The URL can be used to link to this page

270331 .�.WHId'E� — CITY CLERK � PINK � — FINANCE COUI�CIl CP.NARV — DEPARTMENT(Community G I TY OF SA I NT PAU L ��_��.'�� BLI?��J —�AVOR File NO. ��`r` Development) . fj � / Council Resolution Presented By � '�t�J�-�, / Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date WHEREAS, the Mayor has submitted and the City Council approved the budgets for the City Government of the City of Saint Paul for the fiscal year beginning January 1 , 1978, including the Community Development Block Grant Year IV Budget; and WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Urban Development has notified the Mayor that additional funds in the amount of $1 ,480,000 will be available for the City's use in Community Development Year IV, beginning on approximately June 1 , 1978; and WHEREAS, the federally-required public hearings on the additional funds and the Housing Assistance Plan have been held; and WHEREAS, the 1978 City Budgets should now be amended so as to add these additional revenues in accordance with the authority granted by Section 10.07 of the City Charter; and �JHEREAS, the Charter provides in Section 10.07 therein that the City Council , upon recommendation of the Mayor, by resolution adopted following a public hearing held for that purpose at a time and place announced in advance may make supplemental appropriations to the existing City budgets; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that pursuant to Section 10.07.1 of the City Charter, upon the certification of the Mayor that the receipt of Community Development Slock Grant Program funds for Year IV will make available for appropriation revenues not heretofore estimated and contemplated within the heretofore adopted 1978 Saint Paul City budgets, and a public hearing having been held for the purpose of considering this supplemental appropriation for which advance notice has been given as required by the City Charter, the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby adopt the attached supplemental appropriation to the 1978 City Budgets so as to add additional revenues to the Budget Financing Summary and to COUNCIL'NEN Yeas Nay,s Requested by Department of: Butler Hozza In Favor Hunt ' ' C� Levine _ __ Against BY �'��""'z � ` � Roedler S ylvester Tedesco Form Approved by 'ty Att rney Adopted by Council: Date _ Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY By / Approved by :Vlayor: Date Appro e+ y Mayor or Su i .ion to Council gy By _N/Nl7Er - C�TV GLERK COIlIICll PINK - FINANCE Communit G I TY OF SA I NT PAU L �� CANARY - DEPARTMENT � V � �� ' BL�.E� _ -�IAYOR File NO. �Development) . , Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date „2_ add additional appropriations as specified; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission, the City Council does also approve the Housing Assistance Plan for Corr�nunity Development Year IV; and be it FINALLY RESOLVED, that Mayor George Latimer, as Chief Executive Officer of the City, is hereby authorized and directed to submit the Community Development Year IV Program, as amended, and Housing Assistance Plan to the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development in such form as prescribed by the regulations of said department. �PPROVED AS TO FUNDING: APPROVED: 9T.�---� D Bernard J. arlson, Director Q Department of Finance & Management � ichard E. Sc roeder � +�3�� Budget Di rector COUNCILI�EN Yeas Na}�s Requested by Department of: Butler � Corr�nun i ty Devel opment Hozza In Favor Hunt � �-��'�-- bev�e�-" __ A ga i n s t B Y -��;✓f�� Roedler Sylvester Tedesco 1g78 -1�� j Form Approved b City Attor Adopted by Council: Date — J Certified P� Council retary BY - By Approv b ;Vlavor: Date � N 9 �97$ Appr ve by Mayor for Submi io ,to Council By BY �uBUSNEO JAN 1 4 1978 { � � . . . . . - � .... � J ��'�+� 1 �� +� C�I Ol: ],2/19T5 \ b Rev.: 9f 8/76 �� r. : E�LANATZ�N OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS, ;, RESOLUTIONS,� AND. ORDINANCE� � . . . .. . � � . . . � �. � .. � . - f��4 . . . . . . . � . .. . .. � ' . . . . . .. � . � :�� . . . � � � . . � . . . . � .. � � . . . � . . . . . . . i,�:: ;Date: May 16, 197$- �� TO: MAYOR GEORGE= LATTMER I� ' �. FRs Richard E. 3chroeder, Budget Directar - �: : , RE; Council resolution transferring funds from contingency reserve. K k ' ' id ACTIONI REQUESTED: ;.` . � . . � . .. �.� Approval of �ttached council resolution. � � : �. ' � p PURFOSE AI�ID RATI�EyN;ALE �`OR �HTS ACTION s . During the p�eparation of the 1978 general revenue fund' budget, funds were provided in the contingency reserve fo,r 'tKe addition of a resear�� analyst to the couneil resea.rch unit. The attac.hed : resolution v�.lt �transfer $15, 623 froan the reserve to' the researeh unit to �ina€�ice the add.itional position. , ATTACHNlENTS: ! . � . . � . . . . R �� ... � . . . � . .. � �. .. � . �. . � . �. . � , � .. � - . � � � . � � . . ...� . . � � . . _ . � . . ". � . . .� . .. . . � , ... . � . . .. . . � .. , ' . ._ ._.�. � �� RECOMMENOATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL CD IV FUNDS ; Additional CD Year IY Funds Available . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1 ,480,000 Country Club Market--West Seventh & St. Clair acquisition and demolition . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65,000 Country Club has indicated that they will not renew their lease unless we provide needed space for expansion. This is a previously approved but not funded CD Year II project. � � Union Gospel Mission acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . 670,000 demol i ti on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70,000 740— ,0 acquisition and demolition of existing facility--funds needed to satisfy HRA contractual obligation resulting from the NDP program. Disposition of Property A contract services budget to allow for disposition of land purchased under conventional renewal , NDP, or CD line items which no longer exist. The services would be for planning, engineering and real estate work tasks for 1978 which were overlooked when the administrative budget was prepared earlier this year.. . . . . . . . . . 125,000 Contingency Fund Due to rapidly excalating costs, a contingency fund of 4% is highly advisable . . . 550,000 TOTAL $1 ,480,000 12/22/77 - � � �Ci' ^ � � � � � \ � � � � � n w w 1� M Ol ln l� O c.� N O r � Ol 2� r— n r f�'7 �' °t' r— � «7� '�..� 0° � d." w „� CN r' � � � Z �� O � f- ►¢-� O O O O � c � O O O O 1� N 0.. w w w � O I.f) O O pQ al � l0 M M 00 �l r � � n Q O1 r � � � Q' ¢ W f- >- W C.'3 F- � Z = Q m � C'3 000 O 000 f- t�M d-I� O 00 O O O O Z � d� d-O �L 000 O 000 W Ntt I� l.f) V .. .. ., g .. O M� Lc") N O O Lc� W t0 Op Op � J �NN M �' IS') M � lnN lflN m �O � �' �� O I� N O� N w � n n Z F- N l� d r- r O Z � r-i W ►--� H � N Q � �C O � . J F- �--+ a. W i--� I- O > a Q � W Q F--� d � U � d a Q I-- U +� � a' � r--� N C C Ol +� i� a �--� Z Z Rf 41 r C C d � O N � W � � ¢ Q O Q �N a. F- S. � - W >- V �"� N � �6 U L.L d �I-� a C rC �--� (n N N � Z O � N r'-O� J � U � � W � � d � �I-� � C W ►-r +-� N +� N C'S � d +-� C N � � �--i � C > C � Q � � J N � � W N L N H Y � F- a. Q. +-� • � F- N a cn � O O = W N O � C U O Z O � O a J N' C.�3 � r C U fC C � W �- ••e- � r- a. OO � N O •� � �--� a � d' N � N � 0 � � > •r 4- N F--� O +> > +> > (n F- W 00 � N �1-� 4- I- ^ �1-� a N N � N Z V? � R3 O N C N d �� !n �� N oZ5 W �--� F- N 'p oz5 � N Z = "�7 N 'C N � � Z C U C C O � � O N � U U 7 U U Z d W W O N•r • � O �•� O O- �--� 00 •r •'- 00 •r •� O O � � •r N � N O•r- � i-� N •r O I'- � � � � � r--� J W +� U O N I.i �I-� C rtf � +� � Q Z tn O i.. N O i I- W � Rf •r C U (� � � +-� f6 N �--� O •� > O •�- i � O O tC O.. > � ¢ C O N C O N � W � i i U > N 5..U �1-� U •� � d Z � U � U W � d a. N W tn Z. -p p N O U � O O I..L W +� li W �1-� d � O (n �G N r 4- � N > •r � r--i i i O � �---� S� o2S � N •� C N � T3 +� � d I- �- �S O r oZS O F--- � � O 3 �--� N a S.. O d Q rtS d r� �. � a-i � n+� rn 3 "C E � �a O ¢ � •r- v� O. •�- v� n.. ¢ Z Q ¢ •r- c a� +-� a� �a 3 v� a. � w c� c � c� c � � >- _ �--� +� �•C r U Z r � O- L C'S d N•rN N •� (n C'S U � F-- C C O o� O fl.. C a. C O Z � d U C r- r0 N v)4- N G! � � tn C a tn C � � W O Q N t�f.aJ i � � O"a EJ N .0 U � � +� J r�f +� J d C.'3 U U 'r7 O'- �Q � E O r- O Q •� a1 Q 00 r•� ¢ dl r•r¢ Z O U d d I- C Q 2 O 3 F- +� •r J � I� d U F- I� d U � �1 i--� J 00 S.. O O O •r N Q U3 al O dl O Q F- Q � � �"_' U �'-- U Z O � r � r ~ O O O � I- a F-- U F- �;- � ,,, ��1 . , � e } �.� � ' � - .. . .. . ' � , . . . . . , . . . . . . _ 2'��P�� NOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN . � City of Saint Paul , Minnesota , December 16, 1977 (Community DeveTopment Year IV) . . ;The preparation of this plan�was financed in : part through a Comprehensive Planning Grant ' � � from the Department of Housing and Urban Development. } ` city�of s��t pa�al pianning ccx�missinn resofution f�l� numb�r »-42 � December 16, 1977 xe _..__._...._.�_ � WHEREAS, sane residents of the City of Saint Paul do not have access to sound housing units at affordable cost on the private market; and WHEREAS, some resources to meet these housing needs can be provided through public programs for housing assistance payments in existin9. rehabilitated and newly constructed units and through loans and grants for rehabilitation; and WHEREAS, a Housing Assistance Plan has been prepared pursuant to requirements for the Comnunity Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the Housing Assistance Plan provides for the use of available housing assistance resources in a manner consistent with identified housing needs, with the ob�ectives and policies adopted for Comnunity Development, and with the program activlties proposed for Community Development; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYED by the Planning Commission of the City of Saint Paul , Minnesota, that the Housing Assistance Plan, as revised for the 1978/19 Community Development program year. is hereby approved and recomnended to the Mayor �nd the Council of the City of Saint Paul . m�� Glen Hanggi y--- — — -- �;�� by Catheri ne Pi ccol o in f�a�nor.?�.