The URL can be used to link to this page

01-423� FINAL �e-�� U �-'v�5 l C� � ' ��, r . L �S , 2-c� c \ Presented By Referred To Council Fi1e # 0�- y a 3 Resolution # Green Sheet # �L.O s' ESOTA y3 . D3tE 1 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING TFIE SMITH AVENUE TRANSTT HfJB PROJECT, EXECUTING A 2 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT ON THE ARMSTRONG/QUINLAN HOUSE, ACCEPTING 3 TITLE TO THE ARMSTRONG/QUINLAN HOUSE FROM THE STATE AND REQUESTING HRA 4 TO RELOCATE AND STABILIZE THE ARMSTRONG/QUINLAN HOU5E AT THE FORMER 5 PLASTICS PARKING LOT STTE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 WI�REAS, the City, after receiving initial approval for a$5.5 million federal grant in 1998, has spent more than two years investigating the feasibility of the Smith Avenue Transit Project including conducting a federally mandated Section 106 Process with respect to the state owned historic Armstrong/Quinlan House ("House") and the Project as described in the attached E�ibit 3; and WHEREA5, as part of the federal Section 106 Process, the City of Saint Paul must, together with the State Historic Preservation Office and the Federal government, make an informed decision on its mitigation efforts with respect to the House, before proceeding with the Project; and , WHBREAS, the City Council supports a measured approach between preservation of historic sriuctures and the development of the Smith Avenue Transit Hub, which will serve the western end of Downtown including the RiverCentre Area; and WI�REAS, the House is a federally designated historic house that requires a thorough analysis of the altemative solutions and the impact the Project will ha�e on the historic nature of the House; the alternative solutions reviewed with the City Council include: (1) leaving the House in its present location with the Development Program around the House ("In Place Alternative"), (2) moving the House to several possible sites in either the West 5eventh/Irvine Pazk area, the edge of the site along Seventh Street or Saint Joseph's Lane ("City Sites") or other site acceptable to the City or (3) demolition and mitigation of the House; and WHEREAS, concerned citizens for preserving the House have expressed a clear preference for the House to be preserved and redeveloped as residential in the Irvine Park area which is attached in the Section 106 Report Volumes 1-5 previously submitted to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the State Legislature in 2000 agreed to donate the House and surrounding land to the City on the condition that City agreed to move the House to an alternative location so that it can be preserved; and 33 34 Wf�REAS, in Res. 00-6/14- 3, IIltA provided fixnds of $2,375,000 for the moving and stabilization of 35 the House with its prefeired site being the foixner Plastics Parking Site near Ryan and Chestnut and that the 36 City cause the House to be moved and stabilized; and 37 38 o� . y.a.� 39 WHEREAS, a Memorandum of Agreement ("MOA") among the Federal Highway Administration 40 ("FHWA"), the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation ("ACHP") the Minnesota Historical Preservation 41 Office ("SHPO") and the City along with concurring parties has been negotiated and attached in E�ubit 1; 42 and 43 44 WHEREAS, Saint Pau1 Heritage Preservation Cou�ission ("HPC") hosted the required public meeting 45 required by the federal Section 106 process on August 10, 2000 conceming the House and Smith Avenue 46 Transit Hub; and 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 WHEREAS, HPC has passed two resolutions conceming the House ( HPC Res 99-4 on July 22, 1999 and Res. O i-i on January 11 , 2001). The second resolution supports execution by HPC of the MOA, subject to its normal review with respect to municipal preservation matters as described in Chapter 73 of the Saint Paul Legislative code (see E�ubit i, Stipulation I C and D); and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the importance of the Seven Comers Gateway Area of Saint Paul, including significant views of the Saint Paul Cathedral, Xcel Energy Center and other important landmarks; and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes other projects that are under consideration including transit projects such as the Riverview Corridor and the Trolley, and other parking projects for Aoliday Inn Hotel, United/Clrildren's Hospitals, and others; and WI�REAS, a pazking supply and demand study for the westem end of Downtown, including the Smith Avenue Transit Hub, United Hospital campus, Holiday Inn Hotel etc,. Will be completed shortly to assist the City: (1) in the coordination between pending parking and transit projects in the westem end of Downtown and (2) in helping determine the final number of parking spaces to be financed and constructed as part of the Smith Avenue Transit Hub Project. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council approves and directs the following: 1. Accepts the final Section 106 Smith Avenue Transit Hub Report, Volumes 1-5. This includes Volume 5 which was prepared after the required public hearing on August 10, 2000 at the Saint Paul Heritage Preservation Comxnission and contains all written testimony of interested parties and the City's response to the testimony. 2. Approves proceeding with the Smith Avenue Transit Hub Project and accepts the now $6.2 million grant from Federal goveininent for the Project and directs staff to compiete securing at least $2.0 million from Metro Transit, which will be used toward the transit component of the Project. Approves execution of the Memorandum of Agreement substantially in the form as attached in E�ubit 1, 79 by appropriate City officials, and with such subsequent changes as may be approved by the City Attorney and 80 PED staff that are consistent with the actions taken in this Resolution. 81 82 4. Accepts title to the House and surrounding land from the State of Minnesota with the condition imposed by 83 2000 Legislature that in exchange for the House being donated to the City, the City agree that the House be 84 preserved at an aiternative site and directs staffto complete acceptance. SS 86 5. City selects Site # 7 the former Plastics Pazking Lot (on Chestnut St. south of Ryan Street) as the site to 87 which the House will be moved and stabilized for residential reuse, names Histonc Irvine Park Association as 88 Redeveloper, and approves attached Memarandum of Intent, s�ctut�a prrt�isic�n ft� �liaat p�icip�c��i � o�-4'y� 89 90 91 92 93 in substantially the same form as attached in E�ibiti2 with such subsequent changes as may be approved by the City Attomey and PED staff that are consistent with the actions taken in this Resolution. 5iting, move and stabilization activities of the House on Site #7 will be reviewed by the HPC as fiuther descnbed in the lines 48-51 above. 94 6. Authorizes City staffto commence and complete vacation process to convey Site #7 - Plastics to HI2A, who 95 in tum will convey to the Redeveloper. 96 97 7. Accepts rezoning petitions for the former Plastics Parking Lot and authorizes rezoning process to begin. 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 8. Requests HRA to cause: A) the House to be moved and stabilized and directs appropriate staff to retain a historic mover and any other contractors necessary to move and stabilize the House at Site # 7, consistent with the City's obligations descnbed in the Memorandum of Agreement in Paragraph 3 above. B) Use the $2375 million dollars wluch haue previously been budgeted in HRA Res. 00-6/14-3 to move and stabilize the House on behalf of the City. Further the City Council understands these HRA monies are interim funds to the City that shall be reimbursed to the HRA no later than the closing on the finaucing for the Smith Avenue Transit Hub by the City. 9. City staff is to continue design and traffic work on the Project on this gateway site to the Downtown by Collaborative Design Group Arclutects(Dick Faricy, Bill Hickey, et. al.) and SRF Consulting Crroup, in conjunction with other projects under consideration in the project area including Riverview Corridor, Trolley and other parking projects in the area.. 10. After completion of the parking demand study for the western end of Downtown, which will assist in the coordination of pending parking and transit projects in the area, the Administration sha11 return to the City Council and recommend: 118 119 120 121 122 '1'1 123 124 125 126 (i) the number of pazking spaces and buses to be built for the Project (ii) the design concept for Project described in E�ibit 3 (iii) the Finance Plan for the Project which will be developed by PED and Financial Services. ��? sr��:�nill. Prr�t�?e a t�tt�n'i�a�� tnt?ut�tp tc� t�te �1� �Zt��1 r�n:the �mit�i ��e �`ra�s�t Y�iii�rr �'io;jec�, �.as'ld�€c�c� t� st��'u�:6� ava�i� to �e a�a1 repc�rts #� t�e; �at� �;�i�ac�: Attachments to City Council Resolution 127 E�ibit 1-Copy of draft Dec 17, 2000 MOA with City, FHWA, SHPO, ACHP, et a1 128 129 Exhibit 2- Draft Memorandum of Intent with Redeveloper of House at Plastic Parking Lot Site 130 131 E�u�bit 3- Description of the Development Program for the Smith Avenue Transit Hub Project 132 133 OI-��S Adoption By: by Council Secretary � � �_ Appxoved by Mayor: Date "('V(!1 � H"�• By: Requested by Department of: Planning & Economic evelopment � �N BY U Approved by Financial Services B � ��'� Form Approved by Citp A,Etorney �� /�^ / BY - ', N ��;(/�l r Approved by Mayo o Submissio�i J.d COV�ci1 1\%/� 7 By: Adopted by Council: Date �S p�0, DEPARTMENT/OFFICFJCOUNCIL: DATE INITTATED GREEN SHEET No.• 101857 d �'`� y � Planning & Economic Dev. Mazch 26, 2001 ' CONTACI' PERSON & PHONE: � ml A7e INiTTniIDATE B. Geurs 6-6653 3 PED DIl2ECTOR 5 CTTY COUNCII, CHI2IS COLEMAN MUST�E ON COUNCII, AGENDA BY (DATE) �IGN 4_CITY ATTORNEY' Y� _ CITY CLERK T,pTqgEg FiNANCIAL SER CTG ,��?, API1�' _ , : _ -� � �, S � 'd.00 � F.Q 5 MAYOR (OR ASST.) _1_ BOB GEURS�L�,{.� �� `� ROi3TITiG 2 BOBSCHREIEA J / � !� ORDER .�. � TOTAL # OF SIGNAI'ORE PAGES _1_(CLIP ALL LOCATTONS FOR SIGNATf7RE) ncriorr xeQuES�n: After public hearing on Smith Avenue Transit Hub Project and Armstrong House consider attached Ciry Council Resolurion for Apri14, 2001. Also attached is the public hearing notice that is being published. RECOM[vS,NDATIONS: Approve (A) or Rejear (R) PERSONAI, SERVICE CONTRA("fS MUST AIVSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNING COMMISSION 1. Haz this person/fvm ever worked under a contract for this departmeat? CIB COINNIITTEE Yes No CI VIL SERVICE COMbIISSION 2. Has this person/fvm ever been a city employee? � Yes No 3. Does this person/fim� possess a skill not notmally possessed by any curzent city employee? Yes No Explain all yes answers ou separate sheet and attach to green sheet A'ITIATING PROBLEM, ISS[3E, OPPORTUNI'LY (Who, What, When, Where, Why): The Council needs to decide if it wishes to move and relocate the Armstrong House to the Plastic site and proceed with the Smith Avenue Transit Hub project which must be under contract by September 2002. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Preserve the national designated House and receive up to $7.5 million ($5.5 million of federal, $2 million of Metro Transit monies) to undertake the bus layover, parking project on Cleveland Circle. DISADVANTAGES IF APPAOVED: City or HRA is responsible for moving and stabilizing the House on the Plastic site, HRA in 00-6/14-3 has already budgeted the money. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: The Cleveland Circle site of 4.8 acres will continue not to be developed with the deteriorated house on the middle of the site. Addirional parlang for visitors will not be constructed. TOTAI. AD10UN1' OF 112ANSACTTON: $2,375,000 to move and stabilize COST/REVENUE BUDGETED: Yes F[JNDING SOURCE: Fund 148-76813-0561-65005/' AC1'IVITY NUMBER: FINANCIAL IlVFORMATION: (EXPLAA� � � K.\Shared�P�N[1LVER�nsM1ibobg03 ?b.01.101 BSl.wpd Ex� Z e�� . ��.s � tF D�-�r� a►-�� DRAFT - AECEh1BER 13, 2000 MEi140RANAUM OF AGREE�IENT AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGH�YAY ADIIII�IISTRATION, THE ADYIS ORY COUNCIL ON AISTORIC PRESERVATION, TFIE MINIVESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFTCE, AND THE CITY OF SAI�T PAUL, FOR TAE RELOCATION OF THE JOHN bI. ARMSTFtONG IiOUSE Ai�D CONSTRUCTION OF THE SNIITH A�'ENUE TRANSIT HUB SAINT PAUL, MINnESOTA WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration (FH�1'A) proposes to fund a portion of a transit hub project �vithin the City of St. Paul, Ramsey County, �finnesota; and tiVHEREAS, the FH�VA has determined that this project, the Smith A��emte Transit fiub project, will have an adverse effect on the John M. Armstrong House (House), a double-house listed on the National Register of Historic Places (National Register); \VHEREAS, the FHWA has consulted with the Ad�•isory Council on Historic Preservation (Council), the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), and the City of St. Paul (City) as an Invited Signatory, pursuant to the re�ulations (36 CFR Part 800) implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470�; and WHEREAS, the St. Paul Housin� and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and the St. Paul Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) have participated in the consultation and have been invited to concur in this Memorandum of Agreement (VIOA); and �VHEREA3, the HPC serves as an advisory body to the mayor and city council on municipa] herita�e preservation matters as outlined in Chapter 73 of St. Paul's legislati�-e code (Chapter 73); and tiVHEREAS, several Interestefl Parties have participated in the consultation through pubiic meetings, work sessions and review of documentation, includin; Tom Dimond, F:athryn Babcock - representing Citizens to Save the Armstrong House, the Fort Road Federation, Historic Irvine Park Association, and several other interested parties listed in the Section 106 Report dated June 2000. Tom Dimond and Kathryn Babcock have been invited to concur in this MOA; and, � WHBREAS, under Minnesota Sessions Laws 2000, Chapter 492, Art. l, Sec 86, in order for the City to acquire property from the State that is needed to proceed �vith the Transit Hub projzct on the Cleveland Circle site, the City of Saint Paul, at its expense, is required to relocate the House to an __ alternative site to preserve it; and d1-4�� WHEREAS, the City has completed historical research surrimarized in a report entitled, "Smith � Avenue Transit Hub: Literature Search forArchaeolo�ical Potential and Historic BuiidingInfensity Survey" (July 1999) and an Addendum (July 2000); and • tiYf�REAS, the Area of Potential Effects for the undertakin� is defined as the Smith Avenue Transit Hub Site (bounded by Kellogg Boulevard, West Seventh Street, Pifth/Sixth Street and I-35E), the buildings immediately adjacent to the Transit Hub Site, and any property on or buildings immediately adjacent to the Relocaiion Sites identified in this Agreement; IQOW, THEREFORE, the FHWA, the Council, the SHPO and the CITY (the "Signatories") agree that the undertakin� shall be implemented in accordance with the following stipulations in order to talce into account the effect of the undertaking on the John M. Armstron� House. STIPULATIO\S The FWHA will ensure that the followin� measures are carried out. I. RELOCATION AND STABILIZATION OF THE HOUSE A. Citv Oblioation to Relocate the House to an Altemative_ Site. The City shall cause the House to be relocated and stabilized ��ithin one year of the execution of theMOA to one of the acceptable sites listed in Appendix A. The relocation of the House will be completed according to the guidelines set forth in the National Pazk Service publication "Movin� Historic Buildin�s" by John Obed Curtis. The building mover will be selected by the City with review and concunence by SHPO. The City agrees to undertake relocation of the House and stabilization needed to maintain National Re�ister listin�. Moving and stabilization activities to be completed by the City, or its designee (i.e., historic mover; redeveloper), are tisted in Appendix B. � B. Citv Conveyance to Redevelonec The City shall enter into a redevelopment contract �vith a redeveloper, �vhich wil( determine the Relocation Site from Appendi� A. The House �vill be sold AS IS to a rede��eloper for reuse as either residential or commercial, at the sole discretion of the City. At the time the City conveys the land and the House to the redeveloper, the City shall attach a 30-yeaz covenant to the deed requiring that exterior modifications to the House be in compliance �vith the Secretary of Interior's Standards at the time of the modifications. If the redeveloper fails to perform the stabilization activities listed in Appendix B as required by the contraot, ownership of the I-Iouse wili re�•ert to the City. C. Rehabilitation Plan Review and Concurrence. The City orits redeveloper«�ill submit Rehabilitation Plans to HPC and SHPO during the City's Site Plan Revie��• Process, including the MovinglBuildin� Permit process, for review and concurrence as to consistency with the 5ecretary of Interior's Standards, within the context of chazacter-defining features of the building. The proposed Rehabilitation Plans will 3 Ol-ya� include buildin� siting, rehabilitation, landscaping, site improvements, and adj acent new construction that is part of the site plan. If the Move and Stabilization Plans {as further discussed in Appendix B} are submitted for revie�v prior to completion of Rehabilitation Pians for the remainder of the buitdia� (inc?uding the interior), the remaining plans will be reviewed separately. Fiexibility will be allo«�ed in the review of the interior ofthe House. HPC will provide an opportunity forpublic input during the Rehabilitation Plan Review Process(es) and SHPO will consider public comments as part of their revie�v(s). D. HPC Jurisdsction. If the proposed relocation site is located tvithin an azza that has been designated by the City under Chapter 73, the HPC wili have responsibility as determined by city ordinance for long term monitoring to ensure that subsequent treatment and impro��ements to the exterior of the House are in compliance �vith the Secretary of Interior's standards. If the proposed relocation site is not in an area that has been designated by the City under Chapter 73, the City will take every reasonable step to ensure that the House is redesi�natzd as a St. Paul Herita�e Presen•ation Site, subject to a public revie�v process outlined in Chapter 73. E. Retainin; National Re¢ister Listing durino the Ivio��e. Tn accordance ��•ith 36 CFR Section 60.14(b)(5), the House �vili remain on the National Register ��•hile bein� moved and after the move is complete. ��'ithin nine months after the House has been moved to its neGV site and stabilized accordin3 to the activities listed in Appendix B, the City shall prepare documentation required by 36 CFR Section 60.14. Appendix C identifies the materials to be fiimished. SHPO shali forward this documentation to the Keeper of the Register as notification of the move in accordance ��•ith 36 CFR Section 60.14(b)(5). F, TemaorarX Stora��of House durins Mo��e. If necessary, the City �i'ilf move the House to a temporary location to allow time for ne«• site preparation and to facilitate the transit hub constn�ction schedule. Appropriate measures ��•ill be taken to prote�t and secure the buildin� durin� this interim period. ` G. Protection of the Resource. After the City recei��es title of the propetty from the State, appropriate measures ��•ill be takzn by the City to protect and secure the building prior to, during and after it is moti•ed. II. ARCAAEOLOGX On behalf of FHWA, the City shall ensure that an archaeolo�ical survey is conducted on the Transit Hub site and on the selected Relocation Site for the House. The sun�ey shall be conducted by the City in a manner consistent with the Secretary of Interior's Standards and Guidelines for ldentificafion (48 CFR 44720-23) and taking into account relevant guidelines of the SHPO. The survey shall be conducted in consultation �vith the SEIPO, and a report of the survey meetin� the standards o f the Secretary of the Interior shall be submitted to FHWA for revie�v and approval. e a� -4� 1 FHWA shall evaluate properties identified throu�h the survey in accordance with 36 CFR Part 800.4. If the survey results in the identification of properties that are eligible for the National Register, FFi�VA shall comply with 36 CFR Parts 800.5 and 800.6. . III. COSTS OF TEiE MOA The Signatories and Concumng Parties shaii be responsible for their o�vn adminis�ation and staff costs associated �vith either document revie�v or field work related to this A�eement. Further, the City sha11 pay costs associated �vith the follo�vin�: (1) documentation, relocation and stabilization costs described in Stipulation I; (2) Archaeology survey and mitigation costs in Stipulation II; (3) Any other City costs required to complete h40A stipulations. IV. MODIFICATIONS, DISPUTES, TERMINATION, ETC. A. Modification or amendment of this agreement, as necessary, shall be accompiished by the Signatories in the same manner as the original agreement. B. Should the Si�natories object �vithin 30 days to the materials provided for revie�v pursuant to Sections I.A, I.C, I.E and II of this agreement, the FHWA shall consult �vith the objecting party to resolve the objection. If the FHWA determines that the objection cannot be resolved, the FHWA shall request the further comments of the Council. Any Councii comment provided in response to such a request �cill be taken into account by the FHWA �vith reference only to the subject of the dispute; the FHWA's responsibility to carry out all actions under this agreement that ue not the subjects of the dispute remain unchanged. C. Tfprovisions of this a�reement are not camed out within three (3) years from the date of its execution, the Signatories shall consult to seek amendment of the agreement. If •-- the agreement is not amended, any.Signatory may terminate it pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(c)(8). G! O�—`�� Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement and implementation of its terms evidence that FHWA has taken into account the effects of its undertaking on historic properties. A photocopy of this document will be deemed to be an original by the Signatories. ' FEDERAL HIGHFVAY ADMINISTRATION By Alan R. Steger, Division Administrator ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION By 7ohn M. Fowler, Executive Director b1INNESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATIO\ OFFTCE By Nina M. Archabal, State Historic Preservation Officer INVITED SIGl`IATORY: CITY OF SAINT PAUL By Mayor Norm Coleman fipproved to Porm: Peter McCall, Assistant City Attomey Date: Date: Date: Date: O�-y�� CO\'CUR: ST. PAUL HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSTON ay Name and Title of Signer Date:,_._. CITY OF SAINT PAUL HO'(JSING AND REDEVELOPVTENT AUTHORITY � By Date: Name and Title of Signer Approved to Form THOMAS R. DIMOND CITIZENS TO SAVE THE ARi�ISTRONG HOUSE By Kathryn M. Babcock Date: Date: 0 D�-ya� , � • .n i;�� Relocatian Sites currently o�vned by City or HRA Site �` 2- Kellogg and Seventh Street (Transit Hub Site) Site # 3- St. Joseph's Lane and West Seventh Street Site # 7- Plastics Pazking Lot (on Chestnut south of Ryan Street) __ Site # 8- Ryan Parking Lot (at Chestnut and Exchange) �� 4`-4a� APPENDIX B " MOVING AiVD STA.B�LIZATION ACTIVITIES TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY (Detailed Ntove and Stabiliae Data can be foernd in Yolume 1, r1t[achment I ofthe Section 106Reporl.) A. MOVE BY HISTORIC NIOVING CONTRACTOR This step includes the activities involved in physically lifting the Armstrong House off its existing foundation, movin� it alon� city strzets and placing it on a new foundation within a new site. (A separate contractoc �vill be responsible for the new foundation, as noted in Section B beloFV). The contractor hired to complete the moving activities must meet special requirements for moving historic structures. Prior to the move, preliminary bracin„ shoring and brick stabilization wil! be completed. Phofo documentation of interior and exterior tvill be completed to ailo�v monitoring of buildin� condition. Durin� the move, the historic moving contractor will take steps to protect overhead and underground utilities, as well as protecting or replacing affected landscapin„ curbs, ete. The historic movin� contractor �vill also provide liability insurance and performance bonds to ensure successfi�l completion of the move. Included in this Appendix is a memorandum dated May 4, 2000, from Constnictive Ideas that provides a detailed listing of items that �vill be the responsibility of the Historic Buildin� Mover and the City at the existing building location, �vhile the buildin� is in transit, and at the new building location. B. NEtiV CONSTRTJCTION ITEMS This step includes the activities of a general contractor to clear out the existing site oftheAmistrong fiouse 28er is has been moved, and to prepare the ne�v site for placement of the Armstron� House. i�'ew site �vork will involve constructing a foundation and basement for the House, including a structural support system. If necessary, a new entry porch tivill be built on the front of the House at its ne�v location. Depending on the site chosen for the Armstrong House, other activities will be required to provide a level surface for moving the House on to the new foundation. If necessary, steps will be taken at the new site to protect adj acent sidewalks, frees orstructures. Securin� fencing will be provided at both the old site and the ne�v site. Included in this Appendix is a memorandum dated May 4, 2000, from Constructive Ideas fhat provides a detailed listing of items thac �vili be the responsibility of a General Confractor and the City at the existing building location, �vhile the building is in transit, and at the ne�v building location. E� Oi —ya� C. MINIMUM ELEMENTS TO 12ETAIN NATIONAL REGISTEIt LISTING __ Based upon discussions with the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), this step involves the absolute minimum improvements required to protect the "shell" of the Armsfsong House from further deterioration. Correspondenoe from SHPO dated Much 17, 2000, identified the items in a detailed listing of conshuction activities that would not be needed for continued eligibility of the House. That correspondence is included in the Section 106 Report (Volume 1, Attactunent n. The key elements that are necessary for continued eli�ibility are listed as follows: ♦ Excavation and grading of new site ♦ Sheet pilin� as necessary to protect street, sidewalk, adjacent structures ♦ Wall footin�s, piers for porch footings on new site ♦ Foundation walls, sandstone veneer ♦ Tuckpointing, cleaning and brick reQair ♦ Basement beams ♦ Repair or replace front entry porches ♦ Remove and replace roofin� surface ♦ Ne�v gutters and do�vnspouts ♦ New entrances ♦ ltemove and replace windotivs, or repair existin� �vindows ♦ Perimeter caulking D. STABILIZATION AND ASSET PROTECTION This step involves activities by a general contractor to provide minimum improvements needed to allo�v safe access to the Iiouse for inspection. Minimum electrical service will be provided for basic lighting. Ne�v stairs to the basement will be constructed. Loose or waterlo�ged material will be removed from the house. e Minimum electrical service ♦ Rear exit stairs; basement stairs ♦ General interior clean-up (removal of loose or waterlogged materials) ♦ Environmental clean-up (asbestos and lead-based paint, if necessary) NOTE: Activities in Parts A-D of Appenclix B will be part of the "1Liove and Stabilizatiort Plans"referenced in the MOA. APPENDIX C Documentation required once the Aims�ong House is moved 1) A letter notifying the IvN-SHPO tfie date the property w�s moved 2) Two sets of 8 x 10 black and white photographs aad one set of slides of the house on its new site. Two or more different views (perspectives) of the froat aad rear of the house aze required. The Iab processing the fiIm should be able to pass a hypo (fixer) residue test for fiL�. process:ng. (In other words use a reputable veador for Pio ��g),'I�e phpto�raphs should be printed on photograpFriq silver emulsion resin-coated paper (not photograohic color dye paper used by vendors advertising cheap developin� costs). T1ie photographs shouid have a one-half inch border. They should be labeled on tfie back usin� a soft pencil with the following information: n�me of property, county and state, name of photo�apher, date of photo�apb, location of original negative*, view (camera facing), photo�aph number or number depicting vaatage point on the sketch map. . The slides should be a plastic mount with name of ptoperty, county and state�and date. *The SHPO will accept the negatives (along with the photographs) provided that the film•is 24 exposure aad T Max 100 or Plus X Paa film. 3) A sketch map (done ia black and white) which depicts the house on its new site 4) An original Uaited State Geological Survey Map (U.S.G.S.) whicli depicts the Iocacion o£the house on its new site (Depict locxtioa usin; a dot made with a lead pencil. Do not include any other rvritten informatioa on the map). 5) Acreage of the parcel on which the house is located. � Legat Description of the pazcel � Parcel's PIN number 8) Name and address ofproperty owner{s) � e►-H a� 10 �X l�, � r�"� �nto�u.� �s/Dl �L� Ol��'L� � March 26, 2001 Rehabilitation of the Armstrona House ("House") Memorandum Of Intent Redeveloaer. Site and Reuse of the Relocated House Redeveloper of the House will be the Historic Irvine Park Association ("HIPA"). The site to which the House will be relocated is the former Plastics parking lot at Chestnut and South of Ryan (the"Site"). The Redeveloper at its sofe discretion may seek additional partner(s) after a RFQ process is compieted by the Redeveloper. At this time, the Redeveloper pians to form a Limited Liability Corporation ("LLC") to undertake the remaining rehabilitation after the City or HRA completes move and stabilization activities described in the Memorandum of Agreement ("MOA") attached in F�chibit A. Rehabiiitation of the House would be residential reuse. The density on the site will be effectively controlled by the Redeveloper through the processing of one of three rezonings (RT-1, RT-2, RM-1) attached in Exhibit B. Phase 1: Pubiic Hearing on House and Smith Avenue Transit Hub before City Council (April 4, 2001� Citv and HRA 1. Staff recommends at Public Hearing on House and Smith Avenue Transit Hub that (1) the House be moved and stabilized at Plastics site, (2) recommend HIPA as Redeveloper and support execution of Memo of (ntent with Redeveloper and (3) Smith Avenue Transit Hub project be approved. 2. City Councit considers the Resolution to execute MOA; name Site and Redeveloper; convey property to HRA for disposition; accept HRA Budget of $2.375 M to undertake MOA obligations; accept 3 separate zoning petitions for the Site and related actions concerning the Smith Avenue Transit Hub. 3. HRA agrees to execute MOA, approves Redeveloper, agrees to accept site from the City and reconvey at Closing to Redeveloper; fund $2.375 M for the move and stabilizing and hold a pubiic hearing on land sale of the Site and the House to Redeveloper for a dollar pius a portion of the cost of delivering the sewer to the site to Redeveloper. Redevelouer 1. At Pubiic Hearing on April 4, 2001, on House and Smith Avenue Transit Hub (A) support business points outlined in this Memo of Intent (B) provide adopted neighborhood resolution approved March 20, 2001(C) provide sufficient signatures from immediate neighbors for three separate (RT-2, RT-1, RM-1) zoning petitions to the City as Applicant, that wouid be processed simultaneously. The Redeveloper will notify in writing the City as Petitioner 10 K:lshared\PEDlgeurs�armstronghs.02.14.01.wpd March 26, 2001 et - k�s days before by the third reading on the rezoning (Public Hearing meeting on rezoning), which one of the three rezoning it wishes the City Council to adopt; whereupon the City wili withdraw the two remaining petitions. If the City is not notified the default rezoning is RT -1. The final adopted rezoning will determine the densiry, and only the only structure on the Site will be the House unless Redeveloper recommends and finances additional structures. Phase 2: MOA (April to May 15, 2001) Citv and HRA 1. City, SHPO, ACHP, FNWA execute MOA. Also Concurring Parties HRA, HPC, Tom Dimond, and Save the Armstrong will be invited to sign. 2. Completes transfers of state land and House on Cleveland Circle to City from State. 3. Vacation process for transfer of title of land and House to HRA. (Separate vacation process is underway already for Hill Street adjacent to the Site on the south.) 4. Draft covenant about future rehab to the historic structure described in attached MOA. 5. Rezoning and Variance process for the Site. Variance for height will be necessary and a back yard variance may aiso be necessary. [Estimated completion of Rezoning and Variance by end of July] 6. HRA agrees to execute MOA, approves Redeveloper, agrees to accept site from the City and reconvey at Ciosing to Redeveloper; fund $2.375 M for the move and stabilizing and hold a public hearing on land sale of the Site and the House to Redeveloper for a dollar plus a portion of the cost of delivering the sewer to the site to Redeveloper. Redeveloper 1. Select partner(s), if any, through RFQ, arrange financing etc. Phase 3: Between Execution of MOA and Closing on Conveyance of House and Sife to Redeveloper (Mid May to Fall 2001 - 4 to 6 months) Citv and HRA 1. Retain CPMI as Project Manager for MOA move and stabilization under MOA. SRF through Ann Hopkins wiil also be involved. 106 Group will be used for archeology on the Site in advance of move. The City's Architect wili be the Collaborative Design Group for which Dick Faricy works. K:lshared�PED\geurs�armstronghs.02.14.01.wpd March 26, 2001 01-�t� 2. Retain historic mover approved by SHPO. Retain Contractor to build basement, etc. 3. City funds archeology, move and stabilization, and security activities. Budget is $2.375 M 4. City will explore ways to make Historic Tax Credit available to Redeveloper. 5. Move and Stabilization Plans (siting of House, etc.) will require HPC and SHPO review, as well as City Site Plan review process and variances. 6. City keeps House secure until Closing. 7. City prepares documentation for continued Nationai Register listing of House. Redeveloper 1. Two (2) designated representatives of Redeveloper will attend meetings with CPMI, etc. Involved with the exact siting of the House on the site. (Comment only on move and stabilization activities). Phase 4: Closing between City, HRA and Redeveloper on Conveyance of House and Land (after stabilization at Site) (Estimated Closing November 15, 2001 or sooner) House rehabilitated with Certificate of Occupancy complete and marketing within two years of Closing, estimated to by November 15, 2003) Citv and HRA 1. City conveys title of House and land and HRA conveys title of House and land by Quit Claim Deed to Redeveloper and establishes Escrow Funds if any funds remain from $2.375 M; Covenant recorded. Redeveloaer At closing on land and House for $1 plus the cost of delivering sewer to the site, after completion of move and stabilization, Redeveloper accepts the House AS IS, covenant is recorded, reverter language in deed, and if and only if there remains a balance on the City's $2.375 M, City establishes escrow fund for the Redeveloper on a reimbursement basis for the remaining rehabilitation of the House with appropriate documentation and approval by City's Project Manager, CPMI. Escrow funds, if any, would be available for utility connections for water and electrical, etc. 2. Undertake and complete rehabilitation, after review of Rehabilitation Plans by HPC and SHPO ,[i.e., get Certificate of Occupancy ] and market property within 2 years of Closing. K:\sharedWED\geurs�armstronghs.02.14.Ot.wpd March 26, 2001 01-w�`� Attachments to Memo of Intent dated March 26,2001 Exhibit A- Memorandum of Agreement ("MOA") on J.M. Armstrong House and Smith Avenue Transit Hub between FHWA, ACHP, City, SHPO et al. 6chibit B- Draft Rezoning Petition and Conditions for former Plastics Parking Lot site K:�shared�PED�geurs\armsVOnghs.02.14.01.wpd March 26, 2001 o, _�� Attachments fo Memo of Intent dated March 26,2001 Exhibit A- Memorandum of Agreement ("MOA") on J.M. Armstrong House and Smith Avenue Transit Hub between FHWA, ACHP, City, SHPO et al. Exfiibit B- Draft Rezoning Petition and Conditions for former Plastics Parking Lot site � t,�«n zs, zoo� K�shuediPEO\geurs��strcnghs.U2.t4A1 wpd � xl"� � �Me,�.a � ��'� N�a�.�.� u� 2.�1 � o� -�t �'� DRAFT - DECEil1BER 13, 2000 bSE11IORANDU�S OF AGREF,i�IiVT AitiIONG THE FEDERAL HIGHNAY AD�IIi�IISTR4TYON, THE ADYISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION, THE N1IN�IESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATIOI� OFFICE, AND THE CITY OF SAI\T PAUL, FOR THE RELOCATION OF THE JOHN Ai. Al2NISTRONG HOUSE ?.I�D CONSTRUCTION OF THE SI�IITH A�'ENUE TRANSIT HUB SAINT PAUL, MINnESOTA � WHEREAS, the Federal Hi�hway Administration (FH«'A) proposes to fund a portion of a transit hub project within the City of St. Paul, Ramsey County, �finnesota; and 1VHEREAS, the FHtiVA has detemiined that this project, the Smith Aaenue Transit Hub project, will have an adverse effect on the John M. Armstrong House (House), a double-house ]isted on the National Register of Historic Places (Nationat Register); VJHEREAS, the FH�VA has consuited with the Ad��isory Cotmcil on Historic Preservation (Council), theMinnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), and the City of St. Paul (City) as an Invited Signatory, pursuant to the regulations (36 CFR Part 800) implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preserv�tion Act (16 U.S.C. 470�; and �VHEREAS, the St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and the St. Paul Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) have participated in the consultation and have been invited to concur.in this Memorandum of Agreement (D40A); and tiVHEREAS, the HPC serves as an advisory body to the mayor and city council on municipal herita�e preservatian matters as outlined in Chapter 73 of St. Paul's legislati��e code (Chapter 73); and �YHEREAS, several Interested Parties haveparticipated in the consuttation throughpublic meetings, work sessions and revietiv of documentation, includin� Tom Dimond, �athryn Babcock - representing Citizens to Save the Armstrong House, the Fort Road Federation, Historic Irvine �ark Association, and several other interested parties listed in the Section 106 Report dated June 2000. Tom Dimond and Kathryn Babcock have been invited to concur in this MOA; and, �VHEREAS, under Minnesota Sessions Laws 2000, Chapter 492, Art. l, Sec S6, in order for the City to acquire property from the State that is needed to proceed with the T'ransit Hub project on the Cleveland Circle site, the City of Saint Paul, at its expense, is required to relocate theHouse to an : altemative site to preserve it; and � 0�-wa� WHEREAS, the City has completed historical reseazch summarized in a report entitled "5mitn Avenue Transit Hub: Literature Search for Archaeolo�ical Potential and Fiistoric B uilding Tntensity Survey" (July 1999) and an Addendum (July 2000); and WF�REAS, the Area of Potential Effects for the undertakin� is defined as the Smith Avenue Transit Hub Site (bounded by Keilo�g Boulevard,lVest Seventh Street, Fifth/Sixth Streef and I-35E), the buildings immediately adjacent to the Transit Hub Site, and any propedy on or buildings immediately adjacent to the Relocation Sites identified in this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, the FHWA, the Council, the SHPO and the CITY (the "Signatories") a� ee that the undertakin� shall be implemented in accordance with the following stipulations in order to take into account the effect of the undertakin� on the John M. Amistron� House. STIPULATTO\S The F�VHA will ensure that the follo�vin� measures are carried out. I. RELOCATION AND STABILIZATTON OF TFTE HOUSE A. City Oblioation to Relocate the House to a_n_Altemative Site. The City sliall cause the House to be relocated and stabilized ��ithin one }'ear of the execution of the MOA to one of the acceptable sites listed in Appendix A. The relocation of thzHouse �vill be completed according to the guidelines set forth in the National Pazk Service publication"MovingHistoricBuildings"byJohnObedCurtis. Thebuiidingmover wi Ii be selected by tlle City witti review and concunence by SHPO. The City agrees to undertake relocation of the House and stabilization needed to maintain Nationzl Re�ister listing. Movin� and stabilization activities to be completed by the City, or its designee (i.e., historic mover; redeveloper}, are listed in Appendix B. �E. CityConvevance to Redeveloaer. The City shall enter into a redevelopment contract �vith a redeveloper, which �vi11 determine the Relocation Site from Appendi� A. The House tivill be sold AS IS to a rede�•eloper for reuse as either residential or commercial, at the sole discretion of the City. At the time the City conveys the land and the House to the redeveloper, the City shall attach a 30-year covenant to the deed requiring that exterior modifications to the House be in compiiance with the Secretary of Interior's Standards at the time of the modifications. If the redeveloper fails to per£orm the stabilization activities listed in Appendix B as required.by the contraot, ownership of the House will re��ert to the City. C. Rehabilitation Plan Review and Concurrence. The City orits redeveloper�ti•ill submit Rehabilitation Plans to HPC and SHPO during the City's SitePlan Revie«' Process, including the Movin�/Buildin� Permit process, for review and concurrence as to consistency with the Secretary of Intzrior's Standards, within the context of __ character-defining features of the buildin�. The proposed Rehabilitation Pians will O� •4 y� includebuildin� sitin�, rehabilitation, landscaping, site impror•ements, and adjacent _ new construction that is part of the site plan. If the Move and StabilizaYion Plans (as further discussed in Appendix B) are submitted for review prior to completion of Rehabilitation Plans for the remainder of the buildin� (includin� the interior), the . remaining plans wiil be revietived separately. Flexibility wiil be allo��•ed in the review of the interior of the House. HPC �r•ill provide an opportunity forpublic input during the Rehabilitation Plan Review Process(es) and SHPO �vill consider public comments as part of their review(s). D. HPC Jurisdiction. If the proposed relocation site is located �vithin an area that has been designated by the City under Chapter 73, the HPC will have responsibility as determined by city ordinance for long term monitorin� to ensure that subsequent treatment and impro�•ements to the exterior of the House are in compliance with the Secretary of Inteaor's standards. If the proposed rzlocation site is not in an area that has been designated by the City under Chapter 73, the City will take every rzasonable step to ensure that the House is redesi�nated as a St. Paul Heritage Presen�ation Site, subject to a public revietiv process outlinzd in Chapter 73. E. Retainine National Reaister Listin�durin� the Ivlove. In accordance n�ith 36 CFR Section 60.14(b)(5), the House will remain on the National Register ��fiile bein� moved and after the move is complete. �41'ithin nine months after theHouszhasbeen moved to its new site and stabilized accordin� to the activities ]isted in Appendix B, the City shall prepare documentation required by 36 CFR Section 60.14. r�ppendix C ideutiFies themateriats to be furnished. SHPO sh�!I fo:�vard ta.isdocu::�entationto the Keeper of the Register as notification of the mo��e in accordance ��•ith 36 CFR Section 60.14(b){5). F. Temoorary Storaoe of House durinQ Mo�•e. If necessary, the City «�ill move the House to a temporary location to al low timz for neti�� site preparation and to facilitate the transit hub constn�ction schedule. Appropriate measures «•ill be taken to protect and secure the buildin� durin� this interim period. G. Protection of the Resource. After the City receives title of the propem� from the State, appropriate measures �ti•ill be takzn by the City to protect and secure the building prior to, during and after it is mo�•ed. II. ARCHAEOLOGY Onbehalf of FHWA, the City sha11 ensure that an archaeological survey is conducted on the Transit Hub site and on the selected Relocation Site for the House. The sun•ey shall be conducted by the City in a manner consistent with the Secretary of Inteaor's Standards and Guidelines forldentification (48 CFR44720-23) and takin�into accountrelevantguidelines of the 5HP0. The survey shall be conducted in consultation with the SHPO, and a report of the survey meetin� the standards of the Secretap� of the Interior shall be submitted to FHWA for review and approval. o� -�� F�VA shall evaluate properties identified throu�h the survey in accordance with 36 CFR Part 800.4. If the survey results in the identification of properties that aze eligible for the National Register, FH�VA shatl comply with 36 CFR Parts 800.5 and 500.6. III. COSTS OF THE MOA The Si�natories and Concurring Pazties shali be responsible for theirosvn administration and staff costs associated �vith either document revietic or field work related to this A�reement. �� Further, the City shall pay costs associated �vith the following: (1) documenfation, relocation and stabilization costs described in Stipulation I; (2) Archaeology survey and mitigation costs in Stipulation IT; (3) Any other City costs required to complete I�30A stipulations. ' IV. 1�IODIFICATIONS, DISPUTES, TERi1�1INATION, ETC. `�' A. Modification or amendment of this agreement, as necessary, shall be accomplished by the Signatories in the same manner as the original agreemeot. B. Should the Si�natories ob,}ect tivithin 30 days to the materiats grovided for revie�r pursuant to Sections I.A, I.C, I.E and II of this agreement, the FHWA shall consult �vith the ob}ectin� party to resolve the objection. If the FHWA determines that the objection cannot be resolved, the FH�VA shall request the further comments of the Council. Any Council comment provided in response to such a request ��ill be taken into account by the FHWA �vith reference only to the subject of the dispute; the FHWA's responsibility to carry eut zll ections i�nd:r this agreement thet are not the subjects of the dispute remain unchanged. C. Ifprovisions of this agreement are not camed out within three (3) years from the date of its execution, the Si�natories shall consult to seek amendment of the agreement. If - the a�reement is not amended, any Signatory may teaninate it pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(c)(8). 6 F� e�-4�a Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement and implementation of its terms evidence that FHWA has taken into account the effects of its undertaking on historic properties. A photocopy of fhis document will be deemed to be an original by the Signatories. ' FEDERAL HIGH�YAY ADMIMSTRATION By Alan R. Steger, Division Administrator Date: � ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION By 3ohn M. Fo��ler, Executive Director nIINh�ESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE By Nina M. Archabal, State Historic Preservation Officer INVITED SIGNATORY: CITY OF SA.II�IT PAUL By Mayor Norm Coleman Date: Date:,_� Date:�— Approved to Form: Peter McCall, Assistant City Attomey 0►-4 � Co�'CUR:' ST. PAUL HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION By Name and Title of Signer Date: CITY OF SATNT PAUL HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY �" By Name and Title of Si�ner Approved to Form THO;�iAS R. DIMOND � CITIZENS TO SAVE TFIE ARI4ISTRONG HOUSE By Kathryn M. Babcock Date: Date: Date: e � p�� -Ha APPENDIX A Relocation Sites currently o�vned by City or HRA Site � 2- Kellogg and Seventh Street (Transit Hub Site) Site # 3- St. 7oseph's Lane and West Seventh Street Site # 7- Plastics Parking Lot (on Chestnut south of Ryan Sireet) ._ Site # 8- Ryan Parking Lot (at Chestnut and Exchange) � 0� -'i'y� .. �� ; ! MOVING AND STA.BTLIZATION ACTIVITIES TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY (Detailed eLfove anrl Stabili=e Data can befotrnd in Yolume I, flttachment I ojthe Section 106Report.) A. MOYE BX HISTORIC lYiOVING CONTRACTOR This step includes the activities involved in physically lifting the Armstrong House offits existing foundation, movinJ it alon� city streets and placin� it on a new foundation within a ne�v site. (A separate contractot �vill be responsible for the ne�v foundation, as noted in Section B below). The contractor hired to complete the moving activities must meet special requirements for moving historic struchires. Prior to the move, preliminary bracin„ shorin� and brick stabilization will be completed. Photo documentation of interior and exterior �vill be completed to allow monitoring of buildin� condition. Durin� the move, the historic moving contractor will tal:e steps to protect overhead and underground utilities, as �vell as protecting or replacin� affected landscapin„ curbs, etc. The historic movin� contractor will also provide liaSility insurance and performance bonds to ensure successful completion of the move. Included in this Appendix is a memorandum dated May 4, 2000, from Constn�ctive Tdeas that provides a detailed listing of items that �viil be the responsibility of the Historic Buildin� Mover and the City at the existing buiidin� location, while the buildin� is in transit, and at the new building location. B. NE�V CONSTRUCTION ITEMS This step includes the activities ofa general contracfor to clear out the existing site of theAmistrong Aouse 2fter is has been moved, and to grepare the ne�v site for placement of the Armstron� House. I�'ew site �vork �vill involve constructing a foundation and basement for the House, inciuding a structural support system. If necessary, a new entry porch �vill be built on the front of the House at its ne�v location. Depending on the site chosen for the Armstrong House, other activities will be required to provide a level surface for moving the House on to the new foundation. If necessary, steps will be taken at the new site to protect adjacent side�valks, frees or structures. Securin� fencing wiil be provided at both the old site and the ne�v site. Included in this Appendix is a memorandum dated May 4, 2000, from Constructive Ideas that provides a detailed ]isting of items that �vill be the responsibility of a Generai Contractor and the City at the existing building locafion, while the building is in transit, and at the ne�v building location. F� a i .y�-� C. MI\"Ii�1UlI ELEbIEITS TO RETAi� i P:ATIO\AL REGISTER LIST'IivG Based upon discussions with the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (5HP0), this step involves the absolute minimum improvements required to protect the "shell" of the Armstrong House from further deterioration. Correspondenoe &om SHPO dated March 17, 2000, identified the items in a detailed listing of construction activities that �vould not be needed for continued eligibility of the House. That correspondence is included in the Section 106 Report (Volume 1, Attachment �. The key elements that are necessary for continued eli�ibility are listed as follows: ♦ Excavation and grading of new site ♦ Sheet piling as necessary to protect street, sidewalk, adjacent structures ♦��Vatl footings, piers for porch footin�s on ne�v site ♦ Poundation walls, sandstone veneer ♦ Tuckpointing, cleanin� and brick repair ♦ Basement beams ♦ Repair or rzplace front entry porches ♦ Remove and replace roofin� surface ♦ Netiv gutters and downspouts ♦ New entrances ♦ Remove and replace windo�vs, or repair existing �vindows ♦ Perimeter caulkin� D. STABILIZATION AND ASSET PROTECTION This step involves activities by a general contractor to provide minimum improvements needed to allow safe access to the House for inspection. Minimum electrical service will be provided for basic lighting. Ne�v stairs to the basement tvill be consfructed. Loose ot �vaterlogged material �vill be removed from the house. 