Paul, Minnesota, a block grant to be used to continue or initiate programs such as renewal, housing rehabilitatio, planning, human services, - provision of public services and citizen paticipat�.on on a municipality wide bases so as to provide for development of vialple urban communities, - including decent housing and a suitable living env3:ronment and e�cpanding economic opportunities principally for persons of low and moderate- ir���ne by undertaking activities, among others, to elimin�te and prevent blight � and blighting influences and the conservation and expansion of the , municipalities' housing stock; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 and the financial assistance provided thereunder, the Council of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota has considered and approved a program and budget for the Community Development Program, CD Year I , to undertake on a city wide bases planning, conservation of existing housing stock through rehabilitation, housing recycling, haazardous building treatment and provi5ion of public improvements, an�d the continuation of Community Development activities within areas and neighborhoods in the COUIVCILMEN Requested by Departlment of: Yeas Nays Christensen Hozza In Favor Levine Roedler Against BY :� Sylvester Tedesco President Hunt Form Approved by Gity Attorney Adopted by Council: Date Certifie s d Cou il Secretary BY i By � Approved by Mayor: Date Approved by Mayor $or Submission to Council By By WH17E - CITV CLERK . PINK - FINANCE (jITY OF SAINT PAUL Council ��5595 CANARY- Dt�PARTMENT BLUE -MAYOR File NO. Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date -2- City currently undergoing renewal, code enforcement and neighborhood development programs previously funded under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, in accordance with duly adopted programs and redevelopment plans; and WHEREAS, the continuity of activities within the Phalen Code Enforce- ment Area, Concord Terrace Urban Renewal Area, SummS.t-University, West Midway-South St. Anthony Park, Thomas-Dale, Central Core, Seven Corners and West Sevath Street Neighborhood Development Program Areas in accordance with existing programs and redevelopment plans were' programmed and budgeted for in the Communit�'�evelopment Pragram, CD Year I� approved by the Council of the City of Saint Paul; and WHEREAS, there has been prepared and approved by the Board of Commis- sioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, and presented to and considered by the Council of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota a document entitled, "Community Development - A Program For The Revitalization Of The City Of Saint Paul" , consisting of a Program Summary, Redevelopment Plan, Program For rmplementation, Project Eligibility Report, Relocation Plan, Budget and Method of Financing, Legal Certificate and Appendix incorporating the Application for Federal Financial Assistance and Housing Assistance Plan; and WF�REAS, the Council is in receipt of the report of the City of Saint Paul Planning Commission contained in its Resolution adopted May 23, 1975, finding that the Redevelopment Plan and the property acquisition and disposition and public improvements proposed in the Community Development Program are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan For The City of Saint Paul and to be sound extensions of prior renewal activities approved and implemented under the Neighborhood Development Program. COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays _ Christensen Hozza In Favor Levine Rcedler Against BY Sylvester Tedesco President Hunt Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by Council: Date Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY By Approved by Mayor: Date Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council By By WHI7E - CITV CLERK ��5595 PINK - FINANCE �OU11C11 � CANARY -D�EPARTMENT GITY OF SAINT PALTL BLUE ^-MAVOR File NO. Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date -3- WHEREAS, pursuant to notice of the time, place and purpose thereof which notice was published in the St. Paul Dispatch-Pioneer Press on May 30, 1975, a public hearing has been conducted on June 10, 1975 by the Council on the Redevelopment Plan for Community Development Program Year I and the activities therein proposed, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED� by the Council of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota as follaws: � 1. That the findings and determinations of Resolution, Council File No. 263275 respecting the Redevelopment Plans for Neighborhood Development Program Areas, Minn. A-1, are hereby a�firmed. 2. That the Redevelopment Plans for Concord Terrace Urban Renewal Area Project, Minn. R-37, Summit-University, West Midway-South St. Anthony Park, Thomas-Dale, Central Core, Seven Corners and West Seventh Street Neighborhood Deveiopment Program Area, Proj;ect , Minn. A-1, previously adopted and now in effect in the Cit� of Saint Paul, in the areas to which said Redevelopment Plans apply, provide an outline for the continued development or redevelopment of such areas, and said Redevelopment Plans and the Redevelopment Plan for the Community Development Program, CD Year I, Saint Paul, Minne�ota, are sufficiently complete to indicate the relationship of said plans to definite local objectives and land uses and to indicate general land uses and general standards of development and redevelopment. 3. That it is hereby found and determined that the financial aid to be provided pursuant to contract for Federal ffnancial assistance under the Community Development Program is necess�ry to enable the Program to be undertaken in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan COUIVCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays Christensen Hozza In Favor Levine Roedler A gai ns t BY Sylvester Tedesco President Hunt Adopted by Council: Date Form Approved by City Attorney Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY By Approved by Mayor: Date Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council By BY WH17E - CITV CLERK PINK - FINANCE GITY OF SAINT PALTL Council CANARY - O/,PARTMENT File �O. �6559 BLUE �-MAVOR ) Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date -4- approved by this resolution, and that the land in the Project Areas encompassed within the Program would not be acquired and made available for redevelopm�ent without the aid provided under the Community Develop- ment Funding Agreement with the United States of America. 4. That it is hereby found and determined that the Redevelopment Plan for the Community Development Program will a£ford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the locality as a whole, for redevelopment of the Program Areas by private enterprise. 5. That it is hereby found and determined that the Redevelopment Plan for the Community Development Program, CD Year I, conforms to the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Saint Paul. 6. That it is hereby found - and determined that the Redevelopment Plan and Community Development Program make provision toward the development of a viable urban community in Saint Paul including decent housing and suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities principally for persons of law income. 7. That the Redevelopment Plan for the Community Development Program, CD Year I, Saint Paul, Minnesota, is hereby approved together with the provision for relocation of persons, families, business concerns and others to be displaced by Program activities. _---- � ' f COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays ' Christensen � � Hunt In Favor �°��' (� Against By Sylvester T�r President � Hozza Adopted by Council: Date �U� � 4 �� Form A ve by City Attorney � Certifie e b uncil Secretary BY By Appro by Mayor: Date � Approved by Mayor Eor Submission to Council By By P�BUS� � 4 t9i� v ` j '> � r^�' � . CITY OF SAII�TT pAITL . o�e��iae O F F I G E O F T H E M AY O B RE�EIVED a��r -- - MAY 2 2, 1g75 Councii Presic� Ruby Hunt LAWRENOE D. COHEN MnYOa Ma.y 22, 1975 Council President Ruby Hunt and Members of the City Council Dear Madam and Members: Now that the Department of Housing and Urban Development has formally approved Saint Paul's First Year Community Development Program, there is one additional step which requires council action to insure compliance with the State Redevelopment Act. The State Redevelopment Act requires that the City adopt a redevelopment plan. The plan has been prepared from the Community Development Program and Budget, as approved by council and is presently under review by the Planning Commission with final consideration expected at the commission's Ma.y 23 meeting. The Federal statute (Housing and Community Development Act of 1974) is silent as to the procedure to be employed in the council consideration and adoption of a redevelopment plan. It is, therefore, proposed that the hearing procedures employed in the past as to such plans be used. It is, therefore, requested that the City Council set a date for a public hearing on the plan and that notice of the time, place, and purpose of the hearing be published in accardance with Minnesota Statutes Section 462.521. The notice requirement of this statute could be met for a hearing date as early as June 10 in the event Council acts to set the date on May 27. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Sincerel CE D. COHE Mayor LDC/klm cc: Mr. Thomas J. Kelley Mr. Edward N. Helfeld Mr. William Q. Patton 22 +�x %°J.,T. FF �.�,{t �t g:i,r {�l�'. .,;.rqx�.� a`!._ l �::, r ., 4�'1 t .�,'.._yJ �"�l�x"�.'�, �lt� '�:�, � :1�:�,':. a S ;t7" +� ���A°, t�': S�' x� . �, �tc - ',�i��. {X:.�.• i,i.�'. P ?i ,W J�y � �-:. �, ;t�i,v� �'3f a � � Iw��" t. � � =X i/�,L f ��{���+�#��1�t�: ''�'� e���, �T:k'.7�'a �•�:.'��, p� 4 . �Li f 4. . � i ' i ;.t�t 1 r ��;4 v 2 ..r. � :k�.t � t,.; � 1 �d dm.. ti�*,� .: v 4 .:^4°t A� .�,,��,�' 2����1�� �it �y..'� f ' t. � ' S H[1 Y:. e ,:, "' kF b. =� �',e�� '�v. !' fi +� � �c x rY a � �3 �. �,Ly,,,r� �:.�� .:�?I �-.., r ���, �� �GSr�ri,".��r i'�f��:;''�' ��'��'�'�i.'y�'.;'�a�, �:u"�j:l l$.. �a (.: f � ;� i1 4r 3r ;Zr Ay� r�� � . q{j#�;. �9� � F.�: ! { gj: �.t�kl'�...,'{ 1 17*6`4?�wt%b}r".'p i���^{/.�{. if ' 'F'� �'�;41'� �i���n �' �'..� 1 tl°' �, 61 'F '�„� 1 ts"rt �^v� .h��TP �„".�.�. ' 3 �`�� . � �,.� .,g.y t �'r'.. e � 4;,' % .<r �f� � �,�.� �� .+ �t,�,� .,t2xa � .,:..�� �' '� �'�' �r�?�' r�6 � ��r al} � � ;. ak7 t:: � "?r"h t� fir ! .: 1 t 'ai ' k�u �.st S . � 5 x� t xj� � �`;1 S ��. F�#�}s �i�. � l�F� �'�� � � y':.�. �.' � Y�� t '•� �,1 ( e;� �F ",1.���� ',�7�'�}-� 't�,: �' "� �'; � 4 �.�"�i,aEl.� .:_� �tr�i�� � ��.. l_. h�` 4 � .��til a'�j':� 1 g. �� � 'vK. 1 b5�� �y , r 4.�` ::y i ,: �'��� �.,: .� 4 ¢: `{}.t?,�:� � � }a c ,'.r° zlr � 7� a :y e� . , ' a -, �'';` t r i�, ,�.$ p+a� ,�' . 8 r;;,���� arry.,��,•�, �1 �� � ; )� '� r{ C :'.i � d .��y� .'� t �"": ���,i d �x F .6�is`� : '�t � } � .:o t rt+. t s ��a�� �` +kt�i � � � � � "t'i . � ,:.. �i ,i�, � �ti�,�: �4�J ! �. ! �x;s.i k ,� �� �nr Jr�, �,(i: F�F �kr�t� ` ..� �" f"'h�, �S� JS�,^. w xn{ ' a �� i!p �� �. -.�+' a y �� �{'� „ � C � �,..� � ti �a � �' '' x 4� ���y,}��r�J �����;�. r t ,�-.. f � r .��'� ,} i ) �v# � o,,� xdf ,�'k f� t.(. �` i � d- �"+. {�" M r� i Az`X�f �5 ti r��' � � .3; t:. �� bP �'y 1 1 } �� 6 ,'�. � ��k t�, • �' �+ 1;4v ta i;d k�: �.,�'� �V' v 1 } q 4 °M4 ,��C�v �: � ��r fa {t i ;.�I� Kv.� ���,�ti ��� .��„ � ���t� �R�, }4� � i� R.� �� i;.��� kR"X��,��y �i �� v I^ � � .� l r� � �^ e A�. �. k E�l: i '7 a �k �� ��� � � . ��� • S'= �� � � 'a. � �� � i r�,, ,'� a -� `�. ; ,� K�� .' i L FeF � .Y"��', k b � ��Y �!„t .�� � 1 .� i�° r U t. ! �� �� ^ P �w� "�`YI' a �� .��i x �11 .1 ,�� 4`' d �_v A �}���� '��v,� � . � f I } y � t *S�A !". k+�t � � r �� �'�„'� _ ` �,�t `" ` .•�q „ � �'i � 1� � � _� �ti:n�`5 t �^��r����� � "*.�;wp i�y {�'� `��,� �.:r�L�rt,�; yr r ;! �' t?M � ?tj �..� rl ta� �. �' �i .;� Ft w.. i 1�. 'f )�'� � Y`:� S °ak �. tP��,t u�+�, }�'�. y .: t -5 ( �� .� 5 � � ' t�9 Y H � i � ,.1 t� ��: � ��:: ��..a : �`� .,.���� ���Y'� � � .`3 � .'��4 nti��< � .7 � .�,.�x .$'v +.� ���x � ��� 's, "� ,w y� � . ���f �. , L. } � ,�-� � � ,k ,yH ''.r d, Y 4 S �k `'"I `Y y� �l .1,,.}�!� �:t �� �y�+ ,Yr! { �r�S'f � ���F �`� ��S 't�t�. !,� I t x `y�"3 4 �,{�:. �. r�'�r �� �'� t��' ,�� �,. � �j� t x " � {, 1' x ��a � ;,,. t �� c� � �` }rt �, ,.AA+� � >�,�, �r. � . �E,r a - � ' �5 � �, a r J r�; i• 1 � i � � s� ' r � i t t ^R. ° :i 'i �� ++k� "� A 1*;� k�'�` �i�� ' r�`it�' / �t � i �t�;' j p�� �'�+\ � `ii � :i �d .�;° G . . �;.r : ''�.' ���`� � s= '� ajil � � �1- ? �� +�F.ra�.:�'i1� � -�. ��i r�.� �i�: ¢.�� -'t ' t t :,t r E ��f � �). '��v k � s. T �` y ;'t �..a � ,� �� � py :� �,� L� k ,�t�.q����� ,�il« t � '� t� �y -- ": .� � f h # z. � J � �4 �i. ��q«6���. �.` sk� t4'+�M1 � ,v . � K":� r :�4T 3,.` '�. ,A. �" f.7; ��1 ' r r �` `' z�j�': �� �..� k + � �� -., ry�"'� a'�,+XL� ,� � . q � �.`e 1 'V� ` � � � �f,�*{-H �Y iY, � �� ��k t `,�, � �r �� ._t- f y�i 5.1 a�a F A$ � ��y � �t������,�. h'�h'.+��r�'�t ra8r f i� t � ' �+A i t }y,=.. �o :. � . p r+e s�{n� r �: i* ry5,�� �t y t�. 4 �,J � � r t f :1 � �� � ,,;�i n !'" a, <; �,'a 1 • i � �� �-.� .,� �r u {�9' �S.�Sq.,� � S. K �` � a; � f � � �{`-�t }, i �•° � "� { 5 �-�'� � j � r x � '� t n s v �` � . �.`y ��?��.@�b`��r�s'FiN " } � � �* c e���, ,� �t �:i 1 r�.� � � �. f¢ �C� r , '-4 k r t i f g, 4' S � .:I, r �` �F nY r {� ,�gr y 7�Y yy �° � '�f�! �� k -� r _ ! . 4 - '�� �'�.� �r � 7�F t y'� 3y ,� s�i {� P �� �( ..x .\ ap { 'y u �'��� � d t i' �� i � � �'�' t-y �, . � �� CF" ' x }, t� .� . �� ���k� -�> i 0 �re�s. [ ;�'�` �'�y r . �0 � �. &p .tn� �ti- � w��,,��`W,;. i $� " »� �� � i��. 3'� t. . i .,�r ,�� .,. s Kr, �_y � �, y4 W�`x ;;.f'�+� � '� o `� .�>ii ei..�,� �t ,�� ��� � . * �p� � F�:�'� � t . � 1 � � , � i �� �y ��� � i:g�"� � �,q�±; �t� a,��,, , �r ��� �;' � „�#� ��� 4���{� �,°��'�}�,�1��� t�1±�... �`�° *� . i'( r s ' ,.�{ 4 7 � :,� �r� �, �i �'� :�;} i i t �� .: � �� ��m M �` �, �. S� fi 1< �- t �,�'f �y .S; �(y��� $� r ' ' � �x 1 i r rF� r -r� � x: � Xf`l.r j ,�,�.:;,'z�" � :a�t{;r� t dy1 f' i ,.A�t�'r Cy_}'��{��, y �k :��f� `.e.'!5, '1 I k f �Y �'� � r ��� ., a � 1 �' -ti� � 7 :� h?� .i'�' d� �Mr � �z � �F q ;!^ 4 �M � d #?:°� °�'!"f , � � r \ b` �'�'J,'T� ::.� �",r }� `�. 1-� 6 ..� ,� t .:i L i�'���j ���r.r-� }� �t c.,3,�`i E 1 ,.,�u �x�.q'�n�,� � � C�'�r , �y.�1� . a_ � - � rl°c�3 �.:�. r�JY /.i"; fd ,� :'43 t � {. { , �.,.� r7'i�}Y.,� J��,-s"�° r{ Y . � �cx�� t� x kt��.. ��:1 '� R.�' 1 K Vi- Y € � a �.� .:.)'id � r .i l �� , a '.�J � .,� � 5 � � „ � �..�;�� 4 w `e a �` ,., r 'r ,� � w ��' � ° r a � r �,�.��� �:��r ��tirz � 1 *t � 1 :-'� F � . { a y�� ` ° �'.r' r T� 1 *:'. tt �_�: f � ��� � p :,g� �� �' : i i � 1 �+�- �� 3'�, � r. 4'�����i "!t.,� � i l � 1 `` 4 i'� 3 fa $ �,:h a.��'k �'�.;�. `r a'� i : ��� ! '.'� i � i 'r. �a iti �'i� �T,� b�''��, � �.i. e p. �(.�, rF� .� �,. r.- ��i' Tt } ¢ ��i �' ���,'{�;o � ,.vJar y'�::3� `�'b S�� y;, i ��'iF' �-.�` �a..r„ � � f �- �7 1 �1 f� .z r 1 � 1 -F' f •� � I U�'r,, l�y,t. � :S� ^4: .`� o }� r �"�'H���° � •'��ii.` � ��'� '� �' �� t t �,1� �•y �f,� ,�, �r�� �,�'.tt �r�4'''i� � � _��� �r �� '� � ����rt S'���.,1 � 'h',���3���'�� ��'���Y"�ia F���h�e °��� � f �!