265595 WHITE - CITY CLERK
PINK - FINANCE COUI1C11 ��5595
CANARY - D�PARTMENT � GITY OF SAINT PAIIL
BLUR -MAVOR
File N .
ncil Resolution
Presented By
Referred To Committee: Date
Out of Committee By Date
RESOLUTION APPROVING REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM, CD YEAR I
WHEREAS, by its Resolution, Council File No. 2'63275, adopted March 21,
1974, and approved by the Mayor March 25, 1974 , the Council of the City of
Saint Paul, Minnesota approved Redevelopment Plans for the areas comprising
the Neighborhood Development Program, Minn. A-1, �aint Paul, Minnesota,
and the conditions under which relocation payments would be made under said
Program to be carried out with Federal financial assistance under Title I
of the Honsing Act of 1949, as amended; and - ' .
WHEREAS, the Housing and Community Developmenti Act of 1974 consolidated
previous housing and categorical g�nt programs, i�cluding urban renewal,
code enforcement and neighboxhooc� development prog�Cams under Title I of
the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, by providing municipalities such as
Saint Paul, Minnesota, a block grant to be used to continue or initiate
programs such as renewal, housing rehabilitatio, planning, human services,
- provision of public services and citizen paticipat�.on on a municipality
wide bases so as to provide for development of vialple urban communities,
- including decent housing and a suitable living env3:ronment and e�cpanding
economic opportunities principally for persons of low and moderate- ir���ne
by undertaking activities, among others, to elimin�te and prevent blight �
and blighting influences and the conservation and expansion of the
, municipalities' housing stock; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974 and the financial assistance provided thereunder,
the Council of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota has considered and approved
a program and budget for the Community Development Program, CD Year I , to
undertake on a city wide bases planning, conservation of existing housing
stock through rehabilitation, housing recycling, haazardous building
treatment and provi5ion of public improvements, an�d the continuation of
Community Development activities within areas and neighborhoods in the
COUIVCILMEN Requested by Departlment of:
Yeas Nays
Christensen
Hozza In Favor
Levine
Roedler Against BY
:� Sylvester
Tedesco
President Hunt
Form Approved by Gity Attorney
Adopted by Council: Date
Certifie s d Cou il Secretary BY
i
By �
Approved by Mayor: Date Approved by Mayor $or Submission to Council
By By
WH17E - CITV CLERK .
PINK - FINANCE (jITY OF SAINT PAUL Council ��5595
CANARY- Dt�PARTMENT
BLUE -MAYOR File NO.
Council Resolution
Presented By
Referred To Committee: Date
Out of Committee By Date
-2-
City currently undergoing renewal, code enforcement and neighborhood
development programs previously funded under Title I of the Housing Act
of 1949, as amended, in accordance with duly adopted programs and
redevelopment plans; and
WHEREAS, the continuity of activities within the Phalen Code Enforce-
ment Area, Concord Terrace Urban Renewal Area, SummS.t-University, West
Midway-South St. Anthony Park, Thomas-Dale, Central Core, Seven Corners
and West Sevath Street Neighborhood Development Program Areas in accordance
with existing programs and redevelopment plans were' programmed and budgeted
for in the Communit�'�evelopment Pragram, CD Year I� approved by the Council
of the City of Saint Paul; and
WHEREAS, there has been prepared and approved by the Board of Commis-
sioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint
Paul, Minnesota, and presented to and considered by the Council of the
City of Saint Paul, Minnesota a document entitled, "Community Development -
A Program For The Revitalization Of The City Of Saint Paul" , consisting of
a Program Summary, Redevelopment Plan, Program For rmplementation, Project
Eligibility Report, Relocation Plan, Budget and Method of Financing,
Legal Certificate and Appendix incorporating the Application for Federal
Financial Assistance and Housing Assistance Plan; and
WF�REAS, the Council is in receipt of the report of the City of Saint
Paul Planning Commission contained in its Resolution adopted May 23, 1975,
finding that the Redevelopment Plan and the property acquisition and
disposition and public improvements proposed in the Community Development
Program are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan For The City of Saint
Paul and to be sound extensions of prior renewal activities approved and
implemented under the Neighborhood Development Program.
COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of:
Yeas Nays _
Christensen
Hozza In Favor
Levine
Rcedler Against BY
Sylvester
Tedesco
President Hunt
Form Approved by City Attorney
Adopted by Council: Date
Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY
By
Approved by Mayor: Date Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
By By
WHI7E - CITV CLERK ��5595
PINK - FINANCE �OU11C11 �
CANARY -D�EPARTMENT GITY OF SAINT PALTL
BLUE ^-MAVOR File NO.
Council Resolution
Presented By
Referred To Committee: Date
Out of Committee By Date
-3-
WHEREAS, pursuant to notice of the time, place and purpose thereof
which notice was published in the St. Paul Dispatch-Pioneer Press on
May 30, 1975, a public hearing has been conducted on June 10, 1975 by
the Council on the Redevelopment Plan for Community Development Program
Year I and the activities therein proposed,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED� by the Council of the City of Saint
Paul, Minnesota as follaws: �
1. That the findings and determinations of Resolution, Council
File No. 263275 respecting the Redevelopment Plans for Neighborhood
Development Program Areas, Minn. A-1, are hereby a�firmed.
2. That the Redevelopment Plans for Concord Terrace Urban Renewal
Area Project, Minn. R-37, Summit-University, West Midway-South St.
Anthony Park, Thomas-Dale, Central Core, Seven Corners and West Seventh
Street Neighborhood Deveiopment Program Area, Proj;ect , Minn. A-1,
previously adopted and now in effect in the Cit� of Saint Paul, in the
areas to which said Redevelopment Plans apply, provide an outline for
the continued development or redevelopment of such areas, and said
Redevelopment Plans and the Redevelopment Plan for the Community
Development Program, CD Year I, Saint Paul, Minne�ota, are sufficiently
complete to indicate the relationship of said plans to definite local
objectives and land uses and to indicate general land uses and general
standards of development and redevelopment.
3. That it is hereby found and determined that the financial aid
to be provided pursuant to contract for Federal ffnancial assistance
under the Community Development Program is necess�ry to enable the
Program to be undertaken in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan
COUIVCILMEN Requested by Department of:
Yeas Nays
Christensen
Hozza In Favor
Levine
Roedler A gai ns t BY
Sylvester
Tedesco
President Hunt
Adopted by Council: Date Form Approved by City Attorney
Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY
By
Approved by Mayor: Date Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
By BY
WH17E - CITV CLERK
PINK - FINANCE GITY OF SAINT PALTL Council
CANARY - O/,PARTMENT File �O. �6559
BLUE �-MAVOR
)
Council Resolution
Presented By
Referred To Committee: Date
Out of Committee By Date
-4-
approved by this resolution, and that the land in the Project Areas
encompassed within the Program would not be acquired and made available
for redevelopm�ent without the aid provided under the Community Develop-
ment Funding Agreement with the United States of America.
4. That it is hereby found and determined that the Redevelopment
Plan for the Community Development Program will a£ford maximum
opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the locality as a whole,
for redevelopment of the Program Areas by private enterprise.
5. That it is hereby found and determined that the Redevelopment
Plan for the Community Development Program, CD Year I, conforms to
the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Saint Paul.
6. That it is hereby found - and determined that the Redevelopment
Plan and Community Development Program make provision toward the
development of a viable urban community in Saint Paul including decent
housing and suitable living environment and expanding economic
opportunities principally for persons of law income.
7. That the Redevelopment Plan for the Community Development
Program, CD Year I, Saint Paul, Minnesota, is hereby approved together
with the provision for relocation of persons, families, business
concerns and others to be displaced by Program activities.
_----
� '
f
COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of:
Yeas Nays '
Christensen �
� Hunt In Favor
�°��' (� Against By
Sylvester
T�r
President � Hozza
Adopted by Council: Date �U� � 4 �� Form A ve by City Attorney
�
Certifie e b uncil Secretary BY
By
Appro by Mayor: Date � Approved by Mayor Eor Submission to Council
By By
P�BUS� � 4 t9i�
v
` j '> � r^�' � .
CITY OF SAII�TT pAITL .
o�e��iae O F F I G E O F T H E M AY O B RE�EIVED
a��r
-- - MAY 2 2, 1g75
Councii Presic�
Ruby Hunt
LAWRENOE D. COHEN
MnYOa
Ma.y 22, 1975
Council President Ruby Hunt
and Members of the City Council
Dear Madam and Members:
Now that the Department of Housing and Urban Development has
formally approved Saint Paul's First Year Community Development
Program, there is one additional step which requires council
action to insure compliance with the State Redevelopment Act.
The State Redevelopment Act requires that the City adopt a
redevelopment plan. The plan has been prepared from the
Community Development Program and Budget, as approved by
council and is presently under review by the Planning Commission
with final consideration expected at the commission's Ma.y 23
meeting.
The Federal statute (Housing and Community Development Act of
1974) is silent as to the procedure to be employed in the
council consideration and adoption of a redevelopment plan.
It is, therefore, proposed that the hearing procedures employed
in the past as to such plans be used.
It is, therefore, requested that the City Council set a date for
a public hearing on the plan and that notice of the time, place,
and purpose of the hearing be published in accardance with Minnesota
Statutes Section 462.521. The notice requirement of this statute
could be met for a hearing date as early as June 10 in the event
Council acts to set the date on May 27.
Thank you for your anticipated cooperation in this matter.
Sincerel
CE D. COHE
Mayor
LDC/klm
cc: Mr. Thomas J. Kelley
Mr. Edward N. Helfeld
Mr. William Q. Patton 22
+�x %°J.,T. FF �.�,{t �t g:i,r {�l�'. .,;.rqx�.� a`!._ l �::, r ., 4�'1 t .�,'.._yJ �"�l�x"�.'�, �lt� '�:�, � :1�:�,':. a S ;t7" +� ���A°, t�': S�' x� . �, �tc - ',�i��.
{X:.�.• i,i.�'. P ?i ,W J�y � �-:. �, ;t�i,v� �'3f a � � Iw��" t. � � =X i/�,L f ��{���+�#��1�t�: ''�'� e���, �T:k'.7�'a �•�:.'��,
p� 4 . �Li f 4. . � i ' i ;.t�t 1 r ��;4 v 2 ..r. � :k�.t � t,.; � 1 �d dm.. ti�*,� .: v 4 .:^4°t A� .�,,��,�' 2����1��
�it �y..'� f ' t. � ' S H[1 Y:. e ,:, "' kF b. =� �',e�� '�v. !' fi +� �
�c x rY a � �3 �. �,Ly,,,r� �:.�� .:�?I �-.., r ���, �� �GSr�ri,".��r i'�f��:;''�' ��'��'�'�i.'y�'.;'�a�, �:u"�j:l
l$.. �a (.: f � ;� i1 4r 3r ;Zr Ay� r�� � . q{j#�;.
�9� � F.�: ! { gj: �.t�kl'�...,'{ 1 17*6`4?�wt%b}r".'p i���^{/.�{. if ' 'F'� �'�;41'� �i���n �' �'..� 1 tl°' �, 61 'F '�„� 1 ts"rt �^v� .h��TP �„".�.�.
' 3 �`�� . � �,.� .,g.y t �'r'.. e � 4;,' % .<r �f� � �,�.� �� .+ �t,�,� .,t2xa � .,:..�� �' '� �'�' �r�?�' r�6 � ��r al} � � ;.
ak7 t:: � "?r"h t� fir ! .: 1 t 'ai ' k�u �.st S . � 5 x� t xj� � �`;1 S ��. F�#�}s �i�. �
l�F� �'�� � � y':.�. �.' � Y�� t '•� �,1 ( e;� �F ",1.���� ',�7�'�}-� 't�,: �' "� �'; � 4 �.�"�i,aEl.� .:_� �tr�i�� � ��.. l_.
h�` 4 � .��til a'�j':� 1 g. �� � 'vK. 1 b5�� �y , r 4.�` ::y i ,: �'��� �.,: .� 4 ¢: `{}.t?,�:�
� � }a c ,'.r° zlr � 7� a :y e� . , ' a -, �'';` t r i�, ,�.$ p+a� ,�' . 8 r;;,���� arry.,��,•�, �1
�� � ; )� '� r{ C :'.i � d .��y� .'� t �"": ���,i d �x F .6�is`� : '�t � } � .:o t rt+. t s ��a�� �` +kt�i
� � � � � "t'i . � ,:.. �i ,i�, � �ti�,�: �4�J ! �. ! �x;s.i k ,� �� �nr Jr�, �,(i: F�F �kr�t� ` ..� �" f"'h�, �S� JS�,^. w
xn{ ' a �� i!p �� �. -.�+' a y �� �{'� „ � C � �,..� � ti �a � �' '' x 4� ���y,}��r�J �����;�.
r t ,�-.. f � r .��'� ,} i ) �v# � o,,� xdf ,�'k f� t.(. �` i � d- �"+. {�" M r�
i Az`X�f �5 ti r��' � � .3; t:. �� bP �'y 1 1 } �� 6 ,'�. � ��k t�, • �' �+ 1;4v ta i;d k�:
�.,�'� �V' v 1 } q 4 °M4 ,��C�v �: � ��r fa {t i ;.�I� Kv.� ���,�ti ��� .��„ � ���t� �R�, }4� � i� R.� �� i;.��� kR"X��,��y �i ��
v I^ � � .� l r� � �^ e A�. �. k E�l: i '7 a �k
�� ��� � � . ��� • S'= �� � � 'a. � �� � i r�,, ,'� a -� `�. ; ,� K�� .' i L FeF � .Y"��', k b � ��Y
�!„t .�� � 1 .� i�° r U t. ! �� �� ^ P �w� "�`YI' a �� .��i x �11 .1 ,�� 4`' d �_v A �}���� '��v,� � .
� f I } y � t *S�A !". k+�t �
� r �� �'�„'� _ ` �,�t `" ` .•�q „ � �'i � 1� � � _� �ti:n�`5 t �^��r����� � "*.�;wp i�y {�'�
`��,� �.:r�L�rt,�; yr r ;! �' t?M � ?tj �..� rl ta� �. �' �i .;� Ft w.. i 1�. 'f )�'� � Y`:� S °ak �.
tP��,t u�+�, }�'�. y .: t -5 ( �� .� 5 � � ' t�9 Y H � i �
,.1 t� ��: � ��::
��..a : �`� .,.���� ���Y'� � � .`3 � .'��4 nti��< � .7 � .�,.�x .$'v +.� ���x
� ��� 's, "� ,w y� � . ���f �.
, L. } �
,�-� � � ,k ,yH ''.r d, Y 4 S �k `'"I `Y y� �l .1,,.}�!� �:t �� �y�+ ,Yr! { �r�S'f � ���F �`� ��S 't�t�. !,� I t x `y�"3 4 �,{�:. �.
r�'�r �� �'� t��' ,�� �,. � �j� t x " � {, 1' x ��a � ;,,. t �� c� � �` }rt �, ,.AA+� � >�,�, �r. � .
�E,r a - � ' �5 � �, a r J r�; i• 1 � i � � s� ' r � i t t ^R. ° :i 'i �� ++k� "� A 1*;� k�'�`
�i�� ' r�`it�' / �t � i �t�;' j p�� �'�+\ � `ii � :i �d .�;° G . . �;.r : ''�.' ���`� � s= '� ajil � � �1- ? �� +�F.ra�.:�'i1� � -�.
