Loading...
01-354, City of St. Paul RESOLIITION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT Q2(G4�IAL C0� FILE NO. /l �.�5� 7 p I `� - �--L-- File No._99WALK54 Assessment No._0733 Voting Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for Sidewalk Reconstruction (work already donel Sidewalk reconstruction 504 Mississippi River Boulevard (Laid over from March 7, 2�01) Preliminary Order:98-433 Final Order:98-573 approved:May 20, 1998 approved: June 24,1998 A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified. RESOLVED FURTBER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in One thru Twentv equal installment. Yea,s� Nays �B� anav ✓B�,akey �ostrom � � Coleman �y� —Harris kHx „�t- —Lantry �iter �In Favor � Against Adopted by the Council Date �o\ � �r`OS�iti� Certified Passes by Council Secretary /- s T.M.S.lREAL ESTATE DIVISION DB�= March 22,2001 Green Sheet Number: 11 N 05 ontact Person and Phone Number: EPARTMMEtVVT DIItECTOB LTTY COUNCII. Peter Wirite 266-8850 ATfO� '��� , I7DGETDIItECfOR FF7CEOFFAIANC7ALSVCS be on Cmmcil Agenda 6p: YOR(OR e1SS7SLe1N1) 1 OUPICI[. RFCF euCg OTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNA'NRE) c[zox�t�s�rm: blic hearing for the ratificafion of assessments for sidewalk improvements at 504 South Mississippi River oulevard. (Laid over from March 7, 2001) ' e No. 99WALKS4 ASSESSMENT NO. 0733 CO�7DAT10NS: APPROVE (A) OR RFTECT (R) ERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS M[JST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING: . Has ihe person/firm ever worked under a rnna�act for Utis department? YES NO PLANNING COMM65[ON A yTppF . Has this persodfum ever been a City employee? YES NO cnm, s�evice co��ssioN . Does this persodYum possess a skill not normally possessed by any YES NO current City employee? � CIB COMMITI'EL+ E lain aIl YES answexs on a se te sheet and attsch. roxTS wxicx courrcn, os.�crrvE� Nei hborhoods COUNCII. WARD(S) � DISTRICT PLANNING COUNCII, � 5 TIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTONITY (Who, What, When, WLere, Why?): Projects are completed. Ratification is necessary to begin to collect assessments to help pay for the projects. � DVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: Same as above. ISADVANTAGES IF APPROVF,D: Benefitted property owners have assessments payable via property t�es. ISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: To not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with City policy. OTAL AMOUNT' OF TRANSACTION: COST/AEVENi7E BUDGETED (CII2CLE ONE) YES NO ACTIVITY NUMBER: � INGSOURCE: t � a^,�?^F I'le�.�'.a.P,§�� � ANCIAI, INFORMATION: (EXPLAA� �';,";:� � � ���$� F+ b n n r m 0 n x 3 H Y z c� h7 t� m ro n y oiiH 4 n b nii y ii y H n C Hii � ?� n z C II b] n n u o ��z n n ;n n m n m u u i n n n n n x n n n n II N II N N II N J 11 J �P II t o n• I� o W 11 w � xUl�nt7 � O � rov�H o � E �mo �c�z �d�q� � �-+ 3 C �-+ in � �z�rm �o � cam mz � z �T��z.`uV�i� H �m� �m�� � OCN[��] � �o i n]P1r?1 � b i .. pN � K �m �m tDrC � .'v � [+ o < C a� C7 � O r m � � � � � � � � � rzz� � y i-• y � ,� � �z�o i w n> i �q TI [+] � kl '* Y � H � C C] � K xrm� � o �d w y i P7 � 1 W 1 (] N � 1 1 H � � � ro i � y � G � ti � O b z � r � C � � � O � i � i i i � � � � � i i i i i � i i � 1 i i i i � i � b C x z � 0 z � m b n 0 � � m � � � �� 1 H riy o+ i � wi w�H o,m i i � ib �n N i � m i C �� O 1 H oiy o�m ii �y ii � H il i � II � � t/> II +/+ � N Il N � �l II �l i O � II � ; C II• z ouo�y � u w i m o� mi i i N ro m�x ��o N�ro w�m i � ��H N t� O � H O 1 CJ O i W I o�-3sy ���` MINU'IES OF TI� LECiISLATIVE HEARINC� SIDEWALK ISSiJE - 504 Mississippi Boulevard Thursday, March 29, 2001 Room 330 Courthouse Gerry Strathman, Legisiative Hearing Officer The meeting was called to order at 10:31 a.m. STAFF PRESENT: Lany Lueth, Public Works; A1 Czaia, Public Works (Dana Rose presented photographs to Mr. Strathxnan, they were rehuned at the end of the meeting.) Dana Rose appeazed and stated he is appealing the assessment for the replacement of four sidewalk panels at 504 Mississippi