�� ?p� � ° � 4��"` � '��,� � '��:{ `�r =,�r -Xa � �, Ft� I � ��� �> 4`S * .�.� ° � ��� i� h�° w,� ;�.���`�i}�' r:}y��` a�;��a ��; ��� �g � �4' `.x� t � _, i,6 .a �:'t' �i`;, � f t r ." .�t�b .� '�"�e�4 � � � a � 3�t�. �� �.'^ � a 4�.,�s � : � ... ,� , .�.5 y;, �1 t � J �� - �„ �S > ,if'� /� ,+ �,,._3� ��rf�f�l�` 'P�a�" -. � '�k� w1'b � _°*-�.. �"� !� � r� r`� M1 tG.:yf„ �7 �,' , � ., � ��'��i r +:Fa�' 4, ��yk 4�: � �t���,,y� t�f.i� � - .3♦ . � 5 ��� K�i P �,�1 $� E��. +.:�� � '� ���� +� 2 � : : ,, :`j �� � a x;, r � � z �..,� t� . t "` (� t q -��,f7 a�' ��.q�' x�'r '� r�. 5'' � t 4�u^Lk-�. � A �d` �,�°� i ._ � � »y`` :. �� ��r,., a �-,, r i.� ,�, M . '�y � g� .`,i1 p,� :��r � ^t F��,�` ¢�{��' '�t� � � �� � 2af .�� k} ? F � � �����i( ° �- k �. r �,'4�� ��i�� �," j�l�� � -� ;��5 -} 1' � l�� � y � � � . , ���x ' � i !i i � f M i filV d �L F y� i& 7 YA' 'S.,. � � . ' 3 . ��t�� � �.� f � A A t t �,_r ''�n��� i 3 �' � t �."� �� � ��' �r f��ka+ �[,� t��� � '�`�1<�� i�'� ���� t � r�.��� b�! . �Fm�,:,� � � � �� t,..! � �" � '� d��� a� � >��w: � ,...ra w f , * .. 1 � j 1 d " � {, M :�" 7 � �t i s ,4y 1 �� +� � }y�., � 1 xn �,,i` e� ��I��� -� $"� t�� 1 7 tT-&.�. :�'�yt v t �,. .� �� � � � ,, � �' � �' � � ���s`vrv'. �w g �y<` t � � r� t.� y� �,:.g � � ��, �`�, ta p �4, '� � 'i4� `F . �� t ., + ',�y�f''%'�3�',*rt,p� �c �.�r�y;. i�� � t u r:.� 1 A .. wI .- Fi S r'�.:� �.r9FtA t � i "{ � � �� }� � :F �'r ?`�t'1 i *',�;'r�+ .�� '.a , ���� v ,� � -` r <� �r .t ��4� :•:� � �i� 3 ,r� �t y � � � � � s ,���� ���� " � � h ;�1 e� �i N T'}f' '?� 1 .;tt � � �� � ef A.� �r ..k � 7 h +P �t'4b � t y ,. 7 � ' .r �, . � � .i�,j s �'""xX r q�r� : xs ' ��6 �`J a�.� r�7d ,7�'.0'� �1'�k ,d�a�y.Y� �i'�.,� x �A ��'.,� � G f t � 'I�. ro .Y, � i �'' J Nd. I!�' - �x k; T �"�S.r�`�F�.� �'� e� ES���,t{}:K�` �.� .�` C��`'�9;��;�'�r�'�.� �M��� .�' °i�r' �;-.. � a .� �. or��� w n.t ='�; Ss t �,t� �a .j -r :�'rt t., � � • �1 , '� � h t:����1 ��� /�Y:' ��7��� �' � �f �� ���r�A��,� ��fH���� ��*'€1`� ��. t i Y A f � �'h •�iM., 4 �yy {1� 1�4 � y�$ .1i "��X ��. 7 '�1' 4"i T i � � ���'' � � .."� �f +`x..+tr } �' )7� °}°� �� �C t � i �l � ���Y�a � ,; �a e.� � � t # '`�,t ��( �# �{}��,y�,� ��:�� , ,. �, i i � �����f ��'� r� , �� t�1��� _ "�� �; a�' �, tr .,r � � %j��4. �x S{;���}�s�+��ke �� k��"� 'F.a.�.� . � },,��1 � y1�1�"���� ,! � � �� .. � ��^ �r G � x��� �.'y:'�g Y �� � t C J � 1 j�5 .S � y �r k �:a �'+�t t y, js � �, ""3 y�t 1 +''� x �� a ,s y:. . r#i�p�„�,��ir �,FZ,�,t�1�t ��� s`g S �� �,�,t f�e �t^ �, t 4` '� 'y'yd}. ;.,�E .�'o',� � 3�i: T � � i '- ` ,�{� �r �1 e e r X � '� n'. r �, v.. t �d �,t�'�k j„k�!i�\ x ; f w °+ � {��� �y r ,�y '� �`1 *� �::,r�a� y.,� -�t �� �, '!. -.-�f, �5.� ��4. �>Y '�'1 1{r,4 h' •`� y5 .,� ,S. � 9� • .�sA � � � 1:'. +' d k �d} f. --n . i I ':a .'i + _ g � i� t� �.�.L v� kA�a� .. ; i 1 t1��.Jr�'� � � �ti�,� , A a:a � �r 1� r f.,� w� , t , � i : . •} r > � r �'� Y'� � f �.rr� r t � ��{ �,��k , ?' ,> �i$�'' �r t�� ✓ �- ' ,.. d .:�,'i k ;s�' �'u. � 4": �"� �y�a ."�s-kF r� �� �+�,�yY�F,'�� • 7:: � ��� �� � �aS� � _ � - ''f { W �� � yT� ,fi � 7� � d � \�� �? "'�x� i@� � wk ��� .,..� ��i ."_ . _ 1�'� • -? � T .. + � µ��� �€`� �� t�1��� �e�g ` � t � ,, „ � � �� «�. -y ..tl , , ..,. w Y ��������i u � � �� . t > ��r ti � 'r . x n �' .�a� � r,}4h � � ��`��,'t'��4i� �� .._. "6�, "t R s�? � i� �.' ' � � �`3��R .;. �. . .: �� p �bs � � r 7'�. �fi "h�t:�a �ilv*r ��'�� �'A'y� � �.' �q pc e �k �;: a *� � Y .� . , �� +y 4 � ,�� a �d s Y:�' T �` t,q � /k" y�� r 4 'S� u 7 . � � r � � ` + • a�.i e x i _Ix d ',.J �s' i n R � �.. -n G" �° < �' 9 .�'; � ti e � •e ��, f �'� "� �t � r j;�Fffi� �.., I �� v ,� � � �'+ � s c ' �rz ��it�r� �.: � � �x a t` - F ��" � ',) � ` Y� ��°�� , ��� ! ��:ti r q;� �j � +,f��,� "S`'�,+ i�� ,� . 6 . '� . P.� y . . t � �!i� 4 E'�'' .k r .� ;.1 f f f .` �' ', '�"f�r :� �j' r r �y r F'. "� :.k'� +.�`�� L '�� ! Yf ... �Z �. ' ����� � ' 4 Y 3. 9 '� l �.% 'j Y�'� t' al�.� a � .:.a a 1 �i � P �''� J J..:: �''+ �+�+��" �.�:Sc X � �_l fry ` d +c4;A; J-,r! ,j i.. , �.._ � .�r� k�;...a� }���� �.�� te. S i .._{rv�i +�� �.�. � � �-'� A . �w F �/, t t'F t;4� ,.✓ �VS r� � 4.,! :'�`f ��1 � t : ?-� # ,�V; ��� iF b�/�.� `y ' e F y�,A �_"��,. �a�r'� "�,'hy�� i��Z'"� '��4�3k� �t b �f t i ' � ' ,' �S t t� �y P� � F i, y7' �.: i�; ���. , AF'- � �� t Pf, t � �f :,1 �'_�� )§ !x `�.� X'° 4"�>i.�4 a frax �+i Y^� 2,�.ri F t� � 7 dtk ���",g� ' ,.� �z F��� f ;. � ���, � ,x : T Y ��t .>.I F, . � r .�,: r J � , y Y,�+? '' x ''�y� M 'Y�"'� w � �t�,,,«fy y� } , � �. i- �,,��. i � � � lr ��+iiY { .rf 9.'.� � -. St; a � � /.ri" a. � � 'i a _,y �„- 'b � ..,} : ,jy f �� �t � . �K3 ;�4 , . � h � ' 1 � t ,,y � 1 `a ��, : 1 r ' i ,�� �'� ,,�. e.. i t'�. � '^ i , � �, y��,y. � �� '! rf ��� iu ��, � 4�a}r � `� .T�i { �c�s� �.� �'�t� ,` t '�.� �� ' 1 , y �r s .� �� { ����J� � ; F < t d� >€ � : ; "1' r �+? a �� . � ' � �`1 �' ya; �� i 4 ' ��, � �� � v�: � � ,i dr n � p� 1c ���`�i �a� i � 7� �:' �' � � � E s t^ '�� i �' ���'{ t �'� t �t�� a u�w �S yy�p f� � x �, u `r ��>� �-. �� ��" ����� � � � � y��„�a. j x'+. �,�' {ik� y ' �,,�y � .�� 1CAr ':�.p. . sni �,+�'.l'� " . � �v q�/ '•� r � . i�'���: � .� �,rk ;A;' a3 ! � �it.t�t � S F gy � c�j�8 y�`' ,� '.t , S. S1' , i p 7 � � .,..'t i � � �l I� j�}�;.� s �S,y� �+°���.{ � �, 7 f,�r �'�'� �w��..�t �.�; a i�. t �{� � ..., i 'S � `.,. �� ...,��- .�:� � }y 3;M f T ��' +�{x �: �a�' .. f� �"'�. ✓ �:� �� ���I• E °� c �; ° � �'`c�� Pi nyt 1 '' a � �y 'r �,4 �`�, "�F ,� �f:t � ��`�c� ���- ��� °i�'�� � �� �a, ���` k �.�y�,�S k '� i� � _;�'�Yt+ `� ,� � � ���(��� � � r a. � � �. i�, � xt�.. T r�'4 , � �' ' � Y'� � r -� � LL �� av„f. t ��� � t,i ' � �. �� t. �i <l p � .+ �c� �� � ,r :�� X t��i,�i � �� .::i :' � � .., # ;.�x �,, ;� yy� .t ` ti a b ;��� �i.�. r F.' � k� ��'� . r a � i � 1 �� 4r / r r 7 g.c a .i � ��, �f ,, � :N'�''�h' et�� �'x p�.� °jl � � z ^f r s a ":�� � :�.� �y���� �f �l; e F:�� �'� "r ''����I `��r� �1�� yR��-i t L �����-a+c s �� 1 1 � F�`� ��a ats-'�i� � � 3 f '' f r ':' i�i�-.s 1 S,.� � � y,.' � �� �.�' a,{ v.. s w .: y�Y}tkr I�`� F.y �wt �� � o�� ,k..� t „� �`,0.'� +r�: s � , '�f .#;.4b r t :�y,� �r fi 1 ;� � ld � � r�^�: > ? � �, M r�, iq r� {�r , �k ��,a �1" 1 ,ti� y r '.1 t �'i i Y �,�' i ::L 1 J � 4 d ' :, 1 '�`ij"� 5 � �v + ✓s'�'�,W � i' . � +t_ � ��d�F��� 4 ,;.�h � , 4 l� :i�v � _ t � t F d j•it �w,��' ^t L �;. r,y�3 {r4 � S c�„v,� �t � i�.����v�e'&' ii �µ �'i' :.{, � � � �. + � ��' a�.o �..,� ����� . � .� � -A $ 7 i�v�,a � 6 '1"� � �? IS:�r� ,��t`'.� � >G1�y�A'r �� t � e,��"' ; '��+, , k � ti' `'-r� � 1 � �, �. �' �;���� %�� � �uf�, ��C'�++a �` ��� y� �� �, � a l�/ � � F �>.. " �7.. � :�' � �,� � � � '�� �.� � ��` }g�:�' (�c Q�,�}IS � .��'��4'�".�c�� � 4�� �� R` t � r ."t� �� �'� i 41,� .. t ,� + � s��� � � n�,� i3 i 'M1� i rt ; � � z ' r � " ' ` `' � � �`� '` .� s � � { #�t � P5 a y „ ,,,k�+ v�, �r r� ,� ��"'` u ��� ` � � t r ¢ �,.���i3��� :'''� * Y{f�5; ,,, �.`Ky.�, k} .:t� k�Ix���� ��"��A� �� �Y {� r � � y � {�;� 3� `� '� ^•��.a�� � `:� i � �.��� ��'{ .� i t , � t.,� f..:� ; ., ��� � '�i .' �� "� a�.,a ��,�,: �"t �.� �'�,�i^�1,�'it �,i.. � �`' �¢ ' f y!�i �:�, {4p ��. �zt ��` �� di.. � F � l . � �„rt �a r � i�„/ � x�r �y'R�'+�'y t�s 1+�, "��A �� � t 4'� '� � ' ! � ; k�� � . � � i , � �' h k V, � . r: � �� '� ' `� � �,'� �{A �f.�° ,��;��'�t� ' r , 1 �l+nM � i V� ��� �� ����� /� E ��M ,(��' .x� � � , ' �� t�1��� V.:f� � ��� �i� �iY ':b u �,�. � � \+ � ���,x����.^�� 1��,�.x,��� fk ri.s� i �-"'� � r' i v p�y ,.i^ � � t� � �{. $ j :.� �, . � �, r .' d ' � lrit �_�� : 1 i rd�i �ry �F �/y r5`y. d �.•• t:�•a1 � �{r � 4�;��'�i r 4 '+�`�p� f�.�`t����9 d i d#� M :f ! � A') `.5 :� ��f�. � . Ff j 4 1 -l 4 h�,� t ; i S� t,f � � t' s : �' * .> > � 1 x �'�i r , � i ,t� R' ���i 1 4,t � �`a r kt l '� � '' a� +,# �-: r;� � � � (t' r�i ( � v ;� K �t �,1 � � A 1 f I v . �g �,� ���,�, �' 4�r t. � � � � z � 's�. a� . '�`� 1 �. w�t�:a ' �� � i'� �.'� � i �pr� � f "y`4��'Y�'+�r""���n`�;� �#1k"'�,��. � 1 ' ��1 �,.t j� s� :` G � i*; b�� t•+,j t ;/. ` ' '': 5 N � ,�. rn� !�a k� 4�, ''� 'r'1 j�: r��i ,�'��y�,� � ��4 A ai'�'" : i � ;� � rr�( .. F ,f I ,Y' . E .x. � r 8z '` � -,��, � �.� �� i� ti4 k ..�4 }� k t:z �( t?a1t3{�.v� '�y,ti a ' ;., : �� k rC � � ��r v . �. r'�� i .� o� � i " 'i 'k. � �'' 3 �{e � +t t - 1 ,a,,; w ��, � �,, r � 4 1 � , �. � � � ' � - u p�'� +. lF �� + t � , a ''�� � `�� �'�r °i°� �`:. �"� �A . fri r r%i ra� i v i � p r � �i i � ` .� 1 �a..�,�....ii.`ar : .�1�3,.,t .� '�Y' a>�1� ��i;J,.. �f�y�.S..n li� . ...... ...A , u. �. .tt: u, . . . ,.k�_�'8...... v.,1.v_ e.,..._r k� . N l�t.......rc ..4r.i e�T, n, 1�.. -...�1� .M 55 East Fifth Street,Saint P�ul, Minnesota 551 01. Edward N.Helfeld,executive director. phone 298 52 18 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA ' . Ms . Rose Mix, Ci �� May 28, 1975 386 City Hall ' . "�°"��; St. Paul, Minnesc -v�,� �����n,'� ��vEN pevel�j.Min�H¢�EB��codn'. SaNOT��Eto Ra�daM+PeU��w:�� AttentiOn: Mr. A1 �,�Y"�"�Q�Ar' u,�y���e���'^�;� ,h�e����,tof dsa���^'ti►��1.y�°�t°eqb���( ne Gfamctl � Hl�Y qt n tn, Na�E es��co�;ak��Y���pLC Hearing Notice g75;�a�.��,r,a„�p�•��'����„"„�n.�elopment Plan — Community Development �°' ��+ ' m�'�"�(��°sa��'a�;m m°�a:am — CD Year I p P1an � !utµ °- e� dtY�W{de bss�t4y°�Cqti�Vltieln9�j�'ta* t dev���cxl9il tnr�h a�cttvl4ies, Dear Ms. Mix: tY�.��wtidew�� ►:��.��a�� ��,+he�G�n�,pi�(�pT a�G�. �� ��t� n�' mN- St. Find enclosed a cop�` �is�sr,��NM��� ag-�o�ef Public Hearing which will be published in the Dis: ��,,,^��e�na► "���� �'��tii,;;f"s�'n'•ss on Friday, May 30. Pr�� praas�Wiihit�m°�me�t P ert► - 5 reat p�e� Find enclosed also a P�;�,�,��„'„°,�,-����a�,s , "Community Development - A Program For The Revitalizatio. �,�,��re�a �`���°�F�;;c°�-. Saint Paul" , containing the Redevel- opment Plan and suppo� {"�"n?��",m�`�*�a���'�'P:^ � OeVe1� L�..�.�� �K n which the Notice recites is available in your offi. m;'��►�;��m��,�`���;� ;pection during regular business hours. Part three of 1����;,� Pw� �4��'���; •ogram For Implementation" , lists all proposed community c�ri �',e �•�^* �• �;'�q�f�+�; vities including the addresses of eva�fslD Syneys FAn�.tor °t�a1sn plar � ld t�fl �IoP�� 1tn���' real property identifie o���+v � F�r a 1. The Plan also contemplates � seld �pgraM'rs�r��ed Undo tn �� 9Y cer�tl �� �� some acquisition of uni u�►�,{iop et�d , f �hy ,125 in the ITA areas. If residents within the ITi ��,.'�°�m„�,�:- '�eR�";y ndaries are defined in the Program For Implementation has c cw►��� °P�'�`°�� .��,�me ing his property, refer the resident to Bill Fabec, , °s�;°w�o��"��pos�""a�e`�m ln�si'W�P,o plyl�d wt b°�modt �1M ��e y�red �W a��qn����p{n ee qp� ���d,°°t F Sta48a va��iM lal p� V��ted �r Yours very truly,/ �'���WH��A tlerm°Pp � !/ A9���t¢��(1) �sxgrrwme Sov e / Pleo wt11���fltv��R�ev���; ` ( ��//f�— ! �,/f�� t��y,o�ot�s y�nrWat��lan , ,��(�G�� r��Pl3$j^tt� R�+��ty e3 b Jatnes T. Hart '�� g� ��f��ik� d°Y ,rm i ���++;'. d��a���,�v{s1���cro���� General Counsel �,sn��•pa�je�t�cWd�� e�v`� ,'%2 g 8-5 6 9 5 'p"'�asn��°e%tti�"�°t���. t � _ pr�nc�Pa �ncom �POthij�'and s��res4ed�*j: S01�ns a���4 mst1ty���an ��ra °^"�i� at'ow�'°��pyWtc ti���RK the�e� pated:paY�sµ_o g�-05o�t^h— ���� Orville E. Anderson, Donaltl P. Del Fiacco, David H. Hozza, Robert S Ivester, Kenneth J. L nch, Willie Mae Wilson, Ron Maddox ^�'l��'�s�s y y �>I�'ftEC�O EO � PAPER CAarrman . , � NOTICE of hearing on the Redevelopment Plan for the Communi�y Development Program, CD Year I, Saint Paul, Minnesota. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to Resolution of the Council of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota that a public hearing will be held by and before the Council of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota in the Council Chambers in the City Hall and Court House, Saint Paul, Minnesota, on the lOth day of June, 1975 , at 10 o'clock a.m. , upon the Redevelopment Plan for the Community Development Program, CD Year I, Saint Paul, Minnesota, which Plan proposes planning on a city-wide basis for future community development activities, conservation of the existing housing stock on a city-wide basis through rehabilitation loans and related activities, and the continuation of redevelopment and Community Development activities in the Phalen Area, Concord Terrace Area, Summit-University Area, West Midway-South St. Anthony Park Area, Thomas-Dale Area, Central Core and Seven Corners Areas , and West Seventh Street Area within the City of Saint Paul. Copies of the Redevelopment Plan for the Community Development Program, CD Year I, Saint Paul, Minnesota, and related documents including a Program For Implementation which identifies all Community Development activities proposed under the Redevelopment Plan are on file with the City Clerk and in the offices of the Housing and Rede- velopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota and available for inspection during regular business hours . That all real property identified for acquisition under said Redevelopment Plan is listed in the Program For Implementation and the owners of record will be further notified by certified mail of the public hearing. That upon said public hearing the Council shall consider the ♦ • . � � , . Redevelopment Plan for the Community Development Program, CD YEar I, Saint Paul, Minnesota, and the Community Development activities in said Plan proposed and determine whether (1) the real property to be acquired would not be made available for redevelopment without the financial aid provided under the Community Development Funding Agree- ment with the United States of America, (2) the Redevelopment Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the locality as a whole, for redevelopment of the Redevelopment Plan are as by private enterprise, (3) the Redevelopment Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the locality as a whole, and (4) the Redevelopment Plan makes provision toward development of a viable urban community in Saint Paul including decent housing and a suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities principally for persons of low and moderate income. That all persons interested or concerned in said matters shall be given full opportunity to be heard thereor. at said public hearing. ROSE MIX ` Dated: May 30, 1975 CITY CLERK -2- .. _ , � . - r r � r r � r ` � � r �� � ,r■r r■r � . i . , � i � ' _ i �� � <.� � ..,� ,J � J� I . � I i . , . . • - , . �, h � � i � . � � � � � ' . � ' . i I i 1 . . . . , � � . � ' . , ' . ' • . ' ' ' . .. -. .. ' . , . • �.' ' , . . • , •� ' .� • ' • ' ' I ` _ . ' . 'I . __ , . k • � 4 . � I I { -- • i • . _ I � � , , + j � i . ' � • • � p • ; I � � � • �, � . ;� • � . � � � � � � -- . , I � r' . ,._: . ;;., . : , . , . , _ �� � � � �� � � � � � �� � � � � � '� � � , � . . . . . � . . I. . . 4 � . . . . . � . � . . ' � .• . . I . . . . � . . . . . . . ' . ♦ � .. . I . . . . . � . . . � . « , i . . , � � . , � , .. � . � � � � . .. . . . .. . II . . ♦ . . . . • . - . ' .. III . � . � � . . ' I � a . • . � � . . , � ' . � . , ; . . . '� i . , _ II . . . . . . . . . . ' . ' . . •. '6• ' . , . . . � . �. ' .. � . • , • . : I� : . . , : ' • : _ .. .. . I� . . ' . �I � I I � --._._.___�_.________----______.�-----°- _ _ __ .. --- ---- _�__. ___ .----_ _.__. -------- ___._.._._._. ..._____._.._.__. �._._____._._ I . . � , • . ; • � � , II . I � i I . � . ' j _._ . � • . II, � -� j . II I !I � � , • � • • • • � . � • - i � � I � ' � � • • • • �i � I � i • i I ' � ! � - � � � � . i � I ! � ,.