�.... . aC�l l'�.St.._.s._.._ 4 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN SUMMARY The Housing Assistance Plan (HAP) section of the Community Development Block Grant application consists of four parts: I. Survey of Housing Conditions ° - � II. Housinq Assistance Needs of Lower Income Households III. Goals for Lower Income Housing Assistance IV. General Locations of Lower Income Housing For the most part, these sections represent an update of last year's HAP. A statement of policies which will be used in evaluating proposals for housing assistance has been added at the .beginning of the plan. I. Survey of Housing Conditions The number, type and quality of housing units in St. Paul were determined through surveys done in 1974. Approximately 30� of the city's total housing stock (over 30,000 dwelling units) is suitable for rehabilitation. About lOX of total housing units are considered in s�bstandard condition, t.e. , in need of major repairs or else not suited for rehabilitation. II. Housing Assistance Needs of Lower Income Households Housing assistance needs include those households which have inadequate plumbing facilities, are_ overcrowded and/or are paying more than 25� of their income for rent, or are living in an owner-occupied unit which is over 30 years old and valued at less than $10,000. Approximately 10,000 lower income households require .assistance, based on data derived from the 1970 census. III. Goals for Lower Income Housinq Assistance HAP goals are developed after consideration of housing conditions (Table I), need (Table II) , metropolitan goals and policies regarding housing assistance, and available or anticipated funding resources. The Metro- politan Council recommends allocation of no more than 11% of the funding resources available to the Metro area for subsidized housing in St. Paul (approximately 1300 units over 3 years). This formula is based on the ' need to increase dispersal of assisted housing units throughout the Metro area. Three year housing assistance goals would provide: 545 units of new construction of assisted housing 185 rental units which have been substantially rehabilitated 832 households to be provided rental payment assistance in existing housing units 2746 owner-occupied homes to be rehabilitated through loan and grant programs 135 units of new construction, subsidized, single-family homes - i . r IV. General Location of Lower Income Housing The locat�on plan identifies priority locations by census tract for new assisted housing units. The assignment of priorities is based on the objective of increased locational choice for lower income households. The highest priority is assigned to those census trac�s where lawer income population and previously con�tructed subsidized housing units are limited. The plan recommends that no assisted hou�ing units be added in those areas in which more than 15% of the present housing units are subsidized. - ii - HOUSIPJG ASSISTANGE POLICIES The following are statements of policy which were used in developing this year's Housing Assistance Plan and which wi11 be used in evaluating proposals for tiousing assistance under this plan. The policies were d�xived from St. Paul 's adopted Residential Improvement Strategy and past HAP's, the Metropolitan Council 's Subsidized Housing Allocation Plan, and require- ments under the federa] Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. 1 . Housin assistance oals for St. Paul shall conform with the three ear avai a e un i� oa esta is e t e etro o tan ouncil in its Su si ize Housin ocation P an. �s imits t e num er o assiste units t at may e prov e in t. Paul to 1266 units over the period 1977, 1978 and 1979. �o allocation has been authorized beyond 1979, though an increase is anticipated. This number is smaller than what the City would like to be able to provide. It represents only 10% of the need identified in the Housing Assistance Plan for the same 3-year period, and 12% of the full "fair share" need identified by the Metropolitan Council . Both of these figures fall below the 5� per annum (15% for all three years) minimum required by HUD in its proposed revision of the HAP guidelines, but are considered necessary to further the metropolitan-wide "fair share" concept. 2. Housin assistance shall be rovided enerall in ro ortion to the nee s en i ie in t e �n, pproximate y o t e ass ste units w go to serve e er y persons, 50� to serve families, and 10� to serve large families. Because housing for the elderly has been over- represented in the past, priority will be given to family housing proposals under this plan. � 3. Nousin assistance shall be rovided so as to romote a reater ran e 0 ousin o ortunities an to avoi concentrat�on of assiste ersons in ow income nei or oo s. owar t is en , t e ity s a p ace a ig priority on ocating assisted housing in areas which presently have few low income housing opportunities. These areas are identified in the Location �hapter of the plan. Further assisted housing develop- ment shall not be permitted in areas already having a high concentration of assisted housing units. 4. Housin assistance shall be used to maintain low income housin � o ortunities �n areas w ere t e current ow �ncome o u ation is e nq isp ace v an in ux o ig er income persons. �uch � transitional areas shall be considered a high priority location for additional `permanently" subsidized housing units--conventicne�. �ublic housing and Section 8 substantial rehab ar new construction--provided . there is not already a concentration of this kind of unit in the area. Section 8 existing units are not included in the calculation because the subsidy is tied to the renter and not to the housing unit or location. - 1 - 5. In allocatin new construction financin subsidies riorit shall be given �o—ro�ects ex �tin a m x o su s �ze an mar et rate units. is is an a temp to avoi t e pro ems t at have trad t ona y p agued public housing projects. A 100� subsidy would result in an unnecessary . concentration of low income families and would limit the number of proposals that could be assisted. Other factors�notwithstanding, higher priority will be given to those proposals which have the lowest proportion of subsidized units. A 20� subsidy level is preferred. Where a subsidy of more than 50� must be considered, priority will be given to project proposals of 24 units or less. This does not apply to elderly housing projects, which may be subsidized at the 100% level . 6. When evaluatin ro osals for housin assistance. the Cit shall take n o accoun con ormance w ot er a o te ous n � o u at on an economic eve opmen o c es, nc u n e esi en a m rovement ra egy an e is r c ans. e resu s w e use pr mar y or ran ng a ternat ves an secondarily in the decision to approve or disapprove a proposal . 7. When evaluatin ro osals for housin assistance the Cit shall take into accoun e pro�ec s s� e c arac er st cs ts otent a env ronmenta m act, an t e a e uac o conmun cat on w t area res ents. te c arac er st cs w c w e rev ewe nc u e t e pro ect s ocation with respect to public transportation, shopping facilities, employment opportunities; schools, parks, and medical services. These shall be considered in addition to the more general criteria of avoiding concentrations of low income households and assisted housing units. 8. The Cit of St. Paul ob'ects to the exem tion of the MHFA ro'ects rom e provis ons o ection a o t e Hous n an Comrwnit eve opmen c , an s re ues �n e rev ew o a a cat ons sum� e o y esaeaenc . sw a ow e�it�`yto mon or eve opmen n eres an o assure conformance with the HAP. -c- � � ' ....._ ..........,.�... ,..�,.��, � � S°C o � � j � � i � ' a ; •�- � ~ ' r- ic: �:.� r� r.' o' a0 � � � O� � .� � � O 00� �O: I�I 01 tC � M � I O� I�i m � eF �O h sY� M CO � IZO � W . ' � '�^ ,�i z ! � �- C�I I N W � I � - R , � ' � t N � f I � � I O �._�.__..?, ... . __. _'_. ..{_ _ I F i � a i i i �'. ' � �, ( i ,J W I. � � � O � � < M �Yf Oe� aT 1� N N � � �Z s r d I I 1� et� �OI �O; u'f 'ch � O � �? y� 0 � O C 1� c"]I M� O tA tn 00 �. .I '�� ,� � • °' � "' �.,' �I v � � ri ^ � � I . � I I o I J W H � ,� ~ �ec �" � cv v c�v n� o 0�0 O ' � �., e�. � m .� t0 �'f N �� . � ; N� = N I� C� Y �n >i V � i � 2 ►�I z i I O = � " A � � ; �I M � �., , -- _____ __ ___ ___ __ � o _r__ < U I� � � O � � p UI � I o u =! � W � i rn � c°JV o°io � rn . ~ Z ~'� � = I � � �F p � �n � � u=i N Z I W � �' N N o0 � Z � o S ~I2 00 ' � I �I o W Z� I� i � -� oO �I Z ' 01 ! � l� t r I w � _ � U' � W NIu ` � I Z I � C = � > c i � < �� o ,- �d- r� r - � � J < t ^� O t p J � tO N M l2') � � r^� a . JV C O- M- _ 1 ►-u _ ... �n {L) ILI 4 0 � g �'^ z MI a N M e n a W ' � O t L r M . � � 0 � t Q�IV � ._ `s O F" � � _'_._�_. __ __ _ e z � = j I --�-- - _ W � � � I a o� u � I, a o < � p < ou, �r� r� � �n 'E � M N r- I� I� O M p p W F � �O� � N �O �O O N a �^ V ; Q1 00 N N � j � c..r 01 ►� r-.� $' O � ~ ^ � S � ~ + = W � � ~ �4 � j� � � t P. h 1�. h, r� 1�. h Z � W O � 01 01 O� C� O� 01 O� i � � _ } N r f b � W - t V _ 'e O ev e � b � � y N S " M • ►- o . ? ` I N + 0 � Y V � f � Z [ � t '� � y~j •O � e N I � � � � F � � C � � � = s E ` � < 3 e v � '� �. h a i ! y • < � ° e �' O. � W � `�' ! � e e p ``- ~ � ~ � e V ' .� 7 K Z = a � � o ^+ « � � � ,g s F � O .� O � ,•. e N � � i � � o � Z � Z '� ° f r�- � 's • Z • ` ` � P M e � a °u = � � $ i C ` .� o .« ... . J v , v � p • N O • • ` +' i ' � = 6 � �' °C � Z « e : < �i w � . 0 N 6 N < 0 o F '�3 .3S ,`n i �i Ssi 'g € ;' _ •s` s 8 w �, F o o �i > : i � >° •� � c o n° a � � �" ,._ eJ e�i .r : o .• �3 ai V - -- - - n �n � w � • �- • b �� - 3 ^ , , � . G7 i� N O N O �!' 1� . �� . . ` � A N 00 O� �If M 00 � ` L pG r r r . Y! 1 �O N +�•�E C � M �O O� OD 1� � O .IL F- � � t�0 t�0 u�'f ^V � 1� . � d r 1� M t0 st' O lC . y,� . . . . • R{ N M � M N � � � - i � 01 . �r�- O VI C�E i � t�fl t�0 0�1 � M t�0 0�1 r li F= � N N N N � N N � y N OD O� � cY M rt t0 05 01 1� �O O� O f- C' O�N C > •r O vf � 7 i � 01 M OO l� � M O �2 F7-- � � 00 01 1� �O 01 O � . N M N N N N N N N Q N � � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a rn +� cv t~/) �J t%1 � � M � M M M O i i0 •C N N N N N N N Z O� _ rti } zU Q N et t� O 00 C1 O O 1� � ' . � et �n LL� M M �n � �P z ' �c w �r +�•r A� +� O� 1� M t0 C� N � � � �C t�D O O�D � ct 00 00 � = li� � '- N r r- r- �C G a i 1 W � d I� 1� t0 ln I� 1� t0 O m . � O C O O O O O O i 7 �"` N �V H r- C �/f Qf•rE 10 +� i- l0 RY r 00 CQ cF � r f3 b •C N M st M N � eT � �y � � U C N v � 01 � M 00 q M � � � � r N N r' � N N N • � U C C CJ "-' M17 N CN � O M u'f et � I� t0 i 7 +� 7 V •r ln 00 t0 ln M l0 O CJ O �=j � � N N � r N N �_ �� +�•�- r U r- C r 7 � 4�,Cf'CJ C C 0J � O � � � � � 7 U C/•� i • • • �p • i > > 0�0 0^0 0�0 0�0 00 0�0 � > rt �_� •r+� U r rtf O C G1 •r O �+� �i � 01 01 01 O� 01 O� 01 Q �� r r � � r r ^ i I � � N i 1 tA U i 1p Rf i UI C i +� UI C i 01 f O r N M ef r N Cn � # !n - d _ TABLE I - SURVEY OF HOUSING CONDITIONS A. Housinq Status and Conditian of all Housing Units in the Cor�nunity 1 . Occupied Units � � The estimate of occupied units is taken from data derived by the St. Paul City Planning Office and data published by the Metropolitan Council . It was calculated using the 1970 census and St. Paul 's 1974 land use anventory as a base with an annual adjustment from building and demolition permit data. The owner/renter splits are arrived at by using the updated housing stock figures, multiplied by the percentage of homeowners and renters shown in the Polk Company's Profiles of Change, 1974. 