The URL can be used to link to this page

01-521Council File # O t- Sa � Green Sheet # /00 8 RESOLUTION 1 WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Police Deparlment began, in mid-Apri12000, collecting data relaring to potential use of 2 racial profiling by its police officers; and 3 WHEREAS, the Saint Paul City Council began review of these data, collection processes and appropriate 4 interpretation, in 3anuary 2001; and 5 WHEREAS, in the course of its review the Saint Paul City Council requested that the Police Department prepare, in 6 consultation with Council Reseazch, a proposal for the conrinued and improved collection of these data with the 7 purpose of establishing training prograins for officers to prevent the potenrial use of racial profiling; and 8 WHEREAS, in response to this request the Saint Paul Police Department prepazed the Apri[ 23, 200I "Report to the 9 City Council on Racial Profiliag from the Police Department; " and 10 WHEREAS, racial profiling discussion in the City of Saint Paul has lazgely been limited to the City's Police 11 Department, the City Council and a closed-door U.S. Department of Justic�facilitated discussion between the Police 12 Department and the Saint Paul branch of the NAACP, although all parties haue expressed their interest in broadening 13 these discussions; now therefore be it 14 RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul City Council hereby directs Council Research and the Council's Fiscal Policy 15 Director to review, from a policy and financial feasibility and advisability perspective, the April 23, 2001 "Report to 16 the City Council on Racial Profiling from the Police DepartmenY' and the funding proposals contained therein by 17 August 15, 2001; and be it 18 RESOLVED, that the City Council directs Council Reseazch, and requests the Police Department, to shaze the afore- 19 mentioned report with community groups, organizations and individual community leaders and compile their input 20 for Council consideration by August 15, 2001. Requested by Department of: Adopted by Council: Date o O\ r Adoption Ce�tified by Council Secre By: U � �--�-� � � �/ Approved by Mayor: Date � ♦ � By: r � Form Approved by City Attomey � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council � "Report to the City Counci[ on Racial Profiling fiom the Police DepartmenY' o�-sa i ��,�� ,�� c�,�� OS/23/2001 GREEN SHEET No 1 Lt;?�,5 CONTACT PERSON 8 PFiOrE hYtlanDb 6YMaI1Mb co,m��,n� r.�uy zs6-se�a �..,�.�,� �� MUST BE ON CIXRK:IL AGBmA BY (q4T� 5/23l2001: Suspensioq LO to 6/6/Ol � w�a[wrt arc.nowar ❑aneuuc � . � wuwu��aaaecaaw. wuwcut�ro ❑ Yvan�alt�lf�f�rp ❑ TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLJP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATUR� cnataREauES� Council approval of resoluaon direc,�ting Council Research and the Council's Fiscal Poticy Director to review the Apri123, 2001 "Report to ihe City Council on Racial Profi(ing from the Potice Depaztment" RECAMMENDATIO Approve or eJeG VERSONALSERViCICONiRACfSMUSTANSWERTHEFOLLOWINOQUES7ION5: t. Haslhicpe�soM�meverxc'ketluMeraconhactiorMisdepartmenl7 PLANNING CAMMISSION YES NO CIBCOMMITTEE 2. HesMlspdwMmmeverbrenaaryempbyee7 CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION YES NO 3. Dces Mi6 pe�saJfirm powesa a sldll nat � bY �Y aRMR eilY emPbY�? YES I� 4. Is Mis pnaoMrm a tarpeted venda(1 YES NO E+�Iavn aH Yee a�mv,eie an aepa2te sheM and atlech fe Drean af�M INI7IATMG PROBLEM IS�IE, OPPOR'NNITV (Who, What, When, Wheie, Why) ADVAMAGES IF APPROVED DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED DIS4DVANTAGES IF NOi APPF20VED TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S COSTIREVQIUE BUDQE7ED (qRCLE ONq YES NO FUNDIN6 SOURCE ACTNITY