�.� I � � � � � � � .� � � � � � � � 2-20-75 PROGRAM SUt�4(ARY History of Urban Rdevelopment in St. Paul � Since 1950, St. Paul has been a participant in Nederal Urban Renewal Programs. These began with the U. S. Housing Act of 1949, a slum cle�rance program, and . proceeded through various modifications to include housing rehabilitation, • business redevelopsaent, and public improvements as eligible activities. The • mnst xecent redevelopment activities have been carried on under the Neighborhood Development Program (NDP) which began in 1969 under NDP, specific areas of the City were identifi:ed as project areas, with the stipulation that federal monies for NDP could be spent only in those areas. Housin� and Community Development Act of 1974 The Housing and Coaununity Development Act (HCD Act)� of 1974, which was signed into law in August of 1974, consolidates not only previous housing legislation but also several HUD categorical programs. It assigns much more responsibility to the local level of government in that the guidelines for spending of CD monies are much less specific than those for previous programs. What this means for St. Paul is that a single block grant is now available which can be used to continue or initiate programs such as renewal, housing rehabilit- ation, planning, related human services, the provision of public services, and citizen psrticipation. A ma�or guide that is carried over from previous programs is that activities should benefit principally persons of low and moderate in- come. Local matching funds are not required; however, the City must submit an annual application and prepare annual reports. The Community Development program has been funded for three years and will provide the City of St. Paul with an annual $18.8 million. The Com�nunity Development (CD) program broadens the pos�ibilities for types of activities which are eligible to be funded. By omitting the requirement that the activities take place in only a few selected areas of the City, the CD program also provides the capability of serving this entire City. Hawever, the funding level remains the same as when only a few specific areas were expected to be served. ■� � � � � r � � � � r � ■� � � , Program Sumnary � 2-20-75 _ Another major revigion the CD Act makes is in the area of citizen participation. NDP required that a structured commnunity organization be set up in each project area, with specific legal powers. The CD Act specifies only that the applicant (the City of St. Paul) certify that "adequate citizen participation" has taken • � � place in the process of developing the application for funding. . In summary, the intent of the CD Act is to establish a 'biable urban community". In order to do this the City of St. Paul must take a c anprehensive view of community development, including tqpes of activities that have not previously " been eligible for funding;. and it must take a serious look at the role of citizen participation in both long-range and short-�erm planning decisions. Procedures Th� following is a summary of the procedures used to establish goals and policies and to plan activities which will carrq out those goals and policies. After the signing of the Housing and Community Development Act in August, 1974, the '+�ayar pz�' C:.� ...,.._,..�, :^�:t,.,t a Y c�� �, ::::i�:� t;. 3�v�a�g t::� .:��3i��ti�:: 1 iV VNLL�t�.aL iLai lY �'.M iL 1V�. for CD Year I. The City P2anning Department was to take the lead role, with the assistance of an inter-agency task force (which became known as the CD Staff Task Force), Participating on this task force were staff from the Planning Department and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority; and representatives from the offices of the Mayor, City Administrator, Budget Director and City Councfl. Also attending many of the meetings were communitq organizers and representatives of coffinunity groups. The City Planning Commission (the Planning Advisory Board appointed by the Mayor) was designated as the official city-wide citizens' review body. The Task Force began work in September, 1974 by developing objectives and policiee for first year programs. After being reviewed by citizen groups, the Planning Cormnission, the Mayor and the City Council, Chese goals and' objectives were � adopted by City Council in Nvvember, 1974. . � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Progras Sucmnarq , 2-20-75 Community organizations were then invited to pre3ent specific program proposals to the CD Staff Task Force. A series of sessions were held for this purpose which provided time for interaction between staff and community organizations. , The outcome of this process was a listing of program priorities for each ' neighborhood of the City. By the end of December, 1974, the Staff Task Force had made preliminary recommendations for budgeting of the $18.8 million for CD Year I. A major portion o� these recommendations were taken. from the proposals originally made by the community organizations. ; ' . � In January, 1975, a final series of public meetings were sponsored by the Planning Commission 'in order to present the staff recoc�nnendations. The .recommendations were sent on to the Mayor and by the end of February, 1975, the City Council had re- vfewed and given its approval so that the application could be submitted to HUD. Citizen Participation Process Some explanation is needed as to how the "adequate citizen participation" require- �aent was met in St. Paul. When the Staff Task Force first began me�ting (in Sept., 1974) those attending agreed that a definite structure is needed to assure adequate involvement of the community, fn all plann�ng and implementation programs rather � than just for the CD application. However, given the limited time that could be used fn assembling the first application, it was decided that several series of public meetings and hearings would have to suffice. When the budget for CD Year I was developed, $2b7,000 was included as the estimated cost of providing each of a number of districts in the City with office space and staff for a neighborhood citizen participation office which would carry on organi- zational activities and publish a newsletter. No recommendations were made by the Staff Task Force as to how many districts there would be, how the boundaries would be drawn, or what powers and responsibilities the neighborhood offices should have. Thege determinations are expected to be made by those attending a series of open forums which began in January, 1975. Recommendations will then be submitted to the City Council for consideration and adoption. - 3 - � � � � � � � -� � � � � � � � Program Sunnnary 2-20-75 At this writing, the forums have elected officers, adopted �tobert's Rules, , and established four (4) co�nittees to make recommendationa on 1.) Function of citizen participation . , 2.) Internal structure and process � , 3.) Number, sizes and boundaries of districts � 4.) Staffing and financing. ' When the participants have succeeded in developing a citizen particiPation plan and have gained the approval of the City Council, a permanent structure will be set up for involvement of residents in those functions of city government stated in the plan. - 4 - ' � � � � � � � . � � � � � � � � A. STATEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT OB.TECTIVES The primary overall development objective in the .City of Saint Paul is to eliminate and/or ameliorate those existing conditions which serve to impair the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the citizens of the city of Saint Paul, and which also serve to inflict an economic blight upon existing private investment in some areas, and threafen the sources of public revenue. The conditions which have been found_ to exist which cause the above noted * factors include unsafe and unsanitary housing conditions, overcrowding, build-. ing obsolescence or faulty arrangement in building design or improvement, . deleterious land use, lack of adequate light, ventilation or sanitary facili- ties, inadequate public facilities, such as parks, playgrounds, schools, streets, sewer facilities, or other equally deleterious conditions. There _ also has been found to be an inadequate supply of decent, safe, and sanitary . ' . housing in the City of Saint Paul, parti�cularly for families of low .and moderate incomes and 'for the elderly, and a primary objective of this Redevel- opment Plan is to overcome the conditions noted above through public inter- vention so that private enterprise will achieve the means and receive the encouragement to provide such ilecent, safe, and sanitary housing for the resi- , uenLS ui Saii�� raui. Specific objectives to be achieved within the context of the foregoing are as follows: • 1. To restore, conserve, rehabilitate, and foster a neighborhood residential em�ironment conducive to urban living £or all segments af �he population. The neighborhood should have amenizies sufficient for modern needs, be safe, be adequately serviced, and be visually attractive and economically atable. 2. To restore, conserve, and enhance, where feasible and desirable, the identity of existing neighborhoods in Saint Paul by rehabilitating to the extent possible, the exis�ing structures in the area and by strengthening those elements which serve to give identity to an area, such as neighbor- hood gathering places, .education and recreational facilities, and similar elements tending to characterize and/or give identity to each sub-neighbor- hood. ` � � � � i' �' i' �li� �li� � � �. .� 3. To provide for efficient use of land sa that each particular land use will function witihout adversely affecting or being adversely affected by adjacent land uses. New construction should be physically and visually compatible in design and scale with nearby parts of. the exist- ing neighborhood. . . 4. To remove blight and conditions of deterioration by; . a. Encouraging and fostering voluntary rehabilitation of property by . awners. All rehabilitation wi�l, as a minimum, meet all applicable � codes of the City of Saint Pau1. In addition, property owners will be encouraged to meet additional rehabilitation objectives intended � � � to assure the livability, attractiveness, and marketability of � properties, Such additional rehabilitation olijectives are set � � forth in Appendix A of this Redevelopment Plan, . b. Undertaking a program of public rehabilitation of deteriorated build- ings in order to demonstrate rehabilitation feasibility, and public acquisition of deteriorated 'ouiiain�� iur Les�ie �v Yd��ies �aYa�ic . of rehabilitating them, � c. Undertaking a program of acquisition and demolition of buildings blighted to the extent of being incapable of being rehabilitated, substandard buildings, or buildings otherwise determined to represent blighti�g influences. • d. Undertaking a program of code enforcement with the appropriate City departments to ensure that hazardous and unsanitary conditions are either corrected tihrough rehabilitation or elimin3ted through demoli- tion. The teztn code enforcement for purposes of this Redevelopment Plan shall mean substantial structural repairs, alteratfons, or demo- lition of a building to conform to local housing codes. 5. To provide for the development of new housing, both multi-family and single- family, which will maximize housing opportunities for citizens of all income levels particularly in areas whera opRortunities have heretofore been limited. The intent of this objective is to reduce the possibility � � �` i' i' i' iriri� i� � r� � �. �. . of concentrations of any one incoane group and ensure the freedom of choice for all citizens with regard to housing Cypes and location. . 6. .To foster the economic stability of resident-serving commercial facili- ties and to encourage new private imiestment by members of the comaiunity. 7. To achieve safe and adequate vehicular and pedestrian circulation pat- , terns and capacity. � � ' 8. Ta meeC the educational, recreational, spiritual, shopping, service and other needs of the residents within their neighborhood; to assure that the human services needs of the community are met. � 9. �o encourage the continuing participation by the membera of the community . . in the planning and programming of renewa], activities for their respective � neighborhoods. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � B, �General Land Use Plan � For those areas of the city which have either undergone renewal activities in � the past or are currently part of an ongoing program, general land use plans and maps have been adopted. These plans are hereby incorporated by reference �nd made a part hereof. - , . • During CD Year I, as comprehensive and project planning for new areas of the city fs accomplished, specified land use plans will be developed to the detail of those referenced above and submitted for adoption as part of the CD Year II program. These plans will be developed within the framework of over all city wide . policies and comprehensive plans as delineated by the city planning department and will rely for their foundation upon existing documents such as the Zoning �ordinance which is currently unde.rgoing substantial revision. Specific land use categories including type of uses permitted will be defined as will such items as major circnlation routes, densities, building requirements and public facilities. . � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � C. URBAN RFNEWAL TECHNIQUES TO BE USED TO ACHIEVE PLAN OBJECTIVES While annual funding amounts rather than deCerminations of need gov- ern the extent of the renewal activities which can be undertaken by the � city, the following techniques sre cited as a means of achieving as many of the objectives set forth in prior sections of this document as possible. 1. ' To aid in the conservation of existing housing atock, rehabilitation , loans and grants as well as technical assistance will be made available to home owners to improve their properties to meet local codes. 2. Properties which prove to be economically infeasible for the current owner to rehabilitate, or where the current owner is unwilling to rehabilitate the property to code standards, may . � . be purchased and rehabilitated for aubsequent resale to families of low and moderate income or sold to families who have demonstrated their willingnesa and capability to under- take the rehabilitation. 3. Existing housing which is currently underutilized due to its �n�+ e�D�+na� 1�t� � �7��1 �A�ww7..� n `w�1 .y�..w�.. �d. FJ �e l..t 1 . �t..+.�...J �� �v a3 V ra�.. v� •. L� 441V a�V fii�: Li�tOL��.1011r or physically incapable of providing routine maintenance, may be purchased, rehabilitated and resold at a reduced price to a larger family of moderate income. , 4. Structures exhibiting hazardous, unsanitary conditions will be subject to code enforcement by the City. • 5. Vacant land which is currently underutilized and as such exerts an adverse influence upon the surrounding neighborhood may be acquired and subsequently disposed of for redevelopment to meet plan objectives. 