2. Vacant Available Units Vacancy data is''Ymeasured by inactive utility service. The vacancy rates are an average figure for 1976 �and 1977 applied against the total number of available housing units, owner and renter. Vacancy data, as measured by inactive utility service, is considered more accurate and up-to-date than Polk vacancy data. The Metropolitan Council reports that the City of Bloomington recently fi,eld checked vacant units shown by the utilities company. vs. actual field conditions. Accuracy for multi-family units was exce7lent. The vacancy rates for single family units was considered low by as much as 50�. In accordance with this finding, and based on• the data, we have adjusted the single-family vacancy rate upward to more accurately reflect actual conditions. (See Table I-A) 3. Housing Stock Available The sum of occupied and vacant available units, as described above. 4. Vacancy Rate Self-explanatory. See #2 above for data base. . B. Definitions, Data Sourcesl and Methods 1. Defjni�ion of "Substandard Units° A system of building classification by structural condition has been developed and used extensively in St. Paul over the last several years. - 5 - In the Fall of 1974, a residential structural condition survey � (exterior) was undertaken to apply the system .c� a house-by- house basis for major porti,ons of the City. (� copy of the survey is included in the �ppendix.) The areas surveyed had not been included in NDP, code enforcement or renewal project . areas where up-to-date data was already available. Condition data Table I thus reflects complete and recent survey of 60 percent of the total dwelling units in the City, Areas excluded . from this survey are those areas for which, on the basis of CRP studies, census data and knowledge of environmental conditions, it is reasonable to assume that no ma or concentrations of deficient housing- exist. The number�substandard residential units indicated is lower than the actual total to the extent that scattered substandard units do exist in the portions of the City not surveyed. (Census Tracts in which no units were surveyed include numbers 307.01 , 307.02, 351 , 361 , 362, 363, 364, 375 and 376.01 .) Four classifications are employed in the evaluation of building conditions: 1 . Sound structure without defects other than those which would be corrected by routine maintenance. 2. Structure in need of minor repairs. 3. Structure in need of major repairs. 4. "Structurally substandard" or di7apidated to the extent that repair is probably not feasible. For purposes of the Housing Assistance Plan, all residential units in structures which fall into the third and fourth classifications--major repair and structurally substandard--are considered substandard. These are units which require majo� rehabilitation work to be made reasonably livable by comnunity standards and brought into conformance with the housing code or are not suitable for rehabilitation and should be demolished. 2. Definition of Units Suitable for Rehabilitation Total rehabilitation potential includes all of the units in structures classified "minor repair" and 50 percent of the units classified "major repair". The 50 percent of major repair units not included as suitable , for rehabilitation is based on experience in renewal project areas, indicating that a major portion of units in this class- ification ultimately are found to be unsuitable for rehabilitation because of extensive deficiencies found on interior inspection or for environmental reasons. In addition to the units surveyed, an additional 5 percent (approximately) of the total occupied housing units were added to the suitable for rehabilitation total . This 5 percent was added in an effort to adjust for the rehabilitation in areas outside of the survey tra:cts and for units which require additional maintenance since the completion of the survey. _ 6 _ , .. . � /:. . . ,��,�. i � , nl�,.. . .. . '' . ` . . � . il . . . � . . � ^ � _ ��1 j �c s �,•�,€ 3 � � � a • , �, . _. Y+� � N �a� Z � ,. � Y � . � `4 � � �►�r..� ';'f ' . • O t � J Y 47 � �� p < �S N u.,� �� $ � �a � s N .- o ; i � � � ss� ;� � 0 � �' < , ;;� t �i N � i ,,, �OftD '; . t= � � lC r ti' �,�.� ,�. ! � � �,. �� o ° �' � ;. s N ,g , .,.:k: :��;:'f�. � •.� P �� i �xt; O �J 8 � � Y ;;; ,,�,' ; _ �at ; ' : ° . � I� J<g ..�r; R ., 0 � � �� ;�.•'r� �,1 V � '/ ,q O .M Z " o �u .� � � M p � J„~e,e n � ..� . 3 �, „ _ � a r �' ;;�`.:- O �' W "`� J � � = o W � � 0 W 0 W « 0 H � � W W Y� M . J G W O J �U � ~ . Y > W � � � o� h � c Z z � W= ` W F � i � � _ .. � o, � ` � � � ^ _ � � w O L < � t [ r' ►- _ U' H � < y N F ; C $ z u � ' � ^ J •-� o �^ � m � �J E � Z W � N r � J``� V . f s � ye s W J,�,� � , 0 M � ,� � s � �t � � � W �`8 I N � O` I�j � = O s J • � �,� e y Mv S d � w p H , W °�� V W � _ N < ^ M � � w N O '� M Oi ' '- N � . � � � � � 1 W ;3 W U � � � �� 'h O Q y . ' �v o� � � � � W ` W o� �c ��'o � � �"'o F y y,��, f� � �� r ~L � a o � � �3 �� e �ai _ i + �'^ � � H L N t � a� �~ ! � G � �!$Q� �.�. � H W i.� N� S� '� O O �n s W� a� Wy��p� �� `Z i p � � . . ZE M {�y N O O. J�J �.+ � �g.r Ft , i }�f . V�l OC v1 S= _ �` S 6 i � t m C� O 4! 1V V w w � • • n • w o ' • � �'r�:.�:', � � y . r��. .. . . . . . . . . � . . � _ '�.1�..1 '�� . (r iti N."'�,�y�`,. ,i �I.}.� '!. � , �'�'.:,: �.t,. '�,�+�,,;,��IM� ,F.. , . � � � �. . � � � , . :1 > . ?"!' . . . - . � �. . . � ,. � , . . . - . � .. . . . . ..�`��.� �'i �� ~ rN � � i 2�, �� ► � 7 „ « , a y �O JLL`4 � �. J 2 L C J� 1 O t! �` � . � � J � p n r f r � O V l `o. V = � 1y < � U < � i O ;[ y 2 J � � ~ Z7 ru � _ � :� < : � a� b� � 4 , 20y PY w U Y =`, �Z7 = I =V 2 � W . � W < •< < r . U 'i .. [ = C W M J 6 I i0 i y� 0 O < t7 i u• • .< i � .. O ❑a ° �❑ ❑ ❑ t # * + � � � ma = w a � ~ w O .7•41 N G �� ^= t U a y � � i T � �W WJ � • 'O �, 1Y J < i f i Z y T eh O N •.-�,� = p f f- <t o = Z Q� JLL` 4 O e0 u JO I � � O <� h.r- . i S y N p1 � � T O O ) v rt! W 1 ►- �� o �+ c�a et a 3 � i r � a � � � _ � `a �..� � N N � W O O < .Z O O 4- [ �y y Z7 O O C � -o� .8 � t O � O n o ,� 'C C J W tl U' • b W 2 J < � eV V O O j W � W � W t Z W p 4 +�+� w Z i �' �2 t O =�v iC rt7 � � � � z U J �C � W u < = w � a °' Z z I < y � n i � a � t < w � � a < ~' ` � G f MO O j.0 I Z N V O � < N 2. �l ..� � � F N V1+� 2 < O ►W- ' ~ w N 4- � � U O � � � V � W 3�l' _ = J G �� R1� LL VI l m > VU' j 0 e h �7 O � 6 O [„ R_ @ o � •U C � O < a J ri W <� `o : , N ro Z = � d t =� JLL � GL „ f F Q H � H i� ��.- � y=j Q O N N J � _ C J Z +� Cl < W � .. n O < > '^'� ,-. o m '��: a � tn lC GO U i-� N t ❑ ❑ t o � • C C .... � f M � O 4 •{/) {H f � w L. I � < 2 � O� � d C3. � ; u < Q � a as�. d � r a o � i : ,;, 'd � � t� � _ � V �a i r N � = o� 2 � Z'r •>q-+ t J � Y p u r =�. �6 v- � 4 V 2 Q +� O � < tl C•� � ,N � O a < J � � � V� � � � � i i ro v Z - « ^ �n+s.+ - N N O = W � � Vt •i tC7 .J�v C C I . �y b N oa � Evro = w ' U i G i ;I ac 0� � L� O +� i p W = Fp O O 0 � O N fl. ' pt t �F� �� 4�- C O� ► z Rf i- C �^ � �' ~ J • y� � O V C i � a � o � L � � �,•.- �, �, J N W ` � � �� O � i O I Q fn � � p� �� C�L I ` 4- _ � �, � � � 01L C � C N•� t •r+� � W I � � 1� �� F- •O G�X Z U � m ts C� ,k N W � « w • � o _ � . I � . � •� N N��!' O N N l0 t0lN O OI�7 I � �^IM ' �II � � ir I LL� �Ir I� � r� r- N I t:7 � � r I.n QS �G ct �IQ� �n M I0� O O O I� Lc� N Q� O O O I O C r- U rM� Cf�' I Ir I O �- II •r N i ro � r N N � •r z N r . � � � m N �-. w +� � � p � Z r LC� r 1� CO N M I.f) 00 Gf I��r� Ol � Q � O O O � N U R7 01 r- O O M c7 Ol Ol 00 r-r- N ct M r-IL[) Gl -�y +� Lf') ct O tU P^M r t.[) �% R5 Z � � ��Q 1� r N .?l � � �--� �--� � I--- � r-� Q •� J J � � W 00 � I--� Q � ¢ � O � � c v� � W � N L7 N t , � '-Zi U �C p�.I� O ►nl�n O� .MM-I� 00 MI� I N �i' I�I- I MII � b Z J � ►r Q N L ~ � N C� � W � O O � 'O �NIN � �I� � NIN ��Altn ( � N �I� I �II C � d' � � O t1� OJ 0� � _ � C Z � Ri � � V1 2 � r- �Q VI � t.f)e- tC Q� 00 I� 00 l0 �' �t �t CO t[') M N l!') O � Z J C �0 lA r 1� M r I.f) f� O 00 Ln�O r- M r Ct LA Ol � ►-+ O GJ +� r-- N M r- ct 11') '- l� I� �t tn N tn f� N �' 'p d U O w w w w n i. � � ^ ^ r- . � � �.�-. � � N N N N O • � �- 41 W W O � r � O z O� ' rtf J '-+ r '�'� O i� � O r '- 1� +-� R3 +-� �0 i-� Rf i-� ICS d-� RS Q1 C C +.� C C i-� C C ++ C C {.� C C i-� � 3 � 0 3C� o 3G� o 3 � 0 3 � 0 Q S. � O i- �1-� O 1- +-� G S- +-� O i- +-i ^ Q � N ' r � ~ •r Z 01 W N � V O � "'� L C � [.n � Q' � N Q �" �' � y� S,. C Ry .r .. � C O � r- �^ O p 4��- tQ/1 i � �C C i r-- � O O L i. o2S � rC3 a +� Q1•r- Ql � G. +� C +� G1 C1 Q) O -F � •'- •r- u) N +-� C , tn z) 4J O L > .D X rC � C C •r a •� S- O O O +3-� � 4- �!i vf tT 2 C� , - 8a - TABLE II - HOUSING ASSISTANCE ��E^� OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS DATA RESOURC�> �,�� METHODS A. The Data Base: Special Census Tabu�atian In 1974 a special tabulation of UoS.. Census data wa� prepared for the purpose of identifying households aff�cted by inadequate living condition. The following were employed as indicators: a. households occupying units 1acking some or all plumbing and/or b, households with more than 1 .25 persons per room and/or c. tenant households paying more than 25 percent of their income for rent or, owner households occupying housing more than 30 years old and va7ued at less than $10,000. This tabulation provides the basis fnr the needs assessment as indicated in Table II. Table IT-A (�age 8a) shows the total 21 ,089 lower income households inadequateiy housed by household size and tenure from the special tabulation. The following items were sub- tracted from these totals to arrive «t the needs assessment figure in Table II. B. Change in Housing Assistance Needs Since 1970 1 . Subtractions� from Census Data Needs Assessment a. Assisted units added to the City's housing stock since 1969 A total of 6355 assisted units have been added in St. Paul since 1969 as follows: Type of Unit No. of Units Elderly 1 ,652 Leased scattered housing & Section 8 1 ,341 Scattered site public housing 143 HOPLIF 202 236 Units 2,282 235 Units 301 � Section 8 New Construetion 434 (family units) TQTAL 6,355 b. Public housing households overpaying in 1969 At the time the census was taken, 2,850 households occupying assisted units would have shown up as inadequately housed because they were paying in excess of 25 percent of their incomes for rent. Because of the Brooke Amendment, requiring that public housing families pay