Boulevard. Mr. Rose said he does not recall receiving notification from the City. If a notification letter was sent, Mr. Rose would have contacted the Public Works department to discuss the repairs. Mr. Rose feels the work was unnecessary. The repairs to the sidewalk do not match the e�sting sidewalk. The corner house has a five foot sidewalk and the repairs were done to six feet. There aze other cracked sidewalk panels on the block that were not repaired. The construction crew left tire tracks across the lawn and broke branches off of the tree in the front yard. The lawn has since been repaired. There is not a sidewalk in front of the last two houses on the block, unfortunately Mr. Rose did sign a petition stating he supported not installing a sidewalk there. In 1999 the neighbors got together and requested a full alley, with sewers. The outcome was a heavy assessment. Mr. Strathman asked Mr. Rose, the main reason far the appeal is a possible notification enor and some sidewalk panels on the block that were in need of repair were not repaired. Mr. Rose responded that is correct. A1 Czaia appeazed and stated in October 1998, a petition was signed by a neighbor at 570 Mississippi, requesting sidewalk repairs and the completion of the sidewalk at the end of the block. In the Spring of 1999, an inspection of the block was completed and problematic panels were discovered. A proposal was developed to complete the sidewalk at the end of the block, however this was not completed because a petition was signed by numerous neighbors stating their support against the construction. Some houses did nof receive notifica6on of sidewalk repairs because there was not any work proposed in front of their home. Most of the work was completed in front of 507 Mississippi Boulevard and 504 Mississippi Boulevard. The sidewalk panels that were replaced in front of 504 Mississippi Boulevazd, were low, seitled and cracked. Mr. Czaia said there are different things to look at when assessing cracked panels. Sidewalk panels are not replaced only because they are cracked. The sidewalk panels in front of 504 Mississippi showed evidence of settlement, which relates to potential water ponding, ice build-up, and improper drainage. A public hearing was held on June 23, 1999. Notification of sidewalk reconshuction was sent out, by the Finance Department, to the proper homeowners. ol- 35Y Sidewalk Heazing 3-29-2001 Page 2 In response to Mr. Strathman asked if there aze records that indicate a norice was sent. Mr. Czaia responded the Finance Department maintains the records. However, Public Works does not receive any copies. Mr. Czaia said typically the public heariiig notices are mailed two weeks prior to the hearing. Nofices aze sent only to the houses that need sidewalk repairs. The sidewalk work was completed in September, 1999. Mr. Czaia stated the sod damage was repaired by the City, however, the broken tree branches aze the responsibility of the concrete company. Approximately 27 feet of work was completed in front of 504 Mississippi Boulevazd, there is a charge of $1038 per foot. The actual cost is shazed with the City. The homeowner is responsible for half of the cost. Mr. Strathman stated he questioned that proper notificafion was sent. However, the wark was completed. If proper notification was sent, the home owner is responsible for the assessment. Mr. Strathman requested that staff contact the finance department to confirm that notification was sent. If there is evidence of improper notification Mr. Strathman will recommend deleting the assessment. The meeting was adjourned at 10:50 a.m., the recommendarion of the Legislative Hearing Officer is pending until evidence of notification can be verified, the properiy owner will be contacted with the final recommendation. Mr. Strathman received verification from the Finance Department that proper noticed was mailed to the appellant on June 4, 1999. Mr. Rose was contacted and informed of the recommendafion of the Legislative Heazing Officer. Gerry Strathman recommended approval of the assessment. sjw , City of St. Paul RESOLIITION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT Q2(G4�IAL C0� FILE NO. /l �.