NWABER FlNANCW.INFORMAiION (EJ�WM Council File # O t- Sa � Green Sheet # /00 8 RESOLUTION 1 WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Police Deparlment began, in mid-Apri12000, collecting data relaring to potential use of 2 racial profiling by its police officers; and 3 WHEREAS, the Saint Paul City Council began review of these data, collection processes and appropriate 4 interpretation, in 3anuary 2001; and 5 WHEREAS, in the course of its review the Saint Paul City Council requested that the Police Department prepare, in 6 consultation with Council Reseazch, a proposal for the conrinued and improved collection of these data with the 7 purpose of establishing training prograins for officers to prevent the potenrial use of racial profiling; and 8 WHEREAS, in response to this request the Saint Paul Police Department prepazed the Apri[ 23, 200I "Report to the 9 City Council on Racial Profiliag from the Police Department; " and 10 WHEREAS, racial profiling discussion in the City of Saint Paul has lazgely been limited to the City's Police 11 Department, the City Council and a closed-door U.S. Department of Justic�facilitated discussion between the Police 12 Department and the Saint Paul branch of the NAACP, although all parties haue expressed their interest in broadening 13 these discussions; now therefore be it 14 RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul City Council hereby directs Council Research and the Council's Fiscal Policy 15 Director to review, from a policy and financial feasibility and advisability perspective, the April 23, 2001 "Report to 16 the City Council on Racial Profiling from the Police DepartmenY' and the funding proposals contained therein by 17 August 15, 2001; and be it 18 RESOLVED, that the City Council directs Council Reseazch, and requests the Police Department, to shaze the afore- 19 mentioned report with community groups, organizations and individual community leaders and compile their input 20 for Council consideration by August 15, 2001. Requested by Department of: Adopted by Council: Date o O\ r Adoption Ce�tified by Council Secre By: U � �--�-� � � �/ Approved by Mayor: Date � ♦ � By: r � Form Approved by City Attomey � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council � "Report to the City Counci[ on Racial Profiling fiom the Police DepartmenY' o�-sa i ��,�� ,�� c�,�� OS/23/2001 GREEN SHEET No 1 Lt;?�,5 CONTACT PERSON 8 PFiOrE hYtlanDb 6YMaI1Mb co,m��,n� r.�uy zs6-se�a �..,�.�,� �� MUST BE ON CIXRK:IL AGBmA BY (q4T� 5/23l2001: Suspensioq LO to 6/6/Ol � w�a[wrt arc.nowar ❑aneuuc � . � wuwu��aaaecaaw. wuwcut�ro ❑ Yvan�alt�lf�f�rp ❑ TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLJP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATUR� cnataREauES� Council approval of resoluaon direc,�ting Council Research and the Council's Fiscal Poticy Director to review the Apri123, 2001 "Report to ihe City Council on Racial Profi(ing from the Potice Depaztment" RECAMMENDATIO Approve or eJeG VERSONALSERViCICONiRACfSMUSTANSWERTHEFOLLOWINOQUES7ION5: t. Haslhicpe�soM�meverxc'ketluMeraconhactiorMisdepartmenl7 PLANNING CAMMISSION YES NO CIBCOMMITTEE 2. HesMlspdwMmmeverbrenaaryempbyee7 CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION YES NO 3. Dces Mi6 pe�saJfirm powesa a sldll nat � bY �Y aRMR eilY emPbY�? YES I� 4. Is Mis pnaoMrm a tarpeted venda(1 YES NO E+�Iavn aH Yee a�mv,eie an aepa2te sheM and atlech fe Drean af�M INI7IATMG PROBLEM IS�IE, OPPOR'NNITV (Who, What, When, Wheie, Why) ADVAMAGES IF APPROVED DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED DIS4DVANTAGES IF NOi APPF20VED TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S COSTIREVQIUE BUDQE7ED (qRCLE ONq YES NO FUNDIN6 SOURCE ACTNITY NWABER FlNANCW.INFORMAiION (EJ�WM Council File # O t- Sa � Green Sheet # /00 8 RESOLUTION 1 WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Police Deparlment began, in mid-Apri12000, collecting data relaring to potential use of 2 racial profiling by its police officers; and 3 WHEREAS, the Saint Paul City Council began review of these data, collection processes and appropriate 4 interpretation, in 3anuary 2001; and 5 WHEREAS, in the course of its review the Saint Paul City Council requested that the Police Department prepare, in 6 consultation with Council Reseazch, a proposal for the conrinued and improved collection of these data with the 7 purpose of establishing training prograins for officers to prevent the potenrial use of racial profiling; and 8 WHEREAS, in response to this request the Saint Paul Police Department prepazed the Apri[ 23, 200I "Report to the 9 City Council on Racial Profiliag from the Police Department; " and 10 WHEREAS, racial profiling discussion in the City of Saint Paul has lazgely been limited to the City's Police 11 Department, the City Council and a closed-door U.S. Department of Justic�facilitated discussion between the Police 12 Department and the Saint Paul branch of the NAACP, although all parties haue expressed their interest in broadening 13 these discussions; now therefore be it 14 RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul City Council hereby directs Council Research and the Council's Fiscal Policy 15 Director to review, from a policy and financial feasibility and advisability perspective, the April 23, 2001 "Report to 16 the City Council on Racial Profiling from the Police DepartmenY' and the funding proposals contained therein by 17 August 15, 2001; and be it 18 RESOLVED, that the City Council directs Council Reseazch, and requests the Police Department, to shaze the afore- 19 mentioned report with community groups, organizations and individual community leaders and compile their input 20 for Council consideration by August 15, 2001. Requested by Department of: Adopted by Council: Date o O\ r Adoption Ce�tified by Council Secre By: U � �--�-� � � �/ Approved by Mayor: Date � ♦ � By: r � Form Approved by City Attomey � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council � "Report to the City Counci[ on Racial Profiling fiom the Police DepartmenY' o�-sa i ��,�� ,�� c�,�� OS/23/2001 GREEN SHEET No 1 Lt;?�,5 CONTACT PERSON 8 PFiOrE hYtlanDb 6YMaI1Mb co,m��,n� r.�uy zs6-se�a �..,�.�,� �� MUST BE ON CIXRK:IL AGBmA BY (q4T� 5/23l2001: Suspensioq LO to 6/6/Ol � w�a[wrt arc.nowar ❑aneuuc � . � wuwu��aaaecaaw. wuwcut�ro ❑ Yvan�alt�lf�f�rp ❑ TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLJP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATUR� cnataREauES� Council approval of resoluaon direc,�ting Council Research and the Council's Fiscal Poticy Director to review the Apri123, 2001 "Report to ihe City Council on Racial Profi(ing from the Potice Depaztment" RECAMMENDATIO Approve or eJeG VERSONALSERViCICONiRACfSMUSTANSWERTHEFOLLOWINOQUES7ION5: t. Haslhicpe�soM�meverxc'ketluMeraconhactiorMisdepartmenl7 PLANNING CAMMISSION YES NO CIBCOMMITTEE 2. HesMlspdwMmmeverbrenaaryempbyee7 CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION YES NO 3. Dces Mi6 pe�saJfirm powesa a sldll nat � bY �Y aRMR eilY emPbY�? YES I� 4. Is Mis pnaoMrm a tarpeted venda(1 YES NO E+�Iavn aH Yee a�mv,eie an aepa2te sheM and atlech fe Drean af�M INI7IATMG PROBLEM IS�IE, OPPOR'NNITV (Who, What, When, Wheie, Why) ADVAMAGES IF APPROVED DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED DIS4DVANTAGES IF NOi APPF20VED TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S COSTIREVQIUE BUDQE7ED (qRCLE ONq YES NO FUNDIN6 SOURCE ACTNITY NWABER FlNANCW.INFORMAiION (EJ�WM