The URL can be used to link to this page

267870 WHI7E - CITV CI.ERK �[��,(� PINK - FINANCE t r��s r� CANARV - DEPARTMENT GITY OF SAINT PAUL COl1IIC11 � �� W BLUE' -MAVOR File NO. • in�nce Ordinance N0. ��D��_ Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date An ordinance amending Ordina.nce No. 15881, approved August 29, 1975, entitled "An ordinance adopting a new zoning ordina.nce for the City Qf Saint Paul, repealing Chapters 60, 61, 62, 63 and 64 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code and the zoning ma.p of the City of Saint Paul." THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Tha.t the Zoning Ma.p of the City of Saint Paul, Sheet No. 27, as incorporated by reference in Section 60.401 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, is hereb� amended as follows: The property owned by the Church of Saint James on the East side of View Street between Randolph Avenue and Juno Avenue, more particularly described as, "Lots 8-15 and vacated alley adjacent thereto, Block 1, Glarke' s Addition to the City of Saint Paul," is rezoned from R-4 to RT-1. Section 2 . This ordinance shall take force and effect in thirty (30) days from and after its passage, approval and publication. COUIVCILMEN Yeas Nays ` Requested by Department of: Butler V Hozza In Favor Hunt � Levine Against BY Roedler �� Tedesco OCT � �� Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by C cil: Date . Certifie ass y Cou il Secretary By _ _�5 �, ,(�i/.0� � By Appro by Mayor: D e'� 0 +� � 4 �978 Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council By BY , PUBLISHED O CY 1 � �"�� , � �. ` � l�C��(� ' BOAR,D OF ZONING CITY OF SAINT PAUL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR CITY PLANNING DONALD L. SPAID AIP PLANNING COORDINATOR August 30, 1976 �`�� Ms. Rose Mix, City Clerk 386 City Hall & Court House St. Paul , Minn. 55102 Dear Madam: This is written in response to the petition of Eugene Clemens (Church of St. James) to rezone from R-4 single family residential to RT-1 two family residential the property located on the East side of View between Randolph and Juno. The property is further described by the following legal description: Lots 8-15, and vacated alley accruing thereto, Block 1 , Clarks Addition. This matter was heard by the Current Planning & Zoning Committee on May 6, 1976. A motion to recommend approval of the rezoning petition carried unanimously. This matter was heard by the Planning Commission of St. Paul on May 14, 1976. A motion to recommend approval of the rezoning petition carried unanimously, with the stipulation that there be no special use permit granted for nursery operation until the administration is satisfied that protection of the nursery playground is sufficient in relation to the adjacent alleyway traffic. Sincerely, o�.i��`vv Charles L. McGuire Principal Planner CLMcG/gf 421 Wabasha Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 (612)-298-4151 0 + • , � • ' , C I T Y O F S A I NT PA U L �..,..�---�� , ��, ��`�� ,, , a' `4i Ro:e Miz ` Alb�� . Ols�s City Clerk a.nd � 4' ''� ''•.y' �Y.� Council Kecorder Council Secretary , � ,� \ , ,., �� , ,,,�'' ��'- ..�.-�'" OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK BUREAU OE RECORDS 386 City Hall St.Paul,Minnesota 65102 Phone 298-/,�81 March 25, 1976 Planning Commission Grace Building St. Paul, Minnesota Dear Gentlemen: The City Council at its March 25, 1976 meeting referred the attached petition to rezone property at the southeast corner of Randolph and View to the Planning Commission for study and recommendation. Very truly yours, � � • �J� � City Clerk � ,,� Attach. MS:dcm ....._.... �� . .... _ _�-_. ..,.. ,°' �... �`+r _. _..._._.. ._, . , ._.._�+ r'*+�-�� _ ._. . ...._. ^ ......,.._. ._._ � , - � _ L�C� � - L, -. _�..,,,,,.,.._—,� ! � . � p L '�d..�'iy. - �C"_'S 1�U�.C,� � l �� (�.rtl:�-�•l�(1-f1 �� .-�1.1. Y�L-�, �\ . ��`J' . . � . � , , ` , ��j � � ,D � '" .�"�� O`t Short Form Rezoning Petition �. , � �� TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL c/o the City Clerk, Room 386 City Nall City of Saint Paul , Minnesota Pursuant to the provisions of LAWS OF MINNESOTA for 1975, Chapter 261 , Section 6, I /we the undersigned� being the owner(s) of property described as vacr,�� alrev ar��►acen� atl l.y-ts g �!