4 Minimum electrical service ♦ Rear exit stairs; basement stairs ♦ General interior clean-up (removal of loose or waterlogged materials) ♦ Environmental clean-up (asbestos and lead-based paint, if necessary) NOT'E: Activities irz Parts A D of.4ppendix B will be part of the "rLlove and Stabilization Plans" referenced in the MOA. APPENDIX C Documenta�on required once the Armstron� House is moved 1) A letter no�fyiag the MN-SFiPO the date the property wzs moved 2) Two sets of 8 x 10 black and wbite photographs and one set of slides of the house on its new site. Two or more different views (perspecdves) of the front aad zear of the house aze required. The lab processin� the film should be able to pass a hygo (fixer) residue test for fiL*u processin�. (In other words use a reputable vendor for processing). Tne photographs should be printed on photographic, silver emuLsion resin-coated paper (not photograpflic color dye paper used by vendors advertising chrzp developing costs). The photographs should have a one-half inch border. They should be labeIed on the back usin� a soft pencil wi2h the followin� information: name of property, county and state, name of photo�apher, date of photo�ph, location of original negative*, view (camera facing), photograph number or number depicting vantage point on the sketch map. • The slides should be a plastic mount with name o£property, county and st2te•and date. *The SHPO will accept the negatives (along with the photogaphs) provided th2t tfie film•is 24 exposure and T Max 100 or Plus-X Paa fi1m. 3) A sketch map (done in black and white) which depicts the house on its new site 4) An original United State Geological Survey Ivfzp (U.S.G.S.) wIuch depicts tha locatioa of the house on its new site (Depict location usin; a dot made with a lead pencil. Do not incIude any other rvritten information on the map). 5) Acreage of the pazcel on which the house is located. � Legal Description of the pazcel � � � parcel's PTN number $) Name and 2ddzess of property owner(s) ti�-4a� E[�i �X k�b� f� t3 '— 1M � a� �h�. c�w�� V�la� Z6� aoo� Addendum to Rezoning Petitior_s fox 235 Chestnut St. and 0 Hill St. Parfies agreeing to addendum. This addendum to the rezoning petitions for 235 Chestnut Street and 0 Hill Street has been reviewed and agreed to by the following parties: Saint Paul PED, Historic Irvine Park Association (HIPA), Kevin McGrath and Molly Femhoi� Patrick and Rita Hawkinson Wamer, Dirk and Ruth Dantuma, Peter Hilleren, Louis Fillmon and Karen Jason. Oi-y�� 2. Purpose. The parties want to accelerate rezoning of 235 Chestnut Street to permit the moving of the historic Armstrong House from its present location north of the Xcel Arena to the site. The site's present zoning is P-1, which aliows only surface parking. Before the City can issue moving and foundation permits, the site needs to be zoned to pemut housing. The parties agree that the property on Chestnat Street should be rezoned to ailow the Armsfrong House to be moved and that the new zoning should be the most restrictive residential zone in which the house can feasibly be restored and sold. The City wants to move the house as soon as possibie to open up the site north of the arena for redevelopment. 3. Simultaneous zoning steps and redevelopment anatysis. IiIPA is negotiating to take ownership of the Armstrong House and to partner with a developer to restore and market it. At the time of the filing of the rezoning petitions, HIPA has not had time to select a partner, complete a project feasibility analysis, or detemune how many residentia( units will be at the site. While HIPA is working with developers, public agencies, and contractors to devise a feasible restoration plan for the property, the City and the property u owners within 100 feet of the Chestnut Street site are initiating three separate residential rezoning petitions for RT-1 (duplex), RT'-2 (3-4 units), and RM-1 (mu]ti-family) so that any one of them can be chosen later. The petitions will initiate the rezoning process at the Planning Commission; the parties expect that all three alternatives may still be under consideration when the Planning Comrrussion holds its hearing and makes its recommendation. At least ten days before the rezoning petitions come before the City Council for third reading and public hearing, HIPA will have deternuned and submitted to the City in writing which of the three altemative rezonings fits its restoration plan. The other two petitions will be withdrawn by the parties. If FiIPA has not made a written recommendation, the parties will recommend that the Council approve the RT-1 rezoning altemative. As soon as practical � 01-4ti� after the Councii approves a new zoning district, PED will request building permits for = excavation, a new foundation, and the house move. In addition to the rezoning, other City aggrovals will be required before building pemuts aze issued, including height and setback variances, site plan review, and historic review. 4. Nullificafion of the consents given on the rezoning petitions. Most of the petition signers specifically support the moving and restorarion of the Armstrong House, but would not support whatever residential development may be pemutted in the zoning disfsict without the house. If the Armstrong House is not moved to Chestnut Street or suffers severe damage during the move and cannot be restored, the parties want to retum the zoning, at least for the time being, to P-1. 5. Attachment to rezoning petitions for RT-1, RT-2, and RM-i. This addendum is hereby attached to each of the three rezoning petitions as an explanation for why multiple petitions are being submitted and as a safeguard for the affected neighbors. 6. Signatures of the Parties. I agree with the provisions of this addendum. (Please sign a�rd date.) Brian Sweeney, PED Patrick Wamer Peter Hilleren Kevin McGrath Molly Fernhoiz Molly Howe Lynn Rita Hawkinson Warner Dirk Dantuma Ruth Dantuma K:�Shared�PedSODERHOUZ02�'L�'GWrmstrongHouseZAddrnd�nn2.wpd 2 Louis Fillmon Karen Jason � m CX`�� O� S.A.XN�` �'.A.�7� � CONSENT•OF AD70INING PROPERTY OZyNERS FOR A . .x�zoN.rNc o�-yy3 We, ilte undersigned, otivncrs of the proper�y �vitfiin (00 feet of thc to(a{ contiguous description of taa] estate o�vned, purchased, or sold by THE PET[Tf0\TER tvithin one year prtcedin� th� date of this petition �cknowledge that �ve have been presented �ei[h the follou�'sno; 1. A cop}' oi'the petition o f _ (name of to rezone thc nrogerty loclted at 23S C� d S� 6a; ! l S from a P � zoning distcict to �� district. 2. A copy ofsections �D•��2 tlirouoli ��.�3 inclusive ofthe Saint Paul Zoning Code; and ncknou9cd;e tliat �ve are awnro oFnll of tlie uses permitted in a � zoning district 2nd we are a�vare tl�a[ any of these uses cnn be establisl�ed upon Ciry Counc�l approva{ of Ihe rczoning. \Y horeb�� consent to the rcZOnin� of tlie property in thc petition oC; ��—�� D� �^�N , T �CCi1� f_G ��l / to n� �oning 2istrict. ��°'��'V7�� (?�Iame of petitioner) \Ye conscnt to il�e �pProval of this rczoning as it tivas ezpl�ined fo us by fhe applic�nf or his/I�er represenfativc. o�z8 z� s� o00 � G', o� s�� (�r�k.L 06 z82ZJZ oolO C�'E- of 5��' PRK-L �z$ZZZ3 013$ pqvi�{ �',osef{��, U�eZ.g.ZZ3Z pOC7� KcV�n MCGra.^�-h rrjo/!y Fer hoLz ^�p PAt�;cK tJRr�er Q�p <O zZ `3��Q�3 hZ�'f'A /�RWKi�San 4�aMCf O�z�jZ23z0�bS `�"�K l�. Antu.ma o._�.�_ r,,,_ 1 - v6z�z�3.2or�o9 oGzs2z32.00�} t�irk DAn'fuw�A f�'{e�' �-�� er'e 0(�-Z$ z Z3Zo nlotly l�we L y„�Tus� 06z8 zz3zoat3 `°� �;i�Ma� tfRren 3asen (1�n 0610� �50o Ltne. �i �raac� G�� c.i -J a-"r sT E'�;1,.C, su �nce C,�-v a-F �T PAw L_ hOT,�: This petition shail not be considered as o�cially filed until tne lapse of seven (7) u�orking , daysafteritisreceicedbythePlanningDivision. Anysignatorofthispetitionniay�rithdratiti�his/het name thereCcom by �tiTitten request within that time. ;,' :j � ZONING DYSTRICTS ��-`+y� City of Saint Paul SUD'IMARY OF USES ALLO`VED I�' SAI�'T PAUL ZO\ING DISTRICTS RESIDEtiTIAL CO3I�IERCIAL R-LL, R-1, R-3, R-3, R-4 One-Famil}• One-family dtiG•ellings Schools, libraries, parks, churches Convznts, rectories Family day care (10) and group famity day care (14) Group day care in a non-residzntial structure Home occupations Bed and breakfasts w/one guest room Community residential facilities (56 residents) Cartia�e house drvellin�s (historically existin�)* Cemeteries* Clustzr developments* Colleges, univzrsities* Com•crsions of non-residential structures and residzntiai structures over 9,040 sq. ft* Golfcourses, private rzcreation facilities* RT-1 Tti�'o-Famih• All R-4 uszs T«'o-family homes Group day carz �ratzmity and sororiry houses* Bed and breakfasts ��•/up to 4 guest rooms* RT-3 To��nhouse All RT-1 uses Three- and four-family d��•ellings To�cnhouses «•ith up to 6 units Communiry residential facilities (7-16)* I2D1-1 Dlultiple Family All RT-2 uses � . Apartment buildings (s3 stories) Rootning and boardin� houses* 12,1I-2 DIultiple Famil}• All Rivt-1 uses Apartmznt buitdings (<5 stories) Elderl}• housing support services Hospitals, nursin� homes* iL�t-3 �'Iultiple r'atuily Hi�h dznsity, high rise apartments Churches, day care (all types) Eldzrly housing suppoR services Comm�mity residential facilities'� Hospitals" Acczssory retail service and office uses* OS-1 Local Office-Ser�'ice Business oftices such as banks, insurance, real estate Professiona( offices such as medical clinics,la�v ofTices Artist and photographer studios � Sen•ice businesses such as photocopying, �vatch and shoe rzpair, tailor shops, barber and beauty shops Day care (all types) Schools, colleges, libraries, parks, churches Mixed commercial/residzntial uses hiultiple-family d�vellin�s Community residential facilities (16) Publically o�vned buildings, public utility buildin�s* OS-2 General Office-Serti•ice All OS-1 uses Post oftices and similar eo�•emmental offices Retail businesses such as grocery, etc. (s 10,000 sq. ft.) Restaurants and bars, e�cept dri�•e-in or fast-food Hotets and hospitals Laundries and dry cleaning (retail outlet) nfanufacturin� of small precision goods Carria�e house d�vellin?s Retail businesses (>I0,000 sq. ft.)* B-1 Locai Business �fost OS-i uses Retail businesses such as grocery, bakery, dnigs, books. ciothin„ hard�care, florist, carry-out restaurants Laundries and dry cleanin� (retail outlet) Post ofT3czs and similar govemmental offices Vfixed commercial/residentiai uses �fultiple-family d�vellings* B-2 Communitp Business All B-1 uses Sercice businesses «'ith a shonTOOm or workshop such as contractor, baker, paintzr, appliance repair Restaurants and bars, excep[ drive-in or fast food Food caterin� Coffez kiosks Pricatz halis and clubs, health clubs "l�htaters, Uiit�o halis, asscmbly hal'ss Currency exchange businesses Vetzrinary clinics, tatoo parlors Auto sen�ice stations, con��enience and specialty stores" Pool hells, bon•ling aileys, game rooms and other t}y�� of indoor commercial recreation* Pa��r shops* �,7 ✓ � �1 �'� q � 6 `(5) l ` ,4i«' �5 c�4) , - �l d < ��J 6 0 f� c o b � i ; o .! � \ rb� 4 � ..d..�\ �� ' ,; . `Lv' 'r` . ,49 , A �-^ V ,{� ,�5. � 5 -, � . � � �'j � � �-, o � y� � 6 � � ' �� `- \ ; `. �. 7 ' �`� � ��. ��{ � � • '1�• .y�/ \ (� bs), i - t � /�� _.9 � �,�o� �� ♦ �l 5 0 °' 1 S''Y i.:, ��°' ! �I. � o �.. ` / ; _ � .'. . �� '� 6� ` 6a y t � r� �� I 's. , ,i�3 ;. � `� o ;c � . 3 , . '.� � 12 } �. ;. o t_ . �. o-?�:�.� ` �� - OWN. HIY ' � • : V �1 `' 3£P'� ? ` k''� `�` �`� p Z % � ,�.� Q/ �*' ' P,9t1,cMA )-,.: ; �..` 1 � 6 2 . Q ,°i � cc;�co i .: . ;; ..: � ; . / '� � i ?' Ec„) w ( , / �� / �, � o �, 1'c a . ':. � ` _ � \ \ � � I � / i L p O � va' � r �f \ / V 5 � �s o ♦ ' •. i � ° q \\ i Q' `� � �� ' ''O f � . \ /� '��'�o� 9 � , � �<3��'�,�� 1p '+, ��,• �, ••':, _ :�Y�".� , ;s � 6 m ••�'. ° - I ��'�. ` o . .. .!rp;":•, � , � � ' ' 9 . �, y�,g e 1: �: ` � _ _ _` ��/ __s�_ � _ . �� r:`I. - - ' -- . _. "'�..�_ .. -� "--�. � "Z� �L 1� . p . � . .'`'�,_ %.. .. � v_ � "C3�`� o"'�k�� J �S �u�''� : � � �,a . o .. 3 , � Q _ . . � + C ai� 43 . ' : . t - �5� � 3 � �0 d' � _--_ � �`'� ': . '� .' � - �, , � �� ; o : : 35 ..� . , L .�`��". . +�; .' 9.: ,_ 6 �.�'s, . '� • . j .� o) � t , ` �� ij �:.;_ - -� �. : . : b`�:'. . '"� Oa `. � ,.� .. � - . � � . .s o o . � • . � ` p � "��. . !� . . . - ' � ` ♦ ['� � l'�: . - � o - "" ' o �o' "'�9' 9 oe� ` ` 't i,t-`ir. � 35 . � � � � Ol ' +p ��F, . �/ . a 4• v�� .��. ,��.�_ ;x. %- Qo A C � . . e : � '. �, - •,;..�� : ` '� o'� `\\ . C /�l �i 00 2 9 , G �^' ° � t/ -` 7> � yo,L t J 6 \� . � . . � _=_ � �} .s•L� - ( � v, . O � �� ' R , . . . . r . . : f �,, , o �(9�c� f � '. �a• . \ ),1 • 6 J �.�� .-f- : - .- i . z °oJ' S� ^`s � ,yQ '� . � i �� - _ . ': � 0 V O O ' �� . ' �' � � j �� , - ` • , ...(�j _ �y 0 ' �' •�/:: _ '%:• ::''i -y � bo�� 1 , 3 S 6 .:: :: � �... : j/..,:,, ,: - � � �� = :' ,.... S '' /.��' ' �� _is ° l .,`� `' � :,p �; �� g i � � io) ; ., �,, ..: / � � � � , i . � -:.�.^ .; � - t� � �,�� \ .� `\Ir ' J� �.' /,/ :l . � , v �',l "//, ' �G V _ �°`� .oi � 9 �G� �� bJ�::-' � �'./ .%!' f � �" �/•�/� .� �X �'� �'�-� 3 �� EXhibit 3- City Council Resolufion for Apri125, 2001 Smith Avenue Transit Hub Aevelopment Program Description The Development Program for the Smith Avenue Transit Hub proposes an above-ground combination bus layover facility and parking ramp that includes the following elements: ♦ Up to 1,400 parking stalls, of which approximately 30% aze for caz/van pool; ♦ A bus layover facility for at least 16 buses; ♦ 100 b�lce lockers; ♦ Up to 25,000 squaze feet of future retaiUcommercial along West Seventh street. The facility will be divided by Smith Avenue into a north structure and a south structure connected by bridges at the elevated levels for car and pedestrian traffic. Smith Avenue will likely provide primary entrance/exit to and from the transit hub for buses, commuter/contract parkers and event parkers, retail service access, van access ar. bt�ces, as well as pro��ide for four lanes of vehicular traffic. Sidewallcs, including one covered walk within the ramp structure will provide for a pedestrian friendly use of Smith Avenue. The street-level bus layover facility will accommodate peak time metro bus layover for at least 16 buses. Metro Transit facilities on the site will include all weather shelter accessible to the public from Smith Avenue, bus driver facilities, a with drivers room, general storage and a supervisors office. The bus layover facility will also serve charter buses for RiverCentre, the Xcel Energy Center, the Ordway, and the Science Museum of MN. Such charter buses will shaze the facility, to the degree it is not needed for Metro Transit bus layover, and will utilize the majority of the bus portion of the transit hub at non-peak times and on weekends. The aesthetic design of the Smith Avenue Transit Hub will be of urban character with roof top parking. The facility will be set back from West Seventh Street to accommodate the construction of retaiUcommercial space. Up to 25,000 S.F. of high bay retail space at street level will eictend the length of the facility along West Seventh Street and will provide a variety of tenant frontages up to 75 feet deep set back from the curb approxunately 15 feet. There will be a pedestrian connection across West Seventh Street to the Xcel Energy Center via tunnel, skyway, or at grade. K�SharefiPedvSchiecke�2vIISC PROIECTSS�IITH TRANSIT HS7B�Ez}ubit C- Project Desctipfion.wpd o t-+{ a.3 39 WHEREAS, a Memorandum of Agreement ("MOA") among the Federal Highway Admiuistration 40 ("FHWA"), the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation ("ACHP") the Minnesota Histozical Preservation 41 Office ("SHPO") and the City along with concuu•ing parties has been negotiated and attached in E�ibit 1; 42 and 43 44 WHEREAS, Saint Paul Heritage Preservation Conmvssion ("HPC") hosted the required public meeting 45 required by the federal Section 106 process on August 10, 2000 concerning the House and Smith Avenue 46 Transit Aub; and 47 48 WF�REAS, HPC has passed two resolutions conceining the House ( HPC Res 99-4 on July 22, 1999 49 and Res. 01-1 on January 11 , 2001). The second resolution supports execution by HPC of the MOA, subject 50 to its normal review with respect to municipal preservation matters as descn�beSY`m Chapter 73 of the Saint 51 Paul L,egislative code (see E�ibit 1, Stipulation I C and D); and � 52 53 54 55 57 58 59 0 61 62 63 64 65 V1�IEREAS, the City Council recognizes the importance of the 5 en Corners Gateway Area of Saint Pau1, including significant views of the Saint Paul Cathedral, Xcel En gy Center and other important landmarks; and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes other projects t at are under consideration including transit projects such as the Riverview Corridor and the Trolley, and er parking projects for Holiday Inn Aotel, United/Children's Hospitals, and others; and WI�,REAS, a parking supply and demand study r the western end of Downtown, including the Smith Avenue Transit Hub, United Hospital campus, oliday Inn Hotel etc,. Will be compieted shortly to assist the City: (1) in the coordination between pen ' g parking and transit projects in the westem end of Downtown and (2) in helping detennine the final ber of pazking spaces to be financed and constructed as part of the Smith Avenue Transit Hub Project. 66 67 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLV D, that the City Council approves and directs the following: 68 69 1. Accepts the final Section 106 Smith Av ue Transit Hub Report, Voluxnes 1-5. This includes Volume 5 70 which was prepared after the required pu ic hearing on August 10, 2000 at the Saint Paul Heritage 71 Preservation Commission and contains 1 written testimony of interested parties and the City's response to 72 the testimony. 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 8Q 81 2. Approves proceeding with the S'th Avenue Transit Hub Project and accepts the now $6.2 million grant from Federal government for the roject and directs staff to complete securing at least $2.0 million from Metro Transit, which will be us toward the transit component of the Project. 3. Approves execution of by appropriate City offici� PED staffthat aze consist of Agreement substantially in the form as attached in E�bit 1, and with such subsequent changes as may be approved by the City Attorney aud with the actions taken in this Resolution. 82 4. Accepts title to the ouse and surrounding land from the State of Minnesota with the condition imposed by 83 2000 Legislature that exchange for the House being donated to the City, the City agree that the House be 84 preserved at an alte ative site and directs staff to complete acceptance. 85 86 5. City selects Site # 7 the former Plastics Parking Lot (on Chestnut St. south of Ryan Street) as the site to 87 wbich the House will be moved and stabilized for residential reuse, names Historic Irvine Pazk Association as 88 Redeveloper, and approves attached Memorandum of Intent in substantially the same form as attached in o�_yy3 89 E�ubit2 with such subsequent changes as may be approved by the City Attorney and PED staff that aze 90 consastent with the actions taken in this Resolution. Siting, move and stabilization activities of the House on 91 Site #7 will be reviewed by the HPC as fiuther described in the lines 48-51 above�;;- 92 93 6. Authorizes City staff to commence and complete vacation process to convey Site #7 - Plastics to HRA, who 94 in turn will convey to the Redeveloper. 95 96 7. Accepts rezoning petitions for the former Plastics Pazking I,ot and authorizes 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 8. Requests HRA to cause: process to begin. A) the House to be moved and stabilized and directs appropriate ff to retain a historic mover and any other contractors necessary to move and stabilize the House at rte # 7, consistent with the City's obligations described in the Memorandum of Agreement in P agraph 3 above. B} Use fhe $2375 million dollars whicfl ha�e previously en budgeted in HRA Res. 00-6/14-3 to move and stabilize the House on behalf of the City. F er the City Council understands these HRA monies are interim funds to the City that shall be reim sed to the HRA no later than the closing on the financing for the Smith Avenue Transit Hub by t e City. 9. City staff is to continue design and traffic work on t Project on this gateway site to the Downtown by Collaborative Design Group Architects(Dick Faricy, 1 Hickey, et. a1.) and SRF Consulting Crroup, in conjunction with other projects under consideration ' the project area including Riverview Corridor, Trolley and other parking projects in the area.. 10. After completion of the parking demand stu for the western end of Downtown, which will assist in the coordination of pending parking and transit pro' cts in the area, the Adnvnistration shall return to the City Council and recommend: (i) the number of parking spaces and (ii) the design concept for Project de (rii) the Finance Plan for the Project� 121 122 123 E�ibit 1-Copy of draft Dec 17, : 124 125 E�ibit 2- Draft Memorandum of 126 127 E�ibit 3- Description of the D v 128 129 to be buik for the Project in E�ibit 3 will be developed by PED and Financial Services. to City Council Resoiution MOA with City, FHWA, SHPO, ACHP, et al with Redeveloper of House at Plastic Parking Lot 5ite Program for the Smith Avenue Transit Hub Project �x� Z DRAFT - DECEMBER 13, 2000 MEMORANDiM OF AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGH`VAY AD�IIIVISTRATION, THE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION THE MINNESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND THE CITY OF SAI�'T PAUL, FOR THE RELOCATION OF THE JOHN DI. CK�I��Iy Z1I�MS�7`►[il�:i��►Tl�.`��`►11L�7 SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration (FHtiVA) hub project within the City of St. Paul, Ramsey County, Mi m n� o� .y a�� to fund a portion of a transit and WHEREAS, the FHWA has determined that this project, t Smith Avenue Transit Hub project, will have an adverse effect on the John M. Armstrong Ho e(House), a double-house listed on the National Register of Historic Places (National Regist , WHEREAS, the FHWA has consulted with th Ad��isory Council on Historic Preservation (Council), the Minnesota State Historic Preservat' n Office (SHPO), and the City of St. Paul (City) as an Invited Signatory, pursuant to the regulati s(36 CFR Part 800) implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U. .C. 470�; and WHEREAS, the St. Paul Housing and Re velopment Authority (HRA) and the St. Paul Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) have rticipated in the consultation and have been invited to concur in this Memorandum of Agree ent (tiIOA); and WHEREAS, the HPC serves as a advisory body to the mayor and city council on municipa] heritage preservation matters as o lined in Chapter 73 of St. Paul's legislati�e code (Chapter 73); and WHEREAS, several Interest Parties have participated in the consultation through public meetings, work sessions and revie of documentation, includin� Tom Dimond, Kathryn Babcock - representing Citizens to S e the Armstrong House, the Fort Road Federation, Historic Irvine Park Association, and severa ther interested parties listed in the Section 106 Report dated June 2000. Tom Dimond and Kat n Babcock have been invited to concur in this MOA; and, WHEREAS, under innesota Sessions Laws 2000, Chapter 492, Art. l, Sec 86, in order for the City to acquire propert from the State that is needed to proceed with the Transit Aub projzct on the Cleveland Circle ite, the City of Saint Paul, at its expense, is required to relocate the House to an altemative site t preserve it; and 01-4�� WHEREAS, the City has completed historical research summarized in a report entitled, "Smith Avenue Transit Hub: Literature Seazch for Archaeological Potential and Historic Buiidin� ensity Survey" (7uly 1999) and an Addendum (July 2000); and WHEREAS, the Area of Potential Effects for the undertakin� is defined as the Smi venue Transit Hub Site (bounded by Kellogg Boulevard, West Seventh Street, Fifth/Sixth Str t and I-35E), the buildings immediately adjacent to the Transit Hub Site, and any prop on or buildings immediately adjacent to the Relocation Sites identified in this Agreement NOW, TF3EREFORE, the FHWA, the Council, the SHPO and the that the undertaking shall be implemented in accordance with the f take into account the effect of the undertakin� on the John M. Ar� The FWHA will ensure that the following measures ar�arried out. (the "Signatories") agree ig stipulations in order to ; House. I. RELOCATION AND STABTLIZATION F THE HOUSE A. Ci Obli ation to Relocate the use to an Alternative Site. The City shall cause the House to be relocated and st ilized �vithin one year ofthe execution of the MOA to one of the acceptabte sites li ed in Appendix A. The relocation ofthe House will be completed according publication "Moving Hi: will be selected by the Ci to undertake relocation ` Register listing. Mov � its designee {i.e., hi oric B. CitxCc with a i House comme and the requirii Secretp fails �6 to e guidelines set forth in the National Pazk Service o c Buildings" by John Obed Curtis. The building mover with review and concurrence by SF3P0. The City a� F the House and stabilization needed to maintain National and stabilization activities to be compieted by the City, or mover; redeveloper), are listed in Appendix B. �nve anc o Redevelo er. The City shall enter into a redevelopment contract edevelo er, which will determine the Relocation Site from Appendix A. The will sold AS IS to a redeveloper for reuse as either residential or rcia at the sole discretion of the City. At the time the City conveys the land H se to the redeveloper, the City shall attach a 30-yeaz covenant to the deed i that exterior modifications to the House be in compliance with the ry of Interior's Standards at the time of the modifications. If the redeveloper perform the stabilization activities listed in Appendix B as required by the t, ownership of ihe House will revert to the City. C. ehabilitation Plan Review and Concurrence. The City or its redeveloper �cill submit efiabilitation PIans to HPC and SHPO during the City's Site Pian Revie�r Process, including the Moving/Buildin� Permit process, for review and concurrence as to consistency with the Secretary of Interior's Standards, within the context of character-defining features of the buildin�. The proposed Rehabilitation Ptans will o►-w}� II. include building sitin�, rehabilitation, landscaping, site improvements, and adjace new construction that is part ofthe site plan. Ifthe Move and Stabilization Pla (as further discussed in Appendix B) are submitted for review prior to compl on of Rehabilitation Plans for the remainder of the buildin� (including the in rior), the remaining plans will be reviewed sepazately. Flexibility will be a«•ed in the review ofthe interior of the House. HPC will provide an opportwii orpublic input during the Rehabilitation Plan Review Process(es) and SHPO �' 1 consider public comments as part of their review(s). D. HPC Jurisdiction. If the proposed relocation site is loca d within an area that has been designated by the City under Chapter 73, the HP will have responsibility as determined by city ordinance for long term monito�ng to ensure that subsequent treatment and improvements to the exterior of the�ouse are in compliance with the Secretary of Interior's standards. If the proposed elocation site is not in an area that has been designated by the City under Chapter ,, the City will take every reasonable step to ensure that the House is redesignated a a St. Paul Herita�e Presen Site, subject to a public review process outlined � Chapter 73. E. Section 60.14(b)(5), the House will znoved and after the move is complet moved to its new site and stabilized • the City shall prepare documentati : C identifies the materials to be fu is: the Keeper of the Register as n ific Section 60.14(b)(5). lu � a the Move. In accordance «�ith 36 CFR r am on the National Register �vhile being GVithin nme months after the House has been �cording to the activities listed in Appendix B, required by 36 CFR Section 6Q.14. Appendix �ed. SHPO shall fonvazd this documentation to ition of the move in accordance �cith 36 CFR F. Tem�orary_Stora e of Ho e durin Moae. If necessary, the City will move the House to a temporary loc ion to allow time for ne�v site preparation and to facilitate the transit hub construct' n schedule. Appropriate measures will be taken to protect and secure the buildin during this interim period. G. Protection of the source. After the City receives title of the property from the State, appropriat measures will be takzn by the City to protect and secure the building prior t, during and after it is moved. On behalf of F WA, the City shall ensure that an azchaeolo�ical survey is conducted on the Transit Hub ite and on the selected Relocation Site for the House. The sun�ey shall be conducte y the City in a manner consistent with the Secretary of Interior's Siandards and Guideli s for ldentification (48 CFK 44720-23) and takin� into account relevant �uidelines of the O. The survey shall be conducted in consultation with the SHPO, and a report of the s ey meetin� the standards of the Secretary of the Interior shall be submitted [o FHWA for eview and approval. o i-�a3 III. IV FHWA shall evaluate properties identified through the survey in accordance with 36 CFR Part 800.4. If the survey results in the identification of properties that aze eligible for the Narional Register, FHWA shall�comply with 36 CFR Parts 800.5 and 800.6. COSTS OF THE MOA The Signatories and Concurrin� Parties shail be responsible for their own admi ' tration and staff costs associated �vith either document revie�v or field �vork related to t' Agreement. Further, the City shall pay costs associated with the foliowing: (1) documen tion, relocation and stabilization costs described in Stipulation I; (2) Archaeology suru y and mitigation costs in Stipulation II; (3) Any other Ciry costs required to complete OA stipulations. MODIFICATIONS, DISPUTES, TERMINATION, ETC. A. Modification or amendment of this agreement, as ne essary, shall be accompiished by the Signatories in the same manner as the origi al agreement. B. Should the Signatories object within 36 days the materials provided for review pursuant to Sections I.A, I.C, I.E and II of t's agreement, the FHWA shall consult with the objecting party to resolve the obj tion. If the FHWA determines that the objection cannot be resolved, the FHW shall request the further comments of the Council. Any Council comment provi ed in response to such a request will be taken into account by the FHWA with re rence only to the subject of the dispute•, the C. FHWA's responsibility to carry o all actions under this agreement that are not the subjects of the dispute remain u hanged. Ifprovisions of this a�reeme are not camed out within three (3) years from the date of its execution, the Signat 'es shall consult to seek amendment ofthe a�eement. If the agreement is not am ded, any Signatory may terminate it pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(c)(8). 4 o�-Ha3 Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement and implementarion of ' terms evidence that FHWA has taken into account the effects of its undertakin n historic properties. A photocopy of this document will be deemed to be an o ginal by the Signatories. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION � Alan R. Steger, Division Administrator ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESEI�VATION I� John M. Fowler, Executive Director MINNESOTA STATE Bv ATION OFFICE Nina M. Archabal, Stat,�Historic Preservation Officer INVTTED SIGNA CITY OF SAIN� PAUL I: Coleman Approved to Form: Peter McCall, Assistant City Attorney Date: Date: Date: Date: � D 1-�1�� co��cux: ST. PAUL HERTTAGE PRESER'VATION COi�'INIISSION � Name and Title of Signer CITY OF 5AINT PAUL HOUSING AND REDEVELOPM�NT AUTHORITY � Name and Title of Signer Approved to Form THOMAS R. DIMOND CITIZENS TO SAVE TH�ARMSTRONG HOUSE Date; Date: B Date: Kathryn M. B cock D 1-`l'a-� APPENDIX A Relocation Sites currently owned by City � HRA. Site # 2- Kellogg and Seventh Street (Transit Hub Site # 3- St. Joseph's Lane and West Seventh Site # 7- Plastics Parking Lot (on Chestnut �outh of Ryan Street) Site # 8- Ryan Parking Lot (at Chestnut �d Exchange) 7 1-ya� APPENDIX B � MOVING AND STABILIZATION TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY (Detailed Move and Stabilize Data can be found in Yolz:me 1, Attachment I A. MOVE BY fIISTORIC MOVING CONTRACTOR Section 106Report.) This step includes the activities involved in physically liftin the Armstrong House off its existing foundation, moving it along city streets and placing it on new foundation within a new site. (A separate contractor will be responsible for the new foun tion, as noted in Section B below). The contractor hired to complete the moving activities st meet special requirements for moving historic structures. Prior to the move, preliminary b cing, shorinJ and brick stabilization will be completed. Photo documentation of interior and ex rior will be completed to aliow monitoring of building condition. During the move, the histo ' moving contractor will take steps to protect overhead and underground utilities, as well as p otecting or replacing affected landscaping, curbs, etc. The historic moving contractor will also ovide liability insurance and performance bonds to ensure successful completion of the move. ncluded in this Appendix is a memorandum dated May 4, 2000, from Constructive Ideas th . provides a detailed listing of items that will be the responsibility of the Historic Building M er and the City at the existing building location, while the building is in transit, and at the new bu' ing location. B. NE`V This step includes the activities a general contractor to clear out the existing site ofthe Amistrong House after is has been moved and to prepare the new site for placement of the Armstron� House. New site �vork wi11 invotve onstructing a foundation and basement for the House, including a structural support system. I necessary, a new entry porch will be built on the front of the House at its new location. Depend' g on the site chosen for the Armstrong House, other activities will be required to provide a steps will be taken at'� will be provided at bc dated May 4, 2000� responsibility of a building is in tran t, lev surface for moving the House on to the new foundation. If necessary, h' ew site to protect adj acent sidewalks, trees or structures. Securing fencing �' the old site and the new site. Included in this Appendix is a memorandum m Constructive Ideas that provides a detailed listing of items that will be the eneral Contractor and the City at the existin� building location, while the and at the new building location. 0 � -aa3 C. NIINIMUM ELEMENTS TO RETAIN NATIONAL REGISTER Based upon discussions with the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office ( O), this step involves the absolute minimum unprovements required to protect the "shell" of the Armstrong House &om further deterioration. Correspondence from SHPO da d Mazch 17, 2000, identified the items in a detailed listing of construction activities that wo d not be needed for continued eli�ibility of the FIouse. That correspondence is included � Section 106 Report (Volume 1, Attachment I). The key elements that are necessary for cont� ed eli;ibility are listed as follows: � ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Excavation and grading of new site Sheet piling as necessary to protect street, Wall footin�s, piers for porch foorings on Foundation walls, sandstone veneer Tuckpointing, cleaning and brick repai� Basement beams Repair or replace &ont entry porch � Remove and replace roofing surf e New gutters and downspo�ts �,� New entrances � site adjacent structures Remove and replace windo s, or repair existin� windows Perimeter caulking � � D. STABILIZATION AND ASS�`T PROTECTION This step involves activities by a ge eral contractor to provide minimum improvements needed to allow safe access to the House for i spection. Minimum electrical service will be provided forbasic lighting. New stairs to the base ,'ent will be constructed. Loose or waterlogged material will be removed from the house. � ♦ Mmi ♦ Reaz ♦ eiene ♦ Envi eiectncalservice stairs; basement stairs interior clean-up (removal of loose or waterlogged materials) mentai clean-up (asbestos and lead-based paint, if necessary) NOTE: A tivities in Parts A-I3 of Appendix B will be part of the "Move and tabilization PZans"referenced in the MOA. �; D\-Ka� APPENDIX C Documentation required once the Armstrong House is moved 1) A letter notifying the MN-SHPO the date the property was moved,� � 2) Two sets of 8 x 10 black and white photographs aad one set of �des of the hovse on its new site. Two or more different views (perspectives) o the froat aad rear of the house aze required. The lab processia� the film should e able to pass a hypo (fixer) residue test for film processin�. (In other words ; a reputable vendor for processing), The photographs should be printed on pho, ' graphic, silver emulsion resin-coated paper (not ghotograpluc color dye paper � ed by vendors advertising cheap developing costs). The photographs should ve a ane-half inch border. They shouid be labeled on the back usin� a soft p�cil wzth the followiag information: name of property, county and photo�aph, location of original aegative*, number or number depicting vantage point be a plastic mount with name of property c will accept the negatives (along with the exposure and T Max 100 or Plus-X Pan , 3) A sketch map (done in black aad 4) An original United State Geolo€ location of the house on its new pencil. Do not include any othe� S) Acreage of the pazcel on � Legal Description of the � Parcel's PIN number �F 8) Name and address o rpr� ,'name of photographer, date of (camera faciag), photograph : sketch map. • The slides should + and state�and date. *The SHPO aphs) provided that the film•is 24 which depicts the hovse on its new site Survey Map (LT-S.G.S.} which depicts the (Depict locatioa using a dot made with a lead tten information on the map). tfie house is located. owner(s) � Ex��+� .�- ot-'ia� March Rehabilitation of tfie Armstrona House f"House"1 Memorandum Of Intent Redeveloaer. Site and Reuse of the Relocated House Redeveloper of the House wi41 be the Nistoric trvine Park Associ on ("HIPA"). The site to which the House wiil be relocated is the former Plastics parking lot at hestnut and South of Ryan (the"Site"). The Redeveloper at its sole discretion may seek a ditional partner(s) after a RFQ process is completed by the Redeveloper. At this time, the edeveloper plans to form a Limited Liability Corporation ("LLC") to undertake the rem ' ing rehabilitation after the City or HRA completes move and stabiiization activities describ in the Memorandum of Agreement ("MOA") attached in Exhibit A. Rehabilitation of the House would be residential reus . The density on the site will be effectively controlied by the Redeveloper through the processir�g of one of three rezonings (RT-1, RT-2, RM-1) attached in Exhibit B. ,,/� Phase 1: Pubfic Hearing on House and (April 4, 2001) Citv and HRA Transit Hub before City Council 1. Staff recommends at Public Hearing�'`on House and Smith Avenue Tra�sit Hub that (1) the House be moved and stabilized at Plastics site, (2) recommend HIPA as Redeveloperand support execution of Memo of Int nt with Redeve{oper and (3) Smith Avenue Transit Hub project be approved. 2. City Council considers the R�olution to execute MOA; name Site and Redeveloper; convey property to HRA for �isposition; accept HRA Budget of $2.375 M to undertake MOA obligatians; accept 3 separ�te zoning petitions for the Site and related actions concerning the Smith Avenue Transit,�iub. 3. HRA agrees to e and reconvey at hoid a pubiic he� a portion of the � Redeveloper �fiv10A, approves Redeveloper, agrees to accept site from the City � to Redeveloper; fund $2.375 M for the move and stabitizing and i land sale of the Site and the House to Redeveloper for a doilar plus delivering the sewer to the site to Redeveloper. 1. At Public Hear"' g on April 4, 2001, on House and Smith Avenue Transit Hub (A) support business poin s outlined in this Memo of Intent (B) provide adopted neighborhood resolution approved M ch 20, 2001(C) provide sufficient signatures from immediate neighbors for three separ te (RT-2, RT-1, RM-1) zoning petitions to the City as Applicant, that would be processed imultaneously. The Redeveloper wiil notify in writing the City as Petitioner 10 K:\shared\PED\geurslarmstronghs.02.14.01.wpd March 26, 2001 D�-4a� days before by the third reading on the rezoning (Public Hearing meeting on rezoning), which one of the three rezoning it wishes the City Council to adopt; whereupon the City will withdraw the two remaining petitions. �f the City is not notified the dgfault rezoning is RT -1. The finai adopted rezoning will determine the density, and only the/6niy structure on the Site will be the House unless Redeveloper recommends and finances�dditional structures. Phase 2= MOA (April to May 15, 2001) Citv and HRA 1. City, SHPO, ACHP, FHWA execute MOA. Also G Dimond, and Save the Armstrong wi41 be invited to 2. Compfetes transfers of state land and House on 3. Vacation process for transfer of title of iand is underway already for Hill Street adjacent 4. Draft covenant about future rehab to the 5. Rezoning and Variance process for the back yard variance may aiso be neces€ Variance by end of July] ,� Parties HRA, HPC, Tom Circle to City from State. House to HRA. (Separate vacation process � Site on the south.) structure described in attached MOA. Variance for height will be necessary and a [Estimated completion of Rezoning and 6. HRA agrees to execute MOA, app�ves Redeveloper, agrees to accept site from the City and reconvey at Closing to Rede�loper; fund $2.375 M for the move and stabilizing and hold a public hearing on land sal of the Site and the House to Redeveloper for a dolfar plus a portion of the cost of deliveri the sewer to the site to Redeveloper. Redeveloper 1. Select partner(s), if any Phase 3: Between Exe Redeveloper (Mid May to Fall 200 Citv and HRA RFQ, arrange financing etc. of MOA and Ciosing on Conveyance of House and Site fo 4 to 6 months) 1. Retain CPMI as�oject Manager for MOA move and stabilization under MOA. SRF through Ann Hopkins wil'also be involved. 106 Group will be used for archeology on the Site in advance of mo e. The City's Architect wili be the Collaborative Design Group for which Dick Faricy works.� K:4shared�PED\geurs�armstronghs.02.14.07.wpd March 26, 2001 di-��3 2. Retain historic mover approved by SHPO. Retain Contractor to build 3. City funds archeology, move and stabilization, and security activities. 4. City wiN expfore ways to make Historic Tax Credit availabfe to etc. is $2.375 M 5. Move and Stabilization Plans (siting of House, etc.) will require H C and SHPO review, as well as City Site Plan review process and variances. 