6. Properties which are substandard, exert blighting influences, are infeasible to rehabilitate, or are needed for public purposes or to effect ob,jectives .of the plan may be acquired and demolished. 7. Construction, reconstruction or expansion of public and semi-public facilities contributing to the viability, attractiveness and safety of the community will be secured. Such facilities shall include parks, playgrounds, schools, churches, coromunity centers, utilities and sewers, libraries, and similar facilities. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 8. Relocation of site occupants displaced by public action will be undertaken with the intent to assist those diaplaced in securing adequate replacement housing which meets their needs and is within their means. ' • 9. Home ownership will be encouraged, particularly for families of low and moderate incomes. 10. Safe and adequate vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns will be achieved through: a. . The redesign and reconstruction of major streets where necessary. � b. The elimination o£ reduct�on of 'unnecessary thru-traf�iC. c. The provision of off-street parking where feasible by . commerical and other uses which generate vehicular traffic. d. The construction or reconstruction of sidewalks, pedestrianways, street lights, traffic mntrol devices and other facilities �.iht�rP rnn(1�tinr�c �.,�rra„r anr,j t;��1PYP c+�nli amnrnnn+�crtc �.�ill un� � r-'•-- hance the environment of a neighborhood and sugment rehabilitation • and/or redevelopment activities. 11. Sites will be made available for new �commercial construction and the grouping of commercial facilities at appropriate locations where such facilities can be mutually supporting and provide greater convenience and service to residents. � 12. The coordination aMOng public and private agenciea,will be sought to ensure that the human services needs of the community will be met. 13. Maximum citizen involvement will be encouraged through a structure now being developed by the Citizen Participation Forum in cooperation with the City government.. � � � � � � � •� � � � � � � �'; � � ;� � . � � Although ats�ing of renewal activities is required due ta '' � � limited funding sources, it should be noted thst the city � � will continue to investigate every means to implement necessary actions within a reasonahle time frame. Recent � legislation allowing for the creation of development districts, � garking dfstricts, the sale of bonds to finance commercial and � j • industrial development, and the utilization of tax increment financing will be applied �ere feasible to expand the city's capability to implement this plan. � ___ � ._ ._______.__..--___ . .__ ._..._. ___ ::_ __ � . � � � �� i � - � � � , � I � { . � ; � i i i . . . . , � . � �1 � � � � � �' � •� � � � � � � � D. LAND DISPOSITION . Properties acquired by the designated city agency pursuant to the plan may be disposed of by any of the following methods or combination thereof: � 1. Demolish the structure thereon and dispose of the land in accordance with this plan. . 2. Sell the property subject to its being rehabilitated to meet local applicable , codes. 3. Rehabilitate the property to meet local applicable codes and sell the property at its fair market value or lease at fair rental value. 4, Retain or sell the residential property for development of low- or moderate- income housing. 5. Dispose of property to appropriate public entities for purpose of providing � supporting facilities and project improvements. , The designated city agency may elect to dispase of the properties individually or in combinations, whichever method will best accomplish the purpos�s of this Plan. In any case, all disposition of sites will follow the requirements of State and Federal laws. Specific additional guidelines governing land disposition are cited below, 1. Land Use and Building Restrictions • For neighborhoods where land use plans and redevelopment plans have been previously adopted, land use controls as set forth in those documents will be applicable to disposition of properties, Building Restriction provisions further detailing these land use controls and governing density, bulk, open space, setbacks, parking, circulation, etc. , will be provided as parcels become available for sale or lease. 2. Circulation Requirement For previous NDP and renewal areas, land use maps have been adopted which indicate all major streets through and on the periphery of the neighborhood, The number of local streets will be limited to only those needed for access to property and will be designed to discourage through traffic. Connections to major streets will.be limited to only those necessary and these intersections will incorporate such devices as medians, turning slots, and traffic controls to insure maximum safety. These same general objectives will play a major role in the development of plans for new areas of the city. : � � � � � � � � � � � � � i � 3. Redeveloper's Obligations - . The general requirements to be imposed by the Contract for Sale between the redeveloper's of property and the city's implementation agency are: a. To develop the land purch�sed in accordance with the controls and objectives of this Redevelopment Plan. � � b, To commence and complete. the building of improvements on the land within a reason�ble period of time as determined by the implementation agency. c. Not to resell the land before improvements are made without the prior consent of the implementation agency. � ; • ' . d, Not to discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin in the sale, lease, transfer, or occupancy of the land. • e. The contract and disposition documents will spell out in detail the provisions, standards and criteria for achieving applicable objectives, requirements and regulations contained in the Redevelopment Plan. 4. Cnmmitment to New Housing Opportunities To increase housing opportunities for citizens of all income levels, priority will be given in matters of land disposition to those proposals which will . result in Che development of housing which serves the needs of income groups previously unmet in certain areas of the city. 5. Urban Design Obiective and Control . The implementation agency maq contract for sale of property upon receipt and acceptance of preliminary plans, but normally will not dispose of property under such contracti prior to receipt and acceptance of construcfi ion drawings, The agency shall retain the right of design review and may reject any proposal which is felt to be inconsistent with the goals and objectives of the Plan. Specific design objectives and criteria wil� be established for each parcel prior to disposition, and proposals will be evaluated in the light of these objectives and cri�eria, Such objectives and criteria will generally seek to achieve the Development Ob�ectives set forth in Section B. of this Redevel- opment Plan. � - r � � �■■� � � � � � � � �■ � _ � � � 6, Duration of Controls The development controls and regulations will be incorporated into the deeds conveying land and shall be maintained and continued in effect for a period of thirty (30) years from the date of approval of the Redevelopment Plan by the City Council of Saint Paul. • � � � � � � � � � � � � r � � �� r � � � � :; E. OTHER PROVISIONS NECESSARY TO MEET STATE ANB LOCAL REQUIREML:NTS 1. Non-Discrimination Every contract for sale, lease or redevelopment of property within the project ; area will include prohibitions against land speculation, require compliance � � with all State and local laws in effect from time to time, prohibit discrim- � � ination or segregation by reasons of race, religion, color, sex or national ; • j origin in the sale, lease or occupancy of the property, and require that this latter provision be made a covenant running with the land and be binding upon 1 � the redeveloper and every successor in interest to the property. � � 2. Vacations, Dedications and Covenants � Vacations and dedications of public rights-of-way shall be accomplished by i separate actions in accordance with State law and local ordinances and will ��� � be initiated by the agency or redeveloper. I 3. Citizen Participation � It is the intent of this Redevelopment Plan, and of the governing body of the Ci�y of Saint Paul, that active participation by the citizens of the City of Saint Paul be encouraged in the continuing planning and implementation of the renewal program. Therefore, to the extent possible in a manner consistent with Federal, State, and local law policy and regulations, it is the intent that all activities to be undertaken under the provisions of this Plan be undertaken witk� the knowledge and advice of the citizens' committee designated by the City Council, ' . � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � F. PROVISIONS FOR AMENDING PLAN The Redevelopment Plan may be modified at any time by the City of Saint Paul, in the manner provided by law, , \ . ,,..a , ..,xrn,�..__�,.,,,� .,.......T......._ _ _ _ ,_ ... , ,,._ . _ . . .. ,�,,... � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � /� A. ACTION YEAR PROGRAM The action -program tor CD Year I as developed.by an inter-agency task force established by the Mayor and City Council emphasizes three major themes consistent with the objectives set forth in the Redevelopment Plan; plan- ning, conservation of existing housing stock through rehabilitation and related activities, and the continuat.ion of Community Development activi- • ties within neighborhoods currently undergoing renewal with the assis- tance of previous Federal programs. 1. Planning Program The planning program during CD Year I seeks to address overall city � � needs and the specific requests of areas of the city. $873,000 is recommended in the proposed budget for this activity; $252,000 to the City Planning Department and $621,000 to Che Housing and Redevelopment . Authority. The line item budget detail for each of these allocations is to be developed by the respective agency director. Through this division of responsibilitie$, it �aill be the function of � the City Plannine Deoartment to d�velon vnnAral , ,rnror�71 �it�_wi�iA �19�Q and policies in conjunction with appropriate city departments during � CD Year I that include Che following: . a. Housing and updating of the Housing Assistance Plan. b. Economic concerns c. Parks and recreation , d. Human resources and services (crime prevention, elderly services, day care, multi-purpose centers, etc,) e. Em�ironmental issues. f. Public improvements. In addition, the City Planning Department will develop an evaluative mechanism.to •review CD programs, � It is recac�ended that the City Planning Department and HRA provide a planning and design team, funded by Community Development funds, to undertake area planning in both the neighborhoods new to community development and those with ongoing programs. Pro�ect planning in � � � � � . � � � � � � � � � � neighborhoods shall be undertaken by HRA. Plana :�nd programs develnped ahall be consistent wiCh policies snd comp�ehensive planning determina- tions of the City Ylanning DepartmPnt and•Commission. . Both city-wide and area planning will be accomplished by working in concert with citizen organizations. Approximately $267,OOO ,has been budgeted to fund citizen organizations yet to be established. � . 2. Rehabilitation During CD Year I, it is proposed that emphasis be placed on the conserva- tion o£ the city's existing housing stock. To achieve this objective of conserving the housing stock, the primary tools wi,ll be low-interest � . loans and grants. Resources for the loans and grants will be derived from Che following: . a. Federal Loan and Grant Program � . b. Veterans Administration (VA) , Federal Housing Administration (FHA) , and private funds. c. The State of Minnesota program. • � u. �1'Lc� �'s�y Oi, vaitli. idul�ar 'v0[Yultig ttui.nUY'iZa�lOII IOI C1L�►-wine SCL1Vltl@S. e. Community Development funds. The probable total loan and grant funds which are expected to be used from these programs through June 30, 1976, total approximately $4.5 million. . The federal program offers low-interest loans to homeowners in Neighbor- hood Development Program (NDP) areas. These rehabilitation resources will continue as a separate federal program until August 22, 1975. It is anticipated that during 1975, $1.2 million of these funds will be available. A total of $2 million in city general obligation bonds, if authorized by the Legislature, will be available to the HRA to offer low-interest loans and grants in the former designated I�IDP areas. ' � � � � � � �: � � � � � � � � � In 1974, the Minnesota LegisLature authorized the Minnesota Hous�tng Finance Agency (MFHA) to sell up to $100,000,000 in revenue bonds and the proceeds from the bond sale would be used to oper�te a state-wide housing rehabilitation program. Through this program, eligible home- nwners will be able to obtain low-interest loans to improve their homes. (While due to current econamic conditions, the MHFA has not � . been able to market tt�e bonds, it is expected that the bonds will be sold this year.) The 1974 LegislaCure also authorized the City of Saint Paul to sell u.p to $3.0 million in general obligation bonds for housing rehabilita- tion, The city of Saint Paul has developed and begun implementation of a loan and grant program for owner-occupants of low and moderate-income. Bonds in the amount of $1�.5 million have been sold and will be expended during � � this program year. , During CD Year I, it is proposed that the rehabili�ation resources available to the city be used, for th� most part, in a coordinated program with emphasis on concentrating resources in small areas of. from four to six blocks. Within the NDP neighborhoods, fihese rehabili- - tation areas are designated as Identified Treatment Areas (ITA's) , while in other communities, these areas are being called Concentrated Rehab- ilitation Areas (CRA's) . While the terms are different, the primary objective--conservation of existing housing--is the same. In both types of areas, Community Development resources will be used to comple- . ment the rehabilitation programs. Zn both areas, complementary programs, including public impravements, code enforcement, relocation, and removal o� vacant, hazardous buildings are to be used. The ITA will also include additionnl tools for which funds have been provided. These include spot acquisition and demolition, emergency grants, and acquisition for rehabilitation and resale (house recycling) . The Goncentrated Rehabili- tation Areas have not yet been d2signated by the City Council. CD funds will be used to supppement .the city rehabilitation funds. Rehabilitation loans and grants will also be available to eligible appliGants through- , out the city, on an individual application basis. �■ � ■� � � � �■■ . � � � � � � � �r The following is a listing of rehabilitation and related activities to be implemented by CD Year I funding: (This does not include additional rehabilf.tation loan and grant funds referred to abave.) 1. Rehabilitation loans to supplement the .city-wide $400,000 and NDP areas. . 2. Rehabilitation grants to supplement the city-wide 600,000 and NDP areas. ' 3. Relocation payments in conjunctinn with code 300,000 enforcement in Concentrated Rehabilition areas. 