��i r�.� �i�: ¢.�� -'t ' t t :,t r E ��f � �). '��v k � s. T �` y ;'t �..a � ,� �� � py :� �,� L� k ,�t�.q�����
,�il« t � '� t� �y -- ": .� � f h # z. � J � �4 �i. ��q«6���. �.` sk� t4'+�M1 �
,v . � K":� r :�4T 3,.` '�. ,A. �" f.7; ��1 ' r r �` `' z�j�': �� �..� k + � �� -., ry�"'� a'�,+XL� ,� � .
q � �.`e 1 'V� ` � � � �f,�*{-H �Y iY, � �� ��k t `,�, � �r �� ._t- f y�i 5.1 a�a F A$ � ��y � �t������,�.
h'�h'.+��r�'�t ra8r f i� t � ' �+A i t }y,=.. �o :. � . p r+e s�{n� r �: i* ry5,�� �t
y t�. 4 �,J � � r t f :1 � �� � ,,;�i n !'" a, <; �,'a 1 • i � �� �-.� .,� �r u {�9' �S.�Sq.,�
� S. K �` � a; � f � � �{`-�t }, i �•° � "� { 5 �-�'� � j � r x � '� t n s v �` � . �.`y ��?��.@�b`��r�s'FiN "
} � � �*
c e���, ,� �t �:i 1 r�.� � � �. f¢ �C� r , '-4 k r t i f g, 4' S � .:I, r �` �F nY r {� ,�gr y 7�Y yy
�° � '�f�! �� k -� r _ ! . 4 - '�� �'�.� �r � 7�F t y'�
3y ,� s�i {� P �� �( ..x .\ ap { 'y u �'��� � d t i' �� i � � �'�' t-y �, .
� �� CF" ' x }, t� .� . �� ���k� -�> i 0 �re�s. [ ;�'�` �'�y r . �0 � �. &p .tn� �ti- � w��,,��`W,;.
i $� " »� �� � i��. 3'� t. . i .,�r ,�� .,. s Kr, �_y � �, y4 W�`x ;;.f'�+� � '� o `� .�>ii ei..�,� �t ,�� ��� � .
* �p� � F�:�'� � t . � 1 � � , � i �� �y ��� � i:g�"� � �,q�±; �t� a,��,, , �r ��� �;' � „�#� ��� 4���{� �,°��'�}�,�1��� t�1±�...
�`�° *� . i'( r s ' ,.�{ 4 7 � :,� �r� �, �i �'� :�;} i i t �� .: � �� ��m M �` �, �. S� fi 1< �- t �,�'f �y .S; �(y���
$� r ' ' � �x 1 i r rF� r -r� � x: � Xf`l.r j ,�,�.:;,'z�" � :a�t{;r� t dy1 f' i ,.A�t�'r Cy_}'��{��,
y �k :��f� `.e.'!5, '1 I k f �Y �'� � r ��� ., a � 1 �' -ti� � 7 :� h?� .i'�' d� �Mr � �z � �F q ;!^ 4 �M � d #?:°�
°�'!"f , � � r \ b` �'�'J,'T� ::.� �",r }� `�. 1-� 6 ..� ,� t .:i L i�'���j ���r.r-� }� �t c.,3,�`i E 1 ,.,�u �x�.q'�n�,� � �
C�'�r , �y.�1� . a_ � - � rl°c�3 �.:�. r�JY /.i"; fd ,� :'43 t � {. { , �.,.� r7'i�}Y.,� J��,-s"�° r{ Y . � �cx�� t� x kt��..
��:1 '� R.�' 1 K Vi- Y € � a �.� .:.)'id � r .i l �� , a '.�J � .,� � 5 � � „ � �..�;�� 4 w
`e a �` ,., r 'r ,� � w ��' � ° r a � r �,�.��� �:��r
��tirz � 1 *t � 1 :-'� F � . { a y�� ` ° �'.r' r T� 1 *:'. tt �_�: f � ��� � p :,g� �� �' : i i � 1 �+�- �� 3'�, �
r. 4'�����i "!t.,� � i l � 1 `` 4 i'� 3 fa $ �,:h a.��'k �'�.;�. `r a'� i : ��� ! '.'� i � i 'r. �a iti �'i� �T,� b�''��,
� �.i. e p. �(.�, rF� .� �,. r.- ��i' Tt } ¢ ��i �' ���,'{�;o � ,.vJar y'�::3� `�'b S�� y;,
i
��'iF' �-.�` �a..r„ � � f �- �7 1 �1 f� .z r 1 � 1 -F' f •� � I U�'r,, l�y,t. � :S� ^4: .`� o }� r
�"�'H���° � •'��ii.` � ��'� '� �' �� t t �,1� �•y �f,� ,�, �r�� �,�'.tt �r�4'''i� � � _��� �r �� '� � ����rt S'���.,1 � 'h',���3���'�� ��'���Y"�ia F���h�e
°��� � f �!�� ?p� � ° � 4��"` � '��,� � '��:{ `�r =,�r -Xa � �, Ft� I � ��� �> 4`S * .�.� ° � ��� i� h�° w,� ;�.���`�i}�' r:}y��` a�;��a ��;
��� �g � �4' `.x� t � _, i,6 .a �:'t' �i`;, � f t r ." .�t�b .� '�"�e�4 � �
� a � 3�t�. �� �.'^ � a 4�.,�s � : � ... ,� , .�.5 y;, �1 t � J �� - �„ �S > ,if'� /� ,+ �,,._3� ��rf�f�l�` 'P�a�" -.
� '�k� w1'b � _°*-�.. �"� !� � r� r`� M1 tG.:yf„ �7 �,' , � ., � ��'��i r +:Fa�' 4, ��yk 4�:
� �t���,,y� t�f.i� � - .3♦ . � 5 ��� K�i P �,�1 $� E��. +.:�� � '� ����
+� 2 � : : ,, :`j �� � a x;, r � � z �..,� t� . t "` (� t q -��,f7 a�' ��.q�' x�'r '� r�. 5'' �
t 4�u^Lk-�. � A �d` �,�°� i ._ � � »y`` :. �� ��r,., a �-,, r i.� ,�, M . '�y � g� .`,i1 p,� :��r � ^t F��,�` ¢�{��' '�t�
� � �� � 2af .�� k} ? F � � �����i( ° �- k �. r �,'4�� ��i�� �," j�l�� � -� ;��5 -}
1' � l�� � y � � � . , ���x ' � i !i i � f M i filV d �L F y� i& 7 YA' 'S.,.
�
� . ' 3 . ��t�� � �.� f � A A t t �,_r ''�n��� i 3 �'
� t �."� �� � ��' �r f��ka+ �[,� t��� � '�`�1<�� i�'� ���� t � r�.��� b�! . �Fm�,:,� � � � �� t,..! � �" � '� d��� a�
� >��w: � ,...ra w f , * .. 1 � j 1 d " � {, M :�" 7 � �t i s ,4y 1 �� +� � }y�., � 1 xn �,,i` e� ��I��� -�
$"� t�� 1 7 tT-&.�. :�'�yt v t �,. .� ��
� � � ,, � �' � �' � �
���s`vrv'. �w g �y<` t � � r� t.� y� �,:.g � � ��, �`�, ta p �4, '� � 'i4� `F . �� t ., + ',�y�f''%'�3�',*rt,p� �c �.�r�y;.
i�� � t u r:.� 1 A .. wI .- Fi S r'�.:� �.r9FtA t � i "{ � � �� }�
� :F �'r ?`�t'1 i *',�;'r�+ .�� '.a , ���� v ,� � -` r <� �r .t ��4� :•:� � �i� 3 ,r� �t y � � � �
� s ,���� ���� " � � h ;�1 e� �i N T'}f' '?� 1 .;tt � � �� � ef A.� �r ..k � 7 h +P �t'4b
� t y ,. 7 � ' .r �, . � � .i�,j s �'""xX r q�r� : xs ' ��6 �`J a�.� r�7d ,7�'.0'� �1'�k ,d�a�y.Y� �i'�.,� x
�A ��'.,� � G f t � 'I�. ro .Y, � i �'' J Nd. I!�' - �x k; T �"�S.r�`�F�.� �'� e� ES���,t{}:K�` �.� .�` C��`'�9;��;�'�r�'�.� �M��� .�' °i�r' �;-.. �
a .� �. or��� w n.t ='�; Ss t �,t� �a .j -r :�'rt t., � � • �1 ,
'� � h t:����1 ��� /�Y:' ��7��� �' � �f �� ���r�A��,� ��fH���� ��*'€1`� ��.
t i Y A f � �'h •�iM., 4 �yy {1� 1�4 � y�$ .1i
"��X ��. 7 '�1' 4"i T i � � ���'' � � .."� �f +`x..+tr } �' )7� °}°�
�� �C t � i �l � ���Y�a � ,; �a e.� � � t # '`�,t ��( �# �{}��,y�,� ��:�� ,
,.
�, i i � �����f ��'� r� , �� t�1��� _ "�� �; a�' �, tr .,r � � %j��4. �x S{;���}�s�+��ke �� k��"� 'F.a.�.�
. � },,��1 � y1�1�"���� ,! � � �� .. � ��^ �r G � x��� �.'y:'�g Y �� � t
C J � 1 j�5 .S
� y �r k �:a �'+�t t y, js � �, ""3 y�t 1 +''� x �� a ,s y:. . r#i�p�„�,��ir �,FZ,�,t�1�t ��� s`g S �� �,�,t f�e
�t^ �, t 4` '� 'y'yd}. ;.,�E .�'o',� � 3�i: T � � i '- ` ,�{� �r �1 e e r X � '� n'. r �, v.. t �d �,t�'�k j„k�!i�\ x ;
f w °+ � {��� �y r ,�y '� �`1 *� �::,r�a� y.,� -�t �� �, '!. -.-�f, �5.� ��4.
�>Y '�'1 1{r,4 h' •`� y5 .,� ,S. � 9� • .�sA � � � 1:'. +' d
k �d} f. --n . i I ':a .'i + _ g � i� t� �.�.L v� kA�a� .. ; i 1 t1��.Jr�'� � � �ti�,�
, A a:a � �r 1� r f.,� w� , t , � i : . •} r > � r �'� Y'� � f �.rr� r t
� ��{ �,��k , ?' ,> �i$�'' �r t�� ✓ �- ' ,.. d .:�,'i k ;s�' �'u. � 4": �"� �y�a ."�s-kF r� �� �+�,�yY�F,'�� •
7:: � ���
�� � �aS� � _ � - ''f { W �� � yT� ,fi
� 7� � d � \�� �? "'�x� i@� � wk ��� .,..� ��i ."_ . _ 1�'� • -? � T .. + � µ��� �€`� �� t�1��� �e�g `
� t � ,, „ � �
�� «�. -y ..tl , , ..,. w Y ��������i
u � � �� . t > ��r ti � 'r . x n �' .�a� � r,}4h � � ��`��,'t'��4i� ��
.._. "6�, "t
R s�? � i� �.' ' � � �`3��R .;. �. . .: �� p �bs � � r 7'�. �fi "h�t:�a �ilv*r ��'�� �'A'y� � �.'
�q pc e �k �;: a *� � Y .� . , �� +y 4 � ,�� a �d s Y:�' T �` t,q � /k" y�� r
4 'S� u 7 . � � r � � ` + • a�.i e x i _Ix d ',.J �s' i n R � �.. -n
G" �° < �' 9 .�'; � ti e � •e ��, f �'� "� �t � r j;�Fffi� �.., I �� v ,� � � �'+ � s c ' �rz ��it�r� �.: � �
�x a t` - F ��" � ',) � ` Y� ��°�� , ��� ! ��:ti r q;� �j � +,f��,� "S`'�,+ i�� ,� .
6 . '� . P.� y . . t � �!i�
4 E'�'' .k r .� ;.1 f f f .` �' ', '�"f�r :� �j' r r �y r F'. "� :.k'� +.�`�� L '�� ! Yf ...
�Z �. ' ����� � ' 4 Y 3. 9 '� l �.%
'j Y�'� t' al�.� a � .:.a a 1 �i � P �''� J J..:: �''+ �+�+��" �.�:Sc
X � �_l fry ` d +c4;A; J-,r! ,j i.. , �.._ � .�r� k�;...a� }���� �.�� te. S i .._{rv�i +�� �.�. � � �-'� A .
�w F �/, t t'F t;4� ,.✓ �VS r� � 4.,! :'�`f ��1 � t : ?-� # ,�V; ��� iF b�/�.� `y ' e F y�,A �_"��,. �a�r'� "�,'hy�� i��Z'"� '��4�3k�
�t b �f t i ' � ' ,' �S t t� �y
P� � F i, y7' �.: i�; ���. , AF'- � �� t Pf, t � �f :,1 �'_�� )§ !x `�.� X'° 4"�>i.�4 a frax �+i Y^� 2,�.ri F t� � 7 dtk ���",g� '
,.� �z F��� f ;. � ���, � ,x : T Y ��t .>.I F, . � r .�,: r J � , y Y,�+? '' x ''�y� M 'Y�"'�
w � �t�,,,«fy y� } , � �. i- �,,��. i � � � lr ��+iiY { .rf 9.'.� � -. St; a � �
/.ri" a. � � 'i a _,y �„- 'b � ..,} : ,jy f �� �t � . �K3 ;�4
, . � h � ' 1 � t ,,y � 1 `a ��, : 1 r '
i
,�� �'� ,,�. e.. i t'�. � '^ i , � �, y��,y. � �� '! rf ��� iu ��, � 4�a}r � `� .T�i { �c�s� �.�
�'�t� ,` t '�.� �� ' 1 , y �r s .� �� { ����J� � ; F < t d� >€ � : ; "1' r
�+? a �� . � ' � �`1 �' ya; �� i 4 ' ��, � �� � v�: � � ,i dr n � p� 1c ���`�i
�a� i � 7� �:' �' � � � E s t^ '�� i �' ���'{ t �'� t �t�� a u�w �S yy�p f� � x �,
u `r ��>� �-. �� ��" ����� � � � � y��„�a. j x'+. �,�' {ik� y ' �,,�y � .��
1CAr ':�.p. . sni �,+�'.l'� " . � �v q�/ '•� r � . i�'���: � .� �,rk ;A;' a3 ! � �it.t�t �
S F gy � c�j�8
y�`' ,� '.t , S. S1' , i p 7 � � .,..'t i � � �l I� j�}�;.� s �S,y� �+°���.{ � �, 7 f,�r �'�'� �w��..�t �.�;
a i�. t �{� � ..., i 'S � `.,. �� ...,��- .�:� � }y 3;M f T ��' +�{x �: �a�' .. f� �"'�. ✓ �:� ��
���I• E °� c �; ° � �'`c�� Pi nyt 1 '' a � �y 'r �,4 �`�, "�F ,� �f:t � ��`�c� ���- ��� °i�'�� � �� �a, ���` k �.�y�,�S k '�
i� � _;�'�Yt+ `� ,� � � ���(��� � � r a. � � �. i�, � xt�.. T r�'4 , � �' ' � Y'� � r -� � LL �� av„f.
t ��� � t,i ' � �. �� t. �i <l p � .+ �c� �� � ,r :�� X t��i,�i �
�� .::i :' � � .., # ;.�x �,, ;� yy� .t ` ti a b ;��� �i.�. r F.' � k� ��'� . r
a � i � 1 �� 4r / r r 7 g.c a .i � ��, �f ,, � :N'�''�h' et��
�'x p�.� °jl � � z ^f r s a ":�� � :�.� �y���� �f �l; e F:�� �'� "r ''����I `��r� �1�� yR��-i t L �����-a+c s �� 1 1 � F�`� ��a ats-'�i� � � 3
f '' f r ':' i�i�-.s 1 S,.� � � y,.' � �� �.�' a,{ v.. s w .: y�Y}tkr I�`� F.y �wt �� � o�� ,k..� t
„� �`,0.'� +r�: s � , '�f .#;.4b r t :�y,� �r fi 1 ;� � ld � � r�^�: > ? � �, M r�, iq r� {�r , �k
��,a �1" 1 ,ti� y r '.1 t �'i i Y �,�' i ::L 1 J � 4 d ' :, 1 '�`ij"� 5 � �v + ✓s'�'�,W � i' . � +t_ �
��d�F��� 4 ,;.�h � , 4 l� :i�v � _ t � t F d j•it �w,��' ^t L �;. r,y�3 {r4 � S c�„v,� �t � i�.����v�e'&' ii
�µ �'i' :.{, � � � �. + � ��' a�.o �..,� ����� . � .� � -A $ 7 i�v�,a � 6 '1"� � �? IS:�r� ,��t`'.� � >G1�y�A'r
�� t � e,��"' ; '��+, , k � ti' `'-r� � 1 � �, �. �' �;���� %�� � �uf�, ��C'�++a �` ���
y� �� �, � a l�/ � � F �>.. " �7.. � :�' � �,� � � � '�� �.� � ��` }g�:�' (�c Q�,�}IS � .��'��4'�".�c�� � 4�� �� R`
t � r ."t� �� �'� i 41,� .. t ,� + � s��� � � n�,�
i3 i 'M1� i rt ; � � z ' r � " ' ` `' � � �`� '` .� s � � { #�t � P5 a
y „ ,,,k�+ v�, �r r�
,� ��"'` u ��� ` � � t r ¢ �,.���i3��� :'''� * Y{f�5; ,,, �.`Ky.�, k} .:t� k�Ix���� ��"��A� ��
�Y {� r � � y � {�;� 3�
`� '� ^•��.a�� � `:� i � �.��� ��'{ .� i t , � t.,� f..:� ; ., ��� � '�i .' �� "� a�.,a ��,�,: �"t �.� �'�,�i^�1,�'it �,i..