6. City keeps House secure until Ciosing. � r 7. City prepares documentation for continued National Regist, r listing of House. Redevelooer 1. Two (2) designated representatives of Redeve Involved with the exact siting of the House on stabilization activities). Phase 4: Closing between City, HRA and Land (after stabilization at Site) (Estimated Closing November 15, 200 House rehabilitated with Certificate of of Closing, estimated to by Novembe� Citv and HRA 1. City conveys title of House a Deed to Redeveloper and e: Covenant recorded. ,� Redeveloper attend meetings with CPMI, etc. (Comment only on move and on Conveyance ofHouse and sooner) �pancy compiete and marketing within two years 15,2003) and HRA conveys title of House and land by Quit Claim s Escrow Funds if any funds remain from $2.375 M; At closing on land an House for $1 plus the cost of delivering sewer to the site, after completion of move nd stabilization, Redeveloper accepts the House AS IS, covenant is recorded, reverter I nguage in deed, and if and only if there remains a balance on the City's $2.375 M, City es blishes escrow fund for the Redeveloper on a reimbursement basis for the remaining re abilitation of the House with appropriate documentation and approval by City's Project M nager, CPMI. Escrow funds, if any, would be available for utility connections f water and electrical, etc. 2. Undertake �fid complete rehabilitation, after review of Rehabilitation Plans by HPC and SHPO ,[i.e., get Certificate of Occupancy ] and market property within 2 years of Closing. K:�sharedNED\geursW rtnstronghs.02.14.01.wpd March 26, 2001 � d 1-�� Attachments to Memo of Intent dated March 26,2001 Exhibit A- Memorandum of Agreement ("MOA") on J.M. Armstrong House and Smith Avenue Transit Hub between FHWA, ACHP, City, SHPO et ai. Exhibit B- Draft Rezoning Petition and Conditions for former Plastics Parking Lot >"� � �. K:lshared�PED\geurs\armstronghs.02.14.Ot.wpd March 26, 2001 � x �� DRAFT - AECEMBER 13, 2000 MEMORANDUII OF AGREr;i1�i,VT Ai�10NG TFIE FEDERAL HIGFIEVA'Y AD�SIIVISTRA THE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC P�R�ERVATION, THE MINNESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESE ATION OFFICE, AND THE CITY OF SAI\T P FOR TAE RELOCATION OF THE JOHN hI. HOUSE Ari'D 01-`t}� CONSTRTJCTION OF TIiE SNIITH A� NUE TRANSIT HUB SAINT PAUL, MI ' SOTA WHEREAS, the Federal Hi�hway Administrati n(FH«'A) proposes to fund a portion of a transit hub project within the City of St. Paul, Rams County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the FHWA has determined have an adverse effect on the John M. National Register of Historic Places (I� this proj ect, the Smith Avenue Transit Hub project, will istrong House (House), a double-house listed on the al Register); WHEREAS, the FHWA has con�ulted with the Ad��isory Council on Historic Preservation (Council), the Minnesota State H' foric Preservation Office (SHPO), and the City ofSt. Paul (City) as an Invited Signatory, pursua to the regulations (36 CFR Part 800) implem�nting Section 106 of the National Aistoric Preserv ton Act (16 U.S.C. 470�; and WHEREAS, the St. Paul using and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and the St. Paul Heritage Preservation Commissio (HPC) have participated in thz consultation and have been invited to concur in this Memor um of Agreement (v10A); and WHEREAS, the HP serves as an advisory body to the mayor and city council on municipal heritage preservati matters as outlined in Chapter 73 of St. PauPs legislative code (Chapter 73); and WHEREAS, s eral Interested Parties have participated in the consultation through public meetings, work sessio and review of documentation, includin, Tom Dimond, ICathryn Babcock - representin Citizens to Save the Armstrong House, the Fort Road Federation, Historic Irvine Park Associati , and several other interested parties listed in the Section 106 Report dated 7une 2000. Tom Di ond and Kathryn Babcock have been invited to concur in this MOA; and, WH�EAS, under Minnesota Sessions Laws Z000, Chapter 492, Art. l, Sec 86, in order for the City to acquire property from the State that is needed to proceed with the Transit Hub projzct on the Cleveland Circle site, the City of Saint Paul, at its expense, is required to relocate the House to an altemative site to preserve it; and � p� _y'� �IHEREAS, the City has completed historical reseazch summarized in a report entitled, "Smith Avenue Transit Hub: Literature Search Yor Archaeological Potential and Historic Buildin� Intensity Survey" (JuIy 1999) and an Addendum (July 2000); and WHEREAS, the Area of Potential Effects for the undertakin� is defined as the Smith Avenue Transit Hub Site (bounded by Kello�g Boulevard, West Seventh Street, Fifth/Sixth Street d I-35E), the buildings immediately adjacent to the Transit Hub Site, and any prope on or buildings immediately adjacent to the Relocation Sites identified in this Agreement; NOW, THEREFO1tE, the FHWA, the Council, the SHPO and the that the undertaking shall be implemented in accordance with the f take into account the effect of the undertakin; on the 7ohn M. A� The FWHA will ensure that the following I. RELOCATION AND STABILIZA' carried out. OF THE HOUSE (the "Signatories") agree Zg stipulations in order to ; House. A. Cit Obli ation to Relocate t� House to an Alternative Site. The City shall cause the House to be relocated a stabilized «�ithin one year of the execution ofthe MOA to one of the acceptable si s listed in Appendix A. The relocation of the House will be completed accordin� to the guidelines set forth in the National Park Service publication "Moving I�storic Buildings" by John Obed Curtis. The buildin� mover will be selected by t,�City with review and concurrence by SHPO. The City agrees to undertake reloc ion o£ the House and stabilization needed to maintain National Re?ister listing. ovin� and stabilization activities to be completed by the City, or its designee (i.e„historic mover; redeveloper), aze listed in Appendix B. B. CitV Conve "nce to Redevelo ec The City shall enter into a redevelopment contract with a rede 'eloper, which �vill determine the Relocation Site from Appendix A. The House w'y71 be sold AS IS to a rede��eloper for reuse as either residential or comme �ial, at the sole discretion of the City. At the time the City conveys the land and t�ouse to the redeveloper, the City shall attach a 30-yeaz covenant to the deed requ ng that exterior modifications to the House be in compliance with the Sec�etary of Interior's Standards at the time of the modifications. If the redeveloper f ls to perform the stabilization activities listed in Appendix B as required by the ontract, ownership of the House wiil revert to the City. C. Rehabilitation Plan Review and Concurrence. The City or its redeveloper �cill submit Rehabilitation Pians to HPC and SHPO during the City's Site Plan Revie«� Process, including the Moving/Building Permit process, for review znd concurrence as to consistency with the Secretary of Interior's Standards, within the context of character-defining features of the building. The proposed Rehabilitation Plans will � ot-KaO II. include building siting, rehabilitation, landscaping, site improcemenis, and adj acent new construction that is part of the site plan. Ifthe Move and Stabilization Plans (as further discussed in Appendix B) are submitted for review prior to completion of Rehabilitation Plans for the remainder of the building (includin� the interior), the remainin� plans will be reviecved separately. Flexibility will be allo �•ed in the review of the interior ofthe House. HPC will provide an opportunity f ublic input during the Rehabilitation Plan Review Process(es) and SHPO wil onsider public comments as part of their review(s). D. HPC Jurisdiction. If the proposed relocation site is locate �vithin an uza that has been designated by the City under Chapter 73, the HPC ill have responsibility as determined by city ordinance for lon� term monitori � to ensure that subsequent treatment and improvements to the exterior of the H se are in compliance �vith the Secretary of Interior's standards. If the proposed r ocation site is not in an area that has been designated by the City under Chapter 7, the City will take every reasonable step to ensure that the House is redesignated a St. Paul Herita�e Presen Site, subject to a public review process outlined in Chapter 73. E. moved and after the move is moved to its new site and st; the City shail prepare docur C identiFies the materials to the Keeper of the Register ; Section 60.14(b)(5). � Section 60.14(b)(5), the House will r�nQ the Move In accordance ��ith 36 CFR .main on the National Register «•hite bein� R'ithin nine months after the House has been accordin� to the activities listed in Appendix B, n required by 36 CFR Section 60.14. Appendix shed. SHPO shall fo:��ard t�ss docus�en±ationto cation of the move in accordance ti��ith 36 CFR F. Tem�orarv Stora�e oF I�Iouse durina Mo�•e. If necessary, the City will move the House to a temporary - cat o to allow time for new site preparation and to facilitate the transit hub const 4'ction schedule. Appropriate measures �z'ill be taken to protect and secure the buil}��n� durin� this interim period. G. Protection of th��Resource. After the City receives title of the propem� from the State, appropri�te measures ��ill be taken by the City to protect and secure the building priorfto, during and after it is moved. Onbehalf of F WA, the City shall ensure that an archaeolo�ical survey is conducted onthe Transit Hub 1te and on the selected Relocation Site for the House. The sun•ey shall be conducted b the City in a manner consistent with the Secretary of Interior's Standards and Guideline or ldentification (48 CFR 44720-23) and takin� into account relevant guidelines of the S O. The survey shall be conducted in consultation with the SHPO, and a report of the surv meetin� the standards of the Secretary of the Interior shalt be submittzd to FHWA for red w and approval. o �-Ma� III. FHWA shall evaluate properties identified tYirou�h the survey in accordance with 36 CFR Part 800.4. If the survey results in the identification of properties that aze eli�ible for the National Re�ister, FHWA shall�comply with 36 CFR Parts 800.5 and 800.6. COSTS OF THE MOA The Si�natories and Concurring Parties shall be responsible for their own ad�ninistration and staff costs associated with ei±her document revie�v or field work related `�this A�eement. Further, the City shall pay costs associated with the fotlowin�: (1) doc entation, relocation and stabilization costs described in Stipulation I; (2) Archaeoloa survey and mitigation costs in Stipulation II; (3) Any other City costs required to com�pTete MOA stipulations. IV. MODIFICATIONS, DISPUTES, TERMINATION, Fc3'C. � A. Modification or amendment of this a�reeme�as necessary, shall be accomplished by the Signatories in the same manner as,ik`ie original a�reemen[. B. Should the Si�natories object withinf�0 days to the materials provided for review pursuant to Sections I.A, I.C, I.E a�II of this agreement, the FHWA shall consult with the objecting party to resolu� ``the objection. If the FHWA determinzs that the objection cannot be resolved, ttf'e FHWA shali request the further comments of the Council. Any Council com nt provided in response to such a request �vill be taken into account by the FHW� FHWA's responsibiliry subjects ofthe dispute en C. Ifprovisions of of its execution, the agreement ' 800.6(c)(8). � with reference only to the subject of the dispute; the carry out a!I ac#ions under th:s agreemenE that are not the iain unchanged. ii a�reement are not carried out within three (3) years from the date e Signatories shall consult to seek amendment ofthe aereement. If not amended, any Signatory may terminate it pursuant to 36 CFR 0 o �-�+a� Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement and implementation of its terms evidence that FHWA has taken into account the effects of its undertaking on historic properties. A photocopy of this document wili be deemed to be an original by the Signatories. � FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADNIIiVISTRATION � Alan R. Steger, Division Administrator ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC I� John M. Fowler, Executive Director MINNESOTA5TATE By Nina M. Archabal, � INVITED SIGNAT(� CITY OF � 'AUL Coleman ATION OFFICE Preservation Officer ,`� r' �` Date: Date: Date: Date: Approved to Form: Peter McCall, Assistant City Attorney o� �a� coxcux: ST. PAiIL HERITAGE PRESERVATION CObIMISSION � Name and Title of Signer CITY OF SAINT PAUL HOUSING AND I's�� Name and Titie of Signer Approved to Form THOMAS R. DIMOND � F � r / �. Date: AUTAORITY � Date: Date: CITIZENS TO THE ARMSTRONG HOUSE B � Date: O 1-y�� APPENDIX A Relocation Sites currently owned by City or HRA Site. # 2- Kellogg and Seventh Street (Transit Hub Site) Site # 3- St. Joseph's Lane and West Seventh Street Site # 7- Plastics Parking Lot (on Chesmut south af Ryan Street) Site # 8- Ryan Parking Lot (at Chestnut and R 7 � 0 �-'1y7 APPENDIX B � MOVING AND STABILIZATTON ACTIVITIES TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY (Detniled Move and Stabilize Data can be found in Yolume 1, Attachment I of the Secti,�r'r�106 Report.) A. MOVE BY HISTORIC MOVING CONTRACTOR This step includes the activities involved in physically lifting th,eirlrmstrong House off its existing foundation, moving it along city streets and placin� it on a ne.�v foundation within a new site. (A separate contractor will be responsible for the new foundat�, as noted in Section B below). The contractor hired to complete the moving activities mus meet special requirements for moving historic structures. Prior to the move, preliminary bra n�, shorin� and brick stabilization will be completed. Photo documentation of interior and ext or will be completed to allow monitoring of building condition. During the move, the histo movin� contractor will take steps to protect overhead and underground utilities, as well as p, tecting or replacing affected landscaping, curbs, etc. The historic movin� contractor will also� ovide liability insurance and performance bonds to ensure successfiil completion of the move.!'Included in this Appendix is a memorandum dated May 4, 2000, from Constructive Ideas tl t provides a detailed listing of items that will be the responsibility of the Historic Buildin� N�o'ver and the City at the existing buiiding location, while the buildin; is in transit, and at the new b,�filding location. B. NE�V CONSTRUCTIQ�i ITEMS This step includes the activiti s of a general contractor to clear out the existing site ofthe Armstrong House after is has been mo ed, and to prepare the new site for placement of the Armstron� House. New site work will invo�Ve constructing a foundation and basement for the House, including a structural support syste�: If necessary, a new entry porch will be built on the front of the House at its new location. Dep�,'nding on the site chosen for the Armstrong House, other activities will be required to provide a%level surface for moving the House on to the new foundation. If necessary, steps will be taken �# the new site to protect adjacent sidewalks, trees or structures. Securin� fencing will be provided a# both the old site and the new site. Included in this Appendix is a memorandum dated May 4, 20k�0, from Constructive Ideas that provides a detailed listing of items that will be the responsibility�6f a General Contractor and the City at the existing building location, while the building is in transit, and at the new building location. : o� y�-' C. MI1VI:vIUtII ELE1lIENTS TO RETAi\ IyiA'i'IO\AL REGISTER LISTING Based upon discussions with the Minnesota State Iiistoric Preservation Office (SHPO), this step involves the absolute minimum improvements required to protect the "shell" of the Armstrong House from further deterioration. Correspondence from SHPO dated Marc �7, 2000, identified the items in a detailed listing of construction activities that would not. e needed for continued eligibility of the House. That correspondence is included in the S�`i�ion 106 Report (Volume 1, Attachment I). The key elements that are necessary for continued eiij bility are listed as follows: ,%' ♦ Excavation and grading of new site ♦ Sheet piling as necessary to protect street, sidezvall ♦ Wall footings, piers for porch footin�s on new site ♦ Foundation walls, sandstone veneer i ♦ Tuckpointing, cleaning and brick repajr � ♦ Basementbeams � / ♦ Repair or replace front entry porc,hes ♦ Remove and replace roofin; sqrface ♦ New gutters and downspouts%" ♦ New entrances /� adjacent structures ♦ Remove and replace wineTows, or repair existin� windows ♦ Perimeter caulking �' D. STABILIZATION AND A5'SET PROTECTION , This step involves activities by a�;�eneral contractor to provide minimum improvements needed to allow safe access to the House fdr inspection. Minimum electrical service will be provided for basic lighting. New stairs to the basement will be constructed. Loose or waterlogged material will be removed from the house. ;i i electrical setvice stairs; basement stairs ♦ Ge�ierai interior clean-up (removal of loose or waterlogged materials) ♦ Environmental clean-up (asbestos and lead-based paint, if necessary) ,,' r� � > NOTE: /� Activities in Parts A-D of Appendi.x B will be part of the "1Ltove and �% Stabilization Plans" referenced in the MOA. o�-y�.� APPENDIX C Documentation required once the Armstrong House is moved 1) A letter no�fying the 2vIN-SHPO the date the property was moved 2) Two sets of 8 x 10 black aad wlute photographs and one set on its new site. Two or more different views (persp� -`_._ _, . tfie house ate required. The lab processin� the film (fixer) residue test for film. grocessin�. (Ia other wo processing). The photographs should be printed on resin-coated paper (not photo�aphic color dye pa chea developino costs), 'Tfie photographs sho t ies of the house front and reu of io be able to pass a hypo s" e a reputable veador for otographic, silver emuLsion used by vendors advertising ve a one-half inch border. p = They should be labeled on the back using a so pencil with the following information: name of property, county and te, name of photo�apher, date of photooraph, location of original negative* view (camera facing), photograph number or number depicting vantage po' t oa the sketch map.. The slides should be a plastic mount with name of prop , couaty and stxte�and date. *The SHPO will accept the negatives (along wi e photo�aphs) provided tI�t the film• is 24 exposure and T Max 100 or Plus- Pan film• 3) A sketch map (done in black d white) which depicts the house on its new site 4) An original United State ological Survey Map (U.S.G.S.) which depicts the location of the house o. ts new site (Depict location usin� a dot made with a Iead pencil. Do not includ y other written information on the map). 5) Acreage of the p, el on which the house is Iocated. � Legal Descrip 'on of the pazcel � Parcel's P number 8) Name d address of property owner(s) 10 �x k�bit . 13 `— Vy1 �.v�,,4 a� ��fn.x. c�.a�'� VL1a.�c� 2.6� �oo� 0�-4�� I. Parties agreeing to addendum. This addendum to the Chestnut Street and 0 I-Till Sueet has been reviewed and parties: Saint Paul PED, H'istoric Irvine Park Associati< Molly Femholz, Patrick and Rita Hawkinson Wamer� Hiileren, Louis Fillmon and Kazen Jason. Purpose. The parties want to accelerate moving of the historic Armstrong House f to the site. The site's present zoning is P- City can issue moving and foundation peri housing. The parties agree that the p�o to allow the Armstrong House to be�ma most restrictive residential zone i�whic �omn petitions for 235 re to by the following A), Kevin McGrath and and Ruth Dantuma, Peter aoni�`g of 235 Chestnut Street to pemrit the m�tts present location north of the Xcel Arena ,�4vhich allows only surface parking. Before the ;s, the site needs to be zoned to permit rty on Chestnut Street should be rezoned d and that the new zoning should be the the house can feasibly be restored and sold. The City wants to move t e{fiouse as soon as possible to open up the site north of the arena for redevelopment. ,.� Simultaneous zoning steps�and redevelopment analysis. HII'A is negotiating to take ownership of the Armstro `�House and to partner with a developer to restore and mazket it. At the time of the fili � of the rezoning petitions, HIl'A has not had time to select a partner, complete a pro,'�ct feasibility analysis, or deternune how many residential units will be at the site. 1e HII�A is working with developers, public agencies, and contractors to devis, a feasibie restoration plan for the property, the City and the property owners within 100��eet of the Chestnut Street site are initiating three separate residential rezoning petition�for RT-1 (duplex), RT-2 (3-4 units), and RM-1 (multi-family) so that any one of thect�` can be chosen later. The petition�''will initiate the rezoning process at the Planning Comrnission; the parties expect tha�>all three altematives may still be under consideration when the Planning Commiss n holds its hearing and makes its recommendation. At least ten days before the rezonin�petitions come before the City Council for third reading and public hearing, HIPA,�vill have detemuned and submitted to the City in writing which of the three alte �ative rezonings fits its restoration plan. The other two petitions will be withdrawn by e parties. If HIPA has not made a written recommendatioq the parties wiil r ommend that the Council approve the RT-1 rezoning altemative. As soon as practical 1�. �i —y ?1 after the Council approves a new zoning district, PED will request building permits for excavation, a new foundatioq and the house move. In addirion to the rezoning, other City approvals will be required before building permits aze issued, including height and setback variances, site plan review, and historic review. 4. Nullification of fhe consents given on the rezoaing petitions. Most oFthe petition signers specifically support the moving and restoration of the Armstrong Aouse, but would not support whatever residential development may be permitted in the zoning district without the house. If the Armstrong House is not moved to Chestnut Str or suffers severe damage during the move and cannot be restored, the parties wa o return the zoning, at least for the rime being, to P-1. , 5. Attachment to rezoning peEitions for RT-1, RT-2, and RM-1. Thi iidendum is hereby attached to each of the three rezoning petitions as an explan on for why muitiple petitions are being submitted and as a safeguard for the affected ighbors. 6. Signatures of the Parties. I agree with the provisions of t's addendum. (Please sign and date.) Brian Sweeney, PED Patrick Kevin McGrath Peter Hilleren Molly Fernholz f` Dirk Dantuma Molly Howe Ruth Dantuma K:�Shazed�PedVSODF.RfiOUZONAIG\Atmstron�J Warner Louis Fillmon Karen Jason O CZ'Z`X O�' SA.XNT' _l'.A.YJS.� � CONSENT OF AD70INING PROPERTY OtiYNERS FOR . •.�ZEZONING di -9�� We, tlie undersi�ned, otvncrs oPtlie proper;y tvidtiin 100 feet o(thc total contiguous description of rzal estate o�vned, purciiased, or sofd by'I'HE PETITION6R within one year preczdiit� tlie date oF tliii petition ackno�vledge that �vz have bcen presented u•itli the foilou•ino: I. A cop}' of the petition of (name ofp ctitioner) to rezone the property [ocated at a3S CheS�n�.i.1' �,-„ e� from n P � zo�iino district to �1�� zoning district. �'l � S"f'r2 �"t . 2. A copy ofsections �'� through _(�Q•� inclusive oFtht Saint Paul ning Code; and nckno�vledge that �ve ;�re a�vare oFnll of the uses permitted in z RT =�. zo ' g districC 2nd tve are lware that any oFt(�zse uses can be establislted upon City Councii approval of ie rezoning. 14'e hereby' consent to the rczonin� of the propeRy in the pctition oF, s t_��,�]�, �� G " + �r �+�� "�� U4�/ to,^ zoningdistri lI � � ,] �y� v �i/N � u w\ (Name of petitioner) tiVc conscnt to flie �pproval of fhis i•ezoning �pPlic�nt or his(lier represenfafivc. / OCv7-X 22. �.L DOO 1 O Co z.k 21-. J2, 0 0 f 0 C�zFS2iz3 oi3g vG,zsz�3z 000'{ a�zszzazono3, o6z82232000S v62�z�3.�oc�o� vl�zszz32.00l1 v�z$zz3zo�i2 0628 zz3Zooi c �f o � sr�r�t Pa�:L J�qvrc� (.'oset{;�, Ke:vin meGr,"fh n7otly Ferf�hoLz Pqt��cK ul'�riter �:'Eq /./qW '�'RSon t11PMCf g: �-<. , �.��n nea ��rK ��, ant�..mQ r'2�.'�F� //Dan A DirK� l.�An�Eu.wiA �. S� Rn't ' �er � �(!y I-��we Lyn�Trus�'eE �-okis �':!/`no�l rlRren 5aspn ULo2�223) 0�1�) zSoo Line.. �ai jraa.C� �vas expl�ined fo us by fhe U(a 2 $ z��f U�C�`i <<t�jo-ES-Ck'�Lxie�cf � SP.tcm ' 06 �8 ��.a4r vo7o c,'�y c¢ sT PAu. L ' - NOT�: This petition shall not be considered as o�cially filed until tne lapse of seven (7) u•orking days after it is recei�•ed by the Pianning Division. Any signator of thispetition tnay �v►thdra�ti-h�s/her name therefrom by ��Titten request within that time. :,'� �, � �� CZ�'Y O�` SA.XN'Z' �'.A.Y7� CONSENT•OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWI�iERS POR A . ..�,�zoxxNc d�-4� We, il�e undersigned, otvners oFthe propery tvitf�in t00 feet o(t6e total contiguous description oE real esiate o�vned, purchased, or sold by 7'HE PETITIO� IER tivithin one ye. r precedin� th= date of this petition �cknowledge that tve have bccn presentzd u•idt the following: 1. A copy of the peti[ion oF, (name of ctitioner) to rezone tlte Property located at a3S �h 2Sfn�.i."�"' �„� � � from a �'-' � zoning district to ay� district. 2. A copy oCsections (�D��?.i through ��.�3 in ncknotvlcdge th�t we 1re n�vart ofnll oFthe uses permitted in 1�vare that any oF duse i�ses c�n be established upon Ciry C consent to lhe rczonin� of tfie property in the petition of; (Name of petitioner) tiVe consent to fhe �Pproval of this �PP�ic�nf or his/ficr represenfafive., OCo2.8 2� 3� o00 l p(o J�zL3Z oolp �z82� z3 o i3g vGzg-��3z 000�{ O�z8zZ3z0003 o6zgzz32000S v6z�z23zo�aq oC� z82�3Zoo�1 o6z$zz3zo� D�ZB zz3Z� UCo2$223 qo z$ Z� e�ce il( Sp�m 06 �8 zz a�{ vo7o1 c��Y a� sT PRw 1_ � � hOT�: This petition shall not be considered as officially filed until tne lapse of seven (7) u•orkin8 days a8er it is recei��ed by fhe Plannin;Division. Any signator of this petition may withdra�ti�his/he� namelherefrom by «ritten request within that time. :,'� :j V G o�F S ' �i- Pr}i.�.L Ci�f- oF s ot pRaL (�qvic[ / se'('{'0., Kt:t�in ' eGro...`f-h rho!!y/Fern hoLz on �a�ner � A n a k l7An'furnq �. !-�, I I er en l-��'11 S�f'��ee. clusive f tlie Saint Paut Zoning Code; and a ' zonin; district 2nd we are ou il approval of the rzzoning. \�'o hereb�� j� � / 1� 7/ioningdistrict. ��°'��'�� ing as it �vas ezpI�ined fo us by fhe I, " /ylotly l�we Ly►�.�Trus� 'i3 G.okis T;�/.�c�] lCRren 3'ason 10 �Soo L',ne R�i �raac� � C�'X'X O� S.A.XN� PA.�CJS� CONSEI�IT'-OF ADJOINING PROPERTY O�VNERS FOR A . -,REZDIYING We, ihe undersigned, o�vncrs of tlie property tvitliin 100 feet oFtlic total otvned, purci�ased, or sold by THE PET[TIO� IER within one year lcknotivledge that wz have bccn presented ��•i[h tlte follot�•ing: f 1. A copp of tl�e petition oE (name of ctit to rezone tlic property located at a3S G�eS from a �'� � zoning district to a}�' 2. Acopyofsections �•��7i through,�/� ncknotivled�e diat �ve ��z nware oP111 oFthe uses � nwlre tliat any of thase uses can be established u eonsent to the rezoning of tl�e property in tl�e pet;}� (Nanie of petifioner) � _ � �-i�� .S7�r�2�� ing district. o �-ya.a �, inclusive of dr Saint Paul Zoning Code; and iitted in �� zonin; district 2nd tve are Ciry Councii approval of die rozoning. \�'e horeby• � oF; �j� � � �� _ to r.��,zoning �istricL (�(�Q��V! � ) \Ve consenY to flte �pproval o�this rezoning as it `vas expl�ined fo us by the �PP�ic�nf or his/hcr represert��afivc. Oc>2-.8 zl, 3� o0o ( C, o-4- Sain'i PklA.L o� z�rz�.3� ooro c;�-�o� sr�r�t p�wL p�' zg2z. z3 O 13$ ( f�A�c� �.'osef{�c� U�o�.g•Z� 000� I �in MeGra�.'Yh o!(y Fern hoLz p�2$zZ ous description oE real estate ing the date oE this pe[ition n k�ar�ef O�z$22320o0S'` `�'rK t7. an ��..'�h _ Dan-k�u.w,1 Q�z�,z23-?.�v0�'I 1� irk L�An�Euw�A f�.v..`4h D Rn'tti-mo_ O�z82Z3��11� F� !-��I� U(0.2$ z'Z3 2�o121 t�1olly I�we Cy n�rruS 0628zz3 �oot3 `-��15 r-,�iMO� 1fRfen 3aSO�1 U�oz�2 I Ob10 �Soo Lin2 �r jraa.c� 0� 2$ � z�{ U�G�t <<� � sT �a.�� x� ence hl seum . _ 06 �8 z�a�f o07o C,�-Y a� s'� PHw L IrOT�: This petition shall not be considered as officially filed until tne lapse of seven (7) u�orking _ days aRer it is recei�•ed by the Planning Division. Any signator of this petition may �rithdratti•his/he� name therzErom by ��Titten request within that time. •�: O .� ZONING DISTRICTS City of Saint Paul SUMMARY OF USES ALLOtiVED IN SAINT PAUL ZO\'ING DISTRICTS �� "y a � RESIDE\TIAL R-LL, R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4 One-Famil}• One-family d�vellings Schools, libraries, parks, churches Convents, rectories Family day care (10) and group family day care (14) Group day care in a non-residential structurz Homz occupations Bed and brzakfasts w/one guest room Community residential facilities (s6 residents) Carriage housz dweltings (historically existing)" Cemeteries* Cluster dzvelopments* Colleges, univzrsities* Com•ersions of non-residential structures and residential struchires over 9,000 sq. ft.* Golf courses, private recreation facilities* RT-1 T��'o-Famitr' All R-� uszs T��o-family homzs Group day care Fratzmity and sorority houses* Bed and breakfasts �v/up to 4 guest RT-Z To«'nhouse �p A11 RT-I uses i Thrzz- and four-family d��elfings / To��nhouses «'ith up to 6 units � Community residential faciliti s (7-16)* i I2��I-1 blultiple Family � All R7-2 uses Apartment buildings (5�-'stories) Roomin� and boardin houses* I2_�I-2 �Iultiple Ali RNI-1 uses Apartment buil Eldzrly housi � Hospitals, n si, �ngs (<_ 5 stories) support services iR homes* iL�t-3 l�l tipie I amily Hi�h d sity, high rise apartments Churches, day care (all tyPes) Etdzrly housing support services Community residential facilities* Hospitals` Accessoq� retail service and office uses* CO�I�IERCIAL OS-1 Loca] Oftice-Ser� Business offices such as banks, insurance, real estate Professiona] offices such as medical cIinics, law officz; Artist and photographer studios Sen�ice businesses such as photocopying, �vateh and shoe repair„jailor shops, barber and beauty shops Day care (all es) Schools, co ges, libraries, parks, churches Mised co ercial/residential uses amily dwellin�s y residzntial facitities (16) owned buildin�s, public utility buildin�s* �S-2 General Office-Ser�•ice A110S-1 uses Post offices and similar eo�'emmental offices Retail businesses such as grocery, etc. (s 10,000 sq. fr.) Re;taurants and bars, except dri��e-in or fast-food Hotels and hospitals Laundries and dry deanin� (retail outlet) blanufact�rin� of small precision goods Carria�e house dwellinss Retail businesses (>10,000 sq. ft.)* B-1 Local Business Dtost OS-1 uses Rztail businesses such as erocery, bakery, drugs, books. clothin„ hard«�are, florist, carry-out restaurants Laundries and dry cleanin� (retail outlet) Post ofYices and similar go�'emmental offices ldi�ed commercial/residential uses Vlultiple-family d�vellings* B-2 Community Business Alt B-1 uses Sen'ice businesses �cith a sho�F7oom or �vorkshop such as contractor, baker, painter, appliance repair Restaurants and bars, eacept drive-in or fast food Food catzring CO{t22 �3051:5 Pricatz halls and clubs, health clubs "l�l�zaeers, bingo h�li�, ussemUl}' halis Currzncy exchange businesses Veterinary clinics, tatoo parlors Auto sercice stations, con��enience and specialty stores` Pool halls, bo��'ling alleys, game rooms and other t}'p=� of indoor commercial recreation" Pa��n shops* Z,7 CO�t�fFRCIAL (continued) I\DUSTRIAL . 0 ►- yy� B-3 Genera] Business Most B-2 uscs dndoor vehicle sales Mortuaries Finishing shops Business sales and service such as parcel delivery Manufacturing of small precision goods Hotels and motels Printin� and publishing firms Wholesalin� (no outside storaoe, <15,000 sq. ft.) Hospitals Outdoor vehicle sales * Auto repair facilities* Fast food and drive in restaurants* Greenhouses, nurseries* Car �vashes* Adult ttses'" B-4 Central Business Retaii, sen•ice and office uses Apartment residential uses Hotels, motels, hospitals Amusement and entertainment uses, museums Schools, colleges, libraries, parks, churches Go��emmental uses Currzncy eschan�e businesses, pa��n shops Adutt uses* Community residential facilities" B-5 Central Business/Sercice All B-4 uses �Vholesalino, warehousin� Limited manuEacturin� Dry cleanin� plants Foud catzrin�, processing, manuf Itescarch and testin� laboratories Auto sen�ice stations, auto conve stores, auto repair � B-2C Community Bu All RM-Z uses Most B-2 uses, except and currency excr Retail sales in a buildJ' Service businesses % and specialty urants, assembly halls businesses * Conditionai uses - A Special Condition Use Permit (SCUP) must be granted by the Planning Commission to allow these uses. I-1 Industry All B-3 uses except family and group family day care Warehousing, �vhotesalin� Research and testing Lumber and contractor s yards Manufacturing from pre�iously prepared materials Rental storage facilities Auto service stations, auto convenience/specialty storzs Auto repair, auto body facilities Tele��ision and radio to�vers" Adult uses"` Gun shops and shootin� �lleries* I-2 Industr}� MostI-1 uses ra�c materials Sewage pla Stora�e o, uilding matzrials, sand, gravel, stone �of sand, gravzl, other raw materials* �us and infzctious waste processing* dai freight yards" T-3 Industr}• Gasoline tank farms Rendzring plants and tannin� Rock crushing* SPECI.4L DISTRICTS PD Plnnned Decelopment All uses by specific plan P-1 Par]:ina Off-street parking RCR-I Ricer Corridor Residential Multiple family d��ellings Institutional uses RCGl Ricer Corridor Commercial All B-2 uses RCI-1 Ricer Corridor Industrial Limited I-1 uses nOTE: THiS [S NOT A LEGAI. DOCU!�IE\T. In tha inttrat oC simplicity and readability, it Ceparts Gom the neccss�ry itgal and technic�I langua_e of the Saint Paul Zonin� Code and othcr applicable regulation>- ��«��.cistpaul.nm.us.niep � 2_?p0! � `� � � �, �i� °` 6 �( ' 4 1�c• `S �14� . ,/ '.r- F � �� b o � b � 0 �� A° i 2 .� �� b �7 � � V i ` ' A ��`, : t '. ,�5 "' y � �; 9 '•�� 3 y}� . 6 : ' �` 1 2` ��js ��s ; i ` ��1� � `�; \ � � �•�'• �. X �\ �. ` , . \ �t65�, � � l � ��' .,M� � \ i t '' / � '- x � �� 8 � ,�15 � `' � �� ` 1 d. o � / \ r - i . - �i ,� 6 � � y ;-r , � -t�} _ . 6 �� ` � i,, 3 :• � � 2. '�` � , o , co ' � � � � — � �,':� � ,, !� �' �� 6 1 � , j i 2 ` � i � �, i � � �'° ? � ' /• �� II � �� . .�� / . � �, ; . e ,- � �-_.� �� ' �� ° �,,;�� , � o .�/� ". ' : �Y `� � 6 � '`�� j � °.'\ �\: �S� ..'D+. �,, �� . ` r � > ° 1 — � =_ —_\ _--�- •_':/- - - - — 4 �. 1)�' 0 �� . �_.� ��.: . o�� `� �u� : . _ _ . . Fc � �, ...�•: �`k� h' � � �. o �3� � °3's - ` � � �.,. Dc- � ' �� `.. \ ,� i � � �. G �" : ' '°° . . � . � �'; = 9. 35 ;6' � :;� ' e; �� • � '�, • :;�°� i -; �. ? � J �� '.. i � '� 0 : s � � ..� " ' • 0 ' - � ' � � =� V ` �9� oet . ' `'S: � � p � i o'.`''Ryi �y� � � q� i �Y� . ` �/ ( � pl: �a / tiU� � � 6R � _ �' y�` ./". . .`�/'•.°')�.. � �' � o � A ♦ �\ °� S f e'�!'�/ " , • y ' ' ` 2 J ` - � \ � l ,� " � � ` � � `' � O`, ',v�o 2s �ry ` ' .�� /� �� : �� 'r o s i �. . . '`?' � _ � / � ' �: f ° p�.y��7 . � ' i� % . .- � . � . /' � ti�� _ : - .-/ : `� ' . •6F �0 � C s�,�,� / � ^/ / 7 , �� . / . t � +� _�} 'Ij � t .-.� /`,'y'� � . .:'. .. .. . . .- w . J� � p � J . _. . . , . / i� . ': o .�or`- t}, ° o s � S � 9 ' _ .. : :%�:: ,: � y _."/ ° � - 6 � °'- - 3s 6 . •� . ' �' ' -�•''�� _ °+' �. � - \� ` y '. ;: / � • .. - Q � . ,�vl `�` / . �o - o c - " 5 . ! •� 10� � o � ,. - ._L��. ��_ � e�� / �.' � : ' . / .:' , •. 7, xx •.�� :: . � \ , ' 9 ��' �� f : �/� � —' ;� �i . - � �. : ��q Y,�� b ', . f' . % , � � 2 .. .or �. �G \. .e ...- . � ,-- . o►-�►�� Exhibit 3- City Conncil Resolnfion for Apri125, 2001 Smith Avenue Transit Hnb Development ProEram Descrintion The Development Program for the Smith Avenue Transit Hub proposes an combination bus layover fac�7ity and parking ramp that includes the followi ♦ Up to 1,400 pazking stalls, of which approximately 30% are for ♦ A bus layover facility for at least 16 buses; � ♦ lOQ bike lockers; pool; ♦ Up to 25,000 square feet of future retaiUcommercial alo� West Seventh street. The facility will be divided by Smith Avenue into a connected by bridges at the elevated levels for car ; lakely provide piimary entrance/exit to and from th�� parkers and event parkers, retail service access� lanes of vehiculaz traffic. Sidewalks, including, one provide for a pedestrian friendly use of Smit]�AveT aorth and a south structure n�pedestrian traffic. Smith Avenue will transit hub for buses, commuter/contract access and bikes, as well as provide for four covered walk within the ramp structure will The street-level bus layover facility will �commodate peak time metro bus layover for at least 16 buses. Metro Transit facilities on t site wili include all weather sheker accessible to the public from Smith Avenue, bus drive rfacilities, a with drivers room, general storage and a supervisors office. The bus la yover y will also serve charter buses for RiverCentre, the Xcel Energy Center, the Ordway, and �e Science Museum of MN. Such charter buses will share the facility, to the degree it is not ne `ded for Metro Transit bus layover, and will utilize the majority of the bus portion of the transi��ub at non-peak times and on weekends. The aesthetic design of the�.4'mith Avenue Transit Hub will be of urban character with roof top parking. The facility will b'e set back from West Seventh Street to accommodate the construction of retaiUcommercial spac�. Up to 25,000 S.F. of high bay retail space at street level will e�ctend the length of the � up to 75 feet deep connection across along West Seventh Street and will provide a variery of tenant fronCages �ck from the curb approxixnately 15 feet. There will be a pedestrian Seventh Street to the Xcel Energy Center via tunnel, skyway, or at grade. K:4Stazed�ped�Sc3ueckeV�IISC PROIECTS�SMITH TitANSLT HUB�Ex1u�6itC - Project Desc�ipfionwpd 30 � FINAL �e-�� U �-'v�5 l C� � ' ��, r . L �S , 2-c� c \ Presented By Referred To Council Fi1e # 0�- y a 3 Resolution # Green Sheet # �L.O s' ESOTA y3 . D3tE 1 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING TFIE SMITH AVENUE TRANSTT HfJB PROJECT, EXECUTING A 2 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT ON THE ARMSTRONG/QUINLAN HOUSE, ACCEPTING 3 TITLE TO THE ARMSTRONG/QUINLAN HOUSE FROM THE STATE AND REQUESTING HRA 4 TO RELOCATE AND STABILIZE THE ARMSTRONG/QUINLAN HOU5E AT THE FORMER 5 PLASTICS PARKING LOT STTE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 WI�REAS, the City, after receiving initial approval for a$5.5 million federal grant in 1998, has spent more than two years investigating the feasibility of the Smith Avenue Transit Project including conducting a federally mandated Section 106 Process with respect to the state owned historic Armstrong/Quinlan House ("House") and the Project as described in the attached E�ibit 3; and WHEREA5, as part of the federal Section 106 Process, the City of Saint Paul must, together with the State Historic Preservation Office and the Federal government, make an informed decision on its mitigation efforts with respect to the House, before proceeding with the Project; and , WHBREAS, the City Council supports a measured approach between preservation of historic sriuctures and the development of the Smith Avenue Transit Hub, which will serve the western end of Downtown including the RiverCentre Area; and WI�REAS, the House is a federally designated historic house that requires a thorough analysis of the altemative solutions and the impact the Project will ha�e on the historic nature of the House; the alternative solutions reviewed with the City Council include: (1) leaving the House in its present location with the Development Program around the House ("In Place Alternative"), (2) moving the House to several possible sites in either the West 5eventh/Irvine Pazk area, the edge of the site along Seventh Street or Saint Joseph's Lane ("City Sites") or other site acceptable to the City or (3) demolition and mitigation of the House; and WHEREAS, concerned citizens for preserving the House have expressed a clear preference for the House to be preserved and redeveloped as residential in the Irvine Park area which is attached in the Section 106 Report Volumes 1-5 previously submitted to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the State Legislature in 2000 agreed to donate the House and surrounding land to the City on the condition that City agreed to move the House to an alternative location so that it can be preserved; and 33 34 Wf�REAS, in Res. 00-6/14- 3, IIltA provided fixnds of $2,375,000 for the moving and stabilization of 35 the House with its prefeired site being the foixner Plastics Parking Site near Ryan and Chestnut and that the 36 City cause the House to be moved and stabilized; and 37 38 o� . y.a.� 39 WHEREAS, a Memorandum of Agreement ("MOA") among the Federal Highway Administration 40 ("FHWA"), the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation ("ACHP") the Minnesota Historical Preservation 41 Office ("SHPO") and the City along with concurring parties has been negotiated and attached in E�ubit 1; 42 and 43 44 WHEREAS, Saint Pau1 Heritage Preservation Cou�ission ("HPC") hosted the required public meeting 45 required by the federal Section 106 process on August 10, 2000 conceming the House and Smith Avenue 46 Transit Hub; and 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 WHEREAS, HPC has passed two resolutions conceming the House ( HPC Res 99-4 on July 22, 1999 and Res. O i-i on January 11 , 2001). The second resolution supports execution by HPC of the MOA, subject to its normal review with respect to municipal preservation matters as described in Chapter 73 of the Saint Paul Legislative code (see E�ubit i, Stipulation I C and D); and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the importance of the Seven Comers Gateway Area of Saint Paul, including significant views of the Saint Paul Cathedral, Xcel Energy Center and other important landmarks; and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes other projects that are under consideration including transit projects such as the Riverview Corridor and the Trolley, and other parking projects for Aoliday Inn Hotel, United/Clrildren's Hospitals, and others; and WI�REAS, a pazking supply and demand study for the westem end of Downtown, including the Smith Avenue Transit Hub, United Hospital campus, Holiday Inn Hotel etc,. Will be completed shortly to assist the City: (1) in the coordination between pending parking and transit projects in the westem end of Downtown and (2) in helping determine the final number of parking spaces to be financed and constructed as part of the Smith Avenue Transit Hub Project. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council approves and directs the following: 1. Accepts the final Section 106 Smith Avenue Transit Hub Report, Volumes 1-5. This includes Volume 5 which was prepared after the required public hearing on August 10, 2000 at the Saint Paul Heritage Preservation Comxnission and contains all written testimony of interested parties and the City's response to the testimony. 2. Approves proceeding with the Smith Avenue Transit Hub Project and accepts the now $6.2 million grant from Federal goveininent for the Project and directs staff to compiete securing at least $2.0 million from Metro Transit, which will be used toward the transit component of the Project. Approves execution of the Memorandum of Agreement substantially in the form as attached in E�ubit 1, 79 by appropriate City officials, and with such subsequent changes as may be approved by the City Attorney and 80 PED staff that are consistent with the actions taken in this Resolution. 81 82 4. Accepts title to the House and surrounding land from the State of Minnesota with the condition imposed by 83 2000 Legislature that in exchange for the House being donated to the City, the City agree that the House be 84 preserved at an aiternative site and directs staffto complete acceptance. SS 86 5. City selects Site # 7 the former Plastics Pazking Lot (on Chestnut St. south of Ryan Street) as the site to 87 which the House will be moved and stabilized for residential reuse, names Histonc Irvine Park Association as 88 Redeveloper, and approves attached Memarandum of Intent, s�ctut�a prrt�isic�n ft� �liaat p�icip�c��i � o�-4'y� 89 90 91 92 93 in substantially the same form as attached in E�ibiti2 with such subsequent changes as may be approved by the City Attomey and PED staff that are consistent with the actions taken in this Resolution. 5iting, move and stabilization activities of the House on Site #7 will be reviewed by the HPC as fiuther descnbed in the lines 48-51 above. 94 6. Authorizes City staffto commence and complete vacation process to convey Site #7 - Plastics to HI2A, who 95 in tum will convey to the Redeveloper. 96 97 7. Accepts rezoning petitions for the former Plastics Parking Lot and authorizes rezoning process to begin. 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 8. Requests HRA to cause: A) the House to be moved and stabilized and directs appropriate staff to retain a historic mover and any other contractors necessary to move and stabilize the House at Site # 7, consistent with the City's obligations descnbed in the Memorandum of Agreement in Paragraph 3 above. B) Use the $2375 million dollars wluch haue previously been budgeted in HRA Res. 00-6/14-3 to move and stabilize the House on behalf of the City. Further the City Council understands these HRA monies are interim funds to the City that shall be reimbursed to the HRA no later than the closing on the finaucing for the Smith Avenue Transit Hub by the City. 9. City staff is to continue design and traffic work on the Project on this gateway site to the Downtown by Collaborative Design Group Arclutects(Dick Faricy, Bill Hickey, et. al.) and SRF Consulting Crroup, in conjunction with other projects under consideration in the project area including Riverview Corridor, Trolley and other parking projects in the area.. 10. After completion of the parking demand study for the western end of Downtown, which will assist in the coordination of pending parking and transit projects in the area, the Administration sha11 return to the City Council and recommend: 118 119 120 121 122 '1'1 123 124 125 126 (i) the number of pazking spaces and buses to be built for the Project (ii) the design concept for Project described in E�ibit 3 (iii) the Finance Plan for the Project which will be developed by PED and Financial Services. ��? sr��:�nill. Prr�t�?e a t�tt�n'i�a�� tnt?ut�tp tc� t�te �1� �Zt��1 r�n:the �mit�i ��e �`ra�s�t Y�iii�rr �'io;jec�, �.as'ld�€c�c� t� st��'u�:6� ava�i� to �e a�a1 repc�rts #� t�e; �at� �;�i�ac�: Attachments to City Council Resolution 127 E�ibit 1-Copy of draft Dec 17, 2000 MOA with City, FHWA, SHPO, ACHP, et a1 128 129 Exhibit 2- Draft Memorandum of Intent with Redeveloper of House at Plastic Parking Lot Site 130 131 E�u�bit 3- Description of the Development Program for the Smith Avenue Transit Hub Project 132 133 OI-��S Adoption By: by Council Secretary � � �_ Appxoved by Mayor: Date "('V(!1 � H"�• By: Requested by Department of: Planning & Economic evelopment � �N BY U Approved by Financial Services B � ��'� Form Approved by Citp A,Etorney �� /�^ / BY - ', N ��;(/�l r Approved by Mayo o Submissio�i J.d COV�ci1 1\%/� 7 By: Adopted by Council: Date �S p�0, DEPARTMENT/OFFICFJCOUNCIL: DATE INITTATED GREEN SHEET No.• 101857 d �'`� y � Planning & Economic Dev. Mazch 26, 2001 ' CONTACI' PERSON & PHONE: � ml A7e INiTTniIDATE B. Geurs 6-6653 3 PED DIl2ECTOR 5 CTTY COUNCII, CHI2IS COLEMAN MUST�E ON COUNCII, AGENDA BY (DATE) �IGN 4_CITY ATTORNEY' Y� _ CITY CLERK T,pTqgEg FiNANCIAL SER CTG ,��?, API1�' _ , : _ -� � �, S � 'd.00 � F.Q 5 MAYOR (OR ASST.) _1_ BOB GEURS�L�,{.� �� `� ROi3TITiG 2 BOBSCHREIEA J / � !� ORDER .�. � TOTAL # OF SIGNAI'ORE PAGES _1_(CLIP ALL LOCATTONS FOR SIGNATf7RE) ncriorr xeQuES�n: After public hearing on Smith Avenue Transit Hub Project and Armstrong House consider attached Ciry Council Resolurion for Apri14, 2001. Also attached is the public hearing notice that is being published. RECOM[vS,NDATIONS: Approve (A) or Rejear (R) PERSONAI, SERVICE CONTRA("fS MUST AIVSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNING COMMISSION 1. Haz this person/fvm ever worked under a contract for this departmeat? CIB COINNIITTEE Yes No CI VIL SERVICE COMbIISSION 2. Has this person/fvm ever been a city employee? � Yes No 3. Does this person/fim� possess a skill not notmally possessed by any curzent city employee? Yes No Explain all yes answers ou separate sheet and attach to green sheet A'ITIATING PROBLEM, ISS[3E, OPPORTUNI'LY (Who, What, When, Where, Why): The Council needs to decide if it wishes to move and relocate the Armstrong House to the Plastic site and proceed with the Smith Avenue Transit Hub project which must be under contract by September 2002. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Preserve the national designated House and receive up to $7.5 million ($5.5 million of federal, $2 million of Metro Transit monies) to undertake the bus layover, parking project on Cleveland Circle. DISADVANTAGES IF APPAOVED: City or HRA is responsible for moving and stabilizing the House on the Plastic site, HRA in 00-6/14-3 has already budgeted the money. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: The Cleveland Circle site of 4.8 acres will continue not to be developed with the deteriorated house on the middle of the site. Addirional parlang for visitors will not be constructed. TOTAI. AD10UN1' OF 112ANSACTTON: $2,375,000 to move and stabilize COST/REVENUE BUDGETED: Yes F[JNDING SOURCE: Fund 148-76813-0561-65005/' AC1'IVITY NUMBER: FINANCIAL IlVFORMATION: (EXPLAA� � � K.