no more than 25 percent, sub- sidies have been increased. Thus, this portion of the need has been met. - 9 - c. Turnover and Vacancies The normal turnover and vacancies which occur in existing assisted housing will provide approximatley 1 ,300 units. d. Displacement/Relocation Assistance A total of 2,483 St. Paul households have been displaced since the _Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1970 went into effect. A large majority of these were low income households, but the number that would qualify as needing housing assistance is not known. Assuming that displaced households require assistance at approximately twice the rate of the general population some 820 of the displaced households would have been included in the 1970 needs assessment. Relocation assistance payments can be counted as meeting that need. e. Rehabilitation Assistance to Lower Income Families An estimated total of 3,575 lower income �households have received assistance in the form of loans and/or grants for rehabilitation since the time of the census. Summary of Subtractions from Census Data Needs Assessment a. Assisted units added since 1969 6,355 b. Public housing households overpaying, 1969 2,850 c. Turnover and vacancies 1 ,300 d. Relocation assistance � 820 e. Rehabilitation assistance 3,575 TOTAL 14,900 Needs assessment total (1970) census) 21 ,089 - Subtractions listed above 14,900 Remaining unmet need 6,189 2. Additions to Census Data Needs Assessment �hile the above data reflects the housing assistance needs which have been met since 1970, it must be remembered that the . population needing assistance has not remained constant over the past seven years. In the absence of current census data or other accurate information, estimates reflecting current housing needs are necessary. The needs assessment should include estimates of newly formed households (since 1970) plus households now requiring assistance which did not require assistance in 1970. ' - 10 - �� ,�: I - a. Newly Formed Households The Office of Local and Urban Affairs, State Planning Agency, and Minnesota Housing Finance Agency published a report in October, 1976, entitled, Minnesota Housin Needs Housin . Resource Distribution Plans, is report oes not rea own estimate increase in need for housjng subsidy since 1970 by comnunity, but it does provide a general methodology for obtaining such an estimate. It is assumed in the report that the percentage of newly formed households currently needing subsidy will be higher than the 1970 percentage, and that renter households will have greater subsidy needs than households in general . The report methodology applied to St. Paul produces an estimate that 20% of the new renter households will require subsidy. Most new households in St. Paul are renters. An � estimated 4,100 new households have been formed in St. Paul since 1970. Approximately 820 (20%) of these households will require housing assistance. b. Increase of Assistance Needs in Existing Population There is no accurate methodology for estimating the number of existing households which did not require housing assistance in 1970 .but now require assistance. The recession increased unemployment, inflation, higher energy costs, and other national economic factors are assumed to have negatively affected the housing market, adding to the housing need of St. Paul 's existing populat�ion. To account for the increase in need for housing assistance, as a result of these factors, 3% of the total number of occupied households (3,295) has been added to the needs assessment figure. c. Displacement/Relocation Assistance Displacement for CD Year IV is estimated at approximately 200 households, as indicated in Row C of Table II. Of these, approximately one-third will be owners and two-thirds will be tenants. d: Estimates of Housing Assistance Needs of Families Expected to Reside in the Comnunity St. Paul is a built up city which, like most cities in the country, has experienced declining population and out-migration over the past several years. Recognizing the metropolitan nature of the housing market, St. Paul actively supports the Fair Share Housing Plan of the Metropolitan Council . This plan is aimed at the dispersal of housing opportunities for low and moderate income households throughout the metropolitan area. - 11 - The employment opportunities in suburban areas have ' increased without commensurate increase in low and moderate housing opportunities in those areas. The 1974 St. Paul Migration Survey showed that a significant portion of lower income in-migrants to St. Paul are driving out of St. Paul to their place of employment.* � For St. Paul to increase its housing assist�nce need� figures based on a� "expected to reside" calculation, without analyzing out-migration and the regional fair share housing plan and existing low and moderate housing resources in the City, is inefficient and inaccurate. The data and calculations below were provided by the St. Paul Area Office, Department Housing and Urban Development. These figures were used to fill in Table II , Section D. 1 . Additional families with workers, already employed in the comnunity, but living elsewhere, expected to reside in the 7,866 cor�nunity households 2. Lower income families with workers who live and work in the cor�nunity 38,197 3. Percentage of l.ower income workers li,ving in_the community where they work 53°6 4. Percentage derived from dividing (line 1 ) bY (line 1 ) plus (line �) 17q 5. Number of non-resident lower income families with workers "expected to reside° (line 3 times line 4 times line 1) 708 The above calcualtion applies only to persons already employed in St. Paul ; it does not take into account any increase as a result of planned employment in the City. St. Paul has a strong, diversified employment base which is not dependent on any single employer or industry. While it has lost some employment opportunities as companies relocate to the suburbs, � its total workforce has remained quite stable over the past decade--179,000 in 1967, 180,000 in 1976.** No major corporate . expansions are planned at this time. *Migration rronittee, Saint Paul Po ulation Chan e: Challen e and Opportunity, July, 19 , p. . **Mayor George Latimer, Agenda for a Future Saint Paul , Sept. 1 , 1977, p. s. - 12 - h ' RJr /'��.�� "!�. I Y( � r� �.A. r n Summar_v of Additions to Census Data Needs Assessment a. Newly formed households requiring assistance � gZp b, Increase of assistance needs in ex�sting population • 3,295 c. Displacement and relocation in CD Year IV 200 d. Additional families expected to reside in St. Paul 708 . TOTAL ADDITIONS , 5,023 Remaining Unmet Assistance Needs (from 1970) 6,189 Additional "New" Assistance Needs 5,023 TOTAL Currently Requiring Assistance in St. Paul � �2 C. Female-Headed Households Accurate data for the housing needs of female headed households is not available. Neither the Polk Company nor the census calculates female- headed households (both families and individuals) as a function of income. The following estimate was derived by manipulating 1970 census data and Polk data. 1. Basic data known included the number of families with female heads below poverty ('70 census) , all families with female heads ( '70 census) , and the total number of female-headed households from the 1974 Polk Profiles of Change and from the 1970 census. . 2. An algebraic� equation was developed to estimate the number of female-headed households requiring housing assistance. It was assumed that there was a direct relationship between families with female-heads below poverty to ail families below poverty and the number of female-headed households requiring housing assistance and all households requiring housing assistance. 2369/4776 = X/10304 .X = 5,111 female headed-households requiring housing assistance This figure is the estimate of need for female headed-households requiring housing assistance. 3. Sub-categories were then determined: ELDERLY: Using the percentage of all households at nQed which are � elderly, the elderly female-hee�ded households is deterinined 5111 X .60 = 3066 elderly female-headed households requiring housing assistance LARGE FAMILIES: In the absence of any authroitative data, it was assumed that the same percentage of all large families who require housing assistance would apply to female-headed households. 5111 X .07 = 358 female-headed large families requiring housing assistance. ,� OWNER/REN1'ER C�T�GORIES: Again, accurate data regarding the percentage a� lower incom� female-rieaded households which own or rent is ?�cking. It was assumed that female-headed househalds own and rent �n approximately the same proportion as all other lower income hauseholds requiring housing assistance. Therefore a proportion of 89 percent was used for rental need and 11 percent for homeownershi�. The St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authroity reports that 76,5 percent of all th� �n�ts which they manage and subsidize are occupied by female-heade� h�us�holds. Of the HRA elderly units, 77 percent are occupied by f�r�a�e�headed households. Thus, the unmet need for female-headed househ�lds may actually be lower than the Table II figures indicate. � 14 - . - Fmw A�povd OMB Ho.O�R-1�71 P • 1�1 2 •s " U.S.DEPARTMENT Of IWUSING AND URBAN DEVELO►MENT � � � � HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN TABLE 111. GOALS FOR LGWER INCOME NOUSIN6 ASSISTANCE � CURRENT YEAR GOAL �• MM/E OF A►PLICANT �, � 01�I�INAL � City of St. Paul [� AMENDMRNT, DATE: - �' �PPLI�ATION/GqANT t�UM6E11 •. PQOGqM1 VEAq B - - - FNOM1: June 1, 1978*0� May 31, 1979 NUMBER OF MOUSEIIOLDS TO BE ASSISTED " ElD[RLV Oti LANGE T�PESANDSOURCESOFASSISTANCE AL` MANDICAP�aD �AMILV FAMILv � MOUSEMOLOS (O oI I[ss 11-2 rerso�s/ personsl (5 ar worc , p ersons) (ei -----�- --- -�►1 le) (Q (�► A. NEM RENTAL UNITS i 1. S�ction 8-HUD. -- - --' Z 2. A - Srm o lines n and D) � o. Section B ----- -- — 2 9 00 60 9 � b. Oth.. --_.___..-- ----- 5 3. Othe.Astitt�d N�w Rmtol Housing --------- --- , (IdeneiJyl• Total -------_._____._ ___..----- 6 — - �_._,..___.... ..... ....... ....__.._.�_. � b. — —__— - -- __.. s 4. Totd(Sum o �-:-s�,z,ond 3) 289 100 160 29 B. REHA6ILITATION.Of RENTAL UNITS a 1. Section 8-HUD --_---- --- �0 2. Stute A enc -Totol(Sum oJ linea a and bl +� o. Section 8 � 185 85 100 0 �2 b. Orber �.---- - 13 3. Othp AtsisTed R�hobilitetien ol Rsnld►isuainy pds.iiJvl- Totol • u --.__._.