� �`' �¢ ' f y!�i �:�, {4p ��. �zt ��` �� di.. � F � l . � �„rt �a r � i�„/ � x�r �y'R�'+�'y t�s 1+�, "��A
�� � t 4'� '� � ' ! � ; k�� � . � � i , � �' h k V, � . r: � �� '� ' `� � �,'� �{A �f.�° ,��;��'�t� '
r , 1
�l+nM � i V� ��� �� ����� /� E ��M ,(��' .x� � � , ' �� t�1��� V.:f� � ��� �i� �iY ':b u �,�. � � \+ � ���,x����.^�� 1��,�.x,���
fk ri.s� i �-"'� � r' i v p�y ,.i^ � � t� � �{. $
j :.� �, . � �, r .' d ' � lrit �_�� : 1 i rd�i �ry �F �/y r5`y. d �.•• t:�•a1 � �{r � 4�;��'�i r 4 '+�`�p� f�.�`t����9 d
i d#� M :f ! � A') `.5 :� ��f�. � . Ff j 4 1 -l 4 h�,� t
; i S� t,f � � t' s : �' * .> > � 1 x �'�i r , � i ,t� R' ���i
1 4,t � �`a r kt l '� � '' a� +,# �-: r;� � � � (t' r�i ( � v ;�
K �t �,1 � � A 1 f I v . �g �,� ���,�,
�' 4�r t. � � � � z � 's�. a� . '�`� 1 �. w�t�:a ' �� � i'� �.'� � i �pr� � f "y`4��'Y�'+�r""���n`�;� �#1k"'�,��.
� 1 ' ��1 �,.t j� s� :` G � i*; b�� t•+,j t ;/. ` ' '': 5 N � ,�. rn� !�a k� 4�, ''� 'r'1 j�: r��i ,�'��y�,� � ��4
A ai'�'" : i � ;� � rr�( .. F ,f I ,Y' . E .x. � r 8z '` � -,��, � �.� �� i� ti4 k ..�4 }� k t:z �( t?a1t3{�.v� '�y,ti
a '
;., : �� k rC � � ��r v . �. r'�� i .� o� � i " 'i 'k. � �'' 3 �{e
�
+t t - 1 ,a,,; w ��, � �,, r � 4 1 � , �. � � � ' � - u p�'� +. lF �� + t � , a ''�� � `�� �'�r °i°� �`:.
�"� �A . fri r r%i ra� i v i � p r � �i i � ` .� 1 �a..�,�....ii.`ar : .�1�3,.,t .� '�Y' a>�1� ��i;J,..
�f�y�.S..n li� . ...... ...A , u. �. .tt: u, . . . ,.k�_�'8...... v.,1.v_ e.,..._r k� . N l�t.......rc ..4r.i e�T, n, 1�.. -...�1� .M
55 East Fifth Street,Saint P�ul, Minnesota 551 01. Edward N.Helfeld,executive director. phone 298 52 18
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
' .
Ms . Rose Mix, Ci �� May 28, 1975
386 City Hall ' .
"�°"��;
St. Paul, Minnesc -v�,� �����n,'� ��vEN
pevel�j.Min�H¢�EB��codn'.
SaNOT��Eto Ra�daM+PeU��w:��
AttentiOn: Mr. A1 �,�Y"�"�Q�Ar' u,�y���e���'^�;�
,h�e����,tof dsa���^'ti►��1.y�°�t°eqb���(
ne Gfamctl � Hl�Y qt n tn,
Na�E es��co�;ak��Y���pLC Hearing Notice
g75;�a�.��,r,a„�p�•��'����„"„�n.�elopment Plan — Community Development
�°' ��+ '
m�'�"�(��°sa��'a�;m m°�a:am — CD Year I
p P1an � !utµ °- e�
dtY�W{de bss�t4y°�Cqti�Vltieln9�j�'ta*
t dev���cxl9il tnr�h a�cttvl4ies,
Dear Ms. Mix: tY�.��wtidew�� ►:��.��a��
��,+he�G�n�,pi�(�pT a�G�.
�� ��t� n�' mN- St.
Find enclosed a cop�` �is�sr,��NM��� ag-�o�ef Public Hearing which will be
published in the Dis: ��,,,^��e�na► "���� �'��tii,;;f"s�'n'•ss on Friday, May 30.
Pr�� praas�Wiihit�m°�me�t P ert►
- 5 reat p�e�
Find enclosed also a P�;�,�,��„'„°,�,-����a�,s , "Community Development - A Program
For The Revitalizatio. �,�,��re�a �`���°�F�;;c°�-. Saint Paul" , containing the Redevel-
opment Plan and suppo� {"�"n?��",m�`�*�a���'�'P:^
� OeVe1� L�..�.�� �K n which the Notice recites is
available in your offi. m;'��►�;��m��,�`���;� ;pection during regular business
hours. Part three of 1����;,� Pw� �4��'���; •ogram For Implementation" , lists
all proposed community c�ri �',e �•�^* �• �;'�q�f�+�; vities including the addresses of
eva�fslD Syneys FAn�.tor °t�a1sn
plar � ld t�fl �IoP�� 1tn���'
real property identifie o���+v � F�r a 1. The Plan also contemplates
� seld �pgraM'rs�r��ed
Undo tn �� 9Y cer�tl �� ��
some acquisition of uni u�►�,{iop et�d , f �hy ,125 in the ITA areas. If
residents within the ITi ��,.'�°�m„�,�:- '�eR�";y ndaries are defined in the Program
For Implementation has c cw►��� °P�'�`°�� .��,�me ing his property, refer the
resident to Bill Fabec, , °s�;°w�o��"��pos�""a�e`�m
ln�si'W�P,o plyl�d wt b°�modt
�1M ��e y�red �W a��qn����p{n ee
qp� ���d,°°t F Sta48a
va��iM lal p� V��ted �r
Yours very truly,/ �'���WH��A tlerm°Pp
� !/ A9���t¢��(1) �sxgrrwme Sov e
/ Pleo wt11���fltv��R�ev���; `
( ��//f�— ! �,/f�� t��y,o�ot�s y�nrWat��lan
, ,��(�G�� r��Pl3$j^tt� R�+��ty e3 b
Jatnes T. Hart '�� g� ��f��ik� d°Y
,rm i ���++;'.
d��a���,�v{s1���cro����
General Counsel �,sn��•pa�je�t�cWd�� e�v`�
,'%2 g 8-5 6 9 5 'p"'�asn��°e%tti�"�°t���.
t � _ pr�nc�Pa �ncom
�POthij�'and s��res4ed�*j:
S01�ns a���4 mst1ty���an ��ra
°^"�i� at'ow�'°��pyWtc ti���RK
the�e�
pated:paY�sµ_o g�-05o�t^h—
����
Orville E. Anderson, Donaltl P. Del Fiacco, David H. Hozza, Robert S Ivester, Kenneth J. L nch, Willie Mae Wilson, Ron Maddox ^�'l��'�s�s
y y �>I�'ftEC�O EO
� PAPER
CAarrman
. , �
NOTICE of hearing on the Redevelopment Plan for the Communi�y
Development Program, CD Year I, Saint Paul, Minnesota.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to Resolution of the Council of
the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota that a public hearing will be held
by and before the Council of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota in the
Council Chambers in the City Hall and Court House, Saint Paul,
Minnesota, on the lOth day of June, 1975 , at 10 o'clock a.m. , upon the
Redevelopment Plan for the Community Development Program, CD Year I,
Saint Paul, Minnesota, which Plan proposes planning on a city-wide
basis for future community development activities, conservation of the
existing housing stock on a city-wide basis through rehabilitation
loans and related activities, and the continuation of redevelopment
and Community Development activities in the Phalen Area, Concord
Terrace Area, Summit-University Area, West Midway-South St. Anthony
Park Area, Thomas-Dale Area, Central Core and Seven Corners Areas ,
and West Seventh Street Area within the City of Saint Paul.
Copies of the Redevelopment Plan for the Community Development
Program, CD Year I, Saint Paul, Minnesota, and related documents
including a Program For Implementation which identifies all Community
Development activities proposed under the Redevelopment Plan are on
file with the City Clerk and in the offices of the Housing and Rede-
velopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota and available
for inspection during regular business hours . That all real property
identified for acquisition under said Redevelopment Plan is listed in
the Program For Implementation and the owners of record will be
further notified by certified mail of the public hearing.
That upon said public hearing the Council shall consider the
♦ • .
� � ,
.
Redevelopment Plan for the Community Development Program, CD YEar I,
Saint Paul, Minnesota, and the Community Development activities in
said Plan proposed and determine whether (1) the real property to be
acquired would not be made available for redevelopment without the
financial aid provided under the Community Development Funding Agree-
ment with the United States of America, (2) the Redevelopment Plan
will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of
the locality as a whole, for redevelopment of the Redevelopment Plan
are as by private enterprise, (3) the Redevelopment Plan conforms to the
general plan for the development of the locality as a whole, and (4)
the Redevelopment Plan makes provision toward development of a viable
urban community in Saint Paul including decent housing and a suitable
living environment and expanding economic opportunities principally
for persons of low and moderate income.
That all persons interested or concerned in said matters shall be
given full opportunity to be heard thereor. at said public hearing.
ROSE MIX `
Dated: May 30, 1975 CITY CLERK
-2-
.. _ ,
� . -
r r � r r � r ` � � r �� � ,r■r r■r � .
i .
, � i
� '
_ i �� � <.�
� ..,� ,J � J�
I .
�
I
i
.
,
.
. • - ,
. �,
h
� � i � . � � � �
� '
. �
' .
i
I
i
1
.
.
. .
, � � . � '
. ,
' . ' • . ' ' ' . .. -. .. ' . , . • �.' ' , . . • , •� ' .� • ' •
' ' I
`
_ . ' .
'I
. __ , . k
• �
4 .
� I
I
{ --
• i •
. _ I
�
� ,
,
+ j
�
i
. '
�
• • � p •
;
I
� � �
• �, �
. ;�
• �
. �
� � � � � --
. , I �
r'
. ,._: . ;;., . : , . , . , _
�� � � � �� � � � � � �� � � � �
�
'�
�
� ,
�
. . . . . � . . I. . . 4 � . . . .
. � . � . . ' � .• . . I . . . . � . . . . . .
. ' . ♦ � .. . I . . . .
. � . . . � . « , i . . ,
�
�
. , � , .. � . � �
�
� . .. . . . .. . II . . ♦ .
. . . • . - . ' .. III . � .
� � . . ' I � a
. • .
� � .
.
, �
'
.
� .
, ;
.
. . '� i
. , _
II
. . . . . .
. . . . ' . ' . . •. '6• ' . , . . . � . �. ' .. � . • , • . : I� : . . , : ' • : _ .. ..
. I� . .
' . �I
� I
I
�
--._._.___�_.________----______.�-----°-
_ _ __ .. --- ---- _�__. ___ .----_ _.__. --------
___._.._._._. ..._____._.._.__. �._._____._._
I
. .
�
,
• .
; • � �
, II
. I
�
i
I
. � .
' j
_._ . �
• . II,
� -� j
. II
I
!I
�
�
,
• � • • • •
� .
� • -
i �
� I
�
' � �
• • • • �i �
I �
i •
i I
'
�
! � - �
�
� �
. i
� I
! �
,.�.� I
� � � � � � � .� � � � � � � �
2-20-75
PROGRAM SUt�4(ARY
History of Urban Rdevelopment in St. Paul
� Since 1950, St. Paul has been a participant in Nederal Urban Renewal Programs.
These began with the U. S. Housing Act of 1949, a slum cle�rance program, and .
proceeded through various modifications to include housing rehabilitation,
•
business redevelopsaent, and public improvements as eligible activities. The •
mnst xecent redevelopment activities have been carried on under the Neighborhood
Development Program (NDP) which began in 1969 under NDP, specific areas of the
City were identifi:ed as project areas, with the stipulation that federal monies
for NDP could be spent only in those areas.
Housin� and Community Development Act of 1974
The Housing and Coaununity Development Act (HCD Act)� of 1974, which was signed
into law in August of 1974, consolidates not only previous housing legislation
but also several HUD categorical programs. It assigns much more responsibility
to the local level of government in that the guidelines for spending of CD monies
are much less specific than those for previous programs.
What this means for St. Paul is that a single block grant is now available which
can be used to continue or initiate programs such as renewal, housing rehabilit-
ation, planning, related human services, the provision of public services, and
citizen psrticipation. A ma�or guide that is carried over from previous programs
is that activities should benefit principally persons of low and moderate in-
come. Local matching funds are not required; however, the City must submit an
annual application and prepare annual reports. The Community Development program
has been funded for three years and will provide the City of St. Paul with an
annual $18.8 million.
The Com�nunity Development (CD) program broadens the pos�ibilities for types of
activities which are eligible to be funded. By omitting the requirement that the
activities take place in only a few selected areas of the City, the CD program
also provides the capability of serving this entire City. Hawever, the funding
level remains the same as when only a few specific areas were expected to be served.
■� � � � � r � � � � r � ■� � �
,
Program Sumnary � 2-20-75 _
Another major revigion the CD Act makes is in the area of citizen participation.
NDP required that a structured commnunity organization be set up in each project
area, with specific legal powers. The CD Act specifies only that the applicant
(the City of St. Paul) certify that "adequate citizen participation" has taken •
� �
place in the process of developing the application for funding. .
In summary, the intent of the CD Act is to establish a 'biable urban community".
In order to do this the City of St. Paul must take a c anprehensive view of
community development, including tqpes of activities that have not previously
" been eligible for funding;. and it must take a serious look at the role of citizen
participation in both long-range and short-�erm planning decisions.
Procedures
Th� following is a summary of the procedures used to establish goals and policies
and to plan activities which will carrq out those goals and policies.
After the signing of the Housing and Community Development Act in August, 1974, the
'+�ayar pz�' C:.� ...,.._,..�, :^�:t,.,t a Y c�� �, ::::i�:� t;. 3�v�a�g t::� .:��3i��ti�::
1 iV VNLL�t�.aL iLai lY �'.M iL 1V�.
for CD Year I. The City P2anning Department was to take the lead role, with the
assistance of an inter-agency task force (which became known as the CD Staff
Task Force), Participating on this task force were staff from the Planning
Department and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority; and representatives from
the offices of the Mayor, City Administrator, Budget Director and City Councfl.
Also attending many of the meetings were communitq organizers and representatives
of coffinunity groups. The City Planning Commission (the Planning Advisory Board
appointed by the Mayor) was designated as the official city-wide citizens' review
body.
The Task Force began work in September, 1974 by developing objectives and policiee
for first year programs. After being reviewed by citizen groups, the Planning
Cormnission, the Mayor and the City Council, Chese goals and' objectives were �
adopted by City Council in Nvvember, 1974. .
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Progras Sucmnarq , 2-20-75
Community organizations were then invited to pre3ent specific program proposals
to the CD Staff Task Force. A series of sessions were held for this purpose
which provided time for interaction between staff and community organizations. ,
The outcome of this process was a listing of program priorities for each '
neighborhood of the City. By the end of December, 1974, the Staff Task Force
had made preliminary recommendations for budgeting of the $18.8 million for CD
Year I. A major portion o� these recommendations were taken. from the proposals
originally made by the community organizations. ; ' .
�
In January, 1975, a final series of public meetings were sponsored by the Planning
Commission 'in order to present the staff recoc�nnendations. The .recommendations were
sent on to the Mayor and by the end of February, 1975, the City Council had re-
vfewed and given its approval so that the application could be submitted to HUD.