4. Public improvements in Concentrated Rehabilitatio� 900,000 areas. � S. Rehabilitation and community organization staff , 941,000 needed to implement the program. Within or adjacent to several of the priority rehabilitation areas, . specific improvement activities which are s�tpportive of the residential stability of the neighborhoods have been programmed for CD Year I. 1. Housing Recycling Pilot Program $400,000 2. Removal of Hazardous, Vacant Buildings and Site 725,000 Clearance 3. Implementation of a Rodent Control Program 50,Q00 4. Douglas School Site Park 100,000 Improvement of surplus school property for use as a neighborhood playground , 5. Union Gospel Mission 144,000 To assist in the acquisition of a site for the ' provision of housing of last resort to meet the needs of displaced individuals with special problems 6. Neighborhood Playgrounds 40,000 To provide temporary improvements of surplus school sites to be used on an interim basis as neighborhood playgrounds. Locations are at Lincoln, Phalen and Sibley School sites. 7. Hamline-Hague Playground 75,000 Improvements to provide needed neighborhood recrea- tion area 8. Marydale Park 35,000 Tc .complete improvement program of existing city park previously funded through a Federal Open Space Grant 9. Riverside Park Improvements to utilize surplus school site as neigh- 97,000 borhood recreational facility 10. Kipps-GleiinTerrace Sewer Project Study 10,000 Study to determine the feasibxlity and costs of con- structing a sewer system to serve 105 households in � the Kipps-Glenn area., � - r � ■� � � � . ■■� � �■ � . � � � ■� 3. Continuation of On-goin�;. Community Development Activities. For the past five � to eight years, several areas of the City have undergone intensive planning analysis resulting in the formation � and adoption of general land use plans accompanied by specific redevelopment pla�s. With t�►e assistance of federal and local funds made available through previous urban renewal programs . such as the Neighbrohood Development Program, substantial re- � newal activities such as area wide rehabili.tation, public im- provements, redevelopment of severly deteriorated residential � areas and the revitalization of the Central Business District have already been undertaken. While these efforts have been considerable, insufficient annual fuading has limited the scope of - these undertakings and many unmet needs continue to require concentrated efforts and funding. It is therefore the intent of the City of Saint Paul, that while extensive comprehensive and project planning is being undertaken throughout new areas of the City during CD Year I, a major portion of the funding should be channeled to redevelopment activities within those areas where needs have clearly been identified and plans completed. By reference, these adopted general land use plans are herein incor- porated and made a part of this document and will serve to, guide activities within these neighborhoods until such time as they are either amended or superseded through the development and adoption of more definitive plans. The following proposals are identified by area for implementation during CD Year I, CQNCORD TERRACE Peter's Meats - DannY's Rubbish In order to complete tfie renewal plan by elimiating remaining incompatible uses fram a redeveloped residential area within this urban renewal project and to increase the m<�rketability of exisCing vacant land by enhancing the environmental quality, the followfng properties are proposed far acquisi- tion and clearance: � : � � � � � � •� � � � � � � � Block/Parcel Ad3ress � 2-1 344-52 South Robert Street 2-2 Vacant Lot 3-2A 353-357 South Robert Street 3-6 361-71 South Robert SCreet $350,000 � , PHALEN AItEA , ITA � To sugment rehabilitation activities previously undertaken in this area as part of a federally funded Code Enforcement project, certain renewal tools which were not available through the Code � Enforcement Program will be utilized in the improvement of areas where rehabilitatiorr alone cannot accompliah revitalization. As an initial effort, the area bounded by Jenks, Case, Greenbrier and Arcade Streets .is to be designated as an Identified Treatment Area. $300,000 Pavne Avenue Parkin� As a means of maintaining and improving the viability of the Payne Avenue Business District, the following properties are identified for acquisition and clearance to provide sites for commercial ' parking. Community Development funds programmed for this acti- vity are identified in ane�rmarked contingency fund and will be utilized only if other funding methods such as parking district legislation or direct assessment programs prove to be infeasible. Le�al Descrigtion Address South 25' of Lot 16, 17, 18 964 Payne Avenue Block 17, Arlington Hills South 24' of North 100` of 966 Payne. Avenue Lot 16, 17, 18, Block 17 Arlington Hills Lot 19, Block 17 65I Case Street Arlingtcn Hills $100,000 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � SUMMrT-ITNIVERSITY Comprehensive planning and renewal efforts have been continually and intensively undertaken in this sector of the city over the last decade, most recently through the aid of the Neighborhood Development and Model Cities Programs. Although substantisl accrnnplishments, especially in the areas of rehabilitation, new housing construction and public improvements are visible through- ., out the neighborhood, there are still several areas of severe � deterioration. To ensure the sucess of these past efforts and investments by continuing the attack of blight and deterioration, the city is committing a major share of Cammunity Development funds for the physical and social proposals outlined beZow. Madel Cities Health Clinic To contLnue community health services, funds are programmed to operate the Model Cities Health Clinic fram April 1, 1975 to June 30, 1976. $480,000 wiiiows 5enior �icizens Genter , . This program will continue to provide day care services, � includi.ng tranaportation, leisure time activities, and health and counseling services for a minimum of 'LS senior citizens, with noon meals 5 days per week for those seniors; in addition, hot noon meals will be delivered daily to 100 homebound seniors. Other senior citizens living in the � Model Neighborhood will also benefit from the infonnation and referral services provided. $224,000 Hallie Q. Brown Senior Citizens Center � This program will continue to provide a facility at the Martin Luther King Center where senior citizens may congre- gate for leisure time activities and may receive informa- tion and referrals for housing, health services and legal or financial counseling. In addition, 140 seniors may receive noon meals five days per week. $143,000 _ � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Ne�hborhood Justice Center This program will provide legal and social services for Model Neighborhood residents who are either already imolved � with the criminal justice system becaus� of arrest or convic- tion or who may be prone to commit criminal offenses. These services wi21 extend to the client's family, in order to promote � understanding of the criminal justice system and of the individual ' problems of the clients. The $30,000 noted here :is a match for Law Enforcement Assistance Administration and other funds, , $ 30,000 . Demonstration Grant Program , Grants of $1,000 per bedroom up to $3,000 will be given to � � qualified households who construct new single-family homes in the Mode1 Neighborhood. The purpose of this grant is to encourage higher quality construction and to provide incentive for residents of the Model Neighborhood to remain in the area. $ 75,000 � Selby Avenue Improvement � Acquisition and relocation funds are programmed for acquisi- tion of the following deteriorated structures in the commer- . cial area of Selby Avenue between Dale and Victoria to initiate the general improvement of the envirornnent. Specific reuse � of the sites made available through this action will be determined by detailed econrnnic studies to be undertaken in the early part of the action year. Block/Parce2 Address 123-15 181 Grotto 123-16 739 Selby 123-17, 733 Selby 123-18 731 Selby � 123-19 727 Selby - , .,.. . ..: r. ..:. .. . _ _ _ _. _ _ . _ _ �. _ _ � . ._ _ _� _ 123-22 707 Selby 1Z3-26 693�695 Selby 1z3-Z7 689-691 Selby 123-28 685 Selby 123-'L9 681 Selby � • 124-10 617-679 Selby 124-11 67.1-673 Selby 124�12 665 Selby 124-13 657 Selby 1'L4-14 653-655 Selby 1'L4-15 651 Selby � � 1'L4-16 639-649 Selby 1'14-17 637 Selby 1'L4-18 627-629-631-633-635 5elby . 124-19 6'L1-6'L3-6"LS Selby $341,000 ITA • - As part of the last NDP year program, the area bounded by Interstate 94 to Marshall Avenue, between Dale and Victoria was designated as an Identified Treatment Area (ITA) and activities as defined for ITA's in the Redevelopment Plan section of this document are under way. As Chis is a two- year program, funds are herein programed to undertake the � second phase which will complete the improvements. $600,000 Northeast Quadrant Improvements Activities begun under NDP in the Northeast Quadrant of the Sumnit-University NDP area have been directed toward Che redevelopment of this fifty-acre area as a new residential in-Cown neighborhood. The last improvement effort required is the construction of new streets and a public park. Com- munity Development funds are programmed for �the completion. of this activity. $241,000 � � � � � � � •� � � � � � � � � St. James In an effort to upgrade the area bounded by St. Anthony, ' Dale, Fuller and SC. Albans and to encourage the rehabilita- tion of existing houses where feasible, �the following sCructures are programmed for acquisition and clearance. . B1ocklParcel Address 46-24 643 Central 46-26 ' 633 Central 46=27 631 Central - 46-28 623 Central - 393 Dale 55-18 671 SC. Anthony 55-20 6b3 St. Anthony 55-21 659 St. Anthony 55-`LS 643 St. Anthony 55-'16 639 St. Anthony 55-27 635 St. Anthony SS-29 627 St. Anthony $243,000 Southeast Quadrant - Blair House The Southeast Quadrant of Summit-University is designated in part , as a State Historic District. Recent years have witnessed a resurgent interest in this area by younger families and substantial restoration/ renovatioa activities are visible throughout the neighborhood. The Blair House (formerly the Angus Hotel) is scheduled for extensive renovation by a private concern with the intent of conversion to condo- minium housing. To provide an adequate site for off-street parking as a coc:�plement to this private effort, Coc�munity Development funds are budgeted for the acquisitior� and clearance of an adjacent apartment building. Hawever, this acquisition will proceed only upon receipt of firm cocmnitment that the Blair House renovation program willbe undertaken. These £unds are therefore idenCified in the earmarked contingency fund. Block/Parcel Address 137-16 151-155 Western " $225,000 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �� Marshall/Webster School Expansion In an efforC to conserve standard housing units which must � be cleared as part of Che Marshall/Webstar school expa�sian program, write-down funds are being programmed to undertake a house moving/rehabiiitation program which will attempt to ,. salvage twenty-two single-family homes. . $330,000 Concentrated Rehabilitation Area A concentrated rehabilitation effort begun in the area south- east of Hill School by the Ccm�inity Housing Corporation and HRA has had some initial impact on the stabilization of this residential secCor of the Sumnnit-University area. To complete these activities, CD funds are budgeted for rehabilitation loans and grants as well as code enforcement activities. . $400,000 HF.T.P \ . . HELP Development Corporation is intfie process of responding to ' the area's need for economic growth by developing a shopping � center at University and Dale. $500,000 of the total noted above will be used as equity funding for the shopping center. In addition, HELP will continue to upgrade the business climate of the Model'Neighborhood by providing technical and econanic � assistance to stimulate business opportunities for minorities and area residents. $100,000 will be used as seed money for loans to businesses; the remaining $259,000 is for administra- tion. $859,000 � � t � r � � � � � � � '� � � � � � � / � WEST MIDWAY-SOUTH ST. ANTHQiv'Y PARK . Territorial Road Housing Site To eliminate the last remaining concentration of seriously deteri- orated hou�ing north af University Avenue and canplement previous renewal activities and development, CD funds are budgeted for . the acquisition and clearance of �,he following properCies which will provide a site for the development of market-rate housing. , Block/Pareel Address 25-1 843-45 Raymond Avenue 25-38 876 Hunt Place . 25-40 2373 Ellis Avenue • '15-41 2375 Ellis Avenue : � � 33-1 821 Raymond Avenue 33-3 2314 Territorial Road 2366-68 Ellis Avenue 33-4 Vacant Land . $2 78,000 South St. Anthony Park In the final year of the Neighborhood Development Program, funds have been budgeted for the expansion and improvement of the • South Saint Anthony Park. To pravide this neighborhood with a complete recreational facility, CD funds are programmed fo'r the construction of a new playground building and the addition of tennis courts to the overall improvement program. $370,000 ITA As a continuation of activities centered within the residential protion of this project which were initiated under NDP, the area north of Universi�y Avenue and east of Highway 280 is being designated as an ITA,and CD funds are progratmned to carry out activities which are supportive of a sound residential area. $250,000 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Street Improvement Program To augment acCions proposed within the above ITA and encourage additional rehabilitation of private-housing units, CD funds are identified for the first of a two-phase cocnprehensive street improvement program. $409,000 � THOMAS-DALE ITA As a means of encouraging conservation of existing housing and eliminaeing seriously deteriorated struetures fram an otherwise stabile residentfal area, the area bounded by Victoria, Grotto, the alley between Englewood and Minnehahas and the alley between Thomas and Lafond is identified as an ITA,and CD funds are programmed to undertake a street improvement program as well as other activities aecessary to achieve this goal. $6�0,000 St. Adalbert's-Phase One \ NDP efforts focused in the eastern sector of the project have eliminated same of the most seriously deteriorated housing and produced .sites for the development of both new single-family homes and multi-family complexes. To continue the clearance of substandard t►ousing, increase the marketability of currently available sites and enhance the environmental quality of the area, the following parcels in the St. Adalbert's area are programmed for acquisition. Block/Parcel Address 85-3 254 Thomas 85-4 2S6 Thomas 85-6 268 Thomas ' 85-7 'L70 Thomas 85-11 279 Edmund - 584 Elfelt 85-12 277 Edmund � 85-13 269 Edmund - 271 Edmund t � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � . 1 � 85-16 257-'259 Ed�und - 86-3 238 Thomas 86-4 240-Z4'L Thomas , � 86-5 588 Galzier � 86-6 Z45-247 Edmund - 582 Galtier � � 86-7 243 Edmund 86-8 237 Edmund 86-9 233 Edmund - 235 Edmund ; � . . 