�5� 7 p I `� - �--L-- File No._99WALK54 Assessment No._0733 Voting Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for Sidewalk Reconstruction (work already donel Sidewalk reconstruction 504 Mississippi River Boulevard (Laid over from March 7, 2�01) Preliminary Order:98-433 Final Order:98-573 approved:May 20, 1998 approved: June 24,1998 A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified. RESOLVED FURTBER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in One thru Twentv equal installment. Yea,s� Nays �B� anav ✓B�,akey �ostrom � � Coleman �y� —Harris kHx „�t- —Lantry �iter �In Favor � Against Adopted by the Council Date �o\ � �r`OS�iti� Certified Passes by Council Secretary /- s T.M.S.lREAL ESTATE DIVISION DB�= March 22,2001 Green Sheet Number: 11 N 05 ontact Person and Phone Number: EPARTMMEtVVT DIItECTOB LTTY COUNCII. Peter Wirite 266-8850 ATfO� '��� , I7DGETDIItECfOR FF7CEOFFAIANC7ALSVCS be on Cmmcil Agenda 6p: YOR(OR e1SS7SLe1N1) 1 OUPICI[. RFCF euCg OTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNA'NRE) c[zox�t�s�rm: blic hearing for the ratificafion of assessments for sidewalk improvements at 504 South Mississippi River oulevard. (Laid over from March 7, 2001) ' e No. 99WALKS4 ASSESSMENT NO. 0733 CO�7DAT10NS: APPROVE (A) OR RFTECT (R) ERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS M[JST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING: . Has ihe person/firm ever worked under a rnna�act for Utis department? YES NO PLANNING COMM65[ON A yTppF . Has this persodfum ever been a City employee? YES NO cnm, s�evice co��ssioN . Does this persodYum possess a skill not normally possessed by any YES NO current City employee? � CIB COMMITI'EL+ E lain aIl YES answexs on a se te sheet and attsch. roxTS wxicx courrcn, os.�crrvE� Nei hborhoods COUNCII. WARD(S) � DISTRICT PLANNING COUNCII, � 5 TIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTONITY (Who, What, When, WLere, Why?): Projects are completed. Ratification is necessary to begin to collect assessments to help pay for the projects. � DVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: Same as above. ISADVANTAGES IF APPROVF,D: Benefitted property owners have assessments payable via property t�es. ISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: To not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with City policy. OTAL AMOUNT' OF TRANSACTION: COST/AEVENi7E BUDGETED (CII2CLE ONE) YES NO ACTIVITY NUMBER: � INGSOURCE: t � a^,�?^F I'le�.�'.a.P,§�� � ANCIAI, INFORMATION: (EXPLAA� �';,";:� � � ���$� F+ b n n r m 0 n x 3 H Y z c� h7 t� m ro n y oiiH 4 n b nii y ii y H n C Hii � ?� n z C II b] n n u o ��z n n ;n n m n m u u i n n n n n x n n n n II N II N N II N J 11 J �P II t o n• I� o W 11 w � xUl�nt7 � O � rov�H o � E �mo �c�z �d�q� � �-+ 3 C �-+ in � �z�rm �o � cam mz � z �T��z.`uV�i� H �m� �m�� � OCN[��] � �o i n]P1r?1 � b i .. pN � K �m �m tDrC � .'v � [+ o < C a� C7 � O r m � � � � � � � � � rzz� � y i-• y � ,� � �z�o i w n> i �q TI [+] � kl '* Y � H � C C] � K xrm� � o �d w y i P7 � 1 W 1 (] N � 1 1 H � � � ro i � y � G � ti � O b z � r � C � � � O � i � i i i � � � � � i i i i i � i i � 1 i i i i � i � b C x z � 0 z � m b n 0 � � m � � � �� 1 H riy o+ i � wi w�H o,m i i � ib �n N i � m i C �� O 1 H oiy o�m ii �y ii � H il i � II � � t/> II +/+ � N Il N � �l II �l i O � II � ; C II• z ouo�y � u w i m o� mi i i N ro m�x ��o N�ro w�m i � ��H N t� O � H O 1 CJ O i W I o�-3sy ���` MINU'IES OF TI� LECiISLATIVE HEARINC� SIDEWALK ISSiJE - 504 Mississippi Boulevard Thursday, March 29, 2001 Room 330 Courthouse Gerry Strathman, Legisiative Hearing Officer The meeting was called to order at 10:31 a.m. STAFF PRESENT: Lany Lueth, Public Works; A1 Czaia, Public Works (Dana Rose presented photographs to Mr. Strathxnan, they were rehuned at the end of the meeting.) Dana Rose appeazed and stated he is appealing the assessment for the replacement of four sidewalk panels at 504 Mississippi