---- -- a. �s -�_.,-- ---- 1e 4. Totol (Sum o lines 1 2 cnd 31 185 85 100 0 C. EXISTING RENTAL UNITS » 1. S�ction 8-HUD ---}-_ - ----- ��7 � �e 2. $tofe A M -TOIOI�SYn1 O lines a ond 6J 19 a Section 8 -- 2o b. Oeher � -- 21 3. Olher Assist�d Exi�tiny R�ntal Heusinp /►e��trlyl - Totd z¢ a, -- --- :a 6, ---- — 2� /. To►o�(Sum oJlinea 1,2,ond 31 ---- 32S �7 Q D. REHA�ILITATION ASSISTANCE TO MOMEOMNERS OR PROSPECTtVE HOMEOMNERS ' Za 1. CD Block Grmts ----. .� _ zb 2. «ti 235 �- —. _� 3. Other R�habilitotion Assislanc�to 1'lo�wwnsi or ProsP�ctivs HoeaeMnvs(Iden�i/y1- Totol SeC. 312 125 51 2" o MHFA 240 95 29 b. Cit L an and 150 60 � �0 1. Tof�(s+�a lisea 1,Y,awd 3J 792 E. NEM CONSTRUCTION ASSItTANCE TO MOMEOMNERf OR PROSPECTIVE NOMEOMNERS s� 1. S �: 2. otMr1Neiuij�l - Tetol �• a. 3. b �� a Tetel(Sw�o/linrs 1 sed 21 �� F. ALL MOUSING ASSISTANCE WALS �SYT OI 1Mfi��,s�,a,n�, owd E31 1,626 619� 874 133 NUD-7015.10(I I-�3) - 15 - ; . , , . , � ►N�7�/2 y � • U.i.DE�ARTMENT Of MOyfING ANO YR�AN OEV[LO►YEMT � MONi1qO AS4STANCE►LAN TA6LE III. GOALS FOR LOMER INCOAIE MOUtIN6 ASSISTANCE • TMREE rEAR 60AL , ` �• �NAMC Of A�PIIC�MT 7• � 01tl61NAL City of St. Paul . � Q AMeNOM[NT,OATL: 2. A►PLICATION/GRANT NUM�ER �. •IW011AM YEAII B - .. ��":June 1, 1978 To:May 31, 1979 NUYeER OF MOUSEMOLOS TO�E ASSISTED TYPES ANO SOURCESOF AfSISTANCE ALL ELDERLY 011 Fµ�L� LAI�d[ NANDICA�PED (jer�es� •AMILY NOUtENOLD� ��J_�v��yOpt) S yerao�sJ ( or�or� psrro�sl lo) (�) (cl (dl 1�1 A. NEM RENTAL UNITS � �. 2 2• A e I IS4n1 O liw�s a ond 6) � d S.Cr�o�e 545 225 + b. Orher s 3. Olaa Asaisl�d N�w R�nrol Housiny l/denti /- T 1 6 p, � b e 4. Tofal(5um oJ lincs 1,2,and 3J B. REMABILITATION OF RENTAL UNITS 0 1. Secti n B�HUD io 2• $�ate A �nc -To�o)(Swn oJlines a ond 6) �, o. 5.�� e ]85 �2 b. Oth« �� 3. Other Assis►�d R�Iwbilitwien of RMtd Housin� (lde�ri/r1 - Torol �• o, • ,s b. 16 4. Tord(s��oJ G.�s 1.2.o�d 3; C. EXISTING RENTAL UNITS: �� l. S�cyion 8-HUD 398 i e 2. S�ol�A enc -Totol fSuw o fines o ond bJ 19 a. Section 8 �o b. Other _� 3. Oth�r Assiated E:istin�RMfol Fleusinq f�d��«Jrl• Tolal z o, z a b. 2• 4. Totol (Sum oJ fines 1,2,ond 3) 3(9 D. REMASILItATION ASSISTANCE TO MOMEOMNERS OR �ROSPECTIVE HOMEOMNERS :s 1• Cp Block Gonrs �s 2. S�c�ion 235 _� 3• O�Mr Rahabililrion Aasial�uc�te F1owNw��rs er Prospictiv�No�wwnai(/Je�ti/y)• TeNI �2 400 160 200 ,� :' b, 725 ao 4. Tot�/Srn�o liwe�I,Y,awd 3) 9 E. MEM CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE TO NOYEOMMERf OR ►ROSIECTIVE IIOME �� 1. Sec��en 235 135 0 85 50 �_- z. a�. �.�.�a �-ro►ai )1 ` s� b, �s 3. Totd(Srin o/liwes/o�/YJ as F. ALL MOUSING ASSISTANCE fAALS /S�in o linea A4.B�.f.�,W,owI t.t� 4 428 Z » IERCENT Of ALL MOYSENOLOS �� 40 � X X� G. lXILANATION 0I►RIOIIITIES(A/rcA d1i1i�!p��J MUO-7013.10/�]-)SI _ 7c TABLE III - GOALS FOR LOWER INCOME HOUSTNG ASSIS7ANCE Housing assistance goals have been established to conform with the MetroW politan Council 's regional allocation formula for assisted housing. That formula was arrived at by estimating each community's share of the metro- politan population, population growth, employment, employment growth, and housing assistance need and by subtracting the exis,ting supply of subsidized housing. T.his formula recommends allocation of 11� of the funding resources for subsidized housing in the metropolitan area to St. Paul (1266 units over 3 years). This allocation formula is based on the need to secure greater dispersal of assisted housing units through- out the metropolitan area. St. Paul recognizes and supports this policy as meeting two important objectives: (1 ) providing greater choice of location for lower income households; and (2) ensuring socio-economic balance in the future population of the central cities and throughout the metropolitan area. It should be noted that these goals represent considerable reduction in the city's effort to meet lower income housing needs over previous years and are not commensurate with the magnitude of needs �ndicated in Table II. Change in the extent of available resources, the metropolitan allocation plan, or factors affecting the allocation would result in changes in the city's goals. The city will establish priorities for specific project proposals in ligh� of actual funding allocations. Several housing assi�stance programs which are not subject to the Metropolitan Subsidized Housing Assistance Plan are also included in the oals table. These are the Section 312, Minnesota Housing Finance Agency �MHFA) loan and grant, city bond and CD revolving fund, and Comnunity Development Block Grant programs for providing rehabilitation assistance to homeowners. These are included to give a broader perspective on the city's effort to meet housing needs. Unless otherwise noted, however, the following dis- cussion is limited to those programs which are covered by the allocation plan. A. Current Year Goals 1 . Total Number of Households to be Assisted Section 8 resources available to the metropolitan area have been nearly twice what was originally pro�ected in the Metropolitan Subsidized Housing Allocation Plan. No new allocation has yet . been made, but it is anticipated that the number of units avail- able to St. Paul will be substantially increased in the future. Because of the expected increase, the remainder of St. Paul 's current allocation (774 units) will be used in the second year of the 3 year periqd covered by the allocation plan fCD Year IV). An additional 60 units have been promised by Metro�olitan Council as compensation for accepting 85 units of public housing which were allocated to, but not used by, other cor�nunities in the metropolitan area. - 17 - These have been added to the current year goal for a total of - 834 units. The difference between this number and the grand total shown in Table III (1626 units) is that number of units which will. be provided under programs not covered by the allocation. plan. 2. Proportionality, by Household Type The numbers of. units assigne� to serve elderly, family and large family households were chosen such that, when combined with assistance provided in the past two program years (CD Years II and III) , the total is generally proportional to the needs identified in Table II. The actual needs identified were 43� elderly, 51% family and 6% large family. A ratio of 40% elderly, 50% family and 10% large family is used in this plan. The ��rcentage set aside for elderly households was adjusted down- ward because there is evidence of lessening demand for elderly units (waiting lists have shortened at hi-rise projects) and to comply with the Metropolitan Allocation Plan provision that, at the maximum, 40% of the subsidy be used to meet elderly needs. Conversely, the large family needs are somewhat over-represented in the goals because these households have greater difficulty finding units on the private market. See Figure III - A for a summary of the computation. 3. Sources of Assistance a. Programs Cove�red Under the Metropolitan Subsidized Housing Allocation Plan. Several considerations were taken into account in allocating units to the Section 8 new construction, substantial rehabilitation, and existing rental and the Section 235 programs. First, the Section 8 existing rental program is appropriate in a built city like St. Paul . A high percentage of the Section 8 existing subsidy is used to "rent in place" , i .e. , to help households make rent payments for the unit where they already live, and the program has been very popular with participants. The largest percentage (40�) of units are allocated to this program. - Second, the city has had a number of proposals under the Section 8 new construction program and a somewhat lesser . number under the Section 8 substantial rehab program. Units have been allocated so as to capitalize on the current momentum in these areas. Third, the increased availability of 235 resources is reflected in the number of units assigned to this program. The specific number of units allocated to each subsidy program is subject to change, depending on actual project proposals. - 18 - b. Other Programs Allocation of rehabilitation assistance to homeowners reflects the current availability of funds in the various rehab programs--Section 312, MHFA loan and grant, the city's bond and . CD revolving fund, and the Community Development Block Grant. B. Three-Year Goals , 1 . Total Number of Households to be Assisted The three-year goal is a projection based on St. Paul 's current three year allocation and on the increased availability of Section 8 funds ,experienced this year. It is the sum of the remainder of our current 3 year allocation (774 units), the 60 units that have been promised to compensate for acceptance of additional public housin , and a one-year increment at twice the current allocation level �2/3 X 1266), for a total of 1682 units. This includes only those units covered under the Subsidized Housing Allocation Plan. Rehab a�sistance not covered under the allocation plan was pro- jected based on anticipated funding levels. 2. Proportionality by Nousehold Type The three year housing assistance goals were chosen to address needs in proportion to those identified in the HAP. Forty percent of the assisted units will be reserved for elderly households, 50� for family households, and �lOq for large family households. See the discussion of proportionality under "Current Year Goals" above. 3. Sources of Assistance See discussion under "Current Year Goals" above. C. Explanation of Priorities Rehabilitation assistance for homeowners is a high local priority and accounts for about 60% of the total three year housing assistance goal .� These programs are not subject to ceilings set by the Subsidized Housing Allocation Plan, however, and cannot be ranked for comparison . to other subsidy programs. Where subsidies under the allocation plan are concerned, a balance between rental assistance for existing units and subsidies for new construction and substantial rehabilitation of rental units is pre- ferred. Equal proportions of the 3 year goal are reserved for the existing and the new/rehab programs. - 19 - Within the Section 8 new construction/substantial rehabilitation •component, highest priority is given to those project proposals which: - 1 . exhibit a mix of subsidized and market rate units 2. provide units which meet family and/or large family needs 3. are located in high priority areas as indicated in the location plan (Table IV) . 4. are consistent with adopted housing, population, and economic development policies Proposals will be ranked on the basis of these four criteria without express preference for either new construction or substantial rehab. Goals for substantita7 rehabilitation have been set lower than goals for new construction because there have been few proposals under the substantial rehab program. These may be revised in the future, depending on actual project proposals received. - 20 - rt3 M ^ d' t0 O ' i-� tP� � 00 00 O � � r �"' r � N r t/f i��E� �' CO �I CO O U O J li = � �-- � H +� I-- � a O J U U � i J r +� t1'f 01 �� M O Z.7 UE •r' N � d" 01 �f1 C rt � � � � � H L ,� o J Q � O A ' � � H � U 0 � N +� M O O � O � ¢ � �•� N N M I� ct � N 1 O W � r' � �y pC � O � d O U r� � � C N J 'K� '� � m C.