Citizen Participation Process
Some explanation is needed as to how the "adequate citizen participation" require-
�aent was met in St. Paul. When the Staff Task Force first began me�ting (in Sept.,
1974) those attending agreed that a definite structure is needed to assure adequate
involvement of the community, fn all plann�ng and implementation programs rather
� than just for the CD application. However, given the limited time that could be
used fn assembling the first application, it was decided that several series of
public meetings and hearings would have to suffice.
When the budget for CD Year I was developed, $2b7,000 was included as the estimated
cost of providing each of a number of districts in the City with office space and
staff for a neighborhood citizen participation office which would carry on organi-
zational activities and publish a newsletter. No recommendations were made by the
Staff Task Force as to how many districts there would be, how the boundaries would
be drawn, or what powers and responsibilities the neighborhood offices should have.
Thege determinations are expected to be made by those attending a series of open
forums which began in January, 1975. Recommendations will then be submitted to
the City Council for consideration and adoption.
- 3 -
� � � � � � � -� � � � � � � �
Program Sunnnary 2-20-75
At this writing, the forums have elected officers, adopted �tobert's Rules,
, and established four (4) co�nittees to make recommendationa on
1.) Function of citizen participation
. , 2.) Internal structure and process �
,
3.) Number, sizes and boundaries of districts �
4.) Staffing and financing. '
When the participants have succeeded in developing a citizen particiPation plan
and have gained the approval of the City Council, a permanent structure will be
set up for involvement of residents in those functions of city government stated
in the plan.
- 4 -
' � � � � � � � . � � � � � � � �
A. STATEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT OB.TECTIVES
The primary overall development objective in the .City of Saint Paul is
to eliminate and/or ameliorate those existing conditions which serve to impair
the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the citizens of the city of
Saint Paul, and which also serve to inflict an economic blight upon existing
private investment in some areas, and threafen the sources of public revenue.
The conditions which have been found_ to exist which cause the above noted *
factors include unsafe and unsanitary housing conditions, overcrowding, build-.
ing obsolescence or faulty arrangement in building design or improvement,
. deleterious land use, lack of adequate light, ventilation or sanitary facili-
ties, inadequate public facilities, such as parks, playgrounds, schools,
streets, sewer facilities, or other equally deleterious conditions. There _
also has been found to be an inadequate supply of decent, safe, and sanitary
. ' . housing in the City of Saint Paul, parti�cularly for families of low .and
moderate incomes and 'for the elderly, and a primary objective of this Redevel-
opment Plan is to overcome the conditions noted above through public inter-
vention so that private enterprise will achieve the means and receive the
encouragement to provide such ilecent, safe, and sanitary housing for the resi-
,
uenLS ui Saii�� raui.
Specific objectives to be achieved within the context of the foregoing are as
follows:
• 1. To restore, conserve, rehabilitate, and foster a neighborhood residential
em�ironment conducive to urban living £or all segments af �he population.
The neighborhood should have amenizies sufficient for modern needs, be
safe, be adequately serviced, and be visually attractive and economically
atable.
2. To restore, conserve, and enhance, where feasible and desirable, the
identity of existing neighborhoods in Saint Paul by rehabilitating to the
extent possible, the exis�ing structures in the area and by strengthening
those elements which serve to give identity to an area, such as neighbor-
hood gathering places, .education and recreational facilities, and similar
elements tending to characterize and/or give identity to each sub-neighbor-
hood.
` � � � � i' �' i' �li� �li� � � �. .�
3. To provide for efficient use of land sa that each particular land use
will function witihout adversely affecting or being adversely affected
by adjacent land uses. New construction should be physically and
visually compatible in design and scale with nearby parts of. the exist-
ing neighborhood. .
.
4. To remove blight and conditions of deterioration by; .
a. Encouraging and fostering voluntary rehabilitation of property by .
awners. All rehabilitation wi�l, as a minimum, meet all applicable
� codes of the City of Saint Pau1. In addition, property owners will
be encouraged to meet additional rehabilitation objectives intended
� � � to assure the livability, attractiveness, and marketability of
� properties, Such additional rehabilitation olijectives are set � �
forth in Appendix A of this Redevelopment Plan, .
b. Undertaking a program of public rehabilitation of deteriorated build-
ings in order to demonstrate rehabilitation feasibility, and public
acquisition of deteriorated 'ouiiain�� iur Les�ie �v Yd��ies �aYa�ic .
of rehabilitating them, �
c. Undertaking a program of acquisition and demolition of buildings
blighted to the extent of being incapable of being rehabilitated,
substandard buildings, or buildings otherwise determined to represent
blighti�g influences. •
d. Undertaking a program of code enforcement with the appropriate City
departments to ensure that hazardous and unsanitary conditions are
either corrected tihrough rehabilitation or elimin3ted through demoli-
tion. The teztn code enforcement for purposes of this Redevelopment
Plan shall mean substantial structural repairs, alteratfons, or demo-
lition of a building to conform to local housing codes.
5. To provide for the development of new housing, both multi-family and single-
family, which will maximize housing opportunities for citizens of all
income levels particularly in areas whera opRortunities have heretofore
been limited. The intent of this objective is to reduce the possibility
� � �` i' i' i' iriri� i� � r� � �. �.
. of concentrations of any one incoane group and ensure the freedom of
choice for all citizens with regard to housing Cypes and location. .
6. .To foster the economic stability of resident-serving commercial facili-
ties and to encourage new private imiestment by members of the comaiunity.
7. To achieve safe and adequate vehicular and pedestrian circulation pat- ,
terns and capacity. �
� ' 8. Ta meeC the educational, recreational, spiritual, shopping, service
and other needs of the residents within their neighborhood; to assure
that the human services needs of the community are met. �
9. �o encourage the continuing participation by the membera of the community
. . in the planning and programming of renewa], activities for their respective �
neighborhoods.
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
B, �General Land Use Plan �
For those areas of the city which have either undergone renewal activities in
� the past or are currently part of an ongoing program, general land use plans and
maps have been adopted. These plans are hereby incorporated by reference �nd
made a part hereof. - ,
. •
During CD Year I, as comprehensive and project planning for new areas of the city
fs accomplished, specified land use plans will be developed to the detail of those
referenced above and submitted for adoption as part of the CD Year II program.
These plans will be developed within the framework of over all city wide
. policies and comprehensive plans as delineated by the city planning department
and will rely for their foundation upon existing documents such as the Zoning
�ordinance which is currently unde.rgoing substantial revision. Specific land
use categories including type of uses permitted will be defined as will such
items as major circnlation routes, densities, building requirements and public
facilities. .
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
C. URBAN RFNEWAL TECHNIQUES TO BE USED TO ACHIEVE PLAN OBJECTIVES
While annual funding amounts rather than deCerminations of need gov-
ern the extent of the renewal activities which can be undertaken by the
� city, the following techniques sre cited as a means of achieving as many
of the objectives set forth in prior sections of this document as possible.
1. ' To aid in the conservation of existing housing atock, rehabilitation ,
loans and grants as well as technical assistance will be made
available to home owners to improve their properties to meet
local codes.
2. Properties which prove to be economically infeasible for the
current owner to rehabilitate, or where the current owner is
unwilling to rehabilitate the property to code standards, may
. � . be purchased and rehabilitated for aubsequent resale to
families of low and moderate income or sold to families who
have demonstrated their willingnesa and capability to under-
take the rehabilitation.
3. Existing housing which is currently underutilized due to its
�n�+ e�D�+na� 1�t� � �7��1 �A�ww7..� n `w�1 .y�..w�.. �d. FJ �e l..t 1 .
�t..+.�...J �� �v a3 V ra�.. v� •. L� 441V a�V fii�: Li�tOL��.1011r
or physically incapable of providing routine maintenance, may
be purchased, rehabilitated and resold at a reduced price to
a larger family of moderate income.
, 4. Structures exhibiting hazardous, unsanitary conditions will be
subject to code enforcement by the City. •
5. Vacant land which is currently underutilized and as such
exerts an adverse influence upon the surrounding neighborhood
may be acquired and subsequently disposed of for redevelopment
to meet plan objectives.
6. Properties which are substandard, exert blighting influences, are
infeasible to rehabilitate, or are needed for public purposes
or to effect ob,jectives .of the plan may be acquired and demolished.
7. Construction, reconstruction or expansion of public and semi-public
facilities contributing to the viability, attractiveness and safety
of the community will be secured. Such facilities shall include
parks, playgrounds, schools, churches, coromunity centers, utilities and
sewers, libraries, and similar facilities.
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
8. Relocation of site occupants displaced by public action will
be undertaken with the intent to assist those diaplaced in
securing adequate replacement housing which meets their needs and
is within their means. '
•
9. Home ownership will be encouraged, particularly for families of
low and moderate incomes.
10. Safe and adequate vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns
will be achieved through:
a. . The redesign and reconstruction of major streets where
necessary.
� b. The elimination o£ reduct�on of 'unnecessary thru-traf�iC.
c. The provision of off-street parking where feasible by .
commerical and other uses which generate vehicular traffic.
d. The construction or reconstruction of sidewalks, pedestrianways,
street lights, traffic mntrol devices and other facilities
�.iht�rP rnn(1�tinr�c �.,�rra„r anr,j t;��1PYP c+�nli amnrnnn+�crtc �.�ill un�
�
r-'•--
hance the environment of a neighborhood and sugment rehabilitation •
and/or redevelopment activities.
11. Sites will be made available for new �commercial construction and the
grouping of commercial facilities at appropriate locations where such
facilities can be mutually supporting and provide greater convenience
and service to residents. �
12. The coordination aMOng public and private agenciea,will be
sought to ensure that the human services needs of the community
will be met.
13. Maximum citizen involvement will be encouraged through a structure
now being developed by the Citizen Participation Forum in cooperation
with the City government..
� � � � � � � •� � � � � � � �';
�
� ;�
�
. �
�
Although ats�ing of renewal activities is required due ta ''
� �
limited funding sources, it should be noted thst the city �
�
will continue to investigate every means to implement
necessary actions within a reasonahle time frame. Recent
�
legislation allowing for the creation of development districts, �
garking dfstricts, the sale of bonds to finance commercial and � j
•
industrial development, and the utilization of tax increment
financing will be applied �ere feasible to expand the city's
capability to implement this plan. �
___ � ._ ._______.__..--___ . .__ ._..._. ___ ::_ __ � . �
� � ��
i
�
- �
�
�
, �
I
�
{
. �
;
� i
i
i
. . . . , � . � �1
� � � � � �' � •� � � � � � � �
D. LAND DISPOSITION .
Properties acquired by the designated city agency pursuant to the plan may be
disposed of by any of the following methods or combination thereof:
� 1. Demolish the structure thereon and dispose of the land in accordance with this
plan. .
2. Sell the property subject to its being rehabilitated to meet local applicable ,
codes.
3. Rehabilitate the property to meet local applicable codes and sell
the property at its fair market value or lease at fair rental value.
4, Retain or sell the residential property for development of low- or moderate-
income housing.
5. Dispose of property to appropriate public entities for purpose of providing
� supporting facilities and project improvements. ,
The designated city agency may elect to dispase of the properties individually or
in combinations, whichever method will best accomplish the purpos�s of this Plan.
In any case, all disposition of sites will follow the requirements of State and
Federal laws.
Specific additional guidelines governing land disposition are cited below,
1. Land Use and Building Restrictions
• For neighborhoods where land use plans and redevelopment plans have been
previously adopted, land use controls as set forth in those documents will be
applicable to disposition of properties, Building Restriction provisions
further detailing these land use controls and governing density, bulk, open
space, setbacks, parking, circulation, etc. , will be provided as parcels become
available for sale or lease.
2. Circulation Requirement
For previous NDP and renewal areas, land use maps have been adopted which
indicate all major streets through and on the periphery of the neighborhood,
The number of local streets will be limited to only those needed for access to
property and will be designed to discourage through traffic. Connections to
major streets will.be limited to only those necessary and these intersections
will incorporate such devices as medians, turning slots, and traffic controls
to insure maximum safety. These same general objectives will play a major
role in the development of plans for new areas of the city. :
� � � � � � � � � � � � � i �
3. Redeveloper's Obligations - .
The general requirements to be imposed by the Contract for Sale between the
redeveloper's of property and the city's implementation agency are:
a. To develop the land purch�sed in accordance with the controls and objectives
of this Redevelopment Plan. � �
b, To commence and complete. the building of improvements on the land within
a reason�ble period of time as determined by the implementation agency.
c. Not to resell the land before improvements are made without the prior
consent of the implementation agency. �
; •
' . d, Not to discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national
origin in the sale, lease, transfer, or occupancy of the land.
• e. The contract and disposition documents will spell out in detail the
provisions, standards and criteria for achieving applicable objectives,
requirements and regulations contained in the Redevelopment Plan.
4. Cnmmitment to New Housing Opportunities
To increase housing opportunities for citizens of all income levels, priority
will be given in matters of land disposition to those proposals which will
. result in Che development of housing which serves the needs of income groups
previously unmet in certain areas of the city.
5. Urban Design Obiective and Control
. The implementation agency maq contract for sale of property upon receipt and
acceptance of preliminary plans, but normally will not dispose of property
under such contracti prior to receipt and acceptance of construcfi ion drawings,
The agency shall retain the right of design review and may reject any proposal
which is felt to be inconsistent with the goals and objectives of the Plan.
Specific design objectives and criteria wil� be established for each parcel
prior to disposition, and proposals will be evaluated in the light of these
objectives and cri�eria, Such objectives and criteria will generally seek
to achieve the Development Ob�ectives set forth in Section B. of this Redevel-
opment Plan. � -
r � � �■■� � � � � � � � �■ � _ � � �
6, Duration of Controls
The development controls and regulations will be incorporated into the deeds
conveying land and shall be maintained and continued in effect for a period
of thirty (30) years from the date of approval of the Redevelopment Plan by
the City Council of Saint Paul.
•
�
� � � � � � � � � � � r � � ��
r
� � � �
:;
E. OTHER PROVISIONS NECESSARY TO MEET STATE ANB LOCAL REQUIREML:NTS
1. Non-Discrimination
Every contract for sale, lease or redevelopment of property within the project ;
area will include prohibitions against land speculation, require compliance �
�
with all State and local laws in effect from time to time, prohibit discrim- �
�
ination or segregation by reasons of race, religion, color, sex or national ;
• j
origin in the sale, lease or occupancy of the property, and require that this
latter provision be made a covenant running with the land and be binding upon
1
�
the redeveloper and every successor in interest to the property. �
�
2. Vacations, Dedications and Covenants �
Vacations and dedications of public rights-of-way shall be accomplished by i
separate actions in accordance with State law and local ordinances and will ���
� be initiated by the agency or redeveloper. I
3. Citizen Participation �
It is the intent of this Redevelopment Plan, and of the governing body of the
Ci�y of Saint Paul, that active participation by the citizens of the City of
Saint Paul be encouraged in the continuing planning and implementation of the
renewal program. Therefore, to the extent possible in a manner consistent
with Federal, State, and local law policy and regulations, it is the intent
that all activities to be undertaken under the provisions of this Plan be
undertaken witk� the knowledge and advice of the citizens' committee designated
by the City Council,
' .
�
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
F. PROVISIONS FOR AMENDING PLAN
The Redevelopment Plan may be modified at any time by the City of Saint Paul,
in the manner provided by law,
,
\ .
,,..a , ..,xrn,�..__�,.,,,� .,.......T......._ _
_ _ ,_ ... , ,,._ . _ . . .. ,�,,...
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � /�
A. ACTION YEAR PROGRAM
The action -program tor CD Year I as developed.by an inter-agency task force
established by the Mayor and City Council emphasizes three major themes
consistent with the objectives set forth in the Redevelopment Plan; plan-
ning, conservation of existing housing stock through rehabilitation and
related activities, and the continuat.ion of Community Development activi-
•
ties within neighborhoods currently undergoing renewal with the assis-
tance of previous Federal programs.