\Shared�P�N[1LVER�nsM1ibobg03 ?b.01.101 BSl.wpd Ex� Z e�� . ��.s � tF D�-�r� a►-�� DRAFT - AECEh1BER 13, 2000 MEi140RANAUM OF AGREE�IENT AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGH�YAY ADIIII�IISTRATION, THE ADYIS ORY COUNCIL ON AISTORIC PRESERVATION, TFIE MINIVESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFTCE, AND THE CITY OF SAI�T PAUL, FOR TAE RELOCATION OF THE JOHN bI. ARMSTFtONG IiOUSE Ai�D CONSTRUCTION OF THE SNIITH A�'ENUE TRANSIT HUB SAINT PAUL, MINnESOTA WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration (FH�1'A) proposes to fund a portion of a transit hub project �vithin the City of St. Paul, Ramsey County, �finnesota; and tiVHEREAS, the FH�VA has determined that this project, the Smith A��emte Transit fiub project, will have an adverse effect on the John M. Armstrong House (House), a double-house listed on the National Register of Historic Places (National Register); \VHEREAS, the FHWA has consulted with the Ad�•isory Council on Historic Preservation (Council), the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), and the City of St. Paul (City) as an Invited Signatory, pursuant to the re�ulations (36 CFR Part 800) implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470�; and WHEREAS, the St. Paul Housin� and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and the St. Paul Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) have participated in the consultation and have been invited to concur in this Memorandum of Agreement (VIOA); and �VHEREA3, the HPC serves as an advisory body to the mayor and city council on municipa] herita�e preservation matters as outlined in Chapter 73 of St. Paul's legislati�-e code (Chapter 73); and tiVHEREAS, several Interestefl Parties have participated in the consultation through pubiic meetings, work sessions and review of documentation, includin; Tom Dimond, F:athryn Babcock - representing Citizens to Save the Armstrong House, the Fort Road Federation, Historic Irvine Park Association, and several other interested parties listed in the Section 106 Report dated June 2000. Tom Dimond and Kathryn Babcock have been invited to concur in this MOA; and, � WHBREAS, under Minnesota Sessions Laws 2000, Chapter 492, Art. l, Sec 86, in order for the City to acquire property from the State that is needed to proceed �vith the Transit Hub projzct on the Cleveland Circle site, the City of Saint Paul, at its expense, is required to relocate the House to an __ alternative site to preserve it; and d1-4�� WHEREAS, the City has completed historical research surrimarized in a report entitled, "Smith � Avenue Transit Hub: Literature Search forArchaeolo�ical Potential and Historic BuiidingInfensity Survey" (July 1999) and an Addendum (July 2000); and • tiYf�REAS, the Area of Potential Effects for the undertakin� is defined as the Smith Avenue Transit Hub Site (bounded by Kellogg Boulevard, West Seventh Street, Pifth/Sixth Street and I-35E), the buildings immediately adjacent to the Transit Hub Site, and any property on or buildings immediately adjacent to the Relocaiion Sites identified in this Agreement; IQOW, THEREFORE, the FHWA, the Council, the SHPO and the CITY (the "Signatories") agree that the undertakin� shall be implemented in accordance with the following stipulations in order to talce into account the effect of the undertaking on the John M. Armstron� House. STIPULATIO\S The FWHA will ensure that the followin� measures are carried out. I. RELOCATION AND STABILIZATION OF THE HOUSE A. Citv Oblioation to Relocate the House to an Altemative_ Site. The City shall cause the House to be relocated and stabilized ��ithin one year of the execution of theMOA to one of the acceptable sites listed in Appendix A. The relocation of the House will be completed according to the guidelines set forth in the National Pazk Service publication "Movin� Historic Buildin�s" by John Obed Curtis. The building mover will be selected by the City with review and concunence by SHPO. The City agrees to undertake relocation of the House and stabilization needed to maintain National Re�ister listin�. Moving and stabilization activities to be completed by the City, or its designee (i.e., historic mover; redeveloper), are tisted in Appendix B. � B. Citv Conveyance to Redevelonec The City shall enter into a redevelopment contract �vith a redeveloper, �vhich wil( determine the Relocation Site from Appendi� A. The House �vill be sold AS IS to a rede��eloper for reuse as either residential or commercial, at the sole discretion of the City. At the time the City conveys the land and the House to the redeveloper, the City shall attach a 30-yeaz covenant to the deed requiring that exterior modifications to the House be in compliance �vith the Secretary of Interior's Standards at the time of the modifications. If the redeveloper fails to perform the stabilization activities listed in Appendix B as required by the contraot, ownership of the I-Iouse wili re�•ert to the City. C. Rehabilitation Plan Review and Concurrence. The City orits redeveloper«�ill submit Rehabilitation Plans to HPC and SHPO during the City's Site Plan Revie��• Process, including the MovinglBuildin� Permit process, for review and concurrence as to consistency with the 5ecretary of Interior's Standards, within the context of chazacter-defining features of the building. The proposed Rehabilitation Plans will 3 Ol-ya� include buildin� siting, rehabilitation, landscaping, site improvements, and adj acent new construction that is part of the site plan. If the Move and Stabilization Plans {as further discussed in Appendix B} are submitted for revie�v prior to completion of Rehabilitation Pians for the remainder of the buitdia� (inc?uding the interior), the remaining plans will be reviewed separately. Fiexibility will be allo«�ed in the review of the interior ofthe House. HPC will provide an opportunity forpublic input during the Rehabilitation Plan Review Process(es) and SHPO will consider public comments as part of their revie�v(s). D. HPC Jurisdsction. If the proposed relocation site is located tvithin an azza that has been designated by the City under Chapter 73, the HPC wili have responsibility as determined by city ordinance for long term monitoring to ensure that subsequent treatment and impro��ements to the exterior of the House are in compliance �vith the Secretary of Interior's standards. If the proposed relocation site is not in an area that has been designated by the City under Chapter 73, the City will take every reasonable step to ensure that the House is redesi�natzd as a St. Paul Herita�e Presen•ation Site, subject to a public revie�v process outlined in Chapter 73. E. Retainin; National Re¢ister Listing durino the Ivio��e. Tn accordance ��•ith 36 CFR Section 60.14(b)(5), the House �vili remain on the National Register ��•hile bein� moved and after the move is complete. ��'ithin nine months after the House has been moved to its neGV site and stabilized accordin3 to the activities listed in Appendix B, the City shall prepare documentation required by 36 CFR Section 60.14. Appendix C identifies the materials to be fiimished. SHPO shali forward this documentation to the Keeper of the Register as notification of the move in accordance ��•ith 36 CFR Section 60.14(b)(5). F, TemaorarX Stora��of House durins Mo��e. If necessary, the City �i'ilf move the House to a temporary location to allow time for ne«• site preparation and to facilitate the transit hub constn�ction schedule. Appropriate measures ��•ill be taken to prote�t and secure the buildin� durin� this interim period. ` G. Protection of the Resource. After the City recei��es title of the propetty from the State, appropriate measures ��•ill be takzn by the City to protect and secure the building prior to, during and after it is moti•ed. II. ARCAAEOLOGX On behalf of FHWA, the City shall ensure that an archaeolo�ical survey is conducted on the Transit Hub site and on the selected Relocation Site for the House. The sun�ey shall be conducted by the City in a manner consistent with the Secretary of Interior's Standards and Guidelines for ldentificafion (48 CFR 44720-23) and taking into account relevant guidelines of the SHPO. The survey shall be conducted in consultation �vith the SEIPO, and a report of the survey meetin� the standards o f the Secretary of the Interior shall be submitted to FHWA for revie�v and approval. e a� -4� 1 FHWA shall evaluate properties identified throu�h the survey in accordance with 36 CFR Part 800.4. If the survey results in the identification of properties that are eligible for the National Register, FFi�VA shall comply with 36 CFR Parts 800.5 and 800.6. . III. COSTS OF TEiE MOA The Signatories and Concumng Parties shaii be responsible for their o�vn adminis�ation and staff costs associated �vith either document revie�v or field work related to this A�eement. Further, the City sha11 pay costs associated �vith the follo�vin�: (1) documentation, relocation and stabilization costs described in Stipulation I; (2) Archaeology survey and mitigation costs in Stipulation II; (3) Any other City costs required to complete h40A stipulations. IV. MODIFICATIONS, DISPUTES, TERMINATION, ETC. A. Modification or amendment of this agreement, as necessary, shall be accompiished by the Signatories in the same manner as the original agreement. B. Should the Si�natories object �vithin 30 days to the materials provided for revie�v pursuant to Sections I.A, I.C, I.E and II of this agreement, the FHWA shall consult �vith the objecting party to resolve the objection. If the FHWA determines that the objection cannot be resolved, the FHWA shall request the further comments of the Council. Any Councii comment provided in response to such a request �cill be taken into account by the FHWA �vith reference only to the subject of the dispute; the FHWA's responsibility to carry out all actions under this agreement that ue not the subjects of the dispute remain unchanged. C. Tfprovisions of this a�reement are not camed out within three (3) years from the date of its execution, the Signatories shall consult to seek amendment of the agreement. If •-- the agreement is not amended, any.Signatory may terminate it pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(c)(8). G! O�—`�� Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement and implementation of its terms evidence that FHWA has taken into account the effects of its undertaking on historic properties. A photocopy of this document will be deemed to be an original by the Signatories. ' FEDERAL HIGHFVAY ADMINISTRATION By Alan R. Steger, Division Administrator ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION By 7ohn M. Fowler, Executive Director b1INNESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATIO\ OFFTCE By Nina M. Archabal, State Historic Preservation Officer INVITED SIGl`IATORY: CITY OF SAINT PAUL By Mayor Norm Coleman fipproved to Porm: Peter McCall, Assistant City Attomey Date: Date: Date: Date: O�-y�� CO\'CUR: ST. PAUL HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSTON ay Name and Title of Signer Date:,_._. CITY OF SAINT PAUL HO'(JSING AND REDEVELOPVTENT AUTHORITY � By Date: Name and Title of Signer Approved to Form THOMAS R. DIMOND CITIZENS TO SAVE THE ARi�ISTRONG HOUSE By Kathryn M. Babcock Date: Date: 0 D�-ya� , � • .n i;�� Relocatian Sites currently o�vned by City or HRA Site �` 2- Kellogg and Seventh Street (Transit Hub Site) Site # 3- St. Joseph's Lane and West Seventh Street Site # 7- Plastics Pazking Lot (on Chestnut south of Ryan Street) __ Site # 8- Ryan Parking Lot (at Chestnut and Exchange) �� 4`-4a� APPENDIX B " MOVING AiVD STA.B�LIZATION ACTIVITIES TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY (Detailed Ntove and Stabiliae Data can be foernd in Yolume 1, r1t[achment I ofthe Section 106Reporl.) A. MOVE BY HISTORIC NIOVING CONTRACTOR This step includes the activities involved in physically lifting the Armstrong House off its existing foundation, movin� it alon� city strzets and placing it on a new foundation within a new site. (A separate contractoc �vill be responsible for the new foundation, as noted in Section B beloFV). The contractor hired to complete the moving activities must meet special requirements for moving historic structures. Prior to the move, preliminary bracin„ shoring and brick stabilization wil! be completed. Phofo documentation of interior and exterior tvill be completed to ailo�v monitoring of buildin� condition. Durin� the move, the historic moving contractor will take steps to protect overhead and underground utilities, as well as protecting or replacing affected landscapin„ curbs, ete. The historic movin� contractor �vill also provide liability insurance and performance bonds to ensure successfi�l completion of the move. Included in this Appendix is a memorandum dated May 4, 2000, from Constnictive Ideas that provides a detailed listing of items that �vill be the responsibility of the Historic Buildin� Mover and the City at the existing building location, �vhile the buildin� is in transit, and at the new building location. B. NEtiV CONSTRTJCTION ITEMS This step includes the activities of a general contractor to clear out the existing site oftheAmistrong fiouse 28er is has been moved, and to prepare the ne�v site for placement of the Armstron� House. i�'ew site �vork will involve constructing a foundation and basement for the House, including a structural support system. If necessary, a new entry porch tivill be built on the front of the House at its ne�v location. Depending on the site chosen for the Armstrong House, other activities will be required to provide a level surface for moving the House on to the new foundation. If necessary, steps will be taken at the new site to protect adj acent sidewalks, frees orstructures. Securin� fencing will be provided at both the old site and the ne�v site. Included in this Appendix is a memorandum dated May 4, 2000, from Constructive Ideas fhat provides a detailed listing of items thac �vili be the responsibility of a General Confractor and the City at the existing building location, �vhile the building is in transit, and at the ne�v building location. E� Oi —ya� C. MINIMUM ELEMENTS TO 12ETAIN NATIONAL REGISTEIt LISTING __ Based upon discussions with the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), this step involves the absolute minimum improvements required to protect the "shell" of the Armsfsong House from further deterioration. Correspondenoe from SHPO dated Much 17, 2000, identified the items in a detailed listing of conshuction activities that would not be needed for continued eligibility of the House. That correspondence is included in the Section 106 Report (Volume 1, Attactunent n. The key elements that are necessary for continued eli�ibility are listed as follows: ♦ Excavation and grading of new site ♦ Sheet pilin� as necessary to protect street, sidewalk, adjacent structures ♦ Wall footin�s, piers for porch footings on new site ♦ Foundation walls, sandstone veneer ♦ Tuckpointing, cleaning and brick reQair ♦ Basement beams ♦ Repair or replace front entry porches ♦ Remove and replace roofin� surface ♦ Ne�v gutters and do�vnspouts ♦ New entrances ♦ ltemove and replace windotivs, or repair existin� �vindows ♦ Perimeter caulking D. STABILIZATION AND ASSET PROTECTION This step involves activities by a general contractor to provide minimum improvements needed to allo�v safe access to the Iiouse for inspection. Minimum electrical service will be provided for basic lighting. Ne�v stairs to the basement will be constructed. Loose or waterlo�ged material will be removed from the house. e Minimum electrical service ♦ Rear exit stairs; basement stairs ♦ General interior clean-up (removal of loose or waterlogged materials) ♦ Environmental clean-up (asbestos and lead-based paint, if necessary) NOTE: Activities in Parts A-D of Appenclix B will be part of the "1Liove and Stabilizatiort Plans"referenced in the MOA. APPENDIX C Documentation required once the Aims�ong House is moved 1) A letter notifying the IvN-SHPO tfie date the property w�s moved 2) Two sets of 8 x 10 black and white photographs aad one set of slides of the house on its new site. Two or more different views (perspectives) of the froat aad rear of the house aze required. The Iab processing the fiIm should be able to pass a hypo (fixer) residue test for fiL�. process:ng. (In other words use a reputable veador for Pio ��g),'I�e phpto�raphs should be printed on photograpFriq silver emulsion resin-coated paper (not photograohic color dye paper used by vendors advertising cheap developin� costs). T1ie photographs shouid have a one-half inch border. They should be labeled on tfie back usin� a soft pencil with the following information: n�me of property, county and state, name of photo�apher, date of photo�apb, location of original negative*, view (camera facing), photo�aph number or number depicting vaatage point on the sketch map. . The slides should be a plastic mount with name of ptoperty, county and state�and date. *The SHPO will accept the negatives (along with the photographs) provided that the film•is 24 exposure aad T Max 100 or Plus X Paa film. 3) A sketch map (done ia black and white) which depicts the house on its new site 4) An original Uaited State Geological Survey Map (U.S.G.S.) whicli depicts the Iocacion o£the house on its new site (Depict locxtioa usin; a dot made with a lead pencil. Do not include any other rvritten informatioa on the map). 5) Acreage of the parcel on which the house is located. � Legat Description of the pazcel � Parcel's PIN number 8) Name and address ofproperty owner{s) � e►-H a� 10 �X l�, � r�"� �nto�u.� �s/Dl �L� Ol��'L� � March 26, 2001 Rehabilitation of the Armstrona House ("House") Memorandum Of Intent Redeveloaer. Site and Reuse of the Relocated House Redeveloper of the House will be the Historic Irvine Park Association ("HIPA"). The site to which the House will be relocated is the former Plastics parking lot at Chestnut and South of Ryan (the"Site"). The Redeveloper at its sofe discretion may seek additional partner(s) after a RFQ process is compieted by the Redeveloper. At this time, the Redeveloper pians to form a Limited Liability Corporation ("LLC") to undertake the remaining rehabilitation after the City or HRA completes move and stabilization activities described in the Memorandum of Agreement ("MOA") attached in F�chibit A. Rehabiiitation of the House would be residential reuse. The density on the site will be effectively controlled by the Redeveloper through the processing of one of three rezonings (RT-1, RT-2, RM-1) attached in Exhibit B. Phase 1: Pubiic Hearing on House and Smith Avenue Transit Hub before City Council (April 4, 2001� Citv and HRA 1. Staff recommends at Public Hearing on House and Smith Avenue Transit Hub that (1) the House be moved and stabilized at Plastics site, (2) recommend HIPA as Redeveloper and support execution of Memo of (ntent with Redeveloper and (3) Smith Avenue Transit Hub project be approved. 2. City Councit considers the Resolution to execute MOA; name Site and Redeveloper; convey property to HRA for disposition; accept HRA Budget of $2.375 M to undertake MOA obligations; accept 3 separate zoning petitions for the Site and related actions concerning the Smith Avenue Transit Hub. 3. HRA agrees to execute MOA, approves Redeveloper, agrees to accept site from the City and reconvey at Closing to Redeveloper; fund $2.375 M for the move and stabilizing and hold a pubiic hearing on land sale of the Site and the House to Redeveloper for a dollar pius a portion of the cost of delivering the sewer to the site to Redeveloper. Redevelouer 1. At Pubiic Hearing on April 4, 2001, on House and Smith Avenue Transit Hub (A) support business points outlined in this Memo of Intent (B) provide adopted neighborhood resolution approved March 20, 2001(C) provide sufficient signatures from immediate neighbors for three separate (RT-2, RT-1, RM-1) zoning petitions to the City as Applicant, that wouid be processed simultaneously. The Redeveloper will notify in writing the City as Petitioner 10 K:lshared\PEDlgeurs�armstronghs.02.14.01.wpd March 26, 2001 et - k�s days before by the third reading on the rezoning (Public Hearing meeting on rezoning), which one of the three rezoning it wishes the City Council to adopt; whereupon the City wili withdraw the two remaining petitions. If the City is not notified the default rezoning is RT -1. The final adopted rezoning will determine the densiry, and only the only structure on the Site will be the House unless Redeveloper recommends and finances additional structures. Phase 2: MOA (April to May 15, 2001) Citv and HRA 1. City, SHPO, ACHP, FNWA execute MOA. Also Concurring Parties HRA, HPC, Tom Dimond, and Save the Armstrong will be invited to sign. 2. Completes transfers of state land and House on Cleveland Circle to City from State. 3. Vacation process for transfer of title of land and House to HRA. (Separate vacation process is underway already for Hill Street adjacent to the Site on the south.) 4. Draft covenant about future rehab to the historic structure described in attached MOA. 5. Rezoning and Variance process for the Site. Variance for height will be necessary and a back yard variance may aiso be necessary. [Estimated completion of Rezoning and Variance by end of July] 6. HRA agrees to execute MOA, approves Redeveloper, agrees to accept site from the City and reconvey at Ciosing to Redeveloper; fund $2.375 M for the move and stabilizing and hold a public hearing on land sale of the Site and the House to Redeveloper for a dollar plus a portion of the cost of delivering the sewer to the site to Redeveloper. Redeveloper 1. Select partner(s), if any, through RFQ, arrange financing etc. Phase 3: Between Execution of MOA and Closing on Conveyance of House and Sife to Redeveloper (Mid May to Fall 2001 - 4 to 6 months) Citv and HRA 1. Retain CPMI as Project Manager for MOA move and stabilization under MOA. SRF through Ann Hopkins wiil also be involved. 106 Group will be used for archeology on the Site in advance of move. The City's Architect wili be the Collaborative Design Group for which Dick Faricy works. K:lshared�PED\geurs�armstronghs.02.14.01.wpd March 26, 2001 01-�t� 2. Retain historic mover approved by SHPO. Retain Contractor to build basement, etc. 3. City funds archeology, move and stabilization, and security activities. Budget is $2.375 M 4. City will explore ways to make Historic Tax Credit available to Redeveloper. 5. Move and Stabilization Plans (siting of House, etc.) will require HPC and SHPO review, as well as City Site Plan review process and variances. 6. City keeps House secure until Closing. 7. City prepares documentation for continued Nationai Register listing of House. Redeveloper 1. Two (2) designated representatives of Redeveloper will attend meetings with CPMI, etc. Involved with the exact siting of the House on the site. (Comment only on move and stabilization activities). Phase 4: Closing between City, HRA and Redeveloper on Conveyance of House and Land (after stabilization at Site) (Estimated Closing November 15, 2001 or sooner) House rehabilitated with Certificate of Occupancy complete and marketing within two years of Closing, estimated to by November 15, 2003) Citv and HRA 1. City conveys title of House and land and HRA conveys title of House and land by Quit Claim Deed to Redeveloper and establishes Escrow Funds if any funds remain from $2.375 M; Covenant recorded. Redeveloaer At closing on land and House for $1 plus the cost of delivering sewer to the site, after completion of move and stabilization, Redeveloper accepts the House AS IS, covenant is recorded, reverter language in deed, and if and only if there remains a balance on the City's $2.375 M, City establishes escrow fund for the Redeveloper on a reimbursement basis for the remaining rehabilitation of the House with appropriate documentation and approval by City's Project Manager, CPMI. Escrow funds, if any, would be available for utility connections for water and electrical, etc. 2. Undertake and complete rehabilitation, after review of Rehabilitation Plans by HPC and SHPO ,[i.e., get Certificate of Occupancy ] and market property within 2 years of Closing. K:\sharedWED\geurs�armstronghs.02.14.Ot.wpd March 26, 2001 01-w�`� Attachments to Memo of Intent dated March 26,2001 Exhibit A- Memorandum of Agreement ("MOA") on J.M. Armstrong House and Smith Avenue Transit Hub between FHWA, ACHP, City, SHPO et al. 6chibit B- Draft Rezoning Petition and Conditions for former Plastics Parking Lot site K:�shared�PED�geurs\armsVOnghs.02.14.01.wpd March 26, 2001 o, _�� Attachments fo Memo of Intent dated March 26,2001 Exhibit A- Memorandum of Agreement ("MOA") on J.M. Armstrong House and Smith Avenue Transit Hub between FHWA, ACHP, City, SHPO et al. Exfiibit B- Draft Rezoning Petition and Conditions for former Plastics Parking Lot site � t,�«n zs, zoo� K�shuediPEO\geurs��strcnghs.U2.t4A1 wpd � xl"� � �Me,�.a � ��'� N�a�.�.� u� 2.�1 � o� -�t �'� DRAFT - DECEil1BER 13, 2000 bSE11IORANDU�S OF AGREF,i�IiVT AitiIONG THE FEDERAL HIGHNAY AD�IIi�IISTR4TYON, THE ADYISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION, THE N1IN�IESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATIOI� OFFICE, AND THE CITY OF SAI\T PAUL, FOR THE RELOCATION OF THE JOHN Ai. Al2NISTRONG HOUSE ?.I�D CONSTRUCTION OF THE SI�IITH A�'ENUE TRANSIT HUB SAINT PAUL, MINnESOTA � WHEREAS, the Federal Hi�hway Administration (FH«'A) proposes to fund a portion of a transit hub project within the City of St. Paul, Ramsey County, �finnesota; and 1VHEREAS, the FHtiVA has detemiined that this project, the Smith Aaenue Transit Hub project, will have an adverse effect on the John M. Armstrong House (House), a double-house ]isted on the National Register of Historic Places (Nationat Register); VJHEREAS, the FH�VA has consuited with the Ad��isory Cotmcil on Historic Preservation (Council), theMinnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), and the City of St. Paul (City) as an Invited Signatory, pursuant to the regulations (36 CFR Part 800) implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preserv�tion Act (16 U.S.C. 470�; and �VHEREAS, the St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and the St. Paul Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) have participated in the consultation and have been invited to concur.in this Memorandum of Agreement (D40A); and tiVHEREAS, the HPC serves as an advisory body to the mayor and city council on municipal herita�e preservatian matters as outlined in Chapter 73 of St. Paul's legislati��e code (Chapter 73); and �YHEREAS, several Interested Parties haveparticipated in the consuttation throughpublic meetings, work sessions and revietiv of documentation, includin� Tom Dimond, �athryn Babcock - representing Citizens to Save the Armstrong House, the Fort Road Federation, Historic Irvine �ark Association, and several other interested parties listed in the Section 106 Report dated June 2000. Tom Dimond and Kathryn Babcock have been invited to concur in this MOA; and, �VHEREAS, under Minnesota Sessions Laws 2000, Chapter 492, Art. l, Sec S6, in order for the City to acquire property from the State that is needed to proceed with the T'ransit Hub project on the Cleveland Circle site, the City of Saint Paul, at its expense, is required to relocate theHouse to an : altemative site to preserve it; and � 0�-wa� WHEREAS, the City has completed historical reseazch summarized in a report entitled "5mitn Avenue Transit Hub: Literature Search for Archaeolo�ical Potential and Fiistoric B uilding Tntensity Survey" (July 1999) and an Addendum (July 2000); and WF�REAS, the Area of Potential Effects for the undertakin� is defined as the Smith Avenue Transit Hub Site (bounded by Keilo�g Boulevard,lVest Seventh Street, Fifth/Sixth Streef and I-35E), the buildings immediately adjacent to the Transit Hub Site, and any propedy on or buildings immediately adjacent to the Relocation Sites identified in this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, the FHWA, the Council, the SHPO and the CITY (the "Signatories") a� ee that the undertakin� shall be implemented in accordance with the following stipulations in order to take into account the effect of the undertakin� on the John M. Amistron� House. STIPULATTO\S The F�VHA will ensure that the follo�vin� measures are carried out. I. RELOCATION AND STABILIZATTON OF TFTE HOUSE A. City Oblioation to Relocate the House to a_n_Altemative Site. The City sliall cause the House to be relocated and stabilized ��ithin one }'ear of the execution of the MOA to one of the acceptable sites listed in Appendix A. The relocation of thzHouse �vill be completed according to the guidelines set forth in the National Pazk Service publication"MovingHistoricBuildings"byJohnObedCurtis. Thebuiidingmover wi Ii be selected by tlle City witti review and concunence by SHPO. The City agrees to undertake relocation of the House and stabilization needed to maintain Nationzl Re�ister listing. Movin� and stabilization activities to be completed by the City, or its designee (i.e., historic mover; redeveloper}, are listed in Appendix B. �E. CityConvevance to Redeveloaer. The City shall enter into a redevelopment contract �vith a redeveloper, which �vi11 determine the Relocation Site from Appendi� A. The House tivill be sold AS IS to a rede�•eloper for reuse as either residential or commercial, at the sole discretion of the City. At the time the City conveys the land and the House to the redeveloper, the City shall attach a 30-year covenant to the deed requiring that exterior modifications to the House be in compiiance with the Secretary of Interior's Standards at the time of the modifications. If the redeveloper fails to per£orm the stabilization activities listed in Appendix B as required.by the contraot, ownership of the House will re��ert to the City. C. Rehabilitation Plan Review and Concurrence. The City orits redeveloper�ti•ill submit Rehabilitation Plans to HPC and SHPO during the City's SitePlan Revie«' Process, including the Movin�/Buildin� Permit process, for review and concurrence as to consistency with the Secretary of Intzrior's Standards, within the context of __ character-defining features of the buildin�. The proposed Rehabilitation Pians will O� •4 y� includebuildin� sitin�, rehabilitation, landscaping, site impror•ements, and adjacent _ new construction that is part of the site plan. If the Move and StabilizaYion Plans (as further discussed in Appendix B) are submitted for review prior to completion of Rehabilitation Plans for the remainder of the buildin� (includin� the interior), the . remaining plans wiil be revietived separately. Flexibility wiil be allo��•ed in the review of the interior of the House. HPC �r•ill provide an opportunity forpublic input during the Rehabilitation Plan Review Process(es) and SHPO �vill consider public comments as part of their review(s). D. HPC Jurisdiction. If the proposed relocation site is located �vithin an area that has been designated by the City under Chapter 73, the HPC will have responsibility as determined by city ordinance for long term monitorin� to ensure that subsequent treatment and impro�•ements to the exterior of the House are in compliance with the Secretary of Inteaor's standards. If the proposed rzlocation site is not in an area that has been designated by the City under Chapter 73, the City will take every rzasonable step to ensure that the House is redesi�nated as a St. Paul Heritage Presen�ation Site, subject to a public revietiv process outlinzd in Chapter 73. E. Retainine National Reaister Listin�durin� the Ivlove. In accordance n�ith 36 CFR Section 60.14(b)(5), the House will remain on the National Register ��fiile bein� moved and after the move is complete. �41'ithin nine months after theHouszhasbeen moved to its new site and stabilized accordin� to the activities ]isted in Appendix B, the City shall prepare documentation required by 36 CFR Section 60.14. r�ppendix C ideutiFies themateriats to be furnished. SHPO sh�!I fo:�vard ta.isdocu::�entationto the Keeper of the Register as notification of the mo��e in accordance ��•ith 36 CFR Section 60.14(b){5). F. Temoorary Storaoe of House durinQ Mo�•e. If necessary, the City «�ill move the House to a temporary location to al low timz for neti�� site preparation and to facilitate the transit hub constn�ction schedule. Appropriate measures «•ill be taken to protect and secure the buildin� durin� this interim period. G. Protection of the Resource. After the City receives title of the propem� from the State, appropriate measures �ti•ill be takzn by the City to protect and secure the building prior to, during and after it is mo�•ed. II. ARCHAEOLOGY Onbehalf of FHWA, the City sha11 ensure that an archaeological survey is conducted on the Transit Hub site and on the selected Relocation Site for the House. The sun•ey shall be conducted by the City in a manner consistent with the Secretary of Inteaor's Standards and Guidelines forldentification (48 CFR44720-23) and takin�into accountrelevantguidelines of the 5HP0. The survey shall be conducted in consultation with the SHPO, and a report of the survey meetin� the standards of the Secretap� of the Interior shall be submitted to FHWA for review and approval. o� -�� F�VA shall evaluate properties identified throu�h the survey in accordance with 36 CFR Part 800.4. If the survey results in the identification of properties that aze eligible for the National Register, FH�VA shatl comply with 36 CFR Parts 800.5 and 500.6. III. COSTS OF THE MOA The Si�natories and Concurring Pazties shali be responsible for theirosvn administration and staff costs associated �vith either document revietic or field work related to this A�reement. �� Further, the City shall pay costs associated �vith the following: (1) documenfation, relocation and stabilization costs described in Stipulation I; (2) Archaeology survey and mitigation costs in Stipulation IT; (3) Any other City costs required to complete I�30A stipulations. ' IV. 1�IODIFICATIONS, DISPUTES, TERi1�1INATION, ETC. `�' A. Modification or amendment of this agreement, as necessary, shall be accomplished by the Signatories in the same manner as the original agreemeot. B. Should the Si�natories ob,}ect tivithin 30 days to the materiats grovided for revie�r pursuant to Sections I.A, I.C, I.E and II of this agreement, the FHWA shall consult �vith the ob}ectin� party to resolve the objection. If the FHWA determines that the objection cannot be resolved, the FH�VA shall request the further comments of the Council. Any Council comment provided in response to such a request ��ill be taken into account by the FHWA �vith reference only to the subject of the dispute; the FHWA's responsibility to carry eut zll ections i�nd:r this agreement thet are not the subjects of the dispute remain unchanged. C. Ifprovisions of this agreement are not camed out within three (3) years from the date of its execution, the Si�natories shall consult to seek amendment of the agreement. If - the a�reement is not amended, any Signatory may teaninate it pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(c)(8). 6 F� e�-4�a Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement and implementation of its terms evidence that FHWA has taken into account the effects of its undertaking on historic properties. A photocopy of fhis document will be deemed to be an original by the Signatories. ' FEDERAL HIGH�YAY ADMIMSTRATION By Alan R. Steger, Division Administrator Date: � ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION By 3ohn M. Fo��ler, Executive Director nIINh�ESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE By Nina M. Archabal, State Historic Preservation Officer INVITED SIGNATORY: CITY OF SA.II�IT PAUL By Mayor Norm Coleman Date: Date:,_� Date:�— Approved to Form: Peter McCall, Assistant City Attomey 0►-4 � Co�'CUR:' ST. PAUL HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION By Name and Title of Signer Date: CITY OF SATNT PAUL HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY �" By Name and Title of Si�ner Approved to Form THO;�iAS R. DIMOND � CITIZENS TO SAVE TFIE ARI4ISTRONG HOUSE By Kathryn M. Babcock Date: Date: Date: e � p�� -Ha APPENDIX A Relocation Sites currently o�vned by City or HRA Site � 2- Kellogg and Seventh Street (Transit Hub Site) Site # 3- St. 7oseph's Lane and West Seventh Street Site # 7- Plastics Parking Lot (on Chestnut south of Ryan Sireet) ._ Site # 8- Ryan Parking Lot (at Chestnut and Exchange) � 0� -'i'y� .. �� ; ! MOVING AND STA.BTLIZATION ACTIVITIES TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY (Detailed eLfove anrl Stabili=e Data can befotrnd in Yolume I, flttachment I ojthe Section 106Report.) A. MOYE BX HISTORIC lYiOVING CONTRACTOR This step includes the activities involved in physically lifting the Armstrong House offits existing foundation, movinJ it alon� city streets and placin� it on a new foundation within a ne�v site. (A separate contractot �vill be responsible for the ne�v foundation, as noted in Section B below). The contractor hired to complete the moving activities must meet special requirements for moving historic struchires. Prior to the move, preliminary bracin„ shorin� and brick stabilization will be completed. Photo documentation of interior and exterior �vill be completed to allow monitoring of buildin� condition. Durin� the move, the historic moving contractor will tal:e steps to protect overhead and underground utilities, as �vell as protecting or replacin� affected landscapin„ curbs, etc. The historic movin� contractor will also provide liaSility insurance and performance bonds to ensure successful completion of the move. Included in this Appendix is a memorandum dated May 4, 2000, from Constn�ctive Tdeas that provides a detailed listing of items that �viil be the responsibility of the Historic Buildin� Mover and the City at the existing buiidin� location, while the buildin� is in transit, and at the new building location. B. NE�V CONSTRUCTION ITEMS This step includes the activities ofa general contracfor to clear out the existing site of theAmistrong Aouse 2fter is has been moved, and to grepare the ne�v site for placement of the Armstron� House. I�'ew site �vork �vill involve constructing a foundation and basement for the House, inciuding a structural support system. If necessary, a new entry porch �vill be built on the front of the House at its ne�v location. Depending on the site chosen for the Armstrong House, other activities will be required to provide a level surface for moving the House on to the new foundation. If necessary, steps will be taken at the new site to protect adjacent side�valks, frees or structures. Securin� fencing wiil be provided at both the old site and the ne�v site. Included in this Appendix is a memorandum dated May 4, 2000, from Constructive Ideas that provides a detailed ]isting of items that �vill be the responsibility of a Generai Contractor and the City at the existing building locafion, while the building is in transit, and at the ne�v building location. F� a i .y�-� C. MI\"Ii�1UlI ELEbIEITS TO RETAi� i P:ATIO\AL REGISTER LIST'IivG Based upon discussions with the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (5HP0), this step involves the absolute minimum improvements required to protect the "shell" of the Armstrong House from further deterioration. Correspondenoe &om SHPO dated March 17, 2000, identified the items in a detailed listing of construction activities that �vould not be needed for continued eligibility of the House. That correspondence is included in the Section 106 Report (Volume 1, Attachment �. The key elements that are necessary for continued eli�ibility are listed as follows: ♦ Excavation and grading of new site ♦ Sheet piling as necessary to protect street, sidewalk, adjacent structures ♦��Vatl footings, piers for porch footin�s on ne�v site ♦ Poundation walls, sandstone veneer ♦ Tuckpointing, cleanin� and brick repair ♦ Basement beams ♦ Repair or rzplace front entry porches ♦ Remove and replace roofin� surface ♦ Netiv gutters and downspouts ♦ New entrances ♦ Remove and replace windo�vs, or repair existing �vindows ♦ Perimeter caulkin� D. STABILIZATION AND ASSET PROTECTION This step involves activities by a general contractor to provide minimum improvements needed to allow safe access to the House for inspection. Minimum electrical service will be provided for basic lighting. Ne�v stairs to the basement tvill be consfructed. Loose ot �vaterlogged material �vill be removed from the house. 4 Minimum electrical service ♦ Rear exit stairs; basement stairs ♦ General interior clean-up (removal of loose or waterlogged materials) ♦ Environmental clean-up (asbestos and lead-based paint, if necessary) NOT'E: Activities irz Parts A D of.4ppendix B will be part of the "rLlove and Stabilization Plans" referenced in the MOA. APPENDIX C Documenta�on required once the Armstron� House is moved 1) A letter no�fyiag the MN-SFiPO the date the property wzs moved 2) Two sets of 8 x 10 black and wbite photographs and one set of slides of the house on its new site. Two or more different views (perspecdves) of the front aad zear of the house aze required. The lab processin� the film should be able to pass a hygo (fixer) residue test for fiL*u processin�. (In other words use a reputable vendor for processing). Tne photographs should be printed on photographic, silver emuLsion resin-coated paper (not photograpflic color dye paper used by vendors advertising chrzp developing costs). The photographs should have a one-half inch border. They should be labeIed on the back usin� a soft pencil wi2h the followin� information: name of property, county and state, name of photo�apher, date of photo�ph, location of original negative*, view (camera facing), photograph number or number depicting vantage point on the sketch map. • The slides should be a plastic mount with name o£property, county and st2te•and date. *The SHPO will accept the negatives (along with the photogaphs) provided th2t tfie film•is 24 exposure and T Max 100 or Plus-X Paa fi1m. 3) A sketch map (done in black and white) which depicts the house on its new site 4) An original United State Geological Survey Ivfzp (U.S.G.S.) wIuch depicts tha locatioa of the house on its new site (Depict location usin; a dot made with a lead pencil. Do not incIude any other rvritten information on the map). 5) Acreage of the pazcel on which the house is located. � Legal Description of the pazcel � � � parcel's PTN number $) Name and 2ddzess of property owner(s) ti�-4a� E[�i �X k�b� f� t3 '— 1M � a� �h�. c�w�� V�la� Z6� aoo� Addendum to Rezoning Petitior_s fox 235 Chestnut St. and 0 Hill St. Parfies agreeing to addendum. This addendum to the rezoning petitions for 235 Chestnut Street and 0 Hill Street has been reviewed and agreed to by the following parties: Saint Paul PED, Historic Irvine Park Association (HIPA), Kevin McGrath and Molly Femhoi� Patrick and Rita Hawkinson Wamer, Dirk and Ruth Dantuma, Peter Hilleren, Louis Fillmon and Karen Jason. Oi-y�� 2. Purpose. The parties want to accelerate rezoning of 235 Chestnut Street to permit the moving of the historic Armstrong House from its present location north of the Xcel Arena to the site. The site's present zoning is P-1, which aliows only surface parking. Before the City can issue moving and foundation permits, the site needs to be zoned to pemut housing. The parties agree that the property on Chestnat Street should be rezoned to ailow the Armsfrong House to be moved and that the new zoning should be the most restrictive residential zone in which the house can feasibly be restored and sold. The City wants to move the house as soon as possibie to open up the site north of the arena for redevelopment. 3. Simultaneous zoning steps and redevelopment anatysis. IiIPA is negotiating to take ownership of the Armstrong House and to partner with a developer to restore and market it. At the time of the filing of the rezoning petitions, HIPA has not had time to select a partner, complete a project feasibility analysis, or detemune how many residentia( units will be at the site. While HIPA is working with developers, public agencies, and contractors to devise a feasible restoration plan for the property, the City and the property u owners within 100 feet of the Chestnut Street site are initiating three separate residential rezoning petitions for RT-1 (duplex), RT'-2 (3-4 units), and RM-1 (mu]ti-family) so that any one of them can be chosen later. The petitions will initiate the rezoning process at the Planning Commission; the parties expect that all three alternatives may still be under consideration when the Planning Comrrussion holds its hearing and makes its recommendation. At least ten days before the rezoning petitions come before the City Council for third reading and public hearing, HIPA will have deternuned and submitted to the City in writing which of the three altemative rezonings fits its restoration plan. The other two petitions will be withdrawn by the parties. If FiIPA has not made a written recommendation, the parties will recommend that the Council approve the RT-1 rezoning altemative. As soon as practical � 01-4ti� after the Councii approves a new zoning district, PED will request building permits for = excavation, a new foundation, and the house move. In addition to the rezoning, other City aggrovals will be required before building pemuts aze issued, including height and setback variances, site plan review, and historic review. 4. Nullificafion of the consents given on the rezoning petitions. Most of the petition signers specifically support the moving and restorarion of the Armstrong House, but would not support whatever residential development may be pemutted in the zoning disfsict without the house. If the Armstrong House is not moved to Chestnut Street or suffers severe damage during the move and cannot be restored, the parties want to retum the zoning, at least for the time being, to P-1. 5. Attachment to rezoning petitions for RT-1, RT-2, and RM-i. This addendum is hereby attached to each of the three rezoning petitions as an explanation for why multiple petitions are being submitted and as a safeguard for the affected neighbors. 6. Signatures of the Parties. I agree with the provisions of this addendum. (Please sign a�rd date.) Brian Sweeney, PED Patrick Wamer Peter Hilleren Kevin McGrath Molly Fernhoiz Molly Howe Lynn Rita Hawkinson Warner Dirk Dantuma Ruth Dantuma K:�Shared�PedSODERHOUZ02�'L�'GWrmstrongHouseZAddrnd�nn2.wpd 2 Louis Fillmon Karen Jason � m CX`�� O� S.A.XN�` �'.A.�7� � CONSENT•OF AD70INING PROPERTY OZyNERS FOR A . .x�zoN.rNc o�-yy3 We, ilte undersigned, otivncrs of the proper�y �vitfiin (00 feet of thc to(a{ contiguous description of taa] estate o�vned, purchased, or sold by THE PET[Tf0\TER tvithin one year prtcedin� th� date of this petition �cknowledge that �ve have been presented �ei[h the follou�'sno; 1. A cop}' oi'the petition o f _ (name of to rezone thc nrogerty loclted at 23S C� d S� 6a; ! l S from a P � zoning distcict to �� district. 2. A copy ofsections �D•��2 tlirouoli ��.�3 inclusive ofthe Saint Paul Zoning Code; and ncknou9cd;e tliat �ve are awnro oFnll of tlie uses permitted in a � zoning district 2nd we are a�vare tl�a[ any of these uses cnn be establisl�ed upon Ciry Counc�l approva{ of Ihe rczoning. \Y horeb�� consent to the rcZOnin� of tlie property in thc petition oC; ��—�� D� �^�N , T �CCi1� f_G ��l / to n� �oning 2istrict. ��°'��'V7�� (?�Iame of petitioner) \Ye conscnt to il�e �pProval of this rczoning as it tivas ezpl�ined fo us by fhe applic�nf or his/I�er represenfativc. o�z8 z� s� o00 � G', o� s�� (�r�k.L 06 z82ZJZ oolO C�'E- of 5��' PRK-L �z$ZZZ3 013$ pqvi�{ �',osef{��, U�eZ.g.ZZ3Z pOC7� KcV�n MCGra.^�-h rrjo/!y Fer hoLz ^�p PAt�;cK tJRr�er Q�p <O zZ `3��Q�3 hZ�'f'A /�RWKi�San 4�aMCf O�z�jZ23z0�bS `�"�K l�. Antu.ma o._�.�_ r,,,_ 1 - v6z�z�3.2or�o9 oGzs2z32.00�} t�irk DAn'fuw�A f�'{e�' �-�� er'e 0(�-Z$ z Z3Zo nlotly l�we L y„�Tus� 06z8 zz3zoat3 `°� �;i�Ma� tfRren 3asen (1�n 0610� �50o Ltne. �i �raac� G�� c.i -J a-"r sT E'�;1,.C, su �nce C,�-v a-F �T PAw L_ hOT,�: This petition shail not be considered as o�cially filed until tne lapse of seven (7) u�orking , daysafteritisreceicedbythePlanningDivision. Anysignatorofthispetitionniay�rithdratiti�his/het name thereCcom by �tiTitten request within that time. ;,' :j � ZONING DYSTRICTS ��-`+y� City of Saint Paul SUD'IMARY OF USES ALLO`VED I�' SAI�'T PAUL ZO\ING DISTRICTS RESIDEtiTIAL CO3I�IERCIAL R-LL, R-1, R-3, R-3, R-4 One-Famil}• One-family dtiG•ellings Schools, libraries, parks, churches Convznts, rectories Family day care (10) and group famity day care (14) Group day care in a non-residzntial structure Home occupations Bed and breakfasts w/one guest room Community residential facilities (56 residents) Cartia�e house drvellin�s (historically existin�)* Cemeteries* Clustzr developments* Colleges, univzrsities* Com•crsions of non-residential structures and residzntiai structures over 9,040 sq. ft* Golfcourses, private rzcreation facilities* RT-1 Tti�'o-Famih• All R-4 uszs T«'o-family homes Group day carz �ratzmity and sororiry houses* Bed and breakfasts ��•/up to 4 guest rooms* RT-3 To��nhouse All RT-1 uses Three- and four-family d��•ellings To�cnhouses «•ith up to 6 units Communiry residential facilities (7-16)* I2D1-1 Dlultiple Family All RT-2 uses � . Apartment buildings (s3 stories) Rootning and boardin� houses* 12,1I-2 DIultiple Famil}• All Rivt-1 uses Apartmznt buitdings (<5 stories) Elderl}• housing support services Hospitals, nursin� homes* iL�t-3 �'Iultiple r'atuily Hi�h dznsity, high rise apartments Churches, day care (all types) Eldzrly housing suppoR services Comm�mity residential facilities'� Hospitals" Acczssory retail service and office uses* OS-1 Local Office-Ser�'ice Business oftices such as banks, insurance, real estate Professiona( offices such as medical clinics,la�v ofTices Artist and photographer studios � Sen•ice businesses such as photocopying, �vatch and shoe rzpair, tailor shops, barber and beauty shops Day care (all types) Schools, colleges, libraries, parks, churches Mixed commercial/residzntial uses hiultiple-family d�vellin�s Community residential facilities (16) Publically o�vned buildings, public utility buildin�s* OS-2 General Office-Serti•ice All OS-1 uses Post oftices and similar eo�•emmental offices Retail businesses such as grocery, etc. (s 10,000 sq. ft.) Restaurants and bars, e�cept dri�•e-in or fast-food Hotets and hospitals Laundries and dry cleaning (retail outlet) nfanufacturin� of small precision goods Carria�e house d�vellin?s Retail businesses (>I0,000 sq. ft.)* B-1 Locai Business �fost OS-i uses Retail businesses such as grocery, bakery, dnigs, books. ciothin„ hard�care, florist, carry-out restaurants Laundries and dry cleanin� (retail outlet) Post ofT3czs and similar govemmental offices Vfixed commercial/residentiai uses �fultiple-family d�vellings* B-2 Communitp Business All B-1 uses Sercice businesses «'ith a shonTOOm or workshop such as contractor, baker, paintzr, appliance repair Restaurants and bars, excep[ drive-in or fast food Food caterin� Coffez kiosks Pricatz halis and clubs, health clubs "l�htaters, Uiit�o halis, asscmbly hal'ss Currency exchange businesses Vetzrinary clinics, tatoo parlors Auto sen�ice stations, con��enience and specialty stores" Pool hells, bon•ling aileys, game rooms and other t}y�� of indoor commercial recreation* Pa��r shops* �,7 ✓ � �1 �'� q � 6 `(5) l ` ,4i«' �5 c�4) , - �l d < ��J 6 0 f� c o b � i ; o .! � \ rb� 4 � ..d..�\ �� ' ,; . `Lv' 'r` . ,49 , A �-^ V ,{� ,�5. � 5 -, � . � � �'j � � �-, o � y� � 6 � � ' �� `- \ ; `. �. 7 ' �`� � ��. ��{ � � • '1�• .y�/ \ (� bs), i - t � /�� _.9 � �,�o� �� ♦ �l 5 0 °' 1 S''Y i.:, ��°' ! �I. � o �.. ` / ; _ � .'. . �� '� 6� ` 6a y t � r� �� I 's. , ,i�3 ;. � `� o ;c � . 3 , . '.� � 12 } �. ;. o t_ . �. o-?�:�.� ` �� - OWN. HIY ' � • : V �1 `' 3£P'� ? ` k''� `�` �`� p Z % � ,�.� Q/ �*' ' P,9t1,cMA )-,.: ; �..` 1 � 6 2 . Q ,°i � cc;�co i .: . ;; ..: � ; . / '� � i ?' Ec„) w ( , / �� / �, � o �, 1'c a . ':. � ` _ � \ \ � � I � / i L p O � va' � r �f \ / V 5 � �s o ♦ ' •. i � ° q \\ i Q' `� � �� ' ''O f � . \ /� '��'�o� 9 � , � �<3��'�,�� 1p '+, ��,• �, ••':, _ :�Y�".� , ;s � 6 m ••�'. ° - I ��'�. ` o . .. .!rp;":•, � , � � ' ' 9 . �, y�,g e 1: �: ` � _ _ _` ��/ __s�_ � _ . �� r:`I. - - ' -- . _. "'�..�_ .. -� "--�. � "Z� �L 1� . p . � . .'`'�,_ %.. .. � v_ � "C3�`� o"'�k�� J �S �u�''� : � � �,a . o .. 3 , � Q _ . . � + C ai� 43 . ' : . t - �5� � 3 � �0 d' � _--_ � �`'� ': . '� .' � - �, , � �� ; o : : 35 ..� . , L .�`��". . +�; .' 9.: ,_ 6 �.�'s, . '� • . j .� o) � t , ` �� ij �:.;_ - -� �. : . : b`�:'. . '"� Oa `. � ,.� .. � - . � � . .s o o . � • . � ` p � "��. . !� . . . - ' � ` ♦ ['� � l'�: . - � o - "" ' o �o' "'�9' 9 oe� ` ` 't i,t-`ir. � 35 . � � � � Ol ' +p ��F, . �/ . a 4• v�� .��. ,��.�_ ;x. %- Qo A C � . . e : � '. �, - •,;..�� : ` '� o'� `\\ . C /�l �i 00 2 9 , G �^' ° � t/ -` 7> � yo,L t J 6 \� . � . . � _=_ � �} .s•L� - ( � v, . O � �� ' R , . . . . r . . : f �,, , o �(9�c� f � '. �a• . \ ),1 • 6 J �.�� .-f- : - .- i . z °oJ' S� ^`s � ,yQ '� . � i �� - _ . ': � 0 V O O ' �� . ' �' � � j �� , - ` • , ...(�j _ �y 0 ' �' •�/:: _ '%:• ::''i -y � bo�� 1 , 3 S 6 .:: :: � �... : j/..,:,, ,: - � � �� = :' ,.... S '' /.��' ' �� _is ° l .,`� `' � :,p �; �� g i � � io) ; ., �,, ..: / � � � � , i . � -:.�.^ .; � - t� � �,�� \ .� `\Ir ' J� �.' /,/ :l . � , v �',l "//, ' �G V _ �°`� .oi � 9 �G� �� bJ�::-' � �'./ .%!' f � �" �/•�/� .