Boulevard. Mr. Rose said he does not recall receiving notification from the City. If a notification letter was sent, Mr. Rose would have contacted the Public Works department to discuss the repairs. Mr. Rose feels the work was unnecessary. The repairs to the sidewalk do not match the e�sting sidewalk. The corner house has a five foot sidewalk and the repairs were done to six feet. There aze other cracked sidewalk panels on the block that were not repaired. The construction crew left tire tracks across the lawn and broke branches off of the tree in the front yard. The lawn has since been repaired. There is not a sidewalk in front of the last two houses on the block, unfortunately Mr. Rose did sign a petition stating he supported not installing a sidewalk there. In 1999 the neighbors got together and requested a full alley, with sewers. The outcome was a heavy assessment. Mr. Strathman asked Mr. Rose, the main reason far the appeal is a possible notification enor and some sidewalk panels on the block that were in need of repair were not repaired. Mr. Rose responded that is correct. A1 Czaia appeazed and stated in October 1998, a petition was signed by a neighbor at 570 Mississippi, requesting sidewalk repairs and the completion of the sidewalk at the end of the block. In the Spring of 1999, an inspection of the block was completed and problematic panels were discovered. A proposal was developed to complete the sidewalk at the end of the block, however this was not completed because a petition was signed by numerous neighbors stating their support against the construction. Some houses did nof receive notifica6on of sidewalk repairs because there was not any work proposed in front of their home. Most of the work was completed in front of 507 Mississippi Boulevard and 504 Mississippi Boulevard. The sidewalk panels that were replaced in front of 504 Mississippi Boulevazd, were low, seitled and cracked. Mr. Czaia said there are different things to look at when assessing cracked panels. Sidewalk panels are not replaced only because they are cracked. The sidewalk panels in front of 504 Mississippi showed evidence of settlement, which relates to potential water ponding, ice build-up, and improper drainage. A public hearing was held on June 23, 1999. Notification of sidewalk reconshuction was sent out, by the Finance Department, to the proper homeowners. ol- 35Y Sidewalk Heazing 3-29-2001 Page 2 In response to Mr. Strathman asked if there aze records that indicate a norice was sent. Mr. Czaia responded the Finance Department maintains the records. However, Public Works does not receive any copies. Mr. Czaia said typically the public heariiig notices are mailed two weeks prior to the hearing. Nofices aze sent only to the houses that need sidewalk repairs. The sidewalk work was completed in September, 1999. Mr. Czaia stated the sod damage was repaired by the City, however, the broken tree branches aze the responsibility of the concrete company. Approximately 27 feet of work was completed in front of 504 Mississippi Boulevazd, there is a charge of $1038 per foot. The actual cost is shazed with the City. The homeowner is responsible for half of the cost. Mr. Strathman stated he questioned that proper notificafion was sent. However, the wark was completed. If proper notification was sent, the home owner is responsible for the assessment. Mr. Strathman requested that staff contact the finance department to confirm that notification was sent. If there is evidence of improper notification Mr. Strathman will recommend deleting the assessment. The meeting was adjourned at 10:50 a.m., the recommendarion of the Legislative Hearing Officer is pending until evidence of notification can be verified, the properiy owner will be contacted with the final recommendation. Mr. Strathman received verification from the Finance Department that proper noticed was mailed to the appellant on June 4, 1999. Mr. Rose was contacted and informed of the recommendafion of the Legislative Heazing Officer. Gerry Strathman recommended approval of the assessment. sjw , City of St. Paul RESOLIITION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT Q2(G4�IAL C0� FILE NO. /l �.