� blo k I C[c�r�C�s c��i-t�i o 2 and situated (describe tocation with respect to streets or intersections) _�D u�h en.st cot'nP r Rando 1�,h a 1L e u� wh i ch property was previousl y zoned C �mvmP�['.iQ� G�r1d "(3"_Re9. _, and under Chapters 60 through 64 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code is presently zoned �— �( , a more restrictive zoning classification, do hereby request that consideration be given by your honorable bodies to rezone the above described property to a zoning classification of �T - �, under Chapters b0 through 64 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code. Subscr i bed and sworn to before me �'1/� �J1�ovv��v�.�� f/ �/� this �� Tdyof � : ' /�.�' C'' /v'� l, rt � -�, Gv\ 5 Add res s: �-�( G� �t !_c.�.� ��' r' � �; ,,�` Nota ry Publ i c, Ramsey Co. , ��,�ta o:� �� (',t.�.�.C� : �'�vv' `a 5 � � z o`�� y!` �� • c .�'' �, C My Comm i s s i on exp i r �.� y�` ��``��° Te 1 e�hone:1�'�' '`— � � J •r� y p a�g � � ��.` �i?� ~..?y, �,�5 � :- `' � g�a r;r':.w;.�� 5 Approved as to fo ~. �,�1� /75 by the _City Attorney. �� j� �� { �J �� L�, El , ,, j�j'c� :r;r',i� J - �, r�� , � � �. ��,�f.._ ... R��.;`°—'�' CiTY Pl.f1i�If�91`�U 6�1AR� �k`u$%" � . a �, J,,";' �`" .• 1�f;¢ �?I(lt ��i1��, �lii'i;l�:�.i i .. �1 ...1..` � r r .. -J.1 -.J.._ .......,..�,.�� PLANNING BOARD STAFF REPORT May 6, 1976 Plat Map 8 �`''��✓�l/ 7902 1. APPLICANT'S NAME , Eugene Clemens (Church of St. James) 2. CLASSIFICATION . X� Amendment � Appeal � Permit � Other 3, PURPOSE . Rezone from R-4 to RT-1 4. LOCATION . East side of View Street between Randolph and Juno 5, LEGAL DESCRIPTION : Lots 8-15, and vacated alley accruing thereto, Block 1, Clarke's Addition. � 6. PRESENT 20IJING: R-4 7 . PURSUANT TO Zoning Code Chapter: 64 Section: 210 Paragraph: 8. STAFF INVESTIGATION & REPORT: Date: April 29, 1976 By: ,7'TS A. SUFFICIENCY: The appellant 's request for rezoning was filed on a Short Form Rezoning Petition, subscribed and sworn to before a Notary Public on March L0, 1976, and received by the City Planning Office on March 31, 1976. B. PROPOSED USE: Establishment of a nursery school within a structure currently existing on the proposed site. See Section 60.423 (Principal Uses Permitted Subject to Special Conditions) , Paragraph C, Page 20, City of Saint Paul Zoning Ordinance. � C. FRONTAGE AND AREA: The proposed site has a 282 foot frontage along View Street and is 150 feet in depth along Randolph. The area is approximately 42,300 square feet. D. SITE CONDITIONS: The site is bounded by Randolph to the north, Juno to the south, View Street to the west and a single-family dwelling to the east. The site consists of St. James Church and St. James School. The site is approximately at street level in all directions. There is adequate off-street parking provided by a hard-top area to the rear of the church. E. AREA CO\DITIONS: The area is developed predominantly with single family residential dwelling units of the pre-war construction era, built on mediiim size lots. There are two multi-family units in the area builk during the past decade. There are two other churches in the area; St. Peter's Lutheran Church and Olivet Methodist Church. Near the St. James Church and School area is a Juvenile Justice Center (489 View Street) a restaurant and a combination liquor store and supermarket. There is � only one vacant lot in the immediate area. F, FINDINGS: 1. Rezoning of the proposed property wi� � �ot lower the property values of the adjacent neighbors. 2. The only structures on the property requegced for rezoning are the St. James Church, and the St. James School. ♦ ' �� / V / L1 Eugene Clemens (Cont'd) Page 2 3. The appellant 's request for rezoning is in association with establishing a nursery school within the current St. James School atructure. 