86-10 229 Edmund ' 86-11 227 Edmund 92-2 560 Elfelt - 568 E2felt � • 92-3 283 Charles � $737,000 Arundel-Mackubin North Through several �years of NDP funding, the Arundel-Mackubin area has been transposed from a neighborhood of overcrowded, seriously deteriorated living conditions to one of new single-family homes on adequately sized lots supported by the reconstruction of public facilities. To continue this successful effort in adja- � cent blocks, the following properties are iden�ified for , acquisiti.on and clearance. Block/Parcel Address 21-3 716 Mackubin 21-4 714 Mackubin 21-5 712 Mackubin • z1=7 491 Van Buren 21-8 487. Van Buren 21-9 481 Van Buren � 21-11 473 Van BureTi 63-z8 485-487 Thomas . $289,000 i � � � � � � -� � � � � � � : � Wilder Square As a cosnplement to their development of a 299-unft housing complex recently completed on land made available through ' prior NDP activities, the Wilder Fouadation is also construct- ing a comm�unity center to serve the complex as well as the surrounding neighborhood. CD funds are budgeted to aasist in � , the operatiom of its programs. $ 54,000 �CBNTRAL CORE/SEVEN CORNERS Block 35 A comprehensive redevelopment program in the Seven Cwrners ' � area of the downtown has resulted in the construction of a Civic Center, a reorganization of traffic circulation and the provisian of a si.te for a major hotel/motel complex.�' To continue this program by eliminating inefficient and incompatible land uses and implemenC the street realignment program, CD funds are nrnarR�n�i fnr thA g�i,Y��t`f�^ �y ��,� r..�+ �_ .., _ �.y- .... �...iTi'.:aaa� �av�B�btC.y: . Block/Parcel Address 35-4B 166-174 W. Niath Street • 35-5 414 Exchange 35-6 406-408 Exchange , $2 81,000 WEST SEVE NrH STREET Davis School Site As the elemenCary school conso2fdation program has progressed in the city, several obsolete school buildings have been abandoned and thefr sites declared surplus property. The Davis School site in the West $eventh Street area is one of these properties. Through agreementa with the School Board, this property will be offered for the development of new housing. CD funds are programned to undertake unusual site pteparaCion work necessary to achieve this �development. , $ 35,000 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ■�■ �■■ �fiii ITA and Block 46 Previous NDP activities in the St. Stan's area have resulted in the construction of more than twenty new single-family homes within a two-block area. Complementing this redevelopment and the rehab- ilitation which has been accomplish�ed in adjacent blocks, is the ' reconstruction of streets and sidewalks. The area to the west is a relatively stabile residential neighborhood exhibiting only a limited amount of substandardness and that being on a scattered basis. To complete a comprehensive revitalization of this aub- neighborhood, the area defined as follows has been desigxiated as an ITA. From a point starting at the intersection of St. Clair . and Interstate 35-E, along the freeway to Duke, then south on Duke to Michigan, then east on Michigan to Richmond, then south on Richmond to St. Clair, then west on St. Clair to the point of origin. In addition to activitiea undertaken within this ITA acquisition is programmed for the following selected parcels wii.hin niocic 40, wnere a concentration�of substandardn�ss does exist. Block/Parcel Address 46-1 442 Banfil _ 46-2 159 Richmond 46-4 450 Banfil 46-5 454 Banfil • 46-8 468 Banfil 46-9 472 Banfil 46-11 482 Banfil 46-12 4$6 Banfil � 46-13 490 Banfil ' 46-14 494 Banfil � 46-15 496 Banfil 46-16 4�98 Banfil 46-17 158 Duke 46-18 160 Duke � 46-19 499 Goodhue � � � � � � � � � � � ' � � � � 46-20 497 Goodhue 46-21 495 Goodhue 46-23 487 Goodhue 46-26 467 Goodhue 46-31 449 Goodhue � 46-33 161 Richmond ' $650,000 Street Improvement Program To augment the acCivities of the ITA described above, a street improvement program is scheduled for undertaking. $500,000 . ' St. Stan's East Housing Site � � The area east of the St. Stan's housfng development exhibits deterioration as well as incompatible and inefficient land uses. A comprehensive redevelopment program including acqui- sition of the following properties and utilization of another . surplus school site is proposed for un�ertaking. This activity - wi21 result in a site for the development of new multi-family housing. Block/Parcel Address 41-20 136 Western 41-21 140 Western . 41-22 144 Western 41-23 371 Banfil 41-24 369 Banfil 41-25 365 Banfil 41-26 � 357 Banfil 41-29 347 Banfil 48-7 357 Goodhue 48-8 351-353 Goodhue 48-9 349 Goodhue 48-10 345 Goodhue � � � � � � � � �. � � � � � � � _ 55-1 553 West Seventh 55-2 360 Goodhue � 55-3 364 Goodhue 55-4 368-370 Goodhue 372 Goodhue 55-5 378 Goodh�e ' . 55-6 Playground . 55-7A 563 West Seventh Street � 567 West Seventh Street 571-571� West Seventh Street � 573-573� West Seventh 5treet i � . 55-7B 581-591 West Seventh Street ' $846,000 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � A. ELIGIBLE ACTIUITIES The primary objective of the Community Development Program ia "the develop- ment of viable urban communities, including decent housing and a suitable living envirorunenC and expanding economic opportunities, principally for " (Federal Re ister 570.200` Federal , persons of low and moderate-income, g � • assistance is provided for the sup�ort of Community Development activities which are directed toward the achievement of this overall objective. Although guidelines for the undertaking of a CD program are less restrictive � than those of previous programs and grant the local municipality more flexi- bility in the kinds of activities which may be initiated, all elements of the program must .as a minimum meet certain criteria as delineated in the . section of the Federal Register devoted to regulations governing Community Development. The following excerpt outlines those activities which are eligible for federal assistance through the Comcminity Development Program: � Subpart C • E13gible Activities (570.�U0) - (a) Grant assistance for a Community Development Program is • available for �he following activities: (1) Acquisition in whole or in part by purchase, lease, donation or otherwise of real prope rty (including sir rights, waCer rights, and other interests therein) which is: � (i) Blighted, deteriorated, deteriorating, undeveloped, � or xnappropriately developed from the standpoint of a sound comaaunity development and growth, as deter- mined by the recipient pursuant to State and local laws; (ii) Appropriate for rehabilitation or conservation acti- vities; (iii) Appropriate for the reservation or restoration of histosic sites, the beautification of urban land, the conservation of open spaces, natural resources and scenic areas, the provision of recreational , , opportunities, or the guidance of urban development; (iv) To be used for the provision of public �works, facilities, � . and impravements eligible for assisCance under paragraph (a) (1) of this section; or . (v) To be used for other public purposes, including the comrersion of land to other uses whe�e necessary or appropriate to the Community Development Program. � � � � � � � "� � � � � � � � (2) Acquisition, construction, reconstru�:tion, or installation , of the following public works, facili.Cies, and site or other improvements: neighborhood faciiities, senior centers, historic properties, utilities, stceats, street lights, water and sewer Yacilities, foundations and platforms for air rights sites, pedestrian malls and walkways and parks, playgrounds and other facilities for recreational participation; flood and drainage faciliCies in cases where assistance for such facilities has been determined to be unavailable under other federal laws or programs pursuant to the provisions of 570.608; • and parking facilities, solid waste disposal facilities and fire protection services and facilities which are located in ' areas in which other activities described in 570.303(b) are being carried out. (3) Code enforcement in deteriorated or deteriorating areas in which such enforcement, together with public improvements and services to� be provided is expected to arrest the decline of the area. (4) Clearance, demolition, renewal, and rehabilitation of buildings and improvements (including (i) interim assistance to alleviate harmful conditions in which immediate public action is needed and (ii) financing rehabilitation of privately owned properties • through the use of grants, direct loans, loan guarantees, and oCher means, when in support of other activities described in 57U.303(b) . (5) Special projects directed to the removal of material and archi- tectural barriers which restrict the mobility and accessibility of elderly and handicapped persons. (6) Payments to housing owners for losses of rental income incurred in holding for temporary periods housing units to be utilized far the relocation of individuals and families displaced by program activities. (7) Disposition, through sale, lease, donation, or otherwise of - any real property acquired pursuant to this Part or its reten- tion for public purposes, provided that the proceeds from any such disposition shall be expended only for activities in . accordance with this part. � (8) Provision of public services not otherwise awailable in areas, or serving residants of areas, in which the recipient is under- taking, or will undertake, other activities described in 570.303(b) where such services are determined to be necessary or appropriate to support such other activities and where assistance in provid- ing or securing such services under other applicable federal laws or programs has been applied for and denied or not made available pursuant to the provisions of 570.608, F'or the pur- poses of this paragraph, such services shall be directed toward (i) improving the community's public services and faci- lities concerned with the employment, economic development, crime prevention, child care, health, drug abuse, education, welfare or recreation needs of persons residing i.n such areas, and (ii) coordinating putalic and private development pragrams. (9) Payment of the nan-federal share required in connection with a grant-in-aid program undertaken as part of the Community Development Program pursuant to 570.303(b) . (10) Payment of the cost of completing a project funded under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, including the provisions for finan- cial settlement contained in Subpart I. � i � � i � � � � r � � �I � � � (11) Relocation payments and assistance for individuals, families, businesses, organizations, and farm operations displaced by activities assisted under this. Part, including all benefits at least equal to the minimum levels established under the Uniform Relocation and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601) . (12) Activities necessary (i) to develop a comprehensive comcminity development glan (which plan may address the needs, strateg�►, • and objectives to be summarized in the application pursuanC � to 570.303(a) but may treat only such public services as are neeessary or appropriate to support activities meeting such needs and objectives), and (ii) to develop a policy-planning- management capacity so that the recipient may more rationally and effectively (A) determine its needs, ($) set long-term goals and short-term objectives, (C) devise programs and activities to meet the goals and objectives, (D) evaluate the progress of such programs in accamplishing these goals and objectives, and (E) carry out inanagement, coordination, and monitoring of activities necessary for affective planning implementation, � (13) Payment of reasonable administrative costs and carrying � charges related to the planning and execution of community � development and housing activities, including the provision of information and, at the discretion of the recipient, of resources to residents of areas in which other com.�nunity development activities described in 570.303(b) and the hous- ing activities covered in the Housing Assistance Plan des- cribed in 570.303(c) are to be concentrated with respect to - the planning and execution of such activities. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this section o•r tr c7�' 'J., an; �r.��ia� :. �:..a.. ,.,,: C �i�3 a;:t ia a •— �..�..�..r vc.siab uia model cities program shall be e�igfble for funding under this Part from that portion of the hold-harmless amount attributable ' � to such model cities program as calculated pursusnt to 570.103(c) (2) (iii) (A) . (c) Costs incurred in carrying out the program whether charged to the program on a direct or an indirect basis must be in conformance with the requirements of Federal Management Circular 74-4, "Cost Principles Applicable to Grants and Contracts with Sta�e and Local Governments," except as modified in these regulations. . � � � � �. � � � � � � � � � � g. DEVELOPMENT OF PROJECT ELIGIBILITY Evaluation-of building conditions is a vital first step in the planning process. Any system for classifyiag buildings must produce an accuraCe description of observed conditions and be based on clearly defined and acceptable standards. . A system of building classifications according to structural conditions ' has been developed over the years within the Saint Pau1 Hous�ng and . Redevelopment Authority Neighborhood Development Program, In 1967 and subsequent years during the initiation of NDP, the Saint Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority contracted with Barton-Aschman Associates, , � Incorporated to prepare an urban renewal survey technique that would accurately identify and evaluate the exeent of deterioration, blight or slum conditions existing in project areas. These standards 'and sub- � � sequent surveys provided the basis for substantiating the need for public action in. the area in accordance with established local, state, and federal legal and administrative requirements. In the fall of 1974, a residential structural condition (exterior) was undertaken to apply the system on a house-by-house basis for major portions of the city not included in NDP, code enforcement or renewal project areas. This sur- vey and s.ubsequent evaluation was undertaken in preparation of the � Housing Assistance �lan for Saint Paul, Minnesota. . The completed survey covered 60°� of the total dwelling un�ts in the city. Areas excluded were those which, on the basis of CRP studies, census data and knowledge of environmental conditions, prompted assumption that no major concentrations of deficient housing existed in those areas, Of the 66,16'L dwelling units surveyed, representing 60% of the city's total units, 17% were found to be major deficient and substandard. (For further clarification and the impact upon the city, see HAP Saint Paul, Minnesota, dated Februar•y 12, 1975) 0 As each structure was examined, inspectors noted all deterioration and inadequacies as they might be influenced by age, quality of maintenance, � � � � � � � � � � � '� � � � adequacy of original construction, and obsolescence, regardless of whether code violations were present or not, Upon completion of the inspecCion and subsequent evaluation of the field survey, an overall building condition rating was established from the following categories: Sound - A structure with minimal� defects and in a standard condi- ` tion requiring normal maintenance. � • Deficient buildingscontain defects which are not easily correct- able and cannot be accomplished in the course of normal maintenance. The classification of minor or major reflects the degree or extent ! of defects found during the inspection: Minor - A structure classificed as deficient--requiring minor . repairs--having more than three minor defects. Ma or - Buildings classified as deficient--requiring major repairs. Substandard - A structure containing defects which are so serious, so exLensive tnat tney aciversely affect �11 or a large part of the structure that repair is probably not feasible. Bli�hting Influence - A term used ta describe an existing condition � which (1) applies specifica2ly to the building being surveyed, (Z) has an apparent adverse or degrading effect on other existing devel- opment. Types of blightin�g influence are: Incompatible Uses or Mixed Use - A use (or a mixture of uses in a single building) that is incompatible with the majority of uses in the immediate area, such as a mixture of commercial and residential use in a single building ox_ the presence of a manufacturing use in a predominately resident,ial area. There . must be a significant adverse e£fect generated by the incompat- ibility or admixture. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � , Overcrowding of Buildings on the Land - Excessive land . coverages by buildings resulting in a restriction of acc�ess, servicing, light and air circulat3on, and other factors which impair the functional efficiency of the building or the health and safety of its occupants. Excessive Dwelling Unit Density - Overcrowding of dwelling + ` units within a building, or on the land, to an extent that the health and safety of the residents of the particular � building or neighborhood building is endangered. Obsolete Building Type - A building which can no longer efficiently perform the function for which it was originally constructed. This may be manifest in vacancy for an extended period of time, in full �or partial abandonment or in conversion " to uses which are unsafe or unhealthy for occupants. 1 Underutilization of Land - Undeveloped land, or land developed significantly below the level of development of the neighbor- i���d xnd ics environs constitute a blighting influence. Such influence is manifest when such underutilization has a retard- . � ant effect on the economic, physical or social health of the neighborhood. Other ldentifiable Hazards - Vacant and vandalized structures-- � structures which constitute attractive nuisances to children and adults which are vacant and which are vandalized or are open to vandalism. Combustible Materials - Structures covered with combustible materials and located within four feet of another structure constitute a danger of spreading fire. With the assessment of existing conditions based on the aforementioned criteria, areas may possess conditions by reason of dilapidation, obsoles- cence, overcrowding, faulty arrangement or design, lack of ventilation, � � � � � � � "� � � � '�: � � � light, and sanitary facilities, excessive l�nd coverage or deleterious land use or obsolete layout, or any combinatian of these or other factors, which are detrimental to the safety, health, morals or welfare of the community and collectively may constitute a "Blighted Area" (Minnesota Statutes Section 462.4'L1, Subd. 11.) Resolution of this problem may run the gamut of alterna�ives, from ' non-involvement to clearance and redevelopment. The decision requires an evaluation of a myriad of inputs within the planning process frame- work. Within the analysis, an evaluation of building conditions and the clearance alternative requires adherence to specific cr.iteria. With the completion of interior inspections and subsequent evaluation delineating conditions rating, including structural and the existence of any blight- ing influence, a structure conditions summation is taken assigning the total number of sound, minor, manor, substandard or blighted structures within the area, Clearance eligibility (a standard utilized within the Urban Renewal and Neighborhood Development Program under HUD Guidelines) requires that 20% of the total buildings he substandard and thaC 50°L of the total buildings be substandard and blighted within the designated boundary. . Delineation of the boundary in determining eligibility should be drawn to maximize redevelopment objectives. The clearance solution to a blighted area is an exacting alternative to eliminate the negative impacts associ- ated with the area. The clearance boundary requires suffiCient inclusion of properties to negate the blight with adequate addres5 to redevelopment opportunities. This is nat to say that the boundary cannot gerrymander in and around the area to meet the aforementioned criteria, but those areas excluded which continue to contribute to the negative influence require adequate address within the redevelopment scheme to extract the full potential of the overall community. • , _ ... �: .�.�. ,.,,..�o... .... ..m.._,,,..., ..... , . � ,. _ .. ._ . . _.-,. _.._w . .,. . _ _. � .. . � � � � � � � � � � � i� � � � C. JUSTIFICATION FOR CD YEAR I PROGRAM ACTIVITIES � All activities proposed for undertaking during the first action year of the Community Development Program, as outlined in a prior section of this docu- ment entitled "Program for Implementation" have been subjected to and do meet Che eligibility criteria as set forth in the Federal Register. . � This section of the project eligibility report specifically and individually addresses each proposal contained in the CD Year Y program and sets forth the justification and determination of eligibility for the undertaking of each activity. Numerical notations in the column entftled "Eligibility" refer to eligibil- ity criteria listed under "A. Eligible Activities" in this section. Justification refers to documentation of structural and envirornnental defici- encies as defined under "B. Development of Project Eligibility" in this sec- tion. 1. Planning Pro�ram The planning program as outlined in tho �o�ri�., e�rf*,�� �ro��6��,µ i�� Implementation" is to be funded and executed through the Community Development Program as submitted under items 12 and 13 of "Eligible Activities." ' 2. Rehabilitation Rehabilitation and related activities programmed for implementation during CD Year I are listed below, accompanied by the �ustification and eligibility as set forth in the federal .regulations for the under- taking of each activity. (Numerical notations refer to eligibility criteria listed under "A. Eligible Activities" in this section.) Activity Eligibility Rehabilitation Loans to su�plement the city-wide 4 and NDP areas , Rehabilitation grants to supplement the city-wide 4 and NDP areas Relocation payments in con,junction with code enforce- 3 & 11 ment in Concentrated Rehabilitation areas � � � � � �' � � � � � ! � � � � Activity Eli�ibility Public Improvements in Concentrated Rehabilita- 2 tion areas. Rehabilitation and Community Organization staff 13 needed to implement the program � . . • In addition to the above proposals, specific improvement activities within or adjacent to several of the priority rehabilitation areas and city-wide activities which are supportive of the residential stability of the neighborhoods have been programnaed for implementation as a part of the CD Year I Program. These activities�and their justi- fication for undertaking are listed below. � • Activity ' " � Eli�ibility . � Housing RecycTing Pilot`Prograin l.ii Removal of Hazardous, Vacant Buildings and Site 3 Clearance Implementation of a Rodent Control Program Douglas School Site Park 2 Union Gospel Mission g Neighborhood Playgrounds 2 Hamline-Hague Playground 2 • Marydale Park � Riverside Park 2 Kipps-Glenn Terrace Sewer Project Study 8 and 1'L 3. Continuation of On-going Community Development Activities In areas where intensive planning analysis has been completed and redev- elopment activities undertaken through previous renewal programs, specific proposals have been programmed for implementation during CD Year I. The following is a listing by area of these activities, accompanied by the justification for undertaking as set forth in sections A and 8 of this chapter. � � � � �. � � � � ' � � � � � � CONCORA TERRACE Activity Eligibility Justification Peters Meats - Danny`s Rubbish Block/Parcel 2-I . l.i, v, and 11 Blighting Influence , � (Incompatible Land Use) 3-2 �� _ n 3-6 �� � �� • PHALEN AREA Activity Eligilibility Justification ITA l.i,ii, 3, 4 '� � and 11 Payne Avenue Parking I.i, and 2 SUI�IIT-UNIVERS ITY � Activity Eli�ibility Justification Model Cities Health Clinic 8 Wi2lows Senior Citizens Center 8 Hallie Q. Brown Senior Citizen� 8 �------- - t�l1LC1 � . . . Neishborhood Justice Center 8 Demonstration Grant Program Model Cities Selby Avenue Improvement l.i,ii Clearance Area 2 Block/Parcel . 123-15 , 123-16 123-17 123-18 123-19 1'L3-'L2 1'L'3-16 1Z3-27 123-28 1'L3-29 124-10 . 124-11 1'L4-12 124-13 124-14 ' 124-15 ' 124-16 � 124-17 . 124-18 � 124-19 _ �._ . ...., . , _ ,. ,, � _ �...,,.. ., ,� ,.,.. �. . ..,.. �. ....x_ ...:. _ .: .;,., ._ .. ._. _ �: -- �� �� w� 7�� ■�� ■� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � '� � � _ Activity EligibilitY Justification ITA l.i.,fi, 3, 4 and 11 , Northeast Quadrant Improvements 1 St. James l.i,ii, 3, 4 Clearance Area 1 and 11 Block/Parcel ' 46-24 46-26 46-'L7 46-28 SS-18 55-20 55-21 55-25 � 55-26 , 55-27 55-29 ' . � ' Southeast Quadrant-Blair House � � l.i,iii, 11 Clearance Area 2 � . Black/Parcel 137-16 Marshall/Webster School Expansion l.ii, 4 ConcentraCed Rehabilitation Area 3, 4, I1 HELP 8,� Madel Cities � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � WEST MIDWAY-SOUTH ST. 1�NTHONY PARK Activity Eiigibility Justification Territorial Road Housing Site 1.3, 11 Clearance Area 1 . Block/Parcel , 25-! . . . 25-38 . . 25-40 . 25-41 33-1 � 33-3 33-4 . . South St. Anthony Park 2 ITA l.i, fi, 3, 4 � and 11 . Street Improvement Program � 2 , � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � THOMAS-DALE Activity Eligibility Justification ITA l.i,ii, 2, 4, 11 . St. Adalbert's - Phase One l.i, 11 Clearance Area 4 . � Expanded Block/Paxcel ' 85-3 85-4 85-6 � 85-7 . 85-11 � � 85-12 85-13 � 85-16 ' 86-3 • � 86-4 � � . 86-5 � 86-6 86-7 86-8 86-9 . ' 86-10 . 86-11 . 92-2 � 92-3 Arundel Mackubin North l.i, 11 Clearance Area 5 • Block/Parcel 21-3 21-4 � 21-5 21-7 zL-s � 21-9 ' 21-11 63-28 Wilder Square 8 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � . CENTRAI. CORE/SEVEN C4R1�lERS Activity Eligibility Justification Block 35 l.i, iv, v, Clearance Area 1 � 11 Expanded . Block/Parcel � 35-4B ' 35-5 35-6 , . � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � WEST SEVENTH STREET Activity Elf�ibility Juatifica�ion Davis School Site l.i, 8 ITA and" Block 46 . l.i, ii, 3, Clearance Area 5 4, 11 Expanded Block/Parcel : 46-1 46-2 46-4 46-5 46-8 46-9 46-11 46-12 46-13 � 46-14 � 46-15 � 46-16 46-17 . • . . . � 46-18. ..� � . . . . � 46-19 Street Improvement Program 2 St. Stan's East Housing Site l.i, ii Clearance Area 5 Expanded B1'ock/Parcel � � 41-20 • .. �, -�2-..,. ` 41-22 41-23 ' � 41-24 41-25 41-26 41-29 48-7 48-8 48-9 48-10 55-1A • 55-1B� 55-2 55-3 55-4 SS-5 55-6 55-7A 55-7B 74-1 � � � � � � � '� � � � � � � � A. AbMINISTRATION 1. Policies and Re ,ulations A family,. individual, business firm or non-pro€it organization required to move from property that has been affected by publicly sponsored activity is eligible for relocation payments to assist in obtaining and moving to a replacement dwelling or location in accordance with the • provisions and requirements of the Federal Uniform Relo�ation Assistance Act of 1970. � It is the intent of. the City to provide a relocation worker to assist each person to be displaced in locating a suitable housing unit, or place of business. The first steps of the relocation pr�cess involve the relocation worker assigned to the particular property planned for � • , acquisition. The foZlowing services are provided: � � ' . . a. Eligible persons are informed at the earliest possible date as to the availability of relocation payments and assistance, the eligibility requirements and procedures for obtaining such payments. b. The extent of need of each eligible person for rel�cation assistance is determined through direct personal interview. c. Currettt and continuing information is provided on the availability andprices af comparable sales and rental housing and of cqmparable crnmnercial properties and locations. d. Information concerning Federal and State housing programs, loans and other special programs offering assistance is supplied to eligible displaced persons. e. Other advisory and r�eferral services concerning housing, financing, employment, training, health, welfare and other assistance is pro- vided in order to minimize hardships. f. Assistance is provided in completing �ny required applications and foraas, g. Services are provided to ensure that the relocation process does not result in different or separate treatment on account �of race, color, religion, national origin, sex or source of income. . I _. ...... <..��.. �, . . .. ..,�,._. ._ �.....� � � � � �. � � � � � � � � �~ � The folLowing financial assistance is available to residential relocatees, regardless of how long the dwelling unit has been occupied; -- Actual reasonable moving expenses, or -- A fixed moving expense allowance up to $300 (based on the numUer of rooms of furniture or possessions to be moved) plus � . , a dislocation allowance of $200. � In addition, homeowners who have occupied the dwelling for 180 days prior to the first offer to purchase the property and tenants occupying the unit for 90 days prior, may be eligible for the following replacement � housing payments: -- A Replacement Housing Payment of up to $15,000 for eligible . • � � • • �. owriers wlio occupy. .the home which is� acquired. (This payinent� is � . to he2p owners purchase and occupy another dwelling suitable for their family.) -- A Replacement Housing Payment of up to $4,000 to eligible tenants to help in the rental or purchase of standard replacement housing. Homeowners who have occupied the dwelling for at least 90 but less than ' 180 days are eligible for the $4,000 maximum Replacement Housing Payment. Displaced business concerns and non-profit organizations may be eligible to receive payments for the following: � -- Actual, reasonable moving expenses, plus . , -- Actual direct loss of tangible personal property, plus -- Actual reasonable expenses incurred by a business in searching for a replacement location (limited to $500.OG) or, as an alter- native to the three above payments, -- Payment in lieu of moving �and related expenses. These payments are equal to the average annual net earnings of the business, but not�less than $2,500 nor more than $10,000; payments to non- . profit organizations are limited to $2,500. Certain criteria must be met for a business to be eligible for this payment. �. � � � � �� � � � � � � � � � � The foll�wing financial assistance is available to residential relocatees, regardless of how long the dwelling unit has been occupied; -- Actual reasonable moving expenses, or -- A fixed maving expense allowance up to $300 (based on tihe nucnber of rooms of furnitur.e or possessions to be moved) plus . � a dislocatfon allowance of $200. � . In addition, homeowners who have occupied the dwelling for 1 80 days prio.r to the first offer to purchase the property and tenants occupying the unit for 90 days prior, may be eligible for the following replacement � housing payments: -- A Replacement Housing Payment of up to $IS,000 for eligible . • � • � �. owners wlio occupy. .the home which is� acqiiired. (This payment� is � . to help owners purchase and occupy another dwelliag suitable for their family.