� ' N �t Z � '�'� ~ N t C _ p , U � _ •r S. � tC p .a W � � Q � N �k � r-� r-+ r- N H H � � N ~ ~ O > Q 5;,, � ►.�..� •r O � tO ttS i-� S- � � �- Rf � 0. � > rt7 J � � �- O C a p U � � � r U 'C � i. C "C 'C O rt3 � N N 4- > �'Qr � N 1.[) .0 > > � M i Q O N V � G. d C.7 � •r" O t U U U +� 3 � t0 tp N +-� � � +� N •r N N N � .r .r .r � � N VI N CO N N t/f �/1 Q Q Q O 'C3 CT C) � •r- � C � � � r •r •r- •� U U N V1 N N � O O O 'k 'k S 2 S -k - 21 - � • f�rw Aqre+�d - pM�Ne.63R•1�71 Y.f.DE�AIITMENT Oi NOUi1NG AND UR�AM DEVELO�MENT � � NOUfING AIS:STAIIC[/LAN . TABLE Iv - 6ENER�L LOCATIONS fOR PROPOSED LOwER INOOME NOUSINO . �• MAMf Oi A'�LICANT �. � 0111a1NAL City of St. Paul ' � � AM<NOMtNT,OATts 2� APPLICAT�ON/G11ANT NUMSEII �• •IW011AM�EAq - s - - - - •"OM:June'1� 1978 To:May 31. 1979 w. IDENTIFI/GENERAL LOCATIONS ON MAP IN TMIS A►►LICATION " 1. NeM Censhuc6on: Ca�ms Tacl Nu��as SEE ATTACHED SHEETS 2: Rehabilitation: C�a Tnet Nwibe�s SEE ATTACHED SHEETS . B. EX/IANAT101/Of fELECTION OF GENERAL LOCATIONS L�New OasGrdia� SEE ATTACHED SHEETS 2 ReMlililation SEE ATTACHED SHEETS 22 Muc-�ii�� ci�-�s� � Table IV-A PRIORITY GROUPING �OF CENSUS TRACTS FOR THE LOCATION OF ASSIT tONAi. n:�::iv��'"�? HOUSING UNITS: SUBSTANTITAL REHABILITATION, NEW CONSTRUCZ�I�JN, 2�� Priority I -- Family 301 318.02 349 36? 302 320 350 364 303 323 351 355 304 333 352 :i66 306 338 354 36� 307.02 339 355 3�'S 308 •345 3��6 37�.t'' 3�9 346 35,' ;7F.C!,> 31' 347 35R 31 F3.�I 348 3�? 'ri ari t_y I I -- ��ami 1y ?10 316 327 34� 312 321 328 368 313 322 330 369 314 �325 � 331 37t� j15 326 342 37?_ Pr��r�i� I I I -- Fami 1y 301.01 353 360 335 359 371 Pri��r�ty IV -- Family - - �- 3t15 324 336 361 '�7 329 337 374 319 334 340 F'riorit,�r I -- Elderly 306 347 350 352 318.01 349 351 353 - 23 - TAaLE IV - GENERAL LOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED LOWER INCOME HOUSING The purpose of the location plan is to promote a greater range of housing opportunities for low income households and to avoid concentration of assisted persons in low-income neighborhoods. Toward this end, the plan identifies areas where additional assisted housing Rrojects are to be encouraged or discouraged. Areas which presently have,few assisted housing opportunities are given the highest priority for the location of new subsidized �nits. Avoiding areas where there is a concentration of low-income households not receiving housing assistance is considered, but given somewhat less emp�iasis. Locational priorities are listed in Tab?e IV-A and mapped in the figures that fallow. These priorities apply to both new construction and sub- stantial rehabilitation proposals, though the feasibility of either program type will depend on the amount of vacant land and the need for rehabilitation in a given area. This is done for two reasons: first, there is a clear need for both types of development in the city; and second, an area's development potential is unrelated to its desirability as a location for assisted housing. A neighborhood may be largely developed and we-11 maintained but still be a desirable location for assisted housing, should the opportunity arise. Location of assisted units in such areas would, in many cases, contribute to a broader disa tribution of lower income housing resources and population. Factors �:f,�ct�ng new construction and rehabilitation potentia1 are described in Table IV-B. � Locational priorities for family and elderly housing developments are treated separately. This is because subsidized housing for the elderly has much iess impact on a neighborhood than would a similar number of units for low income families. The presence of an elderly hi-rise, for example, should not preclude the development of additional subsidized family units in the area. A. Locational Priorities for Assisted Family Housinq Locational priorities for family housing development are based on � "fair share" concept with regard to housing assistance. Two fair share figures were determined: (1 ) a fair share of existing sub- sidized units (the number of subsidized units as a percent of the city's total housing stock, 1977); and (2) a larger fair share of subsidized housing needs (total housing assistance need, including existing subsidized housing units and unmet needs, as a percent of housing stock). The "existing subsidy" share is computed at 5�; the "need" share, at 15�. Subsidized housing projects for the elderly were not included in the calculation. Four locational priority categories are identified, with the highest priority going to those areas having the least assisted housing. Priorities range from I to IV. Priority I is highest; Priority IV is lowest. - 24 - 1 . Priority I The highest priority locations for assisted housing are those census tracts with the fewest low income housing opportunities. These are areas where the amount of assisted housing falls below the existing fair share level and where a majority of households have incomes above 80� of the SMSA median.* An exception is made for areas where the current low income population is being displaced by an influx of higher income persons. In the Summit-University neighborhood of St. Paul , for example, historic preservation and rising values are fast eliminating low income housing resources on the private market. 1970 Census data and even the 1974 Polk profile cannot be taken as an accurate measure of the situation today. For this reason, low income population was not used as an indicator in deter- mining the priority rankin of transitional tracts (338, 339, 340, 354, 355, 356 and 358�. Also, Section 8 rental assistance contracts were excluded from the "existing fair share" calculation. Because rent assistance payments are tied to the renter and not to the housing unit or location, they are a poor indicator of future subsidized housing opportunities in transitional areas. In the transitional areas, any tracts where less than 5� of the housing units are "permanently" subsidized** are considered top priority for additional assisted housing development.*** 2. Priority II ' Second priority is given to those areas where the amount of assisted housing falls below the fair share of existing subsidized units but where a majority of resident households are already low-moderate income. The need for assisted housing in these areas is as great that in the. Priority I areas but the availability of low income housing opportunities is generally greater. 3. Priority III Priority III is an intermediate category. Tracts in this group have more than their fair share of existing subsidized units but less than their fair share of the total subsidized housing need. Proposals for additional assisted housing development in these areas must be closely evaluated for their potential impact and relation to existing subsidized housing units. A strong . preference will be given to pr��cts where the ratio of subsidized to market rate units is sma11 . or where the project itself is small . ase on 0 Census data, **Units subsidized under conventional public housing, Section 236, 221(d)3, HOPLIF, and Section 8 new construction and substantial rehab. ***See Addendum - 25 _ 4. Pri ori t,� IV Priority IV areas already have more than their fai � sharF of the subsidized housing needed in the city. Most o-P them are home to one or more of the large family housing projects-- McDonough Homes, Mt. Airy, Roosevelt Homes, Torre de San Miguel , Dunedin Terrace, and others. Additional subsidized housing development is discouraged. Such development ,will be con- sidered only where a project has a very small percentage of subsidized units, such that its net effect is to raise the proportion of market rate units in the area. The one possible exception is Census Tract 374, the Battle Creek/Hiahwood area. This tract, thoug� it has a hig� percentage of subsidized unit�, i�; so large �n area tnat new subsidized developmer�t cannot �e ass��mec �:� ha��e an ��civerse �mpact. It is also one of the fiast�s± growir.g areas t.� St. Paul , and additional subsidized deveiopment miaht be needed to balance new, higher =".ncome deve3opment in Gt�P future. Proposals for Tract 374, then, should �e E�lialuatea on a case-by-case basis. 6. �nca�ianal �riorities for Assisted Hous�n_r., fior the Elder�7y Map 5 identifies those census tracts wh�ch are to be g�ven prio�it,y far the �iocation of new assisted housing units designed specif•- i c:al 1y for� e�l derl y househo�ds. Desi gnati on of these census tracts �s based upon (1 ) the location of existing housing for lower-income ��der�iy households, and (2) the demand for units experienced by t��e Public Housing Agenc,y. Location of units in t�ese areas would improve tne distribution of elclerly un�±� thraugh- out city n�ighborhoods. The �ocationa� priority maps designate broad geographic areas where sub- �idize� i�ousing projects might locate. S�te characteristir.s �nd potential environment�l impact will a1so �ffect the appropriateness �f a specific project location, and will �ie considered in addit�ion ta th� more general criteria of avoiding concentrations of luw 7ncome no�,zsFF�nlds and assisted housing units. Site char�cteristics which wil� be r?��ewed include the project'slocation with respect to public transpertation, shopping facilities, employment opportunities, schools , parks and med?c:al services. - 26 - . .- ---� -- --__ _ �.. , -- - ,--- „ _ —--i --- _ �i � � � �- � - 'T/ � sos' � ,I��// � ✓ �� aozo� ;I/ sozc� 30� �I 30 I 305 / � � O I � 311 ...,,.,�- ,� Io,�, - - -- - 308 . i � —';-,. 310 � I / , e� %� j 3 �� I 319 � ., 312 � 4,.. i i � —=J 316 "-' '�I � � ; _ o_� � 313 ` 314 � %'� 957 � 3180�� ,/ 20 321 � ' _ � �� 315 ��_� ��18.01 � G, � �; 324 0 4,: I —T � \�, � _ \ ' ,322��323 �—p� ---� 331 � -1 '�, 332\�� i 'I �/�325 — 326 f 327 i �329 � 330 j �� ' � ` — ��_i1Ll ' .•.«>��• _ i \ I � \ �— � 328 \: ,.��'�45 46 � � 335 336 � �'° �� i � 334 �337 I ��-'�� 344 ' � ' \ qg 3 ` � �, �- � \� xr. ..3-- • j _.--"� ��.o.� .__ _..__ _ _".. I r- � 3 3A0'�" ' 342 �;� � � 50� � _ -�-�-�,✓ j�� , % �� j� 5 353 .�� 359,'� \ i � � 351 � �� i �, / �' �� ' ,�, '1 36t �� 360 �� - _�- c, � - - - — i , . r , , � ` � _ ,� ��f i 369 ,�371 ' - ,�= <�� 362 363 64 , 365 368 .� � � � � � � �� .., 3 � � ; � : , ^ , , ; i � 3 - 36 .:a, � � � � '�� , � �` _� !� .37a � . ' 361 , � , . i . , .., _ ,:" - � r _ .