1. Planning Program
The planning program during CD Year I seeks to address overall city �
� needs and the specific requests of areas of the city. $873,000 is
recommended in the proposed budget for this activity; $252,000 to the
City Planning Department and $621,000 to Che Housing and Redevelopment
. Authority. The line item budget detail for each of these allocations
is to be developed by the respective agency director.
Through this division of responsibilitie$, it �aill be the function of �
the City Plannine Deoartment to d�velon vnnAral , ,rnror�71 �it�_wi�iA �19�Q
and policies in conjunction with appropriate city departments during
� CD Year I that include Che following:
. a. Housing and updating of the Housing Assistance Plan.
b. Economic concerns
c. Parks and recreation
,
d. Human resources and services (crime prevention, elderly services,
day care, multi-purpose centers, etc,)
e. Em�ironmental issues.
f. Public improvements.
In addition, the City Planning Department will develop an evaluative
mechanism.to •review CD programs,
� It is recac�ended that the City Planning Department and HRA provide a
planning and design team, funded by Community Development funds, to
undertake area planning in both the neighborhoods new to community
development and those with ongoing programs. Pro�ect planning in
� � � � � . � � � � � � � � � �
neighborhoods shall be undertaken by HRA. Plana :�nd programs develnped
ahall be consistent wiCh policies snd comp�ehensive planning determina-
tions of the City Ylanning DepartmPnt and•Commission. .
Both city-wide and area planning will be accomplished by working in
concert with citizen organizations. Approximately $267,OOO ,has been
budgeted to fund citizen organizations yet to be established.
� .
2. Rehabilitation
During CD Year I, it is proposed that emphasis be placed on the conserva-
tion o£ the city's existing housing stock. To achieve this objective
of conserving the housing stock, the primary tools wi,ll be low-interest
� . loans and grants. Resources for the loans and grants will be derived
from Che following: .
a. Federal Loan and Grant Program � .
b. Veterans Administration (VA) , Federal Housing Administration (FHA) ,
and private funds.
c. The State of Minnesota program. • �
u. �1'Lc� �'s�y Oi, vaitli. idul�ar 'v0[Yultig ttui.nUY'iZa�lOII IOI C1L�►-wine SCL1Vltl@S.
e. Community Development funds.
The probable total loan and grant funds which are expected to be used from
these programs through June 30, 1976, total approximately $4.5 million.
. The federal program offers low-interest loans to homeowners in Neighbor-
hood Development Program (NDP) areas. These rehabilitation resources
will continue as a separate federal program until August 22, 1975. It
is anticipated that during 1975, $1.2 million of these funds will be
available.
A total of $2 million in city general obligation bonds, if authorized
by the Legislature, will be available to the HRA to offer low-interest
loans and grants in the former designated I�IDP areas. ' �
� � � � � �: � � � � � � � � �
In 1974, the Minnesota LegisLature authorized the Minnesota Hous�tng
Finance Agency (MFHA) to sell up to $100,000,000 in revenue bonds and
the proceeds from the bond sale would be used to oper�te a state-wide
housing rehabilitation program. Through this program, eligible home-
nwners will be able to obtain low-interest loans to improve their
homes. (While due to current econamic conditions, the MHFA has not �
.
been able to market tt�e bonds, it is expected that the bonds will be
sold this year.)
The 1974 LegislaCure also authorized the City of Saint Paul to sell
u.p to $3.0 million in general obligation bonds for housing rehabilita-
tion, The city of Saint Paul has developed and begun implementation of a
loan and grant program for owner-occupants of low and moderate-income. Bonds
in the amount of $1�.5 million have been sold and will be expended during � �
this program year. ,
During CD Year I, it is proposed that the rehabili�ation resources
available to the city be used, for th� most part, in a coordinated
program with emphasis on concentrating resources in small areas of.
from four to six blocks. Within the NDP neighborhoods, fihese rehabili-
- tation areas are designated as Identified Treatment Areas (ITA's) , while
in other communities, these areas are being called Concentrated Rehab-
ilitation Areas (CRA's) . While the terms are different, the primary
objective--conservation of existing housing--is the same. In both
types of areas, Community Development resources will be used to comple- .
ment the rehabilitation programs. Zn both areas, complementary programs,
including public impravements, code enforcement, relocation, and removal
o� vacant, hazardous buildings are to be used. The ITA will also include
additionnl tools for which funds have been provided. These include
spot acquisition and demolition, emergency grants, and acquisition for
rehabilitation and resale (house recycling) . The Goncentrated Rehabili-
tation Areas have not yet been d2signated by the City Council. CD funds
will be used to supppement .the city rehabilitation funds. Rehabilitation
loans and grants will also be available to eligible appliGants through- ,
out the city, on an individual application basis.
�■ � ■� � � � �■■ . � � � � � � � �r
The following is a listing of rehabilitation and related activities to
be implemented by CD Year I funding: (This does not include additional
rehabilf.tation loan and grant funds referred to abave.)
1. Rehabilitation loans to supplement the .city-wide $400,000
and NDP areas. .
2. Rehabilitation grants to supplement the city-wide 600,000
and NDP areas. '
3. Relocation payments in conjunctinn with code 300,000
enforcement in Concentrated Rehabilition areas.
4. Public improvements in Concentrated Rehabilitatio� 900,000
areas. �
S. Rehabilitation and community organization staff , 941,000
needed to implement the program.
Within or adjacent to several of the priority rehabilitation areas,
. specific improvement activities which are s�tpportive of the residential
stability of the neighborhoods have been programmed for CD Year I.
1. Housing Recycling Pilot Program $400,000
2. Removal of Hazardous, Vacant Buildings and Site 725,000
Clearance
3. Implementation of a Rodent Control Program 50,Q00
4. Douglas School Site Park 100,000
Improvement of surplus school property for use
as a neighborhood playground
, 5. Union Gospel Mission 144,000
To assist in the acquisition of a site for the
' provision of housing of last resort to meet the
needs of displaced individuals with special problems
6. Neighborhood Playgrounds 40,000
To provide temporary improvements of surplus school
sites to be used on an interim basis as neighborhood
playgrounds. Locations are at Lincoln, Phalen and
Sibley School sites.
7. Hamline-Hague Playground 75,000
Improvements to provide needed neighborhood recrea-
tion area
8. Marydale Park 35,000
Tc .complete improvement program of existing city
park previously funded through a Federal Open Space
Grant
9. Riverside Park
Improvements to utilize surplus school site as neigh- 97,000
borhood recreational facility
10. Kipps-GleiinTerrace Sewer Project Study 10,000
Study to determine the feasibxlity and costs of con-
structing a sewer system to serve 105 households in �
the Kipps-Glenn area.,
� - r � ■� � � � . ■■� � �■ � . � � � ■�
3. Continuation of On-goin�;. Community Development Activities.
For the past five � to eight years, several areas of the City have
undergone intensive planning analysis resulting in the formation
� and adoption of general land use plans accompanied by specific
redevelopment pla�s. With t�►e assistance of federal and local
funds made available through previous urban renewal programs
.
such as the Neighbrohood Development Program, substantial re- �
newal activities such as area wide rehabili.tation, public im-
provements, redevelopment of severly deteriorated residential �
areas and the revitalization of the Central Business District
have already been undertaken. While these efforts have been
considerable, insufficient annual fuading has limited the scope of
- these undertakings and many unmet needs continue to require
concentrated efforts and funding.
It is therefore the intent of the City of Saint Paul, that while
extensive comprehensive and project planning is being undertaken
throughout new areas of the City during CD Year I, a major portion
of the funding should be channeled to redevelopment activities
within those areas where needs have clearly been identified and
plans completed.
By reference, these adopted general land use plans are herein incor-
porated and made a part of this document and will serve to, guide
activities within these neighborhoods until such time as they are
either amended or superseded through the development and adoption
of more definitive plans.
The following proposals are identified by area for implementation
during CD Year I,
CQNCORD TERRACE
Peter's Meats - DannY's Rubbish
In order to complete tfie renewal plan by elimiating remaining incompatible
uses fram a redeveloped residential area within this urban renewal project
and to increase the m<�rketability of exisCing vacant land by enhancing the
environmental quality, the followfng properties are proposed far acquisi-
tion and clearance:
� : � � � � � � •� � � � � � � �
Block/Parcel Ad3ress �
2-1 344-52 South Robert Street
2-2 Vacant Lot
3-2A 353-357 South Robert Street
3-6 361-71 South Robert SCreet
$350,000
� , PHALEN AItEA ,
ITA �
To sugment rehabilitation activities previously undertaken in
this area as part of a federally funded Code Enforcement project,
certain renewal tools which were not available through the Code �
Enforcement Program will be utilized in the improvement of areas
where rehabilitatiorr alone cannot accompliah revitalization. As
an initial effort, the area bounded by Jenks, Case, Greenbrier
and Arcade Streets .is to be designated as an Identified Treatment
Area.
$300,000
Pavne Avenue Parkin�
As a means of maintaining and improving the viability of the Payne
Avenue Business District, the following properties are identified
for acquisition and clearance to provide sites for commercial
' parking. Community Development funds programmed for this acti-
vity are identified in ane�rmarked contingency fund and will be
utilized only if other funding methods such as parking district
legislation or direct assessment programs prove to be infeasible.
Le�al Descrigtion Address
South 25' of Lot 16, 17, 18 964 Payne Avenue
Block 17, Arlington Hills
South 24' of North 100` of 966 Payne. Avenue
Lot 16, 17, 18, Block 17
Arlington Hills
Lot 19, Block 17 65I Case Street
Arlingtcn Hills
$100,000
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
SUMMrT-ITNIVERSITY
Comprehensive planning and renewal efforts have been continually
and intensively undertaken in this sector of the city over the
last decade, most recently through the aid of the Neighborhood
Development and Model Cities Programs. Although substantisl
accrnnplishments, especially in the areas of rehabilitation, new
housing construction and public improvements are visible through- .,
out the neighborhood, there are still several areas of severe �
deterioration. To ensure the sucess of these past efforts and
investments by continuing the attack of blight and deterioration,
the city is committing a major share of Cammunity Development
funds for the physical and social proposals outlined beZow.
Madel Cities Health Clinic
To contLnue community health services, funds are programmed to
operate the Model Cities Health Clinic fram April 1, 1975 to
June 30, 1976.
$480,000
wiiiows 5enior �icizens Genter ,
. This program will continue to provide day care services, �
includi.ng tranaportation, leisure time activities, and
health and counseling services for a minimum of 'LS senior
citizens, with noon meals 5 days per week for those seniors;
in addition, hot noon meals will be delivered daily to 100
homebound seniors. Other senior citizens living in the �
Model Neighborhood will also benefit from the infonnation
and referral services provided.
$224,000
Hallie Q. Brown Senior Citizens Center �
This program will continue to provide a facility at the
Martin Luther King Center where senior citizens may congre-
gate for leisure time activities and may receive informa-
tion and referrals for housing, health services and legal or
financial counseling. In addition, 140 seniors may receive
noon meals five days per week.
$143,000
_ � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Ne�hborhood Justice Center
This program will provide legal and social services for
Model Neighborhood residents who are either already imolved �
with the criminal justice system becaus� of arrest or convic-
tion or who may be prone to commit criminal offenses. These
services wi21 extend to the client's family, in order to promote �
understanding of the criminal justice system and of the individual '
problems of the clients. The $30,000 noted here :is a match for
Law Enforcement Assistance Administration and other funds,
, $ 30,000
. Demonstration Grant Program ,
Grants of $1,000 per bedroom up to $3,000 will be given to
� � qualified households who construct new single-family homes in
the Mode1 Neighborhood. The purpose of this grant is to
encourage higher quality construction and to provide incentive
for residents of the Model Neighborhood to remain in the area.
$ 75,000 �
Selby Avenue Improvement �
Acquisition and relocation funds are programmed for acquisi-
tion of the following deteriorated structures in the commer-
. cial area of Selby Avenue between Dale and Victoria to initiate
the general improvement of the envirornnent. Specific reuse
� of the sites made available through this action will be
determined by detailed econrnnic studies to be undertaken in
the early part of the action year.
Block/Parce2 Address
123-15 181 Grotto
123-16 739 Selby
123-17, 733 Selby
123-18 731 Selby �
123-19 727 Selby - ,
.,.. . ..: r. ..:. ..
. _ _ _ _. _ _ . _ _ �. _ _ � . ._ _ _� _
123-22 707 Selby
1Z3-26 693�695 Selby
1z3-Z7 689-691 Selby
123-28 685 Selby
123-'L9 681 Selby �
•
124-10 617-679 Selby
124-11 67.1-673 Selby
124�12 665 Selby
124-13 657 Selby
1'L4-14 653-655 Selby
1'L4-15 651 Selby �
� 1'L4-16 639-649 Selby
1'14-17 637 Selby
1'L4-18 627-629-631-633-635 5elby .
124-19 6'L1-6'L3-6"LS Selby
$341,000
ITA •
- As part of the last NDP year program, the area bounded by
Interstate 94 to Marshall Avenue, between Dale and Victoria
was designated as an Identified Treatment Area (ITA) and
activities as defined for ITA's in the Redevelopment Plan
section of this document are under way. As Chis is a two-
year program, funds are herein programed to undertake the �
second phase which will complete the improvements.
$600,000
Northeast Quadrant Improvements
Activities begun under NDP in the Northeast Quadrant of
the Sumnit-University NDP area have been directed toward Che
redevelopment of this fifty-acre area as a new residential
in-Cown neighborhood. The last improvement effort required
is the construction of new streets and a public park. Com-
munity Development funds are programmed for �the completion.
of this activity.
$241,000
� � � � � � � •� � � � � � � � �
St. James
In an effort to upgrade the area bounded by St. Anthony,
' Dale, Fuller and SC. Albans and to encourage the rehabilita-
tion of existing houses where feasible, �the following
sCructures are programmed for acquisition and clearance.
.
B1ocklParcel Address
46-24 643 Central
46-26 ' 633 Central
46=27 631 Central -
46-28 623 Central - 393 Dale
55-18 671 SC. Anthony
55-20 6b3 St. Anthony
55-21 659 St. Anthony
55-`LS 643 St. Anthony
55-'16 639 St. Anthony
55-27 635 St. Anthony
SS-29 627 St. Anthony
$243,000
Southeast Quadrant - Blair House
The Southeast Quadrant of Summit-University is designated in part
, as a State Historic District. Recent years have witnessed a resurgent
interest in this area by younger families and substantial restoration/
renovatioa activities are visible throughout the neighborhood. The
Blair House (formerly the Angus Hotel) is scheduled for extensive
renovation by a private concern with the intent of conversion to condo-
minium housing. To provide an adequate site for off-street parking
as a coc:�plement to this private effort, Coc�munity Development funds
are budgeted for the acquisitior� and clearance of an adjacent
apartment building. Hawever, this acquisition will proceed only
upon receipt of firm cocmnitment that the Blair House renovation
program willbe undertaken. These £unds are therefore idenCified
in the earmarked contingency fund.
Block/Parcel Address
137-16 151-155 Western "
$225,000
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ��
Marshall/Webster School Expansion
In an efforC to conserve standard housing units which must �
be cleared as part of Che Marshall/Webstar school expa�sian
program, write-down funds are being programmed to undertake
a house moving/rehabiiitation program which will attempt to ,.
salvage twenty-two single-family homes. .
$330,000
Concentrated Rehabilitation Area
A concentrated rehabilitation effort begun in the area south-
east of Hill School by the Ccm�inity Housing Corporation and
HRA has had some initial impact on the stabilization of this
residential secCor of the Sumnnit-University area. To complete
these activities, CD funds are budgeted for rehabilitation
loans and grants as well as code enforcement activities.
. $400,000
HF.T.P
\ . .
HELP Development Corporation is intfie process of responding to '
the area's need for economic growth by developing a shopping
�
center at University and Dale. $500,000 of the total noted
above will be used as equity funding for the shopping center.
In addition, HELP will continue to upgrade the business climate
of the Model'Neighborhood by providing technical and econanic �
assistance to stimulate business opportunities for minorities
and area residents. $100,000 will be used as seed money for
loans to businesses; the remaining $259,000 is for administra-
tion.
$859,000 �
�
t
�
r
� � � � � � � '� � � � � � � / �
WEST MIDWAY-SOUTH ST. ANTHQiv'Y PARK .