�5� 7 p I `� - �--L-- File No._99WALK54 Assessment No._0733 Voting Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for Sidewalk Reconstruction (work already donel Sidewalk reconstruction 504 Mississippi River Boulevard (Laid over from March 7, 2�01) Preliminary Order:98-433 Final Order:98-573 approved:May 20, 1998 approved: June 24,1998 A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified. RESOLVED FURTBER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in One thru Twentv equal installment. Yea,s� Nays �B� anav ✓B�,akey �ostrom � � Coleman �y� —Harris kHx „�t- —Lantry �iter �In Favor � Against Adopted by the Council Date �o\ � �r`OS�iti� Certified Passes by Council Secretary /- s T.M.S.lREAL ESTATE DIVISION DB�= March 22,2001 Green Sheet Number: 11 N 05 ontact Person and Phone Number: EPARTMMEtVVT DIItECTOB LTTY COUNCII. Peter Wirite 266-8850 ATfO� '��� , I7DGETDIItECfOR FF7CEOFFAIANC7ALSVCS be on Cmmcil Agenda 6p: YOR(OR e1SS7SLe1N1) 1 OUPICI[. RFCF euCg OTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNA'NRE) c[zox�t�s�rm: blic hearing for the ratificafion of assessments for sidewalk improvements at 504 South Mississippi River oulevard. (Laid over from March 7, 2001) ' e No. 99WALKS4 ASSESSMENT NO. 0733 CO�7DAT10NS: APPROVE (A) OR RFTECT (R) ERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS M[JST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING: . Has ihe person/firm ever worked under a rnna�act for Utis department? YES NO PLANNING COMM65[ON A yTppF . Has this persodfum ever been a City employee? YES NO cnm, s�evice co��ssioN . Does this persodYum possess a skill not normally possessed by any YES NO current City employee? � CIB COMMITI'EL+ E lain aIl YES answexs on a se te sheet and attsch. roxTS wxicx courrcn, os.�crrvE� Nei hborhoods COUNCII. WARD(S) � DISTRICT PLANNING COUNCII, � 5 TIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTONITY (Who, What, When, WLere, Why?): Projects are completed. Ratification is necessary to begin to collect assessments to help pay for the projects. � DVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: Same as above. ISADVANTAGES IF APPROVF,D: Benefitted property owners have assessments payable via property t�es. ISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: To not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with City policy. OTAL AMOUNT' OF TRANSACTION: COST/AEVENi7E BUDGETED (CII2CLE ONE) YES NO ACTIVITY NUMBER: � INGSOURCE: t � a^,�?^F I'le�.�'.a.P,§�� � ANCIAI, INFORMATION: (EXPLAA� �';,";:� � � ���$� F+ b n n r m 0 n x 3 H Y z c� h7 t� m ro n y oiiH 4 n b nii y ii y H n C Hii � ?� n z C II b] n n u o ��z n n ;n n m n m u u i n n n n n x n n n n II N II N N II N J 11 J �P II t o n• I� o W 11 w � xUl�nt7 � O � rov�H o � E �mo �c�z �d�q� � �-+ 3 C �-+ in � �z�rm �o � cam mz � z �T��z.`uV�i� H �m� �m�� � OCN[��] � �o i n]P1r?1 � b i .. pN � K �m �m tDrC � .'v � [+ o < C a� C7 � O r m � � � � � � � � � rzz� � y i-• y � ,� � �z�o i w n> i �q TI [+] � kl '* Y � H � C C] � K xrm� � o �d w y i P7 � 1 W 1 (] N � 1 1 H � � � ro i � y � G � ti � O b z � r � C � � � O � i � i i i � � � � � i i i i i � i i � 1 i i i i � i � b C x z � 0 z � m b n 0 � � m � � � �� 1 H riy o+ i � wi w�H o,m i i � ib �n N i � m i C �� O 1 H oiy o�m ii �y ii � H il i � II � � t/> II +/+ � N Il N � �l II �l i O � II � ; C II• z ouo�y � u w i m o� mi i i N ro m�x ��o N�ro w�m i � ��H N t� O � H O 1 CJ O i W I o�-3sy ���` MINU'IES OF TI� LECiISLATIVE HEARINC� SIDEWALK ISSiJE - 504 Mississippi Boulevard Thursday, March 29, 2001 Room 330 Courthouse Gerry Strathman, Legisiative Hearing Officer The meeting was called to order at 10:31 a.m. STAFF PRESENT: Lany Lueth, Public Works; A1 Czaia, Public Works (Dana Rose presented photographs to Mr. Strathxnan, they were rehuned at the end of the meeting.) Dana Rose appeazed and stated he is appealing the assessment for the replacement of four sidewalk panels at 504 Mississippi Boulevard. Mr. Rose