4. A clean line of dimarcation exists between the proposed site and all other surrounding properties, There is only a one-step graduated difference between R-4 single family and RT-1 two family townhouse. G. STAFF RECOMMENDS that said request by the appellant for rezoning of the proposed property be granted. Granting of such requeat will not violate the intent and purpose of the City of Saint Paul Zoning Code. The reuse of the structure is very similar to the current use. The rezoning, if granted, would allow the appellant to seek a special co�tdition use permit for the nursery under a RT-1 zoning district. It is evident that the appellant is not going to convert the St. James School nor the church itself into a two-family townhouse. MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CURRENT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMITTEE AT A MEETING HELD ON THURSDAY, MAY 6, 1976 EUGENE CLEMENS (7902): A petition to rezone from R-4 to RT-1, property located on the East side of View Street between Randolph and Juno. Mr. Ted Zarembol, Principal of St. James School, was present to represent the petitioner. There was opposition present. Mr. Shelton showed slides of the site and presented the staff report, and stated that there was a letter on file from the Police Department stating that the granting of this rezoning would not create a traffic hazard in the area. Mr. Ted Zarembol, a resident of Northeast Minneapolis and Principal of the St. James School, stated that the purpose of the rezoning is to enable the school to operate a pre-school in the existing building, and stated that the only thing they are asking to be rezoned are the school and the church basement and the play area/parking lot; this should not include the rectory. The rezoning of this property will allow them to apply for a license for a day nursery for between 17 and 30 children, using only a portion of the school building. Mr. Shelton stated that since it is religious property, the rezoning of the entire lot as opposed to portions of the lot would make no difference. Mr, Adolph Gisch, 760 Randolph, stated that the alley adjoining the lot permits access to his residential property and asked if anything would be done to the alley. Mr. Zarembol stated that they would not build any structures, and they would rope off the alley. Mr. Rupp stated that Mr. Gisch was concerned about whether he would still have access to his garage off of the alley, and asked Mr. Erickson if it is a public alley. Mr. Erickson stated that it is shown on the map as a dedicated alley, and left the meeting in order to verify it. Mr. Rupp stated that if it is a public alley there would be no question but that it would have to remain open. Mr. Zarembol asked if the whole parking lot is considered alley. Mr. Rupp stated that there would be a designated amount alotted for the alley. Mr. Hummer asked if the school owns both sides of the alley in that place, but Mr. Zarembol stated that he didn't know. Mr. Hummer stated that if the alley was already vacated, the applicant wouldn't need anyone else's consent to use it. � . , , ,�� , � Eugene Clemens (cont.) Page 2 , Mr. Rupp stated that the people are presently using that alley as access to their garages. Mr. Hummer stated that if it belongs to the residents they can maintain control over whether it can be vacated. Mr. Gisch stated that 12 years ago they wanted to vacate the alley and they wouldn't vacate it, and he asked if it could be marked with a yellow line to show where the alley is, as they now go across the playground because the alley is not designated. Mr. Rupp stated that if the alley is being used for something other than an alley that use will have to stop. Mr. Erickson stated that the alley is designated on the map as a T-whaped alley. Mr. Rupp stated that the problem is that there is no dema.rcation between the alley and the playground and they are driving over the playground as well as the alley. Mr. Erickson stated that there is platted a 20 foot alley. Mr. Rupp stated that they would have to get a demarcation; they don't want nursery school children playing on the lot which could be mistaken for alley. Mr. Erickson stated that if it is a City owned alley the Department of Pulalic Works would survey it. Ms. Norton said that it is all asphalt, which looks like the playground runs right up to the garages. Mr. Gisch stated that the St. James Men's Club blacktopped the lot 25 years ago with no consideration for where the alley and playground were located. Mr. Rupp stated that they want to make sure to identify the alley. Mr. Erickson asked if Mr. Rupp was suggesting that the Church place a fence