Territorial Road Housing Site
To eliminate the last remaining concentration of seriously deteri-
orated hou�ing north af University Avenue and canplement previous
renewal activities and development, CD funds are budgeted for
.
the acquisition and clearance of �,he following properCies which
will provide a site for the development of market-rate housing. ,
Block/Pareel Address
25-1 843-45 Raymond Avenue
25-38 876 Hunt Place
. 25-40 2373 Ellis Avenue
• '15-41 2375 Ellis Avenue : � �
33-1 821 Raymond Avenue
33-3 2314 Territorial Road
2366-68 Ellis Avenue
33-4 Vacant Land .
$2 78,000
South St. Anthony Park
In the final year of the Neighborhood Development Program, funds
have been budgeted for the expansion and improvement of the
• South Saint Anthony Park. To pravide this neighborhood with a
complete recreational facility, CD funds are programmed fo'r
the construction of a new playground building and the addition
of tennis courts to the overall improvement program.
$370,000
ITA
As a continuation of activities centered within the residential
protion of this project which were initiated under NDP, the
area north of Universi�y Avenue and east of Highway 280 is being
designated as an ITA,and CD funds are progratmned to carry out
activities which are supportive of a sound residential area.
$250,000
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Street Improvement Program
To augment acCions proposed within the above ITA and encourage
additional rehabilitation of private-housing units, CD funds
are identified for the first of a two-phase cocnprehensive street
improvement program.
$409,000 �
THOMAS-DALE
ITA
As a means of encouraging conservation of existing housing and
eliminaeing seriously deteriorated struetures fram an otherwise
stabile residentfal area, the area bounded by Victoria, Grotto,
the alley between Englewood and Minnehahas and the alley between
Thomas and Lafond is identified as an ITA,and CD funds are
programmed to undertake a street improvement program as well as
other activities aecessary to achieve this goal.
$6�0,000
St. Adalbert's-Phase One \
NDP efforts focused in the eastern sector of the project have
eliminated same of the most seriously deteriorated housing and
produced .sites for the development of both new single-family
homes and multi-family complexes. To continue the clearance of
substandard t►ousing, increase the marketability of currently
available sites and enhance the environmental quality of the
area, the following parcels in the St. Adalbert's area are
programmed for acquisition.
Block/Parcel Address
85-3 254 Thomas
85-4 2S6 Thomas
85-6 268 Thomas '
85-7 'L70 Thomas
85-11 279 Edmund - 584 Elfelt
85-12 277 Edmund �
85-13 269 Edmund - 271 Edmund
t
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
. 1 �
85-16 257-'259 Ed�und
- 86-3 238 Thomas
86-4 240-Z4'L Thomas ,
� 86-5 588 Galzier
�
86-6 Z45-247 Edmund - 582 Galtier � �
86-7 243 Edmund
86-8 237 Edmund
86-9 233 Edmund - 235 Edmund
; �
. . 86-10 229 Edmund '
86-11 227 Edmund
92-2 560 Elfelt - 568 E2felt � •
92-3 283 Charles
� $737,000
Arundel-Mackubin North
Through several �years of NDP funding, the Arundel-Mackubin area
has been transposed from a neighborhood of overcrowded, seriously
deteriorated living conditions to one of new single-family homes
on adequately sized lots supported by the reconstruction of
public facilities. To continue this successful effort in adja-
� cent blocks, the following properties are iden�ified for
,
acquisiti.on and clearance.
Block/Parcel Address
21-3 716 Mackubin
21-4 714 Mackubin
21-5 712 Mackubin
• z1=7 491 Van Buren
21-8 487. Van Buren
21-9 481 Van Buren �
21-11 473 Van BureTi
63-z8 485-487 Thomas .
$289,000
i � � � � � � -� � � � � � � : �
Wilder Square
As a cosnplement to their development of a 299-unft housing
complex recently completed on land made available through
' prior NDP activities, the Wilder Fouadation is also construct-
ing a comm�unity center to serve the complex as well as the
surrounding neighborhood. CD funds are budgeted to aasist in � ,
the operatiom of its programs.
$ 54,000
�CBNTRAL CORE/SEVEN CORNERS
Block 35
A comprehensive redevelopment program in the Seven Cwrners
' � area of the downtown has resulted in the construction of a
Civic Center, a reorganization of traffic circulation and the
provisian of a si.te for a major hotel/motel complex.�' To continue
this program by eliminating inefficient and incompatible land
uses and implemenC the street realignment program, CD funds are
nrnarR�n�i fnr thA g�i,Y��t`f�^ �y ��,� r..�+ �_ .., _
�.y- .... �...iTi'.:aaa� �av�B�btC.y: .
Block/Parcel Address
35-4B 166-174 W. Niath Street
• 35-5 414 Exchange
35-6 406-408 Exchange
, $2 81,000
WEST SEVE NrH STREET
Davis School Site
As the elemenCary school conso2fdation program has progressed
in the city, several obsolete school buildings have been
abandoned and thefr sites declared surplus property. The Davis
School site in the West $eventh Street area is one of these
properties. Through agreementa with the School Board, this
property will be offered for the development of new housing.
CD funds are programned to undertake unusual site pteparaCion
work necessary to achieve this �development. ,
$ 35,000
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � ■�■ �■■ �fiii
ITA and Block 46
Previous NDP activities in the St. Stan's area have resulted in
the construction of more than twenty new single-family homes within
a two-block area. Complementing this redevelopment and the rehab-
ilitation which has been accomplish�ed in adjacent blocks, is the '
reconstruction of streets and sidewalks. The area to the west
is a relatively stabile residential neighborhood exhibiting only
a limited amount of substandardness and that being on a scattered
basis. To complete a comprehensive revitalization of this aub-
neighborhood, the area defined as follows has been desigxiated
as an ITA. From a point starting at the intersection of St. Clair
. and Interstate 35-E, along the freeway to Duke, then south on
Duke to Michigan, then east on Michigan to Richmond, then south
on Richmond to St. Clair, then west on St. Clair to the point
of origin. In addition to activitiea undertaken within this ITA
acquisition is programmed for the following selected parcels
wii.hin niocic 40, wnere a concentration�of substandardn�ss does exist.
Block/Parcel Address
46-1 442 Banfil
_ 46-2 159 Richmond
46-4 450 Banfil
46-5 454 Banfil •
46-8 468 Banfil
46-9 472 Banfil
46-11 482 Banfil
46-12 4$6 Banfil �
46-13 490 Banfil '
46-14 494 Banfil �
46-15 496 Banfil
46-16 4�98 Banfil
46-17 158 Duke
46-18 160 Duke �
46-19 499 Goodhue
� � � � � � � � � � � ' � � � �
46-20 497 Goodhue
46-21 495 Goodhue
46-23 487 Goodhue
46-26 467 Goodhue
46-31 449 Goodhue �
46-33 161 Richmond '
$650,000
Street Improvement Program
To augment the acCivities of the ITA described above, a street
improvement program is scheduled for undertaking.
$500,000
. ' St. Stan's East Housing Site � �
The area east of the St. Stan's housfng development exhibits
deterioration as well as incompatible and inefficient land
uses. A comprehensive redevelopment program including acqui-
sition of the following properties and utilization of another .
surplus school site is proposed for un�ertaking. This activity
- wi21 result in a site for the development of new multi-family
housing.
Block/Parcel Address
41-20 136 Western
41-21 140 Western .
41-22 144 Western
41-23 371 Banfil
41-24 369 Banfil
41-25 365 Banfil
41-26 � 357 Banfil
41-29 347 Banfil
48-7 357 Goodhue
48-8 351-353 Goodhue
48-9 349 Goodhue
48-10 345 Goodhue �
� � � � � � � �. � � � � � � �
_ 55-1 553 West Seventh
55-2 360 Goodhue
� 55-3 364 Goodhue
55-4 368-370 Goodhue
372 Goodhue
55-5 378 Goodh�e '
. 55-6 Playground .
55-7A 563 West Seventh Street
� 567 West Seventh Street
571-571� West Seventh Street
� 573-573� West Seventh 5treet
i �
. 55-7B 581-591 West Seventh Street '
$846,000
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
A. ELIGIBLE ACTIUITIES
The primary objective of the Community Development Program ia "the develop-
ment of viable urban communities, including decent housing and a suitable
living envirorunenC and expanding economic opportunities, principally for
" (Federal Re ister 570.200` Federal ,
persons of low and moderate-income, g � •
assistance is provided for the sup�ort of Community Development activities
which are directed toward the achievement of this overall objective.
Although guidelines for the undertaking of a CD program are less restrictive
� than those of previous programs and grant the local municipality more flexi-
bility in the kinds of activities which may be initiated, all elements of
the program must .as a minimum meet certain criteria as delineated in the .
section of the Federal Register devoted to regulations governing Community
Development.
The following excerpt outlines those activities which are eligible for
federal assistance through the Comcminity Development Program: �
Subpart C • E13gible Activities (570.�U0) -
(a) Grant assistance for a Community Development Program is
• available for �he following activities:
(1) Acquisition in whole or in part by purchase, lease,
donation or otherwise of real prope rty (including sir
rights, waCer rights, and other interests therein)
which is:
� (i) Blighted, deteriorated, deteriorating, undeveloped,
� or xnappropriately developed from the standpoint of
a sound comaaunity development and growth, as deter-
mined by the recipient pursuant to State and local
laws;
(ii) Appropriate for rehabilitation or conservation acti-
vities;
(iii) Appropriate for the reservation or restoration of
histosic sites, the beautification of urban land,
the conservation of open spaces, natural resources
and scenic areas, the provision of recreational
, , opportunities, or the guidance of urban development;
(iv) To be used for the provision of public �works, facilities, �
. and impravements eligible for assisCance under paragraph
(a) (1) of this section; or .
(v) To be used for other public purposes, including the
comrersion of land to other uses whe�e necessary or
appropriate to the Community Development Program.
� � � � � � � "� � � � � � � �
(2) Acquisition, construction, reconstru�:tion, or installation ,
of the following public works, facili.Cies, and site or
other improvements: neighborhood faciiities, senior centers,
historic properties, utilities, stceats, street lights, water
and sewer Yacilities, foundations and platforms for air rights
sites, pedestrian malls and walkways and parks, playgrounds
and other facilities for recreational participation; flood
and drainage faciliCies in cases where assistance for such
facilities has been determined to be unavailable under other
federal laws or programs pursuant to the provisions of 570.608;
• and parking facilities, solid waste disposal facilities and
fire protection services and facilities which are located in '
areas in which other activities described in 570.303(b) are
being carried out.
(3) Code enforcement in deteriorated or deteriorating areas in
which such enforcement, together with public improvements and
services to� be provided is expected to arrest the decline of
the area.
(4) Clearance, demolition, renewal, and rehabilitation of buildings
and improvements (including (i) interim assistance to alleviate
harmful conditions in which immediate public action is needed
and (ii) financing rehabilitation of privately owned properties
• through the use of grants, direct loans, loan guarantees, and
oCher means, when in support of other activities described in
57U.303(b) .
(5) Special projects directed to the removal of material and archi-
tectural barriers which restrict the mobility and accessibility
of elderly and handicapped persons.
(6) Payments to housing owners for losses of rental income incurred
in holding for temporary periods housing units to be utilized
far the relocation of individuals and families displaced by
program activities.
(7) Disposition, through sale, lease, donation, or otherwise of
- any real property acquired pursuant to this Part or its reten-
tion for public purposes, provided that the proceeds from any
such disposition shall be expended only for activities in
. accordance with this part.
� (8) Provision of public services not otherwise awailable in areas,
or serving residants of areas, in which the recipient is under-
taking, or will undertake, other activities described in 570.303(b)
where such services are determined to be necessary or appropriate
to support such other activities and where assistance in provid-
ing or securing such services under other applicable federal
laws or programs has been applied for and denied or not made
available pursuant to the provisions of 570.608, F'or the pur-
poses of this paragraph, such services shall be directed
toward (i) improving the community's public services and faci-
lities concerned with the employment, economic development,
crime prevention, child care, health, drug abuse, education,
welfare or recreation needs of persons residing i.n such areas,
and (ii) coordinating putalic and private development pragrams.
(9) Payment of the nan-federal share required in connection with
a grant-in-aid program undertaken as part of the Community
Development Program pursuant to 570.303(b) .
(10) Payment of the cost of completing a project funded under Title I
of the Housing Act of 1949, including the provisions for finan-
cial settlement contained in Subpart I.
� i � � i � � � � r � � �I � � �
(11) Relocation payments and assistance for individuals, families,
businesses, organizations, and farm operations displaced by
activities assisted under this. Part, including all benefits
at least equal to the minimum levels established under the
Uniform Relocation and Real Property Acquisition Policies
Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601) .
(12) Activities necessary (i) to develop a comprehensive comcminity
development glan (which plan may address the needs, strateg�►, •
and objectives to be summarized in the application pursuanC �
to 570.303(a) but may treat only such public services as are
neeessary or appropriate to support activities meeting such
needs and objectives), and (ii) to develop a policy-planning-
management capacity so that the recipient may more rationally
and effectively (A) determine its needs, ($) set long-term
goals and short-term objectives, (C) devise programs and
activities to meet the goals and objectives, (D) evaluate the
progress of such programs in accamplishing these goals and
objectives, and (E) carry out inanagement, coordination, and
monitoring of activities necessary for affective planning
implementation, �
(13) Payment of reasonable administrative costs and carrying
� charges related to the planning and execution of community �
development and housing activities, including the provision
of information and, at the discretion of the recipient, of
resources to residents of areas in which other com.�nunity
development activities described in 570.303(b) and the hous-
ing activities covered in the Housing Assistance Plan des-
cribed in 570.303(c) are to be concentrated with respect to -
the planning and execution of such activities.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this section o•r
tr c7�' 'J., an; �r.��ia� :. �:..a.. ,.,,: C �i�3 a;:t ia a
•— �..�..�..r vc.siab uia
model cities program shall be e�igfble for funding under this
Part from that portion of the hold-harmless amount attributable '
� to such model cities program as calculated pursusnt to 570.103(c)
(2) (iii) (A) .
(c) Costs incurred in carrying out the program whether charged to the
program on a direct or an indirect basis must be in conformance with
the requirements of Federal Management Circular 74-4, "Cost Principles
Applicable to Grants and Contracts with Sta�e and Local Governments,"
except as modified in these regulations. .
� � � � �. � � � � � � � � � �
g. DEVELOPMENT OF PROJECT ELIGIBILITY
Evaluation-of building conditions is a vital first step in the planning
process. Any system for classifyiag buildings must produce an accuraCe
description of observed conditions and be based on clearly defined and
acceptable standards. .
A system of building classifications according to structural conditions '
has been developed over the years within the Saint Pau1 Hous�ng and
. Redevelopment Authority Neighborhood Development Program, In 1967 and
subsequent years during the initiation of NDP, the Saint Paul Housing
and Redevelopment Authority contracted with Barton-Aschman Associates, , �
Incorporated to prepare an urban renewal survey technique that would
accurately identify and evaluate the exeent of deterioration, blight
or slum conditions existing in project areas. These standards 'and sub- �
� sequent surveys provided the basis for substantiating the need for public
action in. the area in accordance with established local, state, and
federal legal and administrative requirements. In the fall of 1974, a
residential structural condition (exterior) was undertaken to apply the
system on a house-by-house basis for major portions of the city not
included in NDP, code enforcement or renewal project areas. This sur-
vey and s.ubsequent evaluation was undertaken in preparation of the
� Housing Assistance �lan for Saint Paul, Minnesota.
. The completed survey covered 60°� of the total dwelling un�ts in the city.
Areas excluded were those which, on the basis of CRP studies, census data
and knowledge of environmental conditions, prompted assumption that no
major concentrations of deficient housing existed in those areas, Of
the 66,16'L dwelling units surveyed, representing 60% of the city's total
units, 17% were found to be major deficient and substandard. (For further
clarification and the impact upon the city, see HAP Saint Paul, Minnesota,
dated Februar•y 12, 1975) 0
As each structure was examined, inspectors noted all deterioration and
inadequacies as they might be influenced by age, quality of maintenance,
� � � � � � � � � � � '� � � �
adequacy of original construction, and obsolescence, regardless of
whether code violations were present or not, Upon completion of the
inspecCion and subsequent evaluation of the field survey, an overall
building condition rating was established from the following categories:
Sound - A structure with minimal� defects and in a standard condi- `
tion requiring normal maintenance. �
• Deficient buildingscontain defects which are not easily correct-
able and cannot be accomplished in the course of normal maintenance.