=: ,:� ___ i � � L\ �°� � � �5 / 36� ; �EN�US TRACTS ' ' ,� � 19 70 ''� , �`/ �.� i' ' , � � � � ,. � �so,, j � �� s.o � � ' V , '� � ; � � � — � .� �.._=,:�;. . ASSISTED HOUSING LOCATION PRIORItY I Family Projects Only �� Areas where the amount of assisted housing falls below the current fair share level (less than 5% of housing stock) anc+ where . the majority of households have incomes above 80� of the SMSA median. �� Summit-University. Census tracts where less. than 5��of the housing unit� are .permanently subsidized.* *Under conventional public housing, 236, HOPLIF, 221 (d)3, and Section 8 new construction and substantial rehab programs. See addendum. . - 27 - . -----,_ _---_ _ .__,._ �_ _ - --- ,__ _ _. --------_ - ----- � � �- r------- � • ___ ----- �---- ' I , I J i � 'I i � 304 306 � i ', , � � ' � I I __ ' r;�� „_— �\ /j 307.01 <I 307_02 . � 301 �� 303 305 � �� ' I � ' 302 � � � — �'---�' ', , :� , 11 � -1 _ , . � � -- � - - �'.,.,_ _� i ' ' � 308 � .�„� iglp'! �i 3 ......� k�,�.— � 309 sl/ "" ; xi ' I � i 319 ,.� - /3'� I-- µ16 �` 3180? � Y� �� .1,. 31� � 317 �5,•=� 'i � j � i " 3� � �� 1 t � � 3 2 0 , � 3 8 0 I-- �� —' 32 323 � 324 ' �___ I �� j 26 27 320 � a�� --.—�!!� _ i _ 2 345 346 347 �, � 334 � 335 336 � 337 44 X � 333 � °' � � � �� 348 �_"—� 1_-.,.e, __�_��wA338 =L339 y 340" 34 ,�p„ --� I I I i 354 355 � i ,i � 350 i � � , 59 � _� 349 ---� 352 � 353 � � 35B 358� � � � � � 351 � � � `" -�� ' .i � 357 361 \ —_� _ 360 � r- -+----�-- -�--- I � � 369 371 `�,�oqo � 362 � 363 �� 364 ; 365 _� _ 6 � r� I �� '� 366 37 �� i 374 � � 361 � I � � �-- �' i r.,�_- --� � ; '� i 367 CENSUS TRACTS � ` � 375 l I � � '� ` 1970 � N ��`�, i \ , � s�so, ��' '�;� ' %` �� `' i � \ :/ s�s.o2 � I _, ; ---1— % i . �� I i� --� � � , ___ � ��-:.,.,,. ASSISTED HOUSING LOCATION PRIORITY II ` Family Projects Only Areas where the amount of assisted housing falls below the current fair share level (less than 5q of the housing stock) and vuhere a majority of resident households are low-moderate income. - 28 - , �- _-- -,�� _ T i------�-----r_ --- � T , � , . ., , � ,-- ------, �--- � � I I 304 I I 306 / � �� 1� 303 � � 3p� � ��i 30 .01 � 30�_C'i2 � 301 � ` ,--- — � „ � � � i ' � i ', � i� 1 ��-- , , ' 302 T _ _ , I __ . � I 311 � . — — .� — � _ f,—i 308 � _ 310 I � _� ' _ ,.., . _ ., ---- � ` � t �,,,.--r ,. 309 ' r� — `1 __ y= _� � � ---- '� 7 �: I s,2 � �� 319 �,i _f �_ � � �.� r � - -- -_ 316 i� 3t.' �' 31i_�.� , ' 3i4 � °,_ � �,�„ 313 ' I 3 5 L � � f----�. 1 � 3 80 I _.,. ; � 320 �� 321 � I —� ,,. _ :i �� '- --t 't i � � , J _ \_, L"� L_,.�,. 3221 323 324 � 5 -r_ � `� — � ----- - -- . ._ �, � I , 331 ,�_, �_ iFL___ u..� . I'�:� 332 �' � �� _ � 326 � 327 �. � 330 �� ! i � ^� � 325 I 329 i � �� —T, � `�� 345 � 346 _� 347 �,., � T- � t- 328 � i i �— � � 336 . 337 �� 348 � 333� � 334 � ""�- 344 � , f ' � "."'., 338 ; 339 � ' �_ . � -, 340�- y 342 _ -. __ ._. ___ __ \ —T-�' ---- "L— � � �i � 350 �� 354 355 �.�� __.. ,,,, �---�=,,,, ..,'' , ; \ ' 349 r,._ __; 352 5`� 356 � 358 �3 i � y � � 35� � 357 � �� ; .- ` � � �� '� 96 S 881 \ --' _��-�.,. : , � -r- -- -r - I--�__-� . � ,.,, , � I I i � j 369:%,� � � � ` � 362 `��'� _ 364 365 ,�'� '� 368 aj I � "�� ;t 'I , i� � , i �, �� % � ;� �'� ��, 366 -'� ��i i � �' 370 .�,2 � ' ' � ,> � � 361 � � ; 71 -L -�- 1 •,.„. ,,..,;f ' ..� - ___, . � ` _ _ . _ _ -- _ z. , i ; 37� �/ 367 �' CC_NJL�`7 � f�r�� 1 J �� `" �� 1y7n � �� ' N! .�. .� ,�.,.,. � � —. i�:. ��a'•, , ��i� .'�'.iuR� s _ � ,-�- �Y., , �: i ,_�. �;�� .3rn�:tr�t ,,� �SS�S��f� ni'' r'• �:N•i<- , t. , , �,-, k;F�r,��G.,, i��e f�air s!?ar� � 1' � . .i�Vit .: 1 .� r'.i� ��l�i._:.,,��rEj J�¢;. �,�.* ��1 � r - f-, , , _,.- ,��„ �j.t � ;I��t.; !?"' '"�'_-,w'F '?>�'tl^1F�Pf. +7;V�! ':5";~ r f fi 'l(Zl�`•lll�" �.�(,.'' � .i: .r t ,.;� . . � , ! E ,_,,� 1�." �� ')f i�,S , .��E�a (lUll�l tT�' �.111,t'_�; �- c �;11i:�2 i f:l,i.:i;Yli; ;�()Ck : tx - ��*�� ; r,eed for Fi�u�ing assistar�ce? - �tata i hoi�sinq st.oc�;, ,��,t.=�: ��iderty housing projects are not included in fihe ab�ve ralcu!ation. -� 29 - ,. _ ._ � �, _ ,._ _ _.__ _. _ _ __ , ; _ , � s��a � /�! 3os � _ _ , /�� :iU7r.�� ,:_;,;. � _ , s(;3 �306 v� � � 3Q[ � ; ' . , ,r ° ..�.. . — -. . , . , � -i � _ ,.. � ' .i08 �{ z�� n . � f _ ;., _. 309 .. ' . . � M�. _... F _�- ._.... _ :ilU� ,�� :i12 _ ,. -' — I_ , • , ,it6 � .�;� _, ,_ ,� � �' ^ s'� , 3� " � . , . � .,,. .313 � z � — , '1_� 1R� � _ � � _ aU „ � � � — � � / � f _,c_�._ �' `, _,�2 � �, — . .. . � , //,� � , ,',o� 323 ;/ �24� � /� --- ,i31 _ __ ; i� �°�� 332 �.C� -� '� 3�� ; 3?6 ; 32i � ��929� 3�Q � .-. �.. , ' � � � � ��- "` �� 3 328 �� ,�4 � , ,. - .- - � �'� 346 34 . �J � _ '� �. . ., �_�- � 5 ' 5 - � 334 �_ 335 �.l�� y �� 3.�3 s „ 344 ; _: , — s48 ° 438 ' � _ _ _ _ i ,., _ i_. 339_�40 " � 342 , - - � � _L �'' -.__ < 350 ` 354 � 355 �'�i�� , ! ;��__.- _-= ., ,. � :�44 _,.. 352 3b.i i .356 358 359/� i / /J;/ . �. �.. :k1_"_— / ,-%/ / � 1 35� ^� ' �S7 �� I� .� �6� � e}% � _ 6 ..r ____. , .__._ . . . T- '� r 360 � � � � 369 � � �� - ;�" 37� I� � � - t62 �� 3r'3 3C�� '� 365 j� ,��68�� i � ` � :� ;i � .�� ' ' 366 � � " �� y �y 37C " ` _I � , z� ` /-,l�31. �� r � - -. _ _. ___ ;-i4 � ., , ..,.,. , -._._ _. _ . _L __� __-- �� ;. __ - _ _ �� 37� � ;; 367' C�NSU�`� i �A� I �7 , ,,1-�' �'� 1970 �� s;�.o, �° -" `� �', �� `� 376.02 i s� /�; _... .. _ ,.��'� / - . � .It. i ,__, N� � �_�. ASSISTED HOUSING LOCATIOfJ PRIORITY IV Family Projects Only �reas �h�re the amount of assisted nousing exceeds the fair share of assisted hous�ng needs (15� or more of i�ousing stock) . . - 30 - . -----__ __. _._ —__ . T_ /� --T--- ..__._ _ _ __ ----- � � ; � � � i . , ._ .. -J I (I -_... ._._ . r- I , I 3�4 i � 306 .� � � 303 � 305 �� s, 307.01 �, 30702 30, 'I 1 i -� , _ p � � i - �� ---- I - �� 'i 302 � � � , � ' ` �I -- ---i � � _ _ � I � � �� `` � / t r -- 31 311 ,f� _ .��" ", 308 ., ; � - ,�, 0 , T � - -- --� �_-'� � � -� 309 ' ..,�,_.. � -- , . - � l r - __ , � , � � 319 ..� 312 f u. � �_ ' ---� i � � i _ I� � i --�,� P., 313 � 314 �� 316�.fiy� 317 � - � 31�0^� � � � ,� � 320 321 �322 323 � ,..�_324 � � � 315 � ��°� 3i8.01 � �_„ _w, � � _-�- ' ��. L� 1 � � I �. , ., —1 �� / 331 � 332 � ,I� � � 325 326 327 329 � 330 � � � � �� I .- . ,, , � � ; � w � - - ��. 1�—_'- — -- — 328 �� 345 � 346 ;� 347 � `'� �� 335 336 ..o.., ,t�� , � � � I � ,, -� 333 � 334 337 j � 1 344 " •. � �! � -I �.�AO, 348 ; ..,,... - „,. _ -- , _ ,E,.. �� 338 : 339 �340 342 �, ;�- ---_ _ _ , / � —�. �. ,�/ 50 � 354 �� .3�' � �� - �I "<, i ��349 352J 353 356 �358 � �359 \ ,� . � 51 �� ,� � o � i i %'� i � � � '�� -- �57 �' _��` i 381 �� —�- - 1� -, —�,� ' 360 � ,..r� �a�� j i � 369 I � � 371 �->" '— \� 362 ;� 363 .i 364 , 365 ,j ,' 368 i� ,I /- '� `\� I � i � I ; '� �� s� 366 � �� 370 y 372 �� . _ � � ; ' p,', �,- � � I � '`��- � 361 ` }—� �� ' 374 � � � ,., i � L •�-_-�----1---- —�— \ ��„�� ..�? � .,.��.�, � --- -- ----��---- � .—..__ , � . � . i i � �� 375 387 CENSUS TRACTS �� I � � 1970 ��`� �, � ;�, �� `�.—__ _� � , � a�s.o, 1�= �, � ; ; � � :%� s�s.oz � � � � � , � �; . __ � �_��4,, ., MAP 5 ASSISTED HOUSING LOCATION PRIORITY I � Elderly Projects Only , - 31 - � � Buildable Rehabilitation Lower Income Subsidized Units Census- Residential Need (Percent Households (Percent (Percent Of Tract Land (Acres) Of Total Units) Of Total Households) Tatal Units) 345 0 19 46 1 346 11 8 44 3 347 5 4 31 , 2 348 0 m* 29 - 349 0 m* 40 1 350 0 m* 48 2 351 0 m* 44 1 352 0 13 48 1 353 0 33 44 5 354 0 59 61 2** 355 0 43 75 -** 356 0 25 56 -** 357 0 10 35 - 358 0 44 61 3 359 0 59 67 6 360 0 37 67 �14 361 4 m* 71 24 362 0 m* 34 - 363 0 m* 37 1 364 0 m* 39 1 365 0 15 41 - 366 0 � 10 � 30 - 367 0 27 48 1 368 0 46 53 - 369 0 56 62 - 370 0 12 56 1 371 1 19 53 i3 372 0 18 54 4 374 11 m* 21 17 375 0 m* 26 - 76.01 2 m* 42 4 76.02 8 m* 48 - *m: minimal , not surveyed **Summit-University area. Section 8 rental assistance units not included in the calculation - 33 - � , TABLE IV-B (�ontinued) � Explanation of Criteria and Data Sources Buildable Residential Land Available land obviously affects the potential for new construction to meet housing assistance needs. Estimated acreage of apparently build- able land in sites of. approximately two acres or larger zoned for multi-family residential use is shown in Table IV-B. In the priority grouping of census tracts, available land is taken as an indicator of potential for new construction but not as an indicator of relative priority among those census tracts wTere some potential exists. n other words, it is not assumed that larger amounts of vacant land necessarily indicate a higher priority for Section 8 assisted units. The vacant land acreage considered included land judged "apparently buildable" and "questionable" on field survey, but not land considered most likely unsuitable for construction due to topographical or other conditions. No investigation of ownership or further determination of actual construction potential has been made. Rehabilitation Potential Rehabilitation need determined by the condition survey as reported on Table I, provides an indicator of the relative potential among census tracts for substantial rehabil,itation as a means of providing assisted housing. Estimated rehabilitation need as a percentage of total units is shown in Table IV-B. � Lower Income Households The percentage of total households which were lower income households according to the 1970 census. Subsidized Units Existing subsidized units as a percentage of total housing units for each census tract. Subsidized housing for the elderly is not ineluded � in the calculation. I Services and Facilities Because of the relatively even distribution of corr�nunity facilities and � access to. shopping, schools, and public transportation throughout the central city, no census tracts are reduced in priority for additional subsidized units on the basis of inadequate facilities and services. More detailed consideration is required with respect to specific project types at specific sites. ♦ . _ _ .. ___ . : - �� 3:�6 �a :'�� , � �Sz �� a � e4_ .8p 3 e(� ==- �__� �+ � ;, �� M � Y� �Y;;LL1?G AAO_.� ��0j 53� y r�� , ; � �5 Q� � ��`irC6 .Mr,. � x�y +:� r °"'�. y ana e. � 's��n$� d ��_7'�' .^. �e .. : � " p a So9�� 0f r� yL'� � 1• n,F n s ws�� O � oI s-�eae � �° �I � �ss . � ;� ; �oao��k � a� 9 � � � ~� _ � �a9 5k3w ., �r �'v'� � " C r �.i raO � ° �OR� '� w w.~. � ��or° g � a�a��: ° om� :,,1 � u �� > �l�.r '^'e«�n�n �� ■� �� ZwB ��i �� e �� ■V�+ M rw � y x -. w . r s-��n �^� ew rwn.w � a w � F W Q 0. ��L � ♦ ^ >�.� �o �'Op � 1y{C�� „7 �f tN `fF�t O4,.r.t `G``t�,4 r*S,�. ^ ��.yQ` � � � O`�t l ��,c, � `C ` .'��y a � p ',o a,0� � t�" p4 C�� tO ' //1 J Vl _ �as'�e �1� .