� �X �'� �'�-� 3 �� EXhibit 3- City Council Resolufion for Apri125, 2001 Smith Avenue Transit Hub Aevelopment Program Description The Development Program for the Smith Avenue Transit Hub proposes an above-ground combination bus layover facility and parking ramp that includes the following elements: ♦ Up to 1,400 parking stalls, of which approximately 30% aze for caz/van pool; ♦ A bus layover facility for at least 16 buses; ♦ 100 b�lce lockers; ♦ Up to 25,000 squaze feet of future retaiUcommercial along West Seventh street. The facility will be divided by Smith Avenue into a north structure and a south structure connected by bridges at the elevated levels for car and pedestrian traffic. Smith Avenue will likely provide primary entrance/exit to and from the transit hub for buses, commuter/contract parkers and event parkers, retail service access, van access ar. bt�ces, as well as pro��ide for four lanes of vehicular traffic. Sidewallcs, including one covered walk within the ramp structure will provide for a pedestrian friendly use of Smith Avenue. The street-level bus layover facility will accommodate peak time metro bus layover for at least 16 buses. Metro Transit facilities on the site will include all weather shelter accessible to the public from Smith Avenue, bus driver facilities, a with drivers room, general storage and a supervisors office. The bus layover facility will also serve charter buses for RiverCentre, the Xcel Energy Center, the Ordway, and the Science Museum of MN. Such charter buses will shaze the facility, to the degree it is not needed for Metro Transit bus layover, and will utilize the majority of the bus portion of the transit hub at non-peak times and on weekends. The aesthetic design of the Smith Avenue Transit Hub will be of urban character with roof top parking. The facility will be set back from West Seventh Street to accommodate the construction of retaiUcommercial space. Up to 25,000 S.F. of high bay retail space at street level will eictend the length of the facility along West Seventh Street and will provide a variety of tenant frontages up to 75 feet deep set back from the curb approxunately 15 feet. There will be a pedestrian connection across West Seventh Street to the Xcel Energy Center via tunnel, skyway, or at grade. K�SharefiPedvSchiecke�2vIISC PROIECTSS�IITH TRANSIT HS7B�Ez}ubit C- Project Desctipfion.wpd o t-+{ a.3 39 WHEREAS, a Memorandum of Agreement ("MOA") among the Federal Highway Admiuistration 40 ("FHWA"), the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation ("ACHP") the Minnesota Histozical Preservation 41 Office ("SHPO") and the City along with concuu•ing parties has been negotiated and attached in E�ibit 1; 42 and 43 44 WHEREAS, Saint Paul Heritage Preservation Conmvssion ("HPC") hosted the required public meeting 45 required by the federal Section 106 process on August 10, 2000 concerning the House and Smith Avenue 46 Transit Aub; and 47 48 WF�REAS, HPC has passed two resolutions conceining the House ( HPC Res 99-4 on July 22, 1999 49 and Res. 01-1 on January 11 , 2001). The second resolution supports execution by HPC of the MOA, subject 50 to its normal review with respect to municipal preservation matters as descn�beSY`m Chapter 73 of the Saint 51 Paul L,egislative code (see E�ibit 1, Stipulation I C and D); and � 52 53 54 55 57 58 59 0 61 62 63 64 65 V1�IEREAS, the City Council recognizes the importance of the 5 en Corners Gateway Area of Saint Pau1, including significant views of the Saint Paul Cathedral, Xcel En gy Center and other important landmarks; and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes other projects t at are under consideration including transit projects such as the Riverview Corridor and the Trolley, and er parking projects for Holiday Inn Aotel, United/Children's Hospitals, and others; and WI�,REAS, a parking supply and demand study r the western end of Downtown, including the Smith Avenue Transit Hub, United Hospital campus, oliday Inn Hotel etc,. Will be compieted shortly to assist the City: (1) in the coordination between pen ' g parking and transit projects in the westem end of Downtown and (2) in helping detennine the final ber of pazking spaces to be financed and constructed as part of the Smith Avenue Transit Hub Project. 66 67 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLV D, that the City Council approves and directs the following: 68 69 1. Accepts the final Section 106 Smith Av ue Transit Hub Report, Voluxnes 1-5. This includes Volume 5 70 which was prepared after the required pu ic hearing on August 10, 2000 at the Saint Paul Heritage 71 Preservation Commission and contains 1 written testimony of interested parties and the City's response to 72 the testimony. 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 8Q 81 2. Approves proceeding with the S'th Avenue Transit Hub Project and accepts the now $6.2 million grant from Federal government for the roject and directs staff to complete securing at least $2.0 million from Metro Transit, which will be us toward the transit component of the Project. 3. Approves execution of by appropriate City offici� PED staffthat aze consist of Agreement substantially in the form as attached in E�bit 1, and with such subsequent changes as may be approved by the City Attorney aud with the actions taken in this Resolution. 82 4. Accepts title to the ouse and surrounding land from the State of Minnesota with the condition imposed by 83 2000 Legislature that exchange for the House being donated to the City, the City agree that the House be 84 preserved at an alte ative site and directs staff to complete acceptance. 85 86 5. City selects Site # 7 the former Plastics Parking Lot (on Chestnut St. south of Ryan Street) as the site to 87 wbich the House will be moved and stabilized for residential reuse, names Historic Irvine Pazk Association as 88 Redeveloper, and approves attached Memorandum of Intent in substantially the same form as attached in o�_yy3 89 E�ubit2 with such subsequent changes as may be approved by the City Attorney and PED staff that aze 90 consastent with the actions taken in this Resolution. Siting, move and stabilization activities of the House on 91 Site #7 will be reviewed by the HPC as fiuther described in the lines 48-51 above�;;- 92 93 6. Authorizes City staff to commence and complete vacation process to convey Site #7 - Plastics to HRA, who 94 in turn will convey to the Redeveloper. 95 96 7. Accepts rezoning petitions for the former Plastics Pazking I,ot and authorizes 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 8. Requests HRA to cause: process to begin. A) the House to be moved and stabilized and directs appropriate ff to retain a historic mover and any other contractors necessary to move and stabilize the House at rte # 7, consistent with the City's obligations described in the Memorandum of Agreement in P agraph 3 above. B} Use fhe $2375 million dollars whicfl ha�e previously en budgeted in HRA Res. 00-6/14-3 to move and stabilize the House on behalf of the City. F er the City Council understands these HRA monies are interim funds to the City that shall be reim sed to the HRA no later than the closing on the financing for the Smith Avenue Transit Hub by t e City. 9. City staff is to continue design and traffic work on t Project on this gateway site to the Downtown by Collaborative Design Group Architects(Dick Faricy, 1 Hickey, et. a1.) and SRF Consulting Crroup, in conjunction with other projects under consideration ' the project area including Riverview Corridor, Trolley and other parking projects in the area.. 10. After completion of the parking demand stu for the western end of Downtown, which will assist in the coordination of pending parking and transit pro' cts in the area, the Adnvnistration shall return to the City Council and recommend: (i) the number of parking spaces and (ii) the design concept for Project de (rii) the Finance Plan for the Project� 121 122 123 E�ibit 1-Copy of draft Dec 17, : 124 125 E�ibit 2- Draft Memorandum of 126 127 E�ibit 3- Description of the D v 128 129 to be buik for the Project in E�ibit 3 will be developed by PED and Financial Services. to City Council Resoiution MOA with City, FHWA, SHPO, ACHP, et al with Redeveloper of House at Plastic Parking Lot 5ite Program for the Smith Avenue Transit Hub Project �x� Z DRAFT - DECEMBER 13, 2000 MEMORANDiM OF AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGH`VAY AD�IIIVISTRATION, THE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION THE MINNESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND THE CITY OF SAI�'T PAUL, FOR THE RELOCATION OF THE JOHN DI. CK�I��Iy Z1I�MS�7`►[il�:i��►Tl�.`��`►11L�7 SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration (FHtiVA) hub project within the City of St. Paul, Ramsey County, Mi m n� o� .y a�� to fund a portion of a transit and WHEREAS, the FHWA has determined that this project, t Smith Avenue Transit Hub project, will have an adverse effect on the John M. Armstrong Ho e(House), a double-house listed on the National Register of Historic Places (National Regist , WHEREAS, the FHWA has consulted with th Ad��isory Council on Historic Preservation (Council), the Minnesota State Historic Preservat' n Office (SHPO), and the City of St. Paul (City) as an Invited Signatory, pursuant to the regulati s(36 CFR Part 800) implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U. .C. 470�; and WHEREAS, the St. Paul Housing and Re velopment Authority (HRA) and the St. Paul Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) have rticipated in the consultation and have been invited to concur in this Memorandum of Agree ent (tiIOA); and WHEREAS, the HPC serves as a advisory body to the mayor and city council on municipa] heritage preservation matters as o lined in Chapter 73 of St. Paul's legislati�e code (Chapter 73); and WHEREAS, several Interest Parties have participated in the consultation through public meetings, work sessions and revie of documentation, includin� Tom Dimond, Kathryn Babcock - representing Citizens to S e the Armstrong House, the Fort Road Federation, Historic Irvine Park Association, and severa ther interested parties listed in the Section 106 Report dated June 2000. Tom Dimond and Kat n Babcock have been invited to concur in this MOA; and, WHEREAS, under innesota Sessions Laws 2000, Chapter 492, Art. l, Sec 86, in order for the City to acquire propert from the State that is needed to proceed with the Transit Aub projzct on the Cleveland Circle ite, the City of Saint Paul, at its expense, is required to relocate the House to an altemative site t preserve it; and 01-4�� WHEREAS, the City has completed historical research summarized in a report entitled, "Smith Avenue Transit Hub: Literature Seazch for Archaeological Potential and Historic Buiidin� ensity Survey" (7uly 1999) and an Addendum (July 2000); and WHEREAS, the Area of Potential Effects for the undertakin� is defined as the Smi venue Transit Hub Site (bounded by Kellogg Boulevard, West Seventh Street, Fifth/Sixth Str t and I-35E), the buildings immediately adjacent to the Transit Hub Site, and any prop on or buildings immediately adjacent to the Relocation Sites identified in this Agreement NOW, TF3EREFORE, the FHWA, the Council, the SHPO and the that the undertaking shall be implemented in accordance with the f take into account the effect of the undertakin� on the John M. Ar� The FWHA will ensure that the following measures ar�arried out. (the "Signatories") agree ig stipulations in order to ; House. I. RELOCATION AND STABTLIZATION F THE HOUSE A. Ci Obli ation to Relocate the use to an Alternative Site. The City shall cause the House to be relocated and st ilized �vithin one year ofthe execution of the MOA to one of the acceptabte sites li ed in Appendix A. The relocation ofthe House will be completed according publication "Moving Hi: will be selected by the Ci to undertake relocation ` Register listing. Mov � its designee {i.e., hi oric B. CitxCc with a i House comme and the requirii Secretp fails �6 to e guidelines set forth in the National Pazk Service o c Buildings" by John Obed Curtis. The building mover with review and concurrence by SF3P0. The City a� F the House and stabilization needed to maintain National and stabilization activities to be compieted by the City, or mover; redeveloper), are listed in Appendix B. �nve anc o Redevelo er. The City shall enter into a redevelopment contract edevelo er, which will determine the Relocation Site from Appendix A. The will sold AS IS to a redeveloper for reuse as either residential or rcia at the sole discretion of the City. At the time the City conveys the land H se to the redeveloper, the City shall attach a 30-yeaz covenant to the deed i that exterior modifications to the House be in compliance with the ry of Interior's Standards at the time of the modifications. If the redeveloper perform the stabilization activities listed in Appendix B as required by the t, ownership of ihe House will revert to the City. C. ehabilitation Plan Review and Concurrence. The City or its redeveloper �cill submit efiabilitation PIans to HPC and SHPO during the City's Site Pian Revie�r Process, including the Moving/Buildin� Permit process, for review and concurrence as to consistency with the Secretary of Interior's Standards, within the context of character-defining features of the buildin�. The proposed Rehabilitation Ptans will o►-w}� II. include building sitin�, rehabilitation, landscaping, site improvements, and adjace new construction that is part ofthe site plan. Ifthe Move and Stabilization Pla (as further discussed in Appendix B) are submitted for review prior to compl on of Rehabilitation Plans for the remainder of the buildin� (including the in rior), the remaining plans will be reviewed sepazately. Flexibility will be a«•ed in the review ofthe interior of the House. HPC will provide an opportwii orpublic input during the Rehabilitation Plan Review Process(es) and SHPO �' 1 consider public comments as part of their review(s). D. HPC Jurisdiction. If the proposed relocation site is loca d within an area that has been designated by the City under Chapter 73, the HP will have responsibility as determined by city ordinance for long term monito�ng to ensure that subsequent treatment and improvements to the exterior of the�ouse are in compliance with the Secretary of Interior's standards. If the proposed elocation site is not in an area that has been designated by the City under Chapter ,, the City will take every reasonable step to ensure that the House is redesignated a a St. Paul Herita�e Presen Site, subject to a public review process outlined � Chapter 73. E. Section 60.14(b)(5), the House will znoved and after the move is complet moved to its new site and stabilized • the City shall prepare documentati : C identifies the materials to be fu is: the Keeper of the Register as n ific Section 60.14(b)(5). lu � a the Move. In accordance «�ith 36 CFR r am on the National Register �vhile being GVithin nme months after the House has been �cording to the activities listed in Appendix B, required by 36 CFR Section 6Q.14. Appendix �ed. SHPO shall fonvazd this documentation to ition of the move in accordance �cith 36 CFR F. Tem�orary_Stora e of Ho e durin Moae. If necessary, the City will move the House to a temporary loc ion to allow time for ne�v site preparation and to facilitate the transit hub construct' n schedule. Appropriate measures will be taken to protect and secure the buildin during this interim period. G. Protection of the source. After the City receives title of the property from the State, appropriat measures will be takzn by the City to protect and secure the building prior t, during and after it is moved. On behalf of F WA, the City shall ensure that an azchaeolo�ical survey is conducted on the Transit Hub ite and on the selected Relocation Site for the House. The sun�ey shall be conducte y the City in a manner consistent with the Secretary of Interior's Siandards and Guideli s for ldentification (48 CFK 44720-23) and takin� into account relevant �uidelines of the O. The survey shall be conducted in consultation with the SHPO, and a report of the s ey meetin� the standards of the Secretary of the Interior shall be submitted [o FHWA for eview and approval. o i-�a3 III. IV FHWA shall evaluate properties identified through the survey in accordance with 36 CFR Part 800.4. If the survey results in the identification of properties that aze eligible for the Narional Register, FHWA shall�comply with 36 CFR Parts 800.5 and 800.6. COSTS OF THE MOA The Signatories and Concurrin� Parties shail be responsible for their own admi ' tration and staff costs associated �vith either document revie�v or field �vork related to t' Agreement. Further, the City shall pay costs associated with the foliowing: (1) documen tion, relocation and stabilization costs described in Stipulation I; (2) Archaeology suru y and mitigation costs in Stipulation II; (3) Any other Ciry costs required to complete OA stipulations. MODIFICATIONS, DISPUTES, TERMINATION, ETC. A. Modification or amendment of this agreement, as ne essary, shall be accompiished by the Signatories in the same manner as the origi al agreement. B. Should the Signatories object within 36 days the materials provided for review pursuant to Sections I.A, I.C, I.E and II of t's agreement, the FHWA shall consult with the objecting party to resolve the obj tion. If the FHWA determines that the objection cannot be resolved, the FHW shall request the further comments of the Council. Any Council comment provi ed in response to such a request will be taken into account by the FHWA with re rence only to the subject of the dispute•, the C. FHWA's responsibility to carry o all actions under this agreement that are not the subjects of the dispute remain u hanged. Ifprovisions of this a�reeme are not camed out within three (3) years from the date of its execution, the Signat 'es shall consult to seek amendment ofthe a�eement. If the agreement is not am ded, any Signatory may terminate it pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(c)(8). 4 o�-Ha3 Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement and implementarion of ' terms evidence that FHWA has taken into account the effects of its undertakin n historic properties. A photocopy of this document will be deemed to be an o ginal by the Signatories. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION � Alan R. Steger, Division Administrator ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESEI�VATION I� John M. Fowler, Executive Director MINNESOTA STATE Bv ATION OFFICE Nina M. Archabal, Stat,�Historic Preservation Officer INVTTED SIGNA CITY OF SAIN� PAUL I: Coleman Approved to Form: Peter McCall, Assistant City Attorney Date: Date: Date: Date: � D 1-�1�� co��cux: ST. PAUL HERTTAGE PRESER'VATION COi�'INIISSION � Name and Title of Signer CITY OF 5AINT PAUL HOUSING AND REDEVELOPM�NT AUTHORITY � Name and Title of Signer Approved to Form THOMAS R. DIMOND CITIZENS TO SAVE TH�ARMSTRONG HOUSE Date; Date: B Date: Kathryn M. B cock D 1-`l'a-� APPENDIX A Relocation Sites currently owned by City � HRA. Site # 2- Kellogg and Seventh Street (Transit Hub Site # 3- St. Joseph's Lane and West Seventh Site # 7- Plastics Parking Lot (on Chestnut �outh of Ryan Street) Site # 8- Ryan Parking Lot (at Chestnut �d Exchange) 7 1-ya� APPENDIX B � MOVING AND STABILIZATION TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY (Detailed Move and Stabilize Data can be found in Yolz:me 1, Attachment I A. MOVE BY fIISTORIC MOVING CONTRACTOR Section 106Report.) This step includes the activities involved in physically liftin the Armstrong House off its existing foundation, moving it along city streets and placing it on new foundation within a new site. (A separate contractor will be responsible for the new foun tion, as noted in Section B below). The contractor hired to complete the moving activities st meet special requirements for moving historic structures. Prior to the move, preliminary b cing, shorinJ and brick stabilization will be completed. Photo documentation of interior and ex rior will be completed to aliow monitoring of building condition. During the move, the histo ' moving contractor will take steps to protect overhead and underground utilities, as well as p otecting or replacing affected landscaping, curbs, etc. The historic moving contractor will also ovide liability insurance and performance bonds to ensure successful completion of the move. ncluded in this Appendix is a memorandum dated May 4, 2000, from Constructive Ideas th . provides a detailed listing of items that will be the responsibility of the Historic Building M er and the City at the existing building location, while the building is in transit, and at the new bu' ing location. B. NE`V This step includes the activities a general contractor to clear out the existing site ofthe Amistrong House after is has been moved and to prepare the new site for placement of the Armstron� House. New site �vork wi11 invotve onstructing a foundation and basement for the House, including a structural support system. I necessary, a new entry porch will be built on the front of the House at its new location. Depend' g on the site chosen for the Armstrong House, other activities will be required to provide a steps will be taken at'� will be provided at bc dated May 4, 2000� responsibility of a building is in tran t, lev surface for moving the House on to the new foundation. If necessary, h' ew site to protect adj acent sidewalks, trees or structures. Securing fencing �' the old site and the new site. Included in this Appendix is a memorandum m Constructive Ideas that provides a detailed listing of items that will be the eneral Contractor and the City at the existin� building location, while the and at the new building location. 0 � -aa3 C. NIINIMUM ELEMENTS TO RETAIN NATIONAL REGISTER Based upon discussions with the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office ( O), this step involves the absolute minimum unprovements required to protect the "shell" of the Armstrong House &om further deterioration. Correspondence from SHPO da d Mazch 17, 2000, identified the items in a detailed listing of construction activities that wo d not be needed for continued eli�ibility of the FIouse. That correspondence is included � Section 106 Report (Volume 1, Attachment I). The key elements that are necessary for cont� ed eli;ibility are listed as follows: � ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Excavation and grading of new site Sheet piling as necessary to protect street, Wall footin�s, piers for porch foorings on Foundation walls, sandstone veneer Tuckpointing, cleaning and brick repai� Basement beams Repair or replace &ont entry porch � Remove and replace roofing surf e New gutters and downspo�ts �,� New entrances � site adjacent structures Remove and replace windo s, or repair existin� windows Perimeter caulking � � D. STABILIZATION AND ASS�`T PROTECTION This step involves activities by a ge eral contractor to provide minimum improvements needed to allow safe access to the House for i spection. Minimum electrical service will be provided forbasic lighting. New stairs to the base ,'ent will be constructed. Loose or waterlogged material will be removed from the house. � ♦ Mmi ♦ Reaz ♦ eiene ♦ Envi eiectncalservice stairs; basement stairs interior clean-up (removal of loose or waterlogged materials) mentai clean-up (asbestos and lead-based paint, if necessary) NOTE: A tivities in Parts A-I3 of Appendix B will be part of the "Move and tabilization PZans"referenced in the MOA. �; D\-Ka� APPENDIX C Documentation required once the Armstrong House is moved 1) A letter notifying the MN-SHPO the date the property was moved,� � 2) Two sets of 8 x 10 black and white photographs aad one set of �des of the hovse on its new site. Two or more different views (perspectives) o the froat aad rear of the house aze required. The lab processia� the film should e able to pass a hypo (fixer) residue test for film processin�. (In other words ; a reputable vendor for processing), The photographs should be printed on pho, ' graphic, silver emulsion resin-coated paper (not ghotograpluc color dye paper � ed by vendors advertising cheap developing costs). The photographs should ve a ane-half inch border. They shouid be labeled on the back usin� a soft p�cil wzth the followiag information: name of property, county and photo�aph, location of original aegative*, number or number depicting vantage point be a plastic mount with name of property c will accept the negatives (along with the exposure and T Max 100 or Plus-X Pan , 3) A sketch map (done in black aad 4) An original United State Geolo€ location of the house on its new pencil. Do not include any othe� S) Acreage of the pazcel on � Legal Description of the � Parcel's PIN number �F 8) Name and address o rpr� ,'name of photographer, date of (camera faciag), photograph : sketch map. • The slides should + and state�and date. *The SHPO aphs) provided that the film•is 24 which depicts the hovse on its new site Survey Map (LT-S.G.S.} which depicts the (Depict locatioa using a dot made with a lead tten information on the map). tfie house is located. owner(s) � Ex��+� .�- ot-'ia� March Rehabilitation of tfie Armstrona House f"House"1 Memorandum Of Intent Redeveloaer. Site and Reuse of the Relocated House Redeveloper of the House wi41 be the Nistoric trvine Park Associ on ("HIPA"). The site to which the House wiil be relocated is the former Plastics parking lot at hestnut and South of Ryan (the"Site"). The Redeveloper at its sole discretion may seek a ditional partner(s) after a RFQ process is completed by the Redeveloper. At this time, the edeveloper plans to form a Limited Liability Corporation ("LLC") to undertake the rem ' ing rehabilitation after the City or HRA completes move and stabiiization activities describ in the Memorandum of Agreement ("MOA") attached in Exhibit A. Rehabilitation of the House would be residential reus . The density on the site will be effectively controlied by the Redeveloper through the processir�g of one of three rezonings (RT-1, RT-2, RM-1) attached in Exhibit B. ,,/� Phase 1: Pubfic Hearing on House and (April 4, 2001) Citv and HRA Transit Hub before City Council 1. Staff recommends at Public Hearing�'`on House and Smith Avenue Tra�sit Hub that (1) the House be moved and stabilized at Plastics site, (2) recommend HIPA as Redeveloperand support execution of Memo of Int nt with Redeve{oper and (3) Smith Avenue Transit Hub project be approved. 2. City Council considers the R�olution to execute MOA; name Site and Redeveloper; convey property to HRA for �isposition; accept HRA Budget of $2.375 M to undertake MOA obligatians; accept 3 separ�te zoning petitions for the Site and related actions concerning the Smith Avenue Transit,�iub. 3. HRA agrees to e and reconvey at hoid a pubiic he� a portion of the � Redeveloper �fiv10A, approves Redeveloper, agrees to accept site from the City � to Redeveloper; fund $2.375 M for the move and stabitizing and i land sale of the Site and the House to Redeveloper for a doilar plus delivering the sewer to the site to Redeveloper. 1. At Public Hear"' g on April 4, 2001, on House and Smith Avenue Transit Hub (A) support business poin s outlined in this Memo of Intent (B) provide adopted neighborhood resolution approved M ch 20, 2001(C) provide sufficient signatures from immediate neighbors for three separ te (RT-2, RT-1, RM-1) zoning petitions to the City as Applicant, that would be processed imultaneously. The Redeveloper wiil notify in writing the City as Petitioner 10 K:\shared\PED\geurslarmstronghs.02.14.01.wpd March 26, 2001 D�-4a� days before by the third reading on the rezoning (Public Hearing meeting on rezoning), which one of the three rezoning it wishes the City Council to adopt; whereupon the City will withdraw the two remaining petitions. �f the City is not notified the dgfault rezoning is RT -1. The finai adopted rezoning will determine the density, and only the/6niy structure on the Site will be the House unless Redeveloper recommends and finances�dditional structures. Phase 2= MOA (April to May 15, 2001) Citv and HRA 1. City, SHPO, ACHP, FHWA execute MOA. Also G Dimond, and Save the Armstrong wi41 be invited to 2. Compfetes transfers of state land and House on 3. Vacation process for transfer of title of iand is underway already for Hill Street adjacent 4. Draft covenant about future rehab to the 5. Rezoning and Variance process for the back yard variance may aiso be neces€ Variance by end of July] ,� Parties HRA, HPC, Tom Circle to City from State. House to HRA. (Separate vacation process � Site on the south.) structure described in attached MOA. Variance for height will be necessary and a [Estimated completion of Rezoning and 6. HRA agrees to execute MOA, app�ves Redeveloper, agrees to accept site from the City and reconvey at Closing to Rede�loper; fund $2.375 M for the move and stabilizing and hold a public hearing on land sal of the Site and the House to Redeveloper for a dolfar plus a portion of the cost of deliveri the sewer to the site to Redeveloper. Redeveloper 1. Select partner(s), if any Phase 3: Between Exe Redeveloper (Mid May to Fall 200 Citv and HRA RFQ, arrange financing etc. of MOA and Ciosing on Conveyance of House and Site fo 4 to 6 months) 1. Retain CPMI as�oject Manager for MOA move and stabilization under MOA. SRF through Ann Hopkins wil'also be involved. 106 Group will be used for archeology on the Site in advance of mo e. The City's Architect wili be the Collaborative Design Group for which Dick Faricy works.� K:4shared�PED\geurs�armstronghs.02.14.07.wpd March 26, 2001 di-��3 2. Retain historic mover approved by SHPO. Retain Contractor to build 3. City funds archeology, move and stabilization, and security activities. 4. City wiN expfore ways to make Historic Tax Credit availabfe to etc. is $2.375 M 5. Move and Stabilization Plans (siting of House, etc.) will require H C and SHPO review, as well as City Site Plan review process and variances. 6. City keeps House secure until Ciosing. � r 7. City prepares documentation for continued National Regist, r listing of House. Redevelooer 1. Two (2) designated representatives of Redeve Involved with the exact siting of the House on stabilization activities). Phase 4: Closing between City, HRA and Land (after stabilization at Site) (Estimated Closing November 15, 200 House rehabilitated with Certificate of of Closing, estimated to by Novembe� Citv and HRA 1. City conveys title of House a Deed to Redeveloper and e: Covenant recorded. ,� Redeveloper attend meetings with CPMI, etc. (Comment only on move and on Conveyance ofHouse and sooner) �pancy compiete and marketing within two years 15,2003) and HRA conveys title of House and land by Quit Claim s Escrow Funds if any funds remain from $2.375 M; At closing on land an House for $1 plus the cost of delivering sewer to the site, after completion of move nd stabilization, Redeveloper accepts the House AS IS, covenant is recorded, reverter I nguage in deed, and if and only if there remains a balance on the City's $2.375 M, City es blishes escrow fund for the Redeveloper on a reimbursement basis for the remaining re abilitation of the House with appropriate documentation and approval by City's Project M nager, CPMI. Escrow funds, if any, would be available for utility connections f water and electrical, etc. 2. Undertake �fid complete rehabilitation, after review of Rehabilitation Plans by HPC and SHPO ,[i.e., get Certificate of Occupancy ] and market property within 2 years of Closing. K:�sharedNED\geursW rtnstronghs.02.14.01.wpd March 26, 2001 � d 1-�� Attachments to Memo of Intent dated March 26,2001 Exhibit A- Memorandum of Agreement ("MOA") on J.M. Armstrong House and Smith Avenue Transit Hub between FHWA, ACHP, City, SHPO et ai. Exhibit B- Draft Rezoning Petition and Conditions for former Plastics Parking Lot >"� � �. K:lshared�PED\geurs\armstronghs.02.14.Ot.wpd March 26, 2001 � x �� DRAFT - AECEMBER 13, 2000 MEMORANDUII OF AGREr;i1�i,VT Ai�10NG TFIE FEDERAL HIGFIEVA'Y AD�SIIVISTRA THE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC P�R�ERVATION, THE MINNESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESE ATION OFFICE, AND THE CITY OF SAI\T P FOR TAE RELOCATION OF THE JOHN hI. HOUSE Ari'D 01-`t}� CONSTRTJCTION OF TIiE SNIITH A� NUE TRANSIT HUB SAINT PAUL, MI ' SOTA WHEREAS, the Federal Hi�hway Administrati n(FH«'A) proposes to fund a portion of a transit hub project within the City of St. Paul, Rams County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the FHWA has determined have an adverse effect on the John M. National Register of Historic Places (I� this proj ect, the Smith Avenue Transit Hub project, will istrong House (House), a double-house listed on the al Register); WHEREAS, the FHWA has con�ulted with the Ad��isory Council on Historic Preservation (Council), the Minnesota State H' foric Preservation Office (SHPO), and the City ofSt. Paul (City) as an Invited Signatory, pursua to the regulations (36 CFR Part 800) implem�nting Section 106 of the National Aistoric Preserv ton Act (16 U.S.C. 470�; and WHEREAS, the St. Paul using and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and the St. Paul Heritage Preservation Commissio (HPC) have participated in thz consultation and have been invited to concur in this Memor um of Agreement (v10A); and WHEREAS, the HP serves as an advisory body to the mayor and city council on municipal heritage preservati matters as outlined in Chapter 73 of St. PauPs legislative code (Chapter 73); and WHEREAS, s eral Interested Parties have participated in the consultation through public meetings, work sessio and review of documentation, includin, Tom Dimond, ICathryn Babcock - representin Citizens to Save the Armstrong House, the Fort Road Federation, Historic Irvine Park Associati , and several other interested parties listed in the Section 106 Report dated 7une 2000. Tom Di ond and Kathryn Babcock have been invited to concur in this MOA; and, WH�EAS, under Minnesota Sessions Laws Z000, Chapter 492, Art. l, Sec 86, in order for the City to acquire property from the State that is needed to proceed with the Transit Hub projzct on the Cleveland Circle site, the City of Saint Paul, at its expense, is required to relocate the House to an altemative site to preserve it; and � p� _y'� �IHEREAS, the City has completed historical reseazch summarized in a report entitled, "Smith Avenue Transit Hub: Literature Search Yor Archaeological Potential and Historic Buildin� Intensity Survey" (JuIy 1999) and an Addendum (July 2000); and WHEREAS, the Area of Potential Effects for the undertakin� is defined as the Smith Avenue Transit Hub Site (bounded by Kello�g Boulevard, West Seventh Street, Fifth/Sixth Street d I-35E), the buildings immediately adjacent to the Transit Hub Site, and any prope on or buildings immediately adjacent to the Relocation Sites identified in this Agreement; NOW, THEREFO1tE, the FHWA, the Council, the SHPO and the that the undertaking shall be implemented in accordance with the f take into account the effect of the undertakin; on the 7ohn M. A� The FWHA will ensure that the following I. RELOCATION AND STABILIZA' carried out. OF THE HOUSE (the "Signatories") agree Zg stipulations in order to ; House. A. Cit Obli ation to Relocate t� House to an Alternative Site. The City shall cause the House to be relocated a stabilized «�ithin one year of the execution ofthe MOA to one of the acceptable si s listed in Appendix A. The relocation of the House will be completed accordin� to the guidelines set forth in the National Park Service publication "Moving I�storic Buildings" by John Obed Curtis. The buildin� mover will be selected by t,�City with review and concurrence by SHPO. The City agrees to undertake reloc ion o£ the House and stabilization needed to maintain National Re?ister listing. ovin� and stabilization activities to be completed by the City, or its designee (i.e„historic mover; redeveloper), aze listed in Appendix B. B. CitV Conve "nce to Redevelo ec The City shall enter into a redevelopment contract with a rede 'eloper, which �vill determine the Relocation Site from Appendix A. The House w'y71 be sold AS IS to a rede��eloper for reuse as either residential or comme �ial, at the sole discretion of the City. At the time the City conveys the land and t�ouse to the redeveloper, the City shall attach a 30-yeaz covenant to the deed requ ng that exterior modifications to the House be in compliance with the Sec�etary of Interior's Standards at the time of the modifications. If the redeveloper f ls to perform the stabilization activities listed in Appendix B as required by the ontract, ownership of the House wiil revert to the City. C. Rehabilitation Plan Review and Concurrence. The City or its redeveloper �cill submit Rehabilitation Pians to HPC and SHPO during the City's Site Plan Revie«� Process, including the Moving/Building Permit process, for review znd concurrence as to consistency with the Secretary of Interior's Standards, within the context of character-defining features of the building. The proposed Rehabilitation Plans will � ot-KaO II. include building siting, rehabilitation, landscaping, site improcemenis, and adj acent new construction that is part of the site plan. Ifthe Move and Stabilization Plans (as further discussed in Appendix B) are submitted for review prior to completion of Rehabilitation Plans for the remainder of the building (includin� the interior), the remainin� plans will be reviecved separately. Flexibility will be allo �•ed in the review of the interior ofthe House. HPC will provide an opportunity f ublic input during the Rehabilitation Plan Review Process(es) and SHPO wil onsider public comments as part of their review(s). D. HPC Jurisdiction. If the proposed relocation site is locate �vithin an uza that has been designated by the City under Chapter 73, the HPC ill have responsibility as determined by city ordinance for lon� term monitori � to ensure that subsequent treatment and improvements to the exterior of the H se are in compliance �vith the Secretary of Interior's standards. If the proposed r ocation site is not in an area that has been designated by the City under Chapter 7, the City will take every reasonable step to ensure that the House is redesignated a St. Paul Herita�e Presen Site, subject to a public review process outlined in Chapter 73. E. moved and after the move is moved to its new site and st; the City shail prepare docur C identiFies the materials to the Keeper of the Register ; Section 60.14(b)(5). � Section 60.14(b)(5), the House will r�nQ the Move In accordance ��ith 36 CFR .main on the National Register «•hite bein� R'ithin nine months after the House has been accordin� to the activities listed in Appendix B, n required by 36 CFR Section 60.14. Appendix shed. SHPO shall fo:��ard t�ss docus�en±ationto cation of the move in accordance ti��ith 36 CFR F. Tem�orarv Stora�e oF I�Iouse durina Mo�•e. If necessary, the City will move the House to a temporary - cat o to allow time for new site preparation and to facilitate the transit hub const 4'ction schedule. Appropriate measures �z'ill be taken to protect and secure the buil}��n� durin� this interim period. G. Protection of th��Resource. After the City receives title of the propem� from the State, appropri�te measures ��ill be taken by the City to protect and secure the building priorfto, during and after it is moved. Onbehalf of F WA, the City shall ensure that an archaeolo�ical survey is conducted onthe Transit Hub 1te and on the selected Relocation Site for the House. The sun•ey shall be conducted b the City in a manner consistent with the Secretary of Interior's Standards and Guideline or ldentification (48 CFR 44720-23) and takin� into account relevant guidelines of the S O. The survey shall be conducted in consultation with the SHPO, and a report of the surv meetin� the standards of the Secretary of the Interior shalt be submittzd to FHWA for red w and approval. o �-Ma� III. FHWA shall evaluate properties identified tYirou�h the survey in accordance with 36 CFR Part 800.4. If the survey results in the identification of properties that aze eli�ible for the National Re�ister, FHWA shall�comply with 36 CFR Parts 800.5 and 800.6. COSTS OF THE MOA The Si�natories and Concurring Parties shall be responsible for their own ad�ninistration and staff costs associated with ei±her document revie�v or field work related `�this A�eement. Further, the City shall pay costs associated with the fotlowin�: (1) doc entation, relocation and stabilization costs described in Stipulation I; (2) Archaeoloa survey and mitigation costs in Stipulation II; (3) Any other City costs required to com�pTete MOA stipulations. IV. MODIFICATIONS, DISPUTES, TERMINATION, Fc3'C. � A. Modification or amendment of this a�reeme�as necessary, shall be accomplished by the Signatories in the same manner as,ik`ie original a�reemen[. B. Should the Si�natories object withinf�0 days to the materials provided for review pursuant to Sections I.A, I.C, I.E a�II of this agreement, the FHWA shall consult with the objecting party to resolu� ``the objection. If the FHWA determinzs that the objection cannot be resolved, ttf'e FHWA shali request the further comments of the Council. Any Council com nt provided in response to such a request �vill be taken into account by the FHW� FHWA's responsibiliry subjects ofthe dispute en C. Ifprovisions of of its execution, the agreement ' 800.6(c)(8). � with reference only to the subject of the dispute; the carry out a!I ac#ions under th:s agreemenE that are not the iain unchanged. ii a�reement are not carried out within three (3) years from the date e Signatories shall consult to seek amendment ofthe aereement. If not amended, any Signatory may terminate it pursuant to 36 CFR 0 o �-�+a� Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement and implementation of its terms evidence that FHWA has taken into account the effects of its undertaking on historic properties. A photocopy of this document wili be deemed to be an original by the Signatories. � FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADNIIiVISTRATION � Alan R. Steger, Division Administrator ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC I� John M. Fowler, Executive Director MINNESOTA5TATE By Nina M. Archabal, � INVITED SIGNAT(� CITY OF � 'AUL Coleman ATION OFFICE Preservation Officer ,`� r' �` Date: Date: Date: Date: Approved to Form: Peter McCall, Assistant City Attorney o� �a� coxcux: ST. PAiIL HERITAGE PRESERVATION CObIMISSION � Name and Title of Signer CITY OF SAINT PAUL HOUSING AND I's�� Name and Titie of Signer Approved to Form THOMAS R. DIMOND � F � r / �. Date: AUTAORITY � Date: Date: CITIZENS TO THE ARMSTRONG HOUSE B � Date: O 1-y�� APPENDIX A Relocation Sites currently owned by City or HRA Site. # 2- Kellogg and Seventh Street (Transit Hub Site) Site # 3- St. Joseph's Lane and West Seventh Street Site # 7- Plastics Parking Lot (on Chesmut south af Ryan Street) Site # 8- Ryan Parking Lot (at Chestnut and R 7 � 0 �-'1y7 APPENDIX B � MOVING AND STABILIZATTON ACTIVITIES TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY (Detniled Move and Stabilize Data can be found in Yolume 1, Attachment I of the Secti,�r'r�106 Report.) A. MOVE BY HISTORIC MOVING CONTRACTOR This step includes the activities involved in physically lifting th,eirlrmstrong House off its existing foundation, moving it along city streets and placin� it on a ne.�v foundation within a new site. (A separate contractor will be responsible for the new foundat�, as noted in Section B below). The contractor hired to complete the moving activities mus meet special requirements for moving historic structures. Prior to the move, preliminary bra n�, shorin� and brick stabilization will be completed. Photo documentation of interior and ext or will be completed to allow monitoring of building condition. During the move, the histo movin� contractor will take steps to protect overhead and underground utilities, as well as p, tecting or replacing affected landscaping, curbs, etc. The historic movin� contractor will also� ovide liability insurance and performance bonds to ensure successfiil completion of the move.!'Included in this Appendix is a memorandum dated May 4, 2000, from Constructive Ideas tl t provides a detailed listing of items that will be the responsibility of the Historic Buildin� N�o'ver and the City at the existing buiiding location, while the buildin; is in transit, and at the new b,�filding location. B. NE�V CONSTRUCTIQ�i ITEMS This step includes the activiti s of a general contractor to clear out the existing site ofthe Armstrong House after is has been mo ed, and to prepare the new site for placement of the Armstron� House. New site work will invo�Ve constructing a foundation and basement for the House, including a structural support syste�: If necessary, a new entry porch will be built on the front of the House at its new location. Dep�,'nding on the site chosen for the Armstrong House, other activities will be required to provide a%level surface for moving the House on to the new foundation. If necessary, steps will be taken �# the new site to protect adjacent sidewalks, trees or structures. Securin� fencing will be provided a# both the old site and the new site. Included in this Appendix is a memorandum dated May 4, 20k�0, from Constructive Ideas that provides a detailed listing of items that will be the responsibility�6f a General Contractor and the City at the existing building location, while the building is in transit, and at the new building location. : o� y�-' C. MI1VI:vIUtII ELE1lIENTS TO RETAi\ IyiA'i'IO\AL REGISTER LISTING Based upon discussions with the Minnesota State Iiistoric Preservation Office (SHPO), this step involves the absolute minimum improvements required to protect the "shell" of the Armstrong House from further deterioration. Correspondence from SHPO dated Marc �7, 2000, identified the items in a detailed listing of construction activities that would not. e needed for continued eligibility of the House. That correspondence is included in the S�`i�ion 106 Report (Volume 1, Attachment I). The key elements that are necessary for continued eiij bility are listed as follows: ,%' ♦ Excavation and grading of new site ♦ Sheet piling as necessary to protect street, sidezvall ♦ Wall footings, piers for porch footin�s on new site ♦ Foundation walls, sandstone veneer i ♦ Tuckpointing, cleaning and brick repajr � ♦ Basementbeams � / ♦ Repair or replace front entry porc,hes ♦ Remove and replace roofin; sqrface ♦ New gutters and downspouts%" ♦ New entrances /� adjacent structures ♦ Remove and replace wineTows, or repair existin� windows ♦ Perimeter caulking �' D. STABILIZATION AND A5'SET PROTECTION , This step involves activities by a�;�eneral contractor to provide minimum improvements needed to allow safe access to the House fdr inspection. Minimum electrical service will be provided for basic lighting. New stairs to the basement will be constructed. Loose or waterlogged material will be removed from the house. ;i i electrical setvice stairs; basement stairs ♦ Ge�ierai interior clean-up (removal of loose or waterlogged materials) ♦ Environmental clean-up (asbestos and lead-based paint, if necessary) ,,' r� � > NOTE: /� Activities in Parts A-D of Appendi.x B will be part of the "1Ltove and �% Stabilization Plans" referenced in the MOA. o�-y�.� APPENDIX C Documentation required once the Armstrong House is moved 1) A letter no�fying the 2vIN-SHPO the date the property was moved 2) Two sets of 8 x 10 black aad wlute photographs and one set on its new site. Two or more different views (persp� -`_._ _, . tfie house ate required. The lab processin� the film (fixer) residue test for film. grocessin�. (Ia other wo processing). The photographs should be printed on resin-coated paper (not photo�aphic color dye pa chea developino costs), 'Tfie photographs sho t ies of the house front and reu of io be able to pass a hypo s" e a reputable veador for otographic, silver emuLsion used by vendors advertising ve a one-half inch border. p = They should be labeled on the back using a so pencil with the following information: name of property, county and te, name of photo�apher, date of photooraph, location of original negative* view (camera facing), photograph number or number depicting vantage po' t oa the sketch map.. The slides should be a plastic mount with name of prop , couaty and stxte�and date. *The SHPO will accept the negatives (along wi e photo�aphs) provided tI�t the film• is 24 exposure and T Max 100 or Plus- Pan film• 3) A sketch map (done in black d white) which depicts the house on its new site 4) An original United State ological Survey Map (U.S.G.S.) which depicts the location of the house o. ts new site (Depict location usin� a dot made with a Iead pencil. Do not includ y other written information on the map). 5) Acreage of the p, el on which the house is Iocated. � Legal Descrip 'on of the pazcel � Parcel's P number 8) Name d address of property owner(s) 10 �x k�bit . 13 `— Vy1 �.v�,,4 a� ��fn.x. c�.a�'� VL1a.�c� 2.6� �oo� 0�-4�� I. Parties agreeing to addendum. This addendum to the Chestnut Street and 0 I-Till Sueet has been reviewed and parties: Saint Paul PED, H'istoric Irvine Park Associati< Molly Femholz, Patrick and Rita Hawkinson Wamer� Hiileren, Louis Fillmon and Kazen Jason. Purpose. The parties want to accelerate moving of the historic Armstrong House f to the site. The site's present zoning is P- City can issue moving and foundation peri housing. The parties agree that the p�o to allow the Armstrong House to be�ma most restrictive residential zone i�whic �omn petitions for 235 re to by the following A), Kevin McGrath and and Ruth Dantuma, Peter aoni�`g of 235 Chestnut Street to pemrit the m�tts present location north of the Xcel Arena ,�4vhich allows only surface parking. Before the ;s, the site needs to be zoned to permit rty on Chestnut Street should be rezoned d and that the new zoning should be the the house can feasibly be restored and sold. The City wants to move t e{fiouse as soon as possible to open up the site north of the arena for redevelopment. ,.� Simultaneous zoning steps�and redevelopment analysis. HII'A is negotiating to take ownership of the Armstro `�House and to partner with a developer to restore and mazket it. At the time of the fili � of the rezoning petitions, HIl'A has not had time to select a partner, complete a pro,'�ct feasibility analysis, or deternune how many residential units will be at the site. 1e HII�A is working with developers, public agencies, and contractors to devis, a feasibie restoration plan for the property, the City and the property owners within 100��eet of the Chestnut Street site are initiating three separate residential rezoning petition�for RT-1 (duplex), RT-2 (3-4 units), and RM-1 (multi-family) so that any one of thect�` can be chosen later. The petition�''will initiate the rezoning process at the Planning Comrnission; the parties expect tha�>all three altematives may still be under consideration when the Planning Commiss n holds its hearing and makes its recommendation. At least ten days before the rezonin�petitions come before the City Council for third reading and public hearing, HIPA,�vill have detemuned and submitted to the City in writing which of the three alte �ative rezonings fits its restoration plan. The other two petitions will be withdrawn by e parties. If HIPA has not made a written recommendatioq the parties wiil r ommend that the Council approve the RT-1 rezoning altemative. As soon as practical 1�. �i —y ?1 after the Council approves a new zoning district, PED will request building permits for excavation, a new foundatioq and the house move. In addirion to the rezoning, other City approvals will be required before building permits aze issued, including height and setback variances, site plan review, and historic review. 