said he does not recall receiving notification from the City. If a notification letter was sent, Mr. Rose would have contacted the Public Works department to discuss the repairs. Mr. Rose feels the work was unnecessary. The repairs to the sidewalk do not match the e�sting sidewalk. The corner house has a five foot sidewalk and the repairs were done to six feet. There aze other cracked sidewalk panels on the block that were not repaired. The construction crew left tire tracks across the lawn and broke branches off of the tree in the front yard. The lawn has since been repaired. There is not a sidewalk in front of the last two houses on the block, unfortunately Mr. Rose did sign a petition stating he supported not installing a sidewalk there. In 1999 the neighbors got together and requested a full alley, with sewers. The outcome was a heavy assessment. Mr. Strathman asked Mr. Rose, the main reason far the appeal is a possible notification enor and some sidewalk panels on the block that were in need of repair were not repaired. Mr. Rose responded that is correct. A1 Czaia appeazed and stated in October 1998, a petition was signed by a neighbor at 570 Mississippi, requesting sidewalk repairs and the completion of the sidewalk at the end of the block. In the Spring of 1999, an inspection of the block was completed and problematic panels were discovered. A proposal was developed to complete the sidewalk at the end of the block, however this was not completed because a petition was signed by numerous neighbors stating their support against the construction. Some houses did nof receive notifica6on of sidewalk repairs because there was not any work proposed in front of their home. Most of the work was completed in front of 507 Mississippi Boulevard and 504 Mississippi Boulevard. The sidewalk panels that were replaced in front of 504 Mississippi Boulevazd, were low, seitled and cracked. Mr. Czaia said there are different things to look at when assessing cracked panels. Sidewalk panels are not replaced only because they are cracked. The sidewalk panels in front of 504 Mississippi showed evidence of settlement, which relates to potential water ponding, ice build-up, and improper drainage. A public hearing was held on June 23, 1999. Notification of sidewalk reconshuction was sent out, by the Finance Department, to the proper homeowners. ol- 35Y Sidewalk Heazing 3-29-2001 Page 2 In response to Mr. Strathman asked if there aze records that indicate a norice was sent. Mr. Czaia responded the Finance Department maintains the records. However, Public Works does not receive any copies. Mr. Czaia said typically the public heariiig notices are mailed two weeks prior to the hearing. Nofices aze sent only to the houses that need sidewalk repairs. The sidewalk work was completed in September, 1999. Mr. Czaia stated the sod damage was repaired by the City, however, the broken tree branches aze the responsibility of the concrete company. Approximately 27 feet of work was completed in front of 504 Mississippi Boulevazd, there is a charge of $1038 per foot. The actual cost is shazed with the City. The homeowner is responsible for half of the cost. Mr. Strathman stated he questioned that proper notificafion was sent. However, the wark was completed. If proper notification was sent, the home owner is responsible for the assessment. Mr. Strathman requested that staff contact the finance department to confirm that notification was sent. If there is evidence of improper notification Mr. Strathman will recommend deleting the assessment. The meeting was adjourned at 10:50 a.m., the recommendarion of the Legislative Hearing Officer is pending until evidence of notification can be verified, the properiy owner will be contacted with the final recommendation. Mr. Strathman received verification from the Finance Department that proper noticed was mailed to the appellant on June 4, 1999. Mr. Rose was contacted and informed of the recommendafion of the Legislative Heazing Officer. Gerry Strathman recommended approval of the assessment. sjw