} -- A Replacemeat Housing Payment of up to $4,000 to eligible tenants to help in the rental or purchase of standard replacement housing. Homeowners wha have occupied the dwelling for at least 90 but less than ' 180 days are eligible for the $4,000 maximum Replacement Housing Payment. . Displaced business concerns and non-profit organizations may be eligible to receive payments for the following: � -- Actual, reasonable moving expenses, plus . / -- Actual direct loss of tangible personal property, plus -- Actual reasonable expenses incurred by a business in searching for a replacement location (limited to $500.OG) or, as an alter- native to the three above payments, -- Payment in lieu of moving and related expenses. These payments are equal to the average annual net earnings of the business, but not�less than $2,500 nor more than $10,000; payments to non- . . profit organizations are limited to $2,500. Certain criteria mus� be met for a business to be eligible for this payment. • _., � � � � � � � '�. . .� � � � � � Occ�ipants nr.e not required to move until given the t:ime and opportunity , to find decent, safe, sanitary housing that mE�e�s the housing code of the city and is satisfactory and affordable to the oacupane. Replace- ment housing payments are not made in casesof ,moves to substandard buildings. The city will ensure adequate inspection of all r eplacement housing resources to be utilized by displaced persons. + 2. Organization and Staffing � The relocation staff of the SC. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) has served since 1959 as the central relocation a�ency for the city. Supervisory personnel, relocation workers and technical and clerical employees are responsible for admini.stering the above policies . . for Federal programs as well as for local programs such as school. site � � assembly for the Schoal. Board of the City and acquisition for the Ramsey County Open Space Program. The relocation staff is assigned to field , affices located throughout the city. Estimates of the personnel needed to carry out relocation activities were based on the projected displacement tor the tirst year of Community Development activities,concurrent local programs and past relocation experience. Following is a summary of staff estimates: � Director of Community Services (time to be divided among relocation, community organization and public information) Chief of Relocation, Family and Business Relocation Supervisors 2 Relocation Claims Technicians � 3 Field Relocation Supervisors 10 Family Relacation Workers and 3 Business Relocation Workers 2 Secretarial/Clerical staff � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �� B. SUM•NIARX OF PROJECTED AISPLIaCENLP7T The displacement programmed �o take place in the First year of Comattunity Development funding is a result of three different types of activities. The first of these are the renewal and code enforcement activities to be funded through the C.D, program, Included here are six "Identified Treatment Areas," . where a combination of clearance, rehabilitation and public improvement activities will be focused on several �blocks of. extreme need, Also in the first year program is the firststage of a "Housing Recycling" pragram, an attempt to "recycle" large, presently under-utilized housing units back to the large £amilies that need them most, Displacement figures for these two programs are estimates based on thz available budgets. , .� Code enforcement for public health reasons will'displace adflitional families� and individuals throughout the city, The third category includes properties acquired or scheduled to be acquired under the Neighborhood Development Program but whose residents were not relocated prior to commencement of the Community Development Year. It is unknown exactly how many of these people will be moved during the. first year but estimates were made from past reloca- tion experience. � ' �ollowing is a summary of displacement activities: C. D. Pro�ram Households Businesses Summit-University - St. James Church 11 2 Selby Avenue $ 16 Southeast Quadrant 20 0 St. Albans I.T.A. 18 0 West Midway - Territorial ltoad Housing 13 1 I.T.A. 8 0 Thomas-Dale - St. Adalberts 38 p � Arundel-Mackubin North 9 0 I.T.A. 10 � p Seven Corners - Block 35 �0 1 � � �_ t � ` -� �- .� � t � � � � � �� ' Households Businesses FJest Seventh St::eet - Block 4b Spot Acquisition `L1 0 - Hammond School Site 33 3 - St. Stan's I.T.A. 14 0 Phalen Area - I.T.A. 14 0 City-wide Housing Rec}rcling Program IO 0 '_' . Total 247 23 City Non-Renewal Code Enforcement 60 0 Carryover from NDP Program 400 114 GRAND TOTAL 707 137 � G. StIN��fAR� OF HOUSIPdG F2ESOtJ�CES � . • ' ' ' � ' Past relocation experience shows that approximately 75% of al�. displacees fall in low or moderate-income categories. A wide variety of housing resources exists to accommodate the special needs of these famil3es and �ndividuals. � Low Income In or�er to qualify for public housing occupancy persons must meet standards . of family composition and income. Generally the following persons are eligible for some type af public housing. � . Families - Two or more persons relafied by blood, marriage, or operation of law who occupy the same unit Individuals - A single person who is (1) eligible by age to receive old age Social Security benefits; (2) physically handi- capped or disabled;or (3) displaced by public action Two sets o£ income 3.imits are established for initial occupancy and for con- tinued occupancy. Persons displaced by public� action may use the limits for continued occupancy in gaining admittar.ce. Eligibility for continued occupancy is reviewed once a year for £amilies and the handicapped, and once every two years for the elderly. r; � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ' '� ability to lease 1,135 privately-owned uniCs and has bought (or is in the process of purchasing) 90 Scattered Site Units and 225 HOPLI� untits. (The leased and scattered site units are rented to low-inco�e families in the sr�me manner as congregate housing. The HOPLYF program is a program through which a tenant evenCually becomes a homeowner.) These four programs result in the availability of approximately 600 units per year. ' Moderate Income Moderate-income housing is available to families and elderly or handicapped individuals who fall within the following income limits. Maximum Annual Family Size Income Limits . • � ' . 1 . , $5,670. . . . � . • . " , . . . 2 � 7,020 . 3 7,965 4 8,640 5 9,180 6 9.720 . \ 7 10,125 . 8 10,530 9 � 10,800 - 10 11,070 There are 2,502 moderate-income new construction rental units in St. Paul and approximately 600 of these became available throughout a given year. The city also has 93 rehabilitated apartment units for moderate-income persons. In addition, there are proposals for 268 units of new construction and 126 rehabilitated units currently in process. � Moderate-income families and individuals will also be able to find housing through MHF'A plans for single-family mortgage and multi-family new construc- tion, the House Moving Program, Housing Recycling Program and Model Cities grants. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � The private-housing market has been and will continue to be s housing resource for most of the persons who are displaced, With the assistance of the $15,000 (maximum) granC, displaced homeowners are able to find housing in the private market. Displaced renters needing 1 and 2-bedroom units.are also competitive on the private market with the aid of Replacement Housing Payments. � Section 8 _____._____� Section 8 is to be the implementation component for policies stated in Che Housing Assistance Plan. During CD Year I, it is intend�d thaC all Section 8 units allocated for the ci�y of St. Paul will be used for rental assistance to families who are of low or moderate income and who will be living in standard rental units. An eligible family will pay between 15 to 25% of their incame for rent and HUD will�pay the difference betiween�that amount �and� � the fair-market rate, To determine eligibility, gross family income must be less than 80% of the 1970 median income by family size for the metropolitan area, Unofficial esti� ,....t..� ..� t12eo� 1�m�1_S �F�r thn jvj,i rinc�a�nl i G�..Sfi, Pa»1 areQ a7'P aG ff1��AWS! W���� v - � \ . � Ma.ximum Annual Family Size Income Limits 1 � . $5,600 � 2 8,000 3 8,700 ' 4 9,350 . 5 9,750 � 6 10,150 7 10,450 g 10,750 g 11,000 10 11,250 It should be noted that there is a signlficant difference between the Section 8 limits and the moderate-income limits under older programs; presumably these differences will be ndjusted. At this writing the number of Section 8 units to be allocated to Saint Paul has not been determined. � � � � � � � "� � � � � � � � �.;_. : ; i_. � 7 _ COI`1MUNITY D'r',VL'LOPP�fEIJT - BLOCt: PROG£�i y BUDGET t CD-1 � ATTACHMT;NT 1'0 Ot�I3N063-R-1471 � � . � . Budget by li.ne item and what it consists of by Program per original � � document as approved by City. Council. . � � LIIvE 1 - ACQUISITION ff .- � ! : Program �� 5 - House Fecycling - Pi1ot Program $ 240,000 �15 - Angus Anex Acquisition 225,000 • �21 - Acquisition and Relocation - Danny's Rubbish ' 125,OOt� � ��22 - Peter's rleats , 200,000 � .: �23 -- Douglas School Site - Open Space 75,000 .- �r`25 - Phalen Area ITA � 180,000 � - ��32 - Selby--Dale, Dale to Victoria 237,500 i _ � � �r33 �- St. Albans ITA , � . . • .50,000. �i35 - St. James Gl�urcti -Area; 170,500 � C ��38 - Terri�orial P.oad - Housino Site 213,000 � �43 - St. Adalberts t�rea - Phase I 428,000 - ��44 - Arundel-riacicubi_n, North En�l East 142,000 �45 - Block 35 - Red Cross Block 236,600 � � ��46 - ITA ��1, Zdest Seventh S�reet � 360,000 ��48 - Hammond School Site . 523,b00 Y3,YJ5,vCv �F Direct Salary Costs � � 247,581 .�.,. GRc1ND TOTAL $3,653,181 �� .� LIN� 2 - Pt1FLIC �d�R?:S, FACILITlES� SITF. I,if'ROVEi1EN1S �• Prograr� �� 4 -- Project Improvement Progran - CP.A $ 900,000 ��14 - Payne Avenue Parking Lots 100,000 ��17 - Davis School 35,OQ0 �� �il�i - Riverside Park , 96,000 �i19 - Zdiluer'SqLare 54,000 , ��2G - Lincoln, Ptial_en, Sibley School Rough Grade �� and Fill i.n Site • 40,000 -' ��26 - Haiulii�e-Ha�,ue I'laygrounds 75,000 �27 - ii�ryland Par.lc Improver,.ents (Rest room facilities) 35,000 � �`33 - St. Albs�is IT�'� 250,000 l.. �=34 - Rorttie<�sr (tiadrant Pr.oj ect 241,000 ��39 -- So. St. A�tilon}• }'�?rl:, Ccnsti-uct P1<zyground �uildino 370,Q00 r " �-41 - �-)est. �f R�y-nionc� Street �fOF,710 �_� �-47. - . ITA llistr.ict j�3 321,847 �r47 - Yublic Inprove.r:lents I.TA �E1 500,000 ��48 - �lain:r,ond School Site 62,750 � $3,ts89,307 ;... Dixect S�lar}� Custs • 252_,405_ GP.Ai�ll TO'1'AL $3,7�t1,7]_2 ' �.� � �_. # t � � ___, _.. __ . � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � _�,�: F �ACL 2 i � _ � . �`" LIN� 3 - COl)E ENFOP.CE'.•fEPdT . . � i . •- Pro�;ram �� 3 - Code Enforcemei�t - CRA's $ 300,000 r� �r25 - Phalen �rea ITA 15,000 ` � �33 - St. Albans ITA 250,000 �37 - CRA - Southeast of Hill School 100,000 � -. �40 - ITA East of 280, Nort.h of University � � 250,000 - I � �42 - Thomas-Dale ItA District ��3 298�298 '_. . $1,213,298 . ' Direct Salary Costs . 88 z051 � . GRAND TOTAL • $1,301,349 t _ �. LINE 4 - CLEAItANCE, DEi�10I,I'I'70V, P,�'H.�RILITATTOti � � . . . • �- Program �I S - Housino P.ecycling - Pilot Program $ . 100,000 J �� 6 - Demolition and Street Removal ' , 725,OUJ 4�12 - Rodent Control 50,000 � 4133 - St. Albans ITA 40,000 • ��36 - Marshall Webster fIouse Moving 330 000 �E37 - CRA - Soutl:east of �Iill School . 300,000 � �43 - St. Eldalberts Area 32,500 �('`� . . . hl c'7-� rnn { � . . . � � � . �I.�tJ/ � ���/�/ E n;,-P�r �ai:,,-;� _r.��t� 522 �30 . - � GRAND TOTAI. $2,099,530 ' � . LINL S - REHAB LOAI�iS £� GP.t1i1TS � Program �� 1 - Rehab Loans p �� 2 -- Rehab Grants - $ 400, 00 600,000 $1,�OG,UO� Dir.ect Salary Costs C;Sg�S�S? 7 � GRAI`D TOTAI, $1,�E5S,8�2 �... LII�f: G - SPECI.IL PP.OJ;:CTS ELll�.P,LY & Ht�i�DICAPP:.D 1 L _ C� ._O_. _ Y �. LII;}. 7 -- PAY:�.I:`;7'S FOR I.�SS OF F,E\'T�1T LICO:�!r � 1 $ _0- i . �.���;r � — nTSt�o�Trt���:a � i_. na�erL�:,ing, Szles Promoti.on, etc. $ 60,0�0 r , i � � � � �. � � � � � � � � � � ,_._ . . � f 1 ' � � PAGE 3 �.� ' . . . . . � � LIPdE 9 - PROVISION FOF. PUELIC SERVICES - . .' �_ � � ' ' ' � Program ��7.6 - Help Dzvelopment Cor.p. - Equity Funding • � $ 5�0.,000 � ' .Direct Salary Costs ' 36,358 . . ' , . r . • � . -. , � . '�� . GRAND TOTAL �' - ' $ ,536,358 � ' , _ LINE 1Q - PE1Y1�iCNT OF NON-FEDEP..AL SHAP.E � • �h ; � ` " � $ ' -Q- . � LINE 11 - COTiPLETION OF UP.BAN RENEj�JP.L PROJECTS . �' ' � � • . � . ' . . . � ' � . ' ' ' _ None � $ -0- ' L . LINE 12 - F.ELO.CATION PAYP�IEI�TS �?D ASSISTAIQCE ' �� Program �� 5 - House Recycling - Pi1ot Program ' $ 60 000 � ��13 - Union Gospel riission ' 144,000 �� �f?_i - Danny's l:ubbish 25,UUU �„j itL� - lloug.las Sehool 5ste - upen 5�ace - • L�,C1UU ��25 - Phalen Area ITt'� _ 105,OOU ��32 - Selby-Dale, Dale to Victoria . 103,500 �J • ��35 - St: James Church �'�rea . 72,500 ��3E - Territorial Road - Housinb Sire 65,0�0 ��43 - St. Adalberts Area - Phase I 316,5fl0 �� ��44 - Arundel-:iackubir, North End East _ 147,200 �f45 - Block 35 - Red Cross Block 44,600 �46 , ITA ��1, West Seventh Stree� 290,000 �� � . ��4£ - Hamr.iond School Si_te 260,OOQ $I,658,300 '. Direct Salary Costs GQ1,250 � Glu'�'D TOTA? $2,�59,550 1,Ti�E 13 - PI:E1?'\.T.ZTG A�'�TD :•i�i\ACi2�iEcvT D?;VrLO"i�'F.i�T Frovisiun tia<_; been i:�.ide icr all of the sal�ry costs ic?entified as the City i latin:ing Coi�:_^.�issior. � and $7_25,000 ot the F.I::1 plc I1I1111� staff . $ 3S7,�50 r LINE 14 - ADMINISTRATIO�T - ` - , i . . �. . Pro�ram Ifll - Support Services . $I,503,00� . ��33 - St. Albans ITA . - 10,000 � • ��49 - Kipps Glen Terrace Se�aer- Proj ect 10,000 �--' Property rfanagement_ . 110,000 " '� Purchase of Equipment from NDP � � 65,000 � $1,698,000 F.. i � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � .a_ :.� �.� • , � PAGE 4 �-�. • . . �._ • : . . � LIP]E 15 - r10DY,L CITI�S ' ' . . • •' �y Program �28 - Health Clinic - ' ' ' $ 480,000 - �-� ' ��29 - Wi_llow - Senior Citizens 223,525 ` �30 - Hallie Q. Bro��rn 150,000 �31 �- rfodel Cities - Demonstration -Grant Proj ect �' . Continuation Thereof 75,000 -• � Administration Costs ' . 358,801 . . � • $1,287,326 � . ' Direct Salary Costs � . � 41,623 - . GRAND TOTAL . � $1,328,949 �A ' . . . r_ LINE 16 — CONTINGENCIES I 1�. � Program �20 - ' Not Earmarked � , ' _ � ' $.. 859,669 � ( �. _ , � . � ' ._ ` � �-� . . . i� � � L.. � . . � _ . . -. . . . , � � . . . . - _- . �� ' � . l_ � l__ _ . � . - , . - l . � - - . . : . . , . - . �� �