on the property line. Mr. Rupp asked Mr. Zarembol what they intended to do to mark the alley and protect the children. Mr. Zarembol stated that the Licensing Committee suggested that they could rope off the area when they are using it, draw a yellow line to mark it, or post and wire the Church playground so nobody would drive through the property. Mr. Rupp asked what the best way other than a fence is to make sure the alley is separated from the playground area. Mr. McGuire stated that fencing off the site would be the safest way, or putting in curb stops, which would require that the alley be surveyed to establish correct alignment, and recommended that the facility be made safe for the occupants. Since the permit is administratively approvable after the rezoning is complete, it could be held until the applicant proved that the area was safe. . • . , � ' Eugene Clemens (cont.) Page 3 -� Mr. Willits asked the residents of the neighborhood which were present if their main concern is that they continue to have access to the alley, whether it is left as it has been, or whether it is designated as alley. Mr. Gisch stated that it didn't make any difference to them. Mr. Rupp stated that they also have to look at the fact that it must go to the City Council saying that the nursery school warrants demarcation and safety for the children from the alley. Ms. Norton asked if there were requirements of nursery school licensing for the protection of the children. Mr. Rupp stated that they should at least have it in the record so that the Board has done its part to bring it to the attention of the proper parties. Mr. Zarembol stated that he had spoken with Mr. Manning at the Licensing Department, who looked at the playground and said that because it is so large euen without the alley and for the number of children involved, just roping in the area would pass the licensing requirements. Mr. Rupp stated that even with supervision, it would be very easy for small children to go under a rope. Mr. Hummer made a motion for approval of the rezoning, stipulating that no Special Use Permit be granted until the administration is satisfied that adequate protection of the playground from alley traffic is sufficient. Ms. Norton seconded the motion. Ms. Showalter asked if this would be a nursery school or a day care center. Mr. Zarembol stated that the children will be 4 to 6 years old, and the same children will be there every day from 7:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., with more children arriving in the afternoon after a half day of kindergarten. The motion for approval of the rezoning passed unanimously. Submitted by; Approved by; � ,:i 2r7/� �� ..�fl,LGvi`�. � / , � �-��- c � James T. Shelton ��G�/ ��7 William H. Rupp, Jr. ____�,, . , �� PLANNING COMMISSION OF ST. PAUL 421 Wabasha Street St. Paul , Minnesota 55102 A meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Saint Paul was held May 14, 1976 at 9:00 a.m. in the City Planning Conference Room at 421 Wabasha Street, St. Paul , Minnesota. . Present: Mmes. Cochrane, Mayne, Norton, Piccolo and Showalter; Messrs. Bryan, Feder, Hanggi , Humner, McDonell , Pangal , Prifrel , Rupp, Tobler, Van Hoef, Wilkening and Willits. Absent: Mme. Slawik; Messrs. Brown, Sherwood and Stegemoeller. Also Present: Thomas Sipkins, Assistant City Attorney; Valerie Cunningham, City Council Aide, Marilynn Egner, City Council Staff; John Kelly, St. Paul Dispatch; Jim Hart, Don Cosgrove and Jerry Mangle, Housing & Redevelopment Authority; Peggy Shay, League of Women Voters; Jeanne Nelson, Planning District 7; Richard Hedman, Puhlic Works; Mrs. Harold Cooley, 607 Sherburne,; Henry DeLong, 599 Sherburne; Carol and F.E. Hamerlind, 587 Sherburne; Walter Montpetit, 615 University Avenue; Mary Murphy, 590 Charles; Mrs. Lenora Neujahr, 603 Sherburne; Jule Schaffer, 603 Sherburne; Gertrude Still , 642 Charles; Emna St.Jean, 613 Sherburne; Anthony Waschbusch, 591 Sherburne; J. Bellus, D. Schnarr and D. Spaid of the Planning Department Staff. The Planning Canmission took the following action at the May 14, 1976 meeting: APPROVED the minutes of the April 23, 1976 Planning Commission meeting by voice vote. APPROVED an application of Walter Montpetit for a special condition