The classification of minor or major reflects the degree or extent !
of defects found during the inspection:
Minor - A structure classificed as deficient--requiring minor .
repairs--having more than three minor defects.
Ma or - Buildings classified as deficient--requiring major repairs.
Substandard - A structure containing defects which are so serious,
so exLensive tnat tney aciversely affect �11 or a large part of the
structure that repair is probably not feasible.
Bli�hting Influence - A term used ta describe an existing condition
� which (1) applies specifica2ly to the building being surveyed, (Z)
has an apparent adverse or degrading effect on other existing devel-
opment.
Types of blightin�g influence are:
Incompatible Uses or Mixed Use - A use (or a mixture of uses
in a single building) that is incompatible with the majority
of uses in the immediate area, such as a mixture of commercial
and residential use in a single building ox_ the presence of
a manufacturing use in a predominately resident,ial area. There .
must be a significant adverse e£fect generated by the incompat-
ibility or admixture.
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
,
Overcrowding of Buildings on the Land - Excessive land
. coverages by buildings resulting in a restriction of acc�ess,
servicing, light and air circulat3on, and other factors which
impair the functional efficiency of the building or the health
and safety of its occupants.
Excessive Dwelling Unit Density - Overcrowding of dwelling +
` units within a building, or on the land, to an extent that
the health and safety of the residents of the particular �
building or neighborhood building is endangered.
Obsolete Building Type - A building which can no longer
efficiently perform the function for which it was originally
constructed. This may be manifest in vacancy for an extended
period of time, in full �or partial abandonment or in conversion
" to uses which are unsafe or unhealthy for occupants.
1
Underutilization of Land - Undeveloped land, or land developed
significantly below the level of development of the neighbor-
i���d xnd ics environs constitute a blighting influence. Such
influence is manifest when such underutilization has a retard-
. �
ant effect on the economic, physical or social health of the
neighborhood.
Other ldentifiable Hazards - Vacant and vandalized structures--
� structures which constitute attractive nuisances to children
and adults which are vacant and which are vandalized or are
open to vandalism.
Combustible Materials - Structures covered with combustible
materials and located within four feet of another structure
constitute a danger of spreading fire.
With the assessment of existing conditions based on the aforementioned
criteria, areas may possess conditions by reason of dilapidation, obsoles-
cence, overcrowding, faulty arrangement or design, lack of ventilation,
� � � � � � � "� � � � '�: � � �
light, and sanitary facilities, excessive l�nd coverage or deleterious
land use or obsolete layout, or any combinatian of these or other
factors, which are detrimental to the safety, health, morals or welfare of
the community and collectively may constitute a "Blighted Area"
(Minnesota Statutes Section 462.4'L1, Subd. 11.)
Resolution of this problem may run the gamut of alterna�ives, from '
non-involvement to clearance and redevelopment. The decision requires
an evaluation of a myriad of inputs within the planning process frame-
work. Within the analysis, an evaluation of building conditions and the
clearance alternative requires adherence to specific cr.iteria. With the
completion of interior inspections and subsequent evaluation delineating
conditions rating, including structural and the existence of any blight-
ing influence, a structure conditions summation is taken assigning the
total number of sound, minor, manor, substandard or blighted structures
within the area, Clearance eligibility (a standard utilized within the
Urban Renewal and Neighborhood Development Program under HUD Guidelines)
requires that 20% of the total buildings he substandard and thaC 50°L of
the total buildings be substandard and blighted within the designated
boundary. .
Delineation of the boundary in determining eligibility should be drawn
to maximize redevelopment objectives. The clearance solution to a blighted
area is an exacting alternative to eliminate the negative impacts associ-
ated with the area. The clearance boundary requires suffiCient inclusion
of properties to negate the blight with adequate addres5 to redevelopment
opportunities. This is nat to say that the boundary cannot gerrymander
in and around the area to meet the aforementioned criteria, but those
areas excluded which continue to contribute to the negative influence
require adequate address within the redevelopment scheme to extract the
full potential of the overall community.
• , _ ...
�: .�.�. ,.,,..�o... .... ..m.._,,,..., ..... , . � ,. _ .. ._ . . _.-,. _.._w . .,. . _ _. � .. .
� � � � � � � � � � � i� � � �
C. JUSTIFICATION FOR CD YEAR I PROGRAM ACTIVITIES �
All activities proposed for undertaking during the first action year of the
Community Development Program, as outlined in a prior section of this docu-
ment entitled "Program for Implementation" have been subjected to and do
meet Che eligibility criteria as set forth in the Federal Register.
. �
This section of the project eligibility report specifically and individually
addresses each proposal contained in the CD Year Y program and sets forth
the justification and determination of eligibility for the undertaking of
each activity.
Numerical notations in the column entftled "Eligibility" refer to eligibil-
ity criteria listed under "A. Eligible Activities" in this section.
Justification refers to documentation of structural and envirornnental defici-
encies as defined under "B. Development of Project Eligibility" in this sec-
tion.
1. Planning Pro�ram
The planning program as outlined in tho �o�ri�., e�rf*,�� �ro��6��,µ i��
Implementation" is to be funded and executed through the Community
Development Program as submitted under items 12 and 13 of "Eligible
Activities."
' 2. Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation and related activities programmed for implementation
during CD Year I are listed below, accompanied by the �ustification
and eligibility as set forth in the federal .regulations for the under-
taking of each activity. (Numerical notations refer to eligibility
criteria listed under "A. Eligible Activities" in this section.)
Activity Eligibility
Rehabilitation Loans to su�plement the city-wide 4
and NDP areas
, Rehabilitation grants to supplement the city-wide 4
and NDP areas
Relocation payments in con,junction with code enforce- 3 & 11
ment in Concentrated Rehabilitation areas
� � � � � �' � � � � � ! � � � �
Activity Eli�ibility
Public Improvements in Concentrated Rehabilita- 2
tion areas.
Rehabilitation and Community Organization staff 13
needed to implement the program � .
. •
In addition to the above proposals, specific improvement activities
within or adjacent to several of the priority rehabilitation areas
and city-wide activities which are supportive of the residential
stability of the neighborhoods have been programnaed for implementation
as a part of the CD Year I Program. These activities�and their justi-
fication for undertaking are listed below.
� • Activity ' " � Eli�ibility . �
Housing RecycTing Pilot`Prograin l.ii
Removal of Hazardous, Vacant Buildings and Site 3
Clearance
Implementation of a Rodent Control Program
Douglas School Site Park 2
Union Gospel Mission g
Neighborhood Playgrounds 2
Hamline-Hague Playground 2
• Marydale Park �
Riverside Park 2
Kipps-Glenn Terrace Sewer Project Study 8 and 1'L
3. Continuation of On-going Community Development Activities
In areas where intensive planning analysis has been completed and redev-
elopment activities undertaken through previous renewal programs, specific
proposals have been programmed for implementation during CD Year I. The
following is a listing by area of these activities, accompanied by the
justification for undertaking as set forth in sections A and 8 of this
chapter.
� � � � �. � � � � ' � � � � � �
CONCORA TERRACE
Activity Eligibility Justification
Peters Meats - Danny`s Rubbish
Block/Parcel
2-I . l.i, v, and 11 Blighting Influence ,
� (Incompatible Land Use)
3-2 �� _ n
3-6 �� � ��
• PHALEN AREA
Activity Eligilibility Justification
ITA l.i,ii, 3, 4 '�
� and 11
Payne Avenue Parking I.i, and 2
SUI�IIT-UNIVERS ITY
� Activity Eli�ibility Justification
Model Cities Health Clinic 8
Wi2lows Senior Citizens Center 8
Hallie Q. Brown Senior Citizen� 8
�-------
- t�l1LC1 � . . .
Neishborhood Justice Center 8
Demonstration Grant Program Model Cities
Selby Avenue Improvement l.i,ii Clearance Area 2
Block/Parcel
. 123-15
, 123-16
123-17
123-18
123-19
1'L3-'L2
1'L'3-16
1Z3-27
123-28
1'L3-29
124-10 .
124-11
1'L4-12
124-13
124-14 '
124-15 '
124-16
� 124-17 .
124-18 �
124-19
_ �._ . ...., . , _ ,. ,, � _ �...,,.. ., ,�
,.,.. �. . ..,.. �. ....x_ ...:.
_ .: .;,., ._ .. ._. _ �:
-- �� �� w� 7�� ■�� ■� � � �
� � � � � � � � � � � '� � � _
Activity EligibilitY Justification
ITA l.i.,fi, 3,
4 and 11
,
Northeast Quadrant Improvements 1
St. James l.i,ii, 3, 4 Clearance Area 1
and 11
Block/Parcel '
46-24
46-26
46-'L7
46-28
SS-18
55-20
55-21
55-25 �
55-26 ,
55-27
55-29
' . � ' Southeast Quadrant-Blair House � � l.i,iii, 11 Clearance Area 2 � .
Black/Parcel
137-16
Marshall/Webster School Expansion l.ii, 4
ConcentraCed Rehabilitation Area 3, 4, I1
HELP 8,� Madel Cities
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
WEST MIDWAY-SOUTH ST. 1�NTHONY PARK
Activity Eiigibility Justification
Territorial Road Housing Site 1.3, 11 Clearance Area 1 .
Block/Parcel
, 25-! . . .
25-38 . .
25-40 .
25-41
33-1 �
33-3
33-4 . .
South St. Anthony Park 2
ITA l.i, fi, 3, 4 �
and 11
. Street Improvement Program � 2
,
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
THOMAS-DALE
Activity Eligibility Justification
ITA l.i,ii, 2, 4, 11
.
St. Adalbert's - Phase One l.i, 11 Clearance Area 4
. � Expanded
Block/Paxcel
' 85-3
85-4
85-6 �
85-7 .
85-11 �
� 85-12
85-13
� 85-16
' 86-3
• � 86-4 � � .
86-5 �
86-6
86-7
86-8
86-9 .
' 86-10
. 86-11 .
92-2 �
92-3
Arundel Mackubin North l.i, 11 Clearance Area 5
• Block/Parcel
21-3
21-4
� 21-5
21-7
zL-s
� 21-9
' 21-11
63-28
Wilder Square 8
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
. CENTRAI. CORE/SEVEN C4R1�lERS
Activity Eligibility Justification
Block 35 l.i, iv, v, Clearance Area 1
� 11 Expanded .
Block/Parcel �
35-4B
' 35-5
35-6
, .
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
WEST SEVENTH STREET
Activity Elf�ibility Juatifica�ion
Davis School Site l.i, 8
ITA and" Block 46 . l.i, ii, 3, Clearance Area 5
4, 11 Expanded
Block/Parcel
:
46-1
46-2
46-4
46-5
46-8
46-9
46-11
46-12
46-13 �
46-14 �
46-15 �
46-16
46-17 . •
. . . � 46-18. ..� � . . . .
� 46-19
Street Improvement Program 2
St. Stan's East Housing Site l.i, ii Clearance Area 5
Expanded
B1'ock/Parcel �
� 41-20 •
.. �,
-�2-..,. `
41-22
41-23 '
� 41-24
41-25
41-26
41-29
48-7
48-8
48-9
48-10
55-1A •
55-1B�
55-2
55-3
55-4
SS-5
55-6
55-7A
55-7B
74-1
� � � � � � � '� � � � � � � �
A. AbMINISTRATION
1. Policies and Re ,ulations
A family,. individual, business firm or non-pro€it organization required
to move from property that has been affected by publicly sponsored
activity is eligible for relocation payments to assist in obtaining
and moving to a replacement dwelling or location in accordance with the
•
provisions and requirements of the Federal Uniform Relo�ation Assistance
Act of 1970. �
It is the intent of. the City to provide a relocation worker to assist
each person to be displaced in locating a suitable housing unit, or
place of business. The first steps of the relocation pr�cess involve
the relocation worker assigned to the particular property planned for
� • , acquisition. The foZlowing services are provided: � � ' . .
a. Eligible persons are informed at the earliest possible date as
to the availability of relocation payments and assistance, the
eligibility requirements and procedures for obtaining such payments.
b. The extent of need of each eligible person for rel�cation assistance
is determined through direct personal interview.
c. Currettt and continuing information is provided on the availability
andprices af comparable sales and rental housing and of cqmparable
crnmnercial properties and locations.
d. Information concerning Federal and State housing programs, loans and
other special programs offering assistance is supplied to eligible
displaced persons.
e. Other advisory and r�eferral services concerning housing, financing,
employment, training, health, welfare and other assistance is pro-
vided in order to minimize hardships.
f. Assistance is provided in completing �ny required applications and
foraas,
g. Services are provided to ensure that the relocation process does not
result in different or separate treatment on account �of race, color,
religion, national origin, sex or source of income.
. I
_. ...... <..��.. �, . . .. ..,�,._. ._ �.....�
� � � � �. � � � � � � � � �~ �
The folLowing financial assistance is available to residential relocatees,
regardless of how long the dwelling unit has been occupied;
-- Actual reasonable moving expenses, or
-- A fixed moving expense allowance up to $300 (based on the
numUer of rooms of furniture or possessions to be moved) plus
� .
, a dislocation allowance of $200. �
In addition, homeowners who have occupied the dwelling for 180 days
prior to the first offer to purchase the property and tenants occupying
the unit for 90 days prior, may be eligible for the following replacement
� housing payments:
-- A Replacement Housing Payment of up to $15,000 for eligible .
• � � • • �. owriers wlio occupy. .the home which is� acquired. (This payinent� is �
. to he2p owners purchase and occupy another dwelling suitable
for their family.)
-- A Replacement Housing Payment of up to $4,000 to eligible tenants
to help in the rental or purchase of standard replacement housing.
Homeowners who have occupied the dwelling for at least 90 but less than
' 180 days are eligible for the $4,000 maximum Replacement Housing Payment.
Displaced business concerns and non-profit organizations may be eligible
to receive payments for the following:
� -- Actual, reasonable moving expenses, plus .
, -- Actual direct loss of tangible personal property, plus
-- Actual reasonable expenses incurred by a business in searching
for a replacement location (limited to $500.OG) or, as an alter-
native to the three above payments,
-- Payment in lieu of moving �and related expenses. These payments
are equal to the average annual net earnings of the business, but
not�less than $2,500 nor more than $10,000; payments to non- .
profit organizations are limited to $2,500. Certain criteria
must be met for a business to be eligible for this payment.
�.
� � � � �� � � � � � � � � � �
The foll�wing financial assistance is available to residential relocatees,
regardless of how long the dwelling unit has been occupied;
-- Actual reasonable moving expenses, or
-- A fixed maving expense allowance up to $300 (based on tihe
nucnber of rooms of furnitur.e or possessions to be moved) plus
.
� a dislocatfon allowance of $200. �
. In addition, homeowners who have occupied the dwelling for 1 80 days
prio.r to the first offer to purchase the property and tenants occupying
the unit for 90 days prior, may be eligible for the following replacement
� housing payments:
-- A Replacement Housing Payment of up to $IS,000 for eligible .
• � • � �. owners wlio occupy. .the home which is� acqiiired. (This payment� is �
. to help owners purchase and occupy another dwelliag suitable
for their family.}
-- A Replacemeat Housing Payment of up to $4,000 to eligible tenants
to help in the rental or purchase of standard replacement housing.
Homeowners wha have occupied the dwelling for at least 90 but less than
' 180 days are eligible for the $4,000 maximum Replacement Housing Payment.
. Displaced business concerns and non-profit organizations may be eligible
to receive payments for the following:
� -- Actual, reasonable moving expenses, plus .
/ -- Actual direct loss of tangible personal property, plus
-- Actual reasonable expenses incurred by a business in searching
for a replacement location (limited to $500.OG) or, as an alter-
native to the three above payments,
-- Payment in lieu of moving and related expenses. These payments
are equal to the average annual net earnings of the business, but
not�less than $2,500 nor more than $10,000; payments to non- .
