96-1182 �3 , �; � �''� � � S ;y � Council File # 1`� � �`U �
; ` j �-, 1�� ,
� �. � � ., �,.: 36332
�~ ESOLUTION Green sheet #
F AI P NESOTA 3a
Presented By
Referred To Committee: Date
1 WHEREAS, in 1996 the assessment rate for street paving, including curb and gutter, in connection with the
2 Residential Street Paving Program (RSPP) was $23.07 per assessable foot; and
;3
4 WHEREAS, in 1996 the assessment rate for the modified lantern style lighting was $4.08 per assessable foot, and
5 the alternative bent straw lighting was $2.56 per assessable foot; and
6
7 WHEREAS, in 1996 the assessment rate for sidewalk reconstruction of flve foot wide sidewalks for 1, 2, and 3
8 family dwellings was $7.21 per assessable foot; and
9
10 WHEREAS, the St. Paul City Council, by resolution, has directed that these assessment rates be adjusted yearly,
11 based on the Minneapolis-St.Paul Urban Consumer Price Index; and
12
13 WHEREA.S, the most recent Minneapolis-St.Paul Urban Consumer Price Index showed an increase of 3.3%from the
14 first half of 1995 (146.0) to the first half of 1996 (150.8); now, therefore, be it
15
16 RESOLVED, that in order for the assessment rate to reflect the increased construction costs and benefit to the
17 property owners, the assessment rate for street paving in connection with RSPP is increased 3.3% from $23.07 per
18 assessable foot to $23.83 per assessable foot for all such RSPP projects approved by Final Order after October 1,
19 1996 to be constructed in 1997; and
20
21 BE IT FLJRIHER RESOLVED, that the assessment rate for the "modifled lantern style lighting" is increased 3.3°r6
22 from $4.08 to $4.21 per assessable foot, and the alternative "bent straw" lighting is increased 3.3% from $2.56 to
23 $2.64 per assessable foot for such projects approved by Final Order after October 1, 1996 to be constructed in
24 1997, and
25
26 BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the assessment rate for reconstruction of tive foot wide sidewalks is increased 3.3%
27 from $7.21 to $7.45 per assessable foot for 1, 2 and 3 family properties for such projects approved by Final Order
28 after October 1, 1996 to be constructed in 1997.
29
30
31
32
33
Yeas Nays Absent Requested by Department of:
Blake
�� ✓ Public Works
Gverin ./
Harris ✓ � ��'w'__
Meqard ✓
Rettman � By:
T une � Stacy Becker, Director PAS 8/14/96
7 �
Adopted by Council• Date �..� _ �S.tq� Form Approved by City Attorney
Adoption Certified•by Council Secretary B : G✓�✓ — °f— �
Y
By� Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
> �G
Approved by Mayor: Date �^ �� 2��
B �� (� ��i��c� /�lil
y. By:
i
`�,
� °l ` - ��� a `�
Pub���wo�s 8-14-96 GREEN SHEET No.36332
INITIA E IIYI I INUUX I C
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CIIY COUNCIL
PBUI St. Martin (Tel. N0.266-6118) ASSI�N CITY ATTORNEV �CITV CLERK
NUMBERFOR
MUST BE ON COUNCII/KiENDA BY(DATE) ROO��tR�Kt BUDGET DIRECTOR �FIN.6 MGT.SEflVICES DIR.X
MAYOR(OR ASSISTMIT)
TOTAL!OF SIQNATURE PAQES � (CLIP ALL IOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) � DEPARTMENTALACCOUNTANT
Approval of resolution establishing the 1997 Residentiai Street Paving Program assessment rates.
RF��l�`�G�
SEP 12 a996
N . °f PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
_PLANNIN(i COeAMISSION _CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �. Has this persoNfirm ever worked under a contrect for thia de�ac�i}�t �
CIB COMMITfEE � YES NO
E=a�,��� ������
A S7aFF 2. Has this persoMfirm ever been a city employee?
DISTRICTCOUNCIL YES NO
- - 3. Does this person/firm possess e skill not normally possed by any current ciry employee?
SUPPORTS WHICH WUNCIL OBJECTIVE? YES NO
Street Paving Explaln all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to gnan sheet
INITIATING PROBLEM.ISSUE.OPPORTUNITY(WHO,WHAT,WHEN,WHERE,WH'
In 1990,the City Council adopted a resolution calling for the assessments for CSSP projects to be adjusted each year
according to the previous years change in the Mpls-St. Paul Urban Consumer Price Index (90-1459). In addition, in 1992,
they adopted a similar resolution dealing with reconstruction of sidewalks (92-146). In 1995,the assessment rates for 1996
Residential Street Paving Projects were increased for inflation (95-1127). We are proposing to increase the assessment rates
for 1997 by 3.3%in a similar manner.
ADVANTAC3ES IF APPROVED:
Assessments will keep pace with inflation.
RECEIV�n
SEP 06 �
CI�
AT��R��
Assessments will be 3.3% higher for residents. ,
Ci0�1�iC'� t :';`. ;°:��k ��iit�t'
�t� 1�d ���6
�....�...•
We will be abie to do less paving of old oiled streets.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION$ NJA COST/REVENUE BUDGETEO(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDING SOURCE ACITVITV NUMB�R
hINAN(:IAL INKJIiMA I WN:(tXNLAIN)