use for a parking facility located on the southeast corner of Dale and Sherburne. Mr. Rupp made a motion to approve the parking facility subject to the original 7 conditions specified by the Thomas Dale P.A.C. Mr. Tobler seconded the motion and it carried by a rollcall vote of 9 to 8. A motion was made by Mr. Pangal to approve the application with the opening on Sherburne. Mrs. Showalter seconded the motion and it failed by a rollcall vote of 7 to 8. APPROVED a petition of Eugene Clemens to rezone property on the east side of View Street between Randolph and Juno. . , - . ' � , Planning Conmission Meeting - 2 - May 14, 1976 Mr. Rupp made a motion to approve the petition with the stipulation that there will be n� special use permit granted for nursery operation until the administration is satisfied that protection of the nursery playground is sufficient in relation to the adjacent alleyway traffic. Mr. Hanggi seconded the motion and it passed unanimousiy. BY RESOLUTION, approved release of City interest in tax forfeit land: Lots 9 and 10, Block 42, Ward's Rearrangement. Motion made by Mr. Rupp, seconded by Mr. Bryan and passed unanimously: It was requested by Mr. Tobler that when staff is referring to legal descriptions of propert�ies, lots be icientified by street nwnbers when possible. BY RESOLUTION, approved conveyance ofi land to the City for Trout Brook Pond. Motion made by Mr. Rupp, seconded by Mrs. Piccolo and passed unanimously. BY RESOLUTION, approved the release of City interest in Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, Block 2, Wilson's Rearrangement for reuse as residential . Motion made by Mr. Rupp, seconded by Mr. Bryan and passed unanimously. BY RESOLUTION, approved the dedication of Block 79, Dayton and Irvine's Addition for park purposes. Motion made by Mr. Rupp, seconded by Mr. Uan Hoef and passed unanimously. The Steering Comnittee presented a proposed resolution and a written opinion on the Housing and Redevelopment Plan for Park Nursery. Mrs. Mayne made a motion to am�end the wording on page 2, paragraph 1 , line 7 of the written opinion to include, "and also the environmental assessment of the site. " Mr. Pangal seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. Mrs. Norton then made a motion to further amend that sentence to read, "that the Planning Commission believes residential use is preferable although both comnercial and residential uses are valid land use arrangements for the site." Mr. Hanggi seconded the motion and it passed by a rollcall vote of 11 to 7. BY RESOLUTION, with attached written opinion, recommended th�t the Housing and Redevelopment Authority not undertake implementation Qf the Redevelopment Plan and also recc�rnmended that the City Council not approve the Redevelopment Plan. Motion made by Mr. Bryan, seconded by Mr. Rupp and passed unanimously by a rollcall vote. REFERRED the Comprehensive Policy for Ponding of Storm Water to the Environmental and Carmunity Facilities Camiittees. The committees will report back to the Carmission on May 28. . . . �,�'��'� , • �� Planning Comnission Meeting - 3 _ May 14, 1976 The Planning Carmission, in or•der to expedite the review process, authorized the Planning Coordinator to set up meetings with the appropriate comnittees before action is required by the canmission,when a staff working paper is completed or a proposal comes to the Commission from another city department or agency. Jim Bellus, of staff, gave an informational repart for discussion purpases only on the Proposed Unified Capital Improvement Program and Budget Process Objectives and policies. The meeting adjourned at 11 :06 a.m. Submitted by: Donald L. Spaid Planning Coordinator � � • • • • ' � � • � : � � • � • � • • �� C•� i (J • C`� • . . . .� � � ! , � : . . . � , .� � • � ��L • ' • • � i . t� � � � c•� . � ir[]� . . . • • . • �'� • C!.7 � r�[3� � �•.� e C!� . • . . . ,► « � . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . • . . � A • • � • ' • � • � • • • � � � • � • �• • • • • • r � � • - , -�- � � � ^�� . _ _ ► . r � � � , � , • • • • • • • � � , `, • • • � • • � • � � • • . d '' � ' ' � • � •, � . � 7" • �� ' -- � • ' � � ' , . � � � . . .� . . . . . . . . �� r q . ; . � � . . �...� ., . � . •�. . �j.