. profit organizations are limited to $2,500. Certain criteria
mus� be met for a business to be eligible for this payment.
• _.,
� � � � � � � '�. . .� � � � � �
Occ�ipants nr.e not required to move until given the t:ime and opportunity ,
to find decent, safe, sanitary housing that mE�e�s the housing code of
the city and is satisfactory and affordable to the oacupane. Replace-
ment housing payments are not made in casesof ,moves to substandard
buildings. The city will ensure adequate inspection of all r eplacement
housing resources to be utilized by displaced persons. +
2. Organization and Staffing �
The relocation staff of the SC. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority
(HRA) has served since 1959 as the central relocation a�ency for the
city. Supervisory personnel, relocation workers and technical and
clerical employees are responsible for admini.stering the above policies
. . for Federal programs as well as for local programs such as school. site �
� assembly for the Schoal. Board of the City and acquisition for the Ramsey
County Open Space Program. The relocation staff is assigned to field
,
affices located throughout the city.
Estimates of the personnel needed to carry out relocation activities
were based on the projected displacement tor the tirst year of Community
Development activities,concurrent local programs and past relocation
experience. Following is a summary of staff estimates:
� Director of Community Services (time to be divided among relocation,
community organization and public information)
Chief of Relocation, Family and Business Relocation Supervisors
2 Relocation Claims Technicians �
3 Field Relocation Supervisors
10 Family Relacation Workers and 3 Business Relocation Workers
2 Secretarial/Clerical staff
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � ��
B. SUM•NIARX OF PROJECTED AISPLIaCENLP7T
The displacement programmed �o take place in the First year of Comattunity
Development funding is a result of three different types of activities. The
first of these are the renewal and code enforcement activities to be funded
through the C.D, program, Included here are six "Identified Treatment Areas,"
.
where a combination of clearance, rehabilitation and public improvement
activities will be focused on several �blocks of. extreme need, Also in the
first year program is the firststage of a "Housing Recycling" pragram, an
attempt to "recycle" large, presently under-utilized housing units back to
the large £amilies that need them most, Displacement figures for these two
programs are estimates based on thz available budgets.
, .� Code enforcement for public health reasons will'displace adflitional families�
and individuals throughout the city, The third category includes properties
acquired or scheduled to be acquired under the Neighborhood Development
Program but whose residents were not relocated prior to commencement of the
Community Development Year. It is unknown exactly how many of these people
will be moved during the. first year but estimates were made from past reloca-
tion experience. �
' �ollowing is a summary of displacement activities:
C. D. Pro�ram
Households Businesses
Summit-University - St. James Church 11 2
Selby Avenue $ 16
Southeast Quadrant 20 0
St. Albans I.T.A. 18 0
West Midway - Territorial ltoad Housing 13 1
I.T.A. 8 0
Thomas-Dale - St. Adalberts 38 p
� Arundel-Mackubin North 9 0
I.T.A. 10 � p
Seven Corners - Block 35 �0 1
� � �_ t � ` -� �- .� � t � � � � � ��
' Households Businesses
FJest Seventh St::eet - Block 4b Spot Acquisition `L1 0
- Hammond School Site 33 3
- St. Stan's I.T.A. 14 0
Phalen Area - I.T.A. 14 0
City-wide Housing Rec}rcling Program IO 0
'_' .
Total 247 23
City Non-Renewal Code Enforcement 60 0
Carryover from NDP Program 400 114
GRAND TOTAL 707 137
� G. StIN��fAR� OF HOUSIPdG F2ESOtJ�CES � . • ' ' ' � '
Past relocation experience shows that approximately 75% of al�. displacees fall
in low or moderate-income categories. A wide variety of housing resources
exists to accommodate the special needs of these famil3es and �ndividuals.
� Low Income
In or�er to qualify for public housing occupancy persons must meet standards .
of family composition and income. Generally the following persons are eligible
for some type af public housing. � .
Families - Two or more persons relafied by blood, marriage, or
operation of law who occupy the same unit
Individuals - A single person who is (1) eligible by age to receive
old age Social Security benefits; (2) physically handi-
capped or disabled;or (3) displaced by public action
Two sets o£ income 3.imits are established for initial occupancy and for con-
tinued occupancy. Persons displaced by public� action may use the limits for
continued occupancy in gaining admittar.ce. Eligibility for continued occupancy
is reviewed once a year for £amilies and the handicapped, and once every two
years for the elderly.
r;
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � ' '�
ability to lease 1,135 privately-owned uniCs and has bought (or is in the
process of purchasing) 90 Scattered Site Units and 225 HOPLI� untits. (The
leased and scattered site units are rented to low-inco�e families in the sr�me
manner as congregate housing. The HOPLYF program is a program through which
a tenant evenCually becomes a homeowner.) These four programs result in the
availability of approximately 600 units per year. '
Moderate Income
Moderate-income housing is available to families and elderly or handicapped
individuals who fall within the following income limits.
Maximum Annual
Family Size Income Limits
. • � ' . 1 . , $5,670. . . . � . • . " , . .
. 2 � 7,020 .
3 7,965
4 8,640
5 9,180
6 9.720 .
\
7 10,125 .
8 10,530
9 � 10,800
- 10 11,070
There are 2,502 moderate-income new construction rental units in St. Paul
and approximately 600 of these became available throughout a given year.
The city also has 93 rehabilitated apartment units for moderate-income
persons.
In addition, there are proposals for 268 units of new construction and 126
rehabilitated units currently in process. �
Moderate-income families and individuals will also be able to find housing
through MHF'A plans for single-family mortgage and multi-family new construc-
tion, the House Moving Program, Housing Recycling Program and Model Cities
grants.
�
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
The private-housing market has been and will continue to be s housing
resource for most of the persons who are displaced, With the assistance of
the $15,000 (maximum) granC, displaced homeowners are able to find housing in
the private market. Displaced renters needing 1 and 2-bedroom units.are also
competitive on the private market with the aid of Replacement Housing Payments. �
Section 8
_____._____�
Section 8 is to be the implementation component for policies stated in Che
Housing Assistance Plan. During CD Year I, it is intend�d thaC all Section 8
units allocated for the ci�y of St. Paul will be used for rental assistance
to families who are of low or moderate income and who will be living in
standard rental units. An eligible family will pay between 15 to 25% of
their incame for rent and HUD will�pay the difference betiween�that amount �and� �
the fair-market rate,
To determine eligibility, gross family income must be less than 80% of the
1970 median income by family size for the metropolitan area, Unofficial esti�
,....t..� ..� t12eo� 1�m�1_S �F�r thn jvj,i rinc�a�nl i G�..Sfi, Pa»1 areQ a7'P aG ff1��AWS!
W���� v - �
\ .
� Ma.ximum Annual
Family Size Income Limits
1 � . $5,600
� 2 8,000
3 8,700
' 4 9,350 .
5 9,750 �
6 10,150
7 10,450
g 10,750
g 11,000
10 11,250
It should be noted that there is a signlficant difference between the Section 8
limits and the moderate-income limits under older programs; presumably these
differences will be ndjusted. At this writing the number of Section 8 units
to be allocated to Saint Paul has not been determined.
� � � � � � � "� � � � � � � �
�.;_. :
;
i_. �
7 _ COI`1MUNITY D'r',VL'LOPP�fEIJT - BLOCt: PROG£�i
y BUDGET
t
CD-1 �
ATTACHMT;NT 1'0 Ot�I3N063-R-1471 �
� . �
. Budget by li.ne item and what it consists of by Program per original �
� document as approved by City. Council. . � �
LIIvE 1 - ACQUISITION
ff .- �
! : Program �� 5 - House Fecycling - Pi1ot Program $ 240,000
�15 - Angus Anex Acquisition 225,000
• �21 - Acquisition and Relocation - Danny's Rubbish ' 125,OOt�
� ��22 - Peter's rleats , 200,000
� .:
�23 -- Douglas School Site - Open Space 75,000
.- �r`25 - Phalen Area ITA � 180,000
� - ��32 - Selby--Dale, Dale to Victoria 237,500
i _ � � �r33 �- St. Albans ITA , � . . • .50,000.
�i35 - St. James Gl�urcti -Area; 170,500 �
C ��38 - Terri�orial P.oad - Housino Site 213,000
� �43 - St. Adalberts t�rea - Phase I 428,000
- ��44 - Arundel-riacicubi_n, North En�l East 142,000
�45 - Block 35 - Red Cross Block 236,600
� � ��46 - ITA ��1, Zdest Seventh S�reet � 360,000
��48 - Hammond School Site . 523,b00
Y3,YJ5,vCv
�F Direct Salary Costs � � 247,581
.�.,.
GRc1ND TOTAL $3,653,181
��
.�
LIN� 2 - Pt1FLIC �d�R?:S, FACILITlES� SITF. I,if'ROVEi1EN1S
�• Prograr� �� 4 -- Project Improvement Progran - CP.A $ 900,000
��14 - Payne Avenue Parking Lots 100,000
��17 - Davis School 35,OQ0
�� �il�i - Riverside Park , 96,000
�i19 - Zdiluer'SqLare 54,000
, ��2G - Lincoln, Ptial_en, Sibley School Rough Grade
�� and Fill i.n Site • 40,000
-' ��26 - Haiulii�e-Ha�,ue I'laygrounds 75,000
�27 - ii�ryland Par.lc Improver,.ents (Rest room facilities) 35,000
� �`33 - St. Albs�is IT�'� 250,000
l.. �=34 - Rorttie<�sr (tiadrant Pr.oj ect 241,000
��39 -- So. St. A�tilon}• }'�?rl:, Ccnsti-uct P1<zyground �uildino 370,Q00
r " �-41 - �-)est. �f R�y-nionc� Street �fOF,710
�_� �-47. - . ITA llistr.ict j�3 321,847
�r47 - Yublic Inprove.r:lents I.TA �E1 500,000
��48 - �lain:r,ond School Site 62,750
� $3,ts89,307
;...
Dixect S�lar}� Custs • 252_,405_
GP.Ai�ll TO'1'AL $3,7�t1,7]_2 '
�.� �
�_.
#
t �
�
___, _.. __ . �
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
_�,�:
F �ACL 2
i
� _ � .
�`" LIN� 3 - COl)E ENFOP.CE'.•fEPdT . . �
i . •-
Pro�;ram �� 3 - Code Enforcemei�t - CRA's $ 300,000
r� �r25 - Phalen �rea ITA 15,000 `
� �33 - St. Albans ITA 250,000
�37 - CRA - Southeast of Hill School 100,000
� -. �40 - ITA East of 280, Nort.h of University � � 250,000 -
I � �42 - Thomas-Dale ItA District ��3 298�298
'_. . $1,213,298
. ' Direct Salary Costs . 88 z051
� . GRAND TOTAL • $1,301,349
t _
�. LINE 4 - CLEAItANCE, DEi�10I,I'I'70V, P,�'H.�RILITATTOti � � . . . •
�- Program �I S - Housino P.ecycling - Pilot Program $ . 100,000
J �� 6 - Demolition and Street Removal ' , 725,OUJ
4�12 - Rodent Control 50,000
� 4133 - St. Albans ITA 40,000
• ��36 - Marshall Webster fIouse Moving 330 000
�E37 - CRA - Soutl:east of �Iill School . 300,000
� �43 - St. Eldalberts Area 32,500
�('`� . . . hl c'7-� rnn
{ � . . . � � � . �I.�tJ/ � ���/�/
E n;,-P�r �ai:,,-;� _r.��t� 522 �30
. - �
GRAND TOTAI. $2,099,530 '
� .
LINL S - REHAB LOAI�iS £� GP.t1i1TS
� Program �� 1 - Rehab Loans p
�� 2 -- Rehab Grants - $ 400, 00
600,000
$1,�OG,UO�
Dir.ect Salary Costs C;Sg�S�S?
7
� GRAI`D TOTAI, $1,�E5S,8�2
�... LII�f: G - SPECI.IL PP.OJ;:CTS ELll�.P,LY & Ht�i�DICAPP:.D
1
L _ C� ._O_. _
Y
�. LII;}. 7 -- PAY:�.I:`;7'S FOR I.�SS OF F,E\'T�1T LICO:�!r �
1 $ _0-
i .
�.���;r � — nTSt�o�Trt���:a �
i_.
na�erL�:,ing, Szles Promoti.on, etc. $ 60,0�0
r ,
i
� � � � �. � � � � � � � � � �
,_._ . .
�
f 1 ' � � PAGE 3
�.� ' . . . . . �
� LIPdE 9 - PROVISION FOF. PUELIC SERVICES - . .'
�_ � � ' ' ' �
Program ��7.6 - Help Dzvelopment Cor.p. - Equity Funding • � $ 5�0.,000
� ' .Direct Salary Costs ' 36,358
. . ' , . r . • � . -. , � .
'�� . GRAND TOTAL �' - ' $ ,536,358
� ' , _
LINE 1Q - PE1Y1�iCNT OF NON-FEDEP..AL SHAP.E � •
�h ; � ` " � $ ' -Q- .
� LINE 11 - COTiPLETION OF UP.BAN RENEj�JP.L PROJECTS .
�' ' � � • . � . ' . . . � ' � . ' ' ' _
None � $ -0- '
L .
LINE 12 - F.ELO.CATION PAYP�IEI�TS �?D ASSISTAIQCE '
�� Program �� 5 - House Recycling - Pi1ot Program ' $ 60 000
�
��13 - Union Gospel riission ' 144,000
�� �f?_i - Danny's l:ubbish 25,UUU
�„j itL� - lloug.las Sehool 5ste - upen 5�ace - • L�,C1UU
��25 - Phalen Area ITt'� _ 105,OOU
��32 - Selby-Dale, Dale to Victoria . 103,500
�J • ��35 - St: James Church �'�rea . 72,500
��3E - Territorial Road - Housinb Sire 65,0�0
��43 - St. Adalberts Area - Phase I 316,5fl0
�� ��44 - Arundel-:iackubir, North End East _ 147,200
�f45 - Block 35 - Red Cross Block 44,600
�46 , ITA ��1, West Seventh Stree� 290,000
�� � . ��4£ - Hamr.iond School Si_te 260,OOQ
$I,658,300
'. Direct Salary Costs GQ1,250
� Glu'�'D TOTA? $2,�59,550
1,Ti�E 13 - PI:E1?'\.T.ZTG A�'�TD :•i�i\ACi2�iEcvT D?;VrLO"i�'F.i�T
Frovisiun tia<_; been i:�.ide icr all of the sal�ry
costs ic?entified as the City i latin:ing Coi�:_^.�issior.
� and $7_25,000 ot the F.I::1 plc I1I1111� staff . $ 3S7,�50
r LINE 14 - ADMINISTRATIO�T - ` -
,
i . .
�. .
Pro�ram Ifll - Support Services . $I,503,00� .
��33 - St. Albans ITA . - 10,000
� • ��49 - Kipps Glen Terrace Se�aer- Proj ect 10,000
�--' Property rfanagement_ . 110,000
" '� Purchase of Equipment from NDP � � 65,000 �
$1,698,000
F..
i
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
.a_ :.�
�.� • ,
� PAGE 4
�-�. • . .
�._ • : . .
� LIP]E 15 - r10DY,L CITI�S ' ' . . • •'
�y Program �28 - Health Clinic - ' ' ' $ 480,000 -
�-� ' ��29 - Wi_llow - Senior Citizens 223,525 `
�30 - Hallie Q. Bro��rn 150,000
�31 �- rfodel Cities - Demonstration -Grant Proj ect
�' . Continuation Thereof 75,000
-• � Administration Costs ' . 358,801
. . � • $1,287,326
� . ' Direct Salary Costs � . � 41,623
- . GRAND TOTAL . � $1,328,949
�A ' . . .
r_
LINE 16 — CONTINGENCIES
I
1�. � Program �20 - ' Not Earmarked � , ' _ � ' $.. 859,669 �
(
�. _ ,
� .
� '
._ `
�
�-� . . .
i� � �
L.. � . . � _ . . -. . . . , � � . . . . - _- .
�� '
� .
l_ �
l__ _ .
� . - , . -
l .
� - - . . : . . , . - .
��
