The URL can be used to link to this page

269313 ITV C�ERK � INANCE GITY OF SAINT PAITL Council EPARTMENT File �O. 26 313 AYOR -- - - � Council Resolution Presented By � Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR SUrIl�LIT-UNIVERSITY MINN. A-1-1, DATED FEBRUARY 1974, AND TO REDEVELOPMENT PLAN COMM[JNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM YEAR II, APPROVED FEBRIJARY 5, 1976, SjTrIlriIT-LTNIVERSITY DISTRICT 8 FOR CONTROL DATA CORPORATION REDEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, by its Resolution, Council File No. 241901 adopted January 24, 1969, the Council of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota determined conditions of blight and eligibility for acquisition and approved the Redevelopment Plan Summit-University Project Minn. A-1-1, Neighborhood Development Program (NDP) Year I, and the public actions therein proposed; by its Resolution, Council File No. 263275 adopted March 21, 1974, the Council approved the Redevelopment Plan Summit-University Minn. A-1-1, dated February 1974, and the public actions therein proposed respecting the Ma.rtin Luther King Center Area; and by its Resolution, Council File No. 266737 adopted February 5, 1976, approved the Redevelopment Pla.n, Cammunity Development Program Year II, adopting the land use controls of the NDP Redevelopment Plans and public action proposals for the Martin Luther King Center Area; and WHEREAS, there has been prepared and approved by the Board of Commissioners of "the Houaing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Pau1, M:innesota (HRA) and presented to and coasidered by the Council, a docu�ent entitled, "Redevelopment Plan Amendment To A Program For The Revitalization Of The City Of Saint Paul CD Year II (Gontrol Data Site) May 27, 1977", consisting of an Introduction with Exhibit A text, and Exhibit B map ch�nges to the Redevelopment Plan, Summit University, Minn. A-1-1, Code ND401, dated February 1974; Legal Description And Boundary Map; Redevelopment Plan amending Redevelopment Pl.an, , Community Development Program Year II; Program For Implementation; Pro�ect Eligibility Report; Relocation Plan; and Financing Plan, herein collectively referred to as the "Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment", and HRA Resolution No. 77-6/22-5 approving the same; and COU[VCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Butler Nays Carieio�a�oa Hozza In Favor Levine Roedler Against BY Pres. Sylvester Tedesco P�rs�e�t Hunt Adopted by Council: Date Form Approved by City Attorney Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY By Approved by Mayor: Date ' Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council By BY �4`� WHITE - CITV CLERK COl1I1C11 ��'�� PINK - FINANCE CANARY - DEPARTMENT GITY OF SAINT PALTL BLUE - MAYOR File NO. H�' Council Resolution Presented By Referred.To Committee: Date � Out of Committee By Date -2- WHEREAS, the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment relates to Blocks 73, 74 and the North half of Blocks 77 and 78, Martin Luther King Center Area, Clearance Section 2, Summit-University Area NDP Project Minn. A-1-1 and Community Development District 8, here- after referred to as the "Control Data Site", provides for public acquisition of private property, vacation of public streets and alleys, rezoning to I-1 Industrial usage, and sale of said'Blocks to Control Data Corporation for redevelopment as an office and parts warehouse and distribution facility, and amends the Land Use Provisions of the Redevelopment Plans from Residential Use to Industrial Use; and Wi�REAS, the Council is in receipt of Resolutions 77-18 adopted June 10, 1977, and 77-25 adopted June 24, 1977, of the City of Saint Paul Planning Commission, consid"ered the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment, found that the office and parts distribution center would constitute an appropriate land use for the site, compatible with adjacent uses and consistent with the continued physical and economic improvement of the area, and that the amendment to the Redevelopment Plans conforms to the politices and standards of the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Saint Paul, and approved said Amendment sub�ect to the recommendation that the alley between Carroll and Iglehart Avenues, running from Dale Street to Kent Street, be excluded from the Control Data Site and not be vacated, which recommenda- tion was accepted by the HRA and which change has been made in the Legal Description and Boundary Map of the Pro�ect; and WHEREAS, pursuant to notice of the time, place, and purpose thereof, which notice was duly published, a public hearing has been conducted on June 30, 1977, by the Council upon the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment and the activities therein proposed, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the findings and determinations of Resolutions, Council File Nos. 241901, 263275, and 266737 respecting the Redevelopment Plans Summ4it-University Neighborhood Development Program, Minn. A-1-1, and Community Development Program, District 8, are hereby affirmed. COUIVCILMEN Yeas tl r Nays Requested by Department of: Hozza In Favor Levine Rcedler Against BY pr�� Sylvester Tedesco P�eeli�t Hunt Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by Council: Date Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY By Approved by Mayor: Date Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council By BY TV CLERK NANCE (jIT� OF .SAINT PAITL Council 269313 =PARTMENT 4YOR File �O. Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date -3- 2. That the proposed amendment to the Redevelop�ent Plan, Summit-University, Minn. A-1-1, February 1974, adopting a light industrial land use for Blocks 73 and 74 and the North one-half of Blocks 77 and 78 of the Project Area, hereinafter referred to as the Control Data Site, the proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendment !o A Program For The Revitali- zation Of Th� City Of Saint Paul CD Year II (Control Data Site) Ma.y 27, 1977, and public actions therein proposed, and the purchase of the Site by Control Data Corporation for redevelopment as an office and parts warehousing and distribution facility with commitment to offer employment opportunity to low income residents of the Summit-University Project Area will achieve removal of conditions of blight and deterioration in said Pro�ect Area, permit private investment and redevelopment consistent with sound planning ob3ectives, provide economic development and employment opportunity to residents of the Pro3ect Area, and by these accomplishments enhance and improve the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of the Area and of the City. 3. That it is hereby found and determined that the financial aid to be provided from the Neighborhood Development Loan Account under the Financing Plan which is the subject of a separate Council resolution, is necessary to permit continued imple�nentation of the Redevelopment Plan program for the Martin Luther King Center Area, Clearance Section 2, Su�it-University NDP and CD Project Area in which Area the ContrQl.Data Site is 1oGat�d and in which Area. additional acquisition and clearance of conditions of blight was progra�ed to the existence of redeveloper interest and available federal funding, without which the land in the Control Data Site would not be made available for redevelopment. 4. That it is hereby found and determined that the aforeindescribed amended Redevelopment Plans and the activities therein provided for will afford maximimm opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the locality as a whole, for redevelopment of the Project Area by private enterprise. 5. That it is hereby found and determined that the amended Redevelopment Plans conform to the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Saint Paul. COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Butler Nays Ck�,ici�on Hozza � In Favor Levine Roedler Against By Pres. Sylvester , Tedesco F�eesidoRt Hunt Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by Council: Date Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY By Approved by Mayor: Date Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council BY BY WHITE - GTV CLERK � ��Nx' �= FINANCE GITY OF SAINT PALTL Council BLUERVt�- MAYORTMENT Flle NO. 2�931� �'' ' Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date -4- 6. That it is hereby found and determined that the amended Redevelopment Plans and programs therein provided for, including the provision for additional housing in Phases 2 and 3 of the Martin Luther King Center Area programmed for Com�unity Development Program Year III, make provision towards the development of a viable urban cammunity in Saint Paul, including decent housing and a suitable living enviro�ent and expanding economic opportunities principally for persons of low income. 7. That it is hereby found and determined that the ob3ectives of the amended Redevel- opment Plans cannot be achieved by rehabilitation of the Control Data Site and that the redevelopment of said Site for predominantly nonresidential uses is necessary for the proper development of the locality as a whole. 8. That the Redevelopment Plan Amendment To A Program For The Revitalization Of The City Of Saint Paul CD Year II (Control Data Site) May 27, 1977, and amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, Summit-University, Minn. A-1-1, Code ND401, dated February 1974, also referred to as the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment, are hereby approved, together with the provision for relocation of persons, families, business concerns and others to be displaced by these Program and Project activites. ..>a� COUNCILMEN Yeas $�� Nays Requested by Department of: ('ri�ioi�� -Iozza [n Favor � Q \_ �"� Against BY `�'r�. _ Sylvester �'edesco �Plesidwt H �UN 3 Q �� Form p ro ed by City Attorney � Adopted b uncil: Date Cert' ed Pass ouncil Secretary Y Approv by a r: Dat ! Appr d by Mayor for Sub x si to Coun ' By BY / PUBLISHED JUL g 1977 . . � ��,�j 3 �� CITY OF SAINT PAUL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR CITY PLANNING DONALD L. SPAID AIP PLANNING COORDINATOR June 2B, 1977 City Council and Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul c/o City Clerk Room 386 City Hall St. Pau7 , Minnesota 55102 Dear Members: The attached resolution amending their previous action concerning the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment was approved by the Planning Commission on June 24. Sincerely, ^ � � - r , Donald L. Spaid � cy � DLS/mb �,,,� � �� attachment �� p � �"� . r v � #N tD , ��n � ?�-w „ � --� 421 Wabasha Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 (612)-298-4151 0 . . � city of saint paul planr�ng commission resolution file number »-25 �te June 24, 1977 WHEREAS, on June 10, 1977, the Planning Commission of the City of St. Paul approved Resolution 77-�18 regarding the Control Data Redevelopment Plan amendment; and WHEREAS, it is desirable to further clarify the Commission's finding concerning conformity of the Redevelopment Plan amendment with genera1 plans for the area, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Resolution 77-18 is amended with the addition of the following language; "WHEREAS, this amendment to the Redevelopment Plan ' conforms to the policies and standards of the Comprehensive Plan for the City of St, Paul .° moved by �oseph Panqa] �i�a'�d by Adol f Tobl er �n faV�r Unanimous a�ItlSt_ 1''�H17E - CITY GLERK � �b9313 :-�>+� - ��N�NCE (�jITY Or' SAINT PAITL Council C.4NaPY - �JEVARTMENT • BI.UE - MAVOR File NO. H�`� Council Resolution ._� Presented By i.� Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR SUMrIIT-UNIVERSITY MINN. A-1-1, DATED FEBRUARY I974, AND TO REDEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMiJNITY DEVELOPMENT PR�DGRAM YEAR II, APPROVED FEBRUARY 5, 1976, SUt�PiiZT-UNIVERSITY DISTRICT 8 FOR CONTROL DATA CORPORATION REDEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, by its Resolution, Council File No. 241901 adopted Januarq 24, 1969, the Council of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota determined conditions of blight and eligibility for acquisition and approved the Redevelopment Plan Summit-University Project Minn. A-1-1, Neighborhood Development Program (NDP) Year I, and the public actions therein proposed; by its Resolution, Council File No. 263275 adopted March 21, 1974, the Council approved the Redevelopment Plan Summit-University Minn. A-1-1, dated February 1974, and the public actiores therein proposed respecting the Martin Luther King Center Area; and by its Resolution, Council File No. 266737 adopted February 5, 1976, approved the Redevelopment Plan, Cammunity Development Program Year II, adopting the land use controls of the NDP Redevelopment Plans and public action proposals for the Martin Luther King Center Area; and WIiEREAS, there has been prepared and approved by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota (HRA) and presented to and considered by the Council, a document entitled, "Redevelopment Plan Amendment To A Program For The Revitalization Of The Citq Of Saint Paul CD Year II (Control Data Site) May 27, 1977", consisting of an Introduction with Exhibit A text, and Exhibit B map changes to the Redevelopment Plan, Summit University, Minn. A-1-1, Code ND401, dated February 1974; Legal Description And Boundary Map; Redevelopment Plan amending Redevelopment Plan, Community Development Program Year II; Program For Implementation; Project Elig3bility Report; Relocation Plan; and Financing Plan, hereia collectively referred to as the "Control Data P,zdevelopment Plan Amendment", and HRA Resolution No. 77-6/22-5 approving the same; and COUIVCILMEN Requested by Department of: `leas Butler Nays C-�sie�t�w�ax Hozza In Favor Levine Roedler Pres. Syivester AgainSt BY — Tedesco Fr.e��cret Hunt Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by Council: Date Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY By ApprovPd by l�tayor: Date Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council , By By Wfl17E - CITY CLERK /rff9313 � PINK - FlNANCE G I Z Y O� SA I1� T PA t,1 L COURCII CANARY - DEPAi2TMENT File NO. t BLUF_ - MAV�OR � H� Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date s Out of Committee By Date -2- WHEREAS, the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment relates to Blocks 73, 74 and the North half of Blocks 77 and 78, Martin Luther King Center Area, Clearance Section 2, Summit-University Area NDP Project Minn. A-1-1 and Community Development District 8, here- after referred to as the "Control Data Site", provides for public acquisition of private property, vacation of public streets and alleys, rezoning to I-1 Industrial usage, and sale of said Blocks to Control Data Corporation for redevelopment as an office and parts warehouse and distribution facility, and amends the Land Use Provisions of the Redevelopment Plans from T<esidential ITse to Industrial Use; and WHEREAS, the Council is in receipt of Resolutions 77-18 adopted June 10, 1977, and 77-25 adopted June 24, 1977, of the City of Saint Paul Planning Co�ission, considered the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment, found that the office and parts distributian center would constitute an appropriate land use for the site, compatible with adjacent uses and consistent with the continued physical and economic improvement of the area, and that the amendmen t to the Redevelopment Plans conforms to the politices and standards of the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Saint Paul, and approved said A�enc�ment subject to the recommendation that the alley between Carroll and Iglehart Avenues, running from Dale Street to Kent Street, be excluded from the Control Data Site and not be vacated, which recommenda- tion was accepted by the HRA and which change has been made in the Legal Description and Boundary Map of the Proj ect; and WHEREAS, pursuant to notice of the time, place, and purpose thereof, which notice was duly published, a public hearing has been conducted on June 30, 1977, by the Council upon the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment and the activities therein proposed, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUI�, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the findings and determinations of Resolutions, Council File Nos. 241901, 263275, and 266737 respecting the Redevelopment Plans Summit-University Neighborhood Development Program, Minn. A-1-1, and Community Development Program, District 8, are hereby affirmed. COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas But�e�� Nays �� Hozza [n Favor Levine Roedler AgaiRSt BY — Pres. Sylvester Tedesco Pre�iwio�t Hunt Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by Council: Date Certified Passed by Council Secretacy BY By Approved by ltayor: Date Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council By-- By WNITE - CITV CI.ERK PINK - FINANCE V !` P TT T� COIIIICil ` � BLUERV - M4YORTMENT . GIT2 VF SAINT i � 11 +� File NO. �b9313 � H�' Council Resol�tion Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date -3- 2. That the proposed amendment to the Redevelopment P1an, Summit-University, Minn. A-1-1, February 1974, adopting a light industrial land use for Blocks 73 and 74 and the North one-half of Blocks 77 and 78 of the Project Area, hereinafter referxed to as the . Control Data Site, the proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendment To A Program For The RevitaZi- zation Of Th� City Of Saint Paul CD Year II (Control Data Site) May 27, 1977, and public actions therein proposed, and the purchase of the Site by Control Data Corporation for redevelopment as an office and parts warehousing and distribution facility with commitment to off er employment opportunity to low income residents of the Summit-University Proj eCt Area will achieve removal of conditions of blight and deterioration in said Project Area, permit private investment and redevelopment consistent with sound planning objectives, provide economic development and employment opportunity to residents of the Pro�ect Area, and by these accomplishments enhance and improve the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of the Area and of the City. 3. That it is hereby found and determined that the financial aa.d to be provided from the Neighborhood Development Loan Account under the Financing Plan which is the subject of a separate Council resolution, is necessary to permit continued imple�entation of the Redevelopment Plan program for the Martin Luther King Center Area, Clearance Section 2, Summit-University NDP and CD Pro�ect Area in which Area the Control Data Site is located and in which Area additional acquisition and clearance of conditions of blight was programm�ed to the existence of redeveloper interest and available federal funding, wi.thout which the land in the Control Data Site would not be made available for redevelopment. 4. That it is hereby found and determi.ned that the aforeindescribed amended Fcedevelopment Plans and the activities therein provided for wi21 afford maxitntmm opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the locality as a whole, for redevelopment of the Project Area by private enterprise. 5. That it is hereby found and determined that the amended Redevelopment Plans conform to the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Saint Paul. COUKCILMEN Yeas Butler Nays Requested by Depattment of: �k�t�can Hozza ' In Favor Levine Roedler B Pres. Sylvester Against Y Tedesco ' � Prz�s�iei.�t Hunt Form Approved by City Attorney Adepted by Council: Date Certified Passed by Council Secretary By Bp Approved by Mayor: Date _ Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council By — gy �14H17'E - CITY CLERK •)C\l'l�� P{NK - F1�'.pNCE �T COURCII NS1J') t � � CANAFI�"- DHPARTMENT . G I TY OF SA I NT PL� l.1 L File N O. ' � BLUE -MAYOR � � H� Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date -4- 6. That it is hereby found and determined that the amended Redevelopment Plans and pro�rams therein provided for, including the provision for additional housing in Phases 2 and 3 of the Ma.rtin Luther King Center Area progra�ed for Community Development Program Year III, make provision towards the development of a viable urban community in Saint Paul, including decent housing and a suitable living environmenC and expanding economic opportunities principally for persons of low income. 7. That it is hereby found and determined that the objectives of the amended Redevel- opment Plans cannot be achieved by rehabilitation of the Control Data Site and that the redevelopment of said Site for predominantly nonresidential uses is necessary for the proper development of the locality as a whole. 8. That the Redevelopment Plan Amendment To A Program For The Revitalization Of The City Of Saint Paul CD Year II (Control Data Site) May 27, 1977, and amendment to ti�e Redevelopment Plan, Stmimit-University, Minn. A-1-1, Code ND401, dated February 1974, also referred to as the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment, are hereby approved, together with the provision for relocation of persons, families, business concerns and others to be displaced by these Program and Project activites. COUIVCILh1EN Requested by Department of: Yeas Butler Nays �c�ic�a Hozza In Favor Levine Roedler Against BY PYes. Sylvester Tedesco Pres�i�wwt Hunt Form p ro ed by City Attorney � ?1 Adopted by Council: Date , / Certified Passed by Council Secretary 4� By Approved by �layor: Date Approved by Mayor for Submission to Coun '1 sy By Fifty-Fi� East Fifth Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101. telephone f612) 298 5218 � � � ��j � V 1 � �1 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Ms. Rose Mix June 15, 1977 Office of the City Clerk 316 City Hall St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Re: Redevelopment Plan Amendment Control Data Project Council Public Hearing Dear Ms. Mix: Please submit the enclosed communication requesting June 30, 1977 as public hearing date to the Council at its meeting of June l6, 1977. Notice of the hearing will be prepared and published in your name in the Dispatch/Pioneer Press by HRA staff. If the Council sets the hearing for Thursday, June 30, the notice should be submitted by 10 a.m. , Friday, June 17, for June 18 publication. Please advise the writer of the Council action. Yours very truly, ... ,1:�� Allan J. Block Acting Executive Director /J� Willie Mae Wilson, Donald P. Del Fiacco, Mary Ann Sudeith, Rosalie L. Butler, Kenneth J. Lynch, David H. Hozza, Ron Maddox chairperson June 15, 1977 Mr. Robert Sylvester Council President c/o City Clerk 316 City Hall St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Dear President Sylvester: The proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendment, Community Development District 8, for the Control Data Site, was heard and approved by the Planning Commission on June 10, 1977, and after receipt of the Commission's report, will be considered by the HRA Board on June 22, 1977. The Council is requested to set a date for public hearing upon the Plan Amendment for Thursday, June 30, 1977, and to cause the requisite notice of the hearing to be published. Yours very truly, George Latimer Mayor WHITE - CITV CLERK ��'1'�1 PINK - FINANCE COUflC1I BLUERV - MAVORTMENT GITY OF SAINT PAUL File NO. � J` � - ' ouncil Resolution .� � Presented By " ��' Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date RESOLUTION DIRECTING PUBLIC HEARING ON � SUMMIT-UNIVERSITY AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS FOR CONTROL DATA CORPORATION PROJECT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota that a public hearing be held in the Council Chambers , City Hall and Court House, Saint Paul, Minnesota, on the 30th day of June, 1977, at 10: 00 o'clock a.m. , upon the proposed amendments to the Redevelopment Plan for Summit-University NDP Area, Minn. A-1-1, and Community Development District 8, and the public activities thereby proposed. RESOLVED FURTHER that not less than ten (10) days prior to the date of said public hearing the City Clerk shall cause published notice of the same to be given in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Saint Paul at least once not less than ten (10) days prior to the date of said hearing. COUNCILMEN Yeas Na s Requested by Department of: BU� Y Hozza � In Favor Levine � Rcedler Against BY C�E.S1C�'.rit Sylvester Tedesco H�Xt un � ��N � t ��,� Form Appro d y Cit ttorney Adopte y Council• Date ��* C ified a by C unci cretary / BY 2 N 2 2 �9�7 Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council Approved by Date gy � By u,�„ .7,5' . � �--t.... . . . . � : r � r �f �,'�""�� j •��;_R :;r:-: ,�� .i.�.:�� .�: .:��t e�.. - ::�. :.e�w � ', � �� `�� ' .� � �� .e�,. ��' . .. .✓,.w,. "7'^ ' . y� � . ....� .,'� �� .��. .si '�' �, '. �;k;t Y�4v a�. :�' � � ',k : ��"��'�< : « �.: ��'�-`"��r"' .r��,;. �a; +��. ,� � '�++•+� n�' !;� �: ' �„ a i y��*�u��'� ,,:i.�� ;��"��- r,t;;� � �"��,,'`��.;.3;w � �,. i" �� . �'. w��'?h'"''�'-�'�'' ,�; T�i e^"`' ��i! . � �� C�3:; ��x •��, - +ti � .�:�'`e�. � , .A �.. A�".. _. . . ,.,.. : ,.�. _ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY t�eri Corr3gan , being �� duly sworn on oath, says: that he is, and during �E��` �"` 'p"" all times herein stated has been, Clerk of the pro � ?�e� Northwest Publications, Inc., publisher of the ° � newspaper known as the St. Paul Dispatch, St. ' "'°` Paul Pioneer Press, St. Paul Sunday Pioneer Press, a newspaper of general circulation within the City of St. Paul and the County of Ramsey. That the Notice hereto attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper and was printed �; � and published therein on the following dates: , . , : 18 day of June , 19 �7 i day of , 19 -"� � day of , 19 ti i .� " dayof , 19 .� n � �,�.� day of , 19 n �� day of , 19 �i .' Pro- C�cl}' Of � 19 Ilo� M ?Of . � 9 J. _ ` � , , _, 1 - � , , • �� . ot ��.P k ' °� � ��"` Subscribed and sworn to before me this �:�►� � '�� ;��;��;'' �„�,r 2 day �►f Jtu1e , 19 �_ emN°"�r c � . vW° �itmut•t .Ru6Ue financi�f a �td�N� smMf�:�wui ,a ��A �tun11Y,coo-- �r n�s; w rh.: Notan• Pu 'c � � �MNts M r�� ,�„�,��' �eY County, Minnesota n�d� v Ny as:a IIM'�ub�l�' ;�a� My commission expires Mst'cth 1�_ , 19 � Aa * eoo,r _ , ., _ . . _ _ - - - M piv., , en fu -1 hoard, teN►eoRG � 4 I�MC. Prsas'; !, Nb.; 164ac�v�.i..vaf�Kf.:. _. ,_ � � � � . . . . Form 236 Fi�`.�y-Five East Fifth Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101. telephone (612) 298 5� �21�j � �1��-t' ,,. , � + + ,�� ^. l/. �,� HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MlNNESOTA Ms. Martha Norton, Chairperson May 31, 1977 City Planning Cammission 421 Wabasha Saint Pau2, riinnesota 55102 re: Redevelopment Plan Amendment to "A Program for the Revitalization of the City of Saint Pau1-CD Year II" (Control Data Site) Dear Ms. Norton: Transmitted herewith are copies of the Amended Redevelopment Plan for the Control Data Site. These documents are transmitted to you in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.515, which Section reads as follows; 462.515 REDEVELOPH�NT PLAN. Any redevelopment company, or aay other person, may submit a redevelopment plan to an authority, or an authority may consider a redevelopment plan on its own initiative. An authority shall imcnediately transmit the plan to the planning agency of the muni� cipality in which the area to be redeveloped is situated, for its study, if such a planning agency is in existence, or, if no such planning agency is in existence, to such agency as the governing body of the municipality shall indicate. An authority shall request the written opiaion of the glan:�ing or other agency on aZl redevelopment plans submitted to it prior to approving those redevelopment plans, and the planning or other agency shall submit its written opinion within 30 days. A Redevelopment Plan, as defined by Minnesota Statutes 462.421, Sub. 15, and which is the document herewith transmitted, is as follows: 462.421, Subd. 150 "Redevelopment plan" means a plan approved by the governing body (or agency designated by it for that purpose or au�horized by law so to act) of each municipality in which any of Che area� to be covered by a redevelopment project is situated, which plan p�ovides an outline for the development or redevelopcnent of such •area. ar�d is `s�t'ffici- ently complete (1) to indicate its relationship to de�finite local objec- tives as to appropriate land uses; and (2} to indicate gerier�l Iand uses and general standards of development or redevelopment. Wiilie Mae Wiison, Donald P. Del Fiacco, Mary Ann Sudeith, Rosalie L. Butler, Kenneth J. Lynch, David H. Hozza, Ron Maddox chavpe�son . . � � Ms. Martha Norton -2- May 31, 1977 You will note that the Redevelopment Plan Amendment includes a legal description and boundary map, redevelopment plan, program for imp2ementation, project eligibility, relocation plan and legal resolution. The HRA requests that the City Planning Commission review the subject Redevelopment Plan Amendment and prepare its written opinion as per M.S. 462.515 so that appropriate action by the HRA ucay be underta ken leading to consideration and action by the City Council. Should you require any further information in conducting your review of the above, my staff and I are available to assist you. Sincerely, .%f,�l _ `��-��°G-� �..