� X V U �y, ~ z - 0 a � i--� . �,oc�tic� = a A � ¢ � �S`m�� . 1 04 ti r �o• � y O� V.: � P _ l��Q eO O O`� � ��14' I W O� ti �o. l ' 9�cf. � •F ' � t E w t� qe M U � n c � � � i w i 1. � m � � ' � ; m - � W � _ � � � - - - - -- — -- o�, a - - — — - _ 4 � i � , ADDEN�UM At the request of the HUD Area Office Housing Management Section, th� following change is being made in the Priority I designation for ass�ste� family housing projects. Section 8 new construction and substantial rehab�litation projects in the Summit-University area (Census Tracts 338, 339, 354, 355, 356 and 35s) will be approved only if they meet one of the following criteria: (1 ) It can be demonstrated that there is a rela+.,ionship between the displacement of low income residents in the Summit.-lJn�vers;Ly neighborhood and the number of un�ts made availab.e throuan the project. This includes dis�lacement thr�ugh e; ther• �ut�l�c or private action. (2j No more than 20% of the project units are subs�idizeci: - 36 - f , � �r� 0�.: ��,��:�� :; 1��;. 4 �/�/�"��; � Y TIQ�i 4F �i�iI�ISTRAZ'� E� `: , . � � RESOI�JTI�+TS,' ��f RDI�C�$ ` _ � � �� ,._.,�, r �� .._._.�....._.�� '� � , . �� _ �:: . �� ; _ . - Date: J�ti�^y 3: 1� �� . , � . _ � �� , . 4 ' . . �.� . . . . �..� ��'�.�� .�'��V• ' . � . . � ...: � � . � TCI�. ' ;�1'7E'4R GSf} � � I.A7!II�+sER �� 378 `° � �� t:. Te�ry 1!�1�1'F�� ,. ' �, , � . _ �3 , .�ppr�va�; +�f t��!��n�� CD .Year •iV Budget � �� . . _�� ` � . . v�� - . . . . . �F � . . . ' ' ' . � ' . • �� _� � ' �CTS��R�, , ,D��r�e f�r sub��lssic� tQ- Conn�il a�xf c�t't fi�r��: �� 5 .. . �� . . . , . v � .t . p : > . . . . : .. .. � . �.� . a � '�. �rr . . � - �S# � � � . � . � i �' � ?i .. . � � . . . �� . � t . � ±3 �'.�:y..�.' x,+.4h t..N'r,;+la1i-L.w�k'l41y��q. ' . C . . . . . . . ..«�. - � � � .�. .�. �. 'M�f A . • � �... , .. � ' §�,' . .• . � , . . . 4 1 • � b'�� . . � ..� � .. . . k . ,�� -� . ' . � . . B� . � . � � � �,; � , � - - . � * 1 PURP4S;8 AN'fl "�' .� FO� THIS ACTIQ�1: p1"�Y'��►��pt°t��►ed by ��# I►�tyA�^ ,��; �: ; � and the City C�u�►eil r�ance C+�itt�e, �i�sl a��ti�r rt��5��^�r f�r sti��si+�n tQ HUQ j � � ;� y �f t� Year IY ap�l i i�n. � ��} �.�; . ;, ;�: { , - f � �' a�� Y . i. . . . r. � � �. � � ; � . � � . . � .. :. . . . . . =� , A��1TS: �s ;;. ��ar�_, rc��ndatio� c�n add�'�ianal Ya�r ��, f�, Y�ar IY � ' bud�t s�rn��, f�s�: Assistance Plan. . . � , t: . � _ � .� �� <�� . i � z . , - . .. . . . yk.. . . . .. . . . . -s . � . . � �; � . . �- , . . . ' , . . � ... . . . � . . � . � � � ��' . . .. . . �. . t . , . .Y. � . . . �� .. . . . . . . . ... .... . � .. . �s�1 .. .. ., _. .. � � � .. .. . . � . . ... . .. � . , r �. . M�NITE - UTV CLE�+K � PiNK� - FIN�NCE Cortdnunit (_i I TY O�'' �A I NT ] AIT L Councii � �AN4qti - DE�P.�7TMENT( y ' �BLUE - MAVOk File NO. Development) Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date . p..�,^J WHEREAS, the Mayor has submitted and the City Council approved the budgets for the City Government of the City of Saint Paul for the fiscal year beginning January 1 , 1978, including the Comnunity Development Block Grant Year IV Budget; and WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Urban Development has notified the Mayor that additional funds in the amount of $1 ,480,000 will be available . for the City's use in Comnunity Development Year IV, beginning on approximately June 1 , 1978; and WHEREAS, the federally-required public hearings on the additional funds and the Housing Assistance Plan have been held; and WHEREAS, the 1978 City Budgets should now be amended so as to add these additional revenues in accordance with the authority granted by Section 10.07 of the City Charter; and WIaEREAS, the Charter provides in Section 10.07 therein that the City Council , upon recommendation of the Mayor, by resolution adopted following a public hearing held for that purpose at a time and place announced in advance may make supplemental appropriations to the existing City budgets; now, therefore, be i t RESOLVED, that pursuant to Section 10.07.1 of the City Charter, upon the certification of the Mayor that the receipt of Community Development Block Grant Program funds for Year IV will make available for appropriation revenues not heretofore estimated and contemplated within the heretofore adopted 1978 Saint Paul City budgets, and a public hearing having been held for the purpose of considering this supplemental appropriation for which advance notice has been given as required by the City Charter, the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby adopt the attached supplemental appropriation to the 1978 City Budgets so as to add additional revenues to the Budget Financing Surr�nary and to COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays ' Butler Hozza [n Favor . � , Le ine _ Against By � �� ` � \�//C � �— Roedler S ylvester Tedesco Form Approved by 'ty Att rney Adopted by Council: Date Certif�ed Passed b}� Council Secretary By - B�� ' Approved by Mayor or Submission to Council Appro��ed by Nayor: Date B�� BY M/N17E - CiTV CLEFK PINK � FINANCE Communit � 1 TY OF � �A I NT I AU L Council �" C�N4R�Y - DEPAqTMENT C V ' � t.PLUE � - MAYOR J File N0. Development) � Council Resolution Presented By � Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date ,.2_ add additional appropriations as specified; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon the recorrmendation of the Planning Corranission, the City Council does also approve the Housing Assistance Plan for Comnunity Development Year IV; and be it � FINALLY RESOLVED, that Mayor George Latimer, as Chief Executive Officer of the City, is hereby authorized and directed to submit the Corrmunity Development Year .IV Program, as amended, and Housing Assistance Plan to the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development in such form as prescribed by the regulations of said department. APPROVED AS TO FUNDING: APPROVED: Bernard J. Car son, Director Department of Finance & Management Richard E. Schroe er Budget Director COUNCILI�EN � Yeas Na��s Requested by Department of: Butte� Comnunity Development Hozza In Favor Hunt Levine _ Against BY Roedler Sylvester Tedesco Form Approved b City Attor Adopted b�� Council: Date Certified Passcd b�• Council Secretary BY B�• Approved b}• 1lavor: Date Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council B}� -- BY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AODITIONAL CD IV FUNDS � �Additional CD Year IY Funds Available . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1 ,480,000 Country Club Market--West Seventh & St. Clair acquisition and demolition . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65,000 Country Club has indicated that they will not renew their lease unless we provide needed space for expansion. This is a previously approved but not funded CD Year II project. Union Gospel Mission acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 670,000 demol i ti on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70,000 � 40,000 acquisition and demolition of existing facility--funds needed to satisfy HRA contractual obligation resulting from the NDP program. Disposition of Property A contract services budget to allow for disposition of land purchased under conventional renewal , NDP, or CD line items which no longer exist. The services would be for planning, engineering and real estate work tasks for 1978 which were overlooked when the administrative budget was prepared earlier this year.. . . . . . . . . . 125,000 Contingency Fund Due to rapidly excalating costs, a contingency fund of 4� is highly advisable . . . 550,000 TOTAL $1 ,480,000 12/22/71 � ' y � � ^ � � � O � � 0 � � � � w � w M O� I.c) �G O N O � � � � r- M � �--- � N Z O � � O O O O I� N Q� w w w w w � O Ll� O O OO � d l0 M M 00 � �""' . 0. �' o w Q Ol r �"` � ►�r � Q W F--' >- W C!3 H � Z � � m C'3 000 O 000 1- tGM �tl� 000 O 000 Z � O� a' O Y 000 O 000 W Nct 1� � (, w w w w w � w w w w O M�t1� N O O �c") W tD 00 CO� J ll')NN M ihll') M � �N tON pp �p117� r� O I�N Or Z w w � Z CV�p � � r O � W N � N O � � � WQ �"� p- p U d a >.. GJ pp O � N C C Q1 +� +� a. ►� � p �-�+ �� r G1 N Q � ~ r R3 S � � N W � Q v� a �--- i i W � ►-r � LL d. +� ¢ C t0 �--� N 4l N � Z O O C � O O W � C � Q � � fC•r J � U W Q.' CC d � C N � � �--� � C > C N C'7 � I— n a J �n L � w � N E � c.Y.� ��..� • G� H N � v► Q O O � W N O � � V O Z O G1 O G- J N C3 � � C U RS C L W F-- ••r � r d 0� � N O•� C ►-+ p.. p � V1 4J N � W o� � N +� 4- i--� " +� ~ d. N GJ N Gl N Z N G �O O N C N G. �O N C�G N oZf W ►-r � N � d3 C C1 Z � � Gl 'C � � > Z C C� C C O C F� O N � U U � V C.! Z d W W O N•r- •• � O A•� .O �--� 00•�•� C�•r-�r O O � � •r G1 E N O•r � +� N •r- G 1"� G � > 9 a-+ J W +� U O �LL. +� C t0 N +� � Q Z N O L v► i F- �+-� � �O •r C t� � S� +� rC d ►-� Q � C N 'C C N 4 `� O •� > O •r L � O O �O d > Q' � O N C O N d' W CG i i. U > � G� +� U •� C1 d Z 7 (� � V W � a a N W tn i'C O �► O U � O O tL W +� L.� W +� a � O N ,C �r-- � � N > •r d' �--� � L O � �--� i ez3 i N •� C N d' 'C. +� T3 d H r- o�S O ��iS O H a � O 3 ►� vf Q L O d Q rt �. rt d E � _J G.+� Q)3 � E C r0 O Q C-' •� 01 C. •r � Q Q Z Q Q•r C Gl +-� C1 Rf 3 N d t W C1 C � V C 7 �-' �- � F-' C•� U � Uf C � O- 5► C'S d N•r- N N•r N C'3 U � �-, +� 7 C•� c.) � •� H C C O oO O d C d C O Z � d C1 C r-- Rf N N� N N � � tn C a N C � G.' W O Q � � eO�J L � � O� E J N .G U � RS +� J rC i-�J d C'S C.) U •n0� 7Q +�� O r- 04 •r � ¢ 00'-•�Q a1r•rQ Z OC�d. dl--' C = 03H �1-� •'- J d' I� dUH I� G- UH J � J 0p S-. O O O •� � Q C'3 � O C� O Q F-- ¢ 1� d F- U H U Z H O r-- H r- F- F-- Z H p� p � O O O / I, � ' t.. � / ' e � � 7 � 33 . .. CITY OF SAINT PAUL Q��,1� . � NOTICE OF i�' � � CItY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARINGS �' ON � . . ,.. " MAYOR IATIMER'S RECOMMENDATIONS 4' ON THE ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT YEAR IV FUNDS AND ' THE COMMUNI71f DEVEIOPMENT YEAR IV , � HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN(HAP) THUR5DAY DECEMBER 29, 1977 1:30 P.M. ' ROOM 707- , CITY HALL � ' AND ' THURSDAY • �AUNARY 5, 1978 10:00 A.M. �UNCiI CHAMBERS 3RD FLOOR-CITY HAII TF�E DECEMBER 29 HEARING WILL BE CONDUCTED BY THE COMMITTEE- QFTHE-WHOIE OF THE FINANCE, MANAGEMENT AND PERSONNEI �`iOMMITTEE THE PURPOSE OF THIS MEETING IS TO RECEIVE CITIZEN INPUT ON THE MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE ADDITIONAL 51.4 MILLION THE CITY Of SAINT PAUL WILL RECEIVE IN YEAR IV FUNDS AND ON THE GTY'S HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN FOR 1978.THE JARJU- ARY STH MEETING Wlll BE THE FULL GTY COUNCIL FOR FIMIAI ACTION � FbR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOP- MENT DIVISION AT 298-5586. - — — i