4. Nullification of fhe consents given on the rezoaing petitions. Most oFthe petition signers specifically support the moving and restoration of the Armstrong Aouse, but would not support whatever residential development may be permitted in the zoning district without the house. If the Armstrong House is not moved to Chestnut Str or suffers severe damage during the move and cannot be restored, the parties wa o return the zoning, at least for the rime being, to P-1. , 5. Attachment to rezoning peEitions for RT-1, RT-2, and RM-1. Thi iidendum is hereby attached to each of the three rezoning petitions as an explan on for why muitiple petitions are being submitted and as a safeguard for the affected ighbors. 6. Signatures of the Parties. I agree with the provisions of t's addendum. (Please sign and date.) Brian Sweeney, PED Patrick Kevin McGrath Peter Hilleren Molly Fernholz f` Dirk Dantuma Molly Howe Ruth Dantuma K:�Shazed�PedVSODF.RfiOUZONAIG\Atmstron�J Warner Louis Fillmon Karen Jason O CZ'Z`X O�' SA.XNT' _l'.A.YJS.� � CONSENT OF AD70INING PROPERTY OtiYNERS FOR . •.�ZEZONING di -9�� We, tlie undersi�ned, otvncrs oPtlie proper;y tvidtiin 100 feet o(thc total contiguous description of rzal estate o�vned, purciiased, or sofd by'I'HE PETITION6R within one year preczdiit� tlie date oF tliii petition ackno�vledge that �vz have bcen presented u•itli the foilou•ino: I. A cop}' of the petition of (name ofp ctitioner) to rezone the property [ocated at a3S CheS�n�.i.1' �,-„ e� from n P � zo�iino district to �1�� zoning district. �'l � S"f'r2 �"t . 2. A copy ofsections �'� through _(�Q•� inclusive oFtht Saint Paul ning Code; and nckno�vledge that �ve ;�re a�vare oFnll of the uses permitted in z RT =�. zo ' g districC 2nd tve are lware that any oFt(�zse uses can be establislted upon City Councii approval of ie rezoning. 14'e hereby' consent to the rczonin� of the propeRy in the pctition oF, s t_��,�]�, �� G " + �r �+�� "�� U4�/ to,^ zoningdistri lI � � ,] �y� v �i/N � u w\ (Name of petitioner) tiVc conscnt to flie �pproval of fhis i•ezoning �pPlic�nt or his(lier represenfafivc. / OCv7-X 22. �.L DOO 1 O Co z.k 21-. J2, 0 0 f 0 C�zFS2iz3 oi3g vG,zsz�3z 000'{ a�zszzazono3, o6z82232000S v62�z�3.�oc�o� vl�zszz32.00l1 v�z$zz3zo�i2 0628 zz3Zooi c �f o � sr�r�t Pa�:L J�qvrc� (.'oset{;�, Ke:vin meGr,"fh n7otly Ferf�hoLz Pqt��cK ul'�riter �:'Eq /./qW '�'RSon t11PMCf g: �-<. , �.��n nea ��rK ��, ant�..mQ r'2�.'�F� //Dan A DirK� l.�An�Eu.wiA �. S� Rn't ' �er � �(!y I-��we Lyn�Trus�'eE �-okis �':!/`no�l rlRren 5aspn ULo2�223) 0�1�) zSoo Line.. �ai jraa.C� �vas expl�ined fo us by fhe U(a 2 $ z��f U�C�`i <<t�jo-ES-Ck'�Lxie�cf � SP.tcm ' 06 �8 ��.a4r vo7o c,'�y c¢ sT PAu. L ' - NOT�: This petition shall not be considered as o�cially filed until tne lapse of seven (7) u•orking days after it is recei�•ed by the Pianning Division. Any signator of thispetition tnay �v►thdra�ti-h�s/her name therefrom by ��Titten request within that time. :,'� �, � �� CZ�'Y O�` SA.XN'Z' �'.A.Y7� CONSENT•OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWI�iERS POR A . ..�,�zoxxNc d�-4� We, il�e undersigned, otvners oFthe propery tvitf�in t00 feet o(t6e total contiguous description oE real esiate o�vned, purchased, or sold by 7'HE PETITIO� IER tivithin one ye. r precedin� th= date of this petition �cknowledge that tve have bccn presentzd u•idt the following: 1. A copy of the peti[ion oF, (name of ctitioner) to rezone tlte Property located at a3S �h 2Sfn�.i."�"' �„� � � from a �'-' � zoning district to ay� district. 2. A copy oCsections (�D��?.i through ��.�3 in ncknotvlcdge th�t we 1re n�vart ofnll oFthe uses permitted in 1�vare that any oF duse i�ses c�n be established upon Ciry C consent to lhe rczonin� of tfie property in the petition of; (Name of petitioner) tiVe consent to fhe �Pproval of this �PP�ic�nf or his/ficr represenfafive., OCo2.8 2� 3� o00 l p(o J�zL3Z oolp �z82� z3 o i3g vGzg-��3z 000�{ O�z8zZ3z0003 o6zgzz32000S v6z�z23zo�aq oC� z82�3Zoo�1 o6z$zz3zo� D�ZB zz3Z� UCo2$223 qo z$ Z� e�ce il( Sp�m 06 �8 zz a�{ vo7o1 c��Y a� sT PRw 1_ � � hOT�: This petition shall not be considered as officially filed until tne lapse of seven (7) u•orkin8 days a8er it is recei��ed by fhe Plannin;Division. Any signator of this petition may withdra�ti�his/he� namelherefrom by «ritten request within that time. :,'� :j V G o�F S ' �i- Pr}i.�.L Ci�f- oF s ot pRaL (�qvic[ / se'('{'0., Kt:t�in ' eGro...`f-h rho!!y/Fern hoLz on �a�ner � A n a k l7An'furnq �. !-�, I I er en l-��'11 S�f'��ee. clusive f tlie Saint Paut Zoning Code; and a ' zonin; district 2nd we are ou il approval of the rzzoning. \�'o hereb�� j� � / 1� 7/ioningdistrict. ��°'��'�� ing as it �vas ezpI�ined fo us by fhe I, " /ylotly l�we Ly►�.�Trus� 'i3 G.okis T;�/.�c�] lCRren 3'ason 10 �Soo L',ne R�i �raac� � C�'X'X O� S.A.XN� PA.�CJS� CONSEI�IT'-OF ADJOINING PROPERTY O�VNERS FOR A . -,REZDIYING We, ihe undersigned, o�vncrs of tlie property tvitliin 100 feet oFtlic total otvned, purci�ased, or sold by THE PET[TIO� IER within one year lcknotivledge that wz have bccn presented ��•i[h tlte follot�•ing: f 1. A copp of tl�e petition oE (name of ctit to rezone tlic property located at a3S G�eS from a �'� � zoning district to a}�' 2. Acopyofsections �•��7i through,�/� ncknotivled�e diat �ve ��z nware oP111 oFthe uses � nwlre tliat any of thase uses can be established u eonsent to the rezoning of tl�e property in tl�e pet;}� (Nanie of petifioner) � _ � �-i�� .S7�r�2�� ing district. o �-ya.a �, inclusive of dr Saint Paul Zoning Code; and iitted in �� zonin; district 2nd tve are Ciry Councii approval of die rozoning. \�'e horeby• � oF; �j� � � �� _ to r.��,zoning �istricL (�(�Q��V! � ) \Ve consenY to flte �pproval o�this rezoning as it `vas expl�ined fo us by the �PP�ic�nf or his/hcr represert��afivc. Oc>2-.8 zl, 3� o0o ( C, o-4- Sain'i PklA.L o� z�rz�.3� ooro c;�-�o� sr�r�t p�wL p�' zg2z. z3 O 13$ ( f�A�c� �.'osef{�c� U�o�.g•Z� 000� I �in MeGra�.'Yh o!(y Fern hoLz p�2$zZ ous description oE real estate ing the date oE this pe[ition n k�ar�ef O�z$22320o0S'` `�'rK t7. an ��..'�h _ Dan-k�u.w,1 Q�z�,z23-?.�v0�'I 1� irk L�An�Euw�A f�.v..`4h D Rn'tti-mo_ O�z82Z3��11� F� !-��I� U(0.2$ z'Z3 2�o121 t�1olly I�we Cy n�rruS 0628zz3 �oot3 `-��15 r-,�iMO� 1fRfen 3aSO�1 U�oz�2 I Ob10 �Soo Lin2 �r jraa.c� 0� 2$ � z�{ U�G�t <<� � sT �a.�� x� ence hl seum . _ 06 �8 z�a�f o07o C,�-Y a� s'� PHw L IrOT�: This petition shall not be considered as officially filed until tne lapse of seven (7) u�orking _ days aRer it is recei�•ed by the Planning Division. Any signator of this petition may �rithdratti•his/he� name therzErom by ��Titten request within that time. •�: O .� ZONING DISTRICTS City of Saint Paul SUMMARY OF USES ALLOtiVED IN SAINT PAUL ZO\'ING DISTRICTS �� "y a � RESIDE\TIAL R-LL, R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4 One-Famil}• One-family d�vellings Schools, libraries, parks, churches Convents, rectories Family day care (10) and group family day care (14) Group day care in a non-residential structurz Homz occupations Bed and brzakfasts w/one guest room Community residential facilities (s6 residents) Carriage housz dweltings (historically existing)" Cemeteries* Cluster dzvelopments* Colleges, univzrsities* Com•ersions of non-residential structures and residential struchires over 9,000 sq. ft.* Golf courses, private recreation facilities* RT-1 T��'o-Famitr' All R-� uszs T��o-family homzs Group day care Fratzmity and sorority houses* Bed and breakfasts �v/up to 4 guest RT-Z To«'nhouse �p A11 RT-I uses i Thrzz- and four-family d��elfings / To��nhouses «'ith up to 6 units � Community residential faciliti s (7-16)* i I2��I-1 blultiple Family � All R7-2 uses Apartment buildings (5�-'stories) Roomin� and boardin houses* I2_�I-2 �Iultiple Ali RNI-1 uses Apartment buil Eldzrly housi � Hospitals, n si, �ngs (<_ 5 stories) support services iR homes* iL�t-3 l�l tipie I amily Hi�h d sity, high rise apartments Churches, day care (all tyPes) Etdzrly housing support services Community residential facilities* Hospitals` Accessoq� retail service and office uses* CO�I�IERCIAL OS-1 Loca] Oftice-Ser� Business offices such as banks, insurance, real estate Professiona] offices such as medical cIinics, law officz; Artist and photographer studios Sen�ice businesses such as photocopying, �vateh and shoe repair„jailor shops, barber and beauty shops Day care (all es) Schools, co ges, libraries, parks, churches Mised co ercial/residential uses amily dwellin�s y residzntial facitities (16) owned buildin�s, public utility buildin�s* �S-2 General Office-Ser�•ice A110S-1 uses Post offices and similar eo�'emmental offices Retail businesses such as grocery, etc. (s 10,000 sq. fr.) Re;taurants and bars, except dri��e-in or fast-food Hotels and hospitals Laundries and dry deanin� (retail outlet) blanufact�rin� of small precision goods Carria�e house dwellinss Retail businesses (>10,000 sq. ft.)* B-1 Local Business Dtost OS-1 uses Rztail businesses such as erocery, bakery, drugs, books. clothin„ hard«�are, florist, carry-out restaurants Laundries and dry cleanin� (retail outlet) Post ofYices and similar go�'emmental offices ldi�ed commercial/residential uses Vlultiple-family d�vellings* B-2 Community Business Alt B-1 uses Sen'ice businesses �cith a sho�F7oom or �vorkshop such as contractor, baker, painter, appliance repair Restaurants and bars, eacept drive-in or fast food Food catzring CO{t22 �3051:5 Pricatz halls and clubs, health clubs "l�l�zaeers, bingo h�li�, ussemUl}' halis Currzncy exchange businesses Veterinary clinics, tatoo parlors Auto sercice stations, con��enience and specialty stores` Pool halls, bo��'ling alleys, game rooms and other t}'p=� of indoor commercial recreation" Pa��n shops* Z,7 CO�t�fFRCIAL (continued) I\DUSTRIAL . 0 ►- yy� B-3 Genera] Business Most B-2 uscs dndoor vehicle sales Mortuaries Finishing shops Business sales and service such as parcel delivery Manufacturing of small precision goods Hotels and motels Printin� and publishing firms Wholesalin� (no outside storaoe, <15,000 sq. ft.) Hospitals Outdoor vehicle sales * Auto repair facilities* Fast food and drive in restaurants* Greenhouses, nurseries* Car �vashes* Adult ttses'" B-4 Central Business Retaii, sen•ice and office uses Apartment residential uses Hotels, motels, hospitals Amusement and entertainment uses, museums Schools, colleges, libraries, parks, churches Go��emmental uses Currzncy eschan�e businesses, pa��n shops Adutt uses* Community residential facilities" B-5 Central Business/Sercice All B-4 uses �Vholesalino, warehousin� Limited manuEacturin� Dry cleanin� plants Foud catzrin�, processing, manuf Itescarch and testin� laboratories Auto sen�ice stations, auto conve stores, auto repair � B-2C Community Bu All RM-Z uses Most B-2 uses, except and currency excr Retail sales in a buildJ' Service businesses % and specialty urants, assembly halls businesses * Conditionai uses - A Special Condition Use Permit (SCUP) must be granted by the Planning Commission to allow these uses. I-1 Industry All B-3 uses except family and group family day care Warehousing, �vhotesalin� Research and testing Lumber and contractor s yards Manufacturing from pre�iously prepared materials Rental storage facilities Auto service stations, auto convenience/specialty storzs Auto repair, auto body facilities Tele��ision and radio to�vers" Adult uses"` Gun shops and shootin� �lleries* I-2 Industr}� MostI-1 uses ra�c materials Sewage pla Stora�e o, uilding matzrials, sand, gravel, stone �of sand, gravzl, other raw materials* �us and infzctious waste processing* dai freight yards" T-3 Industr}• Gasoline tank farms Rendzring plants and tannin� Rock crushing* SPECI.4L DISTRICTS PD Plnnned Decelopment All uses by specific plan P-1 Par]:ina Off-street parking RCR-I Ricer Corridor Residential Multiple family d��ellings Institutional uses RCGl Ricer Corridor Commercial All B-2 uses RCI-1 Ricer Corridor Industrial Limited I-1 uses nOTE: THiS [S NOT A LEGAI. DOCU!�IE\T. In tha inttrat oC simplicity and readability, it Ceparts Gom the neccss�ry itgal and technic�I langua_e of the Saint Paul Zonin� Code and othcr applicable regulation>- ��«��.cistpaul.nm.us.niep � 2_?p0! � `� � � �, �i� °` 6 �( ' 4 1�c• `S �14� . ,/ '.r- F � �� b o � b � 0 �� A° i 2 .� �� b �7 � � V i ` ' A ��`, : t '. ,�5 "' y � �; 9 '•�� 3 y}� . 6 : ' �` 1 2` ��js ��s ; i ` ��1� � `�; \ � � �•�'• �. X �\ �. ` , . \ �t65�, � � l � ��' .,M� � \ i t '' / � '- x � �� 8 � ,�15 � `' � �� ` 1 d. o � / \ r - i . - �i ,� 6 � � y ;-r , � -t�} _ . 6 �� ` � i,, 3 :• � � 2. '�` � , o , co ' � � � � — � �,':� � ,, !� �' �� 6 1 � , j i 2 ` � i � �, i � � �'° ? � ' /• �� II � �� . .�� / . � �, ; . e ,- � �-_.� �� ' �� ° �,,;�� , � o .�/� ". ' : �Y `� � 6 � '`�� j � °.'\ �\: �S� ..'D+. �,, �� . ` r � > ° 1 — � =_ —_\ _--�- •_':/- - - - — 4 �. 1)�' 0 �� . �_.� ��.: . o�� `� �u� : . _ _ . . Fc � �, ...�•: �`k� h' � � �. o �3� � °3's - ` � � �.,. Dc- � ' �� `.. \ ,� i � � �. G �" : ' '°° . . � . � �'; = 9. 35 ;6' � :;� ' e; �� • � '�, • :;�°� i -; �. ? � J �� '.. i � '� 0 : s � � ..� " ' • 0 ' - � ' � � =� V ` �9� oet . ' `'S: � � p � i o'.`''Ryi �y� � � q� i �Y� . ` �/ ( � pl: �a / tiU� � � 6R � _ �' y�` ./". . .`�/'•.°')�.. � �' � o � A ♦ �\ °� S f e'�!'�/ " , • y ' ' ` 2 J ` - � \ � l ,� " � � ` � � `' � O`, ',v�o 2s �ry ` ' .�� /� �� : �� 'r o s i �. . . '`?' � _ � / � ' �: f ° p�.y��7 . � ' i� % . .- � . � . /' � ti�� _ : - .-/ : `� ' . •6F �0 � C s�,�,� / � ^/ / 7 , �� . / . t � +� _�} 'Ij � t .-.� /`,'y'� � . .:'. .. .. . . .- w . J� � p � J . _. . . , . / i� . ': o .�or`- t}, ° o s � S � 9 ' _ .. : :%�:: ,: � y _."/ ° � - 6 � °'- - 3s 6 . •� . ' �' ' -�•''�� _ °+' �. � - \� ` y '. ;: / � • .. - Q � . ,�vl `�` / . �o - o c - " 5 . ! •� 10� � o � ,. - ._L��. ��_ � e�� / �.' � : ' . / .:' , •. 7, xx •.�� :: . � \ , ' 9 ��' �� f : �/� � —' ;� �i . - � �. : ��q Y,�� b ', . f' . % , � � 2 .. .or �. �G \. .e ...- . � ,-- . o►-�►�� Exhibit 3- City Conncil Resolnfion for Apri125, 2001 Smith Avenue Transit Hnb Development ProEram Descrintion The Development Program for the Smith Avenue Transit Hub proposes an combination bus layover fac�7ity and parking ramp that includes the followi ♦ Up to 1,400 pazking stalls, of which approximately 30% are for ♦ A bus layover facility for at least 16 buses; � ♦ lOQ bike lockers; pool; ♦ Up to 25,000 square feet of future retaiUcommercial alo� West Seventh street. The facility will be divided by Smith Avenue into a connected by bridges at the elevated levels for car ; lakely provide piimary entrance/exit to and from th�� parkers and event parkers, retail service access� lanes of vehiculaz traffic. Sidewalks, including, one provide for a pedestrian friendly use of Smit]�AveT aorth and a south structure n�pedestrian traffic. Smith Avenue will transit hub for buses, commuter/contract access and bikes, as well as provide for four covered walk within the ramp structure will The street-level bus layover facility will �commodate peak time metro bus layover for at least 16 buses. Metro Transit facilities on t site wili include all weather sheker accessible to the public from Smith Avenue, bus drive rfacilities, a with drivers room, general storage and a supervisors office. The bus la yover y will also serve charter buses for RiverCentre, the Xcel Energy Center, the Ordway, and �e Science Museum of MN. Such charter buses will share the facility, to the degree it is not ne `ded for Metro Transit bus layover, and will utilize the majority of the bus portion of the transi��ub at non-peak times and on weekends. The aesthetic design of the�.4'mith Avenue Transit Hub will be of urban character with roof top parking. The facility will b'e set back from West Seventh Street to accommodate the construction of retaiUcommercial spac�. Up to 25,000 S.F. of high bay retail space at street level will e�ctend the length of the � up to 75 feet deep connection across along West Seventh Street and will provide a variery of tenant fronCages �ck from the curb approxixnately 15 feet. There will be a pedestrian Seventh Street to the Xcel Energy Center via tunnel, skyway, or at grade. K:4Stazed�ped�Sc3ueckeV�IISC PROIECTS�SMITH TitANSLT HUB�Ex1u�6itC - Project Desc�ipfionwpd 30 � FINAL �e-�� U �-'v�5 l C� � ' ��, r . L �S , 2-c� c \ Presented By Referred To Council Fi1e # 0�- y a 3 Resolution # Green Sheet # �L.O s' ESOTA y3 . D3tE 1 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING TFIE SMITH AVENUE TRANSTT HfJB PROJECT, EXECUTING A 2 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT ON THE ARMSTRONG/QUINLAN HOUSE, ACCEPTING 3 TITLE TO THE ARMSTRONG/QUINLAN HOUSE FROM THE STATE AND REQUESTING HRA 4 TO RELOCATE AND STABILIZE THE ARMSTRONG/QUINLAN HOU5E AT THE FORMER 5 PLASTICS PARKING LOT STTE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 WI�REAS, the City, after receiving initial approval for a$5.5 million federal grant in 1998, has spent more than two years investigating the feasibility of the Smith Avenue Transit Project including conducting a federally mandated Section 106 Process with respect to the state owned historic Armstrong/Quinlan House ("House") and the Project as described in the attached E�ibit 3; and WHEREA5, as part of the federal Section 106 Process, the City of Saint Paul must, together with the State Historic Preservation Office and the Federal government, make an informed decision on its mitigation efforts with respect to the House, before proceeding with the Project; and , WHBREAS, the City Council supports a measured approach between preservation of historic sriuctures and the development of the Smith Avenue Transit Hub, which will serve the western end of Downtown including the RiverCentre Area; and WI�REAS, the House is a federally designated historic house that requires a thorough analysis of the altemative solutions and the impact the Project will ha�e on the historic nature of the House; the alternative solutions reviewed with the City Council include: (1) leaving the House in its present location with the Development Program around the House ("In Place Alternative"), (2) moving the House to several possible sites in either the West 5eventh/Irvine Pazk area, the edge of the site along Seventh Street or Saint Joseph's Lane ("City Sites") or other site acceptable to the City or (3) demolition and mitigation of the House; and WHEREAS, concerned citizens for preserving the House have expressed a clear preference for the House to be preserved and redeveloped as residential in the Irvine Park area which is attached in the Section 106 Report Volumes 1-5 previously submitted to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the State Legislature in 2000 agreed to donate the House and surrounding land to the City on the condition that City agreed to move the House to an alternative location so that it can be preserved; and 33 34 Wf�REAS, in Res. 00-6/14- 3, IIltA provided fixnds of $2,375,000 for the moving and stabilization of 35 the House with its prefeired site being the foixner Plastics Parking Site near Ryan and Chestnut and that the 36 City cause the House to be moved and stabilized; and 37 38 o� . y.a.� 39 WHEREAS, a Memorandum of Agreement ("MOA") among the Federal Highway Administration 40 ("FHWA"), the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation ("ACHP") the Minnesota Historical Preservation 41 Office ("SHPO") and the City along with concurring parties has been negotiated and attached in E�ubit 1; 42 and 43 44 WHEREAS, Saint Pau1 Heritage Preservation Cou�ission ("HPC") hosted the required public meeting 45 required by the federal Section 106 process on August 10, 2000 conceming the House and Smith Avenue 46 Transit Hub; and 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 WHEREAS, HPC has passed two resolutions conceming the House ( HPC Res 99-4 on July 22, 1999 and Res. O i-i on January 11 , 2001). The second resolution supports execution by HPC of the MOA, subject to its normal review with respect to municipal preservation matters as described in Chapter 73 of the Saint Paul Legislative code (see E�ubit i, Stipulation I C and D); and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the importance of the Seven Comers Gateway Area of Saint Paul, including significant views of the Saint Paul Cathedral, Xcel Energy Center and other important landmarks; and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes other projects that are under consideration including transit projects such as the Riverview Corridor and the Trolley, and other parking projects for Aoliday Inn Hotel, United/Clrildren's Hospitals, and others; and WI�REAS, a pazking supply and demand study for the westem end of Downtown, including the Smith Avenue Transit Hub, United Hospital campus, Holiday Inn Hotel etc,. Will be completed shortly to assist the City: (1) in the coordination between pending parking and transit projects in the westem end of Downtown and (2) in helping determine the final number of parking spaces to be financed and constructed as part of the Smith Avenue Transit Hub Project. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council approves and directs the following: 1. Accepts the final Section 106 Smith Avenue Transit Hub Report, Volumes 1-5. This includes Volume 5 which was prepared after the required public hearing on August 10, 2000 at the Saint Paul Heritage Preservation Comxnission and contains all written testimony of interested parties and the City's response to the testimony. 2. Approves proceeding with the Smith Avenue Transit Hub Project and accepts the now $6.2 million grant from Federal goveininent for the Project and directs staff to compiete securing at least $2.0 million from Metro Transit, which will be used toward the transit component of the Project. Approves execution of the Memorandum of Agreement substantially in the form as attached in E�ubit 1, 79 by appropriate City officials, and with such subsequent changes as may be approved by the City Attorney and 80 PED staff that are consistent with the actions taken in this Resolution. 81 82 4. Accepts title to the House and surrounding land from the State of Minnesota with the condition imposed by 83 2000 Legislature that in exchange for the House being donated to the City, the City agree that the House be 84 preserved at an aiternative site and directs staffto complete acceptance. SS 86 5. City selects Site # 7 the former Plastics Pazking Lot (on Chestnut St. south of Ryan Street) as the site to 87 which the House will be moved and stabilized for residential reuse, names Histonc Irvine Park Association as 88 Redeveloper, and approves attached Memarandum of Intent, s�ctut�a prrt�isic�n ft� �liaat p�icip�c��i � o�-4'y� 89 90 91 92 93 in substantially the same form as attached in E�ibiti2 with such subsequent changes as may be approved by the City Attomey and PED staff that are consistent with the actions taken in this Resolution. 5iting, move and stabilization activities of the House on Site #7 will be reviewed by the HPC as fiuther descnbed in the lines 48-51 above. 94 6. Authorizes City staffto commence and complete vacation process to convey Site #7 - Plastics to HI2A, who 95 in tum will convey to the Redeveloper. 96 97 7. Accepts rezoning petitions for the former Plastics Parking Lot and authorizes rezoning process to begin. 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 8. Requests HRA to cause: A) the House to be moved and stabilized and directs appropriate staff to retain a historic mover and any other contractors necessary to move and stabilize the House at Site # 7, consistent with the City's obligations descnbed in the Memorandum of Agreement in Paragraph 3 above. B) Use the $2375 million dollars wluch haue previously been budgeted in HRA Res. 00-6/14-3 to move and stabilize the House on behalf of the City. Further the City Council understands these HRA monies are interim funds to the City that shall be reimbursed to the HRA no later than the closing on the finaucing for the Smith Avenue Transit Hub by the City. 9. City staff is to continue design and traffic work on the Project on this gateway site to the Downtown by Collaborative Design Group Arclutects(Dick Faricy, Bill Hickey, et. al.) and SRF Consulting Crroup, in conjunction with other projects under consideration in the project area including Riverview Corridor, Trolley and other parking projects in the area.. 10. After completion of the parking demand study for the western end of Downtown, which will assist in the coordination of pending parking and transit projects in the area, the Administration sha11 return to the City Council and recommend: 118 119 120 121 122 '1'1 123 124 125 126 (i) the number of pazking spaces and buses to be built for the Project (ii) the design concept for Project described in E�ibit 3 (iii) the Finance Plan for the Project which will be developed by PED and Financial Services. ��? sr��:�nill. Prr�t�?e a t�tt�n'i�a�� tnt?ut�tp tc� t�te �1� �Zt��1 r�n:the �mit�i ��e �`ra�s�t Y�iii�rr �'io;jec�, �.as'ld�€c�c� t� st��'u�:6� ava�i� to �e a�a1 repc�rts #� t�e; �at� �;�i�ac�: Attachments to City Council Resolution 127 E�ibit 1-Copy of draft Dec 17, 2000 MOA with City, FHWA, SHPO, ACHP, et a1 128 129 Exhibit 2- Draft Memorandum of Intent with Redeveloper of House at Plastic Parking Lot Site 130 131 E�u�bit 3- Description of the Development Program for the Smith Avenue Transit Hub Project 132 133 OI-��S Adoption By: by Council Secretary � � �_ Appxoved by Mayor: Date "('V(!1 � H"�• By: Requested by Department of: Planning & Economic evelopment � �N BY U Approved by Financial Services B � ��'� Form Approved by Citp A,Etorney �� /�^ / BY - ', N ��;(/�l r Approved by Mayo o Submissio�i J.d COV�ci1 1\%/� 7 By: Adopted by Council: Date �S p�0, DEPARTMENT/OFFICFJCOUNCIL: DATE INITTATED GREEN SHEET No.• 101857 d �'`� y � Planning & Economic Dev. Mazch 26, 2001 ' CONTACI' PERSON & PHONE: � ml A7e INiTTniIDATE B. Geurs 6-6653 3 PED DIl2ECTOR 5 CTTY COUNCII, CHI2IS COLEMAN MUST�E ON COUNCII, AGENDA BY (DATE) �IGN 4_CITY ATTORNEY' Y� _ CITY CLERK T,pTqgEg FiNANCIAL SER CTG ,��?, API1�' _ , : _ -� � �, S � 'd.00 � F.Q 5 MAYOR (OR ASST.) _1_ BOB GEURS�L�,{.� �� `� ROi3TITiG 2 BOBSCHREIEA J / � !� ORDER .�. � TOTAL # OF SIGNAI'ORE PAGES _1_(CLIP ALL LOCATTONS FOR SIGNATf7RE) ncriorr xeQuES�n: After public hearing on Smith Avenue Transit Hub Project and Armstrong House consider attached Ciry Council Resolurion for Apri14, 2001. Also attached is the public hearing notice that is being published. RECOM[vS,NDATIONS: Approve (A) or Rejear (R) PERSONAI, SERVICE CONTRA("fS MUST AIVSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNING COMMISSION 1. Haz this person/fvm ever worked under a contract for this departmeat? CIB COINNIITTEE Yes No CI VIL SERVICE COMbIISSION 2. Has this person/fvm ever been a city employee? � Yes No 3. Does this person/fim� possess a skill not notmally possessed by any curzent city employee? Yes No Explain all yes answers ou separate sheet and attach to green sheet A'ITIATING PROBLEM, ISS[3E, OPPORTUNI'LY (Who, What, When, Where, Why): The Council needs to decide if it wishes to move and relocate the Armstrong House to the Plastic site and proceed with the Smith Avenue Transit Hub project which must be under contract by September 2002. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Preserve the national designated House and receive up to $7.5 million ($5.5 million of federal, $2 million of Metro Transit monies) to undertake the bus layover, parking project on Cleveland Circle. DISADVANTAGES IF APPAOVED: City or HRA is responsible for moving and stabilizing the House on the Plastic site, HRA in 00-6/14-3 has already budgeted the money. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: The Cleveland Circle site of 4.8 acres will continue not to be developed with the deteriorated house on the middle of the site. Addirional parlang for visitors will not be constructed. TOTAI. AD10UN1' OF 112ANSACTTON: $2,375,000 to move and stabilize COST/REVENUE BUDGETED: Yes F[JNDING SOURCE: Fund 148-76813-0561-65005/' AC1'IVITY NUMBER: FINANCIAL IlVFORMATION: (EXPLAA� � � K.\Shared�P�N[1LVER�nsM1ibobg03 ?b.01.101 BSl.wpd Ex� Z e�� . ��.s � tF D�-�r� a►-�� DRAFT - AECEh1BER 13, 2000 MEi140RANAUM OF AGREE�IENT AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGH�YAY ADIIII�IISTRATION, THE ADYIS ORY COUNCIL ON AISTORIC PRESERVATION, TFIE MINIVESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFTCE, AND THE CITY OF SAI�T PAUL, FOR TAE RELOCATION OF THE JOHN bI. ARMSTFtONG IiOUSE Ai�D CONSTRUCTION OF THE SNIITH A�'ENUE TRANSIT HUB SAINT PAUL, MINnESOTA WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration (FH�1'A) proposes to fund a portion of a transit hub project �vithin the City of St. Paul, Ramsey County, �finnesota; and tiVHEREAS, the FH�VA has determined that this project, the Smith A��emte Transit fiub project, will have an adverse effect on the John M. Armstrong House (House), a double-house listed on the National Register of Historic Places (National Register); \VHEREAS, the FHWA has consulted with the Ad�•isory Council on Historic Preservation (Council), the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), and the City of St. Paul (City) as an Invited Signatory, pursuant to the re�ulations (36 CFR Part 800) implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470�; and WHEREAS, the St. Paul Housin� and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and the St. Paul Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) have participated in the consultation and have been invited to concur in this Memorandum of Agreement (VIOA); and �VHEREA3, the HPC serves as an advisory body to the mayor and city council on municipa] herita�e preservation matters as outlined in Chapter 73 of St. Paul's legislati�-e code (Chapter 73); and tiVHEREAS, several Interestefl Parties have participated in the consultation through pubiic meetings, work sessions and review of documentation, includin; Tom Dimond, F:athryn Babcock - representing Citizens to Save the Armstrong House, the Fort Road Federation, Historic Irvine Park Association, and several other interested parties listed in the Section 106 Report dated June 2000. Tom Dimond and Kathryn Babcock have been invited to concur in this MOA; and, � WHBREAS, under Minnesota Sessions Laws 2000, Chapter 492, Art. l, Sec 86, in order for the City to acquire property from the State that is needed to proceed �vith the Transit Hub projzct on the Cleveland Circle site, the City of Saint Paul, at its expense, is required to relocate the House to an __ alternative site to preserve it; and d1-4�� WHEREAS, the City has completed historical research surrimarized in a report entitled, "Smith � Avenue Transit Hub: Literature Search forArchaeolo�ical Potential and Historic BuiidingInfensity Survey" (July 1999) and an Addendum (July 2000); and • tiYf�REAS, the Area of Potential Effects for the undertakin� is defined as the Smith Avenue Transit Hub Site (bounded by Kellogg Boulevard, West Seventh Street, Pifth/Sixth Street and I-35E), the buildings immediately adjacent to the Transit Hub Site, and any property on or buildings immediately adjacent to the Relocaiion Sites identified in this Agreement; IQOW, THEREFORE, the FHWA, the Council, the SHPO and the CITY (the "Signatories") agree that the undertakin� shall be implemented in accordance with the following stipulations in order to talce into account the effect of the undertaking on the John M. Armstron� House. STIPULATIO\S The FWHA will ensure that the followin� measures are carried out. I. RELOCATION AND STABILIZATION OF THE HOUSE A. Citv Oblioation to Relocate the House to an Altemative_ Site. The City shall cause the House to be relocated and stabilized ��ithin one year of the execution of theMOA to one of the acceptable sites listed in Appendix A. The relocation of the House will be completed according to the guidelines set forth in the National Pazk Service publication "Movin� Historic Buildin�s" by John Obed Curtis. The building mover will be selected by the City with review and concunence by SHPO. The City agrees to undertake relocation of the House and stabilization needed to maintain National Re�ister listin�. Moving and stabilization activities to be completed by the City, or its designee (i.e., historic mover; redeveloper), are tisted in Appendix B. � B. Citv Conveyance to Redevelonec The City shall enter into a redevelopment contract �vith a redeveloper, �vhich wil( determine the Relocation Site from Appendi� A. The House �vill be sold AS IS to a rede��eloper for reuse as either residential or commercial, at the sole discretion of the City. At the time the City conveys the land and the House to the redeveloper, the City shall attach a 30-yeaz covenant to the deed requiring that exterior modifications to the House be in compliance �vith the Secretary of Interior's Standards at the time of the modifications. If the redeveloper fails to perform the stabilization activities listed in Appendix B as required by the contraot, ownership of the I-Iouse wili re�•ert to the City. C. Rehabilitation Plan Review and Concurrence. The City orits redeveloper«�ill submit Rehabilitation Plans to HPC and SHPO during the City's Site Plan Revie��• Process, including the MovinglBuildin� Permit process, for review and concurrence as to consistency with the 5ecretary of Interior's Standards, within the context of chazacter-defining features of the building. The proposed Rehabilitation Plans will 3 Ol-ya� include buildin� siting, rehabilitation, landscaping, site improvements, and adj acent new construction that is part of the site plan. If the Move and Stabilization Plans {as further discussed in Appendix B} are submitted for revie�v prior to completion of Rehabilitation Pians for the remainder of the buitdia� (inc?uding the interior), the remaining plans will be reviewed separately. Fiexibility will be allo«�ed in the review of the interior ofthe House. HPC will provide an opportunity forpublic input during the Rehabilitation Plan Review Process(es) and SHPO will consider public comments as part of their revie�v(s). D. HPC Jurisdsction. If the proposed relocation site is located tvithin an azza that has been designated by the City under Chapter 73, the HPC wili have responsibility as determined by city ordinance for long term monitoring to ensure that subsequent treatment and impro��ements to the exterior of the House are in compliance �vith the Secretary of Interior's standards. If the proposed relocation site is not in an area that has been designated by the City under Chapter 73, the City will take every reasonable step to ensure that the House is redesi�natzd as a St. Paul Herita�e Presen•ation Site, subject to a public revie�v process outlined in Chapter 73. E. Retainin; National Re¢ister Listing durino the Ivio��e. Tn accordance ��•ith 36 CFR Section 60.14(b)(5), the House �vili remain on the National Register ��•hile bein� moved and after the move is complete. ��'ithin nine months after the House has been moved to its neGV site and stabilized accordin3 to the activities listed in Appendix B, the City shall prepare documentation required by 36 CFR Section 60.14. Appendix C identifies the materials to be fiimished. SHPO shali forward this documentation to the Keeper of the Register as notification of the move in accordance ��•ith 36 CFR Section 60.14(b)(5). F, TemaorarX Stora��of House durins Mo��e. If necessary, the City �i'ilf move the House to a temporary location to allow time for ne«• site preparation and to facilitate the transit hub constn�ction schedule. Appropriate measures ��•ill be taken to prote�t and secure the buildin� durin� this interim period. ` G. Protection of the Resource. After the City recei��es title of the propetty from the State, appropriate measures ��•ill be takzn by the City to protect and secure the building prior to, during and after it is moti•ed. II. ARCAAEOLOGX On behalf of FHWA, the City shall ensure that an archaeolo�ical survey is conducted on the Transit Hub site and on the selected Relocation Site for the House. The sun�ey shall be conducted by the City in a manner consistent with the Secretary of Interior's Standards and Guidelines for ldentificafion (48 CFR 44720-23) and taking into account relevant guidelines of the SHPO. The survey shall be conducted in consultation �vith the SEIPO, and a report of the survey meetin� the standards o f the Secretary of the Interior shall be submitted to FHWA for revie�v and approval. e a� -4� 1 FHWA shall evaluate properties identified throu�h the survey in accordance with 36 CFR Part 800.4. If the survey results in the identification of properties that are eligible for the National Register, FFi�VA shall comply with 36 CFR Parts 800.5 and 800.6. . III. COSTS OF TEiE MOA The Signatories and Concumng Parties shaii be responsible for their o�vn adminis�ation and staff costs associated �vith either document revie�v or field work related to this A�eement. Further, the City sha11 pay costs associated �vith the follo�vin�: (1) documentation, relocation and stabilization costs described in Stipulation I; (2) Archaeology survey and mitigation costs in Stipulation II; (3) Any other City costs required to complete h40A stipulations. IV. MODIFICATIONS, DISPUTES, TERMINATION, ETC. A. Modification or amendment of this agreement, as necessary, shall be accompiished by the Signatories in the same manner as the original agreement. B. Should the Si�natories object �vithin 30 days to the materials provided for revie�v pursuant to Sections I.A, I.C, I.E and II of this agreement, the FHWA shall consult �vith the objecting party to resolve the objection. If the FHWA determines that the objection cannot be resolved, the FHWA shall request the further comments of the Council. Any Councii comment provided in response to such a request �cill be taken into account by the FHWA �vith reference only to the subject of the dispute; the FHWA's responsibility to carry out all actions under this agreement that ue not the subjects of the dispute remain unchanged. C. Tfprovisions of this a�reement are not camed out within three (3) years from the date of its execution, the Signatories shall consult to seek amendment of the agreement. If •-- the agreement is not amended, any.Signatory may terminate it pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(c)(8). G! O�—`�� Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement and implementation of its terms evidence that FHWA has taken into account the effects of its undertaking on historic properties. A photocopy of this document will be deemed to be an original by the Signatories. ' FEDERAL HIGHFVAY ADMINISTRATION By Alan R. Steger, Division Administrator ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION By 7ohn M. Fowler, Executive Director b1INNESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATIO\ OFFTCE By Nina M. Archabal, State Historic Preservation Officer INVITED SIGl`IATORY: CITY OF SAINT PAUL By Mayor Norm Coleman fipproved to Porm: Peter McCall, Assistant City Attomey Date: Date: Date: Date: O�-y�� CO\'CUR: ST. PAUL HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSTON ay Name and Title of Signer Date:,_._. CITY OF SAINT PAUL HO'(JSING AND REDEVELOPVTENT AUTHORITY � By Date: Name and Title of Signer Approved to Form THOMAS R. DIMOND CITIZENS TO SAVE THE ARi�ISTRONG HOUSE By Kathryn M. Babcock Date: Date: 0 D�-ya� , � • .n i;�� Relocatian Sites currently o�vned by City or HRA Site �` 2- Kellogg and Seventh Street (Transit Hub Site) Site # 3- St. Joseph's Lane and West Seventh Street Site # 7- Plastics Pazking Lot (on Chestnut south of Ryan Street) __ Site # 8- Ryan Parking Lot (at Chestnut and Exchange) �� 4`-4a� APPENDIX B " MOVING AiVD STA.B�LIZATION ACTIVITIES TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY (Detailed Ntove and Stabiliae Data can be foernd in Yolume 1, r1t[achment I ofthe Section 106Reporl.) A. MOVE BY HISTORIC NIOVING CONTRACTOR This step includes the activities involved in physically lifting the Armstrong House off its existing foundation, movin� it alon� city strzets and placing it on a new foundation within a new site. (A separate contractoc �vill be responsible for the new foundation, as noted in Section B beloFV). The contractor hired to complete the moving activities must meet special requirements for moving historic structures. Prior to the move, preliminary bracin„ shoring and brick stabilization wil! be completed. Phofo documentation of interior and exterior tvill be completed to ailo�v monitoring of buildin� condition. Durin� the move, the historic moving contractor will take steps to protect overhead and underground utilities, as well as protecting or replacing affected landscapin„ curbs, ete. The historic movin� contractor �vill also provide liability insurance and performance bonds to ensure successfi�l completion of the move. Included in this Appendix is a memorandum dated May 4, 2000, from Constnictive Ideas that provides a detailed listing of items that �vill be the responsibility of the Historic Buildin� Mover and the City at the existing building location, �vhile the buildin� is in transit, and at the new building location. B. NEtiV CONSTRTJCTION ITEMS This step includes the activities of a general contractor to clear out the existing site oftheAmistrong fiouse 28er is has been moved, and to prepare the ne�v site for placement of the Armstron� House. i�'ew site �vork will involve constructing a foundation and basement for the House, including a structural support system. If necessary, a new entry porch tivill be built on the front of the House at its ne�v location. Depending on the site chosen for the Armstrong House, other activities will be required to provide a level surface for moving the House on to the new foundation. If necessary, steps will be taken at the new site to protect adj acent sidewalks, frees orstructures. Securin� fencing will be provided at both the old site and the ne�v site. Included in this Appendix is a memorandum dated May 4, 2000, from Constructive Ideas fhat provides a detailed listing of items thac �vili be the responsibility of a General Confractor and the City at the existing building location, �vhile the building is in transit, and at the ne�v building location. E� Oi —ya� C. MINIMUM ELEMENTS TO 12ETAIN NATIONAL REGISTEIt LISTING __ Based upon discussions with the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), this step involves the absolute minimum improvements required to protect the "shell" of the Armsfsong House from further deterioration. Correspondenoe from SHPO dated Much 17, 2000, identified the items in a detailed listing of conshuction activities that would not be needed for continued eligibility of the House. That correspondence is included in the Section 106 Report (Volume 1, Attactunent n. The key elements that are necessary for continued eli�ibility are listed as follows: ♦ Excavation and grading of new site ♦ Sheet pilin� as necessary to protect street, sidewalk, adjacent structures ♦ Wall footin�s, piers for porch footings on new site ♦ Foundation walls, sandstone veneer ♦ Tuckpointing, cleaning and brick reQair ♦ Basement beams ♦ Repair or replace front entry porches ♦ Remove and replace roofin� surface ♦ Ne�v gutters and do�vnspouts ♦ New entrances ♦ ltemove and replace windotivs, or repair existin� �vindows ♦ Perimeter caulking D. STABILIZATION AND ASSET PROTECTION This step involves activities by a general contractor to provide minimum improvements needed to allo�v safe access to the Iiouse for inspection. Minimum electrical service will be provided for basic lighting. Ne�v stairs to the basement will be constructed. Loose or waterlo�ged material will be removed from the house. e Minimum electrical service ♦ Rear exit stairs; basement stairs ♦ General interior clean-up (removal of loose or waterlogged materials) ♦ Environmental clean-up (asbestos and lead-based paint, if necessary) NOTE: Activities in Parts A-D of Appenclix B will be part of the "1Liove and Stabilizatiort Plans"referenced in the MOA. APPENDIX C Documentation required once the Aims�ong House is moved 1) A letter notifying the IvN-SHPO tfie date the property w�s moved 2) Two sets of 8 x 10 black and white photographs aad one set of slides of the house on its new site. Two or more different views (perspectives) of the froat aad rear of the house aze required. The Iab processing the fiIm should be able to pass a hypo (fixer) residue test for fiL�. process:ng. (In other words use a reputable veador for Pio ��g),'I�e phpto�raphs should be printed on photograpFriq silver emulsion resin-coated paper (not photograohic color dye paper used by vendors advertising cheap developin� costs). T1ie photographs shouid have a one-half inch border. They should be labeled on tfie back usin� a soft pencil with the following information: n�me of property, county and state, name of photo�apher, date of photo�apb, location of original negative*, view (camera facing), photo�aph number or number depicting vaatage point on the sketch map. . The slides should be a plastic mount with name of ptoperty, county and state�and date. *The SHPO will accept the negatives (along with the photographs) provided that the film•is 24 exposure aad T Max 100 or Plus X Paa film. 3) A sketch map (done ia black and white) which depicts the house on its new site 4) An original Uaited State Geological Survey Map (U.S.G.S.) whicli depicts the Iocacion o£the house on its new site (Depict locxtioa usin; a dot made with a lead pencil. Do not include any other rvritten informatioa on the map). 5) Acreage of the parcel on which the house is located. � Legat Description of the pazcel � Parcel's PIN number 8) Name and address ofproperty owner{s) � e►-H a� 10 �X l�, � r�"� �nto�u.� �s/Dl �L� Ol��'L� � March 26, 2001 Rehabilitation of the Armstrona House ("House") Memorandum Of Intent Redeveloaer. Site and Reuse of the Relocated House Redeveloper of the House will be the Historic Irvine Park Association ("HIPA"). The site to which the House will be relocated is the former Plastics parking lot at Chestnut and South of Ryan (the"Site"). The Redeveloper at its sofe discretion may seek additional partner(s) after a RFQ process is compieted by the Redeveloper. At this time, the Redeveloper pians to form a Limited Liability Corporation ("LLC") to undertake the remaining rehabilitation after the City or HRA completes move and stabilization activities described in the Memorandum of Agreement ("MOA") attached in F�chibit A. Rehabiiitation of the House would be residential reuse. The density on the site will be effectively controlled by the Redeveloper through the processing of one of three rezonings (RT-1, RT-2, RM-1) attached in Exhibit B. Phase 1: Pubiic Hearing on House and Smith Avenue Transit Hub before City Council (April 4, 2001� Citv and HRA 1. Staff recommends at Public Hearing on House and Smith Avenue Transit Hub that (1) the House be moved and stabilized at Plastics site, (2) recommend HIPA as Redeveloper and support execution of Memo of (ntent with Redeveloper and (3) Smith Avenue Transit Hub project be approved. 2. City Councit considers the Resolution to execute MOA; name Site and Redeveloper; convey property to HRA for disposition; accept HRA Budget of $2.375 M to undertake MOA obligations; accept 3 separate zoning petitions for the Site and related actions concerning the Smith Avenue Transit Hub. 3. HRA agrees to execute MOA, approves Redeveloper, agrees to accept site from the City and reconvey at Closing to Redeveloper; fund $2.375 M for the move and stabilizing and hold a pubiic hearing on land sale of the Site and the House to Redeveloper for a dollar pius a portion of the cost of delivering the sewer to the site to Redeveloper. Redevelouer 1. At Pubiic Hearing on April 4, 2001, on House and Smith Avenue Transit Hub (A) support business points outlined in this Memo of Intent (B) provide adopted neighborhood resolution approved March 20, 2001(C) provide sufficient signatures from immediate neighbors for three separate (RT-2, RT-1, RM-1) zoning petitions to the City as Applicant, that wouid be processed simultaneously. The Redeveloper will notify in writing the City as Petitioner 10 K:lshared\PEDlgeurs�armstronghs.02.14.01.wpd March 26, 2001 et - k�s days before by the third reading on the rezoning (Public Hearing meeting on rezoning), which one of the three rezoning it wishes the City Council to adopt; whereupon the City wili withdraw the two remaining petitions. If the City is not notified the default rezoning is RT -1. The final adopted rezoning will determine the densiry, and only the only structure on the Site will be the House unless Redeveloper recommends and finances additional structures. Phase 2: MOA (April to May 15, 2001) Citv and HRA 1. City, SHPO, ACHP, FNWA execute MOA. Also Concurring Parties HRA, HPC, Tom Dimond, and Save the Armstrong will be invited to sign. 2. Completes transfers of state land and House on Cleveland Circle to City from State. 3. Vacation process for transfer of title of land and House to HRA. (Separate vacation process is underway already for Hill Street adjacent to the Site on the south.) 4. Draft covenant about future rehab to the historic structure described in attached MOA. 5. Rezoning and Variance process for the Site. Variance for height will be necessary and a back yard variance may aiso be necessary. [Estimated completion of Rezoning and Variance by end of July] 6. HRA agrees to execute MOA, approves Redeveloper, agrees to accept site from the City and reconvey at Ciosing to Redeveloper; fund $2.375 M for the move and stabilizing and hold a public hearing on land sale of the Site and the House to Redeveloper for a dollar plus a portion of the cost of delivering the sewer to the site to Redeveloper. Redeveloper 1. Select partner(s), if any, through RFQ, arrange financing etc. Phase 3: Between Execution of MOA and Closing on Conveyance of House and Sife to Redeveloper (Mid May to Fall 2001 - 4 to 6 months) Citv and HRA 1. Retain CPMI as Project Manager for MOA move and stabilization under MOA. SRF through Ann Hopkins wiil also be involved. 106 Group will be used for archeology on the Site in advance of move. The City's Architect wili be the Collaborative Design Group for which Dick Faricy works. K:lshared�PED\geurs�armstronghs.02.14.01.wpd March 26, 2001 01-�t� 2. Retain historic mover approved by SHPO. Retain Contractor to build basement, etc. 3. City funds archeology, move and stabilization, and security activities. Budget is $2.375 M 4. City will explore ways to make Historic Tax Credit available to Redeveloper. 5. Move and Stabilization Plans (siting of House, etc.) will require HPC and SHPO review, as well as City Site Plan review process and variances. 6. City keeps House secure until Closing. 7. City prepares documentation for continued Nationai Register listing of House. Redeveloper 1. Two (2) designated representatives of Redeveloper will attend meetings with CPMI, etc. Involved with the exact siting of the House on the site. (Comment only on move and stabilization activities). Phase 4: Closing between City, HRA and Redeveloper on Conveyance of House and Land (after stabilization at Site) (Estimated Closing November 15, 2001 or sooner) House rehabilitated with Certificate of Occupancy complete and marketing within two years of Closing, estimated to by November 15, 2003) Citv and HRA 1. City conveys title of House and land and HRA conveys title of House and land by Quit Claim Deed to Redeveloper and establishes Escrow Funds if any funds remain from $2.375 M; Covenant recorded. Redeveloaer At closing on land and House for $1 plus the cost of delivering sewer to the site, after completion of move and stabilization, Redeveloper accepts the House AS IS, covenant is recorded, reverter language in deed, and if and only if there remains a balance on the City's $2.375 M, City establishes escrow fund for the Redeveloper on a reimbursement basis for the remaining rehabilitation of the House with appropriate documentation and approval by City's Project Manager, CPMI. Escrow funds, if any, would be available for utility connections for water and electrical, etc. 2. Undertake and complete rehabilitation, after review of Rehabilitation Plans by HPC and SHPO ,[i.e., get Certificate of Occupancy ] and market property within 2 years of Closing. K:\sharedWED\geurs�armstronghs.02.14.Ot.wpd March 26, 2001 01-w�`� Attachments to Memo of Intent dated March 26,2001 Exhibit A- Memorandum of Agreement ("MOA") on J.M. Armstrong House and Smith Avenue Transit Hub between FHWA, ACHP, City, SHPO et al. 6chibit B- Draft Rezoning Petition and Conditions for former Plastics Parking Lot site K:�shared�PED�geurs\armsVOnghs.02.14.01.wpd March 26, 2001 o, _�� Attachments fo Memo of Intent dated March 26,2001 Exhibit A- Memorandum of Agreement ("MOA") on J.M. Armstrong House and Smith Avenue Transit Hub between FHWA, ACHP, City, SHPO et al. Exfiibit B- Draft Rezoning Petition and Conditions for former Plastics Parking Lot site � t,�«n zs, zoo� K�shuediPEO\geurs��strcnghs.U2.t4A1 wpd � xl"� � �Me,�.a � ��'� N�a�.�.� u� 2.�1 � o� -�t �'� DRAFT - DECEil1BER 13, 2000 bSE11IORANDU�S OF AGREF,i�IiVT AitiIONG THE FEDERAL HIGHNAY AD�IIi�IISTR4TYON, THE ADYISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION, THE N1IN�IESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATIOI� OFFICE, AND THE CITY OF SAI\T PAUL, FOR THE RELOCATION OF THE JOHN Ai. Al2NISTRONG HOUSE ?.I�D CONSTRUCTION OF THE SI�IITH A�'ENUE TRANSIT HUB SAINT PAUL, MINnESOTA � WHEREAS, the Federal Hi�hway Administration (FH«'A) proposes to fund a portion of a transit hub project within the City of St. Paul, Ramsey County, �finnesota; and 1VHEREAS, the FHtiVA has detemiined that this project, the Smith Aaenue Transit Hub project, will have an adverse effect on the John M. Armstrong House (House), a double-house ]isted on the National Register of Historic Places (Nationat Register); VJHEREAS, the FH�VA has consuited with the Ad��isory Cotmcil on Historic Preservation (Council), theMinnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), and the City of St. Paul (City) as an Invited Signatory, pursuant to the regulations (36 CFR Part 800) implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preserv�tion Act (16 U.S.C. 470�; and �VHEREAS, the St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and the St. Paul Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) have participated in the consultation and have been invited to concur.in this Memorandum of Agreement (D40A); and tiVHEREAS, the HPC serves as an advisory body to the mayor and city council on municipal herita�e preservatian matters as outlined in Chapter 73 of St. Paul's legislati��e code (Chapter 73); and �YHEREAS, several Interested Parties haveparticipated in the consuttation throughpublic meetings, work sessions and revietiv of documentation, includin� Tom Dimond, �athryn Babcock - representing Citizens to Save the Armstrong House, the Fort Road Federation, Historic Irvine �ark Association, and several other interested parties listed in the Section 106 Report dated June 2000. Tom Dimond and Kathryn Babcock have been invited to concur in this MOA; and, �VHEREAS, under Minnesota Sessions Laws 2000, Chapter 492, Art. l, Sec S6, in order for the City to acquire property from the State that is needed to proceed with the T'ransit Hub project on the Cleveland Circle site, the City of Saint Paul, at its expense, is required to relocate theHouse to an : altemative site to preserve it; and � 0�-wa� WHEREAS, the City has completed historical reseazch summarized in a report entitled "5mitn Avenue Transit Hub: Literature Search for Archaeolo�ical Potential and Fiistoric B uilding Tntensity Survey" (July 1999) and an Addendum (July 2000); and WF�REAS, the Area of Potential Effects for the undertakin� is defined as the Smith Avenue Transit Hub Site (bounded by Keilo�g Boulevard,lVest Seventh Street, Fifth/Sixth Streef and I-35E), the buildings immediately adjacent to the Transit Hub Site, and any propedy on or buildings immediately adjacent to the Relocation Sites identified in this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, the FHWA, the Council, the SHPO and the CITY (the "Signatories") a� ee that the undertakin� shall be implemented in accordance with the following stipulations in order to take into account the effect of the undertakin� on the John M. Amistron� House. STIPULATTO\S The F�VHA will ensure that the follo�vin� measures are carried out. I. RELOCATION AND STABILIZATTON OF TFTE HOUSE A. City Oblioation to Relocate the House to a_n_Altemative Site. The City sliall cause the House to be relocated and stabilized ��ithin one }'ear of the execution of the MOA to one of the acceptable sites listed in Appendix A. The relocation of thzHouse �vill be completed according to the guidelines set forth in the National Pazk Service publication"MovingHistoricBuildings"byJohnObedCurtis. Thebuiidingmover wi Ii be selected by tlle City witti review and concunence by SHPO. The City agrees to undertake relocation of the House and stabilization needed to maintain Nationzl Re�ister listing. Movin� and stabilization activities to be completed by the City, or its designee (i.e., historic mover; redeveloper}, are listed in Appendix B. �E. CityConvevance to Redeveloaer. The City shall enter into a redevelopment contract �vith a redeveloper, which �vi11 determine the Relocation Site from Appendi� A. The House tivill be sold AS IS to a rede�•eloper for reuse as either residential or commercial, at the sole discretion of the City. At the time the City conveys the land and the House to the redeveloper, the City shall attach a 30-year covenant to the deed requiring that exterior modifications to the House be in compiiance with the Secretary of Interior's Standards at the time of the modifications. If the redeveloper fails to per£orm the stabilization activities listed in Appendix B as required.by the contraot, ownership of the House will re��ert to the City. C. Rehabilitation Plan Review and Concurrence. The City orits redeveloper�ti•ill submit Rehabilitation Plans to HPC and SHPO during the City's SitePlan Revie«' Process, including the Movin�/Buildin� Permit process, for review and concurrence as to consistency with the Secretary of Intzrior's Standards, within the context of __ character-defining features of the buildin�. The proposed Rehabilitation Pians will O� •4 y� includebuildin� sitin�, rehabilitation, landscaping, site impror•ements, and adjacent _ new construction that is part of the site plan. If the Move and StabilizaYion Plans (as further discussed in Appendix B) are submitted for review prior to completion of Rehabilitation Plans for the remainder of the buildin� (includin� the interior), the . remaining plans wiil be revietived separately. Flexibility wiil be allo��•ed in the review of the interior of the House. HPC �r•ill provide an opportunity forpublic input during the Rehabilitation Plan Review Process(es) and SHPO �vill consider public comments as part of their review(s). D. HPC Jurisdiction. If the proposed relocation site is located �vithin an area that has been designated by the City under Chapter 73, the HPC will have responsibility as determined by city ordinance for long term monitorin� to ensure that subsequent treatment and impro�•ements to the exterior of the House are in compliance with the Secretary of Inteaor's standards. If the proposed rzlocation site is not in an area that has been designated by the City under Chapter 73, the City will take every rzasonable step to ensure that the House is redesi�nated as a St. Paul Heritage Presen�ation Site, subject to a public revietiv process outlinzd in Chapter 73. E. Retainine National Reaister Listin�durin� the Ivlove. In accordance n�ith 36 CFR Section 60.14(b)(5), the House will remain on the National Register ��fiile bein� moved and after the move is complete. �41'ithin nine months after theHouszhasbeen moved to its new site and stabilized accordin� to the activities ]isted in Appendix B, the City shall prepare documentation required by 36 CFR Section 60.14. r�ppendix C ideutiFies themateriats to be furnished. SHPO sh�!I fo:�vard ta.isdocu::�entationto the Keeper of the Register as notification of the mo��e in accordance ��•ith 36 CFR Section 60.14(b){5). F. Temoorary Storaoe of House durinQ Mo�•e. If necessary, the City «�ill move the House to a temporary location to al low timz for neti�� site preparation and to facilitate the transit hub constn�ction schedule. Appropriate measures «•ill be taken to protect and secure the buildin� durin� this interim period. G. Protection of the Resource. After the City receives title of the propem� from the State, appropriate measures �ti•ill be takzn by the City to protect and secure the building prior to, during and after it is mo�•ed. II. ARCHAEOLOGY Onbehalf of FHWA, the City sha11 ensure that an archaeological survey is conducted on the Transit Hub site and on the selected Relocation Site for the House. The sun•ey shall be conducted by the City in a manner consistent with the Secretary of Inteaor's Standards and Guidelines forldentification (48 CFR44720-23) and takin�into accountrelevantguidelines of the 5HP0. The survey shall be conducted in consultation with the SHPO, and a report of the survey meetin� the standards of the Secretap� of the Interior shall be submitted to FHWA for review and approval. o� -�� F�VA shall evaluate properties identified throu�h the survey in accordance with 36 CFR Part 800.4. If the survey results in the identification of properties that aze eligible for the National Register, FH�VA shatl comply with 36 CFR Parts 800.5 and 500.6. III. COSTS OF THE MOA The Si�natories and Concurring Pazties shali be responsible for theirosvn administration and staff costs associated �vith either document revietic or field work related to this A�reement. �� Further, the City shall pay costs associated �vith the following: (1) documenfation, relocation and stabilization costs described in Stipulation I; (2) Archaeology survey and mitigation costs in Stipulation IT; (3) Any other City costs required to complete I�30A stipulations. ' IV. 1�IODIFICATIONS, DISPUTES, TERi1�1INATION, ETC. `�' A. Modification or amendment of this agreement, as necessary, shall be accomplished by the Signatories in the same manner as the original agreemeot. B. Should the Si�natories ob,}ect tivithin 30 days to the materiats grovided for revie�r pursuant to Sections I.A, I.C, I.E and II of this agreement, the FHWA shall consult �vith the ob}ectin� party to resolve the objection. If the FHWA determines that the objection cannot be resolved, the FH�VA shall request the further comments of the Council. Any Council comment provided in response to such a request ��ill be taken into account by the FHWA �vith reference only to the subject of the dispute; the FHWA's responsibility to carry eut zll ections i�nd:r this agreement thet are not the subjects of the dispute remain unchanged. C. Ifprovisions of this agreement are not camed out within three (3) years from the date of its execution, the Si�natories shall consult to seek amendment of the agreement. If - the a�reement is not amended, any Signatory may teaninate it pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(c)(8). 6 F� e�-4�a Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement and implementation of its terms evidence that FHWA has taken into account the effects of its undertaking on historic properties. A photocopy of fhis document will be deemed to be an original by the Signatories. ' FEDERAL HIGH�YAY ADMIMSTRATION By Alan R. Steger, Division Administrator Date: � ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION By 3ohn M. Fo��ler, Executive Director nIINh�ESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE By Nina M. Archabal, State Historic Preservation Officer INVITED SIGNATORY: CITY OF SA.II�IT PAUL By Mayor Norm Coleman Date: Date:,_� Date:�— Approved to Form: Peter McCall, Assistant City Attomey 0►-4 � Co�'CUR:' ST. PAUL HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION By Name and Title of Signer Date: CITY OF SATNT PAUL HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY �" By Name and Title of Si�ner Approved to Form THO;�iAS R. DIMOND � CITIZENS TO SAVE TFIE ARI4ISTRONG HOUSE By Kathryn M. Babcock Date: Date: Date: e � p�� -Ha APPENDIX A Relocation Sites currently o�vned by City or HRA Site � 2- Kellogg and Seventh Street (Transit Hub Site) Site # 3- St. 7oseph's Lane and West Seventh Street Site # 7- Plastics Parking Lot (on Chestnut south of Ryan Sireet) ._ Site # 8- Ryan Parking Lot (at Chestnut and Exchange) � 0� -'i'y� .. �� ; ! MOVING AND STA.BTLIZATION ACTIVITIES TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY (Detailed eLfove anrl Stabili=e Data can befotrnd in Yolume I, flttachment I ojthe Section 106Report.) A. MOYE BX HISTORIC lYiOVING CONTRACTOR This step includes the activities involved in physically lifting the Armstrong House offits existing foundation, movinJ it alon� city streets and placin� it on a new foundation within a ne�v site. (A separate contractot �vill be responsible for the ne�v foundation, as noted in Section B below). The contractor hired to complete the moving activities must meet special requirements for moving historic struchires. Prior to the move, preliminary bracin„ shorin� and brick stabilization will be completed. Photo documentation of interior and exterior �vill be completed to allow monitoring of buildin� condition. Durin� the move, the historic moving contractor will tal:e steps to protect overhead and underground utilities, as �vell as protecting or replacin� affected landscapin„ curbs, etc. The historic movin� contractor will also provide liaSility insurance and performance bonds to ensure successful completion of the move. Included in this Appendix is a memorandum dated May 4, 2000, from Constn�ctive Tdeas that provides a detailed listing of items that �viil be the responsibility of the Historic Buildin� Mover and the City at the existing buiidin� location, while the buildin� is in transit, and at the new building location. B. NE�V CONSTRUCTION ITEMS This step includes the activities ofa general contracfor to clear out the existing site of theAmistrong Aouse 2fter is has been moved, and to grepare the ne�v site for placement of the Armstron� House. I�'ew site �vork �vill involve constructing a foundation and basement for the House, inciuding a structural support system. If necessary, a new entry porch �vill be built on the front of the House at its ne�v location. Depending on the site chosen for the Armstrong House, other activities will be required to provide a level surface for moving the House on to the new foundation. If necessary, steps will be taken at the new site to protect adjacent side�valks, frees or structures. Securin� fencing wiil be provided at both the old site and the ne�v site. Included in this Appendix is a memorandum dated May 4, 2000, from Constructive Ideas that provides a detailed ]isting of items that �vill be the responsibility of a Generai Contractor and the City at the existing building locafion, while the building is in transit, and at the ne�v building location. F� a i .y�-� C. MI\"Ii�1UlI ELEbIEITS TO RETAi� i P:ATIO\AL REGISTER LIST'IivG Based upon discussions with the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (5HP0), this step involves the absolute minimum improvements required to protect the "shell" of the Armstrong House from further deterioration. Correspondenoe &om SHPO dated March 17, 2000, identified the items in a detailed listing of construction activities that �vould not be needed for continued eligibility of the House. That correspondence is included in the Section 106 Report (Volume 1, Attachment �. The key elements that are necessary for continued eli�ibility are listed as follows: ♦ Excavation and grading of new site ♦ Sheet piling as necessary to protect street, sidewalk, adjacent structures ♦��Vatl footings, piers for porch footin�s on ne�v site ♦ Poundation walls, sandstone veneer ♦ Tuckpointing, cleanin� and brick repair ♦ Basement beams ♦ Repair or rzplace front entry porches ♦ Remove and replace roofin� surface ♦ Netiv gutters and downspouts ♦ New entrances ♦ Remove and replace windo�vs, or repair existing �vindows ♦ Perimeter caulkin� D. STABILIZATION AND ASSET PROTECTION This step involves activities by a general contractor to provide minimum improvements needed to allow safe access to the House for inspection. Minimum electrical service will be provided for basic lighting. Ne�v stairs to the basement tvill be consfructed. Loose ot �vaterlogged material �vill be removed from the house. 4 Minimum electrical service ♦ Rear exit stairs; basement stairs ♦ General interior clean-up (removal of loose or waterlogged materials) ♦ Environmental clean-up (asbestos and lead-based paint, if necessary) NOT'E: Activities irz Parts A D of.4ppendix B will be part of the "rLlove and Stabilization Plans" referenced in the MOA. APPENDIX C Documenta�on required once the Armstron� House is moved 1) A letter no�fyiag the MN-SFiPO the date the property wzs moved 2) Two sets of 8 x 10 black and wbite photographs and one set of slides of the house on its new site. Two or more different views (perspecdves) of the front aad zear of the house aze required. The lab processin� the film should be able to pass a hygo (fixer) residue test for fiL*u processin�. (In other words use a reputable vendor for processing). Tne photographs should be printed on photographic, silver emuLsion resin-coated paper (not photograpflic color dye paper used by vendors advertising chrzp developing costs). The photographs should have a one-half inch border. They should be labeIed on the back usin� a soft pencil wi2h the followin� information: name of property, county and state, name of photo�apher, date of photo�ph, location of original negative*, view (camera facing), photograph number or number depicting vantage point on the sketch map. • The slides should be a plastic mount with name o£property, county and st2te•and date. *The SHPO will accept the negatives (along with the photogaphs) provided th2t tfie film•is 24 exposure and T Max 100 or Plus-X Paa fi1m. 3) A sketch map (done in black and white) which depicts the house on its new site 4) An original United State Geological Survey Ivfzp (U.S.G.S.) wIuch depicts tha locatioa of the house on its new site (Depict location usin; a dot made with a lead pencil. Do not incIude any other rvritten information on the map). 5) Acreage of the pazcel on which the house is located. � Legal Description of the pazcel � � � parcel's PTN number $) Name and 2ddzess of property owner(s) ti�-4a� E[�i �X k�b� f� t3 '— 1M � a� �h�. c�w�� V�la� Z6� aoo� Addendum to Rezoning Petitior_s fox 235 Chestnut St. and 0 Hill St. Parfies agreeing to addendum. This addendum to the rezoning petitions for 235 Chestnut Street and 0 Hill Street has been reviewed and agreed to by the following parties: Saint Paul PED, Historic Irvine Park Association (HIPA), Kevin McGrath and Molly Femhoi� Patrick and Rita Hawkinson Wamer, Dirk and Ruth Dantuma, Peter Hilleren, Louis Fillmon and Karen Jason. Oi-y�� 2. Purpose. The parties want to accelerate rezoning of 235 Chestnut Street to permit the moving of the historic Armstrong House from its present location north of the Xcel Arena to the site. The site's present zoning is P-1, which aliows only surface parking. Before the City can issue moving and foundation permits, the site needs to be zoned to pemut housing. The parties agree that the property on Chestnat Street should be rezoned to ailow the Armsfrong House to be moved and that the new zoning should be the most restrictive residential zone in which the house can feasibly be restored and sold. The City wants to move the house as soon as possibie to open up the site north of the arena for redevelopment. 3. Simultaneous zoning steps and redevelopment anatysis. IiIPA is negotiating to take ownership of the Armstrong House and to partner with a developer to restore and market it. At the time of the filing of the rezoning petitions, HIPA has not had time to select a partner, complete a project feasibility analysis, or detemune how many residentia( units will be at the site. While HIPA is working with developers, public agencies, and contractors to devise a feasible restoration plan for the property, the City and the property u owners within 100 feet of the Chestnut Street site are initiating three separate residential rezoning petitions for RT-1 (duplex), RT'-2 (3-4 units), and RM-1 (mu]ti-family) so that any one of them can be chosen later. The petitions will initiate the rezoning process at the Planning Commission; the parties expect that all three alternatives may still be under consideration when the Planning Comrrussion holds its hearing and makes its recommendation. At least ten days before the rezoning petitions come before the City Council for third reading and public hearing, HIPA will have deternuned and submitted to the City in writing which of the three altemative rezonings fits its restoration plan. The other two petitions will be withdrawn by the parties. If FiIPA has not made a written recommendation, the parties will recommend that the Council approve the RT-1 rezoning altemative. As soon as practical � 01-4ti� after the Councii approves a new zoning district, PED will request building permits for = excavation, a new foundation, and the house move. In addition to the rezoning, other City aggrovals will be required before building pemuts aze issued, including height and setback variances, site plan review, and historic review. 4. Nullificafion of the consents given on the rezoning petitions. Most of the petition signers specifically support the moving and restorarion of the Armstrong House, but would not support whatever residential development may be pemutted in the zoning disfsict without the house. If the Armstrong House is not moved to Chestnut Street or suffers severe damage during the move and cannot be restored, the parties want to retum the zoning, at least for the time being, to P-1. 5. Attachment to rezoning petitions for RT-1, RT-2, and RM-i. This addendum is hereby attached to each of the three rezoning petitions as an explanation for why multiple petitions are being submitted and as a safeguard for the affected neighbors. 6. Signatures of the Parties. I agree with the provisions of this addendum. (Please sign a�rd date.) Brian Sweeney, PED Patrick Wamer Peter Hilleren Kevin McGrath Molly Fernhoiz Molly Howe Lynn Rita Hawkinson Warner Dirk Dantuma Ruth Dantuma K:�Shared�PedSODERHOUZ02�'L�'GWrmstrongHouseZAddrnd�nn2.wpd 2 Louis Fillmon Karen Jason � m CX`�� O� S.A.XN�` �'.A.�7� � CONSENT•OF AD70INING PROPERTY OZyNERS FOR A . .x�zoN.rNc o�-yy3 We, ilte undersigned, otivncrs of the proper�y �vitfiin (00 feet of thc to(a{ contiguous description of taa] estate o�vned, purchased, or sold by THE PET[Tf0\TER tvithin one year prtcedin� th� date of this petition �cknowledge that �ve have been presented �ei[h the follou�'sno; 1. A cop}' oi'the petition o f _ (name of to rezone thc nrogerty loclted at 23S C� d S� 6a; ! l S from a P � zoning distcict to �� district. 2. A copy ofsections �D•��2 tlirouoli ��.�3 inclusive ofthe Saint Paul Zoning Code; and ncknou9cd;e tliat �ve are awnro oFnll of tlie uses permitted in a � zoning district 2nd we are a�vare tl�a[ any of these uses cnn be establisl�ed upon Ciry Counc�l approva{ of Ihe rczoning. \Y horeb�� consent to the rcZOnin� of tlie property in thc petition oC; ��—�� D� �^�N , T �CCi1� f_G ��l / to n� �oning 2istrict. ��°'��'V7�� (?�Iame of petitioner) \Ye conscnt to il�e �pProval of this rczoning as it tivas ezpl�ined fo us by fhe applic�nf or his/I�er represenfativc. o�z8 z� s� o00 � G', o� s�� (�r�k.L 06 z82ZJZ oolO C�'E- of 5��' PRK-L �z$ZZZ3 013$ pqvi�{ �',osef{��, U�eZ.g.ZZ3Z pOC7� KcV�n MCGra.^�-h rrjo/!y Fer hoLz ^�p PAt�;cK tJRr�er Q�p <O zZ `3��Q�3 hZ�'f'A /�RWKi�San 4�aMCf O�z�jZ23z0�bS `�"�K l�. Antu.ma o._�.�_ r,,,_ 1 - v6z�z�3.2or�o9 oGzs2z32.00�} t�irk DAn'fuw�A f�'{e�' �-�� er'e 0(�-Z$ z Z3Zo nlotly l�we L y„�Tus� 06z8 zz3zoat3 `°� �;i�Ma� tfRren 3asen (1�n 0610� �50o Ltne. �i �raac� G�� c.i -J a-"r sT E'�;1,.C, su �nce C,�-v a-F �T PAw L_ hOT,�: This petition shail not be considered as o�cially filed until tne lapse of seven (7) u�orking , daysafteritisreceicedbythePlanningDivision. Anysignatorofthispetitionniay�rithdratiti�his/het name thereCcom by �tiTitten request within that time. ;,' :j � ZONING DYSTRICTS ��-`+y� City of Saint Paul SUD'IMARY OF USES ALLO`VED I�' SAI�'T PAUL ZO\ING DISTRICTS RESIDEtiTIAL CO3I�IERCIAL R-LL, R-1, R-3, R-3, R-4 One-Famil}• One-family dtiG•ellings Schools, libraries, parks, churches Convznts, rectories Family day care (10) and group famity day care (14) Group day care in a non-residzntial structure Home occupations Bed and breakfasts w/one guest room Community residential facilities (56 residents) Cartia�e house drvellin�s (historically existin�)* Cemeteries* Clustzr developments* Colleges, univzrsities* Com•crsions of non-residential structures and residzntiai structures over 9,040 sq. ft* Golfcourses, private rzcreation facilities* RT-1 Tti�'o-Famih• All R-4 uszs T«'o-family homes Group day carz �ratzmity and sororiry houses* Bed and breakfasts ��•/up to 4 guest rooms* RT-3 To��nhouse All RT-1 uses Three- and four-family d��•ellings To�cnhouses «•ith up to 6 units Communiry residential facilities (7-16)* I2D1-1 Dlultiple Family All RT-2 uses � . Apartment buildings (s3 stories) Rootning and boardin� houses* 12,1I-2 DIultiple Famil}• All Rivt-1 uses Apartmznt buitdings (<5 stories) Elderl}• housing support services Hospitals, nursin� homes* iL�t-3 �'Iultiple r'atuily Hi�h dznsity, high rise apartments Churches, day care (all types) Eldzrly housing suppoR services Comm�mity residential facilities'� Hospitals" Acczssory retail service and office uses* OS-1 Local Office-Ser�'ice Business oftices such as banks, insurance, real estate Professiona( offices such as medical clinics,la�v ofTices Artist and photographer studios � Sen•ice businesses such as photocopying, �vatch and shoe rzpair, tailor shops, barber and beauty shops Day care (all types) Schools, colleges, libraries, parks, churches Mixed commercial/residzntial uses hiultiple-family d�vellin�s Community residential facilities (16) Publically o�vned buildings, public utility buildin�s* OS-2 General Office-Serti•ice All OS-1 uses Post oftices and similar eo�•emmental offices Retail businesses such as grocery, etc. (s 10,000 sq. ft.) Restaurants and bars, e�cept dri�•e-in or fast-food Hotets and hospitals Laundries and dry cleaning (retail outlet) nfanufacturin� of small precision goods Carria�e house d�vellin?s Retail businesses (>I0,000 sq. ft.)* B-1 Locai Business �fost OS-i uses Retail businesses such as grocery, bakery, dnigs, books. ciothin„ hard�care, florist, carry-out restaurants Laundries and dry cleanin� (retail outlet) Post ofT3czs and similar govemmental offices Vfixed commercial/residentiai uses �fultiple-family d�vellings* B-2 Communitp Business All B-1 uses Sercice businesses «'ith a shonTOOm or workshop such as contractor, baker, paintzr, appliance repair Restaurants and bars, excep[ drive-in or fast food Food caterin� Coffez kiosks Pricatz halis and clubs, health clubs "l�htaters, Uiit�o halis, asscmbly hal'ss Currency exchange businesses Vetzrinary clinics, tatoo parlors Auto sen�ice stations, con��enience and specialty stores" Pool hells, bon•ling aileys, game rooms and other t}y�� of indoor commercial recreation* Pa��r shops* �,7 ✓ � �1 �'� q � 6 `(5) l ` ,4i«' �5 c�4) , - �l d < ��J 6 0 f� c o b � i ; o .! � \ rb� 4 � ..d..�\ �� ' ,; . `Lv' 'r` . ,49 , A �-^ V ,{� ,�5. � 5 -, � . � � �'j � � �-, o � y� � 6 � � ' �� `- \ ; `. �. 7 ' �`� � ��. ��{ � � • '1�• .y�/ \ (� bs), i - t � /�� _.9 � �,�o� �� ♦ �l 5 0 °' 1 S''Y i.:, ��°' ! �I. � o �.. ` / ; _ � .'. . �� '� 6� ` 6a y t � r� �� I 's. , ,i�3 ;. � `� o ;c � . 3 , . '.� � 12 } �. ;. o t_ . �. o-?�:�.� ` �� - OWN. HIY ' � • : V �1 `' 3£P'� ? ` k''� `�` �`� p Z % � ,�.� Q/ �*' ' P,9t1,cMA )-,.: ; �..` 1 � 6 2 . Q ,°i � cc;�co i .: . ;; ..: � ; . / '� � i ?' Ec„) w ( , / �� / �, � o �, 1'c a . ':. � ` _ � \ \ � � I � / i L p O � va' � r �f \ / V 5 � �s o ♦ ' •. i � ° q \\ i Q' `� � �� ' ''O f � . \ /� '��'�o� 9 � , � �<3��'�,�� 1p '+, ��,• �, ••':, _ :�Y�".� , ;s � 6 m ••�'. ° - I ��'�. ` o . .. .!rp;":•, � , � � ' ' 9 . �, y�,g e 1: �: ` � _ _ _` ��/ __s�_ � _ . �� r:`I. - - ' -- . _. "'�..�_ .. -� "--�. � "Z� �L 1� . p . � . .'`'�,_ %.. .. � v_ � "C3�`� o"'�k�� J �S �u�''� : � � �,a . o .. 3 , � Q _ . . � + C ai� 43 . ' : . t - �5� � 3 � �0 d' � _--_ � �`'� ': . '� .' � - �, , � �� ; o : : 35 ..� . , L .�`��". . +�; .' 9.: ,_ 6 �.�'s, . '� • . j .� o) � t , ` �� ij �:.;_ - -� �. : . : b`�:'. . '"� Oa `. � ,.� .. � - . � � . .s o o . � • . � ` p � "��. . !� . . . - ' � ` ♦ ['� � l'�: . - � o - "" ' o �o' "'�9' 9 oe� ` ` 't i,t-`ir. � 35 . � � � � Ol ' +p ��F, . �/ . a 4• v�� .��. ,��.�_ ;x. %- Qo A C � . . e : � '. �, - •,;..�� : ` '� o'� `\\ . C /�l �i 00 2 9 , G �^' ° � t/ -` 7> � yo,L t J 6 \� . � . . � _=_ � �} .s•L� - ( � v, . O � �� ' R , . . . . r . . : f �,, , o �(9�c� f � '. �a• . \ ),1 • 6 J �.�� .-f- : - .- i . z °oJ' S� ^`s � ,yQ '� . � i �� - _ . ': � 0 V O O ' �� . ' �' � � j �� , - ` • , ...(�j _ �y 0 ' �' •�/:: _ '%:• ::''i -y � bo�� 1 , 3 S 6 .:: :: � �... : j/..,:,, ,: - � � �� = :' ,.... S '' /.��' ' �� _is ° l .,`� `' � :,p �; �� g i � � io) ; ., �,, ..: / � � � � , i . � -:.�.^ .; � - t� � �,�� \ .� `\Ir ' J� �.' /,/ :l . � , v �',l "//, ' �G V _ �°`� .oi � 9 �G� �� bJ�::-' � �'./ .%!' f � �" �/•�/� .� �X �'� �'�-� 3 �� EXhibit 3- City Council Resolufion for Apri125, 2001 Smith Avenue Transit Hub Aevelopment Program Description The Development Program for the Smith Avenue Transit Hub proposes an above-ground combination bus layover facility and parking ramp that includes the following elements: ♦ Up to 1,400 parking stalls, of which approximately 30% aze for caz/van pool; ♦ A bus layover facility for at least 16 buses; ♦ 100 b�lce lockers; ♦ Up to 25,000 squaze feet of future retaiUcommercial along West Seventh street. The facility will be divided by Smith Avenue into a north structure and a south structure connected by bridges at the elevated levels for car and pedestrian traffic. Smith Avenue will likely provide primary entrance/exit to and from the transit hub for buses, commuter/contract parkers and event parkers, retail service access, van access ar. bt�ces, as well as pro��ide for four lanes of vehicular traffic. Sidewallcs, including one covered walk within the ramp structure will provide for a pedestrian friendly use of Smith Avenue. The street-level bus layover facility will accommodate peak time metro bus layover for at least 16 buses. Metro Transit facilities on the site will include all weather shelter accessible to the public from Smith Avenue, bus driver facilities, a with drivers room, general storage and a supervisors office. The bus layover facility will also serve charter buses for RiverCentre, the Xcel Energy Center, the Ordway, and the Science Museum of MN. Such charter buses will shaze the facility, to the degree it is not needed for Metro Transit bus layover, and will utilize the majority of the bus portion of the transit hub at non-peak times and on weekends. The aesthetic design of the Smith Avenue Transit Hub will be of urban character with roof top parking. The facility will be set back from West Seventh Street to accommodate the construction of retaiUcommercial space. Up to 25,000 S.F. of high bay retail space at street level will eictend the length of the facility along West Seventh Street and will provide a variety of tenant frontages up to 75 feet deep set back from the curb approxunately 15 feet. There will be a pedestrian connection across West Seventh Street to the Xcel Energy Center via tunnel, skyway, or at grade. K�SharefiPedvSchiecke�2vIISC PROIECTSS�IITH TRANSIT HS7B�Ez}ubit C- Project Desctipfion.wpd o t-+{ a.3 39 WHEREAS, a Memorandum of Agreement ("MOA") among the Federal Highway Admiuistration 40 ("FHWA"), the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation ("ACHP") the Minnesota Histozical Preservation 41 Office ("SHPO") and the City along with concuu•ing parties has been negotiated and attached in E�ibit 1; 42 and 43 44 WHEREAS, Saint Paul Heritage Preservation Conmvssion ("HPC") hosted the required public meeting 45 required by the federal Section 106 process on August 10, 2000 concerning the House and Smith Avenue 46 Transit Aub; and 47 48 WF�REAS, HPC has passed two resolutions conceining the House ( HPC Res 99-4 on July 22, 1999 49 and Res. 01-1 on January 11 , 2001). The second resolution supports execution by HPC of the MOA, subject 50 to its normal review with respect to municipal preservation matters as descn�beSY`m Chapter 73 of the Saint 51 Paul L,egislative code (see E�ibit 1, Stipulation I C and D); and � 52 53 54 55 57 58 59 0 61 62 63 64 65 V1�IEREAS, the City Council recognizes the importance of the 5 en Corners Gateway Area of Saint Pau1, including significant views of the Saint Paul Cathedral, Xcel En gy Center and other important landmarks; and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes other projects t at are under consideration including transit projects such as the Riverview Corridor and the Trolley, and er parking projects for Holiday Inn Aotel, United/Children's Hospitals, and others; and WI�,REAS, a parking supply and demand study r the western end of Downtown, including the Smith Avenue Transit Hub, United Hospital campus, oliday Inn Hotel etc,. Will be compieted shortly to assist the City: (1) in the coordination between pen ' g parking and transit projects in the westem end of Downtown and (2) in helping detennine the final ber of pazking spaces to be financed and constructed as part of the Smith Avenue Transit Hub Project. 66 67 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLV D, that the City Council approves and directs the following: 68 69 1. Accepts the final Section 106 Smith Av ue Transit Hub Report, Voluxnes 1-5. This includes Volume 5 70 which was prepared after the required pu ic hearing on August 10, 2000 at the Saint Paul Heritage 71 Preservation Commission and contains 1 written testimony of interested parties and the City's response to 72 the testimony. 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 8Q 81 2. Approves proceeding with the S'th Avenue Transit Hub Project and accepts the now $6.2 million grant from Federal government for the roject and directs staff to complete securing at least $2.0 million from Metro Transit, which will be us toward the transit component of the Project. 3. Approves execution of by appropriate City offici� PED staffthat aze consist of Agreement substantially in the form as attached in E�bit 1, and with such subsequent changes as may be approved by the City Attorney aud with the actions taken in this Resolution. 82 4. Accepts title to the ouse and surrounding land from the State of Minnesota with the condition imposed by 83 2000 Legislature that exchange for the House being donated to the City, the City agree that the House be 84 preserved at an alte ative site and directs staff to complete acceptance. 85 86 5. City selects Site # 7 the former Plastics Parking Lot (on Chestnut St. south of Ryan Street) as the site to 87 wbich the House will be moved and stabilized for residential reuse, names Historic Irvine Pazk Association as 88 Redeveloper, and approves attached Memorandum of Intent in substantially the same form as attached in o�_yy3 89 E�ubit2 with such subsequent changes as may be approved by the City Attorney and PED staff that aze 90 consastent with the actions taken in this Resolution. Siting, move and stabilization activities of the House on 91 Site #7 will be reviewed by the HPC as fiuther described in the lines 48-51 above�;;- 92 93 6. Authorizes City staff to commence and complete vacation process to convey Site #7 - Plastics to HRA, who 94 in turn will convey to the Redeveloper. 95 96 7. Accepts rezoning petitions for the former Plastics Pazking I,ot and authorizes 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 8. Requests HRA to cause: process to begin. A) the House to be moved and stabilized and directs appropriate ff to retain a historic mover and any other contractors necessary to move and stabilize the House at rte # 7, consistent with the City's obligations described in the Memorandum of Agreement in P agraph 3 above. B} Use fhe $2375 million dollars whicfl ha�e previously en budgeted in HRA Res. 00-6/14-3 to move and stabilize the House on behalf of the City. F er the City Council understands these HRA monies are interim funds to the City that shall be reim sed to the HRA no later than the closing on the financing for the Smith Avenue Transit Hub by t e City. 9. City staff is to continue design and traffic work on t Project on this gateway site to the Downtown by Collaborative Design Group Architects(Dick Faricy, 1 Hickey, et. a1.) and SRF Consulting Crroup, in conjunction with other projects under consideration ' the project area including Riverview Corridor, Trolley and other parking projects in the area.. 10. After completion of the parking demand stu for the western end of Downtown, which will assist in the coordination of pending parking and transit pro' cts in the area, the Adnvnistration shall return to the City Council and recommend: (i) the number of parking spaces and (ii) the design concept for Project de (rii) the Finance Plan for the Project� 121 122 123 E�ibit 1-Copy of draft Dec 17, : 124 125 E�ibit 2- Draft Memorandum of 126 127 E�ibit 3- Description of the D v 128 129 to be buik for the Project in E�ibit 3 will be developed by PED and Financial Services. to City Council Resoiution MOA with City, FHWA, SHPO, ACHP, et al with Redeveloper of House at Plastic Parking Lot 5ite Program for the Smith Avenue Transit Hub Project �x� Z DRAFT - DECEMBER 13, 2000 MEMORANDiM OF AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGH`VAY AD�IIIVISTRATION, THE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION THE MINNESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND THE CITY OF SAI�'T PAUL, FOR THE RELOCATION OF THE JOHN DI. CK�I��Iy Z1I�MS�7`►[il�:i��►Tl�.`��`►11L�7 SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration (FHtiVA) hub project within the City of St. Paul, Ramsey County, Mi m n� o� .y a�� to fund a portion of a transit and WHEREAS, the FHWA has determined that this project, t Smith Avenue Transit Hub project, will have an adverse effect on the John M. Armstrong Ho e(House), a double-house listed on the National Register of Historic Places (National Regist , WHEREAS, the FHWA has consulted with th Ad��isory Council on Historic Preservation (Council), the Minnesota State Historic Preservat' n Office (SHPO), and the City of St. Paul (City) as an Invited Signatory, pursuant to the regulati s(36 CFR Part 800) implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U. .C. 470�; and WHEREAS, the St. Paul Housing and Re velopment Authority (HRA) and the St. Paul Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) have rticipated in the consultation and have been invited to concur in this Memorandum of Agree ent (tiIOA); and WHEREAS, the HPC serves as a advisory body to the mayor and city council on municipa] heritage preservation matters as o lined in Chapter 73 of St. Paul's legislati�e code (Chapter 73); and WHEREAS, several Interest Parties have participated in the consultation through public meetings, work sessions and revie of documentation, includin� Tom Dimond, Kathryn Babcock - representing Citizens to S e the Armstrong House, the Fort Road Federation, Historic Irvine Park Association, and severa ther interested parties listed in the Section 106 Report dated June 2000. Tom Dimond and Kat n Babcock have been invited to concur in this MOA; and, WHEREAS, under innesota Sessions Laws 2000, Chapter 492, Art. l, Sec 86, in order for the City to acquire propert from the State that is needed to proceed with the Transit Aub projzct on the Cleveland Circle ite, the City of Saint Paul, at its expense, is required to relocate the House to an altemative site t preserve it; and 01-4�� WHEREAS, the City has completed historical research summarized in a report entitled, "Smith Avenue Transit Hub: Literature Seazch for Archaeological Potential and Historic Buiidin� ensity Survey" (7uly 1999) and an Addendum (July 2000); and WHEREAS, the Area of Potential Effects for the undertakin� is defined as the Smi venue Transit Hub Site (bounded by Kellogg Boulevard, West Seventh Street, Fifth/Sixth Str t and I-35E), the buildings immediately adjacent to the Transit Hub Site, and any prop on or buildings immediately adjacent to the Relocation Sites identified in this Agreement NOW, TF3EREFORE, the FHWA, the Council, the SHPO and the that the undertaking shall be implemented in accordance with the f take into account the effect of the undertakin� on the John M. Ar� The FWHA will ensure that the following measures ar�arried out. (the "Signatories") agree ig stipulations in order to ; House. I. RELOCATION AND STABTLIZATION F THE HOUSE A. Ci Obli ation to Relocate the use to an Alternative Site. The City shall cause the House to be relocated and st ilized �vithin one year ofthe execution of the MOA to one of the acceptabte sites li ed in Appendix A. The relocation ofthe House will be completed according publication "Moving Hi: will be selected by the Ci to undertake relocation ` Register listing. Mov � its designee {i.e., hi oric B. CitxCc with a i House comme and the requirii Secretp fails �6 to e guidelines set forth in the National Pazk Service o c Buildings" by John Obed Curtis. The building mover with review and concurrence by SF3P0. The City a� F the House and stabilization needed to maintain National and stabilization activities to be compieted by the City, or mover; redeveloper), are listed in Appendix B. �nve anc o Redevelo er. The City shall enter into a redevelopment contract edevelo er, which will determine the Relocation Site from Appendix A. The will sold AS IS to a redeveloper for reuse as either residential or rcia at the sole discretion of the City. At the time the City conveys the land H se to the redeveloper, the City shall attach a 30-yeaz covenant to the deed i that exterior modifications to the House be in compliance with the ry of Interior's Standards at the time of the modifications. If the redeveloper perform the stabilization activities listed in Appendix B as required by the t, ownership of ihe House will revert to the City. C. ehabilitation Plan Review and Concurrence. The City or its redeveloper �cill submit efiabilitation PIans to HPC and SHPO during the City's Site Pian Revie�r Process, including the Moving/Buildin� Permit process, for review and concurrence as to consistency with the Secretary of Interior's Standards, within the context of character-defining features of the buildin�. The proposed Rehabilitation Ptans will o►-w}� II. include building sitin�, rehabilitation, landscaping, site improvements, and adjace new construction that is part ofthe site plan. Ifthe Move and Stabilization Pla (as further discussed in Appendix B) are submitted for review prior to compl on of Rehabilitation Plans for the remainder of the buildin� (including the in rior), the remaining plans will be reviewed sepazately. Flexibility will be a«•ed in the review ofthe interior of the House. HPC will provide an opportwii orpublic input during the Rehabilitation Plan Review Process(es) and SHPO �' 1 consider public comments as part of their review(s). D. HPC Jurisdiction. If the proposed relocation site is loca d within an area that has been designated by the City under Chapter 73, the HP will have responsibility as determined by city ordinance for long term monito�ng to ensure that subsequent treatment and improvements to the exterior of the�ouse are in compliance with the Secretary of Interior's standards. If the proposed elocation site is not in an area that has been designated by the City under Chapter ,, the City will take every reasonable step to ensure that the House is redesignated a a St. Paul Herita�e Presen Site, subject to a public review process outlined � Chapter 73. E. Section 60.14(b)(5), the House will znoved and after the move is complet moved to its new site and stabilized • the City shall prepare documentati : C identifies the materials to be fu is: the Keeper of the Register as n ific Section 60.14(b)(5). lu � a the Move. In accordance «�ith 36 CFR r am on the National Register �vhile being GVithin nme months after the House has been �cording to the activities listed in Appendix B, required by 36 CFR Section 6Q.14. Appendix �ed. SHPO shall fonvazd this documentation to ition of the move in accordance �cith 36 CFR F. Tem�orary_Stora e of Ho e durin Moae. If necessary, the City will move the House to a temporary loc ion to allow time for ne�v site preparation and to facilitate the transit hub construct' n schedule. Appropriate measures will be taken to protect and secure the buildin during this interim period. G. Protection of the source. After the City receives title of the property from the State, appropriat measures will be takzn by the City to protect and secure the building prior t, during and after it is moved. On behalf of F WA, the City shall ensure that an azchaeolo�ical survey is conducted on the Transit Hub ite and on the selected Relocation Site for the House. The sun�ey shall be conducte y the City in a manner consistent with the Secretary of Interior's Siandards and Guideli s for ldentification (48 CFK 44720-23) and takin� into account relevant �uidelines of the O. The survey shall be conducted in consultation with the SHPO, and a report of the s ey meetin� the standards of the Secretary of the Interior shall be submitted [o FHWA for eview and approval. o i-�a3 III. IV FHWA shall evaluate properties identified through the survey in accordance with 36 CFR Part 800.4. If the survey results in the identification of properties that aze eligible for the Narional Register, FHWA shall�comply with 36 CFR Parts 800.5 and 800.6. COSTS OF THE MOA The Signatories and Concurrin� Parties shail be responsible for their own admi ' tration and staff costs associated �vith either document revie�v or field �vork related to t' Agreement. Further, the City shall pay costs associated with the foliowing: (1) documen tion, relocation and stabilization costs described in Stipulation I; (2) Archaeology suru y and mitigation costs in Stipulation II; (3) Any other Ciry costs required to complete OA stipulations. MODIFICATIONS, DISPUTES, TERMINATION, ETC. A. Modification or amendment of this agreement, as ne essary, shall be accompiished by the Signatories in the same manner as the origi al agreement. B. Should the Signatories object within 36 days the materials provided for review pursuant to Sections I.A, I.C, I.E and II of t's agreement, the FHWA shall consult with the objecting party to resolve the obj tion. If the FHWA determines that the objection cannot be resolved, the FHW shall request the further comments of the Council. Any Council comment provi ed in response to such a request will be taken into account by the FHWA with re rence only to the subject of the dispute•, the C. FHWA's responsibility to carry o all actions under this agreement that are not the subjects of the dispute remain u hanged. Ifprovisions of this a�reeme are not camed out within three (3) years from the date of its execution, the Signat 'es shall consult to seek amendment ofthe a�eement. If the agreement is not am ded, any Signatory may terminate it pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(c)(8). 4 o�-Ha3 Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement and implementarion of ' terms evidence that FHWA has taken into account the effects of its undertakin n historic properties. A photocopy of this document will be deemed to be an o ginal by the Signatories. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION � Alan R. Steger, Division Administrator ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESEI�VATION I� John M. Fowler, Executive Director MINNESOTA STATE Bv ATION OFFICE Nina M. Archabal, Stat,�Historic Preservation Officer INVTTED SIGNA CITY OF SAIN� PAUL I: Coleman Approved to Form: Peter McCall, Assistant City Attorney Date: Date: Date: Date: � D 1-�1�� co��cux: ST. PAUL HERTTAGE PRESER'VATION COi�'INIISSION � Name and Title of Signer CITY OF 5AINT PAUL HOUSING AND REDEVELOPM�NT AUTHORITY � Name and Title of Signer Approved to Form THOMAS R. DIMOND CITIZENS TO SAVE TH�ARMSTRONG HOUSE Date; Date: B Date: Kathryn M. B cock D 1-`l'a-� APPENDIX A Relocation Sites currently owned by City � HRA. Site # 2- Kellogg and Seventh Street (Transit Hub Site # 3- St. Joseph's Lane and West Seventh Site # 7- Plastics Parking Lot (on Chestnut �outh of Ryan Street) Site # 8- Ryan Parking Lot (at Chestnut �d Exchange) 7 1-ya� APPENDIX B � MOVING AND STABILIZATION TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY (Detailed Move and Stabilize Data can be found in Yolz:me 1, Attachment I A. MOVE BY fIISTORIC MOVING CONTRACTOR Section 106Report.) This step includes the activities involved in physically liftin the Armstrong House off its existing foundation, moving it along city streets and placing it on new foundation within a new site. (A separate contractor will be responsible for the new foun tion, as noted in Section B below). The contractor hired to complete the moving activities st meet special requirements for moving historic structures. Prior to the move, preliminary b cing, shorinJ and brick stabilization will be completed. Photo documentation of interior and ex rior will be completed to aliow monitoring of building condition. During the move, the histo ' moving contractor will take steps to protect overhead and underground utilities, as well as p otecting or replacing affected landscaping, curbs, etc. The historic moving contractor will also ovide liability insurance and performance bonds to ensure successful completion of the move. ncluded in this Appendix is a memorandum dated May 4, 2000, from Constructive Ideas th . provides a detailed listing of items that will be the responsibility of the Historic Building M er and the City at the existing building location, while the building is in transit, and at the new bu' ing location. B. NE`V This step includes the activities a general contractor to clear out the existing site ofthe Amistrong House after is has been moved and to prepare the new site for placement of the Armstron� House. New site �vork wi11 invotve onstructing a foundation and basement for the House, including a structural support system. I necessary, a new entry porch will be built on the front of the House at its new location. Depend' g on the site chosen for the Armstrong House, other activities will be required to provide a steps will be taken at'� will be provided at bc dated May 4, 2000� responsibility of a building is in tran t, lev surface for moving the House on to the new foundation. If necessary, h' ew site to protect adj acent sidewalks, trees or structures. Securing fencing �' the old site and the new site. Included in this Appendix is a memorandum m Constructive Ideas that provides a detailed listing of items that will be the eneral Contractor and the City at the existin� building location, while the and at the new building location. 0 � -aa3 C. NIINIMUM ELEMENTS TO RETAIN NATIONAL REGISTER Based upon discussions with the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office ( O), this step involves the absolute minimum unprovements required to protect the "shell" of the Armstrong House &om further deterioration. Correspondence from SHPO da d Mazch 17, 2000, identified the items in a detailed listing of construction activities that wo d not be needed for continued eli�ibility of the FIouse. That correspondence is included � Section 106 Report (Volume 1, Attachment I). The key elements that are necessary for cont� ed eli;ibility are listed as follows: � ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Excavation and grading of new site Sheet piling as necessary to protect street, Wall footin�s, piers for porch foorings on Foundation walls, sandstone veneer Tuckpointing, cleaning and brick repai� Basement beams Repair or replace &ont entry porch � Remove and replace roofing surf e New gutters and downspo�ts �,� New entrances � site adjacent structures Remove and replace windo s, or repair existin� windows Perimeter caulking � � D. STABILIZATION AND ASS�`T PROTECTION This step involves activities by a ge eral contractor to provide minimum improvements needed to allow safe access to the House for i spection. Minimum electrical service will be provided forbasic lighting. New stairs to the base ,'ent will be constructed. Loose or waterlogged material will be removed from the house. � ♦ Mmi ♦ Reaz ♦ eiene ♦ Envi eiectncalservice stairs; basement stairs interior clean-up (removal of loose or waterlogged materials) mentai clean-up (asbestos and lead-based paint, if necessary) NOTE: A tivities in Parts A-I3 of Appendix B will be part of the "Move and tabilization PZans"referenced in the MOA. �; D\-Ka� APPENDIX C Documentation required once the Armstrong House is moved 1) A letter notifying the MN-SHPO the date the property was moved,� � 2) Two sets of 8 x 10 black and white photographs aad one set of �des of the hovse on its new site. Two or more different views (perspectives) o the froat aad rear of the house aze required. The lab processia� the film should e able to pass a hypo (fixer) residue test for film processin�. (In other words ; a reputable vendor for processing), The photographs should be printed on pho, ' graphic, silver emulsion resin-coated paper (not ghotograpluc color dye paper � ed by vendors advertising cheap developing costs). The photographs should ve a ane-half inch border. They shouid be labeled on the back usin� a soft p�cil wzth the followiag information: name of property, county and photo�aph, location of original aegative*, number or number depicting vantage point be a plastic mount with name of property c will accept the negatives (along with the exposure and T Max 100 or Plus-X Pan , 3) A sketch map (done in black aad 4) An original United State Geolo€ location of the house on its new pencil. Do not include any othe� S) Acreage of the pazcel on � Legal Description of the � Parcel's PIN number �F 8) Name and address o rpr� ,'name of photographer, date of (camera faciag), photograph : sketch map. • The slides should + and state�and date. *The SHPO aphs) provided that the film•is 24 which depicts the hovse on its new site Survey Map (LT-S.G.S.} which depicts the (Depict locatioa using a dot made with a lead tten information on the map). tfie house is located. owner(s) � Ex��+� .�- ot-'ia� March Rehabilitation of tfie Armstrona House f"House"1 Memorandum Of Intent Redeveloaer. Site and Reuse of the Relocated House Redeveloper of the House wi41 be the Nistoric trvine Park Associ on ("HIPA"). The site to which the House wiil be relocated is the former Plastics parking lot at hestnut and South of Ryan (the"Site"). The Redeveloper at its sole discretion may seek a ditional partner(s) after a RFQ process is completed by the Redeveloper. At this time, the edeveloper plans to form a Limited Liability Corporation ("LLC") to undertake the rem ' ing rehabilitation after the City or HRA completes move and stabiiization activities describ in the Memorandum of Agreement ("MOA") attached in Exhibit A. Rehabilitation of the House would be residential reus . The density on the site will be effectively controlied by the Redeveloper through the processir�g of one of three rezonings (RT-1, RT-2, RM-1) attached in Exhibit B. ,,/� Phase 1: Pubfic Hearing on House and (April 4, 2001) Citv and HRA Transit Hub before City Council 1. Staff recommends at Public Hearing�'`on House and Smith Avenue Tra�sit Hub that (1) the House be moved and stabilized at Plastics site, (2) recommend HIPA as Redeveloperand support execution of Memo of Int nt with Redeve{oper and (3) Smith Avenue Transit Hub project be approved. 2. City Council considers the R�olution to execute MOA; name Site and Redeveloper; convey property to HRA for �isposition; accept HRA Budget of $2.375 M to undertake MOA obligatians; accept 3 separ�te zoning petitions for the Site and related actions concerning the Smith Avenue Transit,�iub. 3. HRA agrees to e and reconvey at hoid a pubiic he� a portion of the � Redeveloper �fiv10A, approves Redeveloper, agrees to accept site from the City � to Redeveloper; fund $2.375 M for the move and stabitizing and i land sale of the Site and the House to Redeveloper for a doilar plus delivering the sewer to the site to Redeveloper. 1. At Public Hear"' g on April 4, 2001, on House and Smith Avenue Transit Hub (A) support business poin s outlined in this Memo of Intent (B) provide adopted neighborhood resolution approved M ch 20, 2001(C) provide sufficient signatures from immediate neighbors for three separ te (RT-2, RT-1, RM-1) zoning petitions to the City as Applicant, that would be processed imultaneously. The Redeveloper wiil notify in writing the City as Petitioner 10 K:\shared\PED\geurslarmstronghs.02.14.01.wpd March 26, 2001 D�-4a� days before by the third reading on the rezoning (Public Hearing meeting on rezoning), which one of the three rezoning it wishes the City Council to adopt; whereupon the City will withdraw the two remaining petitions. �f the City is not notified the dgfault rezoning is RT -1. The finai adopted rezoning will determine the density, and only the/6niy structure on the Site will be the House unless Redeveloper recommends and finances�dditional structures. Phase 2= MOA (April to May 15, 2001) Citv and HRA 1. City, SHPO, ACHP, FHWA execute MOA. Also G Dimond, and Save the Armstrong wi41 be invited to 2. Compfetes transfers of state land and House on 3. Vacation process for transfer of title of iand is underway already for Hill Street adjacent 4. Draft covenant about future rehab to the 5. Rezoning and Variance process for the back yard variance may aiso be neces€ Variance by end of July] ,� Parties HRA, HPC, Tom Circle to City from State. House to HRA. (Separate vacation process � Site on the south.) structure described in attached MOA. Variance for height will be necessary and a [Estimated completion of Rezoning and 6. HRA agrees to execute MOA, app�ves Redeveloper, agrees to accept site from the City and reconvey at Closing to Rede�loper; fund $2.375 M for the move and stabilizing and hold a public hearing on land sal of the Site and the House to Redeveloper for a dolfar plus a portion of the cost of deliveri the sewer to the site to Redeveloper. Redeveloper 1. Select partner(s), if any Phase 3: Between Exe Redeveloper (Mid May to Fall 200 Citv and HRA RFQ, arrange financing etc. of MOA and Ciosing on Conveyance of House and Site fo 4 to 6 months) 1. Retain CPMI as�oject Manager for MOA move and stabilization under MOA. SRF through Ann Hopkins wil'also be involved. 106 Group will be used for archeology on the Site in advance of mo e. The City's Architect wili be the Collaborative Design Group for which Dick Faricy works.� K:4shared�PED\geurs�armstronghs.02.14.07.wpd March 26, 2001 di-��3 2. Retain historic mover approved by SHPO. Retain Contractor to build 3. City funds archeology, move and stabilization, and security activities. 4. City wiN expfore ways to make Historic Tax Credit availabfe to etc. is $2.375 M 5. Move and Stabilization Plans (siting of House, etc.) will require H C and SHPO review, as well as City Site Plan review process and variances. 6. City keeps House secure until Ciosing. � r 7. City prepares documentation for continued National Regist, r listing of House. Redevelooer 1. Two (2) designated representatives of Redeve Involved with the exact siting of the House on stabilization activities). Phase 4: Closing between City, HRA and Land (after stabilization at Site) (Estimated Closing November 15, 200 House rehabilitated with Certificate of of Closing, estimated to by Novembe� Citv and HRA 1. City conveys title of House a Deed to Redeveloper and e: Covenant recorded. ,� Redeveloper attend meetings with CPMI, etc. (Comment only on move and on Conveyance ofHouse and sooner) �pancy compiete and marketing within two years 15,2003) and HRA conveys title of House and land by Quit Claim s Escrow Funds if any funds remain from $2.375 M; At closing on land an House for $1 plus the cost of delivering sewer to the site, after completion of move nd stabilization, Redeveloper accepts the House AS IS, covenant is recorded, reverter I nguage in deed, and if and only if there remains a balance on the City's $2.375 M, City es blishes escrow fund for the Redeveloper on a reimbursement basis for the remaining re abilitation of the House with appropriate documentation and approval by City's Project M nager, CPMI. Escrow funds, if any, would be available for utility connections f water and electrical, etc. 2. Undertake �fid complete rehabilitation, after review of Rehabilitation Plans by HPC and SHPO ,[i.e., get Certificate of Occupancy ] and market property within 2 years of Closing. K:�sharedNED\geursW rtnstronghs.02.14.01.wpd March 26, 2001 � d 1-�� Attachments to Memo of Intent dated March 26,2001 Exhibit A- Memorandum of Agreement ("MOA") on J.M. Armstrong House and Smith Avenue Transit Hub between FHWA, ACHP, City, SHPO et ai. Exhibit B- Draft Rezoning Petition and Conditions for former Plastics Parking Lot >"� � �. K:lshared�PED\geurs\armstronghs.02.14.Ot.wpd March 26, 2001 � x �� DRAFT - AECEMBER 13, 2000 MEMORANDUII OF AGREr;i1�i,VT Ai�10NG TFIE FEDERAL HIGFIEVA'Y AD�SIIVISTRA THE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC P�R�ERVATION, THE MINNESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESE ATION OFFICE, AND THE CITY OF SAI\T P FOR TAE RELOCATION OF THE JOHN hI. HOUSE Ari'D 01-`t}� CONSTRTJCTION OF TIiE SNIITH A� NUE TRANSIT HUB SAINT PAUL, MI ' SOTA WHEREAS, the Federal Hi�hway Administrati n(FH«'A) proposes to fund a portion of a transit hub project within the City of St. Paul, Rams County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the FHWA has determined have an adverse effect on the John M. National Register of Historic Places (I� this proj ect, the Smith Avenue Transit Hub project, will istrong House (House), a double-house listed on the al Register); WHEREAS, the FHWA has con�ulted with the Ad��isory Council on Historic Preservation (Council), the Minnesota State H' foric Preservation Office (SHPO), and the City ofSt. Paul (City) as an Invited Signatory, pursua to the regulations (36 CFR Part 800) implem�nting Section 106 of the National Aistoric Preserv ton Act (16 U.S.C. 470�; and WHEREAS, the St. Paul using and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and the St. Paul Heritage Preservation Commissio (HPC) have participated in thz consultation and have been invited to concur in this Memor um of Agreement (v10A); and WHEREAS, the HP serves as an advisory body to the mayor and city council on municipal heritage preservati matters as outlined in Chapter 73 of St. PauPs legislative code (Chapter 73); and WHEREAS, s eral Interested Parties have participated in the consultation through public meetings, work sessio and review of documentation, includin, Tom Dimond, ICathryn Babcock - representin Citizens to Save the Armstrong House, the Fort Road Federation, Historic Irvine Park Associati , and several other interested parties listed in the Section 106 Report dated 7une 2000. Tom Di ond and Kathryn Babcock have been invited to concur in this MOA; and, WH�EAS, under Minnesota Sessions Laws Z000, Chapter 492, Art. l, Sec 86, in order for the City to acquire property from the State that is needed to proceed with the Transit Hub projzct on the Cleveland Circle site, the City of Saint Paul, at its expense, is required to relocate the House to an altemative site to preserve it; and � p� _y'� �IHEREAS, the City has completed historical reseazch summarized in a report entitled, "Smith Avenue Transit Hub: Literature Search Yor Archaeological Potential and Historic Buildin� Intensity Survey" (JuIy 1999) and an Addendum (July 2000); and WHEREAS, the Area of Potential Effects for the undertakin� is defined as the Smith Avenue Transit Hub Site (bounded by Kello�g Boulevard, West Seventh Street, Fifth/Sixth Street d I-35E), the buildings immediately adjacent to the Transit Hub Site, and any prope on or buildings immediately adjacent to the Relocation Sites identified in this Agreement; NOW, THEREFO1tE, the FHWA, the Council, the SHPO and the that the undertaking shall be implemented in accordance with the f take into account the effect of the undertakin; on the 7ohn M. A� The FWHA will ensure that the following I. RELOCATION AND STABILIZA' carried out. OF THE HOUSE (the "Signatories") agree Zg stipulations in order to ; House. A. Cit Obli ation to Relocate t� House to an Alternative Site. The City shall cause the House to be relocated a stabilized «�ithin one year of the execution ofthe MOA to one of the acceptable si s listed in Appendix A. The relocation of the House will be completed accordin� to the guidelines set forth in the National Park Service publication "Moving I�storic Buildings" by John Obed Curtis. The buildin� mover will be selected by t,�City with review and concurrence by SHPO. The City agrees to undertake reloc ion o£ the House and stabilization needed to maintain National Re?ister listing. ovin� and stabilization activities to be completed by the City, or its designee (i.e„historic mover; redeveloper), aze listed in Appendix B. B. CitV Conve "nce to Redevelo ec The City shall enter into a redevelopment contract with a rede 'eloper, which �vill determine the Relocation Site from Appendix A. The House w'y71 be sold AS IS to a rede��eloper for reuse as either residential or comme �ial, at the sole discretion of the City. At the time the City conveys the land and t�ouse to the redeveloper, the City shall attach a 30-yeaz covenant to the deed requ ng that exterior modifications to the House be in compliance with the Sec�etary of Interior's Standards at the time of the modifications. If the redeveloper f ls to perform the stabilization activities listed in Appendix B as required by the ontract, ownership of the House wiil revert to the City. C. Rehabilitation Plan Review and Concurrence. The City or its redeveloper �cill submit Rehabilitation Pians to HPC and SHPO during the City's Site Plan Revie«� Process, including the Moving/Building Permit process, for review znd concurrence as to consistency with the Secretary of Interior's Standards, within the context of character-defining features of the building. The proposed Rehabilitation Plans will � ot-KaO II. include building siting, rehabilitation, landscaping, site improcemenis, and adj acent new construction that is part of the site plan. Ifthe Move and Stabilization Plans (as further discussed in Appendix B) are submitted for review prior to completion of Rehabilitation Plans for the remainder of the building (includin� the interior), the remainin� plans will be reviecved separately. Flexibility will be allo �•ed in the review of the interior ofthe House. HPC will provide an opportunity f ublic input during the Rehabilitation Plan Review Process(es) and SHPO wil onsider public comments as part of their review(s). D. HPC Jurisdiction. If the proposed relocation site is locate �vithin an uza that has been designated by the City under Chapter 73, the HPC ill have responsibility as determined by city ordinance for lon� term monitori � to ensure that subsequent treatment and improvements to the exterior of the H se are in compliance �vith the Secretary of Interior's standards. If the proposed r ocation site is not in an area that has been designated by the City under Chapter 7, the City will take every reasonable step to ensure that the House is redesignated a St. Paul Herita�e Presen Site, subject to a public review process outlined in Chapter 73. E. moved and after the move is moved to its new site and st; the City shail prepare docur C identiFies the materials to the Keeper of the Register ; Section 60.14(b)(5). � Section 60.14(b)(5), the House will r�nQ the Move In accordance ��ith 36 CFR .main on the National Register «•hite bein� R'ithin nine months after the House has been accordin� to the activities listed in Appendix B, n required by 36 CFR Section 60.14. Appendix shed. SHPO shall fo:��ard t�ss docus�en±ationto cation of the move in accordance ti��ith 36 CFR F. Tem�orarv Stora�e oF I�Iouse durina Mo�•e. If necessary, the City will move the House to a temporary - cat o to allow time for new site preparation and to facilitate the transit hub const 4'ction schedule. Appropriate measures �z'ill be taken to protect and secure the buil}��n� durin� this interim period. G. Protection of th��Resource. After the City receives title of the propem� from the State, appropri�te measures ��ill be taken by the City to protect and secure the building priorfto, during and after it is moved. Onbehalf of F WA, the City shall ensure that an archaeolo�ical survey is conducted onthe Transit Hub 1te and on the selected Relocation Site for the House. The sun•ey shall be conducted b the City in a manner consistent with the Secretary of Interior's Standards and Guideline or ldentification (48 CFR 44720-23) and takin� into account relevant guidelines of the S O. The survey shall be conducted in consultation with the SHPO, and a report of the surv meetin� the standards of the Secretary of the Interior shalt be submittzd to FHWA for red w and approval. o �-Ma� III. FHWA shall evaluate properties identified tYirou�h the survey in accordance with 36 CFR Part 800.4. If the survey results in the identification of properties that aze eli�ible for the National Re�ister, FHWA shall�comply with 36 CFR Parts 800.5 and 800.6. COSTS OF THE MOA The Si�natories and Concurring Parties shall be responsible for their own ad�ninistration and staff costs associated with ei±her document revie�v or field work related `�this A�eement. Further, the City shall pay costs associated with the fotlowin�: (1) doc entation, relocation and stabilization costs described in Stipulation I; (2) Archaeoloa survey and mitigation costs in Stipulation II; (3) Any other City costs required to com�pTete MOA stipulations. IV. MODIFICATIONS, DISPUTES, TERMINATION, Fc3'C. � A. Modification or amendment of this a�reeme�as necessary, shall be accomplished by the Signatories in the same manner as,ik`ie original a�reemen[. B. Should the Si�natories object withinf�0 days to the materials provided for review pursuant to Sections I.A, I.C, I.E a�II of this agreement, the FHWA shall consult with the objecting party to resolu� ``the objection. If the FHWA determinzs that the objection cannot be resolved, ttf'e FHWA shali request the further comments of the Council. Any Council com nt provided in response to such a request �vill be taken into account by the FHW� FHWA's responsibiliry subjects ofthe dispute en C. Ifprovisions of of its execution, the agreement ' 800.6(c)(8). � with reference only to the subject of the dispute; the carry out a!I ac#ions under th:s agreemenE that are not the iain unchanged. ii a�reement are not carried out within three (3) years from the date e Signatories shall consult to seek amendment ofthe aereement. If not amended, any Signatory may terminate it pursuant to 36 CFR 0 o �-�+a� Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement and implementation of its terms evidence that FHWA has taken into account the effects of its undertaking on historic properties. A photocopy of this document wili be deemed to be an original by the Signatories. � FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADNIIiVISTRATION � Alan R. Steger, Division Administrator ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC I� John M. Fowler, Executive Director MINNESOTA5TATE By Nina M. Archabal, � INVITED SIGNAT(� CITY OF � 'AUL Coleman ATION OFFICE Preservation Officer ,`� r' �` Date: Date: Date: Date: Approved to Form: Peter McCall, Assistant City Attorney o� �a� coxcux: ST. PAiIL HERITAGE PRESERVATION CObIMISSION � Name and Title of Signer CITY OF SAINT PAUL HOUSING AND I's�� Name and Titie of Signer Approved to Form THOMAS R. DIMOND � F � r / �. Date: AUTAORITY � Date: Date: CITIZENS TO THE ARMSTRONG HOUSE B � Date: O 1-y�� APPENDIX A Relocation Sites currently owned by City or HRA Site. # 2- Kellogg and Seventh Street (Transit Hub Site) Site # 3- St. Joseph's Lane and West Seventh Street Site # 7- Plastics Parking Lot (on Chesmut south af Ryan Street) Site # 8- Ryan Parking Lot (at Chestnut and R 7 � 0 �-'1y7 APPENDIX B � MOVING AND STABILIZATTON ACTIVITIES TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY (Detniled Move and Stabilize Data can be found in Yolume 1, Attachment I of the Secti,�r'r�106 Report.) A. MOVE BY HISTORIC MOVING CONTRACTOR This step includes the activities involved in physically lifting th,eirlrmstrong House off its existing foundation, moving it along city streets and placin� it on a ne.�v foundation within a new site. (A separate contractor will be responsible for the new foundat�, as noted in Section B below). The contractor hired to complete the moving activities mus meet special requirements for moving historic structures. Prior to the move, preliminary bra n�, shorin� and brick stabilization will be completed. Photo documentation of interior and ext or will be completed to allow monitoring of building condition. During the move, the histo movin� contractor will take steps to protect overhead and underground utilities, as well as p, tecting or replacing affected landscaping, curbs, etc. The historic movin� contractor will also� ovide liability insurance and performance bonds to ensure successfiil completion of the move.!'Included in this Appendix is a memorandum dated May 4, 2000, from Constructive Ideas tl t provides a detailed listing of items that will be the responsibility of the Historic Buildin� N�o'ver and the City at the existing buiiding location, while the buildin; is in transit, and at the new b,�filding location. B. NE�V CONSTRUCTIQ�i ITEMS This step includes the activiti s of a general contractor to clear out the existing site ofthe Armstrong House after is has been mo ed, and to prepare the new site for placement of the Armstron� House. New site work will invo�Ve constructing a foundation and basement for the House, including a structural support syste�: If necessary, a new entry porch will be built on the front of the House at its new location. Dep�,'nding on the site chosen for the Armstrong House, other activities will be required to provide a%level surface for moving the House on to the new foundation. If necessary, steps will be taken �# the new site to protect adjacent sidewalks, trees or structures. Securin� fencing will be provided a# both the old site and the new site. Included in this Appendix is a memorandum dated May 4, 20k�0, from Constructive Ideas that provides a detailed listing of items that will be the responsibility�6f a General Contractor and the City at the existing building location, while the building is in transit, and at the new building location. : o� y�-' C. MI1VI:vIUtII ELE1lIENTS TO RETAi\ IyiA'i'IO\AL REGISTER LISTING Based upon discussions with the Minnesota State Iiistoric Preservation Office (SHPO), this step involves the absolute minimum improvements required to protect the "shell" of the Armstrong House from further deterioration. Correspondence from SHPO dated Marc �7, 2000, identified the items in a detailed listing of construction activities that would not. e needed for continued eligibility of the House. That correspondence is included in the S�`i�ion 106 Report (Volume 1, Attachment I). The key elements that are necessary for continued eiij bility are listed as follows: ,%' ♦ Excavation and grading of new site ♦ Sheet piling as necessary to protect street, sidezvall ♦ Wall footings, piers for porch footin�s on new site ♦ Foundation walls, sandstone veneer i ♦ Tuckpointing, cleaning and brick repajr � ♦ Basementbeams � / ♦ Repair or replace front entry porc,hes ♦ Remove and replace roofin; sqrface ♦ New gutters and downspouts%" ♦ New entrances /� adjacent structures ♦ Remove and replace wineTows, or repair existin� windows ♦ Perimeter caulking �' D. STABILIZATION AND A5'SET PROTECTION , This step involves activities by a�;�eneral contractor to provide minimum improvements needed to allow safe access to the House fdr inspection. Minimum electrical service will be provided for basic lighting. New stairs to the basement will be constructed. Loose or waterlogged material will be removed from the house. ;i i electrical setvice stairs; basement stairs ♦ Ge�ierai interior clean-up (removal of loose or waterlogged materials) ♦ Environmental clean-up (asbestos and lead-based paint, if necessary) ,,' r� � > NOTE: /� Activities in Parts A-D of Appendi.x B will be part of the "1Ltove and �% Stabilization Plans" referenced in the MOA. o�-y�.� APPENDIX C Documentation required once the Armstrong House is moved 1) A letter no�fying the 2vIN-SHPO the date the property was moved 2) Two sets of 8 x 10 black aad wlute photographs and one set on its new site. Two or more different views (persp� -`_._ _, . tfie house ate required. The lab processin� the film (fixer) residue test for film. grocessin�. (Ia other wo processing). The photographs should be printed on resin-coated paper (not photo�aphic color dye pa chea developino costs), 'Tfie photographs sho t ies of the house front and reu of io be able to pass a hypo s" e a reputable veador for otographic, silver emuLsion used by vendors advertising ve a one-half inch border. p = They should be labeled on the back using a so pencil with the following information: name of property, county and te, name of photo�apher, date of photooraph, location of original negative* view (camera facing), photograph number or number depicting vantage po' t oa the sketch map.. The slides should be a plastic mount with name of prop , couaty and stxte�and date. *The SHPO will accept the negatives (along wi e photo�aphs) provided tI�t the film• is 24 exposure and T Max 100 or Plus- Pan film• 3) A sketch map (done in black d white) which depicts the house on its new site 4) An original United State ological Survey Map (U.S.G.S.) which depicts the location of the house o. ts new site (Depict location usin� a dot made with a Iead pencil. Do not includ y other written information on the map). 5) Acreage of the p, el on which the house is Iocated. � Legal Descrip 'on of the pazcel � Parcel's P number 8) Name d address of property owner(s) 10 �x k�bit . 13 `— Vy1 �.v�,,4 a� ��fn.x. c�.a�'� VL1a.�c� 2.6� �oo� 0�-4�� I. Parties agreeing to addendum. This addendum to the Chestnut Street and 0 I-Till Sueet has been reviewed and parties: Saint Paul PED, H'istoric Irvine Park Associati< Molly Femholz, Patrick and Rita Hawkinson Wamer� Hiileren, Louis Fillmon and Kazen Jason. Purpose. The parties want to accelerate moving of the historic Armstrong House f to the site. The site's present zoning is P- City can issue moving and foundation peri housing. The parties agree that the p�o to allow the Armstrong House to be�ma most restrictive residential zone i�whic �omn petitions for 235 re to by the following A), Kevin McGrath and and Ruth Dantuma, Peter aoni�`g of 235 Chestnut Street to pemrit the m�tts present location north of the Xcel Arena ,�4vhich allows only surface parking. Before the ;s, the site needs to be zoned to permit rty on Chestnut Street should be rezoned d and that the new zoning should be the the house can feasibly be restored and sold. The City wants to move t e{fiouse as soon as possible to open up the site north of the arena for redevelopment. ,.� Simultaneous zoning steps�and redevelopment analysis. HII'A is negotiating to take ownership of the Armstro `�House and to partner with a developer to restore and mazket it. At the time of the fili � of the rezoning petitions, HIl'A has not had time to select a partner, complete a pro,'�ct feasibility analysis, or deternune how many residential units will be at the site. 1e HII�A is working with developers, public agencies, and contractors to devis, a feasibie restoration plan for the property, the City and the property owners within 100��eet of the Chestnut Street site are initiating three separate residential rezoning petition�for RT-1 (duplex), RT-2 (3-4 units), and RM-1 (multi-family) so that any one of thect�` can be chosen later. The petition�''will initiate the rezoning process at the Planning Comrnission; the parties expect tha�>all three altematives may still be under consideration when the Planning Commiss n holds its hearing and makes its recommendation. At least ten days before the rezonin�petitions come before the City Council for third reading and public hearing, HIPA,�vill have detemuned and submitted to the City in writing which of the three alte �ative rezonings fits its restoration plan. The other two petitions will be withdrawn by e parties. If HIPA has not made a written recommendatioq the parties wiil r ommend that the Council approve the RT-1 rezoning altemative. As soon as practical 1�. �i —y ?1 after the Council approves a new zoning district, PED will request building permits for excavation, a new foundatioq and the house move. In addirion to the rezoning, other City approvals will be required before building permits aze issued, including height and setback variances, site plan review, and historic review. 4. Nullification of fhe consents given on the rezoaing petitions. Most oFthe petition signers specifically support the moving and restoration of the Armstrong Aouse, but would not support whatever residential development may be permitted in the zoning district without the house. If the Armstrong House is not moved to Chestnut Str or suffers severe damage during the move and cannot be restored, the parties wa o return the zoning, at least for the rime being, to P-1. , 5. Attachment to rezoning peEitions for RT-1, RT-2, and RM-1. Thi iidendum is hereby attached to each of the three rezoning petitions as an explan on for why muitiple petitions are being submitted and as a safeguard for the affected ighbors. 6. Signatures of the Parties. I agree with the provisions of t's addendum. (Please sign and date.) Brian Sweeney, PED Patrick Kevin McGrath Peter Hilleren Molly Fernholz f` Dirk Dantuma Molly Howe Ruth Dantuma K:�Shazed�PedVSODF.RfiOUZONAIG\Atmstron�J Warner Louis Fillmon Karen Jason O CZ'Z`X O�' SA.XNT' _l'.A.YJS.� � CONSENT OF AD70INING PROPERTY OtiYNERS FOR . •.�ZEZONING di -9�� We, tlie undersi�ned, otvncrs oPtlie proper;y tvidtiin 100 feet o(thc total contiguous description of rzal estate o�vned, purciiased, or sofd by'I'HE PETITION6R within one year preczdiit� tlie date oF tliii petition ackno�vledge that �vz have bcen presented u•itli the foilou•ino: I. A cop}' of the petition of (name ofp ctitioner) to rezone the property [ocated at a3S CheS�n�.i.1' �,-„ e� from n P � zo�iino district to �1�� zoning district. �'l � S"f'r2 �"t . 2. A copy ofsections �'� through _(�Q•� inclusive oFtht Saint Paul ning Code; and nckno�vledge that �ve ;�re a�vare oFnll of the uses permitted in z RT =�. zo ' g districC 2nd tve are lware that any oFt(�zse uses can be establislted upon City Councii approval of ie rezoning. 14'e hereby' consent to the rczonin� of the propeRy in the pctition oF, s t_��,�]�, �� G " + �r �+�� "�� U4�/ to,^ zoningdistri lI � � ,] �y� v �i/N � u w\ (Name of petitioner) tiVc conscnt to flie �pproval of fhis i•ezoning �pPlic�nt or his(lier represenfafivc. / OCv7-X 22. �.L DOO 1 O Co z.k 21-. J2, 0 0 f 0 C�zFS2iz3 oi3g vG,zsz�3z 000'{ a�zszzazono3, o6z82232000S v62�z�3.�oc�o� vl�zszz32.00l1 v�z$zz3zo�i2 0628 zz3Zooi c �f o � sr�r�t Pa�:L J�qvrc� (.'oset{;�, Ke:vin meGr,"fh n7otly Ferf�hoLz Pqt��cK ul'�riter �:'Eq /./qW '�'RSon t11PMCf g: �-<. , �.��n nea ��rK ��, ant�..mQ r'2�.'�F� //Dan A DirK� l.�An�Eu.wiA �. S� Rn't ' �er � �(!y I-��we Lyn�Trus�'eE �-okis �':!/`no�l rlRren 5aspn ULo2�223) 0�1�) zSoo Line.. �ai jraa.C� �vas expl�ined fo us by fhe U(a 2 $ z��f U�C�`i <<t�jo-ES-Ck'�Lxie�cf � SP.tcm ' 06 �8 ��.a4r vo7o c,'�y c¢ sT PAu. L ' - NOT�: This petition shall not be considered as o�cially filed until tne lapse of seven (7) u•orking days after it is recei�•ed by the Pianning Division. Any signator of thispetition tnay �v►thdra�ti-h�s/her name therefrom by ��Titten request within that time. :,'� �, � �� CZ�'Y O�` SA.XN'Z' �'.A.Y7� CONSENT•OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWI�iERS POR A . ..�,�zoxxNc d�-4� We, il�e undersigned, otvners oFthe propery tvitf�in t00 feet o(t6e total contiguous description oE real esiate o�vned, purchased, or sold by 7'HE PETITIO� IER tivithin one ye. r precedin� th= date of this petition �cknowledge that tve have bccn presentzd u•idt the following: 1. A copy of the peti[ion oF, (name of ctitioner) to rezone tlte Property located at a3S �h 2Sfn�.i."�"' �„� � � from a �'-' � zoning district to ay� district. 2. A copy oCsections (�D��?.i through ��.�3 in ncknotvlcdge th�t we 1re n�vart ofnll oFthe uses permitted in 1�vare that any oF duse i�ses c�n be established upon Ciry C consent to lhe rczonin� of tfie property in the petition of; (Name of petitioner) tiVe consent to fhe �Pproval of this �PP�ic�nf or his/ficr represenfafive., OCo2.8 2� 3� o00 l p(o J�zL3Z oolp �z82� z3 o i3g vGzg-��3z 000�{ O�z8zZ3z0003 o6zgzz32000S v6z�z23zo�aq oC� z82�3Zoo�1 o6z$zz3zo� D�ZB zz3Z� UCo2$223 qo z$ Z� e�ce il( Sp�m 06 �8 zz a�{ vo7o1 c��Y a� sT PRw 1_ � � hOT�: This petition shall not be considered as officially filed until tne lapse of seven (7) u•orkin8 days a8er it is recei��ed by fhe Plannin;Division. Any signator of this petition may withdra�ti�his/he� namelherefrom by «ritten request within that time. :,'� :j V G o�F S ' �i- Pr}i.�.L Ci�f- oF s ot pRaL (�qvic[ / se'('{'0., Kt:t�in ' eGro...`f-h rho!!y/Fern hoLz on �a�ner � A n a k l7An'furnq �. !-�, I I er en l-��'11 S�f'��ee. clusive f tlie Saint Paut Zoning Code; and a ' zonin; district 2nd we are ou il approval of the rzzoning. \�'o hereb�� j� � / 1� 7/ioningdistrict. ��°'��'�� ing as it �vas ezpI�ined fo us by fhe I, " /ylotly l�we Ly►�.�Trus� 'i3 G.okis T;�/.�c�] lCRren 3'ason 10 �Soo L',ne R�i �raac� � C�'X'X O� S.A.XN� PA.�CJS� CONSEI�IT'-OF ADJOINING PROPERTY O�VNERS FOR A . -,REZDIYING We, ihe undersigned, o�vncrs of tlie property tvitliin 100 feet oFtlic total otvned, purci�ased, or sold by THE PET[TIO� IER within one year lcknotivledge that wz have bccn presented ��•i[h tlte follot�•ing: f 1. A copp of tl�e petition oE (name of ctit to rezone tlic property located at a3S G�eS from a �'� � zoning district to a}�' 2. Acopyofsections �•��7i through,�/� ncknotivled�e diat �ve ��z nware oP111 oFthe uses � nwlre tliat any of thase uses can be established u eonsent to the rezoning of tl�e property in tl�e pet;}� (Nanie of petifioner) � _ � �-i�� .S7�r�2�� ing district. o �-ya.a �, inclusive of dr Saint Paul Zoning Code; and iitted in �� zonin; district 2nd tve are Ciry Councii approval of die rozoning. \�'e horeby• � oF; �j� � � �� _ to r.��,zoning �istricL (�(�Q��V! � ) \Ve consenY to flte �pproval o�this rezoning as it `vas expl�ined fo us by the �PP�ic�nf or his/hcr represert��afivc. Oc>2-.8 zl, 3� o0o ( C, o-4- Sain'i PklA.L o� z�rz�.3� ooro c;�-�o� sr�r�t p�wL p�' zg2z. z3 O 13$ ( f�A�c� �.'osef{�c� U�o�.g•Z� 000� I �in MeGra�.'Yh o!(y Fern hoLz p�2$zZ ous description oE real estate ing the date oE this pe[ition n k�ar�ef O�z$22320o0S'` `�'rK t7. an ��..'�h _ Dan-k�u.w,1 Q�z�,z23-?.�v0�'I 1� irk L�An�Euw�A f�.v..`4h D Rn'tti-mo_ O�z82Z3��11� F� !-��I� U(0.2$ z'Z3 2�o121 t�1olly I�we Cy n�rruS 0628zz3 �oot3 `-��15 r-,�iMO� 1fRfen 3aSO�1 U�oz�2 I Ob10 �Soo Lin2 �r jraa.c� 0� 2$ � z�{ U�G�t <<� � sT �a.�� x� ence hl seum . _ 06 �8 z�a�f o07o C,�-Y a� s'� PHw L IrOT�: This petition shall not be considered as officially filed until tne lapse of seven (7) u�orking _ days aRer it is recei�•ed by the Planning Division. Any signator of this petition may �rithdratti•his/he� name therzErom by ��Titten request within that time. •�: O .� ZONING DISTRICTS City of Saint Paul SUMMARY OF USES ALLOtiVED IN SAINT PAUL ZO\'ING DISTRICTS �� "y a � RESIDE\TIAL R-LL, R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4 One-Famil}• One-family d�vellings Schools, libraries, parks, churches Convents, rectories Family day care (10) and group family day care (14) Group day care in a non-residential structurz Homz occupations Bed and brzakfasts w/one guest room Community residential facilities (s6 residents) Carriage housz dweltings (historically existing)" Cemeteries* Cluster dzvelopments* Colleges, univzrsities* Com•ersions of non-residential structures and residential struchires over 9,000 sq. ft.* Golf courses, private recreation facilities* RT-1 T��'o-Famitr' All R-� uszs T��o-family homzs Group day care Fratzmity and sorority houses* Bed and breakfasts �v/up to 4 guest RT-Z To«'nhouse �p A11 RT-I uses i Thrzz- and four-family d��elfings / To��nhouses «'ith up to 6 units � Community residential faciliti s (7-16)* i I2��I-1 blultiple Family � All R7-2 uses Apartment buildings (5�-'stories) Roomin� and boardin houses* I2_�I-2 �Iultiple Ali RNI-1 uses Apartment buil Eldzrly housi � Hospitals, n si, �ngs (<_ 5 stories) support services iR homes* iL�t-3 l�l tipie I amily Hi�h d sity, high rise apartments Churches, day care (all tyPes) Etdzrly housing support services Community residential facilities* Hospitals` Accessoq� retail service and office uses* CO�I�IERCIAL OS-1 Loca] Oftice-Ser� Business offices such as banks, insurance, real estate Professiona] offices such as medical cIinics, law officz; Artist and photographer studios Sen�ice businesses such as photocopying, �vateh and shoe repair„jailor shops, barber and beauty shops Day care (all es) Schools, co ges, libraries, parks, churches Mised co ercial/residential uses amily dwellin�s y residzntial facitities (16) owned buildin�s, public utility buildin�s* �S-2 General Office-Ser�•ice A110S-1 uses Post offices and similar eo�'emmental offices Retail businesses such as grocery, etc. (s 10,000 sq. fr.) Re;taurants and bars, except dri��e-in or fast-food Hotels and hospitals Laundries and dry deanin� (retail outlet) blanufact�rin� of small precision goods Carria�e house dwellinss Retail businesses (>10,000 sq. ft.)* B-1 Local Business Dtost OS-1 uses Rztail businesses such as erocery, bakery, drugs, books. clothin„ hard«�are, florist, carry-out restaurants Laundries and dry cleanin� (retail outlet) Post ofYices and similar go�'emmental offices ldi�ed commercial/residential uses Vlultiple-family d�vellings* B-2 Community Business Alt B-1 uses Sen'ice businesses �cith a sho�F7oom or �vorkshop such as contractor, baker, painter, appliance repair Restaurants and bars, eacept drive-in or fast food Food catzring CO{t22 �3051:5 Pricatz halls and clubs, health clubs "l�l�zaeers, bingo h�li�, ussemUl}' halis Currzncy exchange businesses Veterinary clinics, tatoo parlors Auto sercice stations, con��enience and specialty stores` Pool halls, bo��'ling alleys, game rooms and other t}'p=� of indoor commercial recreation" Pa��n shops* Z,7 CO�t�fFRCIAL (continued) I\DUSTRIAL . 0 ►- yy� B-3 Genera] Business Most B-2 uscs dndoor vehicle sales Mortuaries Finishing shops Business sales and service such as parcel delivery Manufacturing of small precision goods Hotels and motels Printin� and publishing firms Wholesalin� (no outside storaoe, <15,000 sq. ft.) Hospitals Outdoor vehicle sales * Auto repair facilities* Fast food and drive in restaurants* Greenhouses, nurseries* Car �vashes* Adult ttses'" B-4 Central Business Retaii, sen•ice and office uses Apartment residential uses Hotels, motels, hospitals Amusement and entertainment uses, museums Schools, colleges, libraries, parks, churches Go��emmental uses Currzncy eschan�e businesses, pa��n shops Adutt uses* Community residential facilities" B-5 Central Business/Sercice All B-4 uses �Vholesalino, warehousin� Limited manuEacturin� Dry cleanin� plants Foud catzrin�, processing, manuf Itescarch and testin� laboratories Auto sen�ice stations, auto conve stores, auto repair � B-2C Community Bu All RM-Z uses Most B-2 uses, except and currency excr Retail sales in a buildJ' Service businesses % and specialty urants, assembly halls businesses * Conditionai uses - A Special Condition Use Permit (SCUP) must be granted by the Planning Commission to allow these uses. I-1 Industry All B-3 uses except family and group family day care Warehousing, �vhotesalin� Research and testing Lumber and contractor s yards Manufacturing from pre�iously prepared materials Rental storage facilities Auto service stations, auto convenience/specialty storzs Auto repair, auto body facilities Tele��ision and radio to�vers" Adult uses"` Gun shops and shootin� �lleries* I-2 Industr}� MostI-1 uses ra�c materials Sewage pla Stora�e o, uilding matzrials, sand, gravel, stone �of sand, gravzl, other raw materials* �us and infzctious waste processing* dai freight yards" T-3 Industr}• Gasoline tank farms Rendzring plants and tannin� Rock crushing* SPECI.4L DISTRICTS PD Plnnned Decelopment All uses by specific plan P-1 Par]:ina Off-street parking RCR-I Ricer Corridor Residential Multiple family d��ellings Institutional uses RCGl Ricer Corridor Commercial All B-2 uses RCI-1 Ricer Corridor Industrial Limited I-1 uses nOTE: THiS [S NOT A LEGAI. DOCU!�IE\T. In tha inttrat oC simplicity and readability, it Ceparts Gom the neccss�ry itgal and technic�I langua_e of the Saint Paul Zonin� Code and othcr applicable regulation>- ��«��.cistpaul.nm.us.niep � 2_?p0! � `� � � �, �i� °` 6 �( ' 4 1�c• `S �14� . ,/ '.r- F � �� b o � b � 0 �� A° i 2 .� �� b �7 � � V i ` ' A ��`, : t '. ,�5 "' y � �; 9 '•�� 3 y}� . 6 : ' �` 1 2` ��js ��s ; i ` ��1� � `�; \ � � �•�'• �. X �\ �. ` , . \ �t65�, � � l � ��' .,M� � \ i t '' / � '- x � �� 8 � ,�15 � `' � �� ` 1 d. o � / \ r - i . - �i ,� 6 � � y ;-r , � -t�} _ . 6 �� ` � i,, 3 :• � � 2. '�` � , o , co ' � � � � — � �,':� � ,, !� �' �� 6 1 � , j i 2 ` � i � �, i � � �'° ? � ' /• �� II � �� . .�� / . � �, ; . e ,- � �-_.� �� ' �� ° �,,;�� , � o .�/� ". ' : �Y `� � 6 � '`�� j � °.'\ �\: �S� ..'D+. �,, �� . ` r � > ° 1 — � =_ —_\ _--�- •_':/- - - - — 4 �. 1)�' 0 �� . �_.� ��.: . o�� `� �u� : . _ _ . . Fc � �, ...�•: �`k� h' � � �. o �3� � °3's - ` � � �.,. Dc- � ' �� `.. \ ,� i � � �. G �" : ' '°° . . � . � �'; = 9. 35 ;6' � :;� ' e; �� • � '�, • :;�°� i -; �. ? � J �� '.. i � '� 0 : s � � ..� " ' • 0 ' - � ' � � =� V ` �9� oet . ' `'S: � � p � i o'.`''Ryi �y� � � q� i �Y� . ` �/ ( � pl: �a / tiU� � � 6R � _ �' y�` ./". . .`�/'•.°')�.. � �' � o � A ♦ �\ °� S f e'�!'�/ " , • y ' ' ` 2 J ` - � \ � l ,� " � � ` � � `' � O`, ',v�o 2s �ry ` ' .�� /� �� : �� 'r o s i �. . . '`?' � _ � / � ' �: f ° p�.y��7 . � ' i� % . .- � . � . /' � ti�� _ : - .-/ : `� ' . •6F �0 � C s�,�,� / � ^/ / 7 , �� . / . t � +� _�} 'Ij � t .-.� /`,'y'� � . .:'. .. .. . . .- w . J� � p � J . _. . . , . / i� . ': o .�or`- t}, ° o s � S � 9 ' _ .. : :%�:: ,: � y _."/ ° � - 6 � °'- - 3s 6 . •� . ' �' ' -�•''�� _ °+' �. � - \� ` y '. ;: / � • .. - Q � . ,�vl `�` / . �o - o c - " 5 . ! •� 10� � o � ,. - ._L��. ��_ � e�� / �.' � : ' . / .:' , •. 7, xx •.�� :: . � \ , ' 9 ��' �� f : �/� � —' ;� �i . - � �. : ��q Y,�� b ', . f' . % , � � 2 .. .or �. �G \. .e ...- . � ,-- . o►-�►�� Exhibit 3- City Conncil Resolnfion for Apri125, 2001 Smith Avenue Transit Hnb Development ProEram Descrintion The Development Program for the Smith Avenue Transit Hub proposes an combination bus layover fac�7ity and parking ramp that includes the followi ♦ Up to 1,400 pazking stalls, of which approximately 30% are for ♦ A bus layover facility for at least 16 buses; � ♦ lOQ bike lockers; pool; ♦ Up to 25,000 square feet of future retaiUcommercial alo� West Seventh street. The facility will be divided by Smith Avenue into a connected by bridges at the elevated levels for car ; lakely provide piimary entrance/exit to and from th�� parkers and event parkers, retail service access� lanes of vehiculaz traffic. Sidewalks, including, one provide for a pedestrian friendly use of Smit]�AveT aorth and a south structure n�pedestrian traffic. Smith Avenue will transit hub for buses, commuter/contract access and bikes, as well as provide for four covered walk within the ramp structure will The street-level bus layover facility will �commodate peak time metro bus layover for at least 16 buses. Metro Transit facilities on t site wili include all weather sheker accessible to the public from Smith Avenue, bus drive rfacilities, a with drivers room, general storage and a supervisors office. The bus la yover y will also serve charter buses for RiverCentre, the Xcel Energy Center, the Ordway, and �e Science Museum of MN. Such charter buses will share the facility, to the degree it is not ne `ded for Metro Transit bus layover, and will utilize the majority of the bus portion of the transi��ub at non-peak times and on weekends. The aesthetic design of the�.4'mith Avenue Transit Hub will be of urban character with roof top parking. The facility will b'e set back from West Seventh Street to accommodate the construction of retaiUcommercial spac�. Up to 25,000 S.F. of high bay retail space at street level will e�ctend the length of the � up to 75 feet deep connection across along West Seventh Street and will provide a variery of tenant fronCages �ck from the curb approxixnately 15 feet. There will be a pedestrian Seventh Street to the Xcel Energy Center via tunnel, skyway, or at grade. K:4Stazed�ped�Sc3ueckeV�IISC PROIECTS�SMITH TitANSLT HUB�Ex1u�6itC - Project Desc�ipfionwpd 30