�� .: ��-'' Allan J. Block /`��Actin� Executive Director ' Fifty-Five East Fifth Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101. telephone (612) 298 5218 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Mr. Robert Sylvester June 27, 1977 President, City Council c/o City Clerk 316 City Hall St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Re: Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment Submission Dear Mr. Sylvester: In connection with the Control Data Redevelopment Project documents previously submitted, and now on file in the office of the City Clerk, transmitted herewith are: (1) the initial and revised resolutions and report of the Saint Paul Planning Commission on the Plan Amendments, (2) Resolution No. 77-6/22-5 of the Board of Commissioners of HRA making certain findings and approving for submission to the City Council Redevelopment Plan amendments for the Project, and (3) the Financing Plan for the Project. These additional documents are submitted for consideration on the public hearing before the Council on June 30, 1977 respecting the Project and Plan Amendments, and upon consideration on that date of a resolution approving the same. � HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA �, � gy - Acting Exe utive Director /J� , enc. Willie Mae Wilson, Donald P. Del Fiacco, Mary Ann Sudeith, Rosalie L. Butler, Kenneth J. Lynch, David H. Hozza, Ron Maddox chairperson city of saint paui ° _� ,� : �lann�ng commission resolution ' � � file number 7-25 . (�� June 24, 1977 WHEREAS, on June 10, 1977, the Planning Commisston oY the C1ty of , St. Paul approved Resolution 77-�18 regarding the Control Data � Redevelopment Plan amendment; and . WHEREAS, it is desirable to further clarify the Commission's finding � concerning conformity of the Redevelopment Plan amendment with general plans for the area. ' NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Resolutton 77�-1$ is amended with the addition of the fo11ow1ng language: � . "WHEREAS, this amendment to the Redevelopment Pldn . ` conforms to the policies and standards of the Comprehensive Plan for the City of St. Paul .° . � _ __ mQ�/ed by- Joseph Panqal .__. ��"��(� �� Adol f Tobl er � �� ' Unanimous c��f�t � HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA CERTIFICATE OF S�CRETARY The undersigned hereby certifies as follows : 1) That she is the duly qualified and acting Secretary of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, herein called the "Local Public Agency" and the keeper of the records of the Local Public Agency; 2) That the attached Resolution No. 77-6/22-5 is a true and correct copy of the resolution as adopted on the 22nd day of June , 197� ; 3) That tne seal affixed below constitutes the official seal of the Local Public Ayency and this Certificate is hereby executed under such official seal; and 4) That the undersigned is duly authorized to execute this Certificate. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the seal of the said Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, this 27th day of June , 19'7'7 . �� w �. �� ECRETARY ( S E AL ) .+ RESOLUTION N0. 77-6/22-5 RESOLUTION APPROVING FOR SUBMISSION TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF AMENDMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR SUMMIT-UNIVERSITY MINN. A-1-1, DATED FEBRUARY 1974, AND TO REDEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM YEAR II, FOR CONTROL DATA CORPORATION REDEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 69-1/9-7 adopted January 9, 1969, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota (HRA) determined that the Summit-University Neighborhood Development Program (NDP) Area was blighted, deteriorated and deteriorating, and by its Resolution No. 69-1/22-5 adopted January 22, 1969 approved a Redevelopment Plan for said Area determining eligibility for acquisition and clearance within the Summit-University NDP Area including Clearance Section 2, and the Council of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, by Resolution, Council File No. 241901 adopted and approved January 24, 1969 determined conditions of blight and eligibility for acquisition and approved the Redevelopment Plan Summit-University Project Minn. A-1-1, and the public actions, including property acquisi- tion and removal of blighted and deteriorated structures thereby proposed; and 6�iEREAS, by Resolution No. 74-3/6-2 adopted DZarch 6, 1974 , the HRA approved a Redevelopment Plan Summit-University riinrt. A-1-1, dated February 1974, for Year VI of the NDP Program, which Redevelopment Plan redefined a clearance area within Clearance Section 2 identified as the Martin Luther King Center Area consisting of Blocks 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 96, 98, 106 and 125, in which Blocks HRA had acquired 32$ of tne parcels of real property pursuant to authorization of the 1969 Redevelopment Plan as funded in NDP .Years I through V, and as to the balance of said p�rcels of real property, the 1974 Redevelopment Plan provided that acquisition would occur as developer interest required, and as Federal funding under the Housing Act of 1949 permitted, and by its Resolution, Council File No. 263275 adopted r4arch 21, 1974 and approved March 25, 1974, the Council of the City of Saint Paul approved the said Redevelopment Plan and Martin Luther King Center Area proposal; and WHEREAS, with the enactment of the Housing and Community Develop- ment Act of 1974, and provision of federal community development block grants to fund community development program activities including the continuation and conclusion of ongoing NDP projects previously funded under the Housing Act of 1949, the Martin Luther King Center Area redevelopment activities were divided into three phases with Blocks ?4, 75, 76, and 98 in Phase l, Blocks 73, 77, and 78 in Phase 2, and Blocks 96, 106, and 125 in Phase 3, in which property acquisition in Blocks 74, 75, 76, and 98 had been substantially completed in NDP activities for residential reuse redevelopment with permitted institu- tional use with requisite developer interest in accordance with the provision of the 1974 NDP Redevelopment Plan, and in the Community Development Program and Budget for Year II additional property acquisi- tion in Block 73, Phase 2, Nartin Luther King Center Area, Community Development District 8, was programmed and funds allocated in contin- gency account for Phase 2 acquisition; and ' • -2- WHEREAS, HRA is in receipt of a redevelopment proposal from Control Data Corporation to purchase Blocks 73, 74, and the north one-half of Blocks 77 and 78, Martin Luther King Center Area, herein- after referred to as the Control Data Site, and to redevelop said Site as an office and parts warehouse and distribution center facility, to accomplish private redevelopment of the Site, provide em�loyment � opportunity to low income residents of the Summit-University Area, and resolve planning and land marketing difficulties existing by reason of Interstate 94 E�'reeway on the North Boundary of the Site; and WHEREAS, acceptance of the Control Data Corporation proposal will necessitate public acquisition and clearance of private property identified in the Project Eligibility Report, vacation of public streets and alleys identified in Map 3 , and amendment of� the Land Use Plan and Map of the Redevelopment Plan Summit-University Minn. A-1-1 dated February 1974, incorporated by reference in the Redevelopment Plan, Community Development Year II, adopted by HRA by its Resolution No. 76-2/4-4 approved February 4 , 1976 , and adopted by the Council of the City, Council File No. 266737 adopted February 5, 1976 , and proposed amendment report, map and actions are incorporated into a document entitled, "Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment" dated May 27, 1977, consisting of an Introduction, Legal Description and Boundary Map, Redevelopment Plan, Program For Implementation, Project Eligibi lity Report, Relocation Plan and Financing PZan, and text of "Amendment To The Redevelopment Plan, Summit-University , Minn. A-1-1, Code 401, February 1974" , chanqing Land Use provision from residential to light industrial usage, all of which documents have been presented to and considered at this meeting; and WHEREAS , the Board of Commissioners of HRA has also received and considered the resolution and opinion report of the Planning Commission of the City of Saint Paul, Resolution No. 77-18, dated June 10, 1977, approving the proposed Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment upon a finding "that the office and parts distribution center developed under controls established in the Redevelopment Plan Amend- ment would constitute an appropriate land use for the site, compatible with adjacent uses and consistent with continued physical and economic improvement of the area" , and the minutes of the May 23, 1977 meeting of the District 8 Planning Council, the citizen participation group for the Summit-University Area, endorsing the Control Data Site and proposal; and WHEREAS, the proposed Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment and project undertaking proposed thereby will achieve removal of conditions of blight and deterioration in the Martin Luther King Center Area, permit private investment and redevelopment consistent with sound planning objectives and criteria, provide economic development in the Summit-University Area, District 8, and employment opportunity to lower income residents of the area, and by these accomplishments enhance and improve the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the District and of the City: and . ` -3- WHEREAS, with amendment of the land use provisions of the Redevelopment Plans from residential reuse to light industrial reuse, the Control Data Corporation proposal meets the objectives of said Redevelopment Plans for removal. of conditions of blight and deterioration within the Martin Luther King Center Area, assembly of land for private _ redevelopmen t enhancing the tax base and preventing spread of conditions of blight and deterioration, and after redevelopment enhancing the economic viability of the Area, District and City, and providing employment opportunity for lower income residents of the District, which makes desirable and in the public interest the approval by the HRA Board of Commissioners of the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment; and WHEREAS, said approval by the HRA Board of Commissioners is a statutory requisite for consideration of the Amendment by the Council of the City of Saint Paul in whom is placed the responsibility, after public hearing, to determine whether the land in the Control Data Site would not be made available for redevelopment without the public expend- iture detailed in the Financing Plan, the amended Redevelopment Plans will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the redevelopment of the Site by private enterprise, and the conformity of the amended Redevelopment Plans to the Comprehensive Plan For Saint Paul, being the general plan for development of the City as a whole. NOVJ THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Cor.imissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota as follows: 1. That in view of the premises hereby adopted as findings , the amendment to the Redevelopment Plan Summit-University Minn. A-1-1, February 1974, and amendment to the Redevelopment Plan Community Development Program Year II , February 1976 , incorporated in the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment, and the redevelopment undertakings and public actions therein proposed and contained are hereby in all respects approved as necessary and in the public interest to accomplish the purposes and objectives for which said RedeveZopment Plans and Redevelopment Project have been previously approved and undertaken. 2. That the findings and determinations of HRA Resolution Nos. 69-1/9-7 and 69-1/22-5, except as herein expressly otherwise determined, are hereby affirmed, including the determination of blight and deteriora- tion, eligibility for acquisition and clearance, and determination that the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan cannot be achieved through rehabilitation of the Control Data Site, Martin Luther King Center Area, Clearance Section 2, Summit-University NDP Area, Community Development District 8. 3. That the redevelopment of the aforesaid Control Data Site for non-residential uses is necessary for the proper development of the City. 4. That the Schedule of Average Gross Rentals approved October 27, 1976 by Resolution No. 76-10/27-3, the Fixed Relocation Payments Schedule approved by the Minnesota Department of Transportation and currently in effect, and the Schedule of Average Sales Priees approved September 22, 1976 by Resolution No. 76-9/22-12, and the other ► � � . . . -4- . conditions urider which relocation payments will �be made, including assurances of compliance with th�e Uniform Relocation Assistance Act, are hereby approved, and the Relocation Administrator, Department of Planning and Economic Development, is hereby designated to approve all claims and relocation payments . 5. That the United States of America and the Secretary af the Department of Housing and Urban Development be, and hereby are, assured of full compliance by the HRA with regulations of the Department of Fiousing and Urban Development effectuating Title VI of the Civi1 Rights Act of 1964 and applicable Executive Orders. :. 6. That the Executive Director is hereh� authorized-and directed . � -,�- �.�•�� to:-communicate this actio��°a�S- resalution to the` Coun�il of -the� -C�.ty� �f y `� Saint Paul and make presentation of the Redevelopment Plan amendments, financing plan,- and supporting data -to said Council -in.. public--hearing - on Thursday, June 30, 197a, and : to- submi,t- an:NDP- 3evision to tY�e. � Department of Housing and Urban- Development and to act as correspondent- - with said Department. _, .: : . .. ' � � _ _ . _ _. _. ___-.�.�-__._._. ._...,_......_..�._ , , _ � , _ 6/27/77 FINANCING PLAN: CONTROL DATA CORPORATION REDEVELOPMENT SITE DISTRICT 8 The total costs to be incurred by the expenditure of public funds for the assembly of the Control Data Site is $2,152,700. These cost figures are based on estimates for acquisition, relacation, site clearance, and a contingency amount. The Redevelopment Plan Amendment describes all activities which are to take place in order to accomplish the project. These cost figures include acquisition of five properties in the south half of Block 78 and seven properties in the north half of Block 96 outside the Control Data Site, which will be added to existing HRA awner- ship in these half blocks and made available far housing or institutional development as alternative resources to use of the Control Data Site for these purposes. This acquisition will be considered as a part of the Redevelopment Plan for CD Year III, but f�nded in the amount of $189,550 - for all costs as a part of, the Cantrol Data project. The attached table outlines the estimated total project expenditures and indicates the sources of funds. The sources include the u tilization of CD Year YI funds, disposition proceeds, and funds in the PTDP Temporary Loan Repayment Account. The use of the NDP funds necessitates a Revised NDP Urban Renewal Plan. Atto A'TTACI�IENT FINANCING PLAN CONTROL DATE CORPORATION REDEVELOPMENT SITE PROJECT COSTS Acquisition $630,500 Relocation 389,000 Site Clearance 43,925 Contingency 89,275 $1,152,700 FUNDING SOURCES NDP Loan Funds $ 840,000 `' Disposition Proceeds 217,000 CD Year II 95,700 $I,152,700 � . CONTROL DATA SITE StJNAtIT-UNIVERSITY (DISTRICT 8} PROPERTIES TO BE ACQUIRED: 73A ADDRESS PARCEL (Vacant Land) 73-4 (Vacant Land) 73-5 (Vacactt Land) 73-8 592 Concordia 73-9 (Vacant Land) 73-10 (Vacant Land) 73-11 614-18 Concordia 73-12 615 Carroll 73-13 611 Carroll 73-14 605 Carro2l 73-15 (Vacant Land) 73-16 585-587 Carroll 73-19 583 Carroll 73-2p 579 Carroll 73-21 573-575 Carroll 73-22 (Vacant Land) 73-23 Sb5 Carroll 73-24 561 Carroll 73-24 S2F3 Carroll 77-6 532 Carroll 77-� 299 Kent 78`1 297 Ke nt 78-2 �=-—"--�' CONTROL DATA SITE Properties to be Acquired (cont.) ADDRESS PARCEL 566 Carroll 78-4 (Vacant Land) 78-7 586 Carroll 7$-$ � 590 Carroll 78-9 (Vacant Land) 78-11 602 Carroll 78-12 606 Carroll 78-13 608 Carroll 78-14 612 Carroll 78-15 616-618 Carroll 78-16 WNI7E - CITV CLERK � - - . " � � . � .. .. ... P1NK '- fINANCE � nOUnCl� �[��(1��. CANARV - DEPARTMENT GITY OF SAINT PAUL �� j BLUE .r MAVOR � . _ , � Fll@ NO. �,; __ _. -.----- .- �ncil Resol�t�an � _ . _ -__- - F, �� / � . � Presented By � % � . � Referred To Committee: Date fi Out of Committee By_ �'� � Date i �. ' . a�soLU�rrox n=x$cr�c pvBLZC a�ar�6 ox � so�aa�T-oxivs�srr�r � r�rr ;� PL�i 11tdBbTD�iEH'rS 101t CO�iTIb�L D�1TA . t�RPO�iATI�i P�C4 1tESOLVED by the Couacil o� the CitY ot Snint Panl, �sinnasota that a pnblic h+aarinq be hald in the L•onncil Chambers, City aall and Court 8�use, Saint Pan1, Mianesot�t, oa the 3Cth day of Juae, 1977, at 10:00 o'clock a.m., npoa the propoaed amenlbaents to the Redevelopmeat Plaa fvr Summit ilaiveraitp N�P Area, �ti.na. R-1-1, and � Co�nuaity Develop�ent District S, and tha pnblia activi#ias thsreby propose�. RBSOLVED FQRTBE$ that uot lees thau t�n �10� daya prior to the � � date af said publfc hearinq the City C�erk shali caiase publlshecl notice of the same to be qiven in a aevspaper of qs�aeral circulation in the City ot Saiat Panl at leas t once not less thaa ten (lO j 8aya prior to the date ot said hearinq, � _ COUNCILMEN Yeas � Nays Requested by Department of: Hozza / In Favor Levine � Rcedler �S�lt Sylvester Against BY Tedesco ' �t Hunt Adopted by Council: Date �"��"� ` � �� Form Approved by City Attornep • - � Certified Passed by Council Secretary By '.. � By � Approved by Mayor: Date Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council By By . ' -_ i/. .,: �-, . . � t�..�,.� � :_�► _. . , . ��'�� y Of ��t�t �au! ��CEI VEp � ��r��ng ct�nrr�is��on resolutior� J��t� 1 5197 file num,�r 17-18 � Planning D�v. �� June 10, 1977 " � WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul has transmitted to the Planning Comnission of the City of Saint Paul trie "Contro] - • Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment" dated May 27, 1977 for the Comnission's study and opinion pursuant to Minnesota Statute 462,515 (1974); WNEREAS, the Saint Paul Planning Commission has reviewed the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment; . WHEREAS, the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment proposes removal of conditions of blight in the Martin Luther King area of District 8 and assembly of a site for sale to Control Data Corporation for development of an office and parts distribution center; an� WHEREAS, it is found that the office and parts distribution center developed under the controls established in the Redevelopment Plan Amendment would constitute an appropriate land use for the site, compatible with adjacent uses and consistent with continued physical and economic improvement of the area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul Planning Corr�nission finds the Control Data Redeve�apment Plan Amendment acceptable with the following modification: That the alley between Carroll and Tglehart avenues, running from Qaie Street to Kent Street, be excluded from the redevelopment plan site. Furthermore, that the alley not be vacated at this time. BE I1' FURTHER RESOLVED, that the St. Paul Planning Comanission approves the attached w�itten opinion and authorizes its transmittal to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, and to the Mayor and the City Council of the City of , Saint Paul . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that th� St. Paul Planning Commission recommends a financing scheme that will secure for the City the full tax increment for the amortization of acquisition, relocation and clearing costs. �� G1 en Hanggi 5�� " Mertyce Mayne J ir� fa�� ,5 �c,�.�r�st ° OPINION The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Saint Paul has requested the Planning Commission to render its opinion on a proposed redeve1opment plan for a 13.76 acre site in Summit-University on Concordia and Carroll Avenues between Dale and Mackubin. The Plan, known as the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment, is an amendment to the Summit-University Redevelopment Plan. � The Planning staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the project with the following modification: That the alley between Carroll and Iglehart which runs east and west between Kent and Dale, be excluded from the redevelopment plan project boundary and not vacated at this time. SUMMARY OF REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT - DISTRICT 8 The Redevelopment Plan Amendment for District 8 was initiated as a result of a specific developer interest expressed by Contro1 Data Corporation. In discussion with Control Data, their stated objectives regarding the design, intended use, ' types of employment and b1ending into the community were found to be similar to the needs of the community (District 8) , as well as fulfilling objectives of the Community Development Block Grant Program. Previously approved Redevelopment Plans covering this area established that mu1t1- and single-family residential deve1opment should be the predominant land use. These plans also establis�ed the original approved eligible clearance area. Acquisitjon, relocation, demolition and land marketing attempts have been going on since the first redevelopment plan was adopted in 1970. The Housing and Redevel- opment Authority has had difficuity in marketing this land, especially those lots which are adjacent to the freeway. Federa1 and State mortgage money has been difficult to obtain for either sing1e-or-multi-family development. The inherent negative effects of the freeway on residential quality of 1ife has been the main reason. A non-residential corporation is now pi11ing to invest private capital to develop this land. Their intended objectives address the issues of potentially providing jabs for inner-city residents, increasing the tax base of the city, and develaping a long-term interest in Saint Paul on a site which has been difficult to market for r.esidential purposes. STAFF REVIEW After reviewing this redevelopment pl�n, the planning staff inet with the HRA staff who had prepared the plan. Comments were given to the HRA staff and resulted in changes while the redevelopment plan was still in a rough draft form. Only tc�:�o comnents were not facilitated at that time. The first cor�nent pertained to the proposed inclusion of the alley mentioned above. P1anning staff felt that due to the fact that whatever uses developed in the south half of the block surrounded by Carroll , Kent, Iglehart and Dale would need the land occupied by � the alley more than the proposed Control Data to the north. It was understoo� at that time that a parking 1ot was proposed for the area between Kent and Dale, north of this alley. � �Furthermore, Control Data site plans do not include this area nor show desire for its use. After a recent discussion with the HRA planning supervisor, Jerry Mangle, he is not opposed to this modification to the submitted redevelopment plan. The other corr�nent which dTd not amend the redevelopment plan in its rough draft stage was the reference to a "computer parts distribution center" rather than ' � � "industrial " in every case where it is mentioned. Planrring staff was concerned that in case Control Data did not construct a facility, there might be a possibiiity of the developmen� of an industrial facility which would not be compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood. . Discussion between HRA and Planning staff in this matter have indicated that there will be sufficient development controls to assure that the land will be developed in a manner which will be compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood. . PROJECT ASSESSMENT 7ax Return Potential The proposal involves construction worth $5 million. This may generate approximately $200,000 in taxes per year when in operation. An alternative use would be institutional . This alternative will return no tax base since these would be mainly non�profit institutions. Another alternative is single or multiple fami1y home use. The site could hold 40 single family homes. If a $1 ,000-$1 ,500 per home tax is assured, the property would generate only $40,000-$60,000 in taxes. Public Services Since the site is now laid out for smaller scale, residential or institutional uses, the C�ntro1 Data proposal will require change of the pub1ic utilities in order to serve the office-warehouse. Some utilities will need to be relocated in order to allow vacation of streets within the proposed site. Employment The proposed project employs 400 persons. These jobs now exist at scattered sites throughout the Twin Cities. Control Data has made no co�nitment to hire any new employees from the Summit-University area or from the entire city. However, the location of those jobs within Saint Paul will make them more accessible and Saint Paul residents will be more competitive in filling them. The close proximity of this employer, coupled with their strong affirmative action program, should result in increased job opportunities for Saint Paul residents. The jobs re1ated to - the Control Data activities at this site will consist of both skilled and unskilled positions. _2_ The move of this facility to Saint Paul may also have an effect on residential demand in the Summit-University area. The new location of this facility may encaurage present Control Data employees to relocate in Saint Paul to be close to work. Land Use Adjustments The critical issue of this Redevelopment �lan is land use compatihility. The proposal interjects an affice and warehouse use�into 1��d, previously d�signated for housing and small institutional uses. The proposed site, however, borders I-94 to the north. While considerab1e housing has 6een built along the freeway in the past, current planning practice recognizes a conflict fietween housing and and the traffic, dust and noise associated with the interstate freeway system. The Control Data proposal could be an effective buffer between the residential area to the south and the freeway. The Control Data proposal seems to be a better neighbor to the residential area than would be the freeway. The Redevelopment Plan offers the opportunity through its design control provisions to insure a successful boundary between the Control Data site and the resid�ntial area to the south. Through the design controls and uses on the site, landscaping and buffers can be arranged so that a minimal impact is created upon the adjoining residential areas. Environmental Qualit An environmental assessment both for the Minnesota Environmental Quality Council and for �he possible use o` Community Development Block Grant Funds , has been initiated. This assessment will examine the project in detail to ascertain any potent�al environ�ental effects. The assessment will evaluate such items as: potential noise, land use, air quality, aesthe�ic and socioeconomic effects from the project. _3_ CITY OF SAINT PAUL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR CITY PLANNING DONALD L. SPAID AIP PLANNING COORDINATOR June 15, 1977 Robert Sylvester, President and Members of the Council and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul c/o City Clerk Room 386 City Hall St. Paul , Minnesota 55102 Dear Members of the Council : The Planning Commission has completed its review of the proposed "Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment." Enclosed are the Commission resolution and a report outlining our findings which favor adoption of the amendment. Sincerely, � �� Martha Norton, Chairman Planning Commission MN/mb Enc. 421 Wabasha Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 (612)-298-4151 0 ' • �, � city of saint �aul planning cammis�sion resolution � fife number »-,� . ��p June 10, 1977 WNEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Pau'1 has � transmitted to the Planning Commission of the City of Saint Paul the "Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment" dated May 27, 1977 for the Comnission's study and opinion pursuant to Minnesota Statute 462,515 (1974); � WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Planning Comnission has reviewed the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment; WHEREAS, the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment proposes removal of conditions of blight in the Martin Luther King area of District 8 and assembly of a site for sale to Control Data Corporation for development of an office and parts distribution center; and � WHEREAS, it is found that the office and parts distribution center developed under the controls established in the Redevelopment Plan Amendment would constitute an appropriate land use for the site, compatible with adjacent uses and consistent with continued physical and economic improvement of the area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul Planning Comnission finds the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment acceptable with the following modification: That the alley between Carroll and Iglehart avenues, running from Dale Street to Kent Street, be excluded from the redevelopment plan site. Furthermore, that the alley not be vacated at this time. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the St. Paul Planning Comnission approves the attached written opinion and authorizes its transmittal to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, and to the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Saint Paul . ' BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that th� St. Paul Planning Comnission recommends a financing scheme that will secure for the City the full tax increment for the amortization of acquisition, relocation and clearing costs. mO. �,r.1 � G1 en Hanggi \/G'�.6 �� " Mertyce Mayne 7 It1 f�1i"O�' �� aga�nst�._ ° , , „� �, ., • _ �� ,'�"�y OPINION The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Saint Paul has requested the Planning Commission to render its opinion on a proposed redevelopment plan for a 13.76 acre site in Summit-University on Concordia and Carroll Avenues between Dale and Mackubin. The P1an, known as the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment, is an amendment to the Sumnit-University Redevelopment Plan. The Planning staff recomnends that the Planning Comnission approve the project with the following modification: That the alley between Carroll and Iglehart which r.uns east and west between Kent and Dale, be excluded from the redevelopment plan project boundary and not vacated at this time. SUh�IARY OF REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDNtfNT � 't�ISTRICT 8 The Redevelopment Plan Amendment for District 8 was initiated as a result of a specific developer interest expressed by Control Data Corporation. In discussion with Control Data, their stated objectives regarding the design, intended use, types of employment and 61ending into the community were found to be sim9lar to the needs of the comnunity (District 8j, as we11 as fulfilling ob�ecttves of the Community Development Block Grant Program. Previously approved Redevelopment Plans covering this area established that multi- and single-family residentia1 development should 6e the predominant land use. These plans also established the original approved eligible clearance area. Acquisition, relocation, demolition and land marketing attempts have been going on since the first redevelopment plan was adopted in 1970. The Housing and Redevel- opment Authority has had difficulty in marketing this land, especially those lots which are ad�acent to the freeway. Federal and State mortgage money has been difficul.t to obtain for either single-or-multi-family development. The inherent negative effects of the freeway on residential quality of ltfe has been the main reason. A non-residentia1 corporation is now �rilling to invest private capital to develop this land. Their intended objectives address the issues of potentia1ly providing jobs for inner-city residents, increasing the tax base of the city, and developing a long-term interest in Saint Pau1 on a site which has been difficult to market for r.esidential purposes. STAFF REVIEW After reviewing this redevelopment plan, the planning staff inet with the HRA staff who had prepared the plan. Comnents were given to the HRA staff and resulted in changes while the redevelopment plan was still in a rough draft form. Only two comments were not facilitated at that time, The first comnent pertained to the proposed inclusion of the alley mentioned above, Planning staff felt that due to the fact that whatever uses developed in the south half of the block surrounded by Carroll , Kent, Iglehart and Dale would need the land occupied by the alley more than the proposed Control Data to the north. Tt was understood at that time that a parkjng lot was proposed for the area between Kent and Dale, north of this a11ey. . . . .. . ..-. r.,�:,��w�+vv.5re,v�n-n�.rc. r:d ..., . � - � . . .. .. . . l.. . 1}'g . �Ya.�� i«�If� • � ��+,, � . . � . . � � � . . Furthermore, Control Data site plans do not include this area nor�sht�w desire for its use. After a recent discussion with the HRA planning supervisor, Jerry Mangle, he is not opposed to this modification to tf�e submi�ted redevelopm�nt plan. The other comment which dfid not amend the redevelopment p1an in its rough draft stage was the reference to a "computer parts distribut9on center" rather than "industrial " in every case where it is mentioned. Planning staff was concerned � that in case Control Data did not construct a faci1ity, there might be a possibiiity of the development of an industrtal facility which would not be compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood. Discussion between HRA and Planning staff in this matter have lndicated that there will be sufflcient developmen� controls to assure that the land will be developed in a manner which will be compati61e with the surrounding residential neighborhood. PROJECT AS�ESSMENT Tax Return Potential The proposal involves construction worth $5 m�1lion. This may generate approximately $200,000 in taxes per year when tn operation. An alternative use would be institutional . Th1s alternative will return no tax base since these would be mainly non-profit institutions. Another alternative is single or multiple family home use. The site could hold 40 single family homes. If a $1 ,000-$1 ,500 per home tax is assured, the property would generate only $40,000-$60,000 in taxes. Public Services Since the site is now laid out for smaller scale, res�dential or institutional uses, the Control Data proposal will require change of the public utilities in � order to serve the office-warehouse. Some utilities will need to be relocated in order to allow vacation of streets within the proposed sfite. Employment The proposed project employs 400 persons. These �obs now exist �t scattered sites throughout the Twin Cities. Control Data has made no comnitment to Fiire any new employees from the Summit-University area or from the entire city. However, the location of those jobs within Saint Paul will make them more accessible and Saint Paul residents will be more competitive in filling them. The c1ose proximity of this employer, coupled with their strong affirmative action program, should result in increased job opportunities for Saint Paul residents. The jobs related to the Control Data activities at thls site wi11 consist of both skilled and unskilled positions. -2- . . .. . ,.�.,,,, . ...o......�.. ......�..,......,.., ..,., . ..,.i.a•i°IirL'ir..;.:k�� ' � � . , . . � . .. , .. The move of this facility to Saint Paul may also have an effect on residential demand in the Summit-University area, The new location of this facility may encourage present Control Data employees to relocate in Saint Paul to be close to work. Land Use Adjustments The critical issue of this Redevelopment �lan is 1and use comP3tihility. The � proposal interjects an office and warehouse use�into 1a�d, previously d�esignated for housing and small institutional uses. The proposed s1te, however, borders I-94 to the north. While considerable housing has been built along the freeway in the past, current planning practice recognizes a conflict #etween housing and and the traffic, dust and noise associated with the interstate freeway system. The Control Data proposal could be an effective buffer between the residential area to the south and the freeway. The Control Data proposal seems to be a better neighbor to the residential area � than would be the freeway. The Redevelopment Plan offers the opportunity through its design control provisions to lnsure a successful boundary between the Control Data site and the residential area to the south. Through the d�sign controls and uses on the site, landscaping and buffers can be arranged so that a minimal impact is created upon the adjoining residential areas. Environmental Quality An environmental assessment both for the Minnesota Enviror�nental Quality Council and for the possible use of Comnunity Development Block Grant Funds, has been initiated. This assessment will examine the project in detail to ascertain any potential environmental effects. The assessment will evaluate such items as: potential noise, land use, air quality, aesthe�ic and socioeconomic effects from the project. -3- � . . . .. . . . . . .. ... . . . .-�. .,. . � ... , . . , ' 1 � . ..•'i�lr.�1`�a � ,. . ,y .. /r"�. . . . . . . ,iw� � . � , � , . � city of saint paul : pianning commiss�on resolution fiie number »-,� �te June 10, 1977 _ WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul has transmitted to the Planning Commission of the Gity of Saint Paul the "Control � Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment" dated May 27, 1977 for the Commission's study and opinion pursuant to Minnesota Statute 462,515 (1974); : WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Planning Comnission has reviewed the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment; WMEREAS, the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amen�nent proposes removal of conditions of blight in the Martin Luther King area of Di$trict 8 and .assembly of a site for sale to Control Data Corporation for development of an office and parts distribution center; and WHEREAS, it is found that the office and parts distribution center developed under the controls established in the Redevelopment Plan Amendment would constitute an appropriate land use for the site, compatible with adjacent uses and consistent with continued physical and economic improvement of the area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul Planning Comnission finds the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment acceptable with the following modification: That the alley between Carroll and Iglehart avenues, running from Dale Street to Kent Street, be excluded from the redevelopment plan site. Furthermore, that the alley not be vacated at this time. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the St. Paul Planning Commission approves the attached written opinion and authorizes its transmittal to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, and to the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Saint Paul . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the St. Paul Planning Commission recommends a financing scheme that will secure for the City the full tax increment for the amortization of acquisition, relocation and clearing costs. mO� � Glen Hanggi �� Mertyce Mayne in favor '� against� � , . - . . ... , '�...1 5:11:,�..Y.'J.�.y_3_-ilu�'�M�,j. �.. , v. . . , . . ' ' , ',♦ h''`s' , •, • ~+\ . . � ,� �` . .. OPINION The Housing and Redevelopment Author�ty of Saint Paul has requested the Planning Commission to render its opinion on a proposed redevelopment plan for a 13.76 acre site in Summit-University on Concordia and Carroll Avenues between Dale and Mackubin. The Plan, known as the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment, is an amendment to the Sumnit-University Redevelopment Plan. The Planning staff recommends that the Planning Conmission approve the pro�ect with the following modification: That the alley between Carroll and iglehart which runs east and west between Kent and Dale, be excluded from the redevelopment plan project boundary and not vacated at this time. SUMMARY OF REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDI�ENT � '�I�TRIET 8 The Redevelopment Plan Amendment for Distrtct 8 was initiated as a result of a specific developer interest expressed by Control Data Corporation. In discussion . with Control Data, tt�eir stated objectives regarding the design, lntended use, types of employment and 6lending into the community were found to be similar to the needs of the comnunity (District 8), as well as fulfilling objectiYes of the Cortanunity Development Block Grant Program. Previously approved Redevelopment Plans covering tF�is area established that multi- and single-family residentiat development should 6e the predominant 1and use. These plans also establi'shed the origina1 approved eligtble clearanc� area, Acquisition, relocation, demolition and land marketing attempts have been going on since the first redevelopment p1an was adopted tn 1970. The Housing and Redeve1- opment Authority has had difficulty in marketing this land, especially those lots which are adjacent to the freeway. Federal and State mortgage money has been difficult to obtain for either single-or-multi-�family development, The inherent negative effects of the freeway on residential qua1tty of life has been the main reason. R non-residential corporation is now �ril1ing to invest private capital to develop this land. Their intended ob�ectives address the issues of potentially providing jobs for inner-c9ty residents, increasing the tax base of the city, and developing a long-term interest in Saint Pau1 on a site which has been difficult to market for �r.esidential purposes. STAFF REVIEW After reviewing this redevelopment plan, the planning staff inet wi�h the HRA staff who had prepared the plan. Comnents were given to the HRA staff and resulted in changes while the redeve1opment plan was still in a rough draft form. Only two corrments were not facilitated at that time. The first comment pertained � to the proposed inclusion of the alley mentioned above, Planning staff felt that due to the fact that whatever uses developed in the south half of the block surrounded by Carroll , Kent, Iglehart and Dale would. need the land occupied by the alley more than the proposed Control Data to the north, It was understood at that time that a parking lot was proposed for the area be�areen Kent and Da1e, north of this alley. , , , wu�.v�a�. . xt!nrc�Yd'i„�r::�r,.3Cl:w""rrr�s,�.. s , f.Y�, {:. ,+�ya::��,,�;: . �-,` �� Furthermore, Control Data site plans do not include this area nor sht� desire , for its use. - After a recent discussion with the HRA planning supervisor, Jerry Mangle, he is not opposed to this modification to the submitted redevelopment plan. The other comnent which dtd not amend the redevelapment plan in its rough draft stage was the reference to a "computer parts distribution center" rather than "industrial " in every case where it is mentioned. Planning staff was concerned that in case Control Data did not construct a facility, t6ere might be a possibiiity of the development of an industrtal facility which would not be compatible with the surrounding residentia1 neighborhood. Discussion between HRA and Planning staff in thls matter have indicated that there will be sufficient development controls to assure that the land w�ll be developed in a manner which will be compatib1e with tRe surrpunding reside�ti�l neighborhood, . PROJECT ASSESSMENT Tax Return Potential The proposal involves construction worth $5 million. This may generate � approximately $200,000 in taxes per year when in operation. An alternative use would be lnstitutional . This alternat�ive wi11 return no tax base since these would be mainly non�proffit institutions. Another alternative is single or multiple family home use. The site could hold 40 single family homes. If a $1 ,000-$1 ,500 per home tax is assured, the property would generate only $40,000-$60,000 in taxes. Public Services Since the site is now laid out for smaller scale, res�dential or institutional uses, the Contro1 Data proposal will require change of the public utilities in � order to serve the office-warehouse. Some utilities will need to 6e relocated in order to allow vacation of streets within the propo9ed sfite. Employment The proposed project employs 400 persons. These �obs now ex�ist �t scattered sites throughout the Twin Cities. Control Data has made no comnitment to hire any new employees from the Sumnit-University area or from the entire city. However, the location of those jobs within Saint Paul will make them more access�ble and Saint Paul residents will be more competitive in ftlling them. The c1ose proximity of this employer, coupled with their strong affirmative action program, should result in increased job opportunities for Saint Pau1 residents. The jobs related to the Control Data activities at this site will consist of both skilled and unskilled positions. -2- P � � � . . r � . , . 1: . 9kti�.�.y.�•Vx1rH,�i'.:'F"�d.iTY'..�'^+iwM,..`:�.c.t.4.�-r� :w:T'1�•-... '+',.�,Wenid�. ..t��$�T�:�,°.,;'�� -� . . • � � . - . . . . . . , � r�;y �.�; The move of this facility to Saint Paul may also have an effect on residential demand in the Summit-University area, The new loc�tion of this fmcllfty may encourage present Control Data employees to relocate in Saint Paul to be close to work. Land Use Adjustments The critical issue of this Redevelopment �lan 1s ]and use comp3tibility. The „ proposal interjects an office and warehouse use�into 1a�rd, previous]y deg i ated for housing and small institutional uses. The proposed site, however, bo��ers I-94 to the north. While considerable housing has beel� built along the freeWay in the past, current planning practice recognizes a confllct between housing and and the traffic, dust and noise associated with the interstate freeway system. The Control Data proposal could be an effective buffer betwe�n the �^�Sidentlal , area to the south and the freeway. The Control Data proposal seems to be a better neighbor to the residential area than would be the freeway. T'he Redevelopment Plan pffers the opportunity through its design control provisions to insure a successful boundary between the Control Data site and the residential area to the south. Through the design controls and uses on the site, landscaping and buffers can be arranged so that a minimal impact is created upon the adjoining residential areas. Environmental Qualitv An environmental assessment both for the Minnesota Environmental Quality Council and for the possible use of Community Development Block Grant �'unds, has been initiated. This assessment will examine the pro�ect in detail to aSCertain any potential environmental effects. The assessment will evaluate such items as: potential noise, land use, air quality, aesthe�ic and socioeconomic effects from the project. -3- ,�.... . . � � city of saint paul pianning ccxnmiss�on resolution fii� nurr�ber »-,� da�e �une ,o, ,9» WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul has transmitted to the Planninq Commission of the City of Saint Paul the "Control � Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment" dated May 27, 1977 for the Commission's study and opinion pursuant to Minnesota Statute 462,515 (1974); WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Planning Comnission has r�eviewed the Control Qata Redevelopment Plan Amendment; WHEREAS, the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amenc�nent proposes removal of conditjons of blight in the Martin Luther King area of District 8 and assembly of a site for sale to Control Data Corporation for development of an office and parts distribution center; and WHEREAS, it is found that the office and parts distribution center developed under the controls established in the Redevelopment Flan Amendment would constitute an appropriate land use for the site, compatible with adjacent uses and consistent with continued physical and economic improvement of the area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul Planning Comnission finds the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment acceptable with the following modification: That the alley between Carroll and Iglehart avenues, running from Dale Street to Kent Street, be excluded from the redevelopment plan site. Furthermore, that the alley not be vacated at this time. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the St. Paul Planning Commission approves the attached written opinion and authorizes its transmittal to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, and to the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Saint Paul . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the St. Paul Planning Commission recommends a financing scheme that will secure for the City the full tax increment for the amortization of acquisition, relocation and clearing costs. mO. ,,.,,.1 � Glen Hanggi VG�.b �� Mertyce Mayne �� fC�l�� ..�._._ against� : . �� OPINION The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Saint Paul has requested the Planning Comnission to render its opinion on a proposed redevelopment plan for a 13.76 acre site in Summit-University on Concordia and Carroll Avenues between Dale and Mackubin. The Plan, known as the Control Data Redevelopment PTan Amendment, is an amendment to the Summit�University Redevelopment Plan. The Planning staff recomnend6 that the Planning Comnission approve the project with the following modification: That the alley between Carroll and �glehart which runs east and west between Kent and Dale, be excluded from the redevelopment plan project boundary and not vacated at this time. SUMMARY OF REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDM�NT � '�ISTRI�CT 8 The Redevelopment Plan Amendment for District 8 was initlated as a result of a ' specific developer interest expressed by Control Data Corporation. In discussion with Control Data, their stated ob�ectives regardtng the design, intended use, types of employment and blending into the community were found to be similar to the needs of the comnunity (Distr�ct 8�, as well as fulfi1ling objectives of the Corrrnunity Development Block Grant Program. Previously approved Redevelopment Plans covering this area established that multi- and single-family residential development should be the predominant land use. These plans also establtshed the original approved eligible clearance area. � Acquisition, relocation, demolition and land marketing attempts have been going on since the first redevelopment p1an was adopted in 1970, fihe Housi'ng and Redeve1- opment Authority has had difficulty in marketing this land, especially those lots which are adjacent to the freeway. Federal and State mortgage money has been difficult to obtain for either single-or-multt-family development, The inherent negative effects of the freeway on residential quality of life f�as been the main reason. A non-residentja1 corporation is now �rilling to invest private capital to develop this land. Their intended objectives address the issues of potentially providing jobs for inner-city residents, increasing the tax base of the city, and developing a long-term interest in Saint Paul on a s9te which has been difficult to market �or �r.esidential purposes. STAFF REVTEW After reviewing this redevelopment plan, the planntng staff inet with ti�e HRA staff who had prepared the plan. Comnents were given to the HRA staff and resulted in changes while the redevelopment plan was still in a rough draft form. Only two comnents were not facilitated at that time. The first comnent pertained to the proposed inclusion of the alley mentioned above, P1anning staff felt that due to the fact that whatever uses developed in the south ha1f of the block surrounded by Carroll , Kent, Iglehart and Dale would need the land occupied by the alley more than the proposed Control Data to the north, Tt was understood at that time that a parking lot was proposed for the area between Kent and Da1e, north of this alley. . . , . . . �.. . ,t.�:�ii ��,�ti�:r.�»�'i..-�A�,r�iitir,.M � ,.. .i .. �ew . . . '.,!1� .. p.4.ia'ti•,u`.'37•j >�p: _. f� . - � . .,. Furthermore, Control Data site plans do not include this area nor shc�r desire for its use. After a recent discussion with the NRA planning supervisor, JQrry Mangle, he is. not opposed to this modification to the submitted redevelopment plan. ; The other comnent which d�d not amend the redevelopment plan in its rough draft stage was the reference to a "computer parts distribution center" rather than ' � "industrial" in every case where it is mentioned. Planning staFf was concerned that in case Control Data did not construct a facility, there might be a possibiiity of the deve1opment of an industrial facility which would not be compatible with the surrounding residentfial neighborhood. Discussion between HRA and Planning staff fin this matter have indicated that there will be sufficient development contro1s to assure that the land will be developed � in a manner which will be compatib1e with tF�e surrounding residential neighborhood. PROJECT ASSE$SMENT Tax Return Potential The proposal involves construction worth $5 mjllion. This may generate � approximately $200,000 in taxes per year when tn operaLion. An alternative use would be institutional . This atternative wtll return no tax base since these would be mainly non-profit tnstitutions. � Another alternative is s�ngle or multiple family home use, The site could hold 40 single family homes, If a $1 ,000-$1 ,5Q0 per home tax is assured, tF�e property would generate only $40,000-$60,000 in taxes. Public Services Since the site is now laid out for smaller scale, restdenti'al or institutional uses, the Control Data proposal will require change of the public utilities in � order to serve the office-warehouse. Some utilities will need to 6e relocated in order to allow vacation of streets within the proposed sfte. Employment The proposed project employs 400 persons. These ,�obs now exist �t scattered sites throughout the Twin Cities. Control Data has made no comnitment to hire any new employees from the Sumnit-University area or from the entire city. However, the location of those jobs within Saint Paul will make them more accessible and Saint Paul residents will be more competitive in filling them. The c1ose proximity of this employer, coupled with their strong affirmative action program, should result in increased job opportunities for Saint Pau1 residents. The jobs related to the Control Data activities at this site will consist of both skilled and unskilled positions. -2- � �� ,� The move of this facility to Saint Paul may a�sfl ha►ve an effect an resldenti�.1 demand in the Sumnit-University area. The new location of this facillty may encourage present Control Data employees to relocate �n Sdint Paul to be close to work. Land Use Adjustments The critical issue of this Redevelopment �1an is land use comp3tihility. The proposal interjects an office and warehouse use�into 1�d, prevlous�y efesignated for housing and small institutional uses. The proposed s1te, however, borders I-94 to the north. While considerable housinq has been built along the freeway in the past, current planning practtce recognixes a conflict between housing and and the traffic, dust and noise associated with the interstate freeway syste�t. The Control Data proposal could be an effective buffer between the residential area to the south and the freeway. The Control Data proposal se�ms to be a better neighbor to the residential area than would be the freeway. The Redevelopment Plan offers the opportunity through its design control provisions to insure a successful boundary between the Control Data site and the residential area to the south. 'fhrough the design controls and uses on the site, landscaping and buffers can be arranged so that a minimal impact is created upon the ad�oining residential areas. Environmental Qualitv An environmental assessment both for the Minnesota Environmental Quality Council and for the possible use of Community Development Block Grant Funds, has been initiated. This assessment will examine the project in detail to ascertain any potential environmental effects. The assessment will evaluate such items as: potential noise, land use, air quality, aesthe�ic and socioeconomic effects from the project. -3- ...-. ` .-, � city of saint paul planning commiss�on resolution fiie number »-.,� �te June 10, 1977 WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul ha's transmitted to the Planning Comnission of the City of Saint Paul the "Control � Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment" dated May 27, 1977 for the Comnission's study and opinion pursuant to Minnesota Statute 462.515 (1974) ; WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Planning Comnission has reviewed the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment; WHEREAS, the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amencfinent proposes removal of conditjons of blight in the Martin Luther King area of Distri�t 8 and assembly of a site for sale to Control Data Corporation for development of an office and parts distribution center; and WHEREAS, it is found that the office and parts distribution center developed under the controls established in the RedevQlapment Plan Amendment would constitute an appropriate land use for the site, compatible with adjacent uses and consistent with continued physical and economic improvement of the area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Saint Pau1 Planning Comnission finds the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment acceptable with the following modification: That the alley between Carroll and Iglehart avenues, running from Dale Street to Kent Street, be excluded from the redevelopment plan site. Furthermore, that the alley not be vacated at this time. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the St. Paul Plannin� Comnission approves the attached written opinion and authorizes its transmittal to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, and to the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Saint Paul . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the St. Paul Planning Comnission recorr�nends a financing scheme that will secure for the City the full tax increment for the amortization of acquisition, relocation and clearing costs. moved by Glen Hanggi �� Mertyce Mayne in fa�or '___5�__ aga�nst�.°_.� � � L .. ...x ,. .. ... .� . . . . . . . � . ��9.`. ''�. . �"'*. . . /� .. OPINION The Housing and Redevelopment Authortty of Sa1nt Pau1 has requested the Planning Commission to render its opinion on a proposed redevelopment plan for a 13.76 acre site in Summit-University on Concordia and Carroll Avenues between Dale and Mackubin. The Plan, known as the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment, is an amendment to the Sumnit-University Redevelopment Plan. The Planning staff recomnends that the Planning Comnission approve the project with the following modification: That the alley between Carroll and �glehart which runs east and west between Kent and Dale, be excluded from the redevelopment plan project boundary and not vacated at this time,T SUhq�IARY OF REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENOI��NT � 'DISTRICT 8 The Redevelopment Plan Amendment for District 8 was initiated as a result of a specific developer interest expressed by Control Data Corporation. In discussion with Control Data, tF�eir stated objectives regarding the design, intended use, types of employment and blending into the community were found to be similar to the needs of the comnunity (District 8), as well as fulfi1ling objectives of the Community Development Block Grant Program. Previously approved Redevelopment Plans covering this area established that multi- and single-family residential development should be the predominant land use. These plans also established the original approved eligi6le c1earance area. Acquisition, relocation, demolition and land marketing attempts have been going on since the first redevelopment plan was adopted in 1970. The Housi'ng and Redevel- opment Authority has had difficu1ty in marketing this land, espec�tal1y those lots which are adjacent to the freeway. Federal and State mortgage money has been difficul.t to obtain for either single-or-multi-family development, The �nherent negative effects of the freeway on residentia1 quality of ltfe has been the main reason. A non-residential corporation is now pilling to invest private capital to develop this land. Their intended objectives address the issues of potential1y providing jobs for inner-city residents, increasing the tax base of the city, and developing a long-term interest in Saint Pau1 on a site which has been difficult to market for -r.esidential purposes. STAFF REVIEW After reviewing this redevelopment plan, the plann�ng staff inet with the HRA staff who had prepared the plan. Comments were given to the HRA staff and resulted in changes while the redeve1opment plan was still in a. rough draft form. Only two corrments were not facilitated at that time. The first comnent pertained to the proposed inclusion of the alley mentioned above. Planning staff felt that due to the fact that whatever uses developed in the south half of the block surrounded by Carroll , Kent, Iglehart and Dale would need the land occupied by the alley more than the proposed Control Data to the north. It was understood at that time that a park9ng lot was proposed for the area between Kent and Dale, north of this a11ey. . . . . . . ...� ... ...- ,-.. .,.+�......-...-.. .,....-�..-.w:�.•�.as� . .•r+: � ... �� . . . i., .. . ..,�,✓:��a��1.Wlr+�`. � �� . . � . � � . . . . . . � � . . ... Furthermore, Control Data site plans do not include this area nor show desire � for its use. After a recent discussion with the HRA planning supervisor, Jerry Mangle, he is not opposed to this modification to the submitted redevelopment plan. The other comnent which d�d not amend the redevelopment plan in its rough draft stage was the reference to a "computer parts distrlbution center" rather than " � "industrial" in every case where it is mentioned. Planning staff was concerned that in case Control Data did not construct a facility, there might be a possibiiity of tf�e development of an industrfial facility which would not be compatible with the surrounding residentia1 neighborhood. Discussion between HRA and Planning staff in this matter have indicated that there will be sufficient development controls to assure that th� land will be developed � in a manner which will be compatib1e with the surrounding residential neighborhood. PROJECT ASSESSMENT Tax Return Potential The proposal involves construction worth $5 millfon. This may generate approximately $200,000 in taxes per year when tn operation. An alternative use would be institutional . This alternative w�ll return no tax base since these would be mainly non�profit tnstitutions. Another alternative is single or multiple family home use, The site could hold 40 single family homes. If a $1 ,OOp-$1 ,500 per home tax is assured, the property would generate only $40,000-$60,000 in taxes. Public Services Since the site is now laid out for smaller scale, restdential or institutional uses, the Control Data proposal will requTre change of the public utilities in � order to serve the office-warehouse. Some utilities will need to be relocated in order to allow vacation of streets within the propo9ed sfite. Employment The proposed project employs 400 persons. These ,�obs now exist at scattered sites throughout the Twin Cities. Control Data F�as made no comnitment to hire any new employees from the Sumnit-University area or from the entire city. However, the location of those jobs within Saint Paul wi11 make them more accessible and Saint Paul residents will be more competitive in filling them. The c1ose proximity of this employer, coupled with their strong affirmative action program, should result in increased job opportunities for Saint Paul residents. The jobs related to ' the Control Data activities at this site will consist of both skilled and unskilled positions. -2- . . . .. , . . . . ��-+�ner...ro..... ..�,rs�..a-..:��s7�rws'*-a:ca�.a.'."aa � ��r,: . ., .. .. - ..' i ,..��....i ..:'t�Fkr<t::! . � � � �. .. � , . � . � �� . , . The move of this facility to Saint Paui may also have an effect on residential demand in the Sumnit-University area. The new locatlon of this facility may encourage present Control Data employees to relo�ate in Saint Paul to be close to work. Land Use Adjustments The critical issue of this Redevelopment �lan is land use comp3tib111ty. The proposal interjects an office and warehouse use�into lawd, 1^eviously daslgnated for housing and small institutional uses. The proposed si�e,. however, borders I-94 to the north. While considerable housing has been buflt along the freeway in the past, current planning practice recognites a conflict �etween housing and and the traffic, dust and noise assocfated with the interstate freewa�y system. The Control Data proposal could be an effective buffer between the r�sidential area to the south and the freeway. The Control Data proposal seems to be a better neighbor to the residential area than would be the freeway. The Redevelopment Rlan offers the oppor�unity through its design control provisions to insure a successful boundary between the Control Data site and the residenti 1 area to the south. Through the design controls and uses on the site, landscap�ng and buffers can be arranged so that a minimal impact is created upon the ad�oining resid$ntial areas. Environmental Qualitv An environmental assessment both for the Minnesota Environmental Quality Council and for the possible use of Comnunity Development Block Grant Funds, has been initiated. This assessment will examine the pro�ect in detail to ascertain any potential environmental effects. The assessment will evaluate such items as: potential noise, land use, air quality, aesthe�ic and socioeconomic effects from the project. , -3- .�-°-•. ._ � city of saint paul planning cc�mmiss�on resolutior� file number »-,� date ��une ,o, ,9» WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of $aint Paul has transmitted to the Planning Commission of the City of Saint Paul the "Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment" dated May 27, 1977 for the Commission's study and opinion pursuant to Minnesota Statute 462,515 (1974); ; . WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Planning Comnission has reviewed the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment; ' WHEREAS, the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment proposes removal of conditjons of blight in the Martin Luther King area of District 8 and assembly of a site for sale to Control Data Corporation for development of an office and parts distribution center; and WHEREAS, it is found that the office and parts distribution center developed under the controls established in the Redevelopment Plan Amendment would constitute an appropriate land use for the site, compatible with adjacent uses and consistent with continued physical and economic improvement of the area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul Planning Comnission finds the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment acceptable with the following modification: That the alley between Carroll and Iglehart avenues, running from Dale Street to Kent Street, be excluded from the redevelopment plan site. Furthermore, that the alley not be vacated at this time. BE IT FUR�FHER RESOLVED, that the St. Paul Planning Comnission approves the attached written opinion and authorizes its transmittal to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, and to the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Saint Paul . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the St. Paul Planning Comnission recommends a financing scheme that will secure for the City the full tax increment for the amortization of acquisition, relocation and clearing costs. mO�� Glen Hanggi `�� Mertyce Mayne ir� farror '� against�.° . . . . . �w'.i. .+v.n �w..rvN� . .. �.n�a. . V.. . .. . . . � . . . . . . � . . '��.1�� . ..... I � 1, . . . � _ � . . OPINION . ___�__ The Housing and Redevelopment Author�ty of Sa1nt Paul has requested the Planning Comnission to render its opinion on a proposed redevelopment plan for a 13,76 acre site in Summit-University on Concordia and Carroll Avenues between Dale and Mackubin. The Plan, known as the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment, is an amendment to the Sumnit-University Redevelopment Pla�. The Planning staff recomnends that the Planning Comnission approve the project with the followjng modification: That the alley between Carro1l and Iglehart which runs east and west between Kent and Dale, be excluded from the redevelopment plan project boundary and not vacated at this ttme. SUN9�IARY OF REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENd�NT ��R�CT 8 The Redevelopment Plan Amendment for District 8 was initlated as a result of a specific developer interest expressed by Control Data Corporation. In discussion with Control Data, ti►eir stated ob,�ectives regarding the design, intended use, types of employment and blending into the comnunity were found to be similar to the needs of the comnunity (District 8�, as .wel1 as fulfilling ob�ectives of the Community Development Block Grant Program. Previously approved Redevelopment Plans covering this area established that multi- and single-family residential deve1opment should 6e the predominant land use. These , plans also esta6lisf�ed ti�e origtnal approved eligi6le c1earance area. Acquisition, relocation, demolition and land marketing attempts hdve been going on since the first redevelopment plan was adopted 3n 1970. The Housing and Redevel- opment Authority has had difficulty in marketing this land, especially those lots which are adjacent to the freeway. Federa1 and State mortgage money has been difficuit to obtain for either single-or-mu1ti'faml1y development. The inherent negative effects of the freeway on residential qualtty of life f�as been the main reason. A non-residential corporation is now silling to tnvest private capital to develop this land. Their intended objectives address the issues of potentially providing �obs for inner-city residents, increasing the tax base of the city, and developing a long-term interest in Saint Pau1 on a site which has been difficult to market for residential purposes. STAFF REVIEW After reviewing this redeveloprr�ent plan, the planntng staff inet with the HRA staff who had prepared the plan. Corrments were given to the HRA staff and resulted in changes while the redevelopment plan was still in a rough draft form. Only two comnents were not facilitated at that time. The first comment pertained to the proposed inclusion of the alley mentioned above. Planning staff felt that due to the fact that whatever uses developed in the south half of the block surrounded by Carroll , Kent, Iglehart and Dale would need the land occupied by the alley more than the proposed Control Data to the north. Tt was understood at that time that a parkjng lot was proposed for the area 6etween Kent and Dale, north of this alley. . ... .. - ,,.vs�^�a -.,^�f�r�::�+ne-«�ar-wrs;�=Ati.a�',it, ;`..� . ,. .. . ..� � . � . �. .. .v'�, ..r .,,._16!'.�,.' :'��f�.'�.,tl'� � . , . . . � � ;� . . . . , , Furthermore, Control Data site plans do not include this area nor:sho� desire for its use. ' After a recent discussion with the HRA planning supervisor, Jerry Mangle, he is . not opposed to this modification to the submitted redevelopment plan. The other comnent which d3d not amend the redevelopment plan in its rough draft stage was tF�e reference to a "computer parts distribution center" rather than � � "industrial " in every case where it is mentioned. Planning staff was concerned that in case Control Data did not construct a facility, there might be a possib�iity of the development of an industrial facility which would not be compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood. Discussion between HRA and Planntng staff 1n this matter have indicat�d that there will be sufficient development controls to assure that the land will be developed in a manner which will 6e compatible with the surrnunding residential neighborhood. PROJECT ASSESSMENT Tax Return Potential The proposal involves construction worth $5 million. This may g�nerate approximately $200,000 in taxes per year when in operation. An alternative use would be institutional . This alternative wi11 return no tax base since these would be mainly non�proPit institutions. Another alternative is single or multiple family home use. The site could hold 40 single family homes. If a $1 ,000-$1 ,500 per home tax is assured, the property would generate only $40,000-$60,OOQ in taxes. Public Services Since the site is now laid out for smaller scale, restdential or institutional uses, the Control Data proposal wi11 requTre change of the publlc utilities in � order to serve the office-warehouse. Some utilities will need to be relocated in order to allow vacation of streets w9thin the propo9ed s�te. Employment The proposed project employs 400 persons. These ,�obs now exist $t scattered sites throughout the Twin Cities. Control Data has made no commfitment to hire any new employees from the Summit-University area or from the entire city, However, the location of those jobs within Saint Paul wi11 make them more accessible and Saint Paul residents will be more competitive in filling them. The c1ose proximity of this employer, coupled with their strong affirmative action program, should result in increased job opportunities for Saint Pau1 residents. The jobs related to the Control Data activities at th�s site wi11 consist of both skil1ed and unskilled positions. -2- . , . . ..... . r . s�. -��„�,��.e+.�a�w,..,. . :. .,... .a�,.,_ ,.tn.. . ..�� i :ik-a��:�: q�r� � :�a., - w . . ,. :�fi:< �� , I � The move of this facility to Saint Paul may also have an effect on r�sidential demand in the Sumnit-University area. The new location of this facllity may encourage present Control Oata employees to relocate in Saint Paul to be close to work. Land Use Adjustments � The critiaal issue of this Redevelopment �lan is land use compatihility. The proposal interjects an office and warehouse use�into la�d, previous]y d�e igr�ated for housing and small institutional uses. The proposed site, however, �rders I-94 to the north. While considerable housing �has been bu11t along the freeway in the past, current planning practice recognizes a conflict Detween housir�g and and the traffic, dust and noise associated with the interstate freeway system. � '. The Control Data proposal could be an effective buffer between the residentia�l area to the south and the freeway. The Control Data proposal seems to be a better neighbor to the residen�lal area than would be the freeway. The Redevelopment Plan offers the opportuni�y through its design control proyisions to insure a successful boundary between the Control Data site and the residential area to the south. Through the design controls and uses on the site, landscaping and buffers can be arranged so that a minimal impact is created upon the ad�oining resldential areas. Environmental Qualitv An environmental assessment both for the Minnesota Environmental Quality Council and for the possible use of Community �velopment Block Grant Funds, has been initiated. This assessment will examine the pro�ect in detail to ascertain any potential environmental effects. The assessment will evaluate such items as: potential noise, land use, air quality, aesthe�ic and socioeconomic effects from the project. , -3- .�,., __ . . .. �, . � � � , � city of saint paul � � plann�ng commiss�on resolu�io� fil� number »-,� date June 10, 1977 WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul has � transmitted to the Planning Commission of the City of Saint Paul the "Control � � Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment" dated May 27, 1977 for the Comnission's study and opinion pursuant to Minnesota Statute 462,515 (1974); WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Planning Commission has reviewed the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment; WHEREAS, the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment proposes removal of condit�ons of blight in the Martin Luther King area of District 8 and assembly of a site for sale to Control Data Corporation for development of an office and parts distribution center; and � WHEREAS, it is found that the office and parts� distribution center developed under the controls established in the Redevelopment Plan Amendment would constitute an appropriate land use for the site, compatible with adjacent uses and consistent with continued physical and economic improvement of the area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul Planning Comnission finds the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment acceptable with the following modification: � That the alley between Carroll and Iglehart avenues, running from Dale Street to Kent Street, be excluded from the redevelopment plan site. Furthermore, that the alley not be vacated at this time. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the St. Paul Planning Comnission approves the attached written opinion and authorizes its transmittal to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, and to the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Saint Paul . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the St. Paul Planning Comnission recorrxnends a financing scheme that will secure for the City the full tax increment for the amortization of acquisition, relocation and clearing costs. moved by Glen Hanggi `�� Mertyce Mayne �� f�� al�ft'1St..� .. ..�. . _.� :-,...'. . :. .. .... . . . .. . . .. �. . ... �. �xl�k ' . w �-\ . � .. � OPINION The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Saint Paul has requested the Planning Comnission to render its opinion on a proposed redevelopment plan for a 13.76 acre site in Summit-University on Concordia and Carrol1 Avenues between Dale and Mackubin. The Plan, known as the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment, is an amendment to the Summit-University Redevelopment Plan. The Planning staff recorr�nends that the Planning Comnission approve the pro�ect with the following modification: That the alley between Carroll and �Iglehart which runs east and west between Kent and Dale, be excluded from the redevelopment plan project boundary and not vacated at this time. SUNwIARY OF REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDhtENT - 'I�ISTRICT 8 The Redevelopment Plan Amendment for District 8 was initiated as a result of a specific developer interest expressed by Control Data Corporation. In discussion with Control Data, their stated objectives regarding the design, 9ntended use, types of emp1oyment and blending into the comnunity were found to be similar to the needs of the comnunity-(Distr�ct 8) , as well as fulfilling objectives of thQ Community Development Block Grant Program. � Previously approved Redevelopment Plans covering t[�is area established �hat multi- and single-family residential development should 6e the predominant land use. These plans also established the original approved eligi61e clearance area. Acquisition, relocation, demolition and land markettng attempts have been going on since the first redevelopment plan was adopted �n 1970. The Hous�'ng and Redevel- opment Authority has had difficulty in marketing this land, especially those lots which are adjacent to the freeway. Federal and State mortgage money has been difficult to obtain for either single-or-multi-family development. The �nherent negative effects of the freeway on residential qua1tty of life has been the main reason. A non-residential corporation is now �tilling to invest private capital to develop this land. Their intended objectives address the issues of potentially providing jobs for inner-city residents, increasing the tax base of the city, and developing a long-term interest in Saint Pau1 on a site which has been difficult to market for r.esidential purposes. STAFF REVIEW After reviewing this redevelopment plan, the planning staff inet w�th the HRA staff who had prepared the plan. Comments were given to the HRA staff and resulted in changes while the redevelopment plan was sti11 in a rough draft form. Only two comnents were not facilitated at that time. The first comment pertained to the proposed inclusion of the alley mentioned above, Planning staff felt that due to the fact that whatever uses developed in the south half of the block surrounded by Carroll , Kent, Iglehart and Dale would need the land accupied by the alley more than the proposed Control Data to the north. It was understood at that time that a parking 1ot was proposed for the area between Kent and Dale, north of this alley. ,:��►"�i�,*�.;t.`4!'. ��x� , . ,, � .''t1. .a :;��X1�;>�;�E`:3�� Furthermore, Control Data site plans do not include tfils nrea nor��sh'a� .desire for its use. � After a recent discussion with the HRA planning $upervlsor, Jerry Mangle, he is not opposed to this modification to the submitted redevelopment plan. � The other comment which d3d not amend the redevelopment plan in its rough draft stage was the reference to a "computer parts distribution center" rather than ' � "industrial " in every case where it is mentioned. Planning staff was concerned that in case Control Data did not construct � facility. there might be a possibiiity of the development of an industridl facility which would not be compatible wi�h the surrounding residential n�eighbprhood. Discussion between HRA and Planning staff in this matter have indicated that there will be sufficient development controls to assure that the land will be developed in a manner which will be compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood. PROJECT ASSESSMENT Tax Return Potential The proposal involves construction worth $5 million. This may generate approximately $200,000 in taxes per year when in operation. An alternative use would be institutional . This alternative wtll return no tax base since these would be main1y non-profit tnstitut'tons. Another alternative is single or multiple family home use. The site could hold 40 single family homes. If a $1 ,000-$1 ,500 per home tax is assured, the property would generate only $40,000-$60,000 in taxes. Public Services Since the site is now laid out for smaller scale, restdential or institutional uses, the Control Data proposal will require change of the public utilities in � order to serve the office-warehouse. Some utilities will need to be re1ocated in order to allow vacation of streets within the propo9ed sfite. Employment The proposed project employs 400 persons. These ,�obs now exist at scattered sites throughout the Twin Cities. Control Data has made no comnitment to hire any new employees from the Su�nit-University area or from the entire city. However, the location of those jobs within Saint Paul will make them more accessible and Saint Paul residents will be more competitive in fi1ling them. The close proximity of this employer, coupled with their strong affirmative action program, should result in increased job opportunities for Saint Paul residents. The jobs related to the Control Data activities at this site wi11 consist of bath skil1ed and unskilled positions. -2- _ . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . ._ .. . . , . . .. 1 - � ��-•ii�a�l[J��iAICS"� . � . � . . ; .. � �r� � � � . . � + . . . . . f � .. � . . , , . � i�,. The move of this facility to Saint Paul may also have an effect on residential demand in the Sumnit-University area. The new location of this facility may � encourage present Control Data employees to relocate in Safnt Paul to be close to work. � Land Use Adjustments The critical issue of this Redevelopment �lan is land use comp�t1hi11ty. The � proposal interjects an office and warehouse use�into la�ad, previous]y dzsigr�ated for housing and small institutional uses. The proposed site, however, borders I-94 to the north. While considerable housing has bee� bu11t ,along the freeway in the past, current planning practice recognizes a conflict betwe�n housir�g and - and the traffic, dust and noise associated with the lnterstate freeway system. The Control Data proposal could be an effective buffer between �he resldential area to the south and the freeway. The Control Data proposal seems to be a better neighbor t0 the residential area than would be the freeway. The Redevelopment Plan offers the opportunity through its design control prnvisions to insure a successful boundary between the Control Data site and the residential area to the south. 7hrough the design controls and uses on the site, landscaping and buffers can be arranged so that a minimal impact is created upon the adjoining res9dential a�reas. Environmental Quality An environmenta1 assessment both for the Minnespta Environmental Quality Council and for the possible use of Community Development Block �rant Funds, has been initiated. This assessment will examine the project in detail to ascertain any potential environmental effects. The assessment will evaluate such items as: potential noise, land use, air quality, aesthe�ic and socioeconomic effects from the project. -3- � ,.� . „ .:.,;, > ,:. . : 1 . x F;:: `� ' ♦ �� F� city of saint paul pianning commission resolution fiie number »--�� date �'une ,o, ,9» WHEREAS, �he Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul has transmitted to the Planning Commission of the City of Saint Paul the "Control � Oata Redevelopment Plan Amendment" dated May 27, 1977 for the Comnission's study and opinion pursuant to Minnesota Statute 462,515 (1974); WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Planning Comnission has reviewed the Control Qata Redevelopment Plan Amendment; WHEREAS, the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment proposes removal of condit9ons of blight in the Martin Luther King area of District 8 and assembly of a site for sale to Control Data Corporation for development of an office and parts distribution center; and WHEREAS, it is found that the office and parts distribution center developed under the controls established in the Redevelopment Plan Amendment would constitute an appropriate land use for the site, compatible with adjacent uses and consistent with continued physical and economic improvement of the area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul Planning Commission finds the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment acceptable with the following modification: That the alley between Carroll and Iglehart avenues, running from Dale Street to Kent Street, be excluded from the redevelopment plan site. Furthermore, that the alley not be vacated at this time. BE IT FURTHER RESOLUED, that the St. Paul Planning Comnission approves the attached written opinion and authorizes its transmittal to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, and to the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Saint Paul . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the St. Paul Planning Comnission reco�nends a financing scheme that will secure for the City the fu11 tax increment for the amortization of acquisition, relocation and clearing costs. moved by Glen Hanggi 5�� Mertyce Mayne in fa�br '.�._. aga�nst�...° � � OPINION � _�„____ The Housing and Redevelopment Authortty of Saint Paul has requested the Planning Comnission to render its opinion on a proposed redevelopment plan for a 13.16 acre site in Surmnit-University on Goncordia and Carroll Avenues between Dale and Mackubin. The Plan, known as the Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment, is an amendment to �i�e Summit-University Redevelopment P1an. The Planning staff recommends that the Planning Comnission approve the pro�ect with the following modification: That the alley between Carroll and �glehart which runs east and west between Kent and Dale, be excluded from the redevelopment plan project boundary and not vacated at this time. SUMMARY OF REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMEN�EN7 ��::C3ISTR�CT 8 The Redevelopment Plan Amendment for District 8 was initlated as a result of a specific developer interest expressed by Control Data Corporation. In discussion with Control Data, their stated ob�ectives regarding the design, intended use, types of employment and blending into the community were found to be similar to the needs of the comnunity (District $�, as well as fulfilling ob�ectives of the Community Development Block Grant Program. Previously approved Redevelopment Plans couering this area established that multi- and single-fami1y residential deve1opment should 6e the predomtnant land use. These plans also establisfied the original approved eligi6le c1earance area. Acquisition, relocation, demolition and land markettng attempts have been going on since the first redevelopment plan was adopted in 1970. The Hous'ing and Redeve1- opment Authority has had difficulty in marketing this land, especially tf�ose lots which are adjacent to the freeway. Federd1 and State mortgage money has 6een difficul.t to obtain for either single-or-multfi-family development, The inherent negative effects of the freeway on residentl'al qualtty of life has been the main reason. A non-residential corporation is now silling to invest prtvate capital to develop this land. Their intended objectives address the issues of potentially providing jobs for inner-city residents, increasing the tax base of the city, and developing a long-term interest in Saint Pau1 on a site which has been difficult to market for �r.esidential purposes.. STAFF REVIEW After reviewing this redevelopment plan, the planning staff inet with the HRA staff who had prepared the plan. Comnents were given to the HRA staff and resulted in changes while the redevelopment plan was sti11 in a rough draft form. Only two comnents were not facilitated at that time. The first comment pertained to the proposed inclusion of the atley mentioned above, Planning staff felt that due to the fact that whatever uses developed in the south half of the blo�k surrounded by Carrol1 , Kent, Iglehart and Dale would need ti�e land occupied by the alley more than the proposed Control Data to the north, Tt was understood at that time that a parking lot was proposed for the area be�ween Kent and Dale, north of this alley. RSi'�4e'f{•1�i.l�i+T'ik�rl��'+�':m Yf►�Mi"ef. .aY .vteiv . . �.. . � � ��j` � ' .. . . � .r� . . . � .� �� . � . � . . Furthermore, Control Data site plans do not �nclude thi.s area nor shoW desire for its use. After a recent discussion with the NRA planning supervisor, Jerry Mangle, he is not opposed to this modification to �F�e submitted redevelopment plan. The other comment which did not amend the redevelopment plan in its rough draft stage was the reference to a "computer parts distribution center" rather than "industrial" in every case where it is mentioned. Planning staff was concerned � � that in case Control Data did not construct d facility, there might be a possibiiity of the development of an industrial �Facility which would not be compatible with the surroundtng residential neighborhood. Discussion between HRA and Planning staff in this matter have indicated that there will be sufficient development controls to assure that the land wi71 be developed in a manner which will be compatible with the surroynding residential neighborhood. PROJECT ASSESSMENT Tax Return Potential The proposal involves construction worth $5 m�llion. This may generate approximately $200,000 in taxes per year when in operati'on. An alternative use would be institutional. This alternative will return no tax base since these would be mainly non�profft institutions. Another alternative is single or multiple family home use, The site could hold 40 single family homes. If a $1 ,000-$1 ,500 per home tax is assured, the property would generate only $40,000-$60,000 in taxes. Public Services Since the sjte is now laid out for smaller scale, residential or institutional uses, the Control Data proposal will require change of the public utilities �n - order to serve the office-warehouse. Some utilities wi11 need to be relocated in order to allow vacation of streets within the propo9ed stte. Employment The proposed project employs 400 persons. These �obs now exist at scattered sites throughout the Twin Cities. Control Data has made no comnitment to hire any new employees from the Summit-University area or from the entire city. However, the location of those jobs within Saint Paul will make them more accessible and Saint Paul residents will be more competttive in filling them. The c1ose proximity of this employer, coupled with their strong affirmative action program, should result in increased job opportunities for Saint Pau1 residents. The jobs related to ' the Control Data activities at this site wi11 consist of both skilled and unskilled positions. -2- � � L . . . .. . . . . � I . .. ' � . � , . . . . � . . -Tiy�. . . ' � .. •£ . The move of this facility to Saint Paul may also have an effect on residential demand in the Summit-University area. The new location of this facility may encourage present Control Data employees to relocate in Saint Paul to be close to work. Land Use Adjustments The critical issue of this Redevelopment �lan is land use comp3tibility. The proposal interjects an office and warehouse use�into la�wd, previously �e igrlated � for housing and small institutional uses. The proposed site, however, �rders I-94 to the north. While considerable housing has been built along the freeway in the past, current planning practice recognizes a conflict f�etween housing and and the traffic, dust and noise assoclated with th� interstate freeway system. The Control Data proposal could be an effective buffer between tMe residential area to the south and the freeway, The Control Data proposal seems to be a better neighbor to the residential area than would be the freeway. The Red�velopment Plan offers the opportun�ty through its design control provisions to lnsure a successful boundary be�ween the Control Data site and the residential area �o thc south. Through the design controls and uses on the site, landscaping and buffers can be arranged so that a minimal impact is created upon the adjoining residential areas. Environmental Quality An environmental assessment both for the Minnesota Environmental Quality Council and for the possible use of Community Development Block Grant Funds, has been initiated. This assessment will examine the project in detail to ascertain any potential environmental effects. The assessment will evaluate such items as: potential noise, land use, air quality, aesthetic and socioeconomic effects from the project. -3- �,._ . � � 7 � REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENP _ TO A PROGRAM FOR THE REVITALIZATION OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL CD YEAR II (CONTROL DATA SITE) May 27, 1977 II � � � , , � � INTRODUCTION This Redevelopment Plan Amendment has been developed as a result of negotiations between the City of 5aint Paul and the ConCrol Data Corporation. Control Data is proposing to construct within the Martin Luther King area of District 8 (Summit-University) a new office and parts distribution ceAter. Control Data has received favorable endorsement from the Aistrict 8 Planning Council at its last meeting (May 23, 1977) f�r a site which both groups feel is feasible for such a facility. The site is generally located to the north and west of the present Martin Luther King Center facility. The total pro3ect includes several parcels of land which are already publicly owned. It is necessary to acquire an additional thirty-one (31) parcels to produce a site which is approximately 13.76 acres in size. This total site will then house a structure which caill employ approximately 400 persons from other satellite locations and contain over 200,OQ0 square feet of floor space. It is concluded that this development is a desirable asset to the Summit- University Neighborhood as well as the City of Saint paul. The purpose of this document is to amend only that portion of the "CD Year II" and "Neighborhood Development Program Redevelopcnent Plan - Year V" which pPr- tains to the area described in the Le�al Description and Boundary Map section. '1' Introduction _ _ _ _ . . ___ ._._., _ ..._ . .4,._._:. ___,....,,..�, a ` ` ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTROL DATA SITE All of Block 24 and Lots 1 thru 15, Block 25, Ma.ckubia and Marsha2l's Addition to Saint Paul; All of Block 2, .Wi].son�s Rearraregement of a part of Ma.rshall's Subdivision of Block 27, Mackubin and Marshall's Addition to Saint Paul; All of Lots 1, 2 and 3, West Side Annex of Lot 8 of Marshall's Subdivision of B2ock 27, Mackubin and Marshall's Addition; All of Lots 1 'thru 6, Whiting's Subdivision of part of Lot 8, Block 27, t�ackubin and Marshall's Addition; All of Blocks 2 and 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 31.; and the vacated alleys in Block 2, Wilson's Rearrangemant and Blocks 24 and 25, Mackubin and Marshal.l's Addition; and all of vacated Keat Street and Carroll Avenue; All lying within the following described lines: Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 15, B7.ock 25, said Mackubin and Marshall's Addition; thence south 139.50 ft. along the west line of said Block 25 to a point; thence east, on a line para21e1 with and 7.25 ft. south of the south Zine of Lots 1 thru 15, said Block 25, and its easterly extension; 625.0 ft. to a point in ;the center line of vacated Kent Street; thence north 13.5 ft., more or Iess, along the center line of said vacated Kent Street to a point in the westerly extension of the south line of Lot 3, said West Side Annex; thence east along the south line of Lot 3 and its extension, 160 ft., more or less, to the northeast corner of Lot 4, said West Side Annex; thence south 7.0 ft. along the east line of said West Side Annex to a point; thence east along th�e south line of Lots 1 thru 6, Whiting's Subdivision, and Lots 4 and 5, Block 3, Auditor's" Subdivision No. 31, 347.0 ft; thence south 12.25 ft; thence east 120.0 ft. along the south line of Lot 3, Block 3, said Auditor's Subdivision No. 31 to the southeast corner of said Lot 3; thence north along the east line of Blocks 2 and 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 32 and the east line o£ Block 2, said Wilson's Rearrangement, to a point L0.0 ft. south of the northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 2, said WiZson's Rearrangement; thence west on a 1 ine parallel with, and 10.0 ft. south of the north line of Block 2, said Wilson's Rearrangement and the north line of Block 24, said Mackubin and Marshall's Addition 125300 ft.,to a point in the west Zine of said Block 24; thence south along the west line of Blocks 24 and 25, said Mackubin and Marshall's Addition, 331050 ft. to the point of beginning. -2- Legal Description . �� I �'Lv.�_.! �:�..:_� � � , . . , �' �---I � _. . ' . _ i .` � �;<i �-}�� , ��,.r._._ -- _ � �_ ' ` � ---- _ ` . -�:�_ _ �:,- -- --- . � _ ; � - . �;.� ' � ' .�}" � � _ `�' � - < _ . '-- '< ,.._i � - � -�- � --- - - - C � < sn� �� -Q � �. _ ' . �' _.� ,� r--, . <_ �: � .- ' ' � . . _ � . , � - - � �' - � , rn . ` . � � � -- . o - _ � -�-. -�� _� �< -< < �� - - - -�- �;i -._o- ,-� �; � < .� <. � . �.. �.a. -� — ` �'; =o- .' � � i � �.< �-�- r; < �^<�, � ��- , - ._� �-►-E < � �' <" -{} .-q- ��_� _ _:c -C�- - � -�- � .p: '�� :-C?-_ .�` � _ ' < ' �< �<` < , -Q-. � , `,�. - t ;� f : �� '�� . < < '4 �Y -s,d .� _ .:� i�' ' ..,� z0' -.-Q- cn C t :r,B Q < .�� <= .. t � • . .. � f ��' • -� •E ! ' � C_� pl:./ l < C' � : � .. _ . -� � E�i��, _ . - � _ ST. � _� _ - - ... . - _' K �'.,,�, i'-.. - - ; O) 'r! 7J • � n . ;� � � � � r ��4r �� C . � •• ��'Z -. ' { l _ ,.^ -� _i < < � n �: -. -- k ��.� r k. � `" x D - -Q- <' ' a � . - _ � _�_�y,_, : z.�' �'. < x� � - y.� - --- - t-' , y� - � e - _. �,� } ; '. . � z � � , �. . � � . _ .,� � • '� . :"� .c,� .' –. t. w �Tl �- ;.� • � _ F � + � . --- . � { � � ��'��-.J - .- y r z —{ . - . . , t j �ti .��` � -_ - - .. __ `t + -��`r �� r,L,�,;r' >t,•� m f�r1 - �'`'' �< .� i � �;.`�' 'l- N ' x tD� � C -� G ' r_� f �.�; � Z1 ... � . . j i ^ _ � i � �� ,.� � . � F � �':�r4 ` . . �n -- ��-0- ,,,��' � �'` -j'� , �. � _, � .� S 0?� � �'l}��,� f��,.� G7:`�•�� • '�.J �� ., - Q N � r . - � 'r � � �h� .. ♦ - S��..J �� t."().� - .:.v' . /� - . �-+�i.7 • � . . � � , �_ : %r s-"` `"��A r.,.� � ��- Q .-., . - . � �: � — � .��`�"� ; �•�'C �. � v. }�_ \� �' � w ' a� � . � ��,, r �. ' �o- '{:;. + �{�� '��,.�;..:``�r-.2 '� � � < , .: .-_._ µ �^► ;;:" �;� �'`� r,;: �s.� t G:3'' `t �t '< .-�. �^'� : - �� - � - � -� �',��'{��. - � . . . _ ,� . � � � - : �, ,� � , � :� `� _ _ l t :-� �: �.� � � < ¢ � , : _� � <. < � ,.�, .: < � �� :-� . � � � .: _: � � : . - � . : 4-` - ' �"w `t�` 6 <.: '"`r' . ! - t � � � S�, _ _ _,_ �, t < � . < _ � C - : --- � -`.:-—� < . ; _�• i �. O • • = � _--� � f - --a� ° . _ � : - _ " � �-�- -� ��=o- . .< ,. ---- ` 1� < -< - - ► �,. � - .__. - ` I: -a-� � -a-� < . , - - _ . - : . . = o . --o-- ; o -< o �H ,� . . <---- : - � . - < . --- f � � " �-` - -a- � - � _ . _ � � < ! . . .,�- � < • - . - � ,--- -- � � �i1' � � < - : ' . � � . ..�-(�v-j�-� �j N .� � � --- � : _ : � �`_. �� i t � � --� -1-''-j--�i < ' < _ ..s... � `�„_,.,,, 1,__�,_ 1 '�". j C. . ,. � � � .AR�!#��E�..I :_ - S`f. ' � - -`: � :� - , . _ . _ '-,��7� I . "' _ �v _.._.. . _ �_ . _�_-_ -�-: . ,,; . � � : _N/1 ,_ •__ _ . . - ___ _ .' _ � : _ _ _.. -_- _ C�NTRC)L DATA ��DEVELOPiiolE�lT PLAt� �ROJECT BOUNDARY ■■■■■■ Z MAY'77 —3— _.. . - _. .__._.. _ _._ _ .__ ____ . .__.___�r,._M_ .. _...__._.,�..., .._�.., _,.,,.a,a,� ` � REDEVELOPMENT PLAN , REDEVELOPMENT PLAN A. STATEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES The primary overall development objective in Community Development District $ is to eliminate and/or ameliorate those existing conditions which serve t� impair the health, safety, morala, and generaZ welfare of the citizens of the District, and which also serve to inflict an ecoROmic blight upon exsiting ` private investment in some areas, and threaten the sources of public revenue. The conditions which have been found to exist which cause the above noted factors include unsafe and unsanitary housing conditions, overcrowd�ng, building absolescence or faulty arrangement in building design or improvement, deleterious land use, lack of adequate light, ventilation or sanitary faGilities, inadequate public facilities, such as streets, sewer facilities, or other equally deleterious conditions. There also has been found to be an inadequate supply of jobs in the District, particularly for familfes of low and moderate incomes and a deter- iorating tax base for the City of Sairct Paul. A primary objective of this Redevelopment Plan is to provide an opportunity for private enterprise to alleviate the above conditions. Specific objectives to be achieved within the context of the foregoing are as follows: 1. To provide for efficient use of land so that each particular land use will function without adversely affecting or being adversely affected by adjacent land uses. New construction should be physically and visually compatible in design and scale with nearby parts of the existing neighborhood. 2. To remove blight and conditions of deterioration by: a. Undertaking a program of acquisition and demolition of buildings blighted to the extent of being incapable of being rehabilitated, substandard buildings, or buildings otherwise determined to represent blighting influences. b. Aiding and promoting programs such as the removal of houses from redevelopment sites (housemoving) in order to preserve existing structures which can be rehabilitated to decent housing. 3. To foster the economic stability of the City and District 8, and to -4- , Redevelopment Plan t � 1 e�courage new private investment. 4. To encourage and support proposals for economic development within the Dis.trict which may have some immediate effect on patterns of employment or general well-being of the community. 5. To assure safe and adequate vehicular and pedestrian circulation " patterns and capacity. 6. To encourage the continuing participation by the members of the community in the planaing and programming of renewal activities for their respective neighborhoods. B. EXISTING ANl3 PROFOSED LANJ USE PLAN (See Proposed Land Use Map attached) The introduction of light industrial land use represents a change to the previously approved Land Use Plan for the Summit-University area, The previous plan recomaeended residential uses. The rationale for this change is as follows: 1. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority has experienced difficulty in marketing residential land_ ad�acent to the freeway for the past several years. Due to the negative influence of the freeway, federal mortgage money is not available for residential construction, A light industzial corpor.ation is now willin.g to invest private capital to develop this land. 2. The Summit-University area has for a number of years had a high rate of unemployment. It also has been the �ea of the highest concentration of low and moderate-income households, as well as the largest population of non-white families and individuals in Saint Paul. This facility has the potential of providing job opportunities. 3. An opportunity to develop the area with a transitional use has become possibleo It is� desirable to provide a graduation of land uses away from the influence of the freeway. The light industrial use would effect a buffer between the freeway and the siregle-family homes to the southe . -5- Redevelopment Plan • . i = a:. . ' . .,_� - ' 1.._ • • �� ;:�.\`�:� �\��. �v�: � ,�.� � �`.��\��\ @�. �°-�:�k�: �� :� - .�� `\�ti.,� ,;. �a� �,8��, •.;,\\t.•�� •;�.•�\�`.��:-� � C�e! . ' ':��:l�`!��:��''. "��.: ,, • ' : � �`\��ti'��:.:\t.\��``��'•�� . s � #��.�.��\��0,\■ '' ' �► °° ;;;.� ��i `.�� ,�„ � �• ,. �o.� � ��;��\�� , � ��s; �\`��,� "�� -� ��:a�.�`.��ti� � ::,`�_ ■ . � � -z� � ��e�, �� . �-� • � ;r�\�.��_�\��\�5��. �i � '��.� ''- ! � ;�.\��..0\��.\�� ;� . � .��a��.,\�� .�\�.��. • �� ._ �.��,�s.�_��\��\.\t.�: ..�� : , �,�.��, .��\\�� ,l,� ��, .,,, � � .�. =��'`!\t.�_O.`�.��.�,.� ��.�� : '�� ; ., �.�, ,� � �. . .�..�'ti � �....� .�. '��:�. '�:�o`��o�� i �:\��t . , � ��\�.+��i.�1�\��,. � .�`�`�.\\� ��,�, 0,�:: r� � •\\\�\\\`�a\..�� i ':�\ ��'��.la ��i �� . \`�� , . ,, . • ,: �.��`�� :,- � �� . � ,\ � � �,, :s�.. \ . . . , -��, ,\ � �: „ �� . . ��, �,�;��.,� � ,-k- - ��e.-�a�. o :-��,.\` .. . '�. • ��..0�� .�, � �•�o�� -� - � ' � � �� e�`,�\�` n . \ ��l�. -� � - � ,��_\\�� - � � ,_ �� .. � � 3.� ��e�� . '� �\ � �� ♦ � � . � `�` �,. i :-_�. ��..,.�`�. � � �r � r . � �� \`. '' � .. � ' � `� I , i _ g 3�4� oyq �' w,� ;r, ` '� • � �: � : � � �` . • - � � � � �� -a\\� � `� ��\� �\ � :� _��\\� � � � � ��: .��, �t` � �►.,`1.'�� a " . � - ' � � ', � � � � � � : , : • :s � � �, . . � • � � � . '� . � " • ' � � � � � ' � \\\\�; • ' \�\\�\ • � � . . � � � „�� C. CONTROLS 1. Function or Character The Redevelopment Plan provides a light industrial site for the consolidation of functions currently located throughout the region. Off-street parking and off-street loading spaces are included. Program activi.ties also will be directed toward eliminating adverse _ effects from light industrial uses on adjacent residentia2 areas. 2. Permitted Uses Permitted uses are those which are not hazardous due to explosion or fire, or offensive or noxious by way of noise, unsightly appearance or emissions. No new residential or commercial uses shaZl be permitted. 3. Density and Building Restrictions Density limitations, setbacks, off-street parking and off-street Ioading shall be required for new construction and such requirements shall be determined by the Renewal Division prior to land disposition activities. Such restrictions, in a11 instances, will be not less restrictive than the curren� applicable codes and ordinances of the City of Saint Paul except in those instances where a legitimate cause for variances can be determined to be beneficial to all concerned parties. D. STREETS AI�ID ALLEYS AZ1 streets and alleys within the subject araa are to be vacated and an internal circulation system will be established as part of the development p1an. A11 street and alley vacations will be processed through the nornia.l petition procedure. (See Map Noo 3) A review of the development plan by the State Department of Transportation will be necessary. Their concern will be the use of Concordia Avenue since it is the fxontaoe road of Interstate 94. E. URBAN RENEWAL TECHNIQUES TO BE USED TO ACHIEVE PLAN OBJECTIVES The followi.ng techniques are cited as a means of achieving the objectives set forth in prior sections of this document. 1. Vacant land which is currently underutilized will be acquired and subsequently disposed as part of the redevelopment site. '�' Redevelopment Plan 2. Properties which are substandard or blightittg influences or are needed for public purposes to effect objectives of this plan wi11 be acquired and the buildings removed. The properties wi1Z then be assembled and disposed vf as part of the redevelopment site. 3. Relocation of site occupants displaced by public action will be uader- -- taken with the intent to assist those disglaced in securing adequate relocation resources which meets their needs and is within their means. 4. Maximum citizen involvement will be encouraged through the structure specified by the City and now in effect through the citizen participation process. F. LAND DISPOSITION The Renewal Division may elect to dispose of the site in total or stages which ever method will best accomplish the purposes of this'Plan. In any case, all disposition of sites will follota the requirements of State and Federal laws. G. REDEVELOPER'S OBLIGATIONS The general requirsments to be imposed by the Contract £or Sale between the redevelopers of property in the District and the city's Renewal Division are: l. To develop the land purchased in accordance with the controZs and objectives of this Redevelopment Plan. 2. To attract developers who will have an awareness and sensitivity to neighborhood plans. � 3. To cornmence and complete the building of improvements on the land within a reasonable period of time as determined by the Renewal Division. 4. Not to resell the land before improvements are made without the prior consent of the Renewal Division. -8- Redevelopment Plan 5. Not to discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin in the sale, lease, transfer, or occupancy of the land. 6. The contract and disposition documents will spell out in detail the provisions, standards and criteria for achieving applicable objectives, requirements and regulations contained in the Redevelopment Plan. H. URBAN DESIGN OBJECTIVE AND CQNTROL The Renewal Division may contract for sale of property upon receipt and acceptance of preliminary plans, but normally will not dispose of property under such contract prior to receipt and acceptance of construction drawings. The Division shall retain the right of design review and may reject any proposal which is felt to be inconsistent with the goals and objectives of the Plan. Specific design objectives and criteria will be established for the site prior to disposition, and proposals will be evaluated in the light of this Plan's objectives and criteria. I. DURATION OF CONTROLS The development controls and regulations will be incorQorated into the deeds conveying land and shall be ma.intained and continued in effect for a period o£ thirty (30} years from the date of approval of the Redevelopment P1an by the City Council of Saint Paul. J. OTHER PROVISIONS NECESSARY TO MEET STATE AND L�AL REQUIREMENTS 1. Non-Discrimination Every contract fn r sale, lease or redevelopment of property within the project area will include prohibitions against land speculation, require compliance with all State and local laws in effect from time ta time, prohibit discrimination or segzegation by reasons of race, religion, color, sex or national origin in the sale, lease or occupancy of the property, and require that this latter provision be made a cozrenant running with the land and be binding upon the redeveloper and eVery successor in interest to the property. -9- Redevelopment Plan 2. Vacations, Dedications and Covenants Vacations and dedications of public rights-of csay shall be accomplished by separate actions in accordance with State law and local ordinances and will be initiated by the Division or redeveloper. 3. Citizen Fartication It is the intent of this Redevelopment Plan, and of the goveraing body of the City of Saint Paul, that active participation by the citizens of the City of Saint Paul be encouraged in the continuing planning and implementation of the program. Therefore, to the extent possible in a manner consistent with Federal, State, and local law policy and regulations, it is the intent that all activities to be undertaken under the pravisions of this Plan be done with the know- ledge and advice of the Citizen Participation Organization which is recognized by the City Council. 4. Environmental Review An ecrv ironmental review of a redevelopmznt plan is not required prior to action of the Planning Commissione If this project proposal is adopted and Community Development Block Grant Funds are used, a Com- munity Development Environmental Review will be required. It is possible that the size of the praject will require preparation of a Minnesota Environmental Assessment Worksheet. City Planning has begun preparation of both of these rev�ews. , The attached Matrix of Environmental parameters lists those environ- mental concerns. 0£ the nine major headings, ft appears that air quality, noise, land, aesthetics, and socio-economic will be of greatest concern in the reviews for the Control Data project. (See next page for Mat�ix. of Environmental Parameters) . K. PROVISIONS FOR AMENDING PLAN The Redevelopment Plan may be modified at any time by the City of Saint Pau1, in the manner provided by law. -10- Redevelopment Plan MATRIX OF ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS t�fATF�IX OF ENVIRt7NM�NTAI_ PARAME`I-ERS tin4�act of [mpatt ot Proposals on Environment Environment on Pro osal�, ❑+ Beneficial Environment Impact F .c' �F � `c`� � Adverse Environmental Impact �L�y �`A�/�:i w �c;yiy [� No Impact or Not Applicable w , � c � y � �� ,� � c°',c D • a�o . i; yOv o � �`�� i� v/�`� � �o AIR Ql)ALITY Odor - Dust - - Chemical content � GROUND WATER Recharge Capability - — Leaching of Harmful Substances _ _ - -_ Excessive 4Jithdrawal SURFACE WATER Appropriation --- Effluent Discharge -- - -- Runoff VEGETATION Disruption - -- Alterations to Plant Succession or Nabitat ANIt�IAL LIFE Disruption - - Habitat Alteration or Removal _ Endangered Species _ Game Species - Pest Species �;OISE yoise Exposure Standards - Noise Sensitivity LAtdO Eros i on -1= Floodplains, Sfioreland and Wetlands _l � Soil Suitability -- Topographic Alteration - -- Yarkland and Recreation Areas Critical Areas AESTHETICS Natural Environment - Built En��ironment: Harmony _ Apparent Access _ SOCIOECO��OMIC Conforn�ance with Comprehensive Plans � Zoning _ � _�__ __�____ Public Health and Safety/Hazards and Nuisanres _ �_..�__�.____� Employment and Income Patterns _ � 1 � -, Demographic/Community Character Alterations _ 'f� � Provision of Public Services � � Ener Consuin tion __ - �-� � 9Y � {� �- Transportatiar. _ _ -�-- -- -- Nistoric and Archeological Sites _�__1__ �._ _� -11- Redevelopment Plan _ __. _ . . _. . _. __ _ __.__ _. � . _ . - �..� PROGRAM FOR IMPLEMEPITATION PROGRAM FOR IMPLEMENTATION In order to fulfi.11 community objectives which addressed the issues of economic development for this area as well as the City and region, the acquisition of parcels of land to assemble this development site is necessary. Conununity Development funds which will be used to assembie the site will lever private reinvestment in the inner-cfty' area of Saint Paul. While much of the land within the approximately three-square-block redevelopment is a�ready publicly owned, the acquisition of additional Iand is needed to pro- duce the total site. The acquisition and subsequent construction will be staged in order to complemertt the activities of the proposed development and facilitate the efficient process necessary to purchase, clear and sell the site. This staging will occur generally along the lines of approximately one-half of the total siCe (easterly portion) being in the first stiage. The second stage will include the remainder of the site (westerly portion) for development of completed circulation patterns within the site and provision for off-street parking. The following are estimated: Acquisition 31 parcels (including 9 vacant lots of which 4 are tax forfeit lots) 23 structures 39 dwelling units 1 non-xesidential unit $550,000 Relocation (For residenti.al and non-residential) $407,000 Demolition . (For all structures) $ 40,000 �OTAL $997,000 -12- Program for Implementation PROJE GT ELIGIBILITY ' ' PROJECT ELIGIBILITY REPORT A. ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES As indicated in the "Program for Implementation," this proposed redevelopment activity is to be accomplished through the utilization of part of the Year II Community Development contingency fund. The primary objective of_ the Community Development Program is "the development af viable urban communities, including decent housing and a suitable living environment and expanding economic oppor- tunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income," (Fedexal Register 570.200). Federal assistance is provided for the support of Community Develop- ment activities which are directed toward the achievement of this overall objective. Although guidelines for the undertaking of a CD program are less restrictive than those of previous programs and grant the local municipality more flexibility in the kinds of activities which may be initiated, all elements of Che program must as a minimum meet certain criteria as delineated in the section of the Federal Register devoted to regulations governing Community DeveZopment. The following .