� � � 1 � • . e . . . . . . . . �� . . . . . . . . � o� . �:• � � ,, �m � . ., �:i� - • _ • � �Q ,� • • � • • • • • �' � • • • •_. � � , • • b • • • • � � � �� ,9�.��Q • . � . . . , , �� . . . � . . . . . . R � :;� � . . . . . � . � • � �� -.� , � - . � �. �... � � . . . . . � . . . . r . �� ION TO�a0�- _ r.►►--- .3:y� nes�= ; 'y " ' eri"�led es �pg ��the � ��en�'aaa.a.�v� F � d. �� bped �� y� dditdi � � � oa p�� ' rel• ��- . .d� y�' � � �91'� � RF!i�'�� C�� CITY Of ST. PAUL DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES ASSESSMENT DIVISION 113 CITY HALL 5T.PAUL,MINNESOTA 55102 August 13, 1976 File X1758, Page Dear Citizen: As a courtesy to qou, and as required by law, we want to notify you about a public hearing which may affect you. The Council flf the City of St. Paul will hold a public hearing in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House (third floor) at 10:00 a.m, on September 2, 1976 on the: AFP�.�CATION of the Church of St. James to rezone from R-4 to RT-1 the East side of Vfew Street between Randolph Avenue and Juno Avemie. The property is described as follows: Vacated alley adjacent and Lots 8 through 15, Block 1, Clark�'s Addition to the City of St, paul. If you wauld like further information about this hearing, contact the Current Planning �ection of the planning Board, 421 Wabasha Street, or telephone 298-4154. While the City Charter requires that we notify you of the hearing, we want to help you to learn fully about any action the cauid affecti you or your community. Therefore, I sincerelp hope you can attend this hearing, so that you can make your views about it known to the CiCy Council, whether for or against. , ROGER A. MATTSON, DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES . e�� 1(��P CITY OF SAINT PAUL OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY September 10, 1976 HARRIET LANSING Mrs. Rose Mix City Clerk 386 City Hall Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 Dear Mrs. Mix: Attached hereto is an ordina.nce rezoning the property of the Church of St. James from R-4 to RT-1. Very truly yours, ,��Zc'!-wQS �• THOMAS M. SIPKINS Assistant City Attorney TMS:er Att. City Hall, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 612 298-5121 W r H � a � k � w m �d �i° � H 6'� C tz�f H H 7d � t�] C C � O � `. �'� C/] C-� H N t'' CC o � r� H 9 � o a � � H � � 7d m v p. � � z � � � � { � � ' -� � WH17E - CITV CLERK COIlIICll ^�V�tJ�y� PINK - FINANCE GITY OF SAINT PAITL CANARV -DEPARTMENT BLUE -MAVOR File NO. :, • �� Or in�nce Ordinance N O.��r�� Presented By • Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A CHAPTER IN THE SAINT PAUL LEGiSLATIVE CODE PERTAIN- ING TO SPRINKLER SYSTEMS IN BOULEVARDS. The Council of the City of Saint Paul does ordain: Sect ion 1 That the following Chapter be incorporated into the Saint Paul Legis- lative Code: XXX. Sprinkler Systems in Boulevards 233..01 Permit Required. Any person, firm or corporation desiring to install an underground sprinkling system in the sodded area of the City right-of-way between the curb or gutter line and their private property shall make application for and receive a permit from the Director of Public Works before commencing installation. � If the underground sprinkling system is to be supplied with water from the Saint Paul Municipal Water System, a permit must be ob- tained, prior to the installation, from the Saint Paul Water Utility in accordance with the City of Saint Paul Legislative Code, Section 253•03• 233 ,02 The fee required is $25.00. 23 3,03 Conditions. The said Director of Public Works is hereby authorized to issue a permit for installation of an underground sprinkling sys- tem upon the abutting property owner complying with the following conditions: (a) That said underground sprinkler systems be installed to the COUIVCILMEN Yeas Nays Requested by Department of: Butler Pub 1 i c Works Hozza In Favor Hunt - Roedler Against BY � Sylvester Daniel J. Du rd, Direct Tedesco Form Approved b City ttorne Adopted by Council: Date Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY . By Approved by Mayor: Date Appro d y Mayor r Su tdl�ouncil By BY � . � lst "��/ 2nd `(! � - 3rd ��_ Adop ted �� Yeas Nays BUTLER HOZZA �� HUNT LEVINE � ROEDLER TEDESCO PRESIDENT (S4'L�L�E,'R)