�xcerpt outlines those activities which are eligible for federal assistance through the Community Development Program; Subpart C - Eligible Activities (570.200) (a) Grant assistance for a Community Development Program is available for the following activities: (1) Acquisiti.on in whole or in part by purchase, lease, donation or otherwise of real property (including air rights, water rights, and other interests therein) which is: . (i) Blighted, deteriorated, deteriorating, undeveloped, or inappropriately .developed from the standpoint of a sound community development and growth, as determined by the recipient pursuant to State and local laws; (ii) Appropriate for rehabilitation or conservation activities; (iii) Appropriate for the preservation or restoration of historic sites, the beautification of urban land, the conservation of open spaces, natural resources and scenic areas, the provi- sion of recreatio nal opportunities, or the guidance of urban development; (iv) To be used for the provision of public works, facilities, and improvements eligible for assistance under paragraph (a)(2) of this section; or (v) To be used for other public purposes, including the comrersion of land to other uses where necessary or appropriate to the Community Development Program. (2) Acquisition, constzuction, reconstruction, or installation of the following public works, facilities, and site or other improvements; neighborhood £acilities, centers for the handicapped, senior centers, historic properties (whether publiclg owned or privately owned), utilities, streets, stree.t lights, water and sewer facilities, foundations and platforms for air rights sites, pedestrian ma11s and walkways, and parks, playgrounds, and other facilities €or -13- , Project Eligibilitj� ` ' recreational participation; flood and drainage facilities in cases where assisCance for such facilities has been determined to be be unavailable under other Federal laws or programs pursuant to the provisions of 570.607; and parking facilities, solid waste disposal facilities, and fire protection services and facilities which are located in areas or which serve areas in which other activities described in 570.303(b) are being, or are to be, carried out. For purposes of this paragraph, a neighborhood facilities is one which (i) is designed to serve a particular neighborho od and provides services for that area, except that such a facility may serve an entire communiCy of under 10,Q00 population; (ii) provides health, recreational, social, or similar community services; and (iii) may be either single purpose or multi-purpose in nature. For purposes of this paragraph, a center for the handicapped is one which (i) may be either single or multi-purpose in nature; (ii} assist persons with physical, mental, develoQmental and/or emotional impairments; (iii) provides services which may include recreation, education, health cara, social development, independent living, physical rehab- ilitation and vocational rehabilitation; (iv) does not provide resi- dential care on a 24-hour day basis such as a group home or half-way house. (3) Code enforcement in deteriorated or deteriorating areas in which such enforcement, together with public improvements and services to be provided, may be expected to arrest the decline of the area. (4) Clearance, demolition, removal and rehabilitation of b uildings attd improvements (including (i) interim assistance to alleviate harmful conditions in which immediate public action is needed, (ii) financ- ing rehabilitation of privately-owned properties through the use of grants, direct loans, loan guarantees, and other means, when in support of other activities described ia 570.303(b), and (iii) demo- lition and modernization (but not new construction) of publicly owned low-rent housing). (5) Special projects directed to the removal of material and architec- tural barriers which restrict the mobility and accessibility of elderZy and handicapped persons. (6) Payments Co housing awners for losses of rentaZ income incurred in holding for temporary periods housing u nits to be utilized for the relocation of individuals and families displaced by program activi- ties. (7) Disposition, through sale, lease, donation, or otherwise of any real property acquired pursuant to this Part or its retention for public pusposes, provided that the proceeds from any such disposition shall be expended only for activities in accordance with this part. (8) Provisfon of public services not otherwise available inareas or serving residents of_ areas in which the recipient is undertaking, or will undertake other physical development activities described in 570.200(a)(1)-(5), (7), and (9)-(10), and where assistance is providing or securing such services under other applicable Federal laws or programs has been applied for and denied or not made avail- able pursuant to the provisions of 570.607, For the purposes o£ this paragraph, such services sha11 be directed to�aard (i) improv- ing the community's public services and facilities, including those concerned with employment, economic development, crime prevention, child �are, health, drug abuse, education, welfare, or recreational needs and (2) which are directed toward coordinating public and private developmenC programs. (9) PaymeRt of the non-Federal share required in connection with a Federal grants-in-aid program undertaken as part of the community development pursuant to 570.303(b), Provided that such payment sha11 be limited to activities otherwise eligible under this section. (10) Payment of the cost of completing a project funded under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, including the provisions for financial settlement contained in Subpart I. -14- Project Eligibility (11) Relocation payments and assistance for individuals, families, businesses, organizaCions, and farm operations displaced by activities assisted under this Part. (12) Activities necessary (i) to develop a comprehensive conununity development plan (which plan ma.y address the needs, strategy, and objectives to be summarized in the application pursuant to 570.303(a) but may treat only such public services as are neces- sary or appropriate to supporC activities meeting such needs and ob�ectives), and (ii) to develop a policy-planning-management capacity so that the recipient may more rationally and effectively (A) determine its needs, (B) set long-term goals and short-term objectives, (C) devise programs and activities to uteet the goals and objectives, (D) evaluate the progress of such programs in accomplishing these goals and objectives, and (E) carry out manage- ment, coordination, and monitoring of activities necessary for . e_ffective planning implementation. (13) Payment of reasonable administrative costs an� carrying charges related to the planning and execution of community development and housing activities, including the pravision of information and, at the discretion of the recipient, of resources to residents of areas in which other community development activities described in 570.303(b) and the housing activities cavered in the Housing Assistance Plan described in 570.303(c) are to be concentrated with respect to the planning and execution of such activities. (b) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in thf.s section or in 570.201, any ongoing activity being carried out in a model cities program shall be eligible for funding under this Part from that portion of the hold- harrsless amount attributable to such model cities program until the applicant has received five years of funding for such acti�ities as cal- culated pursuant to 570.103(c)(2)(iii). For the purpose of this para- graph, the term "ongoing activity" means any model cities activity underwa�► as of January 1, 1975 that was approved and funded by HUD on or before June 30, 1974. (c) Cost incurred in carrying out the program, whether charged to the program on a direct or an indirect basis, must be in conformance with the require- ments of Federal Management Circular 74-4, "Cost Principles Applicable to Grants and Contracts with State and Local Governments," except as modified in these regulations Items (1)(i) and (1)(v) clearly ��tablish the Community Devalopment eligibility requirements for the sub;ject area. B. DEVELOPMENT OF PROJECT ELIGIBILITY Evaluation of building conditions is a vital first step in the planning process. Any system for classifying buildings must produce an accurate description of observed conditions and be based on clearly defined and acceptable standards. A system of building classifications according to strucCural conditions has been developed over the years within the Saint Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority Neighborhood Development Program. In 1967 and subsequent years during the initi- ation of NDP, the Saint Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority contracted with Barton-Aschma�t Associates, Incorporated to prepare an urban renewal svrvey technique that would accurately identify and evaluate the extent of deterioration, blight or slum conditions existing in project areas. These standards and subsequent -I5- Project Eligibility _ __ _ _ _. _ _ __ surveys provided the basis for substantiating the need for public action in the area in accordance with established local, state, and federal legal and adminis- trative requirementso As each structure was examined, inspectors noted all deterioration and inadequacies as they might be influenced by age, quality of maintenance,. adequacy of original constructian, and obsolescence, regardless of whether code violations were present or not. Upon completion of the inspectfon and subsequent evaluation of the field survey, an overall building condition rating was. established from the following categories; Sound - A structure with minimal defects and in a standard condition requiring . normal maintenaace DeiicienC buildings contain defects which are not eaaily correctable and cannot be accompliehed in the course of normal rnaintenance. The classification of minoz or major reflecta the degree or �xtent of defects found during the inspection. Minor - A strvcture classified as de£icient--requiring minor repairs--hzving eiore than three minor defects. Ma or - Buildin�s classified as ci�fzcient--requiring rusjor repairs. � Substendard - A structure containing defects which are so serious, so extensive that they adversely affect all or a large part of the structure that repair is probably not feasible. , Blight{_nF Inf�uence - A term used to describe an exfsting condition which (1} applies specifically to the building being surveyed, (2) has an apparent adverse or degrad- ing effect on other existing development. Types of blighting influence are: Incompatible Uses or riixed Use - A use (or a mixture of uses in a single baild- ing) that is incompatible with the majority of uses in the immediate area, such as A mixture of commercial and re�iden*_ial use in a single building or the presence of a manufacturing use in a predomir.3teZy residential area. There must be a�significant adverse effect generFted by the incorepatibility or _ admixture. Overcrowding of Buildings on the Land - Excessive land coverages by buildings resultino in a restriction of access, servicin;, light and air circulation, and other factor� which i�pair the functional efficiency of the building or the health and sa£ety of its occupants, such as small lot aize on excessively nerrow frontage. -16- Project Eligibility . Excessive Dwelling Unit Density - Overcrowding of dwelling units within a build- ing, or on thc 1�_n3, to an er.tent that the health and safety of the residents . of the particular building or c;eighborhood building is endangered. Obsolete Building Type - A building whicli can no longer efficiently perform the function for which it Uas originally constructed, This may be manifest in . vacancy for an extended period of time, in full or partial abandonment or in � conversion to uses which are unsafe or unhealtliy £or accupants. Underutilization of Land - Undereloped land, or lnnd developed significantly be2ow the leve2 of davelopment of the nefghborhood and its environs constitute a blightfng in£luence. Such ini•luence is manifest when such underutilization has e retardant effect on the econo�ic, physical or cocial health of the neighborhood. Other ldentifiable Hazards - Vacant un3 van�alized �tructures--sr.ructures which constitute attractive� nuisanccs to children and 2dul.ts cahich are vacant and whi.ch are vandnlized or are open to vAttdalisr, • Combustible I�aterials - Structurea covered �aith combustible mzCerials end located within four feeG of another e�tructure constitute n dan�er of spreading fire. � • In NDP Year I, Clearance Area I was established by action of the Saint Paul City Council, the Saint Paul City planning Commission, and Department of Housing and Urban Developmento The subject area is contained within this established clear- ance areao Clearance eligibility (a standard utilized within the Urban Renewal and Neighborhood Development Program under HUD Guidelines) requires that 20% of the total buildings be substandard and that 50% of the totaZ buildings be substandard and blightede This requirement was satisfied by the above czted govern.^�ental actions. Additional Properties to be Acquired to Assemb7.e Redevelopment Site Block & Parcel Current Use 73-4 Vacant Land 73-5 Vacant Land 73-8 Vacant Laad 73-9 Sinole Family 73-10 Vacant Land 73-11 Vacant Land 73-12 Commexcial 73-13 Single Family 73-I4 Single Family 73-15 Duplex _17_ Project Eligibility 73-16 Vacant Land 73-19 4-Plex 73-20 Duplex 73-21 Duplex 73-22 3-Plex 73-23 Vacant Land 73-24 Duplex 73-24 Duplex 77-6 Single Family 77-7 Single Family 78-1 Single Family � 78-2 Single Family 78-4 Vacant Land (Single Family) 78-7 Vacant Land 78-8 Duplex 78-9 Duplex 78-11 Vacant Land 78-12 Single Fami�.y 78-13 Single Family 78-14 Single Family 78-15 Single Family 75-16 Duplex With the assessment of existing conditions based on the aforementioned criteria, Chis area passesses conditions by reason of dilapidation, obsolescence, over- crowding, faulty arrangement or design, Iack of ventilation,. light and sanitary facilities, excessive land coverage or deleterious land use or obsolete layout, or any combination of these or- other factors, which are detrimentaZ to the safety, health, morals or welfare of the community and collectively they constitute a "Blighted Area" (Minnesota Statutes Section 462.421, Subd. 11.). '18' Project Eligibility ■ �■ � `;� .� � a�~ �`'ll , r �� _ �� !��-�� r"' � � �_�� _ --� .♦�� - -i n. _� a._ ■ � ■�� ' • � a. ,� d � � .r� ==-., E��N � ,� � �� -- � _ � � � .� r-� ,:�. A"' . � � - � ,.� d � p :., �«, - qI� :� �a � .'. �w■ - � � 1 .. �=� ` �a ,�;` � �, �� 1��, hw 1� , � :�.'_� � r� � �� ,� f �: �� ■ '-.i . �� i✓,�� - p ,� �I!� � 7 .E: -�--� � ,r •' � ■I�' �� ' � �i �i`a!�, � �° ��. r'-�� - - �/�, �„� N �� 1. � ' =��,�� , � ;,,�.�` �� a yy�, �H�,: � �� !� �w�■ �� •*�� • I � , .. � �. • � 1 ��I` q � ■ � - ,.� � •� $� � '- �• �I �l� . , � �� /� , �; ; - , � ;�- � � �� • � ��'w ,,,�� -: � �. � � �»'�' ' � � ':' `� � - . � �. ;,, �,.r� r� Trr.��.,.�i�_� , , .' . . , ; �,�/��1'� /0//////i/// ` C � �"'i �� r .i�ti ` ., I � p. _ � �� /I .� � %� � �-� • /, �� - I ' � ; . ` � � i' �. I � � /�.- �� I � . i �---- i r - �N �-: I � �g d� 3 � � � f-�- � ��4, : , ; � .. � � � � � � � � � � i�r � _ � � i. - � /� �_ N - � •� � � , �� '?� �� /p N - ,� _ � . �� ;,� � � i,.� � ,�� . ��; e , � .. � - e� _ -. � �:/� � -� `.,. �•1 �" I � �'• � '• �' ' � �` '� �� '� `� � �� . I • � '. , -� ■ �/, � / � r 1� � E� ,� ■� �� +� .'. � :� /� , �. , :�,� . - � � �� , , . r , -. � � � • _>/.: � � � �, � � S �, , �� ` '�� r I ► . ;�1 � � I 1 '- ; .. _ ��' � �' � � � � � � ��I .. . 1� �a .. . I - � E -- . . t� ■ C�■ � �� - �. ' �' � :: � � � `�1�.�� ,� :�� .: �, �. �:-�� . d , . - , �� __ „ , -' s. .. � :� � - ; .� � ■ ' _. . � • �' -= � �ir• . • � � �7 � �, a ■ ; 7■■ �. � ��. �7 :� �� /�1� � *.� II� �� hn;' I n � � ; �- ta . ��;�:� � ,,: � ��,� ��;; � ,� :, � „!,, :, �� .,sr,�; ..� i■ ; � ; ■!� `� � � � � � �/ ■! � � � � . ' . � 0 � � � ., .�� • � � �ir �'��. � � �� ■ .�� . ,�■� �; � M �., � � �� ••� ��. � �, ��. . : � , �_,,�� .�� I �' • � �; - ......,. ., ..:..........:.........�. ..,.�,.,,,,, � �� ' j . �� ' • � � � . � . � .: . , � . • � • � � � . . � ` � � • '� � � � � ��\\� RELOCATION PLAN . � RELO�ATZ�;3 PLAN . , A• ADMINISTRATION ' 1. Poli.cies and Itepulations , A family� individual, husiness firr� or non-profit organization required Co move from property thaC has been affected by pubZicly sponsozed activity is eligible for relocation payments to assist in obt�ining an3 moving to a replacement d�aelling or location in accordance with the provisions and requirements of the Federal - Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 197d. _ It ia the intent of the City to provide a relocation advisor to assisC each person to be displaced in locating a suitable housing unit. or place of business. The first steps of the relocation process involve the relocation advisor assigned to the particular property planned fo: acquisition. The following servicea are provfded: a. Eligible persons are informed at the earliest possible date as to the avail- ability of relocation payments and assiseance, the eligibility requirer,cents and procedures for obtaining cuch payments. b. The extent of aeed of each elieible person for relocation assistance. is determined through direct personal interview. " c. Current and continuing inforesation ie pravide@ on the availability ar.�i prices of comparable sales and rental housing and of comparable commsrcial properties and locuCions. d. Information concerning FederaZ and State housing programs, loans and other special programs offering assistance is eupplfed to eligible displaced persons. e. Other advisory and referral services concerning housing, financing, emp2ay- ment, training, health, welfare and other assistance is provided �in order to minimize hardships. � , f. Assiatance is provided in completing any required applications and forms. g. Services ere provided to ensure that the relocation process does not result in differenC or separate treatment on account of race, color, religion, national origin, aex or source of income. " The following financial assistance is available to residential relocatees, regardless of how long the dwelling unit hzs been nccupied; --.Actual reasonable moving expenses. or -- A fixed rnoving expense allowance up to $3�0 (based on the number of rooms of furniture or posaessions tc be moved) plus a dislocation allowance of $200. , .,2d- ' Retocation Plan _ •, _s _ , �,_.,,,,r�T,, ;�,_.._Y.�-- ._.��,,,,,,�,,.-�„m-.._....�..,,R,._---..__._�_._.,._;._„F,.�.._-_..� . - : - — . . . . : �� : ,. ..; . � � � , � - . _ . - -. .. .: . �- . : � . � �- - -- ��F ��- -- , , . _ ,�. . . � . In addition, homeownera who hnve occupied the dwelling for 180 days prior to • the •first offer to purchase the property anct tenants occupying the unit for • 90 dflys prior, mzy be eligible for the following rep2acement housing payments: -- A Replaceme�2t Housing Payment of up to $Z5,000 for eligible owners who � occup}• the home F:hich is acquired. (This payment is to help owners purchase and occupy anoCher dwelling suitable for their family.) -- A Replzcement ttou3ing Puyment of up to $4,000 Co eligible tenants to help in the rental or purchase of standard replacement housing. Homeowners who have occupied the dwellir.g for at least 90 but less than 180 days are eligible for the $4,000 m.axiav� Replacement Housing Pay-merit. Disp2aced busiciess concerns and non-profit organizations may be eligible to receive payeiants for the following: -- Actual, reasonable moving expenses, plus -- Actual direct loss of tangible personal property, plus -- Actual reasonable expenses incurred by a business in searching for a . replacement location (limited to $500.00) or, as an alternative to the three above pa}m�.ents, ' . -- Pay�ent in lieu of moving and related expeases. These payr�enCS are equal to the average annua2 net earnings of the business, but not less than $2,500 nor more than $10,Q00; payments to non-profit organizations are licaited eo $2,500. Certain criteria must be cset for a business to be eligible for Chis Qayment. Occupants are not required to �ove until given the time and opportunity to find decent, safe, sanitary houaing thst meets the housing code of the city • and is satisfactary and affordable to the occupant. Replacement housing pay- ments are not made in cases of moves to substandard buiZdings. The city will ensure adequate inspection of all repincement housing resources to be utilized. by displaced persons. 2. Organization and Staffinv , The relocation sCaff of the Saint Faul Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA; .has served since 1959 as the central reloc�tion agency for the City. . Supervisory personnel, relocation advisors a1c� technical and clerical employees are responsible for administering the abwe policies for I'ederal progrn.ms and for such local programs as school site assembly for the School � Board of the City and �.cquisition for the Ramsey County Open Space Program. The relocation staff i.s ass£gned to field offices as necessary. _ Estimates o£ the psrsonnel needed to carry out relocation activitiea were - -2 1- Relocation Plan , :; ' � based oq the projected displacement for the third ye�r of Co�racninfty llevelop- ment activities, concurrent local proy,rams and past relocution er,perience. • Following is a summary of staff estimates; -- _ Administrator of Project Services (Cima divided ainong relocation, real est�te and property c•.anagament) Relocation Administrator • Buaineas Relacation Specialist Relocation Claims Technician � . Eight (8) Relocation Specialists (Family and Buainess} . Secretarial/Clerical Staff ' " �. SUMMARY OF DISPLACEMENT The displacement programmed to take place in the redevelopment site is as follaas: • 36 households ` I3 business entities consisting of a bar and 12 rental properties C. SUl�AlARY OF HOUSZNG RESOURC�S Past relocation exgerience has shown that the majority of displa.cecl persons fall within the income limits for eli�;ibility to the various suhsidized housin$ programs available in substantial supply in the c�etropolitan area. There are a �,iide varzety of ho�tsing • reaources to accoromodate the special needs of these families and individuals ir. Saint � Paui. Loc,r Income , . In order to qualify for public housing occupaacy persons must meet standards of fa�ail�� composition and income, Generally the following persons are eligible for some type of public housing. Families - Two or more persons regularly living together and related by blood, ' marriage, or adoption Individuals - A single persbn who is (1) eligible by age to receive old age Social Security benefits; (2) physicaZly haRdicapped or disabled; or (3} displaced by public action Ztao sets of income limits are est�zblished for initiul occupancy and for continued occupancy. Persons disp2aced by public action may use the limiCs for continued occupancy in gaining admittance. Eligibility for continued occupancy is reviewed � once a year for fsmilies and the handicapped, and once every two years for the elderly. � AN�IUAL INCO,� LIMITS . FamiZy Size - Initial Occupancv 1 $ �8,700 Z 9,950 3 11,200 - 4 12,400 5 13.200 6 . 14,000 � 14,750 � . 8 or more 15,550 -22- Relocation PZan f'' � Additional considerations such as totr.l as�ets, desirability of tenants, veteran status, and those displaced by public action are u�ed when numbers of eligible epplicanta er,ceed the units available. Applicantswho qualify under the above guidelinea nre required to pay no more than 25 percent of their adjusted incoma for gross renC. Gross income is adjusted by allo�- able deductions and exemptions for numbers of dependents and escessive ot unusual medical and occupational expenses. . Saint Paul curreatly r�intains 16 hi-rise buildings for the elderly and handicapped in all sections of the city. There are a total of 2,660 units in these buildings, out of which approximately 255 are expected to become available in any twelve-month period. The city has three pro�rar.es designed to meet the housing needs of low-income families. The traditional housing for low-income families is congregate public housing; the city has four of these developments, two small �roups of suah housing totaling 1,349 units. The other three prograMS are oriented to dispersing lower-income families - throughout the city. The city has bought 86 Scattered Site Units and 97 HOPLIF units. The acattered siCe units are rented to low-income families in the sane manner as • congregate housiag. Tl1e Ii�pLIF program is a program through which a tenant eventualiy becoMes a homeowner. Thase three progra�s result in the availability of approxiut3tely 326 units per yePr. '� Noderate Inco�e Dioderate-incoma housing is available to families and elderly or handicapped individuals who fall within the following income limits: _ • Maximum Annual Fa_mily Size Income Li�its 1 � ' $ 9,600 2 ' , 12,000 3 - - 12,400 4 13,800 S 14,700 6 15,500 � •. � 16,400 8 or more 17,300 ihere are 3,008 moder�te-income new construction rental units in Saint Paul and approximately 600 of these become available throughout a given year. �'he city also has 153 reha�ilitated npartcnent units ar:d 10 rehabilitated units in single-family an3 duplex housing for r�oderAte-income persons. lioderate-income families and individuals will also be able to find housing through -23- Relocation Plan �. : . ;. _ : _ . ..; ,<. r � • + I TnIFA plans for t�i.ngle-fnraily r.iortgage and Multi-fumily new construction, and through the Housing Recycliug Program. Several propo3als for maderc�te-income units are currently in varioua stages of planning under the rIl{I'A-Family program. Section 8 - Existi:�g Housing Section 8 is the im?lea:entation componenC for policies stated in the Housing Assistenee Plan. During CD Year IZI, it is intended that all Section S units allocated for the cicy of Saint Paul will be used for rental assistance to families who are of low or moderate income and who will Ue living in staadard rental units. The number for Year III will be based on the t�etropolitan Counci.l's Subaidized Housing Allocation Plan, currently being drafte3. The ciCy has estab}.ishe3 a goal of 150 units for a housing resource in Year III ia the Housing Assistance Plan. Eligible families under this program will pay between 15 and 25% of their income for rent. HUD will pay the difference between that AmounC and the fair-market rental rate, including uti2ities. Eligibility is dete'rmined by gross family income, which c►ust be less than 80% of the 1970 median income by f�mily size for the riinneapolis-Saint Paul Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area. Theae lirsita are as follows: . � � • Maximum �4nnual Family Size Income Linits 1 $ 9,600 2 I1,000 . 3 Z2,400 k 13,000 5 14,700 6 ' 15,500 � 7 . � 16,400 8 or more 17,300 . It should be noted that there is a significant difference between the Section 8 limits and the moderate-in�ome limits under older programs; presumably these differences will be adjusted. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority converted its 970 units of leased housing to the Section 8 prooram in 1976 and has a total of 1,056 units in this program. Section 8 - New Construction and Substantial Kehabilitation I3ew construcCion units under the Section 8 program may be funded by the Minnesota Housing Finance,Agency; the ciCy has no separute allocation for this program. llnits . leased under the Section 8 program will constitute 20% of the total units in the project. The Housing Assiatsnce Plan sets 265 units of new construction and 50 units in the substt�ntiul rehabilitaCion program as realistic goals for Year III. Family eligibility is based on tha same schedule of maximum annual income limiCs as .' _'-2L�- Relocation Plan • ;r�. . - - , : ,, , . • for the existing housing progr�m. Ttie turnover ia the private housing market has been end will continue to be the pricRary housino resource for persons �ho are uisplaced, tlith the nssistance of the $15,000 (maxiuium) grant, displaced honeowners are able to find housing in the private mar�et. Displaced renters needin� 1 and 2 bedroom units are also competitive on the private raar'�et with the aid of Replacement Housing Payments. ' . � ' • �i -25- Relocation Plan . ,,. . • RESOLUTION - LEGAL , . - . , , _ .:_ _ ; . _ , , ; ; ..� . RESOLUr�IOl`I NO. 77-5/31-3 RESOLUTION GIVING PRF.LIAIl�Tt�RY CONSIDERATIOIV TO CONTROL DATA PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AP4ENDN�NT AND AUTHORIZ- • ING SUBMISSION TO PLANNING COMMISSION WHEREA,S, there has been presented to this Special Meeting of the Board of Cor.u-nissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota a draft of a document entitled ' "Control Data Redevelopment Plan Amendment" , dated riay 27, 1977, consisting of an Introduction, Legal Description And Boundary Map, Redevelopment Plan, Program For Implementation, Report On Project • Eligibility, and Relocation Plan; and WHE REAS, the Redevelopment Plan Amendment proposes continuation of removal of conditions of blight in the P�lartin Luther King Center Clearance Area of the Summit-Universif:y Neighborhood and Community Development Project Area, Project Minn. A-1-1, and District 8, through additional property acquisition and removal of structures, and other public actions stated in said amendment, and assembly of a site for sale to Control Data Corporation for redevelopment of an office and parts distribution c�nter to provide, among other things, employment opportunity to low income persons resident in the Project Area in accordance with the purposes of the Housing and Cor.tmunity Development Act of 1974 and the T�unicipal Housing and Redevelopment Act of 1947. NOW TH�,REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopnlent Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota that the Control Data Redevelopment P1an Amendment considered at tnis meeting be transmitted to the Saint Paul Planning Commission for its stizdy and report in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Sectior�s462. 356 and 462. 5I5, and that a Financing Plan for the Control Data redevelop- ment undertaking be prepar_ed and submitted to the Finance Committe� of this Board and City Council for its consideration and report. . ,� . � � -26- Resolution-Legal . • �� , i II i ` �- i � Ti�ii�iii��' iii:iii.�:i:5:ii:c�:i.=:' i: :::::::::::t � �,� � +�+ 1 - � �� ► � .� � . � � �� ■- ■ �■�t`� I � � �' � .�� o , ,� o _ �' - . E-. Q, , � �,�, - � � �:_ . � I = ... .: W �1 � i �- ` ::li �� , _ � � .�I � . �iil � . � ` R� ,�fi ,� � I' r_ ■ ■ G � � ��'L . '� i� . � . �., ■ �,� 'i �u �� - � � F' � � : .._ 4 ■ � � - � ..� . ,�. � � � � � � � � E � I -�' �. � ...�>_..' '�: �� , _�`'�li � ��: �::�i . , ,. �� k � , � . _ , .,.� � . �, �� , ■ ►•_�� . � � � _ •. � . � . � c� t� . .� .., t''� ■ �- .�I � _■ �� a _ � ---- s E'� �■ �—' Q • I • :� '� _ .uwj ��, � ` ��' � �=:';� r �i�.�,,,,II� - � w � � '^� � � qll�p► l�1 . 6, , ' Yi, � i _ � �� C3 B '�1 '� � '� 1' ■ .I N � � . c� � � , � � - ° � ■ , �� E '' � .�, � � � c � � � � � � �� , � , ` I I � ■ � , �, ' I . � '' � ' , �, ��, � ` r r � E �� i ; - � �� - . - i '�i �'�'iC ,,� �' ��''�, _ � ■ � � ■ � i .��i""'-� �- -,- �� . .� �� •,� �„ ' ■ ;� �- . , � � • •� !�a . �' :I. �-�r, � � � . •� � �+ ., �_ �-•�� /_,■ 1 �� • � � ,•,. ��'� , .� ,- �_ ��C� !�� -►r� � ��r, , �� .±1� ■i�s tP�� -.._.. I,►, ; � � � ,. ` C7� . 1� � •� ' � ■ � � , , � ��;' .�� ■ _ '. � �._7�• �ir . ' F�;;= �:� � ' � �.._ � i �= ,.. � ;.�� . M t� �• �' , .� ,a ■ � " �. � �� , , „• � .,. � � � f �`' � � .�� :.- "' , II� � � � � � � ■�■ j � � ��1��_ � � �.--��. ��-� --- � , -��. _.�. -- - . ��s,.� �� . ,� '..----�, , _ •- `� � �� ,�- , • ! . I ' � � � �� ' � � _ �� ■ �1 � �� I i►J�■.F ■ � t , � �j . � � ■ � � A , . , � � - �-� � ■ ■ � , � - � � r� ' � � :�s �' `� � �' � �, � �. _� ,► r "'r �� d �` ►.�� , .� . . a �- . �� ....—�� ;�� , ��iv ■� � .�. � ■ ; ... �. �, � i � �� e� ' � � ' I� �a _ .� ` ■ . .�_ ` ' f_ - � � � � � �.,� .,. �., - 8 ..�t:�,.- . l � � � � - .��- ■ �� _ I � � , r , � �. � - .�- !�► � ■ ��.e �}�r�, � �:�I:� � �� r - - - _ _ ; . � , . _ �. � 1�+�:�.r- —_. - _.:�:s�:�--• –r' : . ; + - - t . �VJ . _ . . . .. _. .�s ... — '� _ — 1� � L�� 4 M� •• � � REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT TO A PRQGR.AM FOR THE REVITALIZEITION OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL CD YEAR II (CONTROL DATA SITE) May 27, 1977 � ` � INTRODUCTION � , • • INTRODUCTION This Redevelopment Plan Amendment has been developed as a result of negotia- tions between the City of Saint Paul and the Contral Data Corporation. Control Data is proposing to construct within the Martin Luther King area of District 8 (Su�nit-University) a new office and parts distribution center. � Control Data has received favorable endorsement fro� the District 8 Planning Council at its last meeting (May 23, 1977) for a site which both groups feel is feasible for such a facility. The site is generaYly located to the north and west of the present Martin Luther King Center facility. The total project includes several parcels of land which are already publicly owned. It is necessary to aequire an additi�nal thirty-one (31) parcels to produce a site which is approx3.mately 13.76 acres in size. This total site will then house a structure which will employ approximately 40Q persons from other satel.liCe locations and contain over 200,000 square feet of floor space. It is concluded that this development is a desirab2e asset to the Summit- Unieersity Neighborhood as well as the City of Saint Paul. The purpose of this document is to amend those portians of "A Program for the Revitalization of the City of Saint Paul, CD Year II," February 5, 1976, and the "Redevelopment Plan, Summit-University, Minn. A-1-1, Code ND 401," Febru- ary 1974 which pertains to the area described in the Legal Description and Boundary Map section. The text changes and map changes recommended for the "Reaevelopment Plan, Summit-University, Minn. A-1-1, Code ND 401," dated February 1974, are herewith attached as Exhibits A and B respectively. - -1- Introduction � . APPROVED COUIVCIL FILE NO. AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, StJMMIT-UNIVERSITY, MINN. A-1-1, GODE ND 40I FEBRUASY 1974 Tnsert into Section C. General Land Use. Plan under Item 2. Description of each _ �redominant l.and use category on the Land Use Plan: Map No. 1, ND 401, Che following: e. Light Industrial (1) Intended Function or Character The Light Industrial area is intended to �rovide a Zand use transi- tion beCween the Interstate I-94 Freeway and residential development to the south. Uses permitted in this area will not be effected by the noise of the freeway and will function as a bu£fer for existing homes to be rehabilitated or new homes to be built. Care will be taken in how the southern edge of the area will. be treated to ensure compatibility batween uses. Also, consistent with Federal Community Development Objectives, a Light Industrial use in this area has the potential of providing employment in a neighborhood which has both a low-income population and blighted deteriorated housing. (2) Permitted Uses All uses permitted under the "I-1 Industrial District" of the Zoning Ordinance, City of St. Paul, Minnesota shall be permiCted. (3) Density and Buildinp Restrictions Restrictions concerning building caveraga, setbackss off-street parking aad loading, height, signs, and lighting shall be determined by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul. - Such restrictions, in all instances, will be not less restrictive than the currently applicable codes and ordinances of the city of Saint Paul. EXHIBZT "A" .r ` '�. .-- ec � � � ��• .��.��. .��.�!�• .. • .. . ..�. • _ • • ��o � . .... . ..... :.�••�� 0..:�.�.. ....' . . ' i � • .. .. � .�.....�F� �°'q��q�Q...' � �.� _ . . o� �4r ��.'s,r��i�� °/ /� rs ��.��7��rIT� � 9�l � � � • • • ./J' f :�.^ .f 1 � ,' .� �� / �l', _ � i d._• ��1i ,r��. . �/ .. . .d ' ' � � � I � � � ' � �7 �-. �; �'/: ' •��% - �,= ' �i�! `� �'�3��i.�#t�,��i !�'%��•J��'�r �;� ��`s/ c'i�E��z�� '�/��,��/�s�� i� .rG.d �.iz�� u .ir�,tixu�tr�,.i, '11�.i� /'�O � .° � ��4 � /r� � �� tuzznr-tt��?5�ai :F�1;`u3fx "(� ssr"` ° i r 4#', � �'��#;� ��t��`�"r��,,f�� ., . � . � � �� «�IS,��tY.� � � F� 'x:um � c. �i • s • i '�'�`� �g �� 2! �� : . at��='iir� �i;1tz�E:;?c�u�tr-�ti�� _:S::=FFt;u�r+l'-;:i£�r�=.:: � . e ° A�1�-:'2Fr� uuar�tiicast.'i Y'F?i �.*�"17 � `+�.us 1�ryftcr:ua�=r�.t{�{iK H• a {r c a �'or i �� a'6z, ��`��: ��'-i� y� �;r �� ,�� rw Y' zz�sr tt' �: � • _ . r� ��" �aGa� � '� ��4...�� i�.F��r��• � ��F� �`.f��:��a��a£f�it�u � �:.#�3r�'sk�33f�f��:�3sr�as; �ust�� iaa�� u:-nc�t�wi�� s �r= ,: :,Y � _ • ��$� x!c��7sL�'��c:.'��u.,� +i��.C«ZLkY:��i«��~ `r? r ::}. " •~$��, it�Y'��!,.��52��. � �� 5L45�� • . � .-,:?�-��,., siyL�.�slr:iinrru:y.«'zr� ��s��¢�'�vs9.�b'� � - • � `. . .' . . ..,��h� ♦��v!.". .`.°.° —._.'_'---—_ � . . . �--___"._----- �� f��.s�'w°«:,, � � • � .___.-__. ,.__--. ._.._ ( r . a —�_ t � . a�,i•'•�'' �� -_ _ �. f��_r4Si♦• ,� 1 � ��:� .�r��S�S�C� � `-` � /r� • . �•:,r o .��_d�a�1� _ ��kikSS.'.�'�:L • � • I ►��i i• � � - i.? ^,.s�;:. �� . . . - . ��.'�� .�� ` , / � �� . . . . - � ��• ,��+ ��b �� ,c��, �,�� • • " �� .� m • .. ... .. .. le�:�a:�sv� ca•ysrv}x�� '':�'� _. _ i � — � ' ' �� ! n �r rr ._ . . , :....,,...: _ —_ � , .... .:?...-. ,_.. . . �...r...' ' .. .. .;. :.r..vi.' --- r. _ . ; ... ,, . J f. . ; ,.� � � . . .. JJ.. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... ..... . .. . � � . � . .�� 1� ti �,,:��' r0 _'Y�`'�i�7S'V' C: / � tti I� /A/�j/� ! � ,��'�`�`�'7� ' f �"� � �� r,�'�/ � � �0�,7� � . . :... ....... . ..�.. ' ��,�,. � � ..��I'.r��.� .� r/ .,. � . � .r .� � �� 'eS �� -- ...... f/��i�/ . ,�. . .l .. j �. ,�,,�TJ��,Y�s�j��-� 1 �. � �F`-1S�F`�`i�9�f°`.ili_Y.: F ,,� �. � 1 rf I ` ...... ...... ....... ..��/�/• ''l��}a'; . ... ,......... ... � r �f�r�� /�� / � �/��I' ~ ��7} t p. *�JIrwC�� 4r�MT_?. 'o� ..r �.9� i�,'°� � 9l�d��d'� � ..• � ' '' . � ' y,^ ,� ,: �. ..:: ::.. . �,�*:;�'p �'�i . ��'''� �� x n��'0�.,�'� �� t+ ' ° �4'�,'` f� ,�6s�a'itRFi4�?; ' ` s ! 4 � ��r�'�s;��Q,�• r �� {k ,li ;FS�t�� o` . � � q+ � �.`��. `ii�J�cu '+�SCi�i4i;l, b�i�tx� rs��k�5?i.£�; • � � b x �+ i- � o � �'!� �' dS,r�}��qp'�ao- 5 ��`, _-�r.,. J,- �_ye� �� ?�� rt RO�� a\o !7S��:A' 7df .'^7'^ Rtl��31 �d•p .. a '�� 1�[IOJOi�II'1..L�IOOOO y � ~� ��, \��,�ShV� � .� O�� ` � �� '� � (� iiC� � � c m � � �� ' s 3 � •� • '�� `�� ° ��' � � ' � *� �� o � . � � �� . , , �� 1 .• � O ��'� 0 ti � O O M 1 � 4 �. QQQ{pp� � ��•�' C ( '� � 6� .�y � ( IIIII �/ � ' /� \ 4 O � ' � �� O • 's' S . � ' i � � � �. � � _ _ �� aad�� e • • �� = ; ��i �, o � �. � � n �� ` x o: �" ` d00�0�� dao �+�� a'r�'�ii �'�, �� ' � •� �� , - . ' � � � p �... �, !� ; � • • — - - -=,�--s -=c: �.,�,� d�!��•��' ..o ;:— r � _ • • LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTROL DATA SITE All of Block 24 and Lots 1 thru 15, Block 25, Mackubin and Marshall's Addition to Saint Paul; All of Block 2, Wilson's Rearrangement of a part of Marshall's Subdivision of Block 27, Mackubin and Marshall's Addition to Saint Paul; All of Lots 1, 2 and 3, West Side Annex of LoC 8 of Marshall's Subdivision of Block 27, Mackubin and Marshall's Addition; All of Lots 1 thru 6, Whiting's Subdivision of part of Lot 8, Block 27, Mackubin and Marshall's Addition; All of Blocks 2 and 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 31; and the vacated alleys in Block 2, Wilson's Rearrangement and Block 24, Mackubin and Marshall's Addition; and all of vacated Kent Street and Carroll Avenue; All lying within the following described lines; Commeacing at the northwest corner of Lot 15, Block 25, said Mackubin and Marshall's Addition; thence south 125 ft, along the west line of said Lot 15 to the southwest corner thereof; thence east along the south line of Lots 1 thru 15, said Block 25, and its easterly extension; 626.0 ft. to a point in the center line of vacated Kent Street.; thence south Z,00 ft. , more or less, along the center line of said vacated Kent Street to a point in the westerly extension of the south line of Lot 3, said West Side Annax; thence east along the south line of Lot 3 and its extension, 160 ft. , more or less, to the northeast corner of Lot 4, said West Side Annex; thence south 7.0 ft. along the east line of said Lot 4, West Side Annex, to a point; thence east along the south line of Lots 1 thru 6, Whiting's Subdivision, and Lots 4 and 5, Block 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 31, 347.0 ft; thence south along the caest line of said Lot 3, Block 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 31, 12.25 ft. ; thence east 120.0 ft. along the south line of said Lot 3, to the southeast corner of said Lot 3; thence north along the east line of Blocks 2 and 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 31 and the east line of Block 2, said Wilson's - Rearrangement, to a point 10.0 ft. south of the northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 2, said Wilson's Rearrangement; thence west on a line parallel with, and 10.0 ft. south of the north line of Block 2, said Wilson's Rearrangement and the north line of Block 24, said Mackubin and Marshall's Addition 1253.0 ft. , to a . point in the west line of said Block 24; thence south along the west line of Blocks 24 and 25, said Mackubin and Marshall's Addition, 331.50 ft. to the point of beginning. -2- Legal Description ':� �" _ '—' - .� � �,( � 1 -�-- . � ,..-:-�-,�� ,' -E. . r-�-�-t-� � < . , ----�--� �.` � ._._ . . � . . . ' �,<� �- . . � f • � � � t • _ • _, . , .. __ ; . ., - _� —�- --- ---- . . - �,-c� � -C?= " • � '"'"', -{�- - ,.. : � � - - .. _—� . �, �_< �� _<. O � -�- � -- - - -� ��'''., _�, � f-� � �=�5- 3� '� - . . __ a . _ �' - _,� rn � ��{ p � � - p , . - � (�; - � Zj .� .� � � � - �;` - � -0- a: ..��.. .� . . .. -� , - D j , � . :c. j-- .�<.: -p� -; � �"'; _o-= . ; �; ,:< -t�- r {. �-^� , _ ---- - - � �-- � t: , :_� �.; < --�� <_�. �. -4- . ..< - --�- � � �o. �� =-�-:- �<�` �� o . . .-a- �._ < _� .,� �� .� _ :..Q.__� :� . �:� °.�.� � . _ c` i o . . '� <� . :�c� �� y. �.�. ;�- � �� '. . � ..� .�c :`-�- "�� . . . - _ c � ' u�-Q. :� ¢� ��--: `� . - -- < , E m-�- ,' � ,�. � ' -,�:.. � _ -�: � � < < �. . � E�l��i"�. - - - . _ � ST. � . _f - .. �: - �.;,,: r• - ` . ; p> '� � _ . (�� c� . . ' � � 4 �� 1 ' _ � ' . \ � � . : � f...��.^� � � < ��C C � � n � . ' --- � � •,' � r�. - X D . _o- ��:_ • � h - ~ . J `,`'`;"�,,; ;� —t �� - - < e� . � � ,___ � ` _ - _ " ; � . �}}`�. � � �.:. :� ,` � .o �_y . �-�' .c,.� -.� _, ,; _ m r_ —„�. _ � .. �� — �" �tt.�� . � � - � .:.{ ---^----� j :� �.` - , 2 t., � 'C? ( +� �+� �- . �� + "�yy `:�!`r�� , ��f � .��1..� . � . �, ' �.t.�;,� �Y �r� . �, �N � { i.�~`"�.0 - r r� ' . _ ��. � C'.•;�. w�t`;� ^r„ ." � t c'i � _ . � �: � �i � �:, �, � ..; ,, � , .��s., :� �-{}" �; �� .>.. z�:x� � _ . O- � ,,.� � - r �af G7 v� 3. . � � �. � " _ � Q N _ �� , � `�i r 4�:>> :;� ti �' � �� g -� k � �. - : ��'?�_ ��._ ; � v , . ►., i'rr __l . : Si �.} �� ..'�.i � . ' , . . "�' . `1. . . T � ' f �: D';:"r'-.� T•'� � =-'-r-- O ', :. . Q,,,; �li _ . \, �• `�'y\ :, �. C � 3: � . � .� '4y � . . "�. .:�r �`' -, ��Z � ...0+�,.�` .�r'7 /` . r�� _ , . . .-.. ' l o "�} � .�-�;;��;?z ��`�,�,3 ` � < , . � . (� N . -��. :w L ti ',_.., t� � � -�3 Z. �f '< . .� � . R„JN� _� t � - . ��i��{U��j.� >_ _ . ' . ; ,► � . _ . . _ ., . -� _ '.� <.� ,ti F i `. � � . ;_ {�-. ' .s�; < - �; � .- -p- D .. �. - . . . �� :. `LJ p �� 6 . C : '`�' . / . � f . � . • � `-~ � �`�� = -�_ �..�I � � , _ • , � < � C �� i �� ' � --;'��'` � _� --"a.` ---� �---_o- . . � _ . ._ '< . �J _ � - �� -� : � �J.. � �_---- _ � .--o- - : �� .�� < �� . : . - . - o -�- ; o -< a �H -, . . -��-- - - . � . < � � --- � < .- , - . y- -- � . � � -_ � - t < � . --..Q:= � . - < � ; .. ,- -- -- � � �-r"� � � _ : , c ��-- �, � � ... � ,� O ��=�� . _ : . : . V , i N � �' � � : � , ?��-T� � �! � � � --� 1-r�';��j � ,� .. �� C �_ ._ � � . .A ��1i� DE�..I : ��.:� � . S`�`. ! :_ : � -. : _`,. -.-_ ' : ,_, � . `=��`1 . i . � . :. _ � , � ��-_ '�"` - Iv/'1 . N/1 � ��T�� . �� P��c-r �o u��Y .�,.��. Z MAY'77 -3- . • • REDEVELOPMENT PLAN A. STATEMENT OF BEVELOPMENT 0�3JECTIVES The primary overall development objective in Community Developmen� District 8 is to eliminate and/or ameliorate those existing conditions which serve to imQair the health, sa€ety, mora}.s, . and general welfare of the ciCizens ot the District, and which also serve to inflict an economic blight upon exsiting private investment in some areas, and threaten the sources of public revenue. The conditions which have been found to exiat which cause the above noted €actors include unsafe and unsanitary housing conditions, overcrowd�Eng, building obsolescence or faulty arrar�ement in building design or improvement, deleterious land use, lack of adequate light, ventilation or sanitary facilities, inadequate public facilities, such as streets, sewer facilities, or other equally deleterious conditions. There also has been found to be an inadequate supply of jobs in the District, particularly for families of low and moderate incomes and a deter- iorating tax base for the City of Saint Paul. A primary objective of this Redevelopment PZan is to provide an opportunity for private enterprise to alleviate the above conditions. Specific objectives to oe achieved within the context of the foregoing are as forlows: �.. To provide for efficient use of land so that each particular land use will funct�on without adversely affecting or being adversely affected by adjacent land uses. New construction should be physically anc3 visually compatible in design and scale with nearby parts of the existing neighborhood. 2. To remove blight and conditions of deterioration by: a. Undertaking a program of acquisition and demolition of buildings blighted to the extent of being incapable of being rehabilitated, ' substandard buildings, or buildzn�s otherwise determined to represent blighting influences. b. Aiding and promoting programs st►ch as the removal of houses from redevelopmQnt sites (t�ousemoving) in order to preserve existing � structures which can be rehabilitated to decent housing. 3. To foster the economic stability of the City and District 8. and to -4- Redevelopment Plan • • encourage new private investment. 4. To encourage and support proposals for economic development within the Distri.ct which may have some immediate effect on patterns of employment or general well-being of the community. 5. To assure safe and adequate vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns and capacity. 6. To encourage the continuing participation by the members of ttce communi.ty in the planning and programming of renewal activities for their respective neighborhoods. B. EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USE. PLAN (See Proposed Land Use Map attached) The introduction of light industrial land use represents a change to the previously approved Land Use Plan for the Summit-University area. The previous plan recommended residential uses. The rationale for this change is as follows; 1. The Housing and Redevelogment Authority has experienced difficulty in marketing residential land adjacent to the freeway for the past several years. Due to the negative influence of ths freeway, federal mortgage money is not available for residential construction. A light industrial corporation is now willing to invest private capital to develop this land. 2. The Sununit-University area has for a number o£ y�ars had a high rate of unemp�oyrnent. It also has been the �ea of the highest concentration of low and moderate-income households, as we11 as the largest population of non-white families and individuals in Saint Paul. This facility has the potentiaZ of providing job opportunities. 3. An opportunity to develop the area with a transitional use has become possibleo It is desirable to provide a graduation of land uses away from the influence of the freeway. The light industrial use wou2d . effect a bu£fer between the freeway and the single-family homes to the south. � -5- Redevelopment Plan. � � . � � . a. . � � M .� �., � . • �� , �"\��`-.� �'�'�,��; �,� w�\�•�\ .� `��,��;r � ;�.88�, � ��.��'��\ ♦`�', '��r.� � ''� �� ' , �"t�,l�.`��;�a�.�:��'�'�: '�� .�: . . , - .•.� . `��:�. • r � .r��-��ti�..��\�.�..a\�� •�. • , ; � ,� �;:, ;�� .�.\��t.��;��; �. . f�.� �.��'\�.�'`� .\��.�\`i.�\.��. � '' r � � ��,!!`�a�� r`ff .�I� , `,°, � .� ��'S �i � �:��:�``�.�.:�\\�� :�: � i � "��'��.��:\_�wO�t:�°1'�� • - � �\�..� � �, �� .,.t : 4:�\\�;��.`i�.��.��\ °� . � : .�:�.�� . ��. r. .�� \�\�.�\ • :�� .��s�\\��..�.`�`��.\: ` �- �,�1�, .�o.��.� _ �.�� ; O�.��\ � ��i�!�� f. ��ti��,,��,�.��. � \\�.�::�.��.�._ �� ' �� .� �: �. � . ��,� �� ...� � M�:�� :�;��i� . �. �'\��:\�►`��\�,� , �2�� `�t�`��.��: � e ��,.:�`�\ � �� 4�` , , � .�tt�.\ 's�: .�.�. . �Y\\ � ��..`��.i.�� i , -�� . . : . •;,��.��\�`�.`�.\�- -�\ ..� �. ,�� r�\,. \ � �, . , � ,� � �\ � � . �: i,.��,�;� - � -��\� ��• : v • � ��,��..�\.�'� .�� .. . . �:��:��.�+ -. � � . � _ �,�. . } - `:�.l��:�� .� ! �, ,� - ■ � � = ``� � �,��.��a�: . � `; . ,`�,�, • � �,�. � �1 �. � � r _ ....�_ �� s � M x ,� . . =- __ �r„. � . � .. :: , � `; ,� X `'' . �� S i' � 1 ` 4 9 � ' IK 4� � � � 4 ' � , -.\ '� � �� -�'� � ; ::��,�� • � � :t.\\ . • ; � �:�\\� _ � � : �:�\.\ _ }� x �� v�.\�,� � � 4.�� \� � k �� • ;t.'�`�` � ;�•:.�.�� . - � - . � �p i �• _� �� .t_ � �. � � .,• �, , �, � t ¢;. �� • .� • 1 •� :�it �� :t �r sf '� � � � � � � � � � . . ;�. '� , .I. . ��.t.�, �� \�.\\\'� � ,�, r • :• � � � •, .� . • C. CONTROLS 1. Function or Character The Redevelopment Plan provides a light industrial site for the consolidation of functions currently located throughout the region. Off-street parking and off-street loading spaces are included. Program activities also will be directed tioward eliminating adverse effects from light indus�rial uses .on adjacent residential areas. 2. Percnitted Uses Permitted uses are those which are not hazardous due to explosion or fire, or offensive or no:�ious by way of noise, unsightly appearance or emissions. No new residenti�l or commercial uses shall be permitted. 3o Density and Building Res�rictions Density limitations, setbacks, off-street parking and of£-street Ioading shall be required for new construction and such requirements shall be determined by the Renewal Division prior .to land disposition activitiese Such restrictions, in a1I instances, will be not less restrictive than the current applicable codes and ordinances of the City of Saint Paul except in those instances where a Iegitimate cause for variances can be determined to be benzficial to all concerned parties. D. STREETS AiVD ALLEYS AlI streets and alleys within the subject area are to be vacated and an internal circulation system cai11 be established as part of the development plan. All street an� a12ey vacations will be processed through the normal petitian procedure. (See Map No. 3} A review of the development plan by the State Department of Transportation will be necessary. Their concern will be the use of Concordia Avenue since � it is the frontaoe road of Interstate 94. E. URBAN RENEWAL TECHNIQUES TO B� USED TO_ ACHIEVE P�N OBJECTIVES The following techniques are cited as a means of achievino the object�.ves set forth in prior sections of this docu�ent. 1, Vacant land which is currently underutilized will be acquired and subseguently disposed as part of the redevelopmeat site. '�- Redevelopnrent Plan • • 2e Properties which are substandard or blighting influences or are needed for public purposes to effect object�ves of this plan will be acquired and the buildings removed. The properties will then be assembled and disposed of as part of the redevelopment site. 3. Relocation of site occupants displaced. by public action will be under- taken with the intent to assist those displaced in securing adequate relocation resources which meets their "needs and is within their means. 4. MaYimum citizen involvement will be encouraged through the structure specified by the City and now in effect through the citizen participation process. F. LAND DISPOSIrI��i The Rene4�a1 Division may elect to dispose of the site in total or stages �ahich ever method �,aill best accomplish the purposes of this�Plan. In any case, all disposition of sites �aill follo�a the req.uirements of State and Federal laws. G. REDEVELOPER'S OBLIGATIONS The general requirements to be imposed by the Contract for Sa1e between the redevelopers of property in the District and the city's Renewal Division are: 1. To devela� tne land purchased in accordance with the controls and objectives of this Redevelopment Plan. 2. To attract develo�ers who will have an awareness and sensitivity to neighborhood plans. 3. To commence and complete the building of improvements on the land within a reasonable period of time as determined by the Renewal Division. 4. Not to resell the land before improvements are made without the prior consent of tne Renewal Division. -8- Redevelopment P1an • � 5. Not to discriminate on the basis of race, colar, religion, sex or national origin in the sale, lease, transfer, or occupancy of the land. 6. The contract and disposition documents wi11 spell out in detail the provisions, standards and criteria for achieving appLicable objectives, requirements and regulations contained in the Redevelopment Plan, H. URBAN DESIGN OBJECTTVE AND CONTROL The Renewal Division may contract for sale of property upon receipt and acceptance of preliminary plans, but normally �vill nat dispose of property under such contract prior to receipt and acceptance of construction drawings. The Division shall retain the right of design review and may reject any proposal which is felt to be inconsistent with the goals and objectives of the Plan. Specific design objectives and criteria will be established for the site prior to disposition, and proposals will be evaluated in the light of this Plan's objectives and criteria. I. DU�2ATION OF CONTROLS Tne development controls and regulations wi1l be incorQorated into the deeds conveyir.g land and shall be maintained and continued in �ffect for a period of thirty (30) years from the date of approval of the Redevelopment Plan. by the City Council of Saint Paul. Jo OTHER PROVISIONS NECESSARY TO MEET STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Non-Discrimination Every coatract f� r sale, lease o•r redevelopment of oroperty within the project area will include prohibitions against Zand speculation, requi.re compliance with all State and local laws in effect from time to time, prohibit discrimination or segregation by reasons of race, _ religion, color, sex or national origin in the sale, Zease or occupancy of the Qroperty, and require that this latter provision be ma.de a cozTenant running with the land and be binding upQn the redeveloper and every successor in interest to the property. , -9- Redevelopment Plan _ .: .. .... .. _. _:. _ _ .,..,.�,. • � 2. Vacations, Dedications and Covenants Vacations and dedications of public rights-of�ay shall be accomplished by separate actions in accordance with State law and local ordinances and will be initiated by the Division or redeveloper. 3. Citizen Partication It is the intent of this Redevelopment Plan, and of the governing body of the City of Saint Pau1, that active participation by the citizens of the City of Saint Faul be encouraged in the continuing planning and implementation of the program. Therefore, to the extent possible in a manner consistent with Federal, State, and 1oca1 law , policy and regulations, it is the intent that all activities to be undertaken under the provisfons of this Plan be done with the know- ledge a.nd advice o£ the Citizen Participation Organization which is recognized by the City Council. 4. Environmental Review An errv ironmental review of a redevelopment pl.an is not required prior to action of the Planning Commission. If this project proposal is adopted and Community Development Block Grant Funds are used, a Com- munity Bzvelapme:�t �r�viror.mental Review wi.11 be requzred. It is possible that the size of the project will require preparation of a Minnesota Environmental Assessment Worksheet. City Planning has begun preparation of both of these rev.i_ews. The attached Niatrix o£ Environmental parameters lists those environ- mental concerns. Of the nine major headings, it appears that air quality, noise, Zand, aesthetics, and socio-economic will be of greatest concern in the reviews for the Control Data project. (See next pa;e for Mat�ix of Environmental Parameters) K. PROVISIONS FOR AMENDING PLAN Ths Redevelopment Plan may be modified at any time by the City of Saint Pau1, in the manner provided by law. � -IO- Redevelopment Plan • � MATRIX OF ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS ��✓F�Tf�IX O� ENVIRONM`N�'AL �ARAMETERS� �in4�act of Impact of � Proposals on Cnvironment I Environment on Pro o;alc []+ Beneficial Environment Irnpact F �� F r� I � Adverse Envirornnental Impact �` tF w � h � cF � : �, � No Impact or Not Appl i cable ,% � � ��`,A ��/"'i �. �.�;+i c, . �. � �, , c, c� � rc o�'� c 2 cT o c�' ��' ti,�` �� h v O � � y'C �O 0 � �tc. \' Alk QL'ALI7Y Odor Dust Chemical content GkOUPtD WATER Recharge Capability _ __ I Leachiny of Harmful Substances 1 Excessive blithdrawal — - SURFACE WATER Appropriation Effluent Discharge —?� � Runoff VEGFTATIOP� Disruption i Alterations to Plant Succession or Nabitat -- - -� ' ANIt�AI LIFE Disruption __ � Habitat Alteration or Removal I Endangered Species — -i Game Species - Pest Species - — �� P;OISE yoise Exposure Standards J Noise Sensitivity -�� I LAW� Erosion _ �� Floodplains, Shoreland and Wetlands �_ �_ I , Soil Suitability � 1 ! Topographic Alteration _ _ �_ _ ' Parkland and Recreation Areas Critical Areas — AESTHETICS Natural Environment __� Built En��ironment: Harmony � Apparent Access — ----- — -._�._ SOCIOECONOhtIC Confor7nance with Comp+•ehensive Plans � Zoning _J__ ! � ---+-—� Pub]ic t'ealth and Safety/Ilazards and Nuisances� i I Employment and lncome Patterns �-� -� � 1 - Demographic/Community Character Alterations � � � � � -� ' Provision of Public Services _ - �1�—� —� � Energy Consum�tion _ I .�_ � Transportatior. _ __ 1- - _ __Historic and Archeological Sites _ __ _ y _ �j _� t_ _i -1�2- Redevelopment Plan • • PROGR.AM FOR IMPLEMENTATYON In order ta fulfil]. community objectives which addressed the issues of economic development for this area as we�l as the City and region, the acquisition of � parcels of land to assemble this development site is necessary. Communf.ty Development funds which will be used to assemble the site will lever private reinvestment in the inner-city area of Saint Paul. WhiZe much of the land within the approxicnata�.y three-square-bZock redevelopmen.t is already publicZy owned, the acqu3.sition af additional land is needed to pro- duce the total site. The acquisition and subsequent construction will be staged in order ta complement the activities of the proposed development and facilitaCe the eff3.cient process necessary to purchase, clear and sell the site. This staging will occur generally along the lines of approximately one-half of the total site (easterly portion) being in the first stage. The second stage will include the remainder of the site (westerly portion) for development of completed circulation patterns saithin the site and provision for off-street parking. The foZlowinQ are estinated; Acquisitiion 31 parcels (including 9 vacant lots of t,rhich 4 are tax forfeit lots) 23 structures 39 dwelling units 1 non-residential unit $550,000 Relocation (For residential and non-residential) $4Q7,000 Demolition � (For a12 structures) $ 40,000 TOTAL $997,000 -12- 1'rogram for Imp�ecnentation . • PROJECT ELIGIBILITY REPORT A. ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES As indicated in the "Program for Implementation," this proposed redevelopment activity is to be accamplished through the utilization of part of the Year II Community Development contingency fund. The primary objective of the Community Development Program is "the development of viable urban communities, including decent housing and a suitable living environment and expanding ecanomic oppor- tunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income,'' (Federal Register 570.200). Federal assistance is provided for the supporC of Cornmunity Develop- ment activities which are directed toward the achievement of this overall objectivee Although guidelines for the undertaking of a CD program are less restrictive than those of previous programs and grant the local municipality more flexibility in the kinds of activzties which may be initiated, all elements of the program must as a minimum meet certain criteria as delineated in the section of the Federal Register devoted to regulations governzng Community Development. The following .�excerpt outlines those activities which are el.igible for federal assistance through the Community Development Program: Subpart G - Eligible Activities (570.200) (a) Grant assistance for a Community Development Program is available for the follrn,aing activities: (I) Acquisition in whole or in part by purchase, lease, donatfon or otherwise of real progerty (including air rights, water rights, and other interests therein) which is: (i) Bl.ighted, deteriorated, deterioratino, undeveloped, or inappropriately developed from the standpoint of a sound community development and growth, as �?termined by the reci�ier.t pursuant to State and lo�al laws; (ii) Appropriate foz rehabilitation or conservation activities; (ia.i) Appropriate for the preservation or restoration of historic sites, the beaut3.fication of urban land, the conservation of open spaces, naturaZ resources and scenic areas, the provi- ,_ sion of recreational opportunities, or the guidance of urban development; (iv) To be used for the provision of public works, £acilities, and improvements eligible for assistanc.e under paragraph (a)(2) of this section; or (v) To be used for other public purposes, including the conversion of land to other uses where necessary or appropriate to the Community Development Prooram. (2} Acquisition, construction, reconstruction, or installation of the following public works, facilities, and site or other improvements: neiohborhood facilities, centers for the handicapped, senior. centers, historic pxoperties (whether publicly owned or privately owned} , utilities, streets, street li�hts, water and sewer facilities, foundations and platfor�s for air rfghts sites, pedestrian malls and walkways, and parks, playgrounds, and other £acilities for -13- Project Eligibility . � recreational participation; f].00d and drainage facilities in cases where assistance for such facilities has been determined to be be unavailable under other Federal laws or programs pursuant to the provisfons of 570.607; and parking facilities, solid waste disposal facilities, and fire protection services and facilities which are � located in areas or which serva areas in which other activities described in 570.303(b) are being, or are to be, carried oue. For purposes of this paragraph, a neighborhood facilities is one which (i) is designed to serve a particular neighborl�n od and provides services for that area, except that such a .facility may serve an entire community of under 10,000 population; (ii) provides health, recreational, social, or similar community services; and (iii) may be either single purpose or multi-purpose in nature. For purposes of this paragraph, a center for the handicapped is one wh�ch (i) may be either singZe or multi-purpose in nature; (ii) assisC persons - with physzcal, mental, developmental and/or emoeional impai�ments; (i�i) provides services which may include recreation, education, health car�, social development, independent living, physica2 rehah- ilitation and vocational rehabi.litation; (iv) does nat provide resi- dential care on a 24-hour day basis such as a group home or half-way house. (3) Code enforcement in deteriorated or deteriorating areas in which such enforcement, together with public improvements and services to be provi.ded, may be expected to arrest the decline of the area. (4) Clearance, demolition, removal and rehabilitation of b uildings and improvements (including (i) interim assistance to alleviate harmful conditions in which immediate public action is needed, (ii) financ- ing rehabili.tation of privately-owned properties throuoh the use of grants, direct loans, loan guarantees, and other means, when in support of other activities descr�.bed in 570.303(b), and (iii) demo- lition and modernization (but not new construction) of publicly owned low-rent housing) . (5) Special prajects directed to the removal of material and architec- tural barriers which restrict the mobility and accessibility of elderZy and handicapped persons. (6} Payments to housing owners for losses of rental income incurred in holding for temporary Qeriods housing u nits to be utilized for the relocation of individuals and families displaced by program activi- ties. (7) Dispositio^, Chrough sale, lease, donation, or otherwise of any real property acquir�d pursuant to this Part or its retention for public puspos�s, provided that the proceeds from any such disposition sha21 be expended on�y for activities in accordance with Chis part. (8) Provision of public services not otherwise available inareas or serving residents of areas in which the recipient is undertaking, or will undertake o�her physical development activities described in 570.200(a)(Z)-(5) , (7), and (9)-(10), and where assistance i.s providing or securing such services under other applicable Federal laws or programs has been applied for and denied or not made avail- able pursuant to the provisions of 570.607, For the purposes of this paragraph, such services shall be directed toward (i.) imprav- " ing the community's public services and facilities, ineludi,ng those con�erned with employment, economic development, crime prevention, child ccare, health, drug abuse, education, welfare, or recreational needs and (2) which sre directed toward coordinating public and private development programs. (9) Payment of the non-Federal share required in connection with a Federal grar►ts-in-aid program undertaken as part of the cornmunity - development pursuant to 570.303(b), Provided that such payment shall be limited to activities otherwise eligible under this section. (10) Payment of the cost of completing a project funded under Ti.tle I of the Housing Act of 1949, including the provisions for financial settlement contained in Subpart I. -14- Project Eligibflity . • (11) Relocation payments and assistance for individuals, families, businesses, organizations, and farm operations displaced by activities assisCed under this Part. (12) Activities necessary (i) to develop a comprehensive community development plan (which plan may address the needs, strategy, and objectives to be summarized in the application pursuant to 570.303(a) but may treat only such public services as are necea- sary or appropriate to support activities meeting such needs and � objecCives), and (ii) to develop a policy-planning-management capacity so that the recipient may more rationally and effectively (A) determine its needs, (B) set long-terrn goals and short-term objectives, {C) devise prograras and activities to meet the goals and objectives, (D� evaluate the progress of such programs in accomplishing these goals and objecti�es, and (E) carry out manage- . ment, coordination, and monitoring of activiCies necessary for ef£ective planning implementation. (13) Payment of reasonable administrative costs an� carrying charges related to the planning and execution of community development and housing activities, including the pravision of information and, at the discretion of the recipient, of resources to residents of areas in which other communi�y �evelopment activities described in 570.303(b) and the housing activities covered in the Rousing Assistance Plan described in 570.303(c) are to be concentrated with respect to the planning and execution o£ such activities. (b) Natwithstanding aaything to the contrary in this section or in 570.201, any ongoin� activity being carried out in a mode2 cities program shall be eligible for funding under this Fart from that portion of the hold- harmless amount attribu�able to such .model cities program until the applican*_ has received five years of funding for such activities as cal- culat�d pursuant to 570.103(c)(2)(iii) . For the purpose of th�s para- graph, the tez�n "ongoing activity" means any model cities activity underwa�� as of January 1, 1975 that was approved and funded by Ht1D on or before June 3Q, 1974. (c) Cos� incurred in carrying out the program, whether charged to the progran on a direct or an indirect basis, must be in conformance with the require- ments of Federal Management Circular 74-4, "Cost Principles Applicable to Grants and Contracts with State and Local Governments," except as modified in these regulations Items (1)(i) and (1)(v} c?early establish the Community Development eligibility requirements for the subject area. B. DEVELO��NT OF PROJECT ELIGIBILITY Evaluation of buildirg conditions is a vital first step in the planning process. Any system for classifying buildings must produce an accurate description of observed conditions and be based on clearly defined and acceptable standards. A system of building classi£ications according ta structural conditions has beere developed over the years within the Saint Paul Housing a.nd Redevelapment Authority Neighborhood Development Program. In 1967 and subsequent years during the initi- ation of NDF, the Saint Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority contracted with Barton-Aschman Assocfates, Incorporated to prepare an urban renewal survey eechnique that would accurately identify and evaluate the extent of deterioration, blight or slum conditions existing in project areas. These standards and subsequent -15- Pro�ect Eligibility � . surveys provided the basis for substantiating the need for public action in the area in accordance with established local, state, and federal legal and adminis- trative requirements, As each structure was examined, inspectors noted a11 deterioration and inadequacies as they might be influenced by age, quality of maintenance, adequacy of original construction, and obsolescence, regardTess of whether code violations were present or not. Upon completion of the inspection - and subse�u�nt evaluation of the field survey, an overall building condition rating was established from the following categories: Sound - A structure with minimal defects �nd in u standard condition requiring . norcial maintenance � Deticient buiLdings contai.n defects �•rtiich are not eaaily correctftble and cannot be accomQliatxed in the course of normal mnintenance. Tlie classification of minor or mAjor reflects the degree or extent of defects found during the fnspection. Minor - A structure classified ns defici.ent--reqairing ninor rep�irs--having r.iore than three minor defects. • Ma or - Buildings classi£ied as d.efi.ci.ent--requir.ing major repairs. � St�bstEndard - A atructitre conCaini.r�g defects which are so serious, so extensive that they adversel} affect all or a lflrge part of the structure tl�at repair is probabZy not feasible. � Bli�hting Inf1.+�ence - A term used to descr�.be an existing condition which (1) applies specifically to the building bei.ng surceyed, (2) hss ttn apparenC adverse or degrad- ing effect on other existing develo�ment. Types of blighting influence are; Incompatible Uses or t•fixed Use - A use (or a mixture of uses in a sin�;le builc3- ing) that i� incompatible W1L'�1 the majority of uses in the ir.cnediate zrea, such as A mixture of commercial and residen*_ial use in e aingle building or tlte pre;ence of a manufacturin� use in a predomin�tely residentia2 area. There _ must be a significant adverse effect generatect by the inco:rp4tibility or _ admixture. Overcrowding of Buildings on the Land - Excessive land coverages by buzldings resultin� in a restriction of acce�s, servicin�, light and air circulation, anc� other factor� whicti impair the functional efficiency of the building or the health and safet� of its occupants, such as small lot size on excessively aarrow frontage. -16- Project Eligibility • � Excessive ]��elling Unit Density - Overcrowding of dwelling units within � build- ing, or on thc 1�.n3, to an extent that the health and safetp of the residents , of the particular building or r:eighborhood building is endangered. Obsolete Buildin� Typ� - A bvilding whicti can no longer efficiently perform the function for which it ti�as originally constructed. This may be manifest in . vacancy for an extendel period of eime, in full or partial abandonment or in coaversion to uses which are unsafe or unhealthy for occupants. • Underutilization of Lznd - Undezeloped land, or lAad developed significantly below �he leveZ of development of the neighborhood and its envfrona constitute a blighCing in£luence. Such inf2uence is nianifest when such underutilxzation hAS a retardant effect on the econo�ic, phygical or socinZ health of the neighborhood. Other ldentifiable f�azarda - Vacant �nd vandali.zed str�,ctur.es--�L-r�:ceures which canstitute attractive� nuisaizces to chi.ldren and adults �ahich are vacnnt and �>hich ar.e vandnlized or are open to va�:ci�.lisr:. ' Combustibl.e I•taterials - StrucCurea covered wf.th combustible m?terials and l.ocated saithin four fcet of- another �tructure constitute a daager af spreading fire> � In NDP Year r, Clearance Area I was estabZished. by action of the Saint Paul City Council, the Saint Paul City Planning Commission, and Department of Housing and Urban Aevelopment. The subject area is contained within this established clear- ance area, Clearance eli;ibility (a standard util.ized within the Urban P.enewal and Neiohborhood Development Program under HUD Guidelines) requires that 20% of the total buildings be substandard and that 50% of the total buildings be substandard and bliohted. This requirement z�as satisfied by the above cited governmental actions. � Additional Properties to be Acquired eo Assemble Redevelopment Site Block � Parcel Current Use 73-4 Vacant Land 73-5 Vacant Land � 73-8 Vacant Land 73-9 Sinol.e Family 73-10 Vacant Land 73-11 Vacant Land 73-12 Commercial 73-I3 Single Family 73-14 Single Family 73-15 Duplex _�7_ Project Eligibility • � 73-16 Vacan� Land 73-19 4-I'lex 73-20 Duplex 73-21 Duplex 73-22 3-Plex 73-23 Vacant Land 73-24 Duplex 73-24 Duplex 77-6 Single Fami�.y 77-7 Single Fam�ly 78-1 Single Family 78-2 Single Family 78-4 Vacant Land (Sinole Family) 78-7 Vacant Land 78-8 Duplex 78-9 Duolex 78-11 Vacant Land 78-12 Single Family 78-13 Single Family 78-14 Single Family 78-15 Single Family ?8-16 Duplex With the assessment of existing conditions based on the aforementioned criteria, this area possesses conditions by reason of d3.lapidation, obsolescence, over- crowding, faulty arrangement or design, lack of ventilation, light and sanitary facilities, excessive lend coverage or deleterious land use or obsolete layout, or any combination of these or other factors, which are detrimentaZ to the safety, health, morals or welfare of the community and collectively they constitute a "Blighted Area" (Minnesota Statutes Section 462.421, Su�d. 11.) . +18- Project Eligibility ■ -, -�� Y � ' :�• I \� � • �.aii �� n • , �1'� ' �� __ _ ._ � _ ,_�-. �'�_ '*��'... � �� ■■■ � , � � a :� � 1 r; =_��1 �� i � - --- f�� j � -�f - � �:��-j � ■ �* .�, � �,� � �,� g ,, _ _�.:., � .r.`• ,. °—' q!� .�� ` � W� � , � � � b' � � r � �` f'•� ' � � .s• �'.',� "',: q��"'�� ■ � _ '�. � � ,,r � � ;z; � N � - I!� � 7 .E: � _� _ � �� I b �� +n.� . �y►Cr�� ■i'�. �� ' �� ;� ,f. �y �,,,, �� .`�� :� � :, +� � ��y1�p � � ��,��.; � " � ��11/l �a � � r � � �;�: i � ' r B � �. � _ ;.a r�;. � � � ;� M��I ■� �■ 1 � i�� 1 � � f� �� , E. �- /� �� • � �i,� � ' • • � . � � f' . q � � ' �� ..- � r! .I' /��' �.._ •► .� . .° ::: ��.;►�i�� .��i��r�i�i � � � �: �: �f.;w ,. ., �, . � ��,�� ' '� � . � � '� ��r' �� , � � � ■ /- /, � ' ' ;� yy� _ � ; ■ '/�- ,n •: � t.�'_._.. � — I � � � i� ��"" �l ri� � w � : � �'/�' � � , I � � '' � g �� , ;� � = ,�.,, . , a � �,� , � �� a �,:� �� .� -,� �: � , �■ _ , �,�� . �,.y► � �: � � � ;� �. � �i� �, � ►•� , � �. � i � .�_ � � � ■ . � , � � _ � � �. !� . ♦^ . �ii .� �. :.. ■ �,� � �. ■ � � _ ' � � ' `�'� ` � � _ ' ' ■ ��,�. .� = , � • -.: �� ,�; '�Is.a� •xt�' i�. �r.:',''s..:'�:. �' , �`. .` r '` I !� j �� `� �'! � � � - � � � �� c�� ;� � I - � E - .� ■ c� � • •� � ' �� .�7. � � d �� , I- � � ■ .� � . .�' . - �e.-• I :� �, � � �' ' � ' � � � . � � , �•r � �y a ■ ■ �.,, � � . �'7 : t_ A�, � '. *.� ` �f .,�` I � � �. � � � �� .,�� :. � '�' • ,�,, rM� � �;;� �: �! F� '*� :. �.'. �. +p s ,. ,�� ■■ � � �•�- � j � ■ • � e - . � - � � � . � �� ■ 7 � � ,;�:� �� ,� �� . � �'� � ' ��`. �. -� �� -� � � i'�' ��. . . � , ��s� �� + . � � •- .�x .:f:'r.i�� `! �.:.�s •�Sl: `rr.e��a-�� :ra•�,..i„t.� �� ,_; .�. ' ` � j � • ! � -. :� � r t -� .. t � f� � �� .: � �� X�.= . . ` ; � � :�� - : - `�► r �� _ � '�j � ` � - .�. � :� :: .��.��` , • • ' � RL'LO��"+'f I0�`i �'L�1iv A, ADMINISTRATZON �. 1. Poli.cies and i��ul.ati.ons - A family, individual, bvsiness €irra or non-profit organizatfon required to move from property that' has been affected by puUlicly sponsored acCivity is elfgible for relocation payraenta to assi.st in obtzining an3 moving to a replacement d�aelling or location in accordance with the provisions And requirements of the Federal � Uniform Etelocation elssistance Act of 1970. It ia the intent of the City to provide a relocation advisor to assist each person to be displaced in locating a svit<ble housing unit, or place of business. The first steps of the relocation process involve the relocxtion udvisor assigned to the particular property planned for acquisition. The following servicea are provided: a. Eligible persons are informad at the earliest possible date as to the avail- ability of relocation payr.;ents and assistar.ce, the eligibilfty requirenei�ts and procedures for obtaining such payr�ents. b. The extent of need of each eligible p�rson for relocatian assistance is determined ti�rough direct person.al intervie;a, c. Current and continuing inforr:u3.tion is pYUV14�C� on the availability ard prices of comparable sales and rental housin� and of comparable comtr.�rcial properties and locations. d. Information concerning Federal and State housing prograr.is, loans and other special programs oifering assistancs is suppliec� to eligible displaced persons. e. Other advisory and referXal aervices concerning housing, financing, employ- ment, training, health, welfare and other assisr.ance is provided in order to ednimize hardships. f. Assistance i,s provided in completir.g any required applicAtions and forms. � g. Services are provided to ensure that the relocation process does not result in diEferenC or separate treatment on account of race, color, religion, natzonal origin, sex or source of income. ' The following financial assi.st-�nce is available to residential relocatezs� regardless of how long the dwelling unit h�s been occupied: -- Actual reasonable moving expenses, or - -- A fixed �aovi.ng expense allowance up to y3�0 (based on the number of rooms of furniture or posaessions tc be moved) plua a dislocation ullowance of $200. -20- RelocAtion Plsn • • In addition, homeo;aners who have occupfed the d�vellin� for 180 days prior to the •first o£fer to purchase the property ancl tenr�nts accupying the unit for • 90 days prior, ►:�y be eligible for th� following replucement housin�; payments: -- A Replacement Housing �'ayrcent o£ up to $15,000 for eligible owners who j occupy the hor?_ w;�ich is acquired. (This paymsnt is to help o�rnera purchase and occupy another dwel2i.ng suitahle for their £ainily.) -- A Replzcec�ent tiousing Payment of up to $4,U00 ro eligible tenants to help in the rental or purchase of standard replacement housing. Homeowne-ts who have occupied Che dwellin� for at Ie�st 90 but less than 180 days are eligible for th� $4,000 �rYxir,um Replace�nent Houaing Pay�ent. Displsced business concer.s �nd non-profit organizations roay be eligible to receive pay��nts for the following: -- Actual, reasonable r.ioving expenses, plus -- Actual direc.t loss of tangib2e personal property, plus -- Actual reasonable er.penses incurred by a bt�siness in searching for � replacement locstion (limited to $SOO.OQ) or, as an alternative to the three above payr�.c:uts, - -- Payment ia l.ieu of moving and related expezses. These paymenCs are equal to the average annua2 net earnings of the Uusiness, bvt not less th3n $2,500 nor �ore than $10,000; payments to non-profit organizations are liraited Lo $2,500. Certain criteria must be met for a business to be eligible for this payment. Occupants are not require3 to move until given the time and opportunity to find decent, safe, sanitary housing that meets the housing code of the city and is satisfscfory and•�ffordable to the occupant, Replacement housixig pay- ments are rtot m�de in c2ses of moves to substandard buildings. The city will ensure adequate inspection of all replacement housino resources to be utilized by displaced pereons. 2. �anir,•^.Cion and Staffing The relocation seaff of the Saint Paul Iiousit� and Redevelopment Authorfty (fIRA; has �erved si.nca 1959 as the central relocation agency for the City. . Superv3_sory personnel, relocation r�dvisors and technical and clerical employees are responsible for rsdministering the above policies for I�ederal prop,rnms and for euch local programs as achool site assembly for Che School : Board of the City ar.d ucquisition for the Ramsey County Open Space Program. The relocation staff is assigned to field offices as necassary. . Estima.tes of the personnel needed to csrry out relacation activitiea were -2 1- Relocation Plan • • . based on ttee projected displacement for the third yeur of Couununity Uevelop- ment nctivities, concurre:�t local prof;rzms rsnd pnst relocr�tion er.perience. . rollowing is a aununary of staff estimates: Administrator of ProjecC Services (tine divi.ded among relocation, rea2 estnCe and praperty n:aua�einent) Relocntfon Admini3trator ' Business Relocation Specialist RelocaCion Claims Technician � Eight (8) RelocaYion Specialists (Family and Buainess) , SecreCarial/Clerical Staff � $. SU:�CLARY OF. DISP'LACEMEP7T , The displacement prograwned to tak� place in the redevelopment site fs as follows: . � 36 households , 13 business entities consisting of a bar and 12 rental properties C. SIJMMARY OF 1?OUS2fiG RESOORC�S Past reZocation experience has shown tl�at the majority of dispi:�ced persons fall c•�ithin Ct�e income 19.mits for eligibility to the various subsidized housing �rograms ava�.lable in substaatial supply i.n Che c�etropolitan area. There are a wide variety of ho«t��.ng • resources Co acco:nmodate the sQecial ne��ds o£ these families and indfviduals ir. Saint Paul. Low Incor�e - In order ko qualify for public housing occupancy person� mu�t meet standards of far�ilp composition and income, Generally the fullou�ing persons are eligible for some type of public housing. Families - Ztao or more persons regularly living together and related by blood, � marriage, or adoption Individuals - A single persSn who is (1) eligible by age to receive old ap,e Social Securfty benefits; (2) physically handicapped or disabl.ed; or (3} displaced by public action 1�o sets of income limits are estc�blished for initial occupancy and for continued occupancy. Persons displaced by public ection may use the Zimits for continued occupancy in gaining acimittance. Eligibility for conCinued occupancy is reviewed once a year for far�ilies and the t�andicapped, and once every two years £or the elderly. w ANNUAI. INCOME LIMITS . Family Size • Initiul Occu.pancy 1. $ �f3,700 � 2 9�950 3 11,200 4 12�400 • 5 13.200 . • 6 . 14.OQ0 7 14,750 � . 8 or more 15,550 -22- Relocation Plan - • • Additional considerati.ons such as total u:�sets, desir�bility of tenants, veteran status, and those dzsplaced by public actiosi �ere u�e.d wh�n nur.:ber.s of eli�ible applfca�ita exceed the units available. Applicantsc.ho qualify under the above guidelines are required to pay no more than 25 percent of their adju�ted incorse for gross rent. Gross income is adjusted by allo�,r- able deductions and exemptions for r.umbers af depend�nts and excessive or unusual medical and occupational expenses. Saint Paul currer.tly na,intaine 16 hi-rise builuings for the elderly aad handicapped in all sectiors o€ the city. There are a total of 2,660 units in these buildings, ouC of which approxi�ately 255 are expected ta beco�ne avail3ble in any twelve-manth period. . The city has three pxograc�s designed Co r.:eet the housing needs of low-incoma families. The traditional housing Eor lo:a-income families is congregate public housing; the city has four of these developments, two sr,:all �roups of such housing totaling 1,349 units. The other three prograr.:s are oriented to dispersing lawer-income families � throughout the city. The city has bought 86 Scattered Site Units and 97 HOPLIF units. The scatte:ed site units are rented to low-ir,come f��milies in the same manrer as • congregate housing. The liOPT.IF progrsm is a program through �ahich a tenant eventualiy b2cones a hor�o�aner. These three pro,r,ra�:s result in Lhe a-vailability of approxi�tel;� 326 units per year. �� 2�:oderate Ir.co�e Moderate-ir.co�� housing is nvailable to families and elderly or handicapped individuals who fall within the folloiaing income limits: • Maximum Annual Family Size Income Li�its 1 � $ 9,600 • 2 � , 11,000 3 12,400 4 13,800 S 14,700 6 15,5�J0 � 16,400 ~ 8 or �ore 17,300 ihere are 3,O�J8 moderate-income new construction rental units in Saint Paul and s�pproximately 600 of these become available throu�hout a given year. The city also has 153 reha6ilitated. npar[ment units and LO rehabilitated units in single-family �tr.3 � duplex housing for moderate-fncome persons. Pioderute-income £amilies nnd individual3 will nlso be r�ble to find housin� through -z3' Relocation Plan � � ti�lFel pl.ans ior single-fnmily r.�ortgage and Multi-family new construction, und through the I:ousiug Recyclii�� Program. "everal propa�cels for moder�te-income units are currently in various stages of planning uncler the rP.�PA-Family program. Section 8 - F.xistiny Housin�v Section 8 is ttie implen:entation co;�ponent for policies stated in the Housing Assistance Plan. During CD Year III, it is iutended that ull Section S units allocated for the City of Saint Paul will be used for rental assistance to families who are of low or moderate income and who w£il be livir.g in st2ndard rental units. The number for Year IIZ will be based on the 2.stropoliten Council's Subsidized Housing Allocation Plan, currently bein� draftel. ^the city tzas established a goal of 150 units for a housing resource in Year�IlI in the Housing Assistance Platt. Eligible £amil.ies under this progra:n Wi.11 pay between 15 and 25% of their incoma for rente HUD wi11 pay the difference betwaen th2t a�count and the fair-market rental rate, including uti2ities. Lligibility is determined by gross famity income, which rnsst be less than 80% of the 1970 m�dian incor.:e by f�:nily size for the riinneapolis-Saint Paul Standard Metropolitan Statistical P.rea. These linits are ns followa: ' Maximum Annual Famil.y Size Incu�ne I.inits 1 $ 9,600 2 11,000 3 � 12,400 y. 13,�00 ,5 14,700 ( • 15,500 7 . � 16,400 8 or more 17,300 It shou2d be noted that there is a signzficant difference between the Section 8 limits and tae mod?ra_te-icicom� limits under older programs; presumably these differences will be adjusted. The Housin� and f:edevelopmenC Authority converted its 970 units of leased housing to the Section 8 pro�ra� 9_n 1976 and has a total of 1,056 units in this pro�ram. Section 8 - New Construction and Substantial Rehabilitation New construction units under the Section 8 program may be funded by the Minnesota Housino Finance,Agency; Lhe city has no separate allocation for this program. Unita leased un�er the Section 8 program taill constitute 20% of the toCal units in the pro3ect. The lIousing Assi:stnnce P1En sets 265 units of n2w construct;Lon and 50 units in the substantinl rehabilit�L-ion prooram as reali.stic goaLs for Year III. Family eligibi�lity i.s based on the same echednle of maximum annual income Limits na �2LF_ ' Relocation Plan • � for the existing housing program. 1i�e t��rnover in the private housing r,«rket liar: been ead t.ill con�inue to be the nrim.ary hausing resource for pe:sons �aho are displaced, t,'ith ti,e assistance of the $15,000 (maximum) grant, displaced honeowners are able to find housing in the private market. Displaced renters needinp, 1 and 2 Uedrooai units are also conipetitive on the private raar'�cet with the aid of Repl�cesnent Housir.g Pa}r�ents. • �25� Relocation ?lan T � . , RESOLUTION NO. 77-5/31-3 RESOLUTION GIVING PRFLITIINE�.RY CONSIDEItATION TO CONTROL DATA PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AP�ENDM;NT AND AUTHORIZ- • ING SUBMISSION TO PLANNING CONlMISSION WHEREAS, there has been presented to this Special Meeting of the Board of Cor.u-nissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota a draft of a document entitled ' "Control Data RedeveZopment Plan Amendment" , dated P-Say 27, 1977, consisting of an Introduction, Legal Description And Boundary Map, Redevelopment Plan, Program For Implementation, Report On P:caject • Eligibility, and Relocation Plan; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment P1an Amendment proposes continuation of removal of conditions of blight in the T�tartin Luther King Center Clearance Area of the Summit-University Neighborhood and Community Development Project Area, Project Minn. A-1-1, and District �, through additional property acquisition and removal of structures, and other public actions stated in said amendment, and assembly o£ a site for sale to Control Data Corporation for redevelopment of an office and parts distribution center to provide, among other things , employment opportunity to low income persons resident in the Praject Area in accordance with the purposes of the Housing and Cor,tmunity Development �ct of 1974 and �ze i�lunicipal Housing and Redevelopment Act of 1947. NOW TH�.REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota that the Control Data Redev�lopment P1an Amendment considered at this m�eting b� transmitted to the Saint Paul Planning Commission for its stiidy and report in accordance with the pr_ovisions of Nlinnesota Statutes Sectiors �62. 356 and 462. 515, ar_d that a Financing Plan for the Control Data redevelop- ment undertalcing be prepared and submitted to the Finance Cor,�mittee of this